Hubbry Logo
Jind StateJind StateMain
Open search
Jind State
Community hub
Jind State
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Jind State
Jind State
Jind State
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Jind State (also spelled Jhind State) was a princely state located in the Punjab and Haryana regions of north-western India. The state was 3,260 km2 (1,260 sq mi) in area and its annual income was Rs.3,000,000 in the 1940s.[1] This state was founded and ruled by the Jats of Sidhu clan.[2]

Key Information

Location

[edit]

The area of the state was 1,259 square miles in total and it ranged from Dadri, Karnal, Safidon, and Sangrur.[1][3]

History

[edit]

Origin

[edit]
Genealogical pedigree (family-tree) of the ruling family of Jind State, Punjab, revised pedigree-table (1940)

The ruling house of Jind belonged to the Phulkian dynasty, sharing with the Nabha rulers a common ancestor named Tiloka. Tiloka was the eldest son of Phul Sidhu of the Phulkian Misl.[3] The Jind rulers descended from Sukhchain Singh, the younger son of Tiloka.[4] The Jind State was founded in 1763 by Gajpat Singh after the fall of Sirhind.[3] Other sources give a date of 1768 for the founding of the state.[1]

Gajpat Singh, son of Sukhchain Singh and great-grandson of Phul, launched a rebellion against the hostile authority based out of Sirhind.[1] The rebellion was a Sikh coalition against the Afghan governors of Jind State.[3] As a reward, Gajpat received a large tract of land, which included Jind and Safidon.[3] Gajpat established his headquarters at Jind, building a large, brick fort at the location.[3]

View of the fortress and palace of Jind State, 1815

He established the state in 1763 or 1768 and made Sangrur its capital.[1][3] Gajpat was bestowed with the title of Raja by the Mughal emperor Shah Alam in the year 1772.[1][3] As a mark of sovereignty, the Sikh raja minted coins bearing his name.[1][3] Shortly after being bestowed with the raja title by the Mughals, Jind was attacked by Rahim Dad Khan, the governor of Hansi, who was killed in action.[3] In 1774, a dispute arose between Jind and Nabha states.[3] The precarious intra-Phulkian situation led to Gajpat Singh of Jind sending troops against Hamir Singh of Nabha, with the former taking possession of Imloh, Bhadson, and Sangrur from the latter's control.[3] However, the ruler of Patiala State and influential members of the family led to Imloh and Bhadson being returned to Nabha's rule.[3] Sangrur remained with Jind and was not given back to Nabha.[3] A daughter of Gajpat Singh of Jind married Maha Singh of the Sukerchakia Misl and was the mother of Ranjit Singh.[3]

Gajpat Singh ordered the raising of several fortresses, whom were constructed using lakhauri (thin burnt-clay) bricks in the year 1775.[1] One of the forts was built to the left of the present-day Rani Talab and the second was built to the right of present-day Tanga Chowk.[1] There was a family connection shared between Jind State and the Sukerchakia Misl, due to the fact that Gajpat's daughter, Raj Kaur, was the mother of Maharaja Ranjit Singh whom founded the Sikh Empire.[1]

Gajpat Singh died in 1786.[3]

After the passing of Gajpat, his son Bhag Singh succeeded to the throne of Jind in 1789.[1] Bhag Singh is notable as being the first cis-Sutlej or Phulkian Sikh ruler to develop amicable ties with the British East India Company, which developed into a state of allyship between the two parties.[1]

British era

[edit]
Detail of the main, continuous tract of territory of Jind State from a map created by the British East India Company, ca.1829–1835 (the state also held many exclave territories that can be seen in the full-map).

It was part of the Cis-Sutlej states until 25 April 1809, when it became a British protectorate.[5] After Bhag Singh died, he would be succeeded by Fateh Singh, who in-turn was followed by Sangat Singh.[1] After the death of Raja Sangat Singh in 1834, some parts of the state were taken over by the British due to the absence of a direct heir. The throne was later gone to his cousin, Swarup Singh.[6] Then the throne passed to Swarup's son, Raghubir Singh.[1] Raghubir Singh did produce an immediate heir in the form of a son named Balbir Singh, but his son had died while young so the line of succession passed to his grandson, Ranbir Singh, who is described as a "philanderer, an extravagant and a philanthropist".[1] Ranbir is noted for being the longest reigning ruler of the Phulkian dynasty.[1] He had twelve children born from his four wives.[1]

When Kaithal was annexed in 1843, the Mahalan Ghabdan pargana was given to Jind State in exchange for a part of Saffdon.[7]

Indian painter Sita Ram produced watercolours of the local scenery (landscape and architecture) of Jind State between June 1814 to early October 1815.[8]

At the Ambala Darbar held in Ambala between 18–20 January 1860, a decision was made to exempt Jind, Patiala, and Nabha states from the doctrine-of-lapse.[9]

During the First World War, the Jind Imperial Service Regiment saw conflict.[1] The state was awarded with a fifteen-gun salute.[1]

On 20 August 1948, with the signing of the instrument of accession, Jind became a part of the Patiala and East Punjab States Union of the newly independent India on 15 July 1948.[1]

Postage stamps prior to King George V consisted of Indian stamps over printed as "Jhind State", with the letter 'H' in the name. On the George V stamps, the 'H' is omitted and is overprinted as "Jind State" (Reference actual stamps from the Victorian, Edward VII and George V eras).

Post-independence

[edit]

Ranbir Singh died on 31 March 1948, shortly after he signed the instrument of accession.[1] He was succeeded by his son Rajbir Singh.[1] Rajbir died in 1959 and in-turn was succeeded by his brother named Jagatbir Singh.[1] However, Rajbir's son named Satbir Singh, claims to have been crowned as a successor to his father, leading to a dispute between the brother and son of the late Rajbir.[1]

After the division of Punjab in 1966, the former territories of Jind State were given to the then newly formed state of Haryana.[1] Thus, Jind town and district now form a part of Indian state of Haryana.

The family of the former Jind rulers are mired in family divisions and conflicts over shares of their declining wealth.[1] The Jind royals currently reside at Raja ki Kothi on Amarhedi Road.[1]

Economy

[edit]

The revenue per annum of Jind State was around 2,800,000 rupees.[3]

Heritage conservation

[edit]

Many monuments and structures related to the erstwhile Jind state lie in disrepair and disregard and few efforts are being taken to conserve them, in-contrast to the heritage of Patiala and Nabha states.[1] Two historical forts (both constructed in 1775 and were located near Rani Talab and Tanga Chowk) related to the history of the state were demolished in the 1990s to make way for newer developments, such as shopping bazaars, a Doordarshan Relay Centre, and parks.[1] There was also a third Jind fort that was demolished in the 1990s as well, it was located beside the fort near Rani Talab.[1] The land the former forts stood on has also suffered from illegal encroachments.[1] Many historical artefacts related to the state have been looted and smuggled.[1] The city of Jind was also known for its three city-gates connected by a border wall, which were named Jhanjh Gate, Ramrai Gate, and Safidon Gate, however these gates have not survived to the present-day.[1] Efforts are ongoing to have the ASI declare the buildings of Rani Talab, Raja-Ki-Kothi, and Khunga Kothi as protected heritage sites.[1] Indo-Saracenic buildings of Jind have fallen into a decrepit condition.[1]

List of rulers

[edit]
Name

(Birth–Death)

