Hubbry Logo
Standard Canadian EnglishStandard Canadian EnglishMain
Open search
Standard Canadian English
Community hub
Standard Canadian English
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Standard Canadian English
Standard Canadian English
Standard Canadian English
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Speech example
An example of a female speaker from Southern Ontario (Margaret Atwood).
Problems playing this file? See media help.
Speech example
An example of a male speaker from Alberta (Mark Carney).
Problems playing this file? See media help.
This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between [ ], / / and ⟨ ⟩, see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.

Standard Canadian English is the largely homogeneous variety of Canadian English that is spoken particularly across Ontario and Western Canada, as well as throughout Canada among urban middle-class speakers from English-speaking families,[1] excluding the regional dialects of Atlantic Canadian English. Canadian English has a mostly uniform phonology and much less dialectal diversity than neighbouring American English.[2] In particular, Standard Canadian English is defined by the cot–caught merger to [ɒ] ⓘ and an accompanying chain shift of vowel sounds, which is called the Canadian Shift. A subset of the dialect geographically at its central core, excluding British Columbia to the west and everything east of Montreal, has been called Inland Canadian English. It is further defined by both of the phenomena that are known as Canadian raising (which is found also in British Columbia and Ontario):[3] the production of /oʊ/[a] and /aʊ/ with back starting points in the mouth and the production of /eɪ/ with a front starting point and very little glide[4] that is almost [e] in the Canadian Prairies.[5]

Phonetics and phonology

[edit]
Based on Labov et al.; averaged F1/F2 means for speakers from Western and Central Canada. Note that /ɒ/ and /ɔ/ are indistinguishable and that /æ/ and /ɛ/ are very open.
Standard Canadian vowels
Front Central Back
lax tense lax tense lax tense
Close ɪ i u ʊ
Mid ɛ eɪ ə (ʌ) oʊ
Open æ ɒ
Diphthongs aɪ   ɔɪ   aʊ   (ʌɪ)   (ʌʊ)
  • Vowel length is a secondary phonemic feature of tense vowels in Canadian English, with the lowered variant of /ɛ/ and the tense variant of /æ/ being distinguished entirely by length for some speakers [citation needed]
  • The phonemes /oʊ/ (as in boat) and /eɪ/ (as in bait) behave as monophthongs phonologically, and are often pronounced as such, especially in the Prairie Provinces.

Back vowel fronting

[edit]

The onset of unraised /aʊ/ is usually low central [äʊ],[6] though it may be fronted before nasals. /oʊ/ usually remains backed [oʊ~o], unlike the fronted values found in the South, the Midland or California. That said, fronted pronunciations of /oʊ/ may exist for some younger speakers. In addition, some younger speakers front and lower /ʊ/.[7]

Unlike most Northern American English, /u/ is generally fronted in Canadian English. In Victoria, where the historical distinction between post-coronal /ju/ and /u/ is often maintained, the latter may be so front as to gain a [j]-like onglide.[8]

Low-back merger

[edit]
Main article: Cot-caught merger

Almost all Canadians have the cot–caught merger, which also occurs primarily in the Western United States but also often elsewhere in the country, especially recently. Few Canadians distinguish the vowels in cot and caught, which merge as [ɒ] (more common in Western and central Canada) or [ɑ] (more common in the Maritimes and eastern mainland Canada in which it can even be fronted). Speakers with the merger often fail to hear the difference when speakers without the merger, such as General American (GenAm) and Inland Northern American English, pronounce the vowels. The merger has existed in Canada for several generations.[9]

Some speakers may not exhibit the merger, especially older speakers and those living in rural areas or in the Prairies.

The standard pronunciation of /ɑr/ (as in start) is [ɑɹ], as in GenAm, or perhaps somewhat fronted as [ɑ̈ɹ]. As with Canadian raising, the advancement of the raised nucleus can be a regional indicator. A striking feature of Atlantic Canadian speech (in the Maritime Provinces and Newfoundland) is a nucleus that approaches the front region of the vowel space; it is accompanied by a strong rhoticity ranging from [ɜɹ] to [ɐɹ].

Words such as origin, Florida, horrible, quarrel, warren, as well as tomorrow, sorry, sorrow, generally use the sound sequence of FORCE, rather than START.[10] The latter set of words often distinguishes Canadian from American pronunciation. In Standard Canadian English, there is no distinction between horse and hoarse.[citation needed]

Loanwords that have a low central vowel in their language of origin, such as llama, pasta, and pyjamas, as well as place names like Gaza and Vietnam, tend to have /æ/, rather than /ɒ/ (which includes the historical /ɑ/, /ɒ/ and /ɔ/ because of the father–bother and cot–caught mergers). That also applies to older loans like drama or Apache. The word khaki is sometimes pronounced /ˈkɒki/ (or even /ˈkɒrki/). The pronunciation of drama with /æ/ is in decline, and studies found that 83% of Canadians used /æ/ in 1956, 47% in 1999, and 10% in 2012.[11] More generally, younger speakers tend to use /ɒ/ more than they did before, though there's still quite a bit of variation.[12][page needed] Some words, including plaza, façade, and lava will take a low central phone [ä], possibly distinct from both /æ/ and /ɒ/.[13]

Canadian Shift

[edit]
Main article: Canadian Shift

The cot-caught merger creates a gap in the short vowel subsystem[14] and triggers a sound change known as the Canadian Shift, which involves the front lax vowels /æ, ɛ, ɪ/. The /æ/ of bat is lowered and retracted in the direction of [a] except in some environments, as is noted below. Indeed, /æ/ is farther back than in almost all other North American dialects,[15] and the retraction of /æ/ was independently observed in Vancouver[16] and is more advanced for Ontarians and for women than for people from the Prairies and Atlantic Canada and men.[17]

Then, /ɛ/ and /ɪ/ may be lowered (in the direction of [æ] and [ɛ]) and/or retracted, but studies actually disagree on the trajectory of the shift.[18][19][20][21] For example, Labov and others (2006) noted a backward and downward movement of /ɛ/ in apparent time in all of Canada except the Atlantic Provinces, but no movement of /ɪ/ was detected.

Therefore, in Canadian English, the short a of trap or bath and the broad ah quality of spa or lot are shifted oppositely from those of the Northern Cities shift, which is found across the border in Inland Northern American English, and is causing both dialects to diverge. In fact, the Canadian short-a is very similar in quality to Inland Northern spa or lot. For example, the production [map] would be recognized as map in Canada but mop in Inland Northern United States.

