Hubbry Logo
Papikonda National ParkPapikonda National ParkMain
Open search
Papikonda National Park
Community hub
Papikonda National Park
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Papikonda National Park
Papikonda National Park
Papikonda National Park
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Papikonda National Park is a national park in India, located near Rajamahendravaram in the Papi Hills of the Alluri Sitharama Raju and Eluru districts of Andhra Pradesh, and covering an area of 1,012.86 km2 (391.07 sq mi).[1][2] It is an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area and home to some endangered species of flora and fauna.[3] No part of Papikonda remains outside East and West Godavari districts after 2014 and the construction of Polavaram Dam.

Key Information

History

[edit]

Papikonda Wildlife Sanctuary was established in 1978.[4] It was upgraded to a national park in 2008.

Geography

[edit]

The national park's boundaries lie between 18° 49’ 20" N to 19° 18’ 14" N, 79° 54’ 13" E to 83° 23’ 35" E spread across the Alluri Sitharama Raju and Eluru districts of Andhra Pradesh. Its altitude ranges from 20 to 850 m (66 to 2,789 ft), and it receives an annual rainfall of 1168 mm. Godavari River flows through the park.[3]

Flora

[edit]

The vegetation of Papikonda national park contains species of moist deciduous and dry deciduous forests.[4] Tree species include Pterocarpus marsupium, Terminalia elliptica, Terminalia arjuna, Adina cordifolia, Sterculia urens, Mangifera indica, Anogeissus latifolia.[3]

Fauna

[edit]

Mammals

[edit]

The mammals either sighted or recorded by camera traps includes Bengal tiger, Indian leopard, Rusty-spotted cat, Jungle cat, Leopard cat, Sloth bear, Small Indian civet, Asian palm civet, Wild boar and Honey badger. Herbivores recorded include spotted deer, Sambar deer, Indian muntjac, Indian spotted chevrotain, Gaur, Nilgai and Four-horned antelope.[5]

The national park has population of both Rhesus macaque which are normally found north of Godavari and Bonnet macaque that are usually found south of Godavari. Gray langurs are also seen inside the national park.[3] The presence of water buffaloes in the area was recorded during the British imperial time.[6]

Birds

[edit]

The national park was recognized as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area by BirdLife International in 2016. Some of the endangered, vulnerable and near threatened species of birds reported includes Black-bellied tern, Pale-capped pigeon, Yellow-throated bulbul, Oriental darter, Pallid harrier, Great Thick-knee, River lapwing, River tern, Malabar pied hornbill, Alexandrine parakeet.

Some of the tropical moist forest species of birds sighted were Black-throated munia, Indian scimitar babbler, Jerdon's nightjar, Malabar trogon Malabar whistling thrush. A subspecies of Abbott's babbler identified and named after ornithologist K. S. R. Krishna Raju was sighted around the periphery of the national park.[7]

Reptiles

[edit]

Indian golden gecko, endemic to the Eastern Ghats was reported from this national park.[8] King cobras were sighted in and around the protected area.[3][9]

Threats

[edit]

Poaching, forest fires and clearing forest for cultivation are some of the threats.[10]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Papikonda National Park

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Papikonda National Park is a protected area situated in the Papi Hills of the northern Eastern Ghats in Andhra Pradesh, India, covering 1,012.86 square kilometers primarily in the Alluri Sitharama Raju and Eluru districts along the Godavari River. Notified as a national park in 2008 after operating as a wildlife sanctuary since 1978, the park preserves a diverse ecosystem shaped by the riverine terrain and hilly topography, which ranges from low-lying floodplains to elevations over 800 meters. Recognized as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area by BirdLife International, it supports rich floristic diversity documented in over 2,500 plant species, including endemic and medicinal plants, as detailed in surveys by the Botanical Survey of India. The fauna includes key predators such as the Bengal tiger and leopard, alongside sambar deer, gaur, and over 200 bird species like the vulnerable greater adjutant stork and painted stork, contributing to its role in regional conservation efforts amid habitat pressures from surrounding human activities.

History and Establishment

Origins and Early Conservation Efforts

The Papikonda hill range in the northern has long featured dense moist deciduous and semi-evergreen forests, supporting diverse fauna including tigers, leopards, and , alongside indigenous tribal groups such as the Konda Reddi who practiced podu () and collection of minor forest produce. These activities, combined with external pressures like timber extraction, contributed to forest fragmentation by the mid-20th century, prompting initial state interventions to assert control over resources under colonial-era legacies extended into independent . Early formal conservation measures commenced with the demarcation of core hill areas as reserve forests pursuant to the Forest Act of 1967, which empowered the state to restrict unregulated felling, grazing, and encroachments to maintain ecological integrity and timber supplies. This notification clustered multiple forest blocks into protected zones, marking a shift from communal tribal access to regulated management, though enforcement remained challenging amid local resistances over traditional rights to jal, jangal, zameen (water, forest, land). Building on these foundations, the sanctuary status was conferred in 1978 under the Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, designating 590.68 square kilometers to safeguard the Godavari River's riparian and endemic species from escalating threats like and habitat loss. This step integrated anti-poaching patrols and boundary demarcation, reflecting national priorities post-Project Tiger (launched 1973) to conserve tiger corridors in fragmented landscapes, though Papikonda itself was not initially included in the core reserves.

Notification as Sanctuary and National Park

Papikonda was initially notified as a in 1978 under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, covering an area of approximately 591 km² to protect the of the Papi Hills region along the . This designation followed earlier management as a since 1882, aiming to regulate human activities and conserve habitats for such as tigers and leopards. The sanctuary was upgraded and consolidated into a through a government order issued on November 4, 2008, by the , expanding the protected area to 1,012.86 km² under Section 35 of the (Protection) Act, 1972. This notification emphasized stricter protections, prohibiting grazing, cultivation, and other extractive uses to enhance conservation efforts amid growing ecological pressures. The upgrade integrated fragmented forest blocks, addressing previous boundary ambiguities and reinforcing the park's role in safeguarding endemic and in the .

Key Administrative Changes

Papikonda was initially notified as a in 1978 under the provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, by the , covering core reserve forest areas in the Papi Hills along the to protect its ecological integrity and wildlife populations. In 2008, the was elevated to status through approval, marking a significant enhancement in protective measures that strictly prohibit human activities such as habitation, grazing, and resource extraction to prioritize habitat conservation and preservation. This upgrade expanded the park's area to 1,012.86 square kilometers and aligned it with national priorities for , as the region serves as a critical corridor in the landscape. Subsequent administrative adjustments have included jurisdictional shifts following Andhra Pradesh's district reorganization in 2022, with the park now primarily falling under Alluri Sitharama Raju and districts, though core boundaries remain unchanged to maintain continuity in management.