Portrait Reign Enthronement Note(s) Reference
Start date End date
Sardars
Sukhchain Singh
(1683–1758) 		? 1758 [4]
Rajas
Gajpat Singh
(15 April 1738 – 11 November 1789) 		1758 1789 [10][11][4]
Bhag Singh
(23 September 1760 – 16 June 1819) 		1789 1819 November 1789 [10][11][4]
Fateh Singh
(6 May 1789 – 3 February 1822) 		1819 1822 [10][11][4]
Sangat Singh
(16 July 1810 – 4/5 November 1834) 		1822 1834 30 July 1822 [10][11][4]
Swarup Singh
(30 May 1812 – 26 January 1864) 		1834 1864 April 1837 [10][11][4]
Raghubir Singh
(1832 – 7 March 1887) 		1864 1887 31 March 1864 [10][11][4]
Ranbir Singh
(11 October 1879 – 1 April 1948) 		1887 1948 27 February 1888 [10][11][4][1]
Titular
Rajbir Singh
(1948 – 1959) 		1948 1959 [10][12][13]
Satbir Singh
(1940–2023) 		1959 2023 Upon the death of his father, Rajbir Singh, in 1959, Yadavindra Singh, the Maharaja of Patiala, installed him as the Maharaja of Jind. His succession was recognized by the President of India on 12 October 1959.[14] [10][15][16]

Other titular claimants

[edit]
Other titular claimants
9 Rajbir Singh 1948–1959 [11][4][1]
10 Jagatbir Singh (disputed)[1][a] 1959 – ? [17][1][11]
11 Rambir Singh
(1944–1992) 		? – 1992 [1]
12 Gajraj Singh
(1981–2016) 		1992–2016 [1]
13 Jagbir Singh Sidhu
(1979–2018) 		2016–2018 [1]
14 Gunveer Singh
(born 2014) 		2018 – present [1]

Administrative divisions and boundaries

[edit]

During the British era (1901), Jind State was divided into two nizāmats (districts): Sangrur and Jind. Each nizāmat was further subdivided into tahsils,[6] which were not contiguous with each other, The State contained 7 towns and 439 villages, with a total physical area of 1,268 square miles:

1901 State Administration
No District/Nizāmat Tahsil Remark Today
I Sangrur Nizāmat Sangrur Capital; included all scattered territories Punjab Bathinda, Patiala, Sangrur District
II Jind Nizāmat Jind Former capital Haryana Jind District
III Dadri Gained in 1858; southern enclave Haryana Charkhi Dadri District
Map of mark, Jind State on punjab state (1909) Sangrur, Jind, and Dadri tahsils

I. Sangrur Tahsil

[edit]

Sangrur Tahsil was one of the three tahsils of Jind State and was part of the Sangrur Nizāmat. It was not in one piece but made up of four separate areas, surrounded by British territory and lands of Patiala and Nabha States.

  1. The Sangrur Ilāqa was the main region of the state and included the capital town of Sangrur. It was bordered to the North: Patiala and Nabha territories, East: Bhawanigarh Nizāmat of Patiala ,South: Sunam Tahsil of Patiala and the village of Khadial (Kaithal Tahsil, Karnal District – former Kaithal state enclave), West: Barnala Tahsil of Patiala & Dhanaula Thana of Nabha. The ilāqa comprised 1 Sangrur town and 43 villages including Ghabdan, badrukha village, covering 109 square miles, with a population of 36,598 according to the 1901 Census. Today, this area forms part of Sunam and Sangrur tahsils in Sangrur district.
  2. The Kularan Ilāqa was located about 20 miles east of Sangrur and was almost completely surrounded by Patiala territory, with one side bordering Kaithal Tahsil. It included 33 villages, had a population of 14,976, and covered an area of 66 square miles. It is located near the town of Samana and today is part of Samana Tahsil in Patiala district.
  3. The Wazidpur Ilāqa was a small, fragmented area made up of two parts of Jind State. The northern part had four villages, and the southern part had three villages, Total 7 villages. The area covered just 9 square miles and had a population of 2,361 in 1901. Today, these areas are near Patiala town, between Patiala and Samana, and part of Patiala district.
  4. The Balanwali Ilāqa was a large, detached area located 48 miles west of Sangrur, made up of three separate parts of state territory, Together, the Balanwali Ilāqa covered 57 square miles and had a population of 10,746 in 1901.
    • The main area included the town of Balanwali and 10 villages. It was bordered on the northeast by Nabha State, on the east and south by Patiala, and on the west by the Mehraj pargana of Moga Tahsil in Ferozepore District. Today, this area is part of Rampura Phul Tahsil in Bathinda district.
    • Another part lay to the north, containing the large village of Dialpura, held as Jagir by the Sardars of Dailpura. It was bordered by Nabha on the southeast, the Mehraj pargana of Ferozepore on the southwest, and Patiala on the northwest. Today, it falls within Rampura Tahsil of Bathinda district and is known as Dyalpura Mirza village and its surrounding area.
    • The third part, south of Balanwali, included two isolated villages, Mansa and Burj, both surrounded entirely by Patiala territory. Today, these villages are part of Maur Tahsil, Bathinda district, known as Mansa Kalana and Burj village.

The tahsil of Sangrur lies almost entirely in the great tract known as the Jangal, with only seven villages around wazidpur situated in the Pawadh region. At that time, Sangrur Tahsil included 95 villages and 2 towns (Sangrur, Balanwali), covering a total area of 241 square miles (19% of the state) with a population of 64,681 (22.93% of the state) in 1901.

Today, the former Sangrur Tahsil of Jind State lies entirely in Punjab, India with parts falling within Sangrur, Patiala & Bathinda District.

II. Jind Tahsil

[edit]

Jind Tahsil was a compact and connected triangular part of state, unlike Sangrur Tahsil, which was divided into parts. It was mostly surrounded by British and Patiala state territories and bordered by: North: Narwana Tahsil (Patiala state) and Kaithal Tahsil (Karnal), East: Panipat Tahsil (Karnal), South-East: Gohana Sub-Tahsil(Rohtak), South: Rohtak Tahsil (Rohtak), West: Hansi Tahsil (Hissar District).

Villages in Jind Tahsil were historically grouped into tappās, The tappās in Jind Tahsil were:

Tappā Name No. of Villages Tappā Name No. of V. Tappā Name No. of V. Tappā Name No. of V.
Chahutra 2 Bārah 15 Lājwāna Kalān 13 Kalwa 13
Dhāk 1 Kānāna 21 Kānāna 21 Saffidon 26
Kandeḷa 31 Rām Rāi 18 Hat 12 Total 165

Jind Tahsil lies entirely in the Bangar region. It included the two towns of Jind and Safidon, along with 163 villages. The tahsil covered 464 square miles area (36.62% of the state) and had a population of 124,954 (44.3% of the state) in 1901.

Today, the entire tahsil lies in Haryana, within Jind district.

III. Dadri Tahsil

[edit]

Dādri Tahsil was also a compact and contiguous part of State, unlike Sangrur Tahsil, in parts. It lay to the south of Jind Tahsil and was separated from it by Rohtak Tahsil of British territory, making it another enclave of the state. This tahsil was bordered by: East: Jhajjar Tahsil (Rohtak), North-West: Bhawani Tahsil (Hissar District) South: Duana State, Bawal Nizāmat (Nabha State) & Mahendragarth Nizāmat (Patiala State), West: Loharu State.

Villages in Dadri Tahsil were also grouped into tappās, The tappās in Jind Tahsil were:

Tappā Name No. of Villages Tappā Name Number of Vill. Tappā Name Number of V.
Phoghāt 20 Sangwān 55 Pachisi 8
Punwār 31 Sheorān 43 Satganwa 9
Chogānwā 6 Haweli 11 Total 183

Dadri Tahsil lies in the Bagar region, Historically and in the present day, it is also known as Dalmia Dadri or Charkhi Dadri. It included 3 towns (Dadri, Kalyana, Baund) and 181 villages, covering a total area of 562 square miles (44.35% of the state) and had a population of 120,451 (32.75%) according to the 1901 census.

Today, the entire tahsil lies in Haryana, mostly within Charkhi Dadri district.

