Hubbry Logo
Glossary of British ordnance termsGlossary of British ordnance termsMain
Open search
Glossary of British ordnance terms
Community hub
Glossary of British ordnance terms
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Glossary of British ordnance terms
Glossary of British ordnance terms
from Wikipedia

This article explains terms used for the British Armed Forces' ordnance (weapons) and ammunition. The terms may have different meanings depending on their usage in another country's military.

BD

[edit]

Between decks: applies to a naval gun mounting in which part of the rotating mass is below the deck, and part of it is above the deck. This allows for a lower profile for a turret, meaning that the turrets need not be superfiring (i.e. they can be mounted on the same deck and not obstruct each other at high angles of elevation).

BL

[edit]
Breech mechanism of BL 9.2-inch howitzer Mk II, showing position of obturating pad at far right

The term BL, in its general sense, stood for breech loading, and contrasted with muzzle loading. The shell was loaded via the breech (i.e. the gunner's end of the barrel, which opened) followed by the propellant charge, and the breech mechanism was closed to seal the chamber.

Breech loading, in its formal British ordnance sense, served to identify the gun as the type of rifled breechloading gun for which the powder charge was loaded in a silk or cloth bag and the breech mechanism was responsible for "obturation" i.e. sealing the chamber to prevent escape of the propellant gases.[1] The term BL was first used to refer to the Armstrong breechloaders, introduced in 1859. Following the discontinuation of Armstrong breechloaders and the period of British rifled muzzle-loaders RML, British breechloaders were re-introduced in 1880. At this point the term rifled breech-loaders RBL was retrospectively introduced to refer to the Armstrong breechloaders, which had a totally different breech mechanism, and since then the term breech-loaders BL has applied exclusively to the type of breechloader introduced from 1880 onwards, using an interrupted-screw breeches.

Early British Elswick breechloaders in the 1880s used a steel "cup" obturation method. This was quickly superseded in guns designed by the Royal Gun Factory by the French de Bange method, the basic principle of which is still in use today. In British service this became a Crossley pad with an interrupted thread screw block e.g. a Welin screw. The shell was loaded via the breech, followed by the propellant charge in a cloth bag. A single-use "vent sealing tube", a type of primer not dissimilar in appearance to a blank rifle round, was inserted into the breech for firing the gun.

While originally, the term "BL" contrasted with "ML", or "muzzleloader" guns, after muzzleloaders were discontinued, the term came to distinguish between traditional, non-obturating guns with fabric propellant bags and separately loaded shells, and quick-firing QF guns which used self-sealing brass cartridge cases, and which usually had the propellant and projectile fixed together as a unit for faster handling and loading. For instance, Britain before World War I had both QF and BL 6-inch (152 mm) guns. Both were "breech loading" in the general sense, but in the formal nomenclature it separated 6-inch (152 mm) guns with breeches designed for charges in brass cartridge cases for quick-firing QF from those designed for cloth bag charges for breech-loaders BL.

Shells designed for one type were not necessarily suitable for use in the other type; for instance, a BL shell relied upon the tight fit of its driving band in the gun bore to prevent it slipping back when the gun was elevated, but a QF shell could rely upon the cartridge case, either fixed or separate, to prevent it slipping back. This presented difficulties for BL guns at high angles. A special cartridge was developed for BL 9.2-inch (234 mm) guns on HA mountings, with provision for a wooden (beech) stick to be inserted through the centre to prevent the shell slipping back on elevation.[2]

Although fixed ammunition allows for a rapid rate of fire in small to medium guns, BL is a better choice for heavy calibre guns; propellant was loaded in a number of small fabric bags, because a single bag holding the full charge would be far too big and bulky for the handlers to lift. Using fabric allows for the charge to be broken into small, easily handled units, while it would be difficult to design a system by which multiple small metallic-cased charges were loaded and fired at the same time. Using multiple small fabric bags also allows the gunners to use a reduced charge if need be.

BLC

[edit]

The term "BLC" stood for "BL converted" and referred to a breech and breech mechanism modified from an early long-screw three- or four-motion to modern short-screw single-motion.[3] An example is the conversion of the BL 15-pounder to BLC 15-pounder.

C.R.H.

[edit]
2 C.R.H. BL 9.2-inch howitzer shell, 1916. See "18.4 R" pointing to curve of nose
3 C.R.H. QF 4.5-inch howitzer shell, 1916. See "13.5 R" pointing to curve of nose

Calibre radius head: the radius of a circle with the curve of the shell's nose on its circumference, expressed in terms of the shell's calibre. The longer and more pointed (and hence streamlined) the shell's nose, the higher the C.R.H. Typical C.R.H. for British shells leading up to World War I was two: e.g. the curve of the nose of a two C.R.H. 6-inch (152 mm) shell was equivalent to the curve of a circle with a radius of 12 inches (300 mm). Shells of four C.R.H. were soon developed in World War I, identified by an A following the shell mark number, B for six, and so on. For modern streamlined shells post-World War I, two numbers were necessary to more correctly denote a shell's C.R.H. characteristics. For instance, the World War I 6-inch 26 cwt howitzer shell was two C.R.H., and the World War II Mk 2D shell was referred to as "5/10 C.R.H.".[4]

Cartridge

[edit]
Cartridge in cloth bag consisting of 108 lb cordite SC 280 14 charge for BL 15-inch naval gun, WWII. Four of these cartridges were loaded together to make up the full service charge.
Cartridge in cloth bag for a BL 6-inch 30 cwt howitzer
Cartridge in brass case for a QF 4.5-inch howitzer

"Cartridge" in British ammunition terminology typically refers to the physical object containing the propellant that a gunner loads.

For small arms and fixed QF artillery ammunition, e.g., the .303 or 18-pounder respectively, this denoted the complete round, that is, the cartridge case, percussion cap or primer, propellant charge and projectile.[5] In this use it is synonymous with "round".

For separate QF artillery, cartridge referred to the cartridge case, its primer, propellant charge, and the disposable lid and fastener of the case.[6]

In BL artillery terminology, cartridge referred to the propellant unit only – there was no case. British cartridges contained gunpowder until about 1892, and thereafter sticks of cordite bound together with an igniter pad, if necessary, in a cloth bag, usually silk. The "stick" nature of cordite gave the cartridges a degree of rigidity and hence they retained a tubular shape and could be handled and loaded as a solid unit even without a case. With BL, cordite is contained in one or more cloth bags joined together. The complete unit is termed a cartridge. The empty bag was termed an "empty cartridge".[7] Heavy naval guns may require up to four separate cartridges to be loaded, each consisting of a 14 charge, to make up the full service charge.

Howitzer cartridges, both BL and separate QF, contained a central core of cordite surrounded by several stacked ring-shaped bags of cordite. To obtain the appropriate "charge" for the required range and angle of elevation, the gunner discarded one or more rings before loading.

See charge for how Ordnance QF 25-pounder charges varied in World War II.

Cartridge case

[edit]
Cartridge cases and complete round for the .455 Webley

The case, usually brass, holding the propellant charge. Used with small arms and QF artillery ammunition. The QF cases in 1915 could be cleaned and then reloaded up to a maximum of six firings with Cordite charges, with the record detailing the "life of the case" marked on the base. The limitation on the number of firings was due to the case expanding on firing, having to be "rectified" by turning metal off the lower part, which restored the correct dimensions but progressively weakened the case.[8]

Charge

[edit]
BL 6-inch gun cartridge of two half charges laced together to provide a full charge

Charge was a concept or category label rather than a specific item. It can be described as "the standard amount of propellant specified to carry out a particular purpose":

  • Full service charge: the full amount of propellant intended for use in action at maximum range, for the usual shell. If a gun had e.g. a "heavy" and a "light" shell, there would be a separate charge associated with the heavy and light shells.
  • Reduced service charge: for practice or firing star shells (which were lighter than the normal shell).
  • Proof charge: a charge giving 25% greater chamber pressure than the full service charge, intended only for the "proof" or testing of a gun.[9]
  • Blank charge: intended for firing without a projectile, usually a reduced charge.
  • Battering charge: a specially large charge for use with "Palliser" projectiles, which were an early British armour-piercing projectile of the mid-to-late 19th century.

For practical purposes, specific cartridges were specified for use to obtain the required charge. A gunner dealt with cartridges and would know that he could load (e.g.) cartridge X or Y for a full service charge for his gun, and cartridge Z to fire a star shell. Cartridges were sometimes made up of fractions of charges e.g. a 6-inch (152 mm) gun cartridge may be made up of two half charges or one two-fifths and one three-fifths laced together. A gun normally fired all rounds using the full charge, and varied the range by elevating or depressing the barrel.

A howitzer gunner's job was more complicated because the range table would specify different "charges", or fractions of the full service charge, for different ranges and angles of shell descent. The standard cartridge for his gun, which as a whole made up the full service charge, would consist of a central "mushroom" cordite core and several smaller cordite rings in bags stacked around the core like doughnuts, all tied together. It was designed so that one or more rings could be quickly removed and discarded before loading, hence providing progressively smaller charges.[10] E.g. if the gunner on a QF 4.5-inch howitzer was ordered to load charge four, he would know he had to remove the top ring from the cartridge, leaving four rings; for charge three he would remove two rings. Discarded rings were burned after the action. This was the standard procedure for howitzers up to and including World War II.

Charge bags arranged in QF 25 pounder cartridge case

In World War II a different system was introduced for varying charges for the QF 25 pounder gun-howitzer, which used separate-loading QF ammunition. A separate 2.7-pound (1.2 kg) "super charge" cartridge was available for firing the 20-pound (9.1 kg) high-velocity anti-tank AP shot, and an additional 4.5-ounce (130 g) "super charge increment" could be added to that for even higher velocity. The cartridge for firing the standard 25-pound (11 kg) shell came ready-loaded with a red bag at the bottom containing the basic charge (charge one), together with white and blue bags laid lengthwise, as in a conventional gun charge, to make up the full service charge (charge three). The blue and white bags could be removed to provide progressively reduced charges (charge two and charge one). From 1944 one or two 4-ounce (110 g) "intermediate charge increments" could be added to the standard charge (replacing the blue bag) for high-angle fire and to provide greater control over angle of shell descent.[11][self-published source?]

For small arms or fixed QF ammunition, where the charge could not be varied by the gunner, the term charge was used to identify the Cordite propellant within the cartridge case, and the round as a whole was referred to as a full or reduced charge. E.g. an 18-pounder star round consisted of a cartridge case containing a reduced charge, and an attached star shell.

Common lyddite

[edit]
Later design common lyddite 6-inch naval shell, four C.R.H., showing shell wall thicker at base and exploders between nose fuze and lyddite filling

British explosive shells filled with Lyddite were initially designated "common lyddite" and beginning in 1896 were the first British generation of modern "high explosive" shells. Lyddite is picric acid fused at 280 °F (138 °C) and allowed to solidify, producing a much denser dark-yellow form which is not affected by moisture and is easier to detonate than the liquid form. Its French equivalent was "melinite", Japanese equivalent was "shimose". Common lyddite shells "detonated" and fragmented into small pieces in all directions, with no incendiary effect. For maximum destructive effect the explosion needed to be delayed until the shell had penetrated its target.

Early shells had walls of the same thickness for the whole length, later shells had walls thicker at the base and thinning towards the nose. This was found to give greater strength and provide more space for explosive.[12] Later shells had 4 c.r. heads, more pointed and hence streamlined than earlier 2 c.r.h. designs.

Proper detonation of a lyddite shell would show black to grey smoke, or white from the steam of a water detonation. Yellow smoke indicated simple explosion rather than detonation, and failure to reliably detonate was a problem with lyddite, especially in its earlier usage. To improve the detonation "exploders" with a small quantity of picric powder or even of TNT (in smaller diameter shells, such as in 3-pounder and 12-pounder guns) was loaded between the fuze and the main lyddite filling or in a thin tube running through most of the shell's length.

Lyddite presented a major safety problem because it reacted dangerously with metal bases. This required that the interior of shells had to be varnished, the exterior had to be painted with leadless paint and the fuze-hole had to be made of a leadless alloy. Fuzes containing any lead could not be used with it.

When World War I began Britain was replacing lyddite with modern "high explosive" (HE) such as TNT. After World War I the term "common lyddite" was dropped, and remaining stocks of lyddite-filled shells were referred to as HE (high explosive) shell filled lyddite. Hence "common" faded from use, replaced by "HE" as the explosive shell designation.

Common lyddite shells in British service were painted yellow, with a red ring behind the nose to indicate the shell had been filled.

For shellite, a successor of lyddite, see HE below.

Common pointed

[edit]
QF 12-pounder common pointed shell

Common pointed shells, or CP were a type of common shell used in naval service from the 1890s to the 1910s which had a solid nose and a percussion fuze in the base rather than the common shell's nose fuze. The ogival two C.R.H. solid pointed nose was considered suitable for attacking shipping but was not armour-piercing - the main function was still explosive. They were of cast or forged (three- and six-pounder) steel and contained a gunpowder bursting charge slightly smaller than that of a common shell, a tradeoff for the longer heavier nose.[13]

In British service common pointed shells were typically painted black, except 12-pounder shells specific for QF guns which were painted lead colour to distinguish them from 12-pounder shells usable with both BL and QF guns. A red ring behind the nose indicated the shell was filled.

By World War II they were superseded in Royal Navy service by common pointed capped (CPC) and semi-armour piercing (SAP), filled with TNT.

Common shell

[edit]
BL 9.2-inch common shell, 1889

"Common shell" is a designation for early 19th century British explosive shells filled with "low explosives" such as "P mixture" (gunpowder) and usually had the fuzes located in the nose. Common shells on bursting (they did not "detonate") tended to break into relatively large fragments which continued along the shell's trajectory rather than laterally. They had some incendiary effect.

In the late 19th century "double common shells" were developed, lengthened so as to approach twice the standard shell weight, to carry more powder and hence increase explosive effect. They suffered from instability in flight and low velocity and were not widely used.

As at 1914, common shells 6 inches (152 mm) and larger were of cast steel, smaller shells were of forged steel for service, and cast iron for practice.[14] They were replaced by "common lyddite" shells by the late 1890s, but some stocks remained as late as 1914.

In British service common shells were typically painted black with red bands behind the noses to indicate the shells were filled.

CP

[edit]
In the CP mounting, the rotating mass (blue) is mounted on a fixed central pivot (red) bolted to the deck.

Central pivot: was applied to a naval gun mounting that rotates around a central pivot that could be bolted to the deck without any structural alterations being required.

cwt

[edit]

The abbreviation cwt stands for hundredweight, which, despite the name, is equal to 112 pounds (51 kg), and signifies the weight of the gun barrel and breech. It is sometimes included in the name of a gun to differentiate it from other guns of the same calibre or weight of shot. For example, the QF 12-pounder 18 cwt naval gun is a different (and heavier) weapon than the QF 12-pounder 8-cwt Mk I naval gun, though they both fire shells of the same approximate weight (12 pounds (5.4 kg)).

DCT

[edit]

The director-control tower (DCT in British usage or "director" in US usage) was a feature of naval ships. It was a trainable turret incorporating the gun-laying sights and often a rangefinder. From here the gunnery officer could select targets and take the range, bearing and rates of change. This data would be provided to the transmitting station (TS), where a firing solution would be calculated and passed on to the gun turrets as the correct degree of training and elevation.

Effective full charge

[edit]

(Note: The British Army term is usually equivalent full charge)

Gun barrels naturally experience internal wear when fired, caused by mechanical wear from the projectile moving along the barrel, and thermal and chemical wear from propellant gases. This wear can reduce muzzle velocity and hence range, affect accuracy, produce unstable projectile flight, and, eventually, cause the gun barrel to fail.

