Hubbry Logo
Haplogroup R1bHaplogroup R1bMain
Open search
Haplogroup R1b
Community hub
Haplogroup R1b
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Haplogroup R1b
Haplogroup R1b
Haplogroup R1b
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Haplogroup R1b
Possible time of originProbably soon after R1, possibly between 18,000-14,000 BC[1]
Possible place of originWestern Asia, North Eurasia or Eastern Europe[2]
AncestorR1
Descendants
  • R1b1a (L754, PF6269, YSC0000022)
  • R1b2 (PH155)
Defining mutationsM343

Haplogroup R1b (R-M343), previously known as Hg1 and Eu18, is a human Y-chromosome haplogroup.

It is the most frequently occurring paternal lineage in Western Europe, as well as some parts of Russia (e.g. the Bashkirs) and across the Sahel in Central Africa, namely: Cameroon, Chad, Guinea, Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Nigeria and Senegal (concentrated in parts of Chad with concentration in the Hausa Tribe and among the Chadic-speaking ethnic groups of Cameroon).

The clade is also present at lower frequencies throughout Eastern Europe, Western Asia, Central Asia as well as parts of North Africa, South Asia and Central Asia.

R1b has two primary branches: R1b1-L754 and R1b2-PH155. R1b1-L754 has two major subclades: R1b1a1b-M269, which predominates in Western Europe, and R1b1a2-V88, which is today common in parts of Central Africa. The other branch, R1b2-PH155, is so rare and widely dispersed that it is difficult to draw any conclusions about its origins. It has been found in Bahrain, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Ladakh, Tajikistan, Turkey, and Western China.

According to ancient DNA studies, most R1a and R1b lineages would have expanded from the Pontic Steppe along with the Indo-European languages.[2][3][4][5][6]

Origin and dispersal

[edit]
Genetic studies performed since 2015 have revealed that the Yamna culture, thought to have spoken some stage of Proto-Indo-European, carried R1b-L23.

The age of R1 was estimated by Tatiana Karafet et al. (2008) at between 12,500 and 25,700 BP, and most probably occurred about 18,500 years ago.[7] Since the earliest known example has been dated at circa 14,000 BP, and belongs to R1b1 (R-L754),[1] R1b must have arisen relatively soon after the emergence of R1.

Early human remains found to carry R1b include:

R1b is a subclade within the "macro-haplogroup" K (M9), the most common group of human male lines outside of Africa. K is believed to have originated in Asia (as is the case with an even earlier ancestral haplogroup, F (F-M89). Karafet T. et al. (2014) suggested that a "rapid diversification process of K-M526 likely occurred in Southeast Asia, with subsequent westward expansions of the ancestors of haplogroups R and Q".[29] However the oldest example of R* has been found in an Ancient North Eurasian sample from Siberia (Mal'ta boy, 24,000 years ago), and its precursor P1 has been found in another Ancient North Eurasian sample from northern Siberia (Yana RHS) dating from c. 31,600 years ago.[30]

Three genetic studies in 2015 gave support to the Kurgan hypothesis of Marija Gimbutas regarding the Proto-Indo-European homeland. According to those studies, haplogroups R1b-M269 and R1a, now the most common in Europe (R1a is also common in South Asia) would have expanded from the West Eurasian Steppe, along with the Indo-European languages; they also detected an autosomal component present in modern Europeans which was not present in Neolithic Europeans, which would have been introduced with paternal lineages R1b and R1a, as well as Indo-European languages.[2][3][4]

Map of Indo-European migrations from c. 4000 to 1000 BC according to the Kurgan model. The magenta area corresponds to the assumed urheimat (Samara culture, Sredny Stog culture).

Analysis of ancient Y-DNA from the remains from early Neolithic Central and North European Linear Pottery culture settlements have not yet found males belonging to haplogroup R1b-M269.[31][32] Olalde et al. (2017) trace the spread of haplogroup R1b-M269 in western Europe, particularly Britain, to the spread of the Beaker culture, with a sudden appearance of many R1b-M269 haplogroups in Western Europe ca. 5000–4500 years BP during the early Bronze Age.[33]

Structure

[edit]

External phylogeny of R1b

[edit]
Main articles: Haplogroup P-P295 and Structure of Y-DNA Haplogroup K

The broader haplogroup R (M207) is a primary subclade of haplogroup P1 (M45) itself a primary branch of P (P295), which is also known as haplogroup K2b2. R-M207 is therefore a secondary branch of K2b (P331), and a direct descendant of K2 (M526).

Phylogeny within K2b
  • P P295/PF5866/S8 (also known as K2b2).
    • P1 M45 (a.k.a.K2b2a)
      • Q M242 (K2b2a1)
      • R M207 (K2b2a2)
        • R1 (M173)
          • R1a (M420)
          • R1b (M343)

Internal structure of R1b

[edit]

Names such as R1b, R1b1 and so on are phylogenetic (i.e. "family tree") names which make clear their place within the branching of haplogroups, or the phylogenetic tree. An alternative way of naming the same haplogroups and subclades refers to their defining SNP mutations: for example, R-M343 is equivalent to R1b.[34] Phylogenetic names change with new discoveries and SNP-based names are consequently reclassified within the phylogenetic tree. In some cases, an SNP is found to be unreliable as a defining mutation and an SNP-based name is removed completely. For example, before 2005, R1b was synonymous with R-P25, which was later reclassified as R1b1; in 2016, R-P25 was removed completely as a defining SNP, due to a significant rate of back-mutation.[35] (Below is the basic outline of R1b according to the ISOGG Tree as it stood on January 30, 2017.[36])

Basic phylogenetic tree for R1b
 M343/PF6242 

R-M343* (R1b*). No cases have been reported.

 L278 
PH155

R-PH155 (R1b2) has been found in individuals from Albania, Bahrain, Bhutan, China, Germany, India, Italy, Singapore, Tajikistan, Turkey, the UK, and the USA.

L754/PF6269/YSC0000022
V88

R-V88 (R1b1b): the most common forms of R1b found among males native to Sub-Saharan Africa, also found rarely elsewhere.

L389/PF6531
 V1636

R-V1636 (R1b1a2) is rare, but has been found in China,[37][38] Bulgaria, Belarus, Southern Finland, Turkey, Iraq, Lebanon, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Russia (including a Tomsk Tatar), Italy (including one from the Province of Salerno), Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, Canada, Germany, Valais, Israel, and Armenia.[39][40]

 P297/PF6398 
 M73 

Subclades of R-M73 (R1b1a1a) are rare overall, with most cases being observed in the Caucasus, Siberia, Central Asia, and Mongolia.

 M269/PF6517 

Subclades of R-M269 (R1b1a1b; previously R1b1a1a2) are now extremely common throughout Western Europe, but are also found at lower levels in many other parts of Western Eurasia and the Mediterranean.

Geographical distribution

[edit]

R1b* (R-M343*)

[edit]

No confirmed cases of R1b* (R-M343*) – that is R1b (xR1b1, R1b2), also known as R-M343 (xL754, PH155) – have been reported in peer-reviewed literature.

R-M343 (xM73, M269, V88)

In early research, because R-M269, R-M73 and R-V88 are by far the most common forms of R1b, examples of R1b (xM73, xM269) were sometimes assumed to signify basal examples of "R1b*".[35] However, while the paragroup R-M343 (xM73, M269, V88) is rare, it does not preclude membership of rare and/or subsequently-discovered, relatively basal subclades of R1b, such as R-L278* (R1b*), R-L389* (R1b1a*), R-P297* (R1b1a1*), R-V1636 (R1b1a2) or R-PH155 (R1b2).

The population believed to have the highest proportion of R-M343 (xM73, M269, V88) are the Kurds of southeastern Kazakhstan with 13%.[41] However, more recently, a large study of Y-chromosome variation in Iran, revealed R-M343 (xV88, M73, M269) as high as 4.3% among Iranian sub-populations.[42]

It remains a possibility that some, or even most of these cases, may be R-L278* (R1b*), R-L389* (R1b1a*), R-P297* (R1b1a1*), R-V1636 (R1b1a2), R-PH155 (R1b2), R1b* (R-M343*), R1a* (R-M420*), an otherwise undocumented branch of R1 (R-M173), and/or back-mutations of a marker, from a positive to a negative ancestral state,[43] and hence constitute undocumented subclades of R1b.

