Hubbry Logo
Plattsburgh Air Force BasePlattsburgh Air Force BaseMain
Open search
Plattsburgh Air Force Base
Community hub
Plattsburgh Air Force Base
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Plattsburgh Air Force Base
Plattsburgh Air Force Base
Plattsburgh Air Force Base
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Plattsburgh Air Force Base is a former United States Air Force (USAF) Strategic Air Command (SAC) base covering 3,447 acres (13.7 km2) in the extreme northeast corner of New York, located on the western shore of Lake Champlain opposite Burlington, Vermont, in the town of Plattsburgh, New York.

Key Information

The base closed on 25 September 1995, pursuant to the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Act of 1990 (10 U.S.C. Sec. 2687 note) and the recommendations of the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Commission. It is now a civilian airport and industrial complex, operated by the Plattsburgh Air Base Development Authority. The airfield is now known as Plattsburgh International Airport.

Geography

[edit]

The former air base is bordered by the city of Plattsburgh and the Saranac River to the north and the Salmon River to the south. It lies on the western shore of Lake Champlain on the New York-Vermont border.[1]

History

[edit]

Military presence before the base

[edit]

Plattsburgh was the third oldest military post in the United States. The U.S. has maintained a military presence at the site of the now-closed base since 30 December 1814.[2]

In particular:[2]

  • On 30 December 1814, the Federal Government purchased 200 acres for the construction of the "Plattsburgh Barracks".
  • In 1838, additional parcels of land were acquired and stone barracks were built to house the personnel.
  • During the Civil War, Union troops organized and departed from the base.
  • During the Spanish–American War, the 21st Infantry was transferred from Plattsburgh Barracks to Cuba in June 1898. The troops returned to Plattsburgh in September 1898.
  • During the Interwar period, Plattsburgh Barracks was the home of the 26th Infantry Regiment of the "Iron first " division.
  • In 1944, it was turned over to the United States Navy and became "Camp MacDonough", an indoctrination school for officers.
  • After World War II, from March 1946 to 1953, the base was used for college student housing for area colleges and extensions schools.

Plattsburgh Air Force Base (PAFB)

[edit]

In 1953, the site returned to the Federal government and Plattsburgh Barracks were renamed Plattsburgh Air Force Base. The USAF held a ground breaking ceremony for the new strategic base on 29 January 1954, and construction began immediately. The runway was completed and the first aircraft landed on 7 November 1955. However, operational facilities were not completed until 1956 due to several work-stoppages and severe winter weather.[2]

F-4D Phantom IIs from the 134th Tactical Fighter Squadron of the Vermont Air National Guard at Plattsburgh AFB

Built during the Cold War, Plattsburgh AFB's runway is large enough to land the Space Shuttle. It was on a list of alternate landing sites for the Shuttle.[3] Space Shuttle Columbia astronaut Michael P. Anderson, born at Plattsburgh AFB, was a USAF pilot at Plattsburgh AFB when he was selected by NASA in 1994.

Major commands to which the base was assigned:

Major units assigned

[edit]
A B-47 Stratojet from Plattsburgh AFB on display
KC-135 Fuselage Departs Plattsburgh AFB

Missile operations

[edit]
A Convair SM-65F Atlas #100 at Site 6 AuSable Forks NY

Plattsburgh Air Force Base was designated as one of four major Atlas launching systems in the U.S.,[4] the only ICBM missile system deployed east of the Mississippi River.[2]

During the period 1961 and 1963, 12 Atlas-F missile sites were constructed within a 50-mile radius of the base, thus giving the 380th the capability to launch 12 missiles. All sites were in New York state, except for two located on the other side of Lake Champlain in Vermont. The 556th Strategic Missile Squadron, formerly assigned to Dow AFB, Maine, was transferred to Plattsburgh AFB on 1 October 1961, and became completely operational on 20 December 1962. It was inactivated on 25 June 1965.[2]

BRACC 1991 and closure

[edit]
Governor Mario Cuomo speaking at a rally in favor of keeping the base

During the 1991 Base Realignment and Closure Commission (BRACC) deliberations, PAFB wound up being pitted against Loring AFB in Limestone, Maine. The people of Maine put up a brief fight but, at the end, PAFB was spared.[5]

Two years later, when BRACC reconvened for another round of closures, PAFB, along with McGuire AFB in New Jersey and Griffiss AFB in Rome, New York, were considered for closing. The local sentiment was that, again, PAFB will be spared mainly because the USAF had plans to transform the base to a major Strategic Air Command base for the Northeast, expanding to add more aircraft and personnel.[5]

It was a hard battle. Rallies were held and a local leadership group, dubbed Team Plattsburgh, was put together to save the base. Testimonies were held, before several BRACC members, to keep PAFB open and give it the intended expansion. At the end, McGuire AFB won over PAFB.[5]

Plattsburgh AFB was officially closed on 30 September 1995, as a result of the 1993 Defense Closure and Realignment actions. The closure ceremony took place on Sept.29, 1995.[2]

Bombardier Transportation established a plant on the site.[6] It has produced standard passenger cars, locomotives, hybrids, light rail cars and subway cars.[7]

Current status

[edit]
Operating tables being taken out of the old base hospital, in the Double Cantilever Hangar

Plattsburgh Airbase Redevelopment Corporation (PARC), led by the nationally known planner, David Holmes, was created to manage the 5,000-acre (20 km2) property. Holmes had overseen the redevelopment plan which included a mixed-use solution to overcome the economic shortfall that occurred when the military moved out. Uses included Aviation, Biotechnology, Industrial and Recreation. Ultimately, PARC split up the base into 165 parcels for redevelopment.[8]