Most guns are capable of firing different types of ammunition with varying charges, and not all of these combinations produce the same firing damage per round fired. The concept of ‘effective full charge’ provides a means of estimating the remaining life of a gun barrel taking into account the varying charges that can be fired from it before it becomes so worn as to be unusable, or no longer safe.[15]

To illustrate, the round (i.e. the combination of projectile and propelling charge) that produces the most firing damage is assigned an effective full charge (EFC) value of "one*. Other round combinations are assigned lesser values derived from testing and experience.

If a gun barrel is capable of firing three different round types: round A (EFC = 1); round B (EFC = 0.75); and round C (EFC = 0.25), and if 100 of each round type is fired, then the barrel is said to have fired (100×1.00) + (100×0.75) + (100×0.25) = 200 EFCs.

If it had previously been determined from testing and experience that this type of barrel has an estimated wear life of 250 EFCs, this specific barrel is at about 80% of its useful life. Plans would be made to order a replacement barrel within the time an additional 50 EFCs were expected to be fired. However the actual decision to retire any specific barrel would be made on examination and measurement of actual wear rather than that predicted by the EFC count.[15]

In practice, a barrel might be replaced before reaching its EFC life, or the limits of wear. In the case of the 15-inch (381 mm) guns fitted to the World War I Marshal Ney-class monitors a gun was generally condemned when wear reached about 0.74 in (19 mm) at 1 in (25 mm) from the start of the rifling. However it was the usual practice to replace guns when their projected remaining life fell below the ship's normal full outfit of ammunition per gun, which ensured that the entire magazine could be safely fired in action.[16]

Equipment

[edit]

This was the term for a gun together with its gun carriage, i.e. the complete set of equipment needed to be able to fire the gun, as the gun could only be fired when mounted on its correct carriage. The carriage could be a wheeled carriage, a static siege carriage or include both a traversing mounting and railway wagon in the case of a railway gun. For example, a complete deployable gun might be described as "Ordnance QF 18 pdr gun Mk II on carriage, field, QF 18 pdr gun Mk I".

Gunpowder

[edit]

Britain employed gunpowder as a propellant until superseded by Cordite Mk I from 1892, and as an explosive filling in common shells until slowly superseded by lyddite from the late 1890s.

In World War I gunpowder was still in wide British use :

  • in shrapnel shells as a burster to propel the bullets out of the case
  • in "igniter pads" at the ends of cordite cartridges to facilitate ignition
  • as the delay mechanism in time fuzes for artillery
  • in vent tubes for firing guns.

British gunpowder designations were :[17]

  • E.X.E.: "extra experimental": propellant: mixture of 23 brown and 13 black powders, used with BL 6 inch guns Mk III, IV & VI
  • L.G.: large grain: propellant
  • Mealed powder: powder in fine dust form: used to ignite fuzes, friction tubes
  • Prism or moulded powders: propellant pressed into regular hexagonal prism shape, with a hole in the centre to give even burning: included prism brown" (slower burning) and "prism black" (faster burning)
  • P: Pebble powder: propellant in cube shape, designed to reduce the ratio of surface area to weight, and hence to slow the rate of burning to reduce strain on guns. A larger weight of P (approximately 16% more) is required than R.L.G. for an equivalent charge.[18]
  • S.P.: propellant: P specially selected for consistency, for use in BL guns[18]
  • P mixture: mixture of pebble and fine grain powders: explosive: filled common and common-pointed shells
  • Q.F. mixture: explosive: filled medium-sized common and common-pointed shells
  • R.F.G.2: rifle fine grain: dogwood charred for eight hours: bursting charge for shrapnel and star shells
  • R.L.G.: rifle large grain: propellant; explosive filling for armour-piercing shells
  • S.B.C. slow-burning cocoa: propellant, brown powder (cocoa refers to the colour).

Gas-check

[edit]
12-inch (30 cm) automatic gas-check

Attached to the base of RML artillery shells from 1878 onwards to avoid gas wastage on firing, and to rotate studless shells. It was an interim measure between studs and modern driving bands.

Related terms:

(Note: The term "gas-check" was hyphenated in official British government publications of the late 19th and early 20th century. These publications also used the term "automatic gas-check" while acknowledging that the term "rotating gas-check" had been used previously.[19]

HA

[edit]
Gunners with HA QF 4-inch MK V gun on HMAS Canberra c. 1940

High angle: a naval designation equivalent to AA (anti-aircraft), for a gun mounting which was capable of an elevation exceeding 50° from the horizontal, allowing the gun to be used against aircraft.

HA/LA

[edit]

High angle / low angle: a naval designation, equivalent to "dual purpose", for a weapon intended for engaging both surface targets and aircraft, on a mounting capable of elevating above 50 degrees but also effective at low elevations. Typical examples were the QF 4-inch Mk XVI, QF 5.25-inch gun, and QF 4.5-inch gun used in World War II and later.

HE

[edit]
World War I-era HE shell for 9.2 inch howitzer. Red band indicates it is filled, green band marked "Trotyl" indicates filling is TNT.

"HE" in British terminology initially designated only shells filled with modern "high explosive" such as Trotyl (the British term for TNT), which was being introduced when World War I began, and Amatol from 1915. It contrasted with common shells, which were filled with older explosives such as gunpowder, and common lyddite, the earlier British high-explosive shell. Britain also used Tetryl before World War I under the designation "composition exploding" (C.E.).

The HE shell filling was detonated by a fuze, usually augmented by a "gaine" to ensure complete ignition, causing the thick steel shell case to shatter into large and small fragments at great velocity in all directions.

Britain first used pure TNT for land warfare shells from late 1914, but this proved expensive and difficult to manufacture in the necessary large quantities, and was also inefficient as much energy was output as heavy black smoke. Amatol, a mixture of cheap ammonium nitrate and TNT (initially "40/60": 40% ammonium nitrate and 60% TNT for land shells and 80/20 from 1917) proved 27% more powerful than pure TNT and was soon adopted as the preferred HE filling in World War I. TNT and Amatol were approximately 20% less sensitive to shock and hence safer than lyddite, and Amatol 80/20 cost only 7d per pound (£0.06/kg) to produce in 1917 compared to 1s 11d (£0.28/kg) for lyddite and 1s 3d (£0.21/kg) for TNT.[20]

Britain was slow to move from 40/60 Amatol to the preferred 80/20 mixture during World War I, due to manufacturing difficulties. The preferred method for filling explosive shells was by pouring the molten mixture through the fuze hole in the shell nose or base. This was well suited to Lyddite filling, but it was found that Amatol with more than 40% ammonium nitrate did not pour well. Hence it was not simply a case of switching existing filling machinery from Lyddite to Amatol. Dry filling with Amatol 80/20 in block form and by pressing was used but was not considered to be a success. By the end of World War I the process for pouring 80/20 Amatol as a shell filling for land warfare shells had finally been perfected and was in large–scale production.

The Royal Navy resisted switching from Lyddite to Amatol for its shells because it considered Amatol was too hygroscopic (water-absorbing) to be suitable for use at sea, and instead used pure TNT as its high-explosive replacement for Lyddite. After World War I, remaining stocks of Lyddite-filled naval shells were redesignated "H.E. shell filled Lyddite", and henceforth the term H.E. encompassed all Lyddite, TNT and subsequent high-explosive shell types. From 1919 into the 1930s a less sensitive and safer version of Lyddite named Shellite, consisting of 70% Lyddite and 30% dinitrophenol was used in naval AP shells.[21]

Amatol continued in field use to 1945[22] when it began to be replaced by a 60/40 mixture of RDX and TNT.

High-explosive shells were typically painted yellow in British service in World War I, with a red ring below the nose to indicate the shell was filled and a green ring round the body to indicate filling with TNT or Amatol. In World War II they were typically painted olive green.

LA

[edit]

Low angle: a naval designation for a gun mounting not capable of high angles of elevation, and intended solely for firing at surface targets. In theory any CP mounting was an LA mounting by default.

ML

[edit]

Muzzle-loading. By World War II, there were no muzzle loading artillery guns in British use, so ML was used only for mortars, as the mortar bomb was dropped tail-first down the barrel from the muzzle.

Ordnance

[edit]

In British use, ordnance meant the barrel and breech, without mounting, of a gun. The gun with its mounting was called an equipment. For example, a complete deployable gun might be described as ordnance QF 18 pdr gun Mk II on carriage, field, QF 18 pdr gun Mk I.

P

[edit]
In the P mounting, the rotating mass (blue) is mounted on a pedestal (red) which is fixed to the deck.

P refers to a "pedestal" mounting for a gun, and was used by the Royal Navy. It differed from a central pivot mounting in that the mounting rotated around a fixed pedestal, rather than being bolted directly to the deck.

Pounder

[edit]

Many British naval and land artillery pieces of this period continued to be categorised by their pound rating, the weight in pounds of the shell that they fired, rather than by their bore. For example, a gun firing 32-pound projectiles was called a "32-pounder", abbreviated pdr. Larger guns, such as the RML 9 inch 12 ton gun, were more often categorised by their bore. This system was still in use after World War II. A rough pound rating to bore conversion for that time is the 1-pounder (37 mm), 2-pounder (40 mm), 3-pounder (47 mm), 6-pounder (57 mm), 17-pounder (76.2 mm), 25-pounder (87.6 mm), and 60-pounder (127 mm).

Preponderance

[edit]

This term was used in the 19th century, which specified the amount by which the breech end of a gun mounted on trunnions was heavier than the muzzle end. This was determined by the location of the trunnions, the lugs on the barrel by which it rotated in its mounting, which were usually located slightly forward of the gun's centre of gravity. E.g. if the preponderance was quoted as 4 tons 2+12 cwt (4.2 t) as for the RML 17.72-inch "100-ton" gun, the breech end sat with that weight on its mounting, enough to ensure stability but not enough to hinder changes in elevation. The preponderance of British muzzle-loading guns was typically stamped on the end of one of the trunnions. The term was dropped when it became meaningless with the replacement of trunnions by more modern methods of mounting guns on recoil slides in the 20th century.

QF

[edit]

The term QF came from "quick-firing". The designation was put into use in the late 19th century in two different meanings. In naval terms it was first used for small guns firing fixed ammunition, that is, a complete round in one piece, consisting of a brass cartridge case containing both the propellant and the projectile, thus enabling higher firing rates; an early example was the QF 6-pounder Hotchkiss. In later pieces, the charge was sometimes separate from the shell, to reduce the individual weight of loading, with the charge still in a brass case rather than a cloth or silk bag typical of "BL" guns.

In formal British ordnance terminology the term QF came to mean that the propellant charge is loaded in a metal case, usually brass, that provides obturation, that is, it seals the breech to prevent escape of the expanding propellant gas.[1] The term QF hence referred to both the breech-sealing mechanism and the method of loading propellant charges. Ordnance of other countries employed other techniques, and hence this description and distinction is limited to British ordnance.

Following the early success of the light QF Hotchkiss and Nordenfelt guns in the 1880s, the Royal Navy implemented QF guns in all calibres up to 6-inch in the 1890s, and also converted various 4-inch and 6-inch BL guns to QF under the designation QFC. This all-QF era ended in 1901 with the BL 6-inch Mk VII gun and a swing back to BL guns. Since 1914 the trend has been to use QF for naval guns below 6-inch and BL for guns 6-inch and over.

Fixed QF

[edit]

In lighter QF guns, including field guns and anti-aircraft guns, the round was complete: "fixed ammunition", where the shell was attached to the cartridge case like a large bullet. Examples are the QF 3-pounder Vickers, QF 18-pounder field gun, QF 4-inch Mk V anti-aircraft gun and the current 4.5-inch Mark 8 naval gun. Fixed QF was suited for rapid loading, especially at high angles, and was limited by the total weight of cartridge and projectile, which had to be easily handled by one man. A maximum total weight of approximately 80 pounds (36 kg) was generally considered suitable for sustained manual loading of fixed ammunition rounds; for modern automatic loading guns since World War II, the maximum weight is no longer the limiting factor. The Royal Navy gun standard as of 2014 was the 4.5-inch Mark 8 naval gun, using a fixed round weighing 81 pounds (37 kg).

Separate QF

[edit]
Separate QF 15-pounder cartridge

In other guns, typically naval guns 3 inches (76 mm) and above, such as the QF 12-pounder 12 cwt and QF 6-inch naval gun, and howitzers, such as the QF 4.5-inch howitzer and Ordnance QF 25-pounder gun-howitzer, the projectile was loaded separately to the cartridge case containing the propellant: "separate ammunition". This system was suitable for howitzers as it allowed the gunner to remove part of the cordite charge before loading, if required for shorter ranges. Having the cartridge and projectile separate also allowed the weight of loading to be shared by two men.

Characteristics

[edit]

In all types, the primer for the round was in the cartridge case base. The term QF in British use referred to the breech sealing mechanism, in which the brass cartridge case provided the gas seal. This allowed a sliding block, which can generally be operated faster than a BL screw mechanism, and is characteristic of small to medium artillery. Early QF guns offered the advantage over BL guns that no time was wasted in inserting vent tubes after loading, as the primer was built into the case, and sponging out of the chamber was not necessary between rounds. QF also removed the risk of back-flash.[23] QF also, by rigidly fixing the position of the primer, igniter and cordite charge in the case relative to each other, improved the chances of successful firing compared to BL with its flexible bags.

By the early 20th century British doctrine held that QF ammunition, while allowing faster-operating breeches, had the disadvantage that ammunition is heavier and takes up more space, which was limited on warships. For guns larger than 6 inches (150 mm), it becomes impractical as the cartridge case becomes unwieldy for manual operation, and it does not allow charges to be loaded via multiple bags as BL does. Also, dealing with misfires was simpler with BL, as another tube could simply be tried. With QF the gunner had to wait a time and then open the breech, remove the faulty cartridge and reload. Already by 1900, modern BL breeches allowed the gunners to insert vent tubes while the gun was being loaded, obviating one of the previous QF advantages, and hence the Royal Navy abandoned the QF 6-inch gun and returned to BL 6-inch guns with the Mk VII.[23]

Another potential disadvantage associated with QF came with the horizontal sliding block breech, as used with the QF 4.5-inch howitzer. With the gun traversed at high elevation, the block could not be operated, as it came into contact with the inside of the box carriage. Not all British QF guns in fact used sliding blocks – the QF 2.95-inch and QF 3.7-inch mountain guns and the QF 18-pounder used screw breeches. The thing to note is that their screw mechanism were much lighter and simpler than BL screw mechanisms and served merely to lock the cartridge in place.

British artillery doctrine considered QF, even separate-loading, as unsuited for guns over 5 inches (130 mm) following experiences with the QF 6-inch guns in the 1890s, while European militaries such as Germany continued to use separate QF with sliding-block breeches for large guns up to 15 inches (380 mm), with larger German guns loading part of the propellant charge in cloth bags followed by the main charge in the metal cartridge case.

In colloquial use, quick firing is artillery having attributes like recoil buffers and quick shell loading characteristics, introduced in the late 19th century.

QFC

[edit]

QF converted: in the 1890s there was much enthusiasm for QF technology, and many older BL guns had their breeches modified to use the same QF cartridges as the new QF guns of the same calibre. Examples were conversion of BL 6-inch Mk IV and VI guns which became e.g. QFC I/IV, and some BL 4-inch guns.

QF SA

[edit]

Quick firing, semi-automatic: applied to naval QF guns where there was a mechanism to automatically open the breech and eject the case after firing. This was useful to enable a high rate of fire. An example was the QF 3-inch 20 cwt anti-aircraft gun.

RBL

[edit]
RBL 12-pounder gun barrel and breech

"Rifled breech loading": refers to the first generation of British rifled breech loading guns introduced in 1859 which used the unique Armstrong "screw breech" and included the RBL 12-pounder field gun and RBL 7-inch naval gun. These guns were originally known as "BL" (breech loading); the term "RBL" was introduced retrospectively in the 1880s to differentiate these Armstrong designs from the second unrelated generation of rifled breech loaders beginning in 1880 which are referred to as BL. The "RBL" guns were considered to be failures and Britain reverted to RML (rifled muzzle-loading) guns from the mid-1860s to the 1880s.