Physical Environment

Location and Boundaries

Papikonda National Park is located in the northern of , , primarily spanning the East Godavari and West Godavari districts, with extensions into the Alluri Sitharama Raju and districts following administrative reorganizations. The park also incorporates portions of Telangana's , reflecting its position along the inter-state basin. Geographically, it lies between latitudes 18°49'20" N and 19°18'14" N and longitudes 79°54'13" E and 83°23'35" E, covering a total area of 1,012.86 square kilometers. The park's boundaries are delineated by the meandering course of the to the south and east, which forms a natural riparian edge, while the northern and western limits are defined by the rugged Papi Hills and forested ridges of the . This configuration isolates the core area amid valleys and plateaus, with elevations ranging from riverine lowlands to hilltops exceeding 800 meters. The southern boundary interfaces with agricultural lands and settlements near , while upstream sections border Polavaram irrigation project influences and tribal habitations.

Topography and Geology

Papikonda National Park occupies a rugged portion of the , characterized by undulating terrain with steep slopes ranging from 30% to 50%, encompassing hill ranges oriented west to east, peaks, saddles, deep valleys, plateaus, glens, and gorges. The bisects the park, flowing through the Papikonda hill range and creating diverse riparian features along its banks. Elevations vary significantly, from approximately 150 meters to 1,350 meters above , with typical ranges between 500 and 1,200 meters and an average height of around 600 meters; notable peaks include those near Ravigudem and Geddapalli. The landscape includes interspersed plains (lankas), grasslands, and scrub areas, supporting a of habitats from hilltops to riverine zones. Geologically, the park features formations from Archaean to recent periods, dominated by Khondalites of Archaean age in the Eastern Ghats, alongside metamorphic rocks including gneisses, schists, granites, and intrusions of granite into older metamorphic sequences. Key rock types comprise ferruginous quartzites, banded magnetite quartzites, graphite, and quartz, with sandstone prevalent in plain areas and gneiss-schist assemblages in hilly regions. Alluvial deposits and lateritic soils overlay these bedrock formations, particularly along river valleys, contributing to the area's mineral diversity and soil variability. This geological complexity underlies the park's topographic diversity, influencing erosion patterns, valley incision by the Godavari, and the stability of steep slopes.

Climate Patterns

Papikonda National Park exhibits a hot and humid typical of the coastal region, with three distinct seasons influencing its biodiversity and ecological dynamics. The park's climate features moderate to high annual rainfall concentrated in the period, alongside significant temperature fluctuations driven by seasonal shifts and topographic variations from 20 to 850 meters . Summer, spanning March to May, is characterized by hot and dry conditions, with temperatures frequently reaching 42–48°C in lower elevations and increased risk of forest fires in drier divisions such as Eluru. The season from June to brings heavy , accounting for approximately 80% of the annual total, with levels peaking at 70–90% and occasional cyclonic storms enhancing water availability for and . Annual rainfall averages 974–1200 mm, varying by division from 575 mm in East Godavari to 1362 mm in Chinturu, supporting lush growth in moist deciduous and forests during this period. Winter, from November to February, provides cooler and drier weather, with minimum temperatures dropping to 10–17°C, facilitating moderate conditions for wildlife activity and seasonal flowering in many plant species. Overall annual temperature ranges from 10°C to 48°C, while humidity averages 75–90%, dipping below 70% in pre-monsoon dry spells. These patterns govern species distribution, with wet seasons promoting riparian and aquatic flora and dry periods inducing leaf shedding in deciduous trees.
SeasonTemperature Range (°C)Key Rainfall FeaturesHumidity Range (%)
Summer (Mar–May)Up to 42–48Low, dry conditions60–70
Monsoon (Jun–Sep)17–37Heavy, 80% of annual total (974–1200 mm avg.)70–90
Winter (Nov–Feb)10–25Minimal, post-monsoon transition60–75

Hydrological Features

Godavari River System

The serves as the primary hydrological feature of Papikonda National Park, flowing approximately 42.5 kilometers through the park from Koida to Singanapally and Devipatnam while traversing the Papikonda hill range. This perennial river, with its varied streams, drains northern sections of the park, including via tributaries like Perantapalle R.L., and experiences that shapes the local . The river segment within the park spans about 50 kilometers with a 36-meter drop, contributing to dynamic flow characteristics that support riparian habitats across the park's 1,012.86 square kilometers. Key tributaries of the Godavari within or adjacent to the park include the Pamuleru, Peddavagu, and Kinnersani Rivers, which augment the main channel's discharge and extend the river system's influence on formation and . These inflows create a network of streams, ponds, and canals that maintain hydrological connectivity, fostering moist forests and reducing through dense vegetative cover in undisturbed areas. The system's nature ensures year-round water availability, though seasonal monsoonal surges enhance ecological processes like cycling and renewal. Ecologically, the Godavari River system underpins the park's biodiversity by supporting riverine forests with species such as Dimorphocalyx glabellus and Ficus nervosa, alongside semi-aquatic flora like Aponogeton crispus in shallow water bodies and stream banks hosting grasses including Chrysopogon aciculatus and Imperata cylindrica. These habitats along river beds, marshy zones, and sandy banks provide critical corridors for wildlife movement and sustain tribal communities dependent on river resources, while the minimal anthropogenic disturbance preserves hydrological integrity and low sediment loads.

Associated Wetlands and Riparian Zones

The riparian zones of Papikonda National Park, primarily along the and its tributaries such as Pamuleru, Peddavagu, Jalthar Kalva, Kovvada Kalva, and Yerra Kalva, feature luxuriant riverine forests and moist mixed deciduous vegetation that stabilize banks and support aquatic transitions. Dominant tree species include , , Ficus semicordata, and Pongamia pinnata, which thrive on stream and river banks, providing shade, erosion control, and fruit resources for wildlife. Climbers like and entwine large trees in these zones, while grasses such as and dominate edges, aiding sediment deposition and flood mitigation. Associated wetlands encompass marshy areas, stagnant ponds, and sandbars formed by river meanders and seasonal flooding, particularly in the Godavari delta fringes and confluences within the park. These habitats host semi-aquatic flora including Cyperus haspan, Leersia hexandra, and aquatic species like Aponogeton crispus in shallow waters, fostering nutrient cycling and supporting invertebrate and fish populations. The zones sustain diverse avifauna, with surveys recording 63 species across 25 families in riverine stretches, including threatened ones like the endangered Black-bellied (Sterna acuticauda) and near-threatened Grey-headed Fish Eagle (Haliaeetus ichthyaetus), which rely on these areas for nesting and foraging. Ecologically, these features enhance connectivity between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, buffering against floods and maintaining water quality amid threats like , which disrupts habitats and bird populations. They also harbor otters, freshwater , and migratory waterbirds in marshy patches, underscoring their role in biodiversity corridors within the .

