Hubbry Logo
LusitaniansLusitaniansMain
Open search
Lusitanians
Community hub
Lusitanians
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Lusitanians
Lusitanians
Lusitanians
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Lusitanians[1] were an Indo-European-speaking people living in the far west of the Iberian Peninsula, in present-day central Portugal and the regions of Extremadura and Castilla y León of Spain. It is uncertain whether the Lusitanians were Celts or Celticized Iberians, related to the Lusones.[2] After its conquest by the Romans, the land was subsequently incorporated as a Roman province named after them (Lusitania).

History

[edit]

Origins

[edit]
Ethnographic and linguistic map of the Iberian Peninsula at about 300 BCE (before the Carthaginian conquests)

Frontinus mentions Lusitanian leader Viriathus as the leader of the Celtiberians, in their war against the Romans.[3] The Lusitanians were also called Belitanians, according to the diviner Artemidorus.[4][5] Strabo differentiated the Lusitanians from the Iberian tribes and thought of them as being Celtiberians who had been known as Oestriminis in ancient times.[6][7][8] However, based on archeological findings, Lusitanians and Vettones seem to have been largely pre-Celtic Indo-European populations that adopted Celtic cultural elements by proximity. On the other hand, Pliny the Elder and Pomponius Mela distinguished the Lusitanians from neighboring Celtic tribes in their geographical writings.[9]

The original Roman province of Lusitania briefly included the territories of the Astures and Gallaeci in the north, but these were soon ceded to the jurisdiction of the Provincia Tarraconensis, while the south remained the Provincia Lusitania et Vettones. Later, Gallaecia would become its own province. After this, Lusitania's northern border was along the Douro River, while its eastern border passed through Salmantica and Caesarobriga to the Anas (Guadiana) river.

Wars with Rome

[edit]
Main article: Lusitanian War
Further information: Siege of the Blastophoenicians and Roman conquest of the Iberian Peninsula
Iberian Peninsula at about 200 BCE[10]

Lusitanian mercenaries fought for the Carthaginian Empire between the years 218 and 201 BCE, during the Second Punic War against the Roman Republic that took place in the Western Mediterranean. Roman senator and orator Silius Italicus describes them in his 17-volumes epic poem Punica as forming a combined force with the Gallaeci and both being led by a commander named Viriathus (not to be confused with the similarly named chieftain).[11] According to Roman historian Titus Livius, Lusitanian and Celtiberian cavalry performed raids in northern Italy whenever the terrain was too rough for the Carthaginian general Hannibal's famed Numidian cavalry.[12]

Starting in 193 BCE, the Lusitanians fought the Romans in Hispania. In 150 BCE, they were defeated by the Roman praetor Servius Galba: springing a treacherous trap, he killed 9,000 Lusitanians and later sold 20,000 more as slaves in Gaul (modern-day France). This massacre would not be forgotten by Viriathus, who three years later (147 BCE) would become the leader of the Lusitanians, and severely damaged the Roman rule in Lusitania and beyond. In 139 BCE, Viriathus was betrayed and killed in his sleep by three of his companions (who had been sent as emissaries to the Romans), Audax, Ditalcus and Minurus, bribed by Marcus Popillius Laenas (although they were warrior companions of Viriathus, they were not Lusitanians themselves; they seem to have been Turdetanians, or from another people who were not Lusitanian). However, when the three returned to receive their reward from the Romans, the consul Quintus Servilius Caepio ordered their execution, declaring: "Rome does not pay traitors".

Romanization of Lusitania

[edit]
Main article: Romanization of Hispania
Further information: Legacy of the Roman Empire, Old Latin, and Roman citizenship

After the death of Viriathus, the Lusitanians kept fighting under the leadership of Tautalus, but gradually acquired Roman culture and language; the Romanized Lusitanian cities, in a manner similar to those of the rest of the Iberian Peninsula, eventually gained the status of "Citizens of Rome".

Culture

[edit]
Lusitanian lunula from Miranda do Corvo (Portugal)
Generalised distribution and movements of the Bell Beaker culture[13]

Categorising Lusitanian culture generally, including the language, is proving difficult and contentious. Some believe it was essentially a pre-Celtic Iberian culture with substantial Celtic influences, while others argue that it was an essentially Celtic[14] culture with strong indigenous pre-Celtic influences associated with the Bell Beaker culture.

Religion

[edit]
Main article: Lusitanian mythology

The Lusitanians worshiped various gods in a very diverse polytheism, using animal sacrifice. They represented their gods and warriors in rudimentary sculpture.

Endovelicus was the most important god for the Lusitanians. He is considered a possible Basque language loan god[15] by some, yet according to scholars like José Leite de Vasconcelos, the word Endovellicus was originally Celtic,[16] Andevellicos.

Endovelicus is compared with Welsh and Breton names, giving him the meaning of "Very Good God", the same epithet of the Irish god Dagda. Even the Romans worshiped him for his ability to protect. His cult eventually spread across the Iberian peninsula and beyond, to the rest of the Roman Empire and his cult was maintained until the fifth century; he was the god of public health and safety. The goddess Ataegina was especially popular in the south; as the goddess of rebirth (spring), fertility, nature, and cure, she was identified with Proserpina during the Roman era.

Ataegina by Pedro Roque Hidalgo (20th century), Museu do Mármore, Vila Viçosa, (Portugal).

Lusitanian mythology was heavily influenced by or related to Celtic mythology.[17][18]

Also well attested in inscriptions are the names Bandua[19][20][21] (one of the variants of Borvo)[22] often with a second name linked to a locality such as Bandua Aetobrico, and Nabia,[23] a goddess of rivers and streams.[17][24]

According to Strabo the Lusitanians were given to offering sacrifices; they practiced divination on the sacrificial offering by inspecting its vitals and veins.

They also sacrificed human victims, prisoners of war, by striking them under coarse blankets and observing which way they fell. They cut off the right hands of their captives, which they offered to the gods.

