Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Wanli Emperor
View on Wikipedia
The Wanli Emperor (4 September 1563 – 18 August 1620), personal name Zhu Yijun,[iv][v] was the 14th emperor of the Ming dynasty, reigning from 1572 to 1620. He succeeded his father, the Longqing Emperor. His reign of 48 years was the longest of the Ming dynasty.[3]
Key Information
The Wanli Emperor ascended the throne at the age of nine. During the first ten years of his reign, Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng effectively led the government, while the Emperor's mother, Lady Li, and the eunuch Feng Bao also played significant roles. The country experienced economic and military prosperity, reaching a level of power not seen since the early 15th century. The Emperor held great respect and appreciation for Zhang Juzheng, but as time passed, various factions within the government openly opposed Zhang, and the Emperor started to consider his influential position a burden. In 1582, Zhang died and within months, the Emperor dismissed Feng Bao and made significant changes to Zhang's administrative arrangements.
The Wanli era saw a significant boom in industry, particularly in the production of silk, cotton, and porcelain, and agriculture and trade also experienced growth. Increased trade had the strongest impact in Jiangnan, where cities such as Suzhou, Songjiang, Jiaxing, and Nanjing flourished. Despite the economic growth of the empire, state finances remained in a dire state, and while wealthy merchants and the gentry enjoyed lavish lifestyles, the majority of peasants and day laborers lived in poverty.
Ming China saw three major campaigns in the last decade of the 16th century. A Ming force of 40,000 soldiers had quelled a large rebellion in Ningxia by October 1592, allowing the Ming to shift their focus to Korea. Concurrently, Japan invaded Korea, leading to a joint Korean-Chinese force, including 40,000 Ming soldiers, pushing the Japanese out of most of Korea and forcing them to retreat to the southeast coast by 1593. In 1597, a second Japanese invasion was thwarted, and the suppression of the Yang Yinglong rebellion in southwest China concluded in a few months from 1599 due to Ming forces concentrating there amidst the ongoing war with Japan. In the final years of the Wanli era, the Jurchens grew stronger on the northeastern frontiers and posed a significant threat. In 1619, they defeated the Ming armies in the Battle of Sarhu and captured part of Liaodong.
Over time, the Emperor grew increasingly disillusioned with the constant demoralizing attacks and counterattacks from officials, causing him to become increasingly isolated. In the 1580s and 1590s, he attempted to promote his third son, Zhu Changxun, as crown prince, but faced strong opposition from officials. This led to ongoing conflicts between the Emperor and his ministers for over fifteen years. Eventually, the Emperor gave in and appointed his eldest son, Zhu Changluo, as crown prince in 1601, and Zhu Changluo later succeeded his father as the Taichang Emperor. In 1596, the Wanli Emperor attempted to establish a parallel administration composed of eunuchs, separate from the officials who had traditionally governed the empire, but this effort was abandoned in 1606. As a result, the governance of the country remained in the hands of Confucian intellectuals, who were often embroiled in disputes with each other. The opposition Donglin movement continued to criticize the Emperor and his followers, while pro-government officials were divided based on their regional origins.
Background and accession
[edit]Zhu Yijun, the future Wanli Emperor, was born on 4 September 1563 to Zhu Zaiji,[3] the third son[5] and heir apparent of the Jiajing Emperor (r. 1521–1567),[3] and his concubine, Lady Li. He had two older brothers, both of whom died in early childhood before 1563, and a younger brother, Zhu Yiliu (朱翊鏐; 1568–1614), who was created Prince of Lu in 1571.[6] Zhu Zaiji ascended the throne as the Longqing Emperor in 1567.[5] On 5 July 1572, the Longqing Emperor died at the age of 35, and Zhu Yijun succeeded his father two weeks later on 19 July 1572.[1] He adopted the era name Wanli, which means "ten thousand calendars".[7]
The Wanli Emperor was known for his restless and energetic nature during his youth.[8] He was a quick learner,[9][vi] intelligent,[8][9] and perceptive, always staying well-informed about occurrences in the empire.[8] Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng assigned eight teachers to educate the Wanli Emperor in Confucianism, history, and calligraphy. The history lessons focused on teaching him about good and bad examples of governance, and Zhang personally compiled a collection of historical stories for the young emperor to learn from. The Emperor's fascination with calligraphy concerned Zhang, who feared that this "empty pastime" would distract him from his duties as a ruler. As a result, Zhang gradually stopped the Emperor's calligraphy lessons.[11] From 1583 to 1588, the Wanli Emperor visited several mausoleums near Beijing and paid attention to the training of the palace guard. His officials were worried that he would become a ruler similar to the Zhengde Emperor (r. 1505–1521),[12] and discouraged him from traveling outside the Forbidden City and pursuing his interests in the military, horse riding, and archery.[8][12] Under their pressure, the Wanli Emperor stopped leaving Beijing after 1588 and stopped participating in public sacrifices after 1591. He also canceled the morning court audiences (held before dawn) and the evening study of Confucianism with his tutors (after sunset).[12] In his youth, the Emperor was obedient to his mother and showed respect towards eunuchs[vii] and the grand secretaries, but as he aged, he became cynical and skeptical towards rituals and bureaucrats.[14] His opposition to ritualized royal duties linked him to his grandfather the Jiajing Emperor, but he lacked his grandfather's decisiveness and flamboyance. While the Jiajing Emperor was a devoted Taoist, the Wanli Emperor leaned towards Buddhism.[14]
In the first period of his rule, the Wanli Emperor displayed a strong commitment to the well-being of his people, actively combating corruption and striving to improve border defense. His mother, a devout Buddhist, had a significant influence on him, leading him to rarely impose the death penalty, but one punished official claimed that his leniency was sometimes excessive. He was known for being both vulnerable and vengeful, but also generous, and was not afraid to use violence against offending officials, although he did not make it a regular practice.[8] From the mid-1580s, he began to gain weight[12] and his health deteriorated. By 1589, he cited long-term dizziness, accompanied by fevers, heatstroke, eczema, diarrhea, and general weakness as reasons for his absence from audiences. This condition was linked to his regular use of opium.[15][viii]
Zhang Juzheng and Empress Dowager Li raised the Wanli Emperor to be modest in material possessions and exemplary in behavior, which he saw as a humiliation that he never forgot. Upon learning that Zhang himself lived in luxury, the Wanli Emperor was deeply affected. This display of double standards hardened his attitude towards officials and made him cynical about moral challenges. Two years after Zhang's death, his family was accused of illegal land dealings, and the Emperor severely punished them by confiscating their property and sending Zhang's sons to the border troops.[16]
Early reign (1572–1582)
[edit]
At the end of the Longqing Emperor's reign, Senior Grand Secretary Gao Gong headed the government. Shortly after the accession of the Wanli Emperor, however, an alliance between the eunuch Feng Bao (馮保), head of the Directorate of Ceremonial (the most important eunuch office[vii] in the imperial palace), and Zhang Juzheng succeeded in deposing Gao. Zhang took over Gao's place and remained in power for ten years until his death in 1582.[18] Influenced by the Mongol raids of the 1550s, Zhang aimed to "enrich the country and strengthen the army",[ix] using Legalist rather than Confucian methods.[19] He sought to centralize the government and increase the emperor's authority at the expense of local interests by streamlining the administration and strengthening the military.[20] This included closing local academies and placing the investigating censors under the Grand Secretariat's control.[20] Zhang had the support of eunuchs, particularly Feng Bao, and Empress Dowager Li,[21] who acted as regent. He was able to handpick his colleagues in the Grand Secretariat and informally control the Ministry of Rites and the Censorate, appointing his followers to important positions in central offices and regions. This gave him significant influence in the government, although he did not have the authority to issue orders or demands.[21] Zhang also attempted to redirect the censors from seeking revenge against each other and instead focus on collecting taxes and suppressing bandits. As a result, the efficiency of the Ming state administration improved between 1572 and 1582,[22] reaching a level that had only been achieved in the early days of the empire.[23]
Zhang systematically implemented a series of reforms, including the conversion of tax payments from goods to silver (known as the single whip reform), changes to the old military field system,[19] and between 1572 and 1579, revised the accounts of county offices regarding corvée labor and various fees and surcharges.[22] A new cadastre was also created from 1580 to 1582.[24] These reforms were formalized across the empire with the publication of revised lists of taxpayers' duties, now converted to a unified payment in silver.[22] As part of the administrative reforms, unnecessary activities were abolished or limited, the number of Confucian students receiving state support was reduced, and provincial authorities were urged to only require one-third of the previous amount of corvée labor. Additionally, the services provided by post offices were reduced. Despite these changes, taxes remained at their original level and tax arrears were strictly enforced. Zhang was able to accumulate a surplus of income over expenditure.[25] This was a significant achievement, as the Ming state typically operated without reserves in the 16th century. Zhang's administration was able to save money and improve tax collection, resulting in considerable reserves. In 1582, the granaries around the capital held nine years' worth of grain, the Taicang treasury (太倉庫) of the Ministry of Revenue contained 6 million liang (about 223 tons) of silver, the Court of the Imperial Stud (太僕寺) held another 4 million, and an additional 2.5 million was available in Nanjing. Smaller reserves were also available to provincial administrations in Sichuan, Zhejiang, and Guangxi. Despite these achievements, there were no institutional changes during Zhang's time in office. He simply made existing processes more efficient under the slogan of returning to the order from the beginnings of the empire.[26]
As a proponent of peace with the Mongols, Zhang rejected the proposal of Minister of War Tan Lun for a pre-emptive strike against them. Instead, he ordered Qi Jiguang, commander of the northeastern border, to maintain an armed peace.[25] This decision not only allowed for a reduction in the border army, but also resulted in the return of surplus soldiers to their family farms.[22] Zhang not only rejected the notion that military affairs were less important than civilian ones, but also challenged the dominance of civilian dignitaries over military leaders. He appointed capable military leaders such as Qi Jiguang, Wang Chonggu (王崇古), Tan Lun, Liang Menglong (梁夢龍), and Li Chengliang to positions of responsibility. Additionally, he implemented a combination of defensive and offensive measures to strengthen border defenses and fostered peaceful relations with neighboring countries by opening border markets, particularly in the northwest.[27]
Zhang's actions were within the bounds of existing legislation, but critics viewed them as an abuse of power to promote his followers and exert illegitimate pressure on officials. Open criticism was rare until his father's death in 1577. According to the law, Zhang was supposed to leave office due to mourning, but the Emperor chose to keep him in office. This was not unprecedented, but criticism of disrespect for parents was widespread.[23] Despite the fact that the most vocal critics were punished with beatings, Zhang's reputation was damaged. In an attempt to suppress opposition, Zhang then enforced an extraordinary self-evaluation of all high-ranking officials,[28] resulting in the elimination of around fifty opponents.[29]
Zhang died on 9 July 1582. After his death, he was accused of the typical offenses of high officials, including bribery, living in luxury, promoting unqualified supporters, abusing power, and silencing critics.[30] Thereafter, his followers among the officials were dismissed,[31] and in the beginning of 1583, Feng Bao also lost his position.[32][x] The Emperor protected the officers, which boosted their morale to a level not seen since the mid-15th century. The Wanli Emperor's more aggressive military policy was based on Zhang's successes,[20] as he attempted to replace static defense with more offensive tactics and appointed only officials with military experience to lead the Ministry of War.[31] The Emperor also shared Zhang's distrust of local and regional authorities and opposition to factional politics.[20] Like Zhang, the Emperor preferred to solve real problems rather than engage in "empty talk"[xi] and factional conflicts.[34]
Mid-reign (1582–1596)
[edit]
After Zhang's death, a coalition formed between the Emperor's mother,[35] the grand secretaries, the Ministry of Personnel, and the Censorate to ensure efficient administration of the empire. The opposition objected to this alliance and deemed it illegal,[36] but with the absence of a strong statesman in the Grand Secretariat, there was no one to bring the administration under control.[37] Both the Emperor and opposition officials feared the concentration of power in the Grand Secretariat and worked to prevent it.[38] From 1582 to 1591, the Grand Secretariat was led briefly by Zhang Siwei (張四維) and then for eight years by Shen Shixing. Shen Shixing attempted to find compromises between the Emperor and the bureaucracy, while also tolerating criticism and respecting the decisions of ministries and the censors, but his efforts to create a cooperative and cohesive atmosphere were unsuccessful.[36] In 1590, the Grand Secretariat's alliance with the leadership of the Ministry of Personnel and the Censorate fell apart, causing Shen to lose much of his influence.[39] He was eventually forced to resign in 1591 due to his approach to the succession issue, which had lost him the confidence of opposition officials.[37]
After 1582, the Emperor chose the leaders of the Grand Secretariat from among the opponents of Zhang Juzheng (after Shen Shixing, the position was held by Wang Jiaping (王家屏), Wang Xijue, and Zhao Zhigao (趙志皋) until 1601). Except for the short-lived Wang Jiaping, all of Zhang's successors—including Shen Yiguan (沈一貫), Zhu Geng (朱賡), Li Tingji (李廷機), Ye Xianggao, and Fang Congzhe (方從哲)—fell out of favor and were either accused by censors during their lifetime or posthumously.[40][xii]
The opposition to Zhang, led by Gu Xiancheng, was successful in condemning him and purging his followers from the bureaucracy after his death,[41] but this also created an opportunity for the censors to criticize higher-ranking officials, which angered the Emperor and caused dissatisfaction because the critics did not offer any positive solutions.[16] As a result, Zhang's opponents became embroiled in numerous disputes, hindering the restoration of a strong centralized government.[41] From 1585, the censors also began to criticize the Emperor's private life.[16] The Emperor's reluctance to impose harsh punishments emboldened the critics.[42] In response, the Wanli Emperor tried to silence their informers among his servants[16] and gradually stopped responding to comments about himself.[42] In 1588, however, the Emperor's censors accused him of accepting a bribe from one of his eunuchs, which shocked the Emperor and caused him to withdraw from cooperating with officials. He reduced his contact with them to a minimum and canceled the morning audience. He only appeared in public at celebrations of military victories and communication with the bureaucracy was done through written reports, to which he may not have responded. Towards the end of his reign, he also hindered personnel changes in offices, leaving positions vacant and allowing officials to leave without his written consent–which was illegal, but went unpunished.[43] As a result, by 1603, nine of the thirteen regional inspector positions had long remained unfilled, and by 1604, almost half of the prefects and over half of the ministers and vice ministers in both capitals were vacant.[44] The Emperor also deliberately left many positions vacant in the eunuch offices of the palace, particularly the position of head of the Directorate of Ceremonial, in an attempt to weaken communication between eunuchs and officials.[45] This resulted in significant financial savings from unoccupied seats.[44]
The Emperor's lack of involvement in official positions did not affect the administration's responsibility for tax collection.[44] In times of military or other serious issues, he sought advice from responsible officials in ministries and the Censorate, and was not hesitant to appoint capable individuals outside of the traditional hierarchy to handle the situation, but he had a lack of trust in the regular administration and often found ways to bypass it.[46] While he may have left some memoranda unanswered, he actively responded to others. Although the Emperor left some high positions vacant, the authorities were able to function under the guidance of deputies and the country's administration continued to run smoothly. Assistance was provided to those affected by famine, rebellions were suppressed, border conflicts were resolved, and infrastructure was maintained.[47][xiii]
Hundreds of memoranda arrived on the Wanli Emperor's desk daily, but he only read and decided on a handful of them. The rest were handled by commissioned eunuchs, who were equipped with the imperial "red brush".[xiv] These eunuchs mostly confirmed the recommendations and proposals of the grand secretaries, but occasionally made different decisions if they believed the Emperor would not agree with the grand secretaries' proposals.[49]
Despite his desire to reform the civil service, the Emperor was unable to do so, and he also did not want to simply confirm the decisions of the officials. Both sides—the Emperor and the bureaucrats—wanted the other to behave properly, but their efforts were unsuccessful and only served to paralyze each other.[43] As a result of these disputes at the center, the state's control over the countryside weakened.[41]
Succession dispute (1586–1614)
[edit]
In 1586, the issue of succession arose when the Emperor elevated his favorite concubine, Lady Zheng, to the rank of "Imperial Noble Consort" (Huang Guifei),[42][50] placing her only one rank below the Empress and above all other concubines, including Lady Wang, mother of the Emperor's eldest son Zhu Changluo (1582–1620). This made it clear to those around him that he favored Lady Zheng's son, Zhu Changxun (1586–1641)—his third son (the second had died in infancy)—over Zhu Changluo as his successor. This caused a division among the bureaucracy; some officials defended the rights of the first son based on legal primogeniture, while others aligned themselves with Lady Zheng's son.[42] In response to the widespread support for the eldest son's rights among officials, the Emperor postponed his decision.[42] He justified the delay by stating that he was waiting for a son from the Empress.[51] When asked to appoint Zhu Changluo as the crown prince at the age of eight so that his education could officially begin, the Emperor again defended himself by saying that princes were traditionally taught by eunuchs.[10]
In 1589, the Emperor agreed to appoint Zhu Changluo as his successor, but Lady Zheng opposed this decision, causing a wave of controversy and, two years later, even arrests when a pamphlet accusing her of conspiring with high officials against the Emperor's eldest son spread in Beijing. In an attempt to improve her public image, the Emperor made efforts to portray Lady Zheng in a favorable light.[50] This reached its peak in 1594 when he supported her efforts to aid the victims of a famine in Henan. He ordered all Beijing officials of the fifth rank and above to contribute to her cause from their incomes.[52]
The failure to appoint a successor sparked frequent protests from both opposition-minded officials and high dignitaries, such as grand secretaries Shen Shixing (in office 1578–91) and Wang Xijue (in office 1584–91 and 1593–94).[42] Empress Wang[53] and Empress Dowager Li also supported the rights of Zhu Changluo,[51] but the Wanli Emperor did not appoint him as crown prince until 1601, after facing pressure from another round of protests and requests.[51][54] At the same time, the Emperor gave Zhu Changxun the title of Prince of Fu,[43] but kept him in Beijing instead of sending him to the province as originally planned when he turned eighteen in 1604. This fueled rumors that the question of succession was still unresolved.[55] It was not until 1614, after numerous appeals and protests against inaction, that the Emperor finally sent his younger son to his provincial seat.[54][56] This decision was only made after the Emperor's mother firmly advocated for it.[51]
Related to the succession debates was the "case of the attack with the stick" (梃擊案), which greatly damaged the ruler's reputation. In late May 1615, a man with a stick was detained at the crown prince's palace. From the subsequent investigation, it was discovered that the man, Zhang Chai (張差), was mentally unstable[57] and had attempted to use his stick to settle a dispute with two eunuchs. Initially, it was decided that he would be executed to resolve the issue,[45] but Wang Zhicai (王之寀), a prison official, intervened and disputed the claim that Zhang was insane. He pushed for a public investigation involving the Ministry of Justice. This new version of events suggested that Zhang was actually of sound mind and two eunuchs close to Lady Zheng and her brother had invited him to the palace. This raised suspicions that their true intention was to assassinate the crown prince and replace him with Lady Zheng's son.[58] This caused a stir at court. In response, the Emperor took the unprecedented step of summoning all civilian and military officials employed in Beijing and appearing before them[xv] with his family–the crown prince and his children. The Emperor scolded the officials for doubting his relationship with the crown prince, whom he trusted and relied on. The crown prince himself confirmed their close relationship and requested an end to the matter. Ultimately, the Emperor decided to execute Zhang and the two eunuchs involved in the case,[61] but officials from the Ministry of Justice opposed the execution and demanded further investigation. A compromise was reached through the mediation of the grand secretaries—Zhang was executed the following day, while the suspected eunuchs were to be interrogated. The interrogation did take place, but both eunuchs remained under the supervision of the Emperor's eunuchs. On the fifth day after the Emperor's speech, the officials were informed that the two eunuchs had died under palace confinement.[58]
Mine tax crisis (1596–1606)
[edit]
In August 1596, due to poor tax collection and the depletion of the treasury from the costly restoration of the Forbidden City palaces destroyed by fire in April of that year, the Wanli Emperor made the decision to accept proposals for silver mining that had been suggested by lower-level administrators for several years. He dispatched a team consisting of eunuchs, Imperial Guard officers, and representatives from the Ministry of Revenue to the outskirts of Beijing to establish new silver mines. He also sent an Imperial Guard officer to Henan province with the same task, and within a few weeks, other officers and eunuchs were sent to Shandong, Shaanxi, Zhejiang, and Shanxi provinces.[62] There was a long-standing tradition of sending eunuchs to various regions, as the business, trade, and mining industries provided opportunities for them to earn income.[63] However, within a few days, this initiative was met with opposition from local authorities in Beijing, who raised concerns about the potential threat to imperial tombs in the mountains near Beijing and the difficulty of recruiting miners who were still engaged in illegal mining. In response, the Emperor designated a protective zone for the tombs, but did not cancel the mining operation. He also appointed wealthy individuals from the local gentry to manage the mines and oversee necessary investments.[62]
