Hubbry Logo
Demographics of the NetherlandsDemographics of the NetherlandsMain
Open search
Demographics of the Netherlands
Community hub
Demographics of the Netherlands
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Demographics of the Netherlands
Demographics of the Netherlands
from Wikipedia

Demographics of the Netherlands
Population pyramid of the Netherlands in 2023
Population18,000,000 (15 August 2024) (67th)
Density424 per km2 (33rd)
Growth rate0.29% (155th)
Birth rate10.2 births/1,000 (2021)
Death rate9.6 deaths/1,000 (2022)
Life expectancy81.6 years (16th)
 • male80.1 years
 • female83.1 years
Fertility rate1.43 children/woman (2023)
Age structure
0–14 years16.1%
15–64 years64.1%
65 and over20.2%
Sex ratio
Total0.98 male/female
At birth1.05 male/female
Under 151.05 male/female
15–64 years1.02 male/female
65 and over0.83 male/female
Nationality
NationalityDutch citizen
Major ethnicDutch (72.0%) or Frisians (2.8%) (74.8%)
Minor ethnic
Language
OfficialDutch and Frisian
SpokenLanguages of the Netherlands
Population growth between 1000–2021

Demographic features of the population of the Netherlands include population density, ethnicity, education level, health of the population, economic status, religious affiliations and other aspects of the population.

Population

[edit]

The Netherlands is the 69th most populous country in the world. As of January 2023, the Netherlands has a population of 17,821,419.[1]

Between 1900 and 1950 the population almost doubled from 5.14 to 10.11 million people. From 1950 to 2000 the population increased from 10.11 to 15.92 million people, increasing by a smaller proportion but, still, at an impressive pace for a European country, recording a growth of 57.45% over a 50-year time span.[2]

Of countries with at least 7.5 million people, The Netherlands is the 4th most densely populated, and is the 26th most densely populated in the world overall. It is the 5th most densely populated country in Europe; the first four are microstates. The 17,821,419 million Dutch inhabitants are concentrated on an area (land surface) of 33,895 km2 (13,087 sq mi). This means that the country has a population density of 526/km2 (1,360/sq mi). The density of 500 inhabitants/km2 was reached in the first half of 2014.

As a result of these demographic characteristics, the Netherlands has had to plan its land use strictly. Since 1946 the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment has been occupied with the national coordination of land use. Because of its high population density the Netherlands has also reclaimed land from the sea by poldering. Between 1927 and 1968 an entire province - Flevoland - was created. As of May 2023 it houses 447,193 people.[3] Because of these policies, the Dutch have been able to combine high levels of population density with extremely high levels of agricultural production.

Even though the Netherlands is so densely populated, it has no municipalities with a population over one million. Nevertheless, the two largest municipalities of the country do score well over a million if the complete city region is counted, thus including the neighbouring satellite towns that often are physically connected to the main municipality. Moreover, the "four big cities" (Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague and Utrecht) can in many ways be regarded as a single metropolitan area, the Randstad ("rim city" or "edge city") with over 7.5 million inhabitants around an agricultural "green heart" (Groene Hart).

millionyears369121518189019201950198020102040populationNetherlands Population
%year-1-0.500.511.522.519001920194019601980200020202040% natural growth% Crude migration changeNetherlands Population Growth Rate

[4]

IMRyear030609012015018019001920194019601980200020202040Infant Mortality (per 1000 births)Netherlands Infant Mortality
TFRyear11.522.533.544.5519001920194019601980200020202040Total Fertility RateTotal Fertility Rate

Growth rate

[edit]

0.37% (2021 est.) Country comparison to the world: 168th

Fertility

[edit]
Historical population
YearPop.±% p.a.
1000 369,000—    
1300 881,000+0.29%
1500 1,090,000+0.11%
1600 1,540,000+0.35%
1700 2,000,000+0.26%
1800 2,000,000+0.00%
1900 5,104,000+0.94%
1910 5,858,000+1.39%
1920 6,754,000+1.43%
1930 7,825,000+1.48%
1940 8,834,000+1.22%
1950 10,026,773+1.27%
1960 11,417,254+1.31%
1970 12,957,621+1.27%
1980 14,091,014+0.84%
1990 14,892,574+0.55%
2000 15,863,950+0.63%
2010 16,574,989+0.44%
2020 17,424,978+0.50%
Source: Our World in Data[5] and Statistics Netherlands[6]

The Dutch population is ageing. Furthermore, life expectancy has increased because of developments in medicine, and in addition to this, the Netherlands has seen increasing immigration. Despite these developments combined with the population boom after the Second World War, the low birth rate has caused extremely low population growth: 2005 saw the lowest absolute population growth since 1900.

