Hubbry Logo
BardaisanBardaisanMain
Open search
Bardaisan
Community hub
Bardaisan
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bardaisan
Bardaisan
Bardaisan
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

 
Part of a series on
Gnosticism
Gnostic concepts
Gnostic sects and founders
Proto-Gnosticism
Judean / Israelite
Christian Gnosticism
Persian Gnosticism
Chinese Gnosticism
Islamic Gnosticism
Modern
Scriptures
Texts
Codices
Influenced by
Influence on

Bardaisan (11 July 154 – 222 AD; Syriac: ܒܪ ܕܝܨܢ, Bar Dayṣān; also Bardaiṣan), known in Arabic as ibn Dayṣān (Arabic: ابن ديصان)[1] and in Latin as Bardesanes, was a Syriac-speaking[2] Christian writer and teacher with a Gnostic background,[3] and founder of the Bardaisanites.

A scientist, scholar, astrologer, philosopher, hymnwriter,[4] and poet, Bardaisan was also renowned for his knowledge of India, on which he wrote a book, now lost.[5] According to the early Christian historian Eusebius, Bardaisan was at one time a follower of the Gnostic Valentinus, but later opposed Valentinian Gnosticism and also wrote against Marcionism.[6]

Biography

[edit]

Early life and education

[edit]

Bardaisan (Syriac: ܒܪ ܕܝܨܢ bar Daiṣān "son of the Dayṣān") was a Syriac author born on 11 July 154 in Edessa, Osroene, which, in those days, was alternately under the influence of both the Roman Empire and the Parthian Empire. To indicate the city of his birth, his parents called him "Son of the Dayṣān", the river on which Edessa was situated. He is sometimes also referred to as "the Babylonian" (by Porphyrius); and, on account of his later important activity in Parthian Armenia, "the Armenian", (by Hippolytus of Rome), while Ephrem the Syrian calls him "philosopher of the Arameans" (Syriac: ܦܝܠܘܣܘܦܐ ܕܐܖ̈ܡܝܐ, romanized: Filosofā d-Arāmāyē). Some sources refer to his high birth and wealth; according to Michael the Syrian, Bardaisan's parents had fled Persia and Sextus Julius Africanus reports that he was of the Parthian nobility.[2] His parents, Nuhama and Nah 'siram, must have been people of rank, for their son was educated with the crown-prince of Osroene at the court of Abgar VIII. Africanus says that he saw Bardaisan, with bow and arrow, mark the outline of a boy's face with his arrows on a shield which the boy held.[7]

Owing to political disturbances in Edessa, Bardaisan and his parents moved for a while to Hierapolis (now Manbij), a strong centre of Babylonianism. Here, the boy was brought up in the house of a priest Anuduzbar. In this school he learnt all the intricacies of Babylonian astrology, a training that permanently influenced his mind and proved the bane of his later life. At the age of twenty-five he happened to hear the homilies of Hystaspes, the Bishop of Edessa, received instruction, was baptized, and even admitted to the diaconate or the priesthood. "Priesthood", however, may merely imply that he ranked as one of the college of presbyters, because Bardaisen remained in the world and had a son called Harmonius, who according to Sozomen's Ecclesiastical History, was "deeply versed in Grecian erudition, and was the first to subdue his native tongue to meters and musical laws; these verses he delivered to the choirs".[citation needed] When Abgar IX, the friend of his youth, ascended the throne (179), Bardaisan took his place at court. While a sincere Christian, he was clearly no ascetic, but dressed in finery "with berylls and caftan",[7] according to Ephrem, one of his critics.[7]

Preaching activity

[edit]

Bardaisan is said to have converted prince Abgar IX to Christianity (probably after 202, i.e. after his visit and honourable reception at Rome). Even if he did not, he had an important share in Christianizing the city. Both king and philosopher laboured to create the first Christian state.[8] He showed great literary activity against Valentinus (of whom Eusebius of Caesarea says Bardaisan was once a follower) and Marcion.[9]

Alternatively, Epiphanius of Salamis and Bar Hebraeus assert that he was first an orthodox Christian and only afterwards became an adept of Valentinus,[8] even creating his own heterodox Christian dogma (Bardaisanism) by mixing its doctrines with Babylonian astrology.[7] Bardaisan has often been described as a gnostic who denied the resurrection of the body and the works of Ephrem the Syriac suggest that he explained the origin of the world by a process of emanation from the supreme God whom he called the Father of the Living.[8] As a result, his teachings would form the basis of the Manichaeism and later of the batini sects of Shia Islam.[10] Bardaisan and his movement were subjected to critical polemics[8] that claimed, probably falsely, that he became a Valentinian Gnostic out of disappointed ambitions in the Christian church.[7] In particular, he was vigorously combated by St. Ephrem[7] who mentioned him in his hymns:

And if he thinks he has said the last thing
He has reached heathenism,
O Bar-Daisan,
Son of the River Daisan,
Whose mind is liquid like his name![11]

This view has come under criticism as these sources likely quote later Bardaisanites, whereas Eusebius and Porphyry are known to quote directly from authentic fragments of Bardaisan's work.[12] Sozomen specifically reports that Bardaisan taught about palingenesis (παλιγγενεσίας), that is the rebirth of physical bodies, and in his authentic fragments (which includes a treatise on the resurrection) Bardaisan affirms the resurrection of the body but believed it to be a transformation from a corruptible body into an incorruptible body, which is what he meant by "spiritual bodies" elsewhere.[12] While some Bardaisanites after the rise of Manichaeism considered the creation of bodies to be necessarily evil, Bardaisan himself only considered bodies to be sinful if they were mortal and that 'the body of resurrection and the body humans had prior to the fall is a body created from pure matter without any mixture with darkness'.[12] Bardaisan himself was not dualistic but monistic, in that he considered God to exist and evil not to, 'and those who are in evil are in weakness and not in force'.[12]

Nevertheless, criticism about Bardaisan's belief in seven ουσιαι or ʿitye (substances) that pre-existed Creation, from which God fashioned everything, was more accurate and may have put Bardaisan beyond the bounds of mainstream orthodoxy.[13] "Bardaisan refers only to the elements as ʿitye, not to plants or animals", though he also uses the term to refer to the seven planets.[14] Even so, Bardaisan clearly described these celestial beings as created beings subordinate to God.[15]

Encounter with religious men from India

[edit]

Porphyry states that on one occasion at Edessa, Bardaisan interviewed an Indian deputation of holy men (Ancient Greek: Σαρμαναίοι "śramaṇas") who had been sent to the Roman emperor Elagabalus or another Severan emperor, and questioned them as to the nature of Indian religion. The encounter is described in Porphyry De abstin., iv, 17[16] and Stobaeus (Eccles., iii, 56, 141):

For the polity of the Indians being distributed into many parts, there is one tribe among them of men divinely wise, whom the Greeks are accustomed to call Gymnosophists. But of these there are two sects, one of which the Bramins preside over, the Samanaeans the other.[17] The race of the Bramins, however, receive divine wisdom of this kind by succession, in the same manner as the priesthood. But the Samanaeans are elected, and consist of those who wish to possess divine knowledge. And the particulars respecting them are the following, as the Babylonian Bardaisan narrates, who lived in the times of our fathers, and was familiar with those Indians who, together with Damadamis, were sent to Caesar. All the Bramins originate from one stock; for all of them are derived from one father and one mother. But the Samanaeans are not the offspring of one family, being, as we have said, collected from every nation of Indians.

