Hubbry Logo
Viktor YushchenkoViktor YushchenkoMain
Open search
Viktor Yushchenko
Community hub
Viktor Yushchenko
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Viktor Yushchenko
Viktor Yushchenko
Viktor Yushchenko
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Viktor Andriiovych Yushchenko[a] (Ukrainian: Віктор Андрійович Ющенко, IPA: [ˈwiktor ɐnˈd⁽ʲ⁾r⁽ʲ⁾ijowɪtʃ ˈjuʃtʃenko] ⓘ; born 23 February 1954) is a Ukrainian politician who was the third president of Ukraine from 23 January 2005 to 25 February 2010. He aimed to orient Ukraine towards the West, European Union, the G7 and NATO.

Key Information

Yushchenko's first career was in the banking industry. In 1993, he became governor of the National Bank of Ukraine, presiding over their response to hyperinflation and the introduction of a national currency. From 1999 to 2001 he was prime minister under President Leonid Kuchma. After his dismissal as prime minister, Yushchenko went into opposition to President Kuchma and founded Our Ukraine Bloc, which at the 2002 parliamentary election became Ukraine's most popular political force.

As an informal leader of the Ukrainian opposition coalition, he was one of the two main candidates in the 2004 Ukrainian presidential election, the other being Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. During the election campaign in late 2004, Yushchenko became the victim of an assassination attempt when he was poisoned with dioxin. He suffered disfigurement as a result of the poisoning, but survived. The runoff election in November 2004, won by Yanukovych, was marred by widespread accusations of election fraud, leading to the Orange Revolution and an order by the Ukrainian Supreme Court to repeat the vote. Yushchenko won the revote 52% to 44%.

Yushchenko's influence declined soon after assuming the presidency, especially after falling out with his prime minister and leading political ally Yulia Tymoshenko, as did his and his party's popularity and electoral standing. The rest of his presidency was marked by infighting, legislative deadlock and coalition crises in 2007 and in 2008. He lost re-election to Yanukovych in the 2010 Ukrainian presidential election, finishing in fifth place in the first round with 5.5% of the vote. Yushchenko again led Our Ukraine in the 2012 parliamentary election, but they failed to win representation.

Early life

[edit]

Yushchenko was born on 23 February 1954, in Khoruzhivka, Sumy Oblast, Ukrainian SSR, Soviet Union, into a family of teachers. His father, Andriy Andriyovych Yushchenko (1919–1992) fought in the Second World War, was captured by German forces and imprisoned as a POW in a series of concentration camps in the German Reich, including Auschwitz-Birkenau. His father survived the ordeal, and after returning home taught English at a local school.[1]

Viktor's mother, Varvara Tymofiyovna Yushchenko (1918–2005), taught physics and mathematics at the same school. The Sumy Oblast region where he was born is predominantly Ukrainian-speaking, and this differentiated him in later life from his political counterparts, for whom Russian was the mother tongue.[1]

Yushchenko graduated from the Ternopil Finance and Economics Institute in 1975. He began work as an accountant, as a deputy to the chief accountant in a kolkhoz. From 1975 to 1976, he served as a conscript in the Transcaucasian Military District on the Soviet–Turkish border.

Central banker

[edit]
See also: 1996 Ukrainian monetary reform

In 1976, Yushchenko began a career in banking.[2] In 1983, he became the Deputy Director for Agricultural Credit at the Ukrainian Republican Office of the Soviet Union State Bank.[2] From 1990 to 1993, he worked as vice-chairman and first vice-chairman of the JSC Agroindustrial Bank Ukraina. In 1993, he was appointed Governor of the National Bank of Ukraine (Ukraine's central bank).[2] In 1997, Verkhovna Rada, the parliament of Ukraine, re-appointed him.

As a central banker, Yushchenko played an important part in the creation of Ukraine's national currency, the hryvnia, and the establishment of a modern regulatory system for commercial banking. He also successfully overcame a debilitating wave of hyper-inflation that hit the country—he brought inflation down from more than 10,000 percent to less than 10 percent—and managed to defend the value of the currency following the 1998 Russian financial crisis.

In 1998, he wrote a thesis entitled "The Development of Supply and Demand of Money in Ukraine" and defended it in the Ukrainian Academy of Banking. He thereby earned a doctorate in economics.

Prime minister

[edit]
Yushchenko as prime minister visiting Poland in 2000

In December 1999, Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma unexpectedly nominated Yushchenko to be the prime minister after the parliament failed by one vote to ratify the previous candidate, Valeriy Pustovoytenko.

Ukraine's economy improved during Yushchenko's cabinet service. However, his government, particularly Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, soon became embroiled in a confrontation with influential leaders of the coal mining and natural gas industries. The conflict resulted in a no-confidence vote by the parliament on 26 April 2001,[3] orchestrated by the Communist Party of Ukraine, who opposed Yushchenko's economic policies, and by centrist groups associated with the country's powerful "oligarchs." The vote passed 263 to 187 and resulted in Yushchenko's removal from office.

"Our Ukraine" leader

[edit]
Yushchenko with fellow opposition leader Oleksandr Moroz during the Orange Revolution, 2004
Yushchenko's approval rating stood at 7% as of October 2009 according to FOM-Ukraine polling results.[4]

In 2002, Yushchenko became the leader of the Our Ukraine (Nasha Ukrayina) political coalition, which received a plurality of seats in the year's parliamentary election. However, the number of seats won was not a majority, and efforts to form a majority coalition with other opposition parties failed. Since then, Yushchenko has remained the leader and public face of the Our Ukraine parliamentary faction. [citation needed]

In 2001, both Yushchenko and Tymoshenko broached at creating a broad opposition bloc against the incumbent President Kuchma in order to win the Ukrainian presidential election 2004.[5]

In late 2002 Yushchenko, Oleksandr Moroz (Socialist Party of Ukraine), Petro Symonenko (Communist Party of Ukraine) and Tymoshenko (Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc) issued a joint statement concerning "the beginning of a state revolution in Ukraine". Though the communists stepped out of the alliance and though Symonenko opposed having one single candidate from the alliance in the 2004 presidential election, the other three parties remained allies[6] until July 2006.[7]

On 2 July 2004, Our Ukraine and the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc established the Force of the people, a coalition which aimed to stop "the destructive process that has, as a result of the incumbent authorities, become a characteristic for Ukraine", at the time Kuchma and Yanukovych were the incumbent authorities in Ukraine. The pact included a promise by Yushchenko to nominate Tymoshenko as prime minister if he won the October 2004 presidential election.[5]

Yushchenko was widely regarded as the moderate political leader of the anti-Kuchma opposition, since other opposition parties were less influential and had fewer seats in parliament. Since becoming President of Ukraine in 2005, he has been an honorary leader of the Our Ukraine party.

From 2001 to 2004, his rankings in popularity polls were higher than those of Kuchma. In later public opinion polls, though, his support plummeted from a high of 52% following his election in 2004 to below 4%.[8][9][10]

However, in the parliamentary elections of March 2006, the Our Ukraine party, led by Prime Minister Yuriy Yekhanurov, received less than 14% of the national vote, taking third place behind the Party of Regions and the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc. In a poll by the Sofia Social Research Centre between 27 July and 7 August 2007 more than 52% of those polled said they distrusted Yushchenko while 48% said they trusted him.[11]

Presidential election of 2004

[edit]
Main article: 2004 Ukrainian presidential election
Pro-Orange Revolution demonstration in Brussels, Belgium

In 2004, as Kuchma's term came to an end, Yushchenko announced his candidacy for president as an independent. His major rival was Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. Since his term as prime minister, Yushchenko had slightly modernized his political platform, adding social partnership and other liberal slogans to older ideas of European integration, including Ukraine's joining NATO and fighting corruption. Supporters of Yushchenko were organized in the "Syla Narodu" ("Power to the People") electoral coalition, which he and his political allies led, with the Our Ukraine coalition as the main constituent force.

Yushchenko built his campaign on face-to-face communication with voters, since the government prevented most major TV channels from providing equal coverage to candidates.[12][13] Meanwhile, his rival, Yanukovych, frequently appeared in the news and even accused Yushchenko, whose father was a Red Army soldier imprisoned at Auschwitz, of being "a Nazi,"[14][15] even though Yushchenko actively reached out to the Jewish community in Ukraine and his mother is said to have risked her life by hiding three Jewish girls for one and a half years during the Second World War.[16]

TCDD poisoning

[edit]
Left to right: Viktor Yushchenko before the poisoning (2004), and after (2006), with chloracne from his TCDD poisoning.

Yushchenko became seriously ill in early September 2004. He was flown to Vienna's Rudolfinerhaus clinic for treatment and diagnosed with acute pancreatitis, accompanied by interstitial edematous abnormalities, due to a serious viral infection and chemical substances that are not normally found in food products. Yushchenko claimed that he had been poisoned by government agents. After the illness, his face has shown signs of chloracne.

British toxicologist Professor John Henry of St Mary's Hospital in London declared the abnormalities in Yushchenko's face were due to chloracne, which results from dioxin poisoning.[17] Dutch toxicologist Bram Brouwer also stated his abnormalities in appearance were the result of chloracne, and found dioxin levels in Yushchenko's blood 6,000 times above normal.[18]

On 11 December, Michael Zimpfer of the Rudolfinerhaus clinic declared that Yushchenko had ingested TCDD dioxin and had 1,000 times the usual concentration in his body.[19]

Many have linked Yushchenko's poisoning to a dinner with a group of senior Ukrainian officials (including Volodymyr Satsyuk) that took place on 5 September.[17][18][19]

Since 2005, Yushchenko has been treated by a team of doctors led by Professor Jean Saurat at the University of Geneva Hospital.[20] Analysis of Yushchenko's body fluids and tissues provided useful information on the human toxicokinetics of TCDD and its metabolites.[21]

Yushchenko himself implicated Davyd Zhvania, the godfather of one of his children, of involvement in his dioxin poisoning.[22]

In August 2009, The Lancet published a scientific paper by Swiss and Ukrainian researchers on the monitoring, form, distribution, and elimination of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) in Yushchenko in relation to his severe poisoning. The 2004 TCDD levels in Yushchenko's blood serum were 50,000 times greater than those in the general population.[21] This new study also concluded that the dioxin "was so pure that it was definitely made in a laboratory".[23]

On 27 September 2009, Yushchenko said in an interview aired on Channel 1+1 that the testimony of three men who were at a dinner in 2004 at which he believes he was poisoned is crucial to finishing the investigation, and he claimed these men were in Russia. Ukrainian prosecutors said Russia has refused to extradite one of the men, the former deputy chief of Ukraine's security service, Volodymyr Satsyuk, because he holds both Russian and Ukrainian citizenship.[24] Satsyuk returned to Ukraine in 2012 and tried to relaunch his political career, but did not succeed.[25]

Presidency

[edit]

Inauguration

[edit]

At 12 pm (Kyiv time) on 23 January 2005 the inauguration of Yushchenko as the President of Ukraine took place.[26] The event was attended by numerous foreign dignitaries.[27][28]

Presidency

[edit]
Yushchenko meeting U.S. President George W. Bush at an April 2005 press conference.

The first hundred days of Yushchenko's term, 23 January 2005 through 1 May 2005, were marked by numerous dismissals and appointments at all levels of the executive branch. He appointed Tymoshenko as prime minister and the appointment was ratified by parliament. Oleksandr Zinchenko was appointed the head of the presidential secretariat with a nominal title of Secretary of State. Petro Poroshenko, a fierce competitor of Tymoshenko for the post of prime minister, was appointed Secretary of the Security and Defense Council.

In May 2005, Ukraine hosted the Eurovision Song Contest in the capital of Kyiv. Some accused Yushchenko of attempting to gain political capital from the event, with his appearance on stage at the end criticised as 'undignified' by certain commentators.[29] During 2005, Yushchenko was in confident mood, making such pledges as solving the Gongadze case to the removal of Russia's Black Sea Fleet.[30]

In August 2005, Yushchenko joined with Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili in signing the Borjomi Declaration, which called for the creation of an institution of international cooperation, the Community of Democratic Choice, to bring together the democracies and incipient democracies in the region around the Baltic, Black, and Caspian Seas. The first meeting of presidents and leaders to discuss the CDC took place on 1–2 December 2005 in Kyiv.