This demographic development has consequences for health care and social security policy. As the Dutch population ages, the proportion of people of working age, as a percentage of the entire population, decreases. Important policy advisors like the CBS (Statistical Office) and the CPB (Planning Office) have pointed out that this will cause problems with the current system of old age pensions: fewer people will work to pay for old age pensions, while there will be more people receiving those pensions. Furthermore, the costs of health care are also projected to increase. These developments have caused several cabinets, notably the second Balkenende cabinet to reform the system of health care and social security to increase participation in the labour market and make people more conscious of the money they spend on health care.

In 2003, the annual birth rate per thousand was highest in the province of Flevoland (15.9). The overall lifelong Total fertility rate (TFR), was highest in the province of Flevoland (2.0) and lowest in the province of Limburg (1.6). The municipality with the highest TFR was Urk (3.23) followed by Valkenburg (2.83), Graafstroom (2.79) and Staphorst (2.76). The lowest TFRs were recorded in Vaals (1.11) and Thorn (1.21).[7]

The total population at December 31, 2006 was 16,356,914. The population loss due to net emigration was 35,502 (an estimated 40-50% of emigrants were ethnic non-Dutch).

In 2007, there were 117,000 immigrants (including 7000 Germans, 6000 Poles, 5000 Bulgarians, 3000 Turks and 2000 Moroccans) and 123,000 emigrants. Nearly half the emigrants were native Dutch, followed at a distance by nearly 5000 Poles and more than 3000 Germans. There was an observable increase in net immigration from the former USSR, Bulgaria and Romania.[8]

The annual death rate was lowest in the municipalities of Valkenburg (2.9 per 1000), Zeewolde (3.2), Renswoude (3.4), Westervoort and Zeevang (both 3.9). The highest annual death rates were recorded in Warmond (22.3 per 1000), Laren (19.9) and Doorn (18.8).[9]

16.4% of the total births in 2003 were to parents of non-European origin, although they account for only 12.4% of the population in the 25-34 age group. For example, 3.8% of the births were ethnic Moroccan, although they were only 2.26% of the 25-34 age group. Respective figures were 3.27% and 3.0% for Turks. The TFR for Moroccans in 2003 was 3.3 while the general TFR was 1.73. TFR was 2.3 for Turks, 1.7 for Surinamese, 1.8 for Arubans, 3.0 for Africans and 1.8 for Americans.[10] (These figures compare with a figure of around 2.1 required to maintain a stable overall population figure.)

According to Statistics Netherlands, for the year 2007, the TFR for those born in Netherlands was 1.72[11] (1.65 in 2000). TFR of Moroccan immigrants was 2.87 (3.22 in 2000) and that of Turkish immigrants was 1.88 (2.18 in 2000).[12]

The total fertility rate is the annual average number of children born per woman over her lifespan. It is based on fairly good data for the entire period. Sources: Our World In Data and Gapminder Foundation.[13]

Years 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850[13]
Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands 5.11 5.09 5.06 5.04 5.02 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.89
Years 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860[13]
Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.68 4.75
Years 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870[13]
Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands 4.83 4.9 4.98 4.99 5.01 5.02 5.04 5.05 5.09 5.12
Years 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880[13]
Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands 5.16 5.19 5.23 5.27 5.31 5.34 5.38 5.42 5.39 5.35
Years 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890[13]
Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands 5.32 5.28 5.25 5.23 5.21 5.18 5.16 5.14 5.11 5.07
Years 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899[13]
Total Fertility Rate in the Netherlands 5.04 5 4.97 4.93 4.88 4.84 4.79 4.75 4.6

1.78 children born/woman (2021 est.) Country comparison to the world: 157th

11.0 births/1,000 population (2021 est.) Country comparison to the world: 178th

Mother's mean age at first birth

[edit]
29.8 years (2017 est.)