— Porphyry De abstin., IV

Exile and death

[edit]

Eventually, after 353 years of existence, the Osrhoenic kingdom came to an end by the Romans under Caracalla. Taking advantage of the anti-Christian faction in Edessa, the Romans captured Abgar IX and sent him in chains to Rome. Though he was urged by a friend of Caracalla to apostatize, Bardaisan stood firm, saying that he feared not death, as he would in any event have to undergo it, even though he should now submit to the emperor. At the age of sixty-three he was forced to take refuge in the fortress of Ani in Armenia and tried to preach there, but with little success. He also composed a history of the Armenian kings.[8] He died at the age of sixty-eight, either at Ani or at Edessa. According to Michael the Syrian, Bardaisan had besides Harmonius two other sons, called Abgarun and Hasdu.[7]

Bardaisanite school

[edit]

The followers of Bardaisan (the Bardaisanites) continued his teachings in a sect of the 2nd century deemed heretical by later Christians. Bardaisan's son, Harmonius, is considered to have strayed farther from the path of orthodoxy. Educated at Athens, he added to the Babylonian astrology of his father Greek ideas concerning the soul, the birth and destruction of bodies and a sort of metempsychosis.[7]

A certain Marinus, a follower of Bardaisan and a dualist, who is addressed in the "Dialogue of Adamantius", held the doctrine of a twofold primeval being; for the devil, according to him is not created by God. He was also a Docetist, as he denied Christ's birth of a woman. Bardaisan's form of gnosticism influenced Manichaeism.[7]

Ephrem the Syrian's zealous efforts to suppress this powerful heresy were not entirely successful. Rabbula, Bishop of Edessa in 431–432, found it flourishing everywhere. Its existence in the seventh century is attested by Jacob of Edessa; in the eighth by George, Bishop of the Arabs; in the tenth by the historian al-Masudi; and even in the twelfth by al-Shahrastani. Bardaisanism seems to have merged first into Valentinianism and then into common Manichaeism.[7]

Doctrine

[edit]

Various opinions have been formed as to the real doctrine of Bardesanes. As early as Hippolytus (Philosophumena, VI, 50) his doctrine was described as a variety of Valentinianism, the most popular form of Gnosticism. Adolf Hilgenfeld in 1864 defended this view, based mainly on extracts from St. Ephrem, who devoted his life to combating Bardaisanism in Edessa.[7] However, it has been argued that the strong and fervent expressions of St. Ephrem against the Bardaisanites of his day are not a fair criterion of the doctrine of their master. The extraordinary veneration of his own countrymen, the very reserved and half-respectful allusion to him in the early Fathers, and above all the "Book of the Laws of the Countries" suggest a milder view of Bardaisan's aberrations.[7]

Like the Early Christians, Bardaisan believed in an Almighty God, Creator of heaven and earth, whose will is absolute, and to whom all things are subject. God endowed man with freedom of will to work out his salvation and allowed the world to be a mixture of good and evil, light and darkness. All things, even those we now consider inanimate, have a measure of liberty. In all of them the light has to overcome the darkness.[7]

Al-Shahrastani states: "The followers of Daisan believe in two elements, light and darkness. The light causes the good, deliberately and with free will; the darkness causes the evil, but by force of nature and necessity. They believe that light is a living thing, possessing knowledge, might, perception and understanding; and from it movement and life take their source; but that darkness is dead, ignorant, feeble, rigid and soulless, without activity and discrimination; and they hold that the evil within them is the outcome of their nature and is done without their co-operation".[18]

He apparently denied the resurrection of the body, although he believed Christ's body was endowed with incorruptibility as with a special gift. Bardaisan postulated that after six thousand years this Earth would have an end, and a world without evil would take its place.[7]

Bardaisan also thought the sun, moon and planets were living beings, to whom, under God, the government of this world was largely entrusted; and though man was free, he was strongly influenced for good or for evil by the constellations. According to St. Ephrem, Sun and Moon were considered male and female principles, and the ideas of heaven amongst the Bardaisanites were not without an admixture of sensuality (or "obscenities"). Led by the fact that "spirit" is feminine in Syriac, Bardaisan might have held unorthodox views on the Trinity.[7]

Bardaisan's cosmology and commentary on it only survives in much later sources, but can be outlined as follows. The world began with the four pure and uncreated elements of light, wind, fire, water, respectively located in East, West, South, North (and are each able to move throughout their own, individual regions). Above the plane on which these four pure elements rest is the Lord, and below is the darkness. At one time and by chance, the four pure elements exceeded their boundaries and began to mix. Taking up the opportune chance, darkness also mixed with them. Distressed, the elements appeal to God to separate the darkness from them, but God is only partially successful in this procedure. The Lord uses the mix to create the world, but the remaining darkness in the mix acts as the cause of evil in the world since then and until today. The world is allotted a period of 6,000 years to exist. Purifications through conception and birth take place, but at the end of the allotted period for the Earth, a definitive purification will take place that will expunge darkness from the world.[19]

Patristics scholar Ilaria Ramelli has argued that Bardaisan may have been one of the first Christian supporters of apokatastasis (universal restoration),[20] citing especially the following passage in Bardaisan's Book of the Laws of Countries as evidence for his belief in this doctrine:

There will come a time when even this capacity for harm that remains in [mankind] will be brought to an end by the instruction that will obtain in a different arrangement of things. And, once that new world will be constituted, all evil movements will cease, all rebellions will come to an end, and the fools will be persuaded, and the lacks will be filled, and there will be safety and peace, as a gift of the Lord of all natures.[21]

Writings

[edit]

Bardaisan apparently was a voluminous author. Though nearly all his works have perished, references to the following survive:[7]

