Hubbry Logo
CrannogCrannogMain
Open search
Crannog
Community hub
Crannog
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Crannog
Crannog
Crannog
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A reconstructed crannog near Kenmore, Perth and Kinross, on Loch Tay, Scotland
Look up crannog in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

A crannog[1][2][3] (/ˈkrænəɡ/; Irish: crannóg [ˈkɾˠan̪ˠoːɡ]; Scottish Gaelic: crannag [ˈkʰɾan̪ˠak]) is typically a partially or entirely artificial island, usually constructed in lakes, bogs and estuarine waters of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Unlike the prehistoric pile dwellings around the Alps, which were built on shores and not inundated until later, crannogs were built in the water, thus forming artificial islands.

Humans have inhabited crannogs over five millennia, from the European Neolithic Period[4] to as late as the 17th/early-18th centuries.[3] In Scotland there is no convincing evidence in the archaeological record of their use in the Early or Middle Bronze Age or in the Norse period. The radiocarbon dating obtained from key sites such as Oakbank and Redcastle indicates at a 95.4 per cent confidence level that they date to the Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age. The date ranges fall after around 800 BC and so could be considered Late Bronze Age by only the narrowest of margins.[3][5]

Some crannogs apparently involved free-standing wooden structures, as at Loch Tay,[3] although more commonly they are composed of brush, stone or timber mounds that can be revetted with timber piles. In areas such as the Outer Hebrides of Scotland, timber was unavailable from the Neolithic era onwards.[6] As a result, crannogs made completely of stone and supporting drystone architecture are common there.[7]

Etymology and uncertain meanings

[edit]

The Irish word crannóg derives from Old Irish crannóc,[8] which referred to a wooden structure or vessel, stemming from crann, which means "tree", suffixed with "-óg" which is a diminutive ending ultimately borrowed from Welsh. The suffix -óg is sometimes misunderstood by non-native Irish-speakers as óg, which is a separate word that means "young". This misunderstanding leads to a folk etymology whereby crannóg is misanalysed as crann óg, which is pronounced differently and means "a young tree". The modern sense of the term first appears sometime around the 12th century; its popularity spread in the medieval period along with the terms isle, ylle, inis, eilean or oileán.[9][10]

There is some confusion on what the term crannog originally referred to, as the structure atop the island or the island itself.[9] The additional meanings of Irish crannóg can be variously related as 'structure/piece of wood', including 'crow's nest', 'pulpit', or 'driver's box on a coach'; 'vessel/box/chest' more generally; and 'wooden pin'.[11] The Scottish Gaelic form is crannag and has the additional meanings of 'pulpit' and 'churn'.[12] Thus, there is no real consensus on what the term crannog actually implies, although the modern adoption in the English language broadly refers to a partially or completely artificial islet that saw use from the prehistoric to the Post-Medieval period in Ireland and Scotland.[9]

Location

[edit]

Crannogs are widespread in Ireland, with an estimated 1,200 examples,[13] while Scotland has 389 sites officially listed as such.[14] The actual number in Scotland varies considerably depending on definition—between about 350 and 500, due to the use of the term "island dun" for well over one hundred Hebridean examples—a distinction that has created a divide between mainland Scottish crannog and Hebridean islet settlement studies.[15][16] Previously unknown crannogs in Scotland and Ireland are still being found as underwater surveys continue to investigate loch beds for completely submerged examples.[17]

The largest concentrations of crannogs in Ireland are found in the Drumlin Belt of the Midlands, North and Northwest. In Scotland, crannogs are mostly found on the western coast, with high concentrations in Argyll and Dumfries and Galloway.[5][18] In reality, the Western Isles contain the highest density of lake-settlements in Scotland, yet they are recognised under varying terms besides "crannog".[19] One lone Welsh example exists at Llangorse Lake, probably a product of Irish influence.[20]

In Ireland, crannogs were most prevalent in Connacht and Ulster; where they were built on bogs and small lakes such as Lough Conn and Lough Gara, while being less frequent on larger lakes such as Lough Erne, or rivers such as the Shannon.[21] Today, crannogs typically appear as small, circular islets, often 8–25 metres (30–80 ft) in diameter, covered in dense vegetation due to their inaccessibility to grazing livestock.[21] Reconstructed Irish crannógs are located at Craggaunowen, County Clare, in the Irish National Heritage Park, County Wexford and at Castle Espie, County Down. In Scotland there are reconstructions at the "Scottish Crannog Centre" at Loch Tay, Perthshire; this centre offers guided tours and hands-on activities, including wool-spinning, wood-turning and making fire, holds events to celebrate wild cooking and crafts, and hosts yearly Midsummer, Lughnasadh and Samhain festivals.[22]

Types and problems with definition

[edit]
A replica crannóg on Loch Tay

Crannogs took on many different forms and methods of construction based on what was available in the immediate landscape. The classic image of a prehistoric crannog stems from both post-medieval illustrations[13] and highly influential excavations, such as Milton Loch in Scotland by C. M. Piggot after World War II.[23] The Milton Loch interpretation is of a small islet surrounded or defined at its edges by timber piles and a gangway, topped by a typical Iron Age roundhouse.

The choice of a small islet as a home may seem odd today, yet waterways were the main channels for both communication and travel until the 19th century in much of Ireland and, especially, Highland Scotland. Crannogs are traditionally interpreted as simple prehistorical farmsteads. They are also interpreted as boltholes in times of danger, as status symbols with limited access, and as inherited locations of power that imply a sense of legitimacy and ancestry towards ownership of the surrounding landscape.