Vegetation and Flora

Dominant Forest Types

The dominant forest type in Papikonda National Park is tropical moist forest, covering the majority of the park's 1,012.86 square kilometers and supporting a diverse canopy of trees that shed leaves during the . Characteristic species include (Tectona grandis), which forms extensive stands due to its adaptability to the ' undulating topography and seasonal rainfall patterns of 1,000–1,500 mm annually, alongside Terminalia tomentosa, , and . These s emerge from the causal interplay of monsoonal moisture retention in hilly soils and historical pressures that favored resilient hardwoods, as evidenced by floristic surveys documenting over 900 angiosperm taxa. Patches of dry deciduous forests occur in rain-shadowed slopes and elevated plateaus with precipitation below 1,000 , featuring sparser canopies dominated by , Terminalia spp., and associated hardwoods like (Pterocarpus santalinus) that reflect adaptations to prolonged dry periods. Semi-evergreen formations, less extensive but critical for continuity, appear in sheltered valleys and near the , blending evergreen understory with overstory species such as (Dalbergia spp.) and mahua (). (Dendrocalamus spp.) thickets and riparian scrub, including species like , fringe watercourses, enhancing ecological transitions but vulnerable to seasonal flooding. This mosaic of forest types, verified through inventories, underscores the park's role in preserving endemism amid anthropogenic fragmentation, with moist deciduous dominance driven by edaphic factors like lateritic soils rather than uniform climate alone.

Rare and Endemic Species

Papikonda National Park harbors a notable assemblage of rare and endemic vascular plants within its 1,012.86 km² expanse, contributing to the ' biodiversity status. A comprehensive floristic survey documented 970 angiosperm taxa across 119 families and 576 genera, including 18 endemic —14 restricted to Peninsular (e.g., Argyreia daltonii, Barleria montana, Bridelia retusa, epunctata, Cyperus clarkei, Dyschoriste vagans, Habenaria roxburghii, Huberantha cerasoides, mysorensis, Pavetta madrassica, xylocarpa, Strobilanthes pavala, Tephrosia strigosa, Wendlandia gamblei) and 4 endemic to (Chrysopogon hackelii, Tripogon capillatus, Dimeria connivens, Ischaemum polystachyum). These endemics often occupy specialized niches, such as moist rocky crevices (Tripogon capillatus) or hilly slopes (Pavetta madrassica), underscoring the park's role in conserving regionally unique flora adapted to its undulating terrain and riverine influences. Among grasses, Garnotia elata (endemic to ) thrives in rocky crevices of hilly areas, while a newly described variety, Dichanthium caricosum var. bilobum, is known exclusively from its type locality in the park near Kondamodalu at 439 m elevation, occurring in moist places adjacent to paddy fields as a decumbent . Rare orchids represent another critical component, with such as Aerides ringens, Habenaria commelinifolia, H. digitata, H. furcifera, H. reniformis, Liparis nervosa, Nervilia concolor, Pecteilis gigantea, and testacea confined to moist semi-evergreen forests, shady undergrowth, grasslands, or tree trunks; these exhibit limited distributions and vulnerability to disturbance. Threatened species include the endangered , valued for timber and medicinal properties, and the threatened (Indian snakeroot), a medicinal plant found scattered in the park's forests. Other rarities encompass and Musa ornata (wild banana relatives) along stream banks, Hedychium flavescens in semi-evergreen streamsides, and sedges like acutangula and Fimbristylis polytrichoides in aquatic margins, all noted for sparse populations in specific microhabitats such as stagnant waters or sandy shores. Strobilanthes heyneana, deemed very rare with only two individuals observed near Ijjaluru stream banks, highlights localized risks. These species' persistence depends on the park's moist deciduous and semi-evergreen formations, though ongoing threats like selective logging and could exacerbate declines absent targeted monitoring.
CategoryExamplesStatus/NotesHabitat
Peninsular India EndemicsArgyreia daltonii, Pavetta madrassicaEndemic; climbers/shrubsFoothills, hill slopes, streams
India EndemicsGarnotia elata, Dichanthium caricosum var. bilobumEndemic; grassesRocky crevices, moist fields
Rare OrchidsVanda testacea, Pecteilis giganteaRare; limited populationsTree trunks, shady undergrowth
ThreatenedPterocarpus marsupium, Rauvolfia serpentinaEndangered/Threatened; medicinal/timber valueForests, scattered occurrences

Ecological Roles

The vegetation of Papikonda National Park fulfills multiple ecological functions, primarily supporting biodiversity conservation, habitat provision for fauna, and ecosystem restoration in degraded areas. With 970 angiosperm taxa documented, including dominant canopy trees such as Xylia xylocarpa and Terminalia alata in dry mixed deciduous forests, the flora forms a complex layered structure that sustains interconnected food webs and microhabitats across moist deciduous, dry deciduous, grassland, and riparian zones. This diversity underpins the park's role as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area, where epiphytes like orchids (Cymbidium aloefolium) and stream-side shrubs (Rubus ellipticus) enhance habitat heterogeneity for endangered species such as tigers and gaurs. A key function involves and , critical in the park's hilly terrain prone to runoff. Grasses like (vetiver) and bind soils on riverbanks and wastelands, while climbers such as and Calamus viminalis reinforce stream edges against flooding. Hill slope species including , Ventilago denticulata, and Argyreia setosa prevent landslides by anchoring topsoil, with prostrate herbs like stabilizing exposed riverbeds and roadsides. The overall forest cover, encompassing (Tectona grandis) and , mitigates soil degradation, as evidenced by studies showing reduced vegetation loss correlating with preserved soil integrity between 1972 and 2005. Riparian and aquatic flora regulate hydrological processes, filtering sediments and improving in the Godavari River system. Pond-edge species such as Ottelia alismoides, Aponogeton crispus, and Nymphoides hydrophylla stabilize margins and support semi-aquatic communities, while seeds facilitate natural purification of turbid waters. Dense groves, prevalent in the , provide structural shelter and for herbivores and birds, bolstering trophic linkages in riverine habitats. Collectively, these roles maintain ecological balance, with the canopy regulating microclimates and sequestering carbon amid ongoing threats like .