  • Dialogues against Marcion and Valentinus.[22]
  • Dialogue "Against Fate" addressed to an Antoninus. Whether this Antoninus is merely a friend of Bardaisan or a Roman emperor and, in the latter case, which of the Antonines is meant, is a matter of controversy. It is also uncertain whether this dialogue is identical with "The Book of the Laws of the Countries", of which later on.[23]
  • A "Book of Psalms", 150 in number, in imitation of David's Psalter.[24] These psalms became famous in the history of Edessa; their words and melodies lived for generations on the lips of the people. Only when St. Ephrem composed hymns in the same pentasyllabic metre and had them sung to the same tunes as the psalms of Bardaisan, did the latter gradually lose favour. A few of Bardaisan's hymns probably survive in the Gnostic Acts of Thomas; the Hymn of the Pearl (or "Hymn on the Soul"); the "Espousals of Wisdom"; the consecratory prayer at Baptism and at Holy Communion. Of these only the "Hymn of the Pearl" is generally acknowledged to be by Bardesanes, the authorship of the others is doubtful.[7]
  • Astrologico-theological treatises, in which his peculiar tenets were expounded. They are referred to by St. Ephrem, and amongst them was a treatise on light and darkness. A fragment of an astronomical work by Bardaisan was preserved by George, Bishop of the Arab tribes, and republished by Nau.[25]
  • A "History of Armenia". Moses of Chorene[26] states that Bardaisan, "having taken refuge in the fortress of Ani, read there the temple records in which also the deeds of kings were chronicled; to these he added the events of his own time. He wrote all in Syriac, but his book was afterwards translated into Greek". Though the correctness of this statement is not quite above suspicion, it probably has a foundation in fact.[7]
  • "An Account of India". Bardaisan obtained his information from the Indian śramaṇas (wandering ascetic) ambassadors to the Roman Emperor Elagabalus. A few extracts are preserved by Porphyry and Stobaeus.[27]
  • "Book of the Laws of the Countries". This famous dialogue, the oldest remnant not only of Bardaisanite learning, but even of Syriac literature, aside from a translation of the Bible, is not by Bardaisan himself, but by a certain Philip, his disciple.[7] The main speaker, however, in the dialogue is Bardaisan. Excerpts of this work are extant in Greek in Eusebius[28] and in Caesarius;[29] in Latin in the "Recognitions" of Pseudo-Clement[30] A complete Syriac text was first published from a sixth- or seventh-century manuscript in the British Museum by William Cureton, in his Spicilegium Syriacum (London, 1855), and by Nau. It is disputed whether the original was in Syriac or in Greek; Nau is decided in favour of the former. Against a questioning disciple called Abida, Bardaisan seeks to show that man's actions are not entirely necessitated by Fate, as the outcome of stellar combinations. From the fact that the same laws, customs and manners often prevail amongst all persons living in a certain district, or through locally scattered living under the same traditions, Bardaisan endeavours to show that the position of the stars at the birth of individuals can have but little to do with their subsequent conduct, hence the title "Book of the Laws of the Countries".[7]
  • "Gospel of Bardesanes".[31]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bardaisan

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Bardaisan (Syriac: ܒܪ ܕܝܨܢ, Bar Daisan; c. 154 – c. 222 CE) was an early Syriac Christian scholar, philosopher, theologian, and poet from (modern , ), renowned as the earliest known author in the and a key figure in synthesizing emerging Christian doctrine with elements of Greek philosophy, , and regional customs. Active during the late second and early third centuries at the court of King Abgar VIII (r. 177–212 CE), he composed hymns, s, and treatises that explored human against astral , cosmology, and the variability of laws across peoples, most notably preserved in the Book of the Laws of the Countries, a attributed to him but recorded by his disciple . Bardaisan's teachings emphasized enabled by amid natural influences, influencing Syriac intellectual traditions while drawing later orthodox critiques for perceived heterodox leanings toward dualism and encratism, though primary sources portray him as a defender of Christianity's compatibility with reasoned .

Biography

Early Life and Education

Bardaisan was born on 11 July 154 in Edessa, the capital of the kingdom of Osroene in northern Mesopotamia (modern Şanlıurfa, Turkey). The precise date derives from the Chronicle of Edessa, a contemporary Syriac historical record that aligns with the Seleucid era reckoning of 465 Tammuz. Shortly after his birth, Bardaisan's parents, who adhered to pagan traditions, relocated the family to Hierapolis (Mabbug) in northern Syria, approximately 100 kilometers west of Edessa. There, he received his early education under a pagan instructor, immersing him in Hellenistic learning amid a culturally diverse environment influenced by Greco-Roman, Syrian, and local religious customs. Coming from a family of wealth and , Bardaisan benefited from an elite upbringing that included rigorous training in , , and the liberal arts available in the region, as well as exposure to royal circles—he was reportedly raised alongside a prince of the Edessan royal house under King Abgar VIII. This education equipped him with proficiency in Syriac and Greek, fostering his later compositions in verse and that engaged philosophical and theological debates.

Conversion and Preaching Activity

Bardaisan underwent around 179 CE, at approximately age 25, following exposure to the homilies of Hystaspes, bishop of ; he received catechetical instruction, was baptized, and subsequently admitted to , likely as a or . This event marked his transition from prior philosophical and astrological interests, prompting a reevaluation of doctrines like in light of Christian teachings on . Following his baptism, Bardaisan engaged in active preaching within , emphasizing scriptural exposition to the populace and leveraging his court connections—having been educated alongside the royal heirs under King Abgar VIII (r. 177–212 CE)—to propagate doctrine. He played a pivotal role in the conversion of Abgar VIII to circa 200 CE, after which the king declared it the official religion of , facilitating widespread baptisms and the establishment of as the first Christian state. Bardaisan's influence extended to organizing ecclesiastical practices, including the formation of a divided into male and female sections for liturgical singing, which supported evangelistic efforts amid a predominantly pagan environment. His preaching activities reportedly induced Abgar VIII to oversee the of much of Edessa's population, solidifying Christianity's institutional foothold before Roman intervention under in 214 CE disrupted the kingdom. These efforts, grounded in dialogues and hymns, targeted both elites and commoners, countering prevailing pagan and astrological customs with arguments for human agency under divine oversight.

Encounters with Foreign Traditions

Bardaisan engaged with foreign intellectual traditions primarily through personal contacts and reports from travelers and diplomats in , a cosmopolitan trade hub on routes connecting the with Persia and . Around 195 CE, during Emperor Septimius Severus's visit to the court of King Abgar VIII, Bardaisan met the Roman scholar Julius Africanus, whose writings on and reflected Graeco-Roman learning; this encounter likely facilitated exchange on topics such as and possibly , given Africanus's interests. In his Book of the Laws of Countries (circa 196 CE), Bardaisan drew on accounts from Indian ambassadors to describe ascetics who abstained from meat and practiced , contrasting them with "Samanaeans" (likely wandering ascetics akin to early Buddhists or Jain ) who rejected and ; these details underscore his awareness of diverse Indian religious practices, obtained via diplomatic or mercantile channels rather than direct travel. He also referenced Persian customs, including Zoroastrian allowances for close-kin marriages, which defied astrological by varying across regions despite shared stellar influences. Bardaisan composed a now-lost on (Indica), indicating deeper engagement with South Asian philosophy and cosmology, possibly influenced by Parthian-era exchanges predating Sassanid rule. His family's flight from a revolt in Persia around 154 CE provided indirect familiarity with Iranian traditions, though his critiques emphasized cultural variability over fatalistic inheritance. These interactions informed his rejection of astral fatalism, arguing that human laws and choices, as observed in Serians (Chinese), , and others, superseded cosmic influences.

