Hubbry Logo
Storm chasingStorm chasingMain
Open search
Storm chasing
Community hub
Storm chasing
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Storm chasing
Storm chasing
from Wikipedia

Photos from National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) in Norman, Oklahoma show staff and instrument chasing tornadoes during the first VORTEX project from 1994 to 1995. The first photo was in Graham, Texas, and the second southeast of Shamrock, Texas.
NSSL mobile mesonet vehicles on the first VORTEX project (which operated in the seasons of 1994 – 1995), equipped with surface measurement equipment.[1]

Storm chasing is broadly defined as the deliberate pursuit of any severe weather phenomenon, regardless of motive, but most commonly for curiosity, adventure, scientific investigation, or for news or media coverage.[2] A person who chases storms is known as a storm chaser (or "chaser" for short).

While witnessing a tornado is the single biggest objective for most chasers, many chase thunderstorms and delight in viewing cumulonimbus and related cloud structures, watching a barrage of hail and lightning, and seeing what skyscapes unfold. A smaller number of storm chasers attempt to intercept tropical cyclones, waterspouts, blizzards, ice storms, and other weather phenomena.[3]

Nature of and motivations for chasing

[edit]

Storm chasing is chiefly a recreational endeavor, with chasers usually giving their motives as photographing or video recording a storm, or for various personal reasons.[4] These can include the beauty of the views afforded by the sky and land, the mystery of not knowing precisely what will unfold, the journey to an undetermined destination on the open road, intangible experiences such as feeling one with a much larger and more powerful natural world,[5] the challenge of correctly forecasting and intercepting storms with optimal vantage points,[6] and pure thrill seeking.[7] Some chasers do it for money or competition, although chasers typically work together as well.

Although scientific work is sometimes cited as a goal, direct participation in such work is almost always impractical during the actual chase except for chasers collaborating in an organized university or government project.[8] Many chasers also act as storm spotters, reporting their observations of hazardous weather to relevant authorities. These reports greatly benefit real-time warnings with ground truth information, as well as science as a whole by increasing the reliability of severe storm databases used in climatology and other research (which ultimately boosts forecast and warning skill).[9] Some recreational chasers submit photos and videos to researchers as well as to the U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) for spotter training.[10]

Storm chasers are not generally paid to chase, with the exception of television media crews in certain television market areas, video stringers and photographers (freelancers mostly, but some staff), and researchers such as graduate meteorologists and professors. An increasing number sell storm videos and pictures and manage to make a profit.

A few operate "chase tour" services, making storm chasing a recently developed form of niche tourism.[11][12] Financial returns usually are relatively meager given the expenses of chasing, with most chasers spending more than they take in and very few making a living solely from chasing. Chasers are also generally limited by the duration of the season in which severe storms are most likely to develop, usually the local spring and/or summer.

No degree or certification is required to be a storm chaser, and many chases are mounted independently by amateurs and enthusiasts without formal training. Local National Weather Service offices do hold storm spotter training classes, usually early in the spring.[13] Some offices collaborate to produce severe weather workshops oriented toward operational meteorologists.

Storm chasers come from a wide variety of occupational and socioeconomic backgrounds. Though a fair number are professional meteorologists, most storm chasers are from other occupational fields, which may include any number of professions that have little or nothing to do with meteorology. A relatively high proportion possess college degrees and a large number live in the central and southern United States. Many are lovers of nature with interests that also include flora, fauna, geology, volcanoes, aurora, meteors, eclipses, and other aspects of astronomy.[3]

History

[edit]

The first person to gain public recognition as a storm chaser was David Hoadley (born 1938), who began chasing North Dakota storms in 1956, systematically using data from area weather offices and airports. He is widely considered the pioneer storm chaser[3] and was the founder and first editor of Storm Track magazine.

Neil B. Ward (1914–1972) subsequently brought research chasing to the forefront in the 1950s and 1960s, enlisting the help of the Oklahoma Highway Patrol to study storms. His work pioneered modern storm spotting and made institutional chasing a reality.

The first coordinated storm chasing activity sponsored by institutions was undertaken as part of the Alberta Hail Studies project beginning in 1969.[14] Vehicles[15] were outfitted with various meteorological instrumentation and hail-catching apparatus and were directed into suspected hail regions of thunderstorms by a controller at a radar site.[16] The controller communicated with the vehicles by radio.

In 1972, the University of Oklahoma (OU) in cooperation with the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) began the Tornado Intercept Project, with the first outing taking place on 19 April of that year.[17] This was the first large-scale tornado chasing activity sponsored by an institution. It culminated in a brilliant success in 1973 with the Union City, Oklahoma tornado providing a foundation for tornado and supercell morphology that proved the efficacy of storm chasing field research.[18] The project produced the first legion of veteran storm chasers, with Hoadley's Storm Track magazine bringing the community together in 1977.

Storm chasing then reached popular culture in three major spurts: in 1978 with the broadcast of an episode of the television program In Search of...; in 1985 with a documentary on the PBS series Nova; and in May 1996 with the theatrical release of Twister, a Hollywood blockbuster which provided an action-packed but heavily fictionalized glimpse of the hobby. Further early exposure to storm chasing resulted from notable magazine articles, beginning in the late 1970s in Weatherwise magazine.

Various television programs and increased coverage of severe weather by the news media, especially since the initial video revolution in which VHS ownership became widespread by the early 1990s, substantially elevated awareness of and interest in storms and storm chasing. The Internet in particular has contributed to a significant increase in the number of storm chasers since the mid-to-late 1990s. A sharp increase in the general public impulsively wandering about their local area in search of tornadoes similarly is largely attributable to these factors. The 2007–2011 Discovery Channel reality series Storm Chasers produced another surge in activity. Over the years the nature of chasing and the characteristics of chasers shifted.

From their advent in the 1970s until the mid-1990s, scientific field projects were occasionally conducted in the Great Plains during the spring.[18] The first of the seminal VORTEX projects occurred in 1994–1995[19] and was soon followed by various field experiments each spring, with another large project, VORTEX2,[20] in 2009–2010.[21] Since the mid-1990s, most storm chasing science, with the notable exception of large field projects, consists of mobile Doppler weather radar intercepts.

Typical storm chase

[edit]

Chasing often involves driving thousands of miles in order to witness the relatively short window of time of active severe thunderstorms. It is not uncommon for a chaser to end up empty handed on any particular day. Storm chasers' degrees of involvement, competencies, philosophies, and techniques vary widely, but many chasers spend a significant amount of time forecasting, both before going on the road as well as during the chase, utilizing various sources for weather data. Most storm chasers are not meteorologists, and many chasers expend significant time and effort in learning meteorology and the intricacies of severe convective storm prediction through both study and experience.[22]

Besides the copious driving to, from, and during chases, storm chasing is punctuated with contrasting periods of long waiting and ceaseless action. Downtime can consist of sitting under sun-baked skies for hours, playing pickup sports, evaluating data, or visiting landmarks while awaiting convective initiation. During an inactive pattern, this downtime can persist for days. When storms are occurring, there is often little or no time to eat or relieve oneself and finding fuel can cause frustrating delays and detours.

Navigating obstacles such as rivers and areas with inadequate road networks is a paramount concern. Only a handful of chasers decide to chase in Dixie Alley, an area of the Southern United States in which trees and road networks heavily obscure the storms and often large tornadoes. The combination of driving and waiting has been likened to "extreme sitting".[23] A "bust" occurs when storms do not fire, sometimes referred to as "severe clear", when storms fire but are missed, when storms fire but are meager, or when storms fire after dusk.

