Hubbry Logo
Social conservatismSocial conservatismMain
Open search
Social conservatism
Community hub
Social conservatism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Social conservatism
Social conservatism
Social conservatism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Part of a series on
Conservatism
Variants
Principles
Intellectuals
Politicians
Religion
Personal variants
National variants
Asia
Europe
Latin America
North America
Oceania
Related ideologies
Related topics

Social conservatism is a political philosophy and a variety of conservatism which places emphasis on conserving the traditional moral values of a society, typically sourced from a religion. It also aims to preserve traditional social structures over social pluralism.[1][2] Social conservatives organize in favor of duty, traditional values, and social institutions, such as traditional family structures, gender roles, sexual relations, national patriotism, and religious traditions.[3][4] Social conservatism is usually skeptical of social change, instead tending to support the status quo concerning social issues.[4]

Social conservatives also value the rights of religious institutions to participate in the public sphere, thus often supporting government-religious endorsement and opposing state atheism, and in some cases opposing secularism.[5][6][7]

Social conservatism, as a movement, is largely an outgrowth of traditionalist conservatism. The key difference is that traditional conservatism is broader and includes philosophical considerations, whereas social conservatism is largely focused on just moralism.

Social conservatism and other ideological views

[edit]

There is overlap between social conservatism and paleoconservatism, in that they both support and value traditional social forms.[8]

Social conservatism is not to be confused with economically interventionist conservatism, where conservative ideas are combined with Keynesian economics and a welfare state as practised by some European conservatives (e.g. one-nation conservatives in the United Kingdom, Gaullists in France). Some social conservatives support free trade and laissez faire market approaches to economic and fiscal issues, but social conservatives may also support economic intervention where the intervention serves moral or cultural aims. Historian Jon Wiener has described social conservatism as historically the result of an appeal from "elitist preservationists" to lower-class workers to 'protect' wealth from immigration.[1][9]

Many social conservatives support a balance between protectionism and a free market. This concern for material welfare, like advocacy of traditional mores, will often have a basis in religion. Examples include the Christian Social Union of Bavaria, the Family First Party and Katter's Australian Party, and the communitarian movement in the United States.[10]

Social conservatism by country

[edit]

Australia

[edit]
Further information: Conservatism in Australia

Mainstream conservatism in Australia generally incorporates liberalism, hence liberal conservatism being the primary ideology of the major centre-right coalition in Australia, the Liberal-National Coalition. Therefore, the Coalition, while having members with some socially conservative views, is not considered socially conservative. However, both social conservatism and right-wing populism are present among right-wing minor parties, such as Pauline Hanson's One Nation, the United Australia Party (UAP) and Katter's Australian Party (KAP) amongst others.

Nevertheless, the National Right (also known as the "Conservative" faction or the "Right" faction) serves as the party's social conservative faction, although the party is still considered a broad church conservative party and factions do collaborate with each other; for example, the New South Wales Liberal Party often chooses a leadership team consisting of both a member of the more centrist Moderate faction and a member of the Right.

Social conservatives in Australia often need to take a broad church stance while governing. For example, former New South Wales Liberal Party leader and state premier, Dominic Perrottet, a conservative Catholic, despite having voted against legalising same-sex marriage in 2018 and opposing abortion, followed Labor leader Chris Minns' in supporting a 2023 state-wide ban on gay conversion therapy,[11] whilst also vowing to protect religious freedom and preaching.[12]

During the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey of 2018, which successfully sought to legalise same-sex marriage in Australia, the Coalition government led by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull allowed its members a conscience vote on the issue. While many (including Turnbull) were in favour, some were opposed, but supported holding a plebiscite on the matter. Federal Coalition MPs who opposed same-sex marriage during the debate included former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, Peter Dutton, Scott Morrison and many others. However, when the plebiscite was successful (with 61.6% in favour), a vote needed to be held in both chambers of Parliament. The Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Act 2017 was tabled in the Senate and was subsequently passed in the House of Representatives, with just three votes against (excluding the members who abstained). Due to their respective electorates delivering a majority "yes" vote (as well as the entire country), members such as Dutton (who voted "no" in the plebiscite) voted in favour of the bill after his seat of Dickson voted 65.16% in favour.

Canada

[edit]
Main article: Social conservatism in Canada

In Canada, social conservatism, though widespread, is not as prominent in the public sphere as in the United States. It is prevalent in all areas of the country but is seen as being more prominent in rural areas. It is also a significant influence on the ideological and political culture of the western provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia.[citation needed]

Compared to social conservatism in the United States, social conservatism has not been as influential in Canada. The main reason is that the neoconservative style of politics as promoted by leaders such as former Prime Ministers such as Paul Martin and Stephen Harper have focused on fiscal conservatism, with little or no emphasis on moral or social conservatism.[13] Without a specific, large political party behind them, social conservatives have divided their votes and can be found in all political parties.[14]

Social conservatives often felt that they were being sidelined by officials in the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada and its leadership of so-called "Red Tories" for the last half of the twentieth century and therefore many eventually made their political home with parties such as the Social Credit Party of Canada and the Reform Party of Canada. Despite the Reform Party being dominated by social conservatives, leader Preston Manning, seeking greater national support for the party, was reluctant for the party to wholly embrace socially conservative values. This led to his deposition as leader of the party (now called Canadian Alliance) in favor of social conservative Stockwell Day.[15] The party's successor, the Conservative Party of Canada, despite having a number of socially conservative members and cabinet ministers, has chosen so far not to focus on socially conservative issues in its platform. This was most recently exemplified on two occasions in 2012 when the current Conservative Party of Canada declared they had no intention to repeal same-sex marriage or abortion laws.[16]

Islamic world

[edit]
Further information: Sharia and Conservatism in Islam

Due to their interpretation of Islamic law also known as Shariah, they have some differences from social conservatism as understood in the nations of West Europe, North America and Oceania.[citation needed]

Arab world

[edit]
Further information: Arab world, Islam, and Censorship

The Arab world has recently[when?] been more conservative in social and moral issues owing to the Arab spring.[citation needed] An example of a socially conservative party is the Justice and Development Party of Morocco.

Pakistan

[edit]

Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal is an alliance of socially conservative and Islamist political parties in Pakistan.

India

[edit]

Hindu social conservatism

[edit]
Further information: Shiv Sena, Bharatiya Janata Party, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Hindu nationalism, and Hindutva

Hindu social conservatism in India in the twenty first century has developed into an influential movement, represented in the political arena by the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party. Hindu social conservatism, also known as the Hindutva movement, is spearheaded by the voluntary non-governmental organization Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. The core philosophy of this ideology is nativism, and it sees Hinduism as a national identity, rather than a religious one. Due to an inclination towards nativism, much of its platform is based on the belief that Islamic and Christian denominations in India are the result of occupations, and, therefore, these groups should be uprooted from the Indian subcontinent by converting their members back to Hinduism.

In terms of political positions, Hindu social conservatives in India seek to institutionalize a Uniform Civil Code (which is also a directive under Article 44 of the Constitution of India) for members of all religions,[17] over the current scheme of different personal laws for different religions. For instance, polygamy is legal for Muslims in India, but not Hindus.

Muslim social conservatism

[edit]
Further information: Lakshar-e-Taiba

There are several socially conservative Muslim organisations in India, ranging from groups such as the Indian Union Muslim League which aim to promote the preservation of Indian Muslim culture as a part of the nation's identity and history.[citation needed]

South Africa

[edit]

Social conservatism had an important place in Apartheid South Africa ruled by the National Party. Pornography,[18] gambling,[19] and other activities that were deemed undesirable were severely restricted. The majority of businesses were forbidden from doing business on Sunday.[20]

United States

[edit]
Main article: Social conservatism in the United States

Social conservatism in the United States is a right-wing political ideology that opposes social progressivism. It is centered on the preservation of what adherents often call 'traditional' or 'family values', though the accepted aims of the movement often vary amongst the organisations it comprises, making it hard to generalise about ideological preferences. There are, however, a number of general principles to which at least a majority of social conservatives adhere, such as opposition to abortion and opposition to same-sex marriage.[1][21][22][23] Sociologist Harry F. Dahms suggests that Christian doctrinal conservatives (anti-abortion, anti-same-sex marriage) and gun-use conservatives (such as supporters and members of the National Rifle Association of America) form two domains of ideology within American social conservatism.[24]

The Republican Party is the largest United States political party with socially conservative ideals incorporated into its platform. Other socially conservative parties include the American Solidarity Party, and the Constitution Party.

Social conservatives are strongest in the South, where they are a mainstream political force with aspirations to translate those ideals using the party platform nationally. Supporters of social conservatism played a major role in the political coalitions of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.[25]

Other areas

[edit]

There are also social conservative movements in many other parts of the world, such as Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Balkans, the Caucasus, Central Europe, Mediterranean countries, Southeast Asia, and Oceania.

