Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Demographics of the Netherlands.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Demographics of the Netherlands
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2011) |
| Demographics of the Netherlands | |
|---|---|
Population pyramid of the Netherlands in 2023 | |
| Population | 18,000,000 (15 August 2024) (67th) |
| Density | 424 per km2 (33rd) |
| Growth rate | 0.29% (155th) |
| Birth rate | 10.2 births/1,000 (2021) |
| Death rate | 9.6 deaths/1,000 (2022) |
| Life expectancy | 81.6 years (16th) |
| • male | 80.1 years |
| • female | 83.1 years |
| Fertility rate | 1.43 children/woman (2023) |
| Age structure | |
| 0–14 years | 16.1% |
| 15–64 years | 64.1% |
| 65 and over | 20.2% |
| Sex ratio | |
| Total | 0.98 male/female |
| At birth | 1.05 male/female |
| Under 15 | 1.05 male/female |
| 15–64 years | 1.02 male/female |
| 65 and over | 0.83 male/female |
| Nationality | |
| Nationality | Dutch citizen |
| Major ethnic | Dutch (72.0%) or Frisians (2.8%) (74.8%) |
| Minor ethnic |
|
| Language | |
| Official | Dutch and Frisian |
| Spoken | Languages of the Netherlands |

Demographic features of the population of the Netherlands include population density, ethnicity, education level, health of the population, economic status, religious affiliations and other aspects of the population.
Population
[edit]The Netherlands is the 69th most populous country in the world. As of January 2023, the Netherlands has a population of 17,821,419.[1]
Between 1900 and 1950 the population almost doubled from 5.14 to 10.11 million people. From 1950 to 2000 the population increased from 10.11 to 15.92 million people, increasing by a smaller proportion but, still, at an impressive pace for a European country, recording a growth of 57.45% over a 50-year time span.[2]
Of countries with at least 7.5 million people, The Netherlands is the 4th most densely populated, and is the 26th most densely populated in the world overall. It is the 5th most densely populated country in Europe; the first four are microstates. The 17,821,419 million Dutch inhabitants are concentrated on an area (land surface) of 33,895 km2 (13,087 sq mi). This means that the country has a population density of 526/km2 (1,360/sq mi). The density of 500 inhabitants/km2 was reached in the first half of 2014.
As a result of these demographic characteristics, the Netherlands has had to plan its land use strictly. Since 1946 the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment has been occupied with the national coordination of land use. Because of its high population density the Netherlands has also reclaimed land from the sea by poldering. Between 1927 and 1968 an entire province - Flevoland - was created. As of May 2023 it houses 447,193 people.[3] Because of these policies, the Dutch have been able to combine high levels of population density with extremely high levels of agricultural production.
Even though the Netherlands is so densely populated, it has no municipalities with a population over one million. Nevertheless, the two largest municipalities of the country do score well over a million if the complete city region is counted, thus including the neighbouring satellite towns that often are physically connected to the main municipality. Moreover, the "four big cities" (Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague and Utrecht) can in many ways be regarded as a single metropolitan area, the Randstad ("rim city" or "edge city") with over 7.5 million inhabitants around an agricultural "green heart" (Groene Hart).
View source data.
View source data.
View source data.
View source data.
Growth rate
[edit]0.37% (2021 est.) Country comparison to the world: 168th
Fertility
[edit]| Year | Pop. | ±% p.a. |
|---|---|---|
| 1000 | 369,000 | — |
| 1300 | 881,000 | +0.29% |
| 1500 | 1,090,000 | +0.11% |
| 1600 | 1,540,000 | +0.35% |
| 1700 | 2,000,000 | +0.26% |
| 1800 | 2,000,000 | +0.00% |
| 1900 | 5,104,000 | +0.94% |
| 1910 | 5,858,000 | +1.39% |
| 1920 | 6,754,000 | +1.43% |
| 1930 | 7,825,000 | +1.48% |
| 1940 | 8,834,000 | +1.22% |
| 1950 | 10,026,773 | +1.27% |
| 1960 | 11,417,254 | +1.31% |
| 1970 | 12,957,621 | +1.27% |
| 1980 | 14,091,014 | +0.84% |
| 1990 | 14,892,574 | +0.55% |
| 2000 | 15,863,950 | +0.63% |
| 2010 | 16,574,989 | +0.44% |
| 2020 | 17,424,978 | +0.50% |
| Source: Our World in Data[5] and Statistics Netherlands[6] | ||
The Dutch population is ageing. Furthermore, life expectancy has increased because of developments in medicine, and in addition to this, the Netherlands has seen increasing immigration. Despite these developments combined with the population boom after the Second World War, the low birth rate has caused extremely low population growth: 2005 saw the lowest absolute population growth since 1900.
This demographic development has consequences for health care and social security policy. As the Dutch population ages, the proportion of people of working age, as a percentage of the entire population, decreases. Important policy advisors like the CBS (Statistical Office) and the CPB (Planning Office) have pointed out that this will cause problems with the current system of old age pensions: fewer people will work to pay for old age pensions, while there will be more people receiving those pensions. Furthermore, the costs of health care are also projected to increase. These developments have caused several cabinets, notably the second Balkenende cabinet to reform the system of health care and social security to increase participation in the labour market and make people more conscious of the money they spend on health care.
In 2003, the annual birth rate per thousand was highest in the province of Flevoland (15.9). The overall lifelong Total fertility rate (TFR), was highest in the province of Flevoland (2.0) and lowest in the province of Limburg (1.6). The municipality with the highest TFR was Urk (3.23) followed by Valkenburg (2.83), Graafstroom (2.79) and Staphorst (2.76). The lowest TFRs were recorded in Vaals (1.11) and Thorn (1.21).[7]
The total population at December 31, 2006 was 16,356,914. The population loss due to net emigration was 35,502 (an estimated 40-50% of emigrants were ethnic non-Dutch).
In 2007, there were 117,000 immigrants (including 7000 Germans, 6000 Poles, 5000 Bulgarians, 3000 Turks and 2000 Moroccans) and 123,000 emigrants. Nearly half the emigrants were native Dutch, followed at a distance by nearly 5000 Poles and more than 3000 Germans. There was an observable increase in net immigration from the former USSR, Bulgaria and Romania.[8]
The annual death rate was lowest in the municipalities of Valkenburg (2.9 per 1000), Zeewolde (3.2), Renswoude (3.4), Westervoort and Zeevang (both 3.9). The highest annual death rates were recorded in Warmond (22.3 per 1000), Laren (19.9) and Doorn (18.8).[9]
16.4% of the total births in 2003 were to parents of non-European origin, although they account for only 12.4% of the population in the 25-34 age group. For example, 3.8% of the births were ethnic Moroccan, although they were only 2.26% of the 25-34 age group. Respective figures were 3.27% and 3.0% for Turks. The TFR for Moroccans in 2003 was 3.3 while the general TFR was 1.73. TFR was 2.3 for Turks, 1.7 for Surinamese, 1.8 for Arubans, 3.0 for Africans and 1.8 for Americans.[10] (These figures compare with a figure of around 2.1 required to maintain a stable overall population figure.)
According to Statistics Netherlands, for the year 2007, the TFR for those born in Netherlands was 1.72[11] (1.65 in 2000). TFR of Moroccan immigrants was 2.87 (3.22 in 2000) and that of Turkish immigrants was 1.88 (2.18 in 2000).[12]
The total fertility rate is the annual average number of children born per woman over her lifespan. It is based on fairly good data for the entire period. Sources: Our World In Data and Gapminder Foundation.[13]
| Years | 1840 | 1841 | 1842 | 1843 | 1844 | 1845 | 1846 | 1847 | 1848 | 1849 | 1850[13] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands | 5.11 | 5.09 | 5.06 | 5.04 | 5.02 | 4.99 | 4.99 | 4.99 | 4.99 | 4.99 | 4.89 |
| Years | 1851 | 1852 | 1853 | 1854 | 1855 | 1856 | 1857 | 1858 | 1859 | 1860[13] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.68 | 4.75 |
| Years | 1861 | 1862 | 1863 | 1864 | 1865 | 1866 | 1867 | 1868 | 1869 | 1870[13] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands | 4.83 | 4.9 | 4.98 | 4.99 | 5.01 | 5.02 | 5.04 | 5.05 | 5.09 | 5.12 |
| Years | 1871 | 1872 | 1873 | 1874 | 1875 | 1876 | 1877 | 1878 | 1879 | 1880[13] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands | 5.16 | 5.19 | 5.23 | 5.27 | 5.31 | 5.34 | 5.38 | 5.42 | 5.39 | 5.35 |
| Years | 1881 | 1882 | 1883 | 1884 | 1885 | 1886 | 1887 | 1888 | 1889 | 1890[13] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands | 5.32 | 5.28 | 5.25 | 5.23 | 5.21 | 5.18 | 5.16 | 5.14 | 5.11 | 5.07 |
| Years | 1891 | 1892 | 1893 | 1894 | 1895 | 1896 | 1897 | 1898 | 1899[13] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands | 5.04 | 5 | 4.97 | 4.93 | 4.88 | 4.84 | 4.79 | 4.75 | 4.6 |
1.78 children born/woman (2021 est.) Country comparison to the world: 157th
11.0 births/1,000 population (2021 est.) Country comparison to the world: 178th
Mother's mean age at first birth
[edit]- 29.8 years (2017 est.)
Life expectancy
[edit]

Sources: Our World In Data
| 1850 | 1851 | 1852 | 1853 | 1854 | 1855 | 1856 | 1857 | 1858 | 1859 | 1860 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.8 | 40.0 | 38.6 | 38.6 | 38.6 | 34.5 | 38.8 | 35.5 | 34.7 | 30.9 | 36.9 |
| 1861 | 1862 | 1863 | 1864 | 1865 | 1866 | 1867 | 1868 | 1869 | 1870 | |
| 36.4 | 38.3 | 38.3 | 37.5 | 36.4 | 33.6 | 39.2 | 37.7 | 40.4 | 37.3 | |
| 1871 | 1872 | 1873 | 1874 | 1875 | 1876 | 1877 | 1878 | 1879 | 1880 | |
| 32.9 | 36.5 | 39.2 | 41.3 | 38.2 | 40.4 | 42.0 | 41.1 | 41.9 | 40.3 | |
| 1881 | 1882 | 1883 | 1884 | 1885 | 1886 | 1887 | 1888 | 1889 | 1890 | |
| 42.8 | 43.7 | 42.3 | 41.3 | 43.2 | 41.9 | 44.9 | 44.2 | 44.3 | 44.4 | |
| 1891 | 1892 | 1893 | 1894 | 1895 | 1896 | 1897 | 1898 | 1899 | 1900 | |
| 44.2 | 43.9 | 45.8 | 46.9 | 46.6 | 48.6 | 49.4 | 49.1 | 49.3 | 48.4 | |
| 1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1905 | 1906 | 1907 | 1908 | 1909 | 1910 | |
| 48.7 | 50.6 | 51.5 | 50.9 | 52.1 | 52.7 | 53.5 | 52.7 | 54.9 | 55.1 | |
| 1911 | 1912 | 1913 | 1914 | 1915 | 1916 | 1917 | 1918 | 1919 | 1920 | |
| 53.1 | 57.2 | 57.3 | 57.2 | 57.2 | 56.2 | 55.6 | 47.6 | 55.0 | 57.8 | |
| 1921 | 1922 | 1923 | 1924 | 1925 | 1926 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | |
| 59.7 | 59.8 | 62.0 | 62.9 | 63.1 | 63.0 | 62.6 | 63.7 | 62.2 | 64.7 | |
| 1931 | 1932 | 1933 | 1934 | 1935 | 1936 | 1937 | 1938 | 1939 | 1940 | |
| 64.3 | 65.4 | 66.0 | 66.6 | 66.5 | 66.7 | 67.0 | 67.4 | 67.7 | 65.4 | |
| 1941 | 1942 | 1943 | 1944 | 1945 | 1946 | 1947 | 1948 | 1949 | 1950 | |
| 65.3 | 65.8 | 64.4 | 61.3 | 55.4 | 67.6 | 69.5 | 71.1 | 70.3 | 71.4 |
- Total population: 81.9 years (2020 est.) Country comparison to the world: 30th
- Males: 79.7 years (2020 est.)
- Females: 84.3 years (2020 est.)
Age structure
[edit]
- 0-14 years: 16.11% (male 1,425,547 /female 1,358,894)
- 15-24 years: 11.91% (male 1,049.000 /female 1,008,763)
- 25-54 years: 38.47% (male 3,334,064 /female 3,313,238)
- 55-64 years: 13.69% (male 1,177,657/female 1,188,613)
- 65 years and over: 19.82% (male 1,558,241/female 1,866,380) (2020 est.)
Median age
[edit]- total: 42.8 years. Country comparison to the world: 32nd
- male: 41.6 years
- female: 44.0 years (2020 est.)
