Hubbry Logo
List of non-building structure typesList of non-building structure typesMain
Open search
List of non-building structure types
Community hub
List of non-building structure types
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
List of non-building structure types
List of non-building structure types
List of non-building structure types
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Eiffel Tower
Brandenburg Gate
The Arcade du Cinquantenaire in Brussels, Belgium
Golden Gate Bridge
Kapellbrücke (Chapel Bridge), a covered bridge in Lucerne, Switzerland
The Olmsted ramada over the Big House of Casa Grande National Monument in Arizona
Silos in Acatlán, Hidalgo, Mexico
Transmission tower near Le Cluzeau, Saint-Romain, France
The Triumphal Arch of Orange, France

A nonbuilding structure, often referred to simply as a structure, is any built structure or construction structure that is not a building, i.e. not designed for continuous human occupancy. The term is particularly used by architects, structural engineers, and mechanical engineers to distinguish load-bearing structures not designed for continuous human occupancy.[1]

Examples

[edit]

Exceptions

[edit]
Dulles Airport control tower

Some structures that are occupied periodically and would otherwise be considered "nonbuilding structures" are categorized as "buildings" for life and fire safety purposes:[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

List of non-building structure types

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A non-building structure refers to any self-supporting engineered that carries gravity loads and resists environmental forces such as and earthquakes, but is not classified as a building due to its lack of design for continuous human occupancy. These structures are essential components of modern , supporting functions like transportation, production, management, and , and are categorized in standards such as ASCE/SEI 7-22 primarily into two groups: those similar to buildings in their structural systems and dynamic behavior, and those with distinct configurations requiring specialized design approaches. Non-building structures similar to buildings include pipe racks, steel storage racks, electrical power generating facilities, and structural towers supporting tanks or vessels, which often utilize framing systems akin to those in habitable enclosures and are designed using seismic provisions from standards like ASCE 7. In contrast, non-building structures not similar to buildings encompass earth-retaining walls, stacks and chimneys, telecommunication towers, amusement rides, special hydraulic structures like dams, secondary containment systems, and ground-supported storage tanks, each governed by unique reference standards to account for factors such as , sloshing effects, or shell behaviors. This distinction influences seismic design, where non-building structures generally face higher force demands due to limited inherent and compared to buildings, emphasizing the need for precise load calculations, importance factors based on categories, and overstrength considerations to ensure resilience. The cataloging of non-building structure types facilitates standardized classification in and regulatory frameworks, aiding architects, engineers, and policymakers in applying appropriate codes for safety and performance. Notable examples extend beyond industrial applications to include bridges, piers, wharves, and supports, highlighting their role in global connectivity and while underscoring ongoing advancements in materials and for enhanced .

Definition and Scope

Core Definition

Nonbuilding structures are defined as self-supporting constructions that carry gravity loads but are not classified as buildings, primarily serving load-bearing or functional purposes in engineering applications rather than supporting continuous habitation. This classification emphasizes their design intent to accommodate equipment, processes, or infrastructure support without provisions for enclosed, occupiable spaces. According to ASCE/SEI 7-22, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, nonbuilding structures are structures, other than buildings, that are designed and constructed essentially independent of any building and are capable of resisting gravity and environmental loads independently, distinct from components integral to buildings. Key characteristics of nonbuilding structures include their focus on structural integrity for supporting loads associated with , , or industrial functions, often requiring specialized for dynamic forces such as earthquakes and . Unlike buildings, they prioritize robustness in open or semi-enclosed frameworks to facilitate without the need for habitability features like insulation or ventilation for occupants. These structures are engineered to minimize deformation under service conditions while ensuring margins for extreme events, as outlined in standards that differentiate them based on response to lateral and vertical forces. The historical origin of the term "nonbuilding structures" in traces to the late , specifically with the 1988 Uniform , which introduced dedicated seismic design provisions to address their unique dynamic behaviors separate from habitable buildings. However, the underlying distinction from structures intended for human occupancy dates to early 20th-century codes, which categorized constructions by use—such as residential versus industrial—to enforce varying safety requirements for fire resistance and stability following urban fires and structural failures. In civil and , nonbuilding structures play a critical role in load analysis, where engineers evaluate seismic, wind, and gravitational demands to optimize material use and prevent failure. This involves applying methods and equivalent lateral force procedures tailored to their geometry and support conditions, ensuring compliance with performance objectives under multi-hazard scenarios. Such analyses are essential for maintaining system reliability in infrastructure-dependent sectors. Recent updates in ASCE 7-22, as of , include expanded provisions for nonbuilding structures, such as definitions for equipment support structures, enhancing design for complex systems.