Most chasing is accomplished by driving a motor vehicle of any make or model, whether it be a sedan, van, pickup truck, or SUV, however, a few individuals occasionally fly planes and television stations in some markets use helicopters. Research projects sometimes employ aircraft, as well.

Geographical, seasonal, and diurnal activity

[edit]

Storm chasers are most active in the spring and early summer, particularly May and June, across the Great Plains of the United States (extending into Canada) in an area colloquially known as Tornado Alley, with many hundred individuals active on some days during this period. This coincides with the most consistent tornado days[24] in the most desirable topography of the Great Plains. Not only are the most intense supercells common there, but due to the moisture profile of the atmosphere the storms tend to be more visible than locations farther east where there are also frequent severe thunderstorms. There is a tendency for chases earlier in the year to be farther south, shifting farther north with the jet stream as the season progresses. Storms occurring later in the year tend to be more isolated and slower moving, both of which are also desirable to chasers.[22]

Chasers may operate whenever significant thunderstorm activity is occurring, whatever the date. This most commonly includes more sporadic activity occurring in warmer months of the year bounding the spring maximum, such as the active month of April and to a lesser extent March. The focus in the summer months is the Central or Northern Plains states and the Prairie Provinces, the Upper Midwest, or on to just east of the Colorado Front Range. An annually inconsistent and substantially smaller peak of severe thunderstorm and tornado activity also arises in the transitional months of autumn, particularly October and November. This follows a pattern somewhat the reverse of the spring pattern with the focus beginning in the north then dropping south and with an overall eastward shift. In the area with the most consistent significant tornado activity, the Southern Plains, the tornado season is intense but is relatively brief whereas central to northern and eastern areas experience less intense and consistent activity that is diffused over a longer span of the year.[3]

Advancing technology since the mid-2000s led to chasers more commonly targeting less amenable areas (i.e. hilly or forested) that were previously eschewed when continuous wide visibility was critical. These advancements, particularly in-vehicle weather data such as radar, also led to an increase in chasing after nightfall. Most chasing remains during daylight hours with active storm intercepting peaking from mid-late afternoon through early-to-mid evening. This is dictated by a chaser's schedule (availability to chase) and by when storms form, which usually is around peak heating during the mid-to-late afternoon but on some days occurs in early afternoon or even in the morning. An additional advantage of later season storms is that days are considerably longer than in early spring. Morning or early afternoon storms tend to be associated with stronger wind shear and thus most often happen earlier in the spring season or later during the fall season.

Chasing efforts occur in the Top End of the Northern Territory and in southeastern Australia,[25][26] with the biggest successes in November and December. A handful of individuals are also known to be chasing in other countries, including the United Kingdom, Israel, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Finland, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Poland, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Estonia, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, South Africa, Bangladesh, and New Zealand; although many people trek to the Great Plains of North America from these and other countries around the world (especially from the UK). The number of chasers and number countries where chasers are active expanded at an accelerating pace in Europe from the 1990s–2010s and in the Pampas and surrounding areas of South America in the 2010s-2020s.

Dangers

[edit]

There are inherent dangers involved in pursuing hazardous weather. These range from lightning, tornadoes, large hail, flooding, hazardous road conditions (rain or hail-covered roadways), animals on the roadway, downed power lines (and occasionally other debris), reduced visibility from heavy rain (often wind blown), blowing dust, hail and hail fog. Most directly weather-related hazards such as from a tornado are minimized if the storm chaser is knowledgeable and cautious. In some situations severe downburst winds may push automobiles around, especially high-profile vehicles. Tornadoes affect a relatively small area and are predictable enough to be avoided if sustaining situational awareness and following strategies including always having an open escape route, maintaining a safe distance, and avoiding placement in the direction of travel of a tornado (in most cases in the Northern Hemisphere this is to the north and to the east of a tornado). Lightning, however, is an unavoidable hazard.

"Core punching", storm chaser slang for driving through a heavy precipitation core to intercept the area of interest within a storm, is recognized as hazardous due to reduced visibility and because many tornadoes are rain-wrapped. The "bear's cage" refers to the area under a rotating wall cloud (and any attendant tornadoes), which is the "bear", and to the blinding precipitation (which can include window-shatteringly large hail) surrounding some or all sides of a tornado, which is the "cage".[27]

Similarly, chasing at night heightens risk due to darkness.[27]

In reality, the most significant hazard is driving,[27][28] which is made more dangerous by the severe weather. Adding still more to this hazard are the multiple distractions which can compete for a chaser's attention, such as driving, communicating with chase partners and others with a phone and/or radio, navigating, watching the sky, checking weather data, and shooting photos or video. Prudence and defensive driving is key to minimizing the risk. Chasers ideally work to prevent the driver from multitasking either by chase partners covering the other aspects or by the driver pulling over to do these other things if they are chasing alone. Drowsy driving is a chase hazard, especially on long trips back. This is exacerbated by nocturnal darkness and by the defatigating demands of driving through precipitation and on slick roads.[22][29]

Incidents

[edit]

For nearly sixty years, the only known chaser deaths were driving-related. As of 25 December 2025, there are four known direct storm chasing deaths and twelve indirect deaths. Nearly half of the indirect deaths are a result of hydroplaning in conditions after a chase.

The first was Christopher Phillips, a University of Oklahoma (OU) undergraduate student, who died in a hydroplaning accident when swerving to miss a rabbit in 1984.[30] Other incidents included Jeff Wear driving home in East Texas from a Hurricane Dennis chase in 2005,[31] and Fabian Guerra swerving to miss a deer while driving to a chase on I-80 in Iowa in 2009.[32] A wrong-way driver resulted in a head-on collision that killed Andy Gabrielson who was on the Turner Turnpike (I-44) near Sapulpa, Oklahoma, returning to Luverne, Minnesota, from a chase in 2012.[33][34][35]

On 31 May 2013, an extreme event led to the first known chaser deaths inflicted directly by weather when the widest tornado ever recorded struck near El Reno, Oklahoma. Engineer Tim Samaras, his photographer son Paul, and meteorologist Carl Young were killed on a rural road by the tornado while doing in situ probe and infrasonic field research. An amateur storm chaser was also killed in the tornado in a separate vehicle. In an exceptional combination of events, the already large and rain-obscured yet partially translucent tornado swiftly swelled to 2.6 mi (4.2 km) wide as it simultaneously changed direction and accelerated.[36][37] Several other chasers were also struck and some injured by this tornado and its parent supercell's rear flank downdraft (RFD).[38]

While chasing severe storms, a vehicle driven by Randall Yarnall for Kelley Williamson, who were contracting for The Weather Channel (TWC) as stars of their own show, Storm Wranglers, ran a stop sign while northbound on Farm to Market Road 1081 and struck a vehicle driven by Corbin Lee Jaeger going west on Farm to Market Road 2794 in West Texas in 2017. All three died at the scene,[39][40] and the mother of Jaeger sued the estates of Williamson and Yarnall, as well as TWC, as there was a history of reckless driving by the pair for which it was alleged TWC ignored warnings to them by other chasers. The suit filed in 2019 was resolved in 2021.[41]

Another fatality occurred in 2019 when Dale Sharpe, an Australian, struck a deer and subsequently became disabled on Kansas Highway 42. As he fled the vehicle, an oncoming vehicle struck him and he later died at the hospital.[42]

Two separate fatal accidents occurred in 2022. In April three OU meteorology students, Drake Brooks, Nicholas Nair, and Gavin Short, died after hydroplaning on I-35 in Oklahoma while returning from a chase[43] and in May, Martha Llanos Rodriguez, a storm chasing meteorologist from Mexico City was killed and three meteorologist colleagues were injured (two Chileans sustained non-life-threatening injuries and the other, Bradford Barrett, an American stationed in Chile, sustained life-threatening injuries) when they stopped for downed power lines on I-90 in southwestern Minnesota and their vehicle was hit by a semi-trailer truck.[44]

There are other incidents in which chasers were injured by automobile accidents, lightning strikes, and tornado impacts.[citation needed] While chasing a tornado outbreak on 13 March 1990, KWTV television photographer Bill Merickel was shot and injured upon accidentally stumbling on a drug deal near Lindsay, Oklahoma.[45][46]

Equipment

[edit]

Storm chasers vary with regards to the amount of equipment used, some prefer a minimalist approach; for example, where only basic photographic equipment is taken on a chase, while others use everything from satellite-based tracking systems and live data feeds to vehicle-mounted weather stations and hail guards.

