Hubbry Logo
InfatuationInfatuationMain
Open search
Infatuation
Community hub
Infatuation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Infatuation
Infatuation
Infatuation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

An illustrated depiction of Mahābhārata character Ulupi becoming infatuated with Arjuna

Infatuation, also known as being smitten, is the personal state of being overly driven by an uninformed or otherwise unreasonable passion, usually towards another person for whom one has developed strong romantic or sexual feelings.

Psychologist Frank D. Cox said that infatuation could be distinguished from romantic love only when looking back on a particular case of being attracted to a person but which may also evolve into a mature love.[1] Goldstein and Brandon describe infatuation as the first stage of a relationship before developing into a mature intimacy.[2] Whereas love is "a warm attachment, enthusiasm, or devotion to another person", infatuation is "a feeling of foolish or obsessively strong love for, admiration for, or interest in someone or something", a shallower "honeymoon phase" in a relationship.[3] Ian Kerner, a sex therapist, stated that infatuation usually occurred at the beginning of relationships, which is "[...] marked by a sense of excitement and euphoria, and it's often accompanied by lust and a feeling of newness and rapid expansion with a person".[3]

The psychologist Adam Phillips has described how illusions that occurred during infatuation inevitably resulted in disappointment when learning the truth about a lover.[4] Adolescents often make people an object of extravagant, short-lived passion or temporary love.[5]

Youth

[edit]

"It is customary to view young people's dating relationships and first relationships as puppy love or infatuation";[6] and if infatuation is both an early stage in a deepening sequence of love/attachment, and at the same time a potential stopping point, it is perhaps no surprise that it is a condition especially prevalent in the first, youthful explorations of the world of relationships. Thus "the first passionate adoration of a youth for a celebrated actress whom he regards as far above him, to whom he scarcely dares lift his bashful eyes"[7] may be seen as part of an "infatuation with celebrity especially perilous with the young".[8]

Admiration plays a significant part in this, as "in the case of a schoolgirl crush on a boy or on a male teacher. The girl starts off admiring the teacher ... [then] may get hung up on the teacher and follow him around".[9] Then there may be shame at being confronted with the fact that "you've got what's called a crush on him ... Think if someone was hanging around you, pestering and sighing".[10] Of course, "sex may come into this ... with an infatuated schoolgirl or schoolboy"[11] as well, producing the "stricken gaze, a compulsive movement of the throat ... an 'I'm lying down and I don't care if you walk on me, babe', expression"[12] of infatuation. Such a cocktail of emotions "may even falsify the 'erotic sense of reality': when a person in love estimates his partner's virtues he is usually not very realistic ... projection of all his ideals onto the partner's personality".[13]

It is this projection that differentiates infatuation from love, according to the spiritual teacher Meher Baba: "In infatuation, the person is a passive victim of the spell of conceived attraction for the object. In love there is an active appreciation of the intrinsic worth of the object of love."[14]

Distance from the object of infatuation—as with celebrities—can help maintain the infatuated state. A time-honoured cure for the one who "has a tendre ... infatuated" is to have "thrown them continually together ... by doing so you will cure ... [or] you will know that it is not an infatuation".[15]

The possible effects of infatuation and love relationships on the academic behaviour of adolescent students were examined in research. The outcome shows that most of the participants had distraction, stress, and poor academic performance as a result of love relationships and infatuation. Furthermore, the findings highlighted that this has a detrimental effect on learning behaviour among teenagers who are in romantic or infatuated relationships.[16]

Types

[edit]

Three types of infatuation have been identified by Brown: the first type is characterized by being "carried away, without insight or proper evaluative judgement, by blind desire"; the second, closely related, by being "compelled by a desire or craving over which the agent has no control" while "the agent's evaluation ... may well be sound although the craving or love remains unaffected by it"; and the third is that of "the agent who exhibits bad judgement and misvaluation for reasons such as ignorance or recklessness".[17]

In transference

[edit]