Language

[edit]
Main article: Lusitanian language
Further information: Paleo-Iberian languages and Paleohispanic scripts

The Lusitanian language was a Paleohispanic language that clearly belongs to the Indo-European family. The precise affiliation of Lusitanian with the other Indo-European languages is still a matter of debate: there are those who endorse that it is a para-Celtic language with an obvious Celticity to most of the lexicon, over many anthroponyms and toponyms.[25] A second theory relates Lusitanian with the Italic languages;[26] based on the names of Lusitanian deities with other grammatical elements of the area.[27]

One hypothesis is that the Lusitanian language may have been basal Italo-Celtic, a branch independent from Celtic and Italic, and splitting off early from Proto-Celtic and Proto-Italic populations who spread from Central Europe into western Europe after new Yamnaya migrations into the Danube Valley.[28][29][30][31] Alternatively, a European branch of Indo-European dialects, termed "North-west Indo-European" and associated with the Beaker culture, may have been ancestral to not only Celtic and Italic, but also to Germanic and Balto-Slavic.[32] Ellis Evans believes that Gallaecian and Lusitanian were one language (not separate languages) of the "P" Celtic variant.[33][34] Some recent scholars' analyses, further conducted on a newly discovered inscription, strongly suggest that Lusitanian is more akin to Italic and has no relation to Celtic.[35][36]

Lujan, argues that the evidence shows that Lusitanian must have diverged from the other western Indo-European dialects before the kernel of what would then evolve into the Italic and Celtic language families had formed. This points to Lusitanian being so ancient that it predates both the Celtic and Italic linguistic groups. Contact with subsequent Celtic migrations into the Iberian Peninsula are likely to have led to the linguistic assimilation of the Celtic elements found in the language.[37]

Tribes

[edit]
Map showing the main pre-Roman tribes in Portugal and their main migrations: Turduli movement in red, Celtici in brown, and Lusitanian in blue; most tribes neighbouring the Lusitanians were dependent on them. Names are in Latin.

The Lusitanians were a people formed by several tribes that lived between the rivers Douro and Tagus, in most of today's Beira and Estremadura regions of central Portugal, and some areas of the Extremadura region (Spain).

They were a tribal confederation, not a single political entity; each tribe had its own territory and was independent, and was formed by smaller clans. However, they had a cultural sense of unity and a common name for the tribes.

Each tribe was ruled by its own tribal aristocracy and chief. Many members of the Lusitanian tribal aristocracy were warriors as happened in many other pre-Roman peoples of the Iron Age.

Only when an external threat occurred did the different tribes politically unite, as happened at the time of the Roman conquest of their territory when Viriathus became the single leader of the Lusitanian tribes. Punicus, Caucenus and Caesarus were other important Lusitanian chiefs before the Roman conquest. They ruled the Lusitanians (before Viriathus) for some time, leading the tribes in the resistance against Roman attempts of conquest, and were successful.

The known Lusitanian tribes were:

  • Arabrigenses
  • Araocelenses
  • Aravi
  • Coilarni/Colarni
  • Interamnienses
  • Lancienses
    • Lancienses Oppidani
    • Lancienses Transcudani
    • Lancienses Ocelenses (may be the same as the Oppidani)
  • Meidubrigenses
  • Paesuri - Douro and Vouga (Portugal)
  • Palanti (there is not agreement among scholars if they were Vettones or Lusitanian)[38]
    • Calontienses
    • Caluri
    • Coerenses
  • Petravioi
  • Tangi
    • Elbocori
    • Igaeditani
    • Tapori/Tapoli - by the river Tagus, around the border area between Portugal and Spain
  • Talures
  • Veaminicori
  • Vissaieici

It remains to be known whether the Turduli Veteres, Turduli Oppidani, Turduli Bardili, and Turduli were Lusitanian tribes (coastal tribes), were related Celtic peoples, or were instead related to the Turdetani (Celtic, pre-Celtic Indo-European, or Iberians) and came from the south. The name Turduli Veteres (older or ancient Turduli), a tribe that dwelt in today's Aveiro District, seems to indicate they came from the north and not from the south (contrary to what is assumed on the map). Several Turduli peoples were possibly Callaeci tribes that initially came from the north, towards the south along the coast and then migrated inland along the Tagus and the Anas (Guadiana River) valleys.

If there were more Lusitanian tribes, their names are unknown.

Warfare

[edit]
Main article: Warfare in the ancient Iberian Peninsula
Statue of Viriatus in Viseu, the Lusitanian leader during the Lusitanian War (155 to 139 BCE).

The Lusitanians were considered by historians to be particularly adept at guerrilla warfare. The strongest amongst them were selected to defend the populace in mountainous sites.[39] They used hooked javelins or saunions made of iron, and wielded swords and helmets like those of the Celtiberians. They threw their darts from some distance, yet often hit their marks and wounded their targets deeply. Being active and nimble warriors, they would pursue their enemies and decapitate them.

"In a narrow pass 300 Lusitani faced 1000 Romans; as a result of the action 70 of the former and 320 of the latter died. When the victorious Lusitani retired and dispersed confidently, one of them on foot became separated, and was surrounded by a detachment of pursuing cavalry. The lone warrior pierced the horse of one of the riders with his spear, and with a blow of his sword cut off the Roman’s head, producing such terror among the others that they prudently retired under his arrogant and contemptuous gaze."

— Orosius, Seven Books of History Against the Pagans, 5.4

In times of peace, they had a particular style of dancing, which required great agility and nimbleness of the legs and thighs. In times of war, they marched in time, until they were ready to charge the enemy.[40]

Appian claims that when Praetor Brutus sacked Lusitania after Viriathus's death, the women fought valiantly next to their men as women warriors.[4]

Contemporary meaning

[edit]
Main articles: Lusitanic and Lusophone
Further information: European Portuguese, Lusophone Commonwealth, and Portuguese literature

While the Lusitanians did not speak a Romance language, nowadays the term Lusitanian is often used as a metonym for the Portuguese people, and similarly Lusophone is used to refer to a Portuguese speaker within or outside Portugal, Brazil, Macau, Timor-Leste, Angola, Mozambique, Cape Verde, São Tomé and Príncipe, Guinea Bissau, and other overseas territories and countries formerly comprised within the Portuguese Empire.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Lusitanians