Confucian officials, who were concerned about the erosion of their authority,[63] opposed the Emperor's initiative on ideological grounds, as they believed that the state should not engage in business and compete with the people for profit. They also objected to the Emperor's involvement in the mining industry, as it required the employment of miners who were considered untrustworthy and derogatorily referred to as "mining bandits". Another reason for the gentry and officials' opposition was the fact that eunuchs, a rival power group, were in charge of the mining operations. Furthermore, mining for silver was a complex task that required expertise and skills that the Emperor's eunuchs did not possess. To address this issue, the Emperor appointed wealthy local individuals as mine managers, who were responsible for paying the mining tax and delivering the silver, regardless of the profitability of the mine. As a result, the mining of silver shifted from underground to the coffers of the wealthy, effectively taxing them. American historian Harry Miller bluntly described the Wanli Emperor's actions as an "economic war against the wealthy".[62]
After the war in Korea reignited in 1597, the Emperor made increased efforts to raise additional funds.[64] Due to his lack of trust in the gentry, he began to establish an alternative eunuch regional administration. Gradually, the mining tax commissioners (kuangshi; 礦使; literally 'mining envoy') gained control over the collection of trade and other taxes, in addition to the mining tax (kuangshui; 礦稅) to which the Emperor gave official approval in 1598–1599.[65] The Emperor granted these commissioners the authority to supervise the county and prefectural authorities, and even the grand coordinators. As a result, the imperial commissioners no longer had to consider the opinions of local civil or military authorities. Instead, they could assign tasks to them and even imprison them if they resisted. While the Emperor disregarded the protests of officials against the mining tax and the actions of the eunuchs, he closely monitored the reports and proposals of the eunuchs and responded promptly, often on the same day they arrived in Beijing.[64] In 1599, he dispatched eunuchs to major ports, where they took over the powers of official civil administration.[66] The Emperor finally resolved disputes with officials defending their powers in the spring of 1599 by officially transferring the collection of taxes to mining commissioners.[67] This expansion of eunuch powers and their operations earned the Emperor a reputation among Confucian-oriented intellectuals as one of the most avaricious rulers in Chinese history, constantly seeking ways to fill his personal coffers at the expense of government revenue.[45]
According to American historian Richard von Glahn, tax revenue from silver mines increased significantly from a few hundred kilograms per year before 1597 to an average of 3,650 kg per year in 1597–1606. In the most successful year of 1603, the revenue reached 6,650 kg, accounting for approximately 30% of mining.[68] According to estimates by modern Chinese historians Wang Chunyu and Du Wanyan, the mining tax earned the state an additional 3 million liang (110 tons) of silver, with the eunuch commissioners retaining eight or nine times more. Another estimate suggests that in 1596–1606, the mine commissioners supplied the state with at least 5.96 million liang of silver, but kept 40–50 million for themselves. While officials commonly profited from their positions, eunuchs were known to pocket a significantly larger portion of the collected funds.[69]
At the turn of the years 1605/1606, the Emperor realized that not only gentry officials, but also eunuchs, were corrupt. He also recognized that the mining tax was causing more harm than good. As a result, in January 1606, he made the decision to abandon the attempt at alternative administration and issued an edict to abolish state mining operations. Tax collection was then returned to the traditional authorities.[70] The gentry not only suffered financially from the eunuchs' actions, but also lost control over the financial transactions between the people and the state. This loss of control was a significant blow to their perceived dominance over the people. It was a humiliating experience and disrupted the natural order of things. By 1606, the gentry regained their dominance over both the people and the state as a whole.[71]
Reforms in the selection and evaluation of officials
[edit]In the Ming administrative system, ultimate authority rested with the emperor, but it required an energetic and competent ruler to effectively carry out this power. In cases where the ruler was not capable, the system of checks and balances resulted in collective leadership.[72] This was due to the dispersion of power among various authorities. In the mid-15th century, a system of collective debates (huiguan tuiju; literally 'to rally officials and to recommend collectively') was established to address issues that were beyond the scope of one department.[73] These gatherings involved dozens of officials discussing political and personnel matters. As a result, the importance of public opinion (gonglun; 公論) grew and the autocratic power of the emperor was limited.[74]
During the Wanli Emperor's reign, one of the issues that was resolved collectively was the appointment of high state dignitaries.[74] At the beginning of his reign, Zhang Juzheng successfully abolished collective debates, giving the emperor the power to appoint high officials based on his own suggestions, but after Zhang's death, the debates were reinstated and the emperor's power was once again limited.[73] Despite this, the Wanli Emperor attempted to overcome these restrictions, such as in 1591 when he announced his decision to appoint the Minister of Rites, Zhao Zhigao, as senior grand secretary without consulting with other officials. This decision was met with criticism from Minister of Personnel Lu Guangzu, who argued that it violated proper procedure and undermined the fairness and credibility of the government's decision-making processes. Lu and others believed that collective consideration of candidates in open public debate was a more impartial and fair method, as it eliminated individual bias and ignorance. In response to the criticism, the Emperor partially retreated and promised to follow the proper procedure in the future, but he continued to occasionally appoint high dignitaries without collective debate, which always sparked protests from officials.[73]
In the late Ming period, there was a widespread belief that public opinion held more weight than individual opinions. This was evident in the way political and administrative issues were addressed, with decision-making being based on gathering information and opinions from officials through questionnaires and voting ballots.[75] This also had an impact on the evaluation of officials, as their performance began to be judged not only by their superiors but also by the wider community. In 1595, Minister of Personnel Sun Piyang conducted a questionnaire survey on the conditions of several offices and used the results to persuade the Wanli Emperor to dismiss a certain official from Zhejiang. The survey had received a large number of negative comments, including accusations of corruption and other crimes. This unprecedented event sparked a heated debate, with Zhao Zhigao arguing that anonymous questionnaires should not be the main criteria for evaluation and that no one should be accused of criminal offenses based on unverified information from anonymous sources.[75] Sun defended himself by stating that solid evidence against the individual was not necessary, as they were not being accused or standing trial. He believed that in evaluating officials, it was sufficient for him to impartially discover the widely held opinion of the individual's recklessness through the survey.[76]
The reform of civil servant evaluations resulted in their careers being dependent on their reputation, as determined by the ministry and censors through anonymous surveys filled out by their colleagues.[76] This shift, along with collective debates, elevated the significance of public opinion during the Wanli Emperor's reign, leading to intense public debates and conflicts as groups of officials vied for control of public opinion while the Emperor's authority and the weight of his voice declined.[77]
Donglin movement and factional disputes (1606–1620)
[edit]In 1604,[78][79] Gu Xiancheng, with the suggestion of his friend Gao Panlong (高攀龍), established the Donglin Academy in Wuxi, located in Jiangnan. The academy served as a hub for discussions and meetings.[80] With the support of local authorities and the gentry, the academy quickly gained prominence. As the founders had been out of politics for many years, the government did not view it as a threat.[81] The academy attracted hundreds of intellectuals and soon became a significant intellectual center across China. It also inspired the creation of similar centers in nearby prefectures,[80] forming a network of associations and circles.[79]

The academy described themselves as a group of officials who advocated for strict adherence to Confucian morality.[82] The supporters of the Donglin movement believed that living an exemplary life was essential for cultivating moral character, and they did not differentiate between private and public morality. They believed that one's moral cultivation should begin with the mind/heart, then extend to one's home, surroundings, and public life. This belief was exemplified by Gao Panlong.[83] However, they viewed Zhang Juzheng's decision to not mourn for his father as a sign of being an unprincipled profiteer. They also criticized the Emperor for hesitating to confirm the succession of his eldest son, considering it unethical and unacceptable.[82] The Donglin movement promoted a system of government based on Confucian values, particularly the values of the patriarchal family, which were extended to the entire state. They believed that the local administration should be led by the educated gentry, who would guide the people. In this context, the technical aspects of governance were considered unimportant[84] and any issues with the organization of administration were addressed by promoting Confucian virtues, preaching morality, and emphasizing self-sacrifice for higher goals.[85] Disputes within the movement centered around moral values and qualities, with opponents being accused of immoral behavior rather than professional incompetence.[86][xvi] The emphasis on morality allowed the Donglin movement to claim that they were not pursuing selfish goals, but were united by universal and true moral principles.[80] Although the leaders of the movement did not return to office until the end of the Wanli Emperor's reign, the movement had a significant influence among junior officials in Beijing.[81]
The Donglin movement opposed the concentration of power in the Grand Secretariat and the ministries, advocating for the independence of the censorial-supervising personnel. They also called for limitations on the activities of eunuchs within the imperial palace.[83] Their stance on succession was based on principles, arguing that the ruler does not have the right to unilaterally change fundamental laws of the empire, including succession rules.[86] However, their emphasis on decentralization and prioritizing morality and ideology over pragmatism hindered effective governance of the empire, which was already challenging due to its size and population.[85]
The tendency to equate personal virtue with administrative talent led to morality becoming the main target in factional disputes.[88] The regular evaluation of the capital officials was often used to eliminate opponents. In 1577, Zhang Juzheng used this type of evaluation for the first time, resulting in the removal of 51 of his opponents. Another evaluation in 1581 led to the dismissal of 264 officials in the capital and 67 in Nanjing,[29] which was a significant purge considering that during the late Ming period, there were over a thousand officials serving in the central government in Beijing and almost four hundred in Nanjing.[89] In 1587, Grand Secretary Shen Shixing removed only 31 jinshi, but none from the Ministry of Personnel, the Hanlin Academy, and the Censorate, where factional disputes were common. The censors also demanded the dismissal of the Minister of Works He Qiming (何起鳴), apparently for political reasons (as a supporter of Zhang Juzheng), just a month after his appointment, which angered the Emperor. The Minister was forced to leave, and the Emperor also dismissed the head of the Censorate and transferred the responsible censors to the provinces. This sparked protests against "the Emperor's interference in the independence of the censorial office".[29]
In the 1593 evaluation, the Donglins utilized their positions in the Ministry of Personnel and the Censorate to eliminate the followers of the grand secretaries. The newly appointed Senior Grand Secretary, Wang Xijue, was unable to support his party members. He did, however, request the dismissal of several organizers of the purge during additional evaluations. The head of the Censorate opposed this, but the Emperor ultimately agreed,[90] sparking further protests from junior officials, including future founders of the Donglin Academy.[91][xvii] By the time of the 1599 evaluation, the Donglin opposition had lost its influence, resulting in a more peaceful evaluation.[93] In the 1605 evaluation, the Donglin movement once again attacked their opponents, and through Wen Chun (溫純), the head of the Censorate, and Yang Shiqiao (楊時喬), Vice Minister of Personnel, demanded the dismissal of 207 officials from the capital and 73 from Nanjing. The Emperor did not agree to such a large-scale purge and explicitly stated that several of the accused officials should remain in their positions. This was an unprecedented refusal and sparked sharp criticism, leading to a months-long debate filled with mutual recriminations. Even Heaven seemed to intervene when lightning struck the Temple of Heaven. Eventually, the accused officials were forced to resign, but so were the organizers of the purge, including Grand Secretary Shen Yiguan, the following year. While the Donglins were successful in dismissing their opponents, they did not have suitable candidates for top positions.[94] Even when a candidate like Li Sancai emerged, he was thwarted in the same way—through an attack on his moral integrity—in Li's case, through bribery. This was also the first instance where a connection to the Donglin movement was used as an argument against a candidate.[95]
In the 1611 evaluation, two anti-Donglin factions clashed, resulting in the downfall of their leaders (Tang Binyin (湯賓尹), Chancellor of Nanking University, and Gu Tianjun (顧天俊), teacher of the heir apparent). The career of the highest-ranking Donglin sympathizer, Vice Minister of Personnel and Hanlin Academy scholar Wang Tu (王圖), was also ruined. In the 1617 evaluation, three cliques based on regional origin were in conflict, formed by anti-Donglin censors.[96] In the last decade of the Wanli Emperor's reign, the indecisive bureaucrat Fang Congzhe led the Grand Secretariat, while the Emperor left many high administrative positions vacant for long periods and simply ignored polemical memoranda.[96]
Economy
[edit]Economic developments
[edit]
During the Wanli era, there was a significant boom in industry,[97] particularly in the production of silk, cotton, and porcelain.[98] The textile industry in Shaanxi employed a large number of people, while Guangdong saw the emergence of large ironworks with thousands of workers.[97] This period also saw the development of specialization in agricultural production and a significant increase in interregional trade.[98] The impact of this development was most strongly felt in Jiangnan, where cities such as Suzhou, Songjiang, Jiaxing, and Nanjing flourished. Suzhou, known for its silk and financial industries, saw its population grow to over half a million by the end of the 16th century, while Songjiang became a center for cotton cultivation.[99]
A significant portion of the production was exported in exchange for silver. Between 1560 and 1640, the Spanish colonies in the Americas shipped 1,000 tons of silver across the Pacific, with 900 tons ending up in China. During this same time period, Japan sent 6–7 times more silver to China.[xviii] This influx of foreign silver coincided with the commercialization of the economy, which led to growth in industries such as cotton and silk, as well as the growth of cities and trade, but this commercialization did not result in prosperity for all. Land and rice prices remained stagnant, and even fell in the 1570s and 1580s,[100] before experiencing a sudden increase in 1587–89 due to famines in southern China.[101] Wages and labor productivity in the Jiangnan cotton industry also declined.[100] Contemporary commentators observed that while the market economy was thriving, state finances remained poor. Despite the luxurious lifestyle of urban elites, the majority of peasants and day laborers continued to live in poverty.[102] These economic changes also brought about changes in values, particularly in regards to official Confucian doctrines.[97]
During the 16th century, the Ming state gradually shifted towards the policy of zhaoshang maiban (召商買辦; 'the government purchases from private merchants'). This marked the emergence of a market economy, where traders were no longer mere extensions of the state apparatus and were able to negotiate prices and contract volumes. State contracts also encouraged the growth of private enterprises, while the quality of production in state factories declined. For example, in 1575, the army had to return 5,000 unusable shields. By the late 16th century, army officers were refusing to use goods produced by state workshops and instead demanded silver from the government to purchase equipment on the market. The government obtained the necessary silver by converting compulsory services into payments in the single bar reform.[103] The aim of the reform was to eliminate levies in kind, services, and compulsory work in the lijia system and replace them with a surcharge to the land tax paid in silver.[104] Transfers of various duties to silver payments had been taking place in various counties since the 1520s, with the most intense changes occurring in the 1570s to the 1590s. County authorities throughout the country implemented the reform.[105][xix] The changes proceeded from the more developed south of the country to the north, where the introduction of procedures common in the south caused a wave of resistance. Controversy centered primarily on the repeal of progressive household taxation: advocates of the reform argued that wealthy households usually received tax exemptions, making progressive taxation only fictitious.[106] By the end of the 16th century, land tax surcharges had already replaced almost all benefits and labor performed in the lijia system.[107]
In an effort to streamline the collection of land tax in 1581, Senior Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng advocated for the creation of a new cadastre. Over the course of 1581–1582, fields were measured, boundaries were marked, sizes were calculated, and owners and tenants were recorded. Cadastral maps were also compiled during this time.[108] Due to Zhang's untimely death, there was no final summary of data for the entire country, but at the local level, the work served its purpose.[109] Zhang's cadastre served as the foundation for later Ming and Qing cadastres.[108]
As early as 1581, the Ministry of Revenue had compiled the Wanli kuai ji lu (萬曆會計錄; 'Record of the accounting procedures of the Wanli reign'), which provided an overview of taxes and fees throughout the empire. This document highlighted the complexity, diversity, and dependence on local conditions of these taxes, making unification a challenging task.[84] After incorporating some compulsory works, the land tax amounted to 5–10% of the harvest, but in the four most heavily taxed prefectures of Nanzhili, it reached 14–20%. In the 1570s–1590s, approximately 21 million liang of silver were collected for the land tax, mostly in the form of grain.[110]
Trade
[edit]
Outside of Jiangnan, in most counties of Ming China, few products were traded across borders, with the most important being grain.[111] Grain was primarily imported to Jiangnan from Jiangxi, Huguang, and western Nanzhili, while Beizhili imported rice from Shandong and Beijing imported tax rice. The majority of rice on the market was collected by landlords from their tenants as rent. The grain market also facilitated the production of non-food goods, particularly textiles. In Jiangnan, there were areas that did not grow rice, but instead focused on textile crops such as cotton and mulberry.[112] Mulberries were primarily grown in northern Zhejiang, with Huzhou being a central location.[113] In and around Songjiang, cotton was grown on more than half of the land. The focus was not just on growing and producing goods, but also on selling them. In the late Ming period, the economy in Jiangnan shifted from cultivation to the processing of cotton, which was imported from Shandong, Henan, Fujian, and Guangdong.[114] Suzhou and Hangzhou were known as centers for the production of luxury goods, while ordinary fabrics were produced in the surrounding areas.[115] Within the production process, there was specialization in individual stages, such as spinning and weaving.[116]
Of the various regional merchant groups, those from Shanxi dominated the salt trade in the interior, including Sichuan. Meanwhile, merchants from Huizhou controlled long-distance trade on the Grand Canal and were the most influential wholesalers and retailers in Jiangnan. They were followed by merchants from Suzhou, Fujian, and Guangzhou, in that order. Merchants from Jiangxi operated on a smaller scale, mainly in Henan, Huguang, and Sichuan.[117] Local agents offered boats, crew, and porters for hire on trade routes.[118] Travel guides were published, providing information on routes, distances, inns, famous places, ferries, and safety.[119] Commercial intermediaries allowed for the sending of money through drafts.[120]
Women entrepreneurs emerged, selling various goods, and also acted as intermediaries in legal disputes.[121] Conservatives viewed women's involvement in trade with disdain, as seen in the case of Li Le, who praised a prefect for "banning gambling and women from selling at markets" in the Jiaxing prefecture.[122]
Silver
[edit]The growth of silver imports in the early 16th century led to an increase in its use. By the second half of the 16th century, Ming statesmen were already concerned that silver would completely replace bronze coins. In the late 16th century, the issue of the relationship between silver and coins became a central topic in discussions about monetary policy. Some officials suggested halting the production of coins due to their lack of profitability, while their opponents argued that this was a short-sighted policy that ignored the long-term benefits of increasing circulation. This allowed silver to become the dominant currency.[100] In the 1570s and 1580s, debates about currency were dominated by concerns about silver shortages causing deflation,[123] but these debates died down in the 1590s.[124] The import of silver had a significant impact on the Ming economy. Its price relative to gold and copper fell by half during the Wanli era, but its purchasing power was still greater compared to the rest of the world. The Ministry of Revenue's silver income doubled during the 1570s alone, from about 90 tons to approximately 165 tons per year. The income of local authorities also increased, such as in the Moon Port, the main center of foreign maritime trade, where trade licenses and customs fees grew from 113 kg of silver to over one ton between 1570 and 1594. The influx of silver also led to the export of gold and coins.[98] This influx of silver also had negative effects, as inflation appeared in regions with a surplus of silver in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, such as the southeast coast, Jiangnan, and the Grand Canal.[125]
Coinage
[edit]