In psychoanalysis, a sign that the method is taking hold is "the initial infatuation to be observed at the beginning of treatment",[18] the beginning of transference. The patient, in Freud's words, "develops a special interest in the person of the doctor ... never tires in his home of praising the doctor and of extolling ever new qualities in him".[19] What occurs, "it is usually maintained ... is a sort of false love, a shadow of love", replicating in its course the infatuations of "what is called true love".[20]

However, psychoanalyst Janet Malcolm claims that it is wrong to convince the patient "that their love is an illusion ... that it's not you she loves. Freud was off base when he wrote that. It is you. Who else could it be?"[21]—thereby taking "the question of what is called true love ... further than it had ever been taken".[22]

Conversely, in countertransference, the therapist may become infatuated with his/her client: "very good-looking ... she was the most gratifying of patients. She made literary allusions and understood the ones he made ... He was dazzled by her, a little in love with her. After two years, the analysis ground down to a horrible halt".[23]

Intellectual infatuations

[edit]

Infatuations need not only involve people, but can extend to objects, activities, and ideas. "Men are always falling in love with other men ... with their war heroes and sport heroes":[24] with institutions, discourses and role models. Thus for example Jung's initial "'unconditional devotion' to Freud's theories and his 'no less unconditional veneration' of Freud's person' was seen at the time by both men as a 'quasi-religious infatuation' to ... a cult object";[25] while Freud in turn was "very attracted by Jung's personality",[26] perhaps "saw in Jung an idealized version of himself":[27] a mutual admiration society—"intellectually infatuated with one another".[28]

But there are also collective infatuations: "we are all prone to being drawn into social phantasy systems".[29] Thus, for instance, "the recent intellectual infatuation with structuralism and post-structuralism"[30] arguably lasted at least until "September 11 ended intellectual infatuation with postmodernism"[31] as a whole.

Economic bubbles thrive on collective infatuations of a different kind: "all boom-bust processes contain an element of misunderstanding or misconception",[32] whether it is the "infatuation with ... becoming the latest dot.com billionaire",[33] or the one that followed with subprime mortgages, once "Greenspan had replaced the tech bubble with a housing bubble".[34] As markets "swung virtually overnight from euphoria to fear" during the 2008 financial crisis, even the most hardened market fundamentalist had to concede that such "periodic surges of euphoria and fear are manifestations of deep-seated aspects of human nature"[35]—whether these are enacted in home-room infatuations or upon the global stage.

Literary depictions

[edit]

Shakespeare's sonnets have been described as a "Poetics for Infatuation"; as being dominated by one theme, and "that theme is infatuation, its initiation, cultivation, and history, together with its peaks of triumph and devastation"—a lengthy exploration of the condition of being "subject to the appropriate disorders that belong to our infatuation ... the condition of infatuation".[36] In Ivan Turgenev's First Love, a novella from 1860, 16-year-old Woldemar becomes rapturously infatuated with Zinaida, the beautiful daughter of a princess who lives next to his house. Even though she does spend time with him, his intense infatuation is unrequited and he sinks into depression.

See also

[edit]
Look up infatuation in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Infatuation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Infatuation is a psychological state characterized by intense, passionate feelings of attraction toward a specific , typically occurring in the early stages of romantic interest and marked by idealization, , and obsessive preoccupation. This transient phenomenon often involves heightened emotional , physical symptoms such as or increased heart rate, and a focus on the beloved's positive traits while overlooking flaws. Unlike deeper forms of attachment, infatuation is generally short-lived, lasting from weeks to months, and is driven more by novelty and fantasy than by mutual understanding or long-term commitment. Psychologically, infatuation activates regions associated with reward and , similar to , releasing neurotransmitters like and norepinephrine that contribute to its exhilarating yet unstable nature. Research indicates that it can impair cognitive control, leading to reduced to alternatives and biased of the object of , which explains phenomena like "love is blind." Studies have developed scales to measure infatuation separately from attachment, confirming it as a distinct component of romantic love that emphasizes passion over intimacy or commitment. In —a related concept—infatuation escalates into involuntary rumination and emotional dependency, potentially causing distress if unreciprocated. Distinguishing infatuation from mature is crucial, as the former often prioritizes physical and idealization, fostering irrational decisions, whereas builds on trust, , and shared values for sustained relationships. Experimental methods have even induced infatuation in lab settings to study its effects, revealing heightened and for beloved-related stimuli during this phase. While adaptive for initiating bonds, prolonged infatuation without transition to attachment may hinder emotional , underscoring its role as an evolutionary mechanism for pair formation rather than enduring partnership.

