Hubbry Logo
AnchorAnchorMain
Open search
Anchor
Community hub
Anchor
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Anchor
Anchor
from Wikipedia
Stockless ship's anchor and chain on display
Anchor of Amoco Cadiz in Portsall, north-west Brittany, France
Memorial anchor in Kirjurinluoto, Pori, Finland
Massive anchor chain for large ships. The weight of the chain is vital for proper holding of the anchor.[1]

An anchor is a device, normally made of metal, used to secure a vessel to the bed of a body of water to prevent the craft from drifting due to wind or current. The word derives from Latin ancora, which itself comes from the Greek ἄγκυρα (ankȳra).[2][3]

Anchors can either be temporary or permanent. Permanent anchors are used in the creation of a mooring, and are rarely moved; a specialist service is normally needed to move or maintain them. Vessels carry one or more temporary anchors, which may be of different designs and weights.

A sea anchor is a drag device, not in contact with the seabed, used to minimize drift of a vessel relative to the water. A drogue is a drag device used to slow or help steer a vessel running before a storm in a following or overtaking sea, or when crossing a bar in a breaking sea.

Anchoring

[edit]
Anchor winch, or windlass, on RV Polarstern
Colored plastic inserts on a modern anchor chain show the operator how much chain has been paid out. This knowledge is crucial in all anchoring methods.
A stockless anchor being broken out
Holding ground in Akaroa Harbour

Anchors achieve holding power either by "hooking" into the seabed, or weight, or a combination of the two. The weight of the anchor chain can be more than that of the anchor and is critical to proper holding. Permanent moorings use large masses (commonly a block or slab of concrete) resting on the seabed. Semi-permanent mooring anchors (such as mushroom anchors) and large ship's anchors derive a significant portion of their holding power from their weight, while also hooking or embedding in the bottom. Modern anchors for smaller vessels have metal flukes that hook on to rocks on the bottom or bury themselves in soft seabed.

The vessel is attached to the anchor by the rode (also called a cable or a warp). It can be made of rope, chain or a combination of rope and chain. The ratio of the length of rode to the water depth is known as the scope.

Holding ground is the area of sea floor that holds an anchor, and thus the attached ship or boat.[4] Different types of anchor are designed to hold in different types of holding ground.[5] Some bottom materials hold better than others; for instance, hard sand holds well, shell holds poorly.[6] Holding ground may be fouled with obstacles.[6] An anchorage location may be chosen for its holding ground.[7] In poor holding ground, only the weight of an anchor and chain matters; in good holding ground, it is able to dig in, and the holding power can be significantly higher. The basic anchoring consists of determining the location, dropping the anchor, laying out the scope, setting the hook, and assessing where the vessel ends up. The ship seeks a location that is sufficiently protected; has suitable holding ground, enough depth at low tide and enough room for the boat to swing.

The location to drop the anchor should be approached from down wind or down current, whichever is stronger. As the chosen spot is approached, the vessel should be stopped or even beginning to drift back. The anchor should initially be lowered quickly but under control until it is on the bottom (see anchor windlass). The vessel should continue to drift back, and the cable should be veered out under control (slowly) so it is relatively straight.

Once the desired scope is laid out, the vessel should be gently forced astern, usually using the auxiliary motor but possibly by backing a sail. A hand on the anchor line may telegraph a series of jerks and jolts, indicating the anchor is dragging, or a smooth tension indicative of digging in. As the anchor begins to dig in and resist backward force, the engine may be throttled up to get a thorough set. If the anchor continues to drag, or sets after having dragged too far, it should be retrieved and moved back to the desired position (or another location chosen.)

Using an anchor weight, kellet or sentinel

[edit]

Lowering a concentrated, heavy weight down the anchor line – rope or chain – directly in front of the bow to the seabed behaves like a heavy chain rode and lowers the angle of pull on the anchor.[8] If the weight is suspended off the seabed it acts as a spring or shock absorber to dampen the sudden actions that are normally transmitted to the anchor and can cause it to dislodge and drag. In light conditions, a kellet reduces the swing of the vessel considerably. In heavier conditions these effects disappear as the rode becomes straightened and the weight ineffective. Known as an "anchor chum weight" or "angel" in the UK.

Forked moor

[edit]

Using two anchors set approximately 45° apart, or wider angles up to 90°, from the bow is a strong mooring for facing into strong winds. To set anchors in this way, first one anchor is set in the normal fashion. Then, taking in on the first cable as the boat is motored into the wind and letting slack while drifting back, a second anchor is set approximately a half-scope away from the first on a line perpendicular to the wind. After this second anchor is set, the scope on the first is taken up until the vessel is lying between the two anchors and the load is taken equally on each cable. This moor also to some degree limits the range of a vessel's swing to a narrower oval. Care should be taken that other vessels do not swing down on the boat due to the limited swing range.

Bow and stern

[edit]

(Not to be mistaken with the Bahamian moor, below.) In the bow and stern technique, an anchor is set off each the bow and the stern, which can severely limit a vessel's swing range and also align it to steady wind, current or wave conditions. One method of accomplishing this moor is to set a bow anchor normally, then drop back to the limit of the bow cable (or to double the desired scope, e.g. 8:1 if the eventual scope should be 4:1, 10:1 if the eventual scope should be 5:1, etc.) to lower a stern anchor.[9] By taking up on the bow cable the stern anchor can be set. After both anchors are set, tension is taken up on both cables to limit the swing or to align the vessel.

Bahamian moor

[edit]

Similar to the above, a Bahamian moor is used to sharply limit the swing range of a vessel, but allows it to swing to a current. One of the primary characteristics of this technique is the use of a swivel as follows: the first anchor is set normally, and the vessel drops back to the limit of anchor cable. A second anchor is attached to the end of the anchor cable, and is dropped and set. A swivel is attached to the middle of the anchor cable, and the vessel connected to that.

The vessel now swings in the middle of two anchors, which is acceptable in strong reversing currents, but a wind perpendicular to the current may break out the anchors, as they are not aligned for this load.

Backing an anchor

[edit]

Also known as tandem anchoring, in this technique two anchors are deployed in line with each other, on the same rode. With the foremost anchor reducing the load on the aft-most, this technique can develop great holding power and may be appropriate in "ultimate storm" circumstances. It does not limit swinging range, and might not be suitable in some circumstances. There are complications, and the technique requires careful preparation and a level of skill and experience above that required for a single anchor.

Kedging

[edit]
Statue of Peter the Great in Voronezh, Russia. He is leaning on an anchor, symbolic of his contributions to modernizing and expanding Russia's navy (1860)

Kedging or warping is a technique for moving or turning a ship by using a relatively light anchor.

In yachts, a kedge anchor is an anchor carried in addition to the main, or bower, anchor, and usually stowed aft. Every yacht should carry at least two anchors – the main or bower anchor and a second lighter kedge anchor.[clarification needed] It is used occasionally when it is necessary to limit the turning circle as the yacht swings when it is anchored, such as in a narrow river or a deep pool in an otherwise shallow area. Kedge anchors are sometimes used to recover vessels that have run aground.

For ships, a kedge may be dropped while a ship is underway, or carried out in a suitable direction by a tender or ship's boat to enable the ship to be winched off if aground or swung into a particular heading, or even to be held steady against a tidal or other stream.

Historically, it was of particular relevance to sailing warships that used them to outmaneuver opponents when the wind had dropped but might be used by any vessel in confined, shoal water to place it in a more desirable position, provided she had enough manpower.[10]

Club hauling

[edit]

Club hauling is an archaic technique. When a vessel is in a narrow channel or on a lee shore so that there is no room to tack the vessel in a conventional manner, an anchor attached to the lee quarter may be dropped from the lee bow. This is deployed when the vessel is head to wind and has lost headway. As the vessel gathers sternway the strain on the cable pivots the vessel around what is now the weather quarter turning the vessel onto the other tack. The anchor is then normally cut away (the ship's momentum prevents recovery without aborting the maneuver).[11][12]

Multiple anchor patterns

[edit]

When it is necessary to moor a ship or floating platform with precise positioning and alignment, such as when drilling the seabed, for some types of salvage work, and for some types of diving operation, several anchors are set in a pattern which allows the vessel to be positioned by shortening and lengthening the scope of the anchors, and adjusting the tension on the rodes. The anchors are usually laid in prearranged positions by an anchor tender, and the moored vessel uses its own winches to adjust position and tension.[13]

Similar arrangements are used for some types of single buoy moorings, like the catenary anchor leg mooring (CALM) used for loading and unloading liquid cargoes.

Weighing anchor

[edit]

Since all anchors that embed themselves in the bottom require the strain to be along the seabed, anchors can be broken out of the bottom by shortening the rope until the vessel is directly above the anchor; at this point the anchor chain is "up and down", in naval parlance. If necessary, motoring slowly around the location of the anchor also helps dislodge it. Anchors are sometimes fitted with a trip line[14] attached to the crown, by which they can be unhooked from underwater hazards.

The term aweigh describes an anchor when it is hanging on the rope and not resting on the bottom. This is linked to the term to weigh anchor, meaning to lift the anchor from the sea bed, allowing the ship or boat to move. An anchor is described as aweigh when it has been broken out of the bottom and is being hauled up to be stowed. Aweigh should not be confused with under way, which describes a vessel that is not moored to a dock or anchored, whether or not the vessel is moving through the water. Aweigh is also often confused with away, which is incorrect.