Demographics

[edit]
Religious groups in Jind State (British Punjab province era)
Religious
group 		1881[18][19][20] 1891[21] 1901[22] 1911[23][24] 1921[25] 1931[26] 1941[27]
Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. % Pop. %
Hinduism [b] 210,627 84.3% 230,846 81.12% 211,963 75.16% 210,222 77.36% 234,721 76.16% 243,561 75.02% 268,355 74.17%
Islam 34,247 13.71% 38,508 13.53% 38,717 13.73% 37,520 13.81% 43,251 14.03% 46,002 14.17% 50,972 14.09%
Sikhism 4,335 1.73% 15,020 5.28% 29,975 10.63% 22,566 8.3% 28,026 9.09% 33,290 10.25% 40,981 11.33%
Jainism 649 0.26% 173 0.06% 1,258 0.45% 1,233 0.45% 1,548 0.5% 1,613 0.5% 1,294 0.36%
Christianity 3 0% 7 0% 80 0.03% 187 0.07% 637 0.21% 210 0.06% 161 0.04%
Zoroastrianism 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 0%
Buddhism 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 0%
Judaism N/a N/a 6 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Others 1 0% 0 0% 10 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 43 0.01%
Total population 249,862 100% 284,560 100% 282,003 100% 271,728 100% 308,183 100% 324,676 100% 361,812 100%
Note: British Punjab province era district borders are not an exact match in the present-day due to various bifurcations to district borders — which since created new districts — throughout the historic Punjab Province region during the post-independence era that have taken into account population increases.
[edit]
  • Raja Gajpat Singh of Jind State
    Raja Gajpat Singh of Jind State
  • Raja Sangat Singh of Jind State
    Raja Sangat Singh of Jind State
  • Raja Swarup Singh of Jind State
    Raja Swarup Singh of Jind State
  • Miniature painting of Sardar Daya Singh Sibia of Ramgarh, revenue minister of Jind State during the reign of Maharaja Raghubir Singh
    Miniature painting of Sardar Daya Singh Sibia of Ramgarh, revenue minister of Jind State during the reign of Maharaja Raghubir Singh
  • Photograph taken in the erstwhile Jind State
    Photograph taken in the erstwhile Jind State
  • Stamp of the Jind State. Edward VII, 1905
    Stamp of the Jind State. Edward VII, 1905

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Jind State

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Jind State was a in the region of British , established in 1763 by Raja Gajpat Singh, a great-grandson of Phul and founder of the Phulkian branch of the misl, who captured the town of from Afghan control following the Sikh sack of Sirhind. With its capital initially at and later shifting administrative focus to , the state expanded to include territories such as , , and through conquests and British grants, covering a patchwork of jagirs amid the declining and rising Sikh power. The rulers of Jind, holding the title of until 1911 when elevated to , allied early with the British , notably aiding against the Marathas in 1803 under Bhag Singh and supporting suppression of the 1857 Indian Rebellion under Sarup Singh, which secured territorial rewards and internal reforms like banning sati and . Subsequent maharajas, including Raghbir and Ranbir , maintained loyalty during conflicts like the Second , fostering stability through administrative modernization and military contributions, though facing internal challenges such as the 1874 peasant revolt. The state acceded to the Dominion of in 1947 and merged into the Patiala and East Punjab States Union (PEPSU) on 15 July 1948, effectively ending its sovereignty as the last ruling Maharaja Rajbir oversaw the transition.

Geography

Location and Terrain

Jind State was located in the Punjab region of north-western India, spanning territories that correspond to parts of present-day Haryana and Punjab states. The state's capital, Jind, lay approximately 110 kilometers northwest of Delhi in central Haryana. Its lands were bounded to the west by Loharu, southeast by Dujana, and south by the Narnaul district, while being detached from contiguous British-administered areas like Rohtak. The terrain of Jind State comprised flat alluvial plains characteristic of the Indo-Gangetic depositional zone, with average elevations ranging from 220 to 250 meters above . These low-lying expanses supported extensive , irrigated primarily by systems and , though the region experienced semi-arid conditions with hot summers reaching over 45°C and cold winters dipping below 5°C. Soils in the area were predominantly sandy loam to loam, calcareous in nature, and often featured a kankar (calcareous nodule) layer at depths of 0.75 to 1.25 meters. These soils were generally deficient in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potash, necessitating fertilization for crop productivity, with major cultivable lands devoted to wheat, cotton, and gram. Alkaline and saline patches, particularly in irrigated zones, posed challenges, alongside occasional wind erosion in drier tracts.

Boundaries and Territorial Extent

Jind State encompassed a non-contiguous territory in southeastern , divided into three principal tahsils: , , and , totaling 1,268 square miles. The configuration featured scattered tracts amid British districts and adjacent Phulkian states, reflecting historical fragmentation from expansions and alliances. The Jind tahsil formed a compact triangular area of 464 square miles, measuring 36 miles east-west and 24.5 miles north-south, bordered north by tahsil in and tahsil in British , east by Pampat tahsil in , south by , and west by tahsil in Hissar district. tahsil, covering 109 square miles, comprised four dispersed areas—Sangrur, Kuldran, Bazidpur, and Balanwali—bounded north and east by territories including Bhawanigarh nizamat and tahsil, south by Kharak village in , and west by Barnala tahsil in and Dhanaula thana in . Dadri tahsil extended over 562 square miles in a 30-by-23-mile oriented northeast-southwest, including hilly outcrops such as Kaliana hill (282 acres), with boundaries east adjoining Dujana State and Bawani nizamat in , south by , and west by Bhawani tahsil in British Hissar district; its southeastern Mohindargarh nizamat bordered State territory to the south and west. Overall, the state's external limits adjoined British districts of to the north, and to the east, Hissar and to the south, and Ferozepore and Faridkot to the west, alongside fellow Phulkian states and , with southern extensions touching territories. This dispersed layout, spanning roughly 29° to 31° N and 74° to 77° E , underscored Jind's position within the cis-Sutlej Phulkian under British protection.

History

Origins of the Phulkian Dynasty

The originated with Chaudhary Phul Sidhu-Brar, a chieftain of the Sidhu-Brar Jat clan born in 1627 CE as the second son of Rup Chand and Mata Ambi in the village of Phul, located in present-day , . Rup Chand, a local , died fighting Mughal forces when Phul was young, leaving him to navigate a turbulent era of imperial decline and regional power struggles. Phul aligned himself with the , beginning service under —the sixth Guru, known for militarizing the Sikh community—and continuing under Gurus Har Rai and Har Krishan, whose blessings are traditionally credited with fortifying his lineage's resilience and expansion. This allegiance provided Phul not only spiritual legitimacy but also practical alliances amid the weakening Mughal grip on 's tract. By the mid-17th century, Phul had established a foothold in , constructing the Phul Fort (also known as Mubarak or Phulkian Fort) as a defensive stronghold that symbolized the clan's emerging autonomy. Through military exploits, land grants, and strategic marriages, he consolidated jagirs in the fertile and cis-Sutlej regions, laying the groundwork for familial branches that would evolve into sovereign entities. Phul's death in 1689 marked the transition to his progeny, who capitalized on the power vacuum following Aurangzeb's death in 1707 and Afghan incursions, transforming petty chieftaincies into misls and later princely states. Phul fathered multiple sons, with key lines descending from figures such as Tiloka and , whose descendants proliferated amid the Sikh Confederacy's rise in the early . The dynasty's structure reflected Jat agrarian roots, emphasizing martial prowess and land control rather than feudal nobility, though later rulers invoked descent from , the 12th-century founder of , to bolster prestige—a claim common among upwardly mobile clans but unsubstantiated by contemporary Mughal or Sikh records identifying them as Jats. This foundational era positioned the Phulkians as key players in Punjab's transition from Mughal satrapies to semi-independent polities, with branches specializing in cis-Sutlej defense against Afghan warlords like Ahmad Shah Abdali. The clan's cohesion derived from shared origins in Phul's cult of devotion and territorial pragmatism, enabling survival where rival misls fragmented.

