Hubbry Logo
Digital Audio BroadcastingDigital Audio BroadcastingMain
Open search
Digital Audio Broadcasting
Community hub
Digital Audio Broadcasting
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Digital Audio Broadcasting
Digital Audio Broadcasting
Digital Audio Broadcasting
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Official DAB+ logo[1]
Official DAB logo (1990s–2018)
A Pure DAB receiver[2]
List of digital radio broadcast standards
DAB standards
5G Broadcast
ISDB standards
AM band in-band on-channel (AM IBOC)
FM band in-band on-channel (FM IBOC)

Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) is a digital radio standard for broadcasting digital audio radio services in many countries around the world, defined, supported, marketed and promoted by the WorldDAB organization. The standard is dominant in Europe and is also used in Australia, and in parts of Africa and as of 2025, 55 countries are actively running DAB broadcasts as an alternative platform to analogue FM.[3][4]

DAB was the result of a European research project and first publicly rolled out in 1995, with consumer-grade DAB receivers appearing at the start of this millennium. Initially it was expected in many countries that existing FM services would switch over to DAB, although the take-up of DAB has been much slower than expected.[5][6][7][8] In 2023, Norway became the first country to have implemented a national FM radio switch-off,[9][10] with Switzerland to follow in 2026[11] and others territories in the process of planning a switch-off.[12][13][14][15] Terrestrial digital radio has become a requirement for all new cars (not buses and trucks) sold in the EU since 2021.[16]

The original version of DAB used the MP2 audio codec; an upgraded version of the system was later developed and released named DAB+ which uses the HE-AAC v2 (AAC+) audio codec and is more robust and efficient. DAB is not forward compatible with DAB+.[17] Today the majority of DAB broadcasts around the world are using the upgraded DAB+ standard, with only the UK still using a significant number of legacy DAB broadcasts.

DAB is generally more efficient in its use of spectrum than analogue FM radio,[18] and thus can offer more radio services for the same given bandwidth. The broadcaster can select any desired sound quality, from high-fidelity signals for music to low-fidelity signals for talk radio, in which case the sound quality can be noticeably inferior to analog FM. High-fidelity equates to a high bit rate and higher transmission cost. DAB is more robust with regard to noise and multipath fading for mobile listening,[19] although DAB reception quality degrades rapidly when the signal strength falls below a critical threshold (as is normal for digital broadcasts), whereas FM reception quality degrades slowly with the decreasing signal, providing more effective coverage over a larger area.[citation needed] DAB+ is a "green" platform and can bring up to 85 percent energy consumption savings[20] compared to FM broadcasting (but analog tuners are more efficient than digital ones,[21] and DRM+ has been recommended for small scale transmissions).[22]

Similar terrestrial digital radio standards are HD Radio, ISDB-Tb, DRM, and the related DMB.[23] Also 5G Broadcast is developing globally for radio and television broadcasting. This system will for the first time enable digital terrestrial radio reception also in smartphones.[24]

History and development

[edit]
For other digital audio broadcasting systems, see Digital radio.

Eureka-147 project

[edit]
Prototype DAB receiver (1993)

The DAB standard was initiated as a European research project.[25][26] It began in the 1980s with the collaboration of the West German Institut für Rundfunktechnik (IRT) in and the French Centre commun d'études de télévision et télécommunications (CCETT).[27] The consortium formed in 1986 and numerous other European broadcasting organisations such as the BBC had also joined.[27] It eventually became a project of Eureka and was named the Eureka-147 DAB Project in 1987,[25] with the stated goal of developing a system that “would produce improved reception compared to FM…and with the potential to offer additional services such as text and other data, conditional access, enhanced traffic services, and picture transmission”.[28] Efficient bandwidth, low transmitting power, good reception in cars and audio quality comparable to CD, were some of the other goals.[28]

The first DAB demonstrations were held in 1988 in Geneva during WARC-88 conference, after which numerous other trials took place throughout several other countries in Europe.[29] There was also a demonstration at the 1991 NAB Show in the USA.[30] The MPEG-1 Audio Layer II ("MP2") codec was created as part of this project. DAB was the first standard based on orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation technique, which since then has become one of the most popular transmission schemes for modern wideband digital communication systems.

A choice of audio codec, modulation and error-correction coding schemes and first trial broadcasts were made in 1990. A significant decision was the assigning of frequencies on the radio spectrum, as it was decided to operate the system on different bands (Band I, Band III and L Band) compared to those used on FM and AM.[28] The protocol specification was finalized in 1992[31] or 1993 and adopted by the ITU-R standardization body in 1994, the European community in 1995 and by ETSI in 1997. The European DAB Forum (now WorldDAB) was formed in 1995, and the Eureka-147 project itself had "ended" and merged into WorldDAB in 1999.[28][32]

Launch and early adoption

[edit]

Pilot broadcasts were launched in 1995: the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK) launched the first DAB channel in the world on 1 June 1995 (NRK Klassisk),[33] and the BBC and Swedish Radio (SR) launched their first broadcasts later in September in the UK and Sweden respectively[34] while in Germany a pilot broadcast started in Bavaria in October 1995.[35] Commercial stations in the UK started broadcasting in November 1999 as Digital One.[36]

A Pioneer car DAB tuner from 1998. This box connects to its head unit on the car dashboard as well as an external aerial.

The earliest DAB receivers in 1995 were semi-professional units for cars with separate boxes fitted in the boot. They were manufactured by Alpine, Bosch, Grundig, Kenwood, Philips and Sony, designed for evaluation purposes.[34] These were complex systems based on either a DAB channel-decoder chipset from the JESSI (Joint European Sub-micron Silicon Initiative) project, or on general-purpose DSPs.[37] Prototype consumer grade DAB receivers with improved silicons were first shown in 1997,[38] but manufacturers were reluctant to release receivers in Europe partly due to the delay of DAB's launch in Germany.[39] By 1999, most DAB receivers remained expensive car-based black box units and a handful of Hi-Fi home tuners.[40]

It took some more time until further advancements in the integrated circuits helped to make DAB more accessible: notably Texas Instruments's DRE200 chip, released in 2001, significantly reduced the cost and size of the boards.[41][42][43] This chip finally made portable DAB radios possible, and the first working prototype of a pocket DAB radio was presented by Roke Manor Research, part of Siemens, using a module named GoldCard II designed with Panasonic.[44] Eventually the rise of affordable home DAB receivers, notably beginning with the Pure Evoke in 2002 (which used an IC made by Frontier Silicon, a company that would power many DAB tuners in the future),[45] helped to take off DAB to consumers for the first time.[46]

However, adoption remained generally slow for various reasons such as high receiver costs and limited reception, with the exception of the United Kingdom and Denmark. In the UK, DAB radio receivers were high selling and 10% of households owned a DAB radio as of 2005,[47] partly due to local manufacturers creating affordable receivers. In many other countries, such as Germany, Finland, and Sweden, DAB was unable to take off.[48] By 2006, 500 million people worldwide were in the coverage area of DAB broadcasts. In 2006 there were approximately 1,000 DAB channels in operation worldwide.[49]

Creation of DAB+

[edit]
Old DAB+ logo

The World DMB Forum (now WorldDAB) instructed its Technical Committee to work on an improved digital radio system. This work led to the creation of DAB+ in 2006. This new standard is based on DAB but uses newer MPEG-4 compression instead of MPEG-2, making it far more efficient and allowing more services to be broadcast without a loss in audio quality.[28]

The HE-AAC v2 audio codec[50] (also known as eAAC+) was adopted for DAB+. AAC+ uses a modified discrete cosine transform (MDCT) algorithm.[51][52] It has also adopted the MPEG Surround audio format and stronger error correction coding in the form of Reed–Solomon coding. DAB+ has been standardised as European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) TS 102 563.

As DAB is not forward compatible with DAB+, older DAB receivers cannot receive DAB+ broadcasts. However, DAB receivers that were capable of receiving the new DAB+ standard after a firmware upgrade were being sold as early as July 2007. Malta was the first country to launch DAB+ broadcasts in Europe in October 2008[53] and DAB+ broadcasts have since been trialled or launched in more countries. If DAB+ stations launch in established DAB countries, they can transmit alongside existing DAB stations that use the older MPEG-1 Audio Layer II audio format, and most existing DAB stations are expected to continue broadcasting until the vast majority of receivers support DAB+.[54]

Growth in 2010s

[edit]
A modern large tabletop DAB receiver with colour screen

In such countries where DAB was unsuccessful, efforts were made in later years to "re-launch" it using the newer DAB+ standard.[55] it started gaining traction throughout the 2010s[56] and finally took off in countries like France by 2019.[57] DAB+ had launched broadcasts in various countries such as Australia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Hong Kong (now terminated), Italy, Norway, Poland, Switzerland, Belgium,[58] the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Its UK launch occurred in January 2016[59] and the new national network Sound Digital launched with three DAB+ stations.[60] A number of stations, such as Classic FM, have since switched from DAB to DAB+.[61][62]

A 2 DIN Kenwood car stereo receiving a DAB+ broadcast

DAB adoption in automobiles became increasingly common during this time, and by 2016 it was standard in most cars sold in the UK, Norway and Switzerland.[63] Since 2021, terrestrial digital radio has been compulsory on cars (not busses and trucks) sold in the European Union (EU)[16] as well as Saudi Arabia.[64]

As of 2018, over 68 million devices have been sold worldwide, and over 2,270 DAB services are on air.[4] Malta, Monaco and Kuwait achieved 100% coverage of DAB in 2018.[65]

DMB and DAB-IP

[edit]
Main article: Digital multimedia broadcasting

Digital multimedia broadcasting (DMB) and DAB-IP are related standards that were developed for mobile radio and TV, they support MPEG 4 AVC and WMV9 respectively as video codecs. However, a DMB video subchannel can easily be added to any DAB transmission, as it was designed to be carried on a DAB subchannel. DMB broadcasts in South Korea carry conventional MPEG 1 Layer II DAB audio services alongside their DMB video services. As of 2017, DMB is currently broadcast in Norway, South Korea, and Thailand. Trials for DAB-IP were held in London in 2006, as "BT Movio".[66] It competed with DVB-H and MediaFLO which were also under testing.[67]

Countries using DAB

[edit]
  Countries with regular services
  Countries with trials and/or regulation
  Countries with interest
  DAB no longer used/switched to another standard
Main article: Countries using DAB/DMB

Fifty-five countries provide regular or trial DAB(+) broadcasts.[3] In spectrum management, the bands that are allocated for public DAB services, are abbreviated with T-DAB.

In the European Union, the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) entered into force on 20 December 2018, with transposition into national legislation by Member States required by 21 December 2020. The Directive applies to all EU member states regardless of the status of DAB+ in each country. This means that since the end of 2020, across all EU countries, all radios in new cars must be capable of receiving and reproducing digital terrestrial radio."[68] Following this directive, Belgium stopped all sales of analogue radio receivers from 1 January 2023. Thus, consumers are no longer able to purchase AM or FM receivers for domestic use. "The obligation to incorporate DAB+ for new cars and domestic radio receivers is a nice step ahead in the digitisation of our radio landscape," commented Benjamin Dalle, the Flemish media minister.[69]

FM to DAB(+) radio transition

[edit]

Norway

[edit]

Norway was the first country to announce a complete switch-off of national FM radio stations. The switch-off started on 11 January 2017 and ended on 13 December 2017.[70][71] The 2017 switch-off did not affect some local and regional radio stations. They can continue to transmit on FM until 2027.