History

[edit]

Evolution of the anchor

[edit]
Anchors come in a wide variety of shapes, types, and sizes for different conditions, functions and vessels.

The earliest anchors were probably rocks, and many rock anchors have been found dating from at least the Bronze Age.[15] Pre-European Māori waka (canoes) used one or more hollowed stones, tied with flax ropes, as anchors. Many modern moorings still rely on a large rock as the primary element of their design. However, using pure weight to resist the forces of a storm works well only as a permanent mooring; a large enough rock would be nearly impossible to move to a new location.

The ancient Greeks used baskets of stones, large sacks filled with sand, and wooden logs filled with lead. According to Apollonius Rhodius and Stephen of Byzantium, anchors were formed of stone, and Athenaeus states that they were also sometimes made of wood. Such anchors held the vessel merely by their weight and by their friction along the bottom.[citation needed][clarification needed]

Fluked anchors

[edit]
Anchor of the Ladby Ship

Iron was afterwards introduced for the construction of anchors, and an improvement was made by forming them with teeth, or "flukes", to fasten themselves into the bottom. This is the iconic anchor shape most familiar to non-sailors.

This form has been used since antiquity. The Roman Nemi ships of the 1st century AD used this form. The Viking Ladby ship (probably 10th century) used a fluked anchor of this type, made of iron, which would have had a wooden stock mounted perpendicular to the shank and flukes to make the flukes contact the bottom at a suitable angle to hook or penetrate.[16]

Admiralty anchor

[edit]
An Admiralty Pattern anchor; when deployed on the seafloor the stock forces one of its flukes into the bottom.

The Admiralty Pattern anchor, or simply "Admiralty", also known as a "Fisherman", consists of a central shank with a ring or shackle for attaching the rode (the rope, chain, or cable connecting the ship and the anchor). At the other end of the shank there are two arms, carrying the flukes, while the stock is mounted to the shackle end, at ninety degrees to the arms. When the anchor lands on the bottom, it generally falls over with the arms parallel to the seabed. As a strain comes onto the rope, the stock digs into the bottom, canting the anchor until one of the flukes catches and digs into the bottom.

The Admiralty Anchor is an entirely independent reinvention of a classical design, as seen in one of the Nemi ship anchors. This basic design remained unchanged for centuries, with the most significant changes being to the overall proportions, and a move from stocks made of wood to iron stocks in the late 1830s and early 1840s.[citation needed]

Since one fluke always protrudes up from the set anchor, there is a great tendency of the rode to foul the anchor as the vessel swings due to wind or current shifts. When this happens, the anchor may be pulled out of the bottom, and in some cases may need to be hauled up to be re-set. In the mid-19th century, numerous modifications were attempted to alleviate these problems, as well as improve holding power, including one-armed mooring anchors. The most successful of these patent anchors, the Trotman Anchor,[17] introduced a pivot at the centre of the crown where the arms join the shank, allowing the "idle" upper arm to fold against the shank. When deployed the lower arm may fold against the shank tilting the tip of the fluke upwards, so each fluke has a tripping palm at its base, to hook on the bottom as the folded arm drags along the seabed, which unfolds the downward oriented arm until the tip of the fluke can engage the bottom.[citation needed]

Handling and storage of these anchors requires special equipment and procedures. Once the anchor is hauled up to the hawsepipe, the ring end is hoisted up to the end of a timber projecting from the bow known as the cathead. The crown of the anchor is then hauled up with a heavy tackle until one fluke can be hooked over the rail. This is known as "catting and fishing" the anchor. Before dropping the anchor, the fishing process is reversed, and the anchor is dropped from the end of the cathead.

Stockless anchor

[edit]
The action of a stockless anchor being set

The stockless anchor, patented in England in 1821,[18] represented the first significant departure in anchor design in centuries. Although their holding-power-to-weight ratio is significantly lower than admiralty pattern anchors, their ease of handling and stowage aboard large ships led to almost universal adoption. In contrast to the elaborate stowage procedures for earlier anchors, stockless anchors are simply hauled up until they rest with the shank inside the hawsepipes, and the flukes against the hull (or inside a recess in the hull called the anchor box).

While there are numerous variations, stockless anchors consist of a set of heavy flukes connected by a pivot or ball and socket joint to a shank. Cast into the crown of the anchor is a set of tripping palms, projections that drag on the bottom, forcing the main flukes to dig in.

Small boat anchors

[edit]

Until the mid-20th century, anchors for smaller vessels were either scaled-down versions of admiralty anchors, or simple grapnels. As new designs with greater holding-power-to-weight ratios were sought, a great variety of anchor designs have emerged. Many of these designs are still under patent, and other types are best known by their original trademarked names.

Grapnel anchor / drag

[edit]
A grapnel anchor

A traditional design, the grapnel is merely a shank (no stock) with four or more tines, also known as a drag. It has a benefit in that, no matter how it reaches the bottom, one or more tines are aimed to set. In coral, or rock, it is often able to set quickly by hooking into the structure, but may be more difficult to retrieve. A grapnel is often quite light, and may have additional uses as a tool to recover gear lost overboard. Its weight also makes it relatively easy to move and carry, however its shape is generally not compact and it may be awkward to stow unless a collapsing model is used.

Grapnels rarely have enough fluke area to develop much hold in sand, clay, or mud. It is not unknown for the anchor to foul on its own rode, or to foul the tines with refuse from the bottom, preventing it from digging in. On the other hand, it is quite possible for this anchor to find such a good hook that, without a trip line from the crown, it is impossible to retrieve.[19][20]

Herreshoff anchor

[edit]

Designed by yacht designer L. Francis Herreshoff, this is essentially the same pattern as an admiralty anchor, albeit with small diamond-shaped flukes or palms. The novelty of the design lay in the means by which it could be broken down into three pieces for stowage. In use, it still presents all the issues of the admiralty pattern anchor.

Northill anchor

[edit]

Originally designed as a lightweight anchor for seaplanes, this design consists of two plough-like blades mounted to a shank, with a folding stock crossing through the crown of the anchor.

CQR plough anchor

[edit]
A CQR plough anchor

Many manufacturers produce a plough-type anchor, so-named after its resemblance to an agricultural plough. All such anchors are copied from the original CQR (Coastal Quick Release, or Clyde Quick Release, later rebranded as 'secure' by Lewmar), a 1933 design patented in the UK by mathematician Geoffrey Ingram Taylor.[21][22]

Plough anchors stow conveniently in a roller at the bow, and have been popular with cruising sailors and private boaters. Ploughs can be moderately good in all types of seafloor, though not exceptional in any. Contrary to popular belief, the CQR's hinged shank is not to allow the anchor to turn with direction changes rather than breaking out, but actually to prevent the shank's weight from disrupting the fluke's orientation while setting.[23] The hinge can wear out and may trap a sailor's fingers. Some later plough anchors have a rigid shank, such as the Lewmar's "Delta".[24]

A plough anchor has a fundamental flaw: like its namesake, the agricultural plough, it digs in but then tends to break out back to the surface. Plough anchors sometimes have difficulty setting at all, and instead skip across the seafloor. By contrast, modern efficient anchors tend to be "scoop" types that dig ever deeper.

Delta anchor

[edit]

The Delta anchor was derived from the CQR. It was patented by Philip McCarron, James Stewart, and Gordon Lyall of British marine manufacturer Simpson-Lawrence Ltd in 1992. It was designed as an advance over the anchors used for floating systems such as oil rigs. It retains the weighted tip of the CQR but has a much higher fluke area to weight ratio than its predecessor. The designers also eliminated the sometimes troublesome hinge. It is a plough anchor with a rigid, arched shank. It is described as self-launching because it can be dropped from a bow roller simply by paying out the rode, without manual assistance. This is an oft copied design with the European Brake and Australian Sarca Excel being two of the more notable ones. Although it is a plough type anchor, it sets and holds reasonably well in hard bottoms.

Danforth anchor

[edit]
The Danforth is a light, versatile, highly popular fluke-style anchor.

American Richard Danforth invented the Danforth Anchor in the 1940s for use aboard landing craft. It uses a stock at the crown to which two large flat triangular flukes are attached. The stock is hinged so the flukes can orient toward the bottom (and on some designs may be adjusted for an optimal angle depending on the bottom type). Tripping palms at the crown act to tip the flukes into the seabed. The design is a burying variety, and once well set can develop high resistance. Its lightweight and compact flat design make it easy to retrieve and relatively easy to store; some anchor rollers and hawsepipes can accommodate a fluke-style anchor.

A Danforth does not usually penetrate or hold in gravel or weeds. In boulders and coral it may hold by acting as a hook. If there is much current, or if the vessel is moving while dropping the anchor, it may "kite" or "skate" over the bottom due to the large fluke area acting as a sail or wing.[25]

The FOB HP anchor designed in Brittany in the 1970s is a Danforth variant designed to give increased holding through its use of rounded flukes setting at a 30° angle.[26]

The Fortress is an American aluminum alloy Danforth variant that can be disassembled for storage and it features an adjustable 32° and 45° shank/fluke angle to improve holding capability in common sea bottoms such as hard sand and soft mud.[27] This anchor performed well in a 1989 US Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) test[28] and in an August 2014 holding power test that was conducted in the soft mud bottoms of the Chesapeake Bay.[29]

Bruce or claw anchor

[edit]
The Bruce anchor was an evolutionary improvement in its day. It is most effective in larger sizes.