Overview and Definition

Definition

Infatuation is an intense but short-lived emotional state characterized by passionate admiration, idealization, and preoccupation with another person, object, or idea, often arising without deep knowledge of the target or mutual reciprocity. In psychological frameworks, such as Robert Sternberg's triangular theory of love, infatuation represents the passion component in isolation, encompassing physical attraction and arousal but lacking the intimacy of emotional closeness or the commitment of long-term dedication. This state frequently involves obsessive thoughts and heightened emotional arousal, driving individuals to prioritize the object of their above other concerns. The word "infatuation" originates from the Latin verb infatuare, meaning "to make foolish" or "to render insane with passion," which underscores the irrational and potentially disruptive quality of the experience. It entered the as a noun in the mid-17th century, around , initially denoting a form of enchantment or induced by overwhelming passion, evolving from earlier uses of related terms like the verb "infatuate" in the 1530s. In scope, infatuation is distinguished from more enduring emotions by its transient nature, typically lasting 6 to 18 months, though it may extend up to three years in some cases before transitioning to other relational dynamics. This brevity contrasts with sustained affections, where deeper bonds develop over time through mutual understanding and shared experiences.

Characteristics and Stages

Infatuation manifests through a range of intense emotional, cognitive, and physiological traits that distinguish it as a transient state of heightened . Individuals often experience profound , characterized by elation and a sense of invigoration upon encountering or thinking about the object of their , alongside intrusive thoughts that can disrupt concentration. These cognitive fixations stem from a mental preoccupation, where the infatuated person replays interactions and anticipates future ones, leading to emotional dependent on perceived reciprocity. Physically, infatuation triggers symptoms akin to a stress response, including accelerated , sweating, , and diminished , as the body mobilizes toward the perceived romantic pursuit. Accompanying these are tendencies toward idealization, where the object is viewed through a lens of , overlooking flaws, and impaired that can result in impulsive decisions or of other responsibilities. These traits collectively create a consuming focus, often briefly referenced in neurochemical terms as driven by surges in and norepinephrine, though detailed mechanisms are explored elsewhere. Infatuation often progresses from an initial phase of attraction and excitement, to a period of intense preoccupation and fantasies, before declining as sets in or feelings fade. This sequence reflects the natural ebb of the intense , with the entire experience commonly triggered by factors like physical or emotional proximity, shared interests, or the allure of novelty in encountering someone new. In terms of duration, infatuation generally lasts between 6 and 18 months, aligning with the lifespan of passionate romantic attraction before transitioning to more stable forms or dissipating entirely, as supported by anthropological and on relationship dynamics. Research suggests many such episodes fade within the first year due to the instability of idealized perceptions.

Psychological Aspects

In Youth and Adolescence

Infatuation is highly prevalent among , affecting more than 80% of those aged 14 and older, often manifesting as their first romantic experiences and providing an initial exploration of interpersonal attractions. research highlights that these early crushes typically emerge in early , around ages 10-14, as youth become preoccupied with romantic fantasies and curiosity about others, setting the stage for more structured relationships later. These experiences play a dual role in psychological development, enhancing emotional learning through opportunities to practice communication, , and emotional while also contributing to by allowing adolescents to explore personal attractions and . However, unreciprocated infatuation can lead to vulnerabilities, including heightened risks of anxiety and depressive symptoms, as well as in risky behaviors such as substance use or unsafe sexual activity. In this way, infatuation serves as a critical bridge from childhood platonic attachments to mature romantic bonds, teaching essential skills like setting and navigating rejection. Longitudinal studies reveal gender differences in how infatuation is experienced during , with girls more likely to report greater emotional intensity, such as rumination and internalizing distress, compared to boys who tend to exhibit more physical symptoms like increased heart rate or restlessness. These patterns underscore how infatuation influences developmental trajectories differently by gender, fostering growth in emotional awareness for girls and physical self-regulation for boys.