Later Years, Exile, and Death

In his later years, Bardaisan continued to lead a influential school in , producing hymns, dialogues, and treatises that shaped Syriac Christian thought, while his followers formed a dominant community in the city until the fifth century. Around 216 CE, during Roman Emperor Caracalla's campaign in and visit to —which involved the deposition and execution of King Abgar IX—Bardaisan reportedly faced inducements from associates of the emperor to renounce but affirmed his commitment, prioritizing eternal consequences over temporal threats. This episode reflects the precarious status of Edessan amid Roman-Parthian tensions, though no contemporary accounts detail formal persecution targeting Bardaisan personally. Bardaisan died in 222 CE at age 68, remaining in where his community thrived post-mortem until suppressed by Bishop Rabbula around 435 CE, who razed Bardaisanite worship sites and enforced orthodoxy. Later medieval traditions, including those preserved by and Armenian chroniclers like of Chorene, assert that Bardaisan was exiled to —possibly to the fortress of —amid Caracalla-era upheavals, where he allegedly composed works on Armenian and Indian traditions before dying there; however, these accounts derive from secondary sources centuries removed and appear to serve hagiographic or nationalistic aims, lacking support from earlier witnesses like Julius Africanus. His theological legacy persisted through disciples such as Addai and his son Harmonius, influencing subsequent despite orthodox condemnations.

Philosophical Contributions

Critique of Astrology and Fate

Bardaisan of (c. 154–222 AD) developed his critique of and fate primarily in the Book of the Laws of Countries, a Syriac attributed to him and likely composed around 196–201 AD, where he engages pupils in refuting deterministic views prevalent in Hellenistic and Babylonian traditions. In this work, he rejects the notion that celestial bodies rigidly dictate through an inexorable fate (), arguing instead that such undermines and divine justice. He contends that if astral influences fully determined actions, individuals born under identical stellar configurations—such as twins or contemporaries—would exhibit uniform conduct, yet empirical observation reveals otherwise, as people vary in virtues and vices despite shared nativities. Central to Bardaisan's reasoning is the distinction between natural influences and human agency: while he acknowledges that elemental forces, including celestial bodies, exert a general sway over bodily dispositions and environmental habits (e.g., colder climates fostering certain temperaments), these do not compel the rational , which possesses innate to align with or resist such tendencies. He illustrates this through ethnographic examples, cataloging diverse among peoples like Indians, who practice and sati in some cases, versus Persians or Romans, who do not, despite overlapping astrological influences; these variations, he asserts, stem from deliberate choices shaped by laws and rather than stellar compulsion. This anti-fatalist stance aligns with his post-conversion Christian framework, postulating a sovereign who endows humanity with to choose good or evil, thereby preserving accountability for or damnation. Bardaisan's position concedes a limited, non-deterministic role to stars—as signs or secondary causes under divine oversight—rather than denying their existence outright, a nuance that drew later criticism from figures like for bordering on astrological concession. Nonetheless, his emphasis on over astral predestination prefigures similar arguments in of Alexandria, who echoed the rejection of while adapting it to Platonic influences. Empirical diversity in human laws and behaviors, Bardaisan maintains, empirically falsifies strict , as uniform stellar governance would preclude such cultural and ethical divergences observed across regions from to .

Cosmological and Scientific Views

Bardaisan's cosmological framework posited a structured originating from eternal substances organized by divine intervention, featuring in the heights, four primary elements in the middle realms, and darkness in the depths. These elements— positioned to the east, to the north, and and in intermediary states—were conceived as composed of indissoluble atoms (perdē) varying in weight, texture, color, smell, and taste, reflecting an atomistic perspective akin to ancient materialist philosophies but subordinated to theological order. Darkness, characterized as cold, heavy, and inactive, contrasted with the lighter, dynamic elements and ascended through disturbances to mingle with them, prompting the need for cosmic separation and arrangement. The process of creation involved God's infusion of life into these substances, with facilitating the initial mingling of elements to form the world, which was then placed in a central position to stabilize the mixture and prevent further chaotic blending. The divine Word (, identified with Christ) played a restorative role by separating from , ordering the elements, and imposing finite existence on the , initiating a gradual purification through natural processes like conception and birth, culminating in eschatological completion. This system emphasized a hierarchical order where elemental forces and planetary bodies operated as instruments of God's , exerting influences over physical phenomena such as , , and societal conditions, yet bound by fixed divine commandments rather than autonomous fate. In scientific terms, Bardaisan rejected astral determinism while acknowledging the observable effects of celestial bodies; stars and planets, created by God, govern uncontrollable aspects of human life (e.g., birthplace, physical form) according to unalterable laws but possess no free will and remain subject to ultimate divine judgment. Elements like water, wind, and earth similarly followed predetermined patterns without agency, serving as mediums for cosmic governance rather than sources of inevitable destiny, allowing human free will to operate within this ordered framework. His views integrated empirical observations of natural diversity—such as varying customs and environments—with a causal realism attributing uniformity to divine law and variability to elemental interactions, countering fatalistic interpretations prevalent in contemporary Chaldean and Hellenistic astrology.

Theological Doctrines

Anthropology and Human Nature

Bardaisan articulated a tripartite , viewing humans as composed of (or reason, maḍʿā in Syriac), , and body, with the concealed within the as the seat of rational agency. The functions as a subtle, corporeal —lighter than the body but —formed from primordial elements (ītyē) and serving as an intermediary that "wears" the body like a garment while enabling the 's operation in the world. This structure posits primarily in the , where the governs moral and volitional capacities, distinct from the body's subjection to elemental necessities and decay. The body, derived from coarser material origins associated with cosmic "darkness," is secondary to human essence and inherently transient, subject to dissolution irrespective of moral failings like Adam's sin. Bardaisan maintained that souls originate independently of bodily formation, potentially preexistent or drawn from ethereal substances, and retain an innate orientation toward divine refuge amid cosmic adversities. In this framework, embodies a tension between deterministic physical constraints—governed by and partially by fate's archons—and the liberating of the intellect-soul complex, which empowers individuals to deliberate and act beyond stellar influences. Central to Bardaisan's anthropology is the endowment of free will (bar ḥīrūtā) as intrinsic to human nature, surpassing the volition of mere elemental beings and enabling self-justification or condemnation through choices aligned with or against divine order. He argued that while fate dictates external conditions like health or social status, the mind's dominion allows universal override via rational assent to law, as evidenced by cross-cultural variations in behavior that defy astrological uniformity. This capacity underscores human distinctiveness, positioning free will not as illusory but as a causal force rooted in the intellect's superiority, essential for ethical accountability and soteriological progress toward purification by the divine Word.

