Hubbry Logo
Languages of TexasLanguages of TexasMain
Open search
Languages of Texas
Community hub
Languages of Texas
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Languages of Texas
Languages of Texas
Languages of Texas
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Of the languages spoken in Texas, none has been designated the official language. As of 2020, 64.9% of residents spoke only English at home, while 28.8% spoke Spanish at home.[1] Throughout the history of Texas, English and Spanish have at one time or another been the primary dominant language used by government officials, with German recognized as a minority language from statehood until the first World War. Prior to European colonization, several indigenous languages were spoken in what is now Texas, including Caddoan, Na-Dené and Uto-Aztecan languages.

Official language status

[edit]

Texas currently does not have an official language, although historically there have been laws giving both official status and recognition to English, Spanish, German and Norwegian.

In 1834, Degree No. 270 of Coahuila y Tejas gave both English and Spanish official status in Texas.[2] In 1836, the Provisional Government of Texas, in establishing the Judiciary of Texas, provided that Court of Records may be in English.[3]

In 1837, the Congress of the Republic of Texas passed a joint resolution directing the Secretary of State provide an official Spanish translation of general laws,[4] and the act of congress incorporating the City of San Antonio provided that public schools be erected that taught in English,[5] later in 1841 the Spanish Language law was suspended[6] for one year until being reenacted in 1842[7]

In 1846, the newly admitted State of Texas enacted legislation requiring that the laws of Texas be translated into German in addition to Spanish.[6]

In 1856, an act was passed that allowed for legal proceedings in Justice of the Peace courts in counties west of the Guadalupe River (excluding Nueces, Refugio and San Patricio) to be conducted solely in Spanish if the Judge and all parties spoke Spanish.[8]

In 1858, an act was passed requiring public schools teach primarily in English.;[9] In the same year the law requiring the translation of Texas criminal law was briefly extended to Norwegian for two years.[10]

In 1893, State law was passed requiring all public schools to teach exclusively in English.[11]

In 1925, it was made a criminal offense to give instruction in Spanish in Public schools. This law was amended in 1927 to allow Spanish instruction in Elementary schools located in counties bordering Mexico with at least one city of 5,000 population.[12]

Nevertheless, English (specifically, American English) is the language used for legislation, regulations, executive orders, treaties, education, federal court rulings, and all other official pronouncements; Spanish is also heavily spoken in Texas due to the large number of Tejanos, Mexicans and other local and foreign Spanish-speakers.[citation needed] The Government of Texas has been required since 1837 by joint resolution of the Congress of the Republic of Texas to provide Spanish translation of laws through Section 2054.116 of the Government Code, mandates that state agencies provide information on their website in Spanish to assist residents who have limited English,[13] and the Secretary of State since January 1842 French, German, Czech, and Polish are strong minority languages due to several old communities hailing from their respective mother countries. French is most prevalent in Northeastern Texas, near Louisiana, understandably while Southwestern Louisiana Creole language is spoken in Southeastern Texas (Houston, Beaumont, Port Arthur, and Orange). German, Polish, Sorbian, and Czech are mainly spoken in Central Texas, mainly near San Antonio and Austin.

History

[edit]
Tombstone in Dallas. Facts in English, but Bible verse in German

Native American languages

[edit]

Prior to Spanish colonization, several Native American languages such as Caddo, the language from which the state derives its name (i.e. táysha’ /tɑ́iʃɑ̀ʔ/ “friend, ally”), were spoken in present-day Texas. A few of those languages were unique to Texas, with no relatives documented elsewhere, such as Tonkawa, Karankawa, Atakapa, and Aranama, all of which became extinct. Other language isolates such as Coahuilteco and Cotoname, sometimes grouped under Pakawan, were once spoken in Southern Texas.

Other Caddoan languages such as Wichita and Kitsai were also spoken in Northeast Texas before speakers were forced to relocate to Oklahoma. Comanche had once an important presence in the state, as did Lipan Apache, which is still spoken near the border with Mexico. Additionally, the Muskogean language Koasati has a few speakers in Livingston in Polk County.[citation needed] In the 17th century, speakers of Southern Tiwa relocated to Ysleta del Sur near El Paso, after the Pueblo Revolt.

European languages

[edit]

Spanish was the first European language to be used in Texas, especially during the years when Texas was a province of Mexico and Spanish was the official language. Other early immigrants arriving directly from Europe such as Germans, Poles, Czechs,[14] and Sorbs[15] (also called Wends) also brought their own languages, sometimes establishing separate towns where their native tongues became the dominant language. Texas German and Texas Silesian are varieties of German and Silesian, a language closely related to Polish, that are indigenous to Texas. Today the dominant language in Texas, as in most states of the United States, is English.

Creole languages

[edit]

There once were speakers of Louisiana Creole in the area around Beaumont, Houston, Port Arthur, and Galveston, but it is unclear whether there are still any speakers in Texas.[16][17]

Afro-Seminole Creole, a dialect of Gullah spoken by Black Seminoles, was spoken in Brackettville as recently as the 1970s, but all speakers at that time were elderly and it is not known whether any speakers survive.[18]

Texan English

[edit]
Main article: Texan English

Contrary to popular belief, there is no exclusive Texan dialect of American English. However, some linguists contest that there is a unique subset of Southern English spoken in Texas.[19] According to the Phonological Atlas of the University of Pennsylvania virtually all native Texans speak[20] Southern American English, while other studies claim that Texas is home to several dialects of American English. All of East Texas and usually most of central and north Texas are classified as speaking the Southern dialect, which is the same dialect being spoken in north Louisiana, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and northern Alabama. Usually it is portions of far West Texas and lower South Texas that are classified as speaking a Western or Southwestern dialect. According to the University of Tampere atlas, the same Southwestern dialect is spoken in South and West Texas and southern California, extreme southern Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico.[21] The Gulf Southern dialect is spoken in most of Central, East, and North Texas with the Texas Panhandle speaking the Midland South dialect, which is shared by those who live in Kansas, Missouri, and Southern Nebraska.[21]

Other languages

[edit]