According to former Security Service of Ukraine Chairman Oleksandr Turchynov, in the summer of 2005 Yushchenko prevented an investigation into allegedly fraudulent practices in the transport of Turkmen natural gas to Ukraine and the arrest of Yuri Boyko for abuse of office while heading Naftogaz.[31][32]

Dismissal of other Orange Revolution members

[edit]

On 8 September 2005, Yushchenko fired his government, led by Tymoshenko, after resignations and claims of corruption. On 9 September, acting Prime Minister Yekhanurov tried to form a new government.[33] His first attempt, on 20 September, fell short by 3 votes of the necessary 226, but on 22 September the parliament ratified his government with 289 votes.

Also in September 2005, former president Leonid Kravchuk accused exiled Russian tycoon Boris Berezovsky of financing Yushchenko's presidential election campaign, and provided copies of documents showing money transfers from companies he said were controlled by Berezovsky to companies controlled by Yushchenko's official backers. Berezovsky confirmed that he met Yushchenko's representatives in London before the election, and that the money was transferred from his companies, but he refused to confirm or deny that the money was used in Yushchenko's campaign. Financing of election campaigns by foreign citizens is illegal in Ukraine.

In August 2006, Yushchenko appointed his onetime opponent in the presidential race, Yanukovych, to be the new prime minister. This was generally regarded as indicating a rapprochement with Russia.[34]

First dissolution of Parliament

[edit]
Main articles: 2007 Ukrainian political crisis and 2007 Ukrainian parliamentary election
Yushchenko meeting German Chancellor Angela Merkel in EPP Summit in Meise, 21 June 2007

On 2 April 2007, Yushchenko signed an order to dissolve the parliament and call early elections.[35][36] Some consider the dissolution order illegal because none of the conditions spelled out under Article 90 of the Constitution of Ukraine for the president to dissolve the legislature had been met. Yushchenko's detractors argued that he was attempting to usurp the functions of the Constitutional Court by claiming constitutional violations by the parliament as a pretext for his action. The parliament appealed the Constitutional Court itself and promised to abide by its ruling.[37]

In the meantime, the parliament continued to meet and banned the financing of any new election pending the Constitutional Court's decision. Competing protests took place and the crisis escalated. In May 2007, Yushchenko illegally dismissed three members of Ukraine's Constitutional Court, thus preventing the court from ruling on the constitutionality of his decree dismissing Ukraine's parliament.[37]

Second dissolution of Parliament and conflict with Tymoshenko (2008–2009)

[edit]
Main article: 2008 Ukrainian political crisis
Yushchenko and Yulia Tymoshenko representing their parties ("Our Ukraine" and "Fatherland") at the Summit of European People's Party, Lisbon, Portugal, 18 October 2007

Yushchenko again tried to dissolve the parliament on 9 October 2008 by announcing parliamentary elections to be held on 7 December. Yushchenko's decree was suspended and subsequently lapsed. Yushchenko in defense of his actions said, "I am deeply convinced that the democratic coalition was ruined by one thing alone—human ambition. The ambition of one person." Political groups including members of his own Our Ukraine party contested the election decree and politicians vowed to challenge it in the courts.[38][39]

Yushchenko in March 2009

In December 2008, following a back room revolt from members of Our Ukraine-Peoples' Self Defense Party a revised coalition was formed between members of Our Ukraine (OU-PSD), the Bloc of Yulia Tymoshenko (BYuT), and the Lytvyn Bloc (LB), increasing the size of the governing coalition by an additional 20 members. Yushchenko in responding to journalists questions claimed "The fact is that the so-called coalition was formed on basis of political corruption, this coalition will be able to work only if the Communist Party will join it. Speaking about such a type of coalition, it is even more shameful." Yushchenko also stated that Tymoshenko's desire to keep her job as Prime Minister was the main motive for creating the coalition and that he wanted to expel the OU-PSD lawmakers who supported the creation of the coalition from the list of members of parliament.[40][41]

Yushchenko claimed (19 March 2009) that his conflicts with Tymoshenko are not due to personal differences, but to the incompleteness of the constitutional reforms of 2004.[42]

On 23 July 2009, under the terms of Ukraine's Constitution the president cannot dismiss the parliament within six months from the expiration of his five-year term of authority, which ended on 23 January 2010.

2010 presidential election and later career

[edit]

2010 presidential election

[edit]
Main article: 2010 Ukrainian presidential election
Viktor Yushchenko (first round) – percentage of total national vote (5.5%)

On 10 November 2009, Yushchenko was nominated for a second term as president, with the election to be held on 17 January 2010.[43] In late November 2009, he stated he was going to leave politics after his possible second term.[44] During the campaign, Yushchenko claimed that his fellow candidates "Tymoshenko and Yanukovych are not ideologists who care about the fate of Ukraine and its interests. They are two political adventurers" and that Ukraine's independence and sovereignty were at the time more jeopardized than five to ten years earlier.[45]

The first round of the elections took place on 17 January 2010, and Yushchenko dropped to a distant fifth place with only 5.45% of the vote.[46][47] His result became the worst result for any sitting president.[48]

Yushchenko stated that he wanted to continue to defend democracy in Ukraine[49] and that he wanted to return to the presidency.[50]

On 22 January 2010, as outgoing President, Yushchenko officially rehabilitated one of Ukraine's most controversial figures from the era of World War II, the ultranationalist leader Stepan Bandera, awarding him the title of Hero of Ukraine.[51][52] Yushchenko's decision immediately caused an uproar and was condemned by the European Parliament and Russian, Polish, and Jewish organizations[53][54][55][56] and was declared illegal by the following Ukrainian government and a court decision in April 2010. In January 2011, the award was officially annulled.[57]

In the second round of Ukraine's presidential election, Yushchenko did not support either of the candidates, Yanukovych or Tymoshenko.[58]

Yushchenko attributed his low popularity ratings to his adherence to his principles.[59] "Ukraine is a European democratic country", Yushchenko said at the polling station. "It is a free nation and free people."[60] In the following days, he said that "Ukraine doesn't have a decent choice" for his replacement. "Both candidates are alienated from national, European, and democratic values. I don't see a principal difference between them." However, his low approval ratings may also be attributable to his tacit support for his former adversary Yanukovych[61] between rounds one and two. Yushchenko removed the Kharkiv and Dniproptrovsk governors, who had expressed support for Tymoshenko and had refused to provide administrative resources for Yanukovych's campaign.[citation needed][original research?]

Yushchenko did not attend the inauguration ceremony of Yanukovych.[62]

On 10 March 2010, Yushchenko indicated his future plans would largely depend on Yanukovych's performance.[63] A day earlier, Yushchenko's former ally turned rival, Tymoshenko, took up the mantle as leader of the democratic opposition. But Yushchenko warned that her leadership would end in disaster, noting, "[e]very political force that united with Tymoshenko ended badly."[63] On 31 May 2010 Yushchenko stated that Tymoshenko was his "worst mistake": "The most serious mistake was to give power to her twice".[64]

Later career including 2012 parliamentary elections

[edit]
Further information: 2012 Ukrainian parliamentary election
Yushchenko in August 2016

Yushchenko testified against his former ally Tymoshenko during her trial over a 2009 natural gas treaty she brokered with Russia; a trial he called "a normal judicial process".[65][66] Yushchenko's view differed from that of the European Union's (EU) foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who said in a statement the Tymoshenko verdict showed justice was being applied "selectively in politically motivated prosecutions".[66]

Late September 2011 Yushchenko stated he intended to run for parliament on an Our Ukraine party ticket at the 2012 Ukrainian parliamentary elections.[65][67] Mid-February 2012 Yushchenko stated he was ready to take part in this election on a list of the united opposition, but not in a majority constituency.[68] In these election Yushchenko headed the election list of Our Ukraine;[69] the party won 1.11% of the national votes and no constituencies and thus failed to win parliamentary representation.[70][71]

In February 2013 Yushchenko intended to be a candidate during the next presidential election (at the time scheduled to be in 2015).[72]

Euromaidan and 2014 election

[edit]

In an interview with the French radio station Europe 1 in March 2014, Yushchenko stated that he supported the Euromaidan protests and opposed the Russian invasion in Crimea, noting that in his view "Putin dreams of reconstructing the Soviet empire under the name of Russia.[73] He is so obsessed with this that he hasn't understood power balance."[73] He further stated that "Crimea isn't Russian; rather it is Ukrainian".

With regard to the 2014 presidential election, Yushchenko indicated his support for Vitali Klitschko, and described Tymoshenko as "the candidate of Moscow".[73] Yushchenko himself did not stand as a candidate in these elections.[74]

Russian invasion of Ukraine

[edit]

In a 2024 interview, Yushchenko criticized the US Congress's delay in approving military aid to Ukraine, describing it as “a colossal waste of time” that allowed Russia to “attack, ruin infrastructure, rampage all over Ukraine”. He also supported President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's handling of the situation and opposed giving up territory to end the war, saying that it would give Vladimir Putin "five or seven years to get stronger and then start this misery again".[75] In 2025, Yushchenko stated that even the liberation of Ukrainian territory in its internationally recognized borders would not guarantee Ukrainian security, which can only be achieved with the liquidation of Putin's regime in Moscow.[76]

Political positions

[edit]
Yushchenko speaking at the University of Zurich in 2009

On 31 March 2009, in his address to the nation before Parliament, Yushchenko proposed sweeping government reform changes and an economic and social plan to ameliorate current economic conditions in Ukraine and apparently to respond to standing structural problems in Ukraine's political system.

The proposal, which Yushchenko called a 'next big step forward for fairness and prosperity in Ukraine' included the following proposals:[77]

  • Restore financial stability in the country by implementing the International Monetary Fund reforms and a balanced budget
  • Abolish parliamentary immunity
  • Fair pension system based on the number of years of work and salary received
  • Pass a realistic state budget for 2009 that reduces inflation and stabilizes the hryvnia
  • Have the state assume responsibility for struggling banks
  • Rejuvenate rural areas by eliminating state interference in agriculture production
  • Promote Ukrainian products abroad to increase sales for Ukraine's producers
  • European Union membership and increased trade while simultaneously improving relations and trade with Russia
  • Allow voters to elect members of parliament from the areas where they live
  • Open up party lists for both parliamentary and local elections
  • Create bicameral parliament to bring stability to the legislative branch
  • Reduce the number of members of parliament

Yushchenko also advocates NATO membership for Ukraine[78] and is against promoting Russian as the second state language in Ukraine.[79]

According to Yushchenko, a good future for the country is impossible without national unity.[80] Yushchenko also advocates the formation of a single Orthodox Church of Ukraine, thus unifying the current three branches of the Orthodox church in Ukraine (the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchate, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Kyiv Patriarchate and the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church).

Actions by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army have been praised by Yushchenko,[80] and he has tried to give anti-Soviet partisans who fought in World War II the status of war veterans.[81]

According to Yushchenko the difficulties of relations between Ukraine and Russia are because the countries follow different directions and have different system of values.[82] Yushchenko thinks that "the Russia-Georgia war of August 2008 poses a threat that European leaders still haven't addressed". He has called for a demarcation of borders between Russia and Ukraine, which has been delayed by Russia since Ukraine won independence from the Soviet Union in 1991.[83]

During the campaign for the Ukrainian presidential election, 2010 Yushchenko said Russia's influence was again a factor in the upcoming election and warned of "interference" from Moscow in the distribution of Russian passports to residents of Crimea.[84] He stated (on 10 December 2009) "Russia is a friendly country and that it would be a great mistake for Ukraine to lose these relations or to slow down their development; I believe that there will appear politicians in Russia, who will respect the rights of all neighbors, including Ukraine".[85]

Yushchenko's 2010 presidential election program promised visa-free travel with EU, the withdrawal of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation by 2017 and "an active dialogue with all of Ukraine's neighbours based on the principles of equal rights, good neighbourly relations and mutual trust", but did not mention NATO membership.[86] Yushchenko also believed that the 2008–2009 Ukrainian financial crisis could be tackled with the help of reconstruction, including road reconstruction.[87] The program banned tax collection in advance, would return non-reimbursed VAT, create equal tax rules for everybody and stop government interference in certain enterprises and whole sectors of the economy.[88]

Yushchenko considers an open list of candidates for parliamentary elections as one of the conditions for eradicating corruption.[89]

On 2 March 2022, Yushchenko described Russia after its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 as "the Moscow junta and the Russian fascist regime".[90]

Family and personal life

[edit]

In 1977, Yushchenko married Svitlana Ivanivna Kolesnyk, with whom he has two children and three grandchildren:[91]

  • Vitalyna (b. 15 April 1980) currently married to Oleksiy Khakhlyov and has two children.
  • Andriy (b. 1985) and has a daughter

In 1998, he married Kateryna Chumachenko, with whom he has three children. She is a Ukrainian-American born in Chicago who received a degree in Economics from Georgetown University and an MBA from the University of Chicago. She also studied at the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute.[92]

A practicing member of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church,[93] Yushchenko often emphasizes the important role of his religious convictions in his life and worldview.

