Hubbry Logo
Isotopes of oganessonIsotopes of oganessonMain
Open search
Isotopes of oganesson
Community hub
Isotopes of oganesson
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Isotopes of oganesson
Isotopes of oganesson
Isotopes of oganesson
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Isotopes of oganesson (118Og)
Main isotopes[1] Decay
Isotope abun­dance half-life (t1/2) mode pro­duct
294Og synth 0.7 ms[2][3] α 290Lv
SF –

Oganesson (118Og) is a synthetic element created in particle accelerators, and thus a standard atomic weight cannot be given. Like all synthetic elements, it has no stable isotopes. The first and only isotope to be synthesized was 294Og in 2002 and 2005; it has a half-life of 0.7 milliseconds.

List of isotopes

[edit]


Nuclide
 Z N Isotopic mass (Da)[4]
[n 1][n 2] 		Half-life[1]
 Decay
mode[1]
 Daughter
isotope
 Spin and
parity[1]
294Og 118 176 294.21398(59)# 0.58+0.44
−0.18 ms
[0.7(3) ms] 		α 290Lv 0+
This table header & footer:
  1. ^ ( ) – Uncertainty (1σ) is given in concise form in parentheses after the corresponding last digits.
  2. ^ # – Atomic mass marked #: value and uncertainty derived not from purely experimental data, but at least partly from trends from the Mass Surface (TMS).

Nucleosynthesis

[edit]

Target-projectile combinations leading to Z=118 compound nuclei

[edit]

The below table contains various combinations of targets and projectiles that could be used to form compound nuclei with Z=118.[citation needed]

Target Projectile CN Attempt result
208Pb 86Kr 294Og Failure to date
238U 58Fe 296Og Reaction yet to be attempted
244Pu 54Cr 298Og Reaction yet to be attempted
248Cm 50Ti 298Og Failure to date
250Cm 50Ti 300Og Reaction yet to be attempted
249Cf 48Ca 297Og Successful reaction
250Cf 48Ca 298Og Failure to date
251Cf 48Ca 299Og Failure to date
252Cf 48Ca 300Og Reaction yet to be attempted

Cold fusion

[edit]

208Pb(86Kr,xn)294-xOg

[edit]

In 1999, a team led by Victor Ninov at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory performed this experiment, as a 1998 calculation by Robert Smolańczuk suggested a promising outcome. After eleven days of irradiation, three events of 293Og and its alpha decay products were reported in this reaction; this was the first reported discovery of element 118 and then-unknown element 116.[5]

The following year, they published a retraction after researchers at other laboratories were unable to duplicate the results and the Berkeley lab could not duplicate them either.[6] In June 2002, the director of the lab announced that the original claim of the discovery of these two elements had been based on data fabricated by principal author Victor Ninov.[7][8] Newer experimental results and theoretical predictions have confirmed the exponential decrease in cross-sections with lead and bismuth targets as the atomic number of the resulting nuclide increases.[9]

Hot fusion

[edit]

249Cf(48Ca,xn)297-xOg (x=3)

[edit]

Following successful experiments utilizing calcium-48 projectiles and actinide targets to generate elements 114 and 116,[10] the search for element 118 was first performed at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in 2002. One or two atoms of 294Og were produced in the 2002 experiment, and two more atoms were produced in a 2005 confirmation run. The discovery of element 118 was announced in 2006.[2]

Because of the very small fusion reaction probability (the fusion cross section is roughly 0.3–0.6 pb), the experiment took four months and involved a beam dose of 2.5×1019 calcium ions that had to be shot at the californium target to produce the first recorded event believed to be the synthesis of oganesson.[11] Nevertheless, researchers were highly confident that the results were not a false positive; the chance that they were random events was estimated to be less than one part in 100,000.[12]

In a 2012 experiment aimed at the confirmation of tennessine, one alpha decay chain was attributed to 294Og. This synthesis event resulted from the population of 249Cf in the target as the decay product of the 249Bk target (half-life 330 days); the cross section and decays were consistent with previously reported observations of 294Og.[10]

From 1 October 2015 until 6 April 2016, the team at the JINR conducted a search for new isotopes of oganesson using a 48Ca beam and a target comprising a mixture of 249Cf (50.7%), 250Cf (12.9%), and 251Cf (36.4%). The experiment was performed at 252 MeV and 258 MeV beam energies. One event of 294Og was found at the lower beam energy, while no decays of oganesson isotopes were found at the higher beam energy; a cross section of 0.9 pb for the 249Cf(48Ca,3n) reaction was estimated.[13]