Types of Infatuation

Infatuation manifests in various forms depending on the object of focus and the relational , providing a framework for understanding its diverse expressions in human experience. These forms include romantic, platonic, and non-personal targets, each driven by distinct emotional and motivational dynamics. These highlight how infatuation can fuel passion, , or dedication, often serving adaptive roles in social and . Romantic infatuation involves an intense, often sexualized attraction to another person, characterized by idealization, euphoria, and a fantasy-driven longing that dominates thoughts and behaviors. This form typically emerges in early stages of romantic interest, where physical desires and emotional highs overshadow realistic assessments of the individual. For instance, celebrity crushes exemplify romantic infatuation, as individuals project idealized qualities onto distant figures, experiencing heightened excitement and preoccupation without mutual interaction. Surveys in relationship psychology indicate that romantic infatuation is the most prevalent type, reported in approximately 28% of individuals in committed relationships as ongoing "crushes," underscoring its commonality in adult emotional life. Platonic infatuation, in contrast, centers on non-sexual, profound for individuals such as friends or mentors, fostering deep emotional bonds through shared interests and connection without romantic or physical pursuit. This type emphasizes uncontrollable attraction rooted in and inspiration, often enhancing personal growth and loyalty in non-romantic relationships. It differs from casual by its intensity, resembling but directed toward platonic fulfillment, such as idolizing a mentor's guidance to motivate self-improvement. on close relationships notes that such infatuations contribute to emotional stability in , promoting trust and mutual support. Object or activity-based infatuation extends beyond interpersonal targets, involving fixation on hobbies, brands, goals, or pursuits like sports , where intense passion drives motivation and without relational elements. In sports , for example, enthusiasts experience emotional highs akin to infatuation, with team victories eliciting and defeats causing distress, reinforcing a of belonging and purpose. This form channels into foci, such as dedicating time to a or , which can boost through dopamine-driven engagement. Psychological studies on reveal it as a healthy outlet for passion, with fans reporting increased from these immersive attachments.

Transference and Intellectual Forms

In , denotes the unconscious redirection of emotions, desires, and expectations from past relationships—often with parental figures or other early authority symbols—onto present-day individuals, fostering irrational attachments that closely resemble infatuation. This projection can generate intense, seemingly genuine romantic or erotic sentiments, particularly within the therapeutic context, where the analyst becomes the object of these displaced affections. , in his seminal 1915 paper "Observations on Transference-Love," described this as a universal aspect of , rooted in the patient's infantile sources of , and emphasized its value in exposing repressed material while cautioning that it must be handled as an artificial phenomenon to avoid derailing treatment. Clinically, infatuated manifests as a powerful, often obsessive attachment that, if unresolved, may simulate symptoms of disorders such as borderline personality dynamics or . Research in psychoanalytic literature underscores its prevalence as extremely common in long-term therapies, though rates vary by therapeutic modality and patient demographics. Proper management involves interpreting the transference to trace its historical roots, thereby transforming it into a catalyst for rather than a barrier to progress. Intellectual infatuation represents a cognitive subtype of attachment, characterized by an ardent for the ideas, , or creative output of thinkers, artists, or abstract concepts, distinct from physical or emotional pulls. Psychometric studies define this as sapiosexuality, where intelligence serves as the primary attractor, correlating strongly with traits like and often eliciting a euphoric, motivational response that enhances personal and intellectual . However, it risks devolving into idolization, wherein the object is idealized to an unrealistic degree, potentially stifling or leading to disillusionment upon encountering flaws. Historical examples illustrate these dynamics vividly. In the realm of artistic transference, Pablo Picasso's intense attachment to muse Dora Maar blended emotional projection with intellectual fascination, as her surrealist insights and photographic innovations fueled his creative output during the 1930s and 1940s, though it escalated into obsessive control. Among scholars, Friedrich Nietzsche exemplified intellectual infatuation through his profound, almost reverential obsession with Arthur Schopenhauer's philosophy in his youth, crediting it with awakening his own philosophical voice while later critiquing it to forge independence— a process that spurred groundbreaking works like Thus Spoke Zarathustra. These cases highlight how such infatuations, when navigated reflectively, can propel innovation, yet demand vigilance against unchecked idealization.