While community leaders feared in 1995, at the time of the actual closure, that the North Country's economy would collapse, this did not turn out to be the case; the base actually only accounted for $42 million in economic impact (about 8 percent of the local economy) because it was so isolated. It was anticipated that it would take 20 years to replace the impact. But in 1996, Dave Werlin of Great Northeast productions and PARC's Director of Planning, Nate Sears, devised a way to make up $30 million in 3 days. [citation needed]

On 16 and 17 August 1996, PARC hosted a massive music concert on the runway of the old decommissioned airbase by the band Phish. The concert, known as The Clifford Ball, was attended by 70,000 people[9] and added $30 million to the local economy.[10] The concert was the largest Rock concert in North America in 1996 and drew attention from The New York Times, MTV and numerous news media world-wide. The concert was possible due to a coalition of entities, including the New York State Police, Clinton County Sheriff, City of Plattsburgh, CVPH Medical Center, the Clinton County Health Department and numerous other private and public organizations. Although Phish wanted to return, PARC's Board of Directors declined in a 6-1 vote and subsequent Phish concerts were held at the former Loring Air Force Base in Limestone, Maine, where they generated $25 million and $40 million for the local community, respectively in 1997 and 1998.

NSYNC were scheduled to hold a concert at the former base on June 10, 2001 as part of the PopOdyssey tour, but it was cancelled.[11]

As of 2016,[12] PARC tenants on former airbase properties include:

The site also hosts a number of specialty services on site, including acres of parks, trails and playing fields as well as an 18-hole golf course, a day care center and a gym.

On the original Military Reservation, on the shores of Lake Champlain, is the Old Base Museum Campus. There are five museums within 200 feet of each other – the Clinton County Historical Museum, the Air Force Base Museum, the Champlain Valley Transportation Museum, the Kids' Station Children's Museum and the War of 1812 Museum, all housed in former military buildings. Included on the Museum Campus are edifices built in the 1890s including Officers' Row, the old Headquarters Building and the old fire station. The historic district around the Oval parade ground saw General Leonard Wood's founding of the Plattsburgh Idea, a training program started to prepare officers for duty in World War II. There is also a Memorial Chapel, the Clyde A. Lewis Air Park, and the Old Post Cemetery, in which a Spanish American War Medal of Honor recipient is buried. Two of the original structures built just after the War of 1812 are still on Campus – the Old Stone Barracks and the original powder magazine.

The USAF lists Plattsburgh among its BRAC "success stories."[13]

The base's reuse and the circumstances surrounding it were chronicled in Flying High Again: PARC's Redevelopment of Plattsburgh Air Force Base, written by Marian Calabro and published by CorporateHistory.net in 2008.[14][15]

Environmental problems

[edit]

It is designated a military superfund site.[1]

Historically, site contaminants originally included volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including trichloroethene (TCE), dichloroethene (DCE), and vinyl chloride, fuel-related compounds (mainly benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene), pesticides, various metals including chromium and cadmium, and lead and munitions waste from an old small arms range and an explosive-ordnance demolition range. As stated in other sections of this site profile, most of the formerly-contaminated areas have been cleaned up. In addition to groundwater contamination, other potential exposures included direct contact with and ingestion of contaminants found in soil. The only known remaining soil contamination at the former base is at the landfills, which have been capped and are fenced off.[16]

Additional potential risk to human health exists due to soil vapor intrusion (SVI) into buildings by VOCs. However, this contaminant pathway has been extensively studied across the entire base, mainly in association with the FT-002 / Industrial Area Groundwater OU. Soil vapor extraction (SVE) systems were installed at 3 buildings in the industrial area of the base where concentrations of VOCs warranted mitigation and/or remediation. In addition, a large portion of the base is covered by a LUC/IC for SVI that requires either mitigation of risk or sampling and evaluation of risk prior to the construction of new buildings or modifications to or change in use of existing buildings. Any sampling and risk evaluations conducted would be reviewed by the Air Force and regulatory agencies, and continued monitoring or mitigation, as necessary, would be required. Affected property owners must also certify compliance annually with the Air Force, which also conducts annual LUC/IC inspections.[16]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Plattsburgh Air Force Base

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Plattsburgh Air Force Base was a facility in , designated as an active base in 1955 on the site of earlier military installations dating to 1838, and it served primarily under until its closure on September 25, 1995. The base spanned approximately 3,440 acres in a mixed industrial and residential area near the Canadian border, hosting key elements of the including bomber wings, aerial refueling tankers, and silos. Assigned to SAC, Plattsburgh housed the 380th Bombardment Wing, which operated aircraft such as the B-47 Stratojet, B-52 Stratofortress, and later FB-111A strategic bombers, alongside KC-135 Stratotankers for in-flight refueling to extend the reach of strike missions. The base also supported Atlas F ICBM deployments in nearby launch facilities, contributing directly to America's Cold War-era deterrence posture against Soviet aggression through continuous alert postures and rapid response capabilities. These operations underscored the base's role in maintaining strategic parity, with its proximity to the U.S.-Canada border enabling efficient patrols over the approaches. Following the end of the and recommendations from the Commission, Plattsburgh was selected for shutdown in 1991 and fully decommissioned in 1995, leading to significant local economic disruption from the loss of over 4,000 military and civilian jobs. Post-closure, the site transitioned to civilian use, with the airfield becoming and portions redeveloped into an , though ongoing addresses contamination from decades of fuel storage, ordnance disposal, and industrial activities, designating it a site.

