Hubbry Logo
AblationAblationMain
Open search
Ablation
Community hub
Ablation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ablation
Ablation
Ablation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Ablation near the electrode in a flashtube. The high-energy electrical arc slowly erodes the glass, leaving a frosted appearance.

Ablation (Latin: ablatio – removal) is the removal or destruction of something from an object by vaporization, chipping, erosive processes, or by other means. Examples of ablative materials[clarification needed] are described below, including spacecraft material for ascent and atmospheric reentry, ice and snow in glaciology, biological tissues in medicine and passive fire protection materials.

Artificial intelligence

[edit]
Further information: Ablation (artificial intelligence)

In artificial intelligence (AI), especially machine learning, ablation is the removal of a component of an AI system.[1] The term is by analogy with biology: removal of components of an organism.

Biology

[edit]
Further information: Constitutive ablation

Biological ablation is the removal of a biological structure or functionality.

Genetic ablation is another term for gene silencing, in which gene expression is abolished through the alteration or deletion of genetic sequence information. In cell ablation, individual cells in a population or culture are destroyed or removed. Both can be used as experimental tools, as in loss-of-function experiments.[2]

Medicine

[edit]

In medicine, ablation is the removal of a part of biological tissue, usually by surgery. Surface ablation of the skin (dermabrasion, also called resurfacing because it induces regeneration) can be carried out by chemicals (chemoablation), by lasers (laser ablation), by freezing (cryoablation), or by electricity (fulguration). Its purpose is to remove skin spots, aged skin, wrinkles, thus rejuvenating it. Surface ablation is also employed in otolaryngology for several kinds of surgery, such as the one for snoring.

The term is also often used in the context of laser ablation, a process in which a laser breaks a material's molecular bonds. For a laser to ablate tissues, the power density or fluence must be high, otherwise thermocoagulation occurs, which is simply thermal vaporization of the tissues.

In cardiology, Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be used to treat a variety of cardiac arrhythmia such as supraventricular tachycardia, Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome (WPW), ventricular tachycardia, and more recently as management of atrial fibrillation.

Rotablation is a type of arterial cleansing that consists of inserting a tiny, diamond-tipped, drill-like device into the affected artery to remove fatty deposits or plaque. The procedure is used in the treatment of coronary heart disease to restore blood flow.

Microwave ablation (MWA) is similar to RFA but at higher frequencies of electromagnetic radiation.

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation removes tissue from within the body noninvasively.

Bone marrow ablation is a process whereby the human bone marrow cells are eliminated in preparation for a bone marrow transplant. This is performed using high-intensity chemotherapy and total body irradiation. As such, it has nothing to do with the vaporization techniques described in the rest of this article.

Ablation of brain tissue is used for treating certain neurological disorders, particularly Parkinson's disease, and sometimes for psychiatric disorders as well.

Recently, some researchers reported successful results with genetic ablation. In particular, genetic ablation is potentially a much more efficient method of removing unwanted cells, such as tumor cells, because large numbers of animals lacking specific cells could be generated. Genetically ablated lines can be maintained for a prolonged period of time and shared within the research community. Researchers at Columbia University report of reconstituted caspases combined from C. elegans and humans, which maintain a high degree of target specificity. The genetic ablation techniques described could prove useful in battling cancer.[3]

Electro-ablation

[edit]

Electro-ablation, is a process that removes material from a metallic workpiece to reduce surface roughness.

Electro-ablation breaks through highly resistive oxide surfaces, such as those found on titanium and other exotic metals and alloys without melting the underlying non-oxidised metal or alloy. This allows very quick surface finishing

The process is capable of providing surface finishing for a wide range of exotic and widely used metals and alloys, including: titanium, stainless steel, niobium, chromium–cobalt, Inconel, aluminium, and a range of widely available steels and alloys.

Electro-ablation is very effective at achieving high levels of surface finishing in holes, valleys and hidden or internal surfaces on metallic workpieces (parts).

The process is particularly applicable to components produced by additive manufacturing process, such as 3D-printed metals. These components tend to be produced with roughness levels well above 5–20 micron. Electro-ablation can be used to quickly reduce the surface roughness to less than 0.8 micron, allowing the post-process to be used for volume production surface finishing.

Glaciology

[edit]
Further information: Ablation zone

In glaciology and meteorology, ablation—the opposite of accumulation—refers to all processes that remove snow, ice, or water from a glacier or snowfield.[4] Ablation refers to the melting of snow or ice that runs off the glacier, evaporation, sublimation, calving, or erosive removal of snow by wind. Air temperature is typically the dominant control of ablation, with precipitation exercising secondary control. In a temperate climate during ablation season, ablation rates typically average around 2 mm/h.[5] Where solar radiation is the dominant cause of snow ablation (e.g., if air temperatures are low under clear skies), characteristic ablation textures such as suncups and penitentes may develop on the snow surface.[6] Ablation can refer to mass loss from the upper surface of a glacier or ocean-driven melt and calving on the face of a glacier terminus.[7]

Ablation can refer either to the processes removing ice and snow or to the quantity of ice and snow removed.

Debris-covered glaciers have also been shown to greatly impact the ablation process. There is a thin debris layer that can be located on the top of glaciers that intensifies the ablation process below the ice. The debris-covered parts of a glacier that is experiencing ablation are sectioned into three categories which include ice cliffs, ponds, and debris. These three sections allow scientists to measure the heat digested by the debris-covered area and is calculated. The calculations are dependent on the area and net absorbed heat amounts in regards to the entire debris-covered zones. These types of calculations are done to various glaciers to understand and analyze future patterns of melting.[8]

Moraine (glacial debris) is moved by natural processes that allow for down-slope movement of materials on the glacier body. It is noted that if the slope of a glacier is too high then the debris will continue to move along the glacier to a further location. The sizes and locations of glaciers vary around the world, so depending on the climate and physical geography the varieties of debris can differ. The size and magnitude of the debris is dependent on the area of glacier and can vary from dust-size fragments to blocks as large as a house.[9]

There have been many experiments done to demonstrate the effect of debris on the surface of glaciers. Yoshiyuki Fujii, a professor at the National Institute of Polar Research, designed an experiment that showed ablation rate was accelerated under a thin debris layer and was retarded under a thick one as compared with that of a natural snow surface.[10] This science is significant due to the importance of long-term availability of water resources and assess glacier response to climate change.[11] Natural resource availability is a major drive behind research conducted in regards to the ablation process and overall study of glaciers.

Laser ablation

[edit]
Main article: laser ablation
An Nd:YAG laser drills a hole through a block of nitrile. The intense burst of infrared radiation ablates the highly absorbing rubber, releasing an eruption of plasma.

Laser ablation is greatly affected by the nature of the material and its ability to absorb energy, therefore the wavelength of the ablation laser should have a minimum absorption depth. While these lasers can average a low power, they can offer peak intensity and fluence given by:

while the peak power is

Surface ablation of the cornea for several types of eye refractive surgery is now common, using an excimer laser system (LASIK and LASEK). Since the cornea does not grow back, laser is used to remodel the cornea refractive properties to correct refraction errors, such as astigmatism, myopia, and hyperopia. Laser ablation is also used to remove part of the uterine wall in women with menstruation and adenomyosis problems in a process called endometrial ablation.