This claw-shaped anchor was designed by Peter Bruce from Scotland in the 1970s.[30] Bruce gained his early reputation from the production of large-scale commercial anchors for ships and fixed installations such as oil rigs. It was later scaled down for small boats, and copies of this popular design abound. The Bruce and its copies, known generically as "claw type anchors", have been adopted on smaller boats (partly because they stow easily on a bow roller) but they are most effective in larger sizes. Claw anchors are quite popular on charter fleets as they have a high chance to set on the first try in many bottoms. They have the reputation of not breaking out with tide or wind changes, instead slowly turning in the bottom to align with the force.

Bruce anchors can have difficulty penetrating weedy bottoms and grass. They offer a fairly low holding-power-to-weight ratio and generally have to be oversized to compete with newer types.[31]

Scoop type anchors

[edit]

Three time circumnavigator German Rolf Kaczirek invented the Bügel Anker in the 1980s. Kaczirek wanted an anchor that was self-righting without necessitating a ballasted tip. Instead, he added a roll bar and switched out the plough share for a flat blade design. As none of the innovations of this anchor were patented, copies of it abound.

Alain Poiraud of France introduced the scoop type anchor in 1996. Similar in design to the Bügel anchor, Poiraud's design features a concave fluke shaped like the blade of a shovel, with a shank attached parallel to the fluke, and the load applied toward the digging end. It is designed to dig into the bottom like a shovel, and dig deeper as more pressure is applied. The common challenge with all the scoop type anchors is that they set so well, they can be difficult to weigh.

  • Bügelanker, or Wasi: This German-designed bow anchor has a sharp tip for penetrating weed, and features a roll-bar that allows the correct setting attitude to be achieved without the need for extra weight to be inserted into the tip.[32]
Spade anchor
  • Spade: This is a French design that has proven successful since 1996. It features a demountable shank (hollow in some instances) and the choice of galvanized steel, stainless steel, or aluminum construction, which means a lighter and more easily stowable anchor.[33] The geometry also makes this anchor self stowing on a single roller. The Spade anchor is the anchor of choice for Rubicon 3, one of Europe's largest adventure sailing companies[34]
A galvanised Rocna Anchor [35]
  • Rocna: This New Zealand spade design, available in galvanised or stainless steel, has been produced since 2004. It has a roll-bar (similar to that of the Bügel), a large spade-like fluke area, and a sharp toe for penetrating weed and grass. The Rocna sets quickly and holds well.[36]
Mantus anchor
  • Mantus: This is claimed to be a fast setting anchor with high holding power. It is designed as an all round anchor capable of setting even in challenging bottoms such as hard sand/clay bottoms and grass. The shank is made out of a high tensile steel capable of withstanding high loads. It is similar in design to the Rocna but has a larger and wider roll-bar that reduces the risk of fouling and increases the angle of the fluke that results in improved penetration in some bottoms.[37]
  • Ultra: This is an innovative spade design that dispenses with a roll-bar. Made primarily of stainless steel, its main arm is hollow, while the fluke tip has lead within it.[38] It is similar in appearance to the Spade anchor.
A Vulcan anchor, by Rocna Anchors
  • Vulcan: A recent sibling to the Rocna, this anchor performs similarly but does not have a roll-bar. Instead the Vulcan has patented design features such as the "V-bulb" and the "Roll Palm" that allow it to dig in deeply. The Vulcan was designed primarily for sailors who had difficulties accommodating the roll-bar Rocna on their bow.[39] Peter Smith (originator of the Rocna) designed it specifically for larger powerboats. Both Vulcans and Rocnas are available in galvanised steel, or in stainless steel. The Vulcan is similar in appearance to the Spade anchor.
Knox Anchor
  • Knox Anchor: This is produced in Scotland and was invented by Professor John Knox. It has a divided concave large area fluke arrangement and a shank in high tensile steel. A roll bar similar to the Rocna gives fast setting and a holding power of about 40 times anchor weight.[40][clarification needed]

Other temporary anchors

[edit]
  • Mud weight: Consists of a blunt heavy weight, usually cast iron or cast lead, that sinks into the mud and resist lateral movement. It is suitable only for soft silt bottoms and in mild conditions. Sizes range between 5 and 20 kg for small craft. Various designs exist and many are home produced from lead or improvised with heavy objects. This is a commonly used method on the Norfolk Broads in England.
  • Bulwagga: This is a unique design featuring three flukes instead of the usual two. It has performed well in tests by independent sources such as American boating magazine Practical Sailor.[41]

Permanent anchors

[edit]

These are used where the vessel is permanently or semi-permanently sited, for example in the case of lightvessels or channel marker buoys. The anchor needs to hold the vessel in all weathers, including the most severe storm, but needs to be lifted only occasionally, at most – for example, only if the vessel is to be towed into port for maintenance. An alternative to using an anchor under these circumstances, especially if the anchor need never be lifted at all, may be to use a pile that is driven into the seabed.

Permanent anchors come in a wide range of types and have no standard form. A slab of rock with an iron staple in it to attach a chain to would serve the purpose, as would any dense object of appropriate weight (for instance, an engine block). Modern moorings may be anchored by augers, which look and act like oversized screws drilled into the seabed, or by barbed metal beams pounded in (or even driven in with explosives) like pilings, or by a variety of other non-mass means of getting a grip on the bottom. One method of building a mooring is to use three or more conventional anchors laid out with short lengths of chain attached to a swivel, so no matter which direction the vessel moves, one or more anchors are aligned to resist the force.

Mushroom

[edit]
Mushroom anchor (right) on the lightship Portsmouth at Portsmouth, Virginia

The mushroom anchor is suitable where the seabed is composed of silt or fine sand. It was invented by Robert Stevenson, for use by an 82-ton converted fishing boat, Pharos, which was used as a lightvessel between 1807 and 1810 near to Bell Rock whilst the lighthouse was being constructed. It was equipped with a 1.5-ton example.

It is shaped like an inverted mushroom, the head becoming buried in the silt. A counterweight is often provided at the other end of the shank to lay it down before it becomes buried.

A mushroom anchor normally sinks in the silt to the point where it has displaced its own weight in bottom material, thus greatly increasing its holding power. These anchors are suitable only for a silt or mud bottom, since they rely upon suction and cohesion of the bottom material, which rocky or coarse sand bottoms lack. The holding power of this anchor is at best about twice its weight until it becomes buried, when it can be as much as ten times its weight.[42] They are available in sizes from about 5 kg up to several tons.

Deadweight

[edit]

A deadweight is an anchor that relies solely on being a heavy weight. It is usually just a large block of concrete or stone at the end of the chain. Its holding power is defined by its weight underwater (i.e., taking its buoyancy into account) regardless of the type of seabed, although suction can increase this if it becomes buried. Consequently, deadweight anchors are used where mushroom anchors are unsuitable, for example in rock, gravel or coarse sand. An advantage of a deadweight anchor over a mushroom is that if it does drag, it continues to provide its original holding force. The disadvantage of using deadweight anchors in conditions where a mushroom anchor could be used is that it needs to be around ten times the weight of the equivalent mushroom anchor.[43]

Auger

[edit]

Auger anchors can be used to anchor permanent moorings, floating docks, fish farms, etc. These anchors, which have one or more slightly pitched self-drilling threads, must be screwed into the seabed with the use of a tool, so require access to the bottom, either at low tide or by use of a diver. Hence they can be difficult to install in deep water without special equipment.

Weight for weight, augers have a higher holding than other permanent designs, and so can be cheap and relatively easily installed, although difficult to set in extremely soft mud.

High-holding-types

[edit]

There is a need in the oil-and-gas industry to resist large anchoring forces when laying pipelines and for drilling vessels. These anchors are installed and removed using a support tug and pennant/pendant wire. Some examples are the Stevin range supplied by Vrijhof Ankers. Large plate anchors such as the Stevmanta are used for permanent moorings.

Anchoring gear

[edit]
Thomas Brunton invented and patented in 1813 studded-link marine chain cable, which replaced hempen cables and is still in use.
Naval anchor incorporated into HMAS Canberra memorial, Canberra, Australia

The elements of anchoring gear include the anchor, the cable (also called a rode), the method of attaching the two together, the method of attaching the cable to the ship, charts, and a method of learning the depth of the water.

Vessels may carry a number of anchors: bower anchors are the main anchors used by a vessel and normally carried at the bow of the vessel. A kedge anchor is a light anchor used for warping an anchor, also known as kedging, or more commonly on yachts for mooring quickly or in benign conditions. A stream anchor, which is usually heavier than a kedge anchor, can be used for kedging or warping in addition to temporary mooring and restraining stern movement in tidal conditions or in waters where vessel movement needs to be restricted, such as rivers and channels.[44]

Charts are vital to good anchoring.[45] Knowing the location of potential dangers, as well as being useful in estimating the effects of weather and tide in the anchorage, is essential in choosing a good place to drop the hook. One can get by without referring to charts, but they are an important tool and a part of good anchoring gear, and a skilled mariner would not choose to anchor without them.