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Lusitanians were an ancient Indo-European-speaking people who inhabited the western , primarily the region corresponding to modern-day and parts of western , from at least the BCE until their subjugation by in the late BCE. They occupied territories extending from the Atlantic coast inland, primarily between the and rivers, living in a landscape of mountains, rivers, and coastal areas that supported a pastoral and semi-nomadic lifestyle. Known for their warlike nature and skill in , the Lusitanians relied on mobility, light armor, and raids for survival, often clashing with neighboring groups like the Turdetanians and serving as mercenaries in earlier conflicts such as the Second Punic War. Their ethnicity and language remain subjects of scholarly debate, but evidence from inscriptions and ancient accounts points to an Indo-European linguistic affiliation, possibly para-Celtic or closely related to Celtic tongues spoken by other Iberian groups. Personal names like Viriathus and Ambatus, preserved in and historical texts, reflect Celtic influences, with filiation patterns indicating a stratified where elite warriors and pastoral leaders held prominence. Culturally, they practiced animal husbandry and bartering rather than using coined , and their religious included offerings and divinations, as noted by classical authors, though few indigenous written records survive due to their oral traditions and later . Archaeological finds, such as rock inscriptions in native scripts adapted to the Latin alphabet, suggest a conservative resistant to external influences until conquest. The Lusitanians' most notable legacy stems from their prolonged resistance to Roman expansion, beginning in earnest around 155 BCE under leaders like Punicus and Caesarus, who inflicted heavy defeats on Roman forces. This culminated in the leadership of , a former shepherd who rose to command after surviving a Roman massacre in 150 BCE, leading an eight-to-eleven-year campaign of ambushes and victories that humiliated multiple Roman generals, including Quintus Fabius Maximus Aemilianus. Despite temporary truces and Roman bribes leading to his in 139 BCE by traitorous companions, the Lusitanians continued sporadic revolts until full pacification under Decimus Junius Brutus in 137 BCE and later emperors. Their defeat integrated the region into the of by 27 BCE, marking the end of their but influencing Iberian cultural identity through enduring symbols of defiance.

History

Origins

The earliest evidence of the cultural precursors to the Lusitanians appears in the settlements of western Iberia, where influences from the are evident around 2500–2000 BCE. This period marks a transition from traditions, with archaeological sites in and western showing the introduction of distinctive bell-shaped , , and practices that suggest population movements and cultural exchanges across the Atlantic facade of . These developments indicate the formation of early pastoralist communities in the region, blending local farming practices with incoming influences from central and . By the , around the 1st millennium BCE, archaeological findings such as hill forts known as castros and remnants of megalithic structures further illustrate the semi-nomadic pastoralist of these groups in western Iberia. Castros, fortified settlements with circular stone houses, emerged in the northwest and spread southward, reflecting defensive needs and social organization among herding communities who practiced and rearing. Megalithic dolmens and menhirs, dating back to earlier periods but maintained in , underscore continuity in ritual landscapes that supported mobile pastoral economies. These sites, concentrated between the Duero and rivers, point to the consolidation of proto-Lusitanian ethnic identities through stable yet flexible settlement patterns. Recent genetic studies provide insights into the demographic foundations of these populations, revealing a mix of local Western Hunter-Gatherer ancestry with steppe-related components arriving via western migration routes circa 2500 BCE. Analysis of from 67 Portuguese individuals spanning 5000 years shows that Bell Beaker-associated sites introduced the first significant steppe ancestry, linked to Y-chromosome R1b-DF27, with continuity into the despite later admixtures. This genetic profile suggests Indo-European speakers contributed to the linguistic and cultural substrate in western Iberia, with steppe influence diffusing southwestward from northeast Iberia. Theories on the Lusitanians' linguistic origins remain debated, with evidence from and artifacts pointing to either a pre-Celtic substrate or early Celtic affinities. Place names in , such as those ending in -briga (hill fort), exhibit Celtic elements, while others suggest an Indo-European but non-Celtic layer, possibly para-Celtic or influenced by pre-Indo-European substrates. Artifacts like bronze weapons and from sites show parallels with Celtic traditions in decoration and , yet distinct features imply a hybrid formation rather than direct Celtic migration. Scholars continue to weigh these against classical accounts, emphasizing gradual over .

Wars with Rome

The first significant Roman military engagements with the Lusitanians took place in 194–193 BCE, as Roman forces sought to secure their hold on following the Second Punic War. In 194 BCE, Lusitanian raiders crossed the Baetis (modern ) and plundered Roman-allied territories in . Roman forces under the of the province pursued and engaged them, leading to initial setbacks but eventual Roman victories that imposed tribute and temporarily subdued the tribes. In 193 BCE, Roman in , including Sextus Digitius, continued operations against the Lusitanians, engaging in skirmishes that resulted in Roman victories and a fragile that lasted until the mid-150s BCE. These incursions marked the beginning of sustained Roman expansion into Lusitanian lands, driven by the need to protect trade routes and suppress tribal raids. Tensions reignited in 155 BCE with the Lusitanian War (155–139 BCE), prompted by large-scale raids led by chieftains Punicus and then Caesarus into Roman-controlled areas of southern . Under Punicus, the Lusitanians defeated two Roman armies, killing around 6,000–9,000 soldiers, before his death in battle; Caesarus succeeded him and continued the incursions until he too fell to Roman forces under Lucius Mummius in 150 BCE. That same year, a Roman agreement with the Lusitanians promised land in exchange for peace, but Servius Sulpicius betrayed the tribes by dividing them into groups under and massacring thousands in ambushes, an act of treachery that fueled further resistance. One survivor of Galba's slaughter was , a former who emerged as a unifying leader among the Lusitanians. Viriathus assumed command around 147 BCE and orchestrated a decade-long guerrilla campaign that inflicted heavy losses on Roman legions, transforming the war into a of Iberian defiance. In 147 BCE, he ambushed and defeated Gaius Vetilius near Tribola, rescuing 10,000 trapped Lusitanians and capturing Roman supplies; subsequent victories included the destruction of a 4,000-man force under Gaius Plautius in 146 BCE and defeats of Fabius Maximus Aemilianus in 145–144 BCE. 's forces overran Carpetania and other regions, compelling to negotiate a truce in 140 BCE under Fabius Maximus Servilianus, recognizing Viriathus as a "friend and ally of the Roman people," though this treaty was short-lived due to Roman violations. His leadership briefly halted Roman advances, but ended his resistance: in 139 BCE, Servilius Caepio bribed three of Viriathus's lieutenants—Audax, Ditalco, and Minurus—to assassinate him in his sleep, after which the Romans rejected their reward, declaring no price could be placed on such treachery. Following Viriathus's death, Roman campaigns intensified, leading to partial subjugation of the Lusitanians. Lusitanian resistance waned as his successor Tautalus surrendered to Quintus Servilius Caepio in 138 BCE. Sporadic revolts persisted in northern territories, which Decimus Junius Brutus Callaicus subdued during his campaigns as from 138 to 136 BCE, securing truces and alliances that marked the effective end of organized resistance by the late 130s BCE. These wars highlighted recurring Roman deceit, such as the broken 150 BCE treaty, and the Lusitanians' resilient opposition, which delayed full provincialization for decades.