Distinction from Buildings

Buildings are defined as structures intended for supporting or sheltering occupancy, typically featuring enclosed spaces with walls, roofs, and floors designed to provide protection from environmental elements. In contrast, non-building structures are self-supporting constructions not designed for continuous habitation, often consisting of open frameworks or supports that facilitate functions such as transit, storage, or utility conveyance, exemplified by bridges or transmission towers. This fundamental distinction influences their primary purposes: prioritize occupant and comfort, while non-building structures emphasize structural integrity under operational loads without considerations. Design criteria for non-building structures diverge significantly from those for , focusing on resistance to dynamic environmental forces such as , , and seismic activity rather than internal environmental controls. Unlike , which require integrated systems for regulation, , electrical distribution, and ventilation to support human occupancy, non-building structures lack mandates for these habitability features and instead incorporate open or minimal enclosures to reduce weight and enhance load distribution. For instance, bridges and towers are engineered to withstand oscillatory motions and aerodynamic pressures that could compromise stability, often using specialized materials and configurations not typical in . Legally, the International Building Code (IBC) applies to both buildings and structures (per Section 101.2), but non-building structures may have reduced applicability for certain occupancy-specific fire and life safety provisions, such as egress requirements, due to lack of human occupancy; however, they remain subject to structural load provisions via ASCE 7 and relevant fire safety under the International Fire Code where applicable. This regulatory approach recognizes the differing risks while ensuring overall safety. In construction practice, permitting for non-building structures can vary by jurisdiction and may involve simpler reviews for projects without occupancy concerns, though they must still comply with zoning, structural, and environmental regulations.

Exceptions and Classifications

Exceptions to the Definition

While non-building structures are generally defined as those without intended human occupancy or shelter, certain cases with periodic or limited human access challenge this boundary and are reclassified as buildings under building codes to ensure fire safety and egress provisions. For instance, airport traffic control towers, which accommodate personnel for operational shifts rather than continuous habitation, are explicitly addressed in Section 412.2 of the 2024 International Building Code (IBC) as special occupancies requiring compliance with height limits, sprinkler systems, and smoke detection based on elevation above access roads. Similarly, observation decks in towers or similar elevated platforms, intended for temporary public viewing, fall under IBC Chapter 3 occupancy classifications (e.g., Group A-3 assembly) due to their potential for human congregation, mandating building-level fire protection despite infrequent use. Hybrid structures like covered bridges further blur definitional lines by combining transportation functions with partial shelter. The in , —a 14th-century wooden spanning 170 meters—exemplifies this, as its enclosed design protects pedestrians from weather while serving primarily as a link across the Reuss River; such structures are typically classified as non-buildings under standards but may be treated as buildings under local or codes if they include enclosed spaces for occupancy. In the U.S., rehabilitation guidelines for historic covered bridges apply elements of modern building codes such as the IBC for structural and fire safety when enclosures are present, though they remain non-buildings unless designated for sustained human activity. Underwater habitats represent another exception, where temporary residency necessitates building-like regulations for life support and pressure integrity. The Aquarius Reef Base, located 62 feet below the surface off Key Largo, Florida, functions as a research laboratory supporting up to six aquanauts for missions lasting up to 10 days, with living quarters, utilities, and decompression protocols; it incorporates safety standards analogous to those for pressurized occupancies, including occupational regulations for emergency egress and environmental controls to mitigate risks from water pressure and isolation. This approach ensures compliance with occupational safety regulations, treating the habitat as a specialized occupancy despite its non-terrestrial, non-permanent nature. Post-2000 updates in guidelines from the (FEMA) and the (ASCE) have refined these exceptions, particularly in disaster-prone areas, by introducing risk-based reclassification criteria for non-building structures. For example, ASCE/SEI 7-10 and subsequent editions (e.g., 7-16, 7-22) expanded Chapter 15 to include seismic design forces for nonbuilding structures similar to when occupancy risks are elevated, such as in high-seismic zones, allowing reclassification based on potential human exposure during events. FEMA's NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions (e.g., FEMA P-1050, 2015) emphasize analogous approaches for and hazards, recommending that structures with intermittent access in vulnerable areas—like elevated platforms in coastal zones—adopt building codes for enhanced resilience, prioritizing over strict functional separation. These evolutions reflect a shift toward performance-based design, where hazard exposure dictates classification to minimize post-disaster vulnerabilities.

Engineering Classification Systems

Engineering classification systems for non-building structures provide standardized frameworks to guide , , and , ensuring consistency across projects. Functional classification groups these structures by their primary purpose, such as transportation versus systems, which determines applicable load combinations and performance expectations. In the United States, ASCE/SEI 7-16 Chapter 15 specifies seismic requirements for non-building structures, categorizing them into risk categories based on function, such as Category I for low-risk utilities or Category III for essential facilities, to prioritize levels. This approach aligns design forces with operational criticality, avoiding uniform treatment across diverse functions. Structural and material classifications further refine these frameworks by considering form and composition, which influence dynamic behavior and load paths under environmental forces. For instance, lattice forms like braced frames are distinguished from rigid frames such as moment-resisting systems, while materials like for towers contrast with for , affecting and response modification factors. FEMA P-1050, the 2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions, outlines these in Chapters 12 and 15, providing coefficients for systems like braced frames (response modification factor R up to 5) and shear walls (R up to 5.5), with specific tables for diaphragm yield mechanisms and material detailing. Such classifications enable tailored seismic detailing, such as anchorage requirements for tanks per AWWA D100 or ACI 350.3 for vessels. Seismic and risk-based systems categorize non-building structures into those similar to buildings—such as pipe racks or platforms that mimic frame systems—and those not similar, like slender stacks or tanks with unique modal responses. Structures similar to buildings use equivalent lateral force procedures akin to Chapter 12 of ASCE/SEI 7-16, while non-similar ones require site-specific analysis due to lower and higher forces. For rigid non-building structures, the fundamental period is approximated as T=0.1NT = 0.1 N, where NN represents the equivalent number of stories, informing base shear calculations and damping ratios typically between 2-5%. These categories incorporate factors like seismic design category (SDC) and importance factors to scale forces, ensuring resilience without overdesign. International variations exist, with Eurocode 8 (EN 1998) distinguishing non-building structures by material and classes (e.g., low- concrete dams versus high- steel chimneys) in Parts 4 and 6, emphasizing behavior factors q up to 4 for dissipative systems, differing from the U.S. IBC's reliance on ASCE/SEI 7 for equivalent static methods. The second-generation Eurocode 8 (EN 1998-1:2025), adopted in phases starting 2024, integrates aspects including climate-resilient factors such as enhanced protection for coastal towers. The U.S. International (IBC) 2024, effective through 2025, updates seismic provisions via ASCE/SEI 7-22 references, refining risk categories for non-building elements but maintaining core distinctions.