Anchor rode

[edit]

The anchor rode (or "cable" or "warp") that connects the anchor to the vessel is usually made up of chain, rope, or a combination of those.[46] Large ships use only chain rode. Smaller craft might use a rope/chain combination or an all chain rode. All rodes should have some chain; chain is heavy but it resists abrasion from coral, sharp rocks, or shellfish beds, whereas a rope warp is susceptible to abrasion and can fail in a short time when stretched against an abrasive surface. The weight of the chain also helps keep the direction of pull on the anchor closer to horizontal, which improves holding, and absorbs part of snubbing loads. Where weight is not an issue, a heavier chain provides better holding by forming a catenary curve through the water and resting as much of its length on the bottom as would not be lifted by tension of the mooring load. Any changes to the tension are accommodated by additional chain being lifted or settling on the bottom, and this absorbs shock loads until the chain is straight, at which point the full load is taken by the anchor. Additional dissipation of shock loads can be achieved by fitting a snubber between the chain and a bollard or cleat on deck. This also reduces shock loads on the deck fittings, and the vessel usually lies more comfortably and quietly.[original research?]

Being strong and elastic, nylon rope is the most suitable as an anchor rode.[47] Polyester (terylene) is stronger but less elastic than nylon. Both materials sink, so they avoid fouling other craft in crowded anchorages and do not absorb much water. Neither breaks down quickly in sunlight. Elasticity helps absorb shock loading, but causes faster abrasive wear when the rope stretches over an abrasive surface, like a coral bottom or a poorly designed chock. Polypropylene ("polyprop") is not suited to rodes because it floats and is much weaker than nylon, being barely stronger than natural fibres.[48] Some grades of polypropylene break down in sunlight and become hard, weak, and unpleasant to handle. Natural fibres such as manila or hemp are still used in developing nations but absorb a lot of water, are relatively weak, and rot, although they do give good handling grip and are often relatively cheap. Ropes that have little or no elasticity are not suitable as anchor rodes. Elasticity is partly a function of the fibre material and partly of the rope structure.[original research?]

All anchors should have chain at least equal to the boat's length.[clarification needed] Some skippers prefer an all chain warp for greater security on coral or sharp edged rock bottoms. The chain should be shackled to the warp through a steel eye or spliced to the chain using a chain splice. The shackle pin should be securely wired or moused. Either galvanized or stainless steel is suitable for eyes and shackles, galvanized steel being the stronger of the two.[citation needed] Some skippers prefer to add a swivel[49] to the rode. There is a school of thought that says these should not be connected to the anchor itself,[clarification needed] but should be somewhere in the chain. However, most skippers connect the swivel directly to the anchor.[citation needed]

Scope

[edit]

Scope is the ratio of length of the rode to the depth of the water measured from the highest point (usually the anchor roller or bow chock) to the seabed, making allowance for the highest expected tide. When making this ratio large enough, one can ensure that the pull on the anchor is as horizontal as possible. This will make it unlikely for the anchor to break out of the bottom and drag, if it was properly embedded in the seabed to begin with. When deploying chain, a large enough scope leads to a load that is entirely horizontal, whilst an anchor rode made only of rope will never achieve a strictly horizontal pull.

In moderate conditions, the ratio of rode to water depth should be 4:1 – where there is sufficient swing-room, a greater scope is always better. In rougher conditions it should be up to twice this with the extra length giving more stretch and a smaller angle to the bottom to resist the anchor breaking out.[50] For example, if the water is 8 metres (26 ft) deep, and the anchor roller is 1 m (3 ft) above the water, then the 'depth' is 9 meters (~30 feet). The amount of rode to let out in moderate conditions is thus 36 meters (120 feet). (For this reason, it is important to have a reliable and accurate method of measuring the depth of water.)

When using a rope rode, there is a simple way to estimate the scope:[51] The ratio of bow height of the rode to length of rode above the water while lying back hard on the anchor is the same or less than the scope ratio. The basis for this is simple geometry (Intercept Theorem): The ratio between two sides of a triangle stays the same regardless of the size of the triangle as long as the angles do not change.

Generally, the rode should be between 5 and 10 times the depth to the seabed, giving a scope of 5:1 or 10:1; the larger the number, the shallower the angle is between the cable and the seafloor, and the less upwards force is acting on the anchor. A 10:1 scope gives the greatest holding power, but also allows for much more drifting about due to the longer amount of cable paid out. Anchoring with sufficient scope and/or heavy chain rode brings the direction of strain close to parallel with the seabed. This is particularly important for light, modern anchors designed to bury in the bottom, where scopes of 5:1 to 7:1 are common, whereas heavy anchors and moorings can use a scope of 3:1, or less. Some modern anchors, such as the Ultra holds with a scope of 3:1;[citation needed] but, unless the anchorage is crowded, a longer scope always reduces shock stresses.[clarification needed]

A major disadvantage of the concept of scope is that it does not take into account the fact that a chain is forming a catenary when hanging between two points (i.e., bow roller and the point where the chain hits the seabed), and thus is a non-linear curve (in fact, a cosh() function), whereas scope is a linear function. As a consequence, in deep water the scope needed will be less, whilst in very shallow water the scope must be chosen much larger to achieve the same pulling angle at the anchor shank. For this reason, the British Admiralty does not use a linear scope formula, but a square root formula instead.[52]

A couple of online calculators exist to work out the amount of chain and rope needed to achieve a (possibly nearly) horizontal pull at the anchor shank, and the associated anchor load.[53][54][55]

Security and modes of failure

[edit]

Common modes of failure for anchoring are dragging the anchor, in which the anchor fails to hold against the load, parting of the cable, in which the rode either fails under the tensile load or abrades until it is so weakened as to fail under a lesser load, and fouling of the anchor, in which the anchor is prevented from setting correctly.

Consequences of failure depend on circumstances, but may include wrecking by being driven aground on a lee shore, a particularly serious risk for sailing vessels without auxiliary propulsion when embayed.

Holding ground

[edit]

Effects of bottom composition on holding power

Material of cable

[edit]

Rope vs chain cable. Functions of elasticity and weight.

As symbol

[edit]
A 1914 Russian poster depicting the Triple Entente of World War I, with Britannia's association with the sea symbolized by her holding a large anchor
An anchor pictured in the coat of arms of Mariehamn, the capital city of Åland

An anchor frequently appears on the flags and coats of arms of institutions involved with the sea, as well as of port cities and seacoast regions and provinces in various countries. There also exists in heraldry the "Anchored Cross", or Mariner's Cross, a stylized cross in the shape of an anchor. The symbol can be used to signify 'fresh start' or 'hope'.[56]

The Mariner's Cross is also referred to as St. Clement's Cross, in reference to the way this saint was killed (being tied to an anchor and thrown from a boat into the Black Sea in 102). Anchored crosses are occasionally a feature of coats of arms in which context they are referred to by the heraldic terms anchry or ancre.[57] The Unicode anchor (Miscellaneous Symbols) is represented by: U+2693 ANCHOR.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
An anchor is a heavy device, typically constructed from metal such as galvanized or , attached to a vessel by a , cable, or and lowered to the to secure the vessel against , current, or by gripping the underwater bottom. It generally features a central shank with one or more curved flukes or arms that penetrate , rock, or vegetation, along with a ring at the opposite end for the rode attachment, enabling temporary or semi-permanent . The concept of anchoring traces its origins to ancient civilizations, where early forms consisted of stones, wooden stakes, or baskets filled with rocks, used in the (c. 3300–1200 BCE) by early maritime cultures including Mesopotamians and for stabilizing boats on rivers and coasts. The ancient Greeks introduced the first iron anchors in the 6th–4th centuries BCE, marking a significant advancement in durability and holding power, while the Romans further refined designs by incorporating barbed flukes for better seabed penetration from the Republican period onward (c. 5th century BCE–1st century CE). By the , European shipbuilders developed the archetypal admiralty or fisherman's anchor with a wooden stock to orient the flukes correctly, a design that persisted into the before the advent of stockless variants for easier handling on large vessels. Modern anchors have diversified into numerous types tailored to specific seabed conditions, vessel sizes, and operational needs, including the lightweight Danforth or fluke-style anchor, which excels in mud and sand with high holding ratios up to 50:1; the plow or scoop designs like the CQR and Delta, ideal for varied bottoms including grass and weeds; the claw-shaped anchor for rocky or uneven seabeds; and innovative new-generation models such as the Rocna or , featuring concave flukes for superior self-righting and penetration in adverse weather. Materials have evolved from traditional to high-tensile steel, aluminum-magnesium alloys for lightweight applications, and galvanized or stainless finishes for corrosion resistance, with sizes ranging from small grapnel anchors for dinghies to massive units weighing over 30 tons for supertankers. Anchors play a critical role in maritime safety, enabling vessels to remain stationary for rest, repairs, or awaiting tides, while specialized variants like sea anchors or drogues control drift in storms without bottom contact; their effectiveness depends on proper scope (rode length), bottom composition, and techniques like kedging for repositioning.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

An anchor is a heavy device, typically constructed from metal, designed to secure a vessel to the by either embedding into the substrate or providing sufficient weight to counteract forces of drift. It is attached to the vessel via a rode, which may consist of , , or a combination, and is deployed overboard to maintain position relative to the water body. The term originates from word ankura, meaning "" or "bent ," reflecting its fundamental role in grasping or holding fast. The primary purposes of nautical anchors include preventing uncontrolled movement of vessels due to , currents, or waves, thereby ensuring safety during stops or rests at . They facilitate temporary for ships, boats, and floating structures, allowing to disembark or conduct operations without the vessel drifting away. In broader applications, anchors secure buoys for aids or stabilize offshore installations like against environmental forces. Basic components of a nautical anchor consist of the shank, which forms the central vertical body; the ring at the top for connecting to the rode; flukes or arms that penetrate and grip the ; and, in certain designs, a that aids in orienting the flukes correctly upon deployment. These elements work together to embed the anchor, providing resistance through friction and mechanical hold rather than mere weight alone.