/æ/-raising

[edit]
See also: /æ/ raising

Unlike many American English dialects, /æ/ remains a low-front vowel in most environments in Canadian English. Raising along the front periphery of the vowel space is restricted to two environments, before nasal and voiced velar consonants, and even then varies regionally. Ontario and Maritime Canadian English often show some raising before nasals, but it is less extreme than in many American varieties. Much less raising is heard on the Prairies, and some ethnic groups in Montreal show no pre-nasal raising at all. On the other hand, some speakers in the Prairies and British Columbia have raising of /æ/ before voiced velars (/ɡ/ and /ŋ/, with an up-glide rather than an in-glide, such that bag may almost rhyme with vague.[22] For most Canadian speakers, /ɛ/ is also realized higher as [e] before /ɡ/.

/æ/ raising in North American English[23]
Following
consonant 		Example
words[24] 		New York
City, New
Orleans[25] 		Baltimore,
Philadelphia[26] 		Midland US,
New England,
Pittsburgh,
Western US 		Southern
US 		Canada,
Northern
Mountain
US 		Minnesota,
Wisconsin 		Great
Lakes
US
Non-prevocalic
/m, n/ 		fan, lamb, stand [ɛə][27][A][B] [ɛə][27] [ɛə~ɛjə][30] [ɛə][31] [ɛə][32]
Prevocalic
/m, n/ 		animal, planet,
Spanish 		[æ]
/ŋ/[33] frank, language [ɛː~eɪ~æ][34] [æ~æɛə][30] [ɛː~ɛj][31] [eː~ej][35]
Non-prevocalic
/ɡ/ 		bag, drag [ɛə][A] [æ][C] [æ][27][D]
Prevocalic /ɡ/ dragon, magazine [æ]
Non-prevocalic
/b, d, ʃ/ 		grab, flash, sad [ɛə][A] [æ][D][37] [ɛə][37]
Non-prevocalic
/f, θ, s/ 		ask, bath, half,
glass 		[ɛə][A]
Otherwise as, back, happy,
locality 		[æ][E]
  1. ^ a b c d In New York City and Philadelphia, most function words (am, can, had, etc.) and some learned or less common words (alas, carafe, lad, etc.) have [æ].[28]
  2. ^ In Philadelphia, the irregular verbs began, ran, and swam have [æ].[29]
  3. ^ In Philadelphia, bad, mad, and glad alone in this context have [ɛə].[28]
  4. ^ a b The untensed /æ/ may be lowered and retracted as much as [ä] in varieties affected by the Low-Back-Merger Shift, mainly predominant in Canada and the American West.[36]
  5. ^ In New York City, certain lexical exceptions exist (like avenue being tense) and variability is common before /dʒ/ and /z/ as in imagine, magic, and jazz.[38]
    In New Orleans, [ɛə] additionally occurs before /v/ and /z/.[39]

Canadian raising

[edit]
Main article: Canadian raising

Perhaps the most recognizable feature of Canadian English is "Canadian raising," which is found most prominently throughout central and west-central Canada and in parts of the Atlantic Provinces.[2] For the beginning points of the diphthongs (gliding vowels) /aɪ/ (as in the words height and mice) and /aʊ/ (as in shout and house), the tongue is often more "raised" than in other varieties of English in the mouth when the diphthongs are before voiceless consonants: /p/, /t/, /k/, /s/, /ʃ/, and /f/.

Before voiceless consonants, /aɪ/ becomes [ʌɪ~ɜɪ~ɐɪ]. One of the few phonetic variables that divides Canadians regionally is the articulation of the raised allophone of that and /aʊ/. In Ontario, it tends to have a mid-central or even mid-front articulation sometimes approaching [ɛʊ], but in the West and the Maritimes, a more retracted sound is heard, which is closer to [ʌʊ].[40][6] For some speakers in the Prairies and in Nova Scotia, the retraction is strong enough to cause some tokens of raised /aʊ/ to merge with /oʊ/; couch then merges with coach, and both words sound the same (/koʊtʃ/). Also, about then sounds like a boat, which is often inaccurately represented as sounding like "a boot" for comic effect in American popular culture.

In GenAm, out is typically äʊt ⓘ, but with slight Canadian raising, it may sound more like ɐʊt ⓘ, and with the strong Canadian raising of the Prairies and Nova Scotia, it may sound more like ʌʊt. Canadian raising makes words like height and hide have two different vowel qualities. Also, for example, house as a noun (I saw a house) and house as a verb (Where will you house them tonight?) can then have two different vowel qualities: [hɐʊs] and [haʊz].

Especially in parts of the Atlantic Provinces, some Canadians do not have Canadian raising. On the other hand, certain non-Canadian accents use Canadian raising. In the United States, it can be found in areas near the border in dialects in the Upper Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Northeastern New England (like Boston) dialects, but Canadian raising is much less common than in Canada. The raising of /aɪ/ alone is actually increasing throughout the United States and, unlike the raising of /aʊ/, is generally not perceived as unusual by people who do not exhibit the raising.

Because of Canadian raising, many speakers can distinguish between words such as writer and rider, which can otherwise be pronounced the same in North American dialects[citation needed], which typically turn both intervocalic /t/ and /d/ into an alveolar flap. Thus, writer and rider are distinguished solely by their vowel characteristics as determined by Canadian raising, which causes a split between rider as [ˈɹäɪɾɚ] and writer as [ˈɹʌɪɾɚ] (listenⓘ).

Phonemic incidence

[edit]

Although Canadian English phonology is part of the greater North American sound system and so is therefore similar to American English phonology, the pronunciation of particular words may have British influence, and other pronunciations are uniquely Canadian. The Cambridge History of the English Language states, "What perhaps most characterizes Canadian speakers, however, is their use of several possible variant pronunciations for the same word, sometimes even in the same sentence."[41]