Many officials distrusted silver because they feared dependence on its inflow from abroad and did not trust its ability to provide all the functions of money. As a result, they attempted to revive the use of coins.[102] In 1571–1572, the mints were briefly opened, but Zhang Juzheng reopened them in 1576. He restored the mints in Beijing and Nanjing, and later in Yunnan.[126] Additionally, he opened mints in both the northern provinces where coins were commonly used—Shanxi, Shandong, and Henan—as well as in provinces where they were not commonly used—Shaanxi, Jiangxi, Fujian, and Huguang.[127] While the mints in the metropolitan areas were state-owned, licensed entrepreneurs ran those in the provinces.[128] The production of coins faced immediate challenges such as a shortage of copper[xx] and difficulties in hiring qualified personnel.[127] In Jiangxi, for example, the mint was only able to produce 5% of the planned amount of coins. In response, the authorities decreed that at least 70% of tax payments must be made in new coins and encouraged merchants to import coins from surrounding provinces, but merchants often supplied low-quality privately produced coins, which were illegal.[127] Similarly, the introduction of coins failed in Fujian, where silver was already widely used.[127] Zhang's monetary policy was fragmented, with each province's officials making their own decisions on supporting coinage. This led to various issues, such as a revolt in Hangzhou in 1582 when soldiers' salaries were converted into coins in Zhejiang, and the banning of private exchange offices in Jiangxi, which hindered the circulation of new coins. Some provinces also prohibited the export of coins from their territory, while others prohibited coins cast outside their territory.[123][xxi] Attempts to introduce new coins into circulation by selling them at a discount only benefited money changers who bought cheap coins from the authorities and resold them at the normal market price. In some cases, attempts to ban the use of illegal private coins resulted in violent protests and the lifting of the bans.[130] While coins cast in Beijing were accepted by the market,[xxii] low-quality private coins continued to dominate in the south.[128] In 1579, Zhang admitted that the attempt to introduce coins had failed.[128] He closed the Yunnan mint the following year and most of the other provincial mints in 1582, but three mints in Huguang continued to operate, casting different coins and leading to the division of the province into several mint zones.[129] After Zhang's death, his successors and opponents closed most of the mints due to inefficiency.[129] Zhang's opponents argued that the state should not interfere in market and currency affairs and impose a currency that the people did not want. On the other hand, some argued that while silver served as a capital and store of value, coins were essential as a medium of exchange and their production, even if unprofitable, would lead to economic recovery in the long run.[131]
In 1599, the Wanli Emperor returned to an expansive monetary policy. The production of new coins was concentrated in Nanjing,[132] where the capacity of mints increased tenfold, but the circulation of these coins was limited to the immediate vicinity of Nanjing. As a result, there was a surplus of coins in the city, causing their value to decrease from 850 to 1300 per liang of silver. In 1606, floods disrupted the import of metals, causing the price of copper to rise. In response, the state limited coin production[133] and laid off 3,000 workers from the mints. These workers then used their knowledge to produce illegal coins. As a result, private coins began to replace national coins within a few years. The government responded by banning the use of private coins, but this caused money changers to stop accepting any coins as a precaution. Nanjing merchants followed suit, leading to riots among the people. This was especially problematic for day laborers and workers who were paid in coins and relied on merchants accepting them for their daily needs.[134] The use of less valuable private coins became more beneficial for their day-to-day transactions.[135]
Society
[edit]
Only individuals with official status were able to ensure the preservation of a merchant family's wealth. As a result, merchants often encouraged their sons to pursue education and obtain an official rank,[137] but during the first two centuries of the Ming dynasty, only candidates from families of officials, peasants (or landowners), craftsmen, and soldiers were allowed to take the civil service examinations. Merchants were not permitted to participate. In the Wanli era, merchants were finally allowed to participate in the imperial examinations, but only one candidate, Zheng Maohua in 1607, was able to pass the highest level of the examinations, known as the palace examination, and obtain the jinshi rank.[xxiii] Despite this, merchants still managed to pass the examinations by registering under the names of others or posing as peasants or soldiers from a different location.[138] As a result, in the late Ming period, the majority of successful examination candidates came from merchant families.[139]
In the students' environment, the eight-legged essay was an important genre, and mastery of it was crucial for success in examinations. This literary form emerged in the Wanli era and gained popularity over the course of a century. It was not yet rigid and was seen as a challenge for intellectuals to showcase their stylistic dexterity. Esteemed art critics like Li Zhi and Yuan Hongdao valued this genre for its experimental and innovative nature, but mastering the eight-legged essay required more than just individual study. Examiners' favored preferences and stylesbwere constantly changing, giving an advantage to candidates from larger cities who could keep up with these trends. This is why it was beneficial to be part of literary societies. In the 1570s, these societies began publishing successful essays with commentary and criticism.[140][xxiv] Additionally, collections of model essays were published by the authorities starting in 1587.[141]
The study was costly. Even the poorest candidates had to cover at least a third of the cost, often resulting in debt. After being appointed to office, officials had to use their salaries to pay off creditors, who were often wealthy merchants,[142] but official salaries were not high, with county magistrates only earning 87 liang per year in the 16th century.[143]
In 1583, the government tightened control over provincial examinations by selecting chief examiners and their deputies from members of the Hanlin Academy. Previously, these positions were held by teachers in charge of county and prefectural state schools, who typically only passed the provincial examinations.[144][xxv]
Military and foreign policy
[edit]Restoration of Ming military power in the late 16th century
[edit]
The largest military campaigns of the Wanli era were known as the "Three Great Campaigns". The first of these was the suppression of the rebellion in Ningxia, followed by the Imjin War with Japan in Korea[145] and the suppression of the Yang Yinglong rebellion in Bozhou. These campaigns involved the mobilization of tens and hundreds of thousands of troops, as well as their movement and long-distance supply. The success of the Ming dynasty in these campaigns can be attributed to the overall increase in China's military power during the 1570s to the first decade of the seventeenth century. During this time, the Ming dynasty was aggressively expanding along all frontiers, including launching raids into the Mongolian steppes and supporting the colonization of Han borderlands.[146] In addition to these three major campaigns, the Ming troops also suppressed several rebellions within the empire and successfully expanded and secured the borders in the southwest through battles with the Burmese. This allowed for the colonization of previously indigenous territories in the southwest and northwest. The Ming dynasty also actively interfered in the affairs of the Jurchens in the northeast.[147]
Following the example of his teacher Zhang Juzheng, the Wanli Emperor placed great emphasis on military affairs.[148] This was one of the few areas where most civil officials felt insecure, giving the Emperor the ability to enforce his will.[149] In order to bypass the usual bureaucratic procedures, the Emperor relied on successful generals.[148] In the Emperor's eyes, generals were more dependable and trustworthy than officials, as they spent most of their time in the field and did not have the opportunity to build networks of support in the capital. Additionally, the Emperor saw generals as representatives of a different lifestyle, one that was more free and unartistic.[9] He took great care in selecting capable generals and was not afraid to give them extraordinary powers, allowing them to make quick decisions without waiting for his approval. This contributed greatly to the success of their campaigns. The Wanli Emperor was also willing to allocate significant funds from his reserves to supply and equip the troops,[150] and he entrusted the generals with powers and responsibilities that were typically reserved for civil officials, despite objections from the government.[27]

On the northern border, the Wanli Emperor aimed to replace static defense with more aggressive tactics.[31] In his own words,
The Emperor generally preferred a decisive rather than aggressive approach towards domestic rebels and foreign enemies.[147] Under the leadership of capable generals, the Ming army was the strongest it had been since the reign of the Yongle Emperor (1402–1424).[31] Contemporary estimates put the number of Ming soldiers in the 1570s at 845,000. By the beginning of the 17th century, the Ming dynasty had over 4 million men in arms. Training centers were established near Beijing, where units preparing for Korea also trained.[151] Instead of relying on the inefficient and incompetent hereditary soldiers of the Weisuo system, the Ming government turned to hiring mercenaries who were better trained, more disciplined, and more cost-effective in battle.[152] Troops from militant minority nations were also utilized, particularly "wolf troops" (lang bing) from Guangxi.[153] The development of the military was supported by a number of manuals and handbooks. The most extensive surviving works on military affairs are the Chouhai Tubian (Gazeteer of Coastal Defense) by Zheng Ruozeng in 1562, the Shenqi Pu (Treatise on Firearms) by Zhao Shizhen in 1598, and the Wubei Zhi (Encyclopedia of Military Preparedness) by Mao Yuanyi in 1601.[154] In his manuals Jixiao Xinshu and Lianbing Shiji, General Qi Jiguang provided detailed tactics for using small groups of soldiers, discussed psychological warfare, analyzed the composition, tasks, and training of units, and outlined the use of weapons and procedures based on terrain and soldier experience. He emphasized the importance of morale and training for soldiers.[155]
Rebellion in Ningxia
[edit]In March 1592, a rebellion broke out in Ningxia, an important fortress city on the northwestern frontier. Led by Chinese officer Liu Dongyang, the soldiers of the garrison revolted.[156][157] The rebellion was also joined by Pubei, a Mongol and deputy regional commander who had three thousand horsemen in his personal guard. Due to his origin, the rebellion was attributed to him.[156][157] The rebels successfully took control of Ningxia and nearly fifty nearby fortresses. They demanded recognition from the government, threatening to ally with the Ordos Mongols.[156] At the time, Ningxia had a population of 300,000 and a garrison of 30,000[158] (or 20,000)[159] soldiers. The city walls were six meters thick and nine meters high, making it a formidable stronghold. The rebels were experienced soldiers.[158]
On 19 April, the Emperor was informed of the uprising and immediately summoned Minister of War Shi Xing (石星). Following the minister's proposal, he ordered the mobilization of 7,000 soldiers from Xuanhua and Shanxi.[160][161] Wei Xueceng, an experienced military official and commander-in-chief of the three border regions (Xuanfu, Shanxi, and Datong), was entrusted with the task of suppressing the rebellion. The Emperor provided him with a number of officers and officials, including General Ma Gui.[156][161] Wei successfully secured the southern bank of the Yellow River, captured key forts, and within weeks recaptured nearby frontier forts, leaving only the city of Ningxia under rebel control, but he then declared that he did not have enough men and equipment and took a passive stance. Despite the reinforcements provided, he insisted on negotiating with the insurgents, citing concerns for the lives of civilians in Ningxia.[156] The Emperor discussed the situation with the grand secretaries, the censors and the ministers, and ultimately took a decisive position to suppress the rebellion as quickly as possible.[162] For the next six weeks, Ming troops besieged Ningxia, occasionally facing resistance from the Mongols. In the fourth month of the year, the Ming launched an attack on the city and managed to eliminate about 3,000 defenders, but their attempt to penetrate the city through the northern gate failed and resulted in heavy losses.[156]
In an effort to conduct the siege operations more effectively, the Emperor appointed General Li Rusong as the military superintendent in charge of suppressing the rebellion.[163] The bureaucracy in the capital were shocked at this appointment, as civilian officials, not professional officers, traditionally held the position and overall command.[164] In July, Ming reinforcements arrived at Ningxia and skirmishes between the besiegers and the rebels continued. At the end of July, Li also arrived and began attacking the city day and night in early August. The rebels were only able to repel them with difficulty.[163] Meanwhile, the Japanese were successfully occupying Korea, prompting the Emperor to urge a swift resolution of the situation. In late August, Wei Xueceng was arrested for his reluctance and taken to Beijing. The Emperor then approved Shi Xing's plan to build ramparts around the city and fill the interior, including the city itself, with water.[165]
On 23 August, a 5.3 km long dam surrounded Ningxia. The rebels gained the alliance of Mongol chief Bushugtu, but Li Rusong sent generals Ma Gui and Dong Yiyuan with part of the army to attack them and occupy the passes east of the city. Ma and Dong successfully repulsed the Mongols. By 6 September, the city was already flooded with almost three meters of water, causing the rebels' attacks to fail and the besieged to suffer from a critical shortage of food. The city's inhabitants and Ma Gui pleaded with the insurgents to surrender in order to save human lives, but the rebels continued to launch unsuccessful raids while also facing attacks from Ming troops.[166] By the end of September, the 18,000-strong Mongolian army was blocked north of the city. Li and Ma led a counterattack and drove the Mongols back.[167] As the water breached the walls, the city was eventually taken in mid-October.[159] Pubei committed suicide, while several other rebel leaders were captured and executed.[167][159] The Emperor then sent a large portion of the troops from Ningxia, led by Li Rusong, to Korea.[167][168]
Korea and Japan: Imjin War
[edit]
By the early 1590s, Japanese warlord Toyotomi Hideyoshi had successfully unified Japan under his rule, but his ambitions extended beyond just ruling over his own country.[169] In challenges sent to the rulers of neighboring countries, he declared his intention to dominate East Asia and establish his rule from the Chinese port of Ningbo.[170] His first target was Korea, with the ultimate goal of conquering Ming China.[169] The Chinese were well aware of the Japanese threat to their hegemony in East Asia and responded with vigor.[171]
In May 1592, Japanese troops landed in Korea. Due to the Korean army's lack of preparation, they were unable to put up much resistance and the Japanese quickly advanced, taking control of Seoul in just twenty days and continuing further north. The Korean king fled north to the Korean-Ming border on the Yalu River.[172] In response, the Koreans sought help from Ming China. The Wanli Emperor decidedly took an anti-Japanese stance and only sent a small scouting force of three thousand soldiers. In August 1592, the Japanese surprised and destroyed this force in Pyongyang.[173] This event shocked the Beijing court and they began to organize coastal defenses. Vice Minister of War Song Yingchang was sent to Liaodong, a Ming region bordering Korea, to take command of the Korean campaign.[174] A large army was also gathered in Liaodong. The Japanese occupation of Korea sparked a wave of popular resistance, which eventually escalated into a guerrilla war. The victories of the Korean navy under Admiral Yi Sun-sin in the summer and autumn of 1592 played a crucial role in organizing the resistance.[169] After the rebellion in Ningxia was defeated, part of the troops and several generals, including Li Rusong, reinforced the troops gathered in Liaodong.[175] The Korean land army also rose up and, in early 1593, the Ming troops, led by Li, went into battle.[169][176] By May 1593, the Sino-Korean forces had pushed the enemy to the vicinity of Busan in southeastern Korea. This led to the Japanese agreeing to negotiate a truce,[169] but the preliminary negotiations dragged on for several years and ultimately failed in October 1596. As a result, Hideyoshi decided to attack Korea again.[177] Despite this, the second invasion in 1597 was not successful. The Japanese did manage to approach Seoul to within 80 km in August 1597, but were eventually pushed back to the southeast after the arrival of Ming troops. Naval operations heavily influenced the outcome of the war. Initially, the Koreans suffered setbacks under an incompetent admiral, but after Yi Sun-sin was released from prison and placed in command of the fleet,[178] they gained superiority at sea. This forced the Japanese onto the defensive between Ulsan and Sunchon. In May 1598, the Ming fleet arrived and reinforced the Korean fleet. Meanwhile, lengthy sieges and bloody battles took place on land. In the spring of 1598, part of the Japanese troops withdrew from Korea, while the rest successfully resisted the Ming-Korean attacks. After Hideyoshi's death in September 1598, the remaining Japanese troops were evacuated from Korea by the end of the year.[178]
The Imjin War was one of the largest military conflicts of the 16th century, with Japan mobilizing over 150,000 soldiers for the first invasion and over 140,000 for the second. The Ming dynasty also sent a significant number of troops, with over 40,000 soldiers in 1592 and more than double that in 1597.[179] According to Chinese historian Li Guangtao, a total of 166,700 Ming soldiers were deployed to Korea and were provided with 17 million liang of silver and supplies, which was roughly equivalent to half a year's income for the Ming state.[180] While the exact number of Korean soldiers is difficult to estimate, it is believed that there were tens of thousands of them.[179] The losses suffered by Korea were devastating, with the Japanese presenting Hideyoshi with the noses of their enemies as proof of their victory instead of the usual heads. Modern historians estimate that the number of noses brought back to Japan ranged from 100,000 to 200,000.[181]
Yang Yinglong rebellion
[edit]
The Yang family, descendants of a 9th-century Tang general, controlled a mountainous region on the border of Huguang, Guizhou, and Sichuan. The area spanned over 300 km in the east-west direction and slightly less in the north-south direction, with its center located in Bozhou.[184] The clan ruled this territory for many centuries and, although originally Chinese, they assimilated and identified with the local Miao tribes over time.[158]
Yang Yinglong inherited his position from his father during the Longqing era. He distinguished himself on the Ming side in battles against other natives and Tibetans, and also received recognition from the Ming court for the quality of the wood he supplied,[185][186] but he was very ambitious and viewed the Ming troops as weak.[185] Problems with Yang Yinglong's actions continued for the local Ming authorities from 1587.[158] He became involved in disputes between the local Miao tribes and Chinese colonists by attacking the former. Initially, the government in Beijing rejected the local authorities' requests for intervention, stating that there were more pressing matters to attend to and that Yang was simply seeking an opportunity to distinguish himself.[185] In 1590, open and protracted fighting broke out between Yang's warriors and Ming forces.[187] Eventually, Yang submitted to the Ming authorities, but was unexpectedly sentenced to execution. In order to secure his release, he offered a large payment and five thousand troops for the war in Korea. After his release, however, he hid in the mountains and plundered a number of prefectures and counties. In 1595, he was caught again and once again escaped punishment by offering a deal. As a result, his son Yang Chaodong was given a hereditary post and another son was sent to Chongqing as a hostage.[188][189] The Emperor considered the matter settled and rewarded the commander, but within a year, Yang Yinglong was once again leading raids on the provinces of Huguang, Sichuan, and Guizhou, and even declared himself emperor. Over the next three years, his hundred thousand Miao soldiers spread fear throughout the area.[188][190]
Focused on the war in Korea, the Wanli Emperor postponed solving the problems in the relatively peripheral southwest of the empire until early 1599, when he appointed the distinguished official Guo Zichang (1543–1618) as pacification commissioner of Sichuan. The former head of the Censorate, Li Hualong, was promoted to vice minister of war and put in charge of the military affairs of Sichuan, Huguang, and Guizhou. Several generals from Korea were sent to Sichuan, including Li Rumei and the well-known and feared Liu Ting (劉綎) in the southwest.[190][191] Fighting with the rebels lasted the rest of the year, while they also attacked the major cities of Chongqing and Chengdu.[188] At the turn of 1599/1600, minor skirmishes took place between the ever-strengthening Ming troops and the rebels. In the end, the Ming army had 240,000 soldiers from all over the empire.[192] Yang Yinglong tried to mobilize indigenous warriors against the superior Ming troops, who were much better armed with cannons and rifles. He gathered perhaps up to 150,000 warriors by the end of 1599.[193][xxvi] but even the Ming armies were largely composed of local natives.[193] After extensive preparations, Li Hualong planned to attack the rebels from eight directions, each with an army of 30,000 men. He launched the attack at the end of March 1600.[193] The Ming troops systematically pushed back the enemy and in early June, surrounded Yang in the mountain fortress of Hailongtun. The fortress fell in a final assault in mid-July,[193] with Yang killed.[192][194] According to Li Hualong's final report, over 22,000 rebels were killed in the fighting.[187]
Yang's chiefdom was then incorporated into the standard Chinese administrative system.[187] In the following decade, Ming military actions continued quite successfully in the southwest, putting down several minor revolts.[192] In an effort to prevent the recurrence of such a large-scale rebellion, the Ming authorities organized a systematic policing of the region.[195]
Đại Việt
[edit]In the 1520s, a civil war broke out in Đại Việt (present-day northern Vietnam) between the Mạc dynasty, which had ruled the northern part of the country since 1527, and the followers of the previous Lê dynasty in the south. In 1592, Lê Thế Tông's army invaded the north and captured Hanoi and most of the country. The followers of the Mạc retreated to Cao Bằng Province and the surrounding area near the Sino-Vietnamese border. The government of Lê Thế Tông, led by Trịnh Tùng, who held more power than the monarch, established connections with the Ming regional authorities in an attempt to gain recognition for the Lê dynasty instead of the Mạc. In 1540, the Jiajing Emperor recognized Mạc Đăng Dung as the ruler of Đại Việt, but the country's status was reduced from a kingdom to a local command (都統使司; dutongshisi), which Đăng Dung administered as a pacification commissioner or commandant (都統使司; dutongshiguan, with the lower second rank). In 1597, after a year of negotiations, Lê Thế Tông arrived at the border with a thousand soldiers and servants to meet with a delegation of Ming regional officials in Ming territory. The meeting was held in a friendly manner, with Thế Tông expressing his desire for Đại Việt to maintain its status as a tributary kingdom, but the Ming representatives did not make any commitments.[196] That same year, Thế Tông sent Vice Minister of Works Phùng Khắc Khoan to Beijing as an envoy.[197] Phùng Khắc Khoan made a good impression in Beijing with his classical education,[198] but he was unable to gain recognition for Lê Thế Tông as the king of Đại Việt. The Wanli Emperor justified this by stating that the civil war was not yet over and it was uncertain if the Lê dynasty had true support. As a result, Thế Tông only received the seal of the pacification commissioner.[199][xxvii]