A compilation of previous studies regarding the distribution of R1b can be found in Cruciani et al. (2010).[44] It is summarised in the table following. (Cruciani did not include some studies suggesting even higher frequencies of R1b1a1b [R-M269] in some parts of Western Europe.)

Distribution of R-V88, R-M73 and M269
Continent Region Sample
size 		Total R1b R-P25
(unreliable
marker for
R1b1*) 		R-V88
(R1b1b) 		R-M269
(R1b1a1a2) 		R-M73
(R1b1a1a1)
Africa Northern Africa 691 5.9% 0.0% 5.2% 0.7% 0.0%
Africa Central Sahel Region 461 23.0% 0.0% 23.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Africa Western Africa 123 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Africa Eastern Africa 442 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Africa Southern Africa 105 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Europe Western Europeans 465 57.8% 0.0% 0.0% 57.8% 0.0%
Europe North-west Europeans 43 55.8% 0.0% 0.0% 55.8% 0.0%
Europe Central Europeans 77 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% 42.9% 0.0%
Europe North Eastern Europeans 74 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0%
Europe Russians 60 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0%
Europe Eastern Europeans 149 20.8% 0.0% 0.0% 20.8% 0.0%
Europe South-east Europeans 510 13.1% 0.0% 0.2% 12.9% 0.0%
Asia West Asians 328 5.8% 0.0% 0.3% 5.5% 0.0%
Asia South Asians 288 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 3.1%
Asia South-east Asians 10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Asia North-east Asians 30 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Asia East Asians 156 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0%
Total 5326

R1b (R-L278)

[edit]

R-L278 among modern men falls into the R-L754 and R-PH155 subclades, though it is possible some very rare R-L278* may exist as not all examples have been tested for both branches. Examples may also exist in ancient DNA, though due to poor quality it is often impossible to tell whether or not the ancients carried the mutations that define subclades.

Some examples described in older articles, for example two found in Turkey,[34] are now thought to be mostly in the more recently discovered sub-clade R1b1b (R-V88). Most examples of R1b therefore fall into subclades R1b1b (R-V88) or R1b1a (R-P297). Cruciani et al. in the large 2010 study found 3 cases amongst 1173 Italians, 1 out of 328 West Asians and 1 out of 156 East Asians.[44] Varzari found 3 cases in Ukraine, in a study of 322 people from the Dniester–Carpathian Mountains region, who were P25 positive, but M269 negative.[45] Cases from older studies are mainly from Africa, the Middle East or Mediterranean, and are discussed below as probable cases of R1b1b (R-V88).

R1b1 (R-L754)

[edit]

R-L754 contains the vast majority of R1b. The only known example of R-L754* (xL389, V88) is also the earliest known individual to carry R1b: "Villabruna 1", who lived circa 14,000 years BP (north east Italy). Villabruna 1 belonged to the Epigravettian culture.

R1b1a (R-L389)

[edit]

R-L389, also known as R1b1a (L388/PF6468, L389/PF6531), contains the very common subclade R-P297 and the rare subclade R-V1636. It is unknown whether all previously reported R-L389* (xP297) belong to R-V1636 or not.

R1b1a1 (R-P297)

[edit]

The SNP marker P297 was recognised in 2008 as ancestral to the significant subclades M73 and M269, combining them into one cluster.[7] This had been given the phylogenetic name R1b1a1a (and, previously, R1b1a).

A majority of Eurasian R1b falls within this subclade, representing a very large modern population. Although P297 itself has not yet been much tested for, the same population has been relatively well studied in terms of other markers. Therefore, the branching within this clade can be explained in relatively high detail below.

R1b1a1a (R-M73)

[edit]

R-M73, also known as R1b1a1a, is a Y-chromosome haplogroup that is a subclade of the broader R1b lineage. This haplogroup is defined by the M73 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutation. The two largest subclades are R-M478 and R-BY15590.

R-M73 is primarily found in populations across Central Asia, parts of Siberia, the Caucasus region, and to a lesser extent in the Middle East and South Asia. It is particularly prevalent among certain indigenous populations of the Altai region in Siberia.[46][47][41]

R1b (R-73) has been found in 35.3 % of Eushta sub-group of Siberian Tatars.[48]

Malyarchuk et al. (2011) found R-M73 in 13.2% (5/38) of Shors, 11.4% (5/44) of Teleuts, 3.3% (2/60) of Kalmyks, 3.1% (2/64) of Khakassians, 1.9% (2/108) of Tuvinians, and 1.1% (1/89) of Altaians.[46] The Kalmyks, Tuvinians, and Altaian belong to a Y-STR cluster marked by DYS390=19, DYS389=14-16 (or 14–15 in the case of the Altaian individual), and DYS385=13-13.

Dulik et al. (2012) found R-M73 in 35.3% (6/17) of a sample of the Kumandin of the Altai Republic in Russia.[49] Three of these six Kumandins share an identical 15-loci Y-STR haplotype, and another two differ only at the DYS458 locus, having DYS458=18 instead of DYS458=17. This pair of Kumandin R-M73 haplotypes resembles the haplotypes of two Kalmyks, two Tuvinians, and one Altaian whose Y-DNA has been analyzed by Malyarchuk et al. (2011). The remaining R-M73 Kumandin has a Y-STR haplotype that is starkly different from the haplotypes of the other R-M73 Kumandins, resembling instead the haplotypes of five Shors, five Teleuts, and two Khakassians.[46]

While early research into R-M73 claimed that it was significantly represented among the Hazara of Afghanistan and the Bashkirs of the Ural Mountains, this has apparently been overturned. For example, supporting material from a 2010 study by Behar et al. suggested that Sengupta et al. (2006) might have misidentified Hazara individuals, who instead belonged to "PQR2" as opposed to "R(xR1a)."[50][41][51] However, the assignment of these Hazaras' Y-DNA to the "PQR2" category by Behar et al. (2010) is probably ascribable to the habit that was popular for a while of labeling R-M269 as "R1b" or "R(xR1a)," with any members of R-M343 (xM269) being placed in a polyphyletic, catch-all "R*" or "P" category. Myres et al. (2011), Di Cristofaro et al. (2013), and Lippold et al. (2014) all agree that the Y-DNA of 32% (8/25) of the HGDP sample of Pakistani Hazara should belong to haplogroup R-M478/M73.[41][52][53] Likewise, most Bashkir males have been found to belong to U-152 (R1b1a1a2a1a2b) and some, mostly from southeastern Bashkortostan, belonged to Haplogroup Q-M25 (Q1a1b) rather than R1b; contra this, Myres et al. (2011) found a high frequency of R-M73 among their sample of Bashkirs from southeast Bashkortostan (77/329 = 23.4% R1b-M73), in agreement with the earlier study of Bashkirs.[41] Besides the high frequency of R-M73 in southeastern Bashkirs, Myres et al. also reported finding R-M73 in the following samples: 10.3% (14/136) of Balkars from the northwest Caucasus, 9.4% (8/85) of the HGDP samples from northern Pakistan (these are the aforementioned Pakistani Hazaras), 5.8% (4/69) of Karachays from the northwest Caucasus, 2.6% (1/39) of Tatars from Bashkortostan, 1.9% (1/54) of Bashkirs from southwest Bashkortostan, 1.5% (1/67) of Megrels from the south Caucasus, 1.4% (1/70) of Bashkirs from north Bashkortostan, 1.3% (1/80) of Tatars from Kazan, 1.1% (1/89) of a sample from Cappadocia, Turkey, 0.7% (1/141) of Kabardians from the northwest Caucasus, 0.6% (3/522) of a pool of samples from Turkey, and 0.38% (1/263) of Russians from Central Russia.[41]