Recuperator

[edit]

"Recuperator" was the British name for the mechanism which returned the gun barrel to its firing position after recoil. US ordnance uses the term "run-out cylinder".

Hydro-spring

[edit]
Hydro-spring recoil system of 60-pounder Mk I, which failed at Gallipoli

At the beginning of World War I runout after recoil was most commonly achieved in British 1904-vintage field guns and pre-1914 naval guns by a set of springs which were compressed when the barrel recoiled and then expanded again. Piston(s) moving through an oil reservoir damped the recoil, and springs collected the recoil energy and then used it to "run out" the barrel to firing position. This hydraulic configuration was referred to as "hydro-spring". Typical examples were in the QF 13-pounder, 18-pounder, and BL 60-pounder Mk I guns, all dating from 1904 to 1905, where the oil, pistons and springs were integrated in a tubular housing above the barrel. This configuration made the entire recoil system vulnerable to enemy gunfire, and it was protected to some extent in the field by being wound with thick rope. Other guns, typically naval guns, had the pistons in separate housings below the barrel. Note that "hydro-" refers here to hydraulic machinery, not water: as is common in such systems, oil was the liquid used, not water. For other applications of this type of system, see hydrospring.

Hydro-pneumatic

[edit]
The field-fitted hydro-pneumatic recuperator extension (above the barrel) for 18-pounder Mk II gun, WWI
Pneumatic recuperator and hydraulic recoil cylinder arrangement of QF 4.7-inch naval gun, World War II

When World War I began, both the army and navy were in the process of introducing a "hydro-pneumatic" recoil system in which the recuperators were driven by air compression rather than springs. Examples were the navy's new QF 4-inch Mk V gun and the army's new BL 9.2-inch howitzer.

The unexpectedly heavy rates of fire experienced (mainly on the Western front) early in World War I caused many spring breakages in the 1904 generation field artillery (including in the Mk I 60-pounders at Gallipoli) and led to field modification of the 18-pounder which replaced the springs in the housing above the barrel with a pneumatic unit. By the end of the war the hydro-pneumatic system had become standard for a new generation of field artillery, typically seen in a box-shaped unit below the barrel in the 18-pounder Mk IV, 60-pounder Mk II, 6-inch howitzers, 8-inch howitzers, and 6 inch Mk 19 gun.

Ring shell

[edit]

RML

[edit]
Late "studless" common shell with gas-check, for RML 10-inch gun, 1886
Shell for RML 12.5-inch gun showing studs

Rifled muzzle loading: introduced in British service in the mid-1860s following the unsatisfactory service performance of the Armstrong RBL (rifled breech loading) guns. The inside of the barrel had spiral grooves into which "studs" on the shell fitted, to spin the shell and hence improve accuracy and range. The propellant charge, followed by the projectile, is loaded through the muzzle. "RML" became necessary to distinguish between the new rifled and old unrifled smoothbore muzzle loaders (ML).

The first generation of British RML guns in the mid-1860s typically used William Armstrong's design of a wrought-iron "A" tube surrounded by multiple wrought-iron coils. Later marks of guns built by the Royal Gun Factory from the late 1860s onward introduced a toughened mild steel "A" tube to increase the gun's strength, and also used fewer but heavier coils to reduce the cost of manufacture. RML guns in British government service were designed by the Royal Gun Factory, Woolwich, and typically had only a few (three to nine) broad shallow rifling grooves, compared to the many sharp-edged grooves ("polygroove") of the Armstrong system. They were hence referred to as "Woolwich" guns.

From 1878 onwards "gas-checks" were attached to the base of RML shells to seal the bore and reduce windage; it was also found that these gas-checks could be used to rotate the shell, allowing studs to be dispensed with, which was an improvement as the slots in the shell for studs were found to be weak points leading to shells fracturing. The gas-checks evolved into the driving bands still in use today. Modern RML examples are rifled field mortars.

The largest RML gun built was the RML 17.72-inch gun, known as the 100-ton gun. In the 1870-1880s four each went to the Italian ironclads Duilio and Enrico Dandolo, and two each to coastal batteries at Gibraltar and Malta.

The last recorded active deployment of British RML guns was some RML 2.5-inch mountain guns in German East Africa in 1916, although several batteries of RML 9-inch Mk VI high-angle coast defence guns were in service in England throughout World War I.

Round

[edit]

The complete set of components needed to fire the gun once. Consists of a projectile, a propellant cartridge, and a primer or igniter tube. A fixed round had all the components integrated into a brass cartridge case with the projectile attached, e.g. a rifle cartridge or QF 18-pounder round, in which case Round is synonymous with cartridge. A separate round required the projectile and propellant cartridge (either in bags or brass case) to be loaded separately.

RPC

[edit]

Remote power control: this is where a gun turret or a gun director automatically trains and elevates to follow the target being tracked by the DCT and the table (computer) in the transmitting station (see above). Mountings would also have local control in the event of the RPC or director tower being disabled.

S.A.P.

[edit]
S.A.P. shell for the 4.7-inch naval gun, 1933

Semi armour-piercing: introduced after World War I as the successor to common pointed shells for naval use. They had a heavy solid nose and a medium amount of TNT explosive, giving them the capability to penetrate steel superstructures and a small thickness of armour. They were employed as the main shell for naval and coastal guns of 8 inches (203 mm) and smaller in action against warships. Later shells were streamlined with the addition of a pointed ballistic cap, and were designated SAP/BC. In World War II they were typically painted olive green, with a red nose.

S.B.C.

[edit]

Slow burning cocoa powder: a form of brown prismatic powder, i.e. gunpowder, with more charcoal, saltpetre and moisture but less sulphur than black powder. Cocoa referred to the appearance rather than composition. Used in the late 19th century for early large long-barrelled guns, where its slow-burning properties gave the projectile a prolonged smooth acceleration instead of the short violent acceleration typical of black powder. This powder was inefficient because most energy was expended as smoke, and enormous quantities were required, such as 960 lb (440 kg) for the BL 16.25-inch naval gun (also known as Elswick 110 ton guns) of 1888. Required a primer of black powder to ignite.

SBML

[edit]

Smooth bore muzzle loading denotes a barrel that is not rifled and where the projectile is loaded via the muzzle of the barrel. Most early cannons were of this type. British SBML guns of the mid-19th century were typically made of cast iron. In the 1840s, the 68-pounder 95 cwt was the last of this type of cannon introduced into British service. Modern weapons using this method of loading are light field mortars, in which the mortar bomb is dropped into the mortar barrel for firing; in these modern weapons the projectiles are spin-stabilised, but by fins rather than rifling.

Segment shell

[edit]
Segment shell for RBL 12 pdr Armstrong gun

Segment shells, also known as ring shells: this anti-personnel explosive shell originated in British service in 1859 and was designed by William Armstrong for use with his new breechloading field guns. The projectile was made up of layers of iron rings within a thin cast-iron shell wall, held together with lead between them, with a hollow space in the centre for the bursting charge of gunpowder. The rings broke up into segments on explosion. The explosive charge was typically about half that employed in an equivalent calibre common shell as less explosive was needed to separate and break up the rings than to burst the shell wall of a common shell, hence allowing more iron to be employed for the same weight of shell. It could be employed in the role of shrapnel, case or common shell. It was generally phased out in favour of common and shrapnel shells.

Shellite

[edit]

An explosive mixture of picric acid and dinitrophenol or picric acid and hexanitrodiphenylamine in a ratio of 70/30. It was typically used as a filling in Royal Navy, armour-piercing shells after World War I. Known as Tridite in US service.

Steel shell

[edit]
6-pounder Hotchkiss steel shell rounds

"Steel shell" was the British term for the 3-pounder and 6-pounder common pointed shells and some others such as the QF 1-pounder base-fuzed round. They had attributes of British common pointed shells as they were filled with gunpowder, had base percussion fuzes and a heavy pointed nose (almost three C.R.H.). But the nose was closer in design to British A.P. shells - the solid section was longer than common pointed, and the body held proportionately less powder than common pointed. It was intended for naval use.

In common usage, "steel shell" served to differentiate a shell constructed of steel from one constructed of cast iron (C.I.).

Table

[edit]

In the Royal Navy a table refers to a gunnery computer, such as the Dreyer Table, high angle control system table, or Admiralty Fire Control Table. The name probably originated with the Dreyer Table.

Tube

[edit]

UD

[edit]

Upper deck: a naval gun mounting in which the rotating mass of the turret is mounted above the deck, with usually only the ammunition feed trunking piercing the deck.

Velvril

[edit]

"Velvril paint" was used to line larger common shells in the early 20th century to prevent the gunpowder filling from coming into contact with the iron or steel shell wall. This was both to avoid the saltpetre from causing corrosion in the presence of any moisture, and also provided a smooth surface that prevented friction between the gunpowder and shell wall, hence reducing the risk of spontaneous ignition when the shell was fired. It was made up of 24 parts zinc oxide, 3.5 parts yellow ochre, 0.5 parts red iron oxide, 15 parts nitrated castor oil, 7.5 parts nitro-cellulose of very low nitration, and 60 parts acetone oil.

Vent-sealing tube

[edit]
QF 12-pounder 12 cwt cartridges with adapter for V.S. tube
Mk VII percussion tube, standard for medium-heavy BL artillery in 1914

Usually abbreviated to "V.S. tube" or just tube. This was the traditional, reliable British method of fully igniting powder charges in BL guns to fire projectiles, especially large shells. Briefly, after the powder cartridge was loaded (or even during the loading process), the tube was inserted through a vent in the breech. Early vents were "radial" i.e. at right-angles to the barrel length, bored through the top of the barrel into the chamber; later vents were "axial" through the centre of the breech mechanism and "mushroom" into the chamber. When the breech was closed, one of several methods was then used to trigger the tube, which then sent a powerful flash into the breech. The flash ignited a special "igniter" material in the end of the cartridge, and the igniter in turn ignited the main propellant charge (some form of gunpowder or cordite). A powerful reliable flash from the tube was required because with bag charges, especially in the stress of combat or with variable howitzer charges, it could not be guaranteed that the igniter in the cartridge would be up close to the vent – it may have been pushed in too far, leaving a gap. The tube was designed to expand on ignition and seal the vent, preventing escape of gas. Tube types:

  • Percussion tube – the tube was inserted in an axial vent in the breech and triggered by a firing pin in a percussion lock in the breech. Single-use. Used with medium-heavy guns and howitzers, e.g. 60-pounder gun.
  • Electric tube – the tube was fired by an electric current from mains or battery. Considered safe, but cumbersome for field use. Common with naval and coast defence guns.
    T Friction tube Mk IV, 1914
  • Friction tube – the tube would have a lanyard attached, with length proportional to the size of the gun, which when pulled caused friction inside the tube which ignited a powder charge, much like striking a match. Single-use. Originally of "copper" and "quill" types, replaced by the "T" tube by the late 1890s. They were used in great quantities by field artillery and are found on old British battlefields up to 1904, e.g. in South Africa. They were inserted in a "radial" vent on top of the breech, or later in axial vents running lengthwise through the centre of the breech such as with the BL 15-pounder. The T design, with the friction wire to which the lanyard was attached running through the crosspiece of the T, ensured that when the lanyard was pulled and the gun recoiled the wire was pulled smoothly out of the T piece without exerting force on the vertical part of the T and hence affecting the gas seal.

From 1904, the new generation of field artillery was QF with propellant in brass cases with self-contained percussion primers, while small naval QF cases had self-contained electric primers. From then on, tubes were only used on 60-pounder (5 inch) guns and larger, usually percussion tubes; and for a few small BL guns such as the 2.75-inch mountain gun, usually friction tubes. However, Britain entered World War I with many old BLC 15-pounders which continued to require T tubes until phased out by 1916. To approach a QF rate of fire they used a special "push" version of the T friction tube which was inserted into an axial vent in the breech like a BL percussion tube and fired by a similar mechanism to a firing pin activated by a lever rather than being pulled by a lanyard.

Tubes could also be used with QF cartridges fitted with tube adaptors in place of primers, as with the QF 12-pounder.[24]

Windage

[edit]

"Windage" as applied to British muzzle-loading ordnance referred to the difference between a gun's bore and the projectile's diameter, typically 0.1–0.2 inches (2.5–5.1 mm). This gap was necessary to allow the projectile to be rammed down the length of the barrel on loading. The word windage was also used for the amount of propellant gas that escaped around the loosely fitting projectile on firing, and hence failed to contribute to accelerating the projectile. Up to half of the gas was lost in this way in old smoothbore artillery. From 1859, Armstrong rifled guns used a deformable lead coating on the projectile to minimise windage and simultaneously to engage the rifling. The elimination of windage necessitated a new design of timed fuze, because the burning propellant gas escaping past the head of the shell had been used to ignite the gunpowder timer train in the fuze in the shell nose. The new fuses used the shock of firing to ignite the timer. When Britain reverted to muzzle-loaders in the late 1860s, projectiles were rotated by studs protruding from the shell body engaging in deep rifling grooves in the barrel, but the windage caused excessive barrel wear. From 1878, after several years of unsuccessful trials, a fairly effective system of concave copper discs called gas-checks was introduced between the charge and projectile; they expanded on firing and sealed the bore. The gas-checks were soon incorporated into the projectile itself and became the driving bands still in use today.

Wire-wound

[edit]
6-inch Mk XII, a typical British wire-wound naval gun introduced in 1914. The wire layer is the dark area

"Wire-wound" or simply "wire" guns were a gun construction method introduced for British naval guns in the 1890s, at which time the strength of large British steel forgings could not be guaranteed in sufficiently large masses to make an all-steel gun of only two or three built-up tubes.[25] One or more central "A" tubes were tightly wound for part or the full length with layers of steel wire, and the wire was covered by a jacket. It was first used on the QF 6-inch Mk II (40 calibre) of 1892, and the first large calibre gun was the BL 12-inch Mk VIII (35 calibre) of 1895. It provided greater radial strength, i.e., it better withstood the gas pressure attempting to expand the gun's diameter, than previous "hoop" construction methods of similar weight. This was necessitated by the introduction of cordite as a propellant in 1892, which generated higher pressures along the length of the barrel than the gunpowder used before. However, it provided less axial strength, i.e. lengthwise rigidity, and early longer wire-wound guns suffered from droop and inaccuracy. A combination of wire and traditional methods was eventually adopted to solve this problem. The successful British wire naval guns of World War I were typically shorter than German and US guns of the same calibre, which did not use wire-wound construction, e.g. British 45 calibres in length, or only 42 calibres in the 15-inch gun, compared to 50 calibres in guns of other countries. The method was found satisfactory for use with field guns and howitzers which had much shorter barrels (as well as much smaller projectiles and much lower "chamber pressures") than naval guns.

With the post-WWI progress in metallurgy, Britain abandoned wire-wound construction for naval guns after the 16-inch Mk I of the 1920s and later 1930s to 1940s designs used monobloc (single-piece) (e.g. 12 pdr 12 cwt Mk V) or built-up all-steel construction (e.g. 6 inch Mk XXIII and 14-inch Mk VII).