Researchers have demonstrated a successful technique for ablating subsurface tumors with minimal thermal damage to surrounding healthy tissue, by using a focused laser beam from an ultra-short pulse diode laser source.[12]

Marine surface coatings

[edit]

Antifouling paints and other related coatings are routinely used to prevent the buildup of microorganisms and other animals, such as barnacles for the bottom hull surfaces of recreational, commercial and military sea vessels. Ablative paints are often utilized for this purpose to prevent the dilution or deactivation of the antifouling agent. Over time, the paint will slowly decompose in the water, exposing fresh antifouling compounds on the surface. Engineering the antifouling agents and the ablation rate can produce long-lived protection from the deleterious effects of biofouling.

Passive fire protection

[edit]

Firestopping and fireproofing products can be ablative in nature. This can mean endothermic materials, or merely materials that are sacrificial and become "spent" over time while exposed to fire, such as silicone firestop products. Given sufficient time under fire or heat conditions, these products char away, crumble, and disappear. The idea is to put enough of this material in the way of the fire that a level of fire-resistance rating can be maintained, as demonstrated in a fire test. Ablative materials usually have a large concentration of organic matter[citation needed] that is reduced by fire to ashes. In the case of silicone, organic rubber surrounds very finely divided silica dust (up to 380 m2 of combined surface area of all the dust particles per gram of this dust[citation needed]). When the organic rubber is exposed to fire, it burns to ash and leaves behind the silica dust with which the product started.

Protoplanetary disk ablation

[edit]

Protoplanetary disks are rotating circumstellar disks of dense gas and dust surrounding young, newly formed stars. Shortly after star formation, stars often have leftover surrounding material that is still gravitationally bound to them, forming primitive disks that orbit around the star's equator – not too dissimilarly from the rings of Saturn. This occurs because the decrease in the protostellar material's radius during formation increases angular momentum, which means that this remaining material gets whipped into a flattened circumstellar disk around the star. This circumstellar disk may eventually mature into what is referred to as a protoplanetary disk: a disk of gas, dust, ice and other materials from which planetary systems may form. In these disks, orbiting matter starts to accrete in the colder mid-plane of the disk from dust grains and ices sticking together. These small accretions grow from pebbles to rocks to early baby planets, called planetesimals, then protoplanets, and eventually, full planets.[13]

As it is believed that massive stars may play a role in actively triggering star formation (by introducing gravitational instabilities amongst other factors),[14] it is plausible that young, smaller stars with disks may be living relatively nearby to older, more massive stars. This has already been confirmed through observations to be the case in certain clusters, e.g. in the Trapezium cluster.[15] Since massive stars tend to collapse through supernovae at the end of their lives, research is now investigating what role the shockwave of such an explosion, and the resulting supernova remnant (SNR), would play if it occurred in the line of fire of a protoplanetary disk. According to computationally modelled simulations, a SNR striking a protoplanetary disk would result in significant ablation of the disk, and this ablation would strip a significant amount of protoplanetary material from the disk – but not necessarily destroy the disk entirely.[16] This is an important point because a disk that survives such an interaction with sufficient material leftover to form a planetary system may inherit an altered disk chemistry from the SNR, which could have effects on the planetary systems that later form.

Spaceflight

[edit]
Main article: atmospheric reentry § Ablative

In spacecraft design, ablation is used to both cool and protect mechanical parts and/or payloads that would otherwise be damaged by extremely high temperatures. Two principal applications are heat shields for spacecraft entering a planetary atmosphere from space and cooling of rocket engine nozzles. Examples include the Apollo Command Module that protected astronauts from the heat of atmospheric reentry and the Kestrel second stage rocket engine designed for exclusive use in an environment of space vacuum since no heat convection is possible.

In a basic sense, ablative material is designed so that instead of heat being transmitted into the structure of the spacecraft, only the outer surface of the material bears the majority of the heating effect. The outer surface chars and burns away – but quite slowly, only gradually exposing new fresh protective material beneath. The heat is carried away from the spacecraft by the gases generated by the ablative process, and never penetrates the surface material, so the metallic and other sensitive structures they protect, remain at a safe temperature. As the surface burns and disperses into space, the remaining solid material continues to insulate the craft from ongoing heat and superheated gases. The thickness of the ablative layer is calculated to be sufficient to survive the heat it will encounter on its mission.

There is an entire branch of spaceflight research involving the search for new fireproofing materials to achieve the best ablative performance; this function is critical to protect the spacecraft occupants and payload from otherwise excessive heat loading.[17] The same technology is used in some passive fire protection applications, in some cases by the same vendors, who offer different versions of these fireproofing products, some for aerospace and some for structural fire protection.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ablation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Ablation is the removal or destruction of , tissue, or a body part through processes such as , , , or targeted application. The term derives from the Latin ablatio, meaning "removal" or "carrying away," reflecting its core concept of or elimination from a larger entity. In glaciology and earth sciences, ablation describes the net loss of snow, ice, or rock from surfaces like glaciers through mechanisms including surface melting, sublimation, evaporation, and mechanical erosion, which contribute to the mass balance and retreat of ice masses. In medicine, ablation is a minimally invasive therapeutic technique used to treat conditions such as cardiac arrhythmias, tumors, and abnormal uterine bleeding by destroying targeted tissue with heat (e.g., radiofrequency ablation), extreme cold (cryoablation), lasers, or chemicals, often guided by imaging to minimize damage to surrounding areas. In and , particularly , ablation refers to the intentional sacrificial of protective materials, such as heat shields on , where high temperatures during atmospheric re-entry cause and char recession to absorb and dissipate , preventing structural failure. Other applications include for precise material processing in manufacturing and scientific analysis, and experimental ablation in to study organ or function by selective removal.

Fundamentals

Definition

Ablation derives from the Latin term ablatio, meaning "removal" or "carrying away," formed from ab- ("away") and ferre ("to carry"). The word entered English in the early , initially referring to the surgical excision of body parts or tissues. In scientific contexts, ablation generally denotes the removal or of from a solid surface or body through processes such as , , chipping, or other erosive actions, frequently involving phase transitions such as , , or sublimation, or chemical reactions that degrade the . This phenomenon results in progressive loss, protecting underlying structures in high-heat environments or contributing to natural degradation. Key quantitative measures include the loss rate, which quantifies the amount of removed per unit time and area; ablation depth, representing the thickness of eroded; and surface recession rate, indicating the backward movement of the surface boundary due to . Ablation processes can be broadly classified into categories based on dominant mechanisms: thermal ablation, driven by heat-induced or ; mechanical ablation, involving physical chipping or from shear forces; chemical ablation, resulting from reactions that dissolve or decompose the material; and radiative ablation, initiated by high-energy such as lasers or cosmic rays that directly eject atoms. These categories provide a framework for understanding ablation across disciplines, though specific applications, such as ice mass loss in or tissue removal in , illustrate its versatility without altering the core principles.