Yushchenko has been criticized for using many words of Russian origin when speaking Ukrainian.[94][95] His main hobbies are Ukrainian traditional culture (including art, ceramics, and archaeology), mountaineering, and beekeeping. He is keen on painting, collects antiques, folk artifacts, and Ukrainian national dress, and restores objects of Trypillya culture. Each year he climbs Hoverla, Ukraine's highest mountain. After receiving a checkup in which doctors determined he was healthy despite the previous year's dioxin poisoning, he successfully climbed the mountain again on 16 July 2005. [citation needed]

Cultural and political image

[edit]

As a politician, Yushchenko is widely perceived as a mixture of Western-oriented and Ukrainian nationalist. He advocates moving Ukraine in the direction of Europe and NATO, promoting free market reforms, preserving Ukraine's culture, rebuilding important historical monuments, and remembering Ukraine's history, including the famine of 1932–1933, commonly referred to as The Holodomor. His opponents (and allies) sometimes criticize him for indecision and secrecy, while his advocates argue that the same attributes indicate Yushchenko's commitment to teamwork, consensus, and negotiation. He is also often accused of being unable to form a unified team without infighting.[citation needed]

United States Ambassador to Ukraine John F. Tefft, described Yushchenko, in a document uncovered during the United States diplomatic cables leak, as discredited among the population because of his weakness of leadership, continuous conflicts with Tymoshenko, needless hostility towards Russia and his NATO ambitions.[96]

Yushchenko's former Minister of Internal Affairs Yuriy Lutsenko, while awaiting trial on corruption charges for which he was subsequently convicted, accused Yushchenko of betraying the Orange Revolution by bringing Yanukovych to power.[97][dead link]

In December 2011, Russian Prime Minister Putin claimed that the organizers of the 2011 Russian protests were former (Russian) advisors to Yushchenko during his presidency and were transferring the Orange Revolution to Russia.[98]

Public opinion polls

[edit]

In March 2009, Yushchenko's popularity plunged to just 22%.[99] According to a poll carried out by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology between 29 January and 5 February 2009, nearly 70% of Ukrainian voters believed that Yushchenko should leave his post, whereas just over 30% believed he should stay. When asked if Yushchenko should be impeached, over 56% of those polled were in favor with 44% against.[100]

According to a public opinion poll conducted by FOM-Ukraine in September/October 2009, 88.5% of those polled did not support the actions of Yushchenko as president, while 11.5% welcomed them.[101] A Razumkov Center opinion poll conducted in October 2011 told that 80% of Ukrainians did not support his actions, while 20% of Ukrainians supported his actions; it was the highest negative rating of any Ukrainian politician.[102]

Honours and awards

[edit]


Yushchenko was named "Man of the Year 2004" by Wprost and included in the 2005 Time 100, an annual list of Time' 100 most influential people in the world.

Honorary doctorates from the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (1996), the University of Maria Curie-Sklodowska (2000) and the Catholic University of Lublin (2009),[citation needed] and honorary membership in the Academy of Sciences of Moldova.[106]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Viktor Yushchenko

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Viktor Andriyovych Yushchenko (born 23 February 1954) is a Ukrainian economist and politician who served as the third President of Ukraine from 23 January 2005 to 25 February 2010, having led the Orange Revolution protests against widespread electoral fraud in the 2004 presidential runoff and survived an assassination attempt involving dioxin poisoning that caused severe chloracne and other health complications.
Prior to his presidency, Yushchenko pursued a career in finance and banking, graduating with a degree in economics from the Ternopil Institute of Finance and Economics in 1975 before rising to become Governor of the National Bank of Ukraine from 1993 to 1999, where he focused on monetary stabilization amid post-Soviet hyperinflation. He then served as Prime Minister from December 1999 to April 2001 under President Leonid Kuchma, enacting reforms that curbed inflation from triple digits to single digits, balanced the budget, and ensured timely payment of public sector salaries for the first time.
Yushchenko's presidency emphasized Ukraine's pivot toward Western institutions, advocating for NATO membership and EU association while rehabilitating national symbols like Stepan Bandera to assert independence from Russian influence, but it was undermined by chronic parliamentary deadlocks, vetoed legislation, and his 2007 dissolution of the Verkhovna Rada, resulting in repeated elections and policy paralysis. Economic growth averaged around 7% annually early in his term but faltered amid the 2008 financial crisis, with corruption scandals persisting despite initial anti-graft rhetoric and his approval rating plummeting to below 5% by 2010.

Early Life and Professional Foundations

Childhood, Education, and Initial Career

Viktor Yushchenko was born on February 23, 1954, in the village of Khoruzhivka, , in the . His parents were both teachers, and he grew up in rural northeastern near the Russian border, in a region marked by agricultural communities and Soviet-era constraints. Yushchenko pursued higher education at the Ternopil Finance and Economics Institute (now Ternopil National Economic University), graduating in 1975 with a degree in economics. He subsequently earned a Candidate of Economic Sciences degree, equivalent to a PhD in the Soviet system, focusing on financial and economic topics. Following graduation, Yushchenko began his professional career as an in a rural village in . After brief compulsory service in the , he joined the Sumy branch of the USSR State Bank (Gosbank) as an in 1976, initiating his ascent in the Soviet banking apparatus amid centralized planning and limited market mechanisms. By 1983, he had advanced to deputy director for agricultural credit at the Ukrainian Republican Branch of the USSR , overseeing financing for collective farms and state enterprises in a sector dominated by ideological and bureaucratic controls.

Rise in Banking and Central Banking Role

Yushchenko commenced his career in the Soviet banking system shortly after completing compulsory military service in the from October 1975 to November 1976. He initially worked as an and at branches of the USSR , progressing through roles that involved agricultural and financial management in rural . By 1983, he had advanced to Deputy Director for Agricultural at the Ukrainian Republican Branch of the USSR State Agro-Industrial Bank (AgroPromBank), where he focused on lending to the agricultural sector amid the inefficiencies of the . Following Ukraine's in 1991, Yushchenko continued ascending in the nascent financial system. From 1990 to 1993, he served as deputy chairman and first deputy chairman of the board at the Republican Bank "Ukraina," a key institution in the transition from dependency. In 1993, President Leonid appointed him Chairman (Governor) of the newly established (NBU), a position he held until December 1999, overseeing the central bank's formation and operations during the early years of sovereignty. This role marked his emergence as a technocratic leader in post-Soviet economic stabilization, appointed initially by Kravchuk and retained under President Leonid . As NBU Governor, Yushchenko prioritized combating , which had exceeded 10,000% annually in the early due to fiscal deficits and monetary overhang from the Soviet collapse. He directed the 1996 , introducing the hryvnia as Ukraine's national currency on September 2, 1996, at a fixed of 1 hryvnia to 100,000 karbovantsi, which replaced the hyperinflating temporary currency and restored public confidence in . This reform, coupled with tight , reduced from over 400% in 1995 to around 10% by 1997 and facilitated banking sector recapitalization by curbing non-performing loans and promoting liquidity. Yushchenko also pioneered central bank credit auctions in Ukraine, enhancing transparency in refinancing operations and laying groundwork for independent amid political pressures for deficit financing. These measures contributed to economic re-monetization, though challenges like in commercial banks persisted, reflecting the NBU's limited enforcement powers in a transitional state.

Entry into Government and Opposition

Prime Ministership (1999–2001)

Viktor Yushchenko was appointed on December 22, 1999, by President , following the parliament's rejection of Valeriy Pustovoytenko's reappointment by a single vote. His selection reflected Kuchma's aim to stabilize the economy amid a decade of contraction, leveraging Yushchenko's prior experience as National Bank governor in implementing monetary reforms. During his tenure, Yushchenko prioritized fiscal discipline and structural adjustments, including curbing inflation, servicing domestic and international debts, and reducing subsidies to loss-making state enterprises. These measures contributed to Ukraine's first post-Soviet economic expansion, with GDP growing 6 percent in 2000 after years of decline, followed by 9 percent in 2001; industrial output rose approximately 10 percent annually in 2000, real incomes improved, and pension arrears were cleared. Public debt as a share of GDP declined steadily, while international reserves increased, signaling improved macroeconomic stability. Yushchenko's government, including Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko overseeing energy, targeted corruption in sectors like fuel but faced resistance from oligarchic interests opposed to subsidy cuts and privatization pushes. Tensions escalated with Ukraine's parliament, dominated by pro-Kuchma factions and vested groups, over Yushchenko's refusal to compromise on and market-oriented policies. Critics, including energy sector lobbies, accused the government of mismanagement despite the growth indicators, framing reforms as threats to industrial subsidies and regional networks. On April 26, 2001, the passed a no-confidence motion against the cabinet by 263 votes to 101, effectively dismissing Yushchenko after 16 months in office. The ouster halted momentum for deeper liberalization, jeopardizing international lender confidence and reverting policy toward less stringent fiscal controls under successor Anatoliy Kinakh.

Formation of Our Ukraine and Opposition Leadership

Following his dismissal as prime minister on April 26, 2001, by a parliamentary vote orchestrated by a coalition of communists and oligarch-backed factions opposed to his reforms, Viktor Yushchenko transitioned into opposition , capitalizing on his sustained public popularity stemming from prior economic stabilization efforts that had reduced and boosted growth. His ouster highlighted tensions with President Kuchma's inner circle, amid broader scandals including the 2000 murder of journalist and leaked tapes implicating Kuchma in abuses of power, which eroded trust in the regime's governance. Yushchenko rallied fragmented opposition groups disillusioned with Kuchma's authoritarian tendencies and favoritism toward loyalist clans, announcing intentions to unite them under a pro-reform, European-oriented platform emphasizing transparency, job creation, healthcare, and . This effort formalized on January 16, 2002, in , when ten center-right and nationalist parties—including the Popular Rukh of Ukraine, Ukrainian Popular Rukh, Party of Reform and Order, , and Republican Christian Party—merged into the Our Ukraine electoral bloc, with Yushchenko as its leader. The bloc positioned itself against the ruling For a United Ukraine alliance, critiquing by oligarchs and advocating market liberalization without . In the March 31, 2002, parliamentary elections, Our Ukraine achieved the strongest performance among opposition forces, garnering approximately 23.6% of the proportional vote and securing 111 seats in the 450-member , forming the largest single bloc and denying Kuchma's supporters an outright majority. This outcome solidified Yushchenko's role as the preeminent figure in Ukraine's democratic opposition, enabling parliamentary obstruction of pro-Kuchma legislation and amplifying calls for and measures, though internal bloc tensions and electoral irregularities limited its immediate leverage. Through Our Ukraine, Yushchenko fostered a coalition model that bridged nationalist and reformist elements, setting the stage for his presidential bid while navigating pressures from both domestic hardliners and Kuchma's retaliatory tactics, such as media blackouts and legal harassment.

2004 Presidential Campaign and Orange Revolution

Election Campaign Dynamics

Yushchenko's campaign, under the Our Ukraine banner, emphasized democratic reforms, anti-corruption measures, and Ukraine's , positioning him as a counter to the authoritarian tendencies of President Leonid Kuchma's administration and its favored successor, Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. The opposition highlighted Yanukovych's early criminal convictions, including two terms for and inflicting , to undermine his credibility and portray him as unfit for leadership. Yushchenko forged strategic alliances with figures like and , broadening his appeal across reformist and socialist voter bases, while mobilizing through youth groups such as , which focused on voter education and anti-fraud training. State-controlled media provided overwhelmingly favorable coverage to Yanukovych, limiting Yushchenko's airtime and often framing the opposition as destabilizing forces backed by foreign interests. Independent outlets, including Channel 5 and outlets like , became crucial for Yushchenko's messaging, disseminating critiques of government corruption and electoral manipulation. Yushchenko's team countered media imbalances through grassroots efforts, including large-scale rallies in , , and other western and central cities, where crowds numbering in the tens of thousands gathered to hear calls for fair elections and national sovereignty. The campaign unfolded amid reports of administrative resource abuse, including voter intimidation and misuse of public funds by Yanukovych's supporters, which the OSCE noted as compromising the process even before voting. Pre-election polls indicated a tight race, with Yushchenko drawing strong support in urban and western regions due to his economic expertise and anti-oligarch stance from his central banking days. In the first round on , , Yushchenko narrowly led with approximately 40% of the vote against Yanukovych's similar share, necessitating a runoff and underscoring the campaign's divisive regional dynamics—strong Yushchenko backing in the west versus Yanukovych dominance in the east and south. This outcome reflected effective opposition turnout efforts but also foreshadowed intensified government pressure in the subsequent round.