Historic

[edit]
Top of a NSSL chase vehicle showing air conditioning unit, compass, and Global Positioning System.

Historically, storm chasing relied on either in-field analysis or in some cases nowcasts from trained observers and forecasters. The first in-field technology consisted of radio gear for communication. Much of this equipment could also be adapted to receive radiofax data which was useful for receiving basic observational and analysis data. The primary users of such technology were university or government research groups who often had larger budgets than individual chasers.

Radio scanners were also heavily used to listen in on emergency services and storm spotters so as to determine where the most active or dangerous weather was located. A number of chasers were also radio amateurs, and used mobile (or portable) amateur radio to communicate directly with spotters and other chasers, allowing them to keep abreast of what they could not themselves see.

It was not until the mid- to late 1980s that the evolution of the laptop computer would begin to revolutionize storm chasing. Early on, some chasers carried acoustic couplers to download batches of raw surface and upper air data from payphones. The technology was too slow for graphical imagery such as radar and satellite data; and during the first years this wasn't available on any connection over telephone lines, anyway. Some raw data could be downloaded and plotted by software, such as surface weather observations using WeatherGraphix[47] (predecessor to Digital Atmosphere)[48] and similar software or for upper air soundings using SHARP,[47] RAOB,[49] and similar software.

Most meteorological data was acquired all at once early in the morning, and the rest of day's chasing was based on analysis and forecast gleaned from this; as well as on visual clues that presented themselves in the field throughout the day. Plotted weather maps were often analyzed by hand for manual diagnosis of meteorological patterns.

When available chasers would make stops at rural airstrips or NWS offices for an update on weather conditions. NOAA Weather Radio (NWR) could provide information in the vehicle, without stopping, such as weather watches and warnings, surface weather conditions, convective outlooks, and NWS radar summaries. Nowadays, storm chasers may use high-speed Internet access available in any library, even in small towns in the US. This data is available throughout the day, but one must find and stop at a location offering Internet access.

With the development of the mobile computers, the first computer mapping software became feasible, at about the same time as the popular adoption of the VHS camcorder began a rapid growth phase. Prior to the mid to late 1980s most motion picture equipment consisted of 8 mm film cameras. While the quality of the first VHS consumer cameras was quite poor (and the size somewhat cumbersome) when compared to traditional film formats, the amount of video which could be shot with a minimal amount of resources was much greater than any film format at the time.

In the 1980s and 1990s The Weather Channel (TWC) and A.M. Weather were popular with chasers, in the morning preceding a chase for the latter and both before and during a chase for the former. Commercial radio sometimes also provides weather and damage information. The 1990s brought technological leaps and bounds. With the swift development of solid state technology, television sets for example could be installed with ease in most vehicles allowing storm chasers to actively view local TV stations.

Mobile phones became popular making group coordination easier when traditional radio communications methods were not ideal or for those possessing radios. The development of the World Wide Web (WWW) in 1993 hastened adoption of the Internet and led to FTP access to some of the first university weather sites.

The mid-1990s marked the development of smaller more efficient marine radars. While such marine radars are illegal if used in land-mobile situations, a number of chasers were quick to adopt them in an effort to have mobile radar. These radars have been found to interfere with research radars, such as the Doppler on Wheels (DOW) utilized in field projects. The first personal lightning detection and mapping devices also became available[50] and the first online radar data was offered by private corporations or, at first with delays, with free services. A popular data vendor by the end of the 1990s was WeatherTAP.

Current

[edit]
An armored "Tornado Intercept Vehicle" used to film inside a tornado with an IMAX camera, and featured in the Discovery Channel series, Storm Chasers.
The SRV Dominator, an armored tornado intercept vehicle featured in the Discovery Channel series, Storm Chasers.

Chasers used paper maps for navigation and some of those now using GPS still use these as a backup or for strategizing with other chasers. Foldable state maps can be used but are cumbersome due to the multitude of states needed and only show major roads. National atlases allow more detail and all states are contained in a single book, with AAA favored and Rand McNally followed by Michelin also used. The preferred atlases due to great detail in rural areas are the "Roads of..." series originally by Shearer Publishing, which first included Texas but expanded to other states such as Oklahoma and Colorado. Covering every state of the union are the DeLorme "Atlas and Gazetteer" series.

DeLorme also produced early GPS receivers that connected to laptops and for years was one of two major mapping software creators. DeLorme Street Atlas USA or Microsoft Streets & Trips were used by most chasers until their discontinuations in 2013. Chasers now use Google Maps, Waze, and/or Apple Maps or other web mapping on mobile devices as no comparably robust mapping software emerged although operating systems later implemented the apps Windows Maps and Apple Maps. To ensure mapping availability without an active internet connection, these solutions all require downloading maps locally ahead of time. GPS receivers may still be used with other software, such as for displaying radar data.

A major turning point was the advent of civilian GPS in 1996, which was followed by additional satellite navigation systems in ensuing decades and by refinements of GPS. At first, GPS units were very costly and only offered basic functions, but that would soon change. Towards the late 1990s the Internet was awash in weather data and free weather software, the first true cellular Internet modems for consumer use also emerged providing chasers access to data in the field without having to rely on a nowcaster. The NWS also released the first free, up-to-date NEXRAD Level 3 radar data. In conjunction with all of this, GPS units now had the ability to connect with computers, granting greater ease when navigating.

2001 marked the next great technological leap for storm chasers as the first Wi-Fi units began to emerge offering wireless broadband service in many cases for free. Some places (restaurants, motels, libraries, etc.) were known to reliably offer wireless access and wardriving located other availabilities. In 2002 the first Windows-based package to combine GPS positioning and Doppler weather radar appeared called SWIFT WX.[51] SWIFT WX allowed storm chasers to seamlessly position themselves accurately relative to tornadic storms.

In 2004 two more storm chaser tools emerged. The first, WxWorx, was a new XM Satellite Radio based system[52] utilizing a special receiver and Baron Services weather software. Unlike preexisting cellular based services there was no risk of dead spots, and that meant that even in the most remote areas storm chasers still had a live data feed. The second tool was a new piece of software called GRLevel3.[53] GRLevel3 and the higher bandwidth consuming GR2Analyst from the GRLevelX suite utilize both free and subscription based raw radar files, displaying the data in a true vector format with GIS layering abilities. Since 2006 a growing number of chasers are using Spotter Network (SN), which uses GPS data to plot real time position of participating spotters and chasers, and allows observers to report significant weather as well as GIS layering for navigation maps, weather products, and the like.