Recent immigrants from other US regions and foreign countries are causing a linguistic shift in Texas. Spanish speakers have risen to almost a third of the population; Vietnamese and Chinese[22] have replaced German and French to become the third and fourth most spoken languages in Texas, respectively; with Hindi, Korean, Kurdish especially from Abtaf, from the Asad Beig tribe [1], and Tagalog filling out the top nine most spoken languages in Texas.[22] Large numbers of non-native Texas residents are picking up some dialectal traits of Southern English,[23] while other linguistic traits are being subdued into a national homogenizing trend.[23]

There were also several smaller language groups, including Czechs (several thousands Moravians) and Polish. Texas German is a dialect of the German language that is spoken by descendants of German immigrants who settled in the Texas Hill Country region in the mid-19th century.[24]

Spanish in Texas

[edit]
See also: Spanish in the United States

Spanish has been an important language in Texas since the Spanish and Mexican periods. The Spanish dialects spoken by some Tejanos are becoming more influenced by Mexican Spanish[citation needed] due to a large influx of recent immigrants from Mexico. One remnant of 18th and 19th-century Texan Spanish could be found in the community of Moral, west of Nacogdoches, which historically spoke a variety of Sabine River Spanish.

In 1999, René Oliveira proposed a bill that would have required all state high school students to take at least two years of Spanish; at that time actual state law stated that students could choose which foreign language to take.[25]

In 2003 larger numbers of Hispanics in Texas reported that they spoke only English.[26] In August 2004, the community of El Cenizo, along the U.S.-Mexico border, made Spanish its official language.[27]

Since 2007 Texas has provided yearly academic tests in both Spanish and English.[28]

Asian languages

[edit]

As of 2014, Vietnamese is the third most commonly spoken language,[29] Chinese is the fourth most commonly spoken language, and Hindi is the fifth most commonly spoken language in the state.[30] Tagalog is sixth place, and is mostly spoken in small Filipino American communities in Houston.[30]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Languages of Texas

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The languages of Texas encompass a dominated by English and Spanish, with English spoken at home by roughly 65% of residents and Spanish by about 28%, reflecting the state's large Anglo-American majority and substantial population derived from historical territory and subsequent immigration. Other languages, including Vietnamese, Chinese, and smaller pockets of indigenous tongues like those from groups (e.g., Comecrudo and Aranama), constitute the remainder, often concentrated in urban centers or rural historical enclaves. This diversity stems from pre-colonial Native American habitation, Spanish colonial missions establishing Spanish as an early , Anglo settlement post-independence introducing English dominance, and 19th-century European immigration introducing dialects such as Texas German and Texas Czech, some of which persist in isolated communities despite assimilation pressures. Texas lacks an , enabling bilingual signage and in regions, though English remains the de facto standard in and , amid occasional debates favoring monolingual proficiency for integration.

Current Linguistic Demographics

Primary Languages Spoken at Home

According to the U.S. Census Bureau's (ACS) 2018-2022 estimates, 64.9% of residents aged 5 and older speak only English at home, underscoring its position as the dominant household language despite significant and . This figure reflects a stable English-only share, as the proportion of non-English speakers has hovered around 35% in recent years, even as the state's total exceeded 30 million by 2023. Spanish ranks as the predominant non-English language spoken at home, comprising approximately 28.8% of households based on the same ACS data, driven largely by the state's large or Latino population of over 40%. The remaining non-English speakers, about 6.3%, use a diverse array of languages, including Indo-European tongues such as German (with lingering use in rural communities from 19th-century settlements), Asian and Pacific Islander languages like Vietnamese (concentrated in urban areas such as ) and Chinese, and smaller shares of African languages and others.
Language GroupPercentage of Population Aged 5+ (ACS 2018-2022)
English only64.9%
Spanish28.8%
Other languages (Indo-European, Asian/Pacific Islander, etc.)6.3%
These demographics highlight English's enduring household prevalence, with non-English usage concentrated in metropolitan areas like , Dallas-Fort Worth, and border regions, though statewide data shows no erosion of the English-only majority in recent estimates.

English Proficiency and Bilingualism Rates

In Texas, approximately 64.6% of the population aged 5 and older speaks only at home, while 35.4% speaks a other than English at home, according to 2023 (ACS) data processed by the . Among those speaking non-English languages at home, proficiency in English varies significantly by nativity; foreign-born individuals exhibit lower rates, with only 11.4% speaking solely English and 36.9% speaking it "very well," resulting in about 48.3% overall proficiency for this group. In contrast, U.S.-born residents demonstrate high English dominance, with 77.0% speaking only English, 18.8% speaking it "very well," and just 4.2% limited English proficient (LEP), yielding near-universal proficiency rates exceeding 95%. These disparities underscore a rapid generational shift, where immigrant parents' lower proficiency gives way to near-complete English acquisition among their U.S.-born children, driven by immersion in , media, and economic incentives. Bilingualism, particularly Spanish-English, remains prevalent but shows signs of across generations. An estimated 6 million Texans are bilingual—defined as speaking a non-English at home while proficient in English ("well" or "very well")—out of over 9 million who speak non-English languages at home, based on 2022 ACS data analyzed in 2024. This equates to roughly two-thirds of non-English home speakers being proficient in English, with the remainder (about 3 million) classified as LEP. Spanish dominates bilingual pairings, accounting for the majority of cases, yet evidence from nativity breakdowns indicates a trend toward English in subsequent generations, as U.S.-born Hispanics increasingly default to English-only use, mirroring broader U.S. patterns of three-generation observed in analyses. This assimilation dynamic supports metrics of linguistic integration, though persistent replenishes non-proficient cohorts.

Regional Variations in Language Use

In border counties along the , such as Hidalgo County, Spanish is spoken at home by 80.7% of the aged 5 and older, compared to 18.2% for English and 1.1% for other languages, according to 2018-2022 (ACS) data. Similar patterns prevail in El Paso County, where high concentrations correlate with elevated Spanish use, though exact figures reflect over 60% Spanish speakers amid a 82.8% . These areas exhibit the state's highest non-English home rates, tied to cross-border demographics. Urban centers like and show diversified non-English pockets beyond Spanish dominance. In , Vietnamese ranks third among home languages with 29,060 speakers, following Spanish (over 500,000) and English, per 2021 ACS estimates. Dallas County reports 8.7% speaking Asian or Pacific Island languages at home, alongside 34.4% Spanish and 56.9% English, reflecting immigration-driven clusters in metro job hubs. Central Texas regions, including the Austin area, retain traces of European heritage languages like German, with statewide totals of 82,100 speakers but localized concentrations in historical settlements; however, English prevails at over 70% in metro tracts. Rural displays minimal use, with Native North American languages comprising less than 0.1% statewide and negligible -reported pockets in sparse populations. Across , block-level data from the 2018-2022 ACS affirm English as the dominant , with non-English concentrations limited to immigration-linked enclaves amid 64.9% statewide English home use.