Besides the aforementioned Pakistani Hazaras, Di Cristofaro et al. (2013) found R-M478/M73 in 11.1% (2/18) of Mongols from central Mongolia, 5.0% (1/20) of Kyrgyz from southwest Kyrgyzstan, 4.3% (1/23) of Mongols from southeast Mongolia, 4.3% (4/94) of Uzbeks from Jawzjan, Afghanistan, 3.7% (1/27) of Iranians from Gilan, 2.5% (1/40) of Kyrgyz from central Kyrgyzstan, 2.1% (2/97) of Mongols from northwest Mongolia, and 1.4% (1/74) of Turkmens from Jawzjan, Afghanistan.[52] The Mongols as well as the individual from southwest Kyrgyzstan, the individual from Gilan, and one of the Uzbeks from Jawzjan belong to the same Y-STR haplotype cluster as five of six Kumandin members of R-M73 studied by Dulik et al. (2012). This cluster's most distinctive Y-STR value is DYS390=19.[41]

Karafet et al. (2018) found R-M73 in 37.5% (15/40) of a sample of Teleuts from Bekovo, Kemerovo oblast, 4.5% (3/66) of a sample of Uyghurs from Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, 3.4% (1/29) of a sample of Kazakhs from Kazakhstan, 2.3% (3/129) of a sample of Selkups, 2.3% (1/44) of a sample of Turkmens from Turkmenistan, and 0.7% (1/136) of a sample of Iranians from Iran.[54] Four of these individuals (one of the Teleuts, one of the Uyghurs, the Kazakh, and the Iranian) appear to belong to the aforementioned cluster marked by DYS390=19 (the Kumandin-Mongol R-M73 cluster); the Teleut and the Uyghur also share the modal values at the DYS385 and the DYS389 loci. The Iranian differs from the modal for this cluster by having 13-16 (or 13–29) at DYS389 instead of 14-16 (or 14–30). The Kazakh differs from the modal by having 13–14 at DYS385 instead of 13-13. The other fourteen Teleuts and the three Selkups appear to belong to the Teleut-Shor-Khakassian R-M73 cluster from the data set of Malyarchuk et al. (2011); this cluster has the modal values of DYS390=22 (but 21 in the case of two Teleuts and one Khakassian), DYS385=13-16, and DYS389=13-17 (or 13–30, but 14–31 in the case of one Selkup).

A Kazakhstani paper published in 2017 found haplogroup R1b-M478 Y-DNA in 3.17% (41/1294) of a sample of Kazakhs from Kazakhstan, with this haplogroup being observed with greater than average frequency among members of the Qypshaq (12/29 = 41.4%), Ysty (6/57 = 10.5%), Qongyrat (8/95 = 8.4%), Oshaqty (2/29 = 6.9%), Kerey (1/28 = 3.6%), and Jetyru (3/86 = 3.5%) tribes.[55] A Chinese paper published in 2018 found haplogroup R1b-M478 Y-DNA in 9.2% (7/76) of a sample of Dolan Uyghurs from Horiqol township, Awat County, Xinjiang.[56]

R1b1a1b (R-M269)

[edit]
Main articles: Haplogroup R-M269 and Genetic history of Europe

R-M269, or R1b1a1b (as of 2018) amongst other names,[57] is now the most common Y-DNA lineage in European males. It is carried by an estimated 110 million males in Europe.[58]

Projected spatial frequency distribution within Europe of haplogroup R-M269.[58]

R-M269 has received significant scientific and popular interest due to its possible connection to the Indo-European expansion in Europe. Specifically the R-Z2103 subclade has been found to be prevalent in ancient DNA associated with the Yamna culture.[2] All seven individuals in one were determined to belong to the R1b-M269 subclade.[2]

Older research, published before researchers could study the DNA of ancient remains, proposed that R-M269 likely originated in Western Asia and was present in Europe by the Neolithic period.[36][41][59][60] But results based on actual ancient DNA noticed that there was a dearth of R-M269 in Europe before the Bronze Age,[2] and the distribution of subclades within Europe is substantially due to the various migrations of the Bronze and Iron Age. Likewise, the oldest samples classified as belonging to R-M269, have been found in Eastern Europe and Pontic-Caspian steppe, not Western Asia. Western European populations are divided between the R-P312/S116 and R-U106/S21 subclades of R-M412 (R-L51).

Distribution of R-M269 in Europe increases in frequency from east to west. It peaks at the national level in Wales at a rate of 92%, at 82% in Ireland, 70% in Scotland, 68% in Spain, 60% in France (76% in Normandy), about 60% in Portugal,[41] 50% in Germany, 50% in the Netherlands, 47% in Italy,[61] 45% in Eastern England and 42% in Iceland. R-M269 reaches levels as high as 95% in parts of Ireland. It has also been found at lower frequencies throughout central Eurasia,[62] but with relatively high frequency among the Bashkirs of the Perm region (84.0%).[63] This marker is present in China and India at frequencies of less than one percent. In North Africa and adjoining islands, while R-V88 (R1b1b) is more strongly represented, R-M269 appears to have been present since antiquity. R-M269 has been found, for instance, at a rate of ~44% among remains dating from the 11th to 13th centuries at Punta Azul, in the Canary Islands. These remains have been linked to the Bimbache (or Bimape), a subgroup of the Guanche.[64] In living males, it peaks in parts of North Africa, especially Algeria, at a rate of 10%.[65] In Sub-Saharan Africa, R-M269 appears to peak in Namibia, at a rate of 8% among Herero males.[66] In western Asia, R-M269 has been reported in 40% of Armenian males and over 35% in Turkmen males.[67][68] (The table below lists in more detail the frequencies of M269 in regions in Asia, Europe, and Africa.)

Apart from basal R-M269* which has not diverged, there are (as of 2017) two primary branches of R-M269:

  • R-L23 (R1b1a1b1; L23/PF6534/S141) and
  • R-PF7558 (R1b1a1b2; PF7558/PF7562.)

R-L23 (Z2105/Z2103; a.k.a. R1b1a1b1) has been reported among the peoples of the Idel-Ural (by Trofimova et al. 2015): 21 out of 58 (36.2%) of Burzyansky District Bashkirs, 11 out of 52 (21.2%) of Udmurts, 4 out of 50 (8%) of Komi, 4 out of 59 (6.8%) of Mordvins, 2 out of 53 (3.8%) of Besermyan and 1 out of 43 (2.3%) of Chuvash were R1b-L23.[69]

Subclades within the paragroup R-M269(xL23) – that is, R-M269* and/or R-PF7558 – appear to be found at their highest frequency in the central Balkans, especially Kosovo with 7.9%, North Macedonia 5.1% and Serbia 4.4%.[41] Unlike most other areas with significant percentages of R-L23, Kosovo, Poland and the Bashkirs of south-east Bashkortostan are notable in having a high percentage of R-L23 (xM412) – at rates of 11.4% (Kosovo), 2.4% (Poland) and 2.4% south-east Bashkortostan.[41] (This Bashkir population is also notable for its high level of R-M73 (R1b1a1a1), at 23.4%.[41]) Five individuals out of 110 tested in the Ararat Valley of Armenia belonged to R-M269(xL23) and 36 to R-L23*, with none belonging to known subclades of L23.[70]

In 2009, DNA extracted from the femur bones of 6 skeletons in an early-medieval burial place in Ergolding (Bavaria, Germany) dated to around AD 670 yielded the following results: 4 were found to be haplogroup R1b with the closest matches in modern populations of Germany, Ireland and the USA while 2 were in Haplogroup G2a.[71]

The following gives a summary of most of the studies which specifically tested for M269, showing its distribution (as a percentage of total population) in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia as far as China and Nepal.