The most common chaser communications device is the cellular phone. These are used for both voice and data connections. External antennas and amplifiers may be used to boost signal transception. It is not uncommon that chasers travel in small groups of cars, and they may use CB radio (declining in use) or inexpensive GMRS / FRS hand-held transceivers for inter-vehicle communication. More commonly, many chasers are also ham radio operators and use the 2 meters VHF and, less often, 70 cm UHF bands to communicate between vehicles or with Skywarn / Canwarn spotter networks. Scanners are often used to monitor spotter, sometimes public safety communications, and can double as weather radios.

Since the mid-2000s social networking services may also be used, with Twitter most used for ongoing events, Facebook for sharing images and discussing chase reports, Discord for the same and with forecast conversations occurring on both platforms, with YouTube and sometimes Vimeo or TikTok for sharing videos, and Instagram also used to share imagery. Social networking services largely (but not completely) replace forums and email lists, which complemented and eventually supplanted Storm Track magazine, for conversing about and sharing images of storms.

In-field environmental data is still popular among some storm chasers, especially temperature, moisture, and wind speed and direction data. Many choose to mount weather stations atop their vehicles. Even professionally installed and scientific grade instrument systems are subject to various problems, however, so such casually collected data must be considered tenuously.[54] Others use handheld anemometers. Rulers or baseballs may be brought along for measuring hail and for showing as a comparison object. Vehicle mounted cameras, such as on the roof or more commonly on the dash, provide continuous visual recording capability.

Chasers heavily utilized still photography since the beginning. Videography gained prominence by the 1990s into the early 2000s but a resurgence of photography occurred with the advent of affordable and versatile digital SLR (DSLR) cameras. Prior to this, 35 mm SLR print and slide film formats were mostly used, along with some medium format cameras. In the late 2000s, mobile phone 3G data networks became fast enough to allow live streaming video from chasers using webcams. This live imagery is frequently used by the media, as well as NWS meteorologists, emergency managers, and the general public for direct ground truth information, and it promotes video sales opportunities for chasers. Also by this time, camcorders using memory cards to record video began to be adopted. Digital video had been around for years but was recorded on tape, whereas solid-state is random access rather than sequential access (linear) and has no moving parts. Late in the 2000s HD video began to overtake SD (which had been NTSC in North America) in usage as prices came down and performance increased (initially there were low-light and sporadic aliasing problems due to chip and sensor limitations). By the mid-2010s 4K cameras were increasingly in use.

Tripods and other camera mounting devices are used by those seeking crisp professional photo and video imagery and also enable chasers to tend to other activities. Other accessories include cable/remote shutter releases, lightning triggers, and lens filters. Windshield mounted cameras or dome enclosed cameras atop vehicle roofs may also be used, and a few chasers use UASs ("drones").

Late in the 2000s smartphones increased in usage, with radar viewing applications frequently used. Particularly, RadarScope[55] on the iOS and Android platforms is favored. Pkyl3[56] was a dominant early choice on Android devices but which discontinued development in August 2018.[56] RadarOmega[57] became a commonly used app in the 2020s. Other apps may be used as are browsers for viewing meteorological data and accessing social networking services.

Some handsets can be used as WiFi hotspots and wireless cards may also be used to avoid committing a handset to tethering or operating as a hotspot. Some hotspots operate as mobile broadband MNVO devices using any radio spectrum that is both available and is in contract with a service provider. Such devices may expand mobile data range beyond a single carrier's service area and typically can work on month-to-month contracts. Adoption of tablet computers expanded by the early 2010s. 4G LTE was adopted early, when available, and was especially useful for uploading HD video. 5G is used with some chasers selecting carriers based on network coverage. Connected car technology includes Wi-Fi which can be used to augment, or even supplant, connectivity via mobile phones.

A gradual uptick of those selecting mirrorless interchangeable-lens cameras (MILCs) began in the mid-2010s. Usage of DSLR for video capture, called HDSLR, is common, although camcorders remain relatively popular due to their greater functionality (many chasers still shoot both). Through the 2020s the use of 8K devices is gradually expanding and by the mid-2020s a few chasers are experimenting with 360-degree video.

Chasers also carry common travel articles and vehicle maintenance items, and sometimes first aid kits. Full sized spare tires are strongly preferable to "donut" emergency replacement tires. Power inverters (often with surged protected power strips) power devices that require AC (indoor/wall outlet) power, although some devices may be powered directly with DC (battery power) from the vehicle electric system. Water repellent products, such as Rain-X or Aquapel, are frequently applied to windshields to dispel water when driving as well as mud and small detritus, which boosts visibility and image clarity on photographs and videos shot through glass (which is particularly problematic if autofocus is on). Binoculars and sunglasses may be employed.

Ethics

[edit]

A growing number of experienced storm chasers advocate the adoption of a code of ethics in storm chasing featuring safety, courtesy, and objectivity as the backbone.[28][58] Storm chasing is a highly visible recreational activity (which is also associated with science) that is vulnerable to sensationalist media promotion.[59] Veteran storm chasers Chuck Doswell and Roger Edwards deemed reckless storm chasers as "yahoos".[60] Doswell and Edwards believe poor chasing ethics at TV news stations add to the growth of "yahoo" storm chasing.[61]

A large lawsuit[62] was filed against the parent company of The Weather Channel in March 2019 for allegedly keeping on contract storm chaser drivers with a demonstrated pattern of reckless driving which ultimately led to a fatal collision (killing themselves and a storm spotter in the other vehicle) when running a stop sign in Texas in 2017.[63] Edwards and Rich Thompson, among others, also expressed concern about pernicious effects of media profiteering[64] with Matt Crowther, among others, agreeing in principle but viewing sales as not inherently corrupting.[65]

Self-policing is predominantly seen as the means to mold the hobby. There is occasional discussion among chasers that at some point government regulation may be imposed due to increasing numbers of chasers and because of poor behavior by some individuals; however, many chasers do not expect this eventuality and almost all oppose regulations—as do some formal studies of dangerous leisure activities which also advocate deliberative self-policing.[66]

As there is for storm chaser conduct, there is concern about chaser responsibility. Since some chasers are trained in first aid and even first responder procedures, it is not uncommon for tornado chasers to be first on a scene and tending to storm victims or treating injuries at the site of a disaster in advance of emergency personnel and other outside aid.[67]

Aside from questions concerning their ethical values and conduct, many have been credited with giving back to the community in several ways. Just before the Joplin tornado, Storm Chaser[68] Jeff Piotrowski provided advanced warning to Officer Brewer of Joplin local law enforcement, prompting them to activate the emergency sirens. Though lives were lost, many who survived credited their survival to the siren.[69] After a storm has passed storm chasers are often the first to arrive on the scene and sometimes help assist.