Mechanisms

Ablation encompasses a range of physical, chemical, and energetic processes that result in the removal of from a solid surface through localized degradation. These mechanisms are governed by the interaction between the and external stimuli such as , mechanical forces, or reactive environments, leading to mass loss that protects underlying structures by dissipating energy. Understanding these principles is essential for designing materials that withstand extreme conditions, as the dominant mechanism often depends on the intensity and type of energy input. Thermal mechanisms dominate in high-heat-flux scenarios, where heat transfer induces phase changes or decomposition in the material. Heat conduction from the surface raises the temperature, potentially causing melting, where the solid transitions to a liquid state with minimal energy absorption compared to other processes. Vaporization follows, absorbing significant latent heat as the material converts from liquid to gas, while sublimation directly transitions solids to vapor, common in materials like carbon under vacuum conditions. Additionally, endothermic reactions such as pyrolysis occur in organic ablators, where thermal decomposition breaks down polymers into gases and char, absorbing heat and forming a protective layer that reduces further heat penetration. Pyrolysis gases can also outflow to the boundary layer, blocking convective heat transfer. Mechanical mechanisms involve the physical removal of material through forces like , impact, or shear, often exacerbating thermal effects in dynamic environments. Erosion arises from particle bombardment or fluid shear, where surface layers are worn away by frictional forces, leading to progressive material loss. occurs when internal stress waves, generated by rapid heating or impacts, propagate and cause or ejection of material fragments from the surface. These processes are particularly relevant in high-velocity flows, where mechanical can expose fresh material to further degradation. Chemical mechanisms entail reactions between the material and its environment, resulting in dissolution or transformation that contributes to mass loss. Oxidation involves the reaction of surface atoms with oxygen, forming volatile oxides that desorb, as seen in carbon-based ablators where char layers react to produce CO or CO₂. Hydrolysis occurs in moist environments, where water molecules break chemical bonds, leading to material breakdown, though this is less common in high-temperature ablation. These reactions are often heterogeneous, occurring at the surface and influenced by gas-phase diffusion, and can compete with thermal processes by generating additional heat or protective oxides. Radiative and electrical mechanisms rely on the absorption of electromagnetic or electrical current to induce localized heating and expulsion. In radiative ablation, incident photons are absorbed, converting electromagnetic into thermal via electron-phonon interactions, which can drive rapid without direct contact. Electrical mechanisms, such as those in current-based systems, generate heat through resistive ( or dielectric losses, where alternating currents cause molecular and oscillations, leading to material expulsion via or plasma formation. These processes are efficient for precise, non-contact removal but are limited by penetration depth in the material. A fundamental relation for the ablation rate arises from the surface balance, where the incoming qq equals the required to heat and vaporize the ablated mass. The mass loss rate m˙\dot{m} is derived as follows: the to raise the by ΔT\Delta T is m˙cpΔT\dot{m} c_p \Delta T, and the for vaporization is m˙hv\dot{m} h_v, so q=m˙(cpΔT+hv)q = \dot{m} (c_p \Delta T + h_v), yielding m˙=qhv+cpΔT\dot{m} = \frac{q}{h_v + c_p \Delta T}. This simplified model assumes steady-state conditions, neglects losses and chemical reactions, and treats the effective heat of ablation as the denominator; more advanced models incorporate and oxidation terms for accuracy. Several factors influence the rate and extent of ablation across these mechanisms. Material properties, such as thermal conductivity, which governs heat into the bulk, and of , which determines absorption per unit mass, play critical roles in resisting degradation. High thermal conductivity can lead to deeper heating and reduced surface protection, while high slows mass loss. Environmental conditions, including (affecting thresholds) and (accelerating reaction kinetics), modulate the process; low pressure favors sublimation, whereas oxidative atmospheres enhance chemical ablation. The type and intensity of input—convective, radiative, or mechanical—further dictate the dominant mechanism, with higher fluxes accelerating all processes.

Natural Processes

Glaciology

In , ablation refers to the net loss of mass from a or surface, primarily during the summer melt season when losses from melting and other processes exceed any accumulation from , resulting in a negative surface . This loss is quantified as the specific ablation rate, typically expressed in meters of water equivalent per year (m w.e. a⁻¹), which accounts for the volume of or removed relative to the glacier's area. Ablation is a key component of the annual , where sustained negative values lead to glacier thinning and retreat over time. The primary processes driving ablation include surface induced by solar radiation and transfer from warmer air, as well as sublimation and that directly convert to vapor without liquid intermediates. Mechanical contributes additionally through deflation of snow particles or avalanching of from steep slopes, though these are secondary to processes in most temperate and polar glaciers. These mechanisms are modulated by local climate factors such as , , and , with dominating in maritime settings and sublimation more prominent in dry continental interiors. Ablation is measured using a combination of field-based and remote techniques to capture spatial and temporal variations. Traditional stake networks involve drilling poles into the ice surface across the glacier and periodically recording changes in snow or ice height relative to the stake, providing direct point measurements of mass loss that can be extrapolated to water equivalent using ice density. Remote sensing methods, such as satellite altimetry from missions like or radar interferometry via TanDEM-X, enable wide-area monitoring of surface elevation changes and ablation rates without ground access. Energy balance models integrate meteorological data to simulate ablation by balancing incoming radiation, heat fluxes, and exchanges, offering predictive insights into unmeasured regions. A simplified expression for net ablation AA at the surface is given by A=M+E−P,A = M + E - P, where MM represents melt (in m w.e.), EE is and sublimation, and PP is as snow or liquid water; positive values indicate net mass loss dominating over inputs. This equation forms the basis of surface assessments, linking ablation directly to climatic drivers like and . Accelerated ablation due to global warming has profound impacts, including widespread glacier retreat and contributions to sea-level rise, with global glacier mass loss averaging 273 gigatons per year from 2000 to 2023, equivalent to about 0.8 mm of annual sea-level increase. In 2023, glaciers lost a record 600 Gt of , and in 2024, losses reached 450 Gt, the second-highest on record. Global glaciers lost roughly 2,720 gigatons of between 2010 and 2020. These changes exacerbate , alter freshwater inputs to ecosystems, and amplify feedback loops like reduced from exposed darker surfaces. Observations from the 1980s to the 2020s document the expansion of ablation zones in regions like the and , where rising equilibrium line altitudes have shifted the boundary between accumulation and ablation areas upslope. In the Upper Alaknanda basin of the central , glacier frontal area decreased by 4.2% from 1994 to 2020. mass loss rates nearly doubled from 73.8 gigatons per year (2002-2010) to 142.1 gigatons per year (2010-2019), with ablation zones expanding due to prolonged surface melting. These shifts highlight the sensitivity of polar and high-mountain ice to climatic forcing over recent decades.