Soteriology and Free Will

Bardaisan maintained that human beings possess an inherent free will (bar nāšā), granted by God as part of their spiritual nature, which operates independently of astrological fate or deterministic forces. This capacity enables individuals to make moral choices between good and evil, unaffected by the configurations of stars or zodiac at birth, as he argued in dialogues refuting Chaldean astrology. Free will, in his view, distinguishes humans from purely natural or fateful constraints, allowing ethical deliberation even amid physical necessities like growth or reproduction. In soteriological terms, Bardaisan linked to the doctrine of universal restoration (apokatastasis), positing that all souls could ultimately return to through Christ's redemptive work, which counters the soul's entrapment following Adam's primordial misuse of freedom. This fall obstructed the soul's ascent through heavenly spheres, but divine provides the means for voluntary reconciliation, emphasizing 's goodness over . Unlike deterministic systems such as Valentinian or , Bardaisan's framework rejects , insisting that salvation hinges on human choice rather than irrevocable fate, thereby preserving moral accountability. This integration of free will and soteriology served Bardaisan's broader apologetic against pagan fatalism, as seen in The Book of the Laws of the Countries, where he illustrates that ethical actions—such as martyrdom or —transcend stellar influences, ensuring that divine providence respects human agency in the path to salvation. He distinguished from nature's laws, arguing that while bodily processes may align with cosmic order, volitional assent to enables eschatological restoration for all, without coercion.

Ethics and Critique of Customs

Bardaisan's ethical framework emphasized human (bar nāšā) as the foundation for , enabling individuals to choose virtue over vice independently of astrological fate or . In the Book of the Laws of the Countries (c. 200 CE), he argues that endowed humanity with this faculty to foster , allowing ethical discernment between actions that lead to or condemnation. Free will, he contends, operates through rational persuasion and knowledge, where the mind (reʿyānā) governs impulses, aligning with divine order rather than compulsion. To refute fatalism, Bardaisan catalogues diverse customs (nāmōsē) across regions, demonstrating that peoples under identical stellar influences exhibit stark behavioral variations, attributable solely to voluntary choice. Examples include practicing while neighboring Gelians permit ; Magians exposing the elderly to dogs versus Parthians' honorable of kin; and Indians abstaining from carrion in contrast to others' consumption. These disparities, he asserts, prove stem from human liberty, not cosmic necessity, as "the laws of the countries are different, and the of the peoples are diverse, yet the are the same for all." Bardaisan critiques customs fostering sin—such as ritual prostitution among certain Indians, among Greeks, or idolatrous practices among pagans—as erroneous exercises of , arising from rather than inherent compulsion. He contrasts these with , where believers, illuminated by truth, reject corrupt local norms universally, maintaining consistent virtues like , restraint from , and rejection of regardless of locale. This transcendence underscores ethics as alignment with God's rational law, achievable through free adherence rather than cultural inertia. Hellenistic influences, including Stoic notions of rational self-control and Platonic hierarchy of soul over body, inform his view of as deliberate mastery of desires, though subordinated to Christian before .

Literary Works

Extant Dialogues and Treatises

The Book of the Laws of the Countries, also known as the Dialogue on Fate, stands as the sole fully extant prose work linked to Bardaisan, composed in Syriac by his disciple in the late second century CE and presenting Bardaisan's oral teachings. Structured as a philosophical among Bardaisan, , and disciples like Avida and Bar Shu, it addresses core questions on divine permission of evil, human sin, and the tension between celestial influences and . The text opens with Avida's into why an omnipotent God did not create sin-proof humans, leading Bardaisan to affirm as essential to genuine goodness, distinct from coerced obedience. Central to the treatise is Bardaisan's refutation of astrological determinism, arguing that stellar powers govern natural elements like wind and seasons but lack sway over rational endowed with by . To illustrate, the dialogue catalogs diverse human customs across regions—such as the Seres' despite Mars' warlike influence, Brahmins' amid Venusian temptations, Persians' exposure of weak infants contrary to lunar effects, and Magi's rejection of adultery—demonstrating that voluntary laws and choices supersede purported fatalistic constraints. These ethnographic examples underscore causal agency rooted in the soul's admixture with the body, enabling humans to align with or defy cosmic orders, with for deeds ensured by post-mortem . Preserved in a fifth-century Syriac manuscript, the work survives alongside variant Greek recensions, offering primary evidence for Bardaisan's anti-fatalist cosmology and , though scholars note potential later interpolations diluting pure attribution to his views. No other complete dialogues or treatises by Bardaisan endure; fragmentary citations in Ephrem Syrus (d. 373) and later Syriac authors like Theodore bar Konai (8th century) preserve echoes of a separate cosmological exposition on primordial entities and creation, but these lack independent textual integrity.

Hymns, Poetry, and Lost Texts

Bardaisan composed a substantial body of hymns and in Syriac, which were accompanied by musical innovations such as the use of the cithara and other instruments, marking a departure from earlier unaccompanied psalmody in Edessene . His disciple Harmonius is credited with setting these compositions to elaborate melodies, contributing to their widespread performance and influence on subsequent Syriac liturgical traditions. Ephrem the Syrian reports that Bardaisan produced 150 modeled after the biblical of David, though this figure may reflect polemical exaggeration to parallel scriptural . Few direct fragments of Bardaisan's hymns survive intact, with most knowledge derived from quotations in adversarial sources critiquing their doctrinal content, such as cosmogonic narratives emphasizing primordial elements and angelic roles in creation. Ephrem preserves snippets in his Hymns against Heresies (e.g., CH 55), attributing them to Bardaisan's school and highlighting themes of fate, free will, and anti-astrological motifs interwoven with poetic imagery. These verses demonstrate Bardaisan's skill in rhythmic, metrical Syriac verse, which blended philosophical argumentation with devotional expression, though their heterodox elements—per Ephrem—promoted views diverging from emerging Nicene orthodoxy. Beyond hymns, Bardaisan's lost prose texts include the Indica, a treatise drawing on accounts from Indian envoys visiting the court of around 218–222 CE, detailing ascetic practices, , and communal customs unbound by fate or . Fragments of this work are cited by Porphyry in De Styge, preserving Bardaisan's ethnographic observations as evidence against deterministic cosmologies, including descriptions of Indians rejecting planetary influences in favor of voluntary ethical choices. Other attested but unrecovered titles, such as a Of Domnus and treatises on stellar dominions, are referenced obliquely in patristic refutations, suggesting a broader corpus engaging , astronomy, and now known primarily through second-hand Syriac and Greek excerpts. The scarcity of primary manuscripts underscores reliance on transmitters like Ephrem, whose citations, while biased against Bardaisan's dualistic leanings, provide the core evidentiary base for reconstructing these compositions.