Occasionally chasers provide data for research from their videos, social video posts, and documentation of storms. After the El Reno tornado in 2013, portals were created for chasers to submit their information to help in the research of the deadly storm.[70] The El Reno Tornado Environment Display (TED) was created to show a synchronized view of the submitted video footage overlaying radar images of the storm with various chasers' positions.[71] Chasers sometimes contribute to assessments of tornado damage, occasionally conducting their own surveys or collaborating with officials, especially as use of UASs grows. The OTUS Project, in collaboration with researchers, uses hardened custom UASs operated by a head-mounted display to record video and meteorological data, emphasizing wind field and thermodynamic documentation, in the vicinity and interior of tornadoes.[72]

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Storm chasing is the deliberate pursuit and interception of events, most notably thunderstorms and tornadoes, often conducted by meteorologists, researchers, photographers, and enthusiasts to observe, document, and sometimes report on these phenomena from close range. Primarily concentrated in regions like in the , from to , it serves multiple purposes, including advancing scientific understanding through , enhancing via ground reports, and capturing visual media for educational or commercial use. While it contributes valuable real-time observations to organizations like the (NWS), storm chasing is inherently hazardous, involving long-distance travel, unpredictable weather, and risks such as strikes, high winds, and accidents. The practice traces its origins to the mid-20th century, evolving from early storm spotting efforts during , when civilians were enlisted to protect military installations from tornado threats. A pivotal milestone occurred in 1948 when meteorologists at in issued the first public tornado forecasts, marking the beginning of formalized prediction. Scientific storm chasing gained momentum in the 1950s with pioneers like David Hoadley, who began pursuing tornadoes in 1956, and the 1973 Tornado Intercept Project, a collaborative effort that documented the Union City, , F4 tornado and provided groundbreaking insights into storm dynamics. By the 1970s, the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) in , formalized chasing for radar development and research, leading to major initiatives like the Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX) in 1994, which deployed mobile mesonets, weather balloons, and aircraft to gather comprehensive storm data. Recreational chasing surged in popularity during the and 1990s, fueled by media coverage, books like Tornado! (1985), and the 1996 film Twister—with renewed interest from the 2024 sequel Twisters—transforming it from a niche scientific endeavor into a widespread . Modern storm chasing practices typically involve forecasting storm paths using tools like radar apps, , and computer models, followed by high-mileage drives—often exceeding 1,000 miles per day—to position vehicles for safe intercepts. may deploy specialized , such as mobile stations for measuring , , , and , or simply use cameras and smartphones to record events, with success rates around one per ten chases. Motivations vary: professionals contribute to NWS warnings through the SKYWARN program by reporting observations, while amateurs and tour operators seek adventure, opportunities, or commercial footage, though the market for such media is highly competitive and often unprofitable without established skills. Advances in technology, including mobile internet and , have democratized access but also increased participation, with hundreds of chasers converging on major events. Safety remains a paramount concern, as the NWS explicitly discourages untrained individuals from chasing due to lethal risks, recommending instead that novices join experienced groups or professional tours. Essential guidelines include avoiding solo pursuits, maintaining escape routes, parking fully off roadways, and steering clear of storm cores, clouds, or flooded areas; safety protocols advise seeking if strikes occur within one mile. Ethical considerations emphasize courtesy—such as not trespassing, respecting roadblocks, and limiting disruptions to responders—and responsibility, like reporting to authorities without endangering the public. Tragedies, such as the that claimed the lives of veteran chaser and his team, underscore these dangers and have prompted ongoing discussions about reckless behaviors driven by media sensationalism. Despite these challenges, storm chasing continues to play a vital role in research and public .

Fundamentals and Motivations

Definition and Nature

Storm chasing is the deliberate pursuit and interception of events, such as thunderstorms and tornadoes, for , , , or scientific purposes. It encompasses the mobile tracking of these phenomena by individuals or organized groups, often across significant distances in regions prone to . This activity emphasizes direct engagement with dynamic atmospheric conditions rather than passive monitoring. Central to storm chasing are its mobile nature and dependence on predictive tools; participants use to position themselves near developing storms, guided by real-time weather forecasts and data to anticipate storm paths and intensity. Chasers primarily target thunderstorms—isolated, rotating storms characterized by persistent updrafts and potential for formation—due to their capacity to generate extreme hazards like large , damaging winds, and twisters. This focus distinguishes the pursuit from broader observation, as supercells represent the most volatile and visually dramatic convective systems. Storm chasing differs from amateur storm spotting, where individuals remain in fixed local areas to report conditions to weather services without extensive travel, and from professional meteorology, which involves remote analysis and prediction rather than physical interception. Effective participation demands foundational meteorological knowledge, including thunderstorm structure: updrafts sustain storm growth by lifting warm, moist air; downdrafts descend cooler air and precipitation, influencing storm propagation; and mesocyclones denote mid-level rotation within supercells, signaling heightened severe potential. While motivations range from personal thrill to research contributions, the core activity centers on safe, informed engagement with these events.

Motivations for Participation

Storm chasers often pursue the activity for personal reasons, including the adrenaline rush from close encounters with severe weather, the aesthetic appreciation of storms' visual and auditory power, and the personal challenge of predicting and intercepting dynamic atmospheric events. Research indicates that enjoying the sights and power of nature ranks as the top motivation, with 92% of recreational chasers citing the sights of nature and 90% the power of nature as important or very important. This drive for stimulation, such as feeling thrills and action, is secondary but significant, appealing to those seeking novel environmental interactions rather than extreme danger. Scientific and educational motivations also play a key role, with many chasers contributing to through data collection on storm structures and behaviors, which enhances understanding of phenomena. For instance, professional researchers chase storms to gather observations that improve forecasting models and reduce fatalities, viewing the activity as a means to advance . Additionally, participation serves educational purposes, such as training for response by simulating real-time assessment and under . Professionally, storm chasing supports media documentation, where capture footage for outlets to inform public awareness and during severe events. Tourism-based chasing attracts participants to organized tours, driven by operators' passion for sharing storm experiences rather than primary financial gain, though it bolsters local economies through spending on accommodations and . also contribute to storm warning systems by relaying real-time observations to the , aiding timely alerts and response efforts. Psychological profiles of storm chasers reveal moderate overall sensation-seeking traits, with high scores in experience seeking—such as exploring unfamiliar storm environments—and low scores in thrill and seeking or susceptibility, indicating a tolerance for calculated risks focused on novelty over recklessness. This profile fosters community bonding, as chasers often participate in tours or groups that emphasize shared learning and mutual support, enhancing social connections through collective pursuit of .

Historical Development

Origins and Early Practices

The origins of storm chasing trace back to informal and anecdotal pursuits in the early , primarily among residents of the U.S. who observed out of necessity or curiosity. Farmers in tornado-prone areas like and often monitored approaching storms from their fields or homesteads to protect and property, while pilots, leveraging aerial perspectives, reported encounters during routine flights. These early efforts lacked systematic pursuit but laid the groundwork for deliberate observation. A pivotal early organized initiative was the Thunderstorm Project of 1946, conducted by the U.S. Weather Bureau in , where pilots flew surplus aircraft directly into storms to gather data on and , marking the first use of airborne interception for meteorological research. The post-World War II era saw the emergence of dedicated storm chasing, influenced by advancements in radar technology repurposed from military applications. During the war, radar systems inadvertently detected precipitation echoes, inspiring postwar meteorological adaptations that enabled remote storm tracking. This technological shift facilitated the transition from passive observation to active pursuit in the , where the region's flat terrain and frequent thunderstorms provided ideal conditions for early chases. The first documented ground-based storm chases occurred in the mid-1950s, centered in and surrounding states, as enthusiasts began traveling to intercept systems. Pioneers like David Hoadley, who initiated chases in 1956 near his hometown using local weather reports and visual cues, established storm chasing as a distinct driven by scientific curiosity and adventure. Hoadley, often regarded as the father of the practice, traveled long distances in personal vehicles, overnighting on the road to position for storms, and documented his experiences through sketches and notes. Complementing this, Roger Jensen, a Minnesota-based starting in the late 1950s, contributed early photographic records of thunderstorms and tornadoes from fixed rural vantage points, helping to visualize storm structures for broader audiences. These individuals' efforts, without advanced forecasting tools, relied on basic vehicle mobility and naked-eye spotting, fostering a community of amateur observers by the early 1960s.