Historical Evolution

Pre-Columbian Indigenous Languages

Prior to European contact, the territory of present-day hosted a highly diverse array of indigenous languages, spoken by numerous tribes adapted to varied environments from coastal plains to interior prairies. Ethnologists have documented hundreds of distinct groups, many with unique languages or dialects belonging to several families, including Caddoan (e.g., and Wichita), Uto-Aztecan (e.g., ), Athabaskan (e.g., variants), and isolates such as and Karankawa, alongside the poorly attested cluster of small, possibly unrelated tongues along the southern and coastal regions. This linguistic mosaic reflected ecological adaptations, with estimates indicating dozens of languages and potentially over 100 dialects across tribes like the and Bidai, though precise counts remain uncertain due to the absence of pre-contact documentation. These languages existed solely in oral form, with no indigenous writing systems, relying on traditions of , , and for preservation. Initial European incursions, beginning with Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca's expedition in 1528, precipitated a demographic collapse exceeding 90% by 1800, driven primarily by Eurasian diseases such as and —against which native populations lacked immunity—propagated via networks even before direct settlement, compounded by intertribal warfare and later displacement. This causal chain of epidemiological shock, absent and exacerbated by social disruption, rendered most languages extinct within generations, as surviving speakers integrated into other groups or perished without transmission. Contemporary fluency in these original Texas languages is exceedingly rare, with statewide estimates under 1,000 speakers, concentrated in remnants like (fewer than 100 fluent) and (two known fluent as of 2023). Revival initiatives, including tribal immersion programs, have documented minimal gains in proficient speakers, failing to scale against historical prevalence due to intergenerational gaps and limited learner pools.

Spanish Colonial Era and Early European Settlement

The Spanish presence in Texas began in the late , with the establishment of missions aimed at converting indigenous populations and securing the frontier against French incursions. The first mission, San Francisco de los Tejas, was founded near present-day Nacogdoches in 1690, marking the initial overlay of the in religious, administrative, and educational contexts among Native American groups such as the and . By 1718, the founding of Mission San Antonio de Valero (later the Alamo) and subsequent missions in the area solidified Spanish as the of colonial governance under , where it served as the official language for decrees, church records, and interactions with settlers and natives until Mexico's independence in 1821. During this era, Spanish terminology influenced place names, legal terms, and bilingual elements in mission schooling, though indigenous languages persisted among unconverted populations. Following Mexican independence, Anglo-American immigration accelerated under empresario contracts, such as Stephen F. Austin's colony starting in 1821, which required settlers to learn Spanish and adopt Catholicism but permitted English use within communities. By 1834, over 30,000 Anglos resided in Texas compared to fewer than 8,000 Mexican nationals, shifting linguistic dynamics as English dominated settler correspondence, newspapers like the Texas Gazette (founded 1829), and informal governance. The culminated in independence on March 2, 1836, after which the prioritized English in its and official proceedings, though early laws mandated Spanish translations for accessibility to ; this bilingual tolerance waned as Anglo dominance grew. The , signed May 14, 1836, ended hostilities with Mexico but reinforced Anglo control by facilitating unchecked immigration, indirectly accelerating English's supplantation of Spanish in non-coastal administration. By the 1850 U.S. Census, Texas's population reached 212,592, with approximately 70 percent classified as white—predominantly English-speaking migrants from southern and border states—outnumbering Spanish-speaking and Mexican-origin residents, who comprised a minority concentrated in border counties like those near the . This demographic conquest-driven shift marginalized Spanish in inland governance and commerce by annexation in , as settlers' numbers—swelling to over 100,000 whites by —imposed English as the language of power, with Spanish retained mainly in Catholic rites and Tejano enclaves. Such changes reflected causal pressures of migration volume and revolutionary victory rather than formal linguistic edicts alone.

19th-Century European Immigration

German immigrants formed the largest non-Anglo European group in 19th-century Texas, arriving primarily in the 1840s and 1850s, with over 20,000 German-born residents by the decade's end. Organized by the society, they established key settlements including New Braunfels in 1845 and Fredericksburg in 1846, focusing on agricultural communities in the Hill Country and creating a "German Belt" from the inward. These immigrants, hailing from diverse German-speaking regions, introduced varied dialects that coalesced into Texas German, a distinct variety retaining archaic features and influenced by English contact. Czech immigrants began arriving in significant numbers in the early 1850s, drawn by cheap land after Texas statehood, with initial settlements in Austin near Cat Spring by 1848 and expanding through family groups from and . Polish settlers followed closely, as 100 families from and founded Panna Maria in Karnes in 1854, marking the first permanent Polish Catholic community in the United States and emphasizing farming in the region's fertile areas. These groups maintained their languages in insular agricultural enclaves, supporting parochial schools and newspapers that reinforced linguistic continuity alongside German and Spanish. Post-Civil War assimilation pressures accelerated , as state-mandated English instruction in public schools from the 1870s onward supplanted immigrant tongues, though German retained equality with Spanish in some districts until . Intermarriage with English speakers and further eroded heritage languages, peaking German-speaking populations before a gradual decline by the century's end, with Texas German persisting longer than in other states due to geographic isolation.