Cities and population density
[edit]| Rank | Name | Province | Pop. | Rank | Name | Province | Pop. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amsterdam | North Holland | 931,298 | 11 | Apeldoorn | Gelderland | 168,211 | ||
| 2 | Rotterdam | South Holland | 670,610 | 12 | Haarlem | North Holland | 167,636 | ||
| 3 | The Hague | South Holland | 566,221 | 13 | Arnhem | Gelderland | 167,632 | ||
| 4 | Utrecht | Utrecht | 374,238 | 14 | Haarlemmermeer | North Holland | 163,128 | ||
| 5 | Eindhoven | North Brabant | 246,417 | 15 | Amersfoort | Utrecht | 161,852 | ||
| 6 | Groningen | Groningen | 243,768 | 16 | Enschede | Overijssel | 161,738 | ||
| 7 | Tilburg | North Brabant | 229,836 | 17 | Zaanstad | North Holland | 161,389 | ||
| 8 | Almere | Flevoland | 226,500 | 18 | 's-Hertogenbosch | North Brabant | 160,757 | ||
| 9 | Breda | North Brabant | 188,078 | 19 | Zwolle | Overijssel | 133,141 | ||
| 10 | Nijmegen | Gelderland | 187,049 | 20 | Leeuwarden | Friesland | 128,810 | ||
Functional urban areas
[edit]
"Functional urban areas"[16] are a type of urban areas with large populations where commuters from nearby areas work in the core area. There are several functional urban areas officially identified in the Netherlands. The largest ones (with populations over 300,000) are listed below, which count the populations of the core city and their "commuting zones".[17]
| Functional urban areas | Population (2015) |
|---|---|
| Amsterdam-Haarlem-Almere | 2,751,000 |
| Rotterdam-Dordrecht | 1,805,000 |
| The Hague-Delft | 1,052,000 |
| Utrecht | 875,000 |
| Eindhoven | 736,000 |
| Groningen | 474,000 |
| Arnhem | 420,000 |
| Enschede | 401,000 |
| Breda | 367,000 |
| Zwolle | 350,000 |
| Leiden | 339,000 |
| Nijmegen | 322,000 |
| Tilburg | 310,000 |
Vital statistics
[edit]Statistics
[edit]The following table presents the evolution:[18][19][20][21]
| Population (January 1) | Live births | Deaths | Natural change | Crude birth rate (per 1000) |
Crude death rate (per 1000) |
Natural change (per 1000) |
Crude migration change (per 1000) |
Total fertility rate | Infant mortality rate (per 1000) |
Life expectancy males | Life expectancy females | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900 | 5,142,000 | 162,611 | 92,043 | 70,568 | 31.6 | 17.9 | 13.7 | 1.7 | 4.45 | 155.2 | ||
| 1901 | 5,221,000 | 168,380 | 89,967 | 78,413 | 32.3 | 17.2 | 15.0 | 1.1 | 4.53 | 149.3 | ||
| 1902 | 5,305,000 | 168,728 | 86,248 | 82,480 | 31.8 | 16.3 | 15.5 | 0.3 | 4.46 | 129.9 | ||
| 1903 | 5,389,000 | 170,108 | 83,933 | 86,175 | 31.6 | 15.6 | 16.0 | -1.0 | 4.42 | 135.1 | ||
| 1904 | 5,470,000 | 171,495 | 87,091 | 84,404 | 31.4 | 15.9 | 15.4 | -0.6 | 4.38 | 136.9 | ||
| 1905 | 5,551,000 | 170,767 | 85,016 | 85,751 | 30.8 | 15.3 | 15.4 | -0.8 | 4.29 | 130.9 | ||
| 1906 | 5,632,000 | 170,952 | 83,259 | 87,693 | 30.4 | 14.8 | 15.6 | -1.8 | 4.23 | 127.1 | ||
| 1907 | 5,710,000 | 171,506 | 82,250 | 89,256 | 30.0 | 14.4 | 15.6 | -2.3 | 4.18 | 111.9 | ||
| 1908 | 5,786,000 | 171,861 | 86,936 | 84,925 | 29.7 | 15.0 | 14.7 | -1.6 | 4.13 | 124.8 | ||
| 1909 | 5,862,000 | 170,766 | 80,283 | 90,483 | 29.1 | 13.7 | 15.4 | -9.1 | 4.04 | 99.1 | ||
| 1910 | 5,899,000 | 168,894 | 79,984 | 88,910 | 28.6 | 13.6 | 15.1 | -2.0 | 3.94 | 107.9 | ||
| 1911 | 5,976,000 | 166,527 | 86,786 | 79,741 | 27.9 | 14.5 | 13.3 | -0.2 | 3.81 | 137.2 | ||
| 1912 | 6,054,000 | 170,269 | 74,647 | 95,622 | 28.1 | 12.3 | 15.8 | -0.8 | 3.84 | 87.0 | ||
| 1913 | 6,145,000 | 173,541 | 75,867 | 97,674 | 28.2 | 12.3 | 15.9 | 1.3 | 3.85 | 91.4 | ||
| 1914 | 6,251,000 | 176,831 | 77,739 | 99,092 | 28.3 | 12.4 | 15.9 | 2.2 | 3.86 | 94.8 | ||
| 1915 | 6,364,000 | 167,426 | 79,613 | 87,813 | 26.3 | 12.5 | 13.8 | 4.4 | 3.59 | 86.8 | ||
| 1916 | 6,480,000 | 172,572 | 84,024 | 88,548 | 26.6 | 13.0 | 13.7 | 6.7 | 3.64 | 84.5 | ||
| 1917 | 6,612,000 | 173,112 | 87,273 | 85,839 | 26.2 | 13.2 | 13.0 | 1.1 | 3.59 | 86.8 | ||
| 1918 | 6,705,000 | 167,636 | 115,440 | 52,196 | 25.0 | 17.2 | 7.8 | -0.8 | 3.47 | 103.9 | ||
| 1919 | 6,752,000 | 164,447 | 89,646 | 74,801 | 24.4 | 13.3 | 11.1 | -1.0 | 3.36 | 94.0 | ||
| 1920 | 6,820,000 | 192,987 | 81,525 | 111,462 | 28.3 | 12.0 | 16.3 | -1.5 | 3.89 | 83.3 | ||
| 1921 | 6,921,000 | 189,546 | 77,002 | 112,544 | 27.4 | 11.1 | 16.3 | -0.3 | 3.75 | 86.1 | ||
| 1922 | 7,032,000 | 181,886 | 80,381 | 101,505 | 25.9 | 11.4 | 14.4 | 2.4 | 3.54 | 77.6 | ||
| 1923 | 7,150,000 | 187,512 | 72,809 | 114,703 | 26.2 | 10.2 | 16.0 | -0.1 | 3.55 | 66.8 | ||
| 1924 | 7,264,000 | 182,430 | 71,167 | 111,263 | 25.1 | 9.8 | 15.3 | -1.3 | 3.39 | 60.6 | ||
| 1925 | 7,366,000 | 178,545 | 72,121 | 106,424 | 24.2 | 9.8 | 14.4 | 0 | 3.26 | 58.4 | ||
| 1926 | 7,472,000 | 177,498 | 73,357 | 104,141 | 23.8 | 9.8 | 13.9 | 0 | 3.18 | 61.1 | ||
| 1927 | 7,576,000 | 175,098 | 77,614 | 97,484 | 23.1 | 10.2 | 12.9 | 0.6 | 3.08 | 58.7 | ||
| 1928 | 7,678,000 | 179,028 | 73,816 | 105,212 | 23.3 | 9.6 | 13.7 | -0.3 | 3.09 | 52.3 | ||
| 1929 | 7,781,000 | 177,216 | 83,224 | 93,992 | 22.8 | 10.7 | 12.1 | 1.1 | 3.00 | 59.0 | ||
| 1930 | 7,884,000 | 182,310 | 71,682 | 110,628 | 23.1 | 9.1 | 14.0 | 0.6 | 3.03 | 50.9 | ||
| 1931 | 7,999,000 | 177,387 | 77,048 | 100,339 | 22.2 | 9.6 | 12.5 | 2.9 | 2.88 | 49.6 | ||
| 1932 | 8,122,000 | 178,525 | 73,059 | 105,466 | 22.0 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 1.2 | 2.83 | 46.3 | ||
| 1933 | 8,237,000 | 171,289 | 72,096 | 99,193 | 20.8 | 8.8 | 12.0 | 0.6 | 2.66 | 43.9 | ||
| 1934 | 8,341,000 | 172,214 | 70,164 | 102,050 | 20.6 | 8.4 | 12.2 | -1.2 | 2.63 | 42.6 | ||
| 1935 | 8,433,000 | 170,425 | 73,660 | 96,765 | 20.2 | 8.7 | 11.5 | -1.7 | 2.57 | 40.0 | ||
| 1936 | 8,516,000 | 171,675 | 73,923 | 97,752 | 20.2 | 8.7 | 11.5 | -1.9 | 2.51 | 38.9 | ||
| 1937 | 8,598,000 | 170,220 | 75,516 | 94,704 | 19.8 | 8.8 | 11.0 | -1.0 | 2.53 | 38.1 | ||
| 1938 | 8,684,000 | 178,422 | 77,043 | 101,379 | 20.5 | 8.9 | 11.7 | -0.5 | 2.63 | 36.5 | ||
| 1939 | 8,781,000 | 180,917 | 75,841 | 105,076 | 20.6 | 8.6 | 12.0 | -0.8 | 2.64 | 33.7 | ||
| 1940 | 8,879,000 | 184,846 | 87,722 | 97,124 | 20.8 | 9.9 | 10.9 | -1.2 | 2.67 | 39.1 | ||
| 1941 | 8,965,000 | 181,959 | 89,716 | 92,243 | 20.3 | 10.0 | 10.3 | -1.7 | 2.61 | 43.6 | ||
| 1942 | 9,042,000 | 189,975 | 76,040 | 113,935 | 21.0 | 8.4 | 12.6 | -6.0 | 2.71 | 39.5 | ||
| 1943 | 9,102,000 | 209,379 | 91,438 | 117,941 | 23.0 | 10.0 | 13.0 | -5.1 | 2.98 | 40.1 | ||
| 1944 | 9,174,000 | 219,946 | 108,087 | 111,859 | 24.0 | 11.8 | 12.2 | -2.6 | 3.13 | 46.3 | ||
| 1945 | 9,262,000 | 209,607 | 141,398 | 68,209 | 22.6 | 15.3 | 7.4 | 10.0 | 2.96 | 79.7 | ||
| 1946 | 9,423,000 | 284,456 | 80,151 | 204,305 | 30.2 | 8.5 | 21.7 | 0.2 | 3.97 | 38.7 | ||
| 1947 | 9,629,000 | 267,348 | 77,646 | 189,702 | 27.8 | 8.1 | 19.7 | -1.9 | 3.70 | 33.5 | ||
| 1948 | 9,800,000 | 247,923 | 72,459 | 175,464 | 25.3 | 7.4 | 17.9 | -2.0 | 3.41 | 29.3 | ||
| 1949 | 9,956,000 | 236,177 | 81,077 | 155,100 | 23.7 | 8.1 | 15.6 | -8.5 | 3.22 | 26.8 | ||
| 1950 | 10,026,773 | 229,718 | 75,929 | 153,789 | 22.7 | 7.5 | 15.2 | 2.1 | 3.10 | 26.7 | 70.3 | 72.6 |
| 1951 | 10,200,280 | 228,405 | 77,560 | 150,845 | 22.3 | 7.6 | 14.7 | -2.1 | 3.05 | 26.7 | 70.2 | 72.8 |
| 1952 | 10,328,343 | 231,888 | 76,346 | 155,542 | 22.3 | 7.4 | 15.0 | -4.6 | 3.09 | 24.1 | 71.0 | 73.3 |
| 1953 | 10,435,631 | 227,964 | 80,901 | 147,063 | 21.7 | 7.7 | 14.0 | -3.0 | 3.03 | 23.7 | 70.4 | 73.0 |
| 1954 | 10,550,737 | 228,173 | 79,623 | 148,550 | 21.5 | 7.5 | 14.0 | -1.7 | 3.03 | 22.6 | 71.0 | 73.8 |
| 1955 | 10,680,023 | 229,222 | 81,708 | 147,514 | 21.3 | 7.6 | 13.7 | -0.4 | 3.03 | 21.6 | 70.9 | 71.4 |
| 1956 | 10,821,661 | 231,492 | 84,809 | 146,683 | 21.3 | 7.8 | 13.5 | -1.0 | 3.05 | 20.2 | 71.0 | 74.1 |
| 1957 | 10,957,040 | 233,892 | 82,961 | 150,931 | 21.2 | 7.5 | 13.7 | -1.0 | 3.08 | 18.4 | 71.4 | 74.6 |
| 1958 | 11,095,726 | 236,859 | 84,491 | 152,368 | 21.2 | 7.6 | 13.6 | 2.8 | 3.11 | 18.5 | 71.5 | 74.8 |
| 1959 | 11,278,024 | 242,518 | 86,072 | 156,446 | 21.4 | 7.6 | 13.8 | -1.7 | 3.17 | 18.1 | 71.2 | 75.2 |
| 1960 | 11,417,245 | 239,128 | 87,825 | 151,303 | 20.8 | 7.7 | 13.2 | -1.0 | 3.12 | 17.9 | 71.4 | 75.3 |
| 1961 | 11,556,008 | 247,407 | 88,321 | 159,086 | 21.3 | 7.6 | 13.7 | 0.6 | 3.22 | 17.0 | 71.5 | 75.7 |
| 1962 | 11,721,416 | 246,150 | 93,969 | 152,181 | 20.7 | 7.9 | 12.8 | 1.6 | 3.18 | 17.0 | 71.0 | 75.6 |
| 1963 | 11,889,962 | 249,879 | 95,734 | 154,145 | 20.8 | 8.0 | 12.8 | 0 | 3.19 | 15.8 | 71.0 | 75.8 |
| 1964 | 12,041,970 | 250,914 | 93,437 | 157,477 | 20.5 | 7.7 | 12.9 | 1.2 | 3.17 | 14.8 | 71.3 | 76.3 |
| 1965 | 12,212,269 | 245,216 | 98,026 | 147,190 | 19.8 | 7.9 | 11.9 | 1.6 | 3.04 | 14.4 | 71.1 | 76.1 |
| 1966 | 12,377,194 | 239,611 | 100,516 | 139,095 | 19.1 | 8.0 | 11.1 | 1.7 | 2.90 | 14.7 | 71.0 | 76.1 |
| 1967 | 12,535,307 | 238,678 | 99,792 | 138,886 | 18.9 | 7.9 | 11.0 | -1.0 | 2.81 | 13.4 | 71.2 | 76.6 |
| 1968 | 12,661,095 | 237,112 | 104,989 | 132,123 | 18.6 | 8.3 | 10.4 | 0.4 | 2.72 | 13.6 | 70.9 | 76.4 |
| 1969 | 12,798,346 | 247,588 | 107,615 | 139,973 | 19.1 | 8.3 | 10.8 | 1.6 | 2.75 | 13.2 | 70.9 | 76.3 |
| 1970 | 12,957,621 | 238,912 | 109,619 | 129,293 | 18.3 | 8.4 | 9.9 | 2.6 | 2.57 | 12.7 | 70.8 | 76.5 |
| 1971 | 13,119,430 | 227,180 | 110,243 | 116,937 | 17.1 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 2.36 | 12.1 | 71.0 | 76.8 |
| 1972 | 13,269,563 | 214,133 | 113,576 | 100,557 | 16.1 | 8.5 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 2.15 | 11.7 | 70.8 | 76.5 |
| 1973 | 13,387,623 | 194,993 | 110,682 | 84,311 | 14.5 | 8.2 | 6.3 | 1.4 | 1.90 | 11.5 | 71.3 | 77.1 |
| 1974 | 13,491,020 | 185,982 | 109,250 | 76,732 | 13.7 | 8.1 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 1.77 | 11.3 | 71.6 | 77.6 |
| 1975 | 13,599,092 | 177,876 | 113,737 | 64,139 | 13.0 | 8.3 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 1.66 | 10.6 | 71.5 | 77.7 |
| 1976 | 13,733,578 | 177,090 | 114,454 | 62,636 | 12.9 | 8.3 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 1.63 | 10.7 | 71.5 | 77.9 |
| 1977 | 13,814,495 | 173,296 | 110,093 | 63,203 | 12.5 | 7.9 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 1.58 | 9.5 | 72.1 | 78.5 |
| 1978 | 13,897,874 | 175,550 | 114,415 | 61,135 | 12.6 | 8.2 | 4.4 | 1.9 | 1.58 | 9.6 | 72.0 | 78.5 |
| 1979 | 13,985,526 | 174,979 | 112,565 | 62,414 | 12.5 | 8.0 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 1.56 | 8.7 | 72.5 | 78.9 |
| 1980 | 14,091,014 | 181,294 | 114,279 | 67,015 | 12.8 | 8.1 | 4.7 | 3.6 | 1.60 | 8.6 | 72.5 | 79.2 |
| 1981 | 14,208,586 | 178,569 | 115,515 | 63,054 | 12.5 | 8.1 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 1.56 | 8.3 | 72.7 | 79.3 |
| 1982 | 14,285,829 | 172,071 | 117,264 | 54,807 | 12.0 | 8.2 | 3.8 | 0 | 1.50 | 8.3 | 72.8 | 79.4 |
| 1983 | 14,339,551 | 170,246 | 117,761 | 52,485 | 11.9 | 8.2 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 1.47 | 8.4 | 72.9 | 79.6 |
| 1984 | 14,394,589 | 174,436 | 119,812 | 54,624 | 12.1 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 1.49 | 8.3 | 73.0 | 79.7 |
| 1985 | 14,453,833 | 178,136 | 122,704 | 55,432 | 12.3 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 1.51 | 8.0 | 73.1 | 79.7 |
| 1986 | 14,529,430 | 184,513 | 125,307 | 59,206 | 12.7 | 8.6 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 1.55 | 7.7 | 73.1 | 79.6 |
| 1987 | 14,615,125 | 186,667 | 122,199 | 64,468 | 12.7 | 8.3 | 4.4 | 2.4 | 1.56 | 7.6 | 73.5 | 80.1 |
| 1988 | 14,714,948 | 186,647 | 124,163 | 62,484 | 12.6 | 8.4 | 4.2 | 1.9 | 1.55 | 6.8 | 73.7 | 80.2 |
| 1989 | 14,805,240 | 188,979 | 128,905 | 60,086 | 12.7 | 8.7 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 1.55 | 6.8 | 73.7 | 79.9 |