250,251Cf(48Ca,xn)298,299-xOg

[edit]

In the 2015–2016 experiment, these reactions were performed in a search for 295Og and 296Og. No events attributable to a reaction with the 250Cf or 251Cf portions of the target were found. A repeat of this experiment was planned for 2017–2018.[13]

248Cm(50Ti,xn)298-xOg

[edit]

This reaction was originally planned to be tested at the JINR and RIKEN in 2017–2018, as it uses the same 50Ti projectile as planned experiments leading to elements 119 and 120.[14] A search beginning in summer 2016 at RIKEN for 295Og in the 3n channel of this reaction was unsuccessful, though the study is planned to resume; a detailed analysis and cross section limit were not provided.[15][16]

Theoretical calculations

[edit]

Theoretical calculations done on the synthetic pathways for, and the half-life of, other isotopes have shown that some could be slightly more stable than the synthesized isotope 294Og, most likely 293Og, 295Og, 296Og, 297Og, 298Og, 300Og and 302Og.[17][18][19] Of these, 297Og might provide the best chances for obtaining longer-lived nuclei,[17][19] and thus might become the focus of future work with this element. Some isotopes with many more neutrons, such as some located around 313Og, could also provide longer-lived nuclei.[20]

Theoretical calculations on evaporation cross sections

[edit]

The below table contains various targets-projectile combinations for which calculations have provided estimates for cross section yields from various neutron evaporation channels. The channel with the highest expected yield is given.

DNS = Di-nuclear system; 2S = Two-step; σ = cross section

Target Projectile CN Channel (product) σ max Model Ref
208Pb 86Kr 294Og 1n (293Og) 0.1 pb DNS [21]
208Pb 85Kr 293Og 1n (292Og) 0.18 pb DNS [21]
246Cm 50Ti 296Og 3n (293Og) 40 fb 2S [22]
244Cm 50Ti 294Og 2n (292Og) 53 fb 2S [22]
252Cf 48Ca 300Og 3n (297Og) 1.2 pb DNS [23]
251Cf 48Ca 299Og 3n (296Og) 1.2 pb DNS [23]
249Cf 48Ca 297Og 3n (294Og) 0.3 pb DNS [23]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Isotopes of oganesson

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Oganesson (Og), with atomic number 118, is a synthetic superheavy element whose isotopes are all highly unstable, radioactive, and produced only in particle accelerators, exhibiting half-lives on the order of milliseconds or less. The sole confirmed isotope is ^{294}Og, which has a half-life of approximately 0.58 milliseconds (with uncertainties ranging from 0.40 to 1.02 ms across measurements) and primarily undergoes alpha decay to ^{290}Lv (livermorium-290), with a minor branch to spontaneous fission. Theoretical models predict additional isotopes such as ^{293}Og and ^{295}Og, but these remain unconfirmed experimentally, with earlier claims of their synthesis retracted due to insufficient evidence. The discovery of oganesson isotopes stemmed from efforts to extend the periodic table through hot fusion reactions involving heavy-ion bombardment. In 2002, a collaborative team from the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia, and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the United States first synthesized ^{294}Og (along with its decay daughter ^{290}Lv) by accelerating ^{48}Ca ions onto a ^{249}Cf target, producing three decay events. This result was confirmed in 2005 with three additional events at JINR, providing the robust evidence required for official recognition by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAC) in 2015, leading to the element's naming as oganesson in 2016 after nuclear physicist Yuri Oganessian. To date, only a handful of ^{294}Og atoms—fewer than six—have been produced in total, highlighting the extreme challenges in superheavy element synthesis due to low cross-sections (on the order of picobarns) and fleeting existence times. Research on oganesson isotopes focuses on nuclear structure, decay chains, and potential chemical properties, though the sub-millisecond half-lives preclude conventional chemistry experiments. ^{294}Og undergoes alpha decay (with energy around 11.8 MeV) to ^{290}Lv, which further decays by alpha emission to ^{286}Fl (flerovium-286) and continues through the chain to lighter superheavy nuclides. Theoretical studies suggest that isotopes nearer the predicted "island of stability" (around mass numbers 296–298) could have longer half-lives, possibly seconds or more, enabling future investigations into relativistic effects on group 18 element behavior, such as deviations from noble gas inertness. Ongoing experiments at facilities like JINR and GSI Helmholtz Centre aim to produce more events and probe heavier isotopes, but progress remains limited by accelerator capabilities and detection sensitivities.