20th-Century Shifts and Modern Immigration

During , anti-German sentiment prompted to enact strict English-only policies in public education, culminating in House Bill 304 of 1919, which prohibited the teaching of German in schools, colleges, and universities. Similar measures suppressed Czech-language instruction in Czech communities, as public schools shifted to mandatory English amid broader wartime pressures to assimilate immigrant groups. These policies accelerated the decline of European heritage languages like German and Czech, which had persisted in rural enclaves, though private use continued in homes and churches until further reinforced by stigmas. In the 1920s and 1930s, Mexican migration drove significant growth in Spanish speakers, with the Mexican-descent population in reaching approximately 700,000 by 1930, fueled by labor demands in and industry during the Mexican Revolution's aftermath and economic booms. This influx raised the population from 72,000 in 1900 to 250,000 by 1920, concentrating Spanish in border regions and urban centers like , yet English remained dominant in public spheres, government, and commerce, limiting Spanish's institutional role. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 dismantled national-origin quotas, spurring diverse inflows to , including Vietnamese refugees after the 1975 —numbering over 100,000 statewide by the 1980s—and skilled migrants from and in technology sectors post-1990s. Latin American immigration, primarily from and , continued unabated, contributing to non-Mexican growth. Despite this, data indicate rapid : by the third generation, over 70% of descendants from Spanish-speaking immigrants become English monolingual at home, with similar patterns among Asian groups. In the , about 35% of households speak a non-English at home, predominantly Spanish at 27.6%, yet 64.9% of residents speak English proficiently enough for civic and , underscoring English's de facto despite surface-level diversity. This generational assimilation ensures net gains in English dominance, as immigrant languages fade beyond the second generation absent sustained reinforcement.

English as the Dominant Language

Texan English Dialect Features

, a regional variety of , displays phonological traits such as the pin–pen merger, in which the short vowels /ɪ/ and /ɛ/ before nasal consonants merge, causing words like "pin" and "pen" to be pronounced identically, often as [ɪn]. This merger is prevalent across but recessive in metropolitan areas like and . Monophthongization affects diphthongs, notably reducing /aɪ/ to a lengthened [aː] in words like "ride" (pronounced "rahd"), contributing to the , though this offglide loss is weaker in south and and fading urbanly. Other features include upgliding in checked vowels like /ɒ/ in "dog" ("dawg") and an emerging in urban and western regions, with Texas-specific backing of /ɔr/ to [ɑr] in "horse" or "for" (e.g., "lord" as "lard"). The dialect is predominantly rhotic today, with postvocalic /r/ pronounced, though non-rhoticity persists among some older speakers as a remnant of earlier Southern patterns. Lexical hallmarks include "y'all" as the second-person plural pronoun, derived from "you all" and widespread since 19th-century Southern settlement, and "fixin' to," a prospective construction signaling imminent futurity (e.g., "I'm fixin' to leave"). Ranching-influenced terms such as "tank" for a stock pond, "maverick" for an unbranded stray animal, "doggie" for a motherless calf, and "roughneck" for an oilfield worker distinguish Texan usage from broader Southern lexicon. Spanish loanwords like "arroyo" or "remuda" appear peripherally due to border proximity but remain minimal in the core dialect, which draws primarily from Anglo-American settler vocabulary rather than routine code-mixing. Grammatically, Texan English employs perfective "done" for completed actions (e.g., "I've done finished"), though this is declining in cities, and double modals like "might could" or "used to could" for nuanced possibility or past ability, concentrated in . A-prefixing occurs in progressive forms (e.g., "goin' huntin'"), reflecting older Appalachian and Scots-Irish substrates. Regional isoglosses, as mapped in the Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States, delineate as aligning closely with varieties—featuring stronger drawl elements and r-lessness in legacy speakers—while and the Panhandle exhibit Western influences like and reduced Southern shifts. Urban centers show homogenization toward General American, with traditional markers like the pin–pen merger and monophthongization weakening among younger speakers due to mobility and media exposure, contrasting media depictions in country music that amplify rural twang for effect. subtly impacts urban through phonological borrowing, such as intensified vowel lengthening, but core white rural varieties retain distinct Southern roots with limited crossover.

Cultural and Economic Role of English

English serves as the primary medium for economic participation in Texas, where proficiency correlates strongly with higher earnings and labor market success. Studies indicate that immigrants and limited English proficient (LEP) workers who achieve fluency in English experience a wage premium of approximately 20-30% compared to their non-proficient counterparts, after controlling for other factors such as education and experience. This premium arises from expanded access to skilled occupations, supervisory roles, and broader networks, as English enables effective communication in industries like , , and services that dominate the state's . In Texas, where immigrants comprise about 17% of the and contribute significantly to GDP growth, English fluency facilitates upward mobility, distinguishing integrated workers from those confined to low-wage, enclave-based jobs. Public administration and commerce reinforce English's economic dominance, with nearly all official government documents, signage, and business transactions conducted in English to ensure accessibility and efficiency. State agencies provide limited bilingual services under federal mandates, but core operations, licensing, and regulatory compliance require English comprehension, as evidenced by policies enforcing English proficiency for commercial drivers licenses. Linguistic landscape analyses in Texas urban areas show English prevailing on commercial signage and public notices, signaling its role as the lingua franca for trade and governance. This uniformity minimizes transaction costs in a diverse economy, promoting cohesion among workers from varied linguistic backgrounds and enabling seamless participation in statewide markets. Culturally, English underpins social integration and intergenerational mobility, as demonstrated by historical patterns among European immigrants. German settlers, who numbered over 30,000 by 1860 and maintained Texas German dialects into the early 20th century, largely shifted to English as the dominant language by the 1920s, driven by public schooling, media, and wartime pressures during that encouraged assimilation into the English-speaking majority. This transition correlated with economic advancement, as bilingualism gave way to English , allowing descendants to access higher education and professional opportunities unavailable in isolated linguistic communities. Today, English's prevalence in Texas media, legal proceedings, and systems continues this assimilative function, fostering shared cultural norms and reducing barriers to that persist in multilingual enclaves elsewhere.