Biological Foundations

Neurochemical Basis

Infatuation triggers a surge in , a associated with reward, , and motivation, which heightens focus on the object of affection and reinforces behaviors aimed at pursuit and connection. This dopamine release contributes to the euphoric and energizing sensations characteristic of early romantic attraction. Concurrently, norepinephrine levels rise, promoting arousal, increased heart rate, and heightened alertness, which amplify the physiological excitement of infatuation. In contrast, serotonin levels typically decrease during this phase, mirroring patterns observed in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and fostering intrusive thoughts and obsessive focus on the loved one. Hormonally, phenylethylamine (PEA), a trace amine structurally similar to amphetamines, is released in the during infatuation, inducing feelings of exhilaration and the proverbial "" through its effects. Oxytocin, often termed the bonding hormone, also plays a role in the initial stages by facilitating emotional attachment and trust, particularly through physical proximity and touch, though its prominence grows more in sustained pair-bonding. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies reveal that infatuation activates key brain regions in the reward circuitry, including the (VTA), which initiates signaling, and the , which processes the motivational and hedonic aspects of this reward. These activations overlap significantly with those seen in , underscoring infatuation's compulsive qualities as the brain's drives intense craving and reinforcement similar to substance use. The intensity of infatuation is transient; over time, typically lasting from several months to about three years, the initial chemical high diminishes as the adapts, explaining the shift from infatuation's acute fervor to more stable emotional patterns.

Evolutionary Perspectives

Infatuation, often characterized as the intense romantic attraction phase of early , serves an adaptive evolutionary function by promoting pair-bonding and . This mechanism overrides rational processes, compelling individuals to focus efforts on a specific partner, thereby facilitating the formation of temporary or long-term bonds essential for survival in species with high needs. By driving novelty-seeking behaviors, infatuation encourages selection of genetically diverse mates, reducing risks and enhancing viability through increased heterozygosity. This selective focus conserves energy and resources, directing them toward and copulation rather than indiscriminate . Anthropological suggests that infatuation-like attraction mechanisms evolved in hominids approximately 4 to 7 million years ago, coinciding with the of biparental care and larger-brained offspring requiring extended provisioning. Cross-species parallels in mammals, particularly prairie voles, illustrate this: in these monogamous rodents, plays a critical role in forming pair bonds after mating, with males exhibiting partner preference mediated by distribution in the brain's reward pathways. Similar and oxytocin systems in humans underpin attraction and , indicating conservation across mammalian to support in social environments. and genetic points to this shift from to pair-bonding in early , driven by ecological pressures like prolonged dependency. Helen Fisher's model of the brain's mating systems positions infatuation within the romantic attraction phase, driven by the limbic system's reward circuitry, which motivates intense focus on a preferred mate. This system, akin to elements of the framework, evolved to bridge (a reptilian drive for ) and attachment (a nurturing bond for ), ensuring that attraction propels individuals through the energy-intensive pursuit of . In evolutionary terms, this limbic activation fosters behaviors like obsessive thinking and risk-taking for the beloved, optimizing in ancestral environments. In ancestral societies, infatuation likely facilitated intergroup alliances through exogamous pairings, enhancing resource sharing and while contributing to social cohesion. Among the Hadza of , for instance, individuals reporting higher levels of commitment and passion in their relationships had more children. In contemporary settings, while infatuation continues to support initial bonding and social networks, it often conflicts with cultural norms, potentially leading to serial partnerships or that challenge long-term stability.