Romanization

Following the conquest, Lusitania was formally established as a in 27 BCE under Emperor , marking the beginning of systematic administrative integration into the empire. The veteran colony of (modern Mérida) was founded in 25 BCE to house discharged soldiers from the , and by around 16 BCE, it had been designated the provincial capital, serving as the administrative and economic hub. This reorganization facilitated centralized governance, taxation, and military oversight, transforming the region from a frontier zone into a structured imperial territory. From the 1st century CE onward, extensive infrastructure projects accelerated cultural and economic integration by connecting remote areas to Roman networks. Key developments included major roads like the Via de la Plata, a vital artery running north-south through from Emerita Augusta to Asturica Augusta, enabling efficient troop movements, trade, and resource extraction. Aqueducts, such as the Aqueduct of the Miracles (Aquae Martis) in Emerita, constructed in the late 1st century CE, supplied water to growing urban populations and symbolized Roman engineering prowess. The proliferation of rural villas, often established adjacent to pre-Roman settlements from the early 1st century CE, promoted sedentarization by shifting nomadic or semi-nomadic groups toward intensive , including and cultivation aligned with imperial demands. Archaeological research underscores the hybrid nature of this integration. A 2022 study by André Carneiro, "Shifting landscapes: change and adaptation in the Lusitanian territory during the first globalisation," analyzes evidence from surveys and excavations to reveal how local communities adapted Roman practices amid broader Mediterranean influences. It highlights the adoption of Roman farming techniques, such as plowed fields and villa-based estate management, particularly in rural areas, alongside the emergence of urban centers like Emerita that blended indigenous and imperial elements. Carneiro argues that these changes involved "phenomena of hybridizations [and] assimilations," with diverse local responses challenging simplistic narratives of uniform . The Romanization process exhibited social gradients, with urban elites embracing Roman norms more swiftly than rural populations. Epigraphic records demonstrate this disparity, as indigenous Lusitanian personal names persisted in inscriptions through the CE, particularly in non-urban contexts, indicating cultural resistance or among lower strata. For instance, late Lusitanian-language dedications and mixed onomastic formulas in provincial reflect ongoing local identity amid Latin's dominance. This continuity underscores a uneven assimilation, where elite adoption of and nomenclature contrasted with rural adherence to traditional naming practices.

Geography and Tribes

Territory and Settlement

The Lusitanians inhabited a core territory in the western , encompassing much of modern central and western , extending from the Durius () River in the north to the River in the south, and from the Atlantic coast eastward into inland plateaus. This region, known in antiquity as , measured approximately 3,000 stadia in length from the ocean to the interior, with a narrower breadth characterized by rugged eastern mountains transitioning to fertile coastal plains and river valleys. The landscape featured a with seasonal rainfall supporting oak forests, pastures for , and arable lands suitable for grain cultivation, enabling a of herding and farming. Settlement patterns among the Lusitanians were diverse and adapted to the terrain, including fortified hilltop enclosures resembling oppida, open villages in riverine areas, and seasonal camps for mobility, particularly from around 500 BCE onward. These hillforts, often situated on elevated sites for defense and oversight of resources, drew influences from broader Iberian traditions, such as those seen in nearby , and were prevalent in inland zones like the Valley. Coastal and lowland settlements, like the early precursor to (modern ), facilitated access to maritime routes, while nomadic elements allowed for flexible habitation in response to environmental and raiding pressures. The territory's resources, particularly in the Valley, supported mining of tin and silver, which were extracted from riverine deposits and veins, contributing to trans-Pyrenean networks linking Iberia to Mediterranean markets. Rivers like the carried gold dust and facilitated transport of metals, with ancient accounts noting the region's abundance in these materials alongside and iron. To the north, the Lusitanians bordered the along the Durius River, while eastward boundaries adjoined the near the Carpetani and , marking transitions in cultural and linguistic zones.

Tribes and Social Organization

The Lusitanians were organized as a collection of independent tribes rather than a unified political entity, forming loose confederations when faced with external threats such as invasions by or . Ancient geographer described them as comprising approximately 30 tribes inhabiting the region north of the River, extending to the Atlantic coast and neighboring groups like the Callaeci and . Prominent tribes included the Lancienses, who occupied areas near the modern Portuguese-Spanish border, the Coelerni (also known as Coilarni) in northern Lusitania, and the closely allied Vettones to the east, all sharing linguistic and cultural affinities that facilitated temporary alliances. These groups maintained autonomy in peacetime, with each tribe controlling its own territory and resources through kinship-based clans. Social hierarchy among the Lusitanians revolved around a warrior aristocracy that held leadership roles, supported by priestly figures and a base of common herders and farmers, as inferred from Roman ethnographic accounts. Strabo highlighted the prominence of skilled warriors who excelled in guerrilla tactics and raids, forming the elite class that guided tribal decisions. Priestly classes likely played advisory roles in rituals and counsel, drawing from epigraphic evidence of dedications to deities, though details remain sparse in literary sources. The majority of the population consisted of pastoralists and small-scale farmers, whose livelihoods centered on herding cattle and sheep in the rugged terrain, sustaining the warrior elite through tribute and labor. Kinship ties formed the core of Lusitanian organization, with clans united by blood relations and networks that resolved internal disputes and mobilized for defense. observed shared kinship links between the Lusitanians and neighboring Celtic groups, such as those along the River, underscoring a tribal identity rooted in familial bonds rather than formal institutions. During periods of crisis, these kinship groups convened assemblies to coordinate responses, as evidenced by their unification under leaders like to resist Roman expansion in the second century BCE. records how such assemblies elected commanders and rallied diverse tribes into a cohesive force against external aggressors. Gender roles within Lusitanian exhibited relative equality compared to many contemporary cultures, with women actively participating in communal activities and warfare. Strabo noted women's involvement in social dances alongside men during festivals, suggesting integrated roles in tribal gatherings. further describes Lusitanian women fighting alongside men with valor during Roman assaults on their settlements, even taking their own lives or those of their children to avoid capture, which highlights their agency in defense and decision-making. This participation extended to assemblies during wartime, where women's voices contributed to collective strategies, reflecting a where familial and tribal duties were shared across genders.