Evolution in the Modern Era

The modern era of storm chasing, beginning in the 1970s, marked a shift from isolated pursuits to organized, community-driven activities supported by institutional involvement and emerging technologies. In 1972, the , in collaboration with the National Severe Storms Laboratory, launched the Tornado Intercept Project, the first systematic effort to deploy teams for intercepting tornadoes to gather scientific data on storm dynamics. A notable success of this project was the interception and detailed study of the Union City, Oklahoma, F4 tornado on May 24, 1973, which yielded the first observations of a tornado's internal structure. This initiative trained students in field observations and helped professionalize chasing by integrating it with research goals. By 1977, the community coalesced further with the founding of Storm Track magazine by David Hoadley, which served as a key newsletter for sharing chase reports, forecasts, and safety tips among enthusiasts. These developments fostered networks that emphasized education and collaboration, laying the groundwork for broader participation. The 1990s and 2000s saw explosive growth in storm chasing, driven by technological advancements and cultural influences. The deployment of the Doppler radar network, completed nationwide by 1997, transformed chasing by providing real-time velocity data that enabled chasers to detect tornado signatures like mesocyclones from afar, improving intercept success rates. Concurrently, the rise of portable video cameras allowed chasers to document storms in detail, shifting from anecdotal reports to visual evidence that supported meteorological research and public awareness. The 1996 film Twister popularized the activity, spurring commercialization through guided tours; for instance, Silver Lining Tours began operations in 1997, offering civilians access to professional chases and contributing to the industry's expansion. In the and , storm chasing integrated digital tools and responded to environmental shifts, amplifying both opportunities and challenges. Social media platforms like and enabled real-time sharing of chase footage, drawing in younger participants and growing the community from dozens to hundreds per event, though this has raised concerns about safety as novices prioritize viral content over caution. has influenced chasing patterns by potentially increasing conditions favorable for severe thunderstorms, such as warmer atmospheres supporting stronger updrafts, leading chasers to adapt strategies for shifting tornado activity toward regions like the Southeast U.S. (). International chasing has also surged, with enthusiasts pursuing typhoons in and supercells in , facilitated by global weather data access. Key milestones include the establishment of the National Storm Chaser Summit, an annual event promoting education, safety, and collaboration among chasers, researchers, and meteorologists.

Chase Methods and Patterns

Typical Storm Chase Process

Storm chasers initiate the planning phase several days in advance by evaluating numerical weather models and forecasts to pinpoint potential outbreaks. A key resource is the (SPC) outlooks, issued by the (NOAA), which delineate risk categories—ranging from marginal to high—for severe thunderstorms and tornadoes across the . These outlooks guide chasers in selecting target areas, typically within the core of , where favorable conditions like high instability and converge most frequently. On the day of the chase, execution begins with positioning for storm interception, often involving travel along rural road networks to approach thunderstorms from the southeast flank for clear visibility of storm features like wall clouds or funnels. Chasers maintain safe distances while logging observations, including of storm evolution and correlating visual data with real-time returns to document phenomena such as cores or rotation signatures. Decision-making during the chase relies on nowcasting, the short-term forecasting of storm motion using updated , , and surface observations to adjust interception routes dynamically as storms deviate from initial projections. In group chases, convoy tactics are employed, where multiple vehicles travel in loose formation to facilitate radio communication, share updates, and avoid congestion on limited roads, ensuring coordinated yet independent movements. Following the chase, participants conduct debriefings to review encounters, assess forecasting accuracy, and identify procedural improvements for future outings. Observations are then uploaded to collaborative databases, such as the Spotter Network, which aggregates reports from chasers and spotters for integration into (NWS) systems like the Storm Events Database, aiding post-event verification and climatological analysis.

Geographical, Seasonal, and Diurnal Factors

Storm chasing is predominantly concentrated in the , where the region, often referred to as , provides the most favorable conditions for severe thunderstorms and tornadoes. This area spans from northern through , , , and into the Dakotas, characterized by flat terrain, abundant moisture from the , and frequent clashes between warm, moist air masses and dry continental air, leading to high instability. Secondary hotspots include in the , encompassing parts of , , , , and , where tornadoes are often more intense due to denser population, forested terrain, and nocturnal occurrences that complicate detection. The , a subregion of the extending across eastern Colorado, western , and the , is particularly noted for its clear visibility and isolated development, making it a prime area for observing and tornadoes. Seasonally, storm chasing peaks during spring from March to June, when warm Gulf moisture intersects with advancing cold fronts across the Plains, fostering the majority of activity; for instance, the southern Plains see the highest frequency in May and early June. In contrast, summer months, particularly June through August, shift focus to storms and derechos, with the latter—a widespread, long-lived wind event—occurring in about 70% of cases during this warm season due to persistent heat and convective clusters. events are most prevalent in the central and High Plains states like , , and from late spring through summer, driven by strong updrafts in supercells. Diurnally, severe storms typically initiate in the afternoon and early evening, fueled by solar heating that destabilizes the atmosphere by midday, peaking between noon and sunset when surface temperatures maximize . However, in the , storms often propagate eastward after dark, posing nocturnal risks such as reduced visibility, delayed warnings, and heightened flash flooding potential, which complicates chasing efforts. Globally, storm chasing extends beyond the U.S., influenced by regional climatology; in , form during the warmer months ( to April) in the southeastern states, with notable events like the 2000 Sydney tornadic demonstrating potential for severe and in coastal areas. In , severe thunderstorms, including , are most active in summer over continental regions like the Alpine forelands and the Mediterranean, where and heat contribute to and strong , though chasing is less common due to varied terrain and fewer dedicated pursuits.

Equipment and Technology

Historical Tools

Early storm chasers, particularly those active before the 1980s, depended on rudimentary, low-tech equipment to pursue across the , often operating as individual enthusiasts or small groups without institutional support. Standard vehicles such as pickup trucks and older model cars served as the primary means of transportation, enabling chasers to cover vast distances on rural roads while carrying essential gear. These vehicles were typically unmodified personal automobiles, chosen for their durability on unpaved paths and ability to withstand harsh weather conditions. For instance, pioneer David Hoadley, who began chasing storms in in 1956, used basic cars to reach storm sites based on local weather reports. Navigation and communication tools were equally basic, relying on paper maps for route planning and positioning relative to storms, as global positioning systems did not yet exist. Chasers plotted courses using detailed road atlases or state gazetteers, adjusting in real-time based on visible storm features like wall clouds or . For inter-chaser coordination and weather updates, portable radios played a crucial role; ham radios allowed limited voice communication between individuals, while dedicated weather radios provided broadcasts from the on storm locations and intensities. Citizens Band (CB) radios also emerged in the as an affordable option for trucker-style chatter among chasers, facilitating shared sightings on common channels. These tools were essential in the pre-digital era, where early chase practices emphasized solo or ad-hoc group efforts without centralized data feeds. Documentation methods centered on analog techniques to capture and record observations, given the absence of digital recording devices. Film photography dominated visual records, with chasers employing 35mm still cameras loaded with or similar film stocks to photograph storm structures, funnels, and damage; these images were later developed and shared via newsletters like Hoadley's Storm Track magazine, founded in 1977. Handwritten logs in notebooks served as the primary means of noting storm parameters, including visual estimates of wind speeds, hail sizes, and tornado paths, often cross-referenced with post-chase data. Such methods demanded meticulous note-taking during high-stress intercepts, as real-time verification was unavailable. The limitations of this equipment were profound, imposing significant constraints on chase effectiveness and safety. Without real-time or , chasers depended almost entirely on visual cues—such as shapes, inflow patterns, or distant —for storm identification and interception, often leading to missed opportunities or dangerous close calls. Portable radios offered sporadic updates at best, delayed by broadcast schedules and signal range, while paper maps could become obsolete amid rapidly changing storm motions. Film photography required careful exposure judgments in variable and waited days for , hindering immediate . These challenges underscored the exploratory of pre-1980s storm chasing, where persistence and compensated for technological shortcomings.