Spanish Language in Texas

Historical Continuity from Colonization

The Spanish language first entered the region through exploratory expeditions in the , such as the 1528 led by , which included Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca, who traversed coastal areas and interacted with indigenous groups. More sustained linguistic influence arrived with formal colonization efforts, including the establishment of missions starting in the late , such as the 1690 founding of missions east of the , and the 1718 creation of de Béxar as a key presidio and mission hub, where Spanish became the administrative and ecclesiastical language among settlers and converted indigenous populations. These efforts, under New Spain's viceregal authority until 1821, embedded Spanish in legal, religious, and daily communication, particularly along the northern frontier, fostering communities that persisted despite sparse settlement. During the (1836–1845), bilingual practices were formalized to accommodate the existing Spanish-speaking populace; a 1837 congressional resolution required that all laws be translated into and published bilingually, reflecting the significant Tejano population in areas like and the Rio Grande Valley. Following annexation to the in 1845, vestiges of Spanish legal usage endured in border regions, where courts in majority-Hispanic counties continued to employ Spanish interpreters and procedures rooted in prior civil law traditions, preventing abrupt linguistic displacement amid the shift to English common law. This continuity stemmed from demographic realities, as Mexican-descent residents, who formed majorities in counties by the mid-19th century, maintained Spanish as their primary tongue for intergenerational transmission. In the 20th century, despite pressures like the repatriation drives—during which local and federal authorities in encouraged or coerced the departure of up to 500,000 Mexican nationals and amid the —Spanish-speaking communities rebounded due to geographic proximity to and renewed labor demands. The (1942–1964), which recruited over 4.6 million Mexican workers for U.S. agriculture, including substantial numbers for and vegetable fields, reinforced these networks by facilitating temporary but recurrent migration, with many workers establishing family ties and returning seasonally. No complete assimilation occurred, as cross-border flows and settlement patterns in sustained Spanish usage; historical accounts note that Mexican-origin populations in border counties consistently hovered around 20–30% or higher from 1900 onward, serving as a proxy for linguistic persistence in the absence of early language-specific censuses. This resilience highlights causal factors like adjacency to enabling demographic replenishment over cultural erasure.

Contemporary Demographics and Border Influence

Approximately 28.8% of Texas residents aged five and older spoke Spanish at home in 2023, according to (ACS) estimates, representing the largest non-English group but still subordinate to English, spoken at home by about 65% of the population. This figure reflects sustained demographic growth from both legal and illegal migration across the Texas-Mexico , with over 8 million Spanish speakers statewide, concentrated in urban centers like , Dallas-Fort Worth, and , as well as border counties. Bilingualism prevails among these speakers, with roughly 80% proficient in English to varying degrees, facilitating integration while maintaining Spanish for familial and community interactions. The Rio Grande Valley exemplifies peak concentration, where Spanish is spoken at home by over 77% of residents aged five and older, driven by geographic proximity to and cross-border familial ties reinforced by ongoing migration flows. Border dynamics promote language maintenance through daily commerce, media from , and cultural exchanges, yet indicates rapid shift toward English dominance: data from border regions show that more than 70% of Spanish-dominant students achieve primary English proficiency by high school, reflecting assimilation pressures from and peer environments. This pattern holds despite higher Spanish retention in informal settings, with no statewide indicators of Spanish supplanting English in public life or . Economically, Spanish remains entrenched in border-influenced sectors like , , and low-wage services, where immigrant labor networks—often sustained by unauthorized entries—favor communication for in fieldwork and site operations. However, advancement into higher-skill industries such as , , and demands English fluency, limiting Spanish's broader applicability; labor market analyses confirm no erosion of English's primacy, as bilingual workers predominate and Spanish-only proficiency correlates with stagnant wages and . Migration-driven replenishment bolsters Spanish speaker numbers, but intergenerational data reveal consistent dilution, with third-generation households shifting overwhelmingly to English .

European Immigrant Heritage Languages

German-Speaking Communities and Texas German

German immigration to began in significant numbers in the 1840s, with settlers establishing communities primarily in the Hill Country regions around New Braunfels and Fredericksburg. These immigrants, often from various German states including areas with (Plattdeutsch) dialects, developed Texas German, a unique variant incorporating elements of High and dialects alongside English loanwords and regional innovations. By the late , German cultural influence in peaked, with over 100,000 speakers estimated by 1900, supported by a network of German-language schools and newspapers that operated until around 1917. Texas German communities maintained endogamous practices and insular institutions, fostering language retention into the early 20th century, when speaker numbers reached approximately 160,000 by 1940. However, brought internment fears and social pressures against German loyalty, while intensified assimilation through bans on German instruction in schools and heightened scrutiny of ethnic affiliations. These events accelerated a pre-existing trend of voluntary shift to English for economic and , rather than coercive suppression alone, leading to rapid decline post-1940s. Today, fluent Texas German speakers number fewer than 10,000, predominantly elderly individuals over 60, as documented by dialect surveys from the Texas German Dialect Project, with the language no longer transmitted to younger generations. Cultural festivals such as Oktoberfests in Hill Country towns preserve folklore, music, and cuisine but serve more as heritage displays than vehicles for linguistic revival. Descendants of these communities exhibit full integration into English-dominant society, evidenced by their contributions to Texas agriculture, business, and civic life, often achieving higher socioeconomic stability compared to groups resisting assimilation, as reflected in the middle-class origins and entrepreneurial success of early settlers.

Czech, Polish, and Other Central European Languages

Czech immigrants began settling in Texas during the 1850s, primarily in Fayette County, which became known as the cradle of Czech settlement due to the concentration of arrivals there. These settlers, mostly from , introduced a distinct Texas Czech dialect characterized by archaic Moravian features, including Lachian and Valachian influences that differ from standard Bohemian Czech. Catholic churches played a central role in maintaining the and culture among these , with up to 90 percent of immigrants adhering to Catholicism and using church services, hymns, and inscriptions to sustain linguistic practice into the mid-. Early efforts also included schools and newspapers, such as those established in areas like Cat Spring by the late , which reinforced dialect use within families and enclaves. However, by the final decades of the , Texas Czech had effectively ceased functioning as a , with fluent heritage speakers numbering fewer than 1,000 amid broader to English. Polish immigration to Texas commenced in 1854 with Silesian settlers founding Panna Maria in Karnes County, the state's first permanent Polish community and site of the earliest Polish in the U.S., consecrated in 1856. This settlement preserved a Silesian Polish , known as Texas Silesian, which linguists identify as one of the last refuges for this endangered variant, spoken in small rural clusters. Like Czech, Polish communities remained niche, with fewer than 1,000 fluent speakers today despite over 228,000 Texans claiming Polish ancestry in the 2000 . The near-total replacement of these Central European languages stems from empirical patterns of through disuse, driven by high rates of intermarriage with English-dominant groups, rural-to-urban migration disrupting enclave isolation, and absence of institutional support for revival akin to post-communist efforts in . Other Central European tongues, such as Slovak, exhibited even less persistence, with no documented viable communities or dialects surviving beyond initial 19th-century pockets due to similar assimilation pressures.