Protoplanetary Disk Ablation

Protoplanetary disk ablation refers to the erosion and dispersal of gas and dust in circumstellar disks surrounding young stars, primarily driven by photoevaporation, stellar winds, and radiation pressure, which collectively limit the disk's availability for planet formation. This process occurs in the early stages of stellar evolution, where high-energy radiation and magnetic fields interact with the disk material, leading to mass loss rates that can dominate over accretion in later phases. Unlike viscous spreading, ablation rapidly removes outer disk layers, transitioning systems from gas-rich environments to debris disks. Key mechanisms include (EUV) and far-ultraviolet (FUV) radiation from the central star, which ionizes and heats the disk atmosphere, particularly at its edges and surface, triggering hydrodynamic escape flows that carry away gas at velocities up to tens of km/s. Complementing this, magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) winds, launched by threading the disk, entrain and strip both gas and through magnetocentrifugal acceleration, often from midplane regions where is suppressed. These processes are modulated by the disk's flaring geometry and ionization levels, with photoevaporation dominating in irradiated environments and MHD winds providing a baseline mass loss even in isolated systems. Observations of ablation rely on submillimeter imaging with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), which resolves disk substructures like cavities and asymmetries indicative of mass loss, as seen in systems such as . Spectral line analysis of tracers like CO isotopologues and [OI] reveals blueshifted outflows, confirming wind signatures with launching radii of 5–40 AU and mass loss rates around 10^{-9} to 10^{-8} M_\sun/yr. These methods distinguish photoevaporative flows, which show high ionization, from MHD-driven ones with broader velocity profiles. Protoplanetary disks persist for 1–10 million years before significant disperses their material, setting a timescale for core accretion and influencing migration by reducing gas drag and opening gaps. contributes up to 50% of total mass loss in typical disks, accelerating dispersal in clustered environments and shaping the observed radius distribution of exoplanets. Theoretical models, such as those for EUV-driven photoevaporation in viscously heated disks, predict a mass loss rate M˙∝Φ1/2\dot{M} \propto \Phi^{1/2}, where M˙\dot{M} is the rate and Φ\Phi the ionizing flux from the , yielding integrated losses of 0.01–0.1 M_\sun over disk lifetimes. This scaling arises from the balance between radiative heating and hydrodynamic outflow, with extensions incorporating FUV and contributions for more realistic low-mass stars. James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations in 2024 confirmed photoevaporation signatures in the TW Hydrae disk through revealing ionized gas tracers and outflow , linking these processes to the scarcity of gas giants in compact systems and broader demographics. These findings, combined with ALMA data, indicate that photoevaporation truncates disks at ~20–50 AU, consistent with the observed pile-up of super-Earths and mini-Neptunes.

Engineering Applications

Spaceflight

In spaceflight, ablative materials serve as sacrificial layers in heat shields to protect during atmospheric reentry by vaporizing and dissipating the intense frictional heat generated from high-speed interactions with the atmosphere, thereby preventing thermal damage to the underlying structure. These materials undergo controlled erosion, absorbing and carrying away heat through phase changes and gas ejection, which is essential for missions involving velocities exceeding 7 km/s, such as orbital returns or interplanetary entries. Common ablative materials include phenolic resins and carbon-phenolic composites, which have been employed historically in missions. For instance, the Apollo command module utilized 5026-39, an epoxy-novolac phenolic resin filled into a honeycomb structure, to withstand lunar-return heating rates up to approximately 500 W/cm². Early designs considered direct-bond ablators like reinforced phenolic composites for potential use, though the final system favored reusable tiles; these ablative concepts influenced subsequent vehicle protections. The ablation process involves , where the outer layer carbonizes to form a protective barrier, followed by that decomposes the into gases, creating an insulating that blocks convective . The ablation rate is directly proportional to the stagnation at the vehicle's forebody, where peak heating occurs due to compressed , typically modeled as m˙=qsQabl\dot{m} = \frac{q_s}{Q_{abl}}, with m˙\dot{m} as mass loss rate and qsq_s as stagnation-point . The heat of ablation QablQ_{abl} represents the required to remove unit of material and is given by Qabl=hv+∫cp dT,Q_{abl} = h_v + \int c_p \, dT, where hvh_v is the heat of vaporization and the integral accounts for sensible heating and from ambient temperature to pyrolysis onset. This energy balance is critical for reentry simulations, ensuring the shield's thickness suffices to maintain structural integrity. Design considerations emphasize predicting surface recession rates, often validated through arc-jet facilities that simulate reentry conditions with plasma torches delivering heat fluxes up to 10,000 W/cm². Recent advancements as of 2025 include reusable variants like PICA-X, a low-density phenolic-impregnated carbon ablator developed by for the Starship vehicle, offering improved manufacturability and performance over heritage PICA used in Stardust and missions. Early challenges in the Mercury program, such as ablation performance issues observed in 1961 heat shield tests during suborbital flights like Mercury-Redstone 2, highlighted the need for robust material qualification to avoid inadequate protection under unexpected heating. Modern Mars missions, including Perseverance and , continue to rely on ablative entry systems like carbon-phenolic ablators to survive thin-atmosphere entries with peak heating around 45–90 W/cm², depending on the mission profile.

Passive Fire Protection

Passive fire protection utilizing ablative materials focuses on non-reactive coatings that swell or erode under exposure to insulate underlying substrates, preventing rapid and structural failure. These coatings, often termed or ablative systems, activate through to form a protective char layer that absorbs and acts as a barrier against and radiant . Unlike active suppression systems, they rely on physical and chemical changes to delay ignition and maintain for specified durations, typically 30 minutes to 4 hours depending on the scenario. The primary mechanism involves endothermic , where the coating undergoes , releasing gases that cause expansion (up to 50 times the original volume) while forming a carbonaceous char. This char, with low thermal conductivity, insulates the substrate by slowing conductive heat flow; in ablative variants, surface further dissipates heat through sacrifice. paints commonly consist of a binder (e.g., acrylic or resin), acid source (e.g., ammonium polyphosphate), carbon donor (e.g., ), and blowing agent, promoting char formation via dehydration and foaming. Silicone-based ablators, such as those incorporating , enhance this by generating a silica-rich char layer through oxidative cross-linking, offering superior durability in oxidative environments. Performance is evaluated under standards like ASTM E119, which subjects coated assemblies—such as beams or walls—to a controlled time-temperature in a furnace, measuring endurance until structural integrity fails or unexposed side temperatures exceed limits (e.g., 250°C average rise). Protection time correlates directly with thickness (d) and (ρ), as thicker, denser layers extend the barrier's lifespan; for instance, 1-2 mm can achieve 2-hour ratings on . The approximate thermal protection time for the char layer can be modeled from 1D heat conduction equations as t=ρd22kln⁡(Tg−T0Ts−T0)t = \frac{\rho d^2}{2k} \ln\left(\frac{T_g - T_0}{T_s - T_0}\right), where k is thermal conductivity, T_g the gas temperature, T_0 initial substrate temperature, and T_s the critical substrate temperature, providing a basis for . Applications include protecting cable trays in electrical systems and in buildings, where ablative coatings prevent cascading failures by maintaining circuit integrity and load-bearing capacity. Following the 9/11 attacks, building codes emphasized hydrocarbon fire resistance (e.g., UL 1709 curve simulating pool fires), prompting thicker applications on high-rise to withstand rapid temperature rises up to 1100°C, enhancing overall resilience without relying solely on cellulosic fire curves. Recent developments through 2025 incorporate nano-enhancements, such as graphene oxide or nano-TiO2 additives, to accelerate rates by 20-30% and improve mechanical stability, reducing thickness while minimizing volatile emissions for lower environmental impact. These nano-ablators promote denser char structures, extending protection in cellulosic and fires, as demonstrated in composites achieving linear ablation rates below 0.1 mm/s under 50 kW/m² flux.