Basic Principles of Anchoring

Anchors secure vessels by resisting horizontal forces generated by wind, currents, and waves through a combination of their weight providing drag, frictional resistance against the seabed, and penetration into the substrate to develop additional holding capacity. The mechanics of holding power primarily involve these elements, where the anchor's design facilitates burial or gripping to oppose the pull from the rode. A simplified model for the total holding force HH can be expressed as H=μWH = \mu W, where WW is the anchor's submerged weight and μ\mu is the holding coefficient (typically ranging from 10 to 50 depending on anchor type and seabed conditions) that accounts for friction and penetration effects. This highlights how heavier anchors increase drag and friction, while specialized flukes or plows enhance penetration for superior grip in suitable bottoms. Seabed composition significantly influences anchor performance, as different substrates affect penetration and frictional hold. In , anchors achieve strong grip through deep burial, allowing fluke-style designs to embed effectively and resist pullout with high holding ratios up to 50 times their . provides excellent and for penetrating anchors, often yielding holds 30-40 times the anchor , though soft mud may allow gradual settling without full resistance. Rocky or weedy seabeds pose challenges, as hard limits penetration and weed entanglement reduces effective contact area, potentially dropping holding power to less than 10 times the anchor ; in such cases, grapnel types that rather than bury are preferable. To maximize hold, anchors must penetrate or bury sufficiently to engage the seabed's , avoiding surface skidding. Several factors determine an anchor's effectiveness in maintaining position. Vessel size and displacement dictate the required holding capacity, as larger boats generate greater loads from their mass and . , or the exposed surface area above the , amplifies forces in high winds, with calculations often based on projected areas to estimate total pull. Bottom composition, as noted, alters grip, while the scope ratio—the length of rode relative to water depth—introduces a horizontal component to reduce vertical uplift on the anchor, though details vary by conditions. Environmental factors like , currents, and wave action further impact performance by varying load direction and magnitude, potentially shifting the anchor if not accounted for. Common failure modes include dragging, where the anchor slides sideways across the seabed due to insufficient penetration or mismatched bottom type, often signaled by gradual vessel movement. Fouling occurs when the anchor or rode entangles with debris, rocks, or vegetation, preventing proper setting and risking sudden loss of hold. Breakout happens under excessive load, pulling the anchor free vertically or shearing it from the substrate, particularly in storms where forces exceed design limits. Safety considerations emphasize selecting anchors with adequate holding power relative to vessel displacement to prevent drift. Guidelines recommend sizing by weight classes, such as 15-45 pounds for small boats under 40 feet and 5,000-10,000 pounds displacement, ensuring at least 4-6 times the expected maximum load in moderate conditions. Organizations like the American Boat and Yacht Council (ABYC) provide tables correlating boat weight, , and rode strength to minimum anchor requirements, prioritizing conservative sizing for safety in variable environments.

Historical Development

Ancient and Early Anchors

The earliest forms of anchors date back to the Bronze Age in the ancient Near East, particularly ancient Egypt, where stone weights served as primitive devices to hold watercraft in place. Archaeological evidence from sites like Mersa Gawasis reveals triangular or conical stone anchors made of limestone, granite, or conglomerate, dating to around 2000 BCE; these featured a rope hole for attachment and relied solely on their mass to sink and resist drift. Similar stone anchors have been documented across Mediterranean prehistoric contexts from the third millennium BCE, underscoring their role in early maritime trade and fishing. In the classical era, Greek and Roman navies advanced these designs by constructing wooden anchors reinforced with lead weights for added . The earliest visual representations appear on coins from the BCE, such as those minted in Apollonia Pontica, symbolizing maritime prowess and trade. These composite anchors typically consisted of a wooden shank with arms and a removable lead stock, allowing for better deployment and retrieval. A notable example comes from the , ceremonial Roman vessels from the CE, which featured intact wooden anchors with lead stocks measuring up to 5 meters in . By the Roman period, materials evolved further to include iron components, marking a shift from purely wooden and stone constructions to more durable metal-integrated forms beginning in the Republican era (c. 509–27 BCE). While early anchors depended primarily on weight to settle on the and provide holding power through and burial, Roman innovations introduced fluked designs with curved arms for better gripping. However, these designs proved limited in deeper waters, where insufficient rope length could prevent contact with the bottom, or on poor like loose sand or rock, where they might slide or fail to embed securely. Anchors played a strategic role in ancient naval operations, as seen in the in 480 BCE, where the Greek fleet anchored in the narrow straits to constrain Persian movements and facilitate maneuvering during the engagement. These ancient anchors, including the early fluked variants, laid the groundwork for later medieval and modern innovations.

Emergence of Fluked Designs

Fluked anchors, featuring curved arms known as flukes for actively gripping the seabed, first emerged during the Roman era around the 1st century BCE/CE, representing a pivotal advancement over purely weight-dependent designs. Archaeological evidence, including anchors from Roman shipwrecks, shows iron constructions with fluke-like projections to enhance penetration into various bottom types, building on earlier wooden and stone forms. These innovations allowed for better holding in sand and mud by digging rather than merely relying on friction and mass. During the , European shipbuilders refined these designs using iron, developing stocked anchors to orient the flukes correctly, as evidenced by recoveries from 13th–15th century sites. By the , the British Admiralty standardized the fluked anchor into the Admiralty pattern, featuring a long shank, a transverse for proper orientation, and broad flukes for seabed engagement; this design became the backbone of fleets, including during the , where reliable anchoring was critical for blockades and fleet maneuvers. The pattern's ensured the flukes faced downward upon deployment, improving stability in rough conditions compared to earlier forms. A key figure in refining these designs was Richard Pering, a British naval who, in 1813, patented improvements to the long-shank stocked anchor, including repositioning the ring closer to the shank for better balance and shortening the flukes while curving them more acutely to optimize penetration without sacrificing weight distribution. Pering's modifications addressed common failures in variable seabeds, evolving the design to harmonize mass for initial setting with fluke action for sustained hold, as detailed in his contemporary tests conducted under the . These changes resulted in anchors that were lighter yet demonstrated superior holding power over prior Admiralty variants, with reports indicating enhanced security in diverse bottoms like clay and . The advantages of fluked designs over pre-fluke anchors were substantial, providing up to several times greater holding capacity in tests by enabling deeper embedment rather than surface friction alone, which proved vital for larger vessels in unpredictable winds and currents. This shift allowed ships to anchor more securely in a wider range of seabeds, reducing drag risks that plagued stone or simple iron weights from antiquity. Global adoption accelerated through colonial trade routes in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, with the Admiralty pattern influencing variations in the French and American navies; for instance, U.S. warships employed similar long-shank fluked anchors by the 1800s, adapting them for transatlantic and coastal operations, while French designs incorporated comparable fluke geometries for imperial fleets. This widespread use solidified fluked anchors as the standard for maritime powers until later 19th-century refinements.

Modern Anchor Innovations

The , a key naval innovation from the early , eliminated the traditional crossbar stock to facilitate rapid deployment and stowage in hawse pipes, particularly advantageous for chain handling on warships. By , the had widely adopted Hall's stockless design almost exclusively for larger vessels, prioritizing quick maneuvering in combat scenarios over the slower handling of stocked anchors. This design allowed anchors to pivot freely upon contact with the , improving efficiency in varied conditions while reducing deck clutter and enabling permanent storage in bow fittings. Anchor materials evolved significantly in the , transitioning from to galvanized for enhanced resistance and strength during the , followed by the introduction of lightweight aluminum-magnesium alloys in post-World War II models to reduce weight without sacrificing holding capacity. Galvanized became standard for durability in marine environments, as seen in widespread adoption for naval and commercial anchors by the mid-1900s. Post-WWII advancements, such as the aluminum-magnesium alloy used in designs like the Fortress anchor developed in the , enabled lighter anchors suitable for recreational and auxiliary vessels, offering up to half the weight of equivalent models while maintaining high performance through high-tensile properties. Standardized testing emerged in the 1970s through classifications by the (ABS) and (ISO), establishing benchmarks for holding power ratios that compare an anchor's resistance to its weight. ABS defines High Holding Power (HHP) anchors as providing at least twice the holding capacity of a standard in comparable conditions, with Super High Holding Power (SHHP) designs achieving four times that ratio. For example, certain lightweight fluke anchors achieve ratios up to 50:1 in soft , demonstrating superior performance in cohesive soils during controlled pull tests. These standards, outlined in ABS Rules for Materials and Welding (Part 2, Chapter 2) and ISO 19901-7 for offshore moorings, ensure reliability through proof loading and environmental simulations. Key patents in the late advanced self-righting mechanisms and versatility across types, exemplified by the anchor patented in the UK in 1971 and commercialized in the early 1970s for rigs. This claw-shaped design emphasized deep penetration and automatic righting without a , excelling in mixed bottoms like sand and clay. Similarly, the Delta anchor, developed in the 1980s by Simpson-Lawrence and patented in the in 1992, refined plow-style for consistent self-righting and high holding in varied substrates, including rocky areas. These innovations prioritized multi-bottom efficacy, with the achieving reliable resets under load shifts and the Delta offering balanced weight distribution for quick embedding. Contemporary trends focus on roll-bar configurations for rapid setting and eco-friendly adaptations to minimize environmental impact. Roll-bar anchors, such as those inspired by the Rocna design from the early 2000s, use a curved bar to orient the fluke upright upon deployment, enabling penetration in under 5 seconds in tests across and mud. Environmental considerations include non-toxic coatings, like those on cromox® anchor chains, which reduce corrosion without releasing harmful biocides into marine ecosystems, and designs avoiding sharp protrusions to limit scarring. These developments support sustainable anchoring for offshore renewables and sensitive habitats.