Wildlife Populations

Terrestrial Mammals

Papikonda National Park supports a rich assemblage of terrestrial mammals, with a comprehensive survey documenting 55 across nine orders, including high representation from (14 ), Artiodactyla (6 ), and non-aquatic Rodentia (11 ). These findings derived from camera trapping (19,512 trap nights across 271 sites), sign surveys, and interviews with local communities and officials, confirming presences through direct evidence or probable range extensions based on suitability. The park's moist and dry deciduous forests provide critical for large herbivores and apex predators, though populations of like tigers remain low due to historical and . Among large carnivores, the (Panthera tigris) is present but sparse, with camera traps confirming individuals in core areas; a 2016 estimate noted three tigers, and a lone male returned to the park in early 2024 after dispersal from adjacent landscapes. Leopards (Panthera pardus) are more frequently recorded via pugmarks and photographs, occupying diverse elevations from riverine zones to hilltops. Other notable carnivores include the (Cuon alpinus), a pack-hunting species sighted in groups during sign surveys, (Melursus ursinus), often associated with termite mounds and honey sources, and (Felis chaus), adapted to scrub edges. Herbivores form the base of the food web, with (Bos gaurus)—the largest wild bovine in —roaming forested slopes in small herds, supported by bamboo-rich understories. Sambar (Rusa unicolor), the predominant deer species, inhabits dense thickets and riverine areas, frequently preyed upon by tigers and leopards; (Axis axis) and (Sus scrofa) are abundant in open grasslands and clearings. Smaller ungulates like Indian muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak) and (Tetracerus quadricornis) occupy undergrowth, with the latter's unique horn morphology aiding camouflage. Primates such as (Macaca mulatta) and Hanuman langur (Semnopithecus entellus) thrive in troop structures along riparian corridors, foraging on fruits and leaves. Rodent diversity includes the (Hystrix indica), whose quills deter predators, and palm squirrels ( spp.), ubiquitous in canopies. Mongooses ( spp.) and civets patrol understories, controlling small vertebrate populations. Overall, these species underscore the park's role as a connectivity hub in the Central Indian tiger landscape, though ongoing monitoring is essential amid threats like habitat submergence from the Polavaram Dam.

Avian Species

Papikonda National Park harbors a diverse avifauna, with over 200 bird species documented across its varied landscapes, including riverine corridors, moist deciduous forests, and hilly terrains, as recorded in a three-day survey conducted by the Andhra Pradesh Forest Department in March 2024. This count encompasses resident forest birds, raptors, waterbirds, and passerines, reflecting the park's role as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) under BirdLife International criteria, where it qualifies as an A3 site for multiple endemic or biome-restricted species. Earlier checklists, such as those compiled by Avibase based on regional observations, list approximately 159 species, though comprehensive inventories continue to expand with targeted surveys. Riverine habitats along the support specialized avifauna, with a 2017–2018 survey identifying 63 species from 25 families, including , , and adapted to aquatic edges. Notable among these are threatened or such as the Black-bellied Tern (Sterna acuticauda), vulnerable due to habitat loss and disturbance; the (Haliaeetus ichthyaetus), a piscivorous raptor reliant on riverine prey; and the (Bubo bengalensis), which inhabits forested cliffs. Forest interiors host hornbills and ground-dwellers like the (Gallus sonneratii), a endemic to the , alongside the Indian Pitta (Pitta brachyura), a migratory that breeds in the park during seasons. Raptors and piscivores underscore the park's ecological connectivity, with sightings of the (Anhinga melanogaster) and various egrets in wetlands, contributing to metrics that highlight Papikonda's conservation value. diversity includes babblers, drongos, and barbets, such as the (Psilopogon zeylanicus), which dominates in certain IBA trigger species assemblages. While population estimates remain limited, ongoing monitoring via line transect and point count methods in riverine zones indicates stable densities for many residents, though threats like pose risks to specialists.

Reptiles, Amphibians, and Aquatic Fauna

A comprehensive herpetofaunal survey conducted between 2023 and 2025 recorded 51 species in Papikonda National Park, including 18 amphibians and 33 reptiles distributed across 21 lizards, 10 snakes, and 2 turtles. This diversity reflects the park's varied habitats, from riverine corridors to forested hills in the Eastern Ghats. Three amphibian species—Minervarya kalinga, Sphaerotheca maskeyi, and Microhyla rubra—were documented as new records for the park, highlighting ongoing discoveries in understudied areas. Amphibians are dominated by the family Dicroglossidae (10 species), followed by (4 species), Bufonidae (2 species), and (2 species). These species primarily inhabit moist forest floors, , and riparian zones along the , where seasonal monsoons support breeding. Reptilian lizards, numbering 21 species, include ground-dwelling and arboreal forms adapted to deciduous forests, while the 10 snake species encompass both venomous and non-venomous taxa, such as the king cobra (Ophiophagus hannah), a large elapid confirmed in the park's upland areas. The two turtle species, likely freshwater forms like those in the family, frequent riverine and habitats, contributing to the park's semi-aquatic . Aquatic fauna in the Godavari River and associated wetlands includes freshwater and diverse assemblages that sustain the ecosystem's . These habitats support otters and piscivorous birds, indicating a rich piscine community, though specific fish species inventories remain limited in recent surveys. play a key role in aquatic nutrient cycling, while amphibians bridge terrestrial and watery environments, vulnerable to habitat alterations from riverine activities.

Conservation Initiatives

Management Framework

Papikonda National Park is administered by the pursuant to the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, which empowers state governments to declare and manage national parks for conservation. The overarching authority rests with the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Wildlife Wing), while field-level operations are directed by Divisional Forest Officers in territorial divisions such as Wildlife Management Division and , responsible for enforcement, patrolling, and habitat oversight across the park's 1,012.86 square kilometers spanning East Godavari, West Godavari, and Alluri Sitharama Raju districts. Community-based management integrates local tribal participation, particularly through the Papikonda Community Based Eco-Tourism (CBET) initiative, established by the Forest Department to align conservation with indigenous livelihoods. This framework features a 15-member comprising Konda Reddi tribals—a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group—with 50% women representation; funds from eco-tourism activities are held in a joint account overseen by the committee chairman, vice-chairman, and a forest officer as member secretary, directing resources toward ecosystem protection and . This participatory model promotes sustainable practices, including habitat restoration and awareness programs, while generating employment for trained Village Forest Protection Committee members. Management effectiveness, evaluated by the in 2025, scored 60% for the park—up from 45.5% in prior assessments and rated "Good"—reflecting improvements in planning, inputs, and processes amid challenges like internal human settlements, with 47 villages present and only three fully relocated. The framework emphasizes multi-pronged strategies for , including boundary demarcation, fire management, and collaboration with bodies for monitoring, though evaluations note gaps in and staff deployment relative to complexity.