A strict definition of a crannog, which has long been debated, requires the use of timber.[2] Sites in the Western Isles do not satisfy this criterion, although their inhabitants shared the common habit of living on water.[2][15] If not classed as "true" crannogs, small occupied islets (often at least partially artificial in nature) may be referred to as "island duns".[7] Rather confusingly, 22 islet-based sites are classified as "proper" crannogs due to differing interpretations of inspectors or excavators who drew up field reports.[24]

Hebridean island dwellings or crannogs were commonly built on both natural and artificial islets, usually reached by a stone causeway. The visible structural remains are traditionally interpreted[25] as duns or, in more recent terminology, as "Atlantic roundhouses". This terminology has recently become popular when describing the entire range of robust, drystone structures that existed in later prehistoric Atlantic Scotland.[19]

The majority of crannog excavations were, by modern standards, poorly conducted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by early antiquarians, or were purely accidental finds as lochs were drained during the improvements to increase usable farmland or pasture.[26][27][28] In some early digs, labourers hauled away tons of materials, with little regard to anything that was not of immediate economic value. Conversely, the vast majority of early attempts at proper excavation failed to accurately measure or record stratigraphy, thereby failing to provide a secure context for artefact finds. Thus only extremely limited interpretations are possible. Preservation and conservation techniques for waterlogged materials such as logboats or structural material were all but non-existent, and a number of extremely important finds were destroyed as a result; in some instances, they were even dried out for firewood.[26]

Reconstructed crannog

From about 1900 to the late 1940s there was very little crannog excavation in Scotland, while some important and highly influential contributions were made in Ireland.[29][30][31] In contrast, relatively few crannogs have been excavated since the Second World War. This number has steadily grown, especially since the early 1980s, and may soon surpass prewar totals.[32][33][34] The overwhelming majority of crannogs show multiple phases of occupation and re-use, often extending over centuries. Thus the re-occupiers may have viewed crannogs as a legacy that was alive in local tradition and memory.

Crannog reoccupation is important and significant, especially in the many instances of crannogs built near natural islets, which were often completely unused. This long chronology of use has been verified by both radiocarbon dating and more precisely by dendrochronology.[32]

Interpretations of crannog function have not been static; instead they appear to have changed in both the archaeological and historic records. Rather than the simple domestic residences of prehistory, the medieval crannogs were increasingly seen as strongholds of the upper class or regional political players, such as the Gaelic chieftains of the O'Boylans and McMahons in County Monaghan and the Kingdom of Airgíalla, until the 17th century.[citation needed] In Scotland, the medieval and post-medieval use of crannogs is also documented into the early 18th century.[3][9] Whether this increase in status is real, or just a by-product of increasingly complex material assemblages, remains to be convincingly validated.[35]

History

[edit]

The earliest-known constructed crannog is the completely artificial Neolithic islet of Eilean Dòmhnuill, Loch Olabhat on North Uist in Scotland. Eilean Domhnuill[7] has produced radiocarbon dates ranging from 3650 to 2500 BC.[4] Irish crannogs appear in middle Bronze Age layers at Ballinderry (1200–600 BC).[36] Recent radiocarbon dating of worked timber found in Loch Bhorghastail on the Isle of Lewis has produced evidence of crannogs as old as 3380–3630 BC.[37] Prior to the Bronze Age, the existence of artificial island settlement in Ireland is not as clear. While lakeside settlements are evident in Ireland from 4500 BC, these settlements are not crannogs, as they were not intended to be islands. Despite having a lengthy chronology, their use was not at all consistent or unchanging.

Crannog construction and occupation was at its peak in Scotland from about 800 BC to AD 200.[5] Not surprisingly, crannogs have useful defensive properties, although there appears to be more significance to prehistoric use than simple defense, as very few weapons or evidence for destruction appear in excavations of prehistoric crannogs. In Ireland, crannogs were at their zenith during the Early Historic period,[1] when they were the homes and retreats of kings, lords, prosperous farmers and, occasionally, socially marginalised groups, such as monastic hermits or metalsmiths who could work in isolation. Despite scholarly concepts supporting a strict Early Historic evolution,[2] Irish excavations are increasingly uncovering examples that date from the "missing" Iron Age in Ireland.[33]

Construction

[edit]
Loughbrickland Crannóg in Northern Ireland.

The construction techniques for a crannog (prehistoric or otherwise) are as varied as the multitude of finished forms that make up the archaeological record. Island settlement in Scotland and Ireland is manifest through the entire range of possibilities ranging from entirely natural, small islets to completely artificial islets, therefore definitions remain contentious. For crannogs in the strict sense, typically the construction effort began on a shallow reef or rise in the lochbed.

When timber was available, many crannogs were surrounded by a circle of wooden piles, with axe-sharpened bases that were driven into the bottom, forming a circular enclosure that helped to retain the main mound and prevent erosion. The piles could also be joined by mortise and tenon, or large holes cut to carefully accept specially shaped timbers designed to interlock and provide structural rigidity. On other examples, interior surfaces were built up with any mixture of clay, peat, stone, timber or brush – whatever was available. In some instances, more than one structure was built on crannogs.[4]

In other types of crannogs, builders and occupants added large stones to the waterline of small natural islets, extending and enlarging them over successive phases of renewal. Larger crannogs could be occupied by extended families or communal groups, and access was either by logboats or coracles. Evidence for timber or stone causeways exists on a large number of crannogs. The causeways may have been slightly submerged; this has been interpreted as a device to make access difficult[25] but may also be a result of loch level fluctuations over the ensuing centuries or millennia. Organic remains are often found in excellent condition on these water-logged sites. The bones of cattle, deer, and swine have been found in excavated crannogs, while remains of wooden utensils and even dairy products have been completely preserved for several millennia.[3]

Fire and reconstruction

[edit]

In June 2021, the Loch Tay Crannog was seriously damaged in a fire[38] but funding was given to repair the structure, and conserve the museum materials retained.[39] The UNESCO Chair in Refugee Integration through Languages and the Arts, Alison Phipps of Glasgow University and African artist Tawona Sithole considered its future and its impact as a symbol of common human history and 'potent ways of healing' including restarting the creative weaving with Soay sheep wool in 'a thousand touches'.[40]

Footnotes

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Burnett, George (1901). Allardyce, J. (ed.). The Family of Burnett of Leys. Aberdeen: New Spalding Club.
  • Armit, Ian (2000). Scotland's Hidden History. Tempus Publishing. ISBN 0-7524-1400-3.
  • Crone, Anne (2000). The History of a Scottish Lowland Crannog: Excavations at Buiston. Monographs. Edinburgh: AOC/STAR.
  • Halsall, Guy (2003). Warfare and Society in the Barbarian West, 450–900. London: Routledge.