Functional Categories

Transportation Structures

Transportation structures encompass a diverse array of non-building engineering works designed to facilitate the efficient movement of people, vehicles, goods, and even water across obstacles such as rivers, valleys, and seas. These structures prioritize load-bearing capacity, durability against environmental forces, and minimal interference with natural flows, distinguishing them from enclosed buildings by their open or linear configurations. Key examples include bridges, , marine loading platforms, aerial support systems, and mechanisms, each engineered to handle dynamic loads like , water pressure, or while adhering to standards such as those from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Bridges and viaducts form the backbone of overland and water transport, spanning gaps with designs optimized for tension, compression, and shear forces. Beam bridges, the simplest type, rely on horizontal beams supported by abutments or piers to distribute loads over short to medium spans, typically up to 250 feet, and are commonly constructed from steel or concrete girders for highway or rail use. Arch bridges, by contrast, transfer loads through curved structures in compression, enabling longer spans—often exceeding 500 feet—and are exemplified by ancient stone designs evolving into modern reinforced concrete variants that withstand heavy vehicular traffic. Suspension bridges, such as the Golden Gate Bridge, utilize cables draped over towers to support the deck, achieving record main spans of 4,200 feet and accommodating live loads up to 72 kips from design trucks plus lane loads per AASHTO HL-93 standards, with towers rising 746 feet to resist sway and seismic forces. Viaducts extend these principles over multiple spans, often in urban or rugged terrain, while aqueducts adapt bridge forms for water transport, like the Delaware Aqueduct's suspension design with spans of 142 feet and three at 131 feet, channeling water via gravity without pumps. Tunnels provide subterranean or underwater passages for road, rail, and pedestrian traffic, minimizing surface disruption while navigating geological challenges. Road and rail tunnels, such as those under mountains, employ cut-and-cover methods for shallow depths, where a trench is excavated, the structure built, and backfilled, suitable for urban settings with spans under 50 feet deep. Bored tunnels, drilled using tunnel boring machines (TBMs), are preferred for deeper alignments, creating circular cross-sections up to 50 feet in to handle loads and ventilation needs. Pedestrian variants often use similar techniques but with smaller diameters for lower capacities. Underwater examples include the , a 31-mile rail link between and bored through chalk marl using TBMs at depths up to 250 feet below the seabed, and the in , a 33.5-mile rail passage constructed via conventional drill-and-blast methods in to mitigate earthquake risks. Wharves, piers, and docks serve as marine interfaces for loading and unloading or passengers, extending from shorelines to accommodate vessel drafts without enclosing spaces. Wharves run parallel to the shore on reclaimed land or piles, typically using or for decks supported by driven piles up to 100 feet long to resist tidal forces and berthing impacts. Piers project perpendicularly into deeper water, often on concrete piles spaced 10-20 feet apart, enabling multi-sided access for smaller vessels and distinguishing them from broader complexes, which integrate multiple such structures with terminals, cranes, and storage for large-scale operations. Docks, similarly pile-supported, focus on sheltered berthing for , with concrete's resistance in saltwater environments ensuring load capacities for vessels up to 10,000 tons. These differ from full ports by their standalone functionality, lacking the extensive connections of integrated harbors. Aerial lift pylons and cableways enable transport over impassable terrain like mountains or rivers via suspended cables, supporting or cars without ground-level tracks. Pylons, tall towers of or up to 200 feet high, anchor and tension load-bearing cables—often 2-3 inches in —spaced to minimize sway from wind or passenger movement, with engineering focusing on curves for even load distribution. systems use continuously circulating cables for detachable cabins, achieving capacities up to 4,000 persons per hour, while employ fixed rails and counterweighted cars on inclined cables for steeper grades up to 60 degrees. Tensioning systems, including hydraulic drives, maintain cable preload at 50-100 tons to counter dynamic loads, ensuring safe operation in varied weather. Boat lifts and trestles address elevation and spanning needs in water and rail contexts, evolving from 19th-century industrial demands for efficient vertical and horizontal transport. Boat lifts, hydraulic or mechanical systems, raise vessels between canal levels using counterbalanced caissons filled with water, as in the 1875 Anderton Lift in , which elevates two narrow canal boats, each up to about 25 tons loaded, 50 feet via rams powered by steam engines later electrified. Historical development began with experimental models in 1794, peaking in the late 1800s with hydraulic designs like Belgium's Canal du Centre lifts, which testify to era-specific engineering for rapid, lock-free navigation. Trestles, elevated frameworks of timber or bents spaced 10-15 feet apart, support rail tracks over valleys or wetlands, with 19th-century U.S. railroads pioneering their use for quick —such as the 1,900-foot Kinzua Viaduct—before replacement with permanent bridges, handling train axle loads up to 25-30 tons through simple spanning up to 300 feet high.