Examples of social conservative political parties

[edit]

Argentina

[edit]

Armenia

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

Austria

[edit]

Belgium

[edit]

Bosnia and Herzegovina

[edit]

Brazil

[edit]

Bulgaria

[edit]

Cambodia

[edit]

Canada

[edit]

Chile

[edit]

China

[edit]

Czech Republic

[edit]

Denmark

[edit]

El Salvador

[edit]

Estonia

[edit]

Faroe Islands

[edit]

Fiji

[edit]

Finland

[edit]

France

[edit]

Germany

[edit]

Georgia

[edit]

Greece

[edit]

Hungary

[edit]

India

[edit]

Ireland

[edit]

Israel

[edit]

Italy

[edit]

Japan

[edit]

Luxembourg

[edit]

Mexico

[edit]

Moldova

[edit]

Netherlands

[edit]

New Zealand

[edit]

Norway

[edit]

Philippines

[edit]

Poland

[edit]

Portugal

[edit]

Romania

[edit]

Russia

[edit]

Slovakia

[edit]

Spain

[edit]

Serbia

[edit]

Sweden

[edit]

Switzerland

[edit]

Turkey

[edit]

Ukraine

[edit]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Northern Ireland

[edit]

United States

[edit]

Social conservative factions of political parties

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Social conservatism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Social conservatism is a political focused on preserving traditional social values, norms, and institutions that have historically sustained societal cohesion, emphasizing duty, custom, and resistance to rapid changes that disrupt established moral and cultural frameworks. It distinguishes itself from by prioritizing communal and ethical structures—such as the , religious influence in public life, and sanctity of life—over purely economic policies, viewing these elements as foundational to human flourishing and social order. Key characteristics include advocacy for defined as a union between one man and one woman, opposition to abortion as a violation of inherent , and support for policies reinforcing parental and standards over expansive in moral matters. Social conservatives maintain that these positions derive from an enduring moral order rooted in custom and continuity, which empirical data substantiates through correlations between traditional structures and higher stability, marital satisfaction, and child outcomes. For instance, data from longitudinal surveys show Republican-leaning (often socially conservative) families reporting greater happiness and lower divorce rates, while higher-fertility groups adhering to family-centric values exhibit stronger conservative inclinations on related issues. Notable achievements encompass influencing legislative shifts, such as restrictions on elective in various U.S. states following empirical reviews of fetal development and post-birth viability, and bolstering cultural resistance to policies perceived as eroding demographic stability. Controversies arise from clashes with progressive agendas, including accusations of rigidity, yet proponents highlight causal links between conservative social policies and reduced societal fragmentation, as evidenced by parenthood's tendency to foster conservative views aligned with and prioritization. This remains prominent in electoral , particularly among those prioritizing empirical metrics over ideologically driven reforms from academia or media outlets prone to left-leaning biases in value assessments.

Definition and Core Principles

Defining Social Conservatism

Social conservatism constitutes a of conservative thought centered on upholding traditional , familial, and communal structures as foundational to societal stability and . It maintains that these elements form a delicate, interdependent framework of duties and conventions, rather than mere voluntary associations, which rapid innovation risks unraveling. Proponents argue that empirical patterns in —such as the correlation between intact nuclear families and lower rates of and , as documented in longitudinal studies—demonstrate the causal efficacy of these traditions in fostering ordered over atomized . Philosophically, social conservatism draws from Edmund Burke's emphasis on prescriptive knowledge embedded in inherited customs, rejecting abstract in favor of prudent adaptation to circumstances shaped by historical experience. This approach aligns with Russell Kirk's tenets, including reverence for a transcendent order and toward ideological blueprints that disregard the complexity of social bonds. Unlike , which prioritizes economic liberty and intervention in markets, social conservatism extends caution to cultural spheres, viewing unchecked as disruptive to the organic evolution of norms that have sustained civilizations. In practice, it manifests in advocacy for policies reinforcing marital fidelity, parental authority, and communal ethics, often intersecting with religious frameworks that posit inherent human oriented toward procreation and mutual obligation. While critics from progressive institutions frequently portray it as regressive, social conservatives counter with evidence from cross-national data showing correlations between erosion of traditional roles and rising social pathologies, such as fertility declines below replacement levels in since the 1970s. This stance privileges continuity not as nostalgia but as realism about causal mechanisms undergirding human flourishing.

Key Tenets and First-Principles Reasoning

Social conservatism maintains that an enduring moral order exists, independent of human invention or whim, and that adherence to this order—drawn from custom, , and natural human inclinations—forms the basis of a healthy . This principle, articulated by thinkers like , holds that little social problems are resolved by moral principles, which in turn derive from the accumulated wisdom of generations rather than abstract . Societies flourish when institutions such as the and enforce these norms organically, fostering in change and restraining impulses toward novelty that disrupt proven structures. Central to this view is the as the primary unit of , where stable, two-parent households centered on biological parents correlate with improved child outcomes, including lower rates of , , and issues. Empirical from the General Social Survey indicate that individuals and families embracing conservative exhibit higher marital stability and self-reported happiness compared to those in more fluid arrangements. Higher fertility rates among those holding traditional views on and further reinforce societal conservatism on family matters, as parents prioritize stability and safety for . From first principles, human nature exhibits fixed traits shaped by biology and evolution, including tendencies toward pair-bonding and hierarchical social roles that underpin cooperative child-rearing and community cohesion. Causal mechanisms link family disruption—such as elevated divorce rates post-1970s no-fault laws—to intergenerational instability, with studies showing children from intact families achieving 20-30% higher educational and economic attainment. Rapid redefinitions of marriage or gender roles ignore these realities, leading to measurable declines in birth rates and social trust, as evidenced by fertility drops below replacement levels in nations pursuing expansive individualism. Conservatism thus advocates incremental reform grounded in observable patterns of human behavior and societal resilience, rather than ideological experimentation.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Roots

The roots of social conservatism lie in ancient philosophical and customary frameworks that prioritized hierarchical social structures, familial authority, and moral continuity to sustain communal stability. In ancient Greece, Aristotle's Politics (circa 350 BCE) posited the household (oikos) as the foundational unit of the polis, comprising natural hierarchies such as the master's rule over slaves for economic provision, the husband's authority over the wife for deliberative partnership, and parental dominion over children for their moral formation, all oriented toward cultivating virtue and preventing societal disorder. Similarly, in Rome, the mos maiorum—an unwritten code of ancestral customs—dictated social norms encompassing piety toward gods and family, paternal authority (patria potestas), and reverence for tradition, serving as the bedrock of Roman identity and resistance to innovation that threatened cohesion, as evidenced by its invocation by elites like the Optimates to uphold republican virtues against populist upheavals. In ancient , Confucian thought, articulated in the (compiled circa 475–221 BCE), embedded in xiao (), whereby deference to parents extended analogously to rulers and elders, enforcing rituals (li) and hierarchical roles to harmonize family and state, with deviations risking cosmic and social disarray. This principle underscored that individual fulfillment derived from fulfilling relational duties, mirroring the conservative emphasis on inherited obligations over personal . Abrahamic traditions further anchored these ideas in , with ancient Jewish texts like the (circa 13th–5th centuries BCE) mandating familial —exemplified by the Fifth Commandment's injunction to honor parents, punishable by death for rebellion (Deuteronomy 21:18–21)—and strictures against , , and to preserve lineage purity and covenantal morality. These codes viewed as a microcosm of divine order, transmitting through generations. Pre-modern developments in medieval Europe synthesized these influences under Christian auspices, where the , from the onward, codified marriage as indissoluble and monogamous via councils like Lateran IV (1215), banning consanguineous unions up to the seventh degree to dismantle extended kin networks and reinforce nuclear families aligned with biblical ideals of spousal unity (Genesis 2:24) and parental authority. Feudal hierarchies complemented this by embedding social roles in oaths of loyalty and , preserving moral norms against nomadic or clan-based disruptions, as the Church's integrated Roman patrimonial principles with scriptural prohibitions to maintain public virtue amid barbarian incursions.

19th-20th Century Formation

In , social conservatism coalesced in the early as a counterforce to the radical and unleashed by the and Enlightenment rationalism, prioritizing the organic continuity of hierarchical social institutions, family authority, and religious moral frameworks over abstract egalitarian reforms. Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in (1790), though predating the century, profoundly shaped this outlook by arguing that societal stability depended on time-tested customs and intergenerational wisdom rather than engineered change, influencing subsequent defenders of traditional order like , who in works such as Considerations on (1797) insisted on the necessity of divine-right and guidance to prevent societal dissolution. Post-Napoleonic efforts, exemplified by the (1814–1815) under , sought to reinstate pre-revolutionary social hierarchies across monarchies, suppressing liberal and nationalist upheavals like those of and to safeguard familial and communal bonds against atomizing ideologies. These positions reflected causal recognition that abrupt disruptions eroded the mediating structures—such as extended networks and parish-based welfare—that had empirically sustained communities amid pre-industrial hardships. Catholic social teaching formalized a distinctly social conservative strain, beginning with Pope Leo XIII's encyclical Rerum Novarum (1891), which critiqued both unbridled capitalism's dehumanizing effects on workers and socialism's assault on and family sovereignty, advocating instead for —wherein lower social units like the family handle affairs unsuited to state intervention—and the natural rights rooted in . This built on 19th-century ultramontane movements emphasizing papal authority over nationalistic , positioning the Church as guardian of moral norms against industrialization's family fragmentation, evidenced by rising urban poverty and child labor rates exceeding 20% in European factories by the 1880s. Subsequent documents, like Pius XI's (1931), reinforced these tenets amid the , opposing class warfare while upholding vocational groups and familial primacy as bulwarks against totalitarian collectivism, influencing conservative parties in nations like and to integrate traditional ethics into policy. In the United States, social conservatism manifested through Protestant-led moral reform campaigns addressing the social pathologies of rapid and , such as the , which by 1830 had organized over 2,000 local societies under the to combat alcohol's documented role in and , where consumption had peaked at 7.1 gallons of pure alcohol annually in 1830. This culminated in the 18th Amendment (ratified 1919), prohibiting alcohol nationwide until repeal in 1933, driven by evidence from reformers like the (founded 1874) linking intemperance to family breakdown, with studies showing it contributed to 50% of cases in some regions. The early saw further consolidation in the fundamentalist movement, reacting to Darwinian and ; the (1925) highlighted this when prosecutor defended Tennessee's banning teaching in public schools, arguing it undermined parental authority and moral education grounded in scriptural accounts of creation, amid surveys indicating 80% of Southern Protestants rejected evolutionary theory as incompatible with human dignity and doctrines. These efforts underscored a commitment to empirical social stability, as data from the era linked secular educational shifts to rising rates doubling in urban areas between 1900 and 1920.