Spain, Portugal, and Japan
[edit]
In the early 1570s, the Spanish settled in the Philippines, centered in Manila.[202] Trade with the Spanish was highly profitable for the Chinese, as the Spanish bought silk in Manila for double its price in China.[203] The Spanish paid for Chinese goods in American silver, which they imported to China across the Pacific in considerable quantities, estimated to be between 50 and 350 tons per year.[204] This trade between the Spanish Philippines and China flourished,[205] leading to the rapid growth of a Chinatown in Manila.[202] The number of Chinese settlers in Manila increased from forty in the early 1570s to 10,000 in 1588 and 30,000 in 1603.[205] The Spanish authorities viewed the Chinese with suspicion and concern. This mutual distrust often resulted in armed clashes,[202] and in 1603, a pogrom occurred in which 20[203][202] (according to Chinese sources) or 15 (according to Spanish sources) thousand Chinese lost their lives.[202]
During the 1540s, American silver was also introduced to China through the extensive Portuguese trade. Lisbon elites were known to wear Chinese silks, drink Chinese tea, and order porcelain with European motifs from China.[206] The Portuguese had settled in Macau with the consent of local authorities as early as the 1550s. In 1578, they were granted permission to trade in Guangzhou and have continued to do so since then.[207] At the end of the 16th century, between 6 and 30 tons of silver were transported annually from Portugal to Macau.[206] The Dutch also played a significant role in the trade, with the turnover of their trade at the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries matching that of the Portuguese. By 1614, Amsterdam burghers were regularly purchasing blue and white Ming porcelain.[208]
In addition to merchants, missionaries also traveled to China from Europe. The Jesuits, in particular, were successful in spreading the Christian faith through their strategic approach of honoring missionaries. Notable figures such as Michele Ruggieri and Matteo Ricci gained the trust of Chinese dignitaries and were able to persuade some to convert to Christianity. The Jesuits were highly esteemed in Beijing's upper circles for their expertise in mathematics and astronomy, and Ricci was even accepted by the Emperor.[209]
In China, silver was a scarce commodity, making it more valuable than in other countries. This was well-known to European traders, who took advantage of the relative cheapness of Chinese goods. As a result, Chinese silk became popular in other parts of the world, such as Latin American countries like Peru and Mexico. This led to a decline in local silk production in Mexico, which had only been introduced by the Spanish a short time before. On the other hand, the textile industry, which utilized Chinese silk, flourished and even exported to European markets. By the 1630s, there was a significant Chinese community in Mexico City, and they also resided in other areas like Acapulco.[210]
After the unification of Japan, the discovery of new silver mines and the improvement of mining techniques, the extraction and export of silver from Japan increased dramatically, particularly to Ming China. Between 1560 and 1600, the annual export of silver ranged from 33 to 49 tons, but due to the Ming ban on trade with Japan, the import of Japanese silver was facilitated by the Portuguese. In the early 17th century, Japanese silver exports continued to rise, with the import of luxury goods such as silk (reaching up to 280 tons per year in the 1630s). Silk was so abundant and inexpensive in Japan that even some peasants were able to afford it, leading to a rise in its popularity among the lower classes.[211]
Russia
[edit]In the autumn of 1618, Russian ambassadors first arrived in Beijing. On the orders of Tsar Mikhail Fyodorovich, the Tobolsk voivode Ivan Kurakin had sent a group of Siberian Cossacks led by Ivan Petlin to China. The journey began in May 1618 from Tomsk and involved crossing the mountains on the Russian-Mongolian border, passing through Mongolia and the Gobi, and finally arriving in Beijing in early September. However, due to the Cossacks' lack of gifts or credentials, Ming officials did not grant them an audience with the Emperor. Despite this, they were warmly received at the Ministry of Rites and were given a letter from the Wanli Emperor, agreeing to future Russian missions and the arrival of Russian merchants.[212] After a few days, the Russians began their return journey, arriving back in Tomsk in May 1619 and eventually reaching Moscow by the end of the year. Due to Russia's focus on European affairs, there were no further official contacts with China until the end of the Ming dynasty.[212]
Rise of the Jurchens
[edit]
In 1583, Nurhaci, the leader of one of the many Jurchen tribes in southern Manchuria, began to establish his own state. He united the Jurchens with the support of the Ming dynasty, particularly General Li Chengliang. Some Ming officials grew concerned about Nurhaci's growing power and called for his destruction in 1587, but this issue was not resolved due to discussions within the Ming administration. Nurhaci acknowledged his subordinate relationship to the Ming dynasty and paid tribute in 1590 and 1597 by personally visiting Beijing. By the early 1590s, Nurhaci's state had a large military force, estimated at 30–40,000 horsemen and 10,000 infantry. The Ming authorities declined his offer to lead his army into Korea against the Japanese. In 1599, as part of building his state, Nurhaci introduced a new Manchu script and in 1601, a new organization based on banners. In 1603, he reached an agreement with Ming generals in Liaodong to define the borders.[213]
In 1618, Nurhaci had gained control over all the Jurchen tribes except for Yehe and Haixi, who were under Ming protection. An attack on these tribes would trigger a war with China, which is exactly what Nurhaci provoked by raiding Fushun in May 1618. The Ming retaliated with an expedition in early April 1619, after extensive and costly preparations.[xxviii] Yang Hao, a former commander in Liaodong and leader of the Ming forces in Korea from 1597 to 1598, was put in charge of the overall command. The army was divided into four corps, led by experienced generals (from north to south) Ma Lin, Du Song, Li Rubai, and Liu Ting. The Ming troops consisted of about 100,000 men, including 83,000 Chinese, with the rest being Korean and Jurchen allies. On the other hand, Nurhaci had 50–60,000 soldiers at his disposal, but unlike the Chinese, he did not divide them.[215] Instead, he used his knowledge of the terrain, weather, and mobility[216] to his advantage and crushed the individual Ming corps one by one. First, he defeated Du Song's corps on 14 April, followed by Ma Lin's the next day. Yang Hao, in response, ordered a retreat, and while Li Rubai attempted to retreat as well, the order did not reach Liu Ting and his corps, resulting in their defeat on 20 April. Du and Liu both fell in battle.[215] After defeating the Ming, Nurhaci joined forces with the remaining Jurchens and occupied Kaiyuan, where he killed Ma Lin, and Tieling in northern Liaodong.[217] As a result of the defeat, Li Rubai was accused of cowardice and committed suicide under the weight of criticism,[216] while Yang Hao was imprisoned and executed in 1629.[218]
Death and aftermath
[edit]In the final months of his life, the Wanli Emperor's health deteriorated significantly. In 1620, he experienced severe dizziness and was confined to his bed.[219] Finally, he died on 18 August 1620.[220] The day after his death, an edict was issued ordering the transfer of one million liang of silver from the Emperor's treasury to the frontier troops. Two days later, an additional million was sent from the treasury to strengthen the defenses of Liaodong. The edict also called for the abolition of mining and trade dues, and the dismissal of the eunuchs responsible for collecting them. On 28 August, the Wanli Emperor's eldest son, Zhu Changluo, ascended the throne as the Taichang Emperor.[220]
The Taichang Emperor relied on representatives and sympathizers of the Donglin movement, whom he appointed to high positions,[220] but he soon fell ill and died on 26 September 1620. His fifteen-year-old son, Zhu Youjiao, succeeded him as the Tianqi Emperor.[221] The young emperor enjoyed working with wood, making furniture and wooden models of the palace, but neglected his official duties. During this time, there was a power struggle between the official and eunuch groups in the government.[222] Initially, the Donglins had the upper hand, but from 1624, the court was dominated by the eunuch Wei Zhongxian.[223] In 1627, after the death of the Tianqi Emperor, his younger brother ascended the throne as the Chongzhen Emperor and removed Wei Zhongxian's clique,[224] but due to suspicion and a lack of purpose, he was unable to control the factionalism among officials and assemble a capable administration.[224][225]
While the government was consumed by internal strife, conditions in the countryside worsened in the 1620s. From 1628, northern China was ravaged by war between rebellious peasants led by Li Zicheng and the government army.[226] As a result, starving people fled to the cities and entire counties were destroyed in the countryside. The gentry were shocked by the depth of resentment of the poor against the rich, and the state administration began to disintegrate.[227] In 1644, Li Zicheng's army captured Beijing and the Chongzhen Emperor committed suicide. General Wu Sangui, who commanded the Ming border army north of Beijing, saw no other option but to submit to the Qing dynasty (which was renamed in the mid-1630s from the Jurchen state founded by Nurhaci). With the support of the landlords and gentry, the Qing army quickly defeated the rebels and took control of northern China. In the following years, they also conquered the south of the country.[226] In 1662, Wu Sangui, at the head of the Qing army, detained and executed the last Southern Ming emperor, the Yongli Emperor, in Yunnan.[228]
Assessment
[edit]The traditional portrayal of the Emperor as a ruler who neglected his duties and did not focus on governing is inaccurate and biased. This view was perpetuated by Confucian historians and scholars who criticized the fact that the Emperor listened to—in their view—the wrong advisors instead of the right ones.[229]
The Wanli Emperor is often portrayed in traditional Chinese historiography as one of the main causes of the decline and fall of the Ming dynasty. Classical Chinese historians focused on his greed, misuse of eunuch power, factionalism within the government, seclusion in the Forbidden City, indulgence in alcohol and sex, extravagant tomb construction, and political blunders.[230] The History of Ming (the official Ming history completed in 1739) and subsequent works depict him as a lazy, selfish, and reckless ruler who only cared about his harem and neglected state affairs.[231] The animosity of Confucian scholars towards the Wanli Emperor stemmed from different visions of the state and the Emperor's protection of military officers against complaints from civilian officials who controlled the administration at the time.[231] Even modern Chinese works on the Emperor continue to adhere to this traditional perspective.[232] Furthermore, Western historiography tends to adopt the viewpoint of Chinese Confucians[231][232] and perpetuates it, as seen in Charles Hucker's Dictionary of Ming Biography (1976) and Ray Huang's portrayal of the Wanli Emperor in 1587, a Year of No Significance: The Ming Dynasty in Decline (1981). Ray Huang also contributes to this image in his chapter on the Wanli Emperor in the Cambridge History of China, Volume 7 (1988).[230] It is primarily Huang who is responsible for the Western perception of the Wanli Emperor as an isolated and frustrated ruler, "trapped" by his own bureaucracy.[52]
The downfall of the Ming political system can be attributed to its reliance on ideological and moral principles. Zhang Juzheng, in his pursuit of effective rule through personal relationships, faced criticism from his opponents who focused on his personal life, deeming it immoral and illegitimate. This led to a lack of focus on the practical outcomes of his policies. After Zhang's death, the government became divided into factions, with officials in the Censorate and ministries engaging in feuds and purging Zhang's supporters. As a result, important reforms were neglected, and the Emperor's indecisiveness only worsened the situation. The Emperor was not interested in ruling according to the ideas of his officials,[233] preferring to act according to his own will and disliking being pressured,[54] but he lacked the qualities of an effective despot. His mishandling of the succession question also eliminated the Grand Secretariat as a potential center for government restructuring—as attempted by Gao Gong and Zhang Juzheng—as the government suspected the grand secretaries of supporting the Emperor, depriving them of the ability to mediate between the ruler and the government.[233]
The Wanli Emperor, like Zhang Juzheng, attempted to increase the military strength of the empire, control the civilian bureaucracy, reduce factionalism, and rely more on military officers rather than civil officials. During the first three decades of his reign, he devoted himself greatly to military affairs and did not hesitate to allocate funds for the army, including the 1619 expedition. Despite the defeat in 1619, he made efforts to protect the officers, such as Li Rubai, who were targeted by the government.[232] During the Wanli era, the Ming armies maintained control over the border with the Mongols, intervened in border disputes in Burma, conducted raids in Mongolia and Manchuria, suppressed a major rebellion in Ningxia, participated in the war in Korea, and deployed 200,000 soldiers to suppress a rebellion in Sichuan and quell minor rebellions. After the Battle of Sarhū, the Ming government became embroiled in factional conflicts and began to blame others for their failures. Later Chinese Confucian scholars emphasized the defeats at Sarhū and downplayed the previous victories achieved by eunuchs, generals, and the Emperor.[234]
Consorts and issue
[edit]
The Wanli Emperor had 18 children by eight women, eight sons and ten daughters, of whom five sons and two daughters lived to adulthood. The most important women in his life were his mother, Empress Dowager Li, and his favorite concubine, Lady Zheng. Behind them were Empress Wang and Lady Wang, the mother of his eldest son.[12]
After the Wanli Emperor succeeded his father in 1572, his mother was given the title of empress dowager. In accordance with tradition, she headed the government during her son's minority, although decisions remained in the hands of Senior Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng. Empress Dowager Li formed a ruling alliance with the head eunuch Feng Bao and retained her influence even after Zhang Juzheng's death. She also formed alliances with grand secretaries Shen Shixing, Xu Guo (許國), and Wang Xijue.[35] She was a devout Buddhist and made large donations to Buddhist monks and monasteries.[35][51] She supported the succession of the Wanli Emperor's eldest son, the later Taichang Emperor, against the younger Zhu Changxun, the son of Lady Zheng. When the Emperor objected that his eldest son was born to a mere palace servant, she replied that the Emperor himself was also the son of a mere servant.[51]
In 1577, Empress Dowager Li worked with Empress Dowager Chen, the Longqing Emperor's widow, to organize the selection of a wife for the young emperor. They chose the twelve-year-old Wang Xijie, who became empress upon her marriage to the Wanli Emperor in early 1578. Empress Wang had one daughter and no sons.[53] The Emperor did not have a good relationship with the Empress and instead devoted himself to Lady Zheng. Empress Wang maintained a dignified public image and showed respect to Empress Dowager Li. She also supported the Emperor's eldest son over Lady Zheng's son, but she was known for her strictness and cruelty within the imperial palace, causing fear among those who served her.[53] The Empress died in 1620, shortly before the Wanli Emperor's own death.[235]
Lady Wang was a servant in the palace of Empress Dowager Li. In late 1581, during one of his visits to his mother, the Emperor took notice of the young Lady Wang, who soon became pregnant with his child.[236] Although the Wanli Emperor initially wanted nothing to do with the child, his mother convinced him to acknowledge paternity by providing records of his visits.[236] In August 1582, Lady Wang gave birth to the Emperor's first son, Zhu Changluo.[237] Two years later, the Emperor's concubine Lady Zheng gave birth to a daughter, Zhu Xuanshu, and quickly gained the Emperor's favor and trust, causing his interest in Lady Wang to diminish.[236] Lady Wang lived in seclusion in the Forbidden City, and the Emperor neglected her. It was not until 1606, after the birth of Zhu Changluo's first son (the later Tianqi Emperor), that she was granted the title of "Imperial Noble Consort" (Huang Guifei),[236][237] which was appropriate for the mother of an heir.[238] She died in 1611.[236]
Lady Zheng was chosen to join the Emperor's harem in 1581,[237] and soon after her arrival, she captured his attention and love.[237] In 1586, after giving birth to Zhu Changxun, she was promoted to the position of "Imperial Noble Consort", which was just one step below that of empress.[236] She and the Emperor went on to have a total of six children,[237] but their desire to name Zhu Changxun as the successor instead of the eldest son, Zhu Changluo, caused a political crisis. Despite the Emperor's efforts, he was unable to overcome the strong opposition of his ministers and officials, and the decision was postponed for almost two decades. It was not until 1601 that he finally appointed Zhu Changluo as crown prince.[54][236] In 1615, Lady Zheng was suspected of being involved in the "man with a stick" incident, but these were only rumors and nothing was ever proven.[236] Zhu Changluo fell ill shortly after taking the throne and died after just one month of reign. Once again, it was rumored that Lady Zheng was responsible for his death, but there was no concrete evidence to support these accusations. She died in 1630.[236]
- Empress Xiaoduanxian (孝端顯皇后) of the Wang clan (王氏; 1564–1620), personal name Xijie (喜姐)[239]
- Princess Rongchang (榮昌公主), personal name Xuanying (軒媖), first daughter.[240]
- Married Yang Chunyuan (楊春元; d. 1616) in 1596, and had issue (five sons)
- Princess Rongchang (榮昌公主), personal name Xuanying (軒媖), first daughter.[240]
- Empress Xiaojing (孝靖皇后) of the Wang clan (王氏; 1565–1611)[241]
- Zhu Changluo (朱常洛), the Taichang Emperor (泰昌帝; 1582–1620), first son[242]
- Princess Yunmeng (雲夢公主), personal name Xuanyuan (軒嫄), fourth daughter[240]
- Imperial Noble Consort Gongkehuiyonghejing (恭恪惠榮和靖皇貴妃) of the Zheng clan (鄭氏; 1565–1630)[243]
- Princess Yunhe (雲和公主), personal name Xuanshu (軒姝), second daughter[240]
- Zhu Changxu (朱常溆), Prince Ai of Bin (邠哀王), second son[244]
- Zhu Changxun (朱常洵), Prince Zhong of Fu (福忠王; 1586–1641), third son[244]
- Zhu Changzhi (朱常治), Prince Hai of Yuan (沅懷王), fourth son[245]
- Princess Lingqiu (靈丘公主), personal name Xuanyao (軒姚), sixth daughter[246]
- Princess Shouning (壽寧公主; 1592–1634), personal name Xuanwei (軒媁), seventh daughter.[246]
- Married Ran Xingrang (冉興讓; d. 1644) in 1599, and had issue (one son)
- Imperial Noble Consort Gongshunyongzhuangduanjing (恭順榮莊端靜皇貴妃) of the Li clan (李氏; d. 1597)[247]
- Zhu Changrun (朱常潤), Prince of Hui (惠王; 1594–1646), sixth son[248]
- Zhu Changying (朱常瀛), Prince Duan of Gui (桂端王; 1597–1645), seventh son[248]
- Consort Zhao (昭妃) of the Liu clan (劉氏; 1561–1644)[249]
- Consort Ronghuiyi (榮惠宜妃) of the Yang clan (楊氏; d. 1580)[250]
- Consort Wenjingshun (溫靜順妃) of the Chang clan (常氏; d. 1594)[250]
- Consort Duanjingrong (端靖榮妃) of the Wang clan (王氏; d. 1591)[251]
- Princess Jingle (靜樂公主), personal name Xuangui (軒媯), third daughter[240]
- Consort Zhuangjingde (莊靖德妃) of the Xu clan (許氏; d. 1602)[252]
- Consort Duan (端妃) of the Zhou clan (周氏)[253]
- Zhu Changhao (朱常浩), Prince of Rui (瑞王; 1591–1644), fifth son[245]
- Consort Qinghuishun (清惠順妃) of the Li clan (李氏; d. 1623)[252]
- Consort Xi (僖妃) of the Wang clan (王氏; d. 1589)[253]
- Concubine De (德嬪) of the Li clan (李氏; 1576–1628)[255]
- Concubine Shen (慎嬪) of the Wei clan (魏氏; 1567–1606)[251]
- Concubine Jing (敬嬪) of the Shao clan (邵氏; d. 1606)[256]
- Concubine Shun (順嬪) of the Zhang clan (張氏; d. 1589)[257]
- Concubine He (和嬪) of the Liang clan (梁氏; 1562–1643)[257]
- Concubine Dao (悼嬪) of the Geng clan (耿氏; 1569–1589)[258]
- Concubine Rong (榮嬪) of the Li clan (李氏; 1568–1626)[259]
Tomb
[edit]
The Wanli Emperor was buried in the Ming tombs at the base of the Tianshou Mountain, located outside of Beijing. This site is the final resting place for thirteen of the sixteen emperors who reigned from 1368 to 1644. The Wanli Emperor's burial complex, known as the Ding Mausoleum, was constructed between 1584 and 1590. It consists of three walled courtyards, each containing smaller buildings. The second and third courtyards are separated by a three-tiered terrace, which leads to a vast sacrificial hall measuring 30x67 meters. At the back of the third courtyard stands a mound surrounded by a three-meter-high rampart. In 1956–1957, Chinese archaeologists excavated the mound and discovered an underground structure. This structure includes an entrance hall, an outer hall, a middle hall, and a proper burial chamber. The middle hall is accessible through entrances on the left and right side chambers, as well as the back of the chamber. The burial chamber, which is 9.1x30 meters and 9.5 meters high, is larger than the other rooms. The entrance is located in the middle of the longer side. Inside the burial chamber, archaeologists found wooden coffins containing the remains of the Emperor, the Empress, and the Taichang Emperor's mother. Over three thousand objects were also discovered, including jewelry, gold and silver items, jade and porcelain objects, clothing, and the crowns of the Emperor and Empress.[260][261]
The archaeological survey conducted in the 1950s has been considered unprofessionally carried out in China since the 1990s.[xxix] Due to a lack of necessary knowledge, it was not possible to preserve and protect wooden and textile artifacts. The report of the survey was compiled in 1986 based on the preserved notes of the participants in the excavations. Additionally, the Red Guards destroyed many of the discovered objects during the Cultural Revolution, including the remains of the Emperor and his consorts.[262][263]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ simplified Chinese: 万历; traditional Chinese: 萬曆; pinyin: Wànlì
- ^ simplified Chinese: 范天合道哲肃敦简光文章武安仁止孝显皇帝; traditional Chinese: 範天合道哲肅敦簡光文章武安仁止孝顯皇帝 (conferred by the Taichang Emperor in 1620)[2]
- ^ Chinese: 神宗; pinyin: Shénzōng
- ^ simplified Chinese: 朱翊钧; traditional Chinese: 朱翊鈞; pinyin: Zhū Yìjūn
- ^ Art name: Yuzhai (simplified Chinese: 禹斋; traditional Chinese: 禹齋; pinyin: Yǔzhāi)[4]
- ^ He learned to read at the age of four.[10]
- ^ a b Eunuchs served the Ming emperors not only as guards and servants in the harem but also managed the operations of the entire Forbidden City palace complex. Outside of Beijing, they oversaw the imperial estates, supervised the use of firearms in the army, collected certain taxes and fees, and supervised state workshops. There was no shortage of eunuchs, but rather an excess: although voluntary castration was prohibited, the harsh living conditions of peasants led them to break the law and undergo castration in hopes of a better life in imperial service. In the early 16th century, eunuchs flocked to Beijing to seek employment from the emperor. In 1572, the Wanli Emperor accepted 3250 eunuchs into service; in 1578, 3570; in 1588, over 2000; and in 1601, 4500 (two-thirds for himself and the rest divided among princes of the imperial family). By 1620, over 20,000 castrated men had gathered in Beijing seeking employment; when rejected, they responded by inciting street riots.[13]
- ^ In 1958, Chinese archaeologists opened and explored the Wanli Emperor's burial complex. Upon analyzing the bones, it was discovered that they contained a significant amount of morphine, indicating frequent consumption of opium.[15]
- ^ "Enrich the country and strengthen the army", or in Chinese, Fuguo qiang bing (富國強兵), is a phrase from the Zhan Guo Ce that summarizes the (legalist) policy of Shang Yang.