Known isotopes

List of known isotopes

Oganesson (Og), atomic number 118, has only a single confirmed isotope, ^{294}Og, synthesized through fusion reactions involving calcium-48 and californium-249 targets. The known properties of this isotope are summarized in the following table. Due to the extremely limited number of production events—only five atoms observed as of 2025—the half-life measurement carries significant uncertainty, reflecting statistical limitations from the small sample size.
IsotopeMass number (A)Half-lifeDecay mode(s)Daughter product(s)
^{294}Og2940.58^{+0.44}_{-0.18} msα decay (dominant), SF^{290}Lv (α), no observed SF daughter

Nuclear properties of oganesson-294

Oganesson-294, the only confirmed isotope of oganesson, was synthesized through the hot fusion reaction of a ^{48}Ca beam with a ^{249}Cf target, producing the compound nucleus ^{297}Og that evaporates three neutrons to yield ^{294}Og. Evaporation residues were separated in flight using the Dubna Gas-Filled Recoil Separator (DGFRS) at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) and implanted into a position-sensitive silicon detector array, where subsequent alpha decay sequences were recorded to genetically link parent-daughter relationships. This detection method allowed identification of decay chains consistent with Z=118 assignment based on matching energies and half-lives with known descendants. Five atoms of ^{294}Og have been observed across experiments conducted in 2002, 2005, 2018, and a 2023 irradiation at FLNR-JINR, where the fifth event was recorded after 9 days of beam time, all decaying via alpha emission. The measured half-life from these events is 0.58^{+0.44}_{-0.18} ms. The alpha decay energy is 11.65 ± 0.06 MeV, with no observed spontaneous fission (SF) events among the limited statistics, suggesting a dominant alpha decay mode (observed branching ratio ≈100%); however, SF is theoretically possible due to the high fissility of superheavy nuclei, with an upper limit on the SF branching ratio estimated below 20% based on non-observation. The alpha decay of ^{294}Og proceeds through the chain ^{294}Og → ^{290}Lv → ^{286}Fl → ^{282}Cn → ^{278}Ds → ^{274}Hs, with each step primarily via alpha emission except where SF competes in lighter daughters. Representative values include: ^{290}Lv with half-life ≈8.3 ms and α energy ≈10.8 MeV; ^{286}Fl with half-life ≈110 ms (α branching ≈60%, SF ≈40%) and α energy ≈10.3 MeV; ^{282}Cn with half-life ≈1.0 ms and α energy ≈9.9 MeV; ^{278}Ds with half-life ≈1.7 ms and α energy ≈9.7 MeV; and ^{274}Hs with half-life ≈54 ms and α energy ≈9.3 MeV, often terminating in SF of subsequent seaborgium daughters. These properties highlight the rapid succession of decays, limiting opportunities for chemical studies, and confirm the even-even nature of ^{294}Og consistent with enhanced stability against immediate fission.

Nucleosynthesis

Hot fusion reactions

Hot fusion reactions, utilizing neutron-rich projectiles such as ^{48}Ca on actinide targets, have been the primary method for synthesizing isotopes of oganesson, enabling the production of relatively neutron-rich superheavy nuclei near the predicted island of stability. These reactions involve complete fusion followed by evaporation of neutrons to form the compound nucleus ^{297}Og, which de-excites primarily through the 3n channel to yield ^{294}Og. The successful synthesis of oganesson was achieved via the reaction ^{249}Cf(^{48}Ca,3n)^{294}Og at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia. In the initial 2002 experiment, one atom of ^{294}Og was produced, followed by two more atoms in a 2005 confirmation run, establishing the discovery of element 118. These experiments employed a ^{48}Ca beam at an energy of approximately 243 MeV in the laboratory system, corresponding to a compound nucleus excitation energy of about 29 MeV, with a measured cross section of 0.3–0.9 pb for the 3n evaporation channel. The total beam dose across both runs was 2.5×10^{19} ions. The experimental apparatus utilized the Dubna Gas-Filled Recoil Separator (DGFRS), which separates recoil products from the intense beam and scattered particles based on their charge-to-mass ratio in a helium-filled chamber, allowing detection of individual decay chains. Only the 3n evaporation channel was observed, producing ^{294}Og; despite searches, no confirmed events were detected in the 2n or 1n channels leading to ^{295}Og or ^{293}Og, attributable to their significantly lower cross sections below 0.1 pb. Efforts to synthesize heavier oganesson isotopes have included attempts using enriched ^{250}Cf and ^{251}Cf targets in reactions such as ^{250}Cf(^{48}Ca,3n)^{295}Og and ^{251}Cf(^{48}Ca,3n)^{296}Og, aimed at approaching the neutron magic number N=184. However, no decays attributable to these isotopes have been detected as of 2026, despite beam doses exceeding 10^{19} ions in recent experiments at JINR.