The phylogeny of R-M269 according to ISOGG 2017:

M269/PF6517

R-M269* (R1b1a1b*)

L23/PF6534/S141

R-L23* (R1b1a1b1*)

L51/M412/PF6536/S167

R-L51*/R-M412* (R1b1a1b1a*)

L151/PF6542

R-L151* (R1b1a1b1a1a*)

M405/U106/S21

R-U106/R-M405/R-S21 (R1b1a1b1a1a1)

P312/PF6547/S116

R-P312 (R1b1a1b1a1a2)

AM01876/S1194

R-S1194 (R1b1a1b1a1a3)

A8051

R-A8051 (R1b1a1b1a1a4)

PF7589/Z2118

R-PF7589 (R1b1a1b1a2)

CTS1078/Z2103

R-Z2103 (R1b1a1b1b)

PF7558

R-PF7558 (R1b1a1b2)

R1b1a2 (R-V88)

[edit]

R1b1a2 is defined by the presence of SNP marker V88, the discovery of which was announced in 2010 by Cruciani et al.[44] Apart from individuals in southern Europe and Western Asia, the majority of R-V88 was found in the Sahel, especially among populations speaking Afroasiatic languages of the Chadic branch.

Based on a detailed phylogenic analysis, D'Atanasio et al. (2018) proposed that R1b-V88 originated in Europe about 12,000 years ago and crossed to North Africa between 8000 and 7000 years ago, during the 'Green Sahara' period. R1b-V1589, the main subclade within R1b-V88, underwent a further expansion around 5500 years ago, likely in the Lake Chad Basin region, from which some lines recrossed the Sahara to North Africa.[72]

Marcus et al. (2020) provide strong evidence for this proposed model of North to South trans-Saharan movement: The earliest basal R1b-V88 haplogroups are found in several Eastern European Hunter Gatherers close to 11,000 years ago. The haplogroup then seemingly spread with the expansion of Neolithic farmers, who established agriculture in the Western Mediterranean by around 7500 BP. R1b-V88 haplogroups were identified in ancient Neolithic individuals in Germany, central Italy, Iberia, and, at a particularly high frequency, in Sardinia. A part of the branch leading to present-day African haplogroups (V2197) was already derived in Neolithic European individuals from Spain and Sardinia, providing further support for a North to South trans-Saharan movement.[73][74][75] European autosomal ancestry, mtDNA haplogroups, and lactase persistence alleles have also been identified in African populations that carry R1b-V88 at a high frequency, such as the Fulani and Toubou.[76][77][74][78] The presence of European Neolithic farmers in Africa is further attested by samples from Morocco dating from c. 5400 BC onwards.[79][80]

Studies in 2005–08 reported "R1b*" at high levels in Jordan, Egypt and Sudan.[81][66][82][note 1] Subsequent research by Myres et al. (2011) indicates that the samples concerned most likely belong to the subclade R-V88. According to Myres et al. (2011), this may be explained by a back-migration from Asia into Africa by R1b-carrying people.[41][note 2]

Contrary to other studies, Shriner & Rotimi (2018) associated the introduction of R1b into Chad with the more recent movements of Baggara Arabs.[83]

Distribution of R1b in Africa
Region Population Country Language Sample
size 		Total
% 		R1b1a2
(R-V88) 		R1b1a1b
(R-M269) 		R1b1b*
(R-V88*) 		R1b1b2a2a1
(R-V69)
N Africa Composite Morocco AA 338 0.0% 0.3% 0.6% 0.3% 0.0%
N Africa Mozabite Berbers Algeria AA/Berber 67 3.0% 3.0% 0.0% 3.0% 0.0%
N Africa Northern Egyptians Egypt AA/Semitic 49 6.1% 4.1% 2.0% 4.1% 0.0%
N Africa Berbers from Siwa Egypt AA/Berber 93 28.0% 26.9% 1.1% 23.7% 3.2%
N Africa Baharia Egypt AA/Semitic 41 7.3% 4.9% 2.4% 0.0% 4.9%
N Africa Gurna Oasis Egypt AA/Semitic 34 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
N Africa Southern Egyptians Egypt AA/Semitic 69 5.8% 5.8% 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%
C Africa Songhai Niger NS/Songhai 10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
C Africa Fulbe Niger NC/Atlantic 7 14.3% 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0%
C Africa Tuareg Niger AA/Berber 22 4.5% 4.5% 0.0% 4.5% 0.0%
C Africa Ngambai Chad NS/Sudanic 11 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0%
C Africa Hausa Nigeria (North) AA/Chadic 10 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0%
C Africa Fulbe Nigeria (North) NC/Atlantic 32 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
C Africa Yoruba Nigeria (South) NC/Defoid 21 4.8% 4.8% 0.0% 4.8% 0.0%
C Africa Ouldeme Cameroon (Nth) AA/Chadic 22 95.5% 95.5% 0.0% 95.5% 0.0%
C Africa Mada Cameroon (Nth) AA/Chadic 17 82.4% 82.4% 0.0% 76.5% 5.9%
C Africa Mafa Cameroon (Nth) AA/Chadic 8 87.5% 87.5% 0.0% 25.0% 62.5%
C Africa Guiziga Cameroon (Nth) AA/Chadic 9 77.8% 77.8% 0.0% 22.2% 55.6%
C Africa Daba Cameroon (Nth) AA/Chadic 19 42.1% 42.1% 0.0% 36.8% 5.3%
C Africa Guidar Cameroon (Nth) AA/Chadic 9 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 22.2% 44.4%
C Africa Massa Cameroon (Nth) AA/Chadic 7 28.6% 28.6% 0.0% 14.3% 14.3%
C Africa Other Chadic Cameroon (Nth) AA/Chadic 4 75.0% 75.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0%
C Africa Shuwa Arabs Cameroon (Nth) AA/Semitic 5 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0%
C Africa Kanuri Cameroon (Nth) NS/Saharan 7 14.3% 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0%
C Africa Fulbe Cameroon (Nth) NC/Atlantic 18 11.1% 11.1% 0.0% 5.6% 5.6%
C Africa Moundang Cameroon (Nth) NC/Adamawa 21 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 14.3% 52.4%
C Africa Fali Cameroon (Nth) NC/Adamawa 48 20.8% 20.8% 0.0% 10.4% 10.4%
C Africa Tali Cameroon (Nth) NC/Adamawa 22 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 4.5% 4.5%
C Africa Mboum Cameroon (Nth) NC/Adamawa 9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
C Africa Composite Cameroon (Sth) NC/Bantu 90 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0%
C Africa Biaka Pygmies CAR NC/Bantu 33 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
W Africa Composite — 123 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
E Africa Composite — 442 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
S Africa Composite — 105 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 1822
V88
undefined

R-V88* (R1b1a2)

M18

R-M18 (R1b1b1)

V35

R-V35 (R1b1b2a1)

V69

R-V69 (R1b1b2a2a1)

Two branches of R-V88, R-M18 and R-V35, are found almost exclusively on the island of Sardinia.

As can be seen in the above data table, R-V88 is found in northern Cameroon in west central Africa at a very high frequency, where it is considered to be caused by a pre-Islamic movement of people from Eurasia.[66][84]

R1b1b1 (R-M18)

[edit]

R1b1b1 is a sub-clade of R-V88, which is defined by the presence of SNP marker M18.[7] It has been found only at low frequencies in samples from Sardinia[62][85] and Lebanon.[86]

R1b2 (R-PH155)

[edit]

R1b2 is extremely rare and defined by the presence of PH155.[36] Living males carrying subclades of R-PH155 have been found in Bahrain, Bhutan, Ladakh, Tajikistan, Turkey, Xinjiang, and Yunnan. ISOGG (2022) cites two primary branches: R-M335 (R1b2a) and R-PH200 (R1b2b).