- ^ After Feng Bao, in the late 1580s, Zhang Cheng (張誠) rose to a prominent position among the imperial eunuchs. He first led the Directorate of Ceremonial and then, from 1590, the Eastern Depot (secret service), but in 1596, he fell from power and was transferred to the Hongwu Emperor's tomb in Nanjing. The Emperor also confiscated his property and that of his relatives. Following this, Chen Ju (陳矩; 1539–1607), one of the most capable and respected Ming eunuchs, took over the eunuch offices. He was known for his caution, carefulness, and strong sense of duty.[33]
- ^ Xuyan, 虛言.
- ^ In an attempt to avoid this fate, Li Tingji declined the appointment of senior grand secretary, citing illness. He retreated to a desolate temple and persisted in his refusal to hold office for three years and nine months before the Emperor finally signed his retirement in 1613.[40]
- ^ The 180 km long Jia Canal was a major construction project, running parallel to the Grand Canal further east near Xuzhou. Its construction began in 1593 and faced numerous challenges, such as unexpectedly high demand for stone and a shortage of funds.[48] As a result, it was not until 1603 that work picked up. The canal was finally opened in 1609.[44]
- ^ The emperors did not write their official correspondence with ink, as was customary, but with red vermilion paste.
- ^ This was the first meeting between the Emperor and the officials of the "outer court" since 1602.[59] At that time, the Emperor fell seriously ill, and in anticipation of his death, he summoned the grand secretaries and ministers. He ordered the drafting of an edict to abolish the mining tax, cancel the contracts for state textile factories in Suzhou and Hangzhou, and porcelain factories in Jiangxi, as well as the dismissal of eunuchs overseeing them and the release of officials imprisoned for criticizing the Emperor. The following day, the Emperor's condition improved, and he withdrew the edict that had already been drafted. This sparked a wave of criticism from many officials towards Senior Grand Secretary Shen Yiguan, for not officially announcing the edict regardless of the Emperor's change of heart.[60]
- ^ One example of political issues that the supporters of the Donglin movement focused on was the case of Zhu Huakui, Prince of Chu. His father, Zhu Yingxian, Prince Gong of Chu, died in 1571, and Zhu Huakui, who was born in the same year, was confirmed as the Prince of Chu by the Emperor in 1580. In 1603, thirty members of the imperial family petitioned the Emperor, declaring Zhu Huakui illegitimate and claiming that his alleged father was impotent. They requested that the Emperor strip him of his title. The Donglin supporters successfully pushed for an official investigation involving dozens of officials. The Emperor eventually closed the investigation, declaring the prince legitimate, but the case continued as officials from both sides accused each other of bribery and dishonesty. The Emperor distanced himself from their disputes and did not respond to the accusations.[87]
- ^ As a result of the conflict of 1594, Zhao Nanxing (趙南星) and later Gu Xiancheng were expelled from their official positions. Gao Panlong was transferred to the far south.[92]
- ^ André Gunder Frank estimated that out of the 137,000 tons of silver mined in Japan between 1550 and 1800, 60,000 ended up in China.[97]
- ^ Three of the most prominent advocates of the single whip reform were Hai Rui (1513–1587), Pang Shangpeng (龐尚鵬; 1524–1581), and Wang Zongmu (王宗沐; 1523–1591).[99]
- ^ State production of coins caused a 70% increase in the price of copper during the years 1577–1581, which in turn raised the cost of casting coins from 0.9–0.98 liang of silver per 1000 coins (officially valued at 1 liang) to 1.35 liang.[129]
- ^ In the pursuit of profits, officials are associated with private coin manufacturers.[123]
- ^ The government, however, did not primarily put the coins into circulation but instead kept them as reserves in the treasury of the Ministry of Revenue and the emperor.[128]
- ^ Over the course of three centuries, a total of 22,404 men were awarded the title of jinshi during the Ming dynasty. Out of these, 14,756 were registered as farmers (specifically landowners), 5,372 came from soldier families, 808 from bureaucratic families, 801 from artisan families, and only one was mentioned as being from a merchant family. The origins of the remaining 657 jinshi are unknown.[138]
- ^ Collections of essays by leading scholars (such as Wang Ao) have been published since the end of the 15th century.[141]
- ^ At that time, only 2–3% of candidates were able to pass the provincial examinations.[144]
- ^ Ray Huang in The Cambridge History of China, Volume 7, states that there were approximately 40,000–50,000 rebels and 200,000 soldiers on the Ming side,[187]
- ^ The Ming emperors did not confirm the royal title for the Lê dynasty until 1646, during the reign of Zhu Youlang of Southern Ming. By this time, the Ming had already lost most of China to the Qing dynasty.[200] After establishing diplomatic relations, the Qing also confirmed the royal status of Viet rulers.[201]
- ^ The land tax was increased three times between 1618 and 1620 in order to gather funds for the provision of equipment for the troops stationed in Liaodong.[214]
- ^ Yang Ren and Yue Nan criticized the excavations from the 1950s in their publication Fengxue Dingling (风雪定陵), Beijing: Liberation Army Art Press, 1991.[262]
References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ a b Goodrich & Fang (1976), p. xxi.
- ^ Moule (1957), p. 109.
- ^ a b c d Mote (2003), p. 727.
- ^ Wanli yehuo bian, vol. 1.
- ^ a b Mote (2003), p. 724.
- ^ Goodrich & Fang (1976), p. 367.
- ^ Theobald, Ulrich (17 January 2014). "Ming Shenzong 明神宗, the Wanli Emperor 萬曆". ChinaKnowledge.de. Retrieved 15 September 2018.
- ^ a b c d e Huang (1988), p. 514.
- ^ a b c Swope (2008), p. 74.
- ^ a b Duindam (2016), pp. 63–64.
- ^ Duindam (2016), pp. 64–65.
- ^ a b c d e McMahon (2016), p. 128.
- ^ Tsai (1996), p. 25.
- ^ a b McMahon (2016), p. 127.
- ^ a b Zheng (2005), pp. 18–19.
- ^ a b c d Huang (1988), p. 515.
- ^ Zhao, Xu (20 May 2017). "The eternal emperor's road from glory to ashes". China Daily. Retrieved 19 October 2025.
- ^ Huang (1988), pp. 521–522.
- ^ a b Swope (2009), p. 23.
- ^ a b c d Swope (2008), p. 73.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 523.
- ^ a b c d Huang (1988), p. 525.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 526.
- ^ Huang (1988), pp. 527–528.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 524.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 522.
- ^ a b Swope (2008), p. 72.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 527.
- ^ a b c Huang (1988), p. 537.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 528.
- ^ a b c d e Swope (2009), p. 24.
- ^ Pang (2015), pp. 26–28.
- ^ Tsai (1996), p. 109.
- ^ Swope (2008), p. 75.
- ^ a b c Luk (2016), pp. 70–77.
- ^ a b Zhao (2002), pp. 135–136.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), pp. 528–529.
- ^ Zhao (2002), pp. 115–116.
- ^ Zhao (2002), pp. 143–145.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 529.
- ^ a b c Miller (2009), p. 28.
- ^ a b c d e f Huang (1988), p. 516.
- ^ a b c Huang (1988), p. 517.
- ^ a b c d Huang (1988), p. 553.
- ^ a b c Huang (1988), p. 554.
- ^ Swope (2008), p. 82.
- ^ Huang (1988), pp. 552–553.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 552.
- ^ Jang (2008), p. 138.
- ^ a b Brook (2010), p. 101.
- ^ a b c d e f McMahon (2016), p. 130.
- ^ a b Brook (2010), p. 102.
- ^ a b c McMahon (2016), pp. 131–132.
- ^ a b c d Dardess (2002), p. 9.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 550.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 517; 550.
- ^ Dardess (2002), p. 10.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 555.
- ^ Dardess (2002), p. 14.
- ^ Goodrich & Fang (1976), pp. 1179–1182.
- ^ Dardess (2002), p. 15.
- ^ a b c Miller (2009), p. 75.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 530.
- ^ a b Miller (2009), p. 78.
- ^ Miller (2009), p. 79.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 531.
- ^ Miller (2009), p. 80.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), pp. 114–115.
- ^ Miller (2009), p. 93.
- ^ Miller (2009), p. 92.
- ^ Miller (2009), pp. 93–94.
- ^ Wei (2020), p. 94.
- ^ a b c Wei (2020), p. 96.
- ^ a b Wei (2020), p. 95.
- ^ a b Wei (2020), p. 97.
- ^ a b Wei (2020), p. 98.
- ^ Wei (2020), p. 99.
- ^ "Donglin". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 24 February 2010.
- ^ a b Cheng (2006), p. 522.
- ^ a b c Elman (1989), p. 393.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 540.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 532.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 533.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 535.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 534.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 544.
- ^ Huang (1988), pp. 547–549.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 536.
- ^ Fang (2014), pp. 46–47.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 538.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 539.
- ^ Peterson (1998), pp. 754, 762.
- ^ Huang (1988), pp. 539–540.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 541.
- ^ Huang (1988), pp. 541–542.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 543.
- ^ a b c d Li (2010), p. 75.
- ^ a b c Atwell (1998), pp. 403–404.
- ^ a b Atwell (1998), p. 405.
- ^ a b c Von Glahn (1996), p. 142.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), p. 158.
- ^ a b Von Glahn (1996), p. 143.
- ^ Li (2010), p. 74.
- ^ Huang (1998), p. 118.
- ^ Huang (1998), p. 119.
- ^ Huang (1998), pp. 120–121.
- ^ Brook (1998), p. 89.
- ^ a b Heijdra (1998), p. 447.
- ^ Heijdra (1998), p. 448.
- ^ Huang (1998), p. 134.
- ^ Brook (1998), pp. 199–200.
- ^ Brook (1998), pp. 192–194.
- ^ Brook (1998), pp. 194–195.
- ^ Brook (1998), pp. 195–196.
- ^ Brook (1998), p. 197.
- ^ Brook (1998), p. 198.
- ^ Brook (1998), p. 210.
- ^ Brook (1998), pp. 174–175.
- ^ Brook (1998), p. 180.
- ^ Brook (1998), p. 189.
- ^ Brook (1998), p. 202.
- ^ Brook (1998), p. 203.
- ^ a b c Von Glahn (1996), p. 157.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), p. 161.
- ^ Atwell (1998), p. 407.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), pp. 145–146.
- ^ a b c d Von Glahn (1996), pp. 148–150.
- ^ a b c d Von Glahn (1996), p. 150.
- ^ a b c Von Glahn (1996), p. 152.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), pp. 150–151.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), pp. 152–153.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), p. 162.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), p. 163.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), p. 164.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), pp. 165–166.
- ^ Ebrey (1999), p. 200.
- ^ Li (2010), p. 81.
- ^ a b Li (2010), pp. 82–83.
- ^ Li (2010), p. 84.
- ^ Lu (2010), pp. 76–77.
- ^ a b Elman (2013), p. 65.
- ^ Li (2010), p. 89.
- ^ Li (2010), pp. 77–78.
- ^ a b Elman (2013), p. 111.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. ix.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. x.
- ^ a b Swope (2008), p. 70.
- ^ a b Swope (2008), p. 62.
- ^ Swope (2008), pp. 63, 75.
- ^ Swope (2008), p. 71.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 20.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 21.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 22.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 18.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 19.
- ^ a b c d e f Swope (2009), p. 28.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 566.
- ^ a b c d Swope (2009), p. 34.
- ^ a b c Huang (1988), pp. 566–567.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 27.
- ^ a b Swope (2008), p. 80.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 82.
- ^ a b Swope (2009), p. 30.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 29.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 31.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 32.
- ^ a b c Swope (2009), p. 33.
- ^ Swope (2008), p. 88.
- ^ a b c d e Huang (1988), pp. 567–572.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 11.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 6.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. xiii.
- ^ Swope (2009), pp. 123–125.
- ^ Swope (2009), pp. 127–131.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 138.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 150.
- ^ Huang (1988), pp. 570–571.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), p. 572.
- ^ a b Swope (2009), p. 5.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 8.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 3.
- ^ "Tusi Sites". UNESCO. 2015. Retrieved 1 November 2019.
- ^ "China's Tusi Sites Listed as World Heritage". CRIENGLISH.com. Xinhua. 4 July 2015. Archived from the original on 27 October 2019. Retrieved 1 November 2019.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 564.
- ^ a b c Swope (2009), p. 35.
- ^ Swope (2008), p. 101.
- ^ a b c d Huang (1988), p. 565.
- ^ a b c Swope (2009), p. 37.
- ^ Swope (2008), p. 103.
- ^ a b Swope (2008), p. 104.
- ^ Swope (2009), pp. 37–38.
- ^ a b c Swope (2009), p. 39.
- ^ a b c d Lorge (2005), p. 136.
- ^ Swope (2008), p. 107.
- ^ Swope (2008), p. 102.
- ^ Baldanza (2016), pp. 175–177.
- ^ Baldanza (2016), p. 178.
- ^ Baldanza (2016), pp. 189–191.
- ^ Baldanza (2016), p. 193.
- ^ Baldanza (2016), pp. 204–205.
- ^ Baldanza (2016), p. 206.
- ^ a b c d e Huang (1988), pp. 560–562.
- ^ a b Brook (2010), pp. 230–231.
- ^ Atwell (1998), p. 392.
- ^ a b Atwell (1998), pp. 391–392.
- ^ a b Atwell (1998), pp. 393–394.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 559.
- ^ Atwell (1998), pp. 395–396.
- ^ Huang (1988), pp. 562–563.
- ^ Atwell (1998), pp. 400–402.
- ^ Atwell (1998), pp. 396–399.
- ^ a b Демидова & Мясников (1966), pp. 12–32.
- ^ Huang (1988), pp. 575–576.
- ^ Atwell (1988), p. 590.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), pp. 577–583.
- ^ a b Swope (2009), p. 14.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 583.
- ^ Hummel (1943), pp. 885–886.
- ^ Huang (1988), p. 584.
- ^ a b c Atwell (1988), pp. 591–592.
- ^ Atwell (1988), p. 593.
- ^ Atwell (1988), pp. 595–599.
- ^ Miller (2009), pp. 119–121.
- ^ a b Atwell (1988), pp. 611–614.
- ^ Swope (2014), pp. 209–210.
- ^ a b Нефедов (2008), pp. 690–691.
- ^ Wakeman (2009), p. 33.
- ^ Struve (1988), pp. 708–710.
- ^ Miller (2009), pp. 78–79.
- ^ a b Swope (2008), pp. 61–62.
- ^ a b c Swope (2009), p. xi.
- ^ a b c Swope (2009), p. 16.
- ^ a b Huang (1988), pp. 529–530.
- ^ Swope (2009), p. 15.
- ^ Huang (1981), p. 246.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Lin (2014), pp. 409–410.
- ^ a b c d e McMahon (2016), p. 131.
- ^ McMahon (2016), p. 132.
- ^ Wong (1997), p. 303.
- ^ a b c d e Guoque, preface 1, p. 17; History of Ming, vol. 121, p. 3676.
- ^ Wong (1997), p. 305.
- ^ History of Ming, vol. 21, p. 293.
- ^ Wong (1997), p. 311.
- ^ a b History of Ming, vol. 120, p. 3649.
- ^ a b History of Ming, vol. 120, pp. 3649, 3652.
- ^ a b c d e Guoque, preface 1, p. 18; History of Ming, vol. 121, p. 3676.
- ^ Wong (1997), p. 315.
- ^ a b History of Ming, vol. 120, pp. 3649, 3653.
- ^ Wong (1997), p. 317.
- ^ a b Wong (1997), p. 320.
- ^ a b Wong (1997), p. 321.
- ^ a b Wong (1997), p. 323.
- ^ a b Wong (1997), p. 325.
- ^ History of Ming, vol. 120, pp. 3649, 3656.
- ^ Wong (1997), p. 326.
- ^ Wong (1997), p. 330.
- ^ a b Wong (1997), p. 328.
- ^ Wong (1997), p. 332.
- ^ Wong (1997), p. 329.