Cold and other fusion reactions

An attempt to synthesize isotopes of oganesson via cold fusion involved bombarding a ^{208}Pb target with ^{86}Kr ions to form the compound nucleus ^{294}Og^{*}, potentially leading to ^{294-x}Og + x n for x = 0–3. This experiment, conducted at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in April–May 2001, delivered a beam dose of 2.6 \times 10^{18} ions but observed no decay events attributable to oganesson isotopes. The resulting upper limits on the production cross section were 0.9 pb at a magnetic rigidity of 2.00 Tm and 0.6 pb at 2.12 Tm, indicating cross sections below 1 pb. As an alternative to the successful ^{48}Ca-induced hot fusion, researchers explored the reaction ^{248}Cm(^{50}Ti, x n)^{298-x}Og (x = 0–4) to access more neutron-rich oganesson isotopes. This effort, performed at the RIKEN Nishina Center using the GARIS-II separator, spanned 39 days with a total beam dose of 4.93 \times 10^{18} ^{50}Ti projectiles but yielded no correlated decay chains. An upper limit of 0.50 pb (1\sigma) was established for the cross section, limited by achievable beam intensities and the low reaction rates typical of such asymmetric systems. Other proposed routes, such as ^{238}U(^{50}Ti, x n) or multinucleon transfer reactions in heavy-ion collisions (e.g., ^{238}U + ^{238}U or ^{136}Xe + ^{248}Cm), remain unattempted for oganesson production as of 2025, with no observed yields due to insufficient experimental validation. These failures stem from higher fusion barriers in cold fusion reactions, which increase with atomic number and reduce fusion probabilities exponentially beyond Z = 113, and lower neutron evaporation probabilities that limit survival against fission compared to neutron-richer hot fusion pathways.

Theoretical predictions

Predicted isotopes and stability

Theoretical models, including semi-microscopic calculations based on the Skyrme-SLy4 interaction and deformed Woods-Saxon potentials, predict the existence of oganesson isotopes spanning a mass range from ^{288}Og to ^{308}Og, with potential extensions to higher masses up to ^{313}Og in broader superheavy surveys. These predictions indicate that lighter isotopes like ^{293}Og may have alpha decay half-lives around 0.1 ms, while mid-range ones such as ^{295}Og could reach up to 45 ms, marking it as relatively more stable within the series. Heavier isotopes, including those approaching or reaching the neutron number N=184 (e.g., ^{302}Og), are expected to exhibit enhanced stability due to shell closure effects, though overall half-lives remain in the millisecond range owing to the high proton number Z=118, which promotes rapid decay. Macroscopic-microscopic approaches, such as the shell-effect induced generalized liquid-drop model combined with clustering effects, further refine these estimates by predicting dominant alpha decay for isotopes up to ^{303}Og, with half-lives for ^{295}Og and ^{296}Og near 0.4 ms. For ^{297}Og, similar models forecast an alpha decay half-life of approximately 0.16 ms, transitioning toward spontaneous fission dominance in isotopes beyond ^{304}Og, where fission barriers lower significantly. These trends highlight oganesson's position near the periphery of the predicted "island of stability" centered around Z ≈ 114 and N = 184, where shell closures might otherwise prolong lifetimes, but the increasing Coulomb repulsion at high Z limits half-lives to milliseconds rather than seconds or longer. Relativistic effects play a dual role in oganesson isotopes: in nuclear structure, relativistic mean-field models account for enhanced binding near shell closures, supporting the stability trends, while in atomic physics, strong relativistic stabilization of the 7p_{1/2} orbital deviates from the behavior of lighter homologs like radon (Z=86), potentially rendering oganesson less noble-gas-like and more reactive or even solid at room temperature. Despite these predictions, no oganesson isotopes beyond the verified ^{294}Og have been detected, with its measured half-life of 0.7 ms serving as a benchmark for model validation. Ongoing and future experiments at upgraded facilities, such as enhanced heavy-ion accelerators, aim to probe these heavier, theoretically more stable isotopes to test the boundaries of the island of stability.
IsotopePredicted Half-LifeDominant Decay ModeModel/Reference
^{293}Og~0.1 msα-decaySemi-microscopic (Skyrme-SLy4)
^{295}Og~1–45 msα-decaySemi-microscopic (Skyrme-SLy4)
^{297}Og~0.16 msα-decayTwo-potential approach
^{302}Og~1–10 ms (est.)α-decay/SFGLDM + shell effects