See also

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Crannog

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A crannog is a partially or entirely dwelling, typically constructed in lakes, rivers, bogs, or estuarine waters of , , and to a lesser extent , serving as a settlement from the late through the medieval period. These structures, whose name derives from the Irish word crann meaning "," were built using timber piles, brushwood, stones, and organic materials to create elevated platforms often 5–30 meters in diameter and 0.5–3.5 meters high above the waterline. Approximately 2,000 crannogs have been identified in as of recent surveys, with around 500 documented across (more than 100 in the Highlands), highlighting their prevalence as a distinctive form of wetland architecture. Crannogs vary in construction and typology, ranging from low platforms of brushwood and (common in earlier periods) to more substantial stone cairns or palisaded timber enclosures in later medieval examples, often connected to the mainland by a for access. Early forms date to the late (circa 1100–800 BCE), with evidence of occupation from sites like Rathtinaun in Lough Gara, , featuring piled timbers, hearths, and debris. By the (circa 800 BCE–400 CE), they became widespread in , as seen at Loch Migdale (dated 796–516 BCE), where artificial piling created defensible islands. In the early medieval period (400–1100 CE), crannogs evolved into status symbols for elites, exemplified by Drumclay Crannog in (7th–10th centuries CE), which supported multiple wooden buildings, leather artifacts, and iron tools for up to 30 inhabitants. Archaeologically, crannogs are invaluable for their anaerobic preservation of organic remains, yielding insights into daily life, , and across millennia. Key sites like Lagore Crannog (7th–10th centuries CE), a royal residence , have revealed farming implements, jewelry, and ritual deposits, while Scottish examples such as those in Loch Gara demonstrate continuity from prehistoric fishing platforms to medieval strongholds. Their defensive location and multi-phase use underscore adaptations to environmental and societal changes, from clan-based societies to Gaelic lordships, with some persisting into the 17th century for practical purposes like or illicit .

Etymology and Definition

Etymology

The term "crannog" originates from the Irish language, specifically deriving from Middle Irish crannóc, a compound of crann ("tree" or "timber") and the diminutive suffix -óc, emphasizing the wooden materials central to these structures. This etymological root reflects the prominence of timber in Celtic construction practices, where crann itself traces back to Proto-Celtic kʷresnom, meaning "tree" or "wood," a term shared across Insular Celtic languages. A notable early reference implying crannogs appears in the for AD 961, describing an attack by Domnall on the islands of Lough Ennell, interpreted as crannogs to undermine regional power. Earlier annalistic entries from the 7th to 9th centuries imply similar lake-based fortifications but use descriptive phrases like "island fortress" (ailean) rather than crannóc directly, suggesting the word's specialized application to wooden lake-dwellings evolved over time. The term "crannog" itself does not appear explicitly in early medieval annals; its first documented use in Irish sources is in the for AD 1247, referring to the "crannog of Claenlough." In Scottish Gaelic, the cognate form crannag emerged, retaining the core meaning of a timber while extending to other wooden items such as a "" or "churn," indicating semantic broadening beyond lake-dwellings. The term's alternative meanings in Irish, including "wooden vessel," "," or "pole," highlight ongoing scholarly about its precise application to artificial islands, potentially linking it more generally to any elevated wooden platform in Celtic contexts.

Core Definition and Characteristics

A crannog is a partially or entirely , typically constructed in the shallow waters of lakes, rivers, bogs, or estuaries, primarily in regions of , , and . These structures were built using layers of timber, brushwood, , stone, and earth to create stable platforms, often enlarged from natural reefs or islets or formed entirely from deposited materials on lakebeds. The term originates from the Gaelic word crann, meaning "tree," reflecting the prominent use of wooden elements in their . Key characteristics of crannogs include a timber framework supported by driven piles or a basal layer of horizontal beams, topped with a mound-like platform that could accommodate one or more central dwellings, such as roundhouses. These platforms were designed for habitation, often incorporating features like breakwaters for protection against waves and access via submerged causeways or jetties. Typically ranging from 10 to 30 meters in diameter, crannogs served both residential and defensive functions, providing secure retreats elevated above surrounding water levels to deter intruders or . Crannogs are distinguished from natural islands by their deliberate anthropogenic construction and from continental European lake dwellings, such as the Swiss pile dwellings, which feature elevated platforms directly supported by numerous vertical piles rising above the water surface rather than submerged, filled bases. The waterlogged anaerobic environments of crannog sites enhance the preservation of organic materials like wood and textiles, allowing archaeologists to recover detailed evidence of their form and use.

Types and Classification

Platform Types

Crannogs are broadly classified into two main platform types based on their construction and relationship to the natural environment: artificial islands, which are entirely pile-supported structures built from the lakebed, and modified islets, which involve human enhancements to pre-existing natural features such as rocky outcrops or shallow knolls. Artificial islands typically consist of timber piles driven into the substrate to support a platform of brushwood, stones, or peat, creating stable habitation sites in open water; examples include Coolure Demesne 1 on Lough Derravarragh, a 36-meter-diameter platform with oak piles and a plank palisade. In contrast, modified islets augment natural landforms with added materials for elevation or fortification, as seen in Croinis on Lough Ennell, where a natural mound was reinforced with timber and a massive stony cairn reaching 3-4 meters in height. This distinction highlights the adaptive engineering of early inhabitants to wetland conditions, with artificial types often smaller and more labor-intensive to construct. Within these categories, crannogs further divide into single-platform subtypes, which are straightforward, low-lying structures suited for basic or seasonal use, and complex multi-phase structures evidencing repeated rebuilding and long-term occupation. Single-platform crannogs feature a simple, flat surface of compacted materials, typically 5-10 meters in diameter and under 0.5 meters high, such as , an 8-by-6.5-meter timber platform with flagstone flooring in its primary phase. Multi-phase examples, like , demonstrate layered construction across centuries, with six distinct phases incorporating evolving platforms from organic cribwork to gravel bases and post circles, spanning from the late to the early medieval period. These subtypes reflect varying scales of investment, from modest dwellings to elite residences requiring sustained communal effort. Morphological variations in platform design include cribwork bases, formed by interlocked layers of branches, twigs, and horizontal timbers for foundational stability, as evidenced in Ballinderry No. 2, where and posts supported a timber around a 15-meter platform. Beam-framed platforms, another common variation, utilize radially laid logs or horizontal beams to distribute weight, seen in sites like Lough Naneevin with its log-supported decking akin to Scottish examples. These techniques allowed for adaptability to soft sediments, often combining vertical piles with horizontal reinforcements to prevent . Debates persist regarding hybrid forms that blur these categories, particularly those incorporating stone in later periods for enhanced durability or defensive purposes, challenging strict typologies. For instance, Castle Island on Lough Lene features a modified with stone cashels dated to AD 855, integrating with robust walls up to 4.5 meters high, suggesting a transition toward fortified hybrids. Scholars like Lynn (1983) argue for limiting the term "crannog" to early medieval palisaded sites, excluding prehistoric or stone-heavy variants as distinct from ringforts, while others highlight continuity in multi-phase hybrids like Rathtinaun, which evolved from timber platforms to medieval stone-augmented forms. These hybrids, often regional—such as revetments in Westmeath sites like Robinstown—underscore ongoing classificatory ambiguities between artificial, modified, and fortified platforms.