Culture and Society

Material Culture and Economy

The Lusitanians produced distinctive hand-built pottery during the , characterized by coarse wares with incised, stamped, or impressed decorations influenced by Atlantic traditions, as evidenced by finds from settlement sites in western Iberia. These vessels, often used for storage and cooking, featured simple forms like globular pots and bowls, reflecting local technological continuity without widespread wheel-throwing until later periods. Metalwork was a prominent aspect of Lusitanian craftsmanship, with bronze fibulae serving as brooches for fastening garments, commonly found in Portuguese sites and displaying regional variations in bow shape and pin design. Swords known as falcatas, forged from with a curved for slashing, exemplified their metallurgical skills, often featuring decorative engravings and a protective coating, linking them to broader Iberian traditions. The Lusitanian economy centered on transhumant herding of , sheep, goats, pigs, and , with zooarchaeological from western Iberian sites indicating significant reliance on bovids for , , traction, and . supplemented this, focusing on cereals such as and , alongside gathering acorns and , supporting self-sufficient village-based production in a of hillforts and open pastures. Metallurgy played a key role, with communities extracting and working local , silver, and from river deposits and ores, producing tools, jewelry, and weapons that sustained both local needs and exchange networks. involved bartering , metals, and with Phoenician merchants from coastal outposts and neighboring Celtic groups, without the use of coined , as archaeological evidence points to informal markets and gift exchange rather than monetized systems. and jewelry-making further contributed to a craft-oriented , with fibulae and simple looms evidencing household-level production for personal and use.

Daily Life and Social Structure

The Lusitanians organized their society around units structured as clans, forming the core of social cohesion, with families typically comprising multiple generations living together to manage and activities. During periods of settlement, families inhabited round stone or wood-and-thatch huts clustered within fortified hilltop villages known as castros, which provided defense and communal space; archaeological evidence from sites in central , such as those near the Tagus River, reveals these circular dwellings averaging 5-10 meters in diameter, often with central hearths for cooking and warmth. Daily sustenance for Lusitanian families derived primarily from pastoral herding and foraging, featuring goat and sheep meat, dairy products like milk and cheese, and wild-gathered staples such as acorns ground into bread-like porridge, which mountaineers consumed for two-thirds of the year due to the scarcity of cultivated grains. Beer brewed from barley served as the common beverage, with wine being rare and quickly consumed when available through trade; olive oil was largely absent, replaced by animal fats or butter in cooking. Communal feasts, involving shared portions of roasted meats and dairy during seasonal gatherings tied to herding cycles, reinforced clan ties and resource distribution, as evidenced by patterns in Iberian ethnographic accounts. These meals not only addressed nutritional needs but also highlighted the interdependence of herding economies on collective labor. Much of the knowledge of Lusitanian daily life derives from classical authors like Strabo and Diodorus, whose accounts may include generalizations, supplemented by limited archaeological evidence due to later Romanization and the prevalence of oral traditions. Education among Lusitanian emphasized practical skills through informal and , including in manly exercises and the use of arms and horses from an early age. They also held public contests of strength, speed, , running, and fighting in or squadrons, which prepared young males for roles in herding protection and tribal defense. Social norms among the Lusitanians prioritized toward strangers, with clans vying to host travelers as a sign of divine favor and community generosity, a custom shared with neighboring Iberian societies that strengthened inter-clan alliances through shared meals and stories. Oral traditions served as the primary means of preserving , laws, and genealogies, recited during evening gatherings around fires in huts or during communal assemblies, ensuring cultural continuity in a non-literate . roles allowed significant participation by women in labor-intensive tasks like , , and preparation, as well as in informal decision-making within clans, reflected in their attire of long mantles and gay-colored gowns suited for mobility and their presence in daily economic activities. Men, clad in black coarse cloaks for practicality in the field, handled heavier and scouting duties, but both genders contributed to the clan's survival in a harsh environment.

Religion

Beliefs and Deities

The Lusitanian religion was polytheistic, featuring a pantheon of deities tied to natural forces and human concerns, as evidenced by approximately 270 inscriptions from the that document local theonyms. Principal among these were , Ataegina, and , each embodying aspects of the natural and spiritual world. , appearing in about one-third of the inscriptions, served as a chthonic god associated with the , , and prophecy, often invoked through oracular responses in votive offerings. Ataegina, a prominent in Lusitanian and broader Paleohispanic contexts, was linked to , the , and the , with her cult spanning regions from Beja to Toledo and reflected in over 50 votive epigraphs. , attested in inscriptions from Lusitanian and Vettonian territories, functioned as a female potentially connected to rivers and local , highlighting the pantheon's emphasis on powers. Lusitanian beliefs exhibited an animistic worldview, where gods were inextricably bound to natural features such as rivers like the and mountains, which were revered as sacred embodiments of divine presence. This perspective integrated the divine into the landscape, with deities like exemplifying the veneration of water sources essential to agrarian life. The cosmology underlying these beliefs centered on cycles of life, death, and rebirth, drawing from Indo-European motifs but adapted to local Iberian traditions, as seen in the chthonic roles of and Ataegina that mediated transitions between worlds. Such concepts underscored a theological framework where renewal and protection were paramount, distinct from neighboring Celtic pantheons in their emphasis on regional environmental ties. Priesthood played a central role in Lusitanian religious life, with priests acting as intermediaries who conducted and to interpret divine will, particularly through oracles associated with . Roman sources, including historical accounts of Iberian practices, note these figures' involvement in mediating between communities and gods, ensuring communal harmony amid cycles of prosperity and adversity. This structured approach to reinforced the pantheon's accessibility, allowing devotees to seek guidance on , , and natural forces through dedicated cultic roles.