Asian and Emerging Immigrant Languages

Vietnamese and Southeast Asian Languages

The influx of Vietnamese speakers to Texas began primarily after the fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975, when over 130,000 refugees arrived in the United States in the initial wave, with subsequent chain migration through family reunification expanding communities via the Immigration and Nationality Act amendments. By 2019, Texas hosted approximately 310,000 individuals of Vietnamese origin, making it the state with the second-largest such population after . Vietnamese is spoken at home by over 200,000 residents statewide, ranking as the third-most common non-English language after Spanish. Houston's metropolitan area contains the largest Vietnamese enclave in Texas and the second-largest in the U.S., with an estimated 143,000 Vietnamese residents as of , concentrated in areas like Alief and southwest Harris County. This community supports Vietnamese-language media, markets, and institutions that reinforce linguistic continuity among first-generation immigrants. In contrast, speakers of other Southeast Asian languages like Hmong and Lao remain minor in Texas, with resettlement patterns favoring states such as and ; fewer than 10,000 Hmong and Lao combined reside in , often in smaller pockets tied to initial 1975-1980 refugee dispersals. Bilingualism prevails among Vietnamese Texans, with over 50% of adults proficient in both English and Vietnamese, though language shift accelerates in younger generations due to immersion in English-dominant schools and media. Second- and third-generation speakers increasingly favor English at home, contrasting with slower attrition in Spanish-speaking groups sustained by proximity to and continuous inflows; Vietnamese maintenance lags partly from Vietnam's political isolation limiting return migration and cultural reinforcement. Early economic footholds for Vietnamese refugees involved low-skill sectors like Gulf Coast shrimping and fishing, where post-1975 arrivals leveraged pre-war maritime skills to build fleets despite local tensions, including 1970s conflicts with groups like the over resource competition. Subsequent diversification into small businesses, healthcare, and technology reflects upward mobility, yet linguistic enclaves in persist for elder care and commerce, underscoring partial retention amid assimilation pressures.

South and East Asian Languages

South and East Asian languages in Texas have expanded through skilled migration, particularly H-1B visa programs targeting professionals in technology, engineering, and healthcare sectors concentrated in Dallas-Fort Worth, Austin, and Houston tech corridors. Indian nationals, comprising about 72% of H-1B recipients nationally with significant Texas employment, contribute to Hindi and Urdu usage, while Chinese nationals (12% of recipients) bolster Mandarin speakers; Filipino professionals add to Tagalog communities via similar channels. The 2023 American Community Survey estimates around 200,000 Chinese speakers (including Mandarin and variants) in , reflecting the state's second-largest Asian population share nationally. and each maintain speaker bases under 100,000, aligned with Indian and Pakistani demographic growth rates exceeding 50% in some urban Asian subgroups since 2010; Tagalog follows suit with comparable limited scale. High among these immigrants—often requiring advanced degrees for H-1B eligibility—correlates with English proficiency rates over 90% in professional cohorts, facilitating rapid workplace integration. Heritage maintenance occurs via weekend language schools and cultural associations, yet remains secondary to English dominance in daily and economic life. In contrast to Spanish retention bolstered by cross-border ties, these languages exhibit accelerated shift: second-generation speakers frequently achieve monolingual English fluency by , driven by full immersion in English-medium schools and careers, with first-language attrition common within one .

Language Policies and Debates

Absence of Official Language and Policy History

Texas lacks a designated , setting it apart from over 30 other U.S. states that have statutorily established English in that capacity. English functions as the language for state government operations, legislation, and judicial proceedings, a practice originating with the upon its declaration of independence on March 2, 1836, when English supplanted Spanish as the primary medium for official documents and communications. This shift aligned with the Anglo-American settlers' dominance in the independence movement, prioritizing English to facilitate governance amid a population where it was the prevailing tongue among revolutionaries and administrators. In the immediate post-annexation period of the , provisional accommodations for bilingualism appeared in limited spheres, such as public school laws enacted in that implicitly allowed for instruction accommodating non-English speakers in frontier counties with diverse settlers, though these were not formalized statewide mandates and faded as English-centric policies solidified. By the late , English-only requirements emerged in and administration, exemplified by statutes mandating English exclusivity in public schools to promote uniformity, reflecting empirical observations that a common language aided civic cohesion in a heterogeneous society expanding through . Legislative pushes to codify English as official resurfaced in the late amid rising demographic diversity, with bills introduced in the and —such as those debated in the state —aiming to affirm English primacy for governmental efficiency and , yet none succeeded in passage due to concerns over alienating Spanish-speaking populations. Federal court decisions have reinforced English as the presumptive language for state elections and notices, permitting multilingual ballots only where Voting Rights Act thresholds trigger requirements for covered languages like Spanish, without elevating them to equivalent status. This absence of an official multilingual policy underscores Texas's reliance on practical English dominance, supported by data showing over 64% of residents speaking English at home as the unifying medium.

Bilingual Education Programs and Effectiveness

The Bilingual Education Act of 1968 marked the first federal initiative to fund programs for students with , introduced by Senator and allocating initial funding of $7.5 million in 1969 to serve approximately 27,000 students nationwide. In , state-level authorization for bilingual instruction followed in 1968 through legislation championed by State Representative Joe Bernal, removing prior prohibitions and enabling local districts to implement such programs. The U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous ruling in (1974) further compelled schools to provide language support services, interpreting Title VI of the as requiring affirmative steps to overcome language barriers for equal educational access, which led to statewide mandates for bilingual education or English as a (ESL) programs in districts with at least 20 limited-English-proficient students of the same language in a grade level. Texas Education Agency guidelines require districts to offer —typically transitional models emphasizing native-language instruction alongside English—or ESL pull-out/content-based programs for emergent bilingual students, with over 600,000 such students enrolled annually as of recent data. These programs aim to develop biliteracy, but implementation varies, with transitional phasing out native-language use over 2-3 years and late-exit models extending it longer. Federal reauthorizations through 1981 expanded funding and scope, influencing Texas to prioritize native-language maintenance, though empirical evaluations have questioned sustained benefits. Studies indicate English immersion approaches yield faster English proficiency gains than prolonged native-language instruction in bilingual programs; for example, structured immersion has been associated with higher reading achievement among English learners compared to traditional bilingual models in Texas evaluations. A longitudinal analysis of Texas data found bilingual program enrollment correlated with approximately 5 percentage point lower high school graduation rates and reduced standardized test scores for Hispanic students, suggesting delayed academic integration. Districts emphasizing rapid English immersion report stronger long-term outcomes, including higher postsecondary enrollment and earnings for Hispanic graduates, attributing this to accelerated assimilation into mainstream curricula. Bilingual programs in Texas add 10-16% to per-pupil costs over standard instruction, with transitional models roughly doubling expenses due to specialized and materials, contributing to statewide supplemental of hundreds of millions annually via weighted allotments of 616−616-1,568 per student. Critics argue these approaches hinder assimilation by segregating students linguistically longer than necessary, with evidence from immersion-focused reforms showing improved proficiency timelines without native-language reliance.