- ^ "Dingling Tomb". China Internet Information Center. 12 February 2003. Archived from the original on 1 April 2020. Retrieved 30 December 2019.
- ^ Jarzombek & Prakash (2011), p. 498.
- ^ a b "To Dig or Not to Dig: Qianling Mausoleum in the Spotlight Again". Canberra: China Heritage Project, ANU College of Asia & the Pacific (CAP), The Australian National University. 19 October 2015. Retrieved 30 December 2019.
- ^ Melvin, Shelia (7 September 2011). "China's Reluctant Emperor". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
Works cited
[edit]- Atwell, William (1988). "The T'ai-ch'ang, T'ien-ch'i, and Ch'ung-chen reigns, 1620–1644". In Twitchett, Denis C; Mote, Frederick W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of China Volume 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 511–584. ISBN 0521243335.
- Atwell, William (1998). "Ming China and the emerging world economy, c. 1470–1650". In Twitchett, Denis C; Mote, Frederick W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of China 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368 — 1644, Part II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 376–416. ISBN 0521243335.
- Brook, Timothy (1998). The Confusions of Pleasure: Commerce and Culture in Ming China. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-22154-0.
- Brook, Timothy (2010). The troubled empire: China in the Yuan and Ming dynasties. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-04602-3.
- Baldanza, Kathlene (2016). Ming China and Vietnam. Negotiating borders in early modern Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-12424-0.
- Cheng, Anne (2006). Dějiny čínského myšlení (in Czech). Praha: DharmaGaia. ISBN 80-86685-52-7.
- Dardess, John W (2002). Blood and History in China: The Donglin Faction and Its Repression, 1620-1627. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 9780824825164.
- Duindam, Jeroen (2016). Dynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300-1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-06068-5.
- Демидова, Н.Ф; Мясников, В.С (1966). "Миссия Ивана Петлина". Первые русские дипломаты в Китае ("Роспись" Ф. Петлина и Статейный список Ф.И. Байкова) (in Russian). М.: Наука.
- Elman, Benjamin A (October 1989). "Imperial Politics and Confucian Societies in Late Imperial China: The Hanlin and Donglin Academies" (PDF). Modern China. 15 (4): 379–418. doi:10.1177/009770048901500401. S2CID 144743987.
- Elman, Benjamin A (2013). Civil Examinations and Meritocracy in Late Imperial China. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-72495-2.
- Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (1999). The Cambridge Illustrated History of China (Cambridge Illustrated Histories ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 052166991X.
- Fang, Jun (2014). China's Second Capital – Nanjing Under the Ming, 1368-1644 (1st ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 9781135008451.
- Goodrich, L. Carington; Fang, Chaoying (1976). Dictionary of Ming Biography, 1368-1644. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-03801-1.
- Huang, Ray (1981). 1587, a Year of No Significance: The Ming Dynasty in Decline. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300028849.
- Huang, Ray (1988). "The Lung-ch'ing and Wan-li reigns, 1567—1620". In Twitchett, Denis C; Mote, Frederick W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of China Volume 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 511–584. ISBN 0521243335.
- Huang, Ray (1998). "The Ming fiscal administration". In Twitchett, Denis C; Mote, Frederick W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of China 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368 — 1644, Part II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 106–171. ISBN 0521243335.
- Heijdra, Martin (1998). "The socio-economic development of rural China during the Ming". In Twitchett, Denis C; Mote, Frederick W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of China 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368 — 1644, Part II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 417–578. ISBN 0521243335.
- Hummel, Arthur W., ed. (1943). Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period. Vol. 2. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office. OCLC 3443954.
- Jang, Scarlett (2008). "The Eunuch Agency Directorate of Ceremonial and the Ming Imperial Publishing Enterprise". In Robinson, David M (ed.). Culture, Courtiers, and Competition: The Ming Court (1368-1644). Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Asia Center. pp. 116–185. ISBN 978-0-674-02823-4.
- Jarzombek, Mark M.; Prakash, Vikramaditya (2011). A Global History of Architecture. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0470902486.
- Luk, Yu-ping (2016). "Heavenly Mistress and the Nine-lotus Bodhisattva: Visualizing the Celestial Identities of Two Empresses in Ming China (1368-1644)". In Bose, Melia Belli (ed.). Women, Gender and Art in Early Modern Asia, c. 1500-1900. London: Routledge/Ashgate. pp. 63–91.
- Li, Kangying (2010). The Ming Maritime Policy in Transition, 1367 to 1568 (1st ed.). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. ISBN 978-3-447-06172-8.
- Lu, Tina (2010). "The literary culture of the late Ming (1573–1644)". In Chang, Kang-i Sun (ed.). The Cambridge history of Chinese literature: Volume II. From 1375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 63–151. ISBN 978-0-521-11677-0.
- Lorge, Peter Allan (2005). War, politics and society in early modern China, 900-1795. New York; Abington, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 9780415316903.
- Lin, Yanqing (2014). "Empress Dowager of Ming". In Lee, Lily Xiao Hong; Wiles, Sue (eds.). Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Women, Volume II: Tang Through Ming 618–1644. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 9780765643148.
- Mote, Frederick W (2003). Imperial China 900-1800. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-01212-7.
- McMahon, Keith (2016). Celestial Women: Imperial Wives and Concubines in China from Song to Qing. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781442255029.
- Miller, Harry (2009). State versus Gentry in Late Ming Dynasty China, 1572-1644. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-61134-4.
- Moule, Arthur Christopher (1957). The rulers of China, 221 B.C. – A.D. 1949; chronological tables. New York: F. A. Praeger.
- Нефедов, С. А (2008). Война и общество: Факторный анализ исторического процесса. История Востока (Университетская библиотека Александра Погорельского) (in Russian) (1st ed.). Москва: Территория будущего. ISBN 978-5-91129-026-9.
- Pang, Huiping (2015). "The Confiscating Henchmen: The Masquerade of Ming Embroidered-Uniform Guard Liu Shouyou (ca. 1540-1604)". Ming Studies. 72: 24–45. doi:10.1179/0147037X15Z.00000000045. ISSN 0147-037X. S2CID 159862527.
- Peterson, Willard (1998). "Confucian learning in late Ming thought". In Twitchett, Denis C; Mote, Frederick W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of China 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368 — 1644, Part II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 708–788. ISBN 0521243335.
- Swope, Kenneth M (2008). "Bestowing the Double-edged Sword: Wanli as Supreme Military Commander". In Robinson, David M (ed.). Culture, Courtiers, and Competition: The Ming Court (1368–1644) (1st ed.). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Asia Center. pp. 61–115. ISBN 978-0521243322.
- Swope, Kenneth M (2009). A Dragon's Head and a Serpent's Tail: Ming China and the First Great East Asian War, 1592-1598 (Campaigns and Commanders Series ed.). Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 978-0-8061-4056-8.
- Swope, Kenneth M (2014). The Military Collapse of China's Ming Dynasty, 1618-44. Abington, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 9781134462162.
- Struve, Lynn A (1988). "The Southern Ming, 1644—1662". In Twitchett, Denis C; Mote, Frederick W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of China Volume 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 511–584, 641–725. ISBN 0521243335.
- Shen, Defu (1619). Wanli yehuo bian 萬曆野獲編 [Compilation of Wanli era catastrophes] (in Literary Chinese).
- Tsai, Shih-shan Henry (1996). Eunuchs in the Ming Dynasty (SUNY series in Chinese local studies ed.). New York: State University of New York Press. ISBN 0791426874.
- Tan, Qian (1958) [1647]. Guoque 國榷 [Discussions about the state] (in Literary Chinese). Beijing: Zhonghua Book. ISBN 7-101-00372-9.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - Von Glahn, Richard (1996). Fountain of Fortune: money and monetary policy in China, 1000–1700. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-20408-5.
- Wei, Yang (2020). "The paradoxical effect of autocracy: collective deliberation in the Ming official merit-evaluation system". In Swope, Kenneth M (ed.). The Ming world. Abington, Oxon: Routledge. pp. 88–101. ISBN 978-0-429-31871-9.
- Wakeman, Frederic E (2009). Telling Chinese history: a selection of essays. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 9780520256064.
- Wong, Nai-kwan (1997). Ming dai huang shi yan jiu 明代皇室研究 [A Study of the Imperial Family of the Ming Dynasty] (MPhil thesis) (in Chinese). Pokfulam, Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong. doi:10.5353/th_b3122010.
- Zheng, Yangwen (2005). The Social Life of Opium in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521846080.
- Zhao, Jie (2002). "A Decade of Considerable Significance: Late-Ming Factionalism in the Making, 1583-1593". T'oung Pao. Second Series. 88 (1/3): 112–150. doi:10.1163/156853202320465404.
- Zhang, Tingyu (1974) [1739]. Ming Shi 明史 [History of Ming] (in Literary Chinese). Beijing: Zhonghua Book. ISBN 7101003273.
Further reading
[edit]- Fontana, Michela (2011). Matteo Ricci: A Jesuit in the Ming Court. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-4422-0586-4.
- Huang, Ray (1974). Taxation and governmental finance in sixteenth-century Ming China. London; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521202833.
- Hawley, Samuel (2005). The Imjin War: Japan's Sixteenth-Century Invasion of Korea and Attempt to Conquer China. Seoul: Royal Asiatic Society, Korea Branch. ISBN 9788995442425.
- Lewis, James B. (2015). The East Asian War, 1592-1598: International Relations, Violence and Memory. Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 9781317662747.
- Puk, Wing-kin (2016). The Rise and Fall of a Public Debt Market in 16th-Century China. The Story of the Ming Salt Certificate. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-30573-1.
- Swope, Kenneth M (2000). "Civil-Military Coordination in the Bozhou Campaign of the Wanli Era". War & Society. 18 (2): 49–70. doi:10.1179/072924700791201667.
- Swope, Kenneth M (January 2005). "Crouching Tigers, Secret Weapons: Military Technology Employed during the Sino-Japanese-Korean War, 1592-1598". Journal of Military History. 69 (1): 11–41. doi:10.1353/jmh.2005.0059.
- Turnbull, Stephen (2002). Samurai Invasion: Japan's Korean War 1592 -1598. London: Cassell & Company. ISBN 9780304359486.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Wanli Emperor at Wikimedia Commons
Wanli Emperor
View on GrokipediaEarly Life and Ascension
Childhood and Education
Zhu Yijun, who would reign as the Wanli Emperor, was born on 4 September 1563 to Zhu Zaiji, the Longqing Emperor (r. 1567–1572), and his consort, Lady Li of the Li clan, who later became Empress Dowager Xiaoding.[9][10] His father, the third son of the Jiajing Emperor, had ascended the throne in 1567 following the death of his brother, but Zhu Yijun's early years were marked by the political turbulence of the late Jiajing and early Longqing eras.[10][11] Following the Longqing Emperor's death on 5 July 1572, the nine-year-old (in Chinese reckoning) Zhu Yijun ascended the throne later that year, with his mother acting as regent alongside the eunuch Feng Bao and the Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng.[10][11] This regency period shaped his formative years, as the young emperor relied on these figures for governance while preparing for rule.[10] Zhu Yijun's education was rigorous and focused on Confucian classics, history, and statecraft, supervised directly by Zhang Juzheng, who enforced a strict daily schedule beginning at dawn with minimal allowances for recreation.[11][12] Historical accounts describe him as intelligent and diligent in his studies during this time, absorbing the principles of imperial administration under Zhang's tutelage, which emphasized fiscal discipline and bureaucratic efficiency.[11][12] This early training laid the foundation for his later governance, though it also instilled a complex relationship with authority figures like his tutor.[10]Accession to the Throne
Zhu Yijun, the future Wanli Emperor, ascended the throne on July 5, 1572, immediately following the death of his father, the Longqing Emperor (Zhu Zaiji), who succumbed to illness at age 35 after a brief reign marked by initial liberalizations.[13][14] As the Longqing Emperor's third son and eldest surviving heir—his two elder brothers having died in infancy—Zhu Yijun's succession proceeded without dispute, adhering to standard Ming dynastic primogeniture among legitimate sons.[15] Born on September 4, 1563, to the Longqing Emperor and his consort Lady Li (later Empress Dowager Li), Zhu Yijun was approximately eight years old by Western reckoning at the time of his enthronement, though Chinese tradition counted him as nine sui.[15][11] The young emperor's mother assumed the role of Empress Dowager and co-regent alongside senior officials, but effective power was vested in Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng, whom the dying Longqing Emperor had explicitly appointed to guide the throne during the heir's minority.[16] The accession rituals, conducted in Beijing's Forbidden City, emphasized continuity of the Mandate of Heaven, with Zhu Yijun receiving the reign era name Wanli ("Ten Thousand Calendars") to signify enduring imperial rule.[11] No significant factional opposition or ritual anomalies marred the transition, allowing the regency to prioritize administrative stability amid ongoing fiscal strains from prior Jiajing-era extravagances.Early Reign under Regency (1572–1582)
Zhang Juzheng's Reforms and Administration
Zhang Juzheng (1525–1582), appointed Chief Grand Secretary in March 1572 following the death of Emperor Longqing, assumed de facto control over Ming administration during the ten-year-old Wanli Emperor's minority, wielding influence through his role as imperial tutor and alliance with eunuch Feng Bao.[17] His reforms targeted entrenched fiscal deficits, bureaucratic inertia, and military vulnerabilities, enforcing measures via imperial edicts, surveillance, and penalties including public floggings for non-compliance.[17] In fiscal policy, Zhang extended the single-whip method (yitiaobianfa) across the empire by 1580, merging diverse land taxes, labor services, and corvée into unified silver assessments proportional to cultivated land, aiming to curb evasion and simplify collection amid silver inflows from global trade.[18] He ordered examinations of tax registers, cancelling arrears in flood-prone areas like Huai-Yang by 1576 and initiating comprehensive land surveys starting in Shandong in 1581 to rectify century-old inaccuracies and hidden holdings, though these faced elite resistance and incomplete execution.[17] Such actions reduced administrative costs, including halving construction expenditures through audits and slashing Beijing's postal relay usage by 60–70 percent, yielding short-term revenue gains that alleviated treasury strains from prior extravagance.[17] Administratively, Zhang introduced the kaochengfa performance evaluation system in 1573, mandating monthly and annual reviews of officials' adherence to directives, with promotions tied to measurable outcomes to combat procrastination and corruption in the vast bureaucracy lacking a prime minister since 1380.[17][19] He curtailed redundant clerical staff, targeting extortion in locales like Suzhou by 1576, and centralized oversight by merging Grand Canal and Yellow River administrations under Wu Guifang in 1578, enhancing logistical efficiency for grain transport.[17] Enforcement proved authoritarian, as seen in the 1577 controversy over waiving his mandatory mourning leave for his father's death, which drew accusations of suppressing remonstrating officials and prioritizing state over Confucian ritual.[17] On military fronts, leveraging the 1571 peace with Mongol leader Altan Khan—which cut frontier defense costs by up to 80 percent—Zhang reinforced northern defenses under generals Tan Lun and Qi Jiguang, erecting walls spanning 700 li (approximately 350 kilometers) and over 1,000 parapets along the Ji-Liao circuit.[17] In 1573, he commissioned a canal from Tongzhou to Miyun to secure grain supplies to Jizhen garrisons, bolstering readiness against residual raids and laying groundwork for Wanli's later campaigns, though without overhauling the hereditary soldier system.[17] These initiatives temporarily restored fiscal balance and administrative discipline, fostering a decade of relative stability, yet their reliance on personal authority unraveled post-1582, with reversals exacerbating Ming decline.[17]Fiscal and Institutional Achievements
Under the regency of Zhang Juzheng from 1572 to 1582, fiscal policies emphasized revenue stabilization and expenditure control, yielding a treasury surplus of silver reserves estimated at two to ten years of annual national tax revenue by 1580.[20] A key measure was the nationwide expansion of the Single Whip Law in 1580, which merged labor services, corvée duties, and miscellaneous levies into a unified silver tax assessed primarily on landholdings, thereby streamlining collection, curbing local corruption, and adapting to a silver-based economy reliant on global inflows.[17] Complementary efforts included canceling accumulated tax arrears by 1579, which alleviated peasant burdens and restored fiscal equity in regions like Suzhou where exemptions had favored elites.[17] Land administration saw a rigorous survey initiated in Shandong in 1581—the first empire-wide cadastre update since the Song dynasty—aimed at verifying arable acreage, reclaiming tax-exempt imperial estates, and rectifying underreporting that had persisted for over a century.[17] [21] These reforms, enforced through audits of local accounts, reduced postal system waste by 60-70% and halved costs for Yellow River dredging while doubling transport capacity by 1579, bolstering grain reserves to full capacity for flood relief by 1576.[17] Frontier defense economies, such as the 1571 peace with Altan Khan, further cut military outlays by up to 80%, redirecting funds to core administration.[17] Institutionally, Zhang introduced the kaocha evaluation system in 1573, mandating performance reviews of lower officials tied to measurable outcomes like policy execution and revenue targets, enforced via detailed registers and imperial edicts to enhance bureaucratic accountability and compliance.[17] This kaocheng fa (examination of achievements law) prioritized merit over tenure, leading to dismissals of underperformers and incentives for diligence, while centralizing oversight reduced provincial autonomy and eunuch interference in appointments.[14] Administrative streamlining eliminated redundant clerks and streamlined the Grand Canal grain transport, ensuring 120,000 piculs shipped by sea in 1571 despite logistical strains.[17] These changes temporarily restored efficiency to a bloated bureaucracy, though reliant on Zhang's personal authority rather than enduring structural overhauls.[17]Personal Governance and Internal Challenges (1582–1620)
Early Personal Engagements
Following Zhang Juzheng's death on 10 July 1582, the Wanli Emperor, at age 19, ended the regency and initiated personal oversight of court affairs, including familial matters. His empress, Wang Xijie (Empress Xiaoduanxian), had been selected by regents and married in 1578 when the emperor was 15; she entered the palace in 1577 and was installed as empress despite her commoner origins, with her father rapidly elevated to a military post.[10][22] The union produced no children, straining adherence to Confucian norms favoring imperial heirs from the primary consort.[23] In December 1582, shortly after assuming personal rule, the emperor fathered his first son, Zhu Changluo (later Taichang Emperor), with a low-born palace maid Wang Shi, elevated posthumously to Consort Gong. This birth established an heir but highlighted tensions due to the mother's humble status, as Confucian officials prioritized primogeniture and maternal lineage.[10] The emperor's growing favoritism toward Noble Consort Zheng (Zheng Guifei), a cultured woman from a merchant family who entered the harem in the late 1570s, intensified personal engagements; she bore daughters early and, in 1586, the third son Zhu Changxun (Prince of Fu), whom the emperor preferred for succession over Changluo.[24][10] These early familial preferences reflected the emperor's shift from regency-imposed restraint to autonomous indulgences, including harem expansions and leisure pursuits, which contrasted with Zhang's austere directives and sowed seeds for bureaucratic resistance. By 1587, Wanli formally dismissed lingering regency influences, further embedding personal choices in governance.[10][11]Imperial Withdrawal and Bureaucratic Paralysis
Following the death of Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng in 1582, the Wanli Emperor reversed many regency-era policies, dismissing key aides like eunuch Feng Bao and initiating a purge of Zhang's associates, which signaled his intent to govern independently. However, escalating tensions with the scholar-official bureaucracy, rooted in disputes over administrative control and personal favoritism, prompted a deeper retreat from public duties. By the late 1580s, amid resistance to his preferred succession choices, the emperor ceased regular attendance at morning court audiences and imperial rituals, confining himself increasingly to the inner palace.[25][24] This withdrawal manifested in a deliberate refusal to process state memoranda, approve promotions, or fill vacancies left by retiring or deceased officials, paralyzing the vast Ming bureaucracy. For nearly three decades—from the 1590s onward—the emperor ignored thousands of pending personnel requests, leaving critical posts in the six ministries and provincial administrations unmanned. By 1612, more than half of all government positions empire-wide stood vacant, as officials awaited imperial endorsement that never came, forcing acting substitutes to operate without formal authority and stalling routine governance.[24][26] The resulting administrative gridlock eroded fiscal oversight, military readiness, and judicial efficiency, as decisions accumulated unresolved and corruption proliferated among overworked surrogates and encroaching eunuch networks. Scholar-officials, bound by Confucian norms emphasizing collective remonstrance, petitioned futilely against the impasse, but the emperor's seclusion—fueled by resentment toward their obstructionism—prevented resolution, transforming a personal standoff into systemic inertia that weakened the dynasty's institutional resilience.[25][26]Reforms in Official Evaluation and Selection