Rituals and Sacred Sites

Lusitanian rituals centered on animal sacrifices, often documented through epigraphic evidence from rock sanctuaries, where offerings such as sheep, pigs, bulls, goats, calves, and lambs were made to deities like Trebaruna, Reve, Laebus, Trebopala, and Iccona Loimina. These sacrifices involved inspecting the vitals of victims without fully extracting them, as described by , and were sometimes accompanied by libations poured over rocks or into basins at open-air sites. Votive offerings, including bronze anatomical representations such as hands symbolizing healing requests through , were deposited at sanctuaries to fulfill vows or seek divine favor for health and protection. Seasonal festivals aligned with solstices and equinoxes occurred at sites, where solar carvings and footprints facilitated communal ceremonies marking agricultural cycles and royal investitures. Communal processions and oracular consultations formed key elements of , with assemblies gathering for horse-riding events and vow fulfillments, as noted in ancient accounts of Lusitanian festivals. from sites like Cabeço das Fráguas records such dedications, including a roster of sacrificial animals offered by individuals like Bassus, son of Viriati, to multiple deities in a shared ritual context. At oracular sanctuaries, practices like incubatio—sleeping in sacred spaces for divine visions—were employed, evidenced by inscriptions invoking deities ex visu for guidance on and . Major sacred sites included the sanctuary of at São Miguel da Mota in , where over 90 Latin votive inscriptions on altars, bases, and tabulae from the 1st to 4th centuries AD detail offerings like silver icons and ceramics, reflecting a blend of indigenous healing cults and Roman influences. Rock sanctuaries in the Valley, such as Cenicientos near the river, featured bas-reliefs and niches depicting deities like , with channels for libations and animal sacrifices tied to agrarian and boundary rituals. Other prominent locations encompassed hilltop enclosures like Cabeço das Fráguas and Sta. Lucía del Trampal, where clusters of altars and bronze goat figurines honored Ataecina through seasonal depositions of oil lamps and faunal remains. Funerary customs involved within tumuli burials, particularly for warriors, accompanied by such as weapons, tools, and to equip the deceased for the , as inferred from Celtic-influenced practices in the region.

Language

Characteristics and Inscriptions

The , attested through a limited corpus of inscriptions, exhibits several distinctive linguistic features that provide insights into its phonological and grammatical structure. It preserves Indo-European *p in initial and medial positions, as seen in words like porcom (''), contrasting with the loss of *p in neighboring . The language displays centum-like traits, where palatovelars are retained as velars rather than shifting to , evident in forms such as trebo ('house' or 'dwelling'). Possible labial mutations occur, including of intervocalic stops, as in ifate/ifadem, where /t/ becomes /d/. Grammatically, Lusitanian inscriptions reveal a case system including accusative and dative forms, often in votive contexts. For instance, the accusative oilam appears in dedications, likely meaning '' or 'offering,' while dative constructions like Deibabor indicate indirect objects in divine invocations. Personal names such as Ambatus and verb forms like 3rd singular rueti ('flows') or 3rd plural doenti ('they give') suggest a synthetic structure with SVO , though Latin influence is apparent in bilingual texts. Declensions include -o- stems (porcom), -a- stems (oilam), and athematic forms (ifadem). The corpus consists of approximately six or seven inscriptions, many fragmentary and containing fewer than 100 words in total, primarily from the late 1st century BCE to the CE. These texts, such as the Cabeço das Fráguas inscription (divided into three fragments) and the dedication, are written in the Latin alphabet adapted to local phonemes, including diphthongs like eu in teucaecom. Most are bilingual, mixing Lusitanian with Latin, and often appear on stone altars or bronzes in western Iberia. Vocabulary in the surviving texts frequently relates to and , reflecting and daily concerns. Terms like taurom ('') and porcom ('') denote animals in offerings, while trebo suggests domestic structures or family units. River names, such as those preserving Indo-European roots (e.g., Tamara from *tam- 'dark'), link to the Lusitanians' territorial features. Divine epithets like Laebo and Reue further illustrate kinship-like relational terms in religious contexts.

Classification and Debates

The classification of the Lusitanian language within the Indo-European family has long been a subject of scholarly debate, primarily centering on its relationship to the Celtic branch. Traditionally, Lusitanian has been viewed as para-Celtic, an Indo-European language closely related to but distinct from canonical Celtic tongues, due to shared phonological innovations such as the change from Proto-Indo-European *kw to p (e.g., as seen in forms like *kʷetwor- > *-). This perspective, prominent in the , was advanced by Jürgen Untermann, who analyzed onomastic and inscriptional evidence to argue that Lusitanian represented an archaic variety of Celtic, exhibiting features like preserved initial *p (lost in most ) alongside Celtic-like morphology. Alternative classifications challenge this Celtic affiliation, proposing Lusitanian as either part of an grouping or an independent Indo-European branch. Blanca María Prósper, in her study, contended that Lusitanian is a non-Celtic Indo-European , emphasizing morphological and phonological traits incompatible with Celtic definitions, such as distinct endings and verbal forms. Her later works, including analyses from the 2020s, further question Celtic exclusivity through substrate examination, suggesting influences from pre-Indo-European Paleohispanic (e.g., non-Indo-European elements in and ) that shaped Lusitanian independently of Celtic expansions. These arguments posit a closer alignment with , potentially as a sister to the node, based on shared innovations like certain dative formations. Evidence from underscores these debates, with some names showing Celtic parallels—such as briga, a common element denoting 'hill' or 'fort' in —while others appear uniquely Lusitanian, like Lubius or forms deriving from roots not attested in Celtic (e.g., *lub- possibly linked to local substrates). Proponents of para-Celtic ties highlight the prevalence of such shared onomastic elements in western Iberia, whereas critics, including Prósper, argue that these reflect areal convergence rather than genetic affiliation, with unique features indicating an earlier divergence. Post-2020 debates continue to evolve, incorporating substrate analysis to explore Lusitanian's potential pre-Indo-European layers from Paleohispanic non-Indo-European languages, such as Tartessian or Iberian influences evident in vocabulary and place names. Prósper's examination of case endings reinforces the non-Celtic stance, suggesting Lusitanian as a relic of an early western Indo-European dialect with substrate admixtures that preclude straightforward Celtic classification. These discussions emphasize the language's fragmentary corpus, urging caution in subgrouping while highlighting its role in broader Indo-European diversification in Iberia.