Marine Surface Coatings

Ablative antifouling coatings for marine vessels function by controlled of the surface layer, which discourages the attachment of organisms such as and mussels. These coatings, often based on self-polishing copolymers (SPCs), release biocides like compounds at a steady rate while the hull moves through water, combining chemical deterrence with physical ablation to maintain a clean surface. Unlike static coatings, ablative types rely on the vessel's motion to promote gradual material loss, preventing buildup that could increase hydrodynamic drag. Common materials include acrylic-based polymers for SPCs and controlled depletion polymers (CDPs) that enable gradual ablation through . Silicone-based variants provide additional fouling-release properties, where low facilitates detachment under shear forces. These formulations incorporate biocides within a matrix that hydrolyzes or dissolves, exposing fresh layers over time; the process involves hydrodynamic shear from water flow and ionic dissolution, typically yielding a of 3 to 5 years depending on vessel speed and environmental conditions. The (IMO) banned organotin compounds like (TBT) in antifouling systems effective January 1, 2008, under the International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships, prompting a shift to non-toxic ablative alternatives such as copper-acrylate SPCs and biocide-free eroding polymers. Performance is evaluated using rotating drum tests, where coated panels rotate in at simulated speeds (e.g., 10-20 knots) to assess resistance and rates over months. These coatings reduce drag by up to 5%, correlating to fuel savings of 3-5% on commercial vessels by minimizing biofouling-induced resistance. As of 2025, research focuses on biodegradable ablative coatings using natural polymers like to mitigate microplastic release from erosion, with projects such as Fraunhofer's developing self-polishing formulations that degrade environmentally while reducing heavy metal content. These innovations address regulatory pressures on persistent pollutants, aiming for full lifecycle without compromising antifouling efficacy.

Physical Techniques

Laser Ablation

Laser ablation employs focused laser beams to precisely remove material from a solid surface, facilitating applications in processing, analysis, and synthesis. The process typically involves pulsed lasers, which deliver high-energy pulses to the target, inducing rapid heating or bond breaking that generates a plasma plume. This plume ejects atoms, ions, and clusters from the surface through photothermal effects, where absorbed energy causes localized melting and vaporization, or photochemical effects, where high-energy photons directly dissociate molecular bonds without significant heating. Key parameters influencing the ablation process include laser wavelength, pulse duration, and fluence. Wavelength selection affects material absorption; for instance, 193 nm light from ArF lasers is particularly effective for ablating dielectrics due to strong absorption in the deep UV range. Pulse durations range from femtoseconds to nanoseconds, with shorter pulses minimizing thermal diffusion and . Ablation occurs above a material-specific fluence threshold, typically on the order of 1–10 J/cm², beyond which material removal rate increases with incident energy density. The ablation depth per pulse can be approximated using a photothermal model for strong optical absorption derived from the Beer-Lambert law: d≈Fρ(cp(Tm−T0)+hm+hv)d \approx \frac{F}{\rho (c_p (T_m - T_0) + h_m + h_v)} where dd is the ablation depth, FF is the laser fluence, ρ\rho is the material density, cpc_p is the specific heat capacity, TmT_m is the melting temperature, T0T_0 is the initial temperature, hmh_m is the latent heat of fusion, and hvh_v is the latent heat of vaporization. This equation assumes strong absorption (where the optical penetration depth 1/α1/\alpha is much smaller than dd) and balances incident energy with the energy required for heating, melting, and vaporization. Historically, emerged in the shortly after the invention of the , initially applied to micromachining tasks such as and cutting in materials like metals and polymers. Advances in the have focused on ultrafast lasers ( pulses), which enable ablation with minimal heat-affected zones by confining energy deposition to the surface, reducing recast layers and microcracks in precision applications. Prominent applications include material micromachining for fabricating microstructures in and , thin-film deposition via deposition (PLD), where the ablated plume is directed onto a substrate to grow uniform layers, and mass spectrometry using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma- (LA-ICP-MS) for spatially resolved of solids. Safety considerations and limitations arise from the generation of particulate-laden plumes containing potentially hazardous aerosols, requiring evacuation systems and protective equipment to mitigate risks. Additionally, certain setups, such as PLD for thin films, necessitate environments to control plume expansion and prevent contamination.

Electro-ablation

Electro-ablation is a that utilizes controlled electrical discharges to remove material from a workpiece, primarily through the formation of a plasma channel between an and the target surface. When a high-voltage pulse is applied across a small gap filled with a dielectric fluid, the electric field ionizes the fluid, creating a conductive plasma channel that bridges the gap. This channel reaches temperatures exceeding 10,000 K, causing intense localized heating that melts and vaporizes the material via Joule heating, where electrical resistance in the plasma generates heat proportional to the square of the current density. The eroded particles are then flushed away by the dielectric, preventing short-circuiting and allowing repeated discharges. The primary application of electro-ablation is in (EDM), a non-contact technique ideal for shaping hard, high-strength metals such as tool steels, , and superalloys that resist conventional machining due to their or . In , it excels at producing intricate geometries, molds, dies, and prototypes with tolerances as fine as ±0.005 mm, often where mechanical tools would wear rapidly or fail. Additionally, electro-ablation is employed for surface texturing, creating micro-scale patterns on components to enhance control, wettability, or in automotive parts, medical implants, and tooling surfaces. For instance, controlled sparking can generate dimples or ridges on cylinder liners to reduce wear and improve efficiency. Electro-ablation in EDM relies on controlled spark erosion using short, intermittent high-voltage pulses to produce discrete craters for precise removal. Key operational parameters include discharge voltage, typically ranging from 50 to 300 V to initiate breakdown without excessive arcing, and frequency, often 1 kHz to 500 kHz, which influences removal rate and surface quality—higher frequencies yield smoother finishes at the cost of lower removal rates. duration (on-time) and current further tune the process, with shorter pulses minimizing heat-affected zones. In capacitor-based discharge systems, common in early and micro-EDM setups, the energy delivered per pulse—and thus the ablation volume—is governed by the equation E=12CV2,E = \frac{1}{2} C V^2, where EE is the energy in joules, CC is the capacitance in farads, and VV is the discharge voltage in volts. This stored electrostatic energy rapidly converts to in the plasma, with ablation volume scaling roughly with EE for a given ; for example, increasing capacitance from 10 nF to 100 nF at 100 V can boost crater depth by an while risking thermal cracking. The foundational development of electro-ablation occurred in the , when Soviet researchers Boris R. Lazarenko and Natalia I. Lazarenko invented the first practical EDM system while studying in electrical contacts, transforming uncontrolled sparking into a controlled method by immersing electrodes in oil. By the 1950s, relaxation-type generators using capacitors enabled commercial adoption. Recent advancements as of 2025 include hybrid electro-laser systems, which integrate EDM sparks with pulses to enhance precision and efficiency; these hybrids reduce recast layers by up to 50% compared to pure EDM and allow processing of layered materials, as demonstrated in micromachining applications for components. One key advantage of electro-ablation is its non-contact nature, which eliminates mechanical forces and enables of fragile or complex internal features without distortion, particularly suited for hard conductive materials where traditional tools fail. However, limitations include significant wear, often 1-10% of the workpiece removal rate due to symmetric erosion in the plasma, and thermal damage such as microcracks or recast layers in the , which can compromise fatigue strength in critical parts.