In the initial phase of his personal rule following Zhang Juzheng's death in 1582, the Wanli Emperor endeavored to uphold and enforce a rigorous system of official evaluation inherited from the regency period, which classified civil servants into performance categories—superior, middling, and inferior—based on quantifiable achievements in revenue collection, judicial cases, and administrative duties, with consequences including promotions, demotions, or dismissal. This approach, designed to prioritize competence over seniority or patronage, resulted in significant personnel turnover, as thousands of officials faced downgrading in the triennial appraisals conducted by the Ministry of Personnel.[12] However, bureaucratic resistance mounted, with officials engaging in reciprocal denunciations and shielding allies through inflated ratings, transforming evaluations into factional weapons rather than tools for meritocracy.[27] Wanli's interventions in selection processes further highlighted tensions, as he asserted imperial prerogative to override bureaucratic recommendations, demanding personal vetting of candidates for pivotal posts like governors and ministers to favor those demonstrating loyalty and decisiveness amid fiscal strains and military needs. By 1587, this led to rejections of Ministry of Personnel nominees, exacerbating vacancies; for instance, the chief minister position remained unfilled for extended periods when Wanli vetoed proposed appointees deemed insufficiently aligned with his vision.[28] Such efforts aimed to circumvent entrenched networks that perpetuated inefficiency, but they provoked scholarly opposition rooted in Confucian norms emphasizing collective deliberation, culminating in administrative gridlock where over 100 senior positions languished vacant by the 1590s.[12] The emperor's push for reformed selection extended to military appointments, granting select generals expedited decision-making authority to bypass civilian oversight, reflecting distrust in the civil service's evaluative conservatism during crises like the Imjin War (1592–1598). Yet, without systemic overhaul, these ad hoc measures fostered eunuch influence in appraisals, as palace agents supplanted formal channels, undermining long-term credibility and contributing to factional strife between Donglin scholars and court insiders. Evaluations devolved into nominal exercises by the early 1600s, with mutual protections ensuring minimal accountability, as officials prioritized survival over performance amid the emperor's growing disengagement.[2] This erosion highlighted the limits of autocratic reform against a self-preserving bureaucracy, presaging broader Ming decline.[28]Key Controversies and Political Crises
Succession Dispute and Confucian Conflicts
The succession dispute emerged in the late 1580s when the Wanli Emperor, Zhu Yijun, sought to designate his third son, Zhu Changxun (born 8 December 1586 to his favored Noble Consort Zheng), as heir apparent over his eldest son, Zhu Changluo (born 28 August 1582 to a low-ranking palace maid, Wang Shi).[11][5] The emperor's favoritism toward Consort Zheng, whom he attempted to elevate in status, clashed with Ming dynastic law and Confucian orthodoxy, which mandated primogeniture: the throne passing to the eldest legitimate son irrespective of maternal rank, to preserve ritual order and ancestral precedent.[29][5] Bureaucratic opposition intensified after the death of regent Zhang Juzheng in 1582, with Grand Secretary Shen Yiguan and other officials petitioning repeatedly for Zhu Changluo's investiture, arguing that the emperor's delay violated filial piety toward the imperial lineage and risked dynastic instability.[5] Wanli rejected these demands, viewing them as encroachments on his sovereign prerogative, and by 1589, he briefly acquiesced to naming Changluo but retracted amid pressure from Consort Zheng's faction, prolonging the crisis.[29] This standoff escalated Confucian conflicts, as literati officials accused the emperor of prioritizing personal affections over li (ritual propriety) and state duties, fostering factional strife between pro-eldest-son adherents and those aligned with the throne's desires.[29][5] The emperor's refusal to appoint an heir extended to broader governance paralysis; from the early 1590s, Wanli ceased attending grand audiences and endorsing memorials or promotions, leaving key posts vacant—such as ministers of the Six Boards—for up to two decades, as he deemed many candidates insufficiently supportive of his succession preferences.[24] This "strike" deepened rifts with the Confucian bureaucracy, who saw it as abdication of the Mandate of Heaven, prompting protests and memorials that the emperor ignored, further entrenching administrative gridlock.[24][29] Resolution came only on 20 July 1601, when mounting pressure from Empress Dowager Li (Wanli's mother) and the threat of institutional collapse forced the formal investiture of the 19-year-old Zhu Changluo as crown prince, while Zhu Changxun was enfeoffed as Prince of Fu.[11] Yet the emperor's bitterness persisted, sustaining his withdrawal until his death in 1620 and underscoring the limits of imperial authority against entrenched Confucian norms, which scholars later critiqued as exposing the dynasty's vulnerability to personal caprice over collective ritual imperatives.[29][5]Mine Tax Crisis and Fiscal Abuses
In 1596, amid treasury depletion from military campaigns, palace reconstructions following fires, and the emperor's personal expenditures, the Wanli Emperor launched a mining and tax collection initiative by dispatching over 30 eunuchs as imperial agents to provinces across China.[30] These eunuchs were tasked with opening silver and other metal mines, levying taxes on mining output and associated trade, and filling the inner court treasury directly, circumventing the regular bureaucracy which the emperor viewed with antagonism due to its opposition to his fiscal demands.[30] This move reflected the emperor's strategy to assert personal control over revenues, as bureaucratic parsimony had constrained imperial access to funds since the death of Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng in 1582.[12] The eunuch-led system engendered severe fiscal abuses, including extortionate tax quotas, coercion of local populations into unpaid labor for mine development, and violent suppression of dissent by armed retinues.[31] Local officials and gentry, fearing accountability for unrest, often protested or resigned, while peasants and merchants faced arbitrary seizures and beatings, leading to riots in mining regions such as Yunnan, where a eunuch mining superintendent was killed by protesters in 1606.[32] These practices not only failed to generate sustainable revenue—due to overexploitation depleting accessible ores and driving away skilled labor—but also exacerbated economic grievances, as taxes were collected in silver amid fluctuating inflows from global trade.[30] The crisis peaked between 1596 and 1606, with the eunuchs' unchecked authority fostering corruption that military officers and court officials could not effectively curb, despite occasional alliances against specific abusers.[30] In 1602, during a period of imperial illness, an edict temporarily abolished the mine tax to appease critics, but the emperor soon nullified it, prolonging the disruptions until broader fiscal exhaustion and bureaucratic pressure forced a de facto wind-down.[33] This episode highlighted the causal link between the emperor's withdrawal from routine governance and reliance on eunuchs, which prioritized short-term extraction over long-term stability, contributing to the Ming state's accumulating financial vulnerabilities.[12]Factional Strife: Donglin Movement and Eunuch Influence
The Donglin Movement emerged in the late Wanli reign as a coalition of scholar-officials centered on the restored Donglin Academy in Wuxi, Jiangsu province. In 1604, Gu Xiancheng (1550–1612), a former grand secretary dismissed for opposing court policies, collaborated with Gao Panlong (1562–1626) and others to revive the academy, issuing statutes for the Donglin Huiyue conference that emphasized Confucian moral cultivation and critique of political corruption.[34] This group, drawing from southeastern elites, positioned itself against perceived ethical decay at court, including the emperor's prolonged withdrawal from governance and favoritism in succession matters, where they advocated for the eldest son Zhu Changluo over the third son Zhu Changxun.[34] Factional tensions intensified as Donglin adherents memorialized against bureaucratic abuses and the expanding role of eunuchs, whom the Wanli Emperor increasingly employed as tax supervisors to fund palace expenditures amid fiscal shortfalls. Beginning in the 1580s and peaking in the 1590s–1610s, the emperor dispatched over 30 eunuchs as agents to collect mining and commercial taxes, bypassing regular officials and leading to widespread extortion, violence, and provincial unrest.[30] Donglin figures, such as Wei Yunzhong, publicly opposed these "mine tax envoys," arguing they undermined Confucian hierarchy and exacerbated popular suffering, prompting retaliatory dismissals and deepening rifts between moralist literati and pro-eunuch court elements.[34] The emperor's distrust of grand secretaries and reliance on eunuch intermediaries further empowered palace factions, with Donglin criticism extending to figures like the early influential eunuch Feng Bao and later tax agents, fostering a cycle of memorials, impeachments, and countersuits. By 1605–1606, Wanli acknowledged eunuch corruption in tax collection but did not fully dismantle the system, sustaining conflicts that polarized the bureaucracy into Donglin-aligned reformers and opponents, including rival cliques like the Qi, Chu, and Xuan parties.[12] This strife highlighted causal tensions between imperial autocracy and bureaucratic oversight, as eunuch interventions, intended to circumvent official obstruction, instead amplified factionalism and eroded administrative efficacy.[2]Economic Conditions and Developments
Agricultural Expansion and New World Crops
During the Wanli Emperor's reign (1572–1620), Ming agriculture experienced significant expansion through land reclamation, commercialization, and regional specialization, with increased cultivation of cash crops such as cotton, silk, and tobacco to meet growing market demands. [35] This period saw population growth driving further arable land development, as more marginal areas were brought under plow, supported by state investments in irrigation canals and reduced agricultural taxes to as low as 1.5% of output. [36] Regional specialization emerged, with southern provinces emphasizing rice and mulberry for silk, while northern areas focused on grains and fibers, enhancing overall productivity despite periodic droughts like the Wanli Drought of 1585–1588. [37] [35] The introduction of New World crops from the Americas via Spanish trade routes markedly bolstered this expansion, particularly through maize (Zea mays), sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas), and peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), which were adapted to diverse Chinese ecologies. [38] Maize arrived in coastal regions like Fujian by the mid-16th century, likely in the 1550s, and spread inland via Hakka migrants, enabling cultivation on dry, upland soils unsuitable for rice. [39] Sweet potatoes, imported through the Manila galleon trade around the late 16th century, proved drought-resistant and high-yielding on hilly terrains, with Fujianese farmers promoting their use during famines such as the 1594 Henan crisis. [40] [41] Peanuts, also entering via southern ports, supplemented oil and protein needs on sandy soils, diversifying diets and reducing reliance on traditional staples. [35] These crops' impacts were profound, facilitating population increases by supporting intensive farming on previously underutilized lands and mitigating famine risks amid climatic variability, though adoption varied by region and was initially limited to southern provinces before northern diffusion. [38] By enabling multi-cropping and higher caloric outputs—sweet potatoes yielding up to three times rice on marginal plots—they contributed to the late Ming economic boom, though over-reliance later exacerbated ecological strains. [40] Empirical records indicate these introductions correlated with expanded cultivated acreage, from approximately 5–6 million dan of grain stocks in key granaries during the Wanli era, underscoring their role in sustaining imperial granary systems. [37]Silver Economy, Trade, and Coinage
The Wanli Emperor's reign saw the deepening integration of silver into the Ming economy through the Single Whip Reform of 1581, which unified labor, grain, and other levies into a single silver tax assessment to streamline collection and reduce evasion.[42] This policy, advanced by Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng, marked a shift from diverse in-kind payments to silver taels, fostering monetization at local levels and enabling broader market exchanges across agricultural and commercial sectors.[42] By standardizing fiscal obligations in silver—typically sycee ingots of varying purity and weight—the reform supported administrative efficiency but heightened dependence on stable silver supplies for state revenue, which reached approximately 30 million taels annually by the late 16th century.[43] Silver's scarcity domestically necessitated massive imports, primarily from Japanese mines like Iwami Ginzan and New World sources transported via Manila galleons, with China absorbing over half of global silver output between the 1540s and 1630s.[44] From 1565 to the early 17th century, Spanish galleons delivered an estimated 100-150 million pesos of Mexican and Peruvian silver to Manila, much of which merchants smuggled into China in exchange for silk, porcelain, and tea, bypassing official sea bans (haijin) through Fujian ports.[45][46] This influx, peaking during Wanli's middle years, lowered silver's relative value against copper and gold by roughly half, stimulating trade volumes but also contributing to inflationary pressures in urban markets like Suzhou and Nanjing. Coinage remained bimetallic, with copper cash coins (e.g., Wanli Tongbao issues from imperial mints) handling small transactions while silver taels dominated larger commerce and taxation, as failed paper currency experiments like baochao eroded trust in fiat alternatives. The absence of standardized silver coinage—relying instead on weighed sycee—facilitated flexibility but invited debasement and disputes over purity, exacerbating fiscal strains during Wanli's later withdrawal when eunuch-led mining taxes disrupted supply chains.[43] Overall, the silver economy propelled Ming commercialization, integrating regional markets for staples like rice and silk, yet vulnerability to foreign inflows sowed seeds for shortages by the 1610s, as Japanese exports waned post-Imjin War and American shipments fluctuated.[47][44]Industrial Growth and Taxation Pressures
During the Wanli Emperor's reign (1573–1620), the Ming economy experienced significant commercialization, particularly in handicraft industries such as textiles, porcelain, and iron production. Textile manufacturing expanded in regions like Jiangnan, Shanxi, and Fujian, driven by rising domestic and export demand for silk and cotton fabrics, with cotton cultivation and processing gaining prominence in northern provinces like Shandong and Shanxi by the late 16th century.[35] Porcelain production at Jingdezhen reached high levels of output and artistic refinement, exemplified by wucai and blue-and-white wares that fueled global trade, as evidenced by multiple shipwrecks from the era carrying vast cargoes of these goods to Southeast Asia and beyond.[48] Iron smelting and other metallurgical activities also proliferated through privatization of state monopolies, contributing to increased industrial capacity and proto-capitalist tendencies in urban centers.[35] These industrial advances, however, coincided with mounting taxation pressures that strained the agrarian base and fueled social discontent. Fiscal demands escalated due to military expenditures, including the Imjin War (1592–1598), and responses to natural disasters, prompting the imposition of surtaxes and irregular levies that exacerbated peasant burdens.[35] The Single-Whip Reform, consolidated earlier in the dynasty, shifted taxes toward silver payments but failed to prevent abuses, particularly under eunuch-led collections during the Wanli era, which often involved extortion and met resistance from local officials.[49] The controversial mine tax initiative of the late 1590s, intended to bolster revenues through silver extraction, resulted in minimal production but widespread bureaucratic opposition and public extortion, highlighting the regime's fiscal desperation amid decentralized tax administration.[31] Empirical data from the period indicate a direct correlation between tax hikes and unrest, with a 1% increase in taxation linked to a 3.3% rise in peasant rebellions, reflecting the causal pressures of over-extraction on an economy where industrial gains did not uniformly alleviate rural hardships.[50] Despite overall economic prosperity from trade and production, state finances deteriorated, as wartime and disaster relief outpaced revenues, leading to corruption and a growing gap between merchant wealth and peasant impoverishment by the reign's end.[49]Climate Impacts and Natural Disasters
The reign of the Wanli Emperor coincided with the Little Ice Age, a period of cooler global temperatures from roughly the 14th to 19th centuries that brought shorter growing seasons, reduced precipitation variability, and increased frequency of extreme weather events to China, including droughts and floods that disrupted agriculture across northern and central regions.[51] These climatic shifts, evidenced by tree-ring data and historical records, shortened frost-free periods by up to several weeks in some areas, leading to recurrent crop failures in staple grains like wheat and millet, which underpinned Ming food security.[52] While not solely causative of dynastic decline, such conditions amplified existing fiscal and administrative weaknesses by necessitating repeated state relief efforts amid bureaucratic inertia.[51] A prominent example was the Wanli Drought (1585–1588 CE), one of the most severe mega-droughts in northern China during the Ming era, spanning provinces like Henan, Shaanxi, and Shanxi, where precipitation deficits exceeded 50% below normal levels for multiple consecutive years, as reconstructed from paleoclimate proxies such as stalagmite records and instrumental analogs.[37] [53] This event triggered widespread famines, with historical annals documenting mass migrations, elevated grain prices, and localized rebellions, as northern farmlands desiccated and rivers like the Yellow River ran low, hindering irrigation and transport.[54] State responses included tax remissions and porridge distribution, but their scale was limited by the emperor's withdrawal from governance, resulting in uneven implementation and persistent rural distress.[53] Later in the reign, from 1615 to 1619, a sequence of droughts interspersed with flash floods and sandstorms—exacerbated by deforestation and soil erosion in overfarmed regions—further compounded vulnerabilities, particularly in the Yellow River basin and Shandong, where anomalous cold snaps and erratic monsoons led to harvest shortfalls affecting millions.[55] These disasters correlated with outbreaks of locusts and epidemics, as drier conditions facilitated pest proliferation and weakened populations, straining imperial granaries already depleted by military campaigns.[56] Paleoclimate analyses link these patterns to intensified East Asian winter monsoon activity, reducing summer rainfall reliability and underscoring the era's transition toward more volatile hydroclimatic regimes that foreshadowed the dynasty's terminal crises post-1620.[57]Cultural and Intellectual Sphere
Imperial Patronage: Calligraphy, Painting, and Poetry
The Wanli Emperor practiced calligraphy daily from the beginning of his reign in 1572 until around 1578, under the supervision of Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng, focusing on model writings (fatie) to develop writing proficiency rather than aesthetic refinement.[58] Lessons were conducted by court calligraphers (shishu guan) between morning and afternoon Daily Lecture sessions, with the emperor studying styles of historical masters including Wang Xianzhi, Yu Shinan, and Mi Fu.[58] In 1573, he gifted calligraphic works such as "Principal Support" and "Good Minister" to Zhang Juzheng and official Lü Tiaoyang.[58] These sessions were eventually canceled due to the emperor's excessive indulgence, as they were deemed non-essential to governance.[58] Later, in 1601, Wanli personally transcribed the Sutra of Miaosha in gold on black paper, emulating the style of Yan Zhenqing, for prayer purposes; this album is preserved in the Tokyo National Museum.[58][59] His mother, Empress Dowager Cisheng, also practiced calligraphy, influencing his work and producing plaques for sites like the Pavilion of Peaceful Tranquility.[58] Although Wanli did not personally engage in painting, he commissioned significant court artworks during his reign. In 1583, to commemorate his visit to the construction site of his Dingling mausoleum, he ordered the production of Imperial Procession Departing from the Forbidden City and Returning to the Forbidden City, executed by painters from the Directorate of Ceremonial and featuring the eunuch Zhang Hong.[58] These hanging scrolls, now in the National Palace Museum, Taipei, depict imperial processions with detailed entourage and landscapes.[58][60] In 1581, following a military review organized by Zhang Juzheng, he commissioned a Grand Review painting to record the event.[58] During Daily Lectures from 1573, Wanli viewed didactic paintings from the Admonitory Mirrors of Emperors series, compiled by Zhang and lecturers to illustrate virtuous and flawed rulers.[58] He also interacted with the imperial collection, such as requesting poems for earlier works like the Xuande-era Black Rabbit painting in 1581 and appreciating pieces like Yongle's Zou yu from 1404.[58] Court painters active under his patronage included Wu Bin and Gu Bing, who produced landscapes and Buddhist-themed works blending Ming and Tibetan styles, as seen in Fahai Temple murals.[58] Wanli's engagement with poetry was primarily as a patron rather than a composer, ordering officials to produce verses tied to artistic or auspicious events. In 1581, he directed grand secretaries to compose 36 poems on the Xuande Black Rabbit painting, which were mounted alongside the artwork.[58] Similarly, in 1586, he commissioned poems celebrating auspicious lotuses that appeared at Cisheng's palace.[58] His broader artistic patronage, often aligned with Buddhist devotion influenced by Cisheng, extended to sponsoring the reprinting of the Yongle Edition of the Northern Tripitaka in 1586 and two sutras dedicated to Jiulian Pusa.[58] These efforts served to proclaim imperial legitimacy and filial piety amid political challenges.[58]Literature, Drama, and the Book Market