The defining SNP of R1b2a, M335, was first documented in 2004, when an example was discovered in Turkey, though it was classified at that time as R1b4.[34] Other examples of R-M335 have been reported in a sample of Hui from Yunnan, China[87] and in a sample of people from Ladakh, India.[88]

Notable People

[edit]

Spytihněv I, Duke of Bohemia, DNA testing on his remains suggests that his Y-haplogroup was R1b.[89]

The House of Bourbon, which has ruled as kings in France, Spain, and other European countries, have the R1b1b haplogroup.[90]

DNA testing on several mummies from the 18th dynasty of Egypt found haplogroup R1b. The mummy of Tutankhamun had the Y-haplogroup R1b1a2 and the mtDNA haplogroup K. He inherited this Y-haplogroup from his father, the KV55 mummy believed by many to be Akhenaten, and his grandfather, Amenhotep III, whose mummy was found entombed at KV35 with numerous relatives.[91][92]

Health

[edit]

Studies have shown that haplogroup R1b could have a protective effect on the immune system.[93] However, later studies have confirmed that the Y-chromosome has a very limited effect on coronary artery disease (CAD), for example, and that the previously purported link between Y-chromosome haplogroups and health is far from established scientifically.[94]

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Haplogroup R1b of Y-DNA.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Haplogroup R1b

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Haplogroup R1b is a prominent , defined by the (SNP) M343, and it represents one of the most common paternal lineages worldwide, particularly in where it predominates. This haplogroup traces its origins to , with phylogenetic evidence from its branches supporting an initial diversification there before major expansions into . Characterized by high frequencies exceeding 70% in regions like the , Iberia, and parts of , R1b serves as a key marker for studying ancient population movements, including refugia in and later and migrations. The primary subclade, R1b-M269, encompasses the vast majority of R1b lineages in Europe and is estimated to have a time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of approximately 5,000 to 7,000 years ago, aligning with a significant founder effect during the Holocene era in Central and Western Europe. This subclade further branches into notable groups such as R1b-DF27, which shows elevated prevalence in the Iberian Peninsula and is linked to post-Paleolithic demographic expansions; R1b-U152, common in Alpine and Italic populations; and R1b-P312, a broad ancestor to many Western European variants including those associated with Celtic and Italic-speaking groups. These subdivisions highlight R1b's role in genetic diversity, with lower frequencies observed in Southwest Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, reflecting ancient dispersals and limited gene flow. Beyond Europe, R1b exhibits sporadic presence in , the , and , often through distinct subclades like R1b-V88, which is found among Chadic-speaking populations and suggests early out-of-Eurasia migrations around 5,000–7,000 years ago. Genetic studies underscore R1b's utility in reconstructing human history, from survivals to Indo-European expansions, while ongoing research refines its phylogenetic tree using next-generation sequencing to resolve finer-scale migrations and admixture events.

Overview and Fundamentals

Definition and Genetic Characteristics

Haplogroup R1b is a major Y-chromosomal DNA defined by the (SNP) M343, commonly denoted as R-M343. It represents a primary of R (defined by R-M207), which itself falls within the broader macrohaplogroup K (K-M9) in the Y-chromosome phylogeny. As a Y-DNA , R1b is transmitted exclusively from father to son via the non-recombining region of the Y chromosome, enabling the tracing of direct patrilineal ancestry over generations without . The genetic characteristics of R1b include its estimated time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of approximately 20,400 years before present, with formation dated to around 22,800 years ago, based on calibrated mutation rates from full Y-chromosome sequencing. These age estimates position R1b's origin during the period, likely in , and it exhibits high prevalence in Western Eurasian populations, where it constitutes a dominant paternal lineage. Molecularly, R1b is characterized by a series of defining SNPs, including upstream markers such as L278 (equivalent to P231 in some nomenclatures), which help delineate its position relative to other branches. Within the R1 subclade (R1-P231), R1b is distinguished from its sister haplogroup (R-M420), encompassing the majority of R1 diversity while R1a predominates in Eastern . This bifurcation reflects ancient divergences in male-lineage expansions, with R1b's structure supporting its role in for reconstructing paternal histories. Subclade diversity within R1b further refines these traces, though detailed branching is addressed elsewhere.

Discovery, Nomenclature, and Research History

Haplogroup R1b was initially identified in the through pioneering studies on Y-chromosome binary polymorphisms, which revealed distinct phylogenetic branches among paternal lineages. The was formally described in 2001, with the (SNP) M343 established as its defining marker, based on analysis of global Y-chromosome samples that highlighted R1b's prevalence in Eurasian populations. Early nomenclature for R1b varied across research groups; it was initially labeled as Eu18 in European-focused studies and Hg1 in broader phylogenetic surveys before standardization efforts. The Y Chromosome Consortium (YCC) introduced a unified system in 2002, designating it as R1b (R-M343) within the hierarchical R tree, which emphasized SNP-based naming to reflect evolutionary relationships. Subsequent updates in the 2010s, driven by commercial testing platforms like Family Tree DNA's (launched in 2013), enabled the identification of numerous novel subclades through next-generation sequencing (NGS), shifting from short (STR) markers to high-resolution SNP arrays and refining the nomenclature under standards from the International Society of Genetic Genealogy (ISOGG) and YFull. Key research milestones in the 2000s included large-scale population genetics surveys that mapped R1b's distribution and inferred a Holocene founder effect in Central and Western Europe, analyzing over 2,000 samples to link it to post-glacial expansions. The 2010s marked an ancient DNA (aDNA) revolution, with studies like Haak et al. (2015) demonstrating R1b's association with Yamnaya steppe migrations around 3000 BCE, based on genomic data from 69 ancient Europeans that supported Indo-European language dispersal. In the 2020s, advancements continued with YFull's tree version 13.06 (updated September 2025), incorporating SNP calls from recent aDNA studies, such as those from Iron Age Poland revealing expanded R1b subclades like R-Z17913, and from Portugal's 5,000-year genomic dataset showing R1b dominance in Bronze Age contexts. Technological progress has transformed R1b research, evolving from STR-based haplotyping in the early 2000s—which relied on limited markers for broad classification—to NGS and whole-genome sequencing by the , allowing precise resolution and ancient sample recovery. initiatives, notably the launched in 2005, contributed by aggregating global Y-chromosome data from over 500,000 participants, enhancing R1b phylogeographic models through crowdsourced SNP validation.

Phylogenetic Structure

External Phylogeny

Haplogroup R1b occupies a specific position within the human Y-chromosome phylogenetic tree as a descendant of the broader haplogroup R (defined by the SNP M207), which traces its lineage upstream through P (M45), K2b (P331), K2 (M526), and ultimately K (M9). This path distinguishes R from other major K-derived lineages, such as J and T (which branch directly under LT) or E (which diverges earlier under the DE ancestor). The time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) for haplogroup R is estimated at approximately 22,800 years before present, with its origin likely in Central or South Asia based on genetic diversity patterns and ancient DNA correlations. Within R, the primary subdivision is R1 (M173, also phylogenetically equivalent to P224 in early nomenclature), which further bifurcates into sister clades R1a (M420) and R1b (M343). R1a predominates in and , while R1b is more characteristic of Western Eurasia; basal paragroup R* (M207* but lacking M173) remains exceedingly rare globally and is primarily observed in Asian populations. In the broader context of Y-chromosome diversity, R1b exemplifies the expansion of lineages that dominate Western Eurasian paternal ancestries, reaching frequencies over 70% in parts of , in stark contrast to the prevalence of E lineages in and O in . Recent advancements in 2025, including refined Y-chromosomal reference sequences and analyses addressing branch length variations, have updated TMRCA estimates for and its upstream branches by incorporating high-coverage ancient and modern genomes, enhancing resolution of early post-Last Glacial Maximum diversifications.