| 1990 | 14,892,574 | 197,965 | 128,824 | 69,115 | 13.2 | 8.6 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 1.62 | 7.1 | 73.8 | 80.1 |
| 1991 | 15,010,445 | 198,665 | 129,958 | 68,707 | 13.2 | 8.6 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 1.61 | 6.5 | 74.1 | 80.2 |
| 1992 | 15,129,150 | 196,734 | 129,887 | 66,847 | 13.0 | 8.6 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 1.59 | 6.3 | 74.3 | 80.3 |
| 1993 | 15,239,182 | 195,748 | 137,795 | 57,953 | 12.8 | 9.0 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 1.57 | 6.3 | 74.0 | 80.0 |
| 1994 | 15,341,553 | 195,611 | 133,471 | 62,140 | 12.7 | 8.7 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 1.57 | 5.6 | 74.6 | 80.3 |
| 1995 | 15,424,122 | 190,513 | 135,675 | 54,838 | 12.3 | 8.8 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 1.531 | 5.5 | 74.6 | 80.4 |
| 1996 | 15,493,889 | 189,521 | 137,561 | 51,960 | 12.2 | 8.9 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 1.529 | 5.7 | 74.7 | 80.4 |
| 1997 | 15,567,107 | 192,443 | 135,783 | 56,660 | 12.3 | 8.7 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 1.562 | 5.0 | 75.2 | 80.6 |
| 1998 | 15,654,192 | 199,412 | 137,968 | 61,444 | 12.7 | 8.8 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.628 | 5.2 | 75.2 | 80.7 |
| 1999 | 15,760,225 | 200,445 | 140,487 | 59,958 | 12.7 | 8.9 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 1.652 | 5.2 | 75.3 | 80.5 |
| 2000 | 15,863,950 | 206,619 | 140,527 | 66,092 | 13.0 | 8.8 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 1.723 | 5.1 | 75.5 | 80.6 |
| 2001 | 15,987,075 | 202,603 | 140,377 | 62,226 | 12.6 | 8.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 1.710 | 5.4 | 75.8 | 80.7 |
| 2002 | 16,105,285 | 202,083 | 142,355 | 59,728 | 12.5 | 8.8 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 1.731 | 5.0 | 76.0 | 80.7 |
| 2003 | 16,192,572 | 200,297 | 141,936 | 58,361 | 12.3 | 8.7 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 1.747 | 4.8 | 76.2 | 80.9 |
| 2004 | 16,258,032 | 194,007 | 136,553 | 57,454 | 11.9 | 8.4 | 3.5 | -0.6 | 1.726 | 4.4 | 76.9 | 81.4 |
| 2005 | 16,305,526 | 187,910 | 136,402 | 51,508 | 11.5 | 8.4 | 3.2 | -1.4 | 1.708 | 4.9 | 77.2 | 81.6 |
| 2006 | 16,334,210 | 185,057 | 135,372 | 49,685 | 11.3 | 8.3 | 3.0 | -1.5 | 1.720 | 4.4 | 77.6 | 81.9 |
| 2007 | 16,357,992 | 181,336 | 133,022 | 48,314 | 11.1 | 8.1 | 2.9 | 0 | 1.718 | 4.1 | 78.0 | 82.3 |
| 2008 | 16,405,399 | 184,634 | 135,136 | 49,498 | 11.2 | 8.2 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 1.773 | 3.8 | 78.3 | 82.3 |
| 2009 | 16,485,787 | 184,915 | 134,235 | 50,680 | 11.2 | 8.1 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 1.790 | 3.8 | 78.5 | 82.7 |
| 2010 | 16,574,989 | 184,397 | 136,058 | 48,339 | 11.1 | 8.2 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 1.796 | 3.8 | 78.8 | 82.7 |
| 2011 | 16,655,799 | 180,060 | 135,741 | 44,319 | 10.8 | 8.1 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 1.759 | 3.6 | 79.2 | 82.8 |
| 2012 | 16,730,348 | 175,959 | 140,813 | 35,146 | 10.5 | 8.4 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.723 | 3.7 | 79.1 | 82.8 |
| 2013 | 16,779,575 | 171,341 | 141,245 | 30,096 | 10.2 | 8.4 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.679 | 3.8 | 79.4 | 83.0 |
| 2014 | 16,829,289 | 175,181 | 139,073 | 35,434 | 10.3 | 8.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.713 | 3.6 | 79.9 | 83.3 |
| 2015 | 16,900,726 | 170,510 | 147,134 | 23,376 | 10.0 | 8.7 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 1.658 | 3.3 | 79.7 | 83.1 |
| 2016 | 16,979,000 | 172,520 | 148,997 | 23,523 | 10.2 | 8.8 | 1.3 | 4.7 | 1.663 | 3.5 | 79.9 | 83.1 |
| 2017 | 17,081,507 | 169,836 | 150,214 | 19,622 | 9.9 | 8.8 | 1.1 | 4.7 | 1.619 | 3.6 | 80.1 | 83.3 |
| 2018 | 17,181,084 | 168,525 | 153,363 | 15,162 | 9.8 | 8.9 | 0.9 | 5.0 | 1.586 | 3.5 | 80.2 | 83.3 |
| 2019 | 17,282,163 | 169,680 | 151,885 | 17,795 | 9.8 | 8.8 | 1.0 | 6.3 | 1.574 | 3.6 | 80.5 | 83.6 |
| 2020 | 17,407,585 | 168,681 | 168,678 | 3 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 1.545 | 3.8 | 79.7 | 83.1 |
| 2021 | 17,475,415 | 179,441 | 170,972 | 8,469 | 10.2 | 9.8 | 0.4 | 6.2 | 1.624 | 3.3 | 79.7 | 83.0 |
| 2022 | 17,590,672 | 167,504 | 170,112 | -2,608 | 9.5 | 9.6 | -0.1 | 12.7 | 1.487 | 3.8 | 80.1 | 83.1 |
| 2023 | 17,811,291 | 164,487 | 169,521 | -5,034 | 9.2 | 9.5 | -0.3 | 8.2 | 1.430 | 3.6 | 80.3 | 83.3 |
| 2024 | 17,942,942 | 166,143 | 172,165 | -6,022 | 9.2 | 9.6 | -0.4 | 5.5 | 1.44 (e) | 80.5 | 83.3 | |
| 2025 | 18,045,532 |
Current vital statistics
[edit]Source: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek
| Period | Live births | Deaths | Natural increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| January—September 2024 | 125,252 | 128,476 | -3,224 |
| January—September 2025 | 125,480 | 129,170 | -3,690 |
| Difference | |||
| Source:[22] | |||
Total fertility rates by province
[edit]| Province | TFR |
|---|---|
| 1.64 | |
| 1.62 | |
| 1.61 | |
| 1.59 | |
| 1.56 | |
| 1.53 | |
| 1.43 | |
| 1.43 | |
| 1.39 | |
| 1.29 | |
| 1.27 | |
| — | |
| — |
Structure of the population
[edit]Population by Sex and Age Group (Census 01.I.2011): [24]
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 8 243 482 | 8 412 317 | 16 655 799 | 100 |
| 0–4 | 472 308 | 450 798 | 923 106 | 5.54 |
| 5–9 | 503 882 | 481 347 | 985 229 | 5.92 |
| 10–14 | 510 974 | 487 766 | 998 740 | 6.00 |
| 15–19 | 514 830 | 491 914 | 1 006 744 | 6.04 |
| 20–24 | 522 667 | 512 062 | 1 034 729 | 6.21 |
| 25–29 | 504 117 | 497 421 | 1 001 538 | 6.01 |
| 30–34 | 503 323 | 501 441 | 1 004 764 | 6.03 |
| 35–39 | 560 289 | 561 279 | 1 121 568 | 6.73 |
| 40–44 | 653 664 | 642 261 | 1 295 925 | 7.78 |
| 45–49 | 655 302 | 642 990 | 1 298 292 | 7.79 |
| 50–54 | 601 040 | 595 279 | 1 196 319 | 7.18 |
| 55–59 | 546 952 | 543 295 | 1 090 247 | 6.55 |
| 60–64 | 553 446 | 550 206 | 1 103 652 | 6.63 |
| 65-69 | 390 725 | 399 835 | 790 560 | 4.75 |
| 70-74 | 302 542 | 334 976 | 637 518 | 3.83 |
| 75-79 | 219 108 | 280 213 | 499 321 | 3.00 |
| 80-84 | 139 348 | 221 480 | 360 828 | 2.17 |
| 85-89 | 66 949 | 145 107 | 212 056 | 1.27 |
| 90-94 | 18 812 | 57 379 | 76 191 | 0.46 |
| 95+ | 3 204 | 15 268 | 18 472 | 0.11 |
| Age group | Male | Female | Total | Percent |
| 0–14 | 1 487 164 | 1 419 911 | 2 907 075 | 17.45 |
| 15–64 | 5 615 630 | 5 538 148 | 11 153 778 | 66.97 |
| 65+ | 1 140 688 | 1 454 258 | 2 594 946 | 15.58 |
Population Estimates by Sex and Age Group (01.I.2021): [24]
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 8 686 536 | 8 788 879 | 17 475 415 | 100 |
| 0–4 | 439 516 | 418 110 | 857 626 | 4.91 |
| 5–9 | 461 357 | 438 470 | 899 827 | 5.15 |
| 10–14 | 488 746 | 465 532 | 954 278 | 5.46 |
| 15–19 | 527 596 | 504 139 | 1 031 735 | 5.90 |
| 20–24 | 563 311 | 544 175 | 1 107 486 | 6.34 |
| 25–29 | 575 570 | 557 372 | 1 132 942 | 6.48 |
| 30–34 | 570 427 | 556 062 | 1 126 489 | 6.45 |
| 35–39 | 530 309 | 523 777 | 1 054 086 | 6.03 |
| 40–44 | 516 034 | 517 454 | 1 033 488 | 5.91 |
| 45–49 | 562 979 | 569 595 | 1 132 574 | 6.48 |
| 50–54 | 644 880 | 641 251 | 1 286 131 | 7.36 |
| 55–59 | 633 972 | 629 585 | 1 263 557 | 7.23 |
| 60–64 | 566 770 | 570 891 | 1 137 661 | 6.51 |
| 65-69 | 496 148 | 507 630 | 1 003 778 | 5.74 |
| 70-74 | 474 058 | 496 978 | 971 036 | 5.56 |
| 75-79 | 303 655 | 340 405 | 644 060 | 3.69 |
| 80-84 | 196 115 | 253 008 | 449 123 | 2.57 |
| 85-89 | 97 307 | 160 502 | 257 809 | 1.48 |
| 90-94 | 31 861 | 73 187 | 105 048 | 0.60 |
| 95-99 | 5 514 | 18 631 | 24 145 | 0.14 |
| 100-104 | 406 | 2 040 | 2 446 | 0.01 |
| 105-109 | 5 | 84 | 89 | <0.01 |
| 110+ | 0 | 1 | 1 | <0.01 |
| Age group | Male | Female | Total | Percent |
| 0–14 | 1 389 619 | 1 322 112 | 2 711 731 | 15.52 |
| 15–64 | 5 691 848 | 5 614 301 | 11 306 149 | 64.70 |
| 65+ | 1 605 069 | 1 852 466 | 3 457 535 | 19.79 |
Migration and origin groups
[edit]Between 1590 and 1800 the estimated share of foreign-born population was consistently above 5%.[25]
According to Eurostat, in 2010 there were 1,800,000 foreign-born residents in the Netherlands, corresponding to 11.1% of the total population. Of these, 1,400,000 (8.5%) were born outside the EU (including those from Dutch colonies) and 428,000 (2.6%) were born in another EU member state. The most common countries of birth being: Belgium, Germany, Poland and the United Kingdom.[26] On 1 January 2016, 26.2% of persons aged 0–50 had at least one parent born in a foreign country. 11.4% of persons aged 0–50 of 'Dutch background' belonged to the 'third generation', the majority descending from Western immigrants. The third generation constitutes persons born from two second generation immigrants or one second generation immigrant and one person with a Dutch background. First and second generation immigrants and the third generation were 34.5% of the population aged 0–50.[27]
As the result of immigration from overseas, the Netherlands have a sizeable minority of non-indigenous peoples. There is also a considerable level of emigration, in majority consisting of former immigrants. In 2005, some 121,000 people left the country, while 94,000 entered it. Out of a total of 101,150 people immigrating into the Netherlands in 2006, 66,658 were from Europe, Oceania, the Americas or Japan, and 34,492 were from other (mostly developing) countries. Out of a total of 132,470 emigrants, 94,834 were going to Europe, Oceania, the Americas or Japan and 37,636 to other countries.[28]
A large number[25] of immigrants come from countries in Western Europe, mostly from the neighbouring countries of Germany and Belgium. There were five subsequent waves of immigration to the Netherlands in recent history.
- In the late-1940s and into the 1950s, following the end of the Second World War, people from the newly independent Republic of Indonesia repatriated or emigrated to the Netherlands - mainly Indo-European (people of mixed European and Indonesian ancestry of Dutch nationality) and supporters of the Republic of South Maluku.
- Between 1960 and 1974, migrants from Greece, Portugal, Spain, Turkey and Morocco came to work in the Netherlands as guest workers. They were expected to return to their own country and many did, but others remained and in the 1970s and 1980s were joined by their families. Until 2004, when marriage immigration was restricted, their children usually married others from their home country.[citation needed]
- After 1974, people emigrated from the newly independent Suriname and from the Netherlands Antilles, which remained part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. In 1974, about forty thousand Surinamese migrated while still retaining Dutch citizenship; between 1975 and 1980 there was a transitional arrangement allowing migration. Antilleans have the Dutch nationality and behave like typical labour migrants, travelling to and from the country in response to the employment available.
- During the 1970s and 1980s, the number of asylum seekers was low, consisting e.g. of Chileans fleeing from political oppression and/or persecution. In the 1990s, asylum migration sharply increased,[29] largely consisting of Yugoslavs, Somalis, Iraqis, Iranians, Ethiopians, Eritreans, Afghans and Vietnamese, fleeing war or famine.[30] Between 2000 and 2014 asylum migration strongly decreased due to the strict "Cohen Law". However, the Syrian Civil War from 2011 resulted in a large influx of Syrian asylum seekers in 2015 and 2016; about ninety thousand Syrians had been granted asylum by 2018.