Life expectancy

[edit]
Life expectancy in the Netherlands since 1850
Life expectancy in the Netherlands since 1960 by gender

Sources: Our World In Data

Life expectancy in the Netherlands 1850–1950[14]
1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860
39.8 40.0 38.6 38.6 38.6 34.5 38.8 35.5 34.7 30.9 36.9
1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870
36.4 38.3 38.3 37.5 36.4 33.6 39.2 37.7 40.4 37.3
1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880
32.9 36.5 39.2 41.3 38.2 40.4 42.0 41.1 41.9 40.3
1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890
42.8 43.7 42.3 41.3 43.2 41.9 44.9 44.2 44.3 44.4
1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900
44.2 43.9 45.8 46.9 46.6 48.6 49.4 49.1 49.3 48.4
1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910
48.7 50.6 51.5 50.9 52.1 52.7 53.5 52.7 54.9 55.1
1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920
53.1 57.2 57.3 57.2 57.2 56.2 55.6 47.6 55.0 57.8
1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930
59.7 59.8 62.0 62.9 63.1 63.0 62.6 63.7 62.2 64.7
1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
64.3 65.4 66.0 66.6 66.5 66.7 67.0 67.4 67.7 65.4
1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950
65.3 65.8 64.4 61.3 55.4 67.6 69.5 71.1 70.3 71.4
Total population: 81.9 years (2020 est.) Country comparison to the world: 30th
Males: 79.7 years (2020 est.)
Females: 84.3 years (2020 est.)

Age structure

[edit]
Animated population pyramid of the Netherlands: 1950-2020
0-14 years: 16.11% (male 1,425,547 /female 1,358,894)
15-24 years: 11.91% (male 1,049.000 /female 1,008,763)
25-54 years: 38.47% (male 3,334,064 /female 3,313,238)
55-64 years: 13.69% (male 1,177,657/female 1,188,613)
65 years and over: 19.82% (male 1,558,241/female 1,866,380) (2020 est.)

Median age

[edit]
total: 42.8 years. Country comparison to the world: 32nd
male: 41.6 years
female: 44.0 years (2020 est.)

Cities and population density

[edit]
 
Largest municipalities in the Netherlands
Rank Name Province Pop. Rank Name Province Pop.
1 Amsterdam North Holland 931,298 11 Apeldoorn Gelderland 168,211
2 Rotterdam South Holland 670,610 12 Haarlem North Holland 167,636
3 The Hague South Holland 566,221 13 Arnhem Gelderland 167,632
4 Utrecht Utrecht 374,238 14 Haarlemmermeer North Holland 163,128
5 Eindhoven North Brabant 246,417 15 Amersfoort Utrecht 161,852
6 Groningen Groningen 243,768 16 Enschede Overijssel 161,738
7 Tilburg North Brabant 229,836 17 Zaanstad North Holland 161,389
8 Almere Flevoland 226,500 18 's-Hertogenbosch North Brabant 160,757
9 Breda North Brabant 188,078 19 Zwolle Overijssel 133,141
10 Nijmegen Gelderland 187,049 20 Leeuwarden Friesland 128,810

Functional urban areas

[edit]
Population density in the Netherlands by municipality. The largest urban area, the Randstad is clearly visible along the west coast.

"Functional urban areas"[16] are a type of urban areas with large populations where commuters from nearby areas work in the core area. There are several functional urban areas officially identified in the Netherlands. The largest ones (with populations over 300,000) are listed below, which count the populations of the core city and their "commuting zones".[17]

Functional urban areas Population
(2015)
Amsterdam-Haarlem-Almere 2,751,000
Rotterdam-Dordrecht 1,805,000
The Hague-Delft 1,052,000
Utrecht 875,000
Eindhoven 736,000
Groningen 474,000
Arnhem 420,000
Enschede 401,000
Breda 367,000
Zwolle 350,000
Leiden 339,000
Nijmegen 322,000
Tilburg 310,000

Vital statistics

[edit]

Statistics

[edit]

The following table presents the evolution:[18][19][20][21]