Definitional Challenges

The classification of crannogs faces significant challenges due to the lack of a uniform definition, exacerbated by regional differences in construction practices and the poor preservation of organic materials in environments. In , crannogs vary widely in form, from timber-piled platforms to stone-based islets, reflecting diverse local traditions across the Highlands, Lowlands, and Western Isles, while Irish examples often emphasize palisaded, defensive structures associated with early medieval periods. This variability, combined with waterlogged conditions that accelerate the decay of timber and other perishables, results in incomplete archaeological records that make it difficult to apply consistent criteria across sites. As noted in early surveys, the embryonic understanding of crannog — the processes affecting site preservation—further complicates efforts to distinguish intentional artificial islands from naturally formed features modified by human activity. Exclusion criteria for identifying true crannogs remain contentious, particularly in differentiating man-made structures from natural islets or lakebed accumulations that may have been sporadically occupied. Not all lacustrine features qualify as crannogs; for instance, natural islands in areas like or show evidence of habitation but lack the deliberate piling or infilling indicative of artificial , leading archaeologists to exclude them to avoid conflating incidental use with purposeful sites. This distinction is critical yet challenging, as , silting, and post-depositional changes often obscure foundational elements, with some sites initially misidentified as crannogs based on superficial surveys. Regional biases also play a role, as Irish definitions historically prioritized raised, fortified platforms, potentially overlooking subtler Scottish variants built on pre-existing mounds. Modern archaeological methods have reshaped crannog , increasingly excluding non-timber examples such as low stone cairns or platforms in favor of those featuring timber piles and revetments, which align with radiocarbon-dated evidence from well-preserved sites. Advances in underwater excavation and since the late have refined these boundaries, emphasizing structural integrity over vague "lake-dwelling" analogies drawn from . However, this evolution risks narrowing the term's scope, sidelining hybrid or stone-dominant forms that may represent earlier or peripheral traditions. Debates over classifying crannogs as prehistoric or medieval phenomena persist due to evidentiary gaps, with limited excavations—fewer than 10% of known sites fully investigated—yielding ambiguous chronologies that span from the late to the early medieval period. Proponents of a medieval focus argue for origins around the 5th–7th centuries AD, citing defensive features and associations with ring-forts, while others highlight or even dates from radiocarbon samples; for example, a study identified crannogs in Scotland's dating to circa 3500 BCE, providing stronger evidence for earlier origins and challenging traditional timelines. These uncertainties arise from preservation biases, where organic superstructures vanish, leaving only ambiguous basal layers, and underscore the need for integrated regional studies to resolve whether crannogs represent continuous traditions or discrete cultural phases.

Geographical Distribution

Primary Regions

Crannogs are predominantly distributed across the , with the highest concentrations in and , reflecting their association with Celtic cultural landscapes. In , over 1,200 sites have been identified, with a particular prevalence in the and central regions where numerous loughs provide suitable aquatic environments. These structures are especially common in counties like Leitrim, Roscommon, and Offaly, where lake systems facilitated their construction and use. In , approximately 600 crannogs are recorded, primarily concentrated in the , including hotspots in the and lochs such as Tay and Lomond. This westerly distribution aligns with the availability of inland lochs and wetlands, which offered natural defenses and resources for building. hosts fewer examples, with only a single confirmed site at in , highlighting the rarity of crannogs beyond the core Irish-Scottish axis. Evidence for crannogs in broader Celtic regions remains sparse, with no confirmed sites in and limited indications from the Isle of Man, underscoring their strong ties to the wetter, lacustrine terrains of western Britain and . Overall, an estimated 2,000 crannog sites exist across the , favoring inland freshwater bodies like lochs and loughs at lower altitudes where temperate, humid climates supported timber availability and anaerobic preservation conditions. The preference for such settings likely influenced their placement, as these areas provided isolation from terrestrial threats while enabling access to and resources.

Site Variations by Location

Crannogs exhibit notable variations, particularly in their larger scale and integration of stone elements during medieval phases, often situated in expansive loughs such as Lough Gara in . These sites frequently feature high-cairn constructions, where loosely packed stones form internal divisions and dense stone packing creates elevated platforms up to 2.8 meters high, averaging 26 meters by 24 meters in diameter but reaching up to 52 meters by 44 meters in some cases, reflecting adaptations for lordly residences and enhanced monumentality. Early medieval layers dominate, with evidence of multiphase use including stone floors, palisades with stone bases, and hearths, as seen at sites like Rathtinaun and Sroove, where stone packing supported iron production and habitation into later medieval periods. This stone-heavy design contrasts with earlier organic-focused builds, emphasizing durability in open-water loughs. In , crannogs tend to be smaller and predominantly prehistoric, concentrated in Highland lochs where they served as defensive homesteads influenced by -based social structures. Sites like those in [Loch Tay](/page/Loch Tay) average 30 to 60 meters in diameter, with some extending to over 100 meters during later occupations, but many remain compact for strategic placement in secure loch settings. Construction emphasizes timber frameworks and palisades, evolving from simple early forms in the late to more complex roundhouses, as exemplified by Oakbank Crannog, built between 520 BC and 465 BC. Their prehistoric focus, dating primarily from 850 BC to AD 200, underscores indigenous development tied to defense needs, with fewer medieval extensions compared to Irish examples. Specific associations, such as crannogs linked to Donnachaidh, highlight their role in clan territories for and resource control. Welsh crannogs represent marginal occurrences, with simpler forms and limited multi-phase development, primarily known from the single site at in . This measures about 40 meters in width, constructed with planks driven into the lake bed, filled with boulders, and surrounded by a timber connected to the shore by a , dating to the late AD with reused timbers from earlier structures. Unlike the dense clusters in Ireland and , this isolated example suggests localized adaptations, possibly influenced by Irish expertise, but lacks the extensive phasing or stone integrations seen elsewhere, reflecting a rarer in estuarine-influenced lake environments. Environmental factors significantly shape crannog variations, with boggy versus open-lake sites influencing construction and preservation across regions. In Ireland, bog-adjacent loughs like those around Lough Gara promote anaerobic conditions that enhance organic material survival, allowing recovery of brushwood, timbers, and artifacts in waterlogged layers, though bog sites themselves feature more peat-based platforms than stone cairns. Scottish Highland lochs, by contrast, provide deeper, colder waters that similarly foster anaerobic preservation of timber frameworks, as evidenced by intact tools and structures at submerged sites like Cults Loch, but with less bog influence leading to varied ecological impacts such as localized eutrophication. These adaptations—stone reinforcements in exposed Irish loughs for stability versus timber reliance in sheltered Scottish lochs—underscore how local hydrology dictated site longevity and archaeological visibility.