Types of Anchors

Lightweight and Grapnel Anchors

Lightweight and grapnel anchors are compact, portable devices primarily designed for small vessels such as dinghies, kayaks, and sailboards, offering versatility for temporary anchoring in challenging seabeds where traditional burying anchors may struggle. These anchors prioritize ease of storage and quick deployment over heavy-duty holding, making them ideal for recreational , , or as auxiliary kedge anchors to reposition a primary anchor. Their multi-purpose nature stems from simple, often folding mechanisms that allow them to snag rather than deeply penetrate the bottom, providing sufficient hold in conditions unsuitable for larger designs. Grapnel anchors feature three- or four-armed hooks that for compact storage, with a history tracing back to the in modern small-boat applications, though similar designs appear in earlier maritime records from the 16th to 19th centuries. They excel in rocky, weedy, or bottoms by snagging on obstructions rather than relying on penetration, typically weighing 5 to 20 pounds to balance portability and effectiveness. This snagging mechanism ensures at least one arm engages regardless of landing orientation, providing reliable short-term holds for small craft in obstructed environments. The Herreshoff anchor, developed in the 1930s by designer L. Francis Herreshoff, is a three-piece stock anchor with a folding stock that collapses for efficient storage on board, featuring symmetrical diamond-shaped flukes that cut through weed. This design improves upon traditional admiralty patterns by using smaller, symmetrical flukes while allowing the stock to fold away, enhancing maneuverability and reducing fouling risks. Commonly employed on racing s for its quick deployment and stowage, the Herreshoff offers balanced performance in mixed bottoms, though it requires careful sizing for the vessel's needs. The Northill anchor, introduced in the 1930s and widely adopted during for seaplane operations like the PBY Catalina flying boats, utilizes a lightweight aluminum construction in some models to achieve high surface area on the flukes for superior grip in soft substrates such as mud. Weighing under 10 pounds in typical sizes, it folds compactly and provides strong holding through its angled, broad fluke design that maximizes soil interaction without excessive weight. This makes it particularly effective for temporary holds in compliant bottoms where penetration depth is less critical than surface area. In performance evaluations, and grapnel anchors demonstrate holding ratios that support scopes up to 30:1 in favorable tests, particularly in scenarios, allowing effective use with extended rode for small boats under moderate loads. They are frequently deployed on kayaks, sailboards, and as kedge anchors for secondary positioning in recreational settings. However, these anchors exhibit limitations in sandy bottoms due to their shallow engagement, which reduces resistance to dragging, and they are unsuitable for long-term where sustained burial is required.

Plough and Scoop Anchors

Plough and scoop anchors are a category of modern marine anchors designed to bury themselves deeply into the through a slicing or scooping action, providing reliable holding for recreational and commercial vessels in various soft to medium substrates. These anchors typically feature a pointed tip and broad fluke that penetrate and maintain contact with the bottom, promoting self-setting without excessive dragging. Their design emphasizes continuous burial rather than high-angle fluke penetration seen in fluke-style alternatives, making them particularly suited for sand, mud, and clay bottoms where veering or wind shifts are common. The CQR, also known as the Secure plough anchor, originated as a British design in the early 1930s by mathematician Geoffrey Ingram Taylor. It features a hinged shank that allows the plow to pivot for effective resetting during boat swings without breaking out. This articulating plow shape excels in and , where it buries progressively under load to achieve strong holding. The CQR's efficiency, expressed as holding force relative to weight, can reach ratios of around 30 in wet and higher in , though practical performance depends on scope and bottom conditions. An evolution of the plough design, the Delta anchor was developed in the 1980s by Simpson-Lawrence and later commercialized by Lewmar in the 1990s as a one-piece cast steel unit. Unlike the hinged CQR, the Delta's fixed shank and ballasted tip enable faster self-righting and penetration, reducing setting time in substrates like sand and mud. Independent tests have demonstrated its ability to hold vessels up to 100 feet in length during 50-knot winds, with the low center of gravity ensuring quick burial even under surge. This makes it a popular choice for offshore cruising yachts requiring dependable performance in varied conditions. The Spade anchor, introduced in the as a new-generation scoop design, features a concave fluke and weighted bulbous tip for rapid self-righting and deep burial in a wide range of bottoms, including , , and grass. Its one-piece cast construction from high-tensile steel provides high holding ratios up to 50:1 in tests, making it suitable for yachts up to , with superior reset performance in adverse weather compared to earlier plows. Scoop anchors represent a variant with bulbous, concave flukes that maximize buried surface area for enhanced holding, particularly in clay or sticky mud. The Bulwagga, an American design introduced in the early , exemplifies this type with its three-fluke configuration—two penetrating points and a pivoting shank that adjusts to the pull for deep embedding. This setup buries almost completely in soft bottoms, providing high resistance to pull-out in weedy or clay-rich environments. Key advantages of and scoop anchors include low drag during initial setting due to their streamlined , which slices into the efficiently, and resistance to from grass or debris since they lack protruding elements. Common sizes range from 10 to 50 pounds, suitable for boats 20 to 50 feet in length, with galvanized or construction for . However, drawbacks include a potential to invert or trip in very soft mud, where the broad fluke may roll under excessive load, and the need for ample scope—typically 5:1 to 7:1—to ensure proper penetration and burial.

Fluke and Danforth Anchors

Fluke anchors, also known as Danforth-style anchors, feature a lightweight design with two long, flat, triangular flukes attached to a shank at an of approximately 32 degrees, enabling deep penetration into soft substrates like and . This configuration allows the anchor to bury itself efficiently when pulled, providing a high holding-to-weight ratio that can reach up to 50:1 in ideal conditions, such as firm or bottoms. The design originated from a U.S. granted to Richard S. Danforth in 1941 for a twin-fluke anchor, which simplified construction while enhancing performance for lightweight applications. The Danforth anchor gained prominence during , where its compact size and rapid setting capability made it ideal for military uses, including securing , seaplanes, and pontoon bridges in dynamic coastal environments. Weighing between 4 and 50 pounds, these anchors are suited for small to medium vessels up to 50 feet in length, setting quickly under moderate tension to offer reliable holding for coastal cruising and operations. Their mechanics rely on the flukes' sharp edges and angled orientation, which cause the anchor to pivot and dig in deeply rather than skid across the , though full effectiveness requires the flukes to remain clear of debris. The Rocna anchor, introduced in 2004 as a new-generation fluke design, features a concave fluke and roll-bar for self-righting and rapid setting in most bottoms, including , , and some weeds. Made from , it achieves holding ratios exceeding 50:1 in tests and is popular for yachts up to 100 feet due to its reliability in storms and ease of retrieval. A notable variant is the Fortress anchor, introduced in 1986 as an aluminum-magnesium alloy of the Danforth design, emphasizing even lighter weight without sacrificing strength. It incorporates adjustable flukes that can be set at 32 degrees for or 45 degrees for soft , optimizing penetration and holding across varying substrates while maintaining the high efficiency of the original fluke style. However, fluke anchors like the Danforth and Fortress perform poorly in weedy grass or rocky bottoms, where the flat flukes may ball up with vegetation or fail to penetrate, often requiring the anchor to be fully buried and repositioned for resetting.

Claw and Stockless Anchors

The represents an early 20th-century evolution from the traditional Admiralty pattern, designed primarily for compact stowage on naval and merchant vessels without the protruding stock that complicated deck handling. Originating with patents like Thomas W. Hall's design, which featured hinged flukes that folded for storage, stockless anchors rely on their substantial weight—often several tons for large ships—and partial burial of the broad, curved flukes to achieve holding power in , , or seabeds. This configuration allows for quick deployment and retrieval via windlasses, making them ideal for heavy-duty applications in commercial shipping where space efficiency is critical. Constructed from , typically galvanized for resistance, these anchors provide reliable performance in moderate conditions but may require longer scope ratios for optimal penetration in softer substrates. A prominent example of the claw-style subset within stockless designs is the Bruce anchor, invented by Scottish engineer Peter Bruce in the early 1970s to secure North Sea oil rig platforms. This one-piece, three-claw scoop lacks a stock, enabling a low-profile form that self-orients and sets omnidirectionally upon impact with the , gripping a variety of bottoms including rock, sand, and clay. Available in sizes from 20 to 1,000 pounds, it is forged from high-tensile cast steel, often hot-dip galvanized to withstand harsh marine environments. In controlled tests, the Bruce demonstrates holding power ratios of 20 to 30 times its weight, supporting its use on large vessels and offshore structures where rapid resetting during wind or current shifts is essential. Key advantages of and stockless anchors include their ability to set quickly without precise alignment and compatibility with automated systems due to their streamlined shank and fluke geometry, reducing crew effort in high-seas operations. However, they exhibit moderate holding in ultra-soft , where the broad but shallow can lead to gradual drag under sustained loads. Today, these designs remain staples in and merchant fleets for temporary of supertankers and supply ships, with variants like the AC-14—approved by in 1964 as a high-holding-power stockless type—offering enhanced reset capabilities through optimized fluke angles for 25% weight savings over conventional models.

