Arlen Specter
Arlen Specter
Main page
2216272

Arlen Specter

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
Read side by side
Arlen Specter
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Arlen Specter (February 12, 1930 – October 14, 2012) was an American lawyer, author and politician who served as a United States Senator from Pennsylvania from 1981 to 2011. Specter was a Democrat from 1951 to 1965,[2][3][4] then a Republican from 1965 until 2009, when he switched back to the Democratic Party. First elected in 1980, he was the longest-serving senator from Pennsylvania, having represented the state for 30 years.

Key Information

Specter was born in Wichita, Kansas, to immigrant Russian/Ukrainian Jewish parents. He graduated from the University of Pennsylvania and served with the United States Air Force during the Korean War. Specter later graduated from Yale Law School and opened a law firm with Marvin Katz, who would later become a federal judge. Specter served as assistant counsel for the Warren Commission investigating the assassination of John F. Kennedy and helped formulate the "single-bullet theory". In 1965, Specter was elected District Attorney of Philadelphia, a position that he held until 1973.

During his 30-year Senate career, Specter staked out a spot in the political center.[5][6] He served as Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee from 2005 to 2007. In 2006, Specter was selected by Time as one of America's Ten Best Senators.[7] Specter lost his 2010 re-election bid in the Democratic primary to former U.S. Navy vice admiral Joe Sestak, who then lost to Republican Pat Toomey in the general election. Toomey succeeded Specter on January 3, 2011.

In 1993, Specter underwent a surgery to remove a brain tumor.[8] In early 2005 he was diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma, but continued his work in the Senate while undergoing chemotherapy. He died from complications of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma on October 14, 2012.

Early life and education

[edit]

Specter was born in Wichita, Kansas, the youngest child of Lillie (née Shanin) and Harry Specter, who grew up in the Bachkuryne village of Cherkasy Oblast, Ukraine. Specter was Jewish,[9] and wrote in his memoir, Passion for Truth, that his father's family was the only Jewish family in the village.[10] The family lived at 940 South Emporia Street in Wichita before moving to Russell, Kansas, where he graduated from Russell High School in 1947.[11][12] Russell is also the hometown of fellow politician Bob Dole (who graduated from Russell High School in 1941). Specter said that his father weighed items from his junkyard on a scale owned by Dole's father Doran Dole (who owned a granary). He said his brother Morton and Dole's brother Kenny were contemporaries and friends.[12]

Specter's father served in the U.S. infantry during World War I, and was badly wounded. During the Great Depression, Specter's father was a fruit peddler, a tailor, and a junkyard owner. After graduating from Russell High School,[13] Arlen Specter studied first at the University of Oklahoma. He transferred to the University of Pennsylvania, majored in international relations, and graduated Phi Beta Kappa in 1951. While at Penn, Specter was a member of the Pi Lambda Phi fraternity. Specter said the family moved to Philadelphia when his sister Shirley was of a marriageable age because there were no other Jews in Russell.[12]

Military career

[edit]

During the Korean War, Specter served stateside in the United States Air Force from 1951 to 1953 and obtained the rank of first lieutenant as an officer in the Air Force Office of Special Investigations.[14][15][16]

[edit]

In 1953, he married Joan Levy.[17] In 1979, she was elected to one of the two allotted minority party at-large seats on the Philadelphia City Council. She held the seat for four terms, until she was defeated for re-election in 1995 by Frank Rizzo Jr.[18] The couple had two sons.[19] Specter graduated from Yale Law School in 1956, while serving as editor of the Yale Law Journal. Afterward, Specter opened a law practice, Specter & Katz, with Marvin Katz, who served as a Federal District Court Judge in Philadelphia, until his death in October 2010. Specter represented Ira Einhorn, known as "The Unicorn Killer," aiding him to get a very low bail for a murder charge (which Einhorn subsequently jumped). Specter became an assistant district attorney under District Attorney James C. Crumlish Jr., and was a member of the Democratic Party.

Early political career

[edit]
Specter reproducing the assumed alignment of the single bullet theory. The subsequent revelation that Texas Governor John Connally's seat in the Presidential limousine had been elevated with respect to John Kennedy's corroborated this theory.

Involvement with the Warren Commission

[edit]

Specter worked for the Warren Commission, which investigated the assassination of John F. Kennedy, at the recommendation of Representative Gerald Ford, who was then one of the Commissioners. As an assistant for the commission, he co-wrote the proposal of[20] the "single bullet theory", which suggested the non-fatal wounds to Kennedy and wounds to Texas Governor John Connally were caused by the same bullet. This was a crucial assertion for the Warren Commission, since if the two had been wounded by separate bullets within such a short time frame, that would have demonstrated the presence of a second assassin and therefore a conspiracy.[21] Regarding this particular subject, the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded that JFK's assassination was probably a product of a conspiracy, but this conclusion was based partially on acoustic evidence that was later called into question.[citation needed]

Specter with Martin Luther King Jr.

Initial electoral campaigns

[edit]

In 1965, Specter ran for Philadelphia district attorney against his former boss, incumbent James C. Crumlish Jr.[2][3] However, the city's Democratic leaders, such as Peter Camiel, did not want Specter as their candidate, so he switched parties and ran as a Republican, prompting Crumlish to call him "Benedict Arlen".[2][3][22] Specter defeated Crumlish by 36,000 votes.[2] Although he was a supporter of capital punishment, as a prosecutor he questioned the fairness of the Pennsylvania death penalty statute in 1972.[23]

In 1967 he was the Republican Party standard bearer, together with City Controller candidate, Tom Gola, in the Philadelphia mayoral campaign against the Democratic incumbent James Tate. Two of their slogans were, "We need THESE guys to watch THOSE guys" and "They're younger, they're tougher, and nobody owns them!"[24] He served two four-year terms as district attorney for the city of Philadelphia, but was handily defeated in his bid for a third term in 1973 by noted criminal defense attorney F. Emmett Fitzpatrick.[25][26]

In 1976, Specter ran in the Republican primary for the U.S. Senate and was defeated by John Heinz. In 1978, he was defeated in the primary for Governor of Pennsylvania by Dick Thornburgh.[27] After several years in private practice with the Philadelphia law firm Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Specter ran again for the U.S. Senate in 1980. This time, he won, and assumed office in January 1981.

Senate career

[edit]
Specter greeting President Richard Nixon in 1971
Specter with President Ronald Reagan in 1986

In 1988, he co-sponsored an amendment to the Fair Housing Act of 1968, which prohibited discrimination in the rental, sale, marketing, and financing of the nation's housing. The amendment strengthened the ability of the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity to enforce the Fair Housing Act and expanded the protected classes to include disabled persons and families with children. In 1998 and 1999, Specter criticized the Republican Party for the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. Believing that Clinton had not received a fair trial, Specter cited Scots law to render a verdict of "not proven" on Clinton's impeachment.[28] However, his verdict was recorded as "not guilty" in the Senate records.[29]

In October 1999, Specter was one of four Senate Republicans to vote in favor of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. The treaty was designed to ban underground nuclear testing and was the first major international security pact to be defeated in the Senate since the Treaty of Versailles.[30][31]

On October 11, 2002, Specter voted in favor of H.J.Res.114 authorizing the Iraq War.[32]

In a 2002 PoliticsPA Feature story designating politicians with yearbook superlatives, he was named the "Toughest to Work For".[33] In 2003, the Pennsylvania Report, a subscription-based political newsletter, described Specter as one of the "vanishing breed of Republican moderates", and described his political stance as "'Pennsylvania first' middle of-the-road politics", even though he was known as an "avid Republican partisan".[34]

Soon after the 2004 election, Specter stepped into the public spotlight as a result of controversial statements about his views of the future of the Supreme Court. At a press conference, he stated:

When you talk about judges who would change the right of a woman to choose, overturn Roe v. Wade, I think [confirmation] is unlikely. The president is well aware of what happened, when a number of his nominees were sent up, with the filibuster.... And I would expect the president to be mindful of the considerations which I am mentioning.

Activist groups interpreted his comments as warnings to President George W. Bush about the implications of nominating Supreme Court justices who were opposed to the Roe v. Wade decision. Specter maintained that his comments were a prediction, not a warning. He met with many conservative Republican senators, and based on assurances he gave them, he was recommended for the Judiciary Committee's chairmanship in late 2004.[35][36] He officially assumed that position when the 109th Congress convened on January 4, 2005.[37]

On March 9, 2006, a revision of the USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law. It amended the process for interim appointments of U.S. Attorneys, a clause Specter wrote during his chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee.[38] The change allowed the Bush Administration to appoint interim U.S. attorneys without term limits, and without confirmation by the Senate. The Bush administration used the law to place at least eight interim attorneys into office in 2006. Specter claimed that the changes were added by staff member Brett Tolman.[39] For more information, see dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy.

Specter, while he was being interviewed by Margot Adler for an episode of Justice Talking on "Presidential signing statements".

Specter was very critical of Bush's wiretapping of U.S. citizens without warrants. When the story first broke, he called the effort "inappropriate" and "clearly and categorically wrong". He said that he intended to hold hearings into the matter early in 2006, and had Alberto Gonzales appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee to answer for the program. (However, Specter declined to force Gonzales to testify under oath.) On January 15, 2006, Specter mentioned impeachment and criminal prosecution as potential remedies if Bush proved to have broken the law, though he downplayed the likelihood of such an outcome.

On April 9, 2006, speaking on Fox News about the Bush administration's leaking of classified intelligence, Specter stated: "The President of the United States owes a specific explanation to the American people."[40] However, he did vote for the 2008 amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which placed federal electronic searches almost entirely within the executive branch.[41]

During the 2007–2008 National Football League season, Specter wrote to NFL commissioner Roger Goodell concerning the destruction of New England Patriots "Spygate" tapes. Specter, a devout and longtime Philadelphia Eagles fan, wondered if there was a link between the tapes and their Super Bowl victory over the Eagles in 2005. On February 1, 2008, Goodell stated that the tapes were destroyed because "they confirmed what I already knew about the issue". Specter released a follow-up statement:

My strong preference is for the NFL to activate a Mitchell-type investigation, I have been careful not to call for a Congressional hearing because I believe the NFL should step forward and embrace an independent inquiry and Congress is extraordinarily busy on other matters. If the NFL continues to leave a vacuum, Congress may be tempted to fill it.[42]

Starting in 2007, Specter sponsored legislation[43] to fix a long-standing inequity in American law that shut out a majority of U.S. Armed Forces service members convicted in courts-martial from appealing their convictions to the U.S. Supreme Court.[44]

In 2007, Specter co-sponsored the Equal Justice for United States Military Personnel Act of 2007 with Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Russ Feingold (D-Wis.).[43] But the bill failed in the 110th Congress, and Specter again co-sponsored the measure in the 2009 111th Congress.[45] In December 2008, Specter was involved in a controversy as a result of telling "Polish jokes" at New York's Rainbow Room while speaking at the annual meeting of the Commonwealth Club.[46]

Specter voted in favor of the Senate's version of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 on February 10, 2009; he was one of only three Republicans to break ranks with the party and support the bill, which was favored by President Barack Obama and was unanimously supported by the Democratic senators.[47] As a result of his support, many in the Republican mainstream began calling for his removal from office.[48]

Specter was instrumental in ensuring that the act allocated an additional $10 billion to the National Institutes of Health over the next two years.[49] In August 2009, more than ten years before the global Covid-19 pandemic, he joined Pennsylvania congressman Jason Altmire in leading a congressional hearing investigating whether the federal government should fund a national vaccine production center.[50][51][52]

In late April 2009, facing a tough Republican primary, Specter switched to the Democratic party which put Democrats on the "precipice" of a 60-seat majority. In spite of his nearly thirty years in the Senate, however, he was denied seniority on Senate committees by his new Democratic colleagues, effectively reducing him to the status of a freshman and greatly curtailing his influence in the chamber.[53]

In October 2009, Specter called for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, which he had supported in 1996.[54] In November 2009, Specter introduced a bill to require televising U.S. Supreme Court proceedings, and explained that "[t]he Supreme Court makes pronouncements on constitutional and federal law that have direct impacts on the rights of Americans. Those rights would be substantially enhanced by televising the oral arguments of the Court so that the public can see and hear the issues presented."[55]

Specter's career in the United States Senate ended on January 3, 2011, after his primary defeat to Joe Sestak. He was succeeded by Republican U.S. Representative Pat Toomey, who won the general election against Sestak.