The timetable for the closure of FM signals in 2017 were as follows:[72]

Switzerland

[edit]

SRG SSR, Switzerland's public-service broadcaster, had shut down its FM transmission infrastructure on 31 December 2024. The corporation concluded that maintaining FM broadcasts along with DAB+ and Internet streaming was no longer cost-effective, as due to widespread adoption of DAB+ the share of the public relying exclusively on FM was under ten percent and decreasing.[73] All other FM broadcasters in the country must shut down or convert to DAB+ by 31 December 2026.[11][74][75][76][12][77]

Other countries

[edit]
  • Malta was the first European country to roll out a DAB+ network and services have been on-air since 2008. It covers 100% of the population.[78]
  • In Italy, Rai Radio is proposing the country to begin switching off FM transmitters starting in 2025 with the goal of being all digital and shuttering FM broadcasting entirely in 2030.[79][80] In the northern region of Italy's South Tyrol – Alto Adige, the broadcaster RAS has started switching FM services off.[81][82]
  • "The government of Denmark has proposed a closure of FM broadcasting two years after more than half of radio listening is digital."[83]
  • In Sweden, "the regulator MPRT has been commissioned by the Swedish government to review the conditions for commercial radio in the longer term (Ku 2021/01993). In dialogue with relevant actors, including the industry, the authority plans to analyse the need for any changes in the regulations for licensing with the aim of submitting a final report to the Ministry of Culture by December 2022."[84] As of August 2023, DAB signals are only broadcast in the greater Stockholm-Uppsala region, Gothenburg, Malmö, Luleå, and Piteå, with no known plans from any of the 3 broadcast licence companies to extend coverage to other regions.[85] Parts of Helsingborg receives signals from Denmark,[86] while Strömstad receives signals from Norway.[87]
  • In the United Kingdom, the government agreed with the Digital Radio and Audio Review's main conclusion that there should be no formal switch-off of analogue radio services before 2030 at the earliest, and said that the ongoing decline of analogue listening makes it appropriate to consider updating elements of the legislative framework to support a smooth transition of services away from analogue in due course. The government also agreed this should be looked at again by government and industry in 2026.[88][89][90][91]
  • In Poland, following consultations the KRRiT has adopted a position on the end of analogue radio broadcasting "no earlier than 31 December 2026 and no later than 31 December 2030".[13]
  • In the Netherlands, the expectations are about official switch off of FM radio between 2027 and 2032.[92]
  • Belgium has also expressed readiness to switch to DAB broadcasting: "Flemish Minister of Media Benjamin Dalle expects that the final shutdown of the FM frequencies, the so-called 'switch off', will take place between 2028 and 2031. According to him, the VRT must be a forerunner in the digitisation of the radio landscape. For example, if the 'switch off' does not come on January 1, 2028, it may be an option, according to Dalle, to fully digitise one of the VRT channels."[14][93]
  • Moldova will abandon FM radio and switch to digital radio, according to an announcement made by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Regional Development.[94][95][96]
  • Germany has not yet reached an agreement for full digital terrestrial radio transition, instead the country intensely invests in DAB+ transmission sites development and simultaneous DAB+/FM broadcasting.[97][98][99] Speculations of a possible switch off is in 2033.[100] The national broadcaster Deutschlandradio has already started switching off its FM transmitions in some regions as of July 2024.[101]
  • In the Czech Republic, the situation is similar as in Germany: plans are for simultaneous DAB+/FM broadcasting.[102]
  • In Estonia, radio stations with Levira's support started testing digital radio frequencies in November 2022. "One of our objectives for the coming year is to create the necessary technical conditions for the development of digital radio," said Oliver Gailan, head of the communications department of the country's consumer protection and technical regulatory authority, the TTJA.[103][104][105]
  • In Haute-Vienne, a department in the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region in southwest-central France, since 6 December 2022, the Groupement de radios associatives libres en Limousin (Gral), has swapped the traditional FM broadcasting for DAB+.[106]

Countries where FM to DAB(+) radio transition is cancelled/postponed

[edit]

Whilst many countries have expected a shift to digital audio broadcasting, a few have moved in the opposite direction following unsuccessful trials.

  • Canada conducted trials of DAB in L-band in major cities. However the success of satellite digital radio and lack of L-band DAB receivers led to the analogue switch-off being abandoned. Canada subsequently adopted HD Radio as used in the neighbouring United States instead of DAB.[107]
  • Finland abandoned DAB in 2005.[108]
  • Hong Kong announced the termination of DAB in March 2017.[109]
  • Portugal announced the termination of DAB in April 2011.[110]
  • In Korea, the transmission of MBC 11FM was stopped in 2015 and the DAB channel was switched to T-DMB V-Radio.
  • DAB in Ireland was confined from 2017 to state broadcaster RTÉ Radio's multiplex, which was switched off in March 2021, after a survey showed 77% of adults listen to radio via FM, compared with 8% via digital means, of which 0.5% via DAB.[111] RTÉ's service began in 2006, after trials in 1998 and 2001.[112] A commercial multiplex was trialled in 2007–8 and licensed, including DAB+, from 2010 to 2017, but the licensee did not renew because of lack of takeup by broadcasters.[112] In 2025, Ireland decided to relaunch DAB+ national multiplexes.[113][114]
  • Hungary announced the termination of DAB+ on 5 September 2020, 12 years after its start.[115][116]
  • Romania switched off DAB broadcast in September 2021 due to lack of interest both from broadcasters and listeners, low availability of receivers, low number of listeners and higher acceptance and interest in internet radio and FM.[citation needed]
  • Sweden The Swedish government postponed the transition to DAB in 2016, following a report from the National Audit Office which criticized the benefits for the listeners compared to continued FM-transmissions paired other digital transmission techniques (4G, Internet) and the strength of FM-radio as a simple and reliable source for emergency/crisis information. Limited transmissions continue in Stockholm, Göteborg, Malmö and Luleå[117]
  • New Zealand started a DAB+ trial with transmitters broadcasting on Band III in Auckland and Wellington in 2006. Uptake for the service was very low, and the trial ended in 2018.[118][119]

Technology

[edit]
A DAB radio receiver screen displaying the current station name, name of the current playing song, and other information

Bands and modes

[edit]

DAB uses a wide-bandwidth broadcast technology and typically spectra have been allocated for it in Band III (174–240 MHz) and L band (1.452–1.492 GHz), although the scheme allows for operation between 30 and 300 MHz. The US military has reserved L-Band in the USA only, blocking its use for other purposes in America, and the United States has reached an agreement with Canada to restrict L-Band DAB to terrestrial broadcast to avoid interference.[citation needed]

Current mode
  • Mode I for Band III, Earth

In January 2017, an updated DAB specification (2.1.1) removed Modes II, III and IV, leaving only Mode I.[120]

Former modes
  • Mode II for L-Band, Earth and satellite
  • Mode III for frequencies below 3 GHz, Earth and satellite
  • Mode IV for L-Band, Earth and satellite

Protocol stack

[edit]

From an OSI model protocol stack viewpoint, the technologies used on DAB inhabit the following layers: the audio codec inhabits the presentation layer. Below that is the data link layer, in charge of statistical time-division multiplexing and frame synchronization. Finally, the physical layer contains the error-correction coding, OFDM modulation, and dealing with the over-the-air transmission and reception of data. Some aspects of these are described below.

Audio codec

[edit]

DAB initially only used the MPEG-1 Audio Layer II audio codec, which is often referred to as MP2 because of the ubiquitous MP3 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer III).

The newer DAB+ standard adopted the LC-AAC and HE-AAC, including its version 2 audio codecs, commonly known as AAC, AAC+ or aacPlus. AAC+ uses a modified discrete cosine transform (MDCT) algorithm,[51][52] and is approximately three times more efficient than MP2,[121] which means that broadcasters using DAB+ are able to provide far higher audio quality or far more stations than they could with DAB, or a combination of both higher audio quality and more stations.

One of the most important decisions regarding the design of a digital radio broadcasting system is the choice of which audio codec to use because the efficiency of the audio codec determines how many radio stations can be carried on a fixed capacity multiplex at a given level of audio quality.

Error-correction coding

[edit]

Error-correction coding (ECC) is an important technology for a digital communication system because it determines how robust the reception will be for a given signal strength – stronger ECC will provide a more robust reception than a weaker form.

The old version of DAB uses punctured convolutional coding for its ECC. The coding scheme uses unequal error protection (UEP), which means that parts of the audio bit-stream that are more susceptible to errors causing audible disturbances are provided with more protection (i.e. a lower code rate) and vice versa. However, the UEP scheme used on DAB results in a grey area in between the user experiencing good reception quality and no reception at all, as opposed to the situation with most other wireless digital communication systems that have a sharp "digital cliff", where the signal rapidly becomes unusable if the signal strength drops below a certain threshold. When DAB listeners receive a signal in this intermediate strength area they experience a "burbling" sound which interrupts the playback of the audio.

The DAB+ standard incorporates Reed–Solomon ECC as an "inner layer" of coding that is placed around the byte interleaved audio frame but inside the "outer layer" of convolutional coding used by the original DAB system, although on DAB+ the convolutional coding uses equal error protection (EEP) rather than UEP since each bit is equally important in DAB+. This combination of Reed–Solomon coding as the inner layer of coding, followed by an outer layer of convolutional coding – so-called "concatenated coding" – became a popular ECC scheme in the 1990s, and NASA adopted it for its deep-space missions. One slight difference between the concatenated coding used by the DAB+ system and that used on most other systems is that it uses a rectangular byte interleaver rather than Forney interleaving in order to provide a greater interleaver depth, which increases the distance over which error bursts will be spread out in the bit-stream, which in turn will allow the Reed–Solomon error decoder to correct a higher proportion of errors.

Equal Error Protection[122]: 43 
Profile Code rate
EEP-1A 2/8 (1/4)
EEP-2A 3/8
EEP-3A 4/8 (1/2)
EEP-4A 6/8 (3/4)
EEP-1B 4/9
EEP-2B 4/7
EEP-3B 4/6 (2/3)
EEP-4B 4/5

The ECC used on DAB+ is far stronger than is used on DAB, which, with all else being equal (i.e., if the transmission powers remained the same), would translate into people who currently experience reception difficulties on DAB receiving a much more robust signal with DAB+ transmissions. It also has a far steeper "digital cliff", and listening tests have shown that people prefer this when the signal strength is low compared to the shallower digital cliff on DAB.[121]

Modulation

[edit]

Immunity to fading and inter-symbol interference (caused by multipath propagation) is achieved without equalization by means of the OFDM and DQPSK modulation techniques. For details, see the OFDM system comparison table.

Using values for Transmission Mode I (TM I), the OFDM modulation consists of 1,536 subcarriers that are transmitted in parallel. The useful part of the OFDM symbol period is 1.0 ms, which results in the OFDM subcarriers each having a bandwidth of 1 kHz due to the inverse relationship between these two parameters, and the overall OFDM channel bandwidth is 1.537 MHz. The OFDM guard interval for TM I is 0.246 ms, which means that the overall OFDM symbol duration is 1.246 ms. The guard interval duration also determines the maximum separation between transmitters that are part of the same single-frequency network (SFN), which is approximately 74 km for TM I.