Dioxin Poisoning Incident

On September 5, 2004, during the Ukrainian presidential election campaign, Yushchenko attended a private dinner in Kiev with officials from the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU), after which he experienced acute symptoms including severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and back pain. He was initially treated at a clinic in Rudivka, , but his condition worsened, leading to transfer to the Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic in , , on September 10, 2004, for specialized care. Symptoms progressed to include facial swelling, jaundice, and later —a severe acne-like skin condition characterized by cysts, pustules, and scarring—resulting in visible disfigurement. These effects were consistent with acute toxicity, though initial Ukrainian medical assessments did not identify the cause. Austrian physicians, in collaboration with international toxicologists, diagnosed Yushchenko with poisoning by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), the most potent dioxin isomer, confirmed on December 11, 2004, after laboratory analysis of blood samples. TCDD levels in his blood were measured at approximately 1,000,000 pg/g fat—over 50,000 times the average for unexposed individuals and the highest recorded in any living human—indicating deliberate administration of a highly purified form rather than environmental contamination. Unlike typical industrial dioxin mixtures, the poison was nearly pure TCDD, suggesting laboratory synthesis, as such purity is rare outside specialized production. Treatment was primarily supportive, including detoxification efforts and monitoring, with dioxin elimination occurring faster than expected due to metabolic breakdown into less toxic metabolites, though long-term effects persisted. Ukrainian authorities opened a into the incident as an assassination attempt, focusing on potential involvement by state security elements opposed to Yushchenko's candidacy, but no perpetrators were identified or prosecuted despite forensic evidence of intentional . Yushchenko attributed the attack to agents of the incumbent government under President , a claim supported by his political adversaries' motives amid the heated , though official probes yielded inconclusive results and the case was effectively closed without resolution. Independent analyses emphasized the rarity of such targeted use, typically reserved for political eliminations due to its delayed lethality and detectability, but lacked direct attribution beyond . The did not prevent Yushchenko from resuming his campaign, though it fueled public outrage and international scrutiny of the process.

Fraud Allegations, Mass Protests, and Electoral Reversal

In the runoff election held on November 21, 2004, Ukraine's Central Election Commission (CEC) announced results on November 22 declaring Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych the winner with 12,457,327 votes (49.46 percent) to Yushchenko's 11,732,308 votes (46.61 percent), based on protocols from territorial commissions. Yushchenko's campaign immediately contested the outcome, alleging systematic fraud including ballot stuffing, carousel voting (multiple voting by individuals transported between polling stations), alteration of protocols, and exclusion of opposition poll watchers, primarily in Yanukovych strongholds in eastern Ukraine, Donetsk, and Luhansk oblasts, as well as involving absentee and hospital voting irregularities. The OSCE/ODIHR-led International Election Observation Mission (IEOM), deploying over 3,000 observers, documented these violations as widespread and on a scale sufficient to undermine the integrity of the process, noting that the election failed to meet many OSCE and international standards for democratic polls, with particular concerns over media bias favoring Yanukovych and state administrative resource abuse. Independent exit polls by sources including the Ukrainian Sociological Service and Razumkov Centre had shown Yushchenko leading by 5-11 percentage points, further fueling claims of manipulation exceeding 1.5-3 million votes. These allegations triggered the , a series of non-violent mass protests beginning , 2004, centered on 's (Independence Square), where demonstrators erected tent encampments housing up to 10,000 people nightly and waved orange banners symbolizing Yushchenko's campaign. Participation swelled rapidly, with estimates of 200,000 protesters in Kyiv by November 23 and peaking at around 500,000 to 1 million by , alongside smaller rallies in western and ; nationwide, protests involved millions indirectly through strikes and regional actions, paralyzing government functions without resorting to despite attempts by authorities to incite clashes. The movement, coordinated by groups like and supported by Yushchenko allies such as and , demanded annulment of the results, criminal probes into fraud, and international oversight for a revote, drawing endorsements from Western governments and figures like U.S. President while facing counter-demonstrations in the east backed by Russian President . Under mounting pressure from the protests, which included blockades of key buildings and defections by military and police units, Ukraine's —chaired by a panel of 18 justices—ruled unanimously on December 3, 2004, to annul the November 21 runoff due to "massive and systematic violations" including falsified protocols and unauthorized changes to vote tallies, ordering a repeat runoff on with enhanced safeguards like video monitoring and parallel vote tabulation. The decision cited over 120,000 complaints reviewed, confirming irregularities that invalidated results in multiple precincts, though it rejected broader calls to declare Yushchenko the outright winner. The repeat runoff on December 26, 2004, saw heightened OSCE/IEOM scrutiny with biometric voter checks and transparent counting, resulting in Yushchenko's victory with 15,115,712 votes (51.99 percent) to Yanukovych's 12,848,528 (44.20 percent), a margin of over 2.2 million votes from a turnout of 77.2 percent among 37.6 million registered voters. Yanukovych's subsequent challenge on December 28 alleged in but was dismissed on December 30 for lack of evidence, as discrepancies were deemed insignificant (under 0.5 percent) and observers affirmed the process met democratic criteria despite isolated issues. The reversal marked a pivotal democratic assertion, though subsequent analyses noted that patterns reflected deeper regional divides, with Yanukovych's support concentrated in Russian-speaking east and south due to economic networks rather than mere manipulation.

Presidential Term (2005–2010)

Inauguration and Early Governance

Viktor Yushchenko was sworn in as on January 23, 2005, during a ceremony held in Kyiv's Independence Square, marking the culmination of the and the resolution of the disputed 2004 presidential election. The event followed a ruling that invalidated the initial runoff results due to widespread favoring his opponent, , and a subsequent repeat vote on December 26, 2004, in which Yushchenko secured 52 percent of the vote. In his inaugural address, Yushchenko emphasized national unity, democratic reforms, and integration with the West, pledging to combat corruption and oligarchic influence that had undermined prior governance. Following the inauguration, Yushchenko moved swiftly to consolidate power by nominating , a key ally and former prime minister, to head the new government. On February 4, 2005, 's approved Tymoshenko's appointment as prime minister by a vote of 373 to 3, reflecting broad initial support from pro-reform factions including Our Ukraine, the Bloc of Yulia Tymoshenko, and the Socialist Party. The cabinet formation prioritized figures from the revolutionary coalition, with appointments aimed at dismantling entrenched interests; for instance, was named security chief, though his role later fueled internal tensions. Early priorities included judicial reforms to prevent future electoral manipulations, privatization reviews to address corrupt 1990s deals, and economic stabilization measures amid a projected 2005 GDP growth of around 7 percent driven by post-revolution optimism and agricultural recovery. Despite these ambitions, early governance revealed fractures within the Orange coalition, as ideological differences and personal rivalries emerged over and ministerial control. Yushchenko's administration faced immediate resistance from holdover officials in key institutions, complicating efforts to purge ; for example, investigations into Yanukovych-era abuses yielded few high-profile prosecutions initially due to legal hurdles and parliamentary pushback. By mid-2005, public approval ratings for Yushchenko hovered above 60 percent, buoyed by symbolic gestures like honoring victims and pursuing cooperation, yet underlying disputes foreshadowed instability, culminating in the government's dismissal on September 8, 2005, amid accusations of graft and policy .

Domestic Policy Initiatives and Reforms

Upon assuming the presidency in January 2005, Viktor Yushchenko prioritized and transparent to combat entrenched from the prior administration. A flagship initiative was the re-auction of Kryvorizhstal, Ukraine's largest , which had been sold for $800 million in 2004 to insiders linked to former President ; under Yushchenko, it fetched $4.8 billion in October 2005 to Mittal Steel in a televised, competitive bid, generating significant revenue for debt reduction and signaling a shift toward market-oriented practices. The government also announced reviews of approximately 30 prior privatizations suspected of irregularities, aiming to recover assets and restore investor confidence, supported by $60 million in U.S. aid for rule-of-law enhancements. These efforts aligned with IMF-recommended structural adjustments, including regulatory burden reductions targeting 3,000 cuts and WTO accession preparations via a new Customs Code. Fiscal reforms focused on stabilizing public finances amid post-revolutionary spending pressures, with the general government deficit targeted at 2.5% of GDP in (down from 4.5% in 2004) through recurrent spending freezes, VAT refund backlog resolutions, and base broadening to close loopholes. system adjustments were proposed, including subsidy targeting and increases, though implementation lagged due to parliamentary resistance. Energy sector restructuring sought to eliminate quasi-fiscal deficits and non-cash payments, while tightened toward single-digit (projected at 9% by 2006) via a managed hryvnia float and relaxed . Despite these priorities, persisted at around 7% annually early in the term, but deeper stalled amid instability, with critics noting insufficient progress in curbing oligarchic influence. Anti-corruption measures included probes into Kuchma-era dealings, such as alleged arms sales and the 2000 murder of journalist , alongside revisions to elite privileges like Kuchma's retirement perks. Judicial independence was emphasized in early rhetoric, with calls for property rights reinforcement via laws like the Joint Stock Company Law and Land Code updates, but executive interventions—such as Yushchenko's 2007 dismissal of judges and 2008 annulment of an —undermined credibility and fueled perceptions of politicization. Administrative reforms aimed at and efficiency were proposed in early , with a package scheduled for presentation in targeting budget and territorial restructuring to empower local , though legislative prevented comprehensive enactment. Social initiatives received rhetorical emphasis, including commitments to uphold constitutional rights to and healthcare, but lacked substantive legislative advances amid fiscal constraints and political divisions. Overall, Yushchenko's domestic agenda promised a break from politics but yielded uneven results, hampered by intra-elite conflicts and failure to consolidate parliamentary majorities for sustained implementation.

Economic Management and Crises

Ukraine's economy under President Yushchenko initially benefited from sustained growth inherited from the pre-presidency boom, with real GDP expanding at an average annual rate of approximately 5 percent during the first four years of his term (2005–2008), driven largely by high global commodity prices and export demand rather than structural reforms. However, this period was marked by limited progress on and fiscal discipline, as political infighting between Yushchenko and undermined efforts to implement comprehensive measures and banking sector improvements pledged in early IMF consultations. The administration's focus on aspirations did little to address entrenched oligarchic influence over key industries, perpetuating inefficiencies in energy and heavy manufacturing sectors. A major early crisis erupted in the 2006 Russia-Ukraine gas dispute, when halted supplies to on , 2006, citing unpaid debts exceeding $1.8 billion and demanding market-based pricing adjustments from subsidized levels; the cutoff lasted four days, leading to industrial shutdowns and estimated economic losses of up to $1 billion for amid winter heating disruptions. Yushchenko's government accused of political leverage tied to 's pro-Western shift, while negotiating a temporary deal that raised prices fourfold but maintained transit volumes to ; the incident exposed 's vulnerability to Russian energy dependence, with accruing further debts that strained fiscal balances. A more severe confrontation occurred in January 2009, when supplies were cut for 18 days over pricing and debt disagreements totaling around $2.2 billion, halting 25 percent of 's gas imports and causing 's factories to idle, with GDP impacts estimated at 1-2 percent loss and heightened inflation pressures. The global amplified these vulnerabilities, triggering a sharp contraction as Ukraine's export-dependent economy, reliant on and chemicals, faced collapsing demand; real GDP growth slowed to 2.1 percent in before plummeting by approximately 15 percent in 2009, with industrial output falling over 30 percent and the hryvnia depreciating by 60 percent against the . In response, Yushchenko's administration secured a $16.4 billion two-year Stand-By Arrangement from the IMF in November , conditional on fiscal consolidation (limiting deficits to 1 percent of GDP), flexibility, and recapitalization to stabilize the financial sector amid $50 billion in capital outflows. While the averted default, implementation faltered due to ongoing parliamentary and Tymoshenko's populist spending, leading to tranche delays and persistent budgetary shortfalls; critics attributed the tepid recovery in 2010 (around 4 percent growth) to external factors like commodity rebounds rather than domestic policy efficacy, highlighting the presidency's failure to enact lasting structural changes amid chronic political instability.