Contemporary Innovations

Contemporary storm chasers rely on heavily modified vehicles designed to withstand conditions, enhancing mobility and safety during pursuits. The (TIV), developed by storm chaser Sean Casey, features a reinforced , , and hydraulic struts to anchor it against high winds, allowing it to position directly in a tornado's path for . Similarly, the Dominator series, such as Dominator 3, is a customized Ford F-350 Super Duty truck with armored plating, deployable skirts to block debris, and integrated GPS systems for real-time navigation and storm tracking. These vehicles incorporate advanced GPS integration for precise positioning, often linked to meteorological software to optimize chase routes amid rapidly changing conditions. Sensing tools have advanced significantly, with mobile radar units providing on-the-ground data crucial for intercepting storms. The Doppler on Wheels (DOW) network, operated by the Center for Severe Weather Research, consists of truck-mounted X-band radars like DOW6, DOW7, and the rapid-scan DOW8, capable of scanning storm structures at high temporal resolution to detect tornado formation in real time. Chasers also deploy portable anemometers to measure wind speeds up close, complementing these radars, while laptops running specialized software such as GRLevelX enable visualization and analysis of NEXRAD radar data for identifying storm motion and rotation. GRLevelX supports features like storm-relative velocity displays and placefile overlays, allowing chasers to monitor severe weather dynamics efficiently during fieldwork. Documentation capabilities have evolved with high-definition cameras and drones, capturing detailed visuals for research and public awareness. Rugged, weather-resistant HD cameras, often mounted on vehicles in turret systems, provide stable, high-resolution footage of storm features without obstruction, essential for post-chase analysis. Drones equipped with 4K cameras offer aerial perspectives, enabling chasers to film tornado touchdowns from above while minimizing ground risks, as demonstrated in pursuits near , where drone footage revealed structural details of the vortex. Live-streaming via mobile apps, such as those integrated with platforms like or dedicated weather networks, allows real-time sharing of chase data with remote teams and spotters. Forecasting aids leverage smartphone apps and emerging AI models to improve path prediction and decision-making. The RadarScope app delivers high-resolution NEXRAD radar imagery, storm attributes, and velocity data directly to mobile devices, empowering chasers with tools for intercept planning and nowcasting. AI-driven models trained on datasets like TorNet, developed by MIT Lincoln Laboratory researchers, analyze data to enhance tornado detection accuracy. Additionally, AI forecasting models such as WoFSCast predict thunderstorm evolution, including tornado potential, up to two hours ahead, matching 70-80% of traditional predictions as of 2024. These innovations collectively boost efficiency by integrating real-time data streams for safer, more targeted pursuits.

Risks and Safety Measures

Primary Dangers

Storm chasing involves significant exposure to phenomena, which present the most direct threats to participants. Tornadoes can generate winds exceeding , capable of lifting and hurling vehicles or causing structural collapse if chasers are too close. Hailstones, often golf ball-sized or larger in thunderstorms, can shatter windshields and cause blunt force injuries upon impact. strikes from cumulonimbus clouds pose a lethal , with cloud-to-ground bolts striking unpredictably and accounting for numerous fatalities annually among those in open or elevated positions near storms. Flash flooding, a common byproduct of intense rainfall in these systems, can rapidly inundate roads and low-lying areas, sweeping away vehicles even in seemingly shallow water depths. Road hazards amplify these dangers, as chasers often navigate rural highways under duress. High-speed driving in conditions of reduced visibility—due to , dust storms, or blowing —heightens the risk of collisions, hydroplaning, or veering off-road. scattered by winds, including tree limbs or metal objects, can obstruct paths or puncture tires, while "chaser convergence" traffic jams from multiple vehicles block escape routes. These factors make vehicular accidents the leading cause of injury and death in storm chasing, surpassing direct impacts in frequency. Health threats arise from prolonged exposure to extreme conditions during extended pursuits. Physical exhaustion from hours of intense and monitoring can impair judgment, leading to errors in . Direct exposure to high winds, temperature extremes, and increases vulnerability to , heat stress, or injuries from falls and strains, particularly without adequate protective gear. To mitigate these risks, formal spotter training through programs like SKYWARN emphasizes recognizing storm structures and reporting protocols while prioritizing personal safety. Experienced chasers stress meticulous escape route planning, maintaining vehicle readiness with full fuel and spare tires, and adhering to (NWS) guidelines, which explicitly discourage storm chasing due to its inherent perils and recommend staying informed via . Operating in teams with clear communication and avoiding pursuits in low-visibility scenarios, such as nocturnal storms, further reduces hazards.

Notable Incidents and Lessons

Storm chasing has been marked by several tragic incidents that have underscored the inherent risks and prompted critical safety reforms within the community. One of the most devastating events occurred on May 31, 2013, near , when an EF3 claimed the lives of three experienced storm chasers: , his son Paul Samaras, and Carl Young. The trio, part of the research team, were conducting a probe deployment experiment when the rapidly intensifying and erratic storm overtook their vehicle, highlighting the dangers of close-range probing in unpredictable supercells. This incident, which also resulted in the tornado's record-breaking width of 2.6 miles, led to widespread reflection on the balance between scientific pursuit and personal safety. The have seen continued risks tied to the commercialization of storm chasing, with increased participation from tour groups contributing to traffic-related dangers. These events have amplified concerns over the influx of inexperienced participants via commercial operations, straining local and emergency responses. Analysis of these incidents reveals common causes, such as underestimating storm motion and intensity, leading to vehicles being caught in sudden wind gusts, debris fields, or flash flooding. The 2013 El Reno tragedy, for instance, was partly due to the storm's unanticipated rapid eastward shift, catching chasers off guard despite advanced radar data. These patterns have driven the adoption of enhanced safety protocols, including those emphasized in the Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (, which now prioritize maintaining safe distances (at least 1-2 miles from the ) and coordinated communication among chase teams to mitigate group risks. Statistically, storm chasing fatalities remain rare but have trended upward with growing participation; from 1970 to 2013, approximately 8 chaser deaths were recorded, with a spike in the 2000s-2010s correlating to increased amateur and commercial involvement. As of May 2024, total documented storm chaser fatalities stand at 16 (4 direct from , 12 indirect primarily from vehicle accidents). These trends have informed guidelines from organizations like the , advocating for spotter training and avoidance of high-risk maneuvers.

Ethics and Community Dynamics

Ethical Guidelines

Storm chasers are encouraged to adhere to core ethical principles that place above the pursuit of dramatic or personal thrill, ensuring that their activities do not endanger themselves, other chasers, or the public. This includes avoiding interference with services, such as blocking access routes for or creating traffic hazards during pursuits. A foundational guideline, articulated by Charles Doswell, emphasizes responsibility by staying out of damaged areas immediately after events and maintaining professional conduct to prevent exacerbating crises. Environmental considerations form another key aspect of responsible storm chasing, particularly given the high carbon emissions generated by long-distance vehicle travel across rural landscapes. Chasers are urged to minimize their ecological impact by optimizing routes, using fuel-efficient vehicles, and avoiding litter in remote areas to preserve natural habitats affected by . These practices align with broader calls for in weather-related fieldwork, recognizing the irony of pursuing climate-influenced storms while contributing to emissions. Within the chasing community, established rules promote respect for by prohibiting trespassing without permission and adhering to public roadways to avoid damaging crops or infrastructure. Accurate reporting is equally vital, with chasers expected to provide objective observations to meteorological authorities and media outlets, thereby countering that could mislead the public on storm risks. Sensationalized or unverified reports, often amplified on , undermine trust and can hinder effective warnings. Ethical debates in storm chasing often center on , where the demand for high-quality footage has led some participants to engage in riskier behaviors to secure marketable content, potentially prioritizing profit over . Additionally, tensions arise over , with advocates arguing for public dissemination of observations to advance scientific and public , contrasted against proprietary uses by private tour operators or media firms that restrict access. These discussions highlight the need for a balanced approach that supports both individual pursuits and collective benefits.