Cultural and Historical Contexts

Literary and Artistic Depictions

Infatuation has long been a central motif in classic literature, often portrayed as an impulsive force that disrupts social norms and leads to profound consequences. In William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet (1597), the titular characters' rapid infatuation exemplifies archetypal romantic passion, evolving from Romeo's fleeting obsession with Rosaline to an all-consuming attraction to Juliet, culminating in tragedy due to its unchecked intensity and disregard for familial enmity. This depiction underscores infatuation's irrational momentum, transforming mere desire into a catalyst for doom within the constraints of Elizabethan society. Similarly, Jane Austen's novels critique infatuation as social folly, as seen in Pride and Prejudice (1813), where Lydia Bennet's hasty infatuation with the charming but unscrupulous George Wickham exposes the perils of passion devoid of rational judgment, nearly scandalizing her family and highlighting Regency-era anxieties over reputation and propriety. Artistic representations from the further idealize infatuation through visual symbolism of desire and enchantment. Sandro Botticelli's (c. 1485) captures the infatuated gaze in its portrayal of the goddess emerging from the sea, her ethereal beauty evoking a divine allure that mesmerizes the viewer and embodies the era's Neoplatonic reverence for as a transcendent force. Such paintings often contrasted this idealized longing with the follies of earthly pursuit, reflecting broader cultural fascinations with Cupid's arrows and as metaphors for infatuation's intoxicating grip. In modern media, films like (500) Days of Summer (2009) dissect infatuation's nonlinear stages, following protagonist Tom Hansen's idealization of Summer Finn through fragmented recollections that blend euphoria and heartbreak, thereby critiquing contemporary romantic myths of . Recurring themes in these depictions juxtapose infatuation's idealization against harsh realities, frequently critiquing its irrationality while acknowledging its creative spark. During the 19th-century movement, infatuation was elevated as "," a sublime irrationality that poets and novelists like and portrayed as an ecstatic deviation from reason, inspiring artistic genius but risking self-destruction. This era's works often romanticized the tension between fleeting passion and enduring truth, using infatuation to explore human vulnerability. Post-20th-century literature shifted toward psychological depth, as in Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita (1955), where Humbert Humbert's infatuation with Dolores Haze delves into dark , projecting unresolved childhood losses onto the girl and revealing obsession's manipulative undercurrents. Overall, these portrayals trace infatuation's evolution from mythic exaltation to introspective scrutiny, influencing cultural understandings of its transient allure.

Cross-Cultural Variations

In individualistic cultures, such as the , infatuation is often celebrated as a driving force for romantic pursuit and personal fulfillment, aligning with values of and self-expression in relationships. Research in indicates that expressions of passionate love, including infatuation, are more frequent and verbally articulated in these societies, where romantic ideals emphasize intense emotional highs and individual initiative. In contrast, collectivist cultures like prioritize social harmony and group cohesion, viewing infatuation as potentially disruptive if it conflicts with familial or communal obligations, leading to more restrained expressions and a focus on relational stability over transient passion. In societies with arranged marriages, such as , love typically emerges post-maritally rather than as a premarital motivator, fostering gradual attachment through shared experiences and mutual adaptation. A study of 52 couples from multiple countries including found that scores in arranged marriages increased over time, potentially reaching higher levels than in love marriages after several years, as suggested by earlier . This pattern reflects cultural norms that de-emphasize premarital romance in favor of familial alliances, allowing emotional bonds to form organically within . Globalization and social media have universally amplified infatuation by facilitating romantic connections and idealizing passionate encounters, yet stigma persists variably. In conservative Middle Eastern societies, where premarital romance contravenes traditional norms, social media-driven infatuation faces heightened disapproval, often leading to or familial intervention due to fears of social dishonor. Studies highlight how platforms like enable romantic expression in countries such as and but exacerbate tensions between emerging individualistic desires and collectivist values, resulting in greater cultural resistance compared to more permissive regions.