Committee assignments

[edit]

Specter was chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence from 1995, when the Republicans gained control of the Senate, until 1997, when he became chairman of the Committee on Veterans Affairs. He chaired that committee until 2001 and again from 2003 to 2005, during the times the Republicans controlled the Senate. He also chaired the Judiciary Committee from 2005 to 2007.

Campaigns

[edit]
Specter campaigning for re-election

In 1980, Specter became the Republican nominee for Senate when Republican incumbent Richard Schweiker announced his retirement. He faced the former Mayor of Pittsburgh, Pete Flaherty. Specter won the election by a 2.5% margin. He was later re-elected in 1986, 1992, 1998, and 2004, despite 1992 and 1998 being bad years for Republicans. Specter ran for re-election in 2010, for the first time as a Democrat, but was defeated in the primary.[56]

1996 presidential bid

[edit]
Main article: 1996 United States presidential election

On March 31, 1995, Specter announced his candidacy for President of the United States, to challenge the incumbent Bill Clinton. He entered the race as an alternative to the stereotypical religious conservative image. He was critical of Pat Buchanan, Pat Robertson, and Ralph Reed, saying all three were far too conservative.[57]

His campaign focused on balancing the federal budget, strict crime laws, and establishing relations with North Korea.[58] His candidacy was not expected to succeed in winning the Republican nomination due to the overwhelmingly large number of social conservatives in the Republican Party. He was, however, able to gain support. Fellow Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum was supportive of his candidacy.[59] Other supportive Republicans were hopeful Specter could trim the party's "far-right fringe". Although his campaign was ultimately unsuccessful at wooing conservatives, it was widely believed he could have had a strong showing among independents. On November 23, 1995, before the start of the primaries, Specter suspended his campaign to endorse Kansas Senator Bob Dole.

2004 campaign

[edit]
Main article: 2004 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania

In 2004, Specter faced a challenge in the Republican primary election from conservative Congressman Pat Toomey, whose campaign theme was that Specter was not conservative enough. The match-up was closely watched nationally, being seen as a symbolic clash between the conservative and moderate wings of the Republican Party. However, most of the state and national Republican establishment, including the state's other senator at the time, Rick Santorum, closed ranks behind Specter. Specter was supported by President George W. Bush. Specter narrowly avoided a major upset with 51% of the primary vote. Once Specter defeated the challenge from the right, he was able to enjoy great support from independents and some Democrats in his race against U.S. Representative Joe Hoeffel, the Democratic nominee.[60] Hoeffel trailed Specter in name recognition, campaign funds, and poll results.[61] Although the two minor candidates in the race were seen as more conservative than Specter, they were only able to take 5.39 percent of the vote, and Specter was easily re-elected.

2010 campaign

[edit]
Main articles: 2010 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania and 2010 United States Senate Democratic primary election in Pennsylvania
Specter (far right) at the 2009 Netroots Nation convention in Pittsburgh

Specter was up for re-election to the Senate in 2010, and expressed his plans to run again. On March 18, 2009, Specter said that he was not considering running as an independent. He said, "To eliminate any doubt, I am a Republican, and I am running for re-election in 2010 as a Republican on the Republican ticket."[62] Subsequently, Specter's 2004 conservative GOP primary challenger, Pat Toomey, announced he would again run for the Republican nomination in the Republican senatorial primary.[63]

However, on April 28, 2009, Specter stated that, "As the Republican Party has moved farther and farther to the right, I have found myself increasingly at odds with the Republican philosophy and more in line with the philosophy of the Democratic Party".[64] He said that he was switching party affiliation and would run as a Democrat in the 2010 election.[64][65][66]

In the same announcement, Specter also said that he had "surveyed the sentiments of the Republican Party in Pennsylvania and public opinion polls, observed other public opinion polls and have found that the prospects for winning a Republican primary are bleak".[64] A March 2009 Quinnipiac poll indicated that Specter trailed his likely primary challenger, Pat Toomey, by 14% (41% for Toomey, 27% for Specter).[67] Additional polling found that 70% of Pennsylvania Republicans disapproved of his vote in favor of the Stimulus Bill[68] and that 52 percent of Pennsylvania Republicans disapproved of the job he was doing.[67] Following Specter's switching parties, Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele criticized his leaving the Republican Party, claiming that Specter had "flipped the bird" at the GOP.[69]

On February 6, 2010, the Pennsylvania Democratic Party overwhelmingly endorsed Specter at the Democratic State Committee's annual endorsement convention, which was held in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.[70] He received more votes than Joe Sestak, winning more than 77% of the Pennsylvania Democratic State Committee members vote, far in excess of the 2/3 threshold needed to claim the endorsement.[71] Sestak, however, went on to win the Democratic primary nomination on May 18.[72]

Following the primary, Specter endorsed Sestak in the general election. Toomey defeated Sestak, 51% to 49%.[73][74]

Political views

[edit]

According to the National Journal, Specter voted with Democrats 90% of the time after switching parties, while, as a Republican, he split his votes between both parties.[75] According to FiveThirtyEight, during January–March 2009 Specter voted with the Democrats 58% of the time. Following the support of the stimulus package and the entrance of Pat Toomey in the Republican primary, Specter began to vote 16% with Democrats. When switching to become a Democrat, he voted 69% with his new party initially, until Joe Sestak entered the Democratic primary and Specter started to vote with Democrats 97% of the time.[76]

Abortion

[edit]

Specter stated that he was "personally opposed to abortion", but was "a supporter of a woman's right to choose."[77][78] He received a 20% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America in 2005 based on certain votes related to the regulation of abortion. In 2008, he received 100%.[79]

LGBT rights

[edit]

Specter's record on LGBT rights was mixed. He voted to prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation and was a co-sponsor of the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act.[80] Specter was opposed to same-sex marriage, but was also opposed to a federal ban and supported civil unions.[81] He also became opposed to the Defense of Marriage Act, which he once supported. Specter voted in favor of repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" in the lame-duck session of the 111th Congress.

Gun control

[edit]

Specter strongly opposed most gun control measures. He voted against the Brady Bill, background checks at gun shows, the ban on assault weapons, and trigger locks for handguns.[82]

Affirmative action

[edit]

He supported affirmative action, and voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1991, receiving a 76 percent rating from the NAACP in 2008.[83]

Civil rights and U.S. Supreme Court

[edit]

Specter voted in favor of the bill establishing Martin Luther King Jr. Day as a federal holiday and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (as well as to override President Reagan's veto).[84][85][86] Specter voted against the nomination of Robert Bork to the U.S. Supreme Court, but voted in favor of the nominations of Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, and Samuel Alito. Specter described Anita Hill's testimony during Thomas' nomination as "perjurious in its entirety."[87]

Tax cuts and minimum wage

[edit]

In 1995, he was the only Republican to vote to limit tax cuts to individuals with incomes of less than one million dollars. He voted against CAFTA. Specter also supported an increase in the federal minimum wage. He was a leading supporter of the U.S. Public Service Academy.

Illegal immigration

[edit]

On immigration, Specter supported a "pathway to citizenship" and a "guest worker program", which opponents call amnesty. He introduced Senate bill S. 2611 (the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006) on April 6, 2006, which was passed by the Senate on May 25, 2006, before reaching a stalemate in the House.[88]

Health care reform

[edit]

Public option

[edit]

On May 3, 2009, Specter went on Meet the Press and was asked, "Would you support health care reform that puts up a government-run public plan to compete with a private plan issued by a private insurance company?" Specter responded with "no."[89][90] Two months later, he changed his position.[91]

Single-payer

[edit]

Specter believed a single-payer healthcare system should not be "taken off the table", according to an interview he had with John King on CNN.[92]

Votes

[edit]

On health care reform, Specter was a co-sponsor of the Healthy Americans Act, a proposal he supported during both the 110th and 111th Congresses. Specter voted for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the healthcare bill passed through the Senate by every Democratic senator, on a party-line vote.[93]

In May 2012, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, and Weill Cornell Medical College presented Specter with the annual Public Service Award for his work in expanding mental health care.[94]

Card check

[edit]

Specter received a 61% rating from the AFL–CIO.[95] He voted for cloture on the Employee Free Choice Act in 2007. In early 2009, Specter announced he would not be voting for cloture on the same act in the 111th Congress.[96] After Specter switched parties, he changed his position on the issue again, and wrote a letter to the unions indicating he supported card check legislation.

Privacy; computers

[edit]

Spurred by the 2010 Robbins v. Lower Merion School District case, in which two high schools admitted to secretly taking 66,000 webcam photos and screenshots of students in their homes on school-issued laptops, Specter held a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs on March 29, 2010.[97] He said: "The issue is one of surreptitious eavesdropping. Unbeknownst to people, their movements and activities were under surveillance."[97] He said that Lower Merion's use of laptop cameras for surveillance convinced him that new federal legislation was needed to regulate electronic privacy.[98][99]

Specter then introduced legislation in April 2010 to amend the federal Wiretap Act to clarify that it is illegal to capture silent visual images inside another person's home. He said: "This is going to become law. You have a very significant invasion of privacy with these webcams, as more information is coming to light."[100] Speaking on the floor of the Senate, he said:

Many of us expect to be subject to ... video surveillance when we leave our homes and go out each day—at the ATM, at traffic lights, or in stores, for example. What we do not expect is to be under visual surveillance in our homes, in our bedrooms, and, most especially, we do not expect it for our children in our homes.[101]

Other

[edit]

The Jewish daily newspaper The Forward reported in the wake of the July 2009 organ trafficking scandal in the U.S. involving Rabbi Levy Izhak Rosenbaum of Brooklyn that an Organ Trafficking Prohibition Act of 2009, sponsored by Specter, had yet to be officially introduced in the U.S.[102]

Specter criticized the federal government's policy on cancer, stating the day after Jack Kemp—the 1996 Republican vice presidential nominee and former congressman—died of cancer, that Kemp would still be alive if the federal government had done a better job funding cancer research.[103]

On February 16, 2011, Specter wrote a letter to President Obama. As Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, he stated that Jonathan Pollard should be pardoned. He stated, "Unfortunately, spying is not an uncommon practice even between allies and friendly nations."[104]

Electoral history

[edit]
Main article: Electoral history of Arlen Specter

Post-Senate career

[edit]

During the fall of 2011, Specter was an adjunct professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where he taught a course on the relationship between Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court, focusing on separation of powers and the confirmation process.[105] For this course the National Jurist named him as one of the "23 professors to take before you die."[106]

Arlen Specter Center for Public Service at Philadelphia University

[edit]

On December 21, 2011, Specter donated to Philadelphia University nearly 2,700 boxes of historical papers and memorabilia dating from his career as a Philadelphia district attorney to his service as a United States senator, including materials associated with his role as assistant counsel on the Warren Commission. The collection will be jointly managed by the University of Pittsburgh, which will house, organize, and manage the collection. The universities will collaborate on related education programing that will consequently provide access to the archives on both ends of the state.[107] The Specter Collection will also support The Arlen Specter Center for Public Policy at Philadelphia University.