Geography and Strategic Location

Physical Setting

Plattsburgh Air Force Base occupied approximately 3,440 acres in Clinton County, New York, situated in the northeastern corner of the state along the western shore of Lake Champlain. The installation lay roughly 20 miles south of the Canada–United States border and opposite Burlington, Vermont, across the lake. Its location in a mixed-use area included proximity to industrial and residential zones within the city of Plattsburgh. The base's terrain featured a relatively flat to gently sloping land surface, descending eastward toward , which facilitated runway construction and operations. Bordered by the Saranac River to the north and the Salmon River to the south, the site benefited from natural water boundaries amid the broader regional landscape of the , flanked by the to the south and west. This setting provided stable ground conditions suitable for heavy aircraft and missile infrastructure during its active period.

Strategic Military Advantages

Plattsburgh Base's location in the extreme , roughly 20 miles south of border and adjacent to , conferred key strategic advantages for (SAC) operations during the . This positioning minimized flight distances to Soviet targets via transpolar routes, enabling faster response times for bomber wings equipped with B-47 Stratojets from 1956 to 1965, B-52 Stratofortresses from 1966 to 1971, and FB-111A strategic fighters from 1971 to 1991. The base's northern latitude supported efficient polar approach paths, critical for nuclear deterrence missions, as northeastern sites like Plattsburgh and Pease AFB in were selected in 1956 to enhance SAC's forward posture against potential Arctic incursions. For operations, 12 nearby Atlas F ICBM , operational from 1962 to 1965, leveraged the site's coordinates for trajectories over the , allowing warheads to reach Soviet territory in approximately 30 minutes. Surrounding geography further bolstered defensibility and reliability; the provided natural barriers against ground threats, while offered logistical benefits for historical and tactical transport, and base infrastructure like the "Mole Hole" tunnels ensured all-weather aircraft access amid harsh northeastern winters. These factors collectively positioned Plattsburgh as a vital node in SAC's dispersed basing strategy, balancing proximity to targets with survivability.

Historical Development

Pre-20th Century Military Use

In 1814, during the , the site in , saw initial military fortifications constructed to counter a force advancing along . Three temporary forts—Fort Moreau, , and Fort Scott—were erected in the summer and early fall by American forces under Major General George Izard to defend the village and surrounding area. These earthwork defenses formed a pentagonal complex and supported land operations during the on September 11, 1814, where approximately 3,000 American troops, including regulars and militia, repelled over 10,000 British invaders led by Lieutenant General Sir George Prévost. The American victory, combined with the concurrent naval engagement on , halted the British northern offensive and influenced peace negotiations at later that year. Following the war's end in , the federal government established a more permanent presence at the site to secure the U.S.-Canadian border region. By the late , 40 log barracks were constructed within the existing fort complex to house troops, marking the transition from wartime defenses to a standing . This installation, initially informal, evolved into the Plattsburgh Barracks, serving as a key post for training and frontier defense amid ongoing tensions with Britain and Native American tribes in the early republic. In 1838, the U.S. Army formalized the Plattsburgh Post with the construction of stone , including the surviving Old Stone Barracks as part of a planned quadrangle, to replace deteriorating wooden structures and accommodate expanded forces. The post supported routine garrison duties, including recruitment and drill, through the mid-19th century, with expansions during the Civil War era for mustering state volunteers. By 1882, amid post-Reconstruction budget constraints, the Army considered closing the facility but retained it due to local opposition and strategic value near the border. In 1890, the authorized the acquisition of up to 1,000 additional acres for military purposes, enhancing the post's infrastructure before its 20th-century expansions.

World War II and Early Cold War Prelude

The Plattsburgh military post, originally established as in the , maintained an presence throughout most of , with combat engineers receiving training there during 1942 and 1943. In 1944, the transferred the facility to the , which renamed it Camp McDonough and utilized it as an officer indoctrination school. Control reverted to the in , when it operated as the Army Air Forces Convalescent Hospital until the announcement of its closure in November 1945, effective December 1. Postwar repurposing initially involved civilian uses, including housing for college students by the New York State Housing Commission starting April 1, 1946, and operation as Champlain College for World War II veterans from September 1946 to 1953. A municipal airfield, Plattsburgh Municipal Airport, had been operational by June 1944, as depicted on aeronautical charts, providing an existing aviation infrastructure in the vicinity. The early Cold War prelude to the Air Force base's establishment stemmed from the site's strategic proximity to the U.S.-Canadian border and potential for rapid response to northern threats, leading Strategic Air Command head General Curtis LeMay to evaluate it in 1952 for a bomber base. In December 1953, New York State returned 724 acres of the former post to federal control for Air Force use, followed by a groundbreaking ceremony on January 29, 1954, which initiated construction employing 1,300 workers and investing $135,000 weekly. This paved the way for the base's activation in 1955 with the 380th Bombardment Wing on July 11.