Permanent and Specialized Anchors

Permanent anchors are engineered for long-term fixation in applications requiring stability over extended periods, such as fixed moorings, offshore , and environmental installations, where retrieval is infrequent or unnecessary. Unlike temporary anchors used for vessels, these designs prioritize high mass, embedment, or mechanical penetration to withstand environmental loads without frequent adjustment. They are commonly deployed in , , or clay seabeds to support buoys, pipelines, or structures in water depths ranging from shallow coastal zones to ultra-deep offshore environments. Mushroom anchors feature a dome-shaped head typically cast from lead, iron, or , with weights ranging from 50 to 5,000 pounds depending on the application and conditions. The design relies on the anchor's mass to sink into soft substrates like , where it creates a seal upon embedment, enhancing holding power through frictional resistance and effects that prevent dislodgement during tidal or surges. These anchors are particularly effective for permanent moorings of buoys and small craft docks, as the broad base distributes weight evenly and promotes self-burial over time. Deadweight anchors consist of large, dense blocks, often weighing up to 20 tons, positioned on the to provide holding through sheer gravitational and partial burial into . In deep-water settings, such as those supporting oil and gas platforms, the anchors' counteracts horizontal and vertical loads from lines, with burial depth increasing holding capacity by embedding into the substrate under load. This simple, reliable mechanism is favored for its low installation complexity and suitability in areas with variable strengths, though it requires significant deployment . Auger and screw anchors incorporate helical blades attached to a central shaft, originating from 19th-century innovations by engineer Alexander Mitchell, who patented the design in for marine foundations. Installation involves applying via rotational force to screw the assembly into the , achieving deep penetration without excavation and providing resistance through the blades' grip on layers. These anchors are ideal for shoreline stabilizations and floating dock systems, where their vibration-free embedment supports lateral loads in sandy or cohesive soils. High-holding specialized anchors, such as the Stevpris developed by Vryhof Anchors in the , employ pyramid- or plate-like geometries with optimized fluke shapes for enhanced embedment in challenging soils. Designed for ultra-deep water exceeding 2,000 meters, the Stevpris achieves holding ratios up to 50 times its weight in soft clays, as demonstrated in controlled tests. Its robust steel construction and shank design allow for deep penetration and resistance to uplift, making it suitable for permanent of floating production units. These permanent anchors find critical applications in stations, where they secure sensor buoys for long-term oceanographic data collection, and in operations like farms, supporting net pens against currents and waves. Durability is governed by (IMO) standards, including those under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and mooring guidelines, which mandate corrosion-resistant materials, load testing, and periodic inspections to ensure structural integrity over decades of service.

Anchoring Techniques

Single Anchor Deployment

Single anchor deployment is the standard method for securing a vessel in moderate conditions, involving a systematic approach to ensure the anchor embeds securely into the . The process begins with selecting an appropriate anchorage, approaching into the prevailing or current at a slow speed to position the vessel head-on to the elements, thereby minimizing swing and facilitating a controlled drop. Once positioned, the anchor is lowered slowly—never thrown—over the bow until it reaches the , allowing it to settle without tangling the rode. The vessel is then allowed to drift back or is gently reversed to pay out the rode to an appropriate scope, typically 5:1 to 7:1 (rode length to water depth), which provides sufficient for holding power while keeping the rode angle low. To set the anchor, the rode is secured to a bow cleat, and reverse is applied gradually with the , increasing power to embed the flukes or points into the bottom. This backing technique, often called "power setting," applies horizontal pull to dig the anchor in, with ideal reverse speed starting mild (1-2 knots) and building if needed. Successful setting is indicated by a taut rode with no vessel drag, confirmed by observing the rode straighten without the anchor skipping or the continuing to move astern. Monitoring the anchor's hold is essential post-deployment, using visual cues such as a rode angle under 10 degrees from horizontal for optimal pull, or technological aids like GPS to check for drift exceeding a few meters. Common errors include insufficient scope, which raises the rode angle and reduces holding, or failing to back down adequately, leading to poor embedment. Deployment variations account for seabed composition; in soft mud, a gentle drop permits the anchor to bury naturally without aggressive backing, whereas in firmer sand, higher reverse thrust (up to 3-4 knots) helps penetrate and set the flukes securely. Safety protocols emphasize using shock-absorbing snubbers or bridles on the rode to mitigate jerking from waves or gusts, and selecting uncrowded anchorages to maintain at least a 50-100 meter separation from other vessels, preventing collisions during swing.

Multiple Anchor Configurations

Multiple anchor configurations enhance vessel stability in challenging conditions such as strong tidal streams, crowded anchorages, or high winds by distributing loads across several points of attachment, reducing the risk of dragging or excessive swinging. These setups typically involve deploying two or more anchors with dedicated rodes, allowing the to remain oriented in a desired direction or minimize its swing radius compared to single-anchor deployment. Proper execution requires careful planning to ensure even load sharing and avoid rode fouling, with each configuration suited to specific environmental demands. Bow and stern mooring places one anchor forward (bow) and another aft (stern), securing the vessel fore and aft to counteract tidal streams or position it parallel to a dock, thereby preventing side-to-side swinging that could occur in confined marina spaces or areas with reversing currents. This method orients the vessel perpendicular to a wharf or pier, or parallel and centered at the end of a pier, using separate mooring lines or buoys attached to anchors on the seabed. It is commonly mandated in regulated harbors like certain sections of the Annisquam River, where bow and stern mooring is required to maintain order and safety. The Bahamian moor deploys two anchors in line ahead from the bow, dropped sequentially to provide bidirectional holding in areas with strong, reversing currents, such as narrow tidal channels in where hurricanes pose risks. The primary anchor is set first with a 5:1 scope (e.g., 50 feet of rode in 10 feet of water), followed by paying out additional rode on the first to approximately twice the desired scope, then dropping the second anchor from the bow; the vessel is motored astern to set the second anchor, then forward to equalize both rodes to the desired scope, often using the or a . This configuration limits the swing radius to the boat's length, offering enhanced security in crowded or tide-scoured anchorages, though it requires at least one boat length of clearance on each side and is unsuitable for vessels with rudders due to potential fouling. A forked or V-moor positions two anchors from the bow at angles of 45 to 90 degrees apart, ideal for crowded bays where minimizing the swing circle is essential to avoid collisions. The first anchor is dropped and set by backing down, followed by motoring to the side at the desired angle to deploy and set the second, then returning to center to equalize rode tensions. This setup provides a wide holding base while keeping the vessel relatively stationary, particularly useful in areas with variable winds or limited space. For vessels like catamarans or offshore rigs, three-point moorings distribute loads across three anchors, often at 120-degree intervals, to prevent overload on any single rode and enhance stability in exposed conditions. Secondary anchors in multi-anchor setups are typically one size smaller than the primary anchor recommendation, unless frequently used or in heavy conditions where a matching or larger size may be needed; for example, a 30-foot requiring a 20-pound primary might use a 15-pound secondary in a dual setup. Key considerations include selecting anchors of compatible types for the and sizing them proportionally to share loads effectively, as undersized units can lead to uneven stress. Retrieval demands a specific order to prevent : the anchor under least strain (often the one set last) is raised first, followed by others, using trip lines if needed to dislodge any snags without tangling rodes. These techniques build on single-anchor methods by adding but require practice to manage rode adjustments and spatial awareness.

Retrieval and Kedging Methods

Retrieving an anchor, known as weighing anchor, involves positioning the vessel directly over the anchor to reduce the horizontal pull on the rode, thereby facilitating easier lifting. The standard procedure requires motoring forward slowly under gentle engine power to maintain tension on the rode while simultaneously hauling it in, either hand-over-hand for smaller vessels or using a mechanical for larger ones. As the vessel approaches the anchor's position, the rode becomes nearly vertical, and a sudden "breakthrough" occurs when the anchor releases from the , allowing full retrieval. This method minimizes strain on equipment and , as confirmed by nautical resources. Kedging employs a secondary, lightweight anchor—often a type like the Danforth or Fortress—to reposition a vessel or escape hazardous situations, such as grounding on a . The kedge is typically deployed from a , rowed or motored to a suitable holding spot up to 100 meters away, where the anchor is dropped and the rode is payed out smoothly to avoid tangles, relying on scope rather than anchor weight for grip. Once set, the vessel is warped toward the kedge using winches or capstans, potentially heeling the boat by attaching the rode to a to reduce draft in shallow waters. This technique, detailed in historical manuals, enables incremental advances of several hundred feet per setup. An emergency variant of kedging is club hauling, an 18th-century maneuver used to swing a vessel around in confined or gale-force conditions on a . In this high-risk procedure, a kedge anchor is let go from the leeward quarter while the vessel gathers sternway under sail, causing the rode to pivot the ship onto the opposite tack as the anchor catches, allowing it to clear dangers without tacking into the wind. Historical accounts describe it as a desperate tactic for square-rigged ships, rarely used today due to modern propulsion. When anchors become stuck due to on rocks or , a trip line attached to the anchor's or shank provides a critical retrieval by allowing pull from an alternative angle to dislodge it without damaging the rode. The line, often made of buoyant Dyneema and equal in to the depth, is buoyed or secured to the rode and pulled after initial vertical hauling fails, addressing common seabed snags in rocky areas. Divers may assist in severe cases, but protocols emphasize life jackets, clear communication, and avoiding overhead entanglement risks during or freeing. Modern retrieval benefits from electric windlasses, which automate hauling and reduce physical exertion, enabling quick rode recovery without exhausting the crew, especially in adverse conditions. Chain hooks, such as cradle or claw designs, secure the rode during pauses, distributing loads to prevent chain deformation—though some models can reduce working load limits by up to 25% under peak tension, necessitating robust selections like those preserving full strength. These aids complement multi-anchor setups by streamlining recovery in complex configurations.