Foreign Policy Priorities

Yushchenko's foreign policy centered on accelerating Ukraine's integration into and the to secure its independence from Russian dominance. Shortly after his January 2005 inauguration, he prioritized membership, directing military reforms and enhanced cooperation under the NATO-Ukraine Action Plan, including joint exercises and intensified implementation starting in 2006. This shift marked a departure from the multi-vector approach of his predecessor , emphasizing Euro-Atlantic alignment despite domestic public support for hovering around 20-30% during his term. Relations with the strengthened significantly under the Bush administration, which viewed Yushchenko's pro-democracy stance as aligning with its post-Orange Revolution goals. In April 2005, during Yushchenko's Washington visit, President Bush and he issued a joint statement affirming a "new era of strategic partnership," with the U.S. pledging support for Ukraine's aspirations and democratic reforms. This was reinforced in 2008 when Bush advocated for Ukraine at the Summit, where allies declared Ukraine's future membership but withheld a Membership amid opposition from and , citing Ukraine's internal divisions and Russian threats. Yushchenko also pursued EU ties, negotiating an Association Agreement framework by 2007 to foster economic integration and visa liberalization, though progress stalled due to governance issues. Countering Russian leverage, Yushchenko advocated energy diversification to reduce reliance on supplies, which constituted over 80% of Ukraine's imports. Efforts included deals for Turkmen gas imports and plans for LNG terminals, but these faced setbacks during the 2006 and 2009 gas crises, when cut supplies—first on , 2006, for four days over pricing disputes, and again in January 2009 for three weeks, halting 25% of Europe's gas and exposing Ukraine's vulnerabilities. Yushchenko framed these as politically motivated, linking them to his anti-Russian policies, and sought Western , resulting in EU-brokered transit agreements that separated transit fees from purchase prices but failed to fully resolve dependency. Ties with neighbors like and the bolstered his Western orientation, including joint recognition efforts straining Moscow relations further.

Internal Conflicts, Parliamentary Dissolutions, and Coalition Breakdowns

Following the formation of the initial post-Orange Revolution government, internal divisions emerged rapidly within Yushchenko's administration. Tymoshenko's cabinet, appointed in February 2005, encountered scandals involving alleged corruption in energy sector privatizations, such as the Ukrtatnafta affair where government officials were implicated in undervalued asset sales. On September 8, 2005, Yushchenko dismissed the entire cabinet, citing an absence of team spirit, failure to adhere to reform commitments, and high-level graft that had prompted resignations of key aides like , then parliamentary speaker. This action, while intended to reset governance, exacerbated factionalism in the Our Ukraine bloc and eroded public confidence, as evidenced by Yushchenko's approval rating dropping from over 50% in early 2005 to below 30% by late 2005. The March 2006 parliamentary elections yielded no outright majority for pro-Yushchenko forces, with the securing 186 seats amid voter disillusionment with orange infighting. Efforts to revive the orange coalition between Our Ukraine, (BYuT), and the Socialist Party faltered over power-sharing disputes and Tymoshenko's demands for the premiership. By August 2006, an anti-crisis coalition formed comprising , Socialists, and Communists, enabling Viktor Yanukovych's appointment as on August 4, 2006, despite Yushchenko's objections on grounds of electoral legitimacy. This shift marginalized pro-western reformers and highlighted the fragility of post-revolutionary alliances, as defectors from smaller parties tipped the balance toward pro-Russian elements. Tensions peaked in early 2007 when the anti-crisis coalition expanded its majority beyond the constitutional threshold by absorbing additional deputies, prompting Yushchenko to issue a dissolution on April 2, 2007. He justified the move as necessary to safeguard national sovereignty and prevent unconstitutional power grabs, arguing that the coalition's tactics violated coalition agreement terms and electoral laws. The initially suspended the decree but upheld it in May 2007 after procedural reviews, leading to snap elections on September 30, 2007, where combined orange parties regained a slim majority with 228 seats. Tymoshenko returned as on December 18, 2007, but the coalition remained unstable due to persistent vetoes over appointments and budgets. By mid-2008, policy divergences—particularly on energy negotiations with and fiscal priorities—fractured the alliance further. BYuT lawmakers began voting with opposition parties on bills undermining presidential , such as those expanding parliamentary control over the cabinet, culminating in the coalition's collapse on September 3, . Yushchenko responded with a dissolution decree on October 8, , scheduling elections for December 7, but the blocked implementation in November, citing financial constraints and legal irregularities amid the global economic downturn. This deadlock persisted, with Tymoshenko retaining power through procedural maneuvers while accusing Yushchenko of sabotaging ; Yushchenko countered that her unilateral gas pricing talks with in late betrayed national interests by conceding leverage without consultation. The repeated breakdowns underscored causal factors like personal ambitions and ideological rifts overriding reform goals, contributing to legislative paralysis through Yushchenko's term.

Post-Presidency Political Engagement

2010 Presidential Election and Defeat

![Viktor Yushchenko's vote share in the first round of the 2010 Ukrainian presidential election][float-right] Viktor Yushchenko, seeking re-election as the incumbent president, campaigned on a platform emphasizing Ukraine's European integration, NATO membership, and resistance to Russian influence, while criticizing his political rivals for compromising national sovereignty. His bid was hampered by widespread disillusionment stemming from unfulfilled promises of the 2004 Orange Revolution, including persistent corruption and economic stagnation during his term. Pre-election polls indicated his support hovered below 5 percent, reflecting approval ratings that had plummeted to single digits by late 2009 amid infighting with Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko and failure to implement structural reforms. In the first round of voting on January 17, 2010, Yushchenko received 5.45 percent of the vote, placing fifth behind (35.32 percent), Tymoshenko (25.05 percent), , and , and was thereby eliminated from the runoff. The OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission assessed the first round as generally meeting international commitments and standards, though it noted administrative issues and unequal media access favoring Yanukovych. Yushchenko's poor performance was attributed to his inability to broaden appeal beyond , where ethnic Ukrainian nationalists remained his core base, while alienating eastern and southern regions through divisive policies on and that prioritized identity over economic recovery. Economic woes, including a sharp decline in exports and dependence on IMF aid, further eroded voter confidence in his leadership. Following the first round, Yushchenko refused to endorse Tymoshenko in the runoff against Yanukovych, instead urging supporters to cast invalid ballots or abstain, a stance that fragmented the pro-Orange vote and facilitated Yanukovych's victory with 48.95 percent to Tymoshenko's 45.47 percent. This decision underscored deep personal and political rifts within the Orange coalition, contributing to the reversal of 2004's gains and marking the effective end of Yushchenko's pro-Western agenda. Yushchenko's term concluded on February 25, 2010, with his approval rating at historic lows, as exit polls and analyses highlighted voter fatigue with his administration's paralysis and perceived despite initial rhetoric.

Participation in 2012 Elections and Euromaidan

In the parliamentary elections held on 28 October 2012, Viktor Yushchenko led the Our Ukraine party, which secured 1.11% of the proportional vote according to protocols processed by Ukraine's Central Election Commission, failing to surpass the 5% threshold and winning no seats in the 450-member . This outcome represented a sharp decline for the party, which had previously held significant representation during Yushchenko's presidency, reflecting diminished public support amid ongoing political fragmentation and criticism of unfulfilled reforms from his tenure. The elections drew international scrutiny from the OSCE, which reported widespread abuse of administrative resources by the of Regions, lack of transparency in , and an uneven playing field favoring incumbents, though it deemed the process competitive overall. The protests, sparked on 21 November 2013 by President Viktor Yanukovych's abrupt suspension of an association agreement with the , aligned with Yushchenko's long-standing advocacy for Western integration over Russian influence. Yushchenko publicly endorsed the demonstrations, co-authoring a statement on 4 December 2013 with former presidents and expressing solidarity with the peaceful rallies and calling for respect of protesters' rights amid escalating government crackdowns. His support emphasized the protests' pro-European orientation, echoing themes from the 2004 , though Yushchenko's influence was limited compared to emerging opposition figures like and , as his party's marginal electoral standing reduced his platform. By early 2014, as violence intensified—including the deaths of over 100 protesters in February—Yushchenko continued criticizing Yanukovych's authoritarian tendencies, framing as a defense of Ukrainian sovereignty against Moscow-backed concessions. The protests culminated in Yanukovych's flight on 22 February 2014, paving the way for a pro-Western interim government and snap elections, outcomes that advanced Yushchenko's geopolitical priorities despite his sidelined role.

Responses to Russian Aggression (2014–2021)

Yushchenko publicly condemned Russia's of in March 2014, asserting that the peninsula would eventually return to Ukrainian control and emphasizing the need for a resolute international response to Russian actions. Alongside former presidents and , he urged Ukraine's interim government to prioritize amid the escalating crisis, while supporting sanctions against Russia implemented that month to pressure economically. These positions aligned with his long-standing advocacy for Ukraine's sovereignty, viewing the as an imperial overreach rather than a legitimate act by Crimean residents. Regarding the , which intensified after Russian-backed separatists seized territory in April 2014, Yushchenko opposed the Minsk Protocol signed in September 2014 and its follow-up Minsk II agreement in February 2015, arguing that implementation would endanger by effectively legitimizing occupied areas without full Russian withdrawal or disarmament of proxies. He advocated for stronger military support to Ukrainian forces conducting the Anti-Terrorist Operation (ATO), criticizing perceived Western hesitancy in providing lethal as enabling prolonged aggression. Throughout the period, Yushchenko engaged in international forums, including European parliamentary sessions, to highlight Russian tactics and push for sustained sanctions, maintaining that concessions like Minsk frameworks undermined 's negotiating leverage. By 2021, as ceasefire violations persisted, he continued to frame the conflict as existential, warning against diplomatic fatigue that could normalize de facto Russian control over regions.

Stance on 2022 Russian Invasion and Recent Activities

Viktor Yushchenko has vocally supported Ukraine's military resistance to the Russian full-scale invasion that began on , 2022, framing it as a existential struggle against Russian akin to historical aggressions like the famine of 1932–1933. In public appearances, he has emphasized the necessity of international unity to defeat Russian on Ukraine's terms, aligning with President Zelenskyy's calls for unwavering allied backing. Yushchenko has criticized delays in Western military aid, particularly from the , as enabling Russian advances and prolonging the conflict. In a May 2024 interview with the , he described congressional hesitation on aid packages as a "colossal waste of time" that allowed President to "attack, ruin , rampage all over ," leading to Ukrainian troop shortages in ammunition and morale erosion among supporters. He argued against territorial concessions for peace, warning that yielding land would permit to regroup and resume hostilities, and stressed that Ukraine's sacrifices—daily lives lost and infrastructure destroyed—demand faster allied resolve. His positions have grown more assertive regarding the war's endgame. In an October 2024 discussion at the Hoover Institution, Yushchenko rejected partial peaces, insisting only outcomes ensuring lasting Ukrainian security are viable. By August 2025, he advocated for "armed resistance" against Russia by Ukraine alongside a united Europe. In a September 2025 interview with Apostrof TV, Yushchenko urged Ukraine to pursue total victory, stating "Yes, to Moscow" and arguing that reclaiming 1991 borders, including Crimea, leaves the core threat intact: "If you think that returning to the 1991 borders is the formula for victory... you are actually leaving the biggest problem to your children and grandchildren. The problem is Moscow." He opposed ceasefires along current lines under Putin's regime, positing that capturing Moscow is essential for global stability. Post-presidency, Yushchenko's activities have centered on advocacy through speeches, interviews, and commemorative events. In September 2023, he addressed the remembrance in , linking past Soviet atrocities to the ongoing . He visited in May 2024 for discussions at the World Affairs Council and the Ukrainian Catholic Archeparchy, reinforcing calls for sustained aid. These engagements continue his role as a commentator on Ukraine's sovereignty, without active electoral involvement.