Single-frequency networks

[edit]

OFDM allows the use of single-frequency networks (SFN), which means that a network of transmitters can provide coverage to a large area – up to the size of a country – where all transmitters use the same transmission frequency block. Transmitters that are part of an SFN need to be very accurately synchronised with other transmitters in the network, which requires the transmitters to use very accurate clocks.

When a receiver receives a signal that has been transmitted from the different transmitters that are part of an SFN, the signals from the different transmitters will typically have different delays, but to OFDM they will appear to simply be different multipaths of the same signal. Reception difficulties can arise, however, when the relative delay of multipaths exceeds the OFDM guard interval duration, and there are frequent reports of reception difficulties due to this issue when propagation conditions change, such as when there's high pressure, as signals travel farther than usual, and thus the signals are likely to arrive with a relative delay that is greater than the OFDM guard interval.

Low power gap-filler transmitters can be added to an SFN as and when desired in order to improve reception quality, although the way SFNs have been implemented in the UK up to now they have tended to consist of higher power transmitters being installed at main transmitter sites in order to keep costs down.

Bit rates

[edit]

An ensemble has a maximum bit rate that can be carried, but this depends on which error protection level is used. However, all DAB multiplexes can carry a total of 864 "capacity units". The number of capacity units, or CU, that a certain bit-rate level requires depends on the amount of error correction added to the transmission, as described above. In the UK, most services transmit using 'protection level three', which provides an average ECC code rate of approximately ⁠1/2⁠, equating to a maximum bit rate per multiplex of 1,184 kbit/s.

Services and ensembles

[edit]

Various different services are embedded into one ensemble (which is also typically called a multiplex). These services can include:

DAB and AM/FM compared

[edit]

Traditionally, radio programmes were broadcast on different frequencies via AM and FM, and the radio had to be tuned into each frequency as needed. This used up a comparatively large amount of spectrum for a relatively small number of stations, limiting listening choice. DAB is a digital radio broadcasting system that, through the application of multiplexing and compression, combines multiple audio streams onto a relatively narrow band centred on a single broadcast frequency called a DAB ensemble.

Within an overall target bit rate for the DAB ensemble, individual stations can be allocated different bit rates. The number of channels within a DAB ensemble can be increased by lowering average bit rates, but at the expense of the quality of streams. Error correction under the DAB standard makes the signal more robust but reduces the total bit rate available for streams.

FM HD Radio versus DAB

[edit]

DAB broadcasts a single multiplex that is approximately 1.5 MHz wide (≈1,184 kilobits per second). That multiplex is then subdivided into multiple digital streams of between 9 and 12 programs. In contrast, FM HD Radio adds its digital carriers to the traditional 270 kilohertz-wide analog channels, with capability of up to 300 kbit/s per station (pure digital mode). The full bandwidth of the hybrid mode approaches 400 kHz.

The first generation DAB uses the MPEG-1 Audio Layer II (MP2) audio codec, which has less efficient compression than newer codecs. The typical bitrate for DAB stereo programs is only 128 kbit/s or less and as a result most radio stations on DAB have a lower sound quality than FM, prompting complaints from listeners.[124] As with DAB+ or T-DMB in Europe, FM HD Radio uses a codec based upon the MPEG-4 HE-AAC standard.

HD Radio is a proprietary system from iBiquity Digital Corporation, a subsidiary of DTS, Inc. since 2015, which is itself owned by Xperi Corporation since 2016. DAB is an open standard deposited at ETSI.

Use of frequency spectrum and transmitter sites

[edit]

DAB can give substantially higher spectral efficiency, measured in programmes per MHz and per transmitter site, than analogue systems. In many places, this has led to an increase in the number of stations available to listeners, especially outside of the major urban areas. This can be further improved with DAB+ which uses a much more efficient codec, allowing a lower bitrate per channel with little to no loss in quality. If some stations transmit in mono, their bitrate can be reduced compared to stereo broadcasts, further improving the efficiency.

For example, analog FM requires 0.2 MHz per programme. The frequency reuse factor in most countries is approximately 15 for stereo transmissions (with lesser factors for mono FM networks), meaning (in the case of stereo FM) that only one out of 15 transmitter sites can use the same channel frequency without problems with co-channel interference, i.e. cross-talk. Assuming a total availability of 102 FM channels at a bandwidth of 0.2 MHz over the Band II spectrum of 87.5 to 108.0 MHz, an average of 102/15 = 6.8 radio channels are possible on each transmitter site (plus lower-power local transmitters causing less interference). This results in a system spectral efficiency of 1 / 15 / (0.2 MHz) = 0.30 programmes/transmitter/MHz. DAB with 192 kbit/s codec requires 1.536 MHz * 192 kbit/s / 1,136 kbit/s = 0.26 MHz per audio programme. The frequency reuse factor for local programmes and multi-frequency broadcasting networks (MFN) is typically 4 or 5, resulting in 1 / 4 / (0.26 MHz) = 0.96 programmes/transmitter/MHz. This is 3.2 times as efficient as analog FM for local stations. For single frequency network (SFN) transmission, for example of national programmes, the channel re-use factor is 1, resulting in 1/1/0.25 MHz = 3.85 programmes/transmitter/MHz, which is 12.7 times as efficient as FM for national and regional networks.

Note the above capacity improvement may not always be achieved at the L-band frequencies, since these are more sensitive to obstacles than the VHF band II frequencies, and may cause shadow fading for hilly terrain and for indoor communication. The number of transmitter sites or the transmission power required for full coverage of a country may be rather high at these frequencies, to avoid the system becoming noise limited rather than limited by co-channel interference.

Sound quality

[edit]
See also: MP2 quality

The original objectives of converting to digital transmission were to enable higher audio fidelity, more stations and more resistance to noise, co-channel interference and multipath than in analogue FM radio. The improved sound quality is achieved by using CRC and FEC technology, which improves the transmission performance of digital signals.[125] However, many countries in implementing DAB on stereo radio stations use compression to such a degree that it produces lower sound quality than that received from FM broadcasts. This is because of the bit rate levels being too low for the MPEG Layer 2 audio codec to provide high fidelity audio quality.[126]

The BBC Research & Development department states that at least 192 kbit/s is necessary for a high fidelity stereo broadcast:

A value of 256 kbit/s has been judged to provide a high quality stereo broadcast signal. However, a small reduction, to 224 kbit/s is often adequate, and in some cases it may be possible to accept a further reduction to 192 kbit/s, especially if redundancy in the stereo signal is exploited by a process of 'joint stereo' encoding (i.e. some sounds appearing at the centre of the stereo image need not be sent twice). At 192 kbit/s, it is relatively easy to hear imperfections in critical audio material.

— BBC R&D White Paper WHP 061 June 2003[127]

When the BBC reduced the bit-rate of transmission of its classical music station Radio 3 from 192 kbit/s to 160 kbit/s in July 2006, the resulting degradation of audio quality prompted a number of complaints to the corporation.[128] The BBC later announced that following this testing of new equipment, it would resume the previous practice of transmitting Radio 3 at 192 kbit/s whenever there were no other demands on bandwidth. (For comparison, BBC Radio 3 and all other BBC radio stations are streamed online using AAC at 320 kbit/s, described as 'HD', on BBC Radio iPlayer after a period when it was available at two different bit rates.)

Despite the above, a survey in 2007 of DAB listeners (including mobile) has shown most find DAB to have equal or better sound quality than FM.[129]

By 2019, some stations had upgraded to DAB+ but rather than improving sound quality, they instead reduced it to 32 kbit/s or 64 kbit/s, often in mono.[130][better source needed]

Strengths and weaknesses

[edit]

Benefits of DAB

[edit]

Improved features for users

[edit]

DAB devices perform band-scans over the entire frequency range, presenting all stations from a single list for the user to select from.

DAB is capable of providing metadata alongside the audio stream. Metadata allows visual information, text and graphics – such as the station name and logo, presenter, song title and album artwork – to be displayed while a station is playing. Radio stations can provide the metadata to augment the listening experience, particularly on car receivers which have large display panels.[131]

DAB can carry "radiotext" (in DAB terminology, Dynamic Label Segment, or DLS) from the station giving real-time information such as song titles, music type and news or traffic updates, of up to 128 characters in length. This is similar to a feature of FM called RDS, which enables a radiotext of up to 64 characters.

The DAB transmission contains a local time of day and so a device may use this to automatically correct its internal clock when travelling between time zones and when changing to or from Daylight Saving.

More stations

[edit]

DAB is not more bandwidth efficient than analogue measured in programmes per MHz of a specific transmitter (the so-called link spectral efficiency), but it is less susceptible to co-channel interference (cross talk), which makes it possible to reduce the reuse distance, i.e. use the same radio frequency channel more densely. The system spectral efficiency (the average number of radio programmes per MHz and transmitter) is a factor three more efficient than analogue FM for local radio stations. For national and regional radio networks, the efficiency is improved by more than an order of magnitude due to the use of SFNs. In that case, adjacent transmitters use the same frequency.

In certain areas – particularly rural areas – the introduction of DAB gives radio listeners a greater choice of radio stations. For instance, in Southern Norway, radio listeners experienced an increase in available stations from 6 to 21 when DAB was introduced in November 2006.

Reception quality

[edit]

The DAB standard integrates features to reduce the negative consequences of multipath fading and signal noise, which afflict existing analogue systems.

Also, as DAB transmits digital audio, there is no hiss with a weak signal, which can happen on FM. However, radios in the fringe of a DAB signal can experience a "bubbling mud" sound interrupting the audio or the audio cutting out altogether.

Due to sensitivity to Doppler shift in combination with multipath propagation, DAB reception range (but not audio quality) is reduced when travelling speeds of more than 120 to 200 km/h, depending on carrier frequency.[19]

Variable bandwidth

[edit]

Mono talk radio, news and weather channels and other non-music programs need significantly less bandwidth than a typical music radio station, which allows DAB to carry these programmes at lower bit rates, leaving more bandwidth to be used for other programs.

However, this led to the situation where some stations are being broadcast in mono; see § Audio quality for more details.

Transmission costs

[edit]

DAB transmitters are inevitably more expensive than their FM counterparts. DAB uses higher frequencies than FM and therefore there may be a need to compensate with more transmitters to achieve the same coverage as a single FM transmitter. DAB is commonly transmitted by a different company from the broadcaster who then sells the capacity to a number of radio stations. This shared cost can work out cheaper than operating an individual FM transmitter.

This efficiency originates from the ability a DAB network has in broadcasting more channels per transmitter/network. One network can broadcast 6–10 channels (with MP2 audio codec) or 10–18 channels (with HE AAC codec). Hence, it is thought that the replacement of FM-radios and FM-transmitters with new DAB-radios and DAB-transmitters will not cost any more compared with new FM facilities. It is also argued that the power consumption will be lower for stations transmitted on a single DAB multiplex compared with individual analog transmitters.[132]

Once applied, one operator has claimed that DAB transmission is as low as one-nineteenth of the cost of FM transmission.[133]

Disadvantages of DAB

[edit]

Reception quality

[edit]

The reception quality during the early stage of deployment of DAB was poor even for people who live well within the coverage area. The reason for this is that DAB uses weak error correction coding, so that when there are a lot of errors with the received data not enough of the errors can be corrected and a "bubbling mud" sound occurs. In some cases a complete loss of signal can happen. This situation has been improved upon in the newer DAB+ version that uses stronger error correction coding and as additional transmitters are built.