Infatuation vs. Love

Infatuation and , while often conflated in popular discourse, represent distinct emotional states within romantic relationships. Infatuation is characterized by intense passion and idealization, focusing primarily on the self's desires and a fantasy version of the other person, often manifesting as a possessive orientation driven by immediate gratification. In contrast, mature is realistic, other-focused, and rooted in mutual commitment, emphasizing the partner's and long-term over personal possession. According to Robert Sternberg's , infatuation corresponds to passion alone—marked by physical attraction and arousal without deeper emotional bonds—while consummate love integrates passion with intimacy (emotional closeness) and commitment (dedication to the relationship's future). In the context of early passionate relationships, individuals may confuse intense sexual desire or new relationship energy (NRE) for mature love. Research shows that early sexual involvement can create "counterfeit intimacy," where physical bonding leads people to overestimate emotional closeness and overlook incompatibilities, thereby clouding judgment in partner selection. Similarly, NRE, driven by elevated levels of dopamine and other neurochemicals, produces euphoric highs that are often mistaken for enduring love, potentially leading to premature commitments or dissatisfaction when the initial intensity fades. Infatuations can transition into under certain conditions, particularly when feelings are reciprocated and the relationship withstands time and challenges, allowing idealization to give way to genuine understanding. This evolution requires moving beyond surface-level excitement to build trust and shared experiences, though not all infatuations progress this way; many dissipate as initial intensity wanes. Key signs distinguish the two: infatuation tends to fade with increased familiarity, as the thrill of novelty diminishes and unrealistic expectations confront reality, leading to disillusionment if unaddressed. Love, however, often deepens through familiarity, fostering stability and resilience as partners navigate imperfections together. Emotionally, infatuation involves volatility—euphoric highs interspersed with anxiety and obsession—whereas love promotes steady security and calm interdependence. Media portrayals frequently blur these boundaries by romanticizing infatuation's passion as , which can mislead individuals into premature commitments based on fleeting emotions rather than sustainable compatibility. This contributes to unrealistic expectations, increasing the risk of relational dissatisfaction when the initial spark inevitably cools.

Relation to Obsession and Addiction

Infatuation can escalate into obsessive patterns when it persists beyond typical durations, such as over 18 months, potentially signaling underlying obsessive-compulsive traits that intensify the fixation on the object of affection. In such prolonged cases, known as —a non-clinical psychological coined by to describe an involuntary state of obsessive infatuation—individuals may experience intrusive thoughts and compulsive behaviors that mirror those in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), though limerence is not a formal diagnosis. Severe manifestations carry risks, including behaviors, with research indicating strong correlations between limerence and pathways leading to obsessive pursuit in a subset of cases. The addictive qualities of infatuation arise from neurochemical mechanisms, particularly dopamine-driven reward loops that reinforce the emotional high, similar to those in substance . Upon loss or unreciprocation, this can trigger withdrawal symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and emotional dependency, exacerbating the obsessive cycle. Risk factors amplifying progression to include low and insecure attachment styles, which heighten vulnerability to idealizing the object of infatuation and fearing rejection. Individuals with these traits may interpret ambiguous signals as reciprocation, perpetuating the obsession. Interventions for pathological infatuation emphasize cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which targets reality-testing to challenge distorted perceptions and reduce compulsive rumination. Mindfulness practices complement CBT by promoting emotional regulation and detachment from intrusive thoughts, helping to break the addictive loop. Studies on CBT for obsessive-compulsive disorder report response rates of 50–70%.