Systems Analysis

Biology

In biology, ablation refers to the selective destruction or removal of cells, tissues, or organs to investigate their functional roles and the resulting phenotypic effects in living organisms. This experimental approach has been instrumental in elucidating structure-function relationships, particularly in , by disrupting specific components and observing how the system compensates or fails. Early applications focused on to test theories of development, while modern techniques enable precise, high-resolution manipulations at the single-cell level. Historically, ablation experiments trace back to the late , with Wilhelm 's 1888 studies on providing foundational insights into mosaic development. By killing one blastomere of a two-celled using a hot needle, demonstrated that the surviving cell developed into only half an , supporting the idea of predetermined cell fates. In the 1920s, and Hilde Mangold advanced this field through experiments on amphibian , including targeted ablations and transplants of the dorsal blastopore lip—later termed the "organizer"—which revealed inductive signaling mechanisms essential for formation. These classical studies highlighted the 's capacity for and following targeted disruptions. Key techniques in biological ablation include surgical excision for gross tissue removal, laser microablation for precise cellular targeting, and genetic methods such as expression of the receptor (DTR) under cell-specific promoters. Laser microablation employs focused or beams to disrupt targeted structures, such as nuclei or cytoskeletal elements, without broadly affecting surrounding tissues, as demonstrated in studies of and embryos. Genetic ablation, pioneered in the early 2000s, uses toxin receptors to inducibly kill cells upon administration of , allowing conditional knockout in transgenic models. Contemporary applications include optogenetic methods for targeted cell ablation, as demonstrated in studies of embryos. High-throughput single-cell ablation, often combined with light-sheet for real-time , has emerged in the 2020s to screen functions across populations, as seen in automated platforms for embryonic development analysis. Ablation experiments underscore key concepts like compensation and in biological systems, where the loss of one component often triggers upregulation of paralogous or alternative pathways to maintain function. For example, stepwise ablation of transcription factors like tfap2 in development reveals dose-dependent genetic compensation, exposing underlying gene regulatory networks that buffer against perturbations. These findings illustrate how ablation not only identifies essential elements but also unmasks latent redundancies critical for robustness in development. Ethical considerations in biological ablation prioritize , adhering to the 3Rs principle—replacement, reduction, and refinement—to minimize suffering. In vivo ablations in model organisms like mice or require institutional review to ensure humane endpoints, while alternatives using cell cultures or organoids are preferred when feasible to avoid live-animal distress. Compliance with standards from bodies like the NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare ensures that experiments justify the scientific necessity against potential harm.

Artificial Intelligence

In , ablation refers to the deliberate removal or perturbation of specific components within a model, such as layers, neurons, heads, or features, to assess their individual contributions to overall performance. This technique draws an analogy to biological knockouts in , where targeted disruptions isolate the function of particular elements in complex systems. Ablation studies gained prominence in the alongside the rise of , building on earlier -inspired methods to probe the inner workings of artificial neural networks (ANNs). By the late , these studies had become a standard tool for evaluating model architectures, particularly in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent models. More recent advancements, as of 2025, extend ablation to large language models (LLMs), where techniques like removing portions of windows aid in and unlearning harmful behaviors. Common methods include sequential ablation, which removes one component at a time to measure isolated effects, and factorial designs that systematically vary multiple elements for combinatorial . Performance is typically evaluated using metrics such as drops in accuracy, increases in loss, or changes in task-specific scores like in language models. Tools like AutoAblation automate these processes to enable parallel execution and reduce computational overhead. A key challenge in ablation is compensatory effects, where the removal of parts can lead to masking of true contributions. This underscores the value of ablation in explainable AI (XAI), where it enhances interpretability by revealing feature importance in pipelines and debugging behaviors. In , ablation has been applied to assess interpretability, such as removing heads in models to evaluate their roles in tasks like . For instance, the seminal work on multi-head showed that ablating certain heads in BERT-like architectures leads to minimal performance degradation in some layers, indicating redundancy, while others cause significant drops in tasks like . A representative example involves CNNs for image recognition: ablating convolutional layers in models like VGG-16 trained on results in notable accuracy reductions, with feature map unit removals in the final layer causing decision score drops that highlight the layers' role in hierarchical feature extraction. In 2025 LLM contexts, benchmarks like AbGen evaluate how models design their own ablation experiments, revealing insights into prompt optimization by iteratively removing contextual elements to refine outputs.

Medical Applications

Arrhythmia Treatment

Catheter ablation for treatment involves the minimally invasive delivery of energy through a catheter inserted into the heart to create targeted scars in abnormal electrical conduction pathways, thereby restoring normal rhythm. This procedure primarily targets conditions such as (AFib) and (VT), where erratic electrical signals disrupt heart function. Common energy sources include radiofrequency (RF) energy, which heats tissue to approximately 50-80°C to induce ; cryoablation, which freezes tissue to -40°C or lower; and pulsed field ablation (PFA), a non-thermal method using irreversible to selectively disrupt cell membranes without to adjacent structures. For AFib, the most prevalent treated via ablation, success rates range from 70% to 90% in maintaining at one year post-procedure, particularly for paroxysmal cases, with outcomes improving when performed early after . In VT, ablation targets scar-related reentrant circuits in the ventricles, achieving freedom from recurrence in about 70-80% of patients with structural heart disease. These rates are derived from large-scale registries and trials emphasizing single-procedure efficacy without antiarrhythmic drugs. Advanced techniques enhance precision and durability of lesions. Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems, such as the CARTO system, provide real-time visualization of cardiac and by integrating electromagnetic catheter tracking with voltage and timing data, reducing fluoroscopy exposure by up to 90%. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone for AFib, involving a continuous lesion set around the pulmonary vein ostia to electrically isolate triggers originating from these sleeves, confirmed by entrance/exit block testing during the procedure. RF ablation emerged in the as a safer alternative to high-energy direct current shocks, with the first clinical applications reported in for accessory pathway tachycardias, evolving into a standard by the early due to its controllability and lower risk. PFA represents a pivotal advancement, receiving FDA approval in December 2023 for paroxysmal and persistent AFib, as it minimizes risks like esophageal injury—reported in up to 5% of thermal ablations—by sparing non-cardiac cells through tissue-specific thresholds. Major risks include cardiac perforation leading to (0.5-1%) and or (0.2-1%), often mitigated by periprocedural anticoagulation and imaging guidance, with overall major complication rates under 2%. Most patients recover outpatient, resuming normal activities within days, though monitoring for recurrence is standard for 3 months. By 2025, over 200,000 procedures for arrhythmias are performed annually in the , reflecting a 15-20% yearly increase driven by AFib prevalence and procedural safety. PFA adoption has surged, with usage rising approximately 50% in high-volume centers following 2023 trials, displacing 10-15% of traditional RF and cryo cases due to shorter procedure times (under 90 minutes) and reduced complications.