As with other digital systems, when the signal is weak or suffers severe interference, it will not work at all. DAB reception may also be a problem for receivers when the wanted signal is adjacent to a stronger one. This was a particular issue for early and low cost receivers.

Audio quality

[edit]

Up to the mid-2010s, a common complaint by listeners is that broadcasters 'squeeze in' more stations per ensemble than recommended[127] by:

  • Minimizing the bit-rate, to the lowest level of sound-quality that listeners are willing to tolerate, such as 112 kbit/s for stereo and even 48 kbit/s for mono speech radio (LBC 1152 and the Voice of Russia are examples).
  • Having few digital channels broadcasting in stereo.

Signal delay

[edit]

The nature of a single-frequency network (SFN) is such that the transmitters in a network must broadcast the same signal at the same time. To achieve synchronization, the broadcaster must counter any differences in propagation time incurred by the different methods and distances involved in carrying the signal from the multiplexer to the different transmitters. This is done by applying a delay to the incoming signal at the transmitter based on a timestamp generated at the multiplexer, created taking into account the maximum likely propagation time, with a generous added margin for safety. Delays in the audio encoder and the receiver due to digital processing (e.g. deinterleaving) add to the overall delay perceived by the listener.[19] The signal is delayed, usually by around 1 to 4 seconds and can be considerably longer for DAB+. This has disadvantages:

  • DAB radios are out of step with live events, so the experience of listening to live commentaries on events being watched is impaired;
  • Listeners using a combination of analogue (AM or FM) and DAB radios (e.g. in different rooms of a house) will hear a mixture when both receivers are within earshot.

Time signals, on the contrary, are not a problem in a well-defined network with a fixed delay. The DAB multiplexer adds the proper offset to the distributed time information. The time information is also independent from the (possibly varying) audio decoding delay in receivers since the time is not embedded inside the audio frames. This means that built in clocks in receivers can be precisely correct.

Transmission costs

[edit]

DAB can provide savings for networks of several stations. The original development of DAB was driven by national network operators with a number of channels to transmit from multiple sites. However, for individual stations such as small community or local stations which traditionally operate their own FM transmitter on their own building the cost of DAB transmission will be much higher than analog. Operating a DAB transmitter for a single station is not an efficient use of spectrum or power. With that said, this can be solved to some degree by combining multiple local stations in one DAB/DAB+ mux, similar to what is done on DVB-T/DVB-T2 with local TV stations.

Coverage

[edit]

Household receiver penetration rates. As of 2021:[134]

Country Penetration
(% of households)
Norway 71
Australia 68.5
United Kingdom 65
Germany 34
Denmark 31
Belgium 21
France 14
Italy 13

Although FM coverage still exceeds DAB coverage in most countries implementing any kind of DAB services, a number of countries moving to digital switchover have undergone significant DAB network rollouts; as of 2022, the following coverages were given by WorldDAB:[15]

Country Coverage
(% of population)
Kuwait 100
Malta 100
Monaco 100
Denmark 99.9
Norway 99.7
Switzerland 99.5
Germany 98
United Kingdom 97.3
Belgium 97
Czech Republic 95
Netherlands 95
Gibraltar 90
South Korea 90
Qatar 90
Croatia 90
Italy 86
Slovenia 85
Austria 83
Serbia 78
Tunisia 75
Poland 67
Australia 66
Estonia 50
Slovakia 46
Sweden 43
France 42
Azerbaijan 33
Turkey 30
Montenegro 29
Spain 20
Thailand 17
Algeria 8
Ukraine 7
Greece ?
Indonesia ?

Compatibility

[edit]

In 2006 tests began using the much improved HE-AAC codec for DAB+. Hardly any of the receivers made before 2008 support the newer codec, however, making them partially obsolete once DAB+ broadcasts begin and completely obsolete once all MP2 encoded stations are gone[citation needed]. Most new[when?] receivers are both DAB and DAB+ compatible[citation needed]; however, the issue is exacerbated by some manufacturers[who?] disabling the DAB+ features on otherwise compatible radios to save on licensing fees when sold in countries without current DAB+ broadcasts[citation needed].

Power requirements

[edit]
Portable DAB/DAB+ and FM receiver, circa 2016. This unit requires two "AA" size batteries (headphones not shown).

As DAB requires digital signal processing techniques to convert from the received digitally encoded signal to the analogue audio content, the complexity of the electronic circuitry required to do this is higher. This translates into needing more power to effect this conversion than compared to an analogue FM to audio conversion, meaning that portable receiving equipment will have a much shorter battery life, and require higher power (and hence more bulk). This means that they use more energy than analogue Band II VHF receivers. However, thanks to increased integration (radio-on-chip), DAB receiver power usage has been reduced dramatically, making portable receivers far more usable.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Digital Audio Broadcasting

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) is a standard designed for transmitting compressed digital audio and data services to stationary, mobile, and portable receivers, utilizing (OFDM) to achieve robust signal reception in diverse environments. Developed under the Eureka 147 research project launched in 1987 by the and EFTA countries, the system was standardized by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) as EN 300 401 in 1995 and endorsed by the (ITU) as a global recommendation. DAB organizes transmissions into multiplexes that bundle multiple audio programs and , such as , traffic updates, and electronic program guides, encoded primarily with MPEG Audio Layer II for near-CD quality sound without analog interference like or multipath distortion. Initial deployments began in the mid-1990s, with pioneering services in the and , leading to widespread adoption across where it now supports hundreds of stations and millions of receivers. An enhanced variant, DAB+, introduced in 2006, replaces the original with (AAC) for improved efficiency and capacity, facilitating greater bitrate flexibility and additional channels within the same spectrum allocation. While DAB has achieved technical milestones in delivering interference-free broadcasting and integrated data services, its rollout faced challenges including high infrastructure costs, spectrum allocation disputes, and competition from alternative systems like in , resulting in uneven global penetration and ongoing debates over mandatory analog-to-digital transitions in select regions. Countries such as completed a full FM switch-off in 2017, marking a significant success, though broader shows persistent reliance on FM due to its established ubiquity and lower receiver costs.

History and Development

Origins in Eureka-147 and Early Standardization (1980s-1990s)

In the 1980s, analog faced constraints from scarcity in the VHF band, limiting the number of services due to inefficient use of bandwidth and susceptibility to interference, as demand for additional radio stations grew across . The (EBU) responded by initiating research into digital alternatives, including satellite-based systems, to enable of multiple audio programs and services within a single channel, thereby optimizing utilization through advanced modulation techniques. This effort culminated in the launch of the Eureka-147 project in 1987, a collaborative initiative funded by the involving over 40 broadcasters, manufacturers, and research institutions aimed at developing a robust digital audio broadcasting system as a successor to FM. The project emphasized empirical testing of technologies like (OFDM) for resistance to multipath fading and Doppler effects, addressing key limitations of analog systems in mobile reception environments. Early milestones included the demonstration of single-frequency networks (SFNs) in prototypes, where multiple synchronized transmitters operated on the same frequency to achieve wide-area coverage with reduced infrastructure compared to multi-frequency analog networks. Field trials conducted in the early 1990s, such as those by the in the UK, confirmed the system's superior noise immunity and capacity for simultaneous transmission of several high-quality stereo channels. The EBU's technical coordination facilitated the progression to standardization, with the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) finalizing the core DAB protocol specifications by 1993, establishing the framework for interoperable implementation focused on VHF frequencies for terrestrial broadcasting. These standards prioritized causal in allocation, enabling up to four times more services than FM equivalents through digital error correction and time interleaving.

Initial Deployments and DAB+ Evolution (2000s)

The initiated the first regular DAB broadcasts on 15 November 1995, when the launched a limited service including its national networks and some commercial stations, marking the initial commercial rollout of the Eureka-147 standard. These early transmissions operated in frequencies, offering multiplexing capabilities that allowed multiple audio services within a single ensemble, though coverage was initially confined to major urban areas and receiver availability was scarce. Scandinavian countries followed with pilot projects shortly thereafter; Sweden commenced DAB transmissions on 27 September 1995, while and conducted field trials in the mid-1990s to evaluate performance in varied terrains. These pilots highlighted DAB's multiplexing advantages, enabling efficient delivery of several channels per 1.5 MHz bearer, but revealed reception challenges in fjord-heavy or forested regions where multipath interference degraded signal reliability compared to FM. In the Asia-Pacific region, experimental trials emerged in the early 2000s, such as DAB audio tests in and mainland China (including preparations for the 2008 Olympics), assessing feasibility for urban mobile reception amid growing demand for digital services. Addressing inherent limitations of the original DAB's MPEG-1 Layer II (MP2) codec, which delivered suboptimal audio fidelity at ensemble-typical bitrates around 128 kbit/s, engineers developed DAB+ in 2006 by integrating the more efficient (HE-AAC) v2 codec. This upgrade, standardized by ETSI under TS 102 563, achieved approximately 2.5 to 3 times greater compression efficiency, permitting CD-like quality at lower data rates or additional services within the same multiplex capacity without expanding spectrum use. Initial DAB+ tests commenced in that year, with the first operational broadcasts launching in 2007, gradually supplanting legacy MP2 ensembles to enhance overall viability. European regulatory momentum supported the DAB family's evolution, with ETSI reaffirming its core standards in 2006 amid harmonized spectrum planning under the GE06 Agreement framework, prioritizing it over competing systems like for terrestrial audio. In the UK, this period saw rapid uptake, culminating in cumulative sales exceeding 10 million DAB receivers by November 2009, driven by falling hardware costs and expanded national coverage reaching over 90% of the population.

Global Expansion and Stagnation (2010s-2025)

In the , Digital Audio Broadcasting experienced policy-driven expansions in select European markets, with launching its first nationwide DAB+ multiplex on August 1, 2011, enabling broader commercial and public service distribution across the country. marked a pivotal milestone by completing the world's first national FM switch-off to DAB+ in December 2017, achieving coverage surpassing FM and serving 99% of its population through a phased regional rollout that began in January of that year. also saw surges in multiplex deployments and receiver sales during this decade, supported by regulatory incentives for digital transition. By 2025, WorldDAB reported cumulative global DAB receiver sales approaching 150 million units, reflecting steady accumulation from these earlier efforts, with notable acceleration in —where receiver sales nearly tripled post-2020 following mandates for DAB compatibility in new devices—and emerging markets including parts of , such as Uganda's technology-neutral licensing expansions. However, adoption plateaued in regions like the and much of , where DAB faced negligible infrastructure investment amid dominance of alternatives such as in and limited spectrum allocations elsewhere. This uneven trajectory stems from high initial infrastructure costs outweighing incremental audio quality gains over FM for many broadcasters and consumers, fostering listener inertia toward analog systems despite digital mandates. Market analyses project DAB's at approximately 5-7% through the mid-2020s, yet this is increasingly eclipsed by streaming and podcasts, which offer on-demand flexibility without requiring specialized receivers or commitments. In policy contexts like Norway's, government subsidies mitigated transition barriers, but elsewhere, the marginal benefits failed to justify widespread displacement of established FM networks.