References

  1. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-37131-005
  2. https://www.verywellmind.com/infatuation-vs-love-7372960
  3. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-33453-001
  4. https://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug06/cupid
  5. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-07190-001
  6. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699931.2019.1627291
  7. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-flux/202106/5-ways-to-tell-that-its-love-and-not-just-infatuation
  8. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-08161-004
  9. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/gpr13159.pdf
  10. http://pzacad.pitzer.edu/~dmoore/psych199/1986_sternberg_trianglelove.pdf
  11. https://www.etymonline.com/word/infatuation
  12. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/infatuation
  13. https://www.helenfisher.com/romantic-love-can-it-last/
  14. https://www.bustle.com/articles/36780-how-love-changes-over-time-from-lust-to-attachment-chemically-speaking
  15. https://hms.harvard.edu/news-events/publications-archive/brain/love-brain
  16. https://opentext.wsu.edu/social-psychology/chapter/module-12-attraction/
  17. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/living-single/201709/the-science-of-limerence
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11117554/
  19. https://actforyouth.org/resources/rf/romantic-2025.pdf
  20. https://www.ahanahospitals.in/psychology-of-teenage-love/
  21. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01650254251339393
  22. https://news.asu.edu/20180412-not-just-summer-fling-teenage-love-affects-mental-health-school-performance-asu-research
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5061504/
  24. https://dornsife.usc.edu/wendy-wood/wp-content/uploads/sites/183/2023/10/Grossman.Wood_.1993_Sex_differences_in_emotional_intensity.pdf
  25. https://psychcentral.com/relationships/love-versus-infatuation
  26. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-bad-looks-good/202101/how-a-celebrity-crush-can-impact-your-real-relationship
  27. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02654075211038612
  28. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-empowerment-diary/201802/the-secret-of-platonic-relationships
  29. https://livingwithlimerence.com/can-infatuation-be-platonic/
  30. https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/sports-fans
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3330334/
  32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03069885.2024.2373187
  33. https://www.scielo.br/j/rprs/a/WsrhmCvzYMDz4PHqPrVkxzN/?lang=en&format=pdf
  34. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/blame-the-amygdala/202203/what-it-means-be-turned-intelligence
  35. https://www.dailyartmagazine.com/the-muse-throughout-art-history-inspiration-love-and-friendship/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4911849/
  37. https://news.wm.edu/2024/02/12/chemistry-emotion-a-match-made-in-the-brain/
  38. https://case.edu/news/heres-what-happens-your-brain-when-you-fall-love
  39. https://rvannoy.asp.radford.edu/rvn/306/lovechemistry.pdf
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3936960/
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16255001/
  42. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/jn.00838.2004
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12238608/
  44. https://www.helenfisher.com/downloads/articles/14defining.pdf
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3382477/
  46. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/monogamous-prairie-voles-reveal-the-neurobiology-of-love/
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10295201/
  48. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01922/full
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387166151_FROM_ROSALINE_TO_JULIET_ROMEO%27S_ROMANTIC_FICKLENESS_IN_ROMEO_AND_JULIET
  50. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%257CA461073910&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=10240829&p=AONE&sw=w
  51. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/venus-and-the-arts-of-love-in-renaissance-florence/introduction/4870924DB0CCCF9663287FBCFC2FE4BA
  52. https://academic-journals.eu/pl/download?path=/uploads/Zm9sZGVycHVibWVkaWEx/documents/8_tuttle-ross_155_176.pdf
  53. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/jcs/2022/00000029/f0020001/art00004
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356408367_A_Study_of_Nabokov%27s_Humbert_in_the_Light_of_Karen_Horney%27s_Psychoanalytical_Theory
  55. http://www.elainehatfield.com/121.pdf
  56. https://files.blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/7420/files/2013/09/wilkins_gareis_emotion_expression.pdf
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9840424/
  58. https://drrobertepstein.com/downloads/EPSTEIN_et_al_2013-How_Love_Emerges_in_Arranged_Marriages.pdf
  59. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-science-behind-behavior/201511/why-are-so-many-indian-arranged-marriages-successful
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311547358_Love_in_the_Middle_East_The_contradictions_of_romance_in_the_Facebook_World
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4467819/
  62. https://www.simplypsychology.org/types-of-love-we-experience.html
  63. https://ifstudies.org/blog/slow-but-sure-does-the-timing-of-sex-during-dating-matter
  64. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-good-sex-matters/202102/the-rise-and-inevitable-fall-of-new-relationship-energy
  65. https://livingwithlimerence.com/can-infatuation-turn-into-love/
  66. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/between-you-and-me/202203/the-role-of-familiarity-in-attraction
  67. https://www.betterhelp.com/advice/love/infatuation-vs-love-whats-the-difference/
  68. https://dev.housing.arizona.edu/too-fast-for-love
  69. https://www.unfoldinglimerence.com/blog/is-limerence-normal
  70. https://www.themarginalian.org/2021/11/25/love-and-limerence-dorothy-tennov/
  71. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/limerence
  72. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11896-024-09674-x
  73. https://livingwithlimerence.com/withdrawal-pains/
  74. https://www.attachmentproject.com/love/limerence/
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8641115/
  76. https://bayareacbtcenter.com/effective-treatments-for-limerence/
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4516342/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.