Foundation and Early Expansion

Jind State originated from the Phulkian Misl, one of the twelve Sikh confederacies active in the 18th century, established by Chaudhary Phul (1627–1689), a Sidhu Jat chieftain whose descendants formed the ruling dynasty. Phul's lineage provided the foundational jagirs in the Punjab region, with his great-grandson, Raja Gajpat Singh (1738–1789), formalizing the state in 1763 by consolidating control over the town of Jind, which became the capital. Born on April 15, 1738, as the second son of Sukhchain Singh, Gajpat Singh inherited a jagir and expanded it through military engagements aligned with Sikh forces against regional threats, including Afghan incursions. Under Gajpat Singh's rule, Jind State underwent significant early expansion, as he annexed additional territories to his original holdings, enhancing the state's territorial extent in the Cis-Sutlej region. By 1775, he constructed a fort at to fortify the capital against invasions, reflecting the state's growing strategic importance amid the power vacuum following Mughal decline and Sikh resurgence. This period saw Jind asserting independence while navigating alliances, often under nominal Maratha influence, though primary sovereignty derived from Phulkian martial traditions rather than external overlords. Following Gajpat Singh's death in 1789, his son Bhag Singh (r. 1789–1818) continued consolidation, maintaining the state's autonomy through diplomatic maneuvering and military defense, setting the stage for formal recognition as a princely entity. The early rulers' focus on territorial acquisition and laid the groundwork for Jind's as a Phulkian power amid the turbulent 18th-century landscape.

Relations with Sikh Empire and Afghans

In the mid-18th century, the Phulkian territories that would form Jind State faced repeated incursions from Afghan forces under Ahmad Shah Durrani and his governors. The Phulkian misl, including figures like Ala Singh of Patiala, engaged in defensive actions against Durrani's invasions, such as the 1748 battle at Manpur where Ala Singh allied with Mughal forces to repel Afghan advances. By 1762, Afghan pressure intensified, leading Ala Singh to submit temporarily and agree to annual tribute payments to Ahmad Shah, reflecting the precarious balance of tribute and resistance maintained by Phulkian leaders to preserve autonomy amid broader Sikh-Afghan conflicts. The foundation of Jind State in 1763 directly stemmed from resistance to Afghan authority. Raja Gajpat Singh, a great-grandson of the Phulkian progenitor Chaudhary Phul, participated in a Sikh coalition that attacked Sirhind, defeating and killing Zain Khan, the Afghan governor of the province, in a pivotal engagement that weakened Durrani influence in the region. As a reward for this victory, Gajpat Singh received a substantial tract of land encompassing Jind and surrounding areas, establishing the state's core territory independent of Afghan overlordship and marking a shift toward consolidated Phulkian control in the Malwa region south of the Sutlej River. Relations with the under Maharaja were characterized by tension and resistance to absorption. The Phulkian states, including , maintained independence from the Lahore Durbar, refusing alignment with 's unification efforts due to their established and smaller-scale structures. exerted military pressure on the Cis-Sutlej Phulkian territories, seeking to expand eastward, but these ambitions were curtailed by the 1809 Treaty of Amritsar between the British East India Company and , which recognized the Sutlej River as a boundary and effectively shielded , , and from Sikh conquest by affirming British influence in the region. Subsequent Jind rulers, such as Bagh Singh (r. 1790–1818), navigated ongoing Sikh overtures by forging protective alliances with the British, who viewed the Phulkians as buffers against Ranjit Singh's expansionism. This strategic alignment allowed Jind to avoid direct subjugation, preserving its sovereignty until British paramountcy formalized protectorates in the early , while Ranjit Singh focused conquests northward and westward without successfully incorporating the Malwa Phulkian states.

Establishment as British Protectorate

In the early 19th century, the Phulkian state of , located south of the River, confronted expansionist pressures from Maharaja Ranjit Singh's , which sought to consolidate control over the region. The rulers of the , including , , and , increasingly turned to the British East India Company for alliance against this northern threat, recognizing the Company's growing military presence in northern following victories in the Maratha Wars. On 25 April 1809, formally entered into a protective relationship with the British through engagements tied to the Treaty of Amritsar, signed that same day between the and . This treaty demarcated the Sutlej River as the boundary between Sikh territories north of the river and the Cis-Sutlej principalities to the south, with the British guaranteeing the independence and security of the latter against Sikh incursions. Under Bhag Singh (r. 1789–1819), accepted British overlordship in external affairs, ceding rights to conduct independent while retaining in internal , taxation, and administration. This status marked a pivotal shift for , embedding it within the British imperial framework in and fostering a period of relative stability that allowed territorial consolidation and economic recovery. The arrangement proved mutually beneficial initially, as British protection deterred Afghan and Sikh aggression, enabling Jind to focus on internal development without the constant warfare that plagued independent polities in the region.

Loyalty During the 1857 Revolt

Raja Sarup Singh, ruler of Jind State from 1837 to 1864, demonstrated loyalty to the British East India Company during the Indian Rebellion of 1857. Upon receiving news of the mutiny at on May 12, 1857, while at the state capital of , he promptly offered his troops and to the British authorities. Sarup Singh led his forces on forced marches to , where he occupied the cantonment with approximately 800 men and secured the ferry over the River, preventing rebel advances. He joined the at Alipur on June 7, 1857, remaining until June 25 to support operations before returning to address local threats, including suppressing rebels from and Hisar districts. As part of the Phulkian confederacy, Jind's support aligned with that of and , providing crucial military aid in that helped stabilize British control in the region amid widespread sepoy unrest. This allegiance, rooted in prior treaties and strategic interests, was rewarded post-revolt with territorial expansions and honors, including sanads confirming hereditary rule.

Administrative Reforms in the Late 19th-20th Centuries

Following the loyalty demonstrated during the 1857 revolt, Jind State, as a British protectorate, pursued administrative modernization influenced by imperial models. Raja Sarup Singh (r. 1837–1864) initiated key reforms in revenue collection and police organization, aligning them with British practices to enhance efficiency and central control. He also enacted social measures, prohibiting sati, slavery, and female infanticide, with strict enforcement to curb these customs. Revenue assessment advanced with the first summary cash-based settlement in tahsil during 1861–1862, conducted by M. Kale Khan, which estimated produce values over a period to standardize taxation. Under Raja Raghbir Singh (r. 1864–1887), administrative stability was reinforced by swiftly quelling the insurrection in 1864 using 2,000 state troops, restoring order within six weeks. Maharaja Ranbir Singh (r. 1887–1948), formally installed in 1899 after a regency council oversaw his minority, expanded progressive governance. He introduced free across the state, constructing schools and colleges to promote . improvements included building hospitals and medical dispensaries, alongside establishing charities for widows and orphans of state servants. These initiatives reflected British-inspired welfare and administrative rationalization, with the state providing military contingents for imperial campaigns such as the Expedition in 1897. By the early , Jind's administration integrated modern elements while retaining princely autonomy, contributing to regional stability under British paramountcy until accession to in 1947.