The Bardaisanite School

Formation and Key Followers

The Bardaisanite school emerged in during the late second century CE, centered on the teachings of Bardaisan (c. 154–222 CE), who gathered disciples to explore , , scriptural , and scientific inquiry, particularly emphasizing human against deterministic astrological influences. Operating under the patronage of King Abgar VIII (r. 177–212 CE), the school functioned as an intellectual circle rather than a formal institution, producing dialogues, hymns, and treatises that challenged prevailing fatalistic customs while integrating elements of Syriac Christian doctrine with broader Hellenistic knowledge. Following 's incorporation into the in 214 CE, the group persisted as a distinct community, supplanting Marcionite influence and becoming the dominant Christian faction in the region by the early third century. Among Bardaisan's primary disciples was (Philippus), who documented key teachings in The Book of the Laws of the Countries (c. 200–222 CE), a dialogue featuring Bardaisan as the central interlocutor debating fate, , and diverse cultural laws with skeptics like Abida. 's role extended beyond transcription, as he likely edited or composed the work to propagate Bardaisan's arguments, preserving ethnographic observations on global customs to illustrate variability in human practices unbound by stellar necessity. Bardaisan's son, Harmonius, also played a crucial part, collaborating on Syriac hymns to disseminate doctrines through music and studying Greek philosophy in , which introduced Hellenistic elements to the school's cosmological and ethical frameworks. Abida, another interlocutor in Philip's dialogue, represented inquiring followers engaging Bardaisan's views on whether celestial bodies dictate human actions, prompting expositions that affirmed within a divinely ordered . These core adherents ensured the school's doctrinal continuity after Bardaisan's death in 222 CE, with the group maintaining influence for centuries despite emerging orthodox critiques, evolving into a noted for its poetic and argumentative output.

Doctrinal Distinctives and Practices

The Bardaisanite school emphasized human (ḥērūṯā) as paramount against the of fate and astral influences, positing that individuals retain volition in moral decisions despite planetary governance over mundane affairs like health or prosperity. In the Book of the Laws of the Countries, diverse regional customs—such as the Serians' prohibition of , Brahmans' , or ' consanguineous marriages—are explained not by innate or inescapable fate but by deliberate human legislation, allowing peoples to deviate from celestial decrees through choice and thus ensuring based on accountability. This framework subordinated , which Bardaisan incorporated through teachings on zodiacal signs and the seven planets as living entities under , to ethical rather than fatalistic control. Cosmologically, adherents described a primordial disorder where darkness mingled with the four lighter elements (, , , ) within spatial bounds ordained by , necessitating the intervention of the Word (Christ) for separation and order, a integrating dualistic elements without strict matter-spirit opposition. Later sources like Barḥadbešabbā () attributed to the school a denial of , potentially reflecting doctrinal evolution or polemical distortion amid Ephrem's critiques, though primary texts affirm volitional agency. Practices centered on hymnody and communal psalmody, with Bardaisan composing approximately 150 hymns in pentasyllabic meter, often accompanied musically to imitate David's and attract younger adherents, forming a core of worship that Ephrem Syrus (d. 373) countered by adapting the same tunes for orthodox compositions. The community supplemented Old and scriptures with extra revelations, fostering an intellectual milieu of dialogues and poetry, though no unique sacraments or rituals like specialized baptisms are attested distinctly from broader Edessene . Some accounts suggest soteriological significance attached to sexual union, possibly as a means of elemental recombination, but this remains speculative and tied to later interpretations.

Reception and Controversies

Praise from Contemporaries

Bardaisan enjoyed admiration from key contemporaries for his intellectual prowess, eloquence, and multifaceted talents, which positioned him as a prominent figure in the court of . Julius Africanus (c. 160–c. 240 CE), a Christian chronographer and traveler who visited the region, personally witnessed Bardaisan demonstrating exceptional skills during a display at the court of King Abgar VIII (r. 177–212 CE), where he executed precise trick shots that impressed observers with their technical virtuosity. Africanus further characterized Bardaisan as personable and charming, underscoring his interpersonal appeal and rhetorical gifts that complemented his reputation as a philosopher. Bardaisan's close relationship with Abgar VIII exemplified this esteem, as the two were educated together in Greco-Roman and Bardaisan served as a trusted dignitary and advisor in the royal court, roles that required and reflected the king's confidence in his scholarly acumen and strategic insight. This patronage under a ruler who fostered in —evident in Abgar's decrees against pagan practices—indicates Bardaisan's influence extended to shaping cultural and religious discourse, with his presence at court signaling high regard for his contributions to and .

Orthodox Christian Criticisms

St. (c. 306–373 AD), a prominent defender of Nicene orthodoxy in the Syriac tradition, leveled extensive criticisms against Bardaisan and his followers, viewing their teachings as a distortion of apostolic through philosophical and speculative cosmology. In his Hymns on Heresies (particularly Hymns 1–22 and 41), Ephrem targeted the Bardaisanites' adherence to astrological influences and notions of fate, arguing that such views undermined and human accountability by attributing excessive power to celestial bodies, even if Bardaisan himself had nominally refuted . Ephrem contended that this compromise ceded ground to pagan , portraying the Bardaisanites as persisting in "misguided trust in horoscopes" despite Christian emphasis on free moral choice under God's sovereignty. Ephrem's Prose Refutations (I–II) further excoriate Bardaisan's cosmological framework, which posited a mingling of primordial elements or "beings" as the basis for creation, accusing him of deifying these entities and thereby introducing polytheistic or quasi-dualistic principles alien to scriptural . In Hymn on Heresies 41.7, Ephrem explicitly states that Bardaisan "has made other gods out of the 'beings,'" but these false gods lack true power, reflecting a of Bardaisan's system as elevating created substances to divine co-equality and echoing pagan or proto-Gnostic myths rather than the ex nihilo creation affirmed in Genesis. This perspective positioned Bardaisan as a precursor to Mani, with Ephrem highlighting doctrinal parallels in dualistic separations of light and darkness or matter and spirit, which he saw as fracturing the unity of God's singular creative act. Additionally, Ephrem faulted Bardaisan's heavy reliance on Greek philosophy—misapplying Platonic ideas of forms and Stoic materialism— as failing to distinguish properly between these systems, resulting in a hybrid that subordinated biblical to rational . He labeled Bardaisan the "Aramaic philosopher," implying an overemphasis on that diluted orthodox soteriology and ecclesial tradition. Ephrem's poetic counter-hymns, designed to supplant Bardaisan's innovative Syriac hymnody, served as both theological rebuttal and liturgical weapon, urging the faithful in to reject these "heretical songs" as vehicles for error. These critiques, rooted in Ephrem's scriptural hermeneutic, framed Bardaisanite as a subtle erosion of Trinitarian , prioritizing empirical fidelity to patristic consensus over innovative reinterpretations.