Post-1945 Evolution and Global Spread

In the United States, social conservatism evolved post-World War II through a fusion of anti-communist traditionalism and reaction to the cultural upheavals, including widespread availability of contraception and the 1973 Supreme Court ruling in that legalized nationwide, prompting organized opposition from religious groups. The , founded in 1979 by Baptist minister , galvanized evangelical Protestants by registering millions of voters and advocating restrictions on , school prayer reinstatement, and opposition to homosexual rights, thereby embedding social conservatism within the Republican coalition. This mobilization aided Ronald Reagan's 1980 presidential victory, during which his administration advanced social conservative goals through executive actions like declaring a "pro-life" stance and appointing federal judges skeptical of expansive abortion rights, though legislative gains remained limited amid congressional resistance. In , social conservatism manifested through Christian democratic movements that dominated governance, prioritizing family-centric welfare policies, moral education, and resistance to atheistic under the banner of —devolving authority to local and familial levels to preserve organic social bonds. Germany's Christian Democratic Union (CDU), established in 1945, exemplified this by enacting laws in the reinforcing traditional marriage and parental rights in education, while Italy's party similarly upheld Catholic-influenced norms against secular divorce reforms until the . These parties facilitated economic reconstruction while countering socialist expansions, though they faced erosion from student protests and liberalization, leading to alliances with secular conservatives to defend residual social hierarchies. The global spread of social conservatism post-1945 owed much to religious transnational networks, particularly Catholic and evangelical missions in and , where they buttressed indigenous traditions against colonial legacies and modernist . In , church-backed conservative factions resisted 1960s-1970s liberation theology's progressive tilt, emphasizing doctrinal adherence to natural amid ; for instance, Brazil's military regimes (1964-1985) aligned with clerical elites to suppress perceived moral decay. In , post-independence evangelical growth from the 1970s reinforced patriarchal norms and anti-contraception stances, correlating with lower acceptance of Western sexual in nations like and , where Pentecostal churches by the 1990s commanded millions of adherents prioritizing communal over . This reflected causal pushback against globalization's homogenizing effects, sustaining social conservatism in demographically youthful regions where empirical data show higher fertility rates and religious adherence linked to intact family structures.

Philosophical and Religious Foundations

Natural Law, Tradition, and Moral Order

Social conservatism grounds its ethical framework in , a philosophical tradition asserting that universal moral principles derive from the inherent structure of and the cosmos, accessible through reason rather than arbitrary human invention. , in his (1265–1274), integrated Aristotelian with Christian doctrine to define natural law as participation in eternal divine reason, with primary precepts such as pursuing good and shunning evil, which extend to secondary norms regulating social relations, including prohibitions on and as violations of natural inclinations toward procreation and . This view contrasts with by holding that positive laws must conform to to possess legitimacy; unjust statutes, like those endorsing among kin in Aquinas's era, bind no moral obligation. In modern conservative thought, serves as a bulwark against , informing opposition to policies that sever human actions from teleological ends, such as redefining beyond its natural purpose of complementary sexes for reproduction and child-rearing. , in The Conservative Mind (1953), identified adherence to a "transcendent order, or body of " as the first canon of , arguing that without it, ethical norms devolve into subjective preferences, eroding societal cohesion. Kirk contended that transcends cultural variances, providing enduring criteria for that prioritize human flourishing in bodily, intellectual, and spiritual dimensions over egalitarian impositions. Social conservatives invoke this to critique progressive experiments, positing causal links between ignoring natural ends—e.g., in reproductive technologies or transitions—and downstream harms like dissolution, evidenced by longitudinal data on child outcomes in intact biological households. Complementing , tradition functions as an empirical archive of tested wisdom, embodying intergenerational prudence rather than rationalist blueprints. , in Reflections on the Revolution in (1790), portrayed society as a "partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born," where customs and "prejudices" distill collective experience into practical guides for governance and morality. warned that abstract ideologies, like the French Revolution's declaration of rights untethered from historical precedent, unleash chaos by presuming human perfectibility; instead, reform must evolve organically from inherited institutions, preserving hierarchies that reflect natural inequalities in talents and virtues. This Burkean emphasis informs social conservatism's defense of time-honed structures, such as patriarchal family roles, which empirical studies correlate with lower delinquency rates among youth raised under stable, authoritative parenting. The moral order in social conservatism synthesizes and into a hierarchical where —constant in its capacities for vice and —demands restraint and cultivation of character to avert . Kirk's principles assert that " is a constant; and moral truths are permanent," rejecting utopian schemes that deny this order in favor of perpetual revolution. This framework posits causal realism: deviations from moral norms, such as widespread post-1970s, empirically precede spikes in social pathologies like increased and , as tracked in U.S. vital statistics from the era. Proponents argue that restoring this order requires inculcating virtues through education and law, not coercive uniformity but alignment with reality's given constraints, thereby fostering under discipline rather than license masquerading as .

Influence of Major Religions

Social conservatism's emphasis on traditional family structures, sexual , and communal obligations finds doctrinal reinforcement in major , whose sacred texts and interpretive traditions prescribe normative behaviors as essential to moral order and divine will. These religions often frame social stability as contingent upon adherence to time-tested roles for men and women, prohibitions on non-procreative sexual acts, and the prioritization of lineage and community over individual autonomy. Empirical surveys indicate that religious adherence correlates with endorsement of such values, with devout practitioners across faiths showing lower acceptance of practices like or compared to secular populations. In , scriptural mandates from both the Old and New Testaments underpin conservative stances on marriage as a heterosexual union ordained for companionship and reproduction, as articulated in Genesis 2:24 and reinforced by ' teachings in Matthew 19:4-6. , codified in encyclicals like (1930), explicitly condemns artificial contraception and divorce, influencing conservative advocacy for policies protecting the unborn and traditional matrimony; for example, over 80% of white evangelical Protestants in the U.S. opposed in 2017 Pew data, citing biblical fidelity. Protestant reformers like further embedded these views in governance, viewing family hierarchy as a microcosm of and , a legacy evident in the mobilization of conservative Christians against laws enacted in the across Western nations. Islam's influence manifests through Sharia-derived norms that enforce gender segregation, veiling for modesty, and under strict conditions, as derived from Quranic verses like Surah 4:3 and collections emphasizing male guardianship (qiwama). These principles foster social conservative resistance to liberal reforms, as seen in the resurgence of conservative Islamic governance post-1970s, where adherence to () prioritizes communal cohesion over individualistic rights; in countries like , Wahhabi interpretations since the 18th-century pact with the Al Saud family have institutionalized punishments for and , correlating with low rates but high enforcement of familial honor codes. Surveys of global Muslim populations reveal widespread support for traditional roles, with 88% in affirming that wives must obey husbands, per 2013 Pew findings, underpinning conservative alliances against secular changes. Judaism, particularly in its Orthodox strand, contributes through Halakha's codification of marital exclusivity, ritual purity laws prohibiting non-heteronormative acts (Leviticus 18:22), and communal sanctions against intermarriage, preserving ethnic and religious continuity. Orthodox exhibit markedly conservative leanings, with 57% identifying Republican in U.S. polls as of 2015, driven by imperatives for familial piety and opposition to assimilationist reforms; this mirrors historical patterns where rabbinic authority resisted Enlightenment-era dilutions of observance and kosher dietary laws, fostering parallel societies that prioritize tradition over state-imposed egalitarianism. While Reform and have liberalized, Orthodox fidelity to ' Mishneh Torah (12th century) sustains influence on broader , as in Israel's religious parties enforcing gender-separated public spaces. Hinduism reinforces social conservatism via Dharma Shastras like the (circa 200 BCE-200 CE), which delineate varna-based duties, endogamous marriage (kanyadan), and prohibitions on widow remarriage or caste exogamy to maintain cosmic order (rita). These texts underpin resistance to caste abolition and , as well as conservative (Hindutva), which since the 1920s founding has mobilized against missionary conversions and secular reforms; post-1950s legislation granting inheritance rights to women challenged but did not eradicate these norms, with rural adherence correlating to lower female workforce participation and higher fertility rates per 2021 census data. Traditionalist factions oppose bhakti-era dilutions, viewing them as threats to hierarchical stability.

Policy Positions and Causal Mechanisms

Family Structures and Marriage

Social conservatives regard the traditional —defined as a married biological and raising their children together—as the optimal structure for , societal stability, and moral order, arguing that it aligns with natural human complementarity and empirically superior outcomes compared to alternatives like single-parent households or . This view posits that the serves as society's primary institution for transmitting values, providing emotional security, and fostering , with deviations such as widespread or out-of-wedlock births eroding these functions through causal mechanisms like reduced and economic strain. Central to this perspective is the advocacy for as a lifelong, monogamous union exclusively between one man and one woman, which social conservatives maintain promotes mutual commitment, sexual fidelity, and role specialization that benefit spouses and offspring. They contend that such marriages yield measurable advantages, including higher and for adults, as married individuals report greater , lower mortality rates, and better economic prospects than cohabitors or singles, with these effects attributed to the institution's enforceable norms rather than mere . For children, intact two-parent biological families correlate with superior , emotional adjustment, and behavioral outcomes; for instance, meta-analyses indicate that youth in such structures exhibit lower rates of , delinquency, and academic failure than those in stepfamilies or single-parent homes, where risks of poor performance in reading, math, and high school completion rise significantly. Opposition to policies facilitating family fragmentation, such as laws enacted widely since the , stems from evidence linking to intergenerational instability: children of divorced parents face 2-3 times higher odds of , early marriage dissolution, and related socioeconomic disadvantages, perpetuating cycles of relational breakdown. Social conservatives thus prioritize causal reforms like options, premarital counseling mandates, and incentives for stable unions to reinforce integrity, viewing these as essential countermeasures to the 50% U.S. rate peak in the and ongoing single-parent household prevalence exceeding 25% of families with children as of 2020. While acknowledging exceptions like high-conflict intact families yielding worse results than some separations, the aggregate data underscores the net benefits of preserving traditional structures for population-level welfare.