See also

[edit]

Notes and references

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Glossary of British ordnance terms refers to the specialized vocabulary and abbreviations employed by the to precisely denote weapons, , explosives, vehicles, and associated equipment, facilitating standardized communication in , engineering, and operations. This lexicon evolved through official publications, including pamphlets from the Manual of Army Ordnance Services, to ensure consistency across procurement, maintenance, and deployment activities. It primarily covers historical terms related to and naval guns from the 19th and early 20th centuries. Historically, the Royal Army Ordnance Corps (RAOC), formed in 1918 and responsible for supplying and repairing ordnance stores such as fighting vehicles, ammunition, fuel, and spare parts, played a central role in developing and documenting these terms until its merger into the Royal Logistic Corps in 1993. Key examples include AP (armour-piercing projectile), HE (high explosive), and SBX (slow-burning explosive), alongside organizational designations like AOD (Army Ordnance Depot) and ADOS (Assistant Director of Ordnance Services). During , such terminology was critical for Allied interoperability, as outlined in joint glossaries comparing British and U.S. equivalents, such as "anti-tank mine" and "coast defence artillery." In modern contexts, the maintains updated glossaries in safety and operational handbooks (as of 2020), defining terms like munition (a charged with or for military use) and airburst (an above the surface), with applications in range management and weapons handling. These resources emphasize safety distances and technical specifications, reflecting ongoing adaptations to contemporary threats while preserving core historical .

General Concepts

Ordnance

In British military , ordnance refers specifically to the barrel and breech of a , comprising the core components that form the responsible for containing and channeling the forces generated during firing. This design ensures the safe of projectiles while withstanding extreme internal pressures from charges. The term originated in the late as part of evolving designations, where it distinctly separated the firing tube assembly from ancillary elements like supports or carriages, reflecting advancements in breech-loading and rifled technologies during the . By this period, British ordnance incorporated built-up constructions with multiple layers of hoops and tubes to enhance durability against higher chamber pressures, a necessity driven by the shift from muzzle-loading smoothbores to more powerful breech-loaders. In naval contexts, ordnance denotes the gun proper—the barrel and breech mechanism—distinct from its mounting, allowing for interchangeable use across various shipboard or coastal platforms. For instance, 19th-century guns like the BL 6-inch Mark VII featured ordnance with wire-wound barrels to manage stresses, paired with separate pedestal or turret mountings for deployment. This modular approach facilitated repairs and upgrades, as the ordnance could be removed independently for maintenance at facilities like Woolwich Arsenal.

Equipment

In British ordnance terminology, refers to the complete assembly, comprising the ordnance—the barrel and breech of the gun—integrated with its , platform, or mounting to form a fully operational piece ready for deployment. This integration ensures stability, mobility, and functionality, distinguishing the term from standalone components that lack practical usability in combat. Historical examples illustrate this concept clearly. In , the , introduced in 1904 with an initial wheeled field carriage featuring a single-pole trail design (later marks adopted split-trail for improved elevation and traverse), enabled rapid repositioning during as the backbone of British divisional . Naval applications included similar assemblies, such as quick-firing guns mounted within armored turrets on battleships, where the ordnance was secured to a rotating platform for coordinated at sea. The emphasis on deployability in highlights its role in both and maritime contexts, where the full unit—unlike partial assemblies such as the ordnance alone—could be maneuvered, aimed, and fired effectively by trained crews.

Round

In British ordnance terminology, a round refers to the complete unit designed for loading into a to enable a single firing, encompassing all necessary elements for propulsion and detonation. This unified firing package typically includes the , which carries the such as or shrapnel; the , contained either in a cartridge case or separate bags; and the primer or , which initiates ignition. The design ensures reliable and efficient delivery of the to the target upon firing. Rounds are classified into two primary types based on assembly and loading method: fixed rounds, where the projectile, propellant, and primer are pre-assembled as a single, permanently joined unit within a brass cartridge case for rapid handling; and separate rounds, where the components—projectile, propellant charge, and primer—are loaded individually into the breech, often necessitated by the larger size of heavy artillery pieces. Fixed rounds facilitate quicker reloading, while separate rounds allow for greater flexibility in charge adjustments. Historically, in breech-loading (BL) guns prevalent from the late , rounds commonly employed silk or woollen bags to contain the charges, which were loaded separately alongside the and ignited via friction or percussion primers. The adoption of quick-firing (QF) guns in the early shifted toward brass-cased fixed rounds, which integrated all components into one piece, significantly enhancing loading speed and rate of fire during engagements such as those in . This evolution marked a key advancement in British efficiency.

Gun Classifications

Muzzle-Loading (ML)

Muzzle-loading (ML) refers to guns in which the charge and are inserted and rammed into place through the open front end of the barrel, known as the muzzle, typically using a rammer or ladle for the powder followed by and . This method was the standard for early design, relying on gravity and manual force to seat the components securely before ignition via a touch-hole or vent. In British ordnance, ML guns dominated from the 15th century, with initial bombards and culverins evolving into more standardized field and siege pieces by the 18th and 19th centuries, such as cast-iron or bronze smoothbore cannons used extensively before the Crimean War. They remained the primary type through the mid-19th century, powering naval broadsides and land batteries during conflicts like the Napoleonic Wars. By the 1890s, ML designs had become obsolete for most field artillery due to limitations in reloading speed, though some variants, like the RML 2.5-inch mountain gun, were retained in limited naval, colonial, and siege roles into World War I, particularly in theaters such as German East Africa. The simplicity of ML construction allowed for robust, cost-effective manufacturing using traditional casting techniques, making them suitable for mass production in iron foundries. However, the need to load sequentially from the front exposed crews to enemy fire and restricted the rate of fire to roughly 2-3 rounds per minute under ideal conditions, far slower than later breech-loading systems. This transition to breech-loading (BL) ordnance in the late 19th century prioritized improved reloading efficiency and safety for modern warfare demands.

Smoothbore Muzzle-Loading (SBML)

Smoothbore muzzle-loading (SBML) guns were pieces loaded through the muzzle end of the barrel, featuring smooth interiors without to impart spin on projectiles. These guns fired spherical projectiles such as for penetrating enemy hulls and for anti-personnel effects at close range, relying on gravity and initial velocity rather than stabilization for trajectory. In British naval service, SBML designs emphasized simplicity and rapid production, with barrels cast solid and then bored out to ensure uniformity. During the 18th and 19th centuries, SBML guns formed the backbone of broadside armaments on wooden warships, exemplified by the 32-pounder, a common heavy-caliber piece weighing around 42 (cwt) and measuring 96 inches in barrel length. The 32-pounder, introduced in patterns like the design of 1838, was widely mounted on ships such as and later vessels, delivering a 32-pound solid shot with devastating close-quarters impact. Other notable examples included 18-pounders used in land battles like during the (1853–1856) and 68-pounders (8.12-inch caliber) fitted to transitional ironclads like . These guns remained standard until the mid-19th century, supporting Britain's naval supremacy through broadside volleys in fleet actions. Performance of SBML guns was inherently limited by the absence of , which prevented and resulted in poor accuracy and reduced effective range, typically confining their utility to short or close-quarters engagements. Without rotational stability, followed unpredictable arcs influenced by wind and imperfections, making precise long-distance fire challenging compared to later rifled variants that enhanced accuracy through gyroscopic effects. By the , advancements in rifled muzzle-loaders and breech-loaders rendered most SBML guns obsolete for frontline naval use, though they persisted in mortars for high-angle fire into the late 19th century.

Rifled Muzzle-Loading (RML)

Rifled Muzzle-Loading (RML) guns were pieces loaded through the muzzle and equipped with rifled bores featuring helical grooves to impart rotational spin to , enhancing accuracy and range compared to earlier designs. These grooves engaged either studs protruding from the or, later, gas-checks on the shell base, causing the elongated to rotate as it traveled down the barrel. Constructed typically as built-up guns with wrought-iron coils shrunk over a tube, RMLs represented a transitional in British ordnance, bridging muzzle-loaders and more advanced breech-loaders. Introduced in the mid-1860s at facilities like , RML guns marked a significant improvement over Smooth-Bore Muzzle-Loading (SBML) by allowing the use of longer, more aerodynamic shells that could carry larger explosive charges while stabilizing flight through . Early designs featured a few wide, deep grooves, evolving to polygrooved systems with shallower grooves, such as the pattern, often with a uniform or progressive twist to optimize spin. This innovation revolutionized naval and land during the 1860s and 1870s, arming ironclad warships, field batteries, and fortress installations until breech-loading systems predominated. Obturation in RML guns evolved to address gas leakage and barrel wear. Initially, studs on the projectiles not only engaged the rifling for rotation but also provided partial sealing against escaping gases. From 1878, gas-checks superseded studs, consisting of a rotating disk or band at the shell base that expanded under pressure to seal the bore while its projections interacted with the grooves for spin, significantly reducing erosion and boosting muzzle velocity. This "automatic gas-check" enabled studless shells, improving reliability and extending service life; for instance, with cordite charges, a Vavasseur driving band incorporated a copper gas-check ring for enhanced sealing. RML guns persisted in secondary roles, with examples like the 9-inch Mark I–IV remaining operational in coastal defenses until 1922, including during World War I.

Rifled Breech-Loading (RBL)

Rifled Breech-Loading (RBL) guns represented a mid-19th-century in British , designed to load rifled projectiles through the breech rather than the muzzle, enabling faster reloading and improved accuracy over smoothbore predecessors. These weapons utilized a screw-thread mechanism, typically featuring a hollow breech screw and vent piece that allowed insertion of from the rear while imparting spin to elongated shells via internal . Sir William Armstrong's design, adopted by the British in 1859, exemplified this approach, with the guns constructed using a built-up method of shrinking multiple wrought-iron hoops around a central core to withstand firing pressures. The adoption of RBL guns marked a significant shift in British ordnance, with initial production for both field and naval use, including deployments in conflicts such as the Second Opium War in in 1860. However, their service life proved short-lived due to inherent material limitations in the wrought-iron construction, which was prone to cracking and structural weakness under repeated high-pressure firings. Early models suffered from inadequate , allowing gas leakage past the breech seal during discharge, which eroded components and reduced efficiency. Safety concerns escalated with documented explosions and failures, particularly in larger calibers. During the 1863 , , 28 accidents occurred across 365 rounds fired from 21 Armstrong RBL guns, including vent pieces blowing out from excessive gas pressure. These incidents, combined with the overall unreliability of , prompted the and to phase out RBL designs by the mid-1860s in favor of rifled muzzle-loaders, such as Palliser's . The nomenclature "RBL" later distinguished these experimental pieces from subsequent standardized breech-loaders. Successor BL designs in the 1880s addressed these flaws through steel construction and improved sealing mechanisms.

Breech-Loading (BL)

Breech-loading (BL) guns in British ordnance refer to rifled pieces that load through the rear of the barrel, utilizing separate charges consisting of a cloth-bag and a , in contrast to quick-firing (QF) guns that employ fixed metallic cartridges for faster reloading. These guns were standardized in British service starting in the , following the resolution of earlier sealing and reliability issues that had led to a temporary reversion to muzzle-loaders in the and . The adoption marked a significant advancement in , enabled by improved and techniques that prevented gas escape during firing. The propellant for BL guns was initially black powder in silk or cloth bags, transitioning to —a —invented in 1889 and widely issued from 1892 onward, with Mark I cordite entering service for field and naval guns by 1893. , essential for sealing the breech against high-pressure gases, was achieved through systems like the de Bange obturator, which used an expanding pad impregnated with grease to form a gas-tight seal; this French-invented mechanism was adopted by the British after trials with earlier methods such as the Elswick cup, a tin-based seal prone to deformation. Loading involved inserting the bagged charge followed by the shell into the chamber, with the breech then closed to contain the combustion. Breech mechanisms evolved from the multi-threaded Armstrong screw of the 1850s, which required several full rotations to open and close and suffered from poor sealing leading to accidents, to more efficient interrupted-screw designs by the late 1880s. The interrupted screw featured staggered threads allowing a quarter- or half-turn closure, reducing motions from four to two or even one in later variants like the short-screw breech. This progression culminated in the Welin stepped-thread system around 1890, which further simplified operation by enabling a single-motion swing-out for rapid access while maintaining structural integrity under pressure. These original BL designs formed the backbone of British heavy artillery until modifications for quick-firing capabilities emerged later.

Breech-Loading Converted (BLC)

The Breech-Loading Converted (BLC) designation in British ordnance refers to existing breech-loading (BL) guns that were retrofitted with a hydraulic system and often a to improve and crew safety, allowing for faster reloading without necessitating a complete redesign. This modification addressed limitations in earlier BL designs, such as excessive that required repositioning after each shot, by absorbing the gun's backward movement and maintaining alignment for subsequent firing. The conversion process typically involved adapting the gun's mounting to incorporate a buffer mechanism, enabling a closer to emerging quick-firing standards while retaining separate loading of powder and shell. A prominent historical example is the 15-pounder BLC , developed around 1907 by converting the obsolete BL 15-pounder 7 cwt gun originally produced by Elswick Ordnance Company and Woolwich Arsenal. These conversions extended the service life of surplus weapons, equipping artillery brigades and colonial units at a lower cost than procuring new 18-pounder quick-firing guns. Issued starting in , the 15-pounder BLC featured a 76.2 mm calibre barrel on a wheeled with buffers, achieving a maximum range of approximately 5,800 yards using charges, and saw use in training and early operations before being phased out for fully modern quick-firing artillery. The primary purpose of BLC conversions was to bridge the technological gap between traditional BL guns and quick-firing ordnance, providing enhanced loading speed—up to 6-8 rounds per minute under optimal conditions—without altering the ammunition system, thereby maximizing existing stockpiles during the pre-war modernization of the British Army. This approach proved particularly valuable for reserve and overseas forces, where budget constraints limited full re-equipment, and the upgrades ensured compatibility with standard BL projectiles while improving field performance against contemporary threats.

Quick-Firing Guns

Quick-Firing (QF)

Quick-firing (QF) guns represented a significant advancement in British design, characterized by their use of brass-cased cartridges that contained the charge and provided to seal the breech against escaping gases. This mechanism allowed for rapid reloading and automatic ejection of spent cases, substantially increasing the compared to earlier breech-loading (BL) guns, which relied on silk bags for that required manual handling and slower loading procedures. The brass cartridge not only facilitated quicker operations but also enhanced and reliability in combat environments, particularly for field and naval applications. Originating in the late 1880s with early adoption of designs like the Elswick 4.7-inch gun, QF technology became the standard for small- and medium-calibre artillery in British service by 1914. In the Royal Navy, QF guns rapidly supplanted older BL types for secondary armaments, enabling higher volumes of fire against fast-moving targets such as torpedo boats. Similarly, in , weapons like the QF 13-pounder became the norm for units, reflecting the shift toward rapid-response capabilities in . QF generally fell into two broad categories: fixed rounds, where the shell and cartridge were pre-attached for immediate loading, and separate rounds, where the cased was loaded independently of the shell but still within the quick-firing system. These configurations optimized QF guns for diverse roles, from anti-torpedo defense to shore bombardment, underscoring their versatility and dominance in British ordnance through the early .

Fixed QF

Fixed quick-firing (QF) ordnance in British artillery terminology designates guns employing fixed , wherein the shell and cartridge case containing the are permanently attached as a single unit for breech loading. This configuration, integral to the quick-firing system introduced in the late , facilitates rapid reloading by eliminating the need to handle separate components during fire. The fixed QF design enables high rates of fire, with crews achieving up to 20 rounds per minute under optimal conditions, though sustained rates were typically lower at 4-8 rounds per minute to manage barrel heating and ammunition supply. A key historical example is the Ordnance QF 18-pounder field gun, introduced in 1906 and serving as the British Army's primary light field artillery throughout World War I, where it supported infantry advances through intense barrages of shrapnel and high-explosive shells. These guns were prevalent in divisional artillery units, emphasizing mobility and volume of fire in trench warfare scenarios. The primary advantages of fixed QF lie in its operational simplicity and loading speed, as the unified round reduces handling time and errors, making it well-suited for lighter calibres up to around 100 mm. However, this integration limits applicability to smaller guns, as heavier projectiles become unwieldy in a single piece; for larger calibres, separate QF —where shell and cartridge are loaded independently—is employed to accommodate greater weights and adjustable charges.