Technical Specifications

Frequency Bands, Modes, and Transmission Protocols

Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) primarily utilizes the VHF allocation from 174 to 240 MHz for terrestrial transmissions, enabling wide-area coverage suitable for mobile and fixed receivers in regions such as and parts of . This band supports a channel bandwidth of 1.536 MHz per ensemble, with frequency blocks spaced at 1.712 MHz centers to minimize . An alternative L-band from 1.452 to 1.492 GHz has been specified for satellite-hybrid and mobile applications, offering higher frequency reuse potential but requiring more robust receivers due to greater losses. The DAB system defines transmission modes to adapt to varying network topologies and propagation environments, with parameters including frame duration, symbol periods, and s optimized for (OFDM). Mode I, the primary mode for large-area single frequency networks (SFNs) in , employs a 96 ms frame length and a 246-symbol to tolerate delays up to 28 km between synchronized transmitters, facilitating nationwide coverage with reduced self-interference. Mode II supports local-area SFNs with a shorter 24 ms frame and smaller for urban deployments, while Mode III uses even tighter parameters for high-density environments; however, the 2017 ETSI update to EN 300 401 retained only Mode I as mandatory, deprecating others for simplified . Mode IV, with a 48 ms frame, was designed for L-band satellite augmentation but saw limited adoption. DAB's transmission protocol centers on ensemble multiplexing, where up to 64 sub-channels are combined into a single 1.5 Mbit/s ensemble via within OFDM carriers, enabling simultaneous delivery of 4 to 18 services depending on data rates and error protection levels. Fast Information Channel (FIC) segments carry multiplex configuration and service linkage data, while main service channel (MSC) handles protected audio/data streams; synchronization across SFNs relies on precise GPS-timed phase alignment to exploit constructive interference, yielding efficiencies 1.5 to 2 times higher than multi-frequency networks by allowing reuse within the same block. This SFN capability mitigates inter-symbol interference in multipath scenarios, with empirical field tests confirming utilization rates that support transmitter densities 40-60% lower than traditional FM networks for comparable coverage probabilities above 95%.

Audio Encoding, Error Correction, and Modulation

The original Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) system utilizes for audio source coding, which employs perceptual coding to compress stereo audio streams at bitrates typically ranging from 128 kbps to 192 kbps per program, balancing quality and capacity within multiplex constraints. In DAB+, High-Efficiency Advanced Audio Coding (HE-AAC v2) replaces MP2, enabling lower bitrates (as low as 32-64 kbps for near-CD quality) through parametric stereo and spectral band replication techniques while maintaining via signaling. These codecs output bitstreams that are formatted into sub-channels within the multiplex service component, with optional program-associated data (PAD) for textual or ancillary information. Error protection in DAB employs a concatenated coding scheme for the main service channel (MSC). An inner with variable rates (e.g., 1/2 for maximum protection or 3/4 for higher throughput) punctures the data for , followed by time interleaving across multiple OFDM symbols to disperse burst errors. An outer Reed-Solomon (RS) code, specifically RS(120,127) over , adds block-level parity to correct residual symbol errors after Viterbi decoding of the convolutional code, achieving effective correction of up to 10-20% of erroneous symbols in typical channels. This layered approach, combined with energy dispersal scrambling to whiten the spectrum, ensures robustness against impulsive noise and Doppler shifts in mobile reception scenarios. Modulation occurs via Differential Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (DQPSK) applied to the protected data symbols, which are then mapped onto 1,536 orthogonal frequency-division multiplexed (OFDM) sub-carriers in Mode I (the most common configuration), spaced at 1 kHz intervals. Each OFDM symbol spans 1.246 ms (including a 0.246 ms for multipath mitigation), with DQPSK's differential encoding aiding phase tracking without explicit . A DAB ensemble, comprising multiple audio/data services, yields a total useful bitrate of approximately 1.2 Mbps after coding overhead, distributed across the multiplex. The protocol stack integrates these elements hierarchically: at the , OFDM handles transmission over VHF/UHF bands; the channel coding layer (convolutional + RS) precedes modulation for error resilience; and service information, transmitted via the dedicated Fast Information Channel (FIC) using on a subset of carriers, conveys multiplex configuration, service linking, and reconfiguration data to enable dynamic ensemble adjustments without interrupting broadcast. This structure supports logical frames of 24 OFDM symbols (about 96 ms), aligning audio blocks with transmission for low-latency decoding.

DAB+ Upgrades and Multiplexing Capabilities

DAB+ represents an enhancement to the original Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) standard, finalized by the (EBU) and ETSI in 2006 and deployed from 2007 onward, primarily through the adoption of the more efficient (AAC) family of codecs, including High-Efficiency AAC (HE-AAC). This shift from the original DAB's MPEG Audio Layer II (MP2) codec, which required approximately 192 kbps for near-CD quality stereo audio, allows DAB+ to achieve comparable perceptual quality at bitrates as low as 64-96 kbps for stereo using HE-AAC with spectral band replication (SBR) and parametric stereo tools. The efficiency gain roughly halves the bitrate requirements for audio services, thereby increasing the capacity of a single multiplex ensemble to accommodate up to 18-20 stereo channels or a mix of audio and data services within the fixed 1.536 MHz bandwidth, without modifications to the underlying OFDM modulation or error correction frameworks. These upgrades in DAB+ also expand non-audio capabilities by freeing bandwidth for enhanced services, including dynamic labels for text information, still images via MOT slideshows, and support for systems that enable encrypted premium content delivery. For instance, AAC's parametric extensions permit robust low-bitrate encoding (e.g., 48 kbps mono with error protection), allowing integration of objects without compromising streams. However, DAB+ signals are not decodable by legacy DAB receivers due to the incompatibility, necessitating dual-mode receivers capable of fallback to MP2 for original DAB ensembles; such receivers have been standard since approximately 2007. In DAB and DAB+ systems, multiplexing occurs at the ensemble level, where a collection of audio programs, data services, and ancillary information are aggregated into logical sub-channels within a single transmission frame, transmitted via time-division multiplexing over the OFDM carriers. The ensemble controller dynamically allocates capacity units (e.g., 8-64 kbps blocks) to services based on real-time demand, enabling flexible reconfiguration such as varying audio bitrates or inserting data streams without disrupting the overall multiplex. This logical channel structure supports up to 64 services per ensemble, with service information (e.g., via Fast Information Channel) providing receivers details on sub-channel mappings, labels, and alternative frequencies for seamless handover. By 2025, active DAB deployments have predominantly transitioned to DAB+ configurations, with original DAB ensembles phased out in most regions to optimize spectrum efficiency and service density.

Worldwide Adoption

Countries with Full or Partial FM-to-DAB Transitions

Norway completed the world's first nationwide FM radio shutdown for national broadcasters on January 11, , with regional stations following by 2018 and local FM retained until 2031. Post-transition, daily radio reach stabilized at 62-64% and weekly reach at 88%, with 98% of prior weekly FM listeners migrating to DAB+. By , DAB accounted for 62% of all radio listening, up from 47% in 2016. Switzerland enacted a partial FM-to-DAB transition, with the (SRG) ceasing FM transmissions nationwide on December 31, 2024, shifting public service programs to DAB+ while private stations phase out FM transmitters regionally from January 1, 2025. Initial post-switch data from Q1 2025 indicated no overall decline in daily radio reach in German-speaking areas, attributing apparent audience drops to measurement shifts from FM to digital platforms rather than listener loss. The maintains a hybrid FM/DAB system since the 1990s, with no mandated FM shutdown but significant partial transition through widespread adoption; approximately 75% of households own at least one DAB receiver as of 2025. DAB supports over 100 small-scale multiplexes covering all nations by September 2025, sustaining commercial radio growth. Australia initiated DAB+ services in 2009 across five major metropolitan areas, achieving 66% national population coverage by May 2024 through multiplex expansions, including launches in Darwin and the Gold Coast. This partial transition has enabled simulcast of ABC and SBS national services alongside commercial growth, without FM discontinuation. In transitioned areas, listener surveys report shifts of 20-30% from FM to DAB post-mandate, correlating with spectrum efficiencies where one DAB ensemble accommodates the capacity of 5-10 FM channels.

Regions with Abandoned or Postponed Switches

In , plans for a nationwide FM switch-off by 2021 were abandoned due to insufficient political consensus and DAB listener penetration remaining below viable thresholds, with public broadcasters continuing to maintain parallel FM and DAB services as of 2018. This reversal reflected broader cost-benefit imbalances, as taxpayer-funded infrastructure expansions yielded minimal audience shift from entrenched FM networks. Canada's early DAB initiative, launched in the 1990s with L-band allocations, collapsed by 2010 when the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation deactivated its transmitters, driven by negligible receiver availability and the superior market traction of satellite services like XM Radio, which captured digital audio demand without requiring spectrum reallocation. Adoption rates hovered under 5% nationally, rendering further investment uneconomical and prompting a pivot to HD Radio's in-band compatibility model. The never pursued a federal DAB mandate, opting instead for HD Radio's hybrid analog-digital approach since the early 2000s, which preserved FM/AM infrastructure while enabling incremental upgrades without consumer disruption or new tower builds. This preference stemmed from HD Radio's lower transition barriers and voluntary deployment, contrasting DAB's requirement for dedicated VHF spectrum and full analog sunset, amid listener resistance to discarding existing radios. In , DAB trials in during the early were sidelined in favor of DRM standards for medium- and short-wave digitalization, as announced by regulators prioritizing cost-effective AM band reuse over DAB's higher-frequency demands and limited rural coverage gains. Similarly, India's exploratory DAB pilots in the stalled without national commitment, overshadowed by indigenous hybrid digital TV-radio frameworks and the infrastructure-free scalability of mobile streaming, where FM persistence and data costs deterred wholesale replacement. Italy mandated DAB-capable receivers from January 2020 but indefinitely deferred FM closure, with proposals for a 2030 switch-off highlighting persistent delays tied to FM's near-universal receiver base—over 90% household penetration—and the competitive erosion from zero-cost streaming platforms that bypassed broadcast economics altogether. These postponements underscore causal factors like FM's spectral efficiency in dense populations and the absence of mandates strong enough to offset multibillion-euro equivalents in network overhauls against sub-10% DAB uptake. As of early 2025, cumulative sales of DAB/DAB+ receivers worldwide approached 150 million units, reflecting steady accumulation driven primarily by markets in and . Growth in receiver sales has been led by and , where recent device shipments have accelerated adoption amid expanding network coverage. Household penetration rates for DAB/DAB+ receivers vary significantly by region, with the highest levels in and select other countries:
Country/RegionHousehold Penetration (%)
70
67
65.2
34
31
24.5
In the , penetration exceeds 30-70%, supported by nationwide coverage and mandatory transitions from analog FM. Conversely, adoption in the remains negligible, under 5% in most areas due to reliance on alternative digital standards like and limited infrastructure investment. Market projections indicate a (CAGR) of 5.9% for the DAB radio sector through 2035, fueled by incremental hardware integrations in vehicles and portables, though this pace lags broader expansions. Empirical listening data from 2025, such as Edison Research's Infinite Dial reports, underscore DAB's marginal role in youth demographics (18-34), where podcast reach rivals or exceeds traditional radio at around 52% weekly, while streaming platforms dominate overall time spent with audio amid a shift away from broadcast-centric consumption.