Internal Subclades and Diversity

Haplogroup R1b is primarily defined by the M343 mutation and branches into several major internal clades, with R1b1 (L754) representing the dominant lineage, estimated to have a time to (TMRCA) of approximately 17,100 years ago based on YFull phylogenetic analysis. This clade encompasses most modern R1b diversity and further divides into R1b1a (L389/P297), with a TMRCA around 15,000 years ago, which includes key subclades such as M73 (prevalent in , TMRCA ~8,400 years ago), M269 (dominant in , TMRCA ~6,500 years ago), and V88 (associated with African populations, TMRCA ~7,000 years ago). Basal paragroups like R1b* (non-derived L754) and the rare R1b2 (PH155) constitute minor fractions of observed R1b lineages, often identified in isolated ancient or modern samples. Within R1b, the M269 accounts for over 95% of all instances, exhibiting a star-like phylogenetic structure indicative of a rapid radiation following the , as evidenced by high levels of downstream SNP diversity and low heterozygosity in basal branches due to founder effects. Major downstream branches of M269 include L23 (further splitting into Z2103 in eastern distributions and L51 in western ones), with L51 leading to sister clades P312 (further including DF27 (Iberian-linked, TMRCA ~4,500 years ago) and L21 (Celtic-insular, TMRCA ~4,200 years ago)) and U106 (Germanic-associated, TMRCA ~4,800 years ago); these estimates derive from rho statistic and Bayesian BEAST methods applied to whole Y-chromosome sequences. The overall diversity within M269 reflects rapid expansions post-, with heterozygosity levels varying by —higher in peripheral branches due to serial founder effects and lower in core radiations—highlighting bottlenecks followed by demographic booms. Recent phylogenetic updates as of 2025 have refined the internal structure, incorporating new SNPs from population studies; for instance, a analysis identified F1343 as a prevalent sublineage under DF27, expanding the Iberian branch with a TMRCA estimated at around 3,000 years ago using high-resolution . Similarly, deep Y-chromosome sequencing in Polish samples revealed Y14300 as a novel subclade under Z2103, with a TMRCA of approximately 3,500 years ago, underscoring ongoing refinements in eastern R1b lineages. The of R1b, as maintained by ISOGG and YFull in , illustrates a hierarchical structure with R1b1 as the , branching into diverse subclades under M269 that encompass over 1,000 unique SNPs, reflecting extensive accumulation and subclade proliferation since the . This tree employs a time-calibrated model integrating and modern sequences, emphasizing the role of rapid radiations in generating the observed diversity patterns.

Origins and Dispersal

Ancient Origins

Haplogroup R1b emerged during the in , with the earliest evidence coming from the Villabruna individual in , dated to approximately 14,000 years ago. This sample belongs to basal R1b-L754 and is associated with the Villabruna genetic cluster, which represents a major ancestry component in Western Hunter-Gatherers (WHG) across during the Late . Phylogenetic estimates place the time to (TMRCA) for R1b around 20,400 years ago, consistent with its appearance in post-Last Glacial Maximum populations in and western , with no evidence of R1b prior to the LGM (~26,500–19,000 years ago) outside . The diversification of R1b subclades occurred among Epipaleolithic and hunter-gatherer populations, including the split of basal branches such as M73 and V88 from the lineage leading to M269. R1b-V88, for example, has been identified in ancient Balkan hunter-gatherers and individuals, suggesting early spread within European foraging and farming groups before its later migration southward. Low genetic diversity in these basal branches indicates significant bottlenecks and founder effects, likely driven by small population sizes during the repopulation of after the LGM. R1b-M269, the dominant subclade in modern , emerged around 6,500–7,000 years ago, possibly in the Pontic-Caspian steppe region among pre-Neolithic groups. Recent analyses link its Z2103 subclade to pre-Yamnaya populations in the , where it arose from a mixture of (CHG) and Eastern Hunter-Gatherer (EHG) ancestry before expanding with pastoralist cultures. This early diversification underscores R1b's role in the genetic landscape of late prehistoric , shaped by hunter-gatherer mobility and environmental pressures.

Migration Patterns and Historical Dispersal

The primary expansion of R1b-M269 occurred during the Early , linked to the Yamnaya pastoralist culture's westward migration from the Pontic-Caspian around 5,000 to 4,000 years ago, introducing steppe ancestry and R1b lineages into via the . In this context, the Z2103 predominated in eastern and northern extensions of Corded Ware, reflecting continuity with Yamnaya sources, while the L51 branch emerged prominently in western regions. This dispersal accelerated with the Bell Beaker phenomenon around 4,500 years ago, where R1b-L51 males, carrying up to 90% steppe-related ancestry, rapidly replaced local lineages across Iberia, Britain, and Central Europe, suggesting male-biased migration and cultural diffusion. During the and , R1b s continued to spread through Celtic and Germanic population movements, with L21 associating closely with Celtic expansions from the and La Tène cultures into and the , and U106 linking to Proto-Germanic groups in northern and central regions. The Roman Empire's era (circa 2,200 years ago) facilitated further admixture, as evidenced by diverse R1b lineages in imperial populations, including contributions from eastern recruits and local integrations that enhanced R1b diversity in and provinces like Britain. Concurrently, the V88 of R1b dispersed southward to around 5,000 years ago, likely carried by pastoralist groups migrating across the , as indicated by its high frequency among Chadic-speaking peoples and estimated TMRCA aligning with herding expansions. In , R1b-L21 featured in raids and settlements (circa 1,100 years ago), contributing to its elevated presence in , , and through Norse and Danish expansions, while post-1066 CE further disseminated L21-derived lineages into and via mixed Frankish-Scandinavian elites. The also incorporated R1b through European admixture, with medieval Ashkenazi samples showing R1b-M269 at low but detectable frequencies (around 10-15%), attributable to intermarriage during migrations from communities eastward after the . A 2025 genomic study of Iberian Roma revealed unusually high R1b frequencies (up to 40%), signaling substantial from non-Roma Iberian populations during their 15th-century arrival and subsequent admixture in and . Genetic inferences of these migrations rely on tools like ADMIXTURE for ancestry component estimation and D-statistics for detecting admixture events, which in Bell Beaker contexts reveal steppe without significant eastern Eurasian input, supporting a western steppe origin for R1b-L51. Modeling debates contrast stepwise diffusion—gradual cultural and genetic spread from regions—with leapfrog patterns of rapid, long-distance elite dominance, as qpAdm analyses favor the latter for explaining abrupt R1b frequency shifts across distant Beaker sites.

Geographical Distribution

Modern Global Distribution

Haplogroup R1b is one of the most prevalent Y-chromosome lineages worldwide, with an estimated carrier frequency reflecting its dominance in certain populations. It reaches frequencies of over 70% in parts of , particularly along the Atlantic facade, but remains below 5% in most Asian and African populations outside specific exceptions. In , R1b constitutes an average of approximately 45% of male lineages, with peaks exceeding 80% in Ireland (around 85%), the (64-80% in ), and (up to 67%). These elevated levels underscore its role as the predominant in the region. In contrast, frequencies drop to 14-20% in , such as , where R1b accounts for about 14% of Y-chromosomes, often linked to broader . Outside , R1b is rare in and at under 5%, though the V88 subclade reaches 20-95% among Chadic-speaking groups in northern and , representing a notable . The exhibit R1b frequencies influenced by post-colonial European admixture, with 10-37% observed in and Latino populations, including up to 34% in Mestizos, primarily derived from Iberian sources. , similar patterns appear among Latino groups at 10-20%, reflecting historical migrations. and much of show minimal presence, typically under 5%, with isolated minorities. Basal R1b* lineages are particularly rare in , occurring at low frequencies and highlighting limited pre-modern dispersal. Recent genetic surveys provide updated insights into localized distributions. A 2025 study of Spanish Roma populations revealed elevated R1b frequencies, attributed to admixture with Iberian non-Roma groups, marking a departure from typical South Asian Roma profiles. In , analyses confirm R1b at 14-20%, consistent with influences from steppe-related ancestries in the broader genetic makeup. The contemporary distribution of R1b has been shaped by historical factors including European colonialism, which spread lineages to the through settlement and admixture; transatlantic , contributing minor traces in African-descended populations; and ongoing migrations that introduce variants into diverse regions. These processes, combined with in high-frequency areas, maintain its uneven global pattern.