  • The name of the letter Z is normally the Anglo-European (and French) zed, and the American zee is less common in Canada and often stigmatized.[42][43]
  • Lieutenant was historically pronounced as the British /lɛfˈtɛnənt/, rather than the American /luˈtɛnənt/,[44] and older speakers and official usage in military and government contexts typically still follow the older practice, but most younger speakers and many middle-aged speakers have shifted to the American pronunciation. Some middle-aged speakers cannot even remember the existence of the older pronunciation, even when they are specifically asked whether they can think of another pronunciation. Only 14-19% of 14-year-olds used the traditional pronunciation in a survey in 1972, and in early 2017, they were at least 57 years old.[44]
  • In the words adult and composite, the stress is usually on the first syllable (/ˈædʌlt/ ~ /ˈædəlt/, /ˈkɒmpəzət/), as in Britain.
  • Canadians often side with the British on the pronunciation of lever /ˈlivər/, and several other words; been is pronounced by many speakers as /bin/, rather than /bɪn/;[citation needed] and either and neither are more commonly /ˈaɪðər/ and /ˈnaɪðər/, respectively.[citation needed]
  • Furthermore, in accordance with British traditions, schedule is sometimes /ˈʃɛdʒul/; process, progress, and project are occasionally pronounced /ˈproʊsɛs/, /ˈproʊɡrɛs/, and /ˈproʊdʒɛkt/, respectively; harass and harassment are sometimes pronounced /ˈhærəs/ and /ˈhærəsmənt/ respectively,[b] and leisure is rarely /ˈlɛʒər/.
  • Shone is pronounced /ʃɒn/, rather than /ʃoʊn/.
  • Again and against are often pronounced /əˈɡeɪn, əˈɡeɪnst/, rather than /əˈɡɛn, əˈɡɛnst/.[citation needed]
  • Words like semi, anti, and multi tend to be pronounced /ˈsɛmi/, /ˈænti/, and /ˈmʌlti/, rather than /ˈsɛmaɪ/, /ˈæntaɪ/, and /ˈmʌltaɪ/.
  • Words of French origin, such as clique and niche, are pronounced with a high vowel as in French, with /klik/ rather than /klɪk/ and /niʃ/ rather than /nɪtʃ/. Other words such as foyer (/ˈfɔɪ.eɪ/) have a French-influenced pronunciation.
  • Pecan is usually /ˈpikæn/ or /piˈkæn/, as opposed to /pəˈkɒn/, which more common in the United States.[46]
  • The most common pronunciation of vase is /veɪz/.[47] Resource, diagnose, and visa also have /z/.
  • The word premier, the leader of a provincial or territorial government, is commonly pronounced /ˈprimjər/, but /ˈprɛmjɛr/ and /ˈprimjɛr/ are rare variants.
  • Some Canadians pronounce predecessor as /ˈpridəsɛsər/ and asphalt as /ˈæʃfɒlt/.[citation needed]
  • The word room is pronounced /rum/ or /rʊm/.
  • Many anglophone Montrealers pronounced French names with a Quebec accent: Trois-Rivières [tʁ̥wɑʁiˈvjæːʁ] or [tʁ̥wɑʁiˈvjaɛ̯ʁ].
  • The pour-poor merger is less common than in GenAm.

Features shared with General American

[edit]

Like most other North American English dialects, Canadian English is almost always spoken with a rhotic accent, meaning that the r sound is preserved in any environment and not "dropped" after vowels, as commonly done by, for example, speakers in central and southern England where it is only pronounced when preceding a vowel.

Like GenAm, Canadian English possesses a wide range of phonological mergers, many of which are not found in other major varieties of English: the Mary–marry–merry merger which makes word pairs like Barry/berry, Carrie/Kerry, hairy/Harry, perish/parish, etc. as well as trios like airable/errable/arable and Mary/merry/marry have identical pronunciations (however, a distinction between the marry and merry sets remains in Montreal);[2] the father–bother merger that makes lager/logger, con/Kahn, etc. sound identical; the very common horse–hoarse merger making pairs like for/four, horse/hoarse, morning/mourning, war/wore etc. perfect homophones (as in California English, the vowel is phonemicized as /oʊ/ due to the cot–caught merger: /foʊr/ etc.);[citation needed] the hurry-furry merger; and the prevalent wine–whine merger which produces homophone pairs like Wales/whales, wear/where, wine/whine etc. by, in most cases, eliminating /hw/ (ʍ), except in some older speakers.[9]

In addition to that, flapping of intervocalic /t/ and /d/ to alveolar tap [ɾ] before reduced vowels is ubiquitous, so the words ladder and latter, for example, are mostly or entirely pronounced the same. Therefore, the pronunciation of the word "British" /ˈbrɪtəʃ/ in Canada and the U.S. is most often [ˈbɹɪɾɪʃ], while in England it is commonly [ˈbɹɪtɪʃ] ⓘ or [ˈbɹɪʔɪʃ]. For some speakers, the merger is incomplete and 't' before a reduced vowel is sometimes not tapped following /eɪ/ or /ɪ/ when it represents underlying 't'; thus greater and grader, and unbitten and unbidden are distinguished.

Many Canadian speakers have the typical American dropping of /j/ after alveolar consonants, so that new, duke, Tuesday, suit, resume, lute, for instance, are pronounced /nu/ (rather than /nju/), /duk/, /ˈtuzdeɪ/, /sut/, /rəˈzum/, /lut/. Traditionally, glide retention in these contexts has occasionally been held to be a shibboleth distinguishing Canadians from Americans. However, in a survey conducted in the Golden Horseshoe area of Southern Ontario in 1994, over 80% of respondents under the age of 40 pronounced student and news, for instance, without /j/.[48] This glide-deletion is less common in Victoria, though younger speakers front /u/ to such a degree after coronals that some words can take a [j]-like onglide.[8] Canadians do include /j/ in revenue and avenue.

Especially in Vancouver and Toronto, an increasing number of Canadians realize /ɪŋ/ as [in] when the raising of /ɪ/ to [i] before the underlying /ŋ/[49] is applied even after the "g" is dropped, leading to a variant pronunciation of taking, [ˈteɪkin]. Otherwise it primarily is found in speakers from not just California but also from other Western states and Midwestern areas including the Upper Midwest.[50][51] Speakers who use the [in] variant use it only for the underlying /ɪŋ/, which makes taking with a dropped "g" no longer homophonous with taken. This pronunciation is otherwise perceived as incorrect and has been described as a "corruption of the language" by some listeners.[52]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Standard Canadian English

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Standard Canadian English (SCE) is the predominant, relatively homogeneous variety of English spoken across much of , particularly in and , by educated native speakers in formal contexts such as , media, and . It represents a distinct national standard that blends phonological, lexical, and orthographic elements from both American and , while incorporating unique features shaped by Canada's multicultural history, including influences from French and Indigenous languages. Unlike more regionally diverse varieties, SCE emphasizes a tolerant approach to variation, serving as a that converges with global English norms but retains identifiable Canadian traits. The development of SCE traces back to two major waves of English settlement: the arrival of Loyalists from the after the (1775–1783), which introduced influences, and subsequent British and Irish immigration (1815–1867), which reinforced British norms in spelling and vocabulary. Post-Confederation in 1867, increased east-west communication and shorter settlement periods fostered a more uniform variety compared to the , though regional dialects persist in areas like and . Ongoing immigration and bilingualism, especially in , continue to evolve SCE, with French loanwords and becoming more prominent in urban centers. Phonologically, SCE is defined by hallmark features such as , where the diphthongs in words like price (/aɪ/) and mouth (/aʊ/) are raised before voiceless consonants, resulting in distinctions like "rider" versus "writer" or "cloud" versus "clout"—a trait less consistently pronounced in . It also features the low-back vowel merger, merging the vowels in cot and caught (both /kɑt/), and the Canadian Shift, a chain of vowel adjustments lowering and unrounding front vowels. These elements contribute to SCE's rhotic accent (retaining post-vocalic /r/), setting it apart from non-rhotic while differing from in vowel quality. Lexically, SCE incorporates Canadianisms like chesterfield (sofa), toque (knitted winter hat), and washroom (restroom), many derived from Indigenous languages (e.g., , ) or French (e.g., , portage). About 70% of these are compound nouns, with around 10,000 documented in resources like the Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles. Syntactically, it aligns closely with standard but includes regional variants, such as the "after perfect" in Newfoundland (e.g., "I'm after eating") or emphatic ever (e.g., "He drives fast ever!"). In , SCE favors a hybrid system: British endings like -our (e.g., colour, used 75% of the time) and -re (e.g., centre, 89%), combined with American preferences like -ize (85%) over -ise. Media styles vary, with major media outlets like and predominantly using -our, reflecting ongoing debates on a distinctly "Canadian" standard. This flexibility underscores SCE's role as an adaptable variety in Canada's bilingual and multicultural society.