Historical Development

Chronological Timeline

The earliest evidence for proto-crannogs, or structures resembling later examples, dates to the period in Scotland's , with radiocarbon dates from four sites placing construction around 3640–3360 BC. These findings, based on , stone foundations, and timber samples, challenge traditional views but remain debated due to definitional differences from Iron Age crannogs and a subsequent gap in evidence until the late . In , initial crannog builds emerged during the late to early , around 850–800 BC, as confirmed by of structural timbers from multiple sites in the southwest and northeast. This period marks the transition to more standardized artificial islands, with dendrochronological revealing phased constructions tied to timber availability and environmental conditions. The (c. 800 BC–400 AD) represented the peak of crannog construction and occupation in , accounting for approximately 65% of all radiocarbon dates from 52 sites, concentrated between 850 BC and AD 200. Widespread use during this time included reoccupation and expansion, with pulses of activity in the 5th and 2nd centuries BC identified through . In Ireland, the earliest confirmed crannogs date to the late (c. 1200–800 BC), as evidenced by sites like Rathtinaun in Lough Gara with piled timbers, hearths, and debris, followed by significant development in the early medieval period from the AD onward, as dated by tree-ring and radiocarbon sequences from midland sites. Medieval crannogs (c. 400–1600 AD) saw fortified iterations in both regions, with radiocarbon evidence from Scottish sites like Lochrutton indicating 13th–14th century activity and Irish examples showing early medieval phases from AD 552–748. highlights episodic reuse, such as at Buiston crannog (AD 583–668), often involving of earlier foundations. Crannog use declined after the , coinciding with land drainage initiatives, shifts to terrestrial settlements, and socio-political changes in the and Irish midlands, leading to abandonment by the post-medieval period.

Societal Roles and Uses

Crannogs in early medieval and primarily served as elite residences for lords, kings, and high-status individuals, often functioning as royal or lordly sites that symbolized power and authority. Sites such as Lagore in and Moynagh Lough in , occupied from the 7th to 10th centuries AD, featured large palisades, structured house spaces, and rich artifact assemblages including processional crosses and silver hoards, indicating their use by ruling elites of kingdoms like and Clann Cholmáin. These structures provided secure, isolated living spaces on lakes, near key routeways like the Slige Assail, allowing inhabitants to oversee territories while maintaining social distance from mainland populations. In addition to residential functions, crannogs acted as defensive refuges during periods of conflict, particularly Viking raids from the AD onward. Historical records in the document the capture or destruction of crannogs, such as those in in AD 849 and Loch Gaban in AD 850, highlighting their strategic value as fortified island strongholds that could withstand sieges and invasions. Excavations at sites like Croinis on Lough Ennell reveal fortification layers dated to AD 1107±9, underscoring their role in providing refuge for elites and kin-groups amid regional instability. Economically, crannogs supported aquatic-based livelihoods, serving as platforms for , small-scale , and within interconnected lake economies. Artifacts like dugout canoes and fish bones from Moynagh Lough and Ballinderry Crannog No. 1 indicate intensive activities, while querns, carbonized oats, and parts suggest cultivation of crops such as on adjacent lands or the crannog itself. is evidenced by exotic imports, including E-ware , Frankish swords, and Anglo-Saxon coins at sites like Dysart and Coolure , linking crannogs to broader networks with Viking and from the 6th to 12th centuries AD. Craft production further bolstered economic roles, with debris, crucibles, and tools at Bofeenaun and Clea Lakes pointing to on-site iron and copper-alloy that contributed to local and elite economies. Crannogs also reflected social status through activities like feasting and the display of wealth, positioning them as centers for elite gatherings and power negotiation. Faunal remains of cattle, pigs, sheep, and high-status beef cuts at Moynagh Lough and Newtownlow, alongside luxury items such as bronze ladles and zoomorphic brooches, suggest organized feasting events that reinforced hierarchical bonds, as corroborated by sedaDNA analysis showing resource abundance and butchery at medieval sites like Lough Yoan. Gender and community dynamics are inferred from diverse artifacts: spindle whorls and glass beads indicate female involvement in textile work and adornment, while iron tools, awls, and weapons point to male crafts and defense, implying mixed family or kin-group habitation at sites like Lough Faughan and Sroove. Middens and house layouts across varied site sizes, from elite complexes housing 15-20 people to modest dwellings, further suggest inclusive community life encompassing laborers and extended households.