Sexuality, Gender Roles, and Reproduction

Social conservatives hold that serves a natural oriented toward procreation and the stability of the marital union between one man and one , advocating outside and monogamous within it to align with biological reproductive ends and societal order. This perspective draws from reasoning, which posits that sexual acts detached from procreative potential—such as those involving same-sex partners or contraception—frustrate the inherent structure of human embodiment and undermine formation. Empirical correlations support restraint norms, as individuals and societies emphasizing premarital exhibit lower incidences of divorce and single parenthood, which in turn correlate with reduced and behavioral issues. Regarding gender roles, social conservatives affirm biological as foundational to complementary functions in and society, with men predisposed toward protective and provisioning leadership and women toward nurturing and relational caregiving, roles that empirical to optimal socioemotional development through dual-sex parental modeling. Such differentiation, rooted in evolutionary adaptations for and , fosters marital specialization and , as evidenced by studies showing higher relationship satisfaction and in households where spouses leverage innate sex-linked strengths rather than enforcing androgynous . Critics from progressive academia often dismiss these views as outdated, yet data from surveys indicate that adherence to traditional role expectations predicts lower rates of dissolution and adolescent delinquency, suggesting causal benefits via clearer and . On reproduction, social conservatives prioritize the protection of fetal life from conception, opposing as a violation of the unborn's right to existence and citing evidence of its links to maternal risks and demographic decline in low-fertility societies. This stance reflects a causal understanding that intact, two-parent —facilitated by policies discouraging non-marital births and promoting —yield superior outcomes for offspring, including higher and reduced , as documented in longitudinal analyses of stability. They further critique widespread contraception and delayed childbearing for eroding fertility rates below replacement levels in Western nations, arguing that reversing such trends through incentives for early marriage and larger preserves civilizational continuity, with data showing conservative-leaning demographics sustaining higher birth rates amid broader declines.

Education, Culture, and Public Morality

Social conservatives view education as a primary vehicle for transmitting intergenerational moral norms, classical knowledge, and civic virtues, arguing that curricula should prioritize character formation over ideological experimentation to foster social cohesion and individual responsibility. They often support school choice mechanisms, such as vouchers and charter schools, to enable parents to select environments aligned with traditional values, including religious or classical liberal arts programs that emphasize discipline, historical literacy, and ethical reasoning derived from Western heritage. Empirical studies indicate that family-influenced educational environments, which social conservatives seek to bolster through parental rights policies, correlate positively with student achievement and long-term outcomes like graduation rates, as strong familial values reinforce academic motivation and behavioral standards. In , social conservatives prioritize the preservation of a nation's inherited artistic, literary, and historical traditions as bulwarks against and rapid homogenization, contending that unchecked can dilute shared identity and moral exemplars embedded in works. This stance manifests in advocacy for public funding of institutions that uphold traditional —such as museums featuring pre-modern European —and opposition to deconstructive reinterpretations in media or academia that prioritize narratives over transcendent ideals. They draw on that cultural continuity sustains social trust and resilience, evidenced by longitudinal showing communities with robust heritage engagement exhibiting lower rates of alienation and higher civic participation compared to those undergoing forced diversification without assimilation norms. Regarding , social conservatives endorse legal and social restraints on , such as restrictions on distribution, to safeguard communal standards of decency and prevent the normalization of behaviors deemed corrosive to familial and societal bonds. Influenced by traditions, they argue that unrestricted exposure to explicit materials undermines self-control and relational commitments, with historical precedents like 19th-century Comstock laws reflecting efforts to curb materials facilitating moral decay alongside contraception and advocacy. Contemporary positions, articulated by thinkers like Harry Clor, justify limited in liberal societies to maintain a public conducive to , citing linking pervasive to elevated risks of relational instability and youth behavioral issues, though critics from libertarian perspectives challenge such interventions as paternalistic.

Empirical Evidence and Outcomes

Data on Family Stability and Social Health

Children raised in stable, intact with two married biological parents demonstrate superior outcomes across multiple indicators of family stability and social health compared to those in single-parent or unstable structures. Longitudinal analyses, such as those from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, indicate that family instability, including transitions like or parental separation, correlates with poorer psychological and increased behavioral problems in children. Specifically, children experiencing substantial family instability fare worse in emotional development than those in stable two-parent households. Poverty rates starkly differ by family structure, with single-mother households facing significantly higher risks. , 37% of families led by single mothers live in poverty, compared to only 6.8% of married-parent families. This disparity persists even after controlling for socioeconomic factors, as children in single-parent homes are more prone to economic disadvantage, which undermines overall stability. outcomes also favor intact families; children from single-parent households are twice as likely to experience mental health and behavioral issues as those from two-parent families.
Outcome MetricIntact Two-Parent FamiliesSingle-Parent Families
Poverty Rate6.8%37%
Risk of Behavioral ProblemsLower incidenceElevated (2x higher)
Psychological HigherLower due to instability
These patterns hold in peer-reviewed syntheses, where children with both biological parents present benefit from pooled resources, consistent , and reduced exposure to stressors like parental conflict or absence, fostering greater social . However, some studies note that single-parent homes can yield cognitive outcomes comparable to two-parent ones, though overall remains a key detriment. stability thus emerges as a causal factor in social , with linking intact structures to resilience against adverse outcomes.

Correlations with Crime, Health, and Economic Metrics

Empirical studies indicate that regions and populations exhibiting stronger adherence to social conservative values, such as intact two-parent families and religious participation, demonstrate lower rates of . For instance, a review of 40 studies on incorporating religious variables found that 75% reported an inverse relationship between and delinquency, with higher religious involvement—measured through attendance, salience, and other dimensions—consistently linked to reduced deviant behavior, particularly among at-risk . Similarly, , which social conservatism seeks to mitigate through promotion of stable marriages, strongly predicts higher involvement in ; analyses show that children from single-parent homes are significantly more likely to engage in violent offenses, with revealing a robust between out-of-wedlock births, , and elevated adult male violent rates. In terms of health metrics, social conservative emphases on marital stability and religious observance correlate with improved outcomes. Meta-analyses confirm that religious involvement reduces all-cause mortality, with frequent service attendance associated with lower risks of across diverse populations. Married individuals, reflective of traditional structures, exhibit longer life expectancies than unmarried counterparts; for example, U.S. data spanning decades show married persons outliving singles by several years on average, with married men gaining up to 17 months in median survival post-diagnosis in longitudinal cohorts. Mental health benefits are also evident, as conservatives and religiously active individuals report higher and lower depression rates compared to liberals or the non-religious. Economic indicators further reveal positive associations with social conservative family norms. Children raised in intact, two-biological-parent households achieve higher adult earnings and greater upward mobility; from such families are 20 percentage points more likely to attain middle-class or higher status than those from non-intact homes. States with higher proportions of married parents exhibit stronger economic performance, including reduced and enhanced mobility for low-income youth, outperforming predictors like race or parental . These patterns persist after controlling for confounders, suggesting causal pathways through enhanced formation and reduced welfare dependency.

Critiques of Alternative Social Experiments

Social conservatives contend that policies and cultural shifts departing from traditional family norms—such as laws enacted across U.S. states starting in in —have empirically undermined social stability by elevating rates from about 2.2 per 1,000 population in 1960 to a peak of 5.3 in , with lasting effects on children including heightened risks of , behavioral issues, and early mortality. A longitudinal analysis of over 5 million children using linked tax and data revealed that parental correlates with a 35-55% increase in offspring mortality and up to a 63% rise in teen birth rates, effects persisting into adulthood and underscoring causal links to disruption rather than mere . Similarly, on unilateral divorce reforms, which simplified separations without mutual consent, documented worsened child outcomes like increased school dropout and , particularly evident within the first eight years post-reform, as analyzed in state-level data from the 1970s and 1980s. Father absence, often a byproduct of these marital experiments and rising out-of-wedlock births (from 5% in 1960 to 40% by 2020 per U.S. Census data), shows strong correlations with elevated crime rates, with peer-reviewed analyses indicating that children from fatherless homes face 3 to 20 times higher incarceration risks compared to those from intact families. A National Institute of Justice-funded study on family structure and violence found significantly predicts both male and female delinquency rates, independent of socioeconomic controls, with alternative male figures (e.g., stepfathers) mitigating but not fully offsetting the risks. These patterns align with broader metrics: youth in single-parent households, disproportionately fatherless, comprise over 70% of long-term prison inmates in U.S. surveys, a disparity attributed to diminished , role modeling, and rather than inherent traits. Welfare expansions, critiqued as incentivizing non-marital childbearing and family fragmentation, demonstrate negative impacts on marital stability in multiple econometric studies; for instance, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) participation reduced transition probabilities to by about 33% ( of 0.67) among recipients, as estimated from on low-income mothers. A synthesis of post-1996 evaluations confirmed that means-tested benefits often impose marriage penalties—providing higher aid to single mothers than couples—discouraging union formation and correlating with sustained single-parenthood rates exceeding 25% in affected demographics, per and administrative records. Such policies, conservatives argue, invert traditional incentives for two-parent households, yielding intergenerational cycles of dependency evidenced by higher among non-married welfare recipients. The sexual revolution's promotion of and delayed , peaking in cultural acceptance by the , links empirically to higher risks: individuals with multiple premarital partners face 2-3 times greater odds of marital dissolution, per analyses of National Survey of Family Growth data, due to altered mate selection and commitment norms rather than alone. Accompanying surges in sexually transmitted infections—from rates of 15 per 100,000 in 1960 to over 30 by 1980 per CDC surveillance—highlight costs of decoupled sexuality from reproduction, with ongoing epidemics tied to behavioral shifts rather than medical advances alone. Conservatives interpret these outcomes as causal evidence that prioritizing individual autonomy over communal moral structures erodes societal health metrics, including child disparities where intact families buffer against adversity more effectively than interventions.