Utility and Energy Structures

Utility and energy structures encompass a diverse array of non-building frameworks designed to facilitate the production, transmission, and distribution of electrical power, as well as to manage industrial exhaust and capture. These structures prioritize structural integrity under environmental loads such as , seismic activity, and , often employing materials like , , and composites to ensure longevity and reliability. Unlike enclosed buildings, they are open frameworks or tall vertical elements optimized for functionality over habitation, supporting for modern grids. As of 2025, some offshore turbines feature hub heights over 200 meters for enhanced capture. Transmission and distribution towers serve as essential supports for overhead power lines, enabling the efficient transfer of across vast distances. These towers are primarily categorized into lattice and monopole types, with lattice designs consisting of interconnected members forming a triangular or square framework for enhanced stability, while monopoles are single, tapered poles offering a sleeker profile and reduced visual impact. Heights typically range from 30 to 60 meters for distribution lines, extending up to 100 meters or more for high-voltage transmission to minimize line sag and improve efficiency, though specialized designs can reach 200 meters in challenging terrains. Wind resistance is a key , incorporating aerodynamic shaping, systems, and reinforcement members like friction-type braces to withstand gusts exceeding 150 km/h without failure. Chimneys and smokestacks function as vertical exhaust conduits for , dispersing emissions from power plants, factories, and incinerators to mitigate ground-level . Constructed predominantly from for its and durability against corrosive flue gases, these structures can reach heights of 100 to 300 meters to promote atmospheric dilution. Variants include self-supporting types, which rely on their inherent mass and base widening for stability, and guyed configurations anchored by cables to adjacent points, allowing taller, lighter designs in space-constrained areas. Seismic and wind-resistant features, such as flexible joints and tapered profiles, ensure operational continuity during extreme events. Windmills and turbines represent evolving support systems for harnessing kinetic wind , transitioning from traditional post mills with wooden frameworks to modern horizontal-axis turbines mounted on robust towers. Traditional windmills, often guyed or freestanding lattice structures up to 20 meters tall, used sails for mechanical tasks like grinding , supported by stone or foundations. Contemporary utility-scale turbines feature tubular or hybrid concrete- towers reaching hub heights of 80 to 120 meters or more, elevating rotors above turbulent boundary layers to access stronger, steadier winds and boost yield by 2-4% per 10-meter height increase. Foundations typically consist of spread-foot concrete pads or deep piles, dimensioned to counter overturning moments from rotor loads and winds up to 25 m/s, with designs incorporating prestressed elements for taller installations exceeding 150 meters. Solar array supports provide elevated mounting for photovoltaic panels in ground-based installations, optimizing orientation and exposure to . Ground-mounted racks employ fixed-tilt designs, where or aluminum frames hold panels at a static angle matching local for year-round efficiency, anchored via driven piles or ballasted foundations to resist uplift from over 140 km/h. Single-axis trackers, in contrast, rotate panels eastward to westward on motorized tubes, increasing annual output by 15-25% compared to fixed systems through diurnal sun-following, while utilizing similar racking but with enhanced drive mechanisms and wider row spacing to minimize . These supports emphasize corrosion-resistant materials and modular assembly for in utility-scale farms spanning hundreds of acres. Electrical substation frameworks, including non-enclosed gantries, form the skeletal for voltage transformation and switching in power networks. Gantries are typically lattice portals or A-frames supporting busbars, transformers, and circuit breakers, designed to span 10-50 meters with clearances ensuring safe arcing distances under high voltages up to 500 kV. Insulators, often or composite types, suspend conductors to prevent unintended grounding, rated for contamination resistance and mechanical loads from or . Grounding systems, per IEEE standards, employ grids buried in with resistivity below 5 ohm-meters to safely dissipate fault currents up to 40 kA, incorporating mats for personnel . is achieved through redundant bus configurations and flexible joints in gantries, allowing the system to isolate and reroute power during short circuits without catastrophic structural failure.