- Since the 2000s, migrant workers and their families from the newly joined EU member states in Central and Eastern Europe, including: Poland, and Bulgaria, and non-EU states , Ukraine and the former Yugoslavia.[citation needed] In addition, a number of Spaniards, Greeks, Italians, and Portuguese also migrated due to the impact of the Great Recession in those countries. In 2005, non-Western ethnic population comprised 1.7 million individuals, about 10% of the population in the country.[31]
Illegal immigration to the Netherlands results in automatic deportation[32] but this is often not enforced for various reasons such as unknown country of origin, etc. Many Dutch provinces in 2012 had quotas for deporting illegal immigrants.[33][34][35][36]
By 2017, persons with a migration background, both western and non-western, formed a majority in Amsterdam (2011), Rotterdam (2013) and The Hague, the three largest cities of the Netherlands.[37]
In 2005, the governmental Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau in its annual report, noted recurring integration problems for ethnic minorities. While during the economic boom of the 1990s their unemployment and dependence on welfare had strongly decreased, the economic downturn between 2001 and 2004 disproportionally affected immigrant groups. This would be explained by their functioning as a labour reserve, by their lower educational levels and by lower language skills. The report also noted that per capita social interactions between native Dutch and immigrant populations tended to decline over time, partly explainable by the size growth of immigrant groups. Integration levels strongly varied between groups. Surinamese and Antilleans were well economically integrated, but the latter less so culturally. Cultural integration was limited for Turks, but better for Moroccans. Of the asylum seekers, Somalis were among the least integrated into Dutch society, while Iranians were the best integrated with the highest education levels and modern lifestyles. Though the educational levels of the second generation were a significant improvement over those of the first generation, they still lagged behind the native Dutch who themselves on average had been attending ever higher school types. While half of all native Dutch pupils in 2005 proceeded to higher secondary education (HAVO and VWO), for Turks and Moroccans the share was a fifth and for Somali pupils even lower.[31]
In 2007, non-Western groups were generally socio-economically disadvantaged. Of the four largest non-Western groups, Turks and Moroccans were the most disadvantaged. In 2006, only 38.7% of Moroccans and 43.9% of Turks aged 15–64 were employed, meaning their unemployment rate was about four times that of the native Dutch (17.2% for Moroccans and 15.1% for Turks), and 30% received some type of social welfare.[25]
The 2008 financial crisis and the Euro area crisis affected immigrant groups particularly hard. In 2012, at 12% non-Western migrants were six times more likely than native Dutch to receive social welfare benefits, with 2% for the Dutch.[38]

According to a 2010 Statistics Netherlands report, the third generation of non-Western immigrants was predominantly young with 80% being younger than 15, while growing with 10% each year. The third generation have a similar employment rate as the native Dutch and receive a similar amount of social benefits. The third non-Western generation follow adult education more frequently than both the native Dutch and non-Western immigrants. The non-Western immigrant population as a whole has 1.5 to 2 times the benefit dependence compared to the natives. The non-Western third generation had a rate slightly higher than the native Dutch as crime suspects, but lower than for non-Western immigrants as a whole.[40][41]
According to Statistics Netherlands, nearly 53% of refugee households have a low income, six times the Netherlands average (8.2%).[39] For Syrian and Eritrean households the share is about 80%. At 33% the poverty risk is lowest among Iranian refugee households. The group of Syrian households at risk of poverty grew from ten thousand (76% of all Syrian households in 2016) to eighteen thousand (79% of all Syrian households) in 2018. Households of Polish, Romanian or Bulgarian origin have a greater than average risk of poverty even though households from these Eastern European countries generally depend on work for their income. Migrant workers from Eastern Europe generally perform low-skilled work while migrants from Western Europe are often highly educated.[39]
Immigrants from foreign countries are divided into several ethnic groups. For example, there are both Russians and Chechens from Russia, Turks and Kurds from Turkey, Serbs and Albanians from Serbia and immigrants from Iran are divided into Persians, Azeris and Kurds.[42]
Net migration of the Netherlands, 1995-present
[edit]| Year | Immigration | Emigration | Net immigration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 96,099 | 82,195 | +13,904 |
| 1996 | 108,749 | 91,945 | +16,804 |
| 1997 | 109,860 | 81,973 | +27,887 |
| 1998 | 122,407 | 79,289 | +43,118 |
| 1999 | 119,151 | 78,779 | +40,372 |
| 2000 | 132,850 | 78,977 | +53,873 |
| 2001 | 133,404 | 82,566 | +50,838 |
| 2002 | 121,250 | 96,918 | +24,332 |
| 2003 | 104,514 | 104,831 | -317 |
| 2004 | 94,019 | 110,235 | -16,216 |
| 2005 | 92,297 | 119,725 | -27,428 |
| 2006 | 101,150 | 132,470 | -31,320 |
| 2007 | 116,819 | 122,576 | -5,757 |
| 2008 | 143,516 | 117,779 | +25,737 |
| 2009 | 146,378 | 111,897 | +34,481 |
| 2010 | 154,432 | 121,351 | +33,081 |
| 2011 | 162,962 | 133,194 | +29,768 |
| 2012 | 158,374 | 144,491 | +13,883 |
| 2013 | 164,772 | 145,669 | +19,103 |
| 2014 | 182,949 | 147,862 | +35,087 |
| 2015 | 204,615 | 149,509 | +55,106 |
| 2016 | 230,739 | 151,545 | +79,194 |
| 2017 | 234,957 | 154,292 | +80,665 |
| 2018 | 243,737 | 157,366 | +86,371 |
| 2019 | 269,064 | 161,029 | +108,035 |
| 2020 | 220,853 | 152,494 | +68,359 |
| 2021 | 252,528 | 145,330 | +107,198 |
| 2022 | 403,108 | 179,310 | +223,798 |
| 2023 | 335,668 | 198,310 | +137,358 |
| 2024 | 316,305 | 208,537 | +107,768 |
National origins
[edit]
Pie chart showing the breakdown of the Netherlands by national origin (2022)
- Dutch (74.8%)
- Turks (2.44%)
- Moroccans (2.38%)
- Surinamese (2.05%)
- Indos (1.99%)
- Germans (1.95%)
- Poles (1.26%)
- Curaçao (0.77%)
- Belgians (0.70%)
- Other (11.7%)
As of 1 January 2022[update], 4,438,900 citizens are of non-Dutch/Frisian origin. A majority of these (50,86%) are from seven backgrounds alone: Turks (inc. Kurds), Moroccans (inc. Berbers), Surinamese, Indonesians (inc. Moluccans), Germans, Poles and Curaçao.[43]
With the huge expansion of the European Union during the 2000s, the Netherlands has seen a rise in the number of immigrants coming from new member states. Migrant workers from these countries are estimated to be about 100,000 as of 2007.[44] Legal migrants from new EU-member states doubled between 2007–11 to 200,000,[45] with estimates totaling up to 300,000. Of the Poles who initially moved to the Netherlands in 2004, about a quarter had returned to Poland by 2006.[46] In addition, a large number of Syrians moved to the Netherlands in the 2010s mostly as refugees, with the population increasing seven-fold between 2014 and 2019. Both Poles and Syrians have overtaken the population of Antilleans during the decade.[43] More than 36,000 Roma live in the Netherlands.[47] Dutch Roma, Sinti and Dutch Jews were decimated by the Holocaust.[48][49] However, the Jewish population has seen growth in the Netherlands in recent years.[50]
As of 1 January 2022[update]:[43]
| National origins/Migration background | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dutch (& Frisians) | 13 151 772 (74.77%) | 13 169 507 (75.36%) | 13 186 880 (75.75%) | 13 196 025 (76.36%) | 13 209 225 (76.88%) | 13 218 754 (77.39%) | 13 226 829 (77.90%) | 13 235 405 (78.31%) | 13 234 545 (78.64%) | 13 236 494 (78.89%) | 13 236 618 (79.12%) | 13 215 458 (79.73%) |
| Turks (& Kurds) | 429 978 (2.444%) | 422 030 (2.415%) | 416 864 (2.395%) | 409 877 (2.37%) | 404 459 (2.35%) | 400 367 (2.34%) | 397 471 (2.34%) | 396 555 (2.35%) | 396 414 (2.36%) | 392 923 (2.34%) | 392 923 (2.35%) | 384 164 (2.32%) |
| Moroccans (& Berbers) | 419 272 (2.38%) | 414 186 (2.37%) | 408 864 (2.35%) | 402 492 (2.33%) | 396 539 (2.31%) | 391 088 (2.29%) | 385 761 (2.27%) | 380 755 (2.25%) | 374 996 (2.23%) | 368 838 (2.20%) | 362 954 (2.17%) | 349 270 (2.11%) |
| Surinamese | 359 814 (2.05%) | 358 266 (2.05%) | 356 402 (2.05%) | 353 909 (2.05%) | 351 681 (2.05%) | 349 978 (2.05%) | 349 022 (2.06%) | 348 662 (2.06%) | 348 291 (2.07%) | 344 734 (2.05%) | 344 734 (2.06%) | 342 016 (2.06%) |
| Indos (& Moluccans) | 349 301 (1.986%) | 352 266 (2.016%) | 356 029 (2.045%) | 358 773 (2.08%) | 361 594 (2.10%) | 364 328 (2.13%) | 366 849 (2.16%) | 369 661 (2.19%) | 372 233 (2.21%) | 374 847 (2.23%) | 377 618 (2.26%) | 382 319 (2.31%) |
| Germans | 342 925 (1.95%) | 345 746 (1.98%) | 349 284 (2.006%) | 351 552 (2.03%) | 354 136 (2.06%) | 356 875 (2.09%) | 360 116 (2.12%) | 364 125 (2.15%) | 368 512 (2.19%) | ? | ? | 379 017 (2.29%) |
| Poles | 220 980 (1.26%) | 209 278 (1.2%) | 198 024 (1.14%) | 185 497 (1.07%) | 173 050 (1.01%) | 161 158 (0.94%) | 149 831 (0.88%) | 137 794 (0.82%) | 123 003 (0.73%) | 111 121 (0.66%) | 100 775 (0.60%) | 77 178 (0.47%) |
| Antilleans | 165 477 (0.94%) | 160 429 (0.92%) | 158 487 (0.91%) | 155 492 (0.90%) | 153 469 (0.90%) | 150 981 (0.89%) | 148 926 (0.88%) | 146 855 (0.87%) | 145 499 (0.87%) | 143 992 (0.86%) | 138 113 (0.83%) | 134 486 (0.82%) |
| Syrians | 126 260 (0.72%) | 113 126 (0.65%) | 105 440 (0.61%) | 98 090 (0.57%) | 90 771 (0.53%) | 72 903 (0.43%) | 43 838 (0.26%) | 22 568 (0.13%) | 13 744 (0.08%) | 11 665 (0.07%) | 11 025 (0.07%) | 10 263 (0.06%) |
| Belgians | 123 136 (0.7%) | 122 197 (0.7%) | 121 019 (0.695%) | 119 769 (0.69%) | 118 725 (0.69%) | 117 495 (0.69%) | 116 389 (0.69%) | 115 687 (0.68%) | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Former Soviets[a] | ? | 110 877 | 92 128 (0.53%) | 84 498 (0.49%) | 80 013 (0.47%) | 76 102 (0.45%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| British | 97 844 (0.56%) | 97 614 (0.56%) | 91 154 (0.53%) | 88 390 (0.51%) | 86 293 (0.51%) | 84 466 (0.50%) | 82 879 (0.49%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Former Yugoslavs[b] | ? | 91 951 | 87 536 (0.51%) | 85 504 (0.50%) | 84 243 (0.50%) | 83 261 (0.49%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Chinese | 84 453 (0.48%) | 81 735 (0.47%) | 77 648 (0.45%) | 74 234 (0.43%) | 71 229 (0.42%) | 68 697 (0.40%) | 66 088 (0.39%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Iraqis | 67 757 (0.39%) | 66 216 (0.38%) | 63 008 (0.36%) | 61 255 (0.36%) | 59 497 (0.35%) | 56 269 (0.33%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Indians | 65 399 (0.37%) | 58 460 (0.33%) | 48 724 (0.28%) | 36 818 (0.22%) | 32 682 (0.19%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Italians | 64 398 (0.37%) | 61 367 (0.35%) | 56 645 (0.33%) | 53 703 (0.31%) | 50 925 (0.30%) | 48 366 (0.28%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Afghans | 54 991 (0.31%) | 51 830 (0.3%) | 49 122 (0.28%) | 47 776 (0.28%) | 46 701 (0.27%) | 44 339 (0.26%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Spaniards | 54 269 (0.31%) | 50 466 (0.29%) | 46 741 (0.27%) | 42 926 (0.25%) | 41 572 (0.24%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| French | 52 389 (0.3%) | 50 207 (0.29%) | 47 009 (0.27%) | 45 558 (0.27%) | 43 836 (0.26%) | 42 070 (0.25%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Iranians (Persians, Azeris and Kurds) | 52 099 (0.3%) | 49 723 (0.29%) | 44 379 (0.26%) | 42 464 (0.25%) | 40 893 (0.24%) | 38 458 (0.23%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Bulgarians | 50 305 (0.29%) | 44 874 (0.26%) | 40 216 (0.23%) | 34 809 (0.20%) | 27 729 (0.16%) | 25 520 (0.15%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Americans | 49 246 (0.28%) | 47 408 (0.27%) | 44 399 (0.26%) | 40 022 (0.23%) | 38 494 (0.23%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Romanians | 48 563 (0.28%) | 43 161 (0.25%) | 39 340 (0.225%) | 34 185 (0.20%) | 25 551 (0.15%) | 23 020 (0.14%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Somalis | 41 064 (0.23%) | 40 701 (0.23%) | 40 251 (0.23%) | 39 947 (0.23%) | 39 737 (0.23%) | 39 457 (0.23%) | 39 465 (0.23%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Bosnians | 39 265 (0.22%) | 38 927 (0.22%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Brazilians | 38 125 (0.22%) | 35 285 (0.2%) | 33 348 (0.19%) | 30 104 (0.17%) | 24 725 (0.14%) | 23 675 (0.14%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| South Africans (Afrikaners) | 31 693 (0.18%) | 28 562 (0.16%) | 23 738 (0.14%) | 20 859 (0.12%) | 19 877 (0.12%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Greeks | 31 480 (0.18%) | 28 856 (0.16%) | 28 100 (0.16%) | 25 709 (0.15%) | 22 141 (0.13%) | 20 769 (0.12%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Portuguese | 31 306 (0.18%) | 29 092 (0.17%) | 28 802 (0.17%) | 27 450 (0.16%) | 25 637 (0.15%) | 24 930 (0.15%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Egyptians | 29 483 (0.17%) | 28 399 (0.16%) | 26 152 (0.15%) | 23 956 (0.14%) | 23 198 (0.14%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Ethiopians | 28 635 (0.16%) | 27 139 (0.15%) | 23 777 (0.14%) | 19 528 (0.11%) | 16 347 (0.10%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Hungarians | 28 210 (0.16%) | 26 853 (0.15%) | 24 898 (0.14%) | 22 870 (0.13%) | 22 080 (0.13%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Pakistanis | 27 261 (0.15%) | 25 938 (0.15%) | 23 855 (0.14%) | 22 897 (0.13%) | 22 137 (0.13%) | 21 447 (0.13%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Ghanaians | 26 694 (0.15%) | 25 999 (0.15%) | 24 460 (0.14%) | 23 430 (0.14%) | 23 168 (0.14%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Filipinos | 26 658 (0.15%) | 25 365 (0.14%) | 23 128 (0.13%) | 22 000 (0.13%) | 20 937 (0.12%) | 20 073 (0.12%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Vietnamese (Kinh) | 25 135 (0.14%) | 24 594 (0.14%) | 23 488 (0.14%) | 22 023 (0.13%) | 21 435 (0.13%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Thai | 23 390 (0.13%) | 22 642 (0.13%) | 21 364 (0.12%) | 20 106 (0.12%) | 19 513 (0.11%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Cape Verdeans | 23 150 (0.13%) | 22 980 (0.13%) | 22 632 (0.13%) | 22 285 (0.13%) | 22 157 (0.13%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Colombians | 21 853 (0.12%) | 20 515 (0.12%) | 18 351 (0.11%) | 16 607 (0.10%) | 15 892 (0.09%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Hongkongers | 18 363 (0.1%) | 18 332 (0.10%) | 18 367 (0.11%) | 18 357 (0.11%) | 18 300 (0.11%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Australians | 17 722 (0.10%) | 17 688 (0.10%) | 17 349 (0.10%) | 16 597 (0.10%) | 16 127 (0.09%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Canadians | 17 266 (0.1%) | 16 997 (0.10%) | 16 614 (0.10%) | 16 240 (0.09%) | 15 944 (0.09%) | 15 625 (0.09%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