Major Controversies and Debates

Poisoning Perpetrators and Evidence Scrutiny

On September 5, 2004, Viktor Yushchenko dined with Ukrainian security officials, including Volodymyr Satsyuk, deputy head of the (SBU), after which he fell severely ill, exhibiting symptoms later attributed to acute intoxication. Medical examinations in on December 11, 2004, by clinicians at Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic confirmed by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), the most toxic isomer, at concentrations exceeding 1,000 times the normal level in his blood—specifically, around 80,000 pg/g in , far surpassing thresholds for severe . Independent verification by Dutch and U.S. laboratories corroborated these findings, with peer-reviewed analysis in documenting TCDD's persistence and metabolic byproducts unique to deliberate rather than environmental exposure. A 2009 study by Swiss Federal Laboratories for and (Empa) further scrutinized elimination kinetics, noting an unexpectedly rapid TCDD breakdown consistent with a massive acute dose, not chronic accumulation. No perpetrators have been convicted despite Ukrainian investigations launched in 2004 by the Prosecutor General's and SBU, which identified the poison's likely laboratory synthesis but stalled amid political shifts. Yushchenko publicly implicated Satsyuk as the primary suspect in 2006 and 2009, alleging the poisoning occurred at that dinner and citing Satsyuk's subsequent flight to and acquisition of Russian citizenship as evasion tactics; Satsyuk denied involvement and claimed Yushchenko's symptoms stemmed from poor diet or . In 2008, Yushchenko accused David Zhvania, a former parliamentary ally and godfather to one of his daughters, of facilitating the act, based on forensic traces linking Zhvania's property to impurities, though Zhvania rejected the claims and no charges followed. Broader suspicions targeted Viktor Yanukovych's campaign and Russian intelligence, given the geopolitical context of the , with Yushchenko's team alleging Moscow-supplied ; Russian officials dismissed this as unsubstantiated. Declassified U.S. intelligence documents released in November 2024, as reported by Ukrainian outlets citing CIA assessments, assert direct orchestration by Russia's (FSB), framing the attempt as interference in Ukraine's 2004 elections to favor Yanukovych. However, these claims rely on classified without public forensic ties to specific actors, and Ukrainian probes under post-2014 governments have yielded no trials, hampered by witness intimidation, jurisdictional issues, and the 2010 shift to Yanukovych's administration, which reclassified the case as non-criminal. Evidence scrutiny highlights robust toxicological consensus on the poisoning's authenticity—supported by histopathological confirmation of and multi-site biopsies—but persistent gaps in chain-of-custody for the dioxin's origin, with critics noting the agent's rarity (traceable to specialized labs) yet absence of records. Ukrainian courts dismissed related lawsuits in 2017 and 2020 for insufficient proof of intent, underscoring systemic investigative failures rather than evidentiary fabrication.

Corruption Allegations and Oligarch Ties

During Yushchenko's presidency, which began with pledges to eradicate corruption following the 2004 , his administration encountered multiple scandals that undermined those commitments. In September 2005, Oleksandr Zinchenko, Yushchenko's chief of staff, resigned and publicly accused senior officials, including (then foreign minister) and Oleksandr Tretyakov (presidential secretariat head), of involvement in corrupt schemes such as influence peddling and misuse of state funds for personal gain. These allegations triggered a political crisis, culminating in Yushchenko's dismissal of Tymoshenko's entire government on September 8, 2005, amid claims that graft had permeated his inner circle despite early arrests of officials from the prior Kuchma era. , a key Yushchenko ally and oligarch, resigned shortly after but was cleared of charges by December 2005, highlighting selective accountability that critics attributed to protecting political supporters. Yushchenko's ties to oligarchs were evident in his reliance on their financial and political backing during the and beyond, with figures like Poroshenko and those affiliated with his Our Ukraine bloc providing campaign funding and media support in exchange for influence. In July 2007, Yushchenko convened a high-level meeting of major oligarchs—the third such gathering during his term—to align on economic policies ahead of elections, signaling an accommodation with 's business elites rather than their dismantlement. Empirical analyses indicate that oligarchs politically aligned with Yushchenko, such as those opposing Viktor Yanukovych's camp, benefited from enhanced property rights protections post-2004, with affiliation linked to a 29 higher likelihood of defensive ownership strategies against predation, suggesting favoritism in regulatory environments and processes. deals under his watch, including those scrutinized for undervaluation of state assets, drew accusations of , as Yushchenko's team faced claims of shielding allied business interests while targeting opponents. Post-presidency, Yushchenko faced direct scrutiny in a 2019 probe by Ukraine's Prosecutor-General’s Office for alleged and of state property valued at 540 million hryvnias ($19.7 million), stemming from his order transferring control of the Mezhyhirya presidential residence—a lavish estate later emblematic of Yanukovych's excesses—to the Cabinet of Ministers via a fictitious Donetsk company, purportedly facilitating improper . His , Vitaliy Haum, confirmed the accusation centered on that signed order, though the investigation, which also implicated Yanukovych, remained ongoing as of June 2019 without resolution or conviction reported. Allies like Nikolai Martynenko, a Yushchenko-era energy official and parliamentary leader, were later charged in 2017 by the National Bureau with and from state firms, totaling millions in misappropriated funds, underscoring persistent allegations of favoritism toward inner-circle figures despite Yushchenko's anti-corruption rhetoric. These episodes contributed to perceptions that Yushchenko's governance preserved oligarchic structures, with limited systemic reforms amid competing factional interests.

Energy Deals and Tymoshenko Rift

In January 2009, a severe dispute over pricing and transit fees led to halting supplies through , affecting deliveries to Europe and prompting negotiations between Ukrainian Prime Minister and Russian Prime Minister . On January 19, 2009, they signed a 10-year gas supply and a separate transit agreement, under which agreed to purchase a minimum of 11 billion cubic meters more gas annually than its estimated needs—a "take-or-pay" clause obligating payment regardless of usage—and to base pricing on a formula tied to European market rates, starting with a 20% discount for 2009 conditional on unchanged transit tariffs. The deal resolved the immediate crisis but locked into projected costs exceeding $40 billion over the decade, far above prior discounted rates of around $179 per 1,000 cubic meters. President Viktor Yushchenko immediately condemned the agreement, stating on January 20, 2009, that Tymoshenko had failed to uphold Ukraine's national interests by endorsing terms that disadvantaged the country in favor of short-term resolution. In a February 2009 address to Ukraine's , he described the contracts as a direct threat to , citing the mandatory over-purchase requirement as economically burdensome and strategically compromising Ukraine's leverage against . Yushchenko argued that Tymoshenko bypassed him and constitutional protocols by negotiating directly with Putin, excluding key stakeholders like executives who warned of the deal's unfavorable provisions. His administration's energy adviser, Bohdan Sokolovsky, publicly called for revisions, highlighting internal divisions that undermined the coalition's unity. The gas deal exacerbated longstanding tensions between Yushchenko and Tymoshenko, rooted in competing visions for Ukraine's and relations with ; Yushchenko favored diversification away from dependency, while Tymoshenko prioritized immediate stability, even at the cost of concessions. In November 2009, an negotiated by Tymoshenko waived penalties for under-purchasing but did not alter core pricing or obligations, prompting Yushchenko to appeal directly to Russian President for amendments, which went unheeded. This public discord contributed to governmental paralysis, including failed coalition reforms and Yushchenko's repeated threats of early elections. The rift culminated in Yushchenko's August testimony during Tymoshenko's trial for in the deal's negotiation, where he accused her of acting for personal political gain by railroading into the accord against expert advice and his explicit opposition, thereby betraying 's interests to . Critics of Yushchenko's stance, including Tymoshenko's defenders, contended that his testimony aligned with post-Orange political vendettas under President , though the deal's long-term costs—exacerbated by subsequent price hikes—validated concerns over its fiscal impact, with facing penalties and debt accumulation. The episode underscored Yushchenko's prioritization of principled resistance to Russian influence over pragmatic compromise, but it also highlighted his administration's inability to forge alternative energy strategies amid domestic infighting.

Unfulfilled Reform Promises

Following the , Yushchenko's administration promised sweeping reforms to eradicate systemic , establish , enable transparent , and foster , aiming to dismantle entrenched oligarchic networks. These commitments, encapsulated in slogans like "bandits to prison," generated high public expectations for accountability and . However, chronic political instability undermined these goals, with Yushchenko dismissing Yulia Tymoshenko's government in September 2005 amid mutual accusations of misconduct, followed by repeated coalition fractures and parliamentary dissolutions in 2007 and 2008. This turmoil stalled key legislation, including judicial reforms to enhance independence and anti-corruption measures targeting high-level officials. As a result, few oligarchs faced prosecution, and corruption perceptions, as tracked by Transparency International's , remained stagnant, fluctuating between 2.2 and 2.8 out of 10 from 2004 to 2010, reflecting minimal progress in integrity. Economic reforms fared unevenly; while GDP growth averaged approximately 7% annually from 2005 to 2008, driven largely by favorable global commodity prices rather than structural changes, issues like the unresolved land sale moratorium persisted, blocking agricultural market liberalization. efforts, intended to be transparent, often favored political allies, perpetuating and failing to broaden ownership or reduce inequality. Tymoshenko's 2009 gas deal with , negotiated without Yushchenko's full endorsement, highlighted ongoing sector opacity and inter-elite conflicts over resources. By 2010, these shortcomings contributed to Yushchenko's approval rating plummeting below 5%, underscoring widespread disillusionment with unmaterialized pledges.

Ideology and Policy Positions

Views on Ukrainian Sovereignty and Nationalism

Yushchenko has consistently advocated for a robust Ukrainian national identity distinct from Russian influence, emphasizing through cultural revival and Western integration rather than alignment with . During his presidency from 2005 to 2010, he pursued policies aimed at fortifying Ukrainian consciousness, including efforts to elevate the from its historical suppression under Soviet rule and to redirect national orientation toward European democratic norms. This approach countered narratives portraying as a subordinate extension of , instead positioning it as an independent entity with deep European roots. A cornerstone of his nationalism involved reclaiming Ukrainian history from Soviet-era distortions, particularly through the recognition of the —the 1932–1933 famine—as a deliberate targeting Ukrainian peasants and nationalists to eradicate national resistance. In 2006, under his administration, Ukraine's parliament passed legislation designating the fourth Saturday of November as Holodomor Remembrance Day, with Yushchenko framing the event in speeches as an assault on the Ukrainian nation's core identity. He extended this de-Sovietization by rehabilitating figures associated with the fight for independence, such as awarding , leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), the title posthumously on January 22, 2010—the date commemorating the 1918 declaration of Ukrainian independence—despite international criticism labeling Bandera a collaborator with during . Yushchenko justified such honors as recognition of anti-Soviet insurgents' role in pursuing sovereignty, arguing they represented legitimate resistance against imperial domination. Yushchenko's vision of sovereignty intertwined nationalism with geopolitical strategy, advocating membership in 2008 to safeguard against Russian and promote . In his August 24, 2007, Independence Day address, he called for national unity around this independent path, reflecting on early post-1991 challenges and urging a break from historical subjugation. These stances, while credited with popularizing "thinking Ukrainian" and fostering pride in national symbols, drew accusations of ethnic exclusivity from pro-Russian factions, though Yushchenko maintained they were essential for causal resilience against external threats to autonomy.

Economic and Anti-Corruption Stances

During his tenure as from December 1999 to April 2001, Yushchenko pursued market-oriented economic reforms, including a in 2000 that enabled private ownership of and contributed to restoring Ukraine's agricultural output after years of stagnation under state control. He also stabilized the banking sector by introducing the national currency, the hryvnia, in 1996 during his earlier role as National Bank chairman, and implemented fiscal measures to curb inflation and achieve macroeconomic stability through targeted structural adjustments aligned with (IMF) recommendations. These efforts emphasized of state assets, reduction of budget deficits, and liberalization of trade, reflecting a commitment to transitioning from Soviet-era central planning to a competitive . As President from January 2005 to February 2010, Yushchenko advocated for accelerated to reduce state dominance in key sectors like and , arguing that transparent sales of state-owned enterprises would attract foreign investment and dismantle oligarchic monopolies inherited from the Kuchma era. His administration prioritized with the , conditioning reforms on adopting EU standards for competition, fiscal discipline, and property rights, including a and IMF-backed to restore financial credibility after the . Yushchenko opposed directing privatization revenues primarily to the state budget, favoring instead reinvestment in and social programs to foster long-term growth, though this stance led to tensions with parliamentary coalitions seeking short-term fiscal gains. Overall, his economic vision centered on , measures, and export diversification away from raw materials toward value-added industries. On , Yushchenko positioned himself as a reformer intent on eradicating systemic graft that permeated Ukraine's and , declaring in early 2005 that combating was a core policy alongside EU accession. He called for stricter enforcement against bribery at all government levels, including proposals for independent oversight bodies and asset declarations for officials, framing as a barrier to foreign investment and national sovereignty. During his premiership, he had already targeted oligarch influence by reforming subsidies and customs procedures to limit , and as president, he pledged to prosecute high-level malfeasance without political interference. Yushchenko's rhetoric emphasized transparency in public procurement and privatization tenders to prevent the prevalent under prior regimes, though implementation required overcoming entrenched interests in a fragmented .