Communication Structures

Communication structures encompass a variety of engineered frameworks primarily designed to facilitate the transmission, reception, and observation of signals for informational purposes, including , , and . These structures support antennas, dishes, and lighting systems while withstanding environmental loads such as and , often incorporating specialized materials like galvanized for durability. Unlike utility structures focused on distribution, communication structures prioritize signal and line-of-sight . Telecommunication towers form the backbone of modern networks, categorized into monopoles, lattice towers, and guyed masts based on their support mechanisms and design. Monopoles consist of a single, tapered pole, typically 50-200 feet (15-60 meters) tall, suitable for urban deployments due to their compact footprint and ease of antenna mounting on the exterior. Lattice towers feature open-framework constructions, often triangular or square, reaching heights of 100-400 feet (30-120 meters), which allow for heavier antenna loads in suburban or rural areas for enhanced coverage beyond urban . Guyed masts use slender central poles anchored by cable stays, enabling greater heights up to 2,000 feet (610 meters) for long-range signal transmission, though they require larger land areas for guying anchors. Antenna mounting on these towers for and future networks involves sectorized arrays positioned at optimal elevations of 25-35 meters in dense areas to minimize interference and maximize propagation. Broadcast and radio masts represent extreme examples of tall, slender guyed structures optimized for medium-wave transmission over vast distances. The , constructed in 1974 near Gąbin, , stood at 646.38 meters, making it the tallest man-made structure until its collapse in 1991, and relied on a guying with multiple cable levels to counter wind-induced sway. Guying systems in such masts distribute tensile forces from anchors spaced radially, but maintenance errors, such as during wire replacement under windy conditions, pose significant collapse risks, as evidenced by at least nine similar incidents worldwide for masts over 600 meters. These structures highlight the engineering trade-offs between height for signal reach and stability against dynamic loads. Observation and lattice towers serve dual roles in communication by providing elevated vantage points for visual signaling or monitoring, though many modern examples function primarily as non-communicative viewing platforms. The Eiffel Tower, a 324-meter wrought-iron lattice structure completed in 1889, exemplifies this with its open framework designed to resist wind loads while supporting observation decks. Structural redundancy in these towers, achieved through curved profiles and multiple load paths, accommodates tourism loads including live weights from crowds on platforms, estimated at up to 7,300 kilograms per deck level, ensuring safety under combined dead, live, and wind forces. Satellite dish supports include fixed and tracking mounts engineered for precise alignment to geostationary or low-Earth satellites. Fixed mounts, often pole or tripod-based, secure dishes up to 5 meters in with galvanized for permanent installations, emphasizing weatherproofing through coatings that withstand winds up to 194 mph and from or salt. Tracking mounts incorporate motorized actuators for azimuthal and elevational adjustments, maintaining sub-degree precision in alignment to track motion and optimize signal strength, with sealed enclosures protecting gears from environmental exposure. Signal and navigation aids rely on robust structural bases to house lighting or reflector systems for maritime and guidance. Lighthouses function as fixed beacons, typically constructed from or towers ranging from 10 to 60 meters in height, providing stable platforms that elevate lamps or LEDs to project beams over horizons while excluding the optical components themselves. Beacons, as smaller fixed aids permanently attached to the or shore, include single-pile metal structures up to several meters tall, designed to mark channels or hazards without integrated electronics, ensuring visibility through reflective surfaces or simple mounts. These bases prioritize corrosion resistance and foundation stability against wave impacts.

Water Management Structures

Water management structures encompass a variety of engineered features designed to control, store, and convey for purposes such as flood mitigation, , and supply distribution. These non-building structures are essential in to regulate water levels, prevent , and ensure reliable access to in diverse environments. Unlike transportation or energy-focused , they prioritize hydrologic balance and environmental stability. Dams and weirs represent foundational elements in water control, with impounding to form reservoirs and weirs providing precise flow regulation. Gravity dams rely on their massive weight to resist , typically constructed from or to achieve stability in wide valleys. Arch dams, by contrast, transfer loads horizontally to abutments through a curved profile, allowing efficient use of materials in narrow, rocky sites. Embankment dams, often built with compacted or rockfill, offer flexibility for broader foundations and are sealed with impervious cores to prevent seepage. Weirs, functioning as low-head barriers, alter flow characteristics and are classified by crest shape, such as sharp-crested for accurate measurement or broad-crested for higher discharge capacities. Spillway designs in , including or side-channel types, safely release excess to avoid overtopping; for instance, the features two controlled side-channel spillways with a combined capacity of 400,000 cubic feet per second, supporting its role in managing the River's 30.5 million reservoir, . Water towers and standpipes provide elevated storage to maintain in distribution systems, leveraging for consistent delivery without pumps during . Water towers typically feature a supported by a tower , while standpipes are tall, cylindrical reservoirs that inherently create head through . Both are commonly made from welded for durability and watertight integrity, though concrete variants offer longevity in corrosive environments; options weigh about one-eighth that of equivalent structures, facilitating easier installation. Capacities range from 100,000 gallons for small communities to 10 million gallons for larger systems, ensuring supply reliability— for example, a 1 million-gallon standpipe can support approximately 10,000 residents at typical daily usage rates. These structures maintain system pressures of 45 to 80 psi, sufficient for multi-story buildings. Underwater habitats and caissons serve as pressurized enclosures for scientific research and construction in submerged settings, enabling prolonged human presence below the surface. Underwater habitats, such as the off Florida's coast, are self-contained modules rated for depths up to 120 feet, housing crews for missions lasting days to weeks in conditions. Access occurs via airlocks that equalize pressure, with sealing mechanisms including robust hatches and umbilical supplies for , distinguishing them from mobile vessels like submersibles. Caissons, used in foundation work, are watertight chambers pressurized with compressed air to exclude during excavations for bridges or tunnels, featuring cutting edges for penetration and bulkhead doors for worker entry and decompression. These structures facilitate underwater observation of marine ecosystems and geotechnical tasks without surface interruptions. Canals and levees form linear systems for directing and containing water flows, critical for and defense. Canals channel water across landscapes, with earthen variants dug directly into the ground and stabilized by compacted banks, while concrete-lined ones reduce seepage losses by up to 50% and handle higher velocities. Levees act as embankment barriers along rivers, typically earthen with clay cores for impermeability, though supplement them in space-constrained areas to achieve design protection levels. Both mitigate flooding by confining flows—levees protect adjacent lands by raising channel capacity, and canals enable controlled diversion for agricultural use, as seen in systems like the Truckee Canal with mixed earthen and sections. standards classify them hydraulically based on flow regimes, ensuring stability against and overtopping. Aqueducts dedicated to conveyance function as open or closed channels to transport water over distances, often navigating elevation changes without serving transport needs. These structures maintain flows, using designs where pipes dip below ground or obstacles to create conduits that rise again, flowing full under . Inverted siphons, a subtype, invert the typical arch to cross valleys or streams, with invert elevations adjusted to minimize energy losses—typically dropping below the upstream channel before ascending. Such configurations allow water transfer across topographic barriers, as in ancient Roman systems or modern networks, prioritizing efficient delivery over vehicular passage.