Overview

Definition and Characteristics

Standard Canadian English is defined as the urban, educated, and non-regional variety of English spoken primarily by middle-class, second-generation-or-later Anglophones in major Canadian cities such as , , and . This variety represents a codified form of that avoids strong regional accents and serves as a prestige dialect among native speakers. It is estimated that Standard Canadian English is spoken by approximately 38% of Canada's English-speaking population, based on sociolinguistic analysis aligned with 2011 census data on urban demographics and language use. Key characteristics of Standard Canadian English include its phonological proximity to , featuring unique vowel shifts such as the Canadian Vowel Shift, while incorporating lexical blends that draw from both American and British English traditions—for instance, using "elevator" alongside occasional British preferences like "cheque" in specific contexts. Grammatically, it exhibits distinctive patterns, such as the "be done + noun" construction (e.g., "I'm done my homework"), which is more prevalent in Canadian usage than in other North American varieties. These traits contribute to its homogeneity across urban centers, distinguishing it as a unified national standard without heavy regional inflections. In terms of prevalence, Standard Canadian English is the native variety for approximately 21 million speakers in Canada, according to 2021 census data on English mother tongue populations, with additional influence through the global Canadian diaspora. Sociolinguistically, it plays a central role as the de facto national standard in media, education, and government communications, promoting a sense of linguistic unity while accommodating Canada's multicultural context. This variety's avoidance of marked regional features enhances its accessibility and prestige in formal settings.

Historical Context and Development

Standard Canadian English originated in the late with the migration of approximately 10,000 United Empire Loyalists from the following the , who settled primarily in (modern-day ) and introduced dialects characterized by features like rhoticity and certain vowel qualities. These settlers blended their speech with residual influences from earlier colonial periods, establishing a foundational variety that was neither fully American nor British. A second wave of over one million immigrants from , , , and between 1815 and 1867 further reinforced British lexical and attitudinal norms, such as preferences for spellings like "colour" and terms like "tap" over American equivalents. Following in 1867, British influences persisted through education, governance, and trade ties, solidifying a prestige variety that maintained some conservative features relative to . In the early , Americanization accelerated via , including radio and , which introduced U.S. pronunciations and vocabulary into Canadian urban areas, gradually eroding some British elements while preserving others. The establishment of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in played a pivotal role in promoting a unified, neutral pronunciation across the country, countering American media dominance by modeling a standardized accent in news and programming. This effort helped foster a sense of national linguistic cohesion amid growing bilingualism in French-English urban centers like and , where French lexical borrowings (e.g., "dep" for ) occasionally influenced local English but had impact on the broader standard variety. Post-World War II, national identity formation intensified as Canada distanced itself from British colonial ties, contributing to the recognition and preservation of distinct Canadian English features that had emerged earlier, such as the phonological trait of . Waves of European immigration in the 1950s and 1970s, including displaced persons and economic migrants, contributed to urban speech homogenization as second-generation speakers adopted the emerging standard, reducing regional dialectal variation in cities. A key milestone was the publication of the Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles in 1967, which codified over 10,000 unique terms and expressions (e.g., "chesterfield" for sofa) spanning from 1498 to 1965, affirming as a codified national variety.

Phonology

Consonant Features

Standard Canadian English features a consonant inventory of 24 phonemes, identical to that of : the stops /p, b, t, d, k, g/; the fricatives /f, v, θ, ð, s, z, ʃ, ʒ, h/; the nasals /m, n, ŋ/; the /l, ɹ, w, j/; and the affricates /tʃ, dʒ/ . This set reflects a lack of unique consonantal additions or deletions compared to other major North American varieties, maintaining a full range of obstruents and sonorants without regional innovations in phonemic contrast . Key realizations of these consonants distinguish Standard Canadian English in subtle ways from British varieties while aligning closely with American patterns. Intervocalic /t/ and /d/ are typically flapped to [ɾ], as in "butter" pronounced [ˈbʌɾɚ] or "ladder" [ˈlæɾɚ], a process shared with General American English . Additionally, /t/ may undergo glottalization to [ʔ] in word-final position or before syllabic /n/, yielding forms like "cat" [kæʔ] or "button" [ˈbʌʔn], particularly in urban speech . The variety is fully rhotic, with /ɹ/ realized as a retroflex [ɹ̢] or bunched approximant in post-vocalic positions, ensuring pronunciation of 'r' in words like "car" [kɑɹ] or "hard" [hɑɹd] across all speakers in standard contexts . Unlike some regional or multicultural varieties of English in , Standard Canadian English lacks (merger of /θ, ð/ to [f, v]) and h-dropping (deletion of /h/ in word-initial position), preserving distinct realizations of "thin" [θɪn] versus "fin" [fɪn] and "hand" [hænd] with clear /h/ onset . Recent research indicates an increasing trend toward yod-dropping after alveolar consonants /t, d, z/, where the glide /j/ is omitted in words like "tune" [tun], "dune" [dun], or "zoo" [zu], based on corpus analyses of urban Canadian speech showing near-completion of this merger among younger speakers . This development, documented in post-2020 studies, reflects ongoing alignment with patterns while remaining variable across regions .