Geopolitical Orientation

Viktor Yushchenko pursued a pro-Western , prioritizing Ukraine's integration into and the as central pillars of his geopolitical strategy. Following the 2004 , his administration shifted Ukraine's orientation away from a Russia-centric approach toward stronger alignment with Western institutions, including active bids for NATO's Membership Action Plan (MAP) in 2006. This reorientation aimed to enhance Ukraine's security and economic ties with and , contrasting with the multi-vector policy of his predecessor . Yushchenko advocated for NATO membership to counter Russian influence, emphasizing strategic partnerships with alliance members while asserting that such aspirations did not preclude relations with . In a statement, he described as a strategic partner but clarified that Ukraine's policy would not oppose Russian interests. His government lobbied for association agreements and pursued diversification of energy supplies to reduce dependence on Russian natural gas, including overtures to for alternative imports in 2008. These efforts reflected a broader goal of insulating from 's leverage through energy exports. In regional conflicts, Yushchenko demonstrated solidarity with pro-Western neighbors, notably supporting Georgia during the 2008 . He condemned Russia's invasion, joined Baltic leaders in issuing a joint statement backing , and rejected Moscow's recognition of and as independent states. This stance underscored his view of Russian actions as aggressive toward pursuing Western integration, drawing parallels to potential threats against . Despite domestic political challenges, Yushchenko's orientation reinforced Ukraine's European trajectory until the 2010 election of reversed many gains.

Personal Life and Health

Family Background and Relationships

Viktor Yushchenko was born on February 23, 1954, in the village of Khoruzhivka in , Ukrainian SSR, to parents who both worked as schoolteachers. His mother, Varvara Tymofiyovna Yushchenko (1918–2005), taught physics and . In 1977, Yushchenko married Svitlana Ivanivna Kolesnyk; the marriage ended in divorce, and they had two children together. He later married Kateryna Mykhaylivna Chumachenko (born Catherine Claire Chumachenko on September 1, 1961, in , , to Ukrainian émigré parents displaced by ) in 1998. Chumachenko, raised in the Ukrainian-American community in Chicago's Humboldt Park neighborhood, worked in U.S. foreign policy roles, including at the White House Office of Public Liaison and the U.S. State Department, before relocating to in 1991 to support independent Ukrainian initiatives. She became a Ukrainian citizen in and actively campaigned for her husband's political causes, leveraging her Western ties to advocate for Ukraine's integration with and the . Yushchenko and Chumachenko have three children: daughters and Khrystyna, and son Taras. Overall, Yushchenko is the father of five children—three daughters and two sons—with two from his first . The has resided primarily in , with Chumachenko emphasizing preservation of Ukrainian cultural and religious traditions, including support for the Ukrainian Orthodox Church's independence from .

Long-Term Health Effects from Poisoning

Yushchenko's exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), the most potent , resulted in blood concentrations approximately 50,000 times above normal levels, leading to persistent due to the compound's long half-life in humans. This acute intoxication manifested in , a hallmark dermatological condition characterized by severe acneiform lesions, cysts, and scarring, particularly on the face and torso, which disfigured his appearance and required extensive cosmetic intervention. Between late 2004 and 2006, Yushchenko underwent at least 24 surgical procedures to excise dioxin-induced lesions, reconstruct tissues, and mitigate ongoing inflammation and weakness that initially impaired basic motor functions, such as lifting his arm. Medical assessments indicated that while the acute phase resolved, residual TCDD demanded prolonged monitoring and supportive care, including lipid apheresis to accelerate toxin elimination, as documented in follow-up studies tracking decay rates. Longer-term consequences of such high-dose TCDD exposure, informed by Yushchenko's case and comparative data, encompass elevated risks of immunotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and oncogenesis, though no cancer has been publicly confirmed in his instance. Hepatic enzyme elevations and gastrointestinal sequelae persisted intermittently, contributing to and reduced resilience, effects corroborated by research leveraging his clinical data for modeling chronic low-level persistence in adipose tissues. Despite these burdens, Yushchenko resumed public duties post-recovery, with levels declining over years but never fully normalizing without intervention.

Legacy, Achievements, and Criticisms

Key Accomplishments

Yushchenko's leadership in the of November–December 2004 stands as his foremost political accomplishment, mobilizing hundreds of thousands in nonviolent protests against in the presidential runoff that initially favored . The sustained demonstrations pressured Ukraine's to annul the tainted results and mandate a revote on December 26, 2004, which Yushchenko won, assuming the presidency on January 23, 2005, and thereby advancing toward greater democratic accountability. Prior to his presidential bid, as from December 1999 to May 2001, Yushchenko enacted macroeconomic stabilization measures, slashing inflation from triple digits to single-digit levels, clearing chronic state salary and pension arrears—achieving the first timely payouts in years—and fostering GDP expansion through fiscal discipline and subsidy cuts to inefficient enterprises. In his presidential tenure from 2005 to 2010, Yushchenko championed Ukraine's European orientation, initiating steps toward and integration, including early negotiations for an enhanced partnership with the and supporting the country's accession to the on May 16, 2008. His administration expanded media freedoms and political pluralism, establishing Ukraine as a more open relative to prior authoritarian tendencies, while promoting national historical awareness, notably through parliamentary recognition of the as a against on November 28, 2006.

Principal Shortcomings and Failures

Yushchenko's presidency was marked by chronic political instability, as internal divisions within the coalition undermined governance. Appointed Prime Minister was dismissed in September 2005 amid accusations of and infighting, leading to multiple government reshuffles and a fragmented that hindered implementation. This rivalry persisted, with Yushchenko testifying against Tymoshenko in 2011 over gas deal negotiations, exacerbating legislative gridlock and delaying reforms. Efforts to combat corruption largely faltered, despite initial promises. High-profile resignations, including that of Adviser in 2005 over alleged graft, signaled persistent issues within the administration, eroding public trust. Ukraine's ranking on Transparency International's improved modestly from 2.8 in 2004 to 2.1 in 2009 (on a 0-10 scale, lower indicating higher perceived corruption), but systemic problems endured, with critics attributing failures to inadequate enforcement and elite entrenchment. Economic performance under Yushchenko reflected unfulfilled reform pledges, with early growth giving way to vulnerability during the global crisis. GDP expanded at an average of 5% annually from 2005 to , driven by exports, but contracted sharply by 14.8% in 2009 due to delayed structural adjustments and fiscal mismanagement. Foreign direct investment stagnated relative to peers, averaging $5-10 billion yearly, hampered by regulatory barriers and oligarch influence that Yushchenko's government failed to dismantle effectively. Energy policy shortcomings exposed Ukraine's dependency on Russia, culminating in crises that disrupted supplies. The 2006 gas dispute saw Russia halt deliveries on January 1 after failed price negotiations, affecting European transit and highlighting Yushchenko's inability to diversify sources or enforce efficiency reforms despite warnings. A similar cutoff in January 2009, amid unpaid bills exceeding $2 billion, stemmed from protracted talks and Tymoshenko's separate dealings, further damaging Yushchenko's credibility. These failures manifested in plummeting public support, with Yushchenko's approval rating dropping from over 60% in early 2005 to 7% by October 2009 and as low as 2.7% in polls, reflecting disillusionment over unkept promises of unity and prosperity. In the January 2010 , he secured only 5.1% of the vote, signaling a decisive rejection by voters. Overall, leadership lapses in consolidating democratic gains and addressing entrenched interests contributed to stalled progress toward integration and national cohesion.

Public Perception and Polling Data

Following his inauguration on January 23, 2005, Viktor Yushchenko enjoyed widespread public support as the figurehead of the , with approval ratings reaching approximately 73% in April 2005 amid optimism for democratic reforms and anti-corruption efforts. This initial enthusiasm stemmed from his resistance to and the that disfigured his appearance, positioning him as a symbol of Ukrainian sovereignty against authoritarianism. However, by October 2005, positive opinions had fallen to around 50%, signaling early disillusionment. Approval ratings continued to erode due to persistent political infighting, particularly with Prime Minister , economic stagnation exacerbated by the 2006 gas crisis with Russia, and failure to enact promised structural reforms. By , Yushchenko's approval had plummeted to as low as 2.7-4%, with Gallup recording the nadir at 4% and finding 83% disapproval amid perceptions of governmental paralysis and unfulfilled expectations for prosperity and . This decline was mirrored in electoral outcomes: in the 2006 parliamentary elections, Yushchenko's Our Ukraine bloc secured only 13.95% of the vote, reflecting voter frustration with coalition instability. By the 2010 presidential election, his support had contracted to 5.45% in the first round, underscoring a public view of him as ineffective in governance despite his principled stance on . Post-presidency perceptions have varied regionally, with stronger residual support in for his nationalist policies, but overall, polls indicate lasting criticism for prioritizing geopolitical symbolism over domestic economic delivery.

Honors, Awards, and Recognition

In recognition of his leadership during the and commitment to democratic reforms, Yushchenko received the from the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation in 2005. The award, presented by and Senator Edward Kennedy, honored his refusal to accept and persistence despite poisoning. Yushchenko was awarded the inaugural Chatham House Prize on October 17, 2005, presented by Queen Elizabeth II at Mansion House in . The prize, from the Royal Institute of International Affairs, recognized his significant contribution to international affairs through advancing Ukraine's democratic transition and . He also received the Philadelphia Liberty Medal from the on September 23, 2005, accompanied by a $100,000 prize. The medal commended his demonstration of leadership, courage, and commitment in challenging and during Ukraine's 2004 presidential . Prior to his presidency, Yushchenko earned domestic honors including the , Third Degree, the title of Honored Economist of Ukraine, and the Honorary Decoration of the President of Ukraine for contributions to and banking reform.