Industrial Structures

Industrial structures provide essential support for manufacturing, storage, and processing activities, designed to handle heavy loads, dynamic forces, and environmental hazards while prioritizing safety and efficiency in industrial environments. These non-building elements, distinct from architectural buildings, focus on utilitarian functions such as material containment, material handling, soil stabilization, and process infrastructure in sectors like petrochemicals and agriculture. Tanks and vessels are above-ground structures used for storing liquids and gases in industrial settings, with cylindrical designs common for and refrigerated liquefied gases due to their stability against hydrostatic pressures and risks like elephant foot bulge. Spherical tanks, ideal for high-pressure storage of gases such as LPG, feature a pressurized shell supported by multiple vertical columns to distribute loads evenly. Seismic bracing in both types incorporates pipe columns and diagonal members with slenderness ratios limited to 60, enabling and absorption of impulsive and convective forces from sloshing contents during earthquakes. Design standards emphasize or modified seismic coefficients to account for and uplift, ensuring capacities from thousands to tens of thousands of kilonewtons in liquid weight. Silos and bins function as vertical for bulk materials like or powders, engineered with conical bottoms to promote mass flow and prevent arching or rat-holing during discharge. Load-out systems, including augers or conveyors at the base, facilitate controlled unloading while maintaining structural integrity under varying fill levels. These galvanized structures achieve storage capacities from 1,000 to over 10,000 tons, optimized for dry bulk handling in facilities processing , , or plastics. Cranes and derricks enable heavy lifting in industrial operations, with overhead types suspended from runway beams for workspace coverage and gantry variants supported by wheeled legs on rail-mounted bases for mobility across floors. Tower cranes, featuring a vertical mast and rotating , provide elevated reach for assembly lines or maintenance, often with fixed or climbing bases anchored to . Lifting capacities range from 1 to 20 tons for standard overhead and gantry systems to 1,000 tons or more for specialized tower configurations, determined by manufacturer ratings and operational limits like boom length and radius. Retaining and earth-retaining walls stabilize in industrial yards and foundations, using gravity types that depend on self-weight and wide bases to resist overturning from lateral earth pressures. walls employ a vertical stem fixed to a base slab, leveraging the moment arm for passive resistance up to heights of 18 feet economically. Sheet pile walls consist of interlocking sections driven into the ground, providing embedded depth for both active and passive balance in temporary or permanent applications. is calculated using , which assumes a frictionless vertical and derives the active Ka=tan⁡2(45∘−ϕ/2)K_a = \tan^2(45^\circ - \phi/2), where ϕ\phi is the friction , resulting in triangular distribution increasing linearly with depth. Process platforms and pipe supports create elevated skeletal frameworks in petrochemical plants, including grated walkways for personnel access and modular racks to secure multiple pipelines against sagging or misalignment. These structures accommodate movements through expansion joints and are spaced to support distributed loads from carrying fluids or gases. employs spring hangers, cable restraints, or viscous dampers to decouple dynamic inputs from rotating equipment, minimizing and transmission to the supporting framework. In seismic regions, buried pipe supports may use anchored encasements for added lateral restraint.