The center will be a nonpartisan initiative dedicated to promoting greater understanding of public policy issues both foreign and domestic. The center will strive to accomplish these goals through support for research, educational programming, and exhibitions inspired, in part, by the senator's career and the permanent collection of his historic papers. The center will be managed by the Paul J. Gutman Library at Philadelphia University will be located in Roxboro House, which is located nearby on campus.

Parts of Roxboro House date back to 1799. The Georgian period house constructed of frame and clapboard was expanded in 1810. At one point in its history, Roxboro House was owned by Dr. Caspar Wistar who published the first American textbook of anatomy in 1811. Wistar was president of the American Philosophical Society and his friend, Thomas Nuttall, a famous botanist, named the Wisteria vine after him. In 1965, the Philadelphia Historical Commission added this house to its list of registered buildings (No. 141). Prior to the university's purchase of the property in 1998, the house was being used as a bed and breakfast establishment.

Arlen Specter US Squash Center

[edit]

US Squash announced it was building a new squash center in Philadelphia that is to be named the Arlen Specter US Squash Center. The construction of the Arlen Specter US Squash Center began in 2019 and was completed in 2021.[108]

Illness and death

[edit]

On February 16, 2005, Specter announced that he had been diagnosed with an advanced form of Hodgkin's lymphoma, a type of cancer. Despite this, Specter continued working during chemotherapy. He ended treatment on July 22. Senator John Sununu (R-NH) shaved his head to show solidarity with Specter, who was temporarily bald while undergoing chemotherapy. On April 15, 2008, Specter announced his cancer had returned, at a stage "significantly less advanced than his Hodgkin's disease when it was originally diagnosed in 2005."[109][110] He underwent a second round of chemotherapy, which ended on July 14, 2008.[111]

On August 28, 2012, it was announced that Specter was battling a "serious form of cancer" and hospitalized. He was diagnosed six weeks earlier with a new form of the disease.[112] On September 7, 2012, he was released from a Philadelphia hospital, but was expected to return there for additional treatment.[113]

Specter died from complications of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, aged 82, on October 14, 2012, at his home in Philadelphia.[114][115] Statements of condolence were issued by President and Mrs. Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Mrs. Biden, the Office of the Governor of Pennsylvania, and by many of his colleagues and former opponents in the U.S. Congress, the Pennsylvania legislature, and the city of Philadelphia, among many others. Senator Specter, while he had been accused of alienating both parties due to certain positions he took and due to the two times he switched parties, among other issues, was nonetheless respected by many as a principled statesman who did much for his state and country, including by those in politics and the legislature, both in Pennsylvania and his home state, Kansas, as well as across the U.S. and beyond. He was the longest-serving of Pennsylvania's U.S. Senators. As a sign of this respect and out of mourning, President Obama ordered U.S. flags to be lowered to half-staff at public institutions and military bases in Washington, D.C., and the rest of the country on his day of interment.[116]

Books

[edit]
  • Specter, Arlen; Katz, Marvin (1967). Police Guide to Search and Seizure Interrogation and Confession. Philadelphia: Chilton Books. OCLC 1312201.
  • Murray, John P.; Rubin, H. Ted; Specter, Arlen; Rector, Milton G. (1983). Status Offenders: A Sourcebook. Boys Town, NE: Boys Town Center. ISBN 0938510037. OCLC 8785321.
  • Specter, Arlen; with Charles Robbins (2000). Passion for Truth: From Finding JFK's Single Bullet to Questioning Anita Hill to Impeaching Clinton. New York: William Morrow. ISBN 9780060198497. OCLC 45188491.
  • Smerconish, Michael A. (2004). Flying Blind: How Political Correctness Continues to Compromise Airline Safety Post 9/11. Foreword: Arlen Specter. Philadelphia: Running Press. ISBN 9780762423767. OCLC 56512972.
  • Specter, Arlen; with Frank J. Scaturro (2008). Never Give In: Battling Cancer in the Senate. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 9780312383060. OCLC 180751979.

Legislation sponsored or cosponsored

[edit]

The following table links to the Congressional Record hosted by the Library of Congress. All the specifics and actions taken for each individual piece of legislation that Specter either sponsored or cosponsored can be viewed in detail there. "Original bills" and "'Original amendments" indicate instances where Sen. Specter pledged to support the legislation at the time it was initially introduced and entered into the Senate record, rather than later in the legislative process.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Arlen Specter

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Arlen Specter (February 12, 1930 – October 14, 2012) was an American lawyer and politician who served as a United States Senator from Pennsylvania for 30 years, from 1981 to 2011.[1][2] Born in Wichita, Kansas, he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1951 and Yale Law School in 1956, served in the U.S. Air Force from 1951 to 1953, and began his legal career as an assistant district attorney in Philadelphia from 1959 to 1964.[1] Specter rose to national attention as assistant counsel to the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy (Warren Commission) in 1964, where he contributed to the investigation's findings on the events surrounding the assassination.[1] He was elected District Attorney of Philadelphia as a Republican in 1965, serving from 1966 to 1974, during which he prosecuted cases involving political corruption and organized crime.[1][3] In the Senate, initially elected as a Republican in 1980 and reelected four times, Specter chaired the Judiciary Committee from 2005 to 2007 and held influential positions on Appropriations, Intelligence, and Veterans' Affairs committees, advocating for increased funding for medical research including stem cell initiatives and cancer treatment.[1][4] Known for his independent streak and moderate voting record that often crossed party lines, Specter switched to the Democratic Party in April 2009 to seek renomination amid a challenging Republican primary, a move that temporarily expanded Democratic control but ended with his defeat in the 2010 Democratic primary.[1][5][6] His career was marked by participation in high-profile confirmations, such as the contentious Clarence Thomas hearings, and legislative efforts on national security and health policy, though his party switch drew criticism from conservatives for prioritizing electoral survival over principle.[4]

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Childhood

Arlen Specter was born on February 12, 1930, in Wichita, Kansas, as the youngest of four children to Harry Aaron Specter and Lillie (née Shanin) Specter.[1][7] Both parents were Jewish immigrants from Ukraine; Harry Specter, born in the village of Bachkuryne in Cherkasy Oblast, had fled czarist Russia at age 18 around 1910 and later served in the U.S. infantry during World War I.[8][9] Lillie's family origins were similarly rooted in the region, reflecting the broader pattern of Eastern European Jewish migration to the United States in the early 20th century seeking economic opportunity and escape from pogroms.[8] The Specter family relocated to Russell, Kansas—a small farming community in the western part of the state—shortly after Arlen's birth, where they became the only Jewish household amid a predominantly Protestant, rural population.[10][11] Harry's entrepreneurial efforts during the Great Depression included working as a fruit peddler, tailor, and junkyard owner, often involving door-to-door debt collection and manual labor such as unloading produce, which Arlen assisted with as a boy.[8][11] This modest existence underscored the challenges of immigrant assimilation in isolated Midwestern towns, with the family's Jewish identity occasionally exposing them to social exclusion, though Specter later attributed his pragmatic, centrist worldview partly to navigating such a minority status without overt hostility.[12] Specter's siblings—Morton, Hilda, and Shirley—were older, and family dynamics emphasized self-reliance and education amid financial strain.[13] He attended local public schools in Russell, excelling academically despite the cultural homogeneity, and graduated from Russell High School in 1947.[1][14] These formative years in a tight-knit, resource-scarce environment, coupled with his parents' stories of Old World hardships, instilled in him a drive for achievement that propelled his later pursuits in law and public service.[8]

Academic Training

Specter initially enrolled at the University of Oklahoma before transferring to the University of Pennsylvania, where he majored in international relations and graduated Phi Beta Kappa in 1951.[15] At Penn, he participated in intercollegiate debate, winning a championship alongside future law partner Marvin Katz, and joined the Pi Lambda Phi fraternity.[7] [8] After completing his military service, Specter entered Yale Law School, from which he graduated in 1956.[16] His strong academic record there secured him a position as an editor of the Yale Law Journal.[7] Between his second and third years, he clerked at the Philadelphia firm of Pershing, Bosworth, Dick, and Dawson.[17]

Pre-Political Career

Military Service

Specter enlisted in the United States Air Force following his graduation from the University of Pennsylvania in 1951, serving during the Korean War until 1953.[1] His service was stateside, where he worked as an officer in the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, conducting inquiries into potential criminal activities and security matters within the military.[18][8] During this period, Specter attained the rank of second lieutenant, reflecting his role in investigative operations rather than combat duties overseas.[18][8] He was honorably discharged in 1953, after which he pursued legal studies at Yale Law School.[1] No records indicate involvement in frontline engagements, consistent with the domestic focus of the Office of Special Investigations at the time.[19]

Legal Practice and Warren Commission Role

After graduating from Yale Law School in 1956, Specter joined the Philadelphia law firm Barnes, Dechert, Price, Myers & Rhoads, where he practiced corporate and litigation law.[20] He subsequently established his own firm in partnership with Marvin Katz, a future federal judge, focusing on civil and criminal matters in the region.[8] In November 1963, Specter was appointed assistant counsel to the Warren Commission, established by President Lyndon B. Johnson to investigate the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[21] Assigned to scrutinize the medical, ballistic, and forensic evidence, Specter analyzed witness testimonies, autopsy reports, and the Zapruder film, concluding that the timeline required only three shots from Lee Harvey Oswald's rifle within approximately 5.6 seconds.[22] Central to his work was the formulation of the single-bullet theory, positing that Commission Exhibit 399—a nearly intact 6.5mm bullet recovered at Parkland Hospital—caused non-fatal wounds to both Kennedy and Texas Governor John Connally, who sat ahead and to the president's right in the limousine.[23] According to the theory, the bullet entered Kennedy's upper back at a downward angle, exited his throat, then struck Connally's back, shattered his rib, exited his chest, smashed his wrist, and lodged in his thigh, aligning with entry-exit wound alignments when accounting for the men's relative positions and the limousine's movement.[22] This reconstruction, informed by consultations with Parkland physicians and ballistic tests, supported the Commission's determination of a lone gunman by explaining multiple injuries without exceeding the shot sequence constraints.[24] The single-bullet theory, while integral to the Warren Report's findings released in September 1964, has faced persistent scrutiny from skeptics who argue it strains physical plausibility given the bullet's minimal deformation despite traversing dense tissue and bone.[25] Specter defended the hypothesis throughout his career, citing empirical alignments from Commission recreations and subsequent analyses, such as those by the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1979, which upheld its feasibility despite endorsing a possible conspiracy on audio grounds.[23]