Separate QF

Separate QF (Quick-Firing) refers to a type of British naval and artillery ordnance where the shell (projectile) and the propellant charge are loaded as distinct components, with the propellant contained in a brass cartridge case that provides obturation and facilitates rapid reloading. This design balances the speed of quick-firing mechanisms with the handling requirements of heavier projectiles, making it suitable for medium-caliber guns where fixed ammunition would be too cumbersome. Unlike bag-loaded breech-loading (BL) guns, the brass case seals the breech upon firing, enabling higher rates of fire while allowing separate management of shell and propellant for flexibility in charge selection. The loading process for Separate QF guns involves inserting the shell first into the breech, followed by the brass cartridge case containing the (typically ), which is then rammed into position. The breech, often featuring a horizontal sliding block or similar mechanism, is closed manually or semi-automatically before firing. This sequential loading, while slightly slower than fixed QF systems used in lighter calibers, supports the practicalities of larger in naval mountings and . Historically, Separate QF ammunition was employed in medium-caliber naval guns, such as the QF 6-inch guns mounted on pre-dreadnought battleships and early cruisers, enabling rapid fire rates of up to 5-6 rounds per minute in service conditions. This configuration extended quick-firing capabilities to calibers up to 6 inches, bridging the gap between lighter fixed QF weapons for anti-torpedo boat roles and heavier BL guns for main armaments. Examples include the QF 4.7-inch and QF 5.25-inch naval guns, which used Separate QF to maintain effectiveness against surface and air threats during the World Wars.

QF Characteristics

Quick-firing (QF) guns in British ordnance were defined by their ability to deliver rapid, sustained fire through integrated design features that minimized reloading time and stabilized the weapon after each shot. Central to these characteristics was the use of metallic cartridge ammunition, consisting of a cartridge case containing the charge, which could enclose the (fixed) or be loaded separately from it (separate), allowing for quicker handling compared to the separate bag charges of breech-loading (BL) guns. This cartridge design enabled rates of fire typically ranging from 10 to 20 rounds per minute for medium-caliber naval and field pieces, significantly enhancing operational tempo in combat scenarios such as anti-torpedo boat engagements or support. Recoil absorption was another hallmark, achieved via recuperator systems—often hydraulic or pneumatic mechanisms—that absorbed the gun's rearward motion and swiftly returned it to the firing position without manual intervention. These systems, refined in the early , distinguished QF guns from earlier BL designs by permitting continuous fire without the gun needing to reposition the barrel after each discharge, thereby supporting higher volumes of fire over extended periods. The cartridge cases themselves contributed to this efficiency, as they were reusable after reloading, facilitating logistical advantages in prolonged engagements, though exact reuse cycles varied by and maintenance. Historically, QF characteristics evolved rapidly from the late onward, with initial adoption driven by the need for faster-firing weapons in response to threats and demands observed in conflicts like the Boer War. By the early 1900s, improvements in technology and cartridge case allowed for more reliable sustained fire, setting QF guns apart from BL counterparts that relied on slower, separate loading methods. Muzzle velocities in QF guns were influenced by the robust case design, which contained higher pressures for effective , though the primary emphasis remained on achieving superior firing rates to overwhelm targets in dynamic combat environments.

Quick-Firing Converted (QFC)

Quick-Firing Converted () refers to a class of early British naval guns that were originally breech-loading (BL) bag guns modified to incorporate quick-firing capabilities by adapting them to use brass cartridge cases containing the propellant charge, with the projectile loaded separately (separate QF ammunition). This conversion process typically involved altering the gun's chamber and breech mechanism to accommodate the cartridge, often by installing new liners, breech bushes, or rings, while retaining the existing barrel structure to extend the of older weapons. The designation "QFC" distinguished these from purpose-built quick-firing (QF) guns, emphasizing their adapted nature as an interim enhancement to achieve faster reloading rates compared to traditional bag-loaded BL guns. A prominent historical example is the conversion of the BL 6-inch Mk VI gun, which began in the late 1890s and continued into the early 1900s, with 81 such guns modified between 1900 and 1907 to match the cartridge and charge specifications of the contemporary QF 6-inch/40 calibre gun. These QFC conversions were mounted on various vessels, including battleships of the Colossus class and cruisers like HMS Imperieuse and the Leander class, providing rapid-fire secondary armament against torpedo boats and smaller threats during a period of naval rearmament. Similar adaptations were applied to other calibres, such as 4-inch BL guns from Marks IIIA to VI, with around 20 to 27 conversions completed to bolster coastal and shipboard defences. Despite these improvements, guns served primarily as a temporary measure until fully designed QF weapons became widely available in the early , as the conversions did not always optimize the systems or overall for sustained rapid fire. Some retained elements of the original bag-gun design in their breech mechanics, limiting the full benefits of cartridge loading and leading to eventual replacement in frontline service; for instance, several 6-inch QFC guns were relegated to defensive armed merchant ships during or static coastal positions like Fort Bedford on . Unlike non-cartridge upgrades under the Breech-Loading Converted (BLC) category, QFC focused specifically on cartridge integration for quicker operation.

Quick-Firing Semi-Automatic (QF SA)

Quick-Firing Semi-Automatic (QF SA) guns in British ordnance represented an evolution of quick-firing , incorporating automated breech operations to enhance firing rates beyond standard QF designs that relied on manual breech handling. These guns featured a semi-automatic breech mechanism that automatically opened the breech and ejected the spent cartridge case immediately after firing, allowing the loader to insert a new round more rapidly while the gun remained in position due to its recoil absorption system. This significantly reduced and during sustained fire, particularly in anti-aircraft roles where rapid response was critical. The semi-automatic action was typically powered by the energy from the fired round, utilizing a sliding block breech—often vertical in design—that harnessed the gun's to cycle the mechanism without requiring gas operation in most British examples. For instance, the vertical sliding breech block in early marks would open post-firing, eject the case via ejectors, and hold the breech open for reloading, with the process repeating upon chambering a new cartridge. This -driven system, combined with fixed using brass cartridges, enabled rates of fire up to 15-25 rounds per minute, a marked improvement over manual QF guns and essential for engaging fast-moving aerial targets. A prominent historical example of a QF SA gun was the QF 3-inch 20 cwt anti-aircraft gun, introduced in 1914 and serving through both World Wars in and applications. This weapon, weighing 20 (about 2,032 lb or 922 kg), was mounted on mobile carriages for field use or fixed pedestals for naval and coastal defense, achieving its enhanced through the semi-automatic vertical sliding breech on compatible mountings like the Mark IV carriage. Deployed extensively in home defense against German airships and bombers during , with over 400 units in the UK by 1916, it continued into on destroyers, submarines, and even experimental tank mounts due to shortages of newer anti-aircraft guns, remaining in service until declared obsolete in 1946.

Mountings

Central Pivot (CP)

The Central Pivot (CP) mounting is a type of naval mount used by the Royal Navy, characterized by a rotating structure centered on a fixed pivot bolted directly to the deck, which minimizes the need for extensive structural modifications to the ship. This design features a circular base plate secured to the deck, supported by a below-deck ring-shaped bulkhead for stability, with rotation facilitated by lower and upper roller paths, horizontal rollers, and a central cage containing vertical thrust rollers that serve as the pivot point. Electric cabling for control systems is routed through the pivot, enabling efficient integration without additional deck penetrations. Historically, CP mountings were widely adopted for British naval guns in the early , particularly from onward, as seen in applications for 6-inch BL Mark XII guns on cruisers such as the Danae and Emerald classes, as well as auxiliary vessels like gunboats during both World Wars. These mountings allowed for quick traverse capabilities, often providing a arc of approximately 240 degrees (120 degrees to either side), without the complexity of full structures typically required for heavier turrets. The design evolved through variants like CP Mark XIII and XIV, supporting calibers such as 4.7-inch and 6-inch guns, and was valued for accommodating telescopic sights in transitional periods of naval gunnery development. Key advantages of CP mountings include their cost-effectiveness and straightforward installation, as the bolted pivot requires limited shipyard alterations compared to more elaborate or turret systems. They also offered superior manual operability, with the center of rotation at or near the mounting base providing better balance and ease of training under manual power, unlike (P) mountings where rotation occurs just below the platform. This simplicity contributed to their prevalence in secondary armaments and smaller vessels, ensuring reliable performance in resource-constrained environments.

Pedestal (P)

The pedestal (P) mounting is a fixed-base employed in British naval ordnance to provide stable support for pieces on ship decks or coastal emplacements. It consists of a rigid pedestal serving as the central base, around which the gun assembly rotates for , thereby ensuring precise alignment and minimizing vibration during firing. This design was particularly advantageous for mounting quick-firing s, where the pedestal's structure absorbed forces effectively, allowing for sustained rates of fire without compromising deck integrity. Introduced in the late , pedestal mountings became integral to vessels and coastal defenses, primarily for anti-ship engagements against torpedo boats and surface threats. The 12-pounder (3-inch) QF Mark I gun, entering service in 1894, exemplifies early adoption, with its PI pedestal mounting fitted on destroyers of the 1890s and later on battleships like HMS Africa and HMS Lord Nelson for secondary armament roles. By the early 20th century, these mountings supported heavier calibers in naval operations, including cruisers such as HMS Birmingham, which carried nine 6-inch BL Mark XII guns on PVII pedestal mountings for broadside fire. Their use extended into coastal batteries during , underscoring their versatility in defensive anti-ship configurations. In terms of design, the pedestal mounting prioritizes vertical stability through its columnar base, which distributes the weight and recoil of heavier weapons—such as the 6-inch Mark IX—more evenly than simpler alternatives, reducing flex and enhancing accuracy under prolonged use. This contrasts with central pivot (CP) mountings, which favor operational simplicity via side-bracket rotation but offer less inherent rigidity for large-caliber guns. Typically hand-worked with manual and arcs up to ±120 degrees, P mountings like the PIX variant weighed around 13.375 tons and supported elevations from -7° to +17.5°, balancing stability with the demands of anti-ship warfare.

Upper Deck (UD)

The Upper Deck (UD) mounting refers to a naval gun mounting configuration employed by the Royal Navy, wherein the complete rotating mass of the turret—including the , trunnions, and training mechanisms—is situated entirely above the ship's upper deck. This placement ensured that only the supply trunking penetrated the deck to deliver shells and charges from the magazines below, simplifying the overall structural integration into the vessel's hull. Such mountings were engineered for compatibility with quick-firing (QF) ordnance, supporting efficient loading and firing cycles in standard layouts. Historically, UD mountings predominated as the standard for the majority of British naval guns before , particularly from the onward, as they effectively balanced the demands of operational accessibility with the protective requirements of armored ship designs. They were routinely fitted to a range of vessels, including the 4.5-inch QF guns on aircraft carriers like (1937) and light cruisers such as HMS Scylla, where their above-deck positioning allowed for straightforward installation without extensive below-deck modifications. This prevalence reflected the Royal Navy's emphasis on reliable, modular systems that could be adapted across , , and classes during the 1920s and 1930s. The design implications of UD mountings included a relatively higher profile for the armament, which could elevate the guns' exposure to enemy fire compared to more concealed alternatives, yet this was offset by enhanced maintenance practicality, as all critical rotating components remained fully accessible to crews on the open deck without needing to navigate internal bulkheads or compartments. For instance, the Mark III UD mounting for 4.5-inch guns weighed approximately 29.7 tons, lighter than comparable between-decks variants, further aiding and ease of servicing. In scenarios requiring reduced , between decks (BD) mountings provided a lower-profile option by partially submerging components below the deck.

Between Decks (BD)

The Between Decks (BD) mounting is a British naval design that distributes the rotating mass across multiple deck levels, with part of the extending below the upper deck while the guns themselves rotate above it. This configuration supports the weight of the guns and mounting between the upper and lower decks, effectively sinking the base of the turret to reduce its above-deck profile. Unlike traditional upper deck (UD) mountings that position the entire atop a single deck, the BD approach integrates the turret into the ship's vertical for more efficient space utilization. Developed as an innovation in the , BD mountings were first prototyped in the mid- for compact twin-gun turrets, with early applications tested on secondary batteries in battleships and cruisers. For instance, modified 4-inch QF Mark V guns were fitted into the initial BD twin prototypes around 1936, addressing the need for dual-purpose armament in vessels constrained by treaty limitations and deck space. This design gained adoption in the late , appearing on capital ships to enable lower-height installations without compromising firepower. The primary benefits of BD mountings include a lowered center of gravity, which enhances overall ship stability by countering top-heavy configurations from heavy armament. Additionally, the reduced silhouette minimizes the target's visibility and vulnerability, allowing for more effective armor allocation over a smaller area above the waterline and avoiding the structural complications of superfiring turrets. These advantages proved particularly valuable in maintaining balance and protection during high-speed maneuvers in World War II-era warships.

Elevation Types

High Angle (HA)

High Angle (HA) mountings in British naval ordnance refer to gun configurations designed specifically for anti-aircraft (AA) fire, enabling elevations exceeding 50 degrees to engage aerial targets effectively. These mountings were equivalent to dedicated AA setups, distinguishing them from low-angle (LA) configurations limited to surface engagements below 45 degrees. The historical role of HA mountings became critical during , as the Royal Navy responded to emerging aircraft threats by adapting quick-firing guns for high-elevation fire, such as the QF 3-inch 20 cwt introduced in 1913. Their importance peaked in , when intensified air attacks on naval forces necessitated widespread deployment of HA-equipped guns on warships to provide defensive barrages against bombers and dive-bombers. In design, HA mountings were reinforced to handle the stresses of vertical during high-elevation shots, incorporating robust recoil cylinders and counter- mechanisms to absorb and return the gun to position swiftly. They also featured enhanced training capabilities, with powered systems allowing faster traverse speeds—approximately 10 degrees per second in later models—to track agile aircraft targets.

Low Angle (LA)

Low Angle (LA) mountings in British naval ordnance were designed specifically for surface target engagements, restricting maximum to under 50 degrees to optimize trajectories for anti-ship and shore bombardment roles. This limitation ensured stable firing against horizontal threats like enemy vessels or coastal installations, prioritizing range and accuracy in flat trajectories over vertical capabilities. Prior to , British naval guns predominantly emphasized surface warfare, establishing LA mountings as the historical default configuration, especially for Central Pivot (CP) mountings on destroyers and cruisers. These designs reflected the Royal Navy's strategic focus on decisive fleet battles and amphibious operations, where aerial threats were secondary concerns until the . The primary limitation of LA mountings was their unsuitability for air defense, as the low elevation angle made them ineffective against without extensive modifications to enhance vertical range.

High Angle/Low Angle (HA/LA)

High Angle/Low Angle (HA/LA) mountings in British naval ordnance refer to configurations designed to engage both aerial and surface targets, combining the capabilities of high-angle (HA) anti-aircraft fire with the stability required for low-angle (LA) surface engagements. These mountings typically allow exceeding 50 degrees—often up to 80 degrees—while incorporating adjustable stops and safety mechanisms to facilitate seamless transitions between roles, such as training limit stops and elevating gear with friction plates for precise control. This adaptability was achieved through designs like the HA/LA Mark XIX twin mounting, which supported both HA and LA firing via shared cradles and sights optimized for dual use. A prominent historical example is the QF 4-inch Mk XVI naval gun, fitted on HA/LA twin mountings that became a standard armament for destroyers and other vessels during , with elevations ranging from -10 degrees to +80 degrees to counter multi-threat scenarios. Introduced in , these mountings were widely deployed on ships including Tribal-class destroyers and County-class cruisers, reflecting the Royal Navy's shift toward versatile weaponry amid evolving aerial threats. The design's reliance on adjustable mechanisms, such as safety firing gear preventing inadvertent discharges in intermediate angles, ensured operational reliability across both HA and LA configurations. The primary advantages of HA/LA mountings lay in their versatility within multi-threat environments, allowing a single battery to address , surface vessels, and boats without dedicated specialist equipment, thereby optimizing space and crew efficiency on warships. Post-World War I, as advanced, these dual-purpose systems gained prominence in the late , with refits like those on in 1937 exemplifying their integration into fleet operations to enhance overall defensive capabilities. This approach minimized the proliferation of single-role guns, proving particularly effective in the resource-constrained .