Vowel Shifts and Mergers

One of the most distinctive features of Standard Canadian English is , a phenomenon where the diphthongs /aɪ/ and /aʊ/ are raised to [ʌɪ] and [ʌʊ], respectively, when preceding voiceless consonants. This results in contrasts such as "price" pronounced as [prʌɪs] versus "pry" as [praɪ], and "out" as [ʌʊt] versus "cow" as [kaʊ]. First documented in the mid-20th century, is nearly universal among speakers across urban and inland regions, serving as a key marker of in . The low-back merger represents another widespread innovation, involving the complete merger of the vowels /ɑ/ and /ɒ/ into a single low back vowel [ɑ]. This eliminates the historical distinction between words like "cot" and "caught," both realized as [kɑt], and is observed in the vast majority of Standard Canadian English speakers, particularly in central and western dialects. The merger, which originated in the 19th century and stabilized by the mid-20th, creates phonetic space that contributes to subsequent vowel shifts. The Canadian Shift, a chain shift affecting the short front vowel subsystem, further characterizes the variety, with /æ/ lowering to , /ɛ/ backing to [ʌ̈], and /ɪ/ lowering slightly, often accompanied by /æ/-raising before nasals to [eə] or [iə]. First identified in the 1990s, this shift is led by the retraction of /æ/ in TRAP words, progressing in apparent time among younger speakers in major cities like Toronto and Vancouver. Acoustic studies confirm its pan-Canadian diffusion, with normalized F1 and F2 values showing systematic movement away from traditional General American positions. Back vowel fronting involves the advancement of /u/ and /ʊ/ toward central positions, yielding [ʉ] in words like "goose" [gʉs] and [ʊ̈] in FOOT words like "foot" [fʊ̈t]. This ongoing change, documented since the late 20th century, is more pronounced in urban female speakers and correlates with higher second (F2) frequencies, distinguishing from non-fronting varieties. Regarding other mergers, Standard Canadian English typically features a merry-marry merger with both realized as /ɛr/, while MARY is often /ɛər/ or raised higher, though the three words may converge as near-homophones in many speakers, particularly outside eastern dialects. Recent studies post-2020 indicate intensified GOOSE-fronting among urban youth, with [ʉ̈] realizations emerging in multicultural contexts like Toronto, reflecting accelerated innovation in diverse speaker populations.

Suprasegmental Features

Standard Canadian English exhibits stress patterns closely aligned with those of General American English, placing primary stress on lexical roots while reducing unstressed vowels to a central schwa [ə]. For instance, the word "Canada" is typically pronounced as [ˈkænədə], with the initial syllable bearing the primary stress and the medial vowel centralized. This system emphasizes rhythmical secondary stresses following the main stress more frequently than in British English, contributing to a distinct prosodic identity in Canadian speech. The of Standard is stress-timed, characteristic of many North American varieties, where stressed syllables occur at roughly equal intervals, leading to compression of unstressed syllables between them. This manifests in the Rhythm Rule, a prosodic adjustment that shifts secondary stress to avoid clashes between adjacent stressed syllables, as seen in compounds like "high " reduced to [haɪˈskul]. Such patterns enhance the flowing, galloping cadence of speech, with empirical analyses confirming their productivity in Western Canadian English. Intonation in Standard Canadian English features rising declarative contours, particularly in questions and tag questions, often marked by the discourse particle "eh?" to seek agreement or soften statements, as in "It's cold, eh?". Nuclear tone patterns draw heavily from American influences but incorporate Canadian-specific contours, such as gradual pitch rises that convey or inclusivity. High rising terminals (HRT), or uptalk, are prevalent, especially in spontaneous speech, with rising pitch on declaratives reaching up to 40% higher than the final accented ; this feature appears stable across genders and regions but is more frequent among females (58.65%) and younger speakers (78.88% for ages 1-29). Recent post-2020 highlights increasing HRT use among young urban speakers, linked to sociophonetic shifts in focus marking and phrase-level prosody.

Lexicon

Unique Canadian Terms

Standard Canadian English features a distinctive lexicon that reflects the country's cultural, historical, and environmental contexts, with several terms uniquely embedded in everyday usage. Among the core Canadianisms is "toque," referring to a close-fitting knitted hat commonly worn for warmth in winter, borrowed from Canadian French "tuque" and widely recognized as a symbol of Canadian identity since the 19th century. Similarly, "chesterfield" denotes a sofa or couch, a generalization from a specific upholstered style that became prevalent in Canada from the early 20th century but has since declined in favor of "couch." The discourse tag "eh," used at the end of statements to seek confirmation or agreement (e.g., "It's cold out, eh?"), is a hallmark of conversational Canadian English, functioning as a pragmatic particle more frequent in Canada than in other varieties. Another everyday staple is "double-double," a shorthand for coffee with two creams and two sugars, popularized by the Tim Hortons chain and emblematic of Canadian coffee culture since the 1980s. Institutional terms further illustrate Canada's unique vocabulary, often tied to commerce and governance. "Timbits," bite-sized doughnut holes sold by , entered the lexicon in 1976 as a proprietary name that has since become genericized in for similar treats, while also referring to youth hockey programs sponsored by the chain. In currency, "loonie" names the one-dollar coin, introduced in 1987 and so called due to its reverse design featuring the bird, quickly adopting a form from "" that reflects informal Canadian naming patterns. Food and daily life terms highlight regional flavors and seasonal realities. "Poutine," a dish of french fries topped with cheese curds and gravy, originated in rural Quebec snack bars in the late 1950s and has evolved into a national icon, with variations spreading across Canada by the 1990s. "Ketchup chips," potato chips flavored with tomato ketchup seasoning, were invented in the 1970s by the Canadian company Hostess and remain a beloved snack primarily associated with Canada, unavailable or less popular elsewhere. Indigenous loanwords also enrich the lexicon, including "kayak" (from Inuktitut, referring to a hunter's boat), "moose" (from Eastern Abenaki, denoting the animal), and "toboggan" (from Mi'kmaq, for a sled). Recent additions to the lexicon, particularly post-2020, stem from ongoing reconciliation efforts with . "," a formal statement recognizing Indigenous territories and traditional stewardship of the land, has become standard in public speeches, events, and institutional settings since the 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Commission report, with increased emphasis on meaningful implementation amid critiques of superficiality. These terms collectively reinforce , blending indigenous influences, colonial legacies, and modern cultural practices.