Local Political Career

Philadelphia District Attorney Tenure

Arlen Specter was elected Philadelphia District Attorney on November 2, 1965, as the Republican candidate, defeating Democrat Charles G. Nistico in a city dominated by Democratic voters; he assumed office on January 4, 1966.[26] He won re-election in 1969 but lost his bid for a third term in 1973 to Democrat F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, serving until January 8, 1974.[26][8] During his tenure, Specter prioritized prosecutorial efficiency and reform, expanding the district attorney's office from 51 assistant district attorneys to more than 200 to handle rising caseloads amid increasing crime rates.[27] He promoted plea bargaining to accelerate case resolutions, raising the percentage of convicted criminals pleading guilty from 27 percent in 1965 to 72 percent by 1971, which reduced trial backlogs while maintaining high conviction rates.[28] Specter positioned himself as tough on crime, focusing on violent offenses, organized crime, and public corruption, with policies emphasizing repeat offender prosecution.[29] Specter targeted systemic corruption, prosecuting city officials and driving investigations into the magistrate system, which was plagued by bribery and favoritism; his efforts contributed to a 1968 constitutional amendment abolishing magisterial courts in Pennsylvania and replacing them with district justices.[29][30] His office also addressed police misconduct amid scandals, including a 1971 Pennsylvania Crime Commission probe into graft in the Philadelphia Police Department that uncovered payoffs and drug-related corruption, though Specter's aggressive stance drew tensions with Police Commissioner Frank Rizzo.[31][32] These initiatives aimed to restore public trust in the justice system but faced criticism for politicization, contributing to his 1973 defeat.[26]

Key Investigations and Prosecutions

During his tenure as Philadelphia District Attorney from 1966 to 1974, Arlen Specter prioritized combating systemic corruption within the city's judicial and public institutions, particularly targeting the magistrate system long plagued by bribery, extortion, and favoritism. Building on prior state-level investigations he led as a special deputy attorney general, Specter pursued prosecutions against multiple city magistrates accused of accepting payoffs to dismiss cases or grant bail leniently. These efforts culminated in the conviction of at least three magistrates on corruption charges, exposing a network where officials exploited their preliminary hearing roles for personal gain.[33][29] Specter's office also investigated ongoing labor racketeering, including a 1967 probe into alleged gambling operations within Teamsters Local 107, continuing scrutiny of the union he had targeted earlier as an assistant district attorney. This reflected his broader strategy against organized corruption infiltrating public sectors, though federal involvement often complemented local actions. His prosecutions extended to other public officials, contributing to reforms that professionalized the district attorney's office and advocated for abolishing the magistrate system in favor of more accountable district justices.[34][29] Beyond corruption, Specter maintained a rigorous approach to violent crime, overseeing more than 10,000 cases with a reported conviction rate of 69 out of 75 murder trials, emphasizing evidence-based prosecutions over plea bargains in serious offenses. These initiatives enhanced his reputation as a reform-minded prosecutor, though critics occasionally accused his office of selective enforcement amid Philadelphia's rising urban challenges.[35]

U.S. Senate Election and Service

Initial Campaigns and Victories

Following the retirement of incumbent Republican Senator Richard Schweiker, Arlen Specter announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania in the 1980 election cycle.[36] Facing opposition from the state Republican establishment, including Governor Richard Thornburgh, Specter entered the Republican primary as an outsider candidate emphasizing his prosecutorial experience and independence.[26] On April 22, 1980, he narrowly won the nomination, securing 419,372 votes (36.4%) against Bud Haabestad's 382,281 (33.2%), a margin of approximately 3 percentage points amid a multi-candidate field.[37] [38] In the general election on November 4, 1980, Specter competed against Democratic nominee Pete Flaherty, a former Pittsburgh mayor and lieutenant governor. Campaigning as a moderate Republican in a state with a Democratic registration advantage, Specter focused on law-and-order themes and economic issues resonant with the Reagan coalition. He prevailed with 2,230,404 votes (50.5%) to Flaherty's 2,122,391 (48.0%), a narrow victory by about 108,000 votes or 2.4 percentage points, contributing to the Republican Senate majority that year.[39] [38] [36] Specter sought re-election in 1986 amid a midterm environment favoring Democrats nationally. Unchallenged in the Republican primary, he faced U.S. Representative Bob Edgar, a liberal Democrat who criticized Specter's support for certain Reagan administration policies.[40] Specter, bolstered by strong fundraising and incumbency advantages, won decisively on November 4, 1986, with 56% of the vote to Edgar's 44%, securing a second term despite the Democratic gains elsewhere.[38] [41] This outcome underscored Specter's appeal as a centrist capable of broad voter support in Pennsylvania's competitive political landscape.[40]

Committee Assignments and Leadership Positions

Upon entering the U.S. Senate in January 1981, Arlen Specter was assigned to the Committee on the Judiciary, where he served continuously until his departure in 2011, leveraging his prior experience as Philadelphia District Attorney and counsel to the Warren Commission.[42] He also joined the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and the Committee on Environment and Public Works, maintaining membership on these panels through much of his tenure.[43][2] Additionally, Specter served on the Special Committee on Aging and the Select Committee on Intelligence.[8] Specter's leadership roles expanded with Republican majorities. He chaired the Select Committee on Intelligence from January 1995 to January 1997, overseeing inquiries into intelligence operations during a period of post-Cold War restructuring.[8] He then led the Committee on Veterans' Affairs from January 1997 to January 2001 and again from January 2003 to January 2005, focusing on benefits expansion and healthcare reforms for veterans amid shifting congressional control.[44] In 2005, following the Republican retention of the Senate, Specter assumed the chairmanship of the Committee on the Judiciary, holding the position until Democrats gained the majority in January 2007; during this time, he managed high-profile confirmation hearings for judicial nominees.[45] On Appropriations, Specter held influential subcommittee roles, including as ranking member and later chairman of the Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies, directing billions in funding for medical research and education programs.[46] His positions on Environment and Public Works involved oversight of infrastructure and environmental policy, though without formal chairmanship.[47] Following his party switch to Democrat on April 28, 2009, Specter forfeited accumulated seniority on all committees per Senate rules, reverting to junior status on the five panels he retained, which diminished his influence in the final years of his service.[48][49]

Major Legislative Contributions

Specter played a pivotal role in the passage of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) of 1994, providing bipartisan Republican support for the legislation originally sponsored by Senator Joe Biden, which allocated federal resources for prosecuting gender-based violence, established victim services, and mandated law enforcement training on domestic abuse.[29] As Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, he also advanced reauthorizations, including the 2005 VAWA, which expanded protections for victims of human trafficking and dating violence while increasing funding for grants to over $1.6 billion cumulatively by that point.[50] In health policy, Specter spearheaded efforts to double the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget from $13.2 billion in 1998 to $27.1 billion by 2003, collaborating with Senator Ted Kennedy to prioritize biomedical research funding amid competing fiscal priorities, resulting in accelerated advancements in cancer and other disease treatments.[51] He further advocated for expanded federal support of embryonic stem cell research, sponsoring the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 (S. 471), which passed the Senate 63-37 but was vetoed by President George W. Bush; Specter held public hearings challenging administration restrictions and argued for ethical derivations to unlock therapeutic potential without creating new embryos.[52] On national security, as Judiciary Committee Chairman from 2005 to 2007, Specter managed the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005, securing its Senate passage with provisions extending surveillance authorities while incorporating sunset clauses and oversight amendments to address civil liberties concerns raised by groups like the ACLU.[53] He also sponsored elements of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which passed the Senate 65-34 and established military tribunals for Guantanamo detainees, codifying interrogation standards compliant with the Geneva Conventions after Supreme Court rulings invalidated prior frameworks.[54] Following his 2009 switch to the Democratic Party, Specter cast the decisive 60th vote enabling Senate passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on December 23, 2009, by a 60-39 margin, facilitating expanded insurance coverage to over 30 million Americans through mandates, subsidies, and Medicaid expansion despite his prior reservations on the public option.[55]

Pivotal Judicial and Confirmation Votes

As a long-serving member of the Senate Judiciary Committee from 1981 to 2011, Arlen Specter played a significant role in evaluating and voting on numerous judicial nominations, particularly to the Supreme Court, where his positions often reflected his moderate Republican stance and emphasis on judicial restraint.[42][56] His votes and questioning during hearings frequently drew attention due to their potential to sway outcomes in a closely divided Senate. Specter's opposition to Robert Bork's 1987 Supreme Court nomination was among his most consequential actions, contributing to its defeat. During the Judiciary Committee hearings, Specter rigorously questioned Bork on issues like privacy rights and the Ninth Amendment, ultimately voting against reporting the nomination favorably; the committee voted 9-5 against on October 6, 1987.[42][56] The full Senate rejected Bork's confirmation on October 23, 1987, by a 58-42 vote, with Specter joining five other Republicans in opposition, a decision that conservatives later criticized as ideologically driven despite Bork's extensive judicial record.[57][58] In contrast, Specter supported Clarence Thomas's 1991 nomination amid intense scrutiny over sexual harassment allegations from Anita Hill. As a committee member, he conducted pointed cross-examination of Hill on October 11-12, 1991, challenging inconsistencies in her testimony and arguing they undermined her credibility, which drew backlash from women's groups but aligned with his assessment of Thomas's qualifications.[42][59] Specter voted to confirm Thomas, helping secure the committee's advancement; the Senate approved the nomination on October 15, 1991, by a 52-48 margin.[60] During his tenure as Judiciary Committee chairman from 2005 to 2007, Specter presided over the confirmations of Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito. He voted in favor of Roberts on September 22, 2005, after hearings focused on Roberts's respect for precedent, with the committee approving 13-5 and the Senate confirming 78-22 on September 29, 2005.[61] Similarly, Specter endorsed Alito on January 13, 2006, emphasizing Alito's judicial philosophy of textualism, leading to committee approval and full Senate confirmation 58-42 on January 31, 2006.[62][63] After switching to the Democratic Party in April 2009, Specter voted to confirm Sonia Sotomayor on August 6, 2009, by a 68-31 Senate margin, consistent with his support for nominees demonstrating mainstream legal reasoning, though he pressed her during hearings on topics like the Second Amendment and Ricci v. DeStefano.[64] These votes underscored Specter's pattern of independent evaluation, often prioritizing nominee qualifications over strict partisan loyalty.[56]

Ideological Shifts and Party Switch

Evolution from Republican Moderation

Specter entered the Senate in 1981 as a Republican aligned with Ronald Reagan's coalition, securing victories on issues like tax cuts and defense spending, yet demonstrating early independence through support for campaign finance reform and environmental protections that occasionally diverged from strict party orthodoxy.[65] His moderation crystallized in 1987 when he opposed the Supreme Court nomination of Robert Bork, arguing that Bork's originalist philosophy threatened precedents on privacy and equal protection, a vote that contributed to Bork's 58-42 defeat and drew lasting conservative ire as a betrayal of Reagan's judicial agenda.[66][67] Throughout the 1990s, Specter maintained a centrist profile, voting to convict President Bill Clinton during his 1999 impeachment trial while backing bipartisan measures like the Violence Against Women Act, but his pro-choice stance on abortion and advocacy for federal funding of embryonic stem cell research increasingly isolated him from the party's social conservative wing.[68] By the early 2000s, tensions escalated under George W. Bush; Specter supported the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts and the Iraq War authorization in October 2002, yet publicly criticized the administration's warrantless NSA surveillance program in 2006, threatening contempt proceedings against officials for non-cooperation and decrying it as an imbalance against civil liberties.[69][70] He also challenged Bush's use of signing statements to undermine congressional intent, holding Judiciary Committee hearings in June 2006 to scrutinize over 750 such statements issued since 2001.[71] This pattern of cross-party voting intensified on social and scientific issues, exemplified by Specter's leadership in passing the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005, which cleared the House 238-194 and Senate 63-37 before Bush's veto—the first of his presidency—prompting Specter to join an unsuccessful override attempt and predict eventual federal funding as scientific consensus grew.[72][73] National Journal rated him among the Senate's most liberal Republicans in economic and social policy votes by 2005, with a composite score reflecting frequent alignment with Democrats (over 40% on key issues), fueling primary challenges like Pat Toomey's in 2004, where Specter won renomination 60-40 amid accusations of apostasy from groups like the Club for Growth.[74] These deviations, rooted in Specter's self-described commitment to institutional checks and empirical policy over ideological purity, positioned him as a bridge figure whose moderation clashed with the GOP's rightward shift on executive power, judicial restraint, and bioethics.[65][75]