Establishment and Initial Operations (1955–1962)

Plattsburgh Air Force Base was established as a (SAC) installation following the return of the former Plattsburgh Barracks site to federal control in 1953. Groundbreaking for the new SAC bomber base occurred in 1954, with construction focused on runways, hangars, and support facilities suitable for operations. The base's development was driven by the need to expand SAC's dispersed network of bases amid escalating tensions, providing a northern deployment site with favorable weather patterns and proximity to potential transatlantic routes. The 380th Bombardment Wing (Medium) was activated at Plattsburgh on July 11, 1955, marking the base's formal entry into operational service under SAC. Concurrently, the wing's initial flying squadrons—the 528th, 529th, and 530th Bombardment Squadrons—were brought online, equipped with medium bombers capable of delivering nuclear payloads. These units conducted intensive training in strategic bombardment, navigation, and , achieving by late 1955. The base's activation added approximately 5,000 personnel to the local population, transforming the regional economy and infrastructure. In January 1956, the 820th Air Division was established at Plattsburgh to serve as the host command, overseeing the 380th Wing and coordinating SAC alert postures. Initial operations emphasized high-altitude bombing runs and simulated missions against Soviet targets, with B-47s maintaining rotational alert status as part of SAC's nuclear deterrence triad. Through 1962, the base sustained these activities without major incidents, focusing on crew proficiency and equipment upgrades, while the wing's squadrons expanded to include the 531st Bombardment Squadron in May 1959. This period solidified Plattsburgh's role in maintaining continuous airborne alert capabilities, including participation in reflexes.

Operational Era

Major Units and Aircraft Deployments

The primary host unit at Plattsburgh Air Force Base was the 380th Bombardment Wing (Medium), activated on July 11, 1955, under . This wing operated Boeing B-47E Stratojet medium bombers from its inception through the mid-1960s, with the 528th, 529th, and 530th Bombardment Squadrons receiving their initial aircraft in December 1955. The B-47 fleet supported alert commitments and deployed eight aircraft to a dispersal base during the Cuban Missile Crisis on October 22, 1962. Air refueling capabilities were established with the activation of the 380th Air Refueling Squadron on August 16, 1956, equipped with Boeing KC-97F Stratotankers to support the B-47 bombers. The 26th Air Refueling Squadron briefly operated KC-97s from August 7, 1957, to July 31, 1959. In June 1966, the wing transitioned to the Boeing B-52D Stratofortress heavy bomber, marking the arrival of the first aircraft at the base, while upgrading to Boeing KC-135A Stratotankers for refueling. The 310th Air Refueling Squadron activated on January 25, 1967, and operated KC-135Q models until September 30, 1994, providing support for operations including Southeast Asia from 1966 to 1973 and Desert Shield/Storm in 1990–1991. By the early 1970s, the 380th Bombardment Wing shifted to the General Dynamics FB-111A, a supersonic variant of the F-111, which equipped the wing through the 1980s and into the 1990s, participating in events like the 1974 Bombing and Navigation Competition where crews earned the Fairchild Trophy. KC-135 tankers continued to deploy for operations, such as Deny Flight over Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1994.
Aircraft TypePrimary PeriodAssociated Units/Squadrons
B-47E Stratojet1955–1966528th, 529th, 530th Squadrons (380th )
KC-97F Stratotanker1956–1960s380th Air Refueling Squadron; 26th ARS (1957–1959)
B-52D Stratofortress1966–early 1970s380th
KC-135A/Q Stratotanker1966–1995310th Air Refueling Squadron (1967–1994)
FB-111AEarly 1970s–1995380th

ICBM and Strategic Missile Operations

The 556th Strategic Missile Squadron was transferred to Plattsburgh Air Force Base on October 1, 1961, and assigned to the 380th Strategic Aerospace Wing to operate the F (ICBM) system as part of Strategic Air Command's nuclear deterrence posture. This deployment marked Plattsburgh as the easternmost and only ICBM base east of the , enhancing SAC's rapid-response capabilities in the Northeast. The F, a liquid-fueled using and propellants, had a range of approximately 6,000 miles and carried a yielding about 3.8 megatons. The squadron oversaw 12 independent hardened launch arranged in a roughly concentric pattern within a 50-mile radius of the base, primarily in , , and Franklin counties of New York, with two sites located across in Alburgh and Swanton, . of these facilities, managed by the U.S. Corps of Engineers' Office, began in 1961 and involved excavating 174-foot-deep, 54-foot-wide reinforced with thousands of cubic yards of per site. The sites achieved initial operational capability by mid-1962 and full alert status on December 20, 1962, completing the nationwide activation of the Atlas F force. Each silo-launch configuration allowed for relatively quick fueling and launch preparation, with topping systems enabling readiness within hours. Operations emphasized continuous 24-hour manning and rigorous maintenance to counter the Atlas F's challenges, integrating alerts with the wing's missions for layered strategic deterrence. During the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, the squadron maintained heightened readiness, prepared to execute launch orders amid global tensions. However, the system's reliance on volatile liquid propellants proved limiting compared to emerging solid-fuel alternatives, leading to its rapid phase-out; the squadron was inactivated on April 30, 1965, with missiles decommissioned by June 25, 1965, as SAC shifted focus to more reliable Minuteman ICBMs. Post-deactivation, the silos were abandoned and later repurposed or salvaged, leaving a legacy of infrastructure in the region.