References

  1. https://clubmadrid.org/who/members/viktor-yushchenko/
  2. https://www.jfklibrary.org/events-and-awards/profile-in-courage-award/award-recipients/viktor-yushchenko-2005
  3. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna6697752
  4. https://www.empa.ch/web/s604/juschtschenko
  5. https://www.bushcenter.org/freedom-collection/viktor-yushchenko_the-attempted-murder-of-viktor-yushchenko
  6. https://globalaffairs.org/research/experts/viktor-yushchenko
  7. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/rethinking-yushchenko/
  8. https://www.bushcenter.org/freedom-collection/viktor-yushchenko_the-orange-revolution
  9. https://www.rferl.org/a/Unloved_But_Unbowed_Ukraines_Viktor_Yushchenko_Leaves_Office/1967436.html
  10. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Viktor-Yushchenko
  11. https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%255CY%255CU%255CYushchenkoViktor.htm
  12. https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-orange-revolution-20-year-anniversary-photos/33262259.html
  13. https://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/01/20/tol.yushchenko.profile/index.html
  14. https://www.uwinnipeg.ca/awards-distinctions/honorary-doctorate/yushchenko.html
  15. https://www.centralbanking.com/central-banking/news/1428884/yushchenko-central-bank-politics
  16. https://www.rferl.org/a/1056203.html
  17. https://time.com/archive/6627192/viktor-yushchenko/
  18. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/archive/charismatic-top-banker-is-ukraine-success-story
  19. https://www.piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/4273/05iie4273.pdf
  20. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/ukraine0303/Ukraine0303-01.htm
  21. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/ukraine/27580.htm
  22. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/ukraine-s-secret-turnaround
  23. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/023/0034/006/article-A008-en.xml
  24. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/27/world/ukraine-parliament-dismisses-cabinet-in-blow-to-reformists.html
  25. https://www.rferl.org/a/1096303.html
  26. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/apr/27/iantraynor
  27. https://www.rferl.org/a/1098521.html
  28. https://www.bushcenter.org/freedom-collection/viktor-yushchenko-the-second-round-of-the-elections
  29. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2004/37083.htm
  30. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/how-ukraines-orange-revolution-shaped-twenty-first-century-geopolitics/
  31. https://www.rferl.org/a/1054532.html
  32. https://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu/content/ukrainians-overthrow-dictatorship-orange-revolution-2004
  33. https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/56894
  34. https://carnegieendowment.org/events/2004/10/ukraine-before-the-presidential-elections
  35. https://www.bushcenter.org/freedom-collection/viktor-yushchenko-the-first-round-of-the-elections
  36. https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/ukraine/eoms/presidential_2004
  37. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/dec/11/ukraine
  38. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2004/lawrence-dioxin-poisoning
  39. https://www.rferl.org/a/1071434.html
  40. https://www.nature.com/articles/news041122-8
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673609609120
  42. https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/yushchenko-poisoning-study-calls-for-dioxin-tests/3004359.article
  43. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2004/12/12/yushchenko-was-poisoned-doctors-say/38b08066-c0b6-4c82-bb87-f109592fd390/
  44. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2004/12/11/yushchenko-suffered-dioxin-poisoning
  45. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2004/dec/16/thisweekssciencequestions
  46. http://electionresources.org/ua/president.php?election=2004
  47. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/f/14673.pdf
  48. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/when-ukraine-set-course-for-europe/
  49. https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/267261/dl?inline=
  50. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/europe-july-dec04-ukraine_12-03
  51. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2004/12/3/ukrainian-court-annuls-election-result
  52. https://www.oscepa.org/en/documents/election-observation/election-observation-statements/ukraine/statements-25/1491-2004-presidential-second-round-rerun/file
  53. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/dec/31/ukraine.nickpatonwalsh
  54. https://online.ucpress.edu/cpcs/article/55/1/155/120314/The-Effect-of-Election-ObservationEvidence-from
  55. https://www.rferl.org/a/1057021.html
  56. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-inauguration-date-set/
  57. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4198957.stm
  58. https://www.piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/4273/08iie4273.pdf
  59. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna9801877
  60. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/25/business/worldbusiness/worlds-biggest-steel-maker-is-acquiring-ukrainian.html
  61. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/feb/16/ukraine.nickpatonwalsh
  62. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2005/cr05415.pdf
  63. https://www.rferl.org/a/1059353.html
  64. https://www.hrw.org/news/2008/10/28/ukraine-respect-independent-judiciary
  65. https://www.carnegieendowment.org/posts/2005/01/reform-in-ukraine-must-be-swift-and-sweeping?lang=en
  66. https://www.csi.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/hist-atu-1.pdf
  67. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2012/04/reforming-the-ukrainian-economy-under-yanukovych-the-first-two-years?lang=en
  68. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/europes-messy-russian-gas-divorce/
  69. https://www.csis.org/analysis/ukraine-and-russian-gas-never-ending-crisis
  70. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2014/05/09/russian-ukrainian-eu-gas-conflict-who-stands-to-lose-most/index.html
  71. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/676171468313800577/pdf/490570NEWS0ENG10Box338938B01PUBLIC1.pdf
  72. https://wiiw.ac.at/ukraine-in-the-midst-of-economic-meltdown-dlp-609.pdf
  73. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2015/09/14/01/49/pr08271
  74. https://www.imf.org/external/np/loi/2008/ukr/103108.pdf
  75. https://jamestown.org/program/yushchenko-tymoshenko-pledge-reforms-in-letter-to-imf/
  76. https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/apr/14/ask-politifact-whats-ukraines-history-trying-join-/
  77. https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/nato-expansion-into-ukraine-royce/
  78. https://www.fairobserver.com/world-news/ukraine-news/nato-and-ukraine-how-have-we-gotten-here-from-1991/
  79. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/04/20050404-1.html
  80. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/09/04/that-time-ukraine-tried-to-join-nato-and-nato-said-no/
  81. https://www.cfr.org/timeline/ukraines-post-independence-struggles?src=ilaw
  82. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/NG27-TheRussoUkrainianGasDisputeofJanuary2009AComprehensiveAssessment-JonathanSternSimonPiraniKatjaYafimava-2009.pdf
  83. https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/news/poisoned-gas-domestic-networks-and-energy-security-strategy-ukraine
  84. https://www.academia.edu/128419434/Russia_s_War_Against_Ukraine_Domestic_Fallout_and_Eurasian_Geopolitical_Shifts
  85. https://www.rferl.org/a/1061241.html
  86. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/sep/08/ukraine
  87. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/international/europe/ukrainian-president-fires-his-government.html
  88. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna9253631
  89. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/chronology-ukraines-politics-since-orange-revolution-idUSL03334197/
  90. https://jamestown.org/program/yushchenko-rules-to-dissolve-parliament/
  91. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/apr/03/ukraine.marktran
  92. https://www.rferl.org/a/Yushchenko_Sets_Parliamentary_Elections_In_Ukraine_For_December_7/1328315.html
  93. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/sep/16/ukraine
  94. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122349033978016067
  95. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/where-did-ukraines-yushchenko-go-wrong-idUSTRE60A2ZM/
  96. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/monitor/943-presidential-election-in-ukraine-17th-january-2010
  97. https://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/yushchenko-attributes-his-low-popularity-ratings-t-53857.html
  98. https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/ukraine/67844
  99. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/understanding-ukraines-presidential-shift/
  100. https://www.newsweek.com/viktor-yushchenkos-star-has-fallen-76515
  101. https://www.unian.info/politics/710245-cec-processed-9801-of-protocols.html
  102. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/3/c/98578.pdf
  103. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25216727
  104. https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-presidents-back-protesters/25190212.html
  105. https://www.cnbc.com/2014/09/12/ukraine-vows-return-to-union-with-crimea.html
  106. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldeucom/115/11508.htm
  107. https://www.dw.com/en/re-integrate-donbass-no-thanks/a-18817761
  108. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2020/05/minsk-conundrum-western-policy-and-russias-war-eastern-ukraine-0/background-minsk
  109. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-62647062
  110. https://news.wttw.com/2023/09/19/chicago-former-ukrainian-president-viktor-yushchenko-talks-putin-poisoning-and-need
  111. https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-russia-war-american-aid-delay-viktor-yushchenko-1900363
  112. https://www.hoover.org/news/former-ukrainian-president-viktor-yushchenko-only-certain-kind-peace-will-do
  113. https://uatv.ua/en/ukraine-and-united-europe-will-face-armed-resistance-against-russia-yushchenko/
  114. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/yes-to-moscow-former-ukrainian-president-yushchenko-says-kyiv-must-fight-until-capturing-russian-capital/articleshow/124025023.cms
  115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19660807/
  116. https://komersant.ua/en/vid-otruiennia-dioksynom-do-politychnykh-intryh-chomu-sprava-yushchenka-dosi-nezavershena-2/
  117. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/world/europe/24iht-kiev.4.14767930.html
  118. https://archive.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/dead-end-51514.html
  119. https://jamestown.org/was-ukrainian-president-viktor-yushchenko-poisoned-in-2004/
  120. https://www.rferl.org/a/1061186.html
  121. https://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/09/08/ukraine.yushchenko/index.html
  122. https://www.rferl.org/a/1063942.html
  123. https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/quiet-oligarchs-rich-powers-behind-fighting-ukraine-n35671
  124. https://jamestown.org/program/yushchenkos-multi-vector-election-strategy/
  125. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/15/world/europe/deal-for-ukraine-company-renews-charges-of-abuse.html
  126. https://www.rferl.org/a/lawyer-reveals-details-of-yushchenko-corruption-charges/29986363.html
  127. https://eurasianet.org/a-brief-history-of-corruption-in-ukraine-the-yushchenko-era
  128. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jan/18/russia-ukraine-gas-deal
  129. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/russia-and-ukraine-reach-gas-deal/
  130. https://archive.kyivpost.com/article/opinion/op-ed/what-was-really-in-tymoshenkos-2009-gas-agreement-114603.html
  131. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/ukraine-beats-russia-in-epic-gas-battle/
  132. https://www.reuters.com/article/markets/oil/ukrainian-leader-criticises-gas-deal-with-russia-idUSLK129263/
  133. https://jamestown.org/program/yushchenko-criticizes-tymoshenko-for-gas-accords-and-plea-for-loan-from-moscow/
  134. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-14561357
  135. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us/ukraine-leader-s-aide-wants-change-russian-gas-deal-idUSLN717085/
  136. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/10-years-on-tymoshenkos-ill-fated-deal-still-haunts-the-gas-princess/
  137. https://www.rferl.org/a/Ukrainian_President_Asks_Kremlin_To_Amend_Gas_Agreement/1882108.html
  138. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/aug/17/viktor-yushchenko-testifies-against-yulia-tymoshenko
  139. https://www.cfr.org/interview/tymoshenkos-sentence-and-ukraines-future
  140. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/one-year-after-ukraines-orange-revolution
  141. https://time.com/archive/6949124/in-ukraine-the-death-of-the-orange-revolution/
  142. https://www.rferl.org/a/1079175.html
  143. https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/[ukraine](/page/Ukraine)
  144. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/orange-peels-ukraine-after-revolution/
  145. https://united24media.com/culture/ukraines-orange-revolution-the-spark-that-ignited-a-nation-10
  146. https://www.euronews.com/2023/07/10/viktor-yushchenkos-everlasting-impact-on-ukraines-national-revival-shouldnt-be-forgotten
  147. https://www.rferl.org/a/Holodomor_Is_Ukraines_NeverEnding_Trauma/1357818.html
  148. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/stepan-bandera-hero-of-ukraine/
  149. https://portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/tarnished-heroes-the-organization-of-ukrainian-nationalists-in-th
  150. https://www.rferl.org/a/1078321.html
  151. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna6858089
  152. https://jamestown.org/program/yushchenko-will-be-marginalized-by-constitutional-and-political-instability-in-ukraine/
  153. https://bbj.hu/politics/foreign-affairs/eu/ukranian-president-urges-tougher-anti-corruption-measures42437/
  154. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/feb/21/worlddispatch.ukraine
  155. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/natos-ukraine-challenge/
  156. https://jamestown.org/program/viktor-yushchenkos-foreign-policy-agenda/
  157. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ukraine-balancing-russia-the-west-and-democracy/
  158. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_21969.htm
  159. https://www.rferl.org/a/1079590.html
  160. https://www.npr.org/2008/08/18/93718872/georgia-crisis-stirs-concern-in-ukraine
  161. https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/ukraine-rejects-russian-move-on-georgia-regions-idUSLR669524/
  162. https://jamestown.org/program/ukrainian-government-expresses-strong-support-for-georgia/
  163. https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/communications/news/understanding-roots-russia-ukraine-war-and-misuse-history
  164. https://www.notablebiographies.com/newsmakers2/2006-Ra-Z/Yushchenko-Viktor.html
  165. https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/02/daughter-of-ukraine-2/
  166. https://chicago.suntimes.com/2022/3/11/22972056/kateryna-yushchenko-viktor-ukraine-war-russia-humboldt-park-vladimir-putin-kyiv-army-orthodox-church
  167. https://www.rferl.org/a/1056858.html
  168. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090805075638.htm
  169. https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/ukraine-president-poisoning-aids-dioxin-research-idUSL1184810/
  170. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC554869/
  171. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21998131/
  172. https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/ukraines-leader-says-had-24-operations-since-poison-idUSL05236939/
  173. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6785-dioxin-may-cause-yushchenko-long-term-problems/
  174. https://www.nature.com/news/2004/041122/full/news041122-8.html
  175. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/27/world/europe/yushchenko-will-feel-poisons-effects-for-years.html
  176. https://www.cfr.org/event/conversation-viktor-yushchenko-0
  177. https://www.cfr.org/event/conversation-viktor-yushchenko
  178. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/curing-ukraine-fatigue/
  179. https://www.voanews.com/a/ukrainians-disillusioned-with-president-yushchenko-81345692/169756.html
  180. https://www.economist.com/news/2005/09/08/the-orange-revolutionaries-let-the-side-down
  181. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2009/10/ukra-o29.html
  182. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/ukraine_economy.pdf
  183. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/europes-gas-crisis-dont-act-surprised/
  184. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jan/01/gas-gazprom-ukraine-russia
  185. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2009/11/02/chapter-10-rating-country-conditions-and-leaders/
  186. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/172795/
  187. https://www.cfr.org/interview/understanding-ukraines-presidential-shift
  188. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/monitor/494-general-elections-in-the-ukraine-26th-march-2006
  189. https://news.gallup.com/poll/166154/ukrainians-discontent-runs-deep.aspx
  190. https://www.jfklibrary.org/about-us/news-and-press/press-releases/ukraine-president-viktor-yushchenko-to-receive-jfk-profile-in-courage-award
  191. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4348778.stm
  192. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/09/remembering-our-patron-hm-queen-and-chatham-house
  193. https://constitutioncenter.org/about/liberty-medal/recipients/viktor-yushchenko
  194. https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/ukraine-president-viktor-yushchenko-to-receive-2005-philadelphia-liberty-medal
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.