English-Only Movements and Assimilation Arguments

Advocates for English-only policies in have drawn on historical patterns of immigrant language assimilation to argue that mandating English promotes social cohesion and economic integration. Proponents, including organizations like ProEnglish founded in 1994, contend that official English status prevents linguistic fragmentation and ethnic enclaves, citing the gradual shift of Texas German speakers from bilingualism to English dominance by the mid-20th century due to and wartime pressures against German. This assimilation enabled German Texans to achieve parity with English speakers, reducing silos that could hinder intergroup interaction and shared civic participation. In Texas, legislative efforts to designate English as the official state language have recurred without statewide success, such as Senate Bill 447 introduced in 2015 by Senator Bob Hall, which aimed to eliminate multilingual mandates in government services to prioritize English acquisition and cut costs. Supporters reference empirical outcomes from English immersion models, like California's Proposition 227 enacted in , where studies post-implementation documented faster English proficiency gains among immigrants compared to prior bilingual approaches, correlating with improved academic and job market outcomes. These policies, they argue, foster causal pathways to reduced and higher earnings by accelerating linguistic integration, as evidenced by historical precedents where non-English maintenance prolonged socioeconomic disparities. Opponents, such as the ACLU, assert that English-only mandates infringe on free speech and create second-class status for non-speakers, potentially endangering public safety through limited access to services in native languages. However, federal rulings on English requirements have upheld limited policies justified by business necessity, as per EEOC guidelines allowing restrictions during specific operations to ensure efficiency, provided they do not blanketly burden employees. In , absent a statewide , voluntary assimilation prevails, with immigrants shifting to English over generations, though advocates warn that unchecked in public spheres risks perpetuating proficiency gaps observed in prolonged bilingual systems.