Merger into Independent

Maharaja Ranbir Singh, who had ruled Jind State since 1887, signed the to the Dominion of on 15 August 1947, the day of 's independence, thereby ceding control over defense, external affairs, and communications to the central government while retaining internal autonomy. This act aligned Jind with the Indian Union amid the partition of British , reflecting the state's prior loyalty to British authorities and its strategic position in . Ranbir Singh died on 31 March 1948, after a reign of 61 years, leaving succession to his son, Rajbir Singh. Under Rajbir Singh, Jind participated in negotiations for greater integration, joining a covenant signed on 5 May 1948 by rulers of eight states—including , , , and —to form the Patiala and States Union (PEPSU). PEPSU was officially established on 15 July 1948 as a single administrative entity within , with Patiala's Maharaja as , effectively dissolving Jind's separate princely status while preserving some privileges until their abolition in 1971. This merger into PEPSU marked the full incorporation of Jind's territories—totaling approximately 1,259 square miles and encompassing tahsils like , , and —into 's federal structure, facilitating post-independence consolidation in the region amid refugee resettlement from partition violence. PEPSU itself persisted as a distinct state until 1 November 1956, when it was reorganized and absorbed into the enlarged state following the States Reorganisation Act.

Governance and Administration

List of Rulers

The rulers of Jind State belonged to the , tracing descent from Chaudhary Phul, and held the title of until elevated to for later incumbents. The state was founded in 1763 by Gajpat Singh, who consolidated territory amid Sikh and Afghan conflicts.
RulerReignNotes
Gajpat 1763–1789Founder; born circa 1738, died 1789; expanded holdings including town.
Bhag 1789–1819Born 1768, died 1819; supported British against Marathas; regency by widow after early death of sons.
Fateh 1819–1822Born 1789, died 1822; brief rule ended prematurely; succeeded by minor son amid succession issues.
Sangat 1822–1834Born 1811, died 1834; ruled under regency; died without issue, leading to interregnum.
Sarup 1837–1864Born circa 1812, died 1864; selected successor; allied with British, introduced reforms.
Raghbir 1864–1887Born 1832, died 1887; loyal during 1857 revolt; held titles including GCSI.
Ranbir 1887–1947Born 1879, died 1948; ascended at age 8 under regency; title Maharaja from 1911; ruled until accession to .
Rajbir 1948Born 1918, died 1959; titular Maharaja; oversaw merger into Patiala and States Union.
Succession disputes occurred after Bhag Singh's death and Sangat Singh's demise without heirs, resolved through British arbitration favoring Phulkian kin. The dynasty maintained Hindu Jat traditions, with rulers receiving sanads confirming titles post-1857 loyalty.

Hereditary Succession and Key Figures

The hereditary succession in Jind State adhered to male , whereby the eldest legitimate son inherited the throne upon the ruler's death, a practice consistently followed by the Phulkian ruling families. In cases of childless rulers or premature deaths leaving minors, regencies were established—often under the ruler's or British oversight—while collateral succession from close kin occurred when direct lines failed, as British authorities mediated to preserve stability. Adoptions were rare but permitted under British paramountcy to avert lapses, ensuring continuity within the Phulkian lineage descending from Chaudhary Phul via his grandson Gajpat Singh. Raja Gajpat (r. 1763–1789), a great-grandson of Phul through his son Chuno, founded Jind State in 1763 by consolidating territories amid Sikh misl expansions and Mughal decline, earning formal recognition as from Emperor after initial imprisonment for revenue arrears. His successor, Raja Bagh (r. 1789–1819), expanded alliances with the British East India Company, notably aiding against Maratha forces in 1803, which granted additional lands but ended in his death amid palace intrigues following a stroke and regency by his wife Daya Kaur. Raja Fateh Singh (r. 1819–1822), son of Bagh Singh, briefly ruled after suppressing a rebellion by his brother Partab Singh in 1814, dying young and leaving a minor heir under the regency of Rani Mai Sahib Kaur. His son, Raja Sangat Singh (r. 1822–1834), assumed full powers in 1827 after regency but proved profligate, relocating the capital to Sangrur while mismanaging finances, leading to estate forfeitures to the Company and his death without issue in 1834. This prompted British selection of Raja Swarup Singh (r. 1837–1864), a collateral relative, who fortified Jind's loyalty by combating Sikhs in the First Anglo-Sikh War (1845–1846) and suppressing mutineers in 1857, earning honors like the title Maharaja and bans on practices such as sati, slavery, and female infanticide. Later rulers included Maharaja Raghubir Singh (r. 1864–1887), Swarup Singh's son, who served as an imperial councillor in 1877 and advanced administrative reforms; and his grandson Maharaja Ranbir Singh (r. 1887–1948), whose 60-year reign spanned British paramountcy, accession to India in 1947, and merger into Patiala and East Punjab States Union (PEPSU) shortly before his death. Post-merger, titular succession continued with Maharaja Rajbir Singh (1948–1959), who oversaw the brief independent phase before PEPSU integration, followed by Maharaja Satbir Singh from 1959, maintaining family estates amid republican India. These figures exemplified Phulkian adaptability, balancing internal governance with external alliances that preserved the state's autonomy until 1948.

Administrative Divisions

Jind State was administratively organized into two nizamats, and , established in 1837 to facilitate governance over its territory of approximately 3,260 square kilometers. These nizamats were further subdivided into tahsils, the primary revenue and judicial units, comprising tahsil within the Sangrur nizamat, and and tahsils within the Jind nizamat. Each tahsil was headed by a tahsildar responsible for land revenue collection, law and order, and local administration, reflecting the centralized yet decentralized structure typical of princely states under British paramountcy. The nizamat, centered around its namesake town which served as the winter capital, encompassed fertile agricultural lands intermingled with adjacent princely territories, while the nizamat included the summer capital at Khunga Kothi and extended into semi-arid regions towards . By 1901, this division supported a of about 320,000, with tahsils managing from canals like the Western and local zamindari systems. Administrative reforms in the late introduced British-influenced revenue settlements, enhancing efficiency without altering the core tahsil framework.

Judicial and Fiscal Systems

The of Jind State held supreme judicial authority, exercising plenary powers that encompassed civil, criminal, and revenue matters, including the imposition of capital sentences. This centralized structure reflected the sovereign status of princely rulers under British paramountcy, where local disputes were often resolved through customary panchayats or village assemblies for minor cases, escalating to state-level for serious offenses. A formal Judicial Department oversaw operations, but British administrative reports from the late 19th and early 20th centuries documented systemic deficiencies, including rampant bribery, corruption, and delays in case disposal, rendering the inefficient and biased toward influential elites. Fiscal administration centered on land revenue as the primary income source, assessed through periodic settlements across taluqs such as , , and . These assessments involved measuring cultivable land and fixing rates based on , crop yields, and access, with collections handled by state officials akin to tehsildars. Historical records indicate that in one such evaluation covering 144 villages in and taluqs, land revenue totaled Rs. 153,065, supplemented by cesses amounting to Rs. 26,659 for local improvements like roads and wells. Extra levies, including customs duties and abkari (excise) on , further bolstered revenues, though reports criticized the system for excessive burdens, such as a on the birth of a male child, which exacerbated peasant indebtedness and contributed to perceptions of fiscal oppression. By the early , annual state revenues exceeded Rs. 2 lakhs from core territories, reflecting expansion but also reliance on agrarian extraction without significant diversification.

Military Affairs

Composition of Forces

The military forces of Jind State were structured around , , and artillery units, reflecting the princely state's obligations under British paramountcy and its participation in imperial campaigns. The core component was the Jind Imperial Service , originally raised as the Suraj Mukhi in 1837 and reorganized in 1889 with a sanctioned strength of 600 officers and men, supplemented by 40 followers. This unit, composed predominantly of Jat from the state's population, served as the primary combat arm and was deployed in expeditions such as the of 1897 and in , where a contingent of 380 men (including 363 rank and file) participated from 1914 to 1917. Cavalry elements included the Akal Cavalry Regiment, initially 200 strong when raised in 1845 under Raja Sarup Singh, later restructured as the Jind Imperial Service Lancers with 150 sabres by 1889, though this was eventually disbanded. Local cavalry forces totaled around 220 men by 1912, often drawn from Jat Sikh recruits similar to the infantry. Artillery support comprised the Sherdil Horse Artillery, established in 1838 with 104–147 personnel, and a mountain battery of 117 officers and men under Raja Raghbir Singh, equipped with field guns and supported by 70 mules. Overall state military strength in the late 19th century hovered around 1,700–1,800 personnel, including 200 cavalry, 1,581 infantry (encompassing gunners and police), 4 fort guns, and 6 field guns as recorded in 1870–71, with peacetime totals reaching 433 combatants by 1914 under one British officer's oversight. These forces emphasized loyalty to the British, functioning as Imperial Service Troops from 1889 onward, and were augmented by transport units with 74 soldiers, 258 animals, and followers for logistics. Post-independence, the Jind Infantry integrated into the Indian Army in 1951, contributing to units like the 13th Punjab Regiment.