Anti-Poaching and Habitat Restoration

Anti-poaching efforts in Papikonda National Park involve dedicated units and forest ranger patrols to deter illegal hunting targeting species such as Bengal tigers, Gangetic dolphins, and four-horned antelopes. These operations focus on curbing poaching and illegal activities through regular monitoring in vulnerable areas. initiatives, including awareness programs and involvement of local tribes, supplement official patrols to enhance protection. The has emphasized the need to strengthen such measures amid ongoing threats to tiger habitats in the . Habitat restoration initiatives prioritize and control of to rehabilitate degraded forest areas within the park. These efforts aim to preserve and connectivity in the landscape, supported by botanical surveys documenting flora for targeted rehabilitation. However, progress is constrained by human settlements; as of July 2025, only three of 47 villages inside the park have been fully relocated, limiting comprehensive restoration and core area management. Management evaluations have recommended establishing additional camps to facilitate better protection and recovery.

Population Monitoring and Research Findings

Population monitoring in Papikonda National Park primarily relies on surveys integrated with the national All India Tiger Estimation protocol, conducted every four years by the (NTCA) in collaboration with state forest departments. These surveys, which include over 200 s deployed across the park for the 2022 cycle, capture photographic evidence for individual identification via stripe patterns and enable occupancy modeling for tigers and co-predators like leopards. Sign surveys and pugmark tracking supplement camera data for less detectable species, while community-based sightings inform assessments of elusive mammals such as the . Tiger population estimates remain critically low, with forest department records indicating three individuals in 2016 based on prior surveys; the 2022 camera trap effort of 8,470 trap nights confirmed presence but yielded no public disclosure of updated counts from NTCA, suggesting persistence of minimal numbers amid habitat connectivity challenges. A lone male was documented returning to the park via camera traps in early 2024, highlighting occasional dispersal but underscoring the need for corridor enhancements to bolster recruitment. Leopard occupancy showed mixed trends, with declines noted in the southern park regions during the 2022 assessment, despite a statewide increase to 569 individuals in ; park-specific camera data contributed to these findings, revealing temporal overlaps in human-leopard activity that inform coexistence strategies. Prey base monitoring via the same 2022 surveys recorded robust populations of herbivores, including an estimated 375 Indian bison () across the park and adjacent forests from a dedicated three-month survey in late 2023–early 2024 using direct counts and indirect signs. Earlier efforts from 2014–2017 documented 27 , emphasizing the park's role in biodiversity but noting sparse detections for threatened taxa like pangolins, reliant on local knowledge for status inference. Aquatic monitoring for mugger crocodiles along the involves nest surveys and genetic sampling, with 2024 research indicating stable but fragmented populations through occupancy models, though exact counts remain unpublished pending further analysis. These findings underscore effective monitoring frameworks yielding data for habitat restoration, yet reveal pressures from fragmentation and human activity, with research advocating intensified and connectivity measures to reverse predator declines.

Biodiversity Threats

Habitat Degradation Factors

Shifting cultivation, locally known as podu, remains a primary driver of within and around Papikonda National Park, converting forested areas into temporary agricultural plots that regenerate poorly due to depletion. Local communities have identified this practice, alongside over-extraction of non-timber forest products such as honey and , as accelerating degradation, particularly in accessible low-elevation dry deciduous forests. Illegal logging and the establishment of monoculture plantations further exacerbate forest cover loss, with satellite data indicating a 12% degradation rate inside the park's core between 1991 and 2014, rising to 32% in surrounding buffer zones. These activities isolate remnant forest patches from broader connectivity, reducing habitat contiguity for species reliant on contiguous woodlands. Agricultural encroachments and infrastructure development, including road intrusions and the Polavaram Dam project, have led to rapid , with the park's surrounding landscapes losing significant dry cover since the early . Over the past century, forests, including those near Papikonda, have contracted by 16%, with approximately 650 square kilometers lost in the park region over the last two decades, primarily from such human-induced pressures. These factors collectively diminish canopy cover and diversity, impairing .

Poaching and Illegal Exploitation

Poaching poses a persistent threat to the biodiversity of Papikonda National Park, particularly targeting large mammals such as the Indian gaur (Bos gaurus) and potentially apex predators like the Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris tigris). In July 2020, forest officials arrested 20 individuals for hunting gaur for bushmeat consumption along the park's interstate borders, highlighting vulnerabilities in remote, riverine terrains that facilitate undetected incursions. This incident underscored a reported uptick in poaching activities during preceding months, driven by opportunistic hunters exploiting seasonal accessibility. Organized poaching networks have also established temporary camps within the park's dense forests to target unspecified , as evidenced by a May 2019 operation where authorities raided and dismantled such a site operated by a gang. The broader landscape encompassing the park is characterized as Andhra Pradesh's most poached region, with transient movements into peripheral areas amplifying risks to amid sparse prey bases and human- interface zones. Highly like the ( crassicaudata) face additional pressure, with camera-trap surveys spanning 232 km² in the park and buffers (2014–2015) confirming presence but underscoring gaps outside core protected zones. Beyond faunal , illegal exploitation extends to resource extraction, including activities that imperil the park's ecological integrity despite prohibitions under regulations. Studies indicate severe pressures in the Eastern Ghats, contributing to and elevated degradation rates in unprotected buffers adjacent to Papikonda. Unsustainable harvesting of dioecious plant species for timber or non-timber forest products further disrupts population structures and reproductive success in fragmented patches, exacerbating through selective exploitation. Vulnerable aquatic species, such as the (Lutrogale perspicillata), encounter compounded risks from intertwined with riverine illegal and pollution, as recent 2025 sightings affirm ongoing threats despite elusive populations. patrols remain critical, yet challenges persist due to the park's rugged and proximity to human settlements.