| Austrians | 16 216 (0.09%) | 16 130 (0.09%) | 16 055 (0.09%) | 15 777 (0.09%) | 15 674 (0.09%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
| Rest of Sub-Saharan Africa | ? | 108 621 (0.63%) | 97 026 (0.57%) | 91 797 (0.54%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Rest of Europe | ? | 77 245 (0.45%) | 68 592 (0.40%) | 65 849 (0.39%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Rest of Americas (except Caribbean) | ? | 52 425 (0.30) | 47 048 (0.28%) | 45 256 (0.27%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Rest of North Africa and Middle East | ? | 55 180 (0.32%) | 46 231 (0.27%) | 44 059 (0.26%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Rest of East and Southeast Asia | ? | 38 279 (0.22%) | 34 562 (0.20%) | 33 473 (0.20%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Rest of Caribbean | ? | 28 861 (0.17%) | 21 514 (0.13%) | 20 956 (0.12%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Rest of South Asia | ? | 18 672 (0.11%) | 17 448 (0.10%) | 16 762 (0.10%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Rest of Oceania | ? | 6 479 (0.04%) | 6 062 (0.04%) | 5 916 (0.03%) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Others | ? | 1 094 826 (6.48%) | 1 587 433 (9.43%) | 1 437 462 (8.57%) | 1 437 462 (8.59%) | 1 387 255 (8.37%) | ||||||
| Total | 17 590 672 | 17 475 415 | 17 407 575 | 17 282 163 | 17 181 084 | 17 081 507 | 16 979 120 | 16 900 726 | 16 829 289 | 16 779 575 | 16 730 348 | 16 577 612 |
- Population pyramids of background groups
-
Dutch background population pyramid in 2022
-
Migration background: Total
-
1st generation migrant background
-
2nd generation (both parents born abroad) migrant background
-
2nd generation partial (one parent born abroad) migrant background
-
Europe (total foreign/non-Dutch) migrant background
-
Americas (total foreign/non-Dutch) migrant background
-
Asia (total foreign/non-Dutch) migrant background
-
Africa (total foreign/non-Dutch) migrant background
-
Total population pyramid by migration background origin
| Region of the World[51] | 2024[52] | 2023[53] | 2022[51] | 2021 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 12 941 748 (72.13%) | 12 978 154 (72.86%) | 13 013 279 (73.97%) | 13 169 507 (75.36%) | 13 196 025 (76.36%) | 13 209 225 (76.88%) | 13 218 754 (77.39%) | 13 226 829 (77.90%) |
| Europe (Except Netherlands) | 1 677 093 (9.35%) | 1 617 454 (9.08%) | 1 477 069 (8.39%) | 1 237 807 (7.25%) | 1 204 908 (7.10%) | |||
| Asia | 1 661 731 (9.26%) | 1 594 551 (8.95%) | 1 523 493 (8.66%) | |||||
| Americas | 855 488 (4.77%) | 804 097 (4.51%) | 815,554 (4.63%) | |||||
| Africa | 806 882 (4.50%) | 785 016 (4.41%) | 761 277 (4.32%) | |||||
| North Africa and Middle East | 1 148 300 (6.64%) | 1 081 636 (6.33%) | 1 033 393 (6.09%) | |||||
| East and South East Asia | 561 047 (3.25%) | 551 542 (3.23%) | 548 340 (3.23%) | |||||
| Caribbean and Suriname | 538 262 (3.11%) | 524 961 (3.07%) | 520 959 (3.07%) | |||||
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 243 175 (1.41%) | 222 585 (1.30%) | 212 811 (1.25%) | |||||
| Americas (Except Caribbean and Suriname) | 161 893 (0.94%) | 144 346 (0.85%) | 138 942 (0.82%) | |||||
| South Asia | 91 251 (0.53%) | 76 403 (0.45%) | 70 891 (0.42%) | |||||
| Oceania | 32 019 (0.18%) | 24 423 (0.14%) | 24 390 (0.14%) | 22 828 (0.14%) | 22 659 (0.13%) | 22 043 (0.13%) |
| Nationality | Population (2022)[54] |
|---|---|
| 429,978 | |
| 419,272 | |
| 359,814 | |
| 349,301 | |
| 342,925 | |
| 220,980 | |
| 126,260 | |
| 123,136 | |
| 97,844 | |
| 84,453 | |
| 67,757 | |
| 65,399 | |
| 55,001 | |
| 54,991 | |
| 54,269 | |
| 52,389 | |
| 52,099 | |
| 50,305 | |
| 49,246 | |
| 48,563 | |
| 41,064 | |
| 39,265 | |
| 38,125 | |
| 31,693 | |
| 31,480 | |
| 31,306 | |
| 29,483 | |
| 28,635 | |
| 28,210 | |
| 27,261 | |
| 26,694 | |
| 26,658 | |
| 23,150 | |
| 23,390 | |
| 21,853 | |
| 18,363 | |
| 17,722 | |
| 17,266 | |
| 16,216 |
| Rank | Country | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82,767 | 37 | |
| 2 | 16,276 | 7.2 | |
| 3 | 12,040 | 5.4 | |
| 4 | 10,903 | 4.9 | |
| 5 | 10,025 | 4.5 | |
| 6 | 6,043 | 2.7 | |
| 7 | 5,527 | 2.5 | |
| 8 | 4,616 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3,278 | 1.7 | |
| 10 | 3,270 | 1.7 | |
| Top 10 total | 154,745 | 69.1 | |
| Other | 69,053 | 30.9 | |
| Total | 223,798 | 100 |
Emigration
[edit]The Netherlands have seen considerable emigration. In the 1950s and early 1960s, 560,000 people migrated to Canada, Australia, the United States, South Africa and New Zealand, in response to low wage levels and a government programme aiming to reduce the perceived overpopulation. At least 60,000 of these migrants were Indo-European (mixed Dutch-Indonesian) repatriates that moved on, mostly to the United States, or returned to Indonesia after being repatriated to the Netherlands from the former Dutch East Indies during and after the Indonesian Revolution. The official emigration policy combined with a strong economic growth already in the early 1950s led to serious manpower shortages.
In 2005, some 121,000 people migrated from the Netherlands. There is considerable migration towards neighbouring states, Belgium, Germany and the United Kingdom and to the Netherlands Antilles. Furthermore, almost half of the current emigration consists of people returning to their country of birth, including rejected asylum seekers, after the more stringent migration laws were implemented.
Education by background
[edit]According to a 2016 study by Statistics Netherlands, students with a non-western background generally study at a lower level of secondary education. 48 percent of those with a Dutch background were at HAVO or VWO level at third year, compared to 23 percent for Dutch Turks, 28 percent for Dutch Moroccans, 35 percent for Dutch Surinamese and 31 percent for Dutch Antilleans. Some backgrounds fared better: over 40 percent of Dutch Afghans studied at HAVO/VWO level, and for Dutch Iranians the rate was 50 percent, which was above native Dutch students.[56]
Employment and income
[edit]Unemployment, youth ages 15–24
- total: 7.2%. Country comparison to the world: 130th
- male: 7.7%
- female: 6.6% (2018 est.)
Religion
[edit]In 2013, Statistics Netherlands found that 26% of the population identified as Roman Catholic, 16% as Protestant, 5% as Muslim, and 6% as "other" (the last includes other Christian denominations, Hindus 0.6%, Jews 0.1%, and Buddhists 0.4%). The agency interviewed 355,237 people in the period 2010–2013.[57] In 2019, the Central Bureau of Statistics reported that for the first time non-religious people were in the majority in the Netherlands. Only 49% of people older than 15 years reported to be religious; in 2012 that was still 54%. The largest religion was still Catholicism (24%), while 5% identified with Islam.[58]
Religion in Netherlands (2019) by the CIA[59]
- No religion (54.1%)
- Roman Catholic (20.1%)
- Protestantism (14.8%)
- Muslim (5.00%)
- Other religions (5.90%)
Language
[edit]The main language is Dutch, while Frisian (known as West Frisian outside of the Netherlands) is also a recognized language in the province of Friesland and is used by the government and schools there. Several dialects of Low Saxon (Nedersaksisch in Dutch) are spoken in much of the north and east and are recognized by the Netherlands as regional languages according to the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Another group of dialects granted the status of regional language is Limburgish, which is spoken in the south-eastern province of Limburg. Major immigrant languages are Indonesian, Turkish, Arabic, Berber, Papiamento, German and Polish.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Primarily Estonians, Lithuanians, Latvians, Russians and Ukrainians
- ^ Bosniaks & Bosnians, Croats, Macedonians, Montenegrins, Serbs, Slovenes, and other Yugoslavs collectively
References
[edit]- ^ Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS) (January 2023). "Population counter". Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. Retrieved 30 March 2023.
- ^ CBS Statline - Population; history. Statistics Netherlands. Retrieved on 2009-03-08.
- ^ "CBS Statline". opendata.cbs.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 14 July 2023.
- ^ Note: Crude migration change % is a trend analysis, an extrapolation, based average population change (current year minus previous) minus natural change of the current year (see table vital statistics). As average population is an estimate of the population in the middle of the year and not end of the year.
- ^ "Netherlands Population - Our World in Data". www.ourworldindata.org.
- ^ "Population counter of the Netherlands". Archived from the original on 9 October 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
- ^ Netherlands, Statistics (September 2003). "Largest families in Urk". Cbs.nl. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
- ^ Netherlands, Statistics (15 February 2008). "Population growth 46 thousand in 2007". Cbs.nl. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
- ^ http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/publicaties/periodieken/bevolkingstrends/archief/2003/2003-k3-b15-pub.htm [permanent dead link]
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 June 2007. Retrieved 30 June 2007.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ "Bevolkingsprognose 2007–2014: tijdelijk hogere groei" (PDF). Cbs.nl. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
- ^ Charles F. Westoff; Tomas Frejka. "Fertility and Religiousness Among European Muslims". Paa2007.princeton.edu. Archived from the original on 28 June 2007. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
- ^ a b c d e f g Max Roser (2014), "Total Fertility Rate around the world over the last centuries", Our World In Data, Gapminder Foundation, archived from the original on 7 August 2018, retrieved 1 February 2019
- ^ "Life expectancy". Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 August 2018.
- ^ "CBS Statline". opendata.cbs.nl. 1 January 2024.
- ^ "CBS Statline". opendata.cbs.nl.
- ^ "Netherlands" (PDF). oecd.org.
- ^ "CBS Statistics Netherlands". Archived from the original on 14 November 2010.
- ^ "Tweehonderd jaar statistiek in tijdreeksen 1800 – 1999" (PDF). Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek . 2001. Retrieved 10 October 2025.
- ^ "CBS Statline". opendata.cbs.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 10 October 2025.
- ^ Mitchell, Brian R. (1998). International Historical Statistics: Europe, 1750–1993. Macmillan Publishers. pp. 280–284.
- ^ "Population dynamics; month and year". Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. 30 November 2023.
- ^ "Total fertility rate by NUTS 2 region". ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
- ^ a b "UNSD — Demographic and Social Statistics". unstats.un.org. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
- ^ a b c "Focus migration - country profile - Netherlands". focus-migration.hwwi.de. Hamburgisches WeltWirtschaftsinstitut (HWWI). November 2007. Archived from the original on 30 April 2017. Retrieved 6 April 2017.
- ^ VASILEVA, Katya. "6.5% of the EU population are foreigners and 9.4% are born abroad (34/2011)" (PDF). Eurostat. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 January 2012.
- ^ Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, [Wie zijn de derde generatie?. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2016/47/wie-zijn-de-derde-generatie-] Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
- ^ "CBS StatLine - External migration; sex, age (31 dec), marital status and country of birth". cbs.nl.
- ^ "Substantial increase asylum seekers". cbs.nl. 29 January 2015. Archived from the original on 7 April 2017. Retrieved 6 April 2017.
- ^ Nieuwe etnische groepen in Nederland. Een onderzoek onder vluchtelingen en statushouders uit Afghanistan, Iran, Ethiopië, Eritrea, Somalië en Vietnam.
- ^ a b "Jaarrapport Integratie 2005 - SCP Summary". www.scp.nl (in Dutch). pp. 1–3. Archived from the original on 16 September 2018. Retrieved 15 September 2018.
- ^ "Dutch float 'migrant prison' scheme". BBC. Retrieved 5 May 2012.
- ^ "Anti-immigrant website fans flames in the Netherlands". Vancouver Sun. Archived from the original on 29 April 2012. Retrieved 5 May 2012.
- ^ "Dutch Police to Scan Fingerprints in Checks for Illegal Immigrants". Voice of America. Archived from the original on 18 January 2013. Retrieved 5 May 2012.
- ^ "Government gets tougher with illegal immigrants". Radio Netherlands. Archived from the original on 28 April 2012. Retrieved 5 May 2012.
- ^ "Clash over illegal alien arrest quota". Radio Netherlands. Archived from the original on 1 April 2012. Retrieved 5 May 2012.
- ^ Statistiek, Centraal Bureau voor de. "CBS". Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (in Dutch). Retrieved 17 September 2018.
- ^ "Annual Integration Report 2013 Summary". www.scp.nl. SCP. p. 191. Archived from the original on 16 September 2018. Retrieved 16 September 2018.
- ^ a b c Netherlands, Statistics (12 November 2018). "Half of refugee households at risk of poverty". Statistics Netherlands. Retrieved 18 November 2018.
- ^ Steven de Jong, "PVV-plan is prachtig. Derde generatie kan imago ‘allochtoon’ opkrikken", NRC Handelsblad, 29 June 2011
- ^ "Verkenning niet-westerse derde generatie" (PDF). Papers van het Centrum voor Beleidsstatistiek. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek: 5 / Samenvattning. 2010. ISSN 1877-3028. Archived from the original on 16 November 2010.
- ^ Netherlands, Statistics (2 June 2023). "CBS". Statistics Netherlands.
- ^ a b c "CBS StatLine - Bevolking; generatie, geslacht, leeftijd en herkomstgroepering, 1 januari". Statline.cbs.nl. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
- ^ "Donner: 100.000 Oost-Europeanen werken in Nederland". Volkskrant.nl. 25 November 2007. Retrieved 25 November 2007.