Ideological Relations and Distinctions

Integration with Fiscal and National Conservatism

Social conservatism integrates with through the framework of , a philosophical synthesis originating in the mid-20th-century American conservative movement, which reconciles traditional moral order with economic and . Proponents argue that social virtues such as personal responsibility and family stability underpin the necessary for free-market economies, preventing the moral hazards of expansive welfare systems that erode incentives for work and . This alliance posits that unchecked fiscal fosters dependency, which in turn undermines the social structures social conservatives seek to preserve, as evidenced by correlations between rising on entitlements and declining rates in the United States from the onward. Critics within fiscal conservative circles, however, note potential tensions, as social policies like restrictions on or may require state enforcement, diverging from strict minimalism, though fusionists counter that such interventions target societal preconditions for rather than economic spheres. The partnership manifests politically in coalitions like the post-World War II Republican Party under figures such as William F. Buckley Jr., where social conservatives supplied the cultural critique of progressivism, while fiscal conservatives advocated deregulation and tax cuts, as seen in the Reagan-era Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, which reduced top marginal rates from 70% to 50% amid shared opposition to Soviet-style collectivism. Empirical support draws from data showing that states with stronger traditional family policies, such as lower divorce rates, often exhibit better fiscal outcomes, including lower public debt-to-GDP ratios, suggesting a causal link where social stability enables fiscal discipline. With , integration arises from a mutual emphasis on preserving cultural and familial traditions as bulwarks against globalist erosion of . National conservatives view the nation-state as an extension of the unit, aligning with social conservatism's defense of inherited norms against and mass , which they argue dilutes social cohesion and increases fiscal burdens through welfare expansion. This synergy is evident in movements like Hungary's party under , which since 2010 has enacted policies promoting traditional marriage via tax incentives and constitutional amendments defining marriage as heterosexual, while prioritizing national borders and economic to safeguard domestic industries. In the U.S., the post-2016 Republican shift incorporates social traditionalism into national platforms, such as border security measures in the 2017-2021 Trump administration that reduced illegal crossings by over 80% in fiscal year 2020, framed as protecting both economic resources and . Such alliances prioritize empirical preservation of demographic stability, citing studies linking high to strained social trust and formation rates in host nations.

Contrasts with Libertarianism, Progressivism, and Populism

Social conservatism diverges from libertarianism in its willingness to employ state authority to enforce traditional moral norms, whereas libertarianism prioritizes individual autonomy and restricts government to protecting negative rights without prescribing virtue. Social conservatives advocate for policies such as bans on abortion or restrictions on same-sex marriage to preserve societal order and family structures, viewing these as essential for communal stability. In contrast, libertarians oppose such interventions, arguing that personal choices in areas like drug use, sexuality, or voluntary contracts fall outside legitimate state purview, as government overreach undermines consent-based interactions. This tension has manifested in debates over marriage recognition, where social conservatives seek legal affirmation of heterosexual unions as a public good, while libertarians favor privatization or neutrality to avoid coercive moralism. Relative to , social conservatism resists expansive redefinitions of identity, , and morality, emphasizing continuity with historical norms over egalitarian reforms. Progressives often support government-led initiatives to promote diversity in gender roles, reproductive rights, and , seeing tradition as a barrier to equity. Social conservatives counter that such changes erode social cohesion, citing evidence from breakdown metrics like rising rates post-no-fault laws in the 1970s, which correlated with increased by 20-30% in affected demographics. They prioritize organic hierarchies and communal duties, rejecting progressive one-size-fits-all solutions in favor of decentralized, tradition-guided choices. Social conservatism shares some cultural affinities with , such as opposition to elite-driven , but differs in its commitment to institutional restraint and hierarchical order against populism's direct, anti-elitist appeals to mass will. Populists mobilize on national sovereignty and economic grievances, often endorsing social conservative stances on or instrumentally to rally support, yet they may bypass traditional gatekeepers like religious authorities or legislatures for plebiscitary reforms. , by contrast, upholds authority and property rights as bulwarks against fleeting majoritarian impulses, as seen in populist movements' occasional endorsements of that conservatives critique for distorting free markets essential to moral virtue. This divergence appeared in the 2016 U.S. election, where populist amplified social issues but clashed with conservatives' emphasis on procedural norms over charismatic .

Global and Regional Variations

Europe and North America

In , social conservatism manifests primarily through advocacy for traditional family structures, religious influence in public life, and resistance to expansions of access and , with the serving as its epicenter. In the U.S., 38% of adults identified as socially conservative in 2023, the highest level recorded by Gallup since 2012, reflecting opposition to policies perceived as eroding marital norms and parental authority over education on sexuality. This has shaped Republican platforms, exemplified by the 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturning on June 24, 2022, enabling 14 states to enact near-total bans by October 2023, often justified by appeals to fetal personhood and historical legal precedents. Evangelical Protestants, comprising about 25% of the population, remain a core base, with organizations like promoting abstinence education and intact nuclear families as correlates of child well-being. Canada exhibits a more subdued form of social conservatism, integrated into the broader (CPC) but often subordinated to fiscal and economic priorities amid a secular . Support for traditional marriage and life issues persists among religious minorities, such as Orthodox Christians and evangelical Protestants, who number around 10% of the population, but public policy has shifted leftward, with legalized nationwide in 2005 and abortion unregulated since 1988. Recent CPC leadership under , elected September 2022, has de-emphasized divisive social topics to appeal to urban moderates, though factions pushed motions against gender-transition procedures for minors in 2023 provincial legislatures. Polls indicate ranks highly as a value, with 49% of North Americans prioritizing it in 2025 surveys, yet Canadian rates hover at 38% compared to the U.S.'s 42%, suggesting weaker institutional enforcement of traditional norms. In , social conservatism varies starkly by region, thriving in Eastern strongholds like and through state-backed promotion of pronatalist policies and Catholic or Christian democratic traditions, while waning in the secular West amid and harmonization. Poland's (PiS) party, governing 2015-2023, enacted near-total bans in 2020, citing demographic decline— at 1.26 births per woman in 2023—and cultural preservation, with 87% of Poles identifying as Catholic per 2021 census data. under Viktor Orbán's , in power since 2010, offers tax exemptions for mothers of four children and constitutional amendments defining as heterosexual since 2011, aiming to reverse rates from 1.23 in 2010 to 1.59 in 2021, framed as national survival against immigration-driven dilution of ethnic homogeneity. Western Europe shows fragmentation, with social conservative elements absorbed into center-right parties like Germany's or the UK's Conservatives, focusing more on immigration's impact on cohesion than overt moral traditionalism, as prevails—only 18% of Europeans attend religious services weekly per 2018 data. The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group in the , representing parties from 's to , advocates sovereignty and family policy autonomy, gaining seats to 78 in 2024 elections amid voter backlash to quotas and migrant integration strains. Eastern Europe's higher among right-leaning demographics—conservatives averaging more children than progressives across 20 nations studied—signals potential long-term entrenchment, contrasting Western Europe's sub-replacement rates below 1.5 in countries like and .

Asia, Middle East, and Africa

In , social conservatism manifests through Confucian-influenced emphases on familial hierarchy, elder respect, and state-supported traditional welfare models that prioritize family units over individual entitlements. and exemplify conservative social policies where corporate and familial networks provide welfare, reinforcing gender roles with women often expected to prioritize homemaking despite workforce participation; for instance, Japan's fertility rate stood at 1.26 births per woman in 2023, reflecting policies that incentivize traditional marriage amid demographic decline. In , conservatism draws from Confucian and authority, promoting alongside restrictions on , such as censorship of Western individualism and enforcement of legacies that underscore collective family duties over personal autonomy. Southeast Asian variants include Indonesia's growing Islamic conservatism, where moral panics against LGBTQ visibility have led to regional bans and enforcement of traditional norms, contrasting limited progressive shifts in . Across the , social conservatism is predominantly shaped by Islamic principles, which codify patriarchal family structures, prohibiting , , and while mandating modest dress and gender segregation in countries like and . -derived family laws govern , , and , often favoring male authority; a 2013 Pew survey found median support for Sharia as official law exceeding 70% in regions like and the , with endorsements for corporal punishments for moral offenses. These norms sustain low rates in Gulf states— reported 1.5 divorces per 1,000 people in 2022—but correlate with honor-based violence, as evidenced by ongoing "honor killings" tied to purity violations. Reform efforts, such as Saudi's 2019 easing of male guardianship, remain incremental and contested by clerical authorities prioritizing scriptural literalism over secular equality. In , social conservatism blends indigenous tribal traditions with Christian and Muslim doctrines, yielding robust opposition to non-traditional sexuality and forms; over 30 countries criminalize , with penalties ranging from to , as in Uganda's 2023 Anti-Homosexuality Act imposing life sentences for "aggravated" acts. Religious leaders in nations like and invoke biblical or Quranic texts to frame such laws as defenses of and procreation, amid surveys showing 80-90% public disapproval of . Empirical patterns link these norms to stability metrics, such as sub-Saharan 's higher rates (4.6 births per woman in 2023) and lower single-parent household prevalence compared to Western averages, though correlated with elevated under patriarchal expectations. Influences from evangelical networks have amplified domestic movements, yet core resistance stems from pre-colonial customs viewing non-heteronormative behaviors as threats to communal lineage.