Fire Control Systems

Director Control Tower (DCT)

The Director Control Tower (DCT) served as the primary elevated fire control station in British warships, functioning as a rotating turret-top enclosure that housed essential equipment for and gunnery direction. This structure typically included coincidence rangefinders—such as 9-foot or 15-foot models—for measuring target range, optical sights for aligning on enemy vessels, and analog computers like the Dreyer Fire Control Table (e.g., Mark III or IV) to process data on range, bearing, and ballistic corrections. Positioned high above the deck for an unobstructed vantage point, the DCT enabled gunnery officers to select priority targets amid battle conditions and compute precise firing solutions, including elevation and training angles, before relaying them to the ship's armament. In operation, the DCT integrated with the ship's transmitting station (T.S.) through systems, using synchronous transmissions for line-of-sight and step-by-step mechanisms for director settings and cross-levelling to ensure accurate propagation. Crewed by officers including a control and rate specialist, the tower coordinated remote , allowing directors to transmit computed elevations and bearings directly to turrets, thereby centralizing fire direction and reducing local spotting errors. This setup provided a critical elevated perspective, mitigating hull obstructions and enhancing visibility for long-range engagements up to 20,000 yards or more, depending on accuracy and environmental factors. Historically, the DCT played a pivotal role in naval warfare, particularly during the on 31 May 1916, where it facilitated director-controlled firing amid chaotic visibility. British battleships like HMS Lion and HMS Barham relied on DCT-linked Dreyer Tables to generate firing data, contributing to effective salvos in the "Run to the South" phase, though outcomes varied due to rangefinder limitations in poor weather—, for instance, achieved initial ranges comparable to the German SMS . Evolving from early 20th-century designs, the DCT's wired integration with transmitting stations marked a foundational advancement in centralized fire control, influencing subsequent systems through the .

Remote Power Control (RPC)

Remote Power Control (RPC) refers to an automated electrical system employed in British naval ordnance during to direct the aiming of gun turrets and mountings remotely from fire control stations, such as the Director Control Tower (DCT). It operates by transmitting electrical signals from the DCT or transmitting stations to hydraulic servomotors in the turrets, which then power the guns for precise adjustments in and , eliminating the need for local manual following of pointer dials. RPC was introduced as a wartime advancement primarily in the late stages of , particularly with upgrades to systems like the Mark IV, to enable faster response times and greater accuracy against dynamic targets compared to earlier manual or pointer-based methods. This automation allowed guns to track directors automatically, compensating for ship motion and target maneuvers, with local hand controls serving as a backup in the event of electrical or hydraulic failure. The system's core components include servomotors that drive the and mechanisms of the guns and turrets, integrated with gyroscopic elements such as the Gyro Rate Unit () and Gyro Rate Unit Boxes (GRUB) to process rangefinding data from directors or , calculating target rates of change for stabilized aiming. These gyros ensured reliable performance by stabilizing against vessel roll, yaw, and pitch, facilitating seamless integration with broader fire control networks for both surface and anti-aircraft roles.

Table

In British naval ordnance terminology, the "Table" designates analog mechanical fire control tables, such as the Dreyer Fire Control Table, employed as computational devices for ballistic calculations in gunnery operations. Developed by Captain Frederic C. Dreyer around 1910, these tables integrated plotting mechanisms to determine range, bearing, and deflection for targeting enemy vessels, serving as the Royal Navy's primary fire control instrument during . Historically, the Dreyer Table saw widespread adoption in British capital ships by 1912, playing a pivotal role at battles like in 1916, where it facilitated the solving of firing solutions either manually or semi-automatically by plotting enemy position data over time. Refinements during the war, including mechanisms for compensating for ship maneuvers and wind effects, enhanced its accuracy, with variants like the Mark III installed on dreadnoughts such as and . The system remained in use into the , evolving into the by the 1920s, though its core analog principles originated in the WWI era. Operationally, the Table functioned as an electromechanical operated by a of 5 to 12 personnel in the ship's transmitting station, receiving inputs from spotters, , and the Director Control Tower to generate orders. Key inputs included ranges in yards, enemy bearings in degrees, own ship's course and speed in knots, and spotting relayed verbally; these were plotted on paper scrolls advancing at rates like 2 or 4/3 inches per minute to derive range rates (yards per minute) and bearing rates. The range plot used a for discrete data points and pencil for hypotheses, while the bearing plot employed a grid for rate estimation; deflection was computed via dedicated drums and a totalizer, adjusting for factors like drift. Outputs comprised range in yards and deflection in knots (left or right), transmitted mechanically to the director sight and turrets to align and for accurate salvo fire.

Propellant and Charges

Cartridge

In British naval ordnance, a cartridge serves as the container for the propellant charge used to fire the shell or projectile from a gun. For breech-loading (BL) guns, cartridges typically consist of silk or cloth bags filled with propellant, allowing for flexible loading in separate rounds where the shell is inserted first, followed by one or more bags. This design facilitated rapid handling in large-caliber weapons, as the bags could be easily maneuvered by the gun crew. In contrast, quick-firing (QF) guns employed metallic brass cases for cartridges, which integrated the propellant and provided a self-sealing mechanism at the breech during firing, enabling faster reloading rates essential for anti-torpedo boat defense. Historically, prior to the , British cartridges for naval guns used packed in bags, but this shifted with the adoption of , a smokeless invented in 1889 and introduced into service around 1893 for various calibers. , composed of and , offered superior performance in terms of velocity and reduced , revolutionizing design. For heavy BL guns, such as the 15-inch Mark I, the full charge was often divided into multiple quarter-charges—typically four silk bags each containing 108 pounds of SC—allowing crews to adjust quantity for range or barrel preservation while maintaining safety during loading. Loading procedures emphasized safety and efficiency: in BL guns, the cartridge bags were inserted after the shell with the igniter end facing the breech, ensuring complete combustion upon ignition. This separate-loading system contrasted with QF cartridges, where the brass case was loaded as a unit, either fixed with the projectile or separately, directly behind the shell in semi-fixed ammunition. The charge within a cartridge represented the propellant quantity needed for propulsion, varying by gun type and desired muzzle velocity.

Cartridge Case

In British ordnance, the cartridge case refers to the cylinder that forms the rear portion of a fixed Quick Firing (QF) round, containing the charge and enabling efficient loading and firing. Constructed from ductile (typically 70% and 30% ) for its tensile strength and resistance to cracking under pressure, the case expands radially upon ignition to provide , sealing the breech and preventing gas escape while containing the primer at its base. This design distinguishes it from the broader cartridge assembly, which includes the in fixed QF . The cartridge case's reusability was a key economic feature, particularly for like the 18-pounder gun during , where spent cases were collected, cleaned, and reformed through resizing processes involving annealing to restore after cold-working from expansion. A new case, costing approximately 7 shillings, could be reformed up to four times, allowing reuse for multiple firings (typically up to five total uses) before deformation or thinning rendered it unsafe, though this was often impractical in active combat due to the need for specialized equipment. Smaller cases, such as those for 3-inch mountain guns, demonstrated greater longevity, enduring 40–50 firings with proper maintenance. Historical durability of these cases was limited by repeated mechanical stresses and thermal exposure during firing, which caused gradual weakening through work-hardening and potential microcracks in the metal. Post-firing inspection involved visual and for defects like splits or excessive thinning, with annealing at 570–740°C applied during reforming to mitigate and ensure structural integrity for subsequent loads. In naval applications, such as those detailed in gunnery manuals, cases similarly protected propellant during storage and provided breech sealing but were more often treated as expendable in high-rate fire scenarios. The fixed nature of QF rounds, with the cartridge case integral to the complete ammunition unit, facilitated rapid extraction via the gun's breech mechanism, allowing sustained fire rates essential for anti-personnel and light anti-armor roles. This contrasts with bag charges in breech-loading (BL) guns, emphasizing the case's role in enabling the "quick" aspect of QF ordnance.

Charge

In British ordnance, a charge refers to the precisely measured quantity of loaded into a to propel the , with variations including full service charges for standard operational firing, reduced charges for shorter ranges or lower trajectories, and proof charges that generate approximately 25% higher chamber than full service loads solely for testing integrity before acceptance. These charges were tailored to specific firing scenarios, balancing range, , and barrel preservation. For breech-loading (BL) guns, propellant was typically packaged in silk or cotton bags, which were manually loaded into the chamber along with a separate tube primer for ignition, allowing flexibility in charge composition but requiring careful handling to avoid residue buildup. Howitzers, by contrast, often employed removable ring or sectional charges—cylindrical assemblies of propellant wrapped around a central core—that could be partially removed to create reduced loads, facilitating quick adjustments for high-angle fire at varying distances. This modular approach contrasted with quick-firing (QF) guns, which integrated charges into metal cartridge cases. During , the QF 25-pounder gun-howitzer exemplified variable charge systems, using cloth bags of in a cartridge case: Charge 1 (white bag for short range), Charge 2 (white plus red bag for medium range), and Charge 3 (white, red, and blue bags for maximum range of about 12,250 yards with a 25-pound shell). Later modifications introduced a Super charge in 1943 for enhanced anti-tank performance, increasing velocity, and additional increments that expanded options to seven charges by , with bags adjusted or removed based on required range and shell type such as high-explosive or armor-piercing. In larger naval guns, such as the 16-inch Mark I, the full service charge consisted of approximately 495 pounds (224.5 kg) of SC280 divided into six silk bags for sequential loading, enabling high-velocity fire of 2,000-pound armor-piercing shells at ranges up to 35,000 yards while minimizing flash and wear. The selection of charge strength directly influenced barrel erosion, often quantified in terms of Effective Full Charges (EFC) to predict .

Effective Full Charge (EFC)

The Effective Full Charge (EFC) is a metric used in British naval ordnance to quantify the cumulative wear on a gun barrel caused by firing, expressed as the equivalent number of full-service charge rounds that would produce the same level of erosion. It serves as a standardized measure of a barrel's remaining accuracy life, where one EFC corresponds to the wear inflicted by a single round using the maximum propellant charge at normal elevation, typically with an armor-piercing shell. This system allows gunnery officers to track barrel degradation empirically, ensuring weapons maintain sufficient precision for combat effectiveness. In historical applications within the Royal Navy, EFC values were monitored to predict barrel lifespan and schedule maintenance or replacements, preventing accuracy loss due to liner erosion. For instance, during , the 15-inch Mark I guns on battleships like were rated for approximately 335 EFCs before requiring relining, with super charges counting as two EFCs due to their intensified wear. Similarly, high-explosive shells were restricted to 250 EFCs to mitigate excessive longitudinal stress on the barrel. Barrels approaching their EFC limit—such as those with fewer than 20 EFCs remaining in 1939—were prioritized for overhaul to avoid operational risks. EFC calculations are derived from empirical testing of charge power, , and their erosive effects on the liner, particularly in the area just forward of the start. Reduced charges or practice rounds are assigned fractional EFC values (e.g., 0.5 for half-charge firings) based on observed rates, while proof or overload charges receive multipliers exceeding 1.0. This approach accounts for variations in types without direct of barrel dimensions, focusing on the , mechanical, and chemical from gases.

Gunpowder

Gunpowder, also known as black powder, served as the primary propellant in British ordnance from the early days of artillery until the late 19th century, when it was gradually superseded by smokeless alternatives like cordite starting in 1892. It consisted of a mixture of approximately 75% potassium nitrate (saltpeter), 15% charcoal, and 10% sulfur by weight, which provided a relatively slow-burning rate suitable for large charges in early guns. This composition enabled consistent ignition and propulsion but produced significant smoke and residue, limiting its efficiency in prolonged engagements. British military variants of included E.X.E. (Extra Experimental), a blend of two-thirds brown prismatic powder and one-third black powder developed in the 1880s for transitional use in guns like the BL 6-inch Mk II–VI; L.G. (Large Grain), employed in smooth-bore ordnance, field guns, and smaller rifled pieces for its reliable ; and P (), a cube-shaped form designed to minimize surface area and further slow the , reducing barrel strain in heavy . https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/1871-06-02/debates/0ac988e0-4391-41fd-882e-37cb2937e2fe/Army%25E2%2580%2594SupplyOfPowder) These adaptations addressed the demands of evolving rifled and breech-loading systems but proved inadequate for high-velocity firearms due to excessive and pressure buildup. As a burster, filled common shells until the late , when high explosives like lyddite began to replace it in armor-piercing and common pointed projectiles, though it persisted in some applications into the early . During , it remained in use as the burster charge in shrapnel shells for field guns such as the 18-pounder, where a small quantity ruptured the casing to disperse lead bullets forward via the shell's , proving effective against exposed but ineffective against entrenched positions or wire. By then, its role as a had fully transitioned to , which offered higher velocities and cleaner for modern guns. Variants like Slow Burning Cocoa (S.B.C.) represented specialized adaptations for larger calibers, but standard gunpowder's slow burn characteristics made it ideal for the era's large, low-pressure charges.

Slow Burning Cocoa (S.B.C.)

Slow Burning Cocoa (S.B.C.), also known as cocoa powder, was a specialized variant of brown powder developed as a for large-caliber British naval s in the late . It was designed to burn more gradually than traditional black , thereby reducing initial pressure spikes in the barrel and enabling higher muzzle velocities with longer gun lengths. This slow-burning characteristic made it suitable for heavy , where rapid pressure buildup could otherwise damage the weapon or limit performance. The composition of S.B.C. consisted of approximately 79% saltpetre (), 18% —typically derived from steam-carbonized —and 3% sulphur, resulting in a denser formulation than standard . The reduced sulphur content and specialized production contributed to its slower combustion rate, with grains pressed into prismatic shapes featuring a central hole to promote even gas generation. The name "cocoa" derived from its brownish color, resembling cocoa, rather than any actual cocoa-based ingredients. In British naval service, S.B.C. was employed in massive charges for the largest guns of the era, such as the 960-pound (435 kg) load in the BL 16.25-inch (41.2 cm) Mark I guns mounted on battleships like HMS Benbow and HMS Victoria from 1888 onward. These charges produced muzzle velocities around 2,087 feet per second (636 m/s) at working pressures of 17 tons per square inch (2,680 kg/cm²), though barrel life was limited to about 104 rounds due to the powder's characteristics. It served as a transitional in the pre-cordite period, addressing the demands of escalating naval arms races by supporting guns up to 16.25 inches in caliber. Despite its utility, S.B.C. had significant drawbacks, including high smoke production—only about 35-40% of the powder fully converted to gas—leading to inefficiencies and visibility issues in combat. By the early , it was phased out in favor of smokeless alternatives like , which offered superior performance and reduced . Its use in such enormous quantities highlighted the challenges of the era's black powder derivatives.