Warfare

Military Tactics

The Lusitanians employed guerrilla warfare as their primary military strategy, leveraging their intimate knowledge of the rugged Iberian terrain to conduct ambushes, hit-and-run raids, and surprise attacks against superior forces. This approach allowed them to avoid decisive pitched battles, instead harassing enemies through rapid strikes from mountainous hideouts and forested areas, often descending in small bands to raid supply lines before retreating to natural strongholds. Ancient accounts describe their forces scattering into dispersed groups after engagements to evade pursuit, only to regroup with fresh recruits drawn from local tribes, thereby prolonging resistance against organized armies. Lusitanian operated in loose formations suited to irregular , consisting primarily of lightly armed warriors equipped with small, round shields (caetrae) made from oxhide or interwoven sinews for quick maneuverability, barbed javelins known as soliferrata (entirely of iron for penetration and reuse), and short two-edged swords for close-quarters fighting. These troops excelled in hurling javelins from a distance before closing in for , advancing with rhythmic steps and chanting war songs to boost morale and intimidate foes. In open terrain, they occasionally adopted denser arrangements influenced by neighboring Iberian groups, forming rudimentary shield walls to withstand charges, though their preference remained for fluid, skirmishing tactics over rigid lines. Supporting the infantry were light cavalry units interspersed among the foot soldiers, whose sure-footed horses were trained to navigate steep mountains and enable swift flanking maneuvers or pursuits. These horsemen, often unarmored for speed, used similar javelins and swords, contributing to the overall mobility that defined Lusitanian operations. For defense, the Lusitanians relied on fortified hilltop settlements called castros, circular enclosures with stone walls and ditches that served as secure bases for launching raids and storing supplies. In prolonged conflicts, they implemented scorched-earth policies, burning crops and villages to deny resources to invaders and force attrition on advancing armies.

Notable Leaders and Battles

The most prominent leader of the Lusitanians was , a former shepherd who rose to command after surviving Roman massacres under praetors Servius Sulpicius Galba and Lucius Licinius Lucullus in 150 BCE. Joining a band of 10,000 survivors, he was elected leader for his ability to inspire resistance against Roman treachery, leading an eight-year guerrilla campaign that inflicted heavy losses on Roman forces across multiple engagements. Earlier revolts featured leaders such as Caucenus, who in the 150s BCE commanded Lusitanian forces across the Tagus River, capturing the town of Conistorgis and raiding Roman allies in and Ocile before being defeated by Quintus Fabius Maximus Aemilianus. Preceding him, Punicus and Caesarus led incursions starting around 155 BCE, defeating Roman and killing thousands, including 6,000 under Punicus and 9,000 under Caesarus, though both fell in battle against Roman counterattacks. After Viriathus's assassination in 139 BCE by traitors Audax, Ditalco, and Minurus—bribed by consul Quintus Servilius Caepio—successors like Tantalus briefly continued resistance, attacking settlements such as Saguntum before surrendering due to exhaustion. Key battles under included the ambush at Tribola c. 148 BCE, where his forces lured Vetilius's 10,000 Romans into a wooded trap, killing thousands and forcing survivors over cliffs, with only 6,000 escaping to Carpessus. Another pivotal engagement was the 140 BCE siege of Erisana, where 's warriors infiltrated the town at night and routed Fabius Maximus Servilianus's army at dawn, driving them to cliffs and compelling a that recognized as a Roman ally. Roman accounts, particularly by , highlight the role of Lusitanian women as warriors, noting that during praetor Sextus Junius Brutus's campaign in the 130s BCE, they fought alongside men with exceptional bravery, some choosing or over capture to emulate Viriathus's tactics.

Legacy

Roman and Post-Roman Influence

Following the Roman conquest of in the late BCE, Lusitanian warriors were integrated into the Roman structure, particularly valued for their equestrian skills in . These local contingents, such as the Cohors I Lusitanorum, contributed to Roman legions by providing skilled horsemen adept at guerrilla tactics and rapid maneuvers, which proved essential in campaigns across the empire. This incorporation not only bolstered Roman forces but also facilitated the gradual of Lusitanian society through service and resettlement. Lusitanian linguistic and cultural elements persisted in the through toponyms, many of which survived into modern nomenclature. Such place names reflect the incomplete assimilation of Lusitanian identity, embedding local geography into the Roman administrative framework. After the CE, as Roman authority waned, Lusitanian cultural remnants endured in the Visigothic kingdoms that succeeded imperial rule in Iberia. In the territories of former , Visigothic governance incorporated surviving elements, influencing early medieval Portuguese identity through rural customs. Cultural hybridity characterized in , with Lusitanian-influenced populations interacting with invading and later , blending local Romanized traditions with Germanic customs in settlement patterns and social structures. The , establishing a kingdom in and northern by the 5th century CE, engaged in symbiotic relations with Hispano-Roman communities, adopting elements of local agricultural knowledge while influencing legal and ecclesiastical frameworks. A 2022 archaeological study on shifting landscapes in Lusitanian territory highlights long-term agricultural legacies from these interactions, demonstrating how Roman-era adaptations—such as villa-based farming and resource exploitation—influenced post-Roman patterns. Analyzing settlement data from the 1st century BCE onward, the research reveals hybrid socio-economic responses that sustained diverse crop cultivation, evident in enduring rural configurations through .

Modern Interpretations and Genetics

Recent analyses have reshaped understandings of Lusitanian genetic origins by highlighting both migratory inputs and enduring local continuity in populations of the Iberian Peninsula's western regions. A comprehensive 2025 study of 67 ancient Portuguese genomes spanning five millennia identified continuation of Steppe-related ancestry from the into the , consistent with broader into Iberia while underscoring substantial persistence of pre-existing local ancestries, with minimal North African admixture in modern populations. This pattern suggests that Lusitanian groups incorporated steppe-derived elements without wholesale population replacement, aligning genetic evidence with archaeological indications of cultural hybridization in the region. Linguistic scholarship from 2021 to 2025 has further refined interpretations of Lusitanian , moving away from a strictly Celtic classification toward a view of the language as para-Celtic or an isolated western Indo-European branch with mixed influences. Works by Eugenio Salor, for instance, emphasize the para-Celtic isolation of Lusitanian, characterized by unique morphological features diverging from core Celtic dialects while sharing some Italic-like traits. This perspective posits Lusitanians as ethnically heterogeneous, blending indigenous pre-Indo-European substrates with incoming Indo-European elements, challenging earlier monolithic ethnic narratives. Archaeological investigations in the have addressed longstanding gaps in Lusitanian , particularly through surveys in the that illuminate extensive pre-Roman trade networks. These findings portray Lusitanians as active participants in broader commerce, filling interpretive voids left by earlier, Roman-biased excavations. In modern Portuguese , the term "Lusitanian" serves as a metonym for national resilience, invoked in and nationalist discourses since the 19th century to evoke pre-Roman and resistance against external powers. This symbolism persists in contemporary contexts, reinforcing themes of cultural perseverance in political and artistic expressions.