Shared and Divergent Vocabulary

Standard Canadian English shares significant vocabulary with American English, particularly in everyday terms influenced by geographic proximity and extensive cross-border media exposure. Common examples include "" (for fuel, as opposed to British "petrol"), "" (versus British "lorry"), "" (rather than British "" for personal time off), and "" (instead of British ""). This alignment has been reinforced since the post-1940s era, when American media, including radio, television, and film, became dominant in , standardizing many North American lexical preferences amid growing cultural and economic ties. In contrast, Standard Canadian English retains some lexical elements from British English, reflecting historical colonial influences and formal contexts. The pronunciation of the letter Z as "zed" (rather than American "zee") is a prominent shared feature. "holiday" serves as an alternative to "vacation," especially for public observances. These British-leaning terms coexist with American ones, creating a blended lexicon unique to Canadian usage. Divergences highlight Standard Canadian English's distinct identity amid its overlaps. For instance, "washroom" is the preferred term for a public restroom, differing from American "restroom" and British "loo" or "toilet." In Western Canada, "pop" commonly denotes a carbonated soft drink, contrasting with broader Canadian "soft drink" or American regional variations like "soda," while Eastern preferences lean toward "soft drink." Measurement units reflect a hybrid approach: British-style spellings like "kilometre" are standard in official contexts, with speeds in kilometres per hour, yet casual speech may invoke "miles per hour," especially in informal or American-influenced settings such as automotive discussions. Recent digital trends have accelerated lexical convergence across English varieties, including Standard Canadian English. Post-2020, like "yeet" (meaning to throw forcefully or express enthusiasm), often paired with emojis for emphasis, has been uniformly adopted by younger Canadians via platforms such as and , diminishing traditional variety-specific boundaries. This emoji-influenced spreads globally, integrating seamlessly into Canadian online discourse without significant regional adaptation.

Grammar and Syntax

Morphological Patterns

Standard Canadian English exhibits inflectional morphology that closely aligns with General American patterns, emphasizing regularity in noun plurals and verb tenses. For nouns, the regular plural suffix -s is productively applied, as in the plural of roof forming roofs rather than the archaic rooves, which is largely obsolete in contemporary usage across North American varieties. This preference reflects a broader trend toward simplified in , avoiding irregular vowel alternations seen in some historical British forms. Similarly, verb past tenses favor the regular -ed suffix for many historically irregular verbs, such as learn yielding learned (e.g., "She learned the lesson") and dream producing dreamed (e.g., "He dreamed of the "), particularly in formal and written registers; the irregular alternatives learnt and dreamt occur but are less common and often perceived as British-influenced. The form learned also functions adjectivally to denote erudition, as in "a learned ," without variation from standard North American norms. Derivational morphology in Standard Canadian English relies on productive suffixes and compounding to form new words, adapting to cultural and environmental contexts. The suffix -ize (or -ise in some style guides) is actively used to create verbs denoting adaptation or transformation, exemplified by Canadianize, meaning to imbue with Canadian characteristics (e.g., "The policy aims to Canadianize immigrant education"). Compounding, a key process for nominal formation, combines free morphemes to produce terms like snowblower, a machine for removing snow from surfaces, which is particularly salient in Canada's winter climate and functions as a single lexical unit with endocentric structure (snow modifying blower). These mechanisms highlight the variety's capacity for innovation while maintaining transparency in meaning derivation. Possessive forms adhere to standard English conventions, using the 's suffix for singular nouns regardless of ending sounds, as in Canada's resources or Toronto's skyline, to indicate ownership or association. In formal speech and writing, s-free genitives (e.g., Canada welfare instead of Canada's welfare) are avoided, with prepositional "of" phrases preferred for inanimate or abstract possessors to ensure clarity (e.g., "the capital of " over "Canada's capital" in certain stylistic contexts). A notable trend in morphological patterns is the growing normalization of gender-neutral forms, particularly the and its inflections (them, their, themselves), which serve as epicene pronouns for unspecified or non-binary antecedents (e.g., "If a student forgets their ..."). This usage, historically attested but resurgent since the , has gained official endorsement in Canadian style guides by the 2020s, especially in urban professional and governmental standards, reflecting broader inclusivity efforts without altering core inflectional paradigms.

Syntactic Constructions

Standard Canadian English features several distinctive syntactic constructions at the sentence level, particularly in how completion or necessity is expressed. One prominent pattern is the "be done + " construction, where "be done" is followed directly by a direct object without an intervening preposition, as in "I'm done my homework" or "She's done the dishes." This transitive use of "done" functions as a marker, indicating completion of an action, and is widely attested across Canadian varieties, though it is not found in or . Prepositional choices in Standard Canadian English also diverge in specific contexts. The preposition "on" is preferentially used with "weekend," as in "We went skiing on the weekend," aligning more closely with American norms than British "at the weekend." This usage reflects historical American influences on Canadian syntax and is documented in sociolinguistic surveys as a stable feature. Similarly, "different than" is accepted alongside the more traditional "different from" in comparative constructions, such as "This is different than what I expected," with official Canadian style guides noting both as standard before nouns or pronouns. Question formation in Standard Canadian English follows typical English inversion patterns, as in "Do you like it?" for yes/no questions, without significant deviation from broader norms. However, tag questions often incorporate "eh" as a versatile particle, appearing in forms like "You like it, eh?" to seek confirmation or agreement, regardless of polarity matching. This usage of "eh" functions pragmatically to engage the listener and is more frequent in than in other varieties, based on corpus analyses of spoken data.

Orthography and Usage

Spelling Conventions

Standard Canadian English employs a hybrid orthographic system that blends British and American conventions, reflecting historical ties to Britain and proximity to the United States. Words derived from often retain endings such as -our (e.g., colour, honour, favour), -re (e.g., centre, theatre), -ce (e.g., defence), and -gue (e.g., cheque, catalogue), while adopting American preferences for -ize over -ise (e.g., realize, organize) and simplified forms like fulfill instead of fulfil. This variability in -ize/-ise usage can occur contextually, with -ize as the predominant standard but occasional -ise appearances in formal or British-influenced writing. Standardization in Canadian spelling relies on authoritative references like the Canadian Oxford Dictionary, first published in 1998 and updated in subsequent editions to include over 2,200 uniquely Canadian terms and senses while prioritizing hybrid conventions. For media and journalism, the Canadian Press Stylebook and Caps and Spelling guide enforce consistency by deferring to the Canadian Oxford Dictionary for primary spellings, listing exceptions for compound words and abbreviations, and recommending the first-listed variant when alternatives appear. Additional dictionaries such as the Gage Canadian Dictionary serve as supplementary authorities to ensure uniformity across -our, -re, and -ize patterns. Punctuation in Standard Canadian English follows flexible but context-driven rules, with the Oxford (serial) comma optional and typically omitted in simple lists unless needed for clarity (e.g., "red, white and blue" but "Streisand, Prince and " to avoid ambiguity). Date formats exhibit a mix of influences, commonly using the day-month-year order as DD/MM/YYYY in British-style contexts or the month-day-year as Month DD, YYYY in American-influenced writing, while official government standards prefer the format YYYY-MM-DD for numerical clarity.