- ^ "Aantal Midden- en Oost-Europeanen in vijf jaar tijd verdubbeld". CBS. 25 July 2011. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 29 November 2011.
- ^ "Immigratie Oost-Europeanen blijft hoog". CBS. 28 November 2007. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 28 November 2007.
- ^ "Roma and Travelers in Netherlands fear for their culture". 15 July 2019.
- ^ Rutland, Suzanne D. (2001). "A Reassessment of the Dutch Record during the Holocaust". Remembering for the Future. pp. 527–542. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-66019-3_34. ISBN 978-0-333-80486-5.
- ^ "Netherlands | IHRA".
- ^ "Institute for Jewish Policy Research: Netherlands".
- ^ a b "CBS Statline". opendata.cbs.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 15 November 2023.
- ^ "CBS Statline".
- ^ "CBS Statline".
- ^ "CBS Statline". opendata.cbs.nl.
- ^ "CBS Statline". opendata.cbs.nl.
- ^ Jaarraport Integratie 2016 (PDF), CBS
- ^ Schmeets, Hans (2014). De religieuze kaart van Nederland, 2010-2013 (PDF). Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. p. 4. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
- ^ "Niet-religieuze Nederlander is nu officieel in de meerderheid". 22 October 2018.
- ^
{{cite web}}: Empty citation (help)
External links
[edit]Wikimedia Commons has media related to Demographics of the Netherlands.
- CIA World Factbook data
- CBS Dutch Bureau of Statistics
Demographics of the Netherlands
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
Total Population
Current Size and Projections
As of the end of August 2025, the population of the Netherlands was 18,100,436.[10] This figure reflects registered inhabitants and incorporates monthly adjustments for births, deaths, and migration. In the first half of 2025, the population increased by 36,900 persons, entirely attributable to net immigration of 41,900, offsetting a natural decrease of 5,000 due to 9,000 more deaths than births. Such patterns underscore migration as the dominant driver of recent growth, amid persistently low fertility and rising mortality from an aging demographic. Statistics Netherlands (CBS) projects continued expansion under its medium variant forecast. The population is projected to reach 18.14 million in 2026, an increase from 18.04 million in 2025, with a 95% forecast interval of 18.09 to 18.18 million.[11] Longer-term projections include reaching 18.98 million by 2037 (crossing the 19 million threshold), 19.69 million by 2050, 20.06 million by 2060, and 20.63 million by 2070.[11] These estimates assume sustained net migration around 20,000–30,000 annually, gradual fertility stabilization near 1.6 children per woman, and life expectancy gains to 82 years for men and 86 for women by mid-century. Alternative scenarios yield wider ranges: a low variant projects 18.9 million by 2070, while a high variant anticipates 22.3 million, with 95% confidence intervals spanning 17.5–24.1 million.[11] Long-term growth hinges on immigration trends, as natural population change remains negative or negligible; CBS notes uncertainty in fertility due to delayed childbearing and smaller family sizes, compounded by structural aging where the over-65 share rises from 20% in 2025 to 28% by 2070.[11]Historical Trends
The population of the Netherlands grew from just over 2 million inhabitants in 1795 to 5.1 million by 1900, reflecting gradual improvements in agricultural productivity, reduced famine impacts, and early declines in mortality rates amid limited industrialization.[12] This expansion occurred at an average annual growth rate of approximately 0.8 percent, constrained by high emigration to overseas colonies and urban centers, as well as periodic epidemics and economic pressures.[12] By the late 19th century, census data indicated a population of around 5.1 million in 1899, setting the stage for accelerated growth in the 20th century driven by public health advancements and infrastructure development.[13] From 1900 to 1950, the population doubled to over 10 million, despite the disruptions of World War I neutrality and World War II occupation, during which direct military losses were minimal but indirect effects like the 1944-1945 Hunger Winter caused excess mortality of about 20,000-30,000 civilians.[10] Annual growth averaged 1.1 percent, supported by falling infant mortality from 120 per 1,000 live births in 1900 to around 30 by 1950, and rising life expectancy from 44 years to 70 years over the same period.[10] The post-war baby boom, peaking with total fertility rates above 3 children per woman in the 1950s and early 1960s, propelled further increases, with the population reaching 11.5 million by 1960.[10] Since 1960, the population has risen from 11.5 million to approximately 17.9 million by 2023, a 56 percent increase at an average annual rate declining from 1.2 percent in the 1960s to 0.7 percent in recent decades.[9] This sustained growth has increasingly relied on net immigration, as natural increase turned near-zero following fertility declines below replacement level (1.6-1.7 births per woman since the 1970s), with migrants contributing over 80 percent of annual gains in the 2010s and 2020s.[14] Key inflows included labor migration from Mediterranean countries in the 1960s-1970s, family reunification from former colonies, and asylum seekers from conflict zones in the 1990s and 2010s, offsetting aging demographics and low native birth rates.[14]| Year | Population (millions) | Annual Growth Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1900 | 5.1 | - |
| 1950 | 10.1 | 1.1 |
| 1960 | 11.5 | 1.2 |
| 2000 | 15.9 | 0.5 |
| 2023 | 17.8 | 0.7 |
Population Density and Geography
Overall Density
The Netherlands exhibits one of the highest population densities in Europe, with 533 inhabitants per square kilometer of land area recorded in 2024.[16] This metric is computed by Statistics Netherlands (CBS) using the registered population divided by the land surface area, excluding inland water bodies, which total approximately 33,700 square kilometers.[16] As of 1 January 2025, the population reached 18,044,027, reflecting continued growth primarily driven by net migration, which sustains the elevated density despite a land area constrained by geography and historical land reclamation efforts.[17] This density underscores the country's efficient land utilization, where about 55% of the territory remains dedicated to agriculture, facilitated by advanced polder systems and intensive farming practices. Urban concentration in the Randstad region—encompassing the provinces of North Holland, South Holland, Utrecht, and Flevoland—amplifies local densities exceeding 1,000 per square kilometer, while eastern and northern provinces average below 500.[16] CBS data, derived from municipal registers, provide robust empirical tracking, minimizing estimation errors inherent in less rigorous international comparisons.[17] Projections indicate density will rise to around 550 per square kilometer by 2030, assuming moderate immigration and stable land area, as urban expansion faces limits from flood-prone topography and environmental policies.[17] Such figures position the Netherlands ahead of most large European nations in density rankings, excluding principalities, highlighting adaptations like multi-story housing and transport infrastructure to accommodate population pressures without proportional land consumption.[18]Urban-Rural Distribution
The Netherlands maintains one of the highest urbanization rates globally, with 93.18 percent of the population residing in urban areas as of 2023. This equates to roughly 16.66 million urban dwellers out of a total population exceeding 17.8 million, leaving a rural population of 6.82 percent, or approximately 1.22 million individuals.[19] [20] By 2024, the urban share had risen slightly to 93.45 percent, reflecting a continued, albeit gradual, shift from rural to urban living.[21] Urban concentration is pronounced in the Randstad metropolitan region in the west, encompassing provinces such as North Holland, South Holland, and Utrecht, where high-density cities like Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and The Hague account for a disproportionate share of the populace. In contrast, rural areas predominate in the northern (e.g., Friesland, Groningen) and eastern (e.g., Drenthe, Overijssel) provinces, as well as parts of the south, characterized by lower population densities and agricultural focus. The rural population has declined steadily, dropping from 7.11 percent in 2022 and further from 7.76 percent in 2020, driven by migration to urban centers for employment and services.[22] [23] This distribution aligns with the World Bank's classification, which relies on national definitions of urban localities—typically settlements exceeding a certain population threshold or density criterion—yielding figures consistent across international datasets. Historical data illustrate a long-term trend: rural residency fell from over 40 percent in 1960 to under 8 percent by 2020, underscoring the country's transformation into a predominantly urban society amid postwar economic growth and infrastructure development.[24] [23]Vital Statistics
Fertility Rates and Births
The total fertility rate (TFR) in the Netherlands, representing the average number of children a woman would bear if current age-specific fertility rates prevailed throughout her childbearing years, stood at 1.43 live births per woman in 2023.[25] [26] This marked a decline from 1.49 in 2022 and reflects a broader recent downward trajectory below the replacement level of 2.1 required for long-term population stability absent migration.[27] In 2023, 164,297 live births were recorded, a marginal decrease from 2022, with over 75,000 women becoming first-time mothers.[25] Preliminary data for 2024 indicate 165,404 live births, accompanied by 2,448 twin births and 32 higher-order multiples, stable from prior years.[28] [29] Historically, the TFR exceeded 3.0 in the 1950s and early 1960s amid the postwar baby boom, driven by high birth rates among younger women, before plummeting to a low of 1.57 in 1979 due to delayed childbearing, increased female labor participation, and contraceptive availability.[26] [27] A partial recovery occurred in the early 2000s, peaking near 1.82 in 2010, attributed to policy supports like parental leave and childcare subsidies that mitigated postponement effects, but rates have since resumed declining amid sustained low period fertility and rising childlessness.[26] By 2023, the mean age at first birth reached 30.3 years, contributing to compressed fertility schedules and fewer total births.[25] Fertility varies by migration background, with women of Dutch origin exhibiting a TFR of 1.5, lower than among those with non-Dutch origins, though rates are falling across all groups and remain sub-replacement in each.[30] Immigrants, particularly from non-Western countries, historically displayed elevated TFRs upon arrival—often 1.5 to 2 times native levels—due to selectivity for family-oriented migrants and disruption effects, but these converge toward native norms over generations as socioeconomic integration advances and origin-country fertility declines.[31] [32] This pattern results in births to mothers with migration backgrounds comprising a disproportionate share relative to their population weight, sustaining a modest upward pull on the national TFR despite overall contraction.[30] Stillbirths remain low at around 3.5 per 1,000 births, with no significant trend deviation in recent data.[33]Mortality and Life Expectancy
Life expectancy at birth in the Netherlands reached 81.9 years in 2023, with men at 80.3 years and women at 83.3 years.[34][35] Preliminary data for 2024 indicate a slight increase for men to 80.5 years, while women's life expectancy remained at 83.3 years.[36] These figures position the Netherlands above the EU average, reflecting improvements in healthcare and living standards.[37] The crude death rate stood at 9.5 deaths per 1,000 population in 2023, down slightly from 9.6 in 2022, with 169,521 total deaths recorded.[38][39] In 2024, deaths rose to 172,165, yielding a rate of approximately 9.6 per 1,000.[40] Infant mortality has declined to 3.2 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2022, among the lowest globally, supported by advanced neonatal care.[41] Historically, life expectancy has risen steadily from 71.4 years in 1950 to over 82 years by 2024, driven by reductions in infectious diseases, better nutrition, and medical advancements, though progress slowed during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020–2021 before rebounding.[42] At age 65, remaining life expectancy was 19.9 years in 2023, up from 19.7 in 2022.[43] Disparities persist by sex and socioeconomic factors, with women's higher expectancy linked to lower cardiovascular mortality rates, though recent trends show converging gaps.[44]Natural Population Change
The natural population change in the Netherlands, defined as the excess of live births over deaths excluding migration, remained positive for much of the postwar period but turned negative starting in 2023 due to persistently low fertility rates around 1.4 children per woman and an aging population structure.[27][26] In 2022, approximately 167,500 births occurred alongside roughly 169,800 deaths, yielding a small natural decrease that was offset by migration for overall growth.[45][39] This shift accelerated in 2023, with 164,400 live births recorded against 169,000 deaths, resulting in a natural decline of about 4,600—the first annual negative figure in postwar records, making net migration the sole driver of population increase that year.[45][39][46] Preliminary data for 2024 indicate further deterioration, with an average of 455 daily births (totaling around 166,000 annually) and 472 daily deaths (around 172,000 annually), producing a natural decrease of approximately 6,000.[14] In the first half of 2025, the gap widened to nearly 9,000 more deaths than births, reflecting sustained trends in below-replacement fertility and elevated mortality from demographic aging despite life expectancy at birth exceeding 82 years.[47][2] These dynamics stem from fertility declining below the 2.1 replacement level since the 1970s, compounded by postwar baby boomers reaching advanced ages, with deaths now outpacing births amid stable but insufficient natality.[39] Projections from Statistics Netherlands anticipate continued natural declines unless fertility rebounds, though policy interventions have had limited impact on total fertility rates hovering near historic lows of 1.43 in 2023.[48][14]| Year | Live Births | Deaths | Natural Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 167,504 | ~169,800 | -2,296 |
| 2023 | 164,400 | 169,000 | -4,600 |
| 2024 | ~166,000 | ~172,000 | ~-6,000 |
Age and Sex Structure
Age Pyramid
The age-sex pyramid of the Netherlands in 2023 illustrates a contracting structure typical of low-fertility, high-longevity societies, featuring a narrow base, a broad middle, and a moderately tapering apex.[49] The base, representing ages 0-14, accounts for about 15% of the population, reflecting sustained total fertility rates below the 2.1 replacement level since the mid-1970s.[50] A noticeable bulge appears in the 50-70 age range, corresponding to the post-World War II baby boom cohorts born between 1946 and 1964, which now form a significant portion of the working-age and early retirement population.[50] In 2022, the distribution showed 21% aged 0-19, 59% aged 20-64 (with sub-bulges in 20-39 at 26% and 40-64 at 33%), and 20% aged 65 and over (15% aged 65-79 and 5% aged 80+).[50] This structure underscores an aging population, with the share of those 65+ rising from 8% in 1950 to over 20% today, driven by declining mortality and cohort survival.[50] Immigration has contributed a relative widening in the 20-30 age bands, introducing younger adults that partially offset the narrow youth cohorts.[49] Sex disparities are evident, with males slightly outnumbering females up to age 40, after which female predominance increases due to higher male mortality rates, reaching a ratio of about 60 males per 100 females among those 80+.[49] Projections indicate the pyramid evolving toward an urn shape by mid-century, with further contraction at the base from persistent low native fertility, sustained elderly expansion, and immigration-dependent replenishment of prime working ages. Short-term projections from the CBS Bevolkingsprognose 2023-2070 (published December 2023) indicate that the number of children aged 0-17 is expected to be stable or slightly declining as of January 2026 due to low fertility rates around 1.5 children per woman, with detailed age-specific projections showing gradual decreases in younger age groups; precise figures are available via CBS StatLine datasets on population prognosis by age.[49][51] The total population stood at approximately 17.9 million on January 1, 2024, supporting these demographic dynamics.[52] Historical shifts in the pyramid highlight the transition from a expansive form in 1950—driven by higher postwar birth rates—to the current constrictive profile, with the baby boom echo fading and longevity extending the upper tiers.[49] This evolution aligns with broader European trends but is accentuated in the Netherlands by early and consistent fertility declines post-1960s.[50]Median Age and Dependency Ratios
The median age of the population in the Netherlands is 43.6 years, with males at 42.8 years and females at 44.3 years, based on 2023 estimates.[8] This marks an increase from approximately 40 years in the early 2010s, driven by sustained low fertility rates below replacement level since the 1970s and gains in life expectancy exceeding 82 years.[53] Statistics Netherlands reported the mean population age at 42.6 years as of early 2024, underscoring the ongoing aging trend amid a shrinking proportion of youth cohorts.[50] The total age dependency ratio stood at 55.1% in 2024, indicating 55.1 dependents (aged 0-14 and 65+) per 100 individuals of working age (15-64 years).[54] This ratio breaks down into a youth dependency ratio of 23.5% and an old-age dependency ratio of 31.8%.[55] [56] The old-age component has risen sharply from around 20% in 2000, primarily due to the retirement of the baby boom generation born post-World War II, while immigration has partially offset declines in the youth ratio by introducing younger cohorts, though native fertility remains low at 1.5 births per woman.[57] Rising dependency ratios strain public finances, particularly the pay-as-you-go state pension system (AOW), where benefits are funded by current workers' contributions. Projections indicate the old-age dependency ratio could reach 40% or higher by 2040 without policy adjustments, necessitating higher labor participation, delayed retirement, or increased immigration to maintain fiscal sustainability.[58] These dynamics highlight the causal interplay between demographic structure, fertility choices, and economic policy in shaping long-term societal support burdens.Sex Ratios