Bomber Missions and Cold War Deterrence Role

The 380th Bombardment Wing, activated on July 11, 1955, at Plattsburgh Air Force Base, formed a core component of the Strategic Air Command's (SAC) strategic bomber force for nuclear deterrence. Equipped initially with medium bombers, the wing received its first aircraft in 1956 and expanded to a peak of 70 B-47s by 1959, supported by KC-97 and later KC-135 Stratotanker refueling squadrons activated on August 16, 1956. These forces maintained continuous readiness for intercontinental strikes, emphasizing rapid generation of nuclear-armed bombers to counter Soviet threats. On October 1, 1957, Plattsburgh entered SAC's 24-hour alert posture, with one-third of bombers and tankers—crews and aircraft—positioned in hardened "Mole Hole" facilities for immediate launch within minutes of warning, ensuring survivability against preemptive attack. This ground alert commitment, integral to SAC's deterrent strategy, allowed the wing to demonstrate prowess in exercises like the May 28, 1957, "Three Capitals" speed race, averaging 558 mph. During the Cuban Missile Crisis on October 22, 1962, the base achieved full alert, dispersing eight B-47s to , with minimal fuel loads for survival, while retaining primary forces armed and ready until November 25. Transitioning to heavy bombers, B-52G Stratofortresses arrived in September 1962, with the wing conducting global strategic bombardment training by June 1966; these were phased out on January 5, 1971, after supporting missions in from 1966 to 1973 via extended-range strikes enabled by KC-135 refueling. The B-52 operations upheld deterrence through sustained alert commitments, contributing to SAC's ability to execute the (SIOP) for . In the 1974 SAC Bombing and Navigation Competition, Plattsburgh's B-52 and KC-135 crews secured the Fairchild Trophy for superior combined performance, underscoring operational excellence in simulated nuclear scenarios.

Contributions to National Defense and Global Conflicts

Plattsburgh Air Force Base served as a critical component of the ' nuclear deterrence strategy during the , hosting elements of the (SAC) dedicated to maintaining continuous readiness for strategic bombardment and missile launches. The base's 380th Bombardment Wing, activated in 1955, operated B-47 Stratojet bombers initially, transitioning to B-52 Stratofortress aircraft by 1966 for global strategic bombardment training and alert duties. These forces participated in SAC's airborne alert programs, including , where bombers remained aloft with nuclear weapons to ensure retaliatory capability against potential Soviet aggression. Additionally, from 1962 to 1965, the 556th Strategic Missile Squadron managed 12 Atlas F intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in hardened silos nearby, contributing to the land-based leg of the and enhancing second-strike assurance. The base's KC-135 Stratotanker squadrons provided essential support, extending the range of SAC bombers and enabling sustained deterrence patrols, such as Reflex deployments to forward bases in and . This capability underpinned the (SIOP), SAC's framework for massive nuclear retaliation, deterring escalation by demonstrating credible U.S. resolve and technical proficiency. Personnel and aircraft from Plattsburgh maintained high alert postures, with one-third of bombers typically on ground alert, ready for takeoff within minutes of an order, bolstering national defense through peacetime vigilance that arguably prevented direct conflict. In support of global conflicts, Plattsburgh units contributed indirectly to operations beyond deterrence. During the , 380th Wing tanker and bomber crews undertook temporary duty assignments for refueling and Arc Light bombing missions, aiding U.S. air campaigns despite the base's primary strategic focus. Later, in 1990-1991, KC-135s from the wing deployed to provide refueling for Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, supporting coalition aircraft over the Atlantic and , though the base transitioned to Air Refueling Wing status by 1991. By the FB-111A era in the 1970s-1980s, the wing's variable-sweep bombers conducted low-level penetration training simulating strikes on targets, refining tactics for potential European theater contingencies.

Closure and Immediate Aftermath

BRAC Process and 1995 Shutdown

The 1993 round of the (BRAC) process, authorized under 101-510, aimed to reduce excess amid post-Cold War force structure drawdowns and budget constraints. The Department of Defense initially proposed realignments but did not recommend closing Plattsburgh Air Force Base; the independent Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission added the base to its closure list following public hearings and evaluations of military value, capacity, and costs. The Commission's July 1, 1993, report highlighted Plattsburgh's relatively low military value for large aircraft operations compared to alternatives like McGuire AFB, citing its small active-duty force structure supported by an oversized and inefficient . Key factors in the recommendation included high operational expenses, such as $11.8 million in annual fuel resupply costs—460% higher than at McGuire due to winter delivery limitations—and safety risks from commercial encroachment in the North Accident Potential Zone II. The base's geographic isolation from primary airlift customers further diminished its efficiency for mobility missions, contributing to excess capacity across facilities. Projected savings from closure encompassed a one-time cost of $131.2 million offset by $137.1 million in net savings from 1994 to 1999 and $56.6 million in annual recurring savings thereafter, with a three-year payback period. The Commission's recommendations, including Plattsburgh's closure, were forwarded to President , who approved them without modification before submission to for an up-or-down vote, as required by BRAC statutes to insulate decisions from individual political influence. ratified the package, leading to the base's deactivation; operations wound down progressively, with final closure occurring on September 30, 1995. The shutdown affected approximately 300 military and civilian positions, with assets redistributed to higher-value installations per force structure priorities.

Economic Impacts on Local Community

The closure of Plattsburgh Air Force Base on September 30, 1995, led to the immediate loss of approximately 900 civilian jobs directly tied to base operations, alongside the departure of , exacerbating local pressures in Clinton County. Overall, the downsizing and closure were projected to eliminate around 5,039 jobs county-wide by the end of 1996, including indirect positions in supporting industries such as retail, services, and that relied on base-related spending. This represented a substantial shock to the regional economy, where the base had served as a primary employer and stimulus for decades, contributing to a psychological sense of destabilization among residents and businesses even before full implementation. Unemployment rates in Clinton County reflected the strain, rising from 6.3% in December 1994 to 8.3% in January 1995 amid anticipation of the closure, with seasonal fluctuations masking deeper structural losses post-shutdown. Local businesses experienced reduced patronage as base families and workers departed, leading to vacancies in and commercial properties, while out-migration accelerated—thousands of residents relocated, shrinking the tax base and straining municipal revenues. Federal estimates indicated direct federal civilian job losses of about 352, underscoring the concentrated impact on a community heavily dependent on defense-related activity. Despite initial fears of , proactive community planning and federal BRAC assistance programs helped blunt the worst effects, though short-term GDP contraction and heightened reliance on state were evident in the years immediately following. amplified existing challenges in the North Country region, including limited diversification and proximity to the Canadian border, which offered some cross-border employment offsets but could not fully compensate for the payroll and procurement expenditures previously injected by the base.