Storm Chasing Community

The storm chasing community encompasses a network of dedicated enthusiasts, volunteers, and professionals who connect through online platforms, formal organizations, and events to share knowledge, coordinate observations, and promote safe practices. Key online forums and groups, such as the Spotter Network, enable real-time reporting and collaboration by integrating storm spotter and chaser data into a centralized system accessible to meteorologists and emergency responders. Organizations like the Texas Severe Storms Association (TESSA), a 501(c)(3) non-profit, unite amateur and professional severe weather scientists for education and outreach, while annual conventions such as the National Storm Chaser Summit provide opportunities for in-person networking, expert presentations, and technology showcases, drawing hundreds of participants each year. Collaboration within the community often involves structured partnerships with official entities, particularly through spotter networks that supply ground-truth data to the (NWS). The SKYWARN program, administered by the NWS, trains 350,000 to 400,000 volunteers nationwide to report conditions like hail, high winds, and tornadoes, enhancing forecast accuracy and public safety during outbreaks. International exchanges, though less formalized, occur through shared events and tours where chasers from and participate in U.S.-based pursuits, fostering cross-border knowledge on dynamics and observation techniques. Efforts toward diversity and inclusion have gained momentum, with notable growth in female participation driven by initiatives addressing historical male dominance in the field. Groups like Girls Who Chase, founded in 2021, empower women and LGBTQIA+ individuals by providing accessible resources and visibility, including virtual "Storm Chasing 101" trainings in partnership with the (UCAR) program, which have reached hundreds of participants since 2023. These programs extend to underrepresented minorities through inclusive curricula that emphasize equitable access to education, contributing to a broader demographic shift in chasing demographics. Despite these advancements, the community faces internal challenges, including conflicts over "chaser etiquette" that prioritize road safety, minimal disruption to locals, and ethical reporting. Congestion from vehicle convoys during high-profile events has led to hazardous situations, such as backups in low-visibility conditions, prompting calls for stricter self-regulation among to avoid endangering and residents. plays a crucial role in mitigating these issues, with experienced chasers guiding novices through formal programs like those offered by and Girls Who Chase, emphasizing safety protocols and collaborative data sharing to build a more responsible collective.

Cultural and Media Influence

Storm chasing has been prominently featured in films and television, often portraying it as a high-stakes adventure blending scientific pursuit with personal drama. The 1996 blockbuster Twister, directed by and starring and , depicted meteorologists deploying innovative devices to study tornadoes while navigating rivalries and romance amid chaotic chases. This film significantly boosted public interest, with applications to the University of Oklahoma's School of doubling in the years following its release, inspiring a new generation of aspiring chasers and researchers. Its sequel, Twisters (2024), updated the narrative to include influencers and advanced technology, further romanticizing the thrill of intercepting massive storms. Following its 2024 release, Twisters also led to a reported surge in interest and enrollments in meteorology programs across the . Television series have also contributed to this portrayal, emphasizing the adrenaline and teamwork involved. The Discovery Channel's Storm Chasers (2007–2011) followed teams of meteorologists and enthusiasts using armored vehicles and to pursue tornadoes across , capturing dramatic footage while highlighting data collection efforts. The series showcased diverse personalities, from methodical scientists like Josh Wurman to aggressive interceptors like Sean Casey, blending educational insights on dynamics with reality-TV tension. Other films, such as Into the Storm (2014) and (2021), similarly dramatized chases, focusing on survival against massive twisters and the ethical dilemmas of getting too close. In literature, storm chasing appears in both non-fiction accounts and fictional thrillers, offering deeper explorations of the human element. Non-fiction works like Nancy Mathis's Storm Warning: The Story of a Killer Tornado (2007) recount the 1999 Oklahoma outbreak, incorporating perspectives from researchers like , who pioneered tornado studies, and weathermen who tracked storms in real-time, underscoring the blend of science and peril. Fictional narratives, such as Chris Kridler's Storm Seekers series (starting with Funnel Vision in 2007), follow quirky chasers on adrenaline-fueled pursuits through , emphasizing obsession and camaraderie while weaving in meteorological details for authenticity. Social media has amplified storm chasing's visibility, with viral videos fostering both romanticized perceptions and educational outreach. Platforms like and host live streams from chasers using radars and AI tools, such as , whose main channel has approximately 2.9 million subscribers as of November 2025 and often issues tornado warnings faster than official sources, aiding public safety during events like the 2021 outbreaks. These clips, amassing millions of views, portray chasing as an accessible , encouraging viewer engagement but also glamorizing close encounters that shape idealized views of the activity. However, such representations have drawn criticism for , potentially inciting unsafe behavior among amateurs. Media depictions, including close-call videos shared without sufficient , filter for dramatic content that goes viral, misleading viewers into underestimating risks and prompting mimicry—such as inexperienced individuals approaching tornadoes for footage. This has contributed to road congestion and heightened dangers, as seen after the fatalities, where media-inspired tourism exacerbated hazards for both chasers and residents. Critics argue that prioritizing thrills over safety in films, TV, and online content undermines the scientific value of chasing and endangers lives.

Prominent Figures and Contributions

, an engineer and storm chaser, pioneered the development of in-situ probes designed to measure tornado wind speeds and drops at ground level. These cone-shaped devices, which he engineered and deployed directly into tornado paths, provided unprecedented data on internal storm dynamics, including a record-low reading of 100 millibars during a 2003 tornado in . Roger Hill, a storm chaser with over 40 years of experience, holds the Guinness World Record for the most tornadoes sighted by one person (676 as verified in 2018) and has documented nearly 2,000 tornadoes through meticulous photography and video. His extensive fieldwork has contributed to improved understanding of tornado behavior via shared observations, and he has advanced the field through leading storm chasing tours that educate participants on prediction and interception techniques. Sean Casey, a filmmaker and storm chaser, created the Tornado Intercept Vehicle (TIV), a heavily armored capable of withstanding EF3-level winds to collect close-range data and footage during intercepts. The TIV, featured in the series Storm Chasers and IMAX films like , has enabled safer scientific observations and popularized storm research through media. Jennifer Walton, a self-taught forecaster and photographer, founded the Girls Who Chase initiative in 2018 to promote gender equity in the male-dominated field of storm chasing. By amplifying the voices and content of female and non-binary chasers, her advocacy has fostered inclusivity, mentorship, and diverse participation in documentation and research. Participants in the VORTEX2 project (2009-2010), the largest tornado research effort ever, included over 100 scientists who deployed mobile radars and instruments across more than 10,000 miles to capture data on tornado formation from 11 supercells. Key contributors like Josh Wurman advanced mobile radar technology, yielding insights into storm rotation that improved forecasting models. Media pioneers such as Casey and have shaped public awareness through television and film, with Timmer's high-speed intercepts featured on Storm Chasers and his social media reaching millions to disseminate real-time warnings. The legacy of these figures endures through awards like the National Storm Chaser Summit Hall of Fame, which inducted Samaras, Wurman, and others in its inaugural class in 2025. Post-2020 publications, including Storm: Chasing Nature's Wildest Weather (2025), continue to honor their influences by detailing ethical chasing and technological advancements.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.