Regional and Subclade-Specific Patterns

In , haplogroup R1b exhibits marked subclade-specific distributions that align with historical population movements. The R1b-L21 subclade, associated with Celtic and Atlantic fringe populations, predominates in the , achieving frequencies of around 70% among Irish males and up to 80% in . In contrast, R1b-U106, linked to Germanic expansions, reaches 30-50% in the and , reflecting its concentration in and Scandinavian-influenced areas. Further south, R1b-DF27 prevails in Iberian contexts, comprising approximately 40% of male lineages in and up to 70% among , underscoring its role in pre-Roman and medieval population strata. Eastern and southern regions display more diverse and lower-frequency R1b patterns outside the dominant Western European clades. In Eastern Europe, R1b-Z2103, tied to Balkan and Slavic groups, occurs at 10-20% in Poland according to a 2025 analysis of Y-chromosomal lineages, often tracing to Bronze Age steppe influences. In sub-Saharan Africa, R1b-V88 dominates among Chadic-speaking populations, reaching 95% in certain groups in Cameroon and Chad, indicative of mid-Holocene trans-Saharan migrations. Centrally, R1b-M73 appears at ~2% in Tajikistan, primarily among Central Asian communities with Neolithic dispersal ties. Beyond Europe, R1b subclades reflect colonial and minority dispersals. In , R1b-L21 and R1b-U106 lineages, introduced via European settlement, form a significant portion of paternal ancestry among populations of British and Germanic descent, mirroring Atlantic and continental founder effects. Among , R1b constitutes roughly 10% of Y-chromosomes, frequently under the U106>L48 branch, suggesting medieval European admixture. A 2025 study of samples identifies R1b-DF27>F1343 as a prevalent sublineage, at 15-20%, highlighting its ubiquity in Iberian genetic profiles. These patterns correlate with Indo-European language families, where high R1b-M269 frequencies align with Western branches like Celtic and Germanic, supporting Yamnaya-related expansions from the Pontic-Caspian . For illustrative purposes, the following table summarizes key European frequencies for major R1b subclades:
RegionSubcladeApproximate Frequency (%)Source
L2170ResearchGate paper
L2180Nature paper
U10630-50Phylogeography PDF
Spain/BasqueDF2740 / 70Nature paper
Z210310-20Springer paper

Associations and Implications

Haplogroup R1b-M269, particularly its subclade Z2103, is prominently associated with the of the Pontic-Caspian during the early (circa 3300–2600 BCE), where it appears as the dominant Y-chromosome lineage among pastoralist herders. This genetic signature aligns with the archaeological evidence of mobile herding economies and burials, supporting models of Indo-European language origins tied to these populations. A 2025 study by Lazaridis et al. further elucidates this connection, analyzing from over 400 Eneolithic individuals to demonstrate that Yamnaya formation involved admixture of local foragers with incoming Caucasus hunter-gatherers, with R1b-Z2103 lineages emerging as key markers of this proto-Indo-European genetic profile in herder communities. In , the (circa 2800–1800 BCE) shows strong links to R1b-M269, specifically the P312 subclade, which replaced earlier lineages in large-scale population movements across , , and Britain. Ancient genomic data from sites reveal near-universal R1b-P312 among males, correlating with the rapid spread of distinctive , traditions, and metallurgical innovations that transformed local societies from the to the . This genetic shift underscores the role of R1b in facilitating the cultural and demographic expansions of networks. From the to the , R1b-V88 appears in ancient African pastoralist contexts, particularly among groups in the Central and Basin, dating to mid-Holocene migrations (circa 7000–5000 BCE). This subclade is interpreted as a paternal marker of proto-Chadic speakers, part of broader Afro-Asiatic expansions involving herding and linguistic diversification across the . In , R1b lineages, including early M269 branches, emerge in Megalithic cultures of Iberia and during the (circa 3500–2500 BCE), as evidenced by genomic analyses showing admixture between local farmers and incoming steppe-related ancestry in megalithic tomb builders. By the , these patterns persist in Iberian oppida and French oppida settlements, where R1b contributes to the genetic substrate of pre-Roman populations. Historical populations in exhibit subclade-specific associations with R1b, reflecting ethnolinguistic identities. The Celtic sphere, particularly , is linked to R1b-L21, which dominates from Britain and (circa 800 BCE–400 CE), aligning with La Tène cultural artifacts and hillforts. Germanic groups correlate with R1b-U106, prevalent in ancient samples from during the (circa 300–700 CE), corresponding to the expansion of tribal confederations and traditions. Italic populations, including pre-Roman Latins and Osco-Umbrians, show enrichment in R1b-DF27, as seen in to Republican-era burials in , tying to Villanovan and Etruscan-influenced sites. Recent Polish research from 2025 highlights ancestry components in Slavic populations, showing substantial -related ancestry modeled as approximately 71% derived from Baltic sources with Yamnaya components in early medieval Polish samples, indicating genetic continuity from incursions into Eastern European . This input, often carried by R1b lineages, manifests in the formation of Slavic tribal groups during the 6th–9th centuries CE, as traced through ancient genomes from sites like Gródek. Linguistically, R1b-M269 subclades correlate with the Indo-European dispersal, particularly Centum branches like Celtic, Germanic, and Italic, where genetic expansions from the align with phonetic conservatism in Western languages (e.g., retention of velar stops). This pattern is evident in the overlay of R1b-P312 derivatives with Centum-speaking regions from Iberia to the . An exception occurs among , who exhibit high frequencies of R1b-DF27 (up to 70%) despite speaking a non-Indo-European , suggesting language replacement or substrate persistence following Bronze Age arrivals in the .

Health and Phenotypic Associations

Studies have identified associations between Y-chromosome haplogroup R1b and increased susceptibility to certain infectious diseases, particularly . In European populations, the frequency of the R1b-S116 correlates positively with both prevalence and mortality rates, as observed in analyses of Dutch, Flemish, and broader European data from 2020, where higher R1b-S116 proportions aligned with elevated case numbers and deaths per million. This pattern persisted in subsequent studies, including a 2025 review confirming the link between R1b variants and higher mortality risk in affected regions, potentially tied to Y-chromosome influences on immune responses. Regarding cancer, evidence for R1b's role in remains inconclusive; while some s show no significant overall risk in European or African-ancestry populations, preliminary investigations suggest possible -specific vulnerabilities, though larger cohorts are needed for confirmation. Phenotypic associations with R1b are generally subtle and not uniform across the haplogroup, with stronger signals emerging in specific subclades. Population-level analyses indicate a positive between the combined of R1b-U106 and related lineages and in European countries, achieving a of r = 0.75 (p < 0.001) across 34 nations, possibly reflecting historical nutritional or genetic interactions rather than direct causation. No robust links to fertility have been established for R1b overall, though the non-recombining Y region may indirectly influence male reproductive traits through structural variations. For the V88 subclade, prevalent in African pastoralist groups like the Chadic speakers, genetic evidence points to adaptations facilitating mid-Holocene migrations and ecological plasticity in arid environments, potentially aiding survival in pastoral lifestyles via enhanced mobility or resource utilization. The non-recombining region of the Y chromosome, defining R1b, contributes to male-specific health outcomes by harboring variants that affect immune function and disease susceptibility without autosomal recombination. This region has been implicated in heightened vulnerability to inflammatory conditions, such as premature ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), where R1b acts as a risk factor in certain cohorts. In Finnish populations, where R1b co-occurs with N1a1 and I1a, recent Y-chromosome sequencing reveals sublineage variances influencing health traits like cardiovascular risk, though direct causal links require further dissection. Conducting genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for Y-haplogroups like R1b presents methodological challenges, including the haploid nature of the Y chromosome, which limits statistical power and complicates adjustment for population stratification in diverse cohorts. Despite these hurdles, high-R1b populations exhibit potential protective effects against some non-infectious conditions; for instance, R1b carriers show reduced clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease severity compared to other haplogroups.