Latin America and Other Regions

Social conservatism in Latin America remains anchored in the region's predominantly Catholic heritage, which has long endorsed traditional family structures, opposition to abortion, and resistance to same-sex marriage legalization. The Catholic Church's historical alignment with conservative elites reinforced these values, particularly during colonial and post-independence eras, though internal divisions emerged in the 20th century between progressive liberation theology advocates and traditionalist factions. Surveys indicate persistent opposition to abortion across the region, with majorities in countries like Mexico (81%), Brazil (71%), and Argentina (64%) viewing it as morally unacceptable in most cases as of 2014, reflecting entrenched cultural norms despite legal reforms in some nations. A conservative resurgence gained momentum in the mid-2010s, exemplified by under President (2019–2023), where policies emphasized defense of the traditional family against what Bolsonaro termed "gender ideology," supported by rising evangelical influence amid declining Catholic adherence. This wave extended to Colombia's 2016 rejection of a peace accord perceived as too conciliatory toward leftist social agendas, and , often ranked among Latin America's most socially conservative societies due to strong rural and religious adherence to patriarchal norms. In , conservative resistance persists in states like , where traditional values shape local politics, though national trends show mixed outcomes with leftist governments occasionally adopting socially conservative stances on to broaden appeal. Argentina's 2023 election of highlighted libertarian strains over pure social conservatism, yet backlash against gender reforms continues through alliances of Catholic and evangelical groups. Beyond , social conservatism in , particularly , draws from multicultural immigrant communities and rural demographics wary of rapid . In the 2017 Australian marriage equality postal survey, opposition was strongest in areas with high concentrations of socially conservative ethnic groups, such as Lebanese and Indian communities in Western Sydney, where traditional views on family and sexuality prevailed over progressive urban majorities. Australian conservatism more broadly integrates social elements with , as seen in the Liberal Party's historical defense of traditional institutions, though national policy shifts toward legalization of in 2017 reflected broader acceptance tempered by pockets of resistance in outer suburbs and regional areas. These regional variations underscore social conservatism's adaptability to local religious and demographic contexts, often prioritizing empirical preservation of familial stability amid globalization's pressures.

Political Parties, Movements, and Influence

Prominent Examples by Region

In , social conservatism manifests prominently within the Republican Party, where it influences policy platforms opposing and ; a 2023 Gallup survey found 38% of Americans self-identifying as social conservatives, with identification highest among Republicans at over 50%. Key movements include the party's pro-life stance, reinforced by appointments leading to the 2022 overturning of , and advocacy by groups like the for traditional family structures. In Canada, social conservative elements within the have shaped debates, such as opposition to expansions in 2021 and resistance to curriculum changes incorporating , though moderated by the party's broader electoral strategy. In , Eastern examples stand out: Poland's (PiS) party, in power from 2015 to 2023, implemented near-total bans in 2020 and child benefits favoring traditional families, drawing on Catholic values to boost birth rates from 1.26 in 2015 to 1.33 in 2022. Hungary's , under since 2010, amended the constitution in 2020 to define as heterosexual and restricted recognition, while offering tax exemptions for mothers of four or more children to counter demographic decline. features figures like Italy's , whose party, elected in 2022, prioritizes natalist policies and opposes and LGBT , reflecting a voter shift toward cultural preservation amid migration pressures. In Asia, India's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), governing since 2014, embodies social conservatism through Hindu nationalist policies, including the 2019 revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's autonomy to enforce uniform civil codes over religion-specific personal laws and bans on triple talaq divorce in 2019, affecting 90 million Muslim women by standardizing marriage norms. Japan's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), dominant since 1955, maintains conservative positions on family registry systems (koseki) that prioritize patrilineal inheritance and resists constitutional changes to Article 24's traditional marriage emphasis, with public support for such views at 60% in 2020 polls. In Southeast Asia, Indonesia's conservative Islamic movements influence parties like the Prosperous Justice Party, enforcing blasphemy laws and anti-LGBT measures, as seen in the 2022 criminal code upholding sharia-derived penalties. Latin America highlights Brazil under Jair Bolsonaro's Liberal Party (2019-2023), which aligned with evangelical Protestants—comprising 30% of voters by 2022—to veto gender ideology in schools via 2019 decrees and appoint pro-life justices, correlating with a 15% rise in conservative congressional seats. In , post-2023 under Javier Milei's libertarian-leaning coalition, social conservative alliances pushed back against prior , though fiscal priorities temper enforcement; historical parties like Peru's emphasize Catholic-influenced opposition to divorce and euthanasia. In the and , social conservatism often intertwines with religious authority: Turkey's Justice and Development Party (AKP), ruling since 2002, lifted headscarf bans selectively while enforcing via 2016 education reforms prioritizing Islamic values, reducing secular curricula by 20%. In , Nigeria's (APC) upholds northern courts penalizing adultery and , with 12 states applying such codes to 70 million Muslims as of 2023; South Africa's advocates biblical marriage definitions, gaining 1% nationally in 2024 elections amid opposition to same-sex unions legalized in 2006. These examples reflect adaptations to local demographics, prioritizing communal stability over individual liberties.

Factions Within Broader Parties

Within the Republican Party of the , the —also known as the —functions as a core social conservative faction, primarily comprising evangelical Protestants who prioritize opposition to abortion, defense of traditional marriage, and protection of religious freedoms in public life. This group coalesced in the late 1970s in response to the 1973 Supreme Court decision in , which legalized abortion nationwide, prompting mobilization against perceived moral decay. By the 1980s, it exerted significant influence through organizations like the , founded in 1979 by , which registered millions of voters and shaped party platforms to include explicit pro-life planks and advocacy. The faction's enduring impact is evident in Republican primaries, where social conservative voters, often 30-40% of the base per Gallup polling on issue priorities, have elevated candidates like Mike Huckabee in 2008 and in 2016. In the , the serves as a socially conservative faction within the Conservative Party, established in 2005 to champion traditional values encapsulated in its motto of "Faith, Flag, and Family." Comprising backbench MPs, the group advocates for policies reinforcing marriage, , and against liberal reforms, such as resisting further expansions of or euthanasia legalization. It has influenced party debates, notably pushing back against David Cameron's 2010-2016 modernizing agenda, which included legislation in 2013, and maintaining pressure for opt-outs from social policies during . Membership peaked at around 40 MPs in the , reflecting a traditionalist counterweight to the party's libertarian and centrist wings. Canadian social conservatives operate as a vocal faction within the (CPC), drawing from rural and religious voters to advocate pro-life measures, parental rights in education, and restrictions on assisted dying expansions beyond the 2016 Carter v. ruling. This group, often overlapping with evangelical and Catholic bases, secured policy concessions like defunding certain abortion providers abroad during Stephen Harper's 2006-2015 tenure, though facing resistance from urban libertarians. In the 2022 leadership race, candidates like garnered 15-20% support from social conservative delegates, highlighting their role in preventing the party from fully embracing progressive social shifts. Unusual instances occur in non-conservative parties, such as within the UK's Labour Party, a faction blending economic with social conservatism on issues like controls, family-centric welfare, and toward rapid cultural liberalization. Originating in the under thinkers like Maurice Glasman, it critiques New Labour's , emphasizing ties and tradition, and influenced shadow cabinet discussions on integration during Jeremy Corbyn's 2015-2020 leadership. These factions illustrate how social conservatism adapts to broader coalitions, often trading policy wins for electoral loyalty amid internal tensions with fiscal or libertarian priorities.

Contemporary Initiatives and Project 2025

In the United States, contemporary social conservative initiatives since 2022 have focused on reinforcing traditional family structures and limiting progressive influences in education and public policy. Following the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. decision on June 24, 2022, which overturned , numerous states enacted restrictions on abortion, including bans after detection of fetal cardiac activity (typically around six weeks) in at least 14 states by 2024, alongside efforts to defund organizations like through state legislatures. Parallel movements emphasized parental rights, with groups like , founded in 2021, advocating for transparency in school curricula and removal of materials deemed sexually explicit or ideologically biased; by 2024, over 5,000 local chapters influenced school board elections and policies restricting discussions of and in K-12 education across multiple states. State-level reforms targeting gender ideology gained traction, with 24 states by mid-2024 prohibiting medical interventions such as puberty blockers and surgeries for minors identifying as , citing evidence of long-term harms including and loss from studies like the Cass Review in the UK, which found insufficient evidence for benefits outweighing risks. These laws often framed such procedures as experimental and child maltreatment, aligning with social conservative priorities for biological sex-based policies in sports, bathrooms, and prisons. Additionally, initiatives promoted , with nine states adopting or expanding universal education savings accounts by 2024, enabling parents to direct funds toward private, religious, or homeschool options over public schools promoting secular progressive values. Project 2025, formally the ": The Conservative Promise," is a 922-page policy blueprint released by on July 12, 2023, developed by over 100 conservative organizations to guide a potential Republican administration in restructuring federal agencies toward and traditional values. While former President publicly distanced himself in July 2024, stating it did not reflect his agenda, many contributors were his former appointees, and it echoes social conservative goals like protecting life and family. Key proposals include closing the to devolve authority to states and parents, prohibiting federal for schools teaching ideology or , and advancing universal via education savings accounts (pp. 319-321, 286). On family and life issues, advocates eliminating marriage penalties in tax and welfare codes, promoting two-parent households through (TANF) reforms requiring states to measure progress on and formation goals, and funding healthy education programs (pp. 477-480, 285). It calls for reversing FDA approvals of chemical drugs like , enforcing the Comstock Act against mailing abortifacients, defunding Planned Parenthood's non- services via , and reinstating the Protecting in Global Health Assistance policy to bar taxpayer funding for overseas promotion (pp. 458-459, 563, 472). Regarding gender, it recommends banning sex reassignment procedures for minors as , removing "" from federal rules, and restoring biological sex distinctions in and policies, while protecting religious by shielding faith-based entities from DEI mandates (Foreword p. 5; pp. 320, 353). These elements position as a systematic effort to institutionalize social conservative principles, prioritizing empirical stability —such as studies linking intact to reduced and —over expansive federal interventions.