References

  1. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025/2017-2021-acs-language-use-tables.html
  2. https://www.axios.com/local/austin/2025/03/06/texas-language-diversity-trump-english-official-language
  3. https://www.county.org/county-magazine-articles/spring-2024/cover-story-multilingual-services
  4. https://www.texasbeyondhistory.net/st-plains/peoples/coahuiltecans.html
  5. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/dialects
  6. https://txczechproject.laits.utexas.edu/dialect-archive
  7. https://www.worldtravelguide.net/guides/north-america/united-states-of-america/texas/history-language-culture/
  8. https://www.kxan.com/news/texas/census-bureau-estimates-1-in-3-texans-speak-a-language-other-than-english-at-home/
  9. https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST5Y2022.S1601?g=0400000US48
  10. https://demographics.texas.gov/Resources/TDC/Presentations/e0750ca2-0d63-4248-8043-0d1a0488ccb5/20240627_CPUPC.pdf
  11. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023/language-at-home-acs-5-year.html
  12. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/data/state-profiles/state/language/TX
  13. https://everytexan.org/2024/09/23/data-brief-bilingual-texans/
  14. https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2022.S1601?g=040XX00US48
  15. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/elpasocountytexas/IPE120223
  16. https://www.houstontx.gov/ispeakhouston/Top-25-Houston-Languages-2021.pdf
  17. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2007/dec/8_language.pdf
  18. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/indians
  19. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/coahuiltecan-indians
  20. https://www.thestoryoftexas.com/discover/campfire-stories/american-indians
  21. https://americanindian.si.edu/nk360/code-talkers/native-languages/
  22. https://www.oah.org/tah/rethinking-encounters/disruption-then-disease-contextualizing-colonization-and-disease-in-indigenous-north-america/
  23. https://www.keranews.org/texas-news/2023-03-15/caddo-nation-language-program
  24. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=525
  25. https://www.nps.gov/articles/san-antonio-missions-spanish-influence-in-texas-teaching-with-historic-places.htm
  26. https://colfa.utsa.edu/car/missions/
  27. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/republic-of-texas
  28. https://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/25470
  29. https://read.dukeupress.edu/hahr/article/85/2/336/27309/The-Strange-Career-of-Bilingual-Education-in-Texas
  30. https://www.tsl.texas.gov/exhibits/texas175/velasco.html
  31. https://texaspolitics.utexas.edu/archive/html/cult/features/0501_02/slide1.html
  32. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1850/1850a/1850a-36.pdf
  33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/967308
  34. https://www.exploros.com/summary/Germans
  35. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/germans
  36. https://texashighways.com/culture/sprechen-sie-texas-deutsch-how-a-variation-of-german-once-ruled-in-fredericksburg/
  37. https://austinpbs.org/paintedchurches/history_czechs
  38. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/poles
  39. https://journals.ku.edu/ygas/article/download/18201/16376/44158
  40. http://www.tsl.texas.gov/lobbyexhibits/ww1-germantexan
  41. https://www.americanheritage.com/prague-texas
  42. https://tgdp.org/texas-german/the-history-of-texas-german/
  43. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/mexican-americans
  44. https://www.oah.org/tah/immigration-history/immigration-post-1965/
  45. https://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/publications/hispanic-heritage-travel-guide-2021.pdf
  46. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/bilingualism-persists-english-still-dominates
  47. https://ccis.ucsd.edu/_files/wp111.pdf
  48. https://www.pbs.org/speak/seatosea/americanvarieties/texan/
  49. https://mrenwick.franklinresearch.uga.edu/southern_speech/linguistic_features
  50. https://news.utexas.edu/2012/05/07/do-you-speak-texan/
  51. https://www.texasstandard.org/stories/whats-a-double-modal-it-could-be-key-to-sounding-like-a-texan/
  52. https://ygdp.yale.edu/phenomena/a-prefixing
  53. https://www.lap.uga.edu/Site/LAGS.html
  54. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED661984.pdf
  55. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/English-Skills-Embargo.pdf
  56. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/fact-sheet/economic-contributions-immigrants-texas/
  57. https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-directs-texas-dps-to-strictly-enforce-english-proficiency-requirements-for-commercial-drivers
  58. https://www.milestoneloc.com/languages-spoken-in-texas/
  59. https://www.texasalmanac.com/articles/german-texans
  60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30157328
  61. https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/germanic/texas-german-dialect-project/
  62. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/spanish-texas
  63. http://www.tsl.texas.gov/lobbyexhibits/struggles-tejano
  64. https://texapedia.info/spanish-origins-texas-law/
  65. https://www.uscis.gov/about-us/our-history/stories-from-the-archives/ins-records-for-1930s-mexican-repatriations
  66. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/bracero-program
  67. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs
  68. https://www.dallasfed.org/research/economics/2021/0803
  69. https://www.rgvhealthconnect.org/demographicdata?id=281259&sectionId=935
  70. https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1093&context=wls_fac
  71. https://www.rsfjournal.org/content/4/1/1
  72. https://www2.census.gov/library/working-papers/2023/adrm/ces/CES-WP-23-28.pdf
  73. https://www.laits.utexas.edu/hcb/pdf-pubs/Boas_et_al_TGDP_2010.pdf
  74. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/czechs
  75. https://is.muni.cz/th/q5bp7/BA_Thesis_Final_Version.pdf
  76. https://www.texasalmanac.com/articles/czech-texans
  77. https://www.statesman.com/story/news/2016/08/13/giving-texas-czechs-a-sense-of-place/10135965007/
  78. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/23/article/956055/summary
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240797618_Understanding_Language_Death_in_Czech-Moravian_Texas
  80. https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/research/article/view/8201
  81. https://www.tshaonline.org/texas-day-by-day/entry/788
  82. https://www.texasmonthly.com/being-texan/texas-polish-heritage/
  83. https://www.texasalmanac.com/articles/polish-texans
  84. https://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.hdl_11089_9545/c/v10015-007-0006-2.pdf
  85. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110845297.163/pdf
  86. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/vietnamese-immigrants-united-states
  87. https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/fact-sheet/asian-americans-vietnamese-in-the-u-s/
  88. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/bilingualism-texas-ray-perryman
  89. https://statisticalatlas.com/state/Texas/Languages
  90. https://www.pewresearch.org/chart/top-10-u-s-metropolitan-areas-by-vietnamese-population-2019/
  91. https://houstonlanding.org/despite-size-houstons-vietnamese-population-lags-when-it-comes-to-political-engagement/
  92. https://asianamericanedu.org/hmong-refugees.html
  93. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstreams/0fd976ff-a88a-4056-8fa0-b14d3f8b3b54/download
  94. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/104725/NguyenThanhResearch.pdf?sequence=1
  95. https://asianamericanedu.org/vietnamese-fishermen.html
  96. https://www.npr.org/2018/11/25/669857481/decades-after-clashing-with-the-klan-a-thriving-vietnamese-community-in-texas
  97. https://www.immigranthistory.org/news/a-look-back-an-intersectional-civil-rights-challenge-on-the-texas-gulf-coast
  98. https://bimi.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/bimi_policy_brief_bui_from_forced_relocation_to_social_ascension.pdf
  99. https://news.yahoo.com/cognizant-tesla-more-texas-giants-220020611.html
  100. https://www.texastribune.org/2022/10/14/asian-american-pacific-islander-texas-voters-2022/
  101. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/09/2020-census-dhc-a-asian-population.html
  102. https://www.texasstandard.org/stories/asian-americans-are-a-diverse-and-growing-force-in-texas-politics/
  103. https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/politics/yall-itics/texas-fastest-growing-demographics-group-population-data-yallitics-podcast/287-1198f9db-0769-4baa-b99c-c662c0371006
  104. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1775
  105. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/08/21/key-findings-about-us-immigrants/
  106. https://www.netstate.com/states/tables/state_languages.htm
  107. https://www.texasalmanac.com/articles/revolution-and-the-republic
  108. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/texas-revolution
  109. https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/welcome-and-overview/an-overview-of-the-history-of-public-education-in-texas
  110. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/bilingual-education
  111. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/context/lawineq/article/1498/viewcontent/uc.pdf
  112. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/GetStatute.aspx?Code=EL&Value=272.011
  113. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/trending/article/trump-executive-order-english-20194186.php
  114. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bilingual-Education-Act
  115. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/congress-enacts-bilingual-education-act
  116. https://www.idra.org/resource-center/bilingual-education-in-texas/
  117. https://www.idra.org/education_policy/lau-v-nichols-the-law-in-education/
  118. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/414/563/
  119. https://tea.texas.gov/academics/special-student-populations/english-learner-support/bilingual-and-english-as-a-second-language-education-programs
  120. https://tea.texas.gov/academics/special-student-populations/emergent-bilingual-support
  121. https://ncela.ed.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/files/rcd/BE021037/Fall88_6.pdf
  122. https://digital.library.txst.edu/bitstreams/724bce17-a87e-4c24-980e-b8ec6336326b/download
  123. https://www.amherst.edu/system/files/Jamie%2520Gracie%2520Thesis.pdf
  124. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/105325/the-effects-of-teacher-diversity-on-hispanic-student-achievement-in-texas_0_0.pdf
  125. https://www.utep.edu/education/cerps/_Files/docs/briefs/CERPS_Policy_Brief_2_Bilingual_Education.pdf
  126. https://tcf.org/content/commentary/how-texas-is-funding-the-expansion-of-dual-language-programs/
  127. https://ies.ed.gov/rel-southwest/2025/01/descriptive-study-5
  128. https://proenglish.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Fall-2015.pdf
  129. https://www.depts.ttu.edu/international/intlopr/k-12geo/documents/prepost_resources/GTT/GTTPreVisitActivityGermany.pdf
  130. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-english-chairman-calls-texas-174332333.html
  131. https://www.pacificresearch.org/10-years-after-end-of-bilingual-education-in-california-new-study-documents-attempts-to-thwart-english-immersion/
  132. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/How-Are-ELs-Faring-Under-Proposition-227-2006.pdf
  133. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/english-only-amendment-would-endanger-lives-discriminate-and-create-second-class
  134. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/eeoc-enforcement-guidance-national-origin-discrimination
  135. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1606.7
  136. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50550742
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.