2009 Party Change Announcement and Motivations

On April 28, 2009, U.S. Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania publicly announced his departure from the Republican Party to become a Democrat, declaring his intent to seek re-election in the 2010 Democratic primary rather than face a likely defeat in the Republican contest.[65][6] The switch immediately expanded the Democratic Senate majority to 59 seats, positioning it one vote shy of the filibuster-proof threshold, though Specter emphasized he would not serve as an automatic 60th vote for party priorities.[5][76] Specter attributed the decision in part to ideological divergence, asserting that the Republican Party had "moved farther and farther to the right" over recent years, leaving him at odds with its direction while aligning more closely with Democratic principles on issues like economic stimulus and health care reform.[77] However, he candidly acknowledged electoral calculations as a core motivator, stating that internal polling showed his prospects in the upcoming Republican primary—against conservative challenger Pat Toomey—were "bleak," with Specter trailing by double digits amid backlash from GOP activists over his support for President Barack Obama's $787 billion stimulus package and other moderate positions.[77][78] Pennsylvania's voter registration dynamics further underscored the pragmatic rationale: Democrats held a 4-to-3 advantage over Republicans in the state by 2009, reflecting a broader leftward shift in the electorate following the 2008 presidential election, which Barack Obama won by over 10 percentage points.[79] Specter later affirmed that the switch was explicitly designed to enhance his re-election odds, remarking, "My change in party will enable me to be re-elected," a concession that critics across the aisle interpreted as opportunistic self-preservation rather than pure conviction, given his 44-year history as a Republican including multiple endorsements from conservative presidents.[80][78]

Immediate Political Fallout and 2010 Defeat

Specter's announcement on April 28, 2009, that he was switching from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party elicited sharp backlash from Republicans, who viewed the move as opportunistic self-preservation amid poor polling against primary challenger Pat Toomey.[78] Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele labeled it a "self-serving" act that denied Pennsylvania voters a choice, while former Vice President Dick Cheney called it a betrayal of conservative principles.[81] The switch deprived the GOP of a Senate seat they had held for decades and fueled internal recriminations about the party's treatment of moderates, with some conservatives celebrating the purge of a perceived RINO (Republican In Name Only).[5] Democrats welcomed the defection, which brought their Senate majority to 59 seats and positioned them one vote shy of a filibuster-proof threshold, aiding President Barack Obama's agenda on issues like healthcare reform.[76] However, Specter emphasized he would not be an "automatic" 60th vote, signaling his intent to retain independence and critiquing both parties' extremes, which tempered Democratic enthusiasm and drew skepticism from party activists wary of his long Republican history.[5] Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid endorsed Specter but faced pressure from liberals who distrusted his past opposition to nominees like Elena Kagan.[6] Facing a Democratic primary challenge from U.S. Representative Joe Sestak, a retired Navy admiral who positioned himself as an outsider advocating change, Specter campaigned on his seniority, bipartisan record, and ability to deliver federal funds to Pennsylvania.[82] Sestak's ads hammered Specter's party switch as cynical, highlighting polls showing Specter trailing Toomey by double digits in the GOP primary, and capitalized on anti-incumbent fervor amid the Tea Party wave and economic discontent.[83] Specter, at 79, struggled to mobilize the Democratic base, receiving lukewarm support from Obama despite an endorsement, as the president prioritized other races.[84] On May 18, 2010, Sestak defeated Specter in the Democratic primary with 54.4% of the vote to Specter's 45.6%, a margin of over 100,000 votes statewide, ending Specter's bid for a sixth term after 30 years in the Senate.[85] The upset reflected broader voter rejection of entrenched Washington figures, with Sestak's military background and aggressive spending—$10 million personally loaned to his campaign—contrasting Specter's institutional defenses.[86] Analysts attributed the loss to lingering distrust over the switch, Specter's age and health issues (including prior brain cancer), and Democratic primary voters' preference for a fresh face amid national anti-establishment sentiment, despite Specter's efforts to rebrand as a loyal Democrat.[87] Sestak advanced to the general election but lost to Republican Pat Toomey, underscoring the switch's ultimate failure to secure Specter's seat for Democrats.[88]

Policy Positions and Controversies

Abortion and Related Legislation

Arlen Specter consistently described himself as personally opposed to abortion but legally pro-choice, affirming the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision as a "super-precedent" reinforced by subsequent rulings.[89][90] As a Republican senator, his positions drew criticism from social conservatives, who viewed his support for abortion rights as atypical for the party, while pro-choice groups rated him variably due to occasional votes favoring restrictions.[91][92] Specter voted in favor of banning partial-birth abortions on multiple occasions, including yes on S.1692 in 1999 and yes on S.3 in 2003, which prohibited the procedure except when necessary to save the mother's life.[91] These votes aligned with efforts to limit late-term procedures, though he had earlier advocated for additional review of medical and humanitarian aspects before enacting such bans.[93] He also supported the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (S.1019/HR.1997) in 2004, imposing criminal penalties for harming an unborn fetus during other crimes, a measure endorsed by pro-life advocates as recognizing fetal personhood in non-abortion contexts.[91] On measures restricting access, Specter opposed parental notification requirements, voting no on S.403 in 2006 to notify parents of minors seeking out-of-state abortions and no on an amendment in 2008 prohibiting minors from crossing state lines for the procedure without consent.[91] He rejected efforts to bar federal funding for organizations performing abortions, voting no on S.Amdt.3330 to H.R.3043 in 2007, and opposed defining unborn children as eligible for the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in 2008.[91] Additionally, he voted no on maintaining bans on abortions at military bases in 2000 and no on restricting UN funding for population control policies potentially involving abortion in 2009.[91] In related areas intersecting abortion debates, Specter advocated for expanded federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, viewing it as distinct from abortion incentives despite ethical concerns over embryo destruction. He voted yes on S.5 and H.R.3 in 2007 to broaden research to more embryonic lines, signed a 2004 letter urging such expansion, and introduced legislation in 2010 to protect funding amid court challenges.[91][94] His efforts, including Senate hearings as Appropriations subcommittee chair, highlighted potential medical benefits while navigating opposition linking the research to abortion politics.[95][96]

Judicial Philosophy and Supreme Court Influence

Arlen Specter's judicial philosophy, shaped by his experience as a district attorney and emphasis on prosecutorial rigor, prioritized adherence to legal precedent, judicial review, and the protection of minority rights in evaluating nominees. He viewed the Senate's advice-and-consent role as requiring independent scrutiny of a nominee's likely application of constitutional principles, rather than deference to presidential or partisan preferences. This approach favored judges who demonstrated restraint and fidelity to established law, avoiding those whose views suggested potential overreach or disregard for stare decisis.[42][7] Specter's influence was most evident in high-profile Supreme Court confirmations during his 30-year tenure on the Judiciary Committee, where he served as chairman from 2005 to 2007. In 1987, he opposed Robert Bork's nomination, arguing that Bork's positions on judicial review, minority rights, and precedents like those establishing privacy protections raised substantial doubts about his mainstream application of constitutional fundamentals; Specter's pointed questioning of Bork's shifting testimony on these issues contributed to the Senate's 58-42 rejection on October 23, 1987, leading to Anthony Kennedy's appointment instead.[42][97][98] He contrasted this by supporting Clarence Thomas's 1991 confirmation (52-48 on October 15), despite leading the contentious Anita Hill credibility probe, deeming Thomas qualified after extensive review. As chairman, Specter presided over John Roberts's unanimous committee advancement and Senate confirmation (78-22 on September 29, 2005), and Samuel Alito's (58-42 on January 31, 2006), while stressing the need for nominees to respect "super precedents" like Roe v. Wade, which he described as entrenched due to its reaffirmation in over 30 cases. After switching parties in 2009, he voted for Elena Kagan's confirmation (63-37 on August 6, 2010), critiquing her evasive answers but affirming her qualifications.[42][56][99] Through these votes, Specter helped shape a Supreme Court where, by 2012, eight of nine justices had been confirmed during his committee service, indirectly influencing rulings on abortion, civil rights, and executive power without rigid ideological consistency. His centrist independence often drew conservative ire for the Bork vote but earned bipartisan respect for prioritizing legal substance over politics.[42][58][100]

National Security and Intelligence Matters

Arlen Specter served on the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence starting in January 1985 and chaired the committee from 1995 to 1997 following Republican control of the Senate.[101][102] During his tenure as chairman, Specter oversaw investigations into intelligence failures and authored legislation aimed at enhancing counterintelligence measures, including reports on monitoring and counterintelligence issues prompted by events like the Ames espionage case.[103] He emphasized congressional oversight of intelligence activities, as evidenced by his advocacy for notifications under the National Security Act of 1947, which requires briefing Congress on certain covert actions.[104] In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, Specter supported expanded national security authorities as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which he chaired from 2005 to 2007. He voted in favor of the USA PATRIOT Act on October 25, 2001, arguing it provided essential tools for counterterrorism while including sunset provisions for review.[105] During reauthorization debates in 2005 and 2006, Specter negotiated compromises to extend provisions like roving wiretaps and national security letters, rejecting filibuster attempts and securing passage of a revised bill on March 2, 2006, which he described as striking "an acceptable balance" between security and civil liberties, though he pledged further hearings on privacy concerns.[106][107] Specter initially backed military action against Iraq, voting on October 11, 2002, for the joint resolution authorizing force, citing intelligence assessments of weapons of mass destruction and Saddam Hussein's defiance of UN resolutions.[8] By 2007, however, he criticized the Bush administration's surge strategy and called for Congress to share power with the president on war policy, arguing that the original authorization imposed restrictions on force usage that warranted renewed legislative input amid escalating costs and shifting intelligence.[108] He also advocated for habeas corpus rights for Guantanamo Bay detainees and supported strengthening Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) courts in response to warrantless wiretap revelations, positioning himself against unchecked executive surveillance while maintaining support for robust intelligence gathering.[109]