Population (January 1) Live births Deaths Natural change Crude birth rate
(per 1000)
Crude death rate
(per 1000)
Natural change
(per 1000)
Crude migration change
(per 1000)
Total fertility rate Infant mortality rate
(per 1000)
Life expectancy males Life expectancy females
1900 5,142,000 162,611 92,043 70,568 31.6 17.9 13.7 1.7 4.45 155.2
1901 5,221,000 168,380 89,967 78,413 32.3 17.2 15.0 1.1 4.53 149.3
1902 5,305,000 168,728 86,248 82,480 31.8 16.3 15.5 0.3 4.46 129.9
1903 5,389,000 170,108 83,933 86,175 31.6 15.6 16.0 -1.0 4.42 135.1
1904 5,470,000 171,495 87,091 84,404 31.4 15.9 15.4 -0.6 4.38 136.9
1905 5,551,000 170,767 85,016 85,751 30.8 15.3 15.4 -0.8 4.29 130.9
1906 5,632,000 170,952 83,259 87,693 30.4 14.8 15.6 -1.8 4.23 127.1
1907 5,710,000 171,506 82,250 89,256 30.0 14.4 15.6 -2.3 4.18 111.9
1908 5,786,000 171,861 86,936 84,925 29.7 15.0 14.7 -1.6 4.13 124.8
1909 5,862,000 170,766 80,283 90,483 29.1 13.7 15.4 -9.1 4.04 99.1
1910 5,899,000 168,894 79,984 88,910 28.6 13.6 15.1 -2.0 3.94 107.9
1911 5,976,000 166,527 86,786 79,741 27.9 14.5 13.3 -0.2 3.81 137.2
1912 6,054,000 170,269 74,647 95,622 28.1 12.3 15.8 -0.8 3.84 87.0
1913 6,145,000 173,541 75,867 97,674 28.2 12.3 15.9 1.3 3.85 91.4
1914 6,251,000 176,831 77,739 99,092 28.3 12.4 15.9 2.2 3.86 94.8
1915 6,364,000 167,426 79,613 87,813 26.3 12.5 13.8 4.4 3.59 86.8
1916 6,480,000 172,572 84,024 88,548 26.6 13.0 13.7 6.7 3.64 84.5
1917 6,612,000 173,112 87,273 85,839 26.2 13.2 13.0 1.1 3.59 86.8
1918 6,705,000 167,636 115,440 52,196 25.0 17.2 7.8 -0.8 3.47 103.9
1919 6,752,000 164,447 89,646 74,801 24.4 13.3 11.1 -1.0 3.36 94.0
1920 6,820,000 192,987 81,525 111,462 28.3 12.0 16.3 -1.5 3.89 83.3
1921 6,921,000 189,546 77,002 112,544 27.4 11.1 16.3 -0.3 3.75 86.1
1922 7,032,000 181,886 80,381 101,505 25.9 11.4 14.4 2.4 3.54 77.6
1923 7,150,000 187,512 72,809 114,703 26.2 10.2 16.0 -0.1 3.55 66.8
1924 7,264,000 182,430 71,167 111,263 25.1 9.8 15.3 -1.3 3.39 60.6
1925 7,366,000 178,545 72,121 106,424 24.2 9.8 14.4 0 3.26 58.4
1926 7,472,000 177,498 73,357 104,141 23.8 9.8 13.9 0 3.18 61.1
1927 7,576,000 175,098 77,614 97,484 23.1 10.2 12.9 0.6 3.08 58.7
1928 7,678,000 179,028 73,816 105,212 23.3 9.6 13.7 -0.3 3.09 52.3
1929 7,781,000 177,216 83,224 93,992 22.8 10.7 12.1 1.1 3.00 59.0
1930 7,884,000 182,310 71,682 110,628 23.1 9.1 14.0 0.6 3.03 50.9
1931 7,999,000 177,387 77,048 100,339 22.2 9.6 12.5 2.9 2.88 49.6
1932 8,122,000 178,525 73,059 105,466 22.0 9.0 13.0 1.2 2.83 46.3
1933 8,237,000 171,289 72,096 99,193 20.8 8.8 12.0 0.6 2.66 43.9
1934 8,341,000 172,214 70,164 102,050 20.6 8.4 12.2 -1.2 2.63 42.6
1935 8,433,000 170,425 73,660 96,765 20.2 8.7 11.5 -1.7 2.57 40.0
1936 8,516,000 171,675 73,923 97,752 20.2 8.7 11.5 -1.9 2.51 38.9