References

  1. https://academic.oup.com/book/36477/chapter/321084624
  2. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=classicsjournal
  3. https://www.academia.edu/8981062/Personal_Onomastics_and_local_Society_in_ancient_Lusitania
  4. https://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2022/12/iberians-appian-on-viriathus-and-resistance-by-lusitanians-early-second-century-ce/
  5. https://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2024/03/iberians-diodoros-on-viriathus-and-the-lusitanians-mid-first-century-bce/
  6. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-025-03707-2
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5973796/
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230140102_The_Iron_Age_in_western_Spain_800_BC-AD_50_an_overview
  9. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/8d5abbce-7155-42ba-b05e-f8a8eb6990fa/content
  10. https://www.academia.edu/6505899/_The_Place_Names_of_Ancient_Hispania_and_its_Linguistic_Layers_
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340388012_An_Alternative_to_%27Celtic_from_the_East%27_and_%27Celtic_from_the_West%27
  12. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/livy/livy-periochae-31-35/
  13. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Appian/Iberia/6*.html
  14. https://www.attalus.org/names/v/viriathus.html
  15. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/157770/20160404%2BCoen%2Bvan%2BGalen%2Bproefschrift%2BDEF%2B%282%29.pdf?sequence=1
  16. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2011/2011.12.14/
  17. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.3764/aja.122.2.0245
  18. https://www.roamintheempire.com/index.php/2017/05/31/augusta-emerita-part-ii/
  19. https://escholarship.org/content/qt8304n08d/qt8304n08d_noSplash_e574830e48b1e53b49730b7c0e8c6ea8.pdf
  20. https://www.academia.edu/118385750/Carneiro_2022_Shifting_landscapes_change_and_adaptation_in_the_Lusitanian_territory_during_the_first_globalisation
  21. https://academic.oup.com/book/55330/chapter/428803645
  22. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/e/roman/texts/strabo/3c*.html
  23. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Geography_of_Strabo/Book_3
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-archaeology/article/vitrified-walls-in-the-iron-age-of-western-iberia-new-research-from-an-archaeometric-perspective/C44AEC9377BCF320D66702615A8533F8
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/29726496_Oppida_and_Celtic_society_in_western_Spain
  26. https://www.attalus.org/translate/pliny_hn33a.html
  27. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/3C*.html
  28. https://topostext.org/work/148
  29. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/94486/gonzalez_ruibal_6_3.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233254116_Fibulae_from_an_Iron_Age_Site_in_Portugal
  31. https://www.academia.edu/11986135/Iberian_falcata_in_the_British_Museum
  32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-022-01627-x
  33. https://countrystudies.us/portugal/4.htm
  34. https://herminiusmons.wordpress.com/2018/05/15/who-were-the-lusitanians/
  35. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Diodorus_Siculus/5B*.html
  36. https://www.academia.edu/447670/The_Current_State_of_Research_on_Local_Deities_In_Portugal
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352920333_Endovellicus_sanctuary_in_Portugal_An_example_of_language_variation_throughout_votive_inscriptions_in_Latin
  38. https://www.academia.edu/31993864/Ataegina_a_Paleohispanic_Divinity
  39. https://www.academia.edu/1326288/Religion_and_religious_practices_of_the_ancient_Celts_of_the_Iberian_Peninsula
  40. https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/8234/3/Richert2012%20v.1.pdf
  41. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/94474/garcia_quintela_6_10.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  42. https://www.abracademica.com/l/magic-in-pre-roman-hispania-and-lusitania-ii-warrior-magic-votive-offerings-and-amulets/
  43. https://www.academia.edu/15117471/The_inscription_of_Cab%C3%A9%C3%A7o_das_Fraguas_revisited_Lusitanian_and_Alteurop%C3%A4isch_populations_in_the_west_of_the_Iberian_Peninsula
  44. https://www.academia.edu/19947011/113_Lusitanian
  45. https://docta.ucm.es/bitstreams/5bcef4ad-a05e-4e0d-9d8d-1205cbabca97/download
  46. https://ifc.dpz.es/recursos/publicaciones/29/54/22wodtko.pdf
  47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20868003
  48. https://books.google.com/books?id=TdyYAwAAQBAJ
  49. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/indoeuropean-language-family/italoceltic/B4955FB7B7A6803DDD727795EA88C065
  50. https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-6027
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388997864_On_the_Indo-European_origin_of_two_Lusitanian_theonyms_laebo_and_reve
  52. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/3971/86p263.pdf
  53. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/appian/appian-the-spanish-wars/appian-the-spanish-wars-13/
  54. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/appian/appian-the-spanish-wars/appian-the-spanish-wars-12/
  55. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/appian/appian-the-spanish-wars/appian-the-spanish-wars-15/
  56. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/appian/appian-the-spanish-wars/appian-the-spanish-wars-14/
  57. https://archive.org/download/auxiliaofromanim00cheerich/auxiliaofromanim00cheerich.pdf
  58. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/be31d38d-404f-4809-8438-e505e9c47ca6/external_content.pdf
  59. https://www.academia.edu/1523816/Identity_and_Interaction_the_Suevi_and_the_Hispano_Romans
  60. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aav4040
  61. https://www.academia.edu/50649582/The_Lusitanian_oblique_cases_revisited_new_light_on_the_dative_endings
  62. https://docta.ucm.es/entities/publication/78e034a8-6a53-4d73-aff8-7783e30efb0a
  63. https://www.berghahnbooks.com/downloads/OpenAccess/MishkovaEuropean/MishkovaEuropean_06.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.