Construction and Design

Materials and Building Techniques

Crannogs were primarily constructed using locally available timber , with serving as the dominant material for structural elements due to its durability and abundance in prehistoric woodlands. Archaeological evidence from sites such as Oakbank Crannog in reveals extensive use of for foundation piles, platforms, and beams, often sourced from nearby forests and worked into pointed stakes up to 5 meters long. and were commonly employed for brushwood layers, wattle-work, and substructural supports, providing flexibility and resistance to waterlogging, as documented in excavations at Buiston Crannog in and Lough Faughan in . Other woods like , , , and supplemented these in palisades and transverse beams, particularly in Irish and Scottish examples from the onward. In regions with timber scarcity, such as the Western Isles, crannogs often incorporated stone for bases from early periods, forming low-cairn or high-cairn structures with boulders, flagstones, and pebbles to create stable platforms, as seen in sites in the . Recent underwater excavations at Loch Achilty in 2025 have begun to reveal details of medieval crannog construction, potentially including advanced piling techniques in a Scottish Highland context. Building techniques centered on pile-dwelling foundations adapted to soft lake beds, beginning with the driving of vertical timber piles into the sediment using wooden or stone mallets, a method evidenced by axe marks on oak stakes at sites like Clonfinlough and Ballinderry Crannog No. 1. These piles, often arranged in concentric circles 4-5 feet apart, supported horizontal beam framing, where mortised oak planks and transverse rails formed raft-like platforms radiating from a central post, as reconstructed from waterlogged remains at Lochlee and Lagore. For enhanced stability, builders employed cribwork, stacking layered brushwood, peat, and timber in rectangular or circular frames, sometimes revetted with palisades to prevent spreading, a technique prominent in early medieval Irish crannogs like those at Rathtinaun. Organic materials such as lake marl, clay, and heather were layered atop these bases to consolidate the platform, allowing for gradual elevation over multiple occupation phases. Tools from the Bronze and Iron Ages, including axes and adzes, facilitated pile preparation and joinery, with cut marks on timbers from Oakbank Crannog indicating metal implements capable of shaping large logs. The scale of construction—evident in platforms up to 40 meters in diameter—suggests communal labor, likely involving coordinated groups from surrounding settlements to transport and erect heavy timbers, as inferred from the multi-phase builds at Moynagh Lough requiring sustained effort over decades. The predominantly wooden composition rendered crannogs highly vulnerable to fire, with charred beams and ash layers at Lochlee and Buiston Crannog attesting to destruction events, possibly from accidental hearths or intentional attacks. Historical accounts, such as those from medieval , describe crannogs being burned during raids, exploiting their flammability despite water proximity, as noted in references to -arrows at Buiston.

Structural Layout and Features

Crannogs typically featured a central , often a round or rectangular house measuring 5-10 meters in diameter, situated on an platform constructed from layers of stones, timber, and organic materials. This core building was surrounded by a broader platform, providing for additional activities and enhancing stability in the aquatic environment. Access to the crannog was primarily achieved via submerged causeways made of timber piles or beams, such as those observed at Fearnan Crannog in , or by boat, reflecting adaptations to the lake setting. Key internal features included a central for cooking and heating, often positioned in the main house, alongside storage pits for food and goods, as evidenced in excavations at sites like Moynagh Lough. Defensive palisades, constructed from upright posts or planks, encircled the platform to protect against intruders or environmental threats, with examples of multiple concentric palisades uncovered at the same site. In more complex crannogs, evidence of multi-room divisions within the central house suggests partitioning for different functions, accommodating extended families or specialized areas. Archaeological layers at many sites indicate phased rebuilding following fires, with inhabitants reusing salvaged timbers and materials to reconstruct structures, thereby extending the site's longevity over centuries. For instance, at Moynagh Lough, up to six occupational phases show sequential rebuilding on the same platform. Adaptations such as elevated walkways connected platform sections and facilitated movement, while drainage features, including timber channels, helped manage fluctuating water levels and prevent flooding. These elements, often built using local woods like and , underscore the practical of crannog designs.

Archaeological Exploration

Methods of Discovery and Excavation

The discovery of crannogs primarily occurred through 19th-century antiquarian surveys in and , where scholars relied on visual inspections of lochs and bogs to identify mound-like features. A pivotal figure was William Gregory Wood-Martin, whose 1886 book The Lake Dwellings of Ireland documented at least 220 sites through fieldwork and historical records, establishing a foundational based on surface and rudimentary probing. These early efforts often involved draining lochs or partial but lacked systematic recording, leading to incomplete understandings of site extent and chronology. Modern excavation methods emphasize to address the submerged, waterlogged conditions of most crannogs, with techniques like diver-led sediment removal using airlifts and vacuum dredges. At Oakbank Crannog in , , excavations from 1980 to 2005 by the Scottish Trust for Underwater Archaeology employed these approaches to expose over 1,000 cubic meters of preserved timber structures, marking one of the first fully submerged crannog digs. Complementary non-invasive geophysical surveys, such as for bathymetric mapping and magnetometry for detecting anomalies, have mapped potential sites without disturbance; for example, water-penetrating combined with profiled crannog outlines in Aberdeenshire lochs. further refines dating by analyzing growth rings in structural timbers, particularly from sites like Buiston and Oakbank, yielding chronologies that pinpoint construction phases with annual precision where sufficient samples exist. Challenges in crannog excavation stem from their anaerobic, waterlogged settings, which preserve organics like and textiles but require specialized access via SCUBA or remotely operated vehicles to avoid site degradation during sediment shifts. Ethical issues in submerged heritage management include the risk of commercial looting prioritizing artifacts over , as well as jurisdictional ambiguities in lochs that complicate protection under international conventions like UNESCO's Underwater Cultural Heritage framework. In the 2020s, non-invasive prospection has advanced with integration into desktop surveys, enabling detection of subtle mound features under vegetation or water surfaces, as demonstrated in the North of Archaeological Society's Loch Achilty project which combined with aerial data to confirm unrecorded crannogs. Environmental sampling techniques, including multi-proxy analyses of sediment cores for , , and loss-on-ignition, provide palaeoenvironmental context around sites like Loch of Leys without excavation, revealing human-induced changes such as from crannog occupation. These methods support ongoing projects, such as the 2025 underwater excavation at Loch Achilty, prioritizing minimal intervention.