Monumental and Recreational Structures

Monumental and recreational structures encompass a diverse array of non-building forms designed primarily for symbolic, commemorative, or purposes, emphasizing cultural significance and public engagement rather than continuous habitation or utilitarian production. These structures often feature open or partially enclosed designs that prioritize aesthetic impact, structural innovation, and visitor interaction, distinguishing them from enclosed buildings by their lack of defined interior spaces for . Engineering challenges in this category focus on balancing visual grandeur with stability under environmental loads, such as and seismic forces, while ensuring safe public access during periodic use. Triumphal arches and gates represent enduring symbols of victory and commemoration, typically constructed as freestanding curved portals that distribute loads through compressive forces in their arrangements. The in , completed in 1791, exemplifies this form with its neoclassical design featuring twelve columns and a sculpture atop, engineered to withstand over two centuries of exposure without internal occupancy. Similar commemorative gates, like the in , employ keystone mechanisms to transfer vertical and lateral loads efficiently to the foundation, allowing for expansive openings that frame public spaces. These structures highlight the arch's role in monumental , where curved not only enhances visual drama but also optimizes material use in stone or . Obelisks and monuments often take the form of tall, slender shafts crafted from stone or metal, serving as vertical markers of historical events or figures with engineering centered on resisting overturning moments from wind and self-weight. The , a 555-foot dedicated in 1885, incorporates a deep pyramidal foundation and internal iron bracing to counter lateral forces, achieving stability without enclosing habitable space. Ancient Egyptian obelisks, such as those transported to like the , relied on precise quarrying and base plinths for equilibrium, demonstrating early mastery of vertical load paths in monolithic forms. Modern iterations, including steel-clad obelisks, further integrate damping systems to mitigate vibrations, ensuring longevity as public icons. Building canopies and awnings provide overhead protection at structure entrances, utilizing tensile fabrics, metal frames, or cantilevered elements to shield against weather without forming enclosed interiors. The fabric canopies at the forecourt, designed by and engineered with panels, span wide areas using cable nets to distribute tensile loads while allowing light transmission. Rigid frame awnings, such as those at historic train stations, employ steel trusses for cantilever support, preventing rain ingress and offering shade through projected geometries that avoid full enclosure. These features emphasize lightweight materials for ease of installation and removal, prioritizing transient protection over permanent shelter. Amusement and recreational structures, including supports, bleachers, and towers, are engineered for dynamic human interaction, incorporating elevated frameworks that accommodate motion-induced loads. support columns, often lattice steel bents, are designed per ASCE 7 standards to handle cyclic vertical and horizontal forces from train passages, with factors of safety exceeding 2.5 for resistance. Bleacher stands, like those in outskirts, use modular aluminum or steel seating risers supported by braced frames to distribute crowd loads evenly, ensuring stability during intermittent occupancy. towers, such as the 443-foot (135 m) , feature spoked wheel designs with central masts and guyed cables to counter rotational inertia and wind gusts, enabling smooth passenger rotation without enclosed cabins dominating the structure. These elements underscore the need for vibration analysis and redundancy in recreational . Memorial frameworks, such as non-enclosed or bases, embody symbolic through minimalist supports that evoke remembrance without practical utility. The at the memorial in uses a gas-fed ring on a plinth, engineered for continuous low-level with minimal structural intrusion. bases, like the Whitehall in , consist of elevated stone platforms with forms, designed to resist settlement under light, periodic visitor loads while symbolizing absence through open-air exposure. These frameworks prioritize material durability and subtle integration of utilities, such as subsurface piping, to maintain symbolic purity over functional enclosure.