The Wanli era (1573–1620) witnessed a surge in vernacular literature, particularly novels and drama, reflecting broader commercialization of cultural production amid economic prosperity in southern China. Despite the emperor's withdrawal from active governance, cultural output flourished independently of imperial patronage, driven by urban elites and merchants who consumed entertainment-oriented works in everyday language rather than classical Chinese. This shift prioritized narrative accessibility over moralistic orthodoxy, enabling tales of adventure, romance, and social critique to gain popularity.[61] Drama, especially the chuanqi form, reached new heights with Tang Xianzu's The Peony Pavilion (Mudan ting), completed in 1598, which explored themes of love transcending death and critiqued rigid Confucian norms through the story of Du Liniang's ghostly romance. Performed widely in teahouses and private gatherings, such plays drew from regional opera traditions and appealed to a growing audience beyond scholar-officials, fostering public discourse on emotion versus duty. Tang's work, often compared to Shakespearean tragedy for its psychological depth, exemplified the era's tension between individualism and societal expectations, though it faced censorship attempts for perceived heterodoxy.[62] Vernacular novels proliferated, with early editions of Water Margin (Shuihu zhuan) and Jin Ping Mei (c. 1610) depicting bandit heroism and domestic intrigue, respectively, often incorporating erotic and satirical elements that challenged elite propriety. These texts, printed in affordable editions, circulated via lending libraries and street vendors, indicating a market responsive to popular tastes rather than state ideology. The Wanli Emperor himself dispatched eunuchs to acquire such novels and dramas, underscoring personal imperial interest in escapist reading amid political disengagement.[11] The book market expanded dramatically through private commercial printing, centered in hubs like Jianyang (Fujian) and Hangzhou, where woodblock technology enabled mass production of illustrated texts at low cost—one mace (about 3.7 grams of silver) for basic volumes, making them accessible to minor gentry and merchants. Polychrome printing innovations by firms such as Min Chiji in Wuxing during the Wanli reign enhanced visual appeal, boosting sales of fiction and encyclopedias. This commercialization, peaking from the Wanli period onward, diversified output to include almanacs, medical guides, and travelogues, but also invited piracy and quality variance, as printers prioritized volume over editorial rigor. By 1620, an estimated thousands of imprints annually supported a literate public estimated at 1–2% of the population, concentrated in urban areas, fueling intellectual ferment that persisted into the dynasty's fall.[63][64][65]Philosophy, Examinations, and Social Norms
During the Wanli Emperor's reign (1572–1620), Neo-Confucianism remained the prevailing philosophical orthodoxy, particularly the Cheng-Zhu interpretation of rational principle (li) and investigative learning (gewu), which underpinned state ideology and moral governance. This school, formalized in the imperial academy curriculum, prioritized textual exegesis of Confucian classics to cultivate bureaucratic virtue and cosmic order. However, Wang Yangming's rival school of mind (xinxue), stressing intuitive knowledge (liangzhi) and the inseparability of knowledge from action, exerted growing influence among literati, fostering personal moral autonomy over rote scholarship and appealing to those disillusioned with institutional rigidity. By the late Ming, Wang's ideas permeated intellectual circles, contributing to debates on ethical reform amid perceived dynastic decline, though they faced official suspicion for deviating from exam-prescribed norms.[66][67] The civil service examination system (keju), central to elite recruitment, operated on a triennial cycle with escalating tiers: provincial exams yielding shengyuan (licentiates) quotas of 5–10 per county depending on provincial size, metropolitan exams producing juren (recommended men), and palace exams crowning jinshi (presented scholars) numbering around 300 successful candidates per cycle. These tests demanded mastery of the Four Books and Five Classics under Cheng-Zhu commentary, using the eight-legged essay format to enforce stylistic uniformity and doctrinal fidelity, thereby linking scholarly success to Confucian orthodoxy. Under Wanli, the system sustained bureaucratic meritocracy but increasingly drew criticism for favoring mnemonic skills over practical governance, exacerbating factionalism as repeat failures fueled literati discontent and private academies proliferated beyond state oversight.[68] Social norms adhered strictly to Confucian hierarchies, encapsulated in the "five relationships" (wulun) of ruler-subject, father-son, husband-wife, elder-younger brother, and friend-friend, enforcing reciprocal duties with authority vested in superiors to maintain cosmic and social harmony. Family structures emphasized patrilineal descent, filial piety (xiao), and multi-generational co-residence under patriarchal authority, where sons inherited property and performed ancestral rites, while daughters married out to reinforce clan alliances. Late Ming commercialization subtly eroded rigid class barriers—scholars (shi), farmers (nong), artisans (gong), and merchants (shang)—as merchant wealth challenged scholarly prestige, yet Confucian ethics persisted in regulating conduct, condemning heterodoxy and upholding moral self-cultivation as societal bedrock. Gender norms subordinated women to male kin, promoting chastity, obedience, and practices like footbinding among elites to symbolize refinement, though urban prosperity occasionally afforded limited female literacy in gentry households.[69][70]Military Engagements and Foreign Policy
Restoration of Military Capacity
Under the guidance of Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng from 1572 to 1582, the Ming court implemented fiscal and administrative reforms that bolstered military funding and readiness, addressing chronic issues like soldier desertion and inadequate pay stemming from mid-dynasty corruption and hereditary soldier decline.[71] The single-whip reform, aggressively expanded under Zhang, consolidated labor, grain, and miscellaneous taxes into silver payments by 1581, simplifying collection and generating revenue estimated at over 30 million taels annually by the 1590s, much of which supported military stipends and logistics.[19][3] This shift reduced evasion and enabled the court to clear arrears, increasing effective soldier numbers from a nominal 1.5 million to more deployable forces capable of sustaining campaigns.[2] A nationwide land survey initiated in 1582, though completed post-Zhang, verified taxable acreage and curbed elite tax avoidance, yielding an additional 4-5 million mu of registered land and bolstering the military budget through higher yields.[71] Zhang's kaochengfa performance evaluation system extended to military officials, enforcing accountability by linking promotions to verifiable achievements, such as troop training and border fortifications, which reduced graft and improved unit cohesion.[19] These measures prioritized military efficacy as a core reform goal, with Zhang framing them as a revival of early Ming discipline, enabling the dynasty to field 40,000-50,000 troops for the Ningxia suppression by 1592 without immediate fiscal collapse.[2] The Wanli Emperor actively endorsed these efforts, granting Zhang authority over military appointments and personally reviewing border defenses, which facilitated the integration of firearms like the folangji (Frankish) cannon into garrisons by the late 1580s, enhancing firepower against nomadic threats.[72] Post-1582, despite bureaucratic resistance and Zhang's posthumous disgrace in 1587, the restored capacity proved viable for multi-front operations, as evidenced by the dynasty's ability to mobilize over 100,000 troops for the Imjin intervention starting 1592, though long-term sustainability waned due to escalating costs exceeding 10 million taels yearly.[73] This buildup marked a temporary reversal of the military atrophy under Jiajing and Longqing emperors, rooted in fiscal realism rather than doctrinal innovation.[2]Internal Rebellions: Ningxia and Yang Yinglong
The Ningxia mutiny erupted in March 1592 among garrison troops stationed in the strategic northwestern fortress of Ningxia, triggered by arrears in military pay, harsh conditions, and alliances with local Mongol elements dissatisfied with Ming oversight. The primary leaders included the Mongol general Pubei, who served in the Ming army, and Bo Cheng'en, alongside Chinese officer Liu Dongyang, who coordinated with external Mongol reinforcements to seize control of the city and challenge central authority.[2] Wanli Emperor Zhu Yijun responded decisively by mobilizing approximately 40,000 troops under commanders such as Li Rusong and Mei Guozhen, drawing forces from Shaanxi and other border regions to besiege the rebels.[2] Ming forces employed coordinated assaults, leveraging artillery and infantry to recapture key positions, culminating in the mutineers' surrender by October 1592 after prolonged sieges that exploited the rebels' supply shortages and internal divisions.[2] Rebel leaders Pubei and Bo Cheng'en were executed by dismemberment, while others faced summary execution, effectively quelling the uprising and restoring Ming control over the Ordos frontier.[2] The campaign's success, achieved at significant cost in resources and lives—though exact casualty figures remain imprecise in surviving records—demonstrated Wanli's capacity for direct imperial oversight in military affairs, temporarily bolstering frontier stability before resources shifted to the Imjin War in Korea.[2] The Yang Yinglong rebellion, centered in the southwestern tusi (native chieftain) domain of Bozhou (modern Zunyi, Guizhou), simmered from 1587 amid succession disputes, intertribal warfare among Miao groups, and Yang's defiance of central directives, including refusal to dispatch his heir as a hostage and allegations of personal crimes such as the murder of a concubine.[74] Yang Yinglong, hereditary tusi of mixed Han-Miao descent, consolidated power through regalia and alliances but escalated open revolt in 1599 by fortifying strongholds, sabotaging Ming infrastructure via spies, and rallying over 20,000 followers against perceived encroachments on his autonomy within the tusi system.[74] Wanli appointed civil officials Li Hualong as supreme commander for Sichuan and Shaanxi troops and Guo Zizhang for Guizhou forces, assembling a coalition exceeding 240,000 soldiers from multiple provinces to encircle Bozhou.[74] Ming strategy emphasized divide-and-conquer tactics, sowing discord among Yang's kin by recognizing his son Yang Chaodong as nominal successor early in the campaign, while advancing with harquebus-equipped infantry and sieges that methodically reduced rebel fortifications over three months from March 1600.[74] The rebellion collapsed following the death of Yang's key general Yang Zhu in battle, prompting Yang Yinglong to commit suicide by self-immolation; Li Hualong's report documented over 22,000 rebel deaths and the capture of Bozhou, at a fiscal cost of roughly 2 million taels for the 100-day operation.[74] Post-suppression, the Ming implemented gaitu guiliu reforms, abolishing the tusi structure in Bozhou and installing appointed officials, which expanded direct administrative control but strained resources amid concurrent foreign commitments.[75] These internal suppressions highlighted Wanli's reliance on civil-military coordination but also exposed fiscal vulnerabilities in managing peripheral threats.[2]Imjin War: Intervention in Korea
In late 1592, following urgent appeals from the Joseon court after Japan's invasion on April 23, 1592, the Wanli Emperor authorized military intervention to defend China's tributary vassal Korea, viewing the Japanese advance as a potential threat to Ming borders and the tributary system.[76] After quelling the Ningxia rebellion in October 1592, Wanli ordered General Li Rusong to lead an initial force of approximately 40,000 troops across the Yalu River into Korea on January 27, 1593.[77] Li Rusong's army, comprising northern Ming garrisons experienced in steppe warfare, advanced rapidly and laid siege to Japanese-occupied Pyongyang, recapturing the city on February 5, 1593, after fierce fighting against Konishi Yukinaga's forces.[76] This victory forced Japanese troops to retreat southward toward Seoul, marking the first major Ming success, though logistical challenges and ambushes, such as the Battle of Byeokjegwan on February 27, 1593, where Ming forces suffered heavy losses and withdrew, highlighted vulnerabilities in extended operations.[77] Wanli reinforced the campaign with additional troops, committing up to 75,000 soldiers by the war's later phases, coordinating with Joseon forces to stalemate Japanese advances.[78] The intervention escalated into a prolonged conflict, with a fragile truce in 1596 collapsing amid failed negotiations; Japan relaunched invasions in 1597, prompting further Ming deployments under commanders like Ma Gui.[77] Ming artillery and cavalry proved decisive in key engagements, such as the failed Japanese offensives in 1598, culminating in Toyotomi Hideyoshi's death on September 18, 1598, which led to Japanese withdrawal by December.[76] The war preserved Joseon independence and Ming suzerainty but at high cost, with approximately 30,000 Ming casualties and expenditures straining the treasury amid pre-existing deficits, exacerbating fiscal pressures that contributed to later dynastic weaknesses.[77] Wanli's strategic oversight emphasized offensive defense of the tributary order, though court debates revealed divisions over resource allocation.[72]Border Diplomacy: Russia, Europe, and Southeast Asia
Diplomatic interactions between the Ming dynasty and Russia remained minimal during the Wanli Emperor's reign. The earliest significant contact occurred late in his rule, with a Russian embassy led by Ivan Petlin departing from Tomsk in May 1618 and arriving in Beijing by August. Lacking gifts considered sufficiently impressive for imperial attention, the mission achieved little beyond basic observations of the court.[79] Prior Russian overtures in the 1550s and 1560s had elicited no reciprocal engagement from Ming authorities, as Moscow adopted a policy of restraint, avoiding further initiatives for nearly four decades thereafter.[80] No formal border demarcations or treaties emerged, with Russian eastward expansion into Siberia not yet posing direct territorial challenges to Ming frontiers in the northeast. Contacts with Europe were indirect and centered on Jesuit missionary efforts rather than state-to-state diplomacy. In January 1601, Italian Jesuit Matteo Ricci gained entry to the Forbidden City following invitations tied to the emperor's interest in Western mechanical devices and astronomical knowledge. Ricci presented gifts including a chiming clock and his Kunyu Wanguo Quantu world map, which depicted Europe and integrated Chinese cartographic traditions; the map was produced in Beijing in 1602 at Wanli's behest.[81] Though Wanli refrained from personal audiences due to his withdrawal from court affairs, he authorized Ricci's residence in the capital alongside companion Diego de Pantoja, enabling limited exchanges of scientific instruments and texts.[82] Upon Ricci's death in 1610, the emperor granted permission for his burial in Beijing, a rare honor signaling tolerance for Jesuit presence but not formal alliances.[82] These interactions prioritized technological curiosities over geopolitical negotiation, with no broader European powers establishing direct diplomatic channels. In Southeast Asia, Ming border diplomacy under Wanli emphasized preservation of the tributary framework for regional stability, supplemented by economic inducements and trade controls amid persistent maritime smuggling. Relations with Annam (northern Vietnam) involved routine tribute missions from the Lê dynasty, reinforcing nominal suzerainty without military intervention following the earlier 15th-century withdrawal.[83] Similar deference characterized ties to Siam and Burma, where Ming policy deterred threats through prestige and selective aid rather than expansion.[84] Official haijin sea bans notwithstanding, private commerce thrived, as indicated by at least six documented Wanli-era shipwrecks laden with porcelain and goods en route to Southeast Asian ports, underscoring the limits of enforcement and the pull of lucrative exchanges.[48] Wanli's disengagement from routine governance constrained proactive measures, yielding a defensive posture focused on containing piracy and upholding tribute without transformative agreements.[83]Rise of Jurchen Threats
The Jurchens, semi-nomadic tribes inhabiting the northeastern frontiers of the Ming Empire, were divided into competing confederations such as Jianzhou, Haixi, and Ula during the late 16th century, often engaging in intertribal warfare while nominally submitting tribute to the Ming court.[85] Nurhaci, born in 1559 to the Aisin Giorro clan of the Jianzhou Jurchens, inherited leadership in 1583 following the deaths of his grandfather and father, who had served as Ming auxiliaries.[86] That same year, he initiated unification efforts by defeating and beheading Nikan Wailan, a rival Jurchen chieftain responsible for the killings of his kin, thereby consolidating control over Jianzhou territories with implicit Ming tolerance as a counter to other border threats.[86] From 1583 to the early 1600s, Nurhaci conducted systematic military campaigns against fragmented Jurchen groups, subjugating the Haixi and Ula confederations by 1613 through alliances, battles, and strategic marriages, while incorporating Mongol allies to bolster his forces.[85] By 1589, he had emerged dominant in regional clan struggles, expanding his domain and establishing administrative structures, including the creation of hereditary military banners in 1615 to organize his growing army of approximately 60,000 warriors.[85] These reforms emphasized discipline and loyalty, enabling rapid mobilization and contributing to the absorption of over 30 Jurchen tribes under centralized rule.[87] Ming policy initially viewed Nurhaci favorably, granting him titles such as Commander of the Jianzhou Guard and employing him against Mongol incursions and rival Jurchens, particularly under generals like Li Chengliang, who facilitated his early expansions in the 1580s and 1590s.[88] However, as Nurhaci's power consolidated—evidenced by his 1599 bestowal of the Dragon-Tiger General title by the Ming—court officials increasingly warned of his ambitions, though Emperor Wanli's disengagement from administration after the 1580s limited decisive countermeasures.[88] By the early 1600s, Nurhaci's refusal to fully submit and his overtures to Korea in 1607, declaring himself khan, signaled shifting loyalties and heightened Ming concerns over northeastern border stability.[89] The threats escalated decisively in 1616 when Nurhaci proclaimed the Later Jin state at Hetu Ala, rejecting Ming suzerainty and adopting imperial regalia, followed in 1618 by the "Seven Grievances" memorial denouncing Ming mistreatment and justifying rebellion.[89] That year, his forces captured Fushun, a key Ming fortress in Liaodong, killing the defender Li Yongfang and seizing artillery, which exposed vulnerabilities in Ming defenses manned by underpaid, poorly trained troops.[88] In 1619, at the Battle of Sarhu, Nurhaci's 60,000 banners decisively routed a Ming army of over 100,000 under Yang Hao, employing ambushes and exploiting divided command, resulting in massive Ming casualties and the loss of Liaodong strongholds.[89] Wanli's belated mobilization failed to stem the momentum, as fiscal strains from prior wars and internal factionalism hampered reinforcements, marking the onset of existential peril to Ming northern frontiers by 1620.[88]Family, Death, and Legacy
Consorts, Issue, and Personal Relationships
The Wanli Emperor's principal consort was Empress Xiaoduanxian of the Wang clan, selected through imperial selection processes and wed in 1578 at the age of approximately 13. She originated from a modest family in Shandong province and maintained a reserved, dignified demeanor throughout her tenure, which spanned over four decades until her death in 1620 from illness. Despite her position, she bore no children, adhering to Confucian ideals of imperial harmony without personal favoritism influencing state affairs.[90] His most influential relationship was with Noble Consort Zheng, who entered the palace around 1583 and rapidly ascended to the rank of Imperial Noble Consort (Guifei) in 1586 due to the emperor's affections. Born circa 1565 and surviving until 1630, she exerted significant personal sway, prompting Wanli's prolonged resistance to official duties as he sought to elevate her status and their son. This favoritism fueled court tensions, as Zheng's background as a low-ranking entrant contrasted with traditional hierarchies, leading to accusations of undue influence over imperial decisions.[91] The emperor fathered numerous offspring, with records indicating up to nine sons and ten daughters across various consorts, though infant mortality claimed many. The eldest surviving son, Zhu Changluo (born 1582 to a concubine surnamed Wang of lowly origins), was designated crown prince only in 1601 after a protracted succession dispute; he later reigned briefly as the Taichang Emperor before his death in 1620. Wanli persistently advocated for his third son, Zhu Changxun (born 1586 to Noble Consort Zheng), as heir, citing personal preference over primogeniture, which Confucian officials rejected as violating ancestral precedent and dynastic stability. This conflict, spanning 1587 to 1614, exemplifies the emperor's prioritization of intimate ties over bureaucratic norms, exacerbating administrative paralysis. Other notable issue included Zhu Changhao, the second son who died young, and several princesses granted titles like Princess Yunmeng.[8][91] Personal dynamics within the inner court reflected broader Ming tensions between imperial autonomy and ritual orthodoxy. Wanli's estrangement from Empress Wang stemmed from her childlessness and perceived emotional distance, contrasting sharply with his devotion to Zheng, whom he reportedly visited nightly and defended against critics. Such relationships, while private, intersected with governance, as the heir dispute halted appointments and policy execution for years, underscoring causal links between familial preferences and state dysfunction absent empirical overrides of tradition.[24]| Key Consorts | Status and Relation |
|---|---|
| Empress Xiaoduanxian (Wang Xijie, d. 1620) | Principal wife; no issue; died shortly before emperor. |
| Noble Consort Zheng (c. 1565–1630) | Favorite; mother of Zhu Changxun; central to succession conflict. |
| Concubine Wang (fl. 1580s) | Mother of eldest son Zhu Changluo; low palace status. |