Post-Closure Redevelopment

Conversion to Airport and Business Facilities

The former Plattsburgh Air Force Base airfield, spanning 1,699 acres, was repurposed for civilian following the base's closure on September 30, 1995, providing the region with a significant economic asset including a 12,000-foot capable of accommodating large commercial and . The site transitioned into , owned and operated by Clinton County since 2002, with a terminal opening in 2007 to support scheduled flights, , and cargo operations. This conversion leveraged existing military infrastructure, such as hangars and ramps totaling over 200 acres, enabling the airport to serve as a multipurpose facility for freight logistics and industrial activities. Parallel to the airport redevelopment, the base's non-aviation facilities were adapted into business and industrial spaces under the oversight of the Plattsburgh Air Base Development Authority, fostering a mixed-use economic hub with commercial, manufacturing, and warehousing opportunities. The site now offers 1.5 million square feet of aviation-related industrial space alongside 110 acres of developable land, attracting tenants in sectors like manufacturing and logistics, including international firms in the adjacent Air Industrial Park. This reuse has resulted in the 5,000-acre property employing more personnel than during its active military period, marking it as a notable success in post-BRAC economic transition. Surrounding areas incorporate office, storage, and conference facilities, with ongoing developments enhancing connectivity via nearby Interstate 87.

Residential Reuse and Community Integration

Following the 1995 closure of Plattsburgh Air Force Base, portions of the former military family and ancillary structures were repurposed for residential use, with approximately 400 acres and thousands of square feet of residential transferred to local entities for or immediate . Officer quarters, including stately brick homes originally built for base leadership, were preserved and integrated into surrounding neighborhoods, such as those ringing the historic U.S. Oval, where they now function as private residences or townhouses. These conversions capitalized on existing , blending military-era with community needs while avoiding widespread of viable structures. New residential developments emerged on cleared or underutilized base parcels, including the Emerson Place apartment complex, which transformed former base land into multi-family to address local shortages exacerbated by the loss of about 1,000 military units upon closure. In 2019, state funding supported a 40-unit project on a vacant base site, prioritizing low- to moderate-income residents and enhancing housing density through adjustments that permit duplexes, conversions, and multi-family units. Condominium projects, such as those at the site of the former Officer's Club, further diversified options, offering single-level units that appeal to retirees and smaller households. Community integration progressed through the Plattsburgh Air Force Base Redevelopment Authority's oversight of property transfers, which incorporated base lands into the Town and City of Plattsburgh's frameworks, fostering seamless adjacency to existing urban areas. Residential zones now support mixed-use patterns, with former base housing contributing to neighborhood stability amid broader efforts like the 2025 Housing Acceleration Measures, which streamline permitting to counteract post-closure population declines. However, not all areas suited residential reuse; contaminated sites near Wisconsin Street and Ohio Avenue were deemed incompatible due to remediation constraints and proximity to industrial remnants, directing development to cleaner parcels. This selective approach ensured viable integration while prioritizing environmental safeguards, resulting in former base residential areas functioning as standard community enclaves with access to .

Persistent Infrastructure Challenges

The former Plattsburgh Air Force Base, closed in , features infrastructure largely constructed in the 1950s and 1960s to support strategic air operations, including runways, pavements, utilities, and drainage systems designed for heavy military loads. Post-closure redevelopment into the and Clinton County Airport Industrial Park shifted maintenance burdens to local entities, but the aging designs have proven inadequate for sustained civilian use, leading to accelerated deterioration without comprehensive federal upgrades. By 2024, town officials reported widespread failures, including sinkholes, collapsing pavements, and compromised water systems, creating unsafe conditions for residents and businesses in reused facilities. These issues stem from deferred during the base's operational decline and initial transfer, compounded by the inherent limitations of military-grade and subsurface installations exposed to northern New York's freeze-thaw cycles and variable loads. Estimated repair costs run into millions, with local budgets strained by ongoing liabilities not fully addressed in the (BRAC) handover. In June 2025, Town Supervisor highlighted specific hazards like pavement subsidence and water infiltration, prompting renewed appeals to federal agencies for intervention. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conducted assessments in August and September 2025, evaluating options for remediation, though funding commitments remain pending amid debates over federal obligations for legacy assets transferred under BRAC protocols. Persistent challenges have delayed industrial expansion and residential integration, underscoring the long-term costs of closures where original outlives its intended purpose without proactive reinvestment.

Environmental Legacy

Contamination Identification and Sources

Environmental contamination at Plattsburgh Air Force Base was identified through investigations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), dividing the site into multiple operable units (OUs) for assessment. Site-wide records searches began in , followed by , , , , and sampling to detect contaminants of concern (COCs) based on concentrations exceeding risk-based thresholds and potential exposure pathways. These efforts revealed widespread releases from historical base operations, including , fuel handling, and waste disposal, with COCs persisting in multiple media post-1995 closure. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), primarily trichloroethene (TCE) and its degradation products such as dichloroethene (DCE) and , were identified in groundwater and across several OUs, originating from solvent use in and cleaning aircraft, equipment, and facilities during maintenance activities. Petroleum-related compounds, including , , , and (BTEX), contaminated and , sourced from storage, refueling operations, spills, and unburned fuel releases at fire training areas and runways. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including (PFOA) and (PFOS), were detected in groundwater, soil, and off-site wells, stemming from aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) deployed in firefighting training, crash response, and suppression at designated areas like the former fire training facility. A 2015 preliminary assessment identified 10 potential AFFF release sites base-wide, confirming PFAS migration via plumes affecting aquifers used historically for base drinking water. Metals such as , , , and lead appeared in , , and , linked to disposal, small arms ranges, and explosive ordnance demolition residues, while pesticides like were found in liquid waste from storage tanks. These identifications informed subsequent remedial decisions, prioritizing source control in high-risk OUs like fire training and industrial areas.