Climate and Natural Risks

Papikonda National Park features a with pronounced seasonal shifts. Summers, from March to June, are marked by high humidity and temperatures often surpassing 40°C, occasionally reaching up to 47°C in mid-summer. The period, June to September, delivers heavy rainfall averaging 1,168 mm annually, essential for the park's ecosystems but contributing to seasonal inundation. Winters, October to March, remain mild with daytime temperatures between 17°C and 37°C, making this the optimal period for ecological stability and visitor access. Natural risks in the park stem predominantly from its position along the and within the ' hilly topography. Intense downpours frequently cause river flooding, with encroachments along the Godavari basin heightening overflow risks and disrupting natural flow patterns. The broader region, encompassing Papikonda's districts, is prone to cyclones that amplify upstream flooding through extreme , alongside periodic droughts during prolonged dry spells. These events pose threats to habitats and wildlife corridors, though the park's forested buffer zones provide some mitigation against and landslides induced by steep gradients and saturated soils.

Human Interactions

Indigenous Tribal Presence

The Papikonda National Park harbors several indigenous tribal groups, with the Konda Reddi and Koya tribes being the predominant communities residing in and around its forested hills along the basin. These groups, classified under Scheduled Tribes in , maintain traditional livelihoods centered on forest-dependent activities such as gathering non-timber forest products, , fishing, and crafting handicrafts from local materials. The Konda Reddi, designated as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG) due to their small population, semi-nomadic habits, and high vulnerability to socio-economic marginalization, inhabit the rugged Papikonda hill ranges in East and West Godavari . Numbering fewer than 5,000 individuals across their as per recent ethnographic surveys, they possess specialized ethnobotanical , including the use of resources for and sustenance; for instance, in March 2024, Andhra Pradesh Forest Department experiments confirmed their longstanding practice of extracting stored water from the bark of Indian laurel trees () during dry seasons, demonstrating adaptive survival strategies in the park's variable climate. The Koya tribe, larger in scale and more settled in valley settlements near the park's periphery, integrates forest ecology into their cultural practices, including rituals tied to wildlife and seasonal resource cycles, while engaging in agriculture and bamboo-related crafts. Both tribes' presence underscores the park's role as a biocultural landscape, where indigenous stewardship has historically supported biodiversity through sustainable harvesting, though integration with modern conservation frameworks remains ongoing.

Resource Extraction and Encroachment

Unprotected buffer zones of Papikonda National Park exhibit higher rates than core areas, primarily from local exploitation of timber, non-timber forest products (NTFPs), and fuelwood, including instances of by communities dependent on these resources. Such activities fragment habitats and reduce connectivity between the park's interior and broader forests. Vegetation cover within the park declined sharply from 18,403.39 hectares in 1972 to 10,046.80 hectares in 2005, attributable to , human settlements, and resource harvesting. Encroachment by nearby villages has intensified land-use pressures, converting forested areas into farmlands and grazing lands, which further isolates protected habitats and promotes . Illegal extraction incidents underscore persistent challenges; in early 2015, forest officials documented the felling of nearly 50,000 culms inside the park, prompting accusations of cross-state involvement from . Overall deforestation trends continued into the mid-2010s, with reports highlighting ongoing threats from unauthorized timber removal and land conversion.

Tourism and Economic Utilization

Tourism in Papikonda National Park centers on the scenic Papikondalu hills and the , drawing visitors for boat cruises that offer panoramic views of the forested gorges. These cruises typically depart from points like or Pattiseema, allowing tourists to experience the park's rugged terrain and from the water. Annually, approximately 50,000 to 70,000 tourists from and participate in these river cruises to Papikondalu, highlighting the site's popularity as a day-trip destination. Additional activities include limited trekking to viewpoints and visits to nearby tribal settlements, though access is regulated to minimize environmental impact. The park supports community-based eco- through the Papikonda Eco-Tourism Center, which promotes sustainable nature experiences while involving local residents in operations such as guiding and hospitality. This initiative generates economic benefits for surrounding communities via employment in services, including boat handling and accommodation, though specific revenue figures for the park remain undocumented in public reports. Overall, utilization aligns with broader efforts to leverage natural assets for regional income, contributing to local livelihoods without large-scale infrastructure development.

Controversies and Policy Debates

Conservation vs. Local Livelihood Conflicts

Local tribal communities, including Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) such as the Konda Reddi and Koya, inhabit areas within and adjacent to , relying on forest ecosystems for livelihoods through (podu), (NTFP) collection, and traditional gathering practices. These activities, integral to subsistence since pre-colonial times, conflict with conservation mandates that restrict anthropogenic pressures to mitigate and in the park's 1,603.86 km² expanse, notified as a in 2010. Podu cultivation, involving slash-and-burn cycles on hill slopes, has been documented as accelerating in the region encompassing the park, with annual cycles reducing vegetative cover and , prompting regulatory bans within protected boundaries to preserve tropical moist deciduous forests critical for species like tigers and leopards. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Rights) Act, 2006 (FRA), seeks to reconcile these tensions by vesting to occupied lands and sustainable use, yet in Papikonda has yielded high rejection rates for claims, often due to Forest Department assertions of post-2005 encroachments or overlapping Vana Samrakshana Samithi (VSS) claims. In Devaragondi village near the park, 143 individual rights (IFR) claims by Koya and Konda Reddi households were largely denied, with only community rights (CFR) titles granted, lacking Gram Sabha consent and exacerbating displacement risks from adjacent Polavaram submergence affecting over 98,000 families across East and West Godavari districts as of 2021. Similarly, in Reddi Gudem, 83 IFR claims were initially approved but subsequently rejected, spurring via Writ Petition No. 47315 of 2018 and public interest litigations in the , highlighting procedural interference that prioritizes conservation over historical occupancy. Such rights denials intensify livelihood insecurities, as restricted access to NTFPs like , , and tendu leaves—key income sources—correlates with elevated among park-adjacent tribals, who lack scalable alternatives like settled amid hilly terrain. Conservation advocates justify stringent enforcement to counter deforestation drivers, noting Eastern Ghats forest loss patterns linked to , while tribal representatives contend that exclusionary policies ignore sustainable indigenous knowledge, such as Konda Reddi ethno-botanical uses of species like the Indian laurel tree (Ficus microcarpa), verified in forest department trials as of 2024. Recent 2025 reports from division indicate tribal department FRA grants within Papikonda buffers may inadvertently enable encroachments, fueling debates on whether recognition undermines or bolsters long-term ecological stewardship. No widespread evictions have occurred solely due to expansion, per statements from 2012, but cumulative restrictions and project-induced displacements compound conflicts, with FRA's tardy rollout—negligible in many protected areas—failing to integrate roles in monitoring, as evidenced by stalled CFR processes for NTFP management. Efforts to resolve these include VSS-mediated NTFP cooperatives, but persistent rejections and bureaucratic hurdles sustain adversarial dynamics between state conservation priorities and local resource imperatives.