Evaporation cross sections

Theoretical computations of fusion-evaporation cross sections for oganesson isotopes play a crucial role in guiding experimental efforts to synthesize these superheavy nuclei, by estimating the probability of complete fusion followed by neutron evaporation without fission. These calculations typically employ models that separate the process into the fusion probability PcnP_{cn}, which accounts for the formation of a compound nucleus after overcoming the fusion barrier, and the survival probability WsurW_{sur}, which describes the likelihood that the excited compound nucleus de-excites via neutron emission rather than fission. One widely used approach combines the Fusion by Deformed Nuclei (FDN) model for entrance channel dynamics with statistical evaporation codes such as HIVAP to compute the overall evaporation residue cross section σER=σfus⋅Pcn⋅Wsur\sigma_{ER} = \sigma_{fus} \cdot P_{cn} \cdot W_{sur}. For the hot fusion reaction 249Cf(48Ca,3n)294Og^{249}\mathrm{Cf}(^{48}\mathrm{Ca},3n)^{294}\mathrm{Og}, HIVAP calculations with optimized parameters (e.g., barrier factor BARFAC = 1.0 and level density scaling LEVELPAR = 1.16) predict a maximum cross section of approximately 0.5 pb near the Bass barrier, aligning closely with experimental observations and highlighting the viability of calcium-induced reactions for Z=118 production. In contrast, cold fusion pathways like 208Pb(86Kr,1n)293Og^{208}\mathrm{Pb}(^{86}\mathrm{Kr},1n)^{293}\mathrm{Og} yield lower predicted cross sections of about 0.1 pb, as estimated using the dinuclear system (DNS) model, which emphasizes the competition between complete fusion and quasifission due to the symmetric entrance channel. Attempts with more asymmetric systems, such as 248Cm(50Ti,xn)298−xOg^{248}\mathrm{Cm}(^{50}\mathrm{Ti},xn)^{298-x}\mathrm{Og}, result in even smaller cross sections around 10 fb, computed via a two-step model coupled with HIVAP, due to increased quasifission probabilities. Key factors influencing these cross sections include entrance channel dynamics, such as mass asymmetry and nuclear deformation, which affect the fusion barrier height and quasifission hindrance; higher fission barriers in neutron-rich compound nuclei enhance survival; and neutron separation energies that determine the dominant evaporation channels (e.g., 3n vs. 4n). Trends across models indicate that hot fusion with neutron-rich projectiles like 48Ca^{48}\mathrm{Ca} is significantly more favorable for Z=118 than cold fusion, as the increased neutron excess stabilizes the compound nucleus against fission, leading to cross sections orders of magnitude higher. For instance, predictions for the unattempted 4n channel in 249Cf(48Ca,4n)293Og^{249}\mathrm{Cf}(^{48}\mathrm{Ca},4n)^{293}\mathrm{Og} suggest cross sections below 0.1 pb, potentially accessible with extended beam times. Uncertainties in these predictions arise from model dependencies, including parameter choices for level densities, fission barrier heights, and deformation effects, which can vary cross section estimates by factors of 2–10; additionally, incomplete knowledge of shell effects near Z=118 contributes to discrepancies between theory and experiment. Despite these limitations, such computations have proven valuable for prioritizing reaction channels, with hot fusion remaining the preferred route for oganesson synthesis. ===== END CLEANED SECTION =====
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.