The overall sex ratio in the Netherlands, defined as the number of males per 100 females, stood at 99.0 as of January 1, 2025, reflecting a slight female majority in the total population of 18,044,027, with 8,978,451 males and 9,065,576 females.[17] This ratio has remained stable around 98 to 99 males per 100 females in recent years, influenced by higher male mortality rates across the life course, particularly in older age groups where female life expectancy exceeds that of males by several years.[59][60] At birth, the sex ratio is higher, averaging 1.052 males per female birth in 2023, aligning with the biological norm observed globally of approximately 105 male births per 100 female births absent significant interventions.[61] This initial male surplus diminishes over time due to elevated male infant and adult mortality, resulting in near parity in younger age cohorts under 15 years, where ratios hover around 1.05, and a pronounced female skew in cohorts aged 65 and older, often exceeding 70 males per 100 females.[62] Population pyramids illustrate this pattern, showing broader male bases in youth narrowing progressively toward the apex dominated by females.[63] Variations persist across subgroups; for instance, among the native Dutch population, the ratio mirrors national trends, while migrant cohorts may exhibit temporary imbalances due to sex-selective migration patterns, though aggregate data indicate minimal distortion to the overall structure.[63] Historical data from Statistics Netherlands reveal a gradual decline in the total sex ratio from around 100 in the mid-20th century to the current level, attributable to demographic aging and persistent sex differentials in mortality rather than fertility biases.[60]Urbanization
Major Cities and Agglomerations
The Netherlands features a high degree of urbanization, with over 90% of its population residing in urban areas, predominantly concentrated in the western Randstad conurbation. This densely populated ring-shaped urban agglomeration, encompassing the provinces of North Holland, South Holland, and Utrecht, along with parts of Flevoland, had approximately 8.4 million inhabitants as of recent estimates, representing about 46% of the national total. The Randstad includes the four principal cities—Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague (Den Haag), and Utrecht—and their extensive suburbs, forming a continuous metropolitan landscape characterized by intensive land use and infrastructure connectivity.[64][65] Municipal population figures, as reported by Statistics Netherlands (CBS), highlight the scale of these centers. As of 1 January 2024, Amsterdam, the capital, recorded 931,298 residents within its municipal boundaries, making it the most populous municipality. Rotterdam followed with around 654,000 inhabitants, The Hague with approximately 568,000, and Utrecht with 394,000. These figures reflect municipal administrative areas, which often incorporate suburban zones integral to the urban fabric. Other notable cities outside the core Randstad include Eindhoven (243,000), Groningen (236,000), and Almere (229,000), contributing to secondary agglomerations in the south and north.[10][66]| Rank | Municipality | Province | Population (1 Jan 2024) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amsterdam | North Holland | 931,298 |
| 2 | Rotterdam | South Holland | 654,000 |
| 3 | The Hague | South Holland | 568,000 |
| 4 | Utrecht | Utrecht | 394,000 |
| 5 | Eindhoven | North Brabant | 243,000 |
Functional Urban Areas
Functional urban areas (FUAs) in the Netherlands, as delineated by the OECD and Eurostat, consist of high-density urban cores with at least 50,000 inhabitants and adjacent commuting zones where at least 15% of the workforce commutes to the core, reflecting economic and labor market integration beyond municipal boundaries.[68] This methodology captures polycentric dynamics in the densely populated western region known as the Randstad, where multiple FUAs overlap in influence but are defined separately.[69] Approximately 80% of the Dutch population lives in FUAs centered on cities exceeding 50,000 residents, underscoring the country's high degree of urbanization driven by historical trade, infrastructure, and economic agglomeration in coastal and riverine zones.[70] The five largest FUAs—Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague (Den Haag), Utrecht, and Eindhoven—collectively house over one-third of the national population, serving as hubs for finance, logistics, government, and high-tech industries.[71]| Functional Urban Area | Population (2024) |
|---|---|
| Amsterdam | 2,259,981 |
| Rotterdam | 1,559,177 |
| The Hague | 1,049,025 |
| Utrecht | 735,652 |
| Eindhoven | 547,779 |
Population Density Variations
The Netherlands records a national population density of 533 inhabitants per square kilometer in 2024, reflecting its status as one of Europe's most densely populated countries.[16] This average masks substantial regional disparities, primarily driven by the concentration of economic activity, infrastructure, and historical settlement patterns in the western Randstad area—comprising the provinces of North Holland, South Holland, Utrecht, and Flevoland—contrasted with sparser distribution in peripheral rural regions.[72] In the Randstad, densities exceed 1,000 persons per km² in core urban zones, with South Holland province reaching 1,391 inhabitants per km², attributable to major cities like Rotterdam and The Hague, as well as intensive land use for housing and commerce.[73] Conversely, northern provinces such as Friesland and Drenthe exhibit densities around 190-250 per km², characterized by agricultural landscapes, peat meadows, and lower urbanization rates that limit population inflows.[74] These variations stem from geographic factors like polder reclamation enabling dense settlement in the west, while flood-prone or less arable northern terrains historically supported fewer inhabitants.[75] Urban-rural divides amplify these patterns, with metropolitan agglomerations in the west hosting over half the national population on a fraction of the land, fostering high-density living amid green belts like the Groene Hart.[72] Eastern and southern rural areas, including parts of Gelderland and Limburg, maintain intermediate densities of 300-500 per km², balancing farming with suburban expansion.[76] Ongoing migration to peri-urban zones slightly moderates extremes, yet core densities continue rising due to limited land availability and policy constraints on expansion.[77]Ethnic and National Composition
Native Dutch and European Descent
In Dutch official statistics, individuals of native Dutch descent—termed autochtoon—are those born in the Netherlands with both parents also born there. On 1 January 2024, this group comprised 72.1 percent of the 17.9 million inhabitants, or roughly 12.9 million people.[78] This proportion reflects a continued decline from approximately 74 percent in 2023, driven by net positive migration and differential fertility rates favoring groups with foreign backgrounds.[78] The native Dutch population exhibits an aging demographic structure, with a population pyramid skewed toward older age cohorts as of 2022, indicative of sub-replacement fertility rates historically below 1.8 children per woman and limited natural increase. Regional variations exist, with higher concentrations in provinces like Drenthe and Friesland, where shares exceed 85 percent, compared to urban areas like Amsterdam, where they fall below 50 percent. Projections from Statistics Netherlands suggest further erosion, potentially reaching 58 percent by 2050 under high migration scenarios, underscoring the role of immigration in overall population dynamics.[78] Persons of other European descent, primarily from neighboring countries such as Germany, Belgium, and Poland, constitute a supplementary segment within the broader European-origin population. First-generation migrants born in Europe (excluding the Netherlands) represent about one-third of the 16.2 percent foreign-born as of late 2024, though second-generation Europeans remain a modest share due to shorter migration histories and assimilation patterns.[79] This group, often integrated via EU free movement, bolsters sectors like agriculture and services but does not offset the numerical dominance of native Dutch within European descent overall. Combined, native Dutch and other European-origin residents form over 80 percent of the population, though precise aggregation under revised CBS classifications emphasizes continental rather than "Western/non-Western" delineations since 2022.[6]Non-Western Immigrant Origins
Non-Western immigrants to the Netherlands, classified by Statistics Netherlands (CBS) as those originating from Africa, most of Asia (excluding Indonesia and Japan), Latin America, Turkey, and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand, constitute a significant portion of the country's migrant population. As of 2022, approximately 14 percent of the Dutch population had a non-Western migration background, encompassing both first-generation immigrants and their descendants born in the Netherlands.[80] This group totals around 2.5 million individuals out of a national population of 17.8 million in 2023.[81] The origins of these immigrants trace primarily to labor recruitment programs, decolonization, and asylum flows. Guest worker programs in the 1960s and 1970s brought large numbers from Turkey and Morocco, establishing enduring communities. As of recent CBS estimates referenced in demographic studies, the population with a Turkish migration background stands at about 410,000, while those with Moroccan origins number over 400,000, making them the two largest non-Western groups.[82] Colonial ties account for migrants from Suriname and the former Netherlands Antilles (now Curaçao, Aruba, Sint Maarten, and Bonaire), with Surinamese-origin individuals comprising roughly 350,000–400,000 and Antillean-origin around 160,000.[83] More recent inflows have diversified origins, particularly through asylum and family reunification from conflict zones. Groups from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Somalia have grown substantially since the 2010s, with Syrian and Iraqi backgrounds each exceeding 100,000 by the early 2020s, driven by refugee admissions peaking in 2015–2016.[84] Other notable sources include Iran, Pakistan, and various African nations such as Eritrea and Ghana, though these remain smaller in scale compared to the foundational groups. In 2020, non-Western immigration inflows totaled approximately 69,000, reflecting a mix of labor, study, and humanitarian categories.[85]| Major Non-Western Migration Background Groups | Approximate Size (Migration Background, recent estimates) |
|---|---|
| Turkey | 410,000 |
| Morocco | 425,000 |
| Suriname | 350,000–400,000 |
| Netherlands Antilles/Caribbean | 160,000 |
| Syria/Iraq (combined recent growth) | >200,000 |
Mixed and Second-Generation Groups
In the Netherlands, individuals with a migration background are classified by Statistics Netherlands (CBS) into first-generation (born abroad) and second-generation (born in the Netherlands to at least one parent born abroad); the third generation—persons born in the Netherlands to parents also born in the Netherlands, but with foreign-born grandparents—is classified as having a Dutch background and excluded from migration background statistics.[88] As of 2024, the second-generation population totals approximately 2.1 million people, representing those born domestically but with foreign parental origins; this group constitutes about 12 percent of the total population of 17.9 million.[89][79] This figure reflects ongoing immigration patterns, with second-generation numbers rising from around 2 million in 2021 due to births among first-generation immigrants.[6] Within the second-generation, a distinction exists between those with two foreign-born parents and those with one foreign-born parent (often termed mixed-origin or partially native Dutch background). In 2022, about 1.1 million second-generation individuals had exactly one foreign-born parent, accounting for roughly half of the group; of these, 44 percent had a parent from another European country, while the remainder originated from non-European backgrounds such as Turkey, Morocco, or Suriname.[6] Mixed-origin individuals tend to exhibit higher rates of socioeconomic integration compared to those with two non-Western migrant parents, as evidenced by CBS integration monitors showing improved educational attainment and labor market participation among this subgroup over the past decade.[90] The composition of second-generation groups mirrors historical immigration waves, with the largest cohorts descending from Turkish (around 200,000), Moroccan (similar scale), and Surinamese origins, though exact breakdowns vary by whether one or both parents are considered.[6] Non-Western second-generation individuals, comprising the majority, face persistent challenges in full assimilation, including lower average educational outcomes and higher welfare dependency relative to native Dutch peers, though recent CBS data indicate narrowing gaps in school completion and employment for younger cohorts born after 2000.[89] These trends underscore the role of parental origin in shaping demographic outcomes, with mixed groups often bridging native and immigrant populations more effectively due to cultural and linguistic exposure from the Dutch parent.Migration Patterns
Immigration Inflows and Policies
Immigration to the Netherlands has increased significantly since the 1990s, driven by EU free movement, asylum inflows, family reunification, and labor migration, with annual inflows peaking at over 400,000 in 2022 before declining slightly. In 2023, 336,000 immigrants arrived, a decrease of 67,000 from 2022, primarily due to fewer EU citizens and knowledge migrants. By 2024, inflows fell further to 316,000, reflecting a 25% drop in highly skilled labor migrants amid economic slowdowns and policy adjustments. Non-EU inflows constituted about 60% of totals in recent years, with major origins including Turkey, Morocco, Syria, and India, though EU nationals from Poland, Germany, and Romania remain prominent.[91][4][92] Asylum inflows have fluctuated with global conflicts, accounting for 15-20% of total immigration. First-time asylum applications totaled 38,000 in 2023 but dropped 16% to 32,000 in 2024, with Syrians, Eritreans, and Afghans comprising the largest groups. Family reunification added around 20,000-25,000 annually, often linked to prior asylum or labor migrants, while labor migration reached nearly 70,000 in 2023, dominated by highly skilled workers under the knowledge migrant scheme. Student inflows hovered at 40,000-50,000 yearly, though many transition to work permits post-graduation. EU/EEA free movement facilitated about 40% of inflows, enabling short-term and permanent relocations without visas.[93][94][4]| Year | Total Inflows | Asylum (First-Time) | Labor Migrants | Family Reunification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | ~403,000 | ~35,000 | ~60,000 | ~20,000 |
| 2023 | 336,000 | 38,000 | ~70,000 | ~22,000 |
| 2024 | 316,000 | 32,000 | ~52,000 | ~25,000 |
Emigration Trends
Emigration from the Netherlands has shown an upward trend in recent years, with total outflows reaching 179,310 in 2022, up from 145,330 in 2021, and climbing further to approximately 198,000 in 2023.[99][91] In the first nine months of 2024, 154,000 individuals departed, suggesting a continuation of elevated levels despite a slowdown in immigration.[100] These figures encompass both Dutch nationals and foreign residents, with non-Dutch emigrants—often comprising return migrants or those moving within Europe—forming a significant portion; for instance, in earlier years like 2007, Poles and Germans were notable among leavers, though native Dutch accounted for nearly half of total emigrants. Among Dutch citizens specifically, emigration to OECD countries rose 5% in 2022 to 43,000, reflecting a modest increase driven by factors such as high population density and dissatisfaction with public services and the sociopolitical environment.[92][101] Demographically, emigrants tend to include younger adults and families seeking more affordable housing, greater living space, and improved quality of life amid rising costs and overcrowding in the Netherlands; surveys indicate motivations like escaping high taxes, urban congestion, and suboptimal weather patterns.[102][103] Primary destinations for Dutch emigrants remain neighboring countries and select overseas locations, with Belgium and Germany topping the list due to proximity and lower housing costs, followed by Spain for its climate, then the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, and France.[104] Of the 2022 OECD-bound Dutch emigrants, about 20% headed to Spain and 19% to Germany.[92] This pattern underscores a preference for culturally similar or economically accessible locales, though longer-distance moves to Anglophone nations persist among professionals and retirees.[105] Overall, while total emigration contributes to a positive net migration balance—144,558 in 2023—it signals underlying pressures on domestic livability that disproportionately affect native departures.[106]Net Migration and Its Drivers