Effectiveness of Strict Protection Measures

Strict protection measures in Papikonda National Park, established under India's Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, include prohibitions on human settlements, grazing, and resource extraction, alongside patrols and habitat monitoring enforced by forest department . Management Effectiveness Evaluations (MEE) conducted by the show improvement from 45.5% ("Fair") in 2020 to 60% ("Good") in 2025, reflecting enhanced inputs like and , though outputs such as monitoring remain constrained by deficits. This aligns with a broader of 25 Indian protected areas, where Papikonda's MEE score rose from 45.83% in 2006 to 60% in 2018–2019, correlating positively with forest cover stability (Spearman's rank correlation p=0.25 across sites). Evidence of partial success appears in forest dynamics: between 1991 and 2014, outright forest loss inside the park totaled 2.7% of cover, compared to 5.8% in surrounding areas, indicating that legal designations and patrols have curbed conversion to non-forest uses more effectively within boundaries. However, 70% of the park's forests experienced moderate to severe degradation during this period, attributable to factors like selective and fires not fully mitigated by patrols. Wildlife outcomes reveal inconsistencies; while Andhra Pradesh's overall leopard population grew from 492 in 2018 to 569 in 2022, occupancy declined in Papikonda's southern region, with a density of 3.05 per 100 km² amid persistent threats. efforts have yielded arrests, such as the 2019 bust of a poacher camp, but porous borders and a 35% frontline staff shortage undermine enforcement, allowing prey depletion and human-wildlife conflicts to persist. Village relocation lags, with only 3 of 47 communities resettled by 2025, complicating strict zoning and exposing gaps in causal links between policy intent and ecological recovery. Overall, while MEE gains and reduced gross loss suggest modest deterrence of external pressures, incomplete implementation limits reversal of internal degradation and population declines.

Development Pressures and Infrastructure Impacts

The Polavaram multipurpose irrigation and hydropower project represents a primary development pressure on Papikonda National Park, as its reservoir is projected to submerge significant forest areas within the park's boundaries, leading to habitat loss for including tigers and endemic . Construction activities associated with the dam have already heightened erosion risks and altered hydrological patterns in the basin, exacerbating downstream sedimentation that affects aquatic ecosystems. Environmental assessments highlight concerns over decline, with the project's backwaters encroaching on core park zones despite mitigation proposals like compensatory outside the region. Linear infrastructure, particularly road expansion for connectivity and resource transport, has fragmented habitats and facilitated encroachment in the park's buffer zones. Analysis of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) time series from 1990 to 2010 identifies roads as the dominant driver of change within Papikonda, converting dense forests to scrub and open areas through direct clearing and . These developments increase wildlife-road collision risks and provide access corridors for illegal activities, contributing to a 12% degradation of forests inside the park from 1991 to 2014, compared to 32% in surrounding landscapes. Mining proposals and operations in the vicinity, often for and other minerals in the , impose indirect infrastructure impacts through haul roads, dust pollution, and water diversion that infiltrate park ecosystems. Forest diversion requests for mining sites, situated 6-16 km from park boundaries, have raised alarms over vibrational disturbances from blasting affecting faunal behavior, though direct encroachments remain limited by notifications. Broader landscape pressures from such activities, combined with irrigation canals, have accelerated rates, underscoring the tension between regional and integrity.