Major Engagements and Alliances

Raja Gajpat Singh, founder of in 1763, participated in the Sikh coalition against Afghan Governor Zain Khan's forces at the Battle of Sirhind, contributing to the defeat of Afghan power in the region and securing territorial grants for as a share of the spoils. Under Raja Bhag Singh (r. 1803–1813), forged its initial formal alliance with the British East India Company, providing military assistance to Lord Lake during the Second Anglo-Maratha War in 1803, which solidified British influence in northern and positioned as a loyal cis-Sutlej . This early alignment evolved into a pattern of auxiliary support during British campaigns; Jind forces aided in suppressing regional threats, including Pindari raids and hill tribe incursions in the early , earning reciprocal protection under British paramountcy treaties signed in and subsequent agreements. By the mid-19th century, Jind's military commitments extended to the Imperial Service Troops scheme, with the state maintaining a dedicated trained and equipped to for overseas deployment. In , the Jind Imperial Service Regiment, comprising approximately 500 troops under British command, served in from 1916 to 1919, engaging German forces in battles such as Kisangire (November 1917) and Kisiju (September 1917), where it supported advances against entrenched positions amid harsh tropical conditions. The state further contributed a war gift exceeding 24 lakh rupees to the British effort, reflecting Maharaja Ranbir Singh's commitment to the alliance. During , Jind provided contingents to the , including support for Allied operations in the and , though specific engagements were integrated into larger imperial units rather than independent actions. Jind's alliances remained confined primarily to the British Empire and fellow Phulkian states (Patiala and Nabha), avoiding entanglements with the Sikh Empire or rival misls, which preserved its autonomy as a protected principality until 1947. This strategic fidelity ensured territorial stability but limited independent military initiatives beyond auxiliary roles.

Role in Regional Stability

Jind State's role in regional stability was prominently demonstrated during the , when Raja Sarup Singh aligned with British forces against the mutineers. The state provided troops, logistical support, and intelligence, contributing to the containment of unrest in and preventing its linkage with Delhi-based rebels. This assistance from Jind, alongside other Phulkian states like and , leveraged their strategic location along key communication routes, effectively stabilizing British control in the northwest. The Phulkian confederacy's longstanding alliances with the British East India Company, formalized through subsidiary treaties since the early , further underscored Jind's stabilizing influence. By maintaining internal order and frontier security against potential incursions from Afghan or Sikh factions, Jind helped buffer British Punjab from external threats post the Anglo-Sikh Wars. In recognition of these efforts, the British granted Jind additional territories and elevated its to 13 guns by 1861, reinforcing the state's position as a reliable partner in regional pacification. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Jind's participated in campaigns that indirectly supported Punjab's stability, such as border patrols and anti-bandit operations, though primary contributions remained tied to loyalty during crises like 1857. This pattern of cooperation persisted until integration into independent in 1948, where Jind's merger into the Patiala and East Punjab States Union facilitated orderly transition amid partition violence.

Economy and Society

Agricultural Base and Revenue Systems

The economy of Jind State was predominantly agrarian, with forming the backbone of its revenue and sustaining the majority of its . The state's , spanning approximately 3,260 square kilometers across the tahsils of , , and , featured varied soil types, predominantly light loams suitable for dry crops but requiring irrigation for higher yields in fertile pockets. In the more developed and tahsils, wells provided primary irrigation, supplemented by canals such as branches of the system, enabling cultivation of cash crops like and ; however, tahsil remained largely unirrigated, exposing it to frequent droughts and limiting productivity, where 57 percent of the cultivated area was and 23 percent deemed unavailable for farming. Principal crops included and as staples in irrigated zones, alongside millets (jowar and bajra), gram, pulses, and in rain-fed areas, with manuring practices minimal due to and economic constraints. Land revenue constituted the state's primary fiscal pillar, derived from a of proprietary village tenures inherited from Phulkian traditions, where zamindars or village proprietors held rights to collect and remit assessments to the ruler, often at rates akin to British settlements but with jagirdari elements in granted estates. Revenue assessments were periodically revised through local settlements, factoring in yields, classes, and access, with collections enforced via village headmen (lambardars) and state officials; tenants-at-will paid rents equivalent to revenue rates, while occupancy rights were recognized for long-term cultivators. By the early , land revenue yielded the bulk of state income, estimated to form over 70 percent of total receipts, with the overall balancing at Rs. 2,100,000 in 1903–04, excluding supplementary sources like customs (Rs. 133,000) and excise (Rs. 100,000). Historical fiscal pressures, including Mughal-era demands and Sikh disruptions, had shaped a resilient but variable , prone to remissions during famines, as seen in drought-prone . This agrarian framework supported modest state revenues, rising to Rs. 3,000,000 annually by the 1940s amid incremental irrigation expansions and crop diversification, though vulnerability to climatic variability underscored the need for conservative fiscal policies.

Trade and Infrastructure

The economy of Jind State was primarily agricultural, with trade focused on exporting surplus produce from its fertile territories in the region. Large quantities of , , , and oilseeds were exported through principal markets at Sangrur, , and , supporting regional and contributing to the state's revenue, estimated at around Rs. 700,000 annually during the rule of Raja Raghbir Singh (1864–1887). Local manufacturing included gold and silver ornaments, goods, and wooden articles, while exports from areas like extended to Bombay markets. Infrastructure development, particularly under British influence and Phulkian rulers, enhanced trade efficiency. The Delhi–Firozpur railway line, operational by the early , passed through , facilitating the transport of and connecting the state to broader networks; a map from 1909 depicts these lines alongside administrative divisions including , , and tahsils. Roads supplemented rail connectivity, linking internal markets to surrounding districts, though detailed mileage records from the period emphasize metaled routes to key towns. Irrigation systems were critical for agricultural productivity, with the state benefiting from Punjab canal networks such as the system. Allocations included 353 cusecs of water to irrigate approximately 60,000 acres annually in certain reporting years, mitigating reliance on rainfall in semi-arid tahsils like , which otherwise lacked extensive . Cotton ginning factories, introduced in 1902, processed local crops for export, marking early industrial efforts aligned with trade demands.

Demographic Composition

The demographic composition of Jind State reflected the agrarian and caste-based prevalent in the Punjab's Jangal tract, dominated by who comprised more than 33 percent of the population and served as primary landowners and cultivators. The subclan of , affiliated with the ruling family, held particular prominence in the capital and the Sheo tract, underscoring their influence in local governance and . Other notable castes included Brahmins as and administrators, Rajputs as warriors, and various artisan and laboring groups such as chamars and lohar, though precise breakdowns beyond Jats remain limited in contemporary records. Religiously, Hindus formed the overwhelming majority, engaging in traditional village-based practices, while Sikhs represented a substantial minority bolstered by the dynasty's adherence to and patronage of gurdwaras, fostering conversions among and other martial castes. Muslims constituted a minor proportion, largely urban traders and converts from lower castes, with negligible presence in rural areas. The 1901 enumerated the total Jat population within the state at 71,118, highlighting their socioeconomic centrality amid a broader populace reliant on , millet, and cultivation. Urbanization was minimal, with over 90 percent of inhabitants in scattered villages across the state's 1,259 square miles, yielding a low density suited to pastoral-agricultural pursuits; towns like (population 11,852 in 1901) and housed administrative elites and markets but little industrial activity. Literacy hovered below 5 percent overall, confined mostly to upper castes and males, per regional patterns, with no significant tribal or nomadic elements beyond seasonal herders.