Accusations of Gnosticism and Heresy

Ephrem the Syrian, a prominent 4th-century theologian, vehemently criticized Bardaisan and his followers as heretics in his Hymns Against Heresies (c. 363–373 CE), grouping their doctrines with those of Marcion and Mani under the umbrella of Syrian gnostic deviations, particularly targeting their cosmological views on the mingling of primordial elements and astral influences as incompatible with orthodox creation theology. Ephrem accused the Bardaisanites of promoting a form of fatalism disguised as free will, where human natures were determined by mixtures of five eternal elements (light, darkness, spirit, fire, and air), echoing dualistic gnostic cosmogonies that posited matter as inherently flawed or oppositional to the divine. These charges portrayed Bardaisan's system as undermining the sovereignty of a singular creator God by attributing causal power to celestial bodies and pre-existent substances, a perspective Ephrem deemed astrologically pagan and akin to Valentinian emanationism, though without direct evidence of Bardaisan endorsing a demiurge. Later patristic sources, such as of Caesarea in his Ecclesiastical History (c. 325 CE), noted Bardaisan's reputation for stemming from his dialogues that, while initially refuting , allegedly spawned deviant sects emphasizing psychic and pneumatic distinctions among souls—hallmarks of gnostic anthropology that prioritized esoteric knowledge over faith and sacraments. Orthodox critics like bar Kepha (9th century) further condemned Bardaisanite denial of bodily , interpreting their emphasis on the soul's liberation from material mixtures as a gnostic rejection of the incarnation's physical reality, thereby aligning Bardaisan with broader heretical trends that devalued the flesh. However, these accusations often relied on polemical extrapolations from Bardaisan's school rather than his own extant works, such as the Book of the Laws of Countries (c. 200 CE), which affirms one , the goodness of creation, and human agency against astral —elements inconsistent with core gnostic tenets like radical dualism or salvific alone. Modern scholarly reassessments, drawing on Syriac and Greek fragments, challenge the gnostic label as an overgeneralization by orthodox polemicists, arguing that Bardaisan's integration of Aristotelian philosophy and Stoic cosmology into Christian monotheism represents philosophical eclecticism rather than systematic heresy, with Ephrem's critiques reflecting intra-Syriac rivalries more than precise doctrinal analysis. For instance, while Bardaisan's ontology of unmingled natures allowed for diversity in human dispositions, it rejected gnostic pessimism toward matter and emphasized ethical choice, a position Origen (c. 185–254 CE) cited approvingly without heretical censure, highlighting variability in early reception. Critics' associations with gnosticism may thus stem from superficial parallels in terminology, such as "mingling" (symploke), rather than substantive alignment, underscoring how heresy accusations in late antique Christianity often served to consolidate orthodoxy against regional intellectual traditions.

Legacy

Immediate Influence in Edessa

Bardaisan (c. 154–222 AD) founded a in that swiftly emerged as the leading Christian faction, supplanting the previously dominant Marcionites through direct polemics against their rejection of the material world and God. This group emphasized Bardaisan's doctrines of triumphing over astral fate, a creator God distinct from astrological determinism, and the soul's moral agency, which resonated amid Edessa's cosmopolitan mix of Syriac, Greek, and Parthian influences. By leveraging dialogues like the Book of the Laws of Countries—a Socratic-style critiquing deterministic customs across cultures—his followers positioned Edessene as intellectually robust against pagan and dualistic rivals. His son Harmonius played a key role in sustaining this momentum, collaborating on the composition of numerous Syriac hymns set to popular melodies, which served as vehicles for doctrinal transmission and evangelization, drawing in younger adherents and embedding Bardaisan's ideas in local and . These hymns, numbering over 200 according to later accounts, addressed themes of cosmic order, human liberty, and , achieving widespread recitation in 's streets and gatherings shortly after Bardaisan's death in 222 AD. The community's organizational maturity was evident in the of dedicated sites for rituals and teachings, reflecting institutional consolidation in the early third century before Roman annexation of in 214 AD under altered the regional dynamics. This immediate ascendancy stemmed from Bardaisan's court ties under King Abgar VIII (r. 177–212 AD), where his philosophical defenses of against astrologers and skeptics enhanced the faith's prestige among elites and commoners alike, fostering a school-like network of disciples who prioritized rational inquiry over ascetic dualism. Yet, even in this phase, tensions simmered with emerging proto-orthodox elements, as Bardaisanites' tolerance for cultural diversity and rejection of strict invited later scrutiny, though their hymns' enduring appeal necessitated countermeasures like Ephrem's compositions only a century later.

Long-Term Impact and Decline

Bardaisan's cosmological framework, emphasizing the mixture of and within the material world and the role of in human destiny, exerted a notable influence on the emerging Manichaean system in the third century CE. Mani (c. 216–274 CE), who visited and engaged with local Christian traditions, incorporated elements of Bardaisan's dualistic and rejection of , adapting them into a more pronounced cosmic dualism between and . This transmission is evident in shared motifs, such as the primordial separation of elements and the soul's entrapment in matter, which aligned Bardaisan's thought with Manichaeism's syncretic theology despite doctrinal divergences like Bardaisan's affirmation of a single creator God. The Book of the Laws of the Countries, attributed to Bardaisan, continued to circulate in Syriac Christian circles into , shaping debates on fate, , and moral agency even as his school faced condemnation. Orthodox theologians like (d. 373 CE) engaged extensively with Bardaisan's ideas in refutations, inadvertently preserving fragments of his dialogues and hymns while critiquing their perceived astrological . These texts influenced subsequent Syriac writings, including anonymous dialogues that echoed Bardaisan's emphasis on human choice over stellar influences, demonstrating a selective within broader Christian . The Bardaisanite sect, however, experienced gradual decline by the fifth century CE amid intensifying episcopal oversight in . Ephrem's polemics in the fourth century targeted their practices and hymns, but suppression efforts proved incomplete until Bishop Rabbula (r. 431–435 CE), who enforced , forcibly converted remaining adherents and demolished their assembly hall. By this period, the sect's distinct identity had eroded under Roman imperial alignment with Trinitarian post-Constantine, with surviving Bardaisanites likely assimilating into mainstream Syriac churches or dispersing amid regional persecutions. Bardaisan's direct lineage faded, though echoes of his philosophical inquiries persisted marginally in esoteric traditions until overshadowed by formalized doctrines.