Economic and Labor Policies

Arlen Specter, as a long-serving member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, including chairmanship of the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Subcommittee, prioritized funding for workforce training, employment services, and health-related research initiatives aimed at bolstering economic productivity.[110] In fiscal year 2006, he led approval of a $145.7 billion appropriations bill that addressed prior reductions in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, emphasizing research to drive innovation and job growth.[111] Collaborating with Democrat Tom Harkin, Specter incorporated provisions for embryonic stem cell derivation using federal funds in Labor-HHS bills, viewing such investments as essential for long-term economic competitiveness through biomedical advancements.[96] On broader fiscal policy, Specter advocated tax simplification, introducing S. 488 in the 106th Congress to impose a flat tax on individuals' earned income and businesses' taxable income, arguing it would streamline compliance and stimulate growth without favoring specific income brackets.[112] He testified before the Joint Economic Committee in 2003 on rethinking the tax code to enhance efficiency, critiquing complexities that hindered economic dynamism.[113] Specter supported the 2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, providing $700 billion for bank bailouts via the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), despite personal philosophical reservations about taxpayer-funded interventions, citing the risk of systemic financial collapse.[114] In response to the 2008-2009 recession, Specter was one of three Republican senators to vote for the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in February 2009, defending it as a necessary measure to preserve jobs and avert deeper contraction, while negotiating additions like tax cuts and a 34% increase in NIH funding.[115][116] He described the vote as "perilous" but justified by empirical indicators of economic peril, including unemployment risks in manufacturing-heavy Pennsylvania.[117] Specter also backed infrastructure investments, aligning with Vice President Biden's 2010 remarks praising his role in advancing 21st-century economic rebuilding through such spending.[118] Regarding labor policies, Specter's moderate stance reflected Pennsylvania's unionized workforce, particularly in steel and manufacturing. He opposed the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) in March 2009 as a Republican, announcing it as the "decisive vote" against provisions eliminating secret-ballot elections for union certification, which he deemed detrimental to balanced labor relations during economic downturns.[119] Following his April 2009 party switch to Democrat, Specter endorsed a revised union-facilitating bill in a September 2009 AFL-CIO speech, signaling openness to reforms strengthening worker representation while proposing broader National Labor Relations Act overhauls to address enforcement gaps.[120][121] Labor endorsements became pivotal in his 2010 primary, underscoring unions' influence on his electoral viability.[122] Specter supported minimum wage hikes, voting in 1999 to advance waiver points for increases tied to economic relief packages.[123]

Criticisms from Conservative and Liberal Perspectives

Conservatives criticized Specter for his vote against the Supreme Court nomination of Robert Bork on October 1, 1987, viewing it as a betrayal of originalist judicial philosophy and a pivotal moment that doomed Bork's confirmation, earning Specter lasting enmity from the right.[124][125] His moderate-to-liberal voting record, including frequent alignment with Senate Democrats on issues like gun control and abortion rights, led figures like Pat Toomey to label him "across the board" liberal during the 2004 Pennsylvania Republican primary, where Specter narrowly prevailed with President George W. Bush's endorsement amid conservative backlash.[126][127] Specter's opposition to President Bill Clinton's 1999 impeachment conviction, arguing the House managers failed to prove their case under a "not proven" standard akin to Scottish law, further alienated social conservatives who saw it as excusing perjury and obstruction.[128] His 2009 switch to the Democratic Party was decried by Republicans as opportunistic self-preservation ahead of a tough primary, exacerbating perceptions of disloyalty after decades as a GOP senator.[129] Liberals faulted Specter for his aggressive questioning of Anita Hill during Clarence Thomas's 1991 confirmation hearings, where he pressed on details of her sexual harassment allegations, prompting accusations of victim-blaming and insensitivity that fueled feminist outrage and long-term distrust.[130] His October 11, 2002, vote authorizing the Iraq War aligned him with Bush administration policies, drawing ire from anti-war progressives who later highlighted it during his 2010 Democratic primary as evidence of hawkish tendencies unfit for the party.[8][131] Post-switch, Specter faced skepticism from the left for retaining centrist positions, with critics likening him to Joe Lieberman—a Democrat who would obstruct filibuster reform and progressive priorities like card-check labor legislation—while some groups opposed granting him seniority without a primary challenge, questioning his ideological commitment.[132][133] This duality underscored his reputation as a maverick who frustrated partisans on both sides through inconsistent allegiance to ideological purity.[127]

Electoral History

Gubernatorial and Presidential Bids

Arlen Specter launched his bid for the Republican presidential nomination on March 30, 1995, announcing his candidacy in Washington, D.C., and framing himself as a pragmatic moderate capable of broadening the party's appeal.[134] He warned that nominating a staunch conservative would hand re-election to President Bill Clinton, citing the need for the GOP to attract independent and moderate voters on issues like abortion, where Specter advocated for legal access with gestational limits rather than the outright bans favored by competitors such as Pat Buchanan and Alan Keyes.[135] His platform included ten core commitments, emphasizing fiscal responsibility, crime reduction, and pro-choice policies aligned with his "single bullet theory" defense of the Warren Commission's JFK assassination findings as evidence of independent-mindedness.[134] The campaign faced immediate challenges, including limited fundraising—Specter raised under $3 million by mid-1995—and organizational weaknesses, which hampered his performance in early events like the Iowa straw poll, where he placed sixth with 1.6% of the vote.[136] Polling consistently showed him trailing frontrunners Bob Dole and Buchanan, with national support hovering below 5%, as conservative voters coalesced around ideological purists amid the party's rightward shift. Specter criticized the Republican field for extremism on social issues, but this alienated the base without drawing sufficient moderate crossover.[137] On November 22, 1995, Specter suspended his campaign, citing insurmountable financial deficits and the inability to compete effectively in upcoming primaries, effectively ending his White House aspirations before any votes were cast.[137] He endorsed no candidate immediately, though his exit underscored tensions between the GOP's establishment and insurgent wings. Specter never mounted a gubernatorial campaign in Pennsylvania, focusing instead on local prosecutorial roles in the 1960s and his successful U.S. Senate bids starting in 1980.[38]

Senate Re-elections and Final Campaign

Specter secured re-election to the U.S. Senate in 1986, defeating Democratic Congressman Bob Edgar with 1,906,537 votes (56.44%) to Edgar's 1,448,239 (42.87%).[138] In 1992, he faced a competitive race against Democrat Lynn Yeakel, who had gained prominence criticizing Specter's role in the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas hearings; Specter prevailed narrowly with 2,358,125 votes (49.10%) against Yeakel's 2,224,966 (46.33%).[139] His 1998 bid against Democrat Bill Lloyd was less contested, as Specter won 1,814,180 votes (61.34%) to Lloyd's 1,028,839 (34.79%).[140] The 2004 re-election campaign highlighted intra-party tensions within Pennsylvania Republicans. Specter withstood a strong primary challenge from conservative Representative Pat Toomey on April 27, 2004, winning by approximately 17,000 votes amid criticism from the right over his support for federal funding of embryonic stem cell research and other moderate stances.[141] In the general election, he defeated Democrat Joseph Hoeffel with 2,925,080 votes (52.62%) to Hoeffel's 2,334,126 (41.99%).[142] Specter's final campaign followed his April 28, 2009, switch to the Democratic Party, a move he attributed partly to polling showing likely defeat in a Republican primary rematch with Toomey and a desire to continue his Senate service.[78][65] Seeking a sixth term, he entered the 2010 Democratic primary but lost to Representative Joe Sestak on May 18, 2010, with Sestak capturing about 54% of the vote in a contest fueled by voter demand for change and anti-incumbent fervor.[143][82] Sestak's upset reflected broader national discontent with long-serving politicians, ending Specter's 30-year Senate tenure.[83]

Post-Senate Life

Teaching and Public Advocacy

Following his departure from the U.S. Senate in January 2011, Arlen Specter joined the University of Pennsylvania Law School—his alma mater—as an adjunct professor.[15] He commenced teaching in September 2011, delivering a course centered on the relationship between Congress and the Supreme Court, with emphasis on separation of powers and judicial confirmation processes.[8][16] Specter intended to persist in his academic role amid health challenges, planning to co-teach a class in the fall 2012 semester despite a recurrence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma diagnosed earlier that year.[144] Beyond academia, Specter engaged in selective public-oriented activities, including providing strategic advice on federal and state legislation without undertaking lobbying.[145] On December 21, 2011, he donated approximately 2,700 boxes of senatorial papers and memorabilia to Philadelphia University (now Thomas Jefferson University), establishing the Arlen Specter Center for Public Policy as a nonpartisan resource for policy research and education.[8] He also voiced interest in contributing political commentaries via television or radio to leverage his decades of experience.[146] These efforts reflected a commitment to preserving institutional knowledge and fostering informed discourse, though his advancing illness curtailed broader advocacy initiatives.[147]

Philanthropic and Institutional Legacies

Following his departure from the U.S. Senate in January 2011, Specter donated his extensive collection of senatorial papers—spanning over 1,200 boxes and documenting 50 years of public service—to Philadelphia University (now part of Thomas Jefferson University) in December 2010.[148] This donation formed the foundation for the Arlen Specter Center for Public Service, officially dedicated on September 11, 2014, which preserves the archives and fosters research into public policy, bipartisan governance, and leadership.[148][149] The center hosts events, such as webinars examining Specter's approach to policy over party loyalty, and supports fellowships that highlight his influence on criminal justice, healthcare policy, and American politics.[150][151] In March 2013, Philadelphia University partnered with the University of Pittsburgh to enhance preservation and public access to the archives, digitizing materials and enabling broader scholarly use through shared descriptive guides.[152][153] This collaboration underscores Specter's enduring institutional impact, providing resources for researchers studying mid-20th-century legislative history, judicial nominations, and appropriations processes. While Specter did not establish personal philanthropic foundations, his archival gift has sustained educational initiatives aligned with his centrist legacy, including programs on ethics in governance and health policy innovation.[149]

Illness, Death, and Enduring Impact

Health Struggles

In the early 1990s, Specter underwent surgery to remove a brain tumor, followed by a second brain tumor removal in 1996.[154][155] He also had coronary bypass surgery during this period to address heart disease.[52] A bleeding ulcer was diagnosed in December 2003, followed by a rare intestinal cancer in March 2004, which required treatment including surgery.[156] On February 16, 2005, Specter was diagnosed with stage IV Hodgkin's lymphoma shortly after his 75th birthday and assuming the chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee; he underwent eight weeks of chemotherapy and radiation therapy while maintaining his Senate schedule, announcing remission in April 2005.[157][158] The disease recurred in 2008, prompting further treatment, though he continued legislative work.[155][159] After leaving the Senate in January 2011, Specter faced a final cancer diagnosis on August 28, 2012, with a flare-up of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, leading to hospitalization at the University of Pennsylvania; he was discharged on September 7, 2012, but succumbed to complications from the disease on October 14, 2012, at age 82.[160][161][162]

Death and Tributes

Arlen Specter died on October 14, 2012, at his home in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at the age of 82, from complications of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a recurrence of the cancer he had battled previously.[10][163] His death followed a public announcement in late August 2012 of the cancer's return, after which he received treatment but ultimately succumbed to its effects.[164] A memorial service for Specter was held on October 16, 2012, at Har Zion Temple in Penn Valley, Pennsylvania, attended by over 1,000 family members, friends, dignitaries, and political colleagues.[165][166] Vice President Joe Biden delivered a eulogy, describing Specter as possessing "undaunted courage" both in political battles and against illness, and noting that "he believed he could change the world, if he just kept fighting."[167][168] Former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell praised Specter's integrity and willingness to cross party lines, calling him a man who "never walked away from his principles."[169][170] Specter's son, Shanin Specter, highlighted his father's decisive vote against President Barack Obama's health care overhaul in a "dark time for our nation," emphasizing his independence despite the political cost.[171] Tributes from across the political spectrum underscored Specter's long Senate tenure and bipartisan efforts, particularly in advancing medical research funding.[155] The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network expressed gratitude for his advocacy in reducing cancer suffering and mortality.[172] Pennsylvania Republican Congressman Glenn Thompson mourned him as a figure whose passing saddened many, offering prayers for the family.[173] Overall, eulogies portrayed Specter as a tenacious, principle-driven legislator whose career exemplified grit and determination amid ideological shifts and health adversities.[174][175]