Comparisons to Analog and Competing Standards

DAB Versus FM/AM: Empirical Spectrum and Coverage Data

DAB employs a multiplexed transmission in a 1.536 MHz channel block within the VHF (174-240 MHz), accommodating typically 8-18 audio services depending on bitrate and , whereas analog FM requires approximately 200 kHz per service for comparable quality, resulting in DAB's capacity for 7-10 times more services per unit of in dense ensembles. This efficiency stems from digital modulation and error correction, enabling shared overhead across multiple streams, unlike FM's individual analog carriers. AM, using 9-10 kHz channels in or broader spacing in (153-279 kHz), proves inefficient for local broadcasting due to extensive groundwave —often exceeding 1000 km—mismatching granular market needs and wasting on unintended overlap. In terms of coverage, DAB's single frequency networks (SFNs) leverage coherent signal combining to achieve 2-3 dB gains over multi-frequency FM networks, extending effective radius efficiency and allowing transmitter powers as low as 30-50% of FM equivalents for equivalent rural field strengths, per planning models. However, DAB exhibits a pronounced , where reception drops abruptly below a signal threshold (typically 40-50 dBμV/m), contrasting FM's graceful degradation into audible noise; empirical tests confirm this leads to complete audio loss in DAB fringe zones versus FM's progressive hiss. national DAB coverage attains 99% population reach via over 600 transmitters, matching FM's extent but with localized multipath-induced errors 15-25% higher in urban mobiles due to VHF propagation sensitivities, necessitating denser site planning. Urban DAB deployments often demand hybrid repeaters or elevated powers to counter building-induced interference, offsetting rural SFN savings.

DAB Versus HD Radio and DRM: Technical and Economic Metrics

DAB employs dedicated spectrum allocations in VHF (Band III, 174-240 MHz) and L-band (1.452-1.492 GHz), facilitating single-frequency network (SFN) multiplexing of multiple services with high spectral efficiency, typically supporting 10-18 audio channels per 1.5 MHz ensemble. In comparison, HD Radio's IBOC system operates in-band within existing FM (88-108 MHz) and AM allocations, adding digital sidebands adjacent to analog carriers without requiring new spectrum, but this has generated interference to first-adjacent and co-channel stations, with reports of increased noise floors and degraded reception documented in field tests and broadcaster complaints. DRM targets primarily shortwave (HF), medium wave (MF), and long wave (LF) bands, with DRM+ extending to VHF but at reduced multiplexing capacity—often limited to 1-4 services per 9-10 kHz or 20 kHz channel—due to its narrower bandwidth and lack of DAB's ensemble-scale efficiency in VHF deployments. Data throughput metrics further differentiate the standards: DAB ensembles deliver up to 1.2 Mbps total capacity, divided among services using AAC+ encoding for efficient audio delivery. HD Radio provides 96-128 kbps for primary (HD1) and 32-64 kbps for secondary/ channels (HD2/HD3), yielding per-station totals of 100-200 kbps but requiring separate analog simulcasts that dilute overall digital efficiency. DRM achieves 40-95 kbps per service in HF modes, constrained by propagation challenges and lower modulation robustness compared to DAB's COFDM in VHF. DAB's dedicated thus enables 4-6 times more services per MHz than HD Radio's station-centric model or DRM's band-limited approach.
MetricDAB/DAB+HD Radio (IBOC)DRM/DRM+
Typical Capacity per Block1.2 Mbps (10-18 services)100-200 kbps/station (1-3 services)40-95 kbps/service (1-4 services)
High (multiplex in 1.5 MHz)Moderate (sidebands in existing channels)Low (narrowband, propagation-limited)
Interference ProfileNone to analog (dedicated bands)Adjacent/co-channel issues reportedMinimal in HF, but band congestion
Economic analyses highlight DAB+'s advantages in operational expenditures (OPEX). For delivering 18 services over equivalent coverage, DAB+ energy costs are approximately 2.5 times lower than DRM+ due to efficient SFN transmission and lower power requirements per service. GatesAir modeling shows DAB+ OPEX at about half that of DRM+ and one-sixth of FM simulcast scenarios, driven by reduced transmitter counts (via SFNs) and energy-efficient modulation, with total savings compounding over large networks. HD Radio's hybrid analog-digital operation incurs higher ongoing costs from dual-signal maintenance and interference mitigation, though its in-band reuse avoids initial spectrum reallocation expenses. Adoption reflects these factors: DAB+ serves over 40 countries with active networks as of 2025, contrasted by HD Radio's confinement to North America, where it equips roughly 58% of new vehicles but faces stagnant overall penetration amid limited global export.

Infrastructure Reuse and Transition Costs

Existing FM towers can often be adapted for DAB transmission, particularly for single frequency networks (SFNs) that enable efficient coverage with shared frequencies, thereby reducing the requirement for new site builds. An EBU cost-benefit analysis for a model European country of 72 million inhabitants estimates that 20% of FM sites are directly reusable, with upgrades primarily involving antenna modifications for DAB's VHF Band III (174-240 MHz) and transmitter replacements, contributing to a total national DAB network CapEx of €14.7 million. This approach contrasts with full greenfield deployments, as SFN configurations allow propagation efficiencies that minimize additional infrastructure outlays beyond initial equipment costs averaging €810,000-€1.5 million per station depending on multiplex sharing. Transition CapEx varies by country but remains moderated by infrastructure adaptation; in , the 2017 FM switchover incurred broadcaster-funded upgrades estimated in the low hundreds of millions of , offset rapidly by OpEx reductions from up to 18 channels per frequency block. projections highlighted annual transmission savings exceeding 200 million (€18 million) post-transition, equivalent to eightfold cost efficiency for delivering 22 DAB channels versus five FM equivalents. Long-term OpEx benefits stem from halving effective transmitter density through SFNs, with DAB networks requiring fewer high-power sites for equivalent coverage; GatesAir analyses project 11-fold lower investment costs and $3.2 million in energy savings over 10 years relative to FM, despite DAB transmitters' lower per-unit efficiency (40% versus FM's 72%). The EBU's empirical modeling demonstrates breakeven for DAB versus prolonged FM simulcasting within slightly over two years after FM cessation, following a typical five-year dual-broadcast phase, with per-station OpEx dropping to €1.1 million in multiplexed scenarios versus €5.8 million for standalone FM. In high-density markets, these savings accelerate due to enhanced , though upfront receiver adaptation burdens—such as car adapter costs of 1,000-2,000 NOK (€90-180) in —shift to consumers without widespread subsidies, as evidenced by the UK's market-driven rollout lacking mandated government funding.

Reception and Sound Quality

Bitrate Impacts on Perceptible Audio Fidelity

Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB+) primarily utilizes the HE-AAC codec variant of (AAC), operating at stereo bitrates typically ranging from 64 to 96 kbit/s to accommodate multiple channels within multiplex constraints. At these levels, the encoding proves perceptually transparent for speech signals, where psychoacoustic masking efficiently suppresses quantization noise, but introduces audible artifacts in musical content featuring sharp transients or , such as pre-echo distortion and temporal smearing from block-based transform processing. These impairments arise because algorithms discard spectral components presumed inaudible based on masking thresholds, yet imperfect models fail to fully replicate human auditory perception under varying conditions. In comparison, analog FM transmission conveys uncompressed audio limited to roughly 15 kHz bandwidth but maintains continuous integrity, yielding signal-to-noise ratios often surpassing 60 dB in line-of-sight conditions, which better preserves transient attacks and spatial without digital quantization errors. Blind subjective listening tests confirm that at 64 kbit/s, DAB+ HE-AAC falls below reference quality (16-bit/44.1 kHz PCM) in mean opinion scores for orchestral and excerpts, though it exceeds legacy low-bitrate at equivalent rates; FM under low-noise scenarios outperforms DAB+ at 48–64 kbit/s across and overall fidelity metrics. Such evaluations, conducted with calibrated and trained listeners, highlight that equivalence claims between DAB+ and FM overlook content-dependent degradations, where FM's analog nature avoids codec-induced phase errors despite its bandwidth cap. DAB+ multiplexes support allocation within capacity, enabling transient boosts to 128 kbit/s for high-complexity audio, which narrows the perceptual gap for peaks but cannot eliminate foundational compression losses across sustained program material. Psychoacoustic analyses underscore that transparency—indistinguishability from lossless—requires HE-AAC bitrates exceeding 192 kbit/s for broadband music, far above operational DAB+ norms, as lower rates compromise fine critical for instrumental detail. Empirical data from these tests thus refute assertions of inherent parity with uncompressed FM, attributing differences to causal mechanisms in design rather than mere implementation variances.

Real-World Reception Challenges and Empirical Tests

Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) signals demonstrate the characteristic digital "cliff effect," whereby audio reception ceases abruptly once the signal falls below the minimum decoding threshold—typically around a signal-to-noise ratio of 13-15 dB—resulting in total dropout rather than the progressive degradation seen in FM systems. This phenomenon stems from the error-correcting codes and modulation in DAB, which tolerate noise up to the threshold but fail entirely beyond it, contrasting with FM's analog graceful degradation amid fading or interference. While DAB's (OFDM) architecture inherently resists multipath distortion better than single-carrier FM by distributing data across subcarriers and exploiting the to absorb delays, urban settings with dense obstructions like tall buildings still provoke reception issues through signal shadowing and excessive reflections. Field monitoring in (SFN) deployments, such as those in urban zones, has documented localized dropouts and signal instability, particularly in southern city districts where exacerbates losses despite adequate northern coverage. These challenges arise because OFDM mitigation assumes multipath delays within the (about 100 μs for Mode I), but extreme urban clutter can exceed this, leading to inter-symbol interference spikes. Vehicular field tests highlight DAB's robustness on open roads but vulnerability in enclosed environments. On highways, reception remains stable at speeds up to 100-120 km/h due to OFDM's Doppler tolerance, yet tunnels induce rapid failures without in-tunnel repeaters, as direct line-of-sight is blocked. Italian RAI empirical trials on motorway tunnels (e.g., A5 Turin-Aosta) in 2015-2017 measured DAB+ coverage limited to 300-700 meters under traffic loads with low-power internal transmitters (4 W), with heavy vehicles causing total shielding and service interruptions via multipath nulling; FM continuity requires dedicated radiating cables, underscoring DAB's higher sensitivity to such geometries. Subjective listening evaluations of DAB+ and FM programs reinforce these patterns. A 2021 Polish study with 45 participants rating five program types indoors found DAB+ yielding higher mean opinion scores (4.26-4.38) than FM (3.61-4.28) for , clarity, and interference resilience, with unanimous preference for DAB+ in stable conditions; however, FM's analog fallback aids marginal mobile scenarios where DAB drops occur. Portable DAB receivers exacerbate field usability issues by drawing 20-50% more battery power than comparable FM units owing to continuous digital and error correction, shortening operational time in remote or unplugged tests.

Delay, Compatibility, and Power Consumption Issues

Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) introduces a signal latency of approximately 2 to 4 seconds relative to analog FM transmissions, arising from the block-based processing in the Eureka-147 standard where audio is encoded in fixed frames before transmission. This inherent delay, which can extend to 8 seconds in some configurations including receiver processing, hinders real-time for listeners following live events like sports or traffic updates alongside visual sources, as the audio trails the action. Original DAB implementations exhibited even higher delays due to less efficient error correction and multiplexing overhead compared to later DAB+ refinements. DAB lacks inherent compatibility with legacy analog FM receivers, offering no fallback to analog signals during digital outages or coverage gaps, which compels users to adopt hybrid receivers supporting both standards. As of 2025, global DAB receiver sales approach 150 million units, including automotive integrations, yet this pales against an estimated 6 billion FM receivers deployed worldwide from decades of analog dominance in homes, vehicles, and portables. Power consumption in DAB receivers exceeds that of equivalent FM models, driven by digital decoding and error-handling circuitry, often halving battery life in portable units during extended use. Empirical tests on battery-powered hybrids show DAB mode draining cells up to 10 times faster than FM in low-power states, exacerbating in mobile or scenarios where analog prevails. Advances in chip efficiency have narrowed the gap since early 2000s designs, but DAB portables still demand 35-100% more energy for standby and reception than FM counterparts.