Net migration to the Netherlands, defined as the difference between immigration and emigration, has remained positive and a primary driver of population growth since natural increase turned negative around 2023. In 2023, immigration totaled 336,000 while emigration reached 198,000, yielding a net gain of 138,000.[91] Preliminary data for 2024 indicate lower inflows, with 316,000 immigrants arriving, though full-year emigration figures are pending; net migration in the first nine months stood at 89,000, down from 109,000 in the same period of 2023.[4][107] Key drivers of immigration include asylum-seeking, family reunification, labor migration, and intra-EU mobility. Asylum inflows surged post-2015 due to conflicts in Syria, Afghanistan, and Eritrea, with net Syrian migration reaching 24,000 in 2024 alone, up from 18,000 in 2023; similar patterns hold for Iraq, Somalia, and Eritrea.[108] Labor migration, particularly knowledge workers from India and non-EU countries, peaked in 2022-2023 but declined in 2024 amid policy tightening and economic slowdowns.[4] Family reunification sustains chain migration, especially from Turkey, Morocco, and Suriname, where initial asylum or labor entrants sponsor relatives. EU free movement contributed 106,000 immigrants in 2024, mainly from Poland, Romania, and Germany, drawn by job opportunities in agriculture, logistics, and services, though this fell from prior years.[108] Emigration offsets some gains, with 92,000 departures in the first half of 2024 alone, including rising outflows of Dutch nationals to neighboring countries. Approximately 43,000 Dutch emigrated to OECD destinations in 2022, a 5% increase, primarily to Belgium (for lower property taxes and commuting ease), Germany (proximity and costs), and Spain (lifestyle and retirement).[109][92] Returning non-Western migrants and second-generation individuals also contribute, with over half of non-Dutch arrivals leaving within five years, often due to integration failures or better prospects elsewhere.[110] Broader causal factors include the Netherlands' strong economy and welfare system attracting labor and refugees, contrasted with push factors like instability in origin countries; however, domestic pressures such as housing shortages and fiscal burdens from low-skilled inflows have prompted policy responses, including asylum caps and stricter family migration rules implemented in 2024.[111] Net migration's persistence despite these measures reflects entrenched EU obligations and global displacement trends, with non-EU sources dominating long-term composition changes.[92]| Year | Immigration | Emigration | Net Migration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | ~403,000 | Not specified | Positive, higher than 2023[91] |
| 2023 | 336,000 | 198,000 | +138,000 |
| 2024 (proj.) | 316,000 | Pending | Lower than 2023, ~122,000 est.[106] |
Integration and Socioeconomic Outcomes
Education by Background
Educational attainment in the Netherlands varies substantially by migration background, with native Dutch individuals consistently achieving higher levels than those from non-Western origins, even among second-generation groups. According to Statistics Netherlands (CBS) data for the population aged 15-75 in 2025, 36% of those without a migration background hold a higher education qualification (HBO or WO bachelor's/master's), compared to 32% of non-Western individuals born abroad and 38% of those born in the Netherlands. First-generation non-Western immigrants face the largest gaps, often due to lower starting qualifications and language barriers upon arrival, while second-generation outcomes improve but remain below native levels for groups like Turkish and Moroccan descendants.[112][113] In international assessments, these disparities are evident in school performance. The 2022 PISA results show non-immigrant students in the Netherlands outperforming immigrants by 58 score points in mathematics—a gap equivalent to approximately 1.5 to 2 years of education—after accounting for socioeconomic factors, with immigrant students more likely to come from disadvantaged backgrounds. Similar patterns hold in reading and science, where immigrant-background students score below the national average, contributing to persistent tracking into lower secondary levels like VMBO for non-Western groups historically. Recent trends indicate slight narrowing, as second-generation students increasingly enter higher tracks: in 2023/24, 49% of third-year secondary students overall attended HAVO or VWO (preparatory for higher education), with non-Dutch background students showing rising participation, though still lagging in completion rates for university-level degrees.[114][115] The following table summarizes highest educational attainment for select groups aged 15-75 (2025 CBS data), categorized as high (HBO/WO), medium (VMBO/MBO-2/4/ HAVO/VWO equivalents), and low (basic/VMBO/MBO-1); percentages reflect shares within each subgroup:| Migration Background (Born in NL / Abroad) | High (%) | Medium (%) | Low (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native Dutch (no migration background) | 36 | 19 | 7 |
| Western (e.g., Europe excl. NL, born abroad) | 43 | 11 | 18 |
| Non-Western overall (born NL / abroad) | 38 / 32 | 18 / 16 | 7 / 20 |
| Turkish (born NL / abroad) | 28 / 25 | 21 / 18 | 9 / 29 |
| Moroccan (born NL / abroad) | 31 / 15 | 20 / 18 | 10 / 30 |
| Surinamese (born NL / abroad) | 39 / 24 | 17 / 21 | 5 / 14 |
| Netherlands Antilles (born NL / abroad) | 38 / 25 | 16 / 23 | 7 / 7 |
| Indonesian (born NL / abroad) | 48 / 36 | 14 / 21 | 4 / 8 |
Employment and Income Disparities
Non-Western migrants exhibit lower labor force participation and employment rates compared to native Dutch and Western migrants. In 2023, migrants of non-European origin were less frequently engaged in paid employment than the national average, with participation rates for groups such as those from Turkey, Morocco, Suriname, and the Antilles remaining below native levels even among second-generation individuals, though showing improvement over the first generation.[116] Refugee-origin migrants, including those from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iraq, Somalia, and Syria, recorded the lowest employment outcomes among non-Western subgroups.[116] In contrast, Indonesian migrants—a non-Western exception linked to historical ties—demonstrated above-average employment integration.[116] Unemployment disparities persist, with foreign-born individuals facing higher rates than natives. Eurostat data for 2023 indicate unemployment among those born abroad averaged around 5% in quarterly measures, exceeding the native Dutch rate embedded in the overall national figure of approximately 3.5%.[117] Non-Western immigrants, particularly recent arrivals and refugees, contribute to this gap, as their activity and inactivity rates deviate markedly from native patterns, even post-COVID recovery where non-Dutch groups saw relatively stronger rebounds but started from lower bases.[116] Second-generation non-Western youth experience reduced but still elevated unemployment relative to peers of Dutch origin, reflecting incomplete convergence in labor market access.[116] Income levels reveal similar divides, with non-Western and especially refugee-background households earning below the median. CBS analysis from 2023 highlights that migrants from refugee-sending countries have the lowest disposable incomes, compounded by higher reliance on social benefits, which decreases over generations but remains elevated compared to natives.[116] Native Dutch and Western migrants typically achieve incomes closer to or exceeding the average, while non-Western first-generation groups, including Turkish and Moroccan origins, lag due to lower-wage occupations and benefit dependency.[116] Welfare utilization underscores these patterns: non-Western migrants are more prone to social assistance and disability benefits than natives, with refugee subgroups showing the highest rates, though overall dependency has declined across origins amid post-pandemic labor market tightening.[116] [82] These disparities correlate with fiscal outcomes, as evidenced by net contributions: Western immigrants yielded positive public finances in assessed periods, whereas non-Western groups imposed net costs, driven by employment and income shortfalls.[82] Integration policies have narrowed gaps for second-generation cohorts in Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese, and Antillean groups, yet structural differences in skills, education, and cultural adaptation sustain elevated benefit reliance and income inequality relative to the native population.[116]Crime and Social Cohesion Issues
Non-Western immigrants and their descendants are substantially overrepresented in Dutch crime statistics relative to their share of the population, which constitutes about 13% as of 2023. Suspect rates for non-Western groups are typically 3 to 4 times higher than for native Dutch, with particular elevation in violent offenses, property crimes, and youth delinquency; for example, in earlier data from 2009, non-Western migrant suspect rates reached 3.8% compared to 1% for natives, and patterns have persisted despite overall crime declines. Groups originating from Morocco, the Netherlands Antilles, Suriname, and Turkey show the most pronounced disparities, with Moroccan-Dutch and Antillean-Dutch youth historically exhibiting the highest involvement, though rates among Moroccan minors have decreased from peaks in 2012 (over 100 per 1,000 in some cohorts) to lower but still elevated levels by 2023.[118][119][120] These differences extend into the criminal justice system, where ethnic minorities comprise a disproportionate share of prison populations—around 55% of adult prison sentences involve non-Western backgrounds despite comprising under 15% of the populace—and Dutch-born youth with at least one migrant parent are 28% more likely to receive incarceration than those without such backgrounds. A 2025 WODC analysis attributes part of this to potential ethnic biases in prosecution and sentencing but concludes that socioeconomic factors alone do not account for the full gap, implying contributions from cultural attitudes toward authority, family socialization, and community norms that diverge from Dutch standards. Homicide data further illustrates this, with roughly half of victims and offenders in recent years having non-Western origins, exceeding their demographic weight.[121][122][123] Social cohesion challenges arise from these patterns, including ethnic segregation in urban enclaves that fosters parallel societies with limited intergroup contact and trust. Surveys indicate that higher ethnic diversity at the neighborhood level correlates with lower perceived cohesion, particularly among native Dutch residents, though aggregate national trust metrics show no uniform decline since the 2000s. Specific manifestations include rising honor-based violence, with incidents increasing in 2023—primarily affecting women—and concentrated among immigrant communities from Syria (25% of cases), Turkey, Morocco, and Afghanistan, often involving coercion, mutilation, or murder to enforce familial or communal honor codes incompatible with Dutch legal norms.[124][125][126] Gang activity exacerbates fragmentation, with youth groups and organized crime networks like the "Mocro Maffia"—predominantly of Moroccan origin—driving escalations in drug-related violence, including over 100 mob-style killings since 2012 and recruitment of underage immigrants into trafficking. Recent episodes, such as 2025 youth clashes in towns like Beverwijk and Velsen, leading to school closures, frequently involve non-Western background perpetrators in retaliatory assaults, underscoring failures in integration that prioritize cultural preservation over assimilation. These dynamics have fueled public perceptions of declining safety and cohesion, with immigration consistently ranked among top societal concerns in polls.[127][128][129]Religion
Historical Secularization
The Netherlands experienced a distinctive form of social organization known as verzuiling (pillarization) from the late 19th century until the mid-20th century, in which society was segmented into parallel institutions aligned with religious and ideological groups—primarily Protestant, Catholic, socialist, and liberal pillars—each providing separate education, media, labor unions, and political parties.[130] This structure, which emerged as a consociational response to religious tensions following the 19th-century school funding struggles, effectively preserved high levels of religious affiliation and practice by insulating communities from cross-pillar influences, with church membership encompassing over 90% of the population by the early 20th century based on baptismal and household registration data.[131] Depillarization (ontzuiling) commenced after World War II, gaining momentum in the 1950s and accelerating through the 1960s amid economic prosperity, increased social mobility, mass media penetration like television, and the erosion of pillar-specific institutions, which exposed individuals to diverse worldviews and diminished the social enforcement of religious conformity.[131] This process coincided with broader European modernization trends but proceeded more rapidly in the Netherlands due to the prior rigidity of pillarization, leading to a breakdown in the ideological segregation that had sustained religiosity; by the 1970s, the term ontzuiling was widely used to describe the shift toward a more integrated, individualized society.[130] Statistical evidence from official records illustrates the pace of secularization: in 1849, religious affiliation was near-universal, with 56% of the population Protestant and 38% Roman Catholic, reflecting church-based census methods.[132] By 1960, church membership stood at approximately 79%, but non-membership rose to 42% by the late 1970s as de-churching accelerated, particularly among younger cohorts.[133] Church attendance declined even more sharply, from around 40-50% weekly in the 1950s to under 20% by the 1980s, with Protestant groups experiencing steeper drops than Catholics initially.[134] Contributing factors included the post-war welfare state's provision of social services traditionally handled by churches, rising educational attainment fostering critical inquiry, and the 1960s cultural liberalization—marked by permissive shifts in family law, contraception access, and youth rebellion—which prioritized personal autonomy over doctrinal adherence.[135] Unlike gradual declines elsewhere, Dutch secularization was punctuated by mass exits from churches in the 1960s and 1970s, driven by generational turnover rather than isolated apostasy, resulting in a cultural norm of ietsisme (vague spirituality) over organized faith by the 1980s.[136] This trajectory, while influenced by affluence and urbanization, underscores causal links between institutional fragmentation and the retreat from collective religious identity.[137]Current Affiliations
In 2023, 58 percent of the Dutch population aged 15 years and older reported no religious affiliation, reflecting ongoing secularization since the mid-20th century. Among those affiliated with a religion, Roman Catholics formed the largest group at 17 percent, concentrated predominantly in the southern provinces such as Limburg and North Brabant. Protestants accounted for 13 percent, mainly in the northern and eastern regions, including adherents to the Protestant Church in the Netherlands (PKN) and smaller Reformed denominations. Muslims comprised 6 percent, primarily of non-Western immigrant backgrounds from Turkey, Morocco, and more recent cohorts from Syria and Iraq. Other Christian groups, such as Orthodox Christians and independent evangelicals, along with non-Christian faiths like Hinduism and Buddhism, each represented about 3 percent of the population.[132] Self-reported affiliation data from Statistics Netherlands (CBS) derives from periodic surveys, which capture nominal belonging rather than active practice; actual church attendance hovers around 10-15 percent nationally, with Protestants showing higher participation rates than Catholics. The Jewish population, estimated at under 30,000 or roughly 0.2 percent, remains small and urban, centered in Amsterdam. These figures underscore a shift from near-universal Christianity in the 19th century—94 percent in 1849—to a religiously pluralistic but predominantly secular society today, influenced by cultural liberalization and immigration-driven minority growth.[132][138] Preliminary 2024 data indicate a minor reversal, with religious affiliation rising to 44 percent from 42 percent the prior year—the first such increase after a decade of decline—attributed partly to higher retention among Muslim youth amid demographic pressures from migration. Nonetheless, irreligion continues to dominate, particularly among native-born Dutch under 40, where over 70 percent claim no faith.[139]Demographic Shifts by Faith
The Netherlands has undergone profound changes in its religious composition since the mid-20th century, transitioning from a predominantly Christian society to one marked by widespread secularization among the native population alongside growth in non-Christian faiths driven primarily by immigration. In 1849, nearly the entire population identified as Christian, with 56 percent Protestant and 38 percent Roman Catholic.[132] By 2023, these figures had declined sharply to 13 percent Protestant and 17 percent Roman Catholic, reflecting a broader erosion of Christian affiliation that accelerated during the post-World War II era due to rising prosperity, education levels, and cultural shifts favoring individualism over institutional religion.[132] [140] This secularization is evident in the native Dutch cohort, where non-affiliation rose from around 40 percent in the 1960s to over 55 percent by the early 2020s, with church attendance plummeting to negligible levels outside orthodox enclaves.[140] Parallel to this decline, Islam has emerged as the fastest-growing religion, increasing its share from negligible levels pre-1970s to approximately 6 percent of the population by 2023, largely attributable to sustained immigration from Muslim-majority countries such as Turkey, Morocco, Syria, and Somalia.[141] [142] Labor migration in the 1960s-1970s, family reunification, and asylum inflows since the 1990s have concentrated Muslim communities in urban areas like Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and The Hague, where they now form 10-15 percent of residents in certain neighborhoods.[103] Higher fertility rates among Muslim women—estimated at 2.5-3.0 children per woman in the first generation compared to the national average of 1.43—further amplify this growth, though rates converge toward native levels in subsequent generations.[143] [144]| Year | Protestant (%) | Catholic (%) | Muslim (%) | No Religion (%) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1849 | 56 | 38 | <1 | <1 | CBS |
| 2020 | 14 | 20 | 5 | 55 | CBS |
| 2023 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 57 | CBS |