Long-Term Political Legacy

Arlen Specter's long-term political legacy is characterized by his role as a centrist maverick in an increasingly polarized U.S. Senate, where he prioritized policy outcomes over strict party loyalty, authoring or cosponsoring legislation with enduring effects on criminal justice and national security.[176] He introduced the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, which imposed mandatory minimum sentences for felons possessing firearms, influencing federal sentencing guidelines and contributing to tougher enforcement against repeat violent offenders.[176] His involvement in high-profile judicial confirmations, including opposition to Robert Bork's 1987 Supreme Court nomination and support for Clarence Thomas despite controversies, underscored his independent streak, shaping the Court's ideological balance while drawing ire from ideological purists on both sides.[58] The 2009 party switch from Republican to Democrat, after 44 years in the GOP, temporarily handed Senate Democrats a filibuster-proof 60-vote majority, enabling passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act but exemplifying the perils of cross-aisle maneuvers in primary-driven politics.[177][178] Conservatives viewed the switch as opportunistic betrayal, cementing his image as a "RINO" (Republican In Name Only) whose moderate votes—such as on abortion rights and stem cell research—undermined party cohesion, with figures like Pat Toomey challenging him successfully in primaries.[127] Liberals, while benefiting short-term, criticized his inconsistent alignment, noting votes against key priorities like the public option in health reform and his late conversion after facing GOP primary threats. In retrospect, Specter's career highlights the challenges of institutionalist moderation amid rising partisanship; his 30-year tenure as Pennsylvania's longest-serving senator ended in 2010 with a Democratic primary loss to Joe Sestak, signaling voter preference for ideological consistency over bipartisanship.[127][177] His legacy endures as a cautionary tale for politicians navigating primaries, where cross-party appeals often fail, yet his procedural savvy in committees like Judiciary influenced Senate norms on nominations and oversight.[58] Posthumously, analyses portray him as a contrarian who thrived on controversy but rarely built lasting coalitions, with his switches—from Democrat to Republican in 1965 and back—reflecting pragmatic adaptation rather than ideological conviction.[179][180]

Publications and Writings

Authored Books

Passion for Truth: From Finding JFK's Single Bullet to Questioning Anita Hill to Impeaching Clinton, co-authored with Charles Robbins and published on September 30, 2000, by William Morrow, examines Specter's pivotal roles in landmark events, including his formulation of the single-bullet theory as a junior counsel for the Warren Commission investigating President John F. Kennedy's 1963 assassination, his cross-examination of Anita Hill during the 1991 confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and his vote to convict President Bill Clinton on one article of impeachment in 1999 while advocating for a censure alternative.[181][182] In Never Give In: Battling Cancer in the Senate, co-authored with Frank J. Scaturro and released in 2008 by St. Martin's Press, Specter recounts his 1993 diagnosis of stage IV brain cancer, subsequent surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments, as well as his determination to maintain Senate attendance and productivity, including sponsoring legislation on cancer research funding.[1] Specter's last book, Life Among the Cannibals: A Political Career, a Tea Party Uprising, and the End of Governing as We Know It, co-authored with Charles Robbins and published in 2012 by Thomas Dunne Books (an imprint of St. Martin's Press), analyzes his April 2009 switch from the Republican to Democratic Party amid re-election pressures, the internal Democratic primary loss to Representative Joe Sestak on May 18, 2010, by a 54% to 46% margin, and broader critiques of ideological extremism and the decline of bipartisan governance.[1]

Key Articles and Memoirs

Specter contributed several notable op-eds to major publications, often addressing national security, immigration policy, and legislative strategy. In a May 22, 1986, New York Times op-ed titled "How to Make Terrorists Think Twice," he argued for retaliatory military actions against state-sponsored terrorism, citing the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing and proposing targeted strikes to deter future attacks while emphasizing proportionality under international law.[183] On immigration reform, Specter wrote "A Less Ambitious Approach to Immigration" for The Washington Post on August 6, 2007, critiquing the failure of comprehensive legislation and advocating a scaled-back bill focusing on border security, employer verification, and a temporary worker program without full amnesty, based on his experience chairing the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration.[184] In foreign policy, he co-authored "Dialogue with Adversaries" in The Washington Quarterly (Winter 2006–2007) with aide Christopher Bradish, outlining a framework for U.S. engagement with Iran, North Korea, and Syria through phased diplomatic incentives tied to verifiable concessions on nuclear programs and terrorism support, drawing from his Senate Intelligence Committee oversight.[185] Specter also penned a June 18, 2003, Washington Times op-ed asserting the U.S. war in Iraq as a "just war" under ethical and legal criteria, referencing historical precedents like World War II and defending preemptive action against weapons of mass destruction threats despite post-invasion intelligence debates.[186] These pieces reflected his pragmatic, centrist approach to contentious issues, frequently bridging partisan divides in print as he did in Senate debates.

Signature Bills and Cosponsorships

Specter sponsored the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 (S. 471), which proposed expanding federal funding for embryonic stem cell lines derived from excess in vitro fertilization embryos, subject to ethical guidelines including donor consent.[187] As the bill's primary Senate sponsor, he advocated for its passage to advance medical research potential, arguing it addressed limitations in President George W. Bush's 2001 policy restricting funding to existing lines; the measure passed the Senate 63-37 but was vetoed by Bush, with Specter pushing for an override that fell short.[188][189] In the realm of criminal justice and domestic violence prevention, Specter cosponsored and helped introduce the Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization of 2005 (S. 1197) alongside Senators Joe Biden and Orrin Hatch, extending grants for victim services, law enforcement training, and protections against intimate partner violence while addressing constitutional concerns from prior rulings.[50][190] As Judiciary Committee chairman, he presided over hearings advancing the bill, which built on the original 1994 VAWA by enhancing tribal jurisdiction and immigration relief for victims; it was enacted as part of the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-162).[191] Specter sponsored the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007 (S. 2035), intended to create a federal reporter's shield law protecting journalists from compelled disclosure of confidential sources in non-fugitive criminal investigations, balancing First Amendment interests against national security exceptions.[192] The bill advanced through committee but did not reach a full Senate vote, reflecting Specter's long-standing defense of press freedoms informed by his prosecutorial background. He also sponsored the Hospice Protection Act of 2008 (S. 3484), which sought to safeguard Medicare hospice benefits from improper payment recoveries, addressing provider vulnerabilities amid fraud crackdowns.[192] On veterans' issues, Specter sponsored S. 3444 in the 111th Congress to extend the work opportunity tax credit for hiring certain veterans, incentivizing employment for post-9/11 era service members facing readjustment challenges; the provision contributed to broader tax relief measures.[193] His cosponsorships often emphasized bipartisan health and appropriations priorities, including boosts to National Institutes of Health funding, such as securing $10 billion in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 for biomedical research amid his own cancer diagnosis.[52] Overall, Specter's legislative record featured over 1,600 sponsored bills and nearly 4,000 cosponsorships, with emphasis on judiciary reforms, medical innovation, and targeted protections rather than sweeping overhauls.[2]

Impact on Policy Outcomes

Specter's bipartisan support proved pivotal in enacting the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) of 1994, which allocated federal grants exceeding $1.6 billion over subsequent years for victim services, law enforcement training, and prosecution of domestic violence and sexual assault cases, marking the first comprehensive federal response to gender-based violence.[194] As Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman from 2005 to 2007, he led hearings and co-introduced the 2005 reauthorization (S. 1197) with Senators Biden and Hatch, expanding protections to include immigrant victims and enhancing DNA evidence collection for sexual assaults, which passed and was signed into law as part of the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005.[50][195] These measures contributed to a reported 64% decline in intimate partner violence against women from 1993 to 2010, per Bureau of Justice Statistics data, by improving coordination among federal, state, and local agencies. In health policy, Specter's December 23, 2009, vote supplied the 60th Senate tally required to invoke cloture on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), overcoming a filibuster and enabling its 60-39 passage the following day, which extended insurance coverage to over 20 million Americans by 2016 through Medicaid expansion and subsidies.[55] His April 28, 2009, switch from Republican to Democrat created a temporary filibuster-proof majority, facilitating the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009—a $787 billion stimulus package that included $144 billion in tax cuts and $288 billion in aid to states, credited with averting deeper recession impacts according to Congressional Budget Office analyses.[5] As Judiciary Chairman, Specter shaped judicial policy outcomes through oversight of Supreme Court confirmations, including rigorous questioning of Chief Justice John Roberts on July 14, 2005, regarding executive power and commerce clause interpretations, which influenced the 2005-2006 hearings leading to Roberts' and Justice Samuel Alito's approvals by margins of 78-22 and 58-42, respectively; these appointments shifted the Court's balance toward originalist jurisprudence evident in subsequent rulings on issues like campaign finance and gun rights.[196][58] His sponsorship of the USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization in March 2006, incorporating amendments for enhanced oversight of surveillance warrants, ensured its enactment with provisions that balanced national security expansions—such as roving wiretaps—with sunset clauses and judicial reviews, sustaining the law's framework amid post-9/11 threats.[2] Specter's persistent push for expanded federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, including introducing S. 5 in 2005 to repeal President Bush's 2001 restrictions, heightened congressional debates and appropriations—securing $90 million annually for non-embryonic lines under Bush—but yielded no enacted landmark bill during his tenure; however, his advocacy laid groundwork for President Obama's March 9, 2009, executive order lifting the ban, enabling NIH funding for new lines and accelerating research into regenerative therapies.[96][197] Overall, his centrist positioning and committee influence amplified outcomes in criminal justice, healthcare access, and judicial restraint, though his 2009 party switch drew criticism for prioritizing legislative leverage over partisan loyalty, ultimately costing him reelection in the 2010 Democratic primary.[5]