References

  1. https://ntca.gov.in/assets/uploads/Reports/AITM/status_of_tiger-copredators-2022.pdf
  2. https://naparks.com/papikonda-national-park/
  3. https://aspirantias.com/f/papikonda-national-park-a-jewel-of-the-eastern-ghats
  4. https://indiageographies.com/papikonda-national-park/
  5. https://bsi.gov.in/uploads/documents/publications/e-publications/hindi/Flora_of_Papikonda_National_Park%2C_Andhra_Pradesh.pdf
  6. https://www.pmfias.com/andhra-pradesh-national-parks/
  7. https://www.conservationleadershipprogramme.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/India_Vikram_Ghats_CLP-final-report.pdf
  8. https://sanctuarynaturefoundation.org/article/conservation-in-east-central-india
  9. https://www.31jungletours.com/papikonda-wildlife-sanctuary/
  10. https://testbook.com/question-answer/which-river-flows-through-the-papikonda-national-p--5dc17f2ff60d5d2bac85b80f
  11. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-news-analysis/papikonda-national-park
  12. https://www.gktoday.in/question/in-which-year-was-papikonda-national-park-in-andhra-pradesh-officially-595653
  13. https://vajiramandravi.com/current-affairs/papikonda-national-park/
  14. http://sa.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/259292/papikonda-to-become-national-park/
  15. https://en-gb.topographic-map.com/map-h7nggt/Papikonda-National-Park/
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Location-of-Papikonda-National-Park-in-the-northern-Eastern-Ghats-of-Andhra-Pradesh_fig1_320646058
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Location-of-Papikonda-National-Park-in-Andhra-Pradesh-A-India-map-with-Andhra-Pradesh_fig1_344946740
  18. https://wildlifenavigator.com/papikonda-national-park/
  19. https://nationalparkinindia.in/papikonda-national-park/
  20. https://greenverz.com/papikonda-national-park/
  21. https://cganga.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Godavari-RAG-report_27-9-2024.pdf
  22. https://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/article/view/5513
  23. https://x.com/TheCivilslearn/status/1774103119909282101
  24. https://bsi.gov.in/uploads/documents/whatsnew/english/Flyer_Papikonda.pdf
  25. https://nationalparktravel.in/all-national-parks/andhra-pradesh-3-national-parks/papikonda-national-park-a-gateway-to-pristine-nature/
  26. https://nationalparksassociation.org/india-national-parks/papikonda-national-park/
  27. https://www.bsmpsbooks.com/journal/1000/article/MDY1MVY4
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299739010_A_study_of_land_cover_change_in_Papikonda_National_Park_Eastern_Ghats_Andhra_Pradesh_using_NDVI_based_time_series_analysis
  29. https://aspirantias.com/daily-current-affairs/f/papikonda-national-park-a-jewel-of-the-eastern-ghats?blogcategory=UPSC%2BGeography
  30. https://wildlifefeet.com/national-park/papikonda-national-park/
  31. https://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/article/download/3021/4188
  32. https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/lone-tiger-walks-back-to-its-natural-habitat-of-papikonda-national-park-with-good-health/article67816615.ece
  33. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra-pradesh/2022/Mar/31/tiger-census-completed-in-papikonda-national-park-2436184.html
  34. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/more-than-200-bird-species-sighted-in-papikonda-national-park/article67965646.ece
  35. https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/checklist.jsp?region=INseap06&list=howardmoore
  36. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/brown-headed-barbet-psilopogon-zeylanicus
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344946740_Avifaunal_diversity_along_the_riverine_habitats_of_Papikonda_National_Park_Andhra_Pradesh_India
  38. https://recordsofzsi.com/index.php/zsoi/article/view/172983
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394859196_Herpetofaunal_Diversity_in_Papikonda_National_Park_Eastern_Ghats_Andhra_Pradesh_India
  40. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra-pradesh/2025/Sep/21/51-herpetofauna-species-documented-at-papikonda-national-park-in-eastern-ghats
  41. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/Ophiophagus/hannah?search_param=%2528%2528taxon%253D%2527elapidae%2527%2529%2529
  42. https://apfd.apcfss.in/
  43. https://forests.telangana.gov.in/Documents/AAR/AAR7-8.pdf
  44. https://forestsclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/eds_UA/2014_27_24_Aug_2023_132659400_edsletter_SunnampadutoThurruruCFLetter_0001.pdf
  45. https://elurutourism.ap.gov.in/papikondaluecoresorts.html
  46. https://www.thehansindia.com/andhra-pradesh/flora-fauna-thrive-in-papikonda-national-park-643022
  47. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra-pradesh/2025/Jul/05/wii-raises-concern-over-management-of-andhra-pradeshs-protected-areas
  48. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/vijayawada/multiple-challenges-persist-across-andhra-pradeshs-wildlife-sanctuaries/articleshow/122303787.cms
  49. https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/userfiles/MEE%2520Report%25202018-19_compressed.pdf
  50. https://www.redbus.in/blog/papikonda-national-park/
  51. https://tourmitra.com/papikonda-national-park-andhra-pradesh-exploring-the-wilderness-along-the-godavari/
  52. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/oryx/article/integrating-camera-traps-and-community-knowledge-to-assess-the-status-of-the-indian-pangolin-manis-crassicaudata-in-the-eastern-ghats-india/1EBAE67F66563D602D5EC9A7DFD18CFD
  53. https://ntca.gov.in/assets/uploads/Reports/AITM/Leopard_status_2022_ISBN_corrected_1.pdf
  54. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra-pradesh/2024/Mar/01/states-leopard-population-increases-from-492-in-2018-to-569-in-2022
  55. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/375-indian-bison-inhabiting-papikonda-national-park-nearby-forests/article67910635.ece
  56. https://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/article/view/3021/4188
  57. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-57983-2
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361452740_Insights_into_human-wildlife_coexistence_through_temporal_activity_pattern_overlaps_in_a_neglected_tropical_forest_in_India
  59. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/in-other-news/100223/foresters-to-improve-tiger-habitat-for-growth-of-its-population-in-nex.html
  60. https://india.mongabay.com/2018/12/mapping-forest-loss-in-the-northern-eastern-ghats/
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6509315/
  62. https://scroll.in/article/907057/a-ground-level-analysis-of-forest-loss-in-eastern-ghats-sheds-new-light-on-the-role-of-buffer-zones
  63. https://www.drishtiias.com/current-affairs-news-analysis-editorials/news-editorials/09-03-2020/print
  64. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/vijayawada/poaching-rose-in-last-2-months-says-report/articleshow/77094831.cms
  65. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/poachers-gang-busted-at-papikonda-park/article27073905.ece
  66. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/stranded-bengal-tiger-sets-its-foot-in-andhra-pradeshs-most-poached-landscape/article65507845.ece
  67. https://india.mongabay.com/2020/09/one-of-the-worlds-most-trafficked-animals-needs-focus-outside-indias-protected-areas/
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222664972_Influence_of_exploitation_on_population_structure_spatial_distribution_and_reproductive_success_of_dioecious_species_in_a_fragmented_cloud_forest_in_India
  69. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/article312274271.html
  70. https://sac2.cganga.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Godavari-River-at-a-Glance-1.pdf
  71. https://ewsdata.rightsindevelopment.org/files/documents/47/WB-P154847_weuRndG.pdf
  72. https://papikondalu.net.in/papi-kondalu.html
  73. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/konda-reddi-tribes-indigenous-knowledge-of-indian-laurel-tree-proves-resourceful/article68009872.ece
  74. https://raceias.com/current-affairs/konda-reddy-tribe
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379487312_Ethnobotanical_Studies_for_Skin_Diseases_by_tribes_of_Papikondalu_Forest_Andhra_Pradesh_India
  76. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/150225/nation-current-affairs/article/bamboo-felled-illegally-andhra-pradesh-points-finger-telangana
  77. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/150625/nation-current-affairs/article/papikonda-forest-area-shrinks-hunting-rise
  78. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/southern-states/andhra-pradesh/officials-dallying-operation-of-tourism-boats-to-papikondalu-1829294
  79. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/andhra-pradesh-attracts-10644-crore-investments-in-tourism-sector-in-last-15-months-says-minister-kandula-durgesh/article70088768.ece
  80. http://www.csdhyd.org/i/reports/FINAL-FRA.pdf
  81. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Visakhapatnam/podu-cultivation-degrading-forest-cover/article3737719.ece
  82. https://academicjournals.org/journal/IJBC/article-full-text/358C74667372
  83. https://www.dailypioneer.com/2025/columnists/is-forest-rights-act-driving-deforestation-.html
  84. https://rsdebate.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/607275/1/IQ_225_22032012_U1067_p165_p165.pdf
  85. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2019/01/Summary-Final-Implementation-of-FRA-in-PAs.-Final-14.11.2017-as-printed.pdf
  86. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7431
  87. https://prepp.in/news/e-492-polavaram-project-a-critical-analysis-upsc-current-affairs
  88. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1032/1/012020/pdf
  89. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225559925_Reservoir_Impact_Assessment_on_Land_UseLand_Cover_and_Infrastructure-A_Case_Study_on_Polavaram_Project
  90. https://universalinstitutions.com/polavaram-project-developmental-leap-or-ecological-gamble/
  91. https://forestsclearance.nic.in/DownloadPdfFile.aspx?FileName=0_0_71122122212191Siteinspectionminingarea.pdf&FilePath=../writereaddata/Addinfo/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.