Stylistic Norms

Standard Canadian English stylistic norms emphasize clarity, inclusivity, and formality in writing, particularly in official and professional contexts. Following federal guidelines introduced in 2018 and updated in subsequent years, official documents prioritize to promote equity and respect diverse identities. For instance, terms like "parent" replace "mother" or "father" where possible, and salutations such as "Dear Colleague" avoid gendered titles like "Mr." or "Ms." unless specified by the recipient. Politeness markers, including "please" and "thank you," are standard in formal requests and correspondence to maintain a courteous tone, aligning with broader Canadian cultural values of respect and indirectness in communication. In media writing, Standard Canadian English adopts a neutral and objective tone, especially in public broadcasting like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), where journalistic standards require balanced reporting free from bias or sensationalism. Print media, guided by the , generally avoids to ensure accessibility and professionalism, favoring precise terminology over informal expressions. In contrast, digital and social media platforms permit more casual elements, such as abbreviations like "" for "laugh out loud," reflecting the influence of on informal Canadian online discourse. Capitalization follows adapted conventions from established guides like The Canadian Style by the Translation Bureau, which capitalizes official titles when they precede a name or stand alone as a specific reference, such as "Prime Minister Trudeau" or "the Prime Minister." For headings, title case is commonly used in Canadian publishing, capitalizing major words while lowercasing articles and prepositions, often drawing from the Chicago Manual of Style with local adjustments for consistency. Proper nouns, including names of institutions and geographical features, are always capitalized to denote specificity. Standard Canadian English stylistic guidelines have increasingly addressed the integration of Indigenous languages, building on the 2019 Indigenous Languages Act and the 2021 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, alongside ongoing Truth and influences. Recent resources, such as the Indigenous Peoples Language Guide (updated 2024) and the Province of Writing Guide for Indigenous Content (2024), provide detailed protocols for incorporating terms from languages like and in official and media contexts, supporting and efforts.

Comparisons and Influences

Similarities to General American

Standard Canadian English exhibits striking phonological parallels with General American, contributing to their mutual intelligibility and often leading non-experts to perceive them as nearly identical. Both varieties are fully rhotic, consistently pronouncing the post-vocalic /r/ in words like "hard" and "car," in contrast to non-rhotic accents elsewhere. They also share the cot–caught merger, whereby the low back vowels in "cot" and "caught" (or "lot" and "thought") are realized as the same sound, typically a low central or back unrounded [ɑ] in urban speech. Intervocalic flapping unites the two further, converting /t/ and /d/ to a brief alveolar tap [ɾ] in words such as "latter" and "ladder," rendering them homophonous. The core vowel inventory overlaps extensively, including shared mergers like Mary–merry–marry (all with /ɛr/) and a minimal distinction between the strut vowel /ʌ/ and schwa /ə/ in unstressed syllables, though Canadian English features subtle innovations such as Canadian raising that slightly differentiate it. Lexically, Standard Canadian English aligns closely with General American, sharing the majority of everyday due to historical and cultural ties, with common terms like "" (for housing), "" (for lift), "" (for lorry), and "" (for petrol) reflecting North American preferences over British alternatives. This overlap is evident in recent surveys, where over 80% of younger urban speakers use American-influenced words such as "" (replacing older Canadian "chesterfield") and "" (supplanting "serviette"). The convergence has been amplified by prolonged exposure to American media; since the 1920s, Canadian radio listeners have accessed U.S. broadcasts across the border, embedding American lexical norms into daily usage and accelerating homogenization. Grammatically, Standard Canadian English mirrors General American in employing standardized conjugations, such as regular past tenses (e.g., "dove" as the past of "" in over 80% of contemporary speakers) and consistent article usage before nouns, adhering to North American syntactic patterns without the more prescriptive British conventions. In formal contexts, both varieties retain the mandative subjunctive more frequently than in (e.g., "I suggest that he go"), though the indicative is common in casual speech across varieties ("he goes"). These shared structures underscore a unified North American grammatical framework, with minimal divergence in core constructions. Quantitative analyses confirm the profound alignment, with Charles Boberg's studies indicating that urban Standard Canadian English speakers exhibit around 90% similarity to General American in phonological and lexical features, based on nationwide surveys of (e.g., 84–92% convergence in diphthong realizations like those in "genuine" and "again") and vocabulary adoption. This metric highlights how proximity and media have fostered a , where differences remain minor deviations rather than fundamental contrasts.

Differences from British English

Standard Canadian English (StCanE) diverges from (BrE) across , , , and broader cultural influences, reflecting Canada's historical ties to Britain alongside growing proximity to the . While StCanE retains some conservative features from early British settlement, it has evolved distinctly since the mid-20th century, often aligning more closely with in everyday usage. These differences highlight StCanE's status as a unique variety shaped by colonial legacies and modern North American dynamics. In , StCanE is fully rhotic, pronouncing the /r/ sound in all positions, such as in "" (/kɑːr/), whereas (RP) in BrE is non-rhotic, dropping the /r/ unless followed by a vowel, resulting in "cah" (/kɑː/). Additionally, StCanE lacks the trap-bath split characteristic of many BrE varieties, where words like "trap" (/træp/) and "bath" (/bɑːθ/) use distinct s; in StCanE, both employ the /æ/ vowel, as in /træp/ and /bæθ/. of "" further illustrates this divide: StCanE speakers predominantly use /ˈskɛdʒuːl/, akin to American patterns, while BrE favors /ˈʃɛdjuːl/. Lexically, StCanE incorporates more North American terms in daily speech, reducing reliance on BrE-specific . For instance, "gas" is used for fuel instead of "petrol," and "" replaces "lorry" for larger vehicles. This preference for fewer Britishisms stems from cross-border influences, making StCanE's lexicon more aligned with in common contexts like transportation and commerce. Grammatically, StCanE shows subtle variations, including less frequent use of "have got" for possession or compared to BrE, where constructions like "I've got a " are more prevalent; StCanE speakers often opt for simple "have" ("I have a ") or "have gotten" in perfect tenses for acquisition ("I've gotten a "). These patterns reflect American grammatical norms integrated into StCanE, diverging from BrE's stronger emphasis on "have got" structures. Culturally, the divergence intensified post-1960s due to U.S. media and economic dominance, accelerating the adoption of American linguistic features and fostering a distinct separate from British roots, as analyzed in Dollinger (2020). This period marked heightened national consciousness, reducing BrE's prescriptive influence in favor of localized standards.