Federal Remediation Efforts and Achievements

The U.S. Air Force has led environmental remediation at the former Plattsburgh Air Force Base under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) through its Installation Restoration Program (IRP), with oversight from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) pursuant to a 1991 Federal Facilities Agreement. Cleanup activities commenced in the 1980s following the site's addition to the Superfund National Priorities List in November 1989, addressing contaminants including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), DDT, chlorinated solvents, and jet fuel hydrocarbons from historical military operations. By base closure in 1995, all property had been transferred to local entities with institutional controls to restrict groundwater use and ensure long-term monitoring. Federal efforts have investigated over 60 sites and issued Records of Decision (RODs) for 20 operable units (OUs), enabling remediation of , , and at locations such as landfills, fire training areas, and fuel storage sites. Achievements include capping four landfills in the late 1990s to prevent migration, excavation and treatment of contaminated at Building 2774 (addressing VOCs), and installation of groundwater treatment systems at multiple sites, resulting in regulatory closure of sites like IRP Fuel Site ST-030. The Department of Defense has invested over $128 million in these efforts since 1995, supporting property reuse while maintaining human exposures under control per EPA assessments. Upon detection of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in 2015, the initiated immediate interim measures, including provision of and granular (GAC) filtration systems to affected off-base residences exceeding EPA health advisory levels. A multi-phase Remedial Investigation for PFAS commenced in 2021, with monitoring and sampling ongoing; a 2024 contract extended municipal water lines to three residences, with completion targeted for 2025. Six Five-Year Reviews have affirmed remedy protectiveness, with the latest draft in December 2024 confirming no unacceptable exposures from completed non-PFAS actions.

Ongoing PFAS Investigations and Health Claims

In 2023, the U.S. initiated expanded sampling for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in , , and at the former Plattsburgh Base, focusing on sources like historical use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting training and operations. These efforts, part of ongoing remedial investigations under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), identified PFAS detections exceeding EPA lifetime health advisory levels of 70 parts per trillion (ppt) for combined PFOA and PFOS in multiple on-base locations and select off-base private wells. By September 2025, the reported continued site-specific testing tied to and defense activities, with data informing risk assessments but no completed full-scale PFAS remediation announced for the base. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation issued a fish consumption advisory in 2021 for Lake Champlain adjacent to the base due to elevated PFAS levels in fish tissue, recommending limits for sensitive populations like pregnant women and children; this advisory remains active as of 2025, based on sampling showing concentrations up to several hundred ppt in certain species. Federal investigations, including a focused remedial study by environmental consultants, assess potential migration pathways to nearby residential areas and surface waters, with preliminary findings indicating plume extent but emphasizing the need for further delineation due to the persistent nature of PFAS ("forever chemicals"). As of August 2025, the Air Force hosted public updates on these activities, highlighting interim measures like monitoring wells but noting delays in broader Department of Defense PFAS cleanup timelines, projected to span decades across contaminated sites. Health claims from former base personnel, veterans, and nearby residents allege links between PFAS exposure via contaminated drinking water and conditions such as , , liver damage, and disorders, with lawsuits filed under the PACT Act and AFFF multidistrict litigation seeking compensation. These assertions draw from general epidemiological studies, including the C8 Science Panel's probable link findings for PFOA exposure to six diseases (high cholesterol, , , , , and ), though causation remains unproven and research continues on broader PFAS mixtures. No site-specific epidemiological studies have established elevated disease rates in the Plattsburgh community attributable to base contamination, and claims in ongoing litigation emphasize associations rather than definitive causal evidence, amid calls for expanded benefits under federal toxic exposure laws. Community forums report anecdotal and cancer cases potentially tied to exposure, but medical researchers note that PFAS health effects require further longitudinal data to distinguish from confounders like factors.