Shell and Projectile Types

Common Shell

The common shell was a foundational type of explosive artillery projectile in 19th-century British ordnance, consisting of a hollow cast-iron body designed to contain a bursting charge of gunpowder. This spherical or cylindrical projectile, typically with walls about one-sixth of its diameter in thickness and weighing roughly two-thirds that of a comparable solid shot, featured a fuze hole at the nose for inserting a time or percussion fuze, such as the Moorsom or early Boxer variants, to ignite the charge upon impact or after a set delay. The gunpowder filling, often in the form of a P mixture or fine-grained powder, provided a low-order explosive effect primarily through fragmentation and blast, distinguishing it from later high-explosive designs. Employed across field, , and from guns, howitzers, and early rifled pieces like the Armstrong guns introduced in 1860, the common shell served general bombardment roles against unarmored targets. Its primary purposes included anti-personnel effects against troops in the open and destruction of light fortifications, earthworks, or wooden structures, where the relatively modest explosive power—yielding a wide scatter of iron fragments—proved effective for area denial without the need for armor penetration. Fired at low angles from guns or higher trajectories from howitzers and mortars, it relied on sabots for stabilization in smoothbores and later driving bands for rifled ordnance, with historical records noting its use in conflicts from the onward. In British service, common shells were typically painted matte black to reduce visibility and , often accented with red bands near the nose to indicate the position and explosive nature during handling and storage. This marking scheme aided quick identification in depots and batteries. By the late 1890s, however, the design began transitioning away from fillings, with lyddite () adopted in 1896 for enhanced bursting power, marking the obsolescence of the traditional common shell in favor of high-explosive successors while retaining cast-iron variants for practice into the early .

Common Pointed (CP)

The Common Pointed (CP) shell represented an evolution in British naval ordnance, designed as a general-purpose with a solid pointed nose to improve aerodynamic efficiency and extend over the blunt-nosed predecessor, the Common Shell. Constructed from forged or cast unhardened steel, these shells featured a cylindrical body approximately 3.5 calibres in length for medium sizes, with an ogival head of two-diameter radius and a gun-metal bush at the truncated nose in some patterns; a positioned near the base ensured engagement and stability in flight. Unlike armor-piercing variants, CP shells prioritized burst effect against surface targets, employing thinner walls to accommodate larger explosive charges while forgoing hardened components for deep penetration. Equipped with base fuzes such as the percussion No. 11 Mark IV or Hotchkiss Mark IV, screwed in with left-handed threads for secure retention, CP shells detonated upon impact to maximize fragmentation and blast against unarmored ships and light structures. Early fillings consisted of gunpowder derivatives like P mixture or fine-grain (F.G.) shell powder, often contained in brass or copper liners or burster bags of dowlas or shalloon fabric; by 1908, these transitioned to early lyddite (picric acid-based) for enhanced explosive power in Common-type shells, though gunpowder remained common in pre-World War I stocks. In naval service, CP shells were painted matte black overall, accented with white bands to indicate steel construction and red bands for explosive filling, facilitating identification during handling and storage. Introduced in the 1890s for breech-loading (B.L.) and quick-firing (Q.F.) guns ranging from 1-pounder to 9.2-inch calibers, CP shells saw primary use through the 1910s in engagements, filling roles in both coastal defense and fleet actions where superior ballistics were needed without specialized anti-armor capability. By the , remaining stocks served heavy guns like 8-inch and above, filled with shellite and base-fuzed for general bombardment. These were largely phased out by , superseded by capped variants like Common Pointed Capped (C.P.C.) and Semi-Armour-Piercing (S.A.P.) shells offering refined penetration and fillings such as TNT or for modern threats.

Steel Shell

The shell represents a forged adaptation of the common pointed , specifically developed for light naval quick-firing guns such as the 3-pounder Hotchkiss or Nordenfelt models. These shells were engineered for use in fixed systems, featuring a robust to handle the elevated chamber pressures and rapid firing rates typical of quick-firing ordnance introduced in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Unlike earlier cast-iron variants used in muzzle-loading guns, the shell's provided superior tensile strength, enabling sustained performance in anti-torpedo roles without risk of deformation or failure during high-velocity discharge. Internally, the steel shell was filled with a bursting charge, typically around 2 oz (approximately 875 s) of fine (F.G.) for the 3-pounder , contained to maximize effect upon detonation. It employed a base percussion fuze, such as the Hotchkiss Mark IV with a left-handed , positioned at the rear to delay ignition until after impact, thereby enhancing penetration against lightly protected like wooden hulls or superstructures. This configuration distinguished it from nose-fuzed designs, prioritizing controlled bursting over immediate fragmentation. The overall design emphasized reliability in naval service, with the shell body often marked as Mark VIII|C for cordite-compatible quick-firing applications. Painting conventions for steel shells followed standard British naval practices to aid identification and handling, with the body typically finished in black and accented by a white ring near the point; a red ring was added if the shell was filled to indicate its live status. These projectiles were primarily allocated to anti-personnel duties, targeting exposed crews on small rather than armored warships, reflecting their in defensive batteries on larger vessels. Their limited yield and made them unsuitable for heavy armor penetration, confining applications to close-range engagements in fleet actions.

Segment Shell

The segment shell is an early type of anti-personnel employed in British ordnance, featuring pre-formed iron segments arranged around a central bursting charge to maximize fragmentation upon detonation. The shell's construction typically involved cast-iron segments, often semicircular in shape, packed within a thin outer casing, with the segments held in place around the powder core until the explosion scattered them as lethal projectiles. This design provided greater solidity for flight and impact compared to purely explosive shells, while the pre-fragmented elements enhanced its effectiveness against exposed troops over a wide area. Invented by Sir William Armstrong in 1859 as part of his innovative rifled breech-loading gun system, the segment shell was developed to address the limitations of contemporary ammunition in delivering both penetration and dispersal effects. It was initially deployed with Armstrong's rifled breech-loading field guns, such as the 12-pounder 8 cwt model, where it served as a key anti-personnel round alongside common shells for explosive effects. The shell's purpose was to increase lethality against infantry formations by producing controlled fragmentation, making it particularly suitable for field artillery roles in the mid-to-late 19th century. These projectiles remained in British service through the latter half of the 19th century, seeing use in conflicts like the Crimean War aftermath and colonial campaigns, but were gradually superseded by more advanced shrapnel shells by the early 20th century due to improvements in bullet-based fragmentation and fuzing reliability. Early examples were breech-loaded in Armstrong guns, though later variants adapted to rifled muzzle-loading artillery, reflecting shifts in British gun design.

Ring Shell

The ring shell was a specialized artillery projectile developed for British rifled muzzle-loading (RML) guns in the late 19th century, characterized by its incorporation of rings either externally for rifling engagement or internally for enhanced fragmentation. External rings, often in the form of studs or gas-check attachments, were fitted to seal the bore and prevent gas escape during firing, thereby improving obturation in early RML designs. Internally, the shell featured a core of cast iron rings cast around a central burster tube, arranged to avoid aligned breaking joints and ensure the projectile shattered into multiple segments upon detonation for superior dispersal. Introduced around 1891 as a replacement for earlier segment shells, the ring shell was primarily used with smaller-caliber RML , such as the 2.5-inch , where it provided both rotational stability via gas-check engagement and fragmentation effects against personnel or light cover. These shells were typically painted on the tip for identification and could be filled with black or, later, lyddite for increased effect, though their emphasized structural breakup over high-explosive yield. Limited historical records exist due to the type's short service life and overlap with transitioning technologies, but it saw use in colonial campaigns, including mountain operations. The ring shell's functions centered on enhanced obturation through gas-check rings, which minimized gas leakage and improved velocity, and optimized fragmentation patterns by breaking into 6 or more pieces rather than relying on explosive force alone. However, as breech-loading guns and driving bands became standard in the early , the need for integral gas-check rings diminished, leading to the ring shell's obsolescence in Imperial service by 1920, after which it persisted only in limited Indian applications.

Common Lyddite

Common lyddite shells represented an early advancement in British high-explosive ordnance, designated beginning in 1896 as the first generation of modern high-explosive projectiles filled with , known as lyddite, which replaced the less powerful bursting charges previously used in common shells. These shells were equipped with nose-mounted percussion fuzes for impact and were externally painted , featuring a red ring painted behind the nose to denote that the shell had been filled with explosive. The lyddite filling delivered approximately 2-3 times the explosive yield of , offering greater blast effect and fragmentation suitable for anti-personnel and unarmored targets, and it was commonly employed in common pointed shell designs for improved aerodynamics and range. Lyddite itself was essentially pure (trinitrophenol), melted and cast into the shell body. Despite these advantages, common lyddite shells faced significant historical challenges, including unreliable fuze performance that sometimes resulted in duds or premature bursts, as well as inherent sensitivity risks from picric acid's tendency to react with steel casings and form unstable metal crystals, heightening the danger of accidental during handling or firing. These issues prompted their gradual replacement after with trinitrotoluene (TNT), a more stable and reliable high .

High Explosive (HE)

High Explosive (HE) shells in British ordnance represent a class of projectiles optimized for delivering intense blast and fragmentation effects to neutralize enemy personnel, soft targets, and lightly fortified positions such as bunkers. These shells evolved significantly after , shifting from earlier lyddite-based designs to more reliable and economical fillings that prioritized safety during handling and storage. By the and into , HE shells became the standard non-penetrating explosive munition, emphasizing destructive radius over armor defeat. The primary explosive fillings for post-World War I British HE shells included trinitrotoluene (TNT), introduced as a stable alternative to lyddite, and —a mixture of 60% and 40% TNT during for cost efficiency through synthetic production. Late in , from 1944 onward, compositions incorporating research department explosive () mixed with TNT (60/40) were adopted, offering approximately 20% greater lethality than pure TNT due to enhanced and fragmentation. This transition rendered lyddite obsolete, as its high sensitivity to shock (rated at 100 on standard scales) posed risks of premature , whereas TNT and were both cheaper to manufacture and safer for large-scale production and deployment. Common lyddite shells served as the direct predecessor to these modern HE types during . Identification markings on HE shells varied by era: in , they were typically painted yellow ochre to denote high-explosive content, often with additional stamped or painted rings indicating filling type or batch. During , the standard color shifted to olive green for the body, accented by a yellow band to signify HE, supplemented by red bands or crosses for filled status and sometimes rings for specific variants like tropical loading. Fuzing for HE shells focused on versatility for different engagement scenarios, with nose-mounted fuzes predominant for direct impact or airburst to maximize casualty against troops. Common nose fuzes included percussion types like the No. 117 for immediate impact burst and time fuzes such as the No. 213 for controlled airburst, while base fuzes (e.g., No. 16) were used in select designs for ground impact or delay actions against bunkers. Proximity (VT) fuzes, introduced in 1944, further enhanced airburst effectiveness by detecting targets electronically without precise timing.

Semi-Armour-Piercing (S.A.P.)

Semi-Armour-Piercing (S.A.P.) shells were a type of naval adopted by the after as a standard round for engaging lightly armored surface vessels, such as destroyers, where full armor-piercing was unnecessary but some penetration capability was required to reach vital areas before detonation. These shells featured a solid, streamlined design to facilitate piercing thin plating, typically 1 to 2 inches thick, while incorporating an explosive filling to produce a substantial burst radius upon functioning, thereby enhancing damage against ships with minimal protection. This balanced approach made S.A.P. shells particularly suitable for and main armaments, addressing the post-war emphasis on versatile against faster, less heavily armored opponents. The explosive filling in S.A.P. shells consisted primarily of TNT, often alloyed with 7% to improve the material's flow during casting and reduce sensitivity, ensuring reliable performance in naval gun barrels. A nose initiated shortly after penetration, allowing the shell to explode inside the target for maximum effect, while a base with night tracer provided visibility during low-light engagements. During , these shells proved effective against a variety of surface targets, including destroyers and auxiliary vessels, due to their ability to defeat light deck or side armor without the reduced explosive payload of full armor-piercing types. For identification, S.A.P. shells were painted olive green overall, with a red band near the signifying the presence of filling, a white band indicating the semi-armor-piercing capped (SAPC) configuration, and a green band denoting TNT as the burster. This color scheme, standardized in the , facilitated rapid sorting in magazines and hoists aboard warships. In contrast to high (HE) shells optimized for unarmored structures, S.A.P. rounds prioritized initial penetration to optimize their effect against protected but thin-skinned naval threats.

Explosive Fillings

Lyddite

Lyddite is the British military designation for molten picric acid, chemically known as trinitrophenol (C₆H₂(NO₂)₃OH), which was adopted as a high explosive filler for artillery shells in 1888. Experiments with picric acid began in 1885 at the Lydd proving ground in Kent, England, leading to its official naming as Lyddite—a term chosen partly to maintain secrecy about its composition as cast picric acid. Developed as a British counterpart to the French explosive melinite, which had been introduced in using the same base material, Lyddite was melted and poured directly into shell casings to fill common-type projectiles, providing a reliable bursting charge for early high-explosive ordnance. This casting process allowed for efficient production and integration into British systems during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Lyddite exhibited high explosive power, surpassing that of later alternatives like TNT in velocity of , but its use was limited by inherent drawbacks including upon or contact, as well as sensitivity to shock that could lead to premature . It was employed in pure form within shells through the early stages of the War, after which safer mixtures began to supplant it due to risks of forming unstable metal picrates when reacting with shell casings. In applications such as common lyddite shells, it served as the primary filling for enhanced fragmentation and blast effects against unarmored targets.

Shellite

Shellite is an explosive filling developed for British naval ordnance, consisting of 70% and 30% dinitrophenol. This mixture served as a direct improvement over pure -based fillings like lyddite, which proved overly sensitive during armor penetration. With a of approximately 83°C, shellite could be melted and poured into shell casings, facilitating safer and more efficient loading processes. Following the in 1916, where lyddite's instability caused premature detonations in armor-piercing (AP) shells, the British Navy adopted shellite as its standard burster for AP projectiles in the post-World War I era. This transition addressed critical safety concerns by reducing the explosive's sensitivity to shock, allowing shells to withstand impacts against armored targets without detonating until the functioned. Shellite retained similar explosive power to while enhancing overall reliability in naval applications. Beyond AP shells, shellite found use in various British bombs, including deep-water types, due to its castability and stability under high-pressure conditions. Its advantages in pourability and impact resistance made it particularly suitable for ordnance requiring precise filling and robust performance, though it was eventually phased out in favor of less sensitive alternatives like TNT-based mixtures by the mid-20th century.

Gun Components and Mechanisms

Recuperator

In British ordnance, the recuperator is the component of the recoil mechanism responsible for returning the gun barrel to its firing position, or battery, after the recoil impulse from discharge. It works in conjunction with a buffer to absorb the kinetic energy generated by firing, ensuring the ordnance does not permanently shift and allowing for rapid follow-up shots without manual repositioning by the crew. This dual action—energy absorption followed by controlled restoration—maintains alignment and stability, critical for accurate sustained fire. The became historically essential with the adoption of quick-firing (QF) guns in the late , as these weapons demanded high rates of fire that fixed-pivot designs could not support due to excessive from repositioning after each shot. Prior to mechanisms, British field artillery relied on rigid mounts, limiting firing rates to a few rounds per minute; the introduction of recuperators enabled QF capabilities, transforming tactical mobility and firepower, particularly during the Boer War and . Early recuperators in British guns employed mechanical springs to store and release energy, but these proved inadequate for heavier ordnance and variable forces. Post-1900, designs evolved to hydraulic or pneumatic systems, influenced by French innovations using glycerine and , with British variants adopting oil-based hydro-pneumatic recuperators for superior and reliability. These fluid-based mechanisms, often charged to 600-800 pounds per , absorbed energy through fluid displacement while using compressed gas for return, subtypes including hydro-spring and hydro-pneumatic variants further refined this for specific applications.