1937 8,598,000 170,220 75,516 94,704 19.8 8.8 11.0 -1.0 2.53 38.1
1938 8,684,000 178,422 77,043 101,379 20.5 8.9 11.7 -0.5 2.63 36.5
1939 8,781,000 180,917 75,841 105,076 20.6 8.6 12.0 -0.8 2.64 33.7
1940 8,879,000 184,846 87,722 97,124 20.8 9.9 10.9 -1.2 2.67 39.1
1941 8,965,000 181,959 89,716 92,243 20.3 10.0 10.3 -1.7 2.61 43.6
1942 9,042,000 189,975 76,040 113,935 21.0 8.4 12.6 -6.0 2.71 39.5
1943 9,102,000 209,379 91,438 117,941 23.0 10.0 13.0 -5.1 2.98 40.1
1944 9,174,000 219,946 108,087 111,859 24.0 11.8 12.2 -2.6 3.13 46.3
1945 9,262,000 209,607 141,398 68,209 22.6 15.3 7.4 10.0 2.96 79.7
1946 9,423,000 284,456 80,151 204,305 30.2 8.5 21.7 0.2 3.97 38.7
1947 9,629,000 267,348 77,646 189,702 27.8 8.1 19.7 -1.9 3.70 33.5
1948 9,800,000 247,923 72,459 175,464 25.3 7.4 17.9 -2.0 3.41 29.3
1949 9,956,000 236,177 81,077 155,100 23.7 8.1 15.6 -8.5 3.22 26.8
1950 10,026,773 229,718 75,929 153,789 22.7 7.5 15.2 2.1 3.10 26.7 70.3 72.6
1951 10,200,280 228,405 77,560 150,845 22.3 7.6 14.7 -2.1 3.05 26.7 70.2 72.8
1952 10,328,343 231,888 76,346 155,542 22.3 7.4 15.0 -4.6 3.09 24.1 71.0 73.3
1953 10,435,631 227,964 80,901 147,063 21.7 7.7 14.0 -3.0 3.03 23.7 70.4 73.0
1954 10,550,737 228,173 79,623 148,550 21.5 7.5 14.0 -1.7 3.03 22.6 71.0 73.8
1955 10,680,023 229,222 81,708 147,514 21.3 7.6 13.7 -0.4 3.03 21.6 70.9 71.4
1956 10,821,661 231,492 84,809 146,683 21.3 7.8 13.5 -1.0 3.05 20.2 71.0 74.1
1957 10,957,040 233,892 82,961 150,931 21.2 7.5 13.7 -1.0 3.08 18.4 71.4 74.6
1958 11,095,726 236,859 84,491 152,368 21.2 7.6 13.6 2.8 3.11 18.5 71.5 74.8
1959 11,278,024 242,518 86,072 156,446 21.4 7.6 13.8 -1.7 3.17 18.1 71.2 75.2
1960 11,417,245 239,128 87,825 151,303 20.8 7.7 13.2 -1.0 3.12 17.9 71.4 75.3
1961 11,556,008 247,407 88,321 159,086 21.3 7.6 13.7 0.6 3.22 17.0 71.5 75.7
1962 11,721,416 246,150 93,969 152,181 20.7 7.9 12.8 1.6 3.18 17.0 71.0 75.6
1963 11,889,962 249,879 95,734 154,145 20.8 8.0 12.8 0 3.19 15.8 71.0 75.8
1964 12,041,970 250,914 93,437 157,477 20.5 7.7 12.9 1.2 3.17 14.8 71.3 76.3
1965 12,212,269 245,216 98,026 147,190 19.8 7.9 11.9 1.6 3.04 14.4 71.1 76.1
1966 12,377,194 239,611 100,516 139,095 19.1 8.0 11.1 1.7 2.90 14.7 71.0 76.1
1967 12,535,307 238,678 99,792 138,886 18.9 7.9 11.0 -1.0 2.81 13.4 71.2 76.6
1968 12,661,095 237,112 104,989 132,123 18.6 8.3 10.4 0.4 2.72 13.6 70.9 76.4
1969 12,798,346 247,588 107,615 139,973 19.1 8.3 10.8 1.6 2.75 13.2 70.9 76.3
1970 12,957,621 238,912 109,619 129,293 18.3 8.4 9.9 2.6 2.57 12.7 70.8 76.5
1971 13,119,430 227,180 110,243 116,937 17.1 8.3 8.8 2.6 2.36 12.1 71.0 76.8
1972 13,269,563 214,133 113,576 100,557 16.1 8.5 7.5 1.4 2.15 11.7 70.8 76.5
1973 13,387,623 194,993 110,682 84,311 14.5 8.2 6.3 1.4 1.90 11.5 71.3 77.1