References

  1. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/master/pnp/habshaer/ny/ny1800/ny1864/data/ny1864data.pdf
  2. https://ww2.nycourts.gov/courts/4jd/plattsburgh_city/history.shtml
  3. https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/SiteProfiles/index.cfm?fuseaction=second.cleanup&id=0202439
  4. http://www.strategic-air-command.com/bases/Plattsburgh_AFB.htm
  5. https://www.afcec.af.mil/Home/BRAC/Plattsburgh.aspx
  6. https://www.townofplattsburghny.gov/plattsburgh-air-force-base-project/
  7. https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0202439
  8. https://latitude.to/articles-by-country/us/united-states/29145/plattsburgh-air-force-base
  9. https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/SiteProfiles/index.cfm?fuseaction=second.redevelop&id=0202439
  10. https://www.afcec.af.mil/Portals/17/documents/BRAC/Plattsburgh/afd-120726-068.pdf
  11. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA158141.pdf
  12. https://fb-111.net/Page-7.html
  13. https://www.amc.af.mil/Portals/12/documents/AFD-131018-055.pdf
  14. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2021/R244.pdf
  15. https://suncommunitynews.com/news/72683/pride-of-place-the-history-of-the-plattsburgh-barracks/
  16. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/war-1812/battles/plattsburgh
  17. https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/nhhc/browse-by-topic/wars-conflicts-and-operations/1812/lake-champlain.html
  18. https://museum.dmna.ny.gov/forts/forts-m-p-index/plattsburgh-barracks
  19. https://veteran-voices.com/plattsburgh-barracks/
  20. https://suncommunitynews.com/news/105958/history-of-reuse-at-206-us-oval/
  21. https://www.airfields-freeman.com/NY/Airfields_NY_NE.htm
  22. https://www.afcent.af.mil/Units/380th-Air-Expeditionary-Wing/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/445048/380th-air-expeditionary-wing-history/
  23. https://fb-111.net/Page-50.html
  24. http://www.astronautix.com/p/plattsburghafb.html
  25. https://www.556sms.com/
  26. https://www.usace.army.mil/About/History/Historical-Vignettes/Military-Construction-Combat/032-Atlas-ICBM.aspx
  27. https://www.afcent.af.mil/Units/380th-Air-Expeditionary-Wing/Fact-Sheets/Article/445048/380th-air-expeditionary-wing-history/
  28. http://www.strategic-air-command.com/wings/0380bw.htm
  29. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/0960sac/
  30. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D-PURL-LPS111641/pdf/GOVPUB-D-PURL-LPS111641.pdf
  31. https://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/29677/20151001/plattsburgh-marks-20-years-since-the-air-force-base-officially-closed
  32. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/publications/97-dc_community.pdf
  33. https://www.sevendaysvt.com/news/after-the-air-guard-plattsburghs-1995-base-closing-may-be-instructive-for-burlington-2184409/
  34. https://data.thegardnernews.com/unemployment/clinton-county-ny/CN3601900000000/
  35. https://www.mynbc5.com/article/looking-back-30-years-on-the-plattsburgh-air-force-base-closure-and-current-developments-to-the-area/68119379
  36. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a111623.html
  37. https://www.osc.ny.gov/files/local-government/publications/pdf/north-country.pdf
  38. https://www.flyplattsburgh.com/about-us
  39. https://www.airport-technology.com/projects/plattsburgh-international-airport-plattsburgh/
  40. https://www.wamc.org/north-country-news/2014-11-19/officials-provide-update-on-plattsburgh-international-airport-renovations
  41. https://www.flyplattsburgh.com/facilities
  42. https://www.townofplattsburghny.gov/about-the-town/
  43. https://www.tdcnny.com/air-industrial-park
  44. https://www.flyplattsburgh.com/tenants
  45. https://www.wamc.org/news/2025-05-06/officials-highlight-new-local-law-intended-to-accelerate-housing-development-in-the-town-of-plattsburgh
  46. https://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/51754/20250520/clinton-county-plattsburgh-create-new-policies-to-encourage-housing-development
  47. https://www.mychamplainvalley.com/news/local-news/vacant-piece-of-former-plattsburgh-afb-getting-new-life/
  48. https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/60-Club-Rd-UNIT-104-Plattsburgh-NY-12903/114431247_zpid/
  49. https://www.afcec.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/119703/air-force-officials-transfer-more-than-500-acres-of-former-plattsburgh-afb-for/
  50. https://suncommunitynews.com/news/118029/town-of-plattsburgh-creates-housing-acceleration-measures/
  51. https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/data/DecDocs/510003/ROD.HW.510003.2000-08-31._SS-018_and_SS-028_Final.pdf
  52. https://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/50399/20240830/town-of-plattsburgh-sounds-alarm-on-the-state-of-former-air-base-infrastructure
  53. https://www.mynbc5.com/article/federal-engineers-tour-deteriorating-plattsburgh-air-force-base/65987606
  54. https://www.wamc.org/news/2025-08-22/u-s-army-corps-of-engineers-to-meet-with-plattsburgh-officials-regarding-former-air-force-base-infrastructure
  55. https://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/51905/20250618/plattsburgh-officials-renew-calls-for-federal-action-on-former-air-base-issues
  56. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/army-corps-engineers-assess-former-223700870.html
  57. https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/data/DecDocs/510003/ROD.HW.510003.2002-03-27.plattsburgh_afb_ou9_SS-017_Bldg_2774_Soil.pdf
  58. https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/SiteProfiles/index.cfm?fuseaction=second.contams&id=0202439
  59. https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/SiteProfiles/index.cfm?fuseaction=second.Healthenv&id=0202439
  60. https://suncommunitynews.com/news/120470/air-force-to-detail-plattsburgh-environmental-activities/
  61. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/02/585828.pdf
  62. https://suncommunitynews.com/news/120838/usaf-testing-pfas-levels-from-former-base-operations/
  63. https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/SiteProfiles/index.cfm?fuseaction=second.Stayup&id=0202439
  64. https://geosyntec.com/projects/item/6613-focused-remedial-investigation-to-determine-the-health-impacts-of-pfas
  65. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/23/climate/military-defense-pfas-forever-chemicals-cleanup-delay.html
  66. https://www.torhoermanlaw.com/pfas-contamination/plattsburgh-air-force-base-pfas-lawsuit/
  67. https://trulaw.com/pfas-water-contamination-lawsuit/list-of-military-bases-with-contaminated-water/plattsburgh-air-force-base-pfas-lawsuit/
  68. https://pfaswaterexperts.org/afff-lawsuit/
  69. https://www.facebook.com/groups/53984811032/posts/10161223353696033/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.