Key Sites and Recent Findings

Oakbank Crannog, located in , , represents one of the most significant sites due to its exceptional preservation of organic materials in the anaerobic conditions of the submerged peaty loch bed. Excavations conducted in the 1980s and continued in 2002 revealed structural timbers, tools, and textiles dating to the early , around the , providing insights into domestic life and craftsmanship. This site's well-preserved organics, including wooden artifacts and plant remains, have allowed for detailed reconstruction of crannog building techniques and daily activities. In Ireland, Lagore Crannog in stands out as a premier early medieval royal residence, occupied from the 7th to the 10th centuries AD. Archaeological investigations in the mid-20th century uncovered evidence of high-status habitation, including fine metalwork, glass vessels, and structural features indicative of elite occupancy by the kings of . The site's artifacts, such as imported , highlight its role in regional power dynamics and long-distance exchange networks during this period. Recent excavations at Loch Achilty in the , conducted in 2025, have uncovered a rare medieval crannog, with divers identifying timber structures and additional platforms suggesting multiple phases of occupation. This underwater project, funded by the , revealed two further crannogs in the loch, expanding knowledge of post-Iron Age lake dwellings in northern . Preliminary findings include organic remains that could yield radiocarbon dates, confirming medieval use around the 12th-15th centuries AD. Palaeoenvironmental analysis from Loch of Leys in , , provides evidence of early human activity linked to crannog-like structures dating back to approximately 2500 BC, based on multi-proxy sediment studies spanning 2500 years. This 2022 research integrates , diatoms, and to reconstruct environmental changes, indicating initial settlement continuity into the at the site's excavated crannog. Such underscore prehistoric adaptations to environments in northeast . Among recent artifact highlights, a fragment of textile from Oakbank Crannog went on public display in 2025 at the Scottish Crannog Centre, marking one of Britain's oldest surviving woven fabrics dated to 480-390 BC. This woolen piece, preserved in the loch's silty bed, reveals advanced spinning and weaving techniques. Other crannog finds, including iron tools like bits and bronze-working debris from sites such as Oakbank and Lochlea, alongside jet jewelry and imported glass vessels from Lagore and Newtownlow, demonstrate extensive trade connections across Iron Age and early medieval Europe. These items, often found in depositional contexts, suggest ritual and economic exchanges involving local craftsmanship and continental influences. Despite these advances, significant gaps persist in crannog research, particularly for the understudied sites in , where only one confirmed example exists at , limiting comparative analyses of regional variations. Recent efforts by in November 2025 focus on preserving the crannog, addressing environmental threats like . Additionally, comprehensive studies on impacts—such as rising water levels and affecting preservation—are nascent, with broader assessments of environmental threats to Welsh historic wetlands highlighting the need for targeted investigations into crannog vulnerability.

Cultural Significance and Legacy

Interpretations in Society

In and folklore, crannogs were often interpreted as otherworldly islands, embodying liminal spaces between the human realm and the . These artificial dwellings, situated on water, symbolized sacred thresholds where the intersected with the divine, as seen in hagiographical tales like the Navigatio Sancti Brendani Abbatis, where St. Brendan encounters island-like structures during his voyage to the of the Saints, evoking crannog-like forms as portals to mystical experiences. Medieval texts frequently depicted crannogs as formidable fortresses and royal residences, underscoring their defensive and political significance. Early Irish annals, such as the , record crannogs as sites of conflict and plunder, like the 832 AD raid on Loch Bricrenn, where they served as strongholds for Gaelic lords. The Vita Tripartita (c. AD 800) illustrates this through St. Patrick's curse on building artificial islands in bogs, stating they would never stand firmly, implying instability for such structures. By the , romanticization elevated crannogs as emblems of ancient Celtic valor and isolation, with scholars like W.G. Wood-Martin in The Lake-Dwellings of Ireland (1886) weaving narratives of high-status Gaelic life, blending archaeological evidence with evocative tales of chieftains' watery retreats to evoke national pride amid colonial erasure. Contemporary archaeological interpretations debate crannogs' primary functions, weighing their defensiveness against roles as economic hubs. While earlier views emphasized military strongholds, recent analyses highlight multifunctional sites supporting trade, fishing, and lordly oversight, as evidenced by artifacts like silver ingots and querns at sites such as Lagore, suggesting integrated economic activities rather than pure fortification. In Irish and Scottish heritage, crannogs bolster cultural identity, symbolizing resilient Celtic traditions; for instance, the Scottish Crannog Centre reconstructs Iron Age dwellings to connect modern audiences with ancestral ingenuity, fostering a sense of continuity in national narratives.

Modern Reconstructions and Preservation

Modern reconstructions of crannogs have played a pivotal role in , allowing researchers to test ancient building techniques while engaging the public. The Scottish Crannog Centre, located on the shores of , exemplifies this approach through its full-scale replica of an crannog based on excavations at Oakbank Crannog. Rebuilt after a 2021 fire and reopened in April 2024, the site features seven reconstructed roundhouses, hands-on craft demonstrations, and ongoing construction of additional crannogs over the loch, set for completion in spring 2026. As of October 2025, the project is entering its final stages. These builds employ traditional methods, such as driving and piles into the lakebed using replica tools, to recreate the structural integrity of prehistoric dwellings. In , similar efforts include the reconstructed crannog at Craggaunowen in , which simulates a lake dwelling from the fifth to twelfth centuries AD, complete with a central roundhouse and surrounding . This site, part of the Living Past Experience, uses locally sourced timber and thatch to demonstrate daily life in early medieval , providing visitors with interactive insights into crannog construction and use. Preservation of original crannogs faces significant challenges from , particularly rising water levels that accelerate erosion and organic decay in submerged environments. In , sites like those in the Outer Hebrides are increasingly vulnerable, prompting urgent surveys to document threats before irreversible damage occurs. Legal protections safeguard these cultural assets under national frameworks, with many Scottish crannogs designated as scheduled ancient monuments by , prohibiting unauthorized interference. In Ireland, crannogs fall under the National Monuments Acts 1930-2004, administered by the National Monuments Service, which regulates activities near recorded sites to prevent damage. Recent initiatives, such as the North of Scotland Archaeological Society's 2025 Crannogs Project, involve excavation at Loch Achilty's medieval crannog to gather data on construction and environmental impacts amid climate pressures. The excavation took place from September 20–27, 2025, with a report to be produced afterward. Public engagement through museums like the Scottish Crannog Centre enhances educational outreach, offering workshops and tours that foster appreciation of technologies. These reconstructions yield substantial benefits, including boosted that supports local economies— the Scottish Crannog Centre attracts thousands annually— and studies on sustainable replication that inform modern eco-friendly building practices. at the centre highlights how ancient crannog designs, with their use of renewable materials and low environmental footprint, offer lessons for contemporary sustainability efforts.