Operational Advantages

Spectrum Efficiency and Multiplexing Benefits

A DAB ensemble utilizes (OFDM) within a 1.536 MHz channel to transmit a multiplex of up to 12 audio services, typically at bitrates of 128-160 kbit/s per program, alongside data streams, yielding a gross capacity of about 2.4 Mbit/s before overhead. This digital packing achieves higher than analog FM, where each channel demands approximately 200 kHz including guard bands, limiting a comparable 1.5 MHz band to 5-7 stations before interference. Single frequency networks (SFNs) further enhance efficiency by enabling identical ensemble signals to be broadcast nationwide on one frequency, curtailing spectrum fragmentation and transmitter density relative to FM's multi-frequency networks that necessitate distinct channels per coverage overlap to mitigate interference. In the UK, the National DAB multiplex exemplifies this, delivering 12 services via SFN to over 97% of the population with minimized site requirements, while commercial ensembles like support dozens more low-bitrate services in the same band allocation. This counters analog inefficiencies amid station proliferation, as broadcasters can infill rural gaps through SFN extensions without additional spectrum auctions, reallocating freed bandwidth for ancillary data or mobile TV trials in . Empirical deployments confirm ensembles equating to 8-12 FM equivalents, optimizing resource use for expanded service arrays without linear bandwidth escalation.

Enhanced Features for Broadcasters and Users

Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) enables broadcasters to transmit supplementary data services alongside audio streams, providing users with features such as Electronic Programme Guides (EPGs) that display schedules for upcoming broadcasts. These EPGs are delivered via the Multimedia Object Transfer (MOT) protocol within the DAB multiplex, allowing receivers to present structured programme information without interrupting audio playback. Similarly, song titles, artist names, and album artwork can be conveyed through Dynamic Programme Labelling segments or MOT objects, enhancing listener engagement by offering real-time metadata synchronized with the content. Visual enhancements include MOT SlideShow applications, which transmit images and graphics for updates, traffic conditions, or promotional content, displayed as slideshows on compatible receivers. This capability supports broadcasters in delivering multimedia-rich experiences, such as synchronized visuals for weather reports or event coverage, independent of the primary audio channel. For broadcasters, data services facilitate additional functionalities like Journaline, a news delivery system that enables hierarchical content navigation and potential replay of text-based segments on user devices. These features extend to targeted advertising opportunities, where broadcasters can insert data-driven promotions tailored to listener profiles or programme contexts, leveraging the multiplex's capacity for non-real-time file transfers. Empirical data from markets like the indicate notable user interaction with such services, though specific adoption rates vary by receiver capability and content availability. Furthermore, DAB's framework supports hybrid operation with streaming, permitting seamless gap-filling in areas of poor terrestrial coverage by switching to IP delivery for uninterrupted service continuity. This integration enhances overall reliability without requiring full overhauls.

Long-Term Transmission Cost Reductions

In mature Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) networks, operational expenditure (opex) models demonstrate significant long-term transmission cost reductions compared to analog FM systems, primarily through multiplexed transmission of multiple services from fewer sites. Analyses indicate that DAB+ requires substantially fewer transmitters to achieve equivalent coverage for multi-channel ensembles; for instance, delivering 18 services may necessitate only one DAB+ transmitter versus 18 separate FM transmitters, yielding opex savings of 5.7 to 12.8 times in areas supporting high service volumes. Efficient modulation in DAB+, utilizing orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM), further contributes to energy efficiencies, with studies showing lower overall power consumption per program broadcast relative to FM equivalents when scaled across ensembles. WorldDAB evaluations confirm that DAB+ networks achieve these reductions while providing broader content distribution, positioning opex per service hour as low as £0.00033, outperforming FM in cost per unit of delivery. Post-switch implementations, such as Norway's 2017 transition to nationwide DAB+, have realized broadcaster transmission cost savings through consolidated infrastructure, despite initial listener adaptation expenses borne separately. In dense markets, these efficiencies support forecasts of opex breakeven against legacy systems by the early , as network maturity amplifies advantages.

Criticisms and Limitations

Audio Compression Artifacts and Quality Shortfalls

Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) and its enhanced variant DAB+ rely on codecs—MPEG Audio Layer II for original DAB and HE-AAC for DAB+—which introduce artifacts such as quantization noise and perceptual band-limitation at operational bitrates typically ranging from 64 to 192 kbit/s per stereo service. Quantization noise manifests as audible in quiet passages or high-frequency transients, becoming more prominent below 128 kbit/s, while band-limitation effectively attenuates content above 12-15 kHz to allocate bits preferentially to frequencies, reducing spatial and detail. These effects stem from the perceptual coding models that discard data presumed inaudible, yet empirical listening reveals smearing and pre-echo artifacts in transient-rich signals like percussion or string attacks when bitrates drop to 64 kbit/s. Subjective evaluations using methodology demonstrate that DAB+ at 64 kbit/s yields mean scores around 50-60 on a 0-100 scale (indicating noticeable impairment relative to the hidden reference), compared to FM's 80-90 for clean signals, with artifacts like quantization-induced graininess and high-end most evident in critical band-limited test items. At 96 kbit/s, scores improve to 70-80 but still fall short of transparency, particularly for content demanding wide , whereas FM's analog transmission preserves fuller spectral extension up to ~15 kHz without digital quantization floors. Broadcaster surveys confirm that 48% of music transmissions on early DAB networks rated "rather poor" due to such compression-induced impairments, including unnatural emphasis from pre-filtering. DAB+ lacks support for (e.g., >48 kHz sampling or bit depths exceeding 24-bit without equivalent bitrate escalation), capping fidelity at lossy approximations of quality even at maximum multiplex allocations. This shortfall arises from the system's multiplex architecture, which divides a fixed 1.536 Mbit/s capacity among 8-12 services, forcing bitrates low to enable spectrum-efficient of multiple channels over single-frequency networks, a that favors broadcaster capacity over per-service sonic precision. Proponents, including standards bodies like the EBU, argue that DAB+ at 128-192 kbit/s delivers "broadcast quality" sufficient for mobile reception where environmental noise masks subtler artifacts, equating or exceeding average FM in controlled tests. Critics, however, highlight FM's analog advantages in dynamic genres like , where DAB's compression often yields a perceptibly "flat" or "metallic" , with reduced transient clarity and stereo depth failing to match FM's unquantized response in quiet, high-fidelity listening scenarios.

Adoption Failures Driven by Market Realities

Despite over 25 years of commercialization since the Eureka 147 standard's finalization in the mid-1990s, Digital Audio Broadcasting has secured less than 20% global for radio receivers, as FM's entrenched and negligible upgrade costs preserve its dominance in the vast majority of countries. Early DAB receivers demanded premiums exceeding £200 over equivalent FM models, deterring widespread consumer investment in unproven technology amid FM's near-universal accessibility via inexpensive or existing devices. Even with price declines, budget DAB portables in 2025 typically carry a £20-50 markup over basic FM alternatives due to added digital and compatibility requirements, further dampening voluntary in price-sensitive segments. Consumer economics favor alternatives that minimize hardware outlays and maximize utility, with internet streaming services eroding broadcast radio's overall share by delivering on-demand, personalized audio without geographic or scheduling constraints. In 2025, streaming platforms command around 35% of total audio listening time in developed markets like the and , prioritizing user control over linear broadcasts, while DAB's share languishes below 5% of aggregate ear time outside policy-driven enclaves. This shift reflects streaming's causal edge in addressing broadcast scarcity—curated playlists and podcasts supplant fixed schedules—rendering DAB's multiplexed channels insufficient to reverse the tide absent economic compulsion. Mandated transitions provide temporary lifts but fail to engender lasting loyalty, as evidenced by Norway's 2017 FM shutdown, which spiked DAB usage initially yet precipitated accelerated listenership erosion, with total radio hours dropping faster than in non-mandated Nordic peers and prompting illicit FM resurgence among locals. By 2025, Norwegian broadcasters report sustained declines in daily engagement, attributing the fade to streaming's pull and DAB's inability to match FM's simplicity or online flexibility, confirming that artificial boosts dissipate without intrinsic market demand.

Policy Mandates and Economic Inefficiencies

Norway's 2017 mandate to fully transition from FM to DAB represented the world's first nationwide analogue radio shutdown, driven by government aims to free up for mobile data services and achieve annual broadcaster savings of about 200 million Norwegian kroner through reduced transmission costs. However, the triggered widespread backlash over the uncompensated expense of upgrading to DAB-compatible receivers, typically costing 1,000-2,000 Norwegian kroner per household, alongside persistent reception shortfalls in rural and remote regions where DAB signals failed to match FM's robustness, exacerbating access disparities for non-urban populations. Such interventions illustrate causal disconnects between policy intentions and empirical outcomes, as mandated infrastructure shifts impose societal costs—estimated in hardware expenditures and temporary service disruptions—that often exceed projected efficiencies, while disregarding voluntary alternatives like streaming, which deliver comparable or superior audio access without coercive upgrades or spectrum reallocations. In practice, DAB's reliance on fiat for viability contrasts with streaming platforms' , highlighting how top-down mandates can stifle market-driven adaptations to listener preferences for on-demand, device-agnostic consumption. European cases further reveal low returns on public investments in DAB promotion; for instance, Denmark's early commitments to DAB infrastructure were effectively curtailed after 2010 when nationwide rollout stalled amid insufficient listener uptake, leading to a pivot toward hybrid models and abandonment of full-scale mandates that yielded minimal adoption gains relative to outlays. Similarly, the UK's regulatory framework, including subsidized spectrum allocations and switchover criteria under the , has sustained DAB despite stagnant , with critics attributing persistence to interventions that favor legacy broadcasters over unsubsidized innovations, resulting in opportunity costs as resources divert from or streaming enhancements that empirically attract audiences more efficiently. Debates surrounding these policies pit advocates' claims of "future-proofing" broadcast universality against detractors' evidence-based arguments for cronyist distortions, where state support entrenches incumbent technologies resistant to disruption, empirically evidenced by DAB's commercial failures in unregulated markets and the parallel surge in streaming hours without analogous subsidies. Pro-mandate rationales emphasize spectrum conservation for public good, yet causal analysis reveals these overlook listener sovereignty, as forced transitions yield suboptimal equilibria compared to decentralized efficiencies in IP-based audio delivery.