Controversies, Criticisms, and Rebuttals

Progressive and Secular Critiques

Progressives argue that social conservatism obstructs advancements in and by endorsing traditional norms that confine individuals, particularly women, to prescribed roles, thereby exacerbating inequality. Research in indicates that individuals with conservative orientations exhibit concern for narrower social circles compared to liberals, which critics interpret as fostering exclusionary attitudes toward outgroups such as LGBTQ communities or immigrants. For example, opposition to , a hallmark social conservative position until its widespread legalization in the , has been characterized by progressives as rooted in prejudice rather than evidence, with studies linking unsupportive environments to elevated risks among sexual minorities—though causal links remain debated due to factors like family dynamics. Secular critiques emphasize that social conservatism frequently derives from religious doctrines lacking verifiable empirical support, prioritizing faith-based moral absolutes over data-driven policy. Critics contend this reliance on untested traditions impedes rational progress, as seen in resistance to comprehensive sex education, where progressive advocates cite evidence from European nations with permissive curricula showing lower teen pregnancy rates (e.g., the Netherlands at 3.2 per 1,000 in 2022 versus 16.7 in the U.S.) and STI incidences, attributing differences to abstinence-focused approaches favored by conservatives. Such positions are viewed as imposing subjective values on pluralistic societies, potentially violating principles of individual autonomy and secular governance, with academic analyses framing conservatism itself as a motivated cognition serving needs for certainty and resistance to change rather than objective assessment. However, these claims often overlook countervailing data, such as correlations between family instability and adverse child outcomes in more liberal policy environments.

Internal and Libertarian Objections

Within the broader tradition, internal objections to social conservatism often center on its perceived expansion of government authority into private spheres, which critics argue undermines the movement's foundational commitment to limited state power and individual responsibility. , the 1964 Republican presidential nominee and architect of the modern conservative resurgence, evolved to critique the religious right's push for moral legislation, warning in a 1981 speech that allowing preachers to control the party would create "a terrible damn problem" by prioritizing doctrinal enforcement over liberty. He asserted that "religious factions will go on imposing their will on others unless the decent people connected to them recognize that religion has no place in ," reflecting his view that conservatism should protect personal freedoms rather than covenant with to dictate behavior. Goldwater's later positions included support for drug legalization, opposition to sodomy laws, endorsement of gay rights in the , and resistance to federal restrictions, positions he framed as defenses against state overreach into conscience and voluntary association. These internal tensions manifest in fusionism—the postwar synthesis of libertarian economics and traditionalist values—where social conservative demands for policies like marriage amendments or vice prohibitions strain alliances by invoking coercive mechanisms antithetical to small-government ideals. Critics within conservatism, such as those at the American Enterprise Institute, have highlighted how cultural fixations can distract from fiscal discipline, allowing progressive expansions of state power in economic realms while conservatives expend capital on unenforceable moral edicts. Libertarians raise sharper objections, contending that social conservatism's reliance on legislation to uphold norms—such as bans on recreational marijuana (prohibited federally until partial rescheduling in 2024 under DEA guidelines), restrictions on same-sex unions prior to the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, or prohibitions on adult consensual activities—constitutes aggression against non-harmful individual choices, violating the principle that the state's sole legitimate role is preventing force or fraud. The Cato Institute has documented how conservative advocacy for such interventions, including historical backing for alcohol Prohibition (1920–1933) and anti-obscenity laws, demonstrates a pattern of using public authority to engineer virtue, eroding the voluntary moral order libertarians deem essential for sustainable liberty. Surveys of libertarian-identifying respondents show lower adherence to "wisdom of the ages" deference to entrenched norms, with only 38% reporting religious affiliation compared to 95% among conservatives, underscoring philosophical divergence on whether state compulsion can or should supplant cultural persuasion. Proponents of decoupling, as articulated in libertarian analyses, argue that fusionist coalitions falter when social conservatives subordinate individual autonomy to collective moralism, as evidenced by GOP platforms from 1980 onward endorsing interventions like mandates or anti-pornography statutes, which inflate administrative bureaucracies and invite reciprocal left-wing overreach. This critique posits that true , per Goldwater's , prioritizes constitutional restraint over paternalistic governance, with empirical precedents like the failed —costing $1 trillion since 1971 with negligible impact on usage rates—illustrating how moral crusades yield dependency on enforcement rather than reformed character.

Evidence-Based Defenses and Empirical Rebuttals

Children raised in intact, married, biological two-parent families exhibit superior educational, emotional, and behavioral outcomes compared to those in single-parent or non-traditional structures, including higher grade point averages, reduced rates of substance use, lower incidence of early family formation, and decreased involvement in criminal activity. Longitudinal analyses confirm that family stability from birth to age 10 correlates with greater parental involvement and improved academic performance, countering claims that family form is irrelevant to child development. These patterns hold across diverse socioeconomic contexts, with two-parent households providing consistent caregiving environments that mitigate risks of socioemotional deficits. Empirical rebuttals to progressive family diversification narratives highlight that alternatives, such as single-parent homes, are associated with heightened aggression, submissiveness, and poorer academic motivation in children. Regular religious participation demonstrably enhances social stability by reducing risk and fostering community cohesion, with studies showing lower rates among frequent attendees even after controlling for . Aggregate data from multiple countries indicate that religious homogeneity and practice protect against elevated rates, particularly in regions with strong congregational ties, rebutting secular critiques that dismiss faith's role in resilience. Comprehensive reviews affirm that religious involvement correlates with beneficial effects across social metrics, including lower deviance and stronger interpersonal bonds, supporting social conservatism's emphasis on frameworks derived from . Opposition to gender-affirming interventions for finds empirical backing in data, where surveys report rates of 13.1% among those pursuing affirmation, often citing unresolved underlying issues like trauma or co-occurring conditions rather than affirmed identity. Follow-up studies on adolescents reveal discontinuation of hormones in significant subsets, with desistance persisting at low rates post-social transition, challenging assertions of irreversible benefits and highlighting risks of iatrogenic harm. Prevalence estimates for vary from under 1% to 30% due to methodological gaps in tracking, but consistent findings underscore the need for caution against rapid normalization, as conservative stances prioritize longitudinal evidence over short-term ideological affirmation. Social conservatism's advocacy for gradual norm adherence counters evidence of disruption from abrupt changes, which erode traditional bonds and exacerbate biographical stress, particularly among vulnerable groups. Parenthood itself reinforces conservative values, with experimental and linking family formation to heightened pronatalism and stability preferences, suggesting that policies upholding traditional roles may mitigate declines observed globally since the . These outcomes rebut characterizations of as regressive, as adherence to established structures empirically correlates with reduced societal pathologies like isolation and demographic contraction.