References

  1. https://scarf.scot/regional/higharf/iron-age/7-3-settlement-evidence/7-3-3-crannogs/
  2. https://www.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.329636.1492782351!/menu/standard/file/Crannogs-1.pdf
  3. https://archaeology.org/issues/march-april-2013/digs-discoveries/northern-ireland-bog-crannog/
  4. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/crann%C3%B3g
  5. https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/5079/1/Aidan_O%27Sullivan_Vol_1_20140624090451.pdf
  6. https://www.crannogs.com/crannogs/index.php/introduction.html
  7. https://www.heritagedaily.com/2020/03/crannogs-timber-and-stone-riddles-wrapped-in-water/98753
  8. https://soas-test.journals.ed.ac.uk/index.php/psas/article/download/8170/8138
  9. https://www.livescience.com/ancient-elites-partied-on-crannogs-uk
  10. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2022.70
  11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00060
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/neolithic-crannogs-rethinking-settlement-monumentality-and-deposition-in-the-outer-hebrides-and-beyond/41A5D2F1C5E678B9EABB50BB17F7990E
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379122001639
  14. https://offalyhistoryblog.com/2021/05/08/crannogs-in-county-offaly-by-john-dolan/
  15. https://the-past.com/feature/the-palace-in-the-lake-a-royal-residence-on-llangorse-crannog/
  16. https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/humanities/research/archaeologyresearch/currentresearch/celticconnectionsandcrannogs/
  17. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/426174/1/Garrow_Sturt_Neolithic_Crannogs_accepted_Nov_2018.pdf
  18. https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/research/centre-for-research-in-environment-and-society-ceres/celtic-connections-and-crannogs
  19. https://www.academia.edu/380670/Crannogs_a_Study_of_Peoples_Interaction_With_Lakes_With_Particular_Reference_to_Lough_Gara_In_the_North_West_of_Ireland
  20. https://scottishcrannogs.wordpress.com/
  21. https://scarf.scot/regional/pkarf/perth-and-kinross-archaeological-research-framework-case-studies/oakbank-crannog-an-iron-age-loch-dwelling-on-loch-tay/
  22. https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/download/9462/9429/9414
  23. https://www.electricscotland.com/webclans/dtog/donnachaidh/article10.htm
  24. https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/wales/entries/cb33ce7a-497d-3778-961e-e18851042130
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316184062_Paleoenvironmental_investigations_of_Crannogs_in_south_west_Scotland_and_Co_Fermanagh_Northern_Ireland
  26. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.41
  27. https://www.academia.edu/27162281/Forging_a_chronological_framework_for_Scottish_crannogs_the_radiocarbon_and_dendrochronological_evidence
  28. https://www.woolmerforest.org.uk/library/Ancient%20Scottish%20lake-dwellings%20or%20crannogs%20%20with%20a%20supplementary%20chapter%20on%20remains%20of%20lake-dwellings%20in%20England%20-%20R.%20Munro%20%281882%29.pdf
  29. https://mull-historical-society.co.uk/daily-life/castles-fortifications/crannogs/
  30. https://www.jpost.com/archaeology/archaeology-around-the-world/article-847376
  31. https://soas-test.journals.ed.ac.uk/index.php/psas/article/download/9462/9429
  32. https://www.academia.edu/12707542/Crannogs_as_buildings_the_evolution_of_interpretation_1822_2011
  33. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/282330.pdf
  34. https://excavations.ie/report/1987/Meath/0000746/
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cormac_Bourke/publication/280578677_The_Excavation_of_an_Early_Medieval_Crannog_at_Newtownlow_County_Westmeath/links/55bbbeb808ae9289a0957540/The-Excavation-of-an-Early-Medieval-Crannog-at-Newtownlow-County-Westmeath.pdf
  36. https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/download/9078/9046
  37. https://www.academia.edu/8486350/The_Social_and_Ideological_Role_of_Crannogs_in_Early_Medieval_Ireland_Vol_1_PhD_thesis_NUI_Maynooth
  38. https://excavations.ie/report/1989/Meath/0000906/
  39. https://irisharchaeology.org/crannog/
  40. https://www.ria.ie/assets/uploads/2025/03/ALG-2024-Michael-Potteron.pdf
  41. https://www.dib.ie/biography/martin-william-gregory-wood-a5490
  42. https://www.ouririshheritage.org/content/archive/topics/miscellaneous/irelands-crannoga
  43. https://pure.qub.ac.uk/files/263598820/JAS_WPR_V2Cwellan.pdf
  44. http://se.anomic.de/talks/crannogs.pdf
  45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/1473297114Z.0000000007
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257141355_Ethics_Underwater_Cultural_Heritage_and_International_Law
  47. https://www.unesco.org/en/convention-protection-underwater-cultural-heritage-2001
  48. https://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=12304
  49. https://www.trove.scot/place/25024
  50. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/trail/archaeology/iron_age/recon_oakbank_cran_04.shtml
  51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i25506001
  52. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00293652.2021.1941233
  53. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4915342
  54. https://www.nauticalarchaeologysociety.org/loch-achilty-crannog
  55. https://www.socantscot.org/uncategorized/society-funds-underwater-excavation-of-medieval-crannog-and-more-with-latest-grants/
  56. https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/past-times/6863253/three-crannogs-found-in-highland-loch-achilty/
  57. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9n4d45dqko
  58. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/186041/7/1_s2.0_S0277379122001639_main.pdf
  59. https://www.gla.ac.uk/news/archiveofnews/2025/april/headline_1173346_en.html
  60. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg41e6dr2p1o
  61. https://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/view/10763/10930
  62. https://www.academia.edu/14515455/The_Excavation_of_an_Early_Medieval_Crannog_at_Newtownlow_County_Westmeath_Belfast_2015
  63. https://scarf.scot/regional/pkarf/5-iron-age/5-5-material-culture/5-5-2-craftworking/
  64. https://cadw.gov.wales/about-us/news/preserving-wales-only-crannog-cadws-work-llangorse-lake
  65. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-51723863
  66. https://www.academia.edu/8486369/The_Social_and_Ideological_Role_of_Crannogs_in_Early_Medieval_Ireland_PhD_thesis_Vol_2_Dept_of_History_NUI_Maynooth
  67. https://www.academia.edu/36112585/Re_presenting_Scotlands_Celtic_Past_Archaeology_Nature_and_the_Mediation_of_Authenticity_at_the_Scottish_Crannog_Centre
  68. https://crannog.co.uk/
  69. https://www.heritagefund.org.uk/stories/case-study-scottish-crannog-centre
  70. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-68661012
  71. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/25538641.race-finish-rebuilt-crannog-loch-tay/
  72. https://www.craggaunowen.ie/living-past-experience/
  73. https://clarelibrary.ie/eolas/coclare/archaeology/cragno.htm
  74. https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/climate-change-endangers-scotlands-archaeological-treasures-idUSKBN1WP14K/
  75. https://portal.historicenvironment.scot/apex/f?p=1505:300:::::VIEWTYPE%2CVIEWREF:designation%2CSM9762
  76. https://www.archaeology.ie/advice-and-support/protection-and-designation-of-monuments/
  77. https://www.nosas.co.uk/crannogproject
  78. https://exarc.net/issue-2023-2/aoam/crannog-centre-sustainable-thinking
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.