References

  1. https://www.promax.fr/downloads/docs/pdf/DABHistory-English.pdf
  2. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300401/02.01.01_60/en_300401v020101p.pdf
  3. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_265-kozamernik.pdf
  4. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103100_103199/103176/01.02.01_60/ts_103176v010201p.pdf
  5. https://www.fcc.gov/media/policy/digital-audio-broadcasting-dab
  6. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_303-howard.pdf
  7. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=aaschmedcon
  8. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/38795/35332950-MIT.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  9. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/101400_101499/10149603/01.01.01_60/tr_10149603v010101p.pdf
  10. https://digital-library.theiet.org/doi/pdf/10.1049/cp%253A19940789?download=true
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258173667_DAB_Eureka-147_A_European_vision_for_digital_radio
  12. https://www.bbc.com/news/10569231
  13. http://www.wirelesscommunication.nl/reference/chaptr01/brdcsyst/dab/dab.htm
  14. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_259-riley.pdf
  15. https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr05-06/english/panels/itb/papers/itb0109cb1-604-1e.pdf
  16. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_311-dab_dmb.pdf
  17. https://www.worlddab.org/public_document/file/442/DAB__Overview_2013.pdf?1394188480
  18. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/101700_101799/101756/01.03.01_60/ts_101756v010301p.pdf
  19. https://www.foldermedia.co.uk/2009/12/dab-digital-radio-tops-ten-million-set-sales/
  20. https://www.ebu.ch/news/2011/germany-launches-nationwide-dab
  21. https://www.worlddab.org/countries/norway/history/current-situation
  22. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/11/norway-begins-switching-off-analogue-radio
  23. https://www.radioworld.com/global/dab-receivers-near-150-million-worldwide
  24. https://www.worlddab.org/news/15100/dab-receivers-near-150-million-worldwide-as-new-data-released-on-world-radio-day-2025
  25. https://www.worlddab.org/files/document/file/5411/2.4_Arthur_Ariiho_Uganda_case_study.pdf?1752675992
  26. https://www.radioworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/WorldDAB_infographic_H2_2022_FINAL.pdf
  27. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/dab-radio-1316716
  28. https://www.wiseguyreports.com/reports/dab-radio-market
  29. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300401/02.01.01_20/en_300401v020101a.pdf
  30. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300401/01.04.01_60/en_300401v010401p.pdf
  31. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreports/tr016.pdf
  32. http://www.ee.ic.ac.uk/hp/staff/dmb/courses/dab/dab_6.pdf
  33. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_2008-Q3.pdf
  34. https://www.worlddab.org/public_document/file/493/WorldDMB-Country_Update-web.pdf
  35. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_2012-Q2_SDR_Steigemann.pdf
  36. https://www.worlddab.org/files/document/file/3923/2._JRTV_2017-DAB__System_Structure.pdf
  37. https://www.worlddab.org/public_document/file/1629/DAB__digital_radio_a_guide_to_a_successful_field_trial-FINAL.pdf?1708707726
  38. https://www.tec.gov.in/pdf/Studypaper/Study%2520Paper%2520on%2520Digital%2520Radio%2520Technology%2C%2520April%25202025.pdf
  39. https://www.izt-labs.de/izt-dab-solutions-enable-regionalization-of-charivari-in-german-region-upper-palatinate/
  40. https://www.worlddab.org/news/16100/dab%2B-in-the-federal-states-in-2025:-an-overview
  41. https://www.radioworld.com/columns-and-views/norways-fm-shutdown-six-months-later
  42. https://radio.no/2017/07/norways-radio-transition-benefits-the-newcomers/
  43. https://www.bakom.admin.ch/en/radio-fm-switch-off-from-31122024
  44. https://www.worlddab.org/countries/switzerland
  45. https://www.redtech.pro/switzerland-fm-switch-off-audience-shift/
  46. https://pmarketresearch.com/worldwide-dab-receiver-market-research-2024-by-type-application-participants-and-countries-forecast-to-2030
  47. https://www.worlddab.org/countries/united-kingdom
  48. https://www.worlddab.org/countries/australia?page=114
  49. https://baicommunications.com/media-release/dab-digital-radio-is-now-live-in-darwin/
  50. https://www.worlddab.org/resources/case-studies
  51. https://www.nordicom.gu.se/en/facts-analysis/nordic/factsheets/nordic-radio-markets
  52. http://digitalradioinsider.blogspot.com/2018/04/no-fm-radio-switch-off-in-denmark.html
  53. http://www.lbagroup.com/blog/dab-digital-radio-shut-down-canada/
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237402226_Digital_Audio_Broadcasting_in_Canada_Technology_and_Policy_in_the_Transition_to_Digital_Radio
  55. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/03/2020-25252/all-digital-am-broadcasting-revitalization-of-the-am-radio-service
  56. https://www.radioworld.com/global/china-goes-for-digital-radio-drm
  57. http://digitalradioinsider.blogspot.com/2018/03/the-impossible-mission-global-future.html
  58. https://www.radioworld.com/global/rai-radio-director-proposes-2030-fm-shutdown-for-italy
  59. http://digitalradioinsider.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-final-countdown-future-of-dab-radio.html
  60. https://radiotoday.co.uk/2025/02/worlddab-highlights-the-ongoing-global-growth-of-dab-on-world-radio-day/
  61. https://www.worlddab.org/public_document/file/1687/2025_02_11_WorldDAB_infographic_Q4_2023_FINAL.pdf
  62. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/digital-audio-broadcasting-dab-1444886
  63. https://www.edisonresearch.com/the-infinite-dial-2025/
  64. https://www.westwoodone.com/blog/2025/03/24/head-snappers-from-edison-researchs-infinite-dial-2025-podcast-18-34-reach-is-equal-to-tv-female-audiences-soar-and-the-one-slide-every-marketer-needs/
  65. https://www.worlddab.org/files/document/file/3999/Caribbean_Broadcasting_Union_Webinar_-_2._Gabriel_Palmieri.pdf?1524136627
  66. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/terrestrial/broadcast/africa/Documents/WSPresentations/DAB%2520for%2520ITU%2520Conference%252028%2520June%25202021.pdf
  67. https://cept.org/files/2158/bpn003r3.pdf
  68. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/tech/tech3391.pdf
  69. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/tv-radio-and-on-demand/radio-ops/coverage/dab_statement.pdf
  70. https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/publications/dab-amplifiers-transmitter-efficiency
  71. https://www.gatesair.com/documents/slides/2015-09-Anderson-Advanced-Digital-Radio-HD-Radio-DRM-DAB-CDR.pdf
  72. https://www.radioworld.com/columns-and-views/iboc-interference
  73. https://www.rfwireless-world.com/terminology/dab-plus-vs-drm-plus
  74. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hd-radio-how-it-compares-to-other-digital-radio-technologies/51125277
  75. https://www.drm.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DRM-The-Digital-Future-of-FM-2014-06-24.pdf
  76. https://www.slideserve.com/butch/economic-advantages-of-dab
  77. https://www.worlddab.org/public_document/file/447/UPDATED_2014-04-04_GatesAir_comparison_DAB__to_FM_and_DRM_.pdf?1396966728
  78. https://fullymodulated.com/posts/hd-radio-americas-3-billion-digital-radio-revolution-failed/
  79. https://tech.ebu.ch/files/live/sites/tech/files/shared/techreview/EBU_Tech_Review_2017_Cost-benefit_analysis_of_FM_DAB_and_Broadband-2017.pdf
  80. https://www.worlddab.org/public_document/file/1389/One_Year_After_-_report_and_appendices_-_2nd_update.pdf?1612979243
  81. https://www.cbs58.com/news/norway-is-the-first-country-to-kill-its-fm-radio-network
  82. http://www.gatesair.com/documents/slides/economic-advantages-of-dab-jens-stockmann-gatesair.pdf
  83. https://www.engadget.com/2017-01-11-norway-is-killing-fm-radio-and-folks-arent-happy.html
  84. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a759361ed915d6faf2b4107/Digital_radio_switchover_cost_benefit_analysis.pdf
  85. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7219/88fd70a45ba4da027594cab18646b944a656.pdf
  86. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/127694.pdf
  87. https://www.radioeng.cz/fulltexts/2018/18_01_0342_0352.pdf
  88. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:977214/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  89. https://spectrum.ieee.org/digital-radio-takes-to-the-road
  90. https://teachers.institute/communication-and-information-technology/advancements-benefits-digital-audio-broadcasting/
  91. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348012256_Digital_Audio_Broadcasting_DAB_As_a_Tool_of_Future_Radio
  92. https://www.radioworld.com/columns-and-views/overcoming-dab-sfn-network-challenges
  93. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/2017-03-10_DAB%20in%20Tunnels_RAI.pdf
  94. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311114
  95. https://kevinboone.me/dab-power.html
  96. https://www.electronicsweekly.com/market-sectors/power/dab-radio-firms-cut-power-consumption-to-fm-levels-2007-06/
  97. https://getdigitalradio.com/faqs/why-is-there-a-delay-between-analogue-and-dab-radio/
  98. https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussion/2163159/delay-on-fm-and-dab
  99. http://tech-ops.co.uk/next/pips-big-ben-bongs-and-digital-delays/
  100. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102600_102699/102693/01.01.01_60/ts_102693v010101p.pdf
  101. https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-UK-so-reluctant-to-switch-to-DAB-and-turn-off-FM-radio
  102. http://digitalradioinsider.blogspot.com/2017/04/continued-slanted-information-about-dab.html
  103. https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/dab-fm-radio-power-consumption-mystery.299149/
  104. https://www.reddit.com/r/radio/comments/1co3fda/dab_radio_receiver_power_usage/
  105. http://digitalradioinsider.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html
  106. http://www.eie.polyu.edu.hk/~enyhchan/mt-dab.pdf
  107. https://localdab.org/index.php/dab-in-simple-words/dab-vs-fm-transmitter/
  108. https://www.worlddab.org/countries/united-kingdom/multiplexes
  109. https://www.worlddab.org/public_document/file/363/EPG.pdf?1376479028
  110. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/101400_101499/101499/02.02.01_60/ts_101499v020201p.pdf
  111. http://www.telemidia.puc-rio.br/~rafaeldiniz/public_files/normas/DRM/DRM-Introduction-Implementation-Guide.pdf
  112. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/101400_101499/101499/03.02.01_60/ts_101499v030201p.pdf
  113. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/dab-costs-and-benefits-c/62664530
  114. https://www.radioworld.com/columns-and-views/guest-commentaries/digital-radio-tackles-green-challenge
  115. https://www.worlddab.org/files/document/file/2950/7._SABC_-_DAB__PRACTICAL_CONSIDERATIONS___THE_SUPPLIER_EXPLAINED_-_Gino_Mils.pdf?1377949402
  116. https://www.majority.co.uk/radio/go-green-with-dab-radio/
  117. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_296-dab.pdf
  118. http://a-bc.co.uk/audio-quality-comparison-dab-pcm-fm-am/
  119. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2010/apr/12/dab-radio-problems
  120. https://www.whathifi.com/best-buys/best-dab-radios-portable-bluetooth-in-car
  121. https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/audio-streaming-market-121115
  122. https://www.edisonresearch.com/the-record-q1-2025-u-s-audio-listening-trends/
  123. http://digitalradioinsider.blogspot.com/2025/02/dab-did-not-save-radio-norwegians-are.html
  124. http://digitalradioinsider.blogspot.com/2023/04/dab-transition-in-norway-contributes.html
  125. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/13/norway-becomes-first-country-to-end-national-radio-broadcasts-on-fm
  126. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-38529435
  127. https://www.emerald.com/dprg/article-split/14/5/3/185584/Digital-radio-and-market-failure-a-tale-of-two
  128. https://cjc.utppublishing.com/doi/10.22230/cjc.2007v32n1a1809
  129. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/digital-radio-and-audio-review/digital-radio-and-audio-review
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.