Tumor and Tissue Ablation

Tumor and tissue ablation encompasses minimally invasive techniques used to destroy cancerous or abnormal tissues, particularly in , by inducing localized through thermal, cryogenic, or electrical means. These procedures are primarily applied to unresectable tumors in organs such as the liver, , and , offering an alternative to for patients with comorbidities or multifocal . Common procedures include (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), , and irreversible (IRE). RFA and MWA are thermal techniques that deliver energy via probes to heat tissues to temperatures exceeding 60°C, causing in a targeted zone typically measuring 2-5 cm per applicator. , conversely, freezes tissues to below -40°C using cryoprobes, leading to formation and vascular stasis for in similar ablation zones. IRE employs high-voltage electric pulses to create irreversible pores in cell membranes without significant heat, preserving nearby structures like blood vessels and bile ducts, which is advantageous for perivascular tumors. These methods are guided by real-time imaging such as or computed tomography (CT) to ensure precise probe placement and monitor the ablation margin. Post-procedure, (PET) imaging assesses treatment efficacy and detects early recurrence by evaluating metabolic activity. In applications, ablation targets unresectable (HCC), , and metastases, with RFA demonstrating 5-year overall survival rates of 40-68% for early-stage HCC, representing a substantial improvement over supportive care alone. For and tumors, MWA and achieve local control rates exceeding 90% for lesions under 3 cm, often boosting 5-year survival by 20-30% in select cohorts compared to historical non-ablative options. Complications occur in 5-10% of cases, primarily including bleeding (up to 4%) and (less than 1%), with major events like abscesses managed conservatively in most instances. Since the 1990s, these approaches have shifted treatment paradigms from open surgery, reducing morbidity and enabling outpatient procedures following initial RFA trials in liver tumors. Recent advancements through 2025 include nanoparticle-enhanced ablation for improved precision, such as gold nanoparticles enabling targeted photothermal therapy with deeper penetration and reduced off-target effects in liver tumors. Additionally, combining ablation with , like RFA paired with PD-1 inhibitors, amplifies antitumor immune responses by releasing tumor antigens, enhancing in non-small cell and HCC trials. These synergies build on core destruction mechanisms to promote systemic immunity.

Other Procedures

Endometrial ablation is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat (menorrhagia) by destroying the endometrial lining of the , often employing techniques such as thermal balloon ablation or radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery. Common methods include hysteroscope-guided ablation for precise visualization and targeted destruction of uterine tissue, which has demonstrated success rates of 80-90% in reducing bleeding and improving patient satisfaction. Since the , the adoption of has contributed to significant reductions in rates for benign uterine conditions, with decreases of up to 37% observed in certain U.S. states by the late . The NovaSure system, an RF-based device approved by the FDA in 2001, exemplifies second-generation techniques that use impedance-controlled energy to ablate the efficiently in an office setting. Risks associated with include , occurring in approximately 1% of cases, and symptom recurrence requiring further intervention in 10-20% of patients over time. Varicose vein ablation addresses by targeting faulty vein valves through endovenous techniques, such as laser or RF ablation, which seal the saphenous vein to redirect blood flow and alleviate symptoms like and swelling. These procedures serve as minimally invasive alternatives to traditional vein stripping , offering lower recurrence rates (around 4% at long-term follow-up compared to 20% for ) and faster recovery. In gynecological applications beyond , ultrasound-guided high-intensity (HIFU) has emerged as a non-invasive option for treating uterine fibroids as of 2025, using focused sound waves to thermally ablate fibroid tissue while preserving surrounding structures, with studies reporting significant symptom relief and volume reduction in selected patients. Broader applications of ablation in medicine include radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules, which achieves volume reduction rates of over 50% in 78% of cases at one-year follow-up with low complication rates (3.2%), providing an effective alternative to surgery for symptom management. Additionally, nerve ablation via radiofrequency is widely used for chronic pain management, particularly in spinal facet joints, by disrupting nociceptive signals to offer relief lasting 6-24 months with minimal invasiveness.