References

  1. https://www.populismstudies.org/Vocabulary/social-conservatism/
  2. https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-social-conservatism-definition-examples.html
  3. https://study.com/academy/lesson/social-conservatism-vs-fiscal-conservatism.html
  4. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-gov/social-conservatism
  5. https://kirkcenter.org/conservatism/ten-conservative-principles/
  6. https://ifstudies.org/blog/are-red-or-blue-families-more-stable
  7. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1918006117
  8. https://www.aei.org/articles/are-red-or-blue-families-more-stable/
  9. https://mikejohnson.house.gov/7-core-principles-of-conservatism/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9449478/
  11. https://news.tulane.edu/pr/having-children-makes-parents-more-conservative-study-finds
  12. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conservatism/
  13. https://ifstudies.org/blog/red-families-vs-blue-families-which-are-happier/
  14. https://iep.utm.edu/aristotle-politics/
  15. https://worldhistoryedu.com/significance-of-the-mos-maiorum-in-roman-culture/
  16. https://brewminate.com/optimates-conservative-faction-in-ancient-rome/
  17. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/ps/cup/confucius_analects.pdf
  18. https://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF11C13.pdf
  19. https://www.science.org/content/article/how-early-christian-church-gave-birth-today-s-weird-europeans
  20. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/11/07/777276474/western-individualism-may-have-roots-in-the-medieval-churchs-obsession-with-ince
  21. https://study.com/academy/lesson/19th-century-conservatism-overview-history-ideology.html
  22. https://www.britannica.com/topic/conservatism/Conservatism-in-the-19th-century
  23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216414/
  24. https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/religious/the-temperance-movement/
  25. https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/twenty/tkeyinfo/tscopes.htm
  26. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/insignificance-scopes-trial/
  27. https://www.thearda.com/us-religion/history/timelines/entry?etype=1&eid=46
  28. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/moral-majority-founded
  29. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/reagans/reagan-administration/reagan-presidency
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/global-challenges-to-democracy/long-shadow-of-1968-christian-democracys-struggle-for-dominance-and-democratic-backsliding-in-europe/6B245AC9A5A3B7AC3D12EE347D15E74A
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0030438707000841
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8525853/
  33. https://dornsife.usc.edu/iacs/2022/04/30/global-christianity/
  34. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w12610/w12610.pdf
  35. https://modernagejournal.com/natural-law/243543/
  36. https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/lecture/natural-law-and-the-recovery-human-freedom
  37. https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2018/09/21/right-by-nature-russell-kirk-contemporary-conservatism-and-natural-law/
  38. https://daily.jstor.org/edmund-burke-and-the-birth-of-traditional-conservatism/
  39. https://publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu/blog/posts/explore-the-enduring-legacy-of-edmund-burke.htm
  40. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2023/05/left-vs-natural-law-john-horvat.html
  41. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/24/9-views-on-religion-and-social-issues/
  42. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-relationship-between-conservatism-and-religion-Why-do-conservatives-tend-to-be-more-religious-than-liberals
  43. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2022/11/the-stubborn-persistence-of-conservative-religion-in-american-public-life/
  44. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2017/07/26/political-and-social-views/
  45. https://merip.org/2001/12/islam-and-the-politics-of-community-and-citizenship/
  46. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/
  47. https://www.quora.com/Why-did-many-Muslim-countries-swing-so-conservative-over-the-past-few-decades
  48. https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/jewish-political-conservatism-the-emergence-of-republican-jews/
  49. https://www.commentary.org/articles/eric-cohen/jewish-conservatism-manifesto/
  50. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/08/the-rise-of-conservatism-in-israel/
  51. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hinduism/The-struggle-for-independence
  52. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/hindu-conservatism
  53. https://logosjournal.com/article/indias-conservative-revolution-the-postcolonial-left-meets-the-hindu-right/
  54. https://ifstudies.org/blog/how-conservatives-can-promote-family-through-policy
  55. https://www.aei.org/op-eds/liberal-elites-secret-weapon-is-conservative-family-values/
  56. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/184776/the-case-for-marriage-by-linda-j-waite-and-maggie-gallagher/
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2930824/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6240988/
  59. https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/report/the-effects-divorce-america
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4240051/
  61. https://www.mdrc.org/work/publications/effects-marriage-and-divorce-families-and-children
  62. https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-statistics-and-facts/
  63. https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/republicans/2020/7/the-demise-of-the-happy-two-parent-home
  64. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED463491.pdf
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381730079X
  66. https://uscatholic.org/blog/the-birds-and-the-bees-natural-law-and-same-sex-civil-marriage/
  67. https://ifstudies.org/blog/children-first-why-family-structure-and-stability-matter-for-children
  68. https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/commentary/the-conservative-feminist-revolution
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5948107/
  70. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/
  71. https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/report/rights-duties-and-relations-toward-pro-woman-feminism-the-21st-century
  72. https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-next-conservative-education-agenda
  73. https://www.thinkacademy.ca/blog/school-choice-conservative-views-on-education-policy/
  74. https://sedl.org/connections/resources/evidence.pdf
  75. https://www.educationnext.org/how-family-background-influences-student-achievement/
  76. https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/the-cultural-conservatives
  77. https://www.blountlifestyle.org/06/embracing-traditional-conservative-values/
  78. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17535069.2024.2382245
  79. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/pornography-censorship/
  80. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/article/comstockery
  81. https://www.amazon.com/Obscenity-Public-Morality-Censorship-Liberal/dp/0226110338
  82. https://lawliberty.org/when-public-morality-lost-its-foothold-the-unheeded-wisdom-of-harry-clor/
  83. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/ape8-ts46/download
  84. https://post.ca.gov/portals/0/post_docs/publications/Building%2520a%2520Career%2520Pipeline%2520Documents/safe_harbor.pdf
  85. https://www.americafirstpolicy.com/issues/issue-brief-fatherlessness-and-its-effects-on-american-society
  86. https://evidence2impact.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/s_wifis02report.pdf
  87. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/661922
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3806110/
  89. https://ffcws.princeton.edu/publications/effects-paternal-presence-and-family-instability-child-cognitive-performance
  90. https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=jfs
  91. https://manhattan.institute/article/religion-the-forgotten-factor-in-cutting-youth-crime-and-saving-at-risk-urban-youth
  92. https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/reports/ifs-strongerfamilies-final-1.pdf
  93. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6954&context=doctoral
  94. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/hea193211.pdf
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7452000/
  96. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB5018.html
  97. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321573
  98. https://www.aei.org/articles/growing-up-in-intact-families-matters-more-than-ever/
  99. https://www.aei.org/articles/why-family-matters-and-why-traditional-families-are-still-best/
  100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263268091_Why_Does_Growing_up_in_an_Intact_Family_during_Childhood_Lead_to_Higher_Earnings_during_Adulthood_in_the_United_States
  101. https://ifstudies.org/blog/new-study-finds-lasting-effects-of-divorce-on-kids
  102. https://www2.census.gov/library/working-papers/2025/adrm/ces/CES-WP-25-28.pdf
  103. https://www.nber.org/digest/feb01/making-divorce-easier-bad-children
  104. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/206316.pdf
  105. https://www.americafirstpolicy.com/assets/uploads/files/Fatherlessness_and_Crime.pdf
  106. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3068203/
  107. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230345/
  108. https://ifstudies.org/report-brief/marriage-penalized-does-social-welfare-policy-affect-family-formation
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10989935/
  110. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573147/
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11255005/
  112. https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/commentary/we-need-new-fusionism
  113. https://nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/a-family-focused-fusionism
  114. https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/0817945725_31.pdf
  115. https://americancompass.org/the-new-fusionism-we-need/
  116. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2019/07/55245/
  117. https://www.populismstudies.org/Vocabulary/national-conservatism/
  118. https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2025-06/BG3914.pdf
  119. https://nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/national-conservatism-then-and-now
  120. https://www.heritage.org/event/libertarianism-vs-conservatism
  121. https://www.cato.org/blog/reflections-libertarianism-vs-conservativism-debate-2024
  122. https://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2013/Klingsocialconservatives.html
  123. https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/significance-cato-heritage-intern-debate
  124. https://study.com/academy/lesson/social-progressivism-vs-conservatism.html
  125. https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/heritage-explains/the-3-big-differences-between-conservatives-and-progressives
  126. https://values.institute/conservative-vs-progressive-values-what-is-the-difference/
  127. https://www.alreporter.com/2024/10/22/opinion-populism-vs-conservatism-a-showdown-that-will-shape-the-future/
  128. https://www.populismstudies.org/Vocabulary/conservative-populism/
  129. https://news.gallup.com/poll/506765/social-conservatism-highest-decade.aspx
  130. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/young-people-increasingly-embrace-conservatism
  131. https://news.gallup.com/poll/691964/family-top-value-americans.aspx
  132. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19485565.2024.2419075
  133. https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/europe-conservative-wave/
  134. https://ecrparty.eu/
  135. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228311554_Identifying_Variations_of_Conservative_Social_Policy_in_North_East_Asia_The_Welfare_State_in_Japan_South_Korea_and_Mainland_China
  136. https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/the-world-today/2023-06/southeast-asia-ongoing-duel-conservative-forces
  137. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/understanding-sharia-intersection-islam-and-law
  138. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224251324504
  139. https://www.britannica.com/topic/sharia/Reform-of-sharia-law
  140. https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/18/africa/anti-lgbtq-laws-uganda-kenya-ghana
  141. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9543796/
  142. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9477001/
  143. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268121000585
  144. https://oxfordre.com/politics/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-811
  145. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-religions-in-latin-america/catholicism-and-political-parties-in-modern-latin-america/5A2EF47D09F3AEBE33DFB452A77EFCD3
  146. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2014/11/13/chapter-5-social-attitudes/
  147. https://www.crisisgroup.org/latin-america-caribbean/brazil/b047-brazils-true-believers-bolsonaro-and-risks-election-year
  148. https://www.cirsd.org/en/horizons/horizons-winter-2020-issue-no-15/popular-conservatism-rising-in-latin-america
  149. https://www.cfr.org/article/socially-conservative-left-gaining-traction-latin-america
  150. https://www.americasquarterly.org/article/argentinas-new-conservative-coalition/
  151. https://theconversation.com/how-social-conservatism-among-ethnic-communities-drove-a-strong-no-vote-in-western-sydney-87509
  152. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442699618
  153. https://providencemag.com/2021/02/eastern-european-conservatism-different-russia-poland-hungary/
  154. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36130006
  155. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00472336.2018.1448108
  156. https://www.americasquarterly.org/article/a-socially-conservative-left-is-gaining-traction-in-latin-america/
  157. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13530194.2017.1281578
  158. https://www.reddit.com/r/[Africa](/page/Africa)/comments/1giz1t8/how_socially_liberal_or_conservative_is_your/
  159. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/05/religious-right-real-origins-107133
  160. https://www.thearda.com/us-religion/history/timelines/entry?etype=3&eid=17
  161. https://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/welcome/
  162. https://theinterim.com/columnist/andrew-lawton/the-conservative-partys-factions-and-its-future/
  163. https://www.bluelabour.org/about-us
  164. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/69342/maurice-glasman-and-the-origins-of-blue-labour
  165. https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf
  166. https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/agre/conservatism.html
  167. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6763434/
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8172130/
  169. https://gspp.berkeley.edu/assets/uploads/research/pdf/jost.glaser.political-conservatism-as-motivated-social-cog.pdf
  170. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/4-progressive-policies-that-make-families-stronger/
  171. https://ifstudies.org/blog/how-progressive-policies-can-strengthen-marriage-and-family-life
  172. https://medium.com/the-radical-center/goldwaters-warning-to-gop-came-true-5ba91895c6ee
  173. https://www.azquotes.com/author/5665-Barry_Goldwater
  174. https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/the-goldwater-myth/
  175. https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/fusionism-why-libertarianism-should-extricate-itself-conservative-entanglements
  176. https://www.aei.org/research-products/speech/whats-wrong-with-conservatism/
  177. https://www.cato.org/blog/libertarians-conservatives-social-issues
  178. https://www.cato.org/blog/results-2018-libertarianism-vs-conservatism-post-debate-survey
  179. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-023-09916-3
  180. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347621641_Family_Structure_Stability_and_Transitions_Parental_Involvement_and_Educational_Outcomes
  181. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_Special_Issue_April_2013/26.pdf
  182. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09731342231179017
  183. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7310534/
  184. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26859622_Explaining_the_Relation_between_Religiousness_and_Reduced_Suicidal_Behavior_Social_Support_Rather_Than_Specific_Beliefs
  185. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953621009746
  186. https://www.heritage.org/civil-society/report/why-religion-matters-the-impact-religious-practice-social-stability
  187. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8213007/
  188. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10803846/
  189. https://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X%2824%2900554-8/fulltext
  190. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0092623X.2025.2480648
  191. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387462263_Prevalence_of_detransition_in_persons_seeking_gender-affirming_hormonal_treatments_a_systematic_review
  192. https://segm.org/regret-detransition-rate-unknown
  193. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/21568693221100171
  194. https://sociology.institute/introduction-to-sociology/impact-social-change-society-individuals/
  195. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/dependency-and-depopulation-confronting-the-consequences-of-a-new-demographic-reality
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.