References

  1. Arlen Specter - Biographical Directory of the United States Congress
  2. Senator Arlen Specter - Congress.gov
  3. Senator Arlen Specter - The Common Good
  4. Penn Law community mourns Senator Arlen Specter C'51
  5. Specter: I'm not an automatic 60th vote - POLITICO
  6. Specter Switches Parties; More Heft for Democrats
  7. [PDF] In Memoriam â•fi Arlen Specter: 1930-2012
  8. Biography of Arlen Specter
  9. Arlen Specter - Ethnicity of Celebs | EthniCelebs.com
  10. Arlen Specter, Former Senator, Dies at 82 - The New York Times
  11. Arlen Specter, Senator Who Gave No Quarter, Dies - NPR
  12. Former senator Arlen Specter laid to rest | The Times of Israel
  13. Arlen Specter (1930 - 2012) - Genealogy - Geni
  14. Arlen Specter for Kids
  15. Senator Arlen Specter to Teach at the University of Pennsylvania ...
  16. First Day Of Teaching Law For Arlen Specter At University of ...
  17. [PDF] Arlen Specter: How a Jewish Boy from Kansas Became a Mediator ...
  18. Arlen Specter | US Senator, Lawyer & Politician - Britannica
  19. Air Force Office of Special Investigations - AF.mil
  20. An Oral History of Arlen Specter - Philadelphia Magazine
  21. Q&A with Senator Arlen Specter - Penn Today
  22. Single Bullet Theory - Mary Ferrell Foundation
  23. Andy Bloom: Remembering Arlen Specter on the 60th anniversary of ...
  24. The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical than We Knew - History Matters
  25. "Single Bullet: Arlen Specter & the Warren Commission Investigation ...
  26. Recapping Arlen Specter's Political Career - NPR
  27. Letters: Appreciating Specter - Mainline Media News
  28. [PDF] Arlen Specter's Footprint on the Criminal Justice System in the U.S.
  29. Criminal Justice - Arlen Specter Senatorial Papers
  30. [PDF] A Prosecutor's View
  31. [PDF] ,-'.:: ::i.:: If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at ...
  32. Police Scandals Spreading - The New York Times
  33. Philadelphia: Republican Specter - Time Magazine
  34. UNION INQUIRY SET IN PHILADELPHIA; District Attorney Will Study ...
  35. The Law: Tough, Honest and Fired | TIME
  36. Timeline: Arlen Specter's career - POLITICO
  37. 1980 Senatorial Republican Primary Election Results - Pennsylvania
  38. The Arlen Specter Career In Buttons : It's All Politics - NPR
  39. 1980 Senatorial General Election Results - Pennsylvania
  40. PENNSYLVANIA; SPECTER TURNS BACK CHALLENGER
  41. PRESSURE ON SPECTER INTENSIFYING IN PENNSYLVANIA
  42. Judicial Nominations - Arlen Specter Senatorial Papers
  43. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs Final Edition - GovInfo
  44. Arlen Specter Senatorial Papers | Digital Pitt
  45. Previous Committee Chairman | United States Senate Committee on ...
  46. Arlen Specter dies - POLITICO.com
  47. History - U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
  48. Specter loses seniority on committees - POLITICO
  49. Specter Switches Parties in Preparation for 2010 Campaign
  50. New Leave Mandate Proposed as Part of Violence Against Women ...
  51. Arlen Specter: A tenacious public servant - The Hill
  52. Arlen Specter: A retrospective - PMC - NIH
  53. Specter, the Senate's Man of the Hour : NPR
  54. https://www.npr.org/transcripts/6161830
  55. Healthcare - Arlen Specter Senatorial Papers
  56. Arlen Specter and the Supreme Court | The New Yorker
  57. The Original Sin of Robert Bork | Cato Institute
  58. Specter legacy resonates on Supreme Court - NBC News
  59. Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill Supreme Court Confirmation Hearing ...
  60. Clarence Thomas Wins Senate Confirmation - CQ Press
  61. Judiciary Committee Votes On Recent Supreme Court Nominees
  62. Sen. Arlen Specter opening Alito statement - NBC News
  63. Alito Easily Wins Seat on High Court After Opponents' Efforts Fizzle
  64. Sotomayor Hearing Features a Newly Liberated Specter - Roll Call
  65. Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties | PBS News
  66. BORK NOMINATION WILL BE OPPOSED BY 4 KEY SENATORS
  67. IN THE END, BORK HIMSELF WAS HIS OWN WORST ENEMY
  68. Arlen Specter on the Issues - OnTheIssues.org
  69. Specter Joins Nelson as Only Democrats Who Voted for 2001 and ...
  70. https://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/07/nsa/index.html
  71. The Threat of Bush's Signing Statements - Brookings Institution
  72. Bush vetoes embryonic stem-cell bill - Sep 4, 2006 - CNN
  73. Congress Can't Override Bush Stem Cell Veto - NPR
  74. Will Specter Turn Left? | Cato at Liberty Blog
  75. Specter criticizes administration on civil liberties - The Hill
  76. Pennsylvania senator Arlen Specter switches party to become ...
  77. Specter switches parties to win reelection - CSMonitor.com
  78. Specter says party switch driven partly by desire to keep seat - CNN
  79. GOP fall in Pa. sends Specter away - POLITICO
  80. Specter Switches Stories on Why He Switched Parties - Newsweek
  81. Specter colleagues, political elites react to defection - CNN.com
  82. Senate Veteran Specter Loses Pennsylvania Democratic Primary
  83. Longtime Senator Arlen Specter Loses Bid for Sixth Term to ...
  84. Sestak Winner In PA Democratic Senate Primary : The Two-Way - NPR
  85. Arlen Specter Loses Pennsylvania Democratic Senate Primary to ...
  86. The admiral sinks Specter - POLITICO
  87. Specter Defeat Signals a Wave Against Incumbents
  88. Pennsylvania Senate 2010 - Sabato's Crystal Ball
  89. Specter: 'I'm pro-choice ... But I don't make the decisions' - CNN
  90. Senators Question Roberts on Abortion, Civil Rights | PBS News
  91. Arlen Specter on Abortion - OnTheIssues.org
  92. What's behind the Specter spectacle - NBC News
  93. Abortion Foes Dealt Setback By the Senate - The New York Times
  94. Specter pushes stem cell bill - Politico
  95. S.Hrg. 106-413 — STEM CELL RESEARCH, PART 3 - Congress.gov
  96. [PDF] Appropriations and Stem Cell Research Arlen Specter's Senate ...
  97. SPECTER DECIDES TO OPPOSE BORK - The Morning Call
  98. Why I Voted Against Bork. - Document - Gale Academic OneFile
  99. Specter slams Kagan 'non-answers' but will vote 'yes' - NBC News
  100. Specter Remembered for His Influence in Supreme Court ...
  101. BREAKFAST WITH SENATOR ARLEN SPECTER - CIA
  102. United States Senate Committee on Intelligence, 1995
  103. [PDF] REPORT UNITED STATES SENATE
  104. Sen. Specter on Congressional Notification Under the National ...
  105. Roll Call Vote 107 th Congress - 1 st Session - Senate.gov
  106. U.S. Senate approves revised Patriot Act - The New York Times
  107. Senate Clears Way For Patriot Act - CBS News
  108. Specter says Bush should share power over Iraq war
  109. Sen. Specter on Intelligence and Homeland Security
  110. S.1650 - 106th Congress (1999-2000): An original bill making ...
  111. Senate Subcommittee Approves $145.7B Labor-HHS-Education ...
  112. Specter Bill Would Impose Flat Tax, Simplify Tax Returns. - Tax Notes
  113. [PDF] Chairman Bennett and distinguished members of the Committee, I ...
  114. Pa. senators support bailout bill | 6abc Philadelphia
  115. Senate passes $787 billion stimulus bill - POLITICO
  116. Specter, a Fulcrum of the Stimulus Bill, Pulls Off a Coup for Health ...
  117. Specter calls vote 'perilous,' supports stimulus - Lancaster Online
  118. Remarks by the Vice President on the Need to Invest in ...
  119. Specter says he will oppose labor bill - POLITICO
  120. Sen. Specter Says He Now Backs Union Bill - CBS News
  121. Pennsylvania Senator Specter Opposes EFCA but Suggests ...
  122. Labor Groups Key in Pa. Primary - Roll Call
  123. AFSCME Weekly Report 7/30/99
  124. Arlen Specter Stumbles into New Role as Judiciary Committee ...
  125. Waiting For Specter's Next Move - CBS News
  126. Fight on the Right | The New Yorker
  127. Endless contradictions of Specter - POLITICO
  128. Arlen Specter leaves remarkable — and controversial — public record
  129. Party switching: courage or ambition? - POLITICO
  130. Arlen Specter was the rare Senator: Moderate, infuriating to both sides
  131. Specter, Sestak duel over troop surge - - POLITICO.com
  132. What Kind of Democrat Will Specter Be? - The New York Times
  133. Democrats Are Foolish to Humiliate Arlen Specter
  134. https://www.c-span.org/video/?49838-1/senator-arlen-specter-presidential-campaign-announcement
  135. SPECTER ENTERS '96 RACE
  136. AllPolitics - Arlen Specter - CNN
  137. Specter Presidential Campaign Suspension | Video | C-SPAN.org
  138. 1986 Senatorial General Election Results - Pennsylvania
  139. 1992 Senatorial General Election Results - Pennsylvania
  140. 1998 Senatorial General Election Results - Pennsylvania
  141. Specter Wins Senate Primary in Close Vote - The New York Times
  142. 2004 Senatorial General Election Results - Pennsylvania
  143. A switch that didn't work: Specter loses - WHYY
  144. Despite illness, Arlen Specter slated to co-teach law class
  145. Arlen Specter - American lawyer, author, and politician
  146. Specter Looks Ahead After 30 Years In US Senate - CBS Philadelphia
  147. Senator Arlen Specter to Teach at Penn Law • News & Events ...
  148. PhilaU officially dedicates the Arlen Specter Center for Public Service
  149. Arlen Specter Center - Thomas Jefferson University
  150. Policy Over Party: The Legacy of Senator Arlen Specter
  151. Fellowships - Arlen Specter
  152. Pitt, Philadelphia U. share Specter archive - University Times
  153. Specter archive collection to be shared by Pitt and Phila U. - WHYY
  154. Arlen Specter Personified Growing Risk of Second Cancers - MDEdge
  155. Biomedical Research Loses Long-Time Ally With Death of Arlen ...
  156. Sen. Arlen Specter reflects on cancer battle - The Today Show
  157. Specter diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease - Feb 16, 2005 - CNN
  158. Specter's Cancer Battle - Newsweek
  159. Sen. Arlen Specter's Hodgkin's Disease Returns - FOX16.com
  160. Arlen Specter released, has non-Hodgkin's lymphoma - POLITICO
  161. Former Senator Arlen Specter diagnosed with cancer again - Reuters
  162. Arlen Specter: I'm fighting cancer for a third time - NBC News
  163. Former senator Arlen Specter, 82, dies of cancer - Reuters
  164. Arlen Specter – 'one of the few truly wild cards' – dead at 82 - CNN
  165. Political Giant Arlen Specter Laid to Rest - NBC10 Philadelphia
  166. Arlen Specter Remembered By Fellow Politicians, Average ...
  167. Specter remembered as 'undaunted' at funeral - WHYY
  168. Ex-Sen. Arlen Specter remembered for courage | ABC7 Los Angeles
  169. Arlen Specter's funeral features Biden, Rendell tributes
  170. Arlen Specter 'never walked away from his principles'; funeral today ...
  171. Friends memorialize ex-Senator Arlen Specter
  172. A Tribute to Arlen Specter
  173. Rep. Glenn Thompson Remembers the Late Senator Arlen Specter
  174. At funeral, Specter praised for grit and determination
  175. Former Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter remembered for 'intensity ...
  176. Arlen Specter | Pennsylvania Center for the Book
  177. Specter Legacy Is Study of the Perils of a Switch - The New York Times
  178. Specter swings power to Dems - POLITICO
  179. Remembering Arlen Specter: A pugnacious life in politics - The Week
  180. Specter's first party switch - POLITICO
  181. Passion for Truth: From Finding JFK's Single Bullet to Questioning ...
  182. PASSION FOR TRUTH - Kirkus Reviews
  183. Opinion | How to Make Terrorists Think Twice - The New York Times
  184. A Less Ambitious Approach to Immigration - The Washington Post
  185. Dialogue with Adversaries
  186. Byliner: U.S. War Against Terror Is a Just War, Says Sen. Specter
  187. S.471 - Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 - Congress.gov
  188. Sponsor of Stem Cell Bill Says Senate Could Override a Veto
  189. Specter: "Get Busy" on Stem Cell Research Bill - CBS News
  190. ACLU Letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee Regarding the ...
  191. [PDF] WOMEN ACT HEARING - niwap
  192. Sen. Arlen Specter - Pennsylvania - OpenSecrets
  193. Bills | Congressional Chronicle | C-SPAN.org
  194. http://arlenspecter.library.pitt.edu/committee-on-the-judiciary/criminal-justice/
  195. - REAUTHORIZATION OF THE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT
  196. Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter Presses Judge John ...
  197. Senator Specter Introduces Fix to Stem Cell Ban | Science | AAAS
User Avatar
No comments yet.