Notable Individuals

Prominent Figures with Confirmed R1b Lineages

Several prominent historical figures have been associated with Y-DNA haplogroup R1b through direct ancient DNA analysis or genetic testing of patrilineal descendants, providing insights into ancient migrations and royal lineages. One of the most notable examples is the ancient Egyptian royal family of the 18th Dynasty, including Pharaoh Tutankhamun (reigned c. 1332–1323 BCE). Analysis of DNA extracted from royal mummies confirmed that Tutankhamun and his immediate forebears, such as his grandfather Amenhotep III, belonged to haplogroup R1b, suggesting a Western Eurasian paternal origin for this lineage around 14,000 years ago. This finding, derived from targeted sequencing of Y-chromosome markers, highlights R1b's presence in the Nile Valley during the New Kingdom period, potentially linked to earlier Bronze Age dispersals. In European history, the House of Bourbon, a dynasty that ruled France, Spain, and other realms from the 16th century onward, has been confirmed to carry R1b-U106 (a Germanic subclade) via Y-chromosome testing of living male descendants. Princes from branches including Bourbon-Parma and Orléans-Braganza shared identical haplotypes under R1b-M343, with further SNP testing pinpointing the Z381 subclade. This contradicts earlier claims based on presumed remains of and (assigned G2a), underscoring the role of non-paternity events in royal genealogies and the reliability of modern genetic genealogy over osteological identification. The legendary Irish High King Niall of the Nine Hostages (c. 4th–5th century CE), founder of the Uí Néill dynasty that dominated Gaelic Ireland for centuries, is inferred to belong to R1b-L21 > M222 based on a distinctive haplotype shared by up to 3 million modern men, particularly in northwest and . This signature was identified through analysis of over 1,000 Irish surnames associated with the dynasty, showing overrepresentation of the modal in regions tied to Niall's conquests, dated to approximately 1,500–2,000 years ago. While no from Niall himself exists, the pattern supports a from his prolific male-line descendants, corroborated by SNP confirmation in commercial databases. Verification of such lineages typically involves academic ancient DNA studies using next-generation sequencing for degraded samples or commercial platforms like FamilyTreeDNA (FTDNA) for living descendants, which employ STR and SNP testing to assign haplogroups. However, inferences for pre-modern figures carry caveats: non-paternity events (estimated at 1–2% per generation) can disrupt pedigrees, and STR-based predictions require SNP validation to avoid misassignment, as seen in the Bourbon case. Direct , while definitive, is rare due to preservation challenges and ethical restrictions on royal remains.

Genealogical and Forensic Examples

In genealogical research, testing has enabled the detailed mapping of R1b subclades within surname projects, particularly for tracing patrilineal lineages in . For instance, the R-M222 subclade, prevalent among surnames like O'Neill and associated with origins, has been used to connect modern testers to medieval septs through high-resolution SNP analysis in projects administered by FamilyTreeDNA. This approach refines STR-based matches by identifying private variants, allowing participants to distinguish branches within clans like the , as demonstrated in studies linking Y-DNA to historical Irish genealogies. The FamilyTreeDNA R1b haplotree further supports deep ancestry investigations by integrating Big Y-700 results from over 150,000 testers, creating a dynamic phylogeny with more than 20,000 R1b branches that reveal migration timelines and correlations spanning millennia. Genealogists use this resource to corroborate documentary records, such as verifying Celtic or Basque influences in Western European lines, though it relies on tester density for accuracy in underrepresented regions. In forensic applications, matching has resolved cold cases across by profiling male perpetrators, with R1b haplotypes frequently appearing in offender databases due to their high prevalence in Western populations. A seminal 1999 case marked the first use of s to link serial offenses, and subsequent analyses of north-western European profiles have shown R1b dominance in unidentified male traces from sexual assaults and homicides. For disaster victim identification in high-R1b regions like , Y-chromosome analysis complements autosomal STRs when reference samples are limited, aiding confirmation in events such as plane crashes or tsunamis by excluding non-paternal lines. Population studies leveraging R1b have illuminated founder effects and admixture in specific groups. Among Iberian Roma populations, 2025 genomic analyses revealed a high frequency of R1b (18.5% of paternal lineages), reflecting substantial from non-Roma Iberian sources since their 15th-century arrival, which distinguishes them genetically from Central European Roma. In , recent Y-chromosome sequencing from 2024 identified R1b-CTS2134 as a key (4.8% frequency), tracing Western European founder effects from medieval migrations and contributing to the nation's bottlenecked genetic structure. These findings enhance Roma by quantifying admixture and support Finnish studies on regional isolation. Despite these advances, limitations persist in both genealogical and forensic uses of R1b testing. Y-DNA kits raise concerns, as familial from one tester can inadvertently expose relatives' genetic information , prompting calls for stronger regulations on in platforms like FamilyTreeDNA. In forensics, markers offer rapid matching but suffer from higher rates compared to SNPs, reducing discriminatory power in diverse R1b populations; SNP-based approaches, while more precise for resolution, require greater DNA quantities and are less suitable for degraded samples. Ethical guidelines emphasize and anonymization to mitigate these risks.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2987365/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3039512/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5418327/
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-07710-x
  5. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-25200-7
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3312574/
  7. https://isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpR.html
  8. https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg201450
  9. https://isogg.org/wiki/Haplogroup
  10. https://www.yfull.com/tree/r1b/
  11. https://isogg.org/wiki/Haplogroup_R1b_%28Y-DNA%29
  12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11415522/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC155271/
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5048219/
  15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00439-025-02781-7
  16. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-025-03707-2
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4266736/
  18. https://www.yfull.com/tree/R/
  19. https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2010146
  20. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-024-03468-4
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396957023_Subclades_of_the_Y-chromosome_haplogroup_R1b-M269_in_Portuguese_samples_F1343_as_a_common_DF27_sublineage
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-14523-6
  23. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08531-5
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/indoeuropean-puzzle-revisited/corded-ware-complex-in-europe-in-light-of-current-archaeogenetic-and-environmental-evidence/465553463037195D74FA9148A733683D
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5973796/
  26. https://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~mcdonald/genetics/u106-geography-2015-revised.pdf
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3543766/
  28. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-12210-8
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12229683/
  30. https://repository.lincoln.ac.uk/articles/conference_contribution/Exploring_Y-DNA_haplogroup_diversity_in_the_British_Isles/29382773/1/files/55570046.pdf
  31. https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg201575
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7644898/
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40850811_Human_Y_chromosome_haplogroup_R-V88_a_paternal_genetic_record_of_early_mid_Holocene_trans-Saharan_connections_and_the_spread_of_Chadic_languages
  34. https://www.fsigeneticssup.com/article/S1875-1768%2819%2930237-9/fulltext
  35. https://academic.oup.com/book/39252/chapter/338799443
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272409122_The_Major_Y-Chromosome_Haplogroup_R1b-M269_in_West-Europe_Subdivided_by_the_Three_SNPs_S21U106_S145L21_and_S28U152_Shows_a_Clear_Pattern_of_Geographic_Differentiation
  37. https://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~mcdonald/genetics/phylogeography.pdf
  38. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=53754
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6240361/
  40. https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/R-M73/
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337741839_Jewish_men_in_the_most_common_European_Y-DNA_haplogroup_a_new_narrative_for_Jewish_R1b_The_FTDNA_Jewish_R1b_Project
  42. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm4247
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11922553/
  44. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1918034117
  45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40903570/
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7442561/
  47. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14034948251333236
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3374121/
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X16300065
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382264581_From_Lake_Baikal_to_Lake_Chad_The_Y-Chromosome_R1b-V88_Mutation_and_Ecological_Plasticity
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10381015/
  52. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41431-024-01707-7
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6737325/
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7670740/
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353306320_Maternal_and_paternal_lineages_in_King_Tutankhamun%27s_family
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3992573/
  57. https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2013211
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7412454_A_Y-Chromosome_Signature_of_Hegemony_in_Gaelic_Ireland
  59. https://www.familytreedna.com/groups/r-1b-1c-7/about/background
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7782297/
  61. https://blog.familytreedna.com/y-dna-medieval-genealogies-ui-briuin-dynasty/
  62. https://blog.familytreedna.com/classic-tree-for-y-dna/
  63. https://blog.familytreedna.com/y-dna-haplotree-growth-2024/
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9141910/
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391189039_Y-STR_Databases-Application_in_Sexual_Crimes
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5418305/
  67. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6756/1/3/14
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6616921/
  69. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-11634-6
  70. https://iapp.org/news/a/the-dna-of-privacy-and-the-privacy-of-dna
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.