Cultural and Religious Practices

The ruling Phulkian family of Jind State adhered to , having originated from Sikh chieftains of the region who established the state in the . As part of the broader Phulkian misl tradition, the rulers promoted adherence to Sikh religious codes and contributed to the preservation of Sikh identity through patronage of gurdwaras and religious institutions across their territories. The state's population exhibited religious diversity typical of princely states, with Hindus comprising the majority, alongside notable Sikh communities particularly in northern areas and a Muslim minority estimated at around 14% in the early . Religious practices emphasized communal worship and festivals shared across Hindu and Sikh traditions, such as Baisakhi marking the Sikh new year and harvest and commemorating historical Sikh events like the release of . Rulers maintained Hindu temples, including ancient sites linked to the Mahabharata-era founding legend of town around a Pandava-associated , while fostering Sikh langar (community kitchens) and recitation of the in court and public settings. Muslim subjects observed and Eid, with mosques supported under the state's pluralistic governance, though interfaith tensions occasionally arose amid regional Sikh-Muslim dynamics in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Culturally, Jind's elite engaged in patronage of North Indian arts, including miniature painting and portraiture depicting rulers in durbar settings, which blended Sikh martial motifs with Persian-influenced styles inherited from Mughal traditions. The Phulkian rulers, akin to those in sister states, supported , literature, and Punjabi folk forms like bhangra dances during harvest celebrations, reinforcing a shared regional identity rooted in agrarian rhythms and martial heritage. Daily life incorporated caste-based customs among Jat landholders and artisan communities, with women observing in elite households but participating in folk songs and embroidery traditions. These practices underscored a synthesis of Sikh with enduring Hindu social structures, sustained by the dynasty's emphasis on cultural continuity amid British paramountcy.

Legacy and Controversies

Contributions to Regional Order

Jind State contributed to regional order in primarily through strategic alliances with the British , which helped suppress rebellions and maintain stability amid Sikh expansions and later mutinies. As a Phulkian Jat , its rulers prioritized loyalty to British authority to safeguard their autonomy, providing military contingents and logistical aid that reinforced imperial control over northern . This support was instrumental in preventing widespread disorder during critical conflicts, aligning Jind's interests with broader efforts to pacify the region following Afghan invasions and Maratha incursions. In 1803, the ruler of became the first Cis-Sutlej prince to formally ally with the British, assisting Lord Lake's forces against the Marathas and receiving territorial rewards in return, which solidified British influence in and curbed rival powers. During the Anglo-Sikh Wars of the , 's leadership backed British campaigns against the , contributing warriors and resources that aided in limiting Sikh territorial ambitions and establishing a buffer against further northern threats. The most notable contribution occurred during the Indian Revolt of 1857, when Raja Sarup Singh mobilized state troops to assist British suppression efforts in , providing , , and supplies to prevent the uprising's spread from and maintain order in the Cis-Sutlej territories. This intervention, alongside similar actions by other Phulkian states, was pivotal in isolating rebel forces and restoring British authority, earning Jind enhanced privileges and exemplifying how princely loyalty quelled potential anarchy. Subsequent rulers extended this role into imperial defense; Maharaja Raghubir Singh dispatched 700 cavalry and infantry to the Second Anglo-Afghan War in the 1870s–1880s, bolstering frontier security. Maharaja Ranbir Singh further supplied contingents for the of 1897 and operations in , contributing to regional stability by deterring external aggressions and integrating Jind into Britain's global military framework. These efforts collectively fostered a stable administrative order in , reducing inter-state rivalries and banditry under British paramountcy until independence.

Criticisms of Governance

Governance in Jind State faced criticism for its autocratic structure, which concentrated power in the and limited popular participation, contributing to periodic unrest among subjects. The retained authority over cabinet decisions even in the transitional representative assembly established on January 18, 1947, undermining efforts toward accountable administration. During the reign of Raja Sarup (r. 1834–1864), administrative disorganization became pronounced, eroding public respect for the ruling authority and fostering widespread hatred among the populace. This period saw internal rebellions, such as the uprising by Bhura and Nikaiya warriors in Lajwana village, which was brutally suppressed with executions, highlighting failures in maintaining order and addressing grievances. Peasant exploitation triggered significant revolts, notably in the region. Following the award of to after the 1857 revolt, approximately fifty villages rose against heavy-handed revenue demands shortly after 's death in 1864. Under his successor, (r. 1864–1887), a major peasant insurrection erupted in in May 1874, driven by economic burdens and administrative indifference, requiring forceful suppression. The Praja Mandal movement, active from the late 1920s, amplified criticisms of maladministration, particularly under Raja Ranbir Singh (r. 1900–1903) and later rulers, decrying high land enhancements, begar (forced unpaid labor), corruption, and neglect of education and social services. By the 1930s, branches proliferated in areas like , , and town, culminating in a February 1947 revolt in where agitators established a parallel administration to protest ongoing exploitation. These movements exposed systemic restrictions on and economic inherent in the feudal .

Post-Merger Heritage Conservation

Following the merger of Jind State into the and States Union in 1948 and its subsequent integration into in 1966, numerous heritage structures associated with the former experienced significant neglect, exacerbated by resource constraints and prioritization of development over preservation. Many monuments, including palaces and forts, deteriorated without systematic maintenance, leading to proposals for repurposing sites for contemporary infrastructure, such as converting the dilapidated Maharaja's palace in city into a medical facility in 2014. Key sites like Khunga Kothi, a early-20th-century constructed by Ranbir near , have awaited formal heritage designation despite local initiatives; groups raised approximately ₹300,000 around 2016 for basic cleaning and repairs, though efforts fell short of standards required by the (ASI), risking further structural damage. Similarly, the Nawab's Palace within the 18th-century fort at , erected by rulers, remains state-protected but under-maintained, highlighting inconsistent post-independence oversight. State-level interventions gained momentum in 2015 when the government launched a rehabilitation program for state-protected monuments, addressing over 200 sites province-wide amid criticisms of inadequate funding. In , this included documentation and partial upkeep of structures like Qila Zafargarh fort, a small built by rulers near the Jind-Rohtak road, listed among protected assets by the Haryana Archaeology and Museums Department. By September 2025, allocated ₹95 crore for restoring and beautifying 20 centrally and state-protected heritage sites across eight districts, explicitly including Qila Jafargarh (Zafargarh) in to enhance and cultural preservation; this initiative marks a shift toward systematic conservation, though implementation challenges persist due to fiscal limitations. Overall, while grassroots and governmental actions have prevented total loss of 's tangible legacy, comprehensive efforts remain limited compared to more prominent regional sites, with ongoing risks from and deferred upkeep.