Anchoring Equipment

Anchor Rode and Scope

The anchor rode is the line or that connects the anchor to the vessel, serving as the critical link for secure holding by transmitting forces from the to the . It typically consists of a combination of galvanized steel near the anchor for abrasion resistance against the bottom and a longer section of for elasticity, though all- rodes are used in deeper water where weight and durability are prioritized over stretch. The portion protects the rode from wear on rough , with recommendations suggesting at least 6 to 10 feet for most setups, while the allows the system to absorb dynamic loads from waves and . Nylon rope provides significant shock absorption due to its elongation properties, stretching 15-28% at breaking strength to dampen sudden jerks that could dislodge the anchor, whereas contributes a catenary curve that further reduces horizontal pull through its sagging weight. In contrast, all-chain rodes offer superior abrasion resistance and holding in deep water but lack the elasticity of , potentially increasing stress on the vessel in rough conditions unless supplemented by the 's natural effect. Rode sizing is determined primarily by boat length to ensure adequate strength and compatibility with windlasses or cleats; for example, a 30-foot vessel typically requires 1/4-inch diameter chain paired with 1/2-inch nylon rope. General guidelines suggest one foot of chain per foot of boat length as a baseline, though practical lengths often range from 20 to 50 feet depending on anchoring depths and conditions. Scope refers to the ratio of the total rode length deployed to the vertical distance from the anchor to the bow roller, optimizing the angle of pull on the anchor for maximum holding power; for instance, a 5:1 scope means 50 feet of rode in of water depth. The precise calculation is given by the equation: Scope=Rode LengthDepth+Freeboard+Height to Bow Roller\text{Scope} = \frac{\text{Rode Length}}{\text{Depth} + \text{Freeboard} + \text{Height to Bow Roller}} where depth includes water depth plus , freeboard is the distance from to deck, and height to bow roller accounts for the attachment point . A higher scope lowers the pull angle on the anchor shank, ideally to 5-10 degrees for effective embedding in the , as angles above 15 degrees significantly reduce holding capacity by lifting the anchor rather than keeping it set. Recommended minimum scopes are 3:1 in calm conditions for basic holding and 7:1 or greater in windy or wavy scenarios to enhance stability, with all-chain rodes allowing slightly shorter scopes due to the effect from the chain's weight compared to combinations. During deployment, as detailed in single anchor techniques, scope is adjusted to achieve this low-angle pull while monitoring for drag.

Weights, Sentinels, and Accessories

Anchor weights, commonly known as kellets, are heavy objects typically made of lead or iron, weighing between 10 and 50 pounds, that are clipped or shackled to the anchor rode midway between the anchor and the boat to increase the catenary effect and lower the angle of pull on the anchor. This positioning helps maintain a more horizontal pull, though studies indicate their effect on holding power is generally limited, particularly in strong winds where the rode straightens. Kellets are particularly useful in moderate conditions where all-chain rodes are unavailable, as they mimic the weight distribution of chain to improve stability. Sentinels function similarly to kellets as temporary weights attached to the rode, often deployed at night to dampen motion and reduce jerking on the . Typically placed about one-third of the way down the rode from the bow, sentinels—ranging from 15 to 30 pounds—enhance shock absorption through added , minimizing noise and wear on the rode while promoting a steadier anchorage. They are especially valued in crowded or variable anchorages where subtle damping can prevent minor drags without altering the primary scope. Other accessories complement these weights by addressing specific rode dynamics. Snubbers, often made from line or rubber springs, attach near the bow to absorb shock loads from waves and gusts, stretching to cushion the rode and reduce stress on the anchor and deck fittings. Chain stops, simple clips or hooks, secure the rode to prevent unintended slippage through the during deployment or retrieval. Swivel connectors, forged from or , link the anchor to the rode and rotate freely to avoid twists as the boat swings, ensuring smooth operation and preventing fouls. Trip lines, equipped with buoys, aid in anchor retrieval from fouled seabeds like rocky areas by attaching a lightweight line to the anchor's crown and floating a marker at the surface. When the main rode fails to free a stuck anchor, pulling the trip line lifts the crown first, disengaging flukes from obstructions without needing divers or excessive force. This setup is essential in regions with known hazards, where the also marks the anchor's location for nearby vessels. Proper maintenance of these accessories ensures longevity and reliability. Regularly inspect galvanizing on metal kellets, sentinels, and swivels for flaking or pitting, applying rust-preventive coatings like zinc-rich paints to exposed after rinsing with to remove salt buildup. Integration with windlasses requires compatible fittings, such as gypsy-matched chain stops and swivels that pass smoothly over rollers, allowing automated deployment and retrieval without jamming or excessive wear.

Cultural and Symbolic Role

Anchor as a Maritime Symbol

The anchor's adoption as a maritime symbol in drew from its biblical portrayal as a metaphor for unyielding . The New Testament's states that "this we have as an anchor of the soul, a both sure and steadfast and which enters within the " ( 6:19), evoking stability amid life's tempests in a seafaring era. This imagery permeated Christian by the 2nd century CE, where anchors served as veiled crosses in Roman , signifying steadfast faith during and linking spiritual security to nautical reliability. Beyond religious contexts, the anchor embodies core nautical virtues of safety and steadfastness, representing a vessel's refuge from stormy seas and a sailor's enduring resolve. The fouled anchor—an entanglement of or around the shank—emerged as a potent of naval service, denoting the trials and triumphs of seafaring life, with roots in British traditions spanning over 500 years. It frequently adorns flags, badges, and , underscoring themes of and perseverance in maritime heritage. In heraldry, the has symbolized hope and constancy since medieval , appearing in coats of arms for seafaring families and institutions as a charge evoking maritime prowess and moral fortitude. By the , it formed a central element of the British Admiralty's , a fouled anchor on a red field that signified official naval authority and was incorporated into flags from the Restoration period onward. The anchor's symbolic resonance endures in modern maritime culture, particularly through tattoos inked by 19th-century sailors to invoke protection, stability, and the safe crossing of the Atlantic Ocean—a perilous . Similarly, it features prominently in branding, as seen in the logo of , established in in 1896, where the emblem ties the brewery's identity to enduring nautical legacy and resilience. Culturally, 19th-century artists like harnessed the anchor to depict humanity's fraught contest with the sea, as in his turbulent Boats Carrying Out Anchors to the Dutch Men of War (c. 1804), where the device anchors themes of labor, peril, and defiant endurance amid elemental chaos.

Anchors in Heraldry and Art

In , the anchor serves as a charge symbolizing , steadfastness, and maritime heritage, often depicted as a central element on escutcheons. The seal of , adopted in 1647 upon the union of its settlements, features a prominent anchor on a shield, with early versions showing a fouled anchor entwined with to denote naval . In heraldic convention, the anchor is blazoned upright by default, with the shank vertical and horizontal at the top, reinforcing its association with stability and aspiration. The fouled anchor, where the flukes are wrapped in cable, appears in emblems like that of the British Admiralty, originating in the late under Lord High Admiral Charles Howard. Artistic representations of anchors span centuries, appearing in visual arts as both functional objects and symbolic motifs. During the Renaissance, anchors featured in Flemish and Venetian paintings of seascapes and naval scenes, such as Pieter Bruegel the Elder's maritime landscapes that captured the era's seafaring life. In the 20th century, sculptors incorporated anchors into monumental works, exemplified by the large-scale anchor displays at the South Street Seaport Museum in New York, which highlight mid-19th-century designs but were recontextualized in modern installations to evoke historical resilience. Another notable example is the Anchor sculpture along Mexico's Ruta de la Amistad, created in 1968 as part of the Cultural Olympics, blending concrete form with symbolic weight to represent connection and endurance. Cultural artifacts demonstrate the anchor's integration into personal adornments across eras. In modern contexts, anchors appear in memorials like those in Liverpool's St. James Cemetery, where carved stone anchors from the onward symbolize hope amid maritime losses. Stylized anchors influence flags and , adapting the form for emblematic purposes. The state flag, formalized in 1897 but rooted in 17th-century designs, displays a gold anchor on a white field within a blue border, its simplified lines evoking both utility and optimism. In contemporary , anchors appear in abstracted forms, such as in nautical logos and tattoos, where curved flukes and rings are streamlined for visual impact while retaining symbolic depth. The of anchors in traces from literal depictions in folk carvings—often as wooden ship tools in medieval European works—to abstract interpretations in 21st-century installations, where they embody resilience beyond the sea, as seen in minimalist metal sculptures exploring themes of grounding in urban environments. This shift parallels the anchor's broader role as an emblem of , extending its maritime roots into diverse visual narratives.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.