Hydro-spring Recuperator

The hydro-spring recuperator is an early recoil recovery system in British ordnance, integrating mechanical springs with hydraulic elements to manage the energy from gun discharge and restore the barrel to its firing position. This configuration typically features a hydraulic buffer cylinder that absorbs by forcing oil through restricted orifices to dampen motion, while parallel helical springs compress to store energy during the recoil stroke. Upon completion of , the springs expand to counter the force and return the gun to battery, with the hydraulic component providing additional control to prevent excessive . The system was valued for its relative simplicity in construction and maintenance compared to more advanced pneumatic designs. In operation, the recoil length in hydro-spring equipped guns was often around 41 inches, allowing the carriage to remain stable for rapid follow-up shots without significant repositioning. This made it particularly suitable for lighter , where the mechanical springs could efficiently handle moderate forces without requiring complex sealing for gases. However, the design had inherent limitations for heavier calibers or high-velocity rounds, as the springs could fatigue under repeated heavy impacts, leading to reduced reliability over prolonged use. Historically, the hydro-spring recuperator saw prominent use in pre-World War I British field guns, such as the Ordnance QF 18-pounder introduced in 1906, which served as the standard divisional artillery piece for the during the war. The 18-pounder employed this system to achieve a maximum of up to 20 rounds per minute, contributing to its effectiveness in mobile operations despite the need for manual relaying after each shot due to residual movement. Similar applications appeared in other quick-firing guns like the , where the springs were prominently mounted beneath the barrel for accessibility. By the , it was largely supplanted by hydro-pneumatic variants for improved performance in heavier ordnance.

Hydro-pneumatic Recuperator

The hydro-pneumatic is a recoil recovery mechanism employed in British and naval guns, utilizing hydraulic cylinders filled with oil and a chamber of to absorb and counteract the forces generated during firing. In operation, the drives a floating within the cylinder, forcing oil to compress the air at pressures typically ranging from 600 to 800 pounds per , which then provides a controlled return of the to its firing position, or "battery." This design ensures smoother and more consistent performance than earlier mechanical systems, minimizing wear and allowing for rapid follow-up shots. British adoption of the hydro-pneumatic recuperator began in the later stages of , following French innovations, with initial implementations in heavy field pieces such as the 6-inch and the BL 60-pounder gun's Mark II variant, as well as naval armaments including the BL 12-inch Mark X. By the war's end, it had become standard for managing in larger-caliber weapons, enabling more stable platforms for naval and siege artillery. During , the system was further refined for high-angle (HA) guns, such as the QF 3.7-inch anti-aircraft gun, which featured a hydropneumatic setup with a constant 32-inch stroke on mobile mountings, enhancing accuracy against aerial targets. Key advantages of the hydro-pneumatic recuperator include its capacity to handle greater forces in heavy ordnance, such as those from 4.5-inch and 5.5-inch medium guns, while offering adjustability for varying charges through air , which supported multi-charge firing modes essential for versatile battlefield and naval applications. This adaptability reduced the need for manual adjustments and improved reliability in demanding conditions, contrasting with the hydro-spring recuperator's spring-dependent recovery used in earlier designs.

Tube

In British ordnance, the tube, commonly designated as the A-tube, serves as the replaceable inner liner that forms the bore of a in multi-part construction designs. This component directly interfaces with the and gases during firing, making it the primary element exposed to erosive wear from high temperatures and pressures. Constructed from forged , the A-tube is engineered for but inevitably degrades over time due to the mechanical and thermal stresses of repeated shots. Historically, in built-up guns developed from the late onward, the A-tube was distinguished as the innermost layer, separate from outer structural elements like jackets, allowing for targeted maintenance in naval and . Early designs faced challenges such as "steel choke," where uneven cooling and longitudinal stresses caused the A-tube to constrict and crack near the muzzle; this was mitigated in later marks, such as the 13.5-inch/45 Mark V, through tapered fits and repositioned shoulders. The service life of the A-tube was monitored via the Effective Full Charge (EFC) system, which quantifies cumulative wear by equating partial charges to full-charge equivalents, enabling predictions of remaining rounds before replacement. When reaches critical levels—manifesting as bore narrowing, ridges, or —the A-tube is removed and replaced to restore accuracy and , thereby extending the operational lifespan of the entire assembly. Replacement involves specialized facilities, such as gun pits equipped with heating for and hydraulic jacks for extraction and insertion, a process refined in maintenance practices during the World Wars. This modularity was a key advantage in British ordnance, facilitating cost-effective refurbishment without discarding outer components.

Wire-Wound

In British ordnance terminology, wire-wound construction denotes a technique for fabricating high-pressure barrels by wrapping layers of high-tensile wire around an under tension, thereby imparting circumferential (hoop) strength to counter the explosive forces of gases. This method was particularly suited to naval guns, where A tube—serving as the rifled liner—formed the foundation upon which the wire was coiled. The manufacturing process entailed winding continuous lengths of square-sectioned wire in multiple overlapping layers, often in a tapered helical to optimize stress distribution along the barrel's length, achieving thicknesses of several inches. These wire layers were then encased by additional components, including a B tube, full-length jacket, and breech ring, secured via shrinking or threading to compress the assembly uniformly. Compared to solid forged barrels, this design offered superior resistance to bursting and fatigue cracking under repeated high-pressure firings, enabling greater muzzle energies while distributing stresses more evenly across the structure. Wire-wound guns predominated in British naval service from the through the , powering the main armaments of pre-dreadnought and dreadnought-era battleships as well as interwar vessels. Their adoption addressed vulnerabilities in earlier built-up constructions, but post-World War I metallurgical advances—such as improved forging and processes—rendered them obsolete, leading to a shift toward simpler monobloc designs by the 1930s. The final examples were the 16-inch Mark I guns of the Nelson class, completed in the late .

Vent-Sealing Tube

The vent-sealing tube served as a primer device inserted into the breech vent of British breech-loading (BL) guns to ignite the charge in bag ammunition systems. It typically consisted of a tube containing an ignition composition, available in percussion or variants, where percussion types were struck by a and types ignited via a pulled wire mechanism. The tube was secured in a chamber at the vent's end, often by a joint or lock, ensuring reliable flame transmission to the without premature escape of gases. Historically, the vent-sealing tube was essential for BL guns, which relied on separate loading of projectiles and silk-bag charges, from its introduction in 1882 until the widespread adoption of quick-firing (QF) guns around 1904 that incorporated self-contained brass cartridges with integral primers. During , it remained in use for non-cartridge BL weapons, such as field and pieces like the BL 12-pounder 6 cwt gun, where manual insertion of the tube into the external lock was required before each firing. This design addressed the limitations of earlier vent systems by providing consistent ignition for bag charges in high-pressure environments. A key function of the vent-sealing tube was , achieved through the expansion of its brass body and sometimes a washer upon ignition, which sealed the vent against rearward escape of gases and maintained breech pressure integrity. By the , mechanical vent-sealing tubes became obsolete, supplanted by electric primers that offered faster and more reliable initiation without manual handling. In contrast, QF guns eliminated the need for such tubes by integrating the primer directly into the cartridge base.

Projectile Design Features

Calibre Radius Head (C.R.H.)

The Calibre Radius Head (C.R.H.), also known as caliber radius head, is a metric used in British ordnance to describe the curvature of a projectile's ogive, or nose shape, expressed as a multiple of the shell's calibre (diameter). This radius determines the arc of the circle forming the nose, with the value indicating how many times the calibre fits into the radius; for instance, a 2 C.R.H. design on a 6-inch shell yields a 12-inch radius, creating a relatively blunt curve. Simple C.R.H. designs use a single radius value, while compound or dual notations, such as 5/10 C.R.H., describe secant ogives where the first number represents the effective ballistic length multiplier and the second the actual radius multiplier, optimizing the shape for tangent and secant transitions. Historically, British artillery projectiles employed a standard 2 C.R.H. prior to the First World War, providing a basic ogival form suitable for the era's ranges and manufacturing. During and after the war, designs evolved toward higher values—typically 4 C.R.H. or greater—driven by ballistic experiments that demonstrated improved performance; for example, the 60-pounder BL gun transitioned from 2 C.R.H. shells (with a maximum range of about 10,300 yards) to 8 C.R.H. variants, extending reach to 12,300 yards. In the interwar and Second World War periods, further refinements introduced dual C.R.H. configurations, such as the 5/10 C.R.H. secant ogive on the 25-pounder gun's high-explosive shells, which became the "optimum" shape for streamlined aerodynamics while maintaining compatibility with bore fit considerations like windage. Pre-1945 markings for higher C.R.H. values used letters (e.g., A for 2-4 calibres, up to D for 8-10 calibres) to denote variations beyond the original 2 C.R.H. standard. Higher C.R.H. values enhance efficiency by producing a more pointed, streamlined nose that minimizes air resistance during flight, thereby reducing drag and enabling greater muzzle velocities and ranges without excessive use. For instance, British naval 15-inch shells progressed from 4 C.R.H. (3.05/4 C.R.H.) to 6 C.R.H. (5/10 C.R.H.) designs, increasing overall length and for superior long-range performance in both field and naval applications. This evolution prioritized aerodynamic gains over earlier blunt profiles, influencing ordnance design across high-explosive and carrier shells in British .

Gas-Check

In British rifled muzzle-loading (RML) ordnance, the gas-check refers to a disc or ring attached to the base of shells, introduced from 1878 to seal the bore against escaping gases and engage the grooves. This device, typically formed as a shallow cup with a raised rim featuring grooves matching the gun's (such as 20 grooves in examples from 6.3-inch RML howitzers), was made of alloyed with a small amount of for durability. By expanding under the pressure of firing gases, the gas-check obturated the bore, preventing leakage and reducing the gap between the shell and barrel. The historical role of the gas-check was pivotal in enabling the use of studless, elongated shells in RML guns, as it eliminated the need for protruding studs on projectiles that previously engaged the but caused excessive barrel wear and limited shell streamlining. Prior to its , contributed to gas escape, erosion, and reduced accuracy; the gas-check addressed these issues by providing a reliable seal and imparting rotational spin to the for greater stability, range, and precision during flight. This innovation marked a significant advancement in late 19th-century British design, serving as a precursor to modern driving bands by integrating and engagement into a single, expandable component.

Preponderance

In 19th-century British artillery, preponderance referred to the deliberate excess weight at the breech end of a gun, behind the trunnions, relative to the muzzle end forward of them, ensuring overall balance for operational handling. This measure, typically expressed in tons for heavy ordnance or for lighter pieces, compensated for the forward bias inherent in long-barreled designs by concentrating mass rearward. The placement of trunnions forward of the was key to achieving this, promoting stability on mountings while allowing gunners to elevate and depress the barrel with relative ease during loading and firing. The purpose of preponderance was to mitigate the challenges of muzzle heaviness, which could otherwise strain elevating mechanisms and complicate manual adjustments in field conditions. In wire-wound guns, where layers of steel wire around the added significant rearward mass, this feature enhanced control without requiring additional counterweights. For instance, the RML 17.72-inch gun (commonly known as the ) exhibited a breech preponderance of 4 tons, reflecting the scale needed for such massive coastal defense pieces to maintain equilibrium on their trunnion-mounted carriages. This principle became obsolete with the shift to trunnionless mountings in early 20th-century , where recoiled within cradles equipped with their own trunnions, and balance was managed through integrated hydraulic systems or separate counterweights rather than inherent breech weighting.

In British ordnance, refers to the clearance or difference in between the bore of a and the it fires, a feature inherent to early and muzzle-loading to facilitate loading and ramming of the shot. This gap, typically around 1/20 to 1/21 of the bore in 18th-century British (e.g., a 4-inch shot in a 4.2-inch bore for a 9-pounder), allowed for ease of operation but permitted gases to escape around the . Excessive reduced by allowing gas leakage, which diminished the propulsive force on the , and impaired accuracy by permitting the shot to tumble or bounce within the bore during travel. In historical British , such as 12-pounders with typical of about 5-6 mm (1/20 bore diameter), this could limit to approximately 1,600 yards despite velocities around 1,700 feet per second. Efforts to minimize , as advocated by artillery expert John Müller in his 1756 , involved tighter shot-to-bore ratios (e.g., 24:25) and the use of to stabilize the , thereby enhancing both and precision while reducing bore erosion. In rifled muzzle-loading (RML) guns developed from the 1860s, was significantly reduced through the introduction of gas-checks—metal discs or cups fitted behind the projectile to seal the bore against escaping gases—and later by copper s that expanded into the grooves upon firing. These innovations, first widely adopted in British heavy RML ordnance around 1878, not only minimized gas loss for higher velocities and improved accuracy but also extended gun life by curbing erosive . In modern fixed-ammunition systems, is negligible, as the projectile's provides an effective seal from the outset.

Velvril

Velvril is a specialized internal applied to shells, functioning as a paint-like to insulate the interior against sparks from and to protect against . This protective lining helps prevent premature ignition by reducing between the shell walls and any loose particles during handling or firing. Introduced as a safety measure in the early 20th century, Velvril was routinely used in common shells, such as common-pointed (C.P.) and practice variants, where it was applied prior to filling with explosive charges. It replaced earlier methods like lacquering or loam-and-cowhair coatings, offering improved smoothness and non-conductive properties to minimize risks during storage and transport. The composition of Velvril consists of an anti-static, moisture-resistant varnish primarily made from nitro-cellulose (low nitration, 7.5 parts), nitrated (10 parts), and acetone oil (60 parts), blended with pigments such as zinc oxide (2 parts), yellow ochre (3.5 parts), and red oxide of iron (0.5 parts). This formulation ensures durability and electrical insulation, safeguarding the shell's integrity against environmental factors and static discharge that could ignite the filling.

Units of Measurement

Hundredweight (cwt)

In British ordnance nomenclature, the hundredweight (cwt), abbreviated from the imperial unit, equals 112 pounds and serves as a standard measure for specifying the mass of gun barrels and complete ordnance pieces. This unit was integral to describing artillery from the 19th century onward, particularly in muzzle-loading and quick-firing (QF) guns, where the total weight was often marked on the barrel in a format combining hundredweights, quarters (each 28 pounds), and pounds for precision. For instance, a marking of "18-0-0" indicated exactly 18 hundredweight, or 2,016 pounds, reflecting the barrel's heft which influenced handling, mounting, and transport in field or naval applications. The inclusion of the hundredweight value in gun designations, such as the QF 12-pounder 18 cwt, provided a key differentiator among weapons sharing similar projectile weights but varying in construction, length, or intended use. Lighter variants, like the 12-pounder 6 cwt or 8 cwt models, were designed for mobility in landing parties or anti-torpedo boat roles, while heavier 18 cwt versions offered greater durability for shipboard mounting. This practice originated in the 19th-century British artillery standardization efforts, evolving from eras to rifled breech-loaders, ensuring clear identification in inventories and operational manuals without ambiguity in calibre or performance. As part of the broader imperial system in ordnance weighting, the complemented calibre notations like the pounder, emphasizing the gun's physical scale over projectile specifics alone. Its use persisted into the early , underscoring the Royal Artillery's emphasis on empirical, weight-based classification for logistical efficiency.

Pounder (P)

In British ordnance nomenclature, the term "pounder" designates the calibre of a based on the weight of its in pounds, with the gun's name reflecting the nominal weight of the solid shot or shell it fires. For example, a was designed to fire a 32-pound shot, corresponding to a bore of approximately 6.41 inches in designs. This system originated in the era of the , when pieces were classified by the weight of the round iron shot they propelled, a convention that standardized inventory and supply across the Royal and . The pounder designation persisted into the rifled and quick-firing eras, even as bore diameters in inches became common for some weapons, particularly breech-loading naval guns in the late . Post-World War II, it continued in use alongside metric and imperial calibre measurements; for instance, the field gun, which fired a 25-pound shell from a 3.45-inch bore, remained the standard British divisional artillery piece until 1967 and saw service in conflicts such as the and the Dhofar Rebellion. This historical continuity distinguished pounder-based names from other units like the (cwt), which measured total gun weight rather than mass. In designations, "pounder" is abbreviated as "pdr" or "pr," as seen in terms like "6 pdr" for the Ordnance QF 6-pounder anti-tank gun, which fired a 6-pound . This facilitated concise referencing in military documents and orders throughout the .

References

  1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BL8inchSAPKMkIBNTShell1943Diagram.jpg
  2. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Ammunition
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.