Modern Interpretations and Disputes

In contemporary Sikh , the Phulkian rulers of , including its Sidhu Jat Sikh chiefs, are often critiqued for diverging from the Khalsa's martial and egalitarian ethos, having established semi-autonomous principalities through alliances with Mughal and later British authorities rather than fully integrating into the Sikh misls. This interpretation contrasts with broader Indian historical narratives, which portray Jind's loyalty to the British—such as providing troops during the 1857 revolt and suppressing unrest—as pragmatic that preserved regional stability amid collapse and colonial expansion. Such views highlight causal factors like geographic isolation east of the Sutlej River, which insulated Phulkians from the intense faced by western Sikh sardars, enabling separate state-building trajectories. These historiographical tensions persist in debates over Jind's role in events like the 1923-1925 Nabha crisis, where Phulkian states, including Jind, aligned with British forces against Akali reformers seeking control, reinforcing perceptions of over communal solidarity. In Haryana's regional , however, Jind's legacy is reframed positively as foundational to Jat and administrative continuity, emphasizing rulers' developments and integration into post-1947 entities like the Patiala and East Punjab States Union (PEPSU) without major resistance. Post-merger disputes have centered on the erstwhile royal family's internal conflicts over inheritance and remnants, with the lineage of Ranbir Singh (r. 1887-1947) fractured by litigation; in 2019, counsel for claimant threatened action against relatives amid wealth division claims. Government encroachments add contention, as seen in 2023 when authorities initiated possession of lands historically granted to rulers, citing lapsed tenures under post-independence reforms. These frictions underscore the erosion of princely privileges, with no substantiated modern territorial but ongoing assertions of cultural custodianship in Haryana's Jat-dominated .

References

  1. https://jind.gov.in/about-district/history/
  2. https://www.royalark.net/India/jind.htm
  3. https://www.britannica.com/place/Jind
  4. https://www.indianetzone.com/princely_state_jind
  5. https://jindcity.com/geographical-details-of-jind.php
  6. https://jind.gov.in/geography/
  7. https://www.cgwb.gov.in/old_website/District_Profile/Haryana/Jind.pdf
  8. https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.35241/2015.35241.Punjab-State-Gazetteers--Vol-Xvii-A-Phulkian-States-Patiala-Jind-And-Nabha-With-Maps_djvu.txt
  9. https://www.thesikhencyclopedia.com/phul/
  10. https://www.facebook.com/peepsofpunjab/posts/when-the-youth-decides-to-preserve-a-phul-of-historybaba-phul-was-the-ancestor-o/2674985016154826/
  11. https://www.scribd.com/doc/23739615/The-Jat-People-Dhillons-in-History
  12. https://jatchiefs.com/dynasties/sidhu-dynasty-states/jind/
  13. https://www.thesikhencyclopedia.com/gajpat-singh-raja/
  14. https://jatchiefs.com/raja-gajpat-singh/
  15. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=166964607033660&id=166866363710151&set=a.166963600367094
  16. https://www.reddit.com/r/punjab/comments/191h9lz/this_year_marks_333_years_since_ala_singh_founder/
  17. http://sikhcoin.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-coinage-of-sikh-state-of-patiala.html
  18. https://www.facebook.com/groups/sikhmilitaryhistoryforum/posts/2880180308662980/
  19. https://jatchiefs.com/relation-between-lahore-jind/
  20. http://www.panjabdigilib.org/webuser/searches/downloadPdf.jsp?file=BK-001140.pdf&docid=2694
  21. https://kids.kiddle.co/Jind_State
  22. https://www.facebook.com/groups/208332826391090/posts/359720524585652/
  23. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/6/29711.pdf
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44141378
  25. https://www.sikhnet.com/news/role-sikhs-mutiny-1857
  26. https://www.thesikhencyclopedia.com/sarup-singh-raja/
  27. http://www.sikh-heritage.co.uk/heritage/Maharajas%20of%20Punjab/JIND/jind.htm
  28. https://jind.gov.in/revenue-department/
  29. https://jatchiefs.com/maharaja-ranbir-singh-of-jind/
  30. https://www.royalark.net/India/jind4.htm
  31. http://www.geocities.ws/rpf_manipur/memorandum/a104-206.html
  32. https://www.rulers.org/indstat1.html
  33. https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/judgments/index.php?go=1993/august/6.php
  34. https://www.royalark.net/India/jind3.htm
  35. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/445/download/1428/DH_2011_0609_PART_B_DCHB_JIND.pdf
  36. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1907L85.pdf
  37. https://ia801402.us.archive.org/25/items/imperialgazettee22grea/imperialgazettee22grea.pdf
  38. https://brill.com/edcollchap-oa/book/9789004707061/BP000016.xml
  39. https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3d79c6256b9bdac53a55801a066b70da3/uploads/2020/10/2020101422.pdf
  40. https://gurmatveechar.com/books/English_Books/English_Thesis_Papers/Role.of.the.Sikh.rulers.of.princely.states.of.the.Punjab.in.the.first.world.war.%28GurmatVeechar.com%29.pdf
  41. https://www.greatwarforum.org/topic/87217-the-jind-infantry/
  42. https://www.bharat-rakshak.com/army/history/isf/
  43. http://jatchiefs.com/dynasties/sidhu-dynasty-states/jind/
  44. https://www.socialsciencejournal.in/assets/archives/2023/vol9issue3/9068-1684153039731.pdf
  45. https://gweaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/KISANGIRE-AND-KISIJU.pdf
  46. https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3d79c6256b9bdac53a55801a066b70da3/uploads/2020/10/2020102626.pdf
  47. https://archive.org/stream/dli.csl.2941/2941_djvu.txt
  48. https://www.scribd.com/document/516296792/Phulkian-State-Gazzetter
  49. https://ia801900.us.archive.org/17/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.115459/2015.115459.Irrigation-Department-Punjab-Administration-Report-Statistical-Statements-And-Accounts_text.pdf
  50. http://indpaedia.com/ind/index.php/Jind_State%2C_1908
  51. https://newpakhistorian.wordpress.com/2019/09/13/jat-population-of-punjab-according-to-the-1901-census-of-india/
  52. https://www.thetrishsaabblog.com/confederacy/phulkian
  53. https://wikipedia.nucleos.com/viewer/wikipedia_en_all_maxi_2024-01/A/Islam_in_Punjab%252C_India
  54. https://indiaroyalfamilies.com/sikh-sovereigns-of-punjab/
  55. https://www.travel-video.info/en/dynasty-en/india-phulkian-dynasty.html
  56. https://dvnetwork.org/page/sikh-misl
  57. https://www.facebook.com/VinitBhanwala/posts/history-of-jind-dynasty-the-kings-of-jind-patiala-and-nabha-princely-states-are-/707985143368330/
  58. https://charkhidadri.dcourts.gov.in/about-department/history/
  59. https://selfstudyhistory.com/2015/02/13/praja-mandal-movements-in-princely-states/
  60. https://www.granthaalayahpublication.org/Arts-Journal/ShodhKosh/article/view/3540
  61. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/kaleidoscope/limited-resources-are-a-hindrance-764796/
  62. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chandigarh/jind-maharajas-dilapidated-palace-may-make-way-for-pgi-centre/
  63. https://www.academia.edu/31542222/Khunga_Kothi_Jind_awaits_heritage_tag
  64. https://blogvirasatehind.wordpress.com/2017/07/06/khunga-kothi-retreat-awaits-revival/
  65. https://www.archaeology.haryana.gov.in/sites/default/files/site-docs/Heritage-Monuments-and-Sites-of-Haryana.pdf
  66. https://www.academia.edu/37129402/REHABILITATION_OF_STATE_PROTECTED_MONUMENTS_IN_HARYANA
  67. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/haryana/20-protected-heritage-sites-to-be-restored-beautified-in-state/
  68. https://www.travelandtourworld.com/news/article/cultural-revival-in-haryana-restoration-of-historical-gems-like-mirza-ali-jans-baoli-qila-jafargarh-and-lal-gumbad-to-boost-states-tourism-appeal/
  69. https://academic.oup.com/book/34589/chapter/294152710
  70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2943179
  71. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/haryana/counsel-clears-air-on-erstwhile-royal-family-719373/
  72. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/chandigarh-news/sangrur-admn-begins-process-to-take-possession-of-land-given-to-jind-maharaja-101695237920775.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.