References

  1. https://www.oed.com/discover/introduction-to-canadian-english/
  2. https://www.queensu.ca/strathy/apps/OP6v2.pdf
  3. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/blogue-blog/canadian-raising-eng
  4. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/standards-of-english/standard-canadian-english/DF7428DF4462162B1E2A29421101F1F5
  5. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&SearchText=Canada&DGUID=2021A000011124&SEARCH=2021%20Census
  6. https://hal.science/hal-01936077v1/document
  7. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Linguistics/Essentials_of_Linguistics_1e_(Anderson)/03%3A_Speech_Sounds_in_the_Mind/3.02%3A_IPA_for_Canadian_English
  8. https://www.oed.com/information/understanding-entries/pronunciation/world-englishes/canadian-english/
  9. https://open.maricopa.edu/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/3-10-transcribing-vowels-in-canadian-english/
  10. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics/article/is-nuz-really-the-new-njuz-yod-dropping-in-toronto-english/8B125F503347575338CA2726C4FC29B2
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365584151_Is_nuz_really_the_new_njuz_Yod_dropping_in_Toronto_English
  12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/455114
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-variation-and-change/article/producing-and-perceiving-the-canadian-vowel-shift-evidence-from-a-montreal-community/A45A2F348CBC7AA652035F17177AFE30
  14. https://cla-acl.ca/pdfs/actes-2008/CLA2008_Sadlier-Brown_Tamminga.pdf
  15. https://read.dukeupress.edu/pads/article/104/1/100/144397/5-On-the-Uniformity-of-the-Low-Back-Merger-Shift
  16. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/blogue-blog/distinction-in-canadian-and-american-english-eng
  17. http://stanford.edu/class/linguist159/restricted/readings/Bigham2010
  18. https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/download/32759/25405/80034
  19. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0075424219831353
  20. https://www.ijllnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_6_December_2016/1.pdf
  21. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00754242221145164
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268350429_Reshaping_the_Vowel_System_An_Index_of_Phonetic_Innovation_in_Canadian_English
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319082154_Canadian_English_Word_Stress_A_Corpora-Based_Study_of_National_Identity_in_a_Multilingual_Community
  24. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2025/cfp-psc/SC83-99-5000-1019-eng.pdf
  25. https://cla-acl.ca/pdfs/resumes-2025-abstracts/Nwosu.pdf
  26. https://ygdp.yale.edu/phenomena/canadian-eh
  27. https://www.journal-labphon.org/article/id/9316/
  28. https://cla-acl.ca/pdfs/actes-2009/CLA2009_Talla_Sando.pdf
  29. https://dchp.arts.ubc.ca/entries/toque
  30. https://dchp.arts.ubc.ca/entries/chesterfield
  31. https://dchp.arts.ubc.ca/entries/double-double
  32. https://dchp.arts.ubc.ca/entries/Timbits
  33. https://dchp.arts.ubc.ca/entries/loonie
  34. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/history-of-poutine
  35. https://dchp.arts.ubc.ca/entries/ketchup%20chips
  36. https://blog.duolingo.com/canadian-english/
  37. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/land-acknowledgment
  38. https://www.vec.ca/english/2/pronunciation.cfm
  39. https://practicelanguagesonline.com/2021/06/23/canadian-english/
  40. https://the-english-nook.com/2024/10/02/differences-between-british-and-canadian-english-a-detailed-comparison/
  41. https://translationagencyofcanada.ca/blog/canadian-english-vs-british-english-key-differences
  42. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~steffan/canadianisms.html
  43. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/writing-tips-plus/kilometre-km
  44. https://news.syr.edu/2025/07/25/how-new-words-enter-our-language-a-linguistics-expert-explains/
  45. https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/10/us/merriam-webster-new-words-slang-cec
  46. https://grammarhubs.com/roofs-vs-rooves-which-is-correct/
  47. https://prowritingaid.com/-learnt-vs-learned
  48. https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/bitstreams/2cb5ecfc-4ecd-4cdb-b976-e85f40449c6e/download
  49. https://theeditingco.com/blog/canadian-versus-american-english-surprising-differences
  50. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/snow-blower
  51. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/writing-tips-plus/apostrophe-possession
  52. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/writing-tips-plus/gender-inclusive-writing-use-the-singular-they
  53. https://canada.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/legis-redact/legistics/p1p15.html
  54. https://summit.sfu.ca/item/12326
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266558847_New_Englishes_in_a_New_World_A_Brief_Introduction_to_Canadian_English
  56. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/writing-tips-plus/different-from-different-than-different-to
  57. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/blogue-blog/canadian-spelling-eng
  58. https://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tcdnstyl-chap?lang=eng&lettr=chapsect3&info0=3
  59. https://www.oxfordreference.com/abstract/10.1093/acref/9780195418163.001.0001/acref-9780195418163
  60. https://www.thecanadianpress.com/writing-guide/caps-spelling/
  61. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/writing-tips-plus/coordinate-elements-serial-commas
  62. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/writing-tips-plus/commas-in-a-date
  63. https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/enabling-interoperability/gc-enterprise-data-reference-standards/data-reference-standard-date-time-format.html
  64. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/22/canada-government-defends-asking-employees-to-use-gender-neutral-terms
  65. https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/information-notice/inclusive-language-job-descriptions-job-titles.html
  66. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/blogue-blog/inclusifs-gender-inclusive-eng
  67. https://blog.remitly.com/en-ca/lifestyle-and-culture/canadian-politeness/
  68. https://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/canadian-culture/canadian-culture-communication
  69. https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/vision/governance/journalistic-standards-and-practices
  70. https://www.thecanadianpress.com/about/our-team-values/our-news-principles/
  71. https://studycorgi.com/how-the-internet-and-digital-culture-have-changed-language-in-canada/
  72. https://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tcdnstyl-chap?lang=eng&lettr=chapsect4&info0=4
  73. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/pecks-english-pointers/punct-10-ups-downs-capitalization
  74. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/AnnualStatutes/2021_14/FullText.html
  75. https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1524495846286/1557513199083
  76. https://assets.brand.ubc.ca/downloads/UBC_Indigenous_Peoples_Language_Guide_2024.pdf
  77. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/services-for-government/service-experience-digital-delivery/web-content-development-guides/web-style-guide/writing-guide-for-indigenous-content
  78. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/english-language-in-canada/CE90488E53356C11B8CE9F447D362226
  79. https://www.mcgill.ca/canadianenglish/results
  80. https://opentextbc.ca/postconfederation/chapter/10-14-a-culture-under-seige/
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304087834_The_North_American_English_Mandative_Subjunctive_in_the_21st_Century_Revival_or_Remnant
  82. https://www.academia.edu/877820/Canadian_English_Usage_Focus_on_syntax
  83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313632231_English_in_Canada_Phonology
  84. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-world-englishes/english-in-north-america/82047C6A75418D25CF86BE7530BBEF4C
  85. https://proofed.co.uk/writing-tips/dialects-canadian-english/
  86. https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/writing-tips-plus/got-gotten-
  87. https://www.academia.edu/14933782/English_in_Canada_in_press_2018_published_2020_
  88. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-today/article/academic-and-public-attitudes-to-the-notion-of-standard-canadian-english/D61F984AF5AE52C71BD389913F3F7348
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.