References

  1. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/modern-steel/archives/2016/03/nonbuilding.pdf
  2. https://www.structuremag.org/article/seismic-design-of-nonbuilding-structures/
  3. https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/codes-and-standards/asce-sei-7-22
  4. https://www.asce.org/education-and-events/explore-education/on-demand-courses/designing-nonbuilding-structures-using-asce-sei-7-22
  5. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784415788
  6. http://files.engineering.com/download.aspx?folder=fe74713e-77c4-4622-8e07-f4d150ca8390&file=COMPONENT_or_NONSTRUCTURAL.pdf
  7. https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1739/upload/preservation-brief-51-building-codes.pdf
  8. https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2021P1/chapter-2-definitions
  9. https://www.structuremag.org/article/seismic-design-of-nonbuilding-structures-and-nonstructural-components/
  10. https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2021P1/chapter-1-scope-and-administration
  11. https://up.codes/s/airport-traffic-control-towers
  12. https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2024P1/chapter-3-occupancy-classification-and-use
  13. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-I29-PURL-gpo123315/pdf/GOVPUB-I29-PURL-gpo123315.pdf
  14. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/historic/
  15. https://environment.fiu.edu/aquarius/about/
  16. https://www.coris.noaa.gov/activities/resourceCD/resources/aquarius_tech_lp.pdf
  17. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_nehrp_provisions_2015.pdf
  18. https://amplify.asce.org/content/standard/9780784414248/part/provisions/standard-chapter/s15
  19. http://www.ce.memphis.edu/7119/PDFs/FEAM_Notes/Topic15-8-NonbuildingSystemsNotes.pdf
  20. https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/DHS/ARCHIVES/fema_p_1050_1_vol_1_pt_1_prov_pt_2_comm_2015.pdf
  21. https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/13_2025.pdf
  22. https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
  23. https://www.iccsafe.org/wp-content/uploads/2024-IBC-Structural.pdf
  24. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/pubs/nhi15047.pdf
  25. https://deldot.gov/environmental/archaeology/historic_pres/bridges/pdf/context/context_appb.pdf
  26. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/tdot/structures/historic-bridges/chapter4.pdf
  27. https://www.goldengate.org/exhibits/facts-and-figures-about-the-bridge/
  28. https://www.structuremag.org/article/aashto-vehicle-live-loading/
  29. https://pabook.libraries.psu.edu/literary-cultural-heritage-map-pa/feature-articles/bridge-over-troubled-waters-roeblings-delaware
  30. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/tunnel/pubs/nhi09010/tunnel_manual.pdf
  31. https://www.geoengineer.org/education/tunneling
  32. https://practical.engineering/blog/2024/1/16/how-the-channel-tunnel-works
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809918302388
  34. https://portofwoodland.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Appendix-H-Preliminary-Marine-Structurs-Assessment.pdf
  35. https://www.wbdg.org/dod/cpc-source/piers-and-wharves-knowledge-area
  36. https://www.aceec.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/UNIT-5.pdf
  37. https://pilebuck.com/pier-wharf-construction-part-ii-structural-design/
  38. https://skill-lync.com/blogs/the-mechanics-behind-cable-cars-an-engineering-perspective
  39. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1470&context=jpt
  40. https://www.simagazin.com/en/si-urban-en/edition-urban/si-urban-0120/cable-car-knowledge/
  41. https://elevatorworld.com/article/the-anderton-canal-lift-1875-1908/
  42. https://canalrivertrust.org.uk/things-to-do/canal-history/canal-heritage-and-architecture/boat-lifts
  43. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/856/
  44. https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/02/20/trestle-bridges/
  45. https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/wind-turbines-bigger-better
  46. https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/articles/wind-turbines-bigger-better
  47. https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/civil-engineering-magazine/issues/magazine-issue/article/2025/09/sunzia-wind-and-transmission-project-brings-sustainable-power-to-southwest-us
  48. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/documents/cs2ch1.pdf
  49. https://www.academia.edu/34678916/ANALYSIS_OF_SELF_SUPPORTED_REINFORCED_CONCRETE_CHIMNEY_WITH_GEOMETRY_VARIATION
  50. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/documents/c_allchs.pdf
  51. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73629.pdf
  52. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/64746.pdf
  53. https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/solar-photovoltaic-system-design-basics
  54. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/56290.pdf
  55. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1172778
  56. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0907/ML090770332.pdf
  57. https://www.kmbdg.com/news/different-types-telecom-towers-design/
  58. https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/human-exposure-radio-frequency-fields-guidelines-cellular-and-pcs-sites
  59. https://www.westerntowers.com/faq
  60. https://atlastowers.com/2025/08/11/the-different-types-of-cell-towers-a-guide-to-whats-powering-your-phone-signal/
  61. https://www.telecommunicationtower.com/news/four-types-of-communication-tower-16.html
  62. https://lxantenna.com/optimal-base-station-antenna-height-from-theoretical-calculations-to-5g-deployment-strategies/
  63. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/lost-wonders-the-warsaw-radio-mast
  64. https://practical.engineering/blog/2025/10/7/the-bizarre-bases-of-antenna-towers
  65. https://www.mcneilengineering.com/the-eiffel-tower-a-19th-century-feat-of-structural-engineering/
  66. https://www.dhsatellite.com/antenna-mounts
  67. https://www.satellitedish.com/page6.htm
  68. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-33/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-62
  69. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands/mands-pdfs/CanalSysAuto1.pdf
  70. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/pao/faq.html
  71. https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=122
  72. https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/confluence/rasdocs/rasum/6.6/entering-and-editing-geometric-data/inline-structures-dams-weirs-and-gated-spillways
  73. https://stispfa.org/resource/steel-water-storage-tanks-a-selection-guide/
  74. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/2007_05_18_disinfection_tcr_whitepaper_tcr_storage.pdf
  75. https://gerardtank.com/Tanks.html
  76. https://dan.org/alert-diver/article/caissons-compressed-air-work-and-deep-tunneling/
  77. https://www.icid.org/res_drg_cnldrg.html
  78. https://www.tcid.org/truckee-canal-history-significance
  79. https://mmc.sec.usace.army.mil/NLSP_website/NLSG_Chapter_2_Understanding_Levee_Fundamental_DRAFT.pdf
  80. https://kh.aquaenergyexpo.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Design-Recommendation-For-Storage-Tanks-And-Their-Supports-With-Emphasis-On-Seismic-Design.pdf
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262767732_Seismic_design_of_spherical_liquid_storage_tanks
  82. https://www.cmtnc.com/dry-bulk-tanks-storage-silo-systems.html
  83. https://www.kwsmfg.com/hoppers-bins-and-silos/
  84. https://www.grainsilo.com/grain-silo-system/
  85. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3433.pdf
  86. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/engineering/documents/structureconstruction/ts/ts-chpt-4-a11y.pdf
  87. https://pipingtech.com/solutions/pipe-vibration-solutions
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.