References

  1. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/ablation
  2. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/ablation
  3. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ablation
  4. https://nsidc.org/learn/cryosphere-glossary/ablation
  5. https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glacier-processes/mass-balance/glacier-accumulation-and-ablation/
  6. https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/ablation-therapy/about/pac-20385072
  7. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/17801-ablation-therapy
  8. https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/arrhythmia/prevention--treatment-of-arrhythmia/ablation-for-arrhythmias
  9. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20130014035/downloads/20130014035.pdf
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/laser-ablation
  11. https://www.genscript.com/biology-glossary/8251/ablation
  12. https://www.etymonline.com/word/ablation
  13. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/ablation_n
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/ablation-process
  15. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19710001652/downloads/19710001652.pdf
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3324188/
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/physical-ablation
  18. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110014340/downloads/20110014340.pdf
  19. https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/sdc6/paper/141/SDC6-paper141.pdf
  20. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20220016674/downloads/AW_FraileIzquierdo_Poster_36x48.pdf
  21. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c03003
  22. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210023834/downloads/Mechanical_Erosion_Modeling_of_TPS_Materials_AIAA_Aviation2022_Abstract.pdf
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10459378/
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223023374
  25. https://thoracickey.com/ablation-energy-sources/
  26. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110011112/downloads/20110011112.pdf
  27. https://www.jhuapl.edu/Content/techdigest/pdf/V13-N03/13-03-Resch.pdf
  28. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19710018270/downloads/19710018270.pdf
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/ablation-phenomenon
  30. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1216/text.html
  31. https://nsidc.org/learn/parts-cryosphere/glaciers/science-glaciers
  32. https://www.nps.gov/articles/glacier-monitoring-techniques.htm
  33. https://paos.colorado.edu/~fasullo/1060/resources/glacial.glossary.html
  34. https://npshistory.com/publications/dena/glacier-mon-protocol-handbook.pdf
  35. https://www.usgs.gov/programs/ecosystems-land-change-science-program/science/mass-balance-methods-measuring-glacier
  36. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-50398-4
  37. https://www.colorado.edu/instaar/sites/default/files/attached-files/OP55_glaciers.pdf
  38. https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glacier-processes/mass-balance/introduction-glacier-mass-balance/
  39. https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/glacier-melt-will-unleash-avalanche-of-cascading-impacts
  40. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023GL102954
  41. https://climate.copernicus.eu/esotc/2023/glaciers
  42. https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/worlds-glaciers-are-losing-record-ice-global-temperatures-climb-un-says-2025-03-21/
  43. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/03091333241312083
  44. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/glacier-inventory-and-glacier-changes-19942020-in-the-upper-alaknanda-basin-central-himalaya/572315E2F0654C50F99EB11C72CCC10A
  45. https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1080537
  46. https://rdalexander.github.io/pp6_alexander.pdf
  47. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2024/01/aa47850-23/aa47850-23.html
  48. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ac3ed5
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5414277/
  50. https://arxiv.org/html/2506.10719v2
  51. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2020/02/aa36950-19/aa36950-19.html
  52. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/add300
  53. https://www.almaobservatory.org/en/press-releases/alma-reveals-lives-of-planet-forming-disks/
  54. https://phys.org/news/2025-03-webb-reveals-planet-disks-longer.html
  55. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/382524/pdf
  56. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2024/06/aa48596-23/aa48596-23.html
  57. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh2861
  58. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140008557/downloads/20140008557.pdf
  59. https://www.techneglas.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/AST_2022_Hou-et-al..pdf
  60. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19750024432/downloads/19750024432.pdf
  61. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20060004824/downloads/20060004824.pdf
  62. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100022127/downloads/20100022127.pdf
  63. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140002341/downloads/20140002341.pdf
  64. https://www.nasa.gov/history/SP-4001/p2b.htm
  65. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210024480/downloads/Mars2020_Flight_Mechanics_Simulation_Paper_v3.pdf
  66. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20200002812/downloads/20200002812.pdf
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12298081/
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300944024007318
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5457074/
  70. https://www.intertek.com/building/standards/astm-e119/
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376548896_A_simplified_heat_transfer_model_for_intumescent_coatings
  72. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1017/ML101740246.pdf
  73. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=101311
  74. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/16/17/2454
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/self-polishing-coating
  76. https://www.paint.org/coatingstech-magazine/articles/marine-coatings-striking-a-balance-in-biofouling-control/
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9182286/
  78. https://www.international-marine.com/en/products/filters/t_Antifoulings
  79. https://marinecoatings.brand.akzonobel.com/m/f4a900fc1a09430/original/Interspeed_6200_eng_A4_20211116.pdf
  80. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Environment/Documents/FOULING2003.pdf
  81. https://www.usna.edu/NAOE/_files/documents/Faculty/schultz/papers_updated2023/Nolte_et_al_Biofouling_2018.pdf
  82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33441787/
  83. https://www.ifam.fraunhofer.de/en/Press_Releases/biodegradable-antifouling-coatings.html
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143749620300087
  85. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/82/11/5799/493506/Switching-from-photochemical-to-photothermal
  86. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-33933-2
  87. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/3618/0000/UV-laser-ablation-of-ultrathin-dielectric-layers/10.1117/12.352698.full
  88. https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=josaa-24-6-1562
  89. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.044047
  90. https://www.wlt.de/lim/Proceedings2015/Stick/PDF/Contribution281_final.pdf
  91. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2882
  92. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00339-023-06425-3
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/pulsed-laser-ablation
  94. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6732/11/9/857
  95. https://craftetch.com/laser-ablation/
  96. http://www.lasermicromachining.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Applications-of-Laser-Ablation-to-Microengineering.pdf
  97. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2004/cs/b207644f
  98. https://www.eag.com/techniques/mass-spec/la-icp-ms/
  99. https://www.aslms.org/for-professionals/professional-resources/safety-and-complications/aslms-laser-and-energy-device-plume-position-statement
  100. https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/ECOR05/ECOR05016FU.pdf
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785423014503
  102. https://www.ijert.org/thermal-electrical-modelling-of-edm-process
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840425000290
  104. https://www.amedm.co.uk/edm-surface-finishing-explained/
  105. https://tirapid.com/electrical-discharge-machining/
  106. https://www.edmtechman.com/about.cfm?pg=2&chap=3
  107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343249293_Spark_Erosion_Based_Hybrid_Processes
  108. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301679X12003908
  109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285406547_Effect_of_Capacitance_on_Electrical_Discharge_Machining_Using_an_RC_type_Pulse_Generation_Circuit
  110. https://holepop.com/a-very-brief-history-of-electrical-discharge-machining-edm/
  111. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-97-8374-8
  112. https://geomiq.com/blog/electrical-discharge-machining/
  113. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.7017933
  114. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1935/spemann/lecture/
  115. https://journals.biologists.com/dev/article/145/5/dev159525/48669/On-the-nature-and-function-of-organizers
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090775/
  117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32414936/
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6594659/
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9710398/
  120. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.08644
  121. https://dcatkth.github.io/papers/autoablation.pdf
  122. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05566
  123. http://papers.neurips.cc/paper/9551-are-sixteen-heads-really-better-than-one.pdf
  124. https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_WACV_2020/papers/Desai_Ablation-CAM_Visual_Explanations_for_Deep_Convolutional_Network_via_Gradient-free_Localization_WACV_2020_paper.pdf
  125. https://arxiv.org/html/2507.13300v1
  126. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/16851-catheter-ablation
  127. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/catheter-ablation-for-abnormal-heartbeats-beyond-the-basics/print
  128. https://www.hrsonline.org/news/hr2025-showcases-new-advancements-emerging-paf-technology/
  129. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013465
  130. https://www.mayoclinic.org/medical-professionals/cardiovascular-diseases/news/when-atrial-fibrillation-afib-ablation-timing-impacts-afib-recurrence/mac-20584500
  131. https://www.jnjmedtech.com/en-US/product/carto-3-system
  132. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6009785/
  133. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circep.109.924878
  134. https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article/105/4/303/1553881
  135. https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271%2820%2931139-5/fulltext
  136. https://news.medtronic.com/2023-12-13-Medtronic-creates-history-with-FDA-approval-of-its-novel-PulseSelect-TM-Pulsed-Field-Ablation-System-to-treat-atrial-fibrillation
  137. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.418
  138. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circep.111.963413
  139. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7449363/
  140. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/cardiac-mapping-market
  141. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Journal-Scans/2024/08/08/15/02/outcomes-of-atrial-fibrillation
  142. https://clarivate.com/life-sciences-healthcare/blog/pulsed-field-ablation-re-energizes-the-atrial-fibrillation-market/
  143. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11274819/
  144. https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i1/98618.htm
  145. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/GO.23.00155
  146. https://evtoday.com/articles/2021-oct/ablation-modalities-in-interventional-oncology
  147. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/rg.345140054
  148. https://academic.oup.com/radadv/advance-article/doi/10.1093/radadv/umaf033/8251555
  149. https://ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/AJR.05.0243
  150. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2989542/
  151. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/radiol.13130940
  152. https://hbsn.amegroups.org/article/view/4704/html
  153. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009926017300880
  154. https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3228/full/v5/i1/96690.htm
  155. https://ajronline.org/doi/full/10.2214/AJR.06.0234
  156. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adw7032
  157. https://bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12893-025-02778-z
  158. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440%2824%2912419-X
  159. https://journals.lww.com/cancerjournal/fulltext/2024/20020/immunostimulatory_effects_of_thermal_ablation_.4.aspx
  160. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459245/
  161. https://blogs.the-hospitalist.org/content/diagnosis-and-treatment-global-endometrial-ablation-failure
  162. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12391955/
  163. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/p010013b.pdf
  164. https://www.raveco.com/blog/what-patients-should-know-about-endometrial-ablation-success-rates
  165. https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/50/1/10.31083/j.ceog5001003/htm
  166. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/16965-endovenous-thermal-ablation
  167. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4870064/
  168. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/aogs.15086
  169. https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-025-03797-x
  170. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039606023007250
  171. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/17411-radiofrequency-ablation
  172. https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/radiofrequency-ablation-pain-relief
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.