Modern Scholarly Reassessments

Modern scholars have increasingly reassessed Bardaisan (c. 154–222 CE) as a pioneering Syriac Christian thinker whose doctrines align more closely with emerging orthodox Christianity than with Gnostic dualism, challenging earlier patristic portrayals of him as a heretic. Ilaria Ramelli's 2009 monograph argues that Bardaisan's cosmology, centered on a good creation by a single God and human free will as the cause of moral evil rather than inherent matter, reflects scriptural exegesis informed by Middle Platonism, not the radical dualism or docetism typical of Gnostic systems. This view posits Bardaisan as an innovator who defended Christian monotheism against pagan fatalism and astrological determinism prevalent in second-century Mesopotamia. Reassessments emphasize Bardaisan's anti-determinist arguments, particularly in his Book of the Laws of Countries (c. 200 CE), where he critiques by asserting that diverse human customs across regions demonstrate free choice overriding cosmic influences, a stance aligned with Stoic and Christian volitional ethics rather than Gnostic escapism from the material world. Ute Possekel's 2018 analysis traces his enduring influence on late antique , noting echoes in Ephrem the Syrian's hymns despite criticisms, and highlights Bardaisan's affirmation of bodily resurrection—albeit spiritualized—as consistent with proto-orthodox eschatology, countering accusations of soul-only immortality. Contemporary studies further portray the Bardaisanite school as a rationalist enclave in , fostering philosophical dialogue between , Hellenism, and local traditions without the encratite or mythologized aeons of . Scholars like Ramelli caution against overreliance on hostile sources such as Ephrem, whose polemics amplified deviations for rhetorical effect, urging instead a reconstruction from fragments like those in , which reveal Bardaisan's positive valuation of the body and sexuality as part of divine order. This shift underscores Bardaisan's role in early , bridging wisdom traditions with Greek to affirm ethical responsibility in a diverse .

References

  1. https://syri.ac/bardaisan
  2. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bardesanes-syr/
  3. https://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2024/08/eastern-and-northern-peoples-bardaisan-of-edessa-and-philippos-book-of-the-laws-of-countriessecond-third-centuries-ce/
  4. https://online.ucpress.edu/SLA/article/8/4/559/203779/Intellectual-Constructions-of-Free-WillBardaisan
  5. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789047407867/B9789047407867-s007.pdf
  6. https://hugoye.bethmardutho.org/article/hv21n1possekel
  7. https://sacred-texts.com/gno/fff/fff57.htm
  8. https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/info/bardesanes-cathen.html
  9. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ZAC.2006.033/html
  10. http://www.syriacmusic.com/articles.asp?type=article&id=12
  11. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/literature-and-culture-in-the-roman-empire-96235/cultural-translation-and-transformation/00B685066D51FCAD9EE7CBE11C822D9C
  12. https://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2023/05/indians-bardaisan-of-edessa-on-indian-ambassadors-tales-and-the-brahmans-early-third-century-ce/
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/journey-of-christianity-to-india-in-late-antiquity/movement-of-christianity-into-sasanian-persia-perspectives-and-sources/68B5335007765381188E1E79BBCBDBD8
  14. https://www.academia.edu/111628251/Bardaisans_Account_of_Indian_Religious_Practices_and_the_Identification_of_the_Described_Phenomena_on_the_Basis_of_Textual_and_Archaeological_Sources
  15. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0862.htm
  16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/intellectual-world-of-late-antique-christianity/dialogue-and-catalogue-fate-free-will-and-belief-in-the-book-of-the-laws-of-the-countries/88572D7F7C91C0E417D726E01E6D8E58
  17. https://www.syriacstudies.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/25-Bardaisan-and-Origin.pdf
  18. https://hugoye.bethmardutho.org/article/hv11n1possekel
  19. https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/bardaisan-on-human-nature-fate-and-free-will-9783161521218/
  20. https://aramean-dem.org/English/History/BARDAISAN%2520OF%2520EDESSA.pdf
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/origen-bardaisan-and-the-origin-of-universal-salvation/F3A457E9B04A9905B61069CE197F1247
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231766655_Origen_Bardaisan_and_the_Origin_of_Universal_Salvation
  23. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ZAC.2006.033/html?lang=en
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26566943
  25. https://www.gorgiaspress.com/the-book-of-the-laws-of-countries-dialogue-on-fate-of-bardaisan-of-edessa
  26. https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/spicilegium_3_bardesan.htm
  27. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004439573/BP000021.xml
  28. https://syri.ac/authors/bardai%25E1%25B9%25A3an?page=1
  29. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/16/article/856359
  30. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/pearse/morefathers/files/ephraim2_8_intro3.htm
  31. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bardesanes-syr
  32. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02293a.htm
  33. https://dokumen.pub/bardaisan-of-edessa-a-reassessment-of-the-evidence-and-a-new-interpretation-9781463216658-i-1933305.html
  34. https://online.ucpress.edu/sla/article/8/4/559/203779/Intellectual-Constructions-of-Free-WillBardaisan
  35. https://gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Abgarids-of-Edessa
  36. https://ccel.org/ccel/wace/biodict.html?term=Bardaisan%2C%2520Syrian%2520theologian
  37. https://www.syriacstudies.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/manichaeism2.pdf
  38. https://archive.org/download/proserefutations01ephruoft/proserefutations01ephruoft.pdf
  39. https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/ephraim1_0_intro.htm
  40. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.ix.xxx.html
  41. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EECO/SIM-00000385.xml?language=en
  42. https://gorgiaspress.com/bardaisan-of-edessa-a-reassessment-of-the-evidence-and-a-new-interpretation
  43. https://dokumen.pub/bardaisan-of-edessa-a-reassessment-of-the-evidence-and-a-new-interpretation-9781463216658.html
  44. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc0122
  45. http://www.insula.com.au/ahrel/bardaisan.html
  46. https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/ephraim2_8_intro3.htm
  47. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.31826/hug-2019-210105/pdf
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374067969_ONTOLOGICAL_SYSTEM_OF_BARDAISAN_-_FREE_WILL_AND_ETHICAL_COSMOLOGY
  49. https://www.academia.edu/23742143/Bardaisan_s_Psychology_Known_and_Unknown_Testimonies_and_Current_Scholarly_Perspectives_2015_
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.