1974 13,491,020 185,982 109,250 76,732 13.7 8.1 5.7 2.3 1.77 11.3 71.6 77.6
1975 13,599,092 177,876 113,737 64,139 13.0 8.3 4.7 5.2 1.66 10.6 71.5 77.7
1976 13,733,578 177,090 114,454 62,636 12.9 8.3 4.5 1.4 1.63 10.7 71.5 77.9
1977 13,814,495 173,296 110,093 63,203 12.5 7.9 4.6 1.4 1.58 9.5 72.1 78.5
1978 13,897,874 175,550 114,415 61,135 12.6 8.2 4.4 1.9 1.58 9.6 72.0 78.5
1979 13,985,526 174,979 112,565 62,414 12.5 8.0 4.4 3.1 1.56 8.7 72.5 78.9
1980 14,091,014 181,294 114,279 67,015 12.8 8.1 4.7 3.6 1.60 8.6 72.5 79.2
1981 14,208,586 178,569 115,515 63,054 12.5 8.1 4.4 1.0 1.56 8.3 72.7 79.3
1982 14,285,829 172,071 117,264 54,807 12.0 8.2 3.8 0 1.50 8.3 72.8 79.4
1983 14,339,551 170,246 117,761 52,485 11.9 8.2 3.7 0.1 1.47 8.4 72.9 79.6
1984 14,394,589 174,436 119,812 54,624 12.1 8.3 3.8 0.3 1.49 8.3 73.0 79.7
1985 14,453,833 178,136 122,704 55,432 12.3 8.5 3.8 1.4 1.51 8.0 73.1 79.7
1986 14,529,430 184,513 125,307 59,206 12.7 8.6 4.1 1.8 1.55 7.7 73.1 79.6
1987 14,615,125 186,667 122,199 64,468 12.7 8.3 4.4 2.4 1.56 7.6 73.5 80.1
1988 14,714,948 186,647 124,163 62,484 12.6 8.4 4.2 1.9 1.55 6.8 73.7 80.2
1989 14,805,240 188,979 128,905 60,086 12.7 8.7 4.0 1.9 1.55 6.8 73.7 79.9
1990 14,892,574 197,965 128,824 69,115 13.2 8.6 4.6 3.3 1.62 7.1 73.8 80.1
1991 15,010,445 198,665 129,958 68,707 13.2 8.6 4.6 3.3 1.61 6.5 74.1 80.2
1992 15,129,150 196,734 129,887 66,847 13.0 8.6 4.4 2.9 1.59 6.3 74.3 80.3
1993 15,239,182 195,748 137,795 57,953 12.8 9.0 3.8 2.9 1.57 6.3 74.0 80.0
1994 15,341,553 195,611 133,471 62,140 12.7 8.7 4.0 1.4 1.57 5.6 74.6 80.3
1995 15,424,122 190,513 135,675 54,838 12.3 8.8 3.5 1.0 1.531 5.5 74.6 80.4
1996 15,493,889 189,521 137,561 51,960 12.2 8.9 3.3 1.4 1.529 5.7 74.7 80.4
1997 15,567,107 192,443 135,783 56,660 12.3 8.7 3.6 2.0 1.562 5.0 75.2 80.6
1998 15,654,192 199,412 137,968 61,444 12.7 8.8 3.9 2.9 1.628 5.2 75.2 80.7
1999 15,760,225 200,445 140,487 59,958 12.7 8.9 3.8 2.8 1.652 5.2 75.3 80.5
2000 15,863,950 206,619 140,527 66,092 13.0 8.8 4.2 3.6 1.723 5.1 75.5 80.6
2001 15,987,075 202,603 140,377 62,226 12.6 8.7 3.9 3.5 1.710 5.4 75.8 80.7
2002 16,105,285 202,083 142,355 59,728 12.5 8.8 3.7 1.7 1.731 5.0 76.0 80.7
2003 16,192,572 200,297 141,936 58,361 12.3 8.7 3.6 0.4 1.747 4.8 76.2 80.9
2004 16,258,032 194,007 136,553 57,454 11.9 8.4 3.5 -0.6 1.726 4.4 76.9 81.4
2005 16,305,526 187,910 136,402 51,508 11.5 8.4 3.2 -1.4 1.708 4.9 77.2 81.6
2006 16,334,210 185,057 135,372 49,685 11.3 8.3 3.0 -1.5 1.720 4.4 77.6 81.9
2007 16,357,992 181,336 133,022 48,314 11.1 8.1 2.9 0 1.718 4.1 78.0 82.3
2008 16,405,399 184,634 135,136 49,498 11.2 8.2 3.0 1.9 1.773 3.8 78.3 82.3
2009 16,485,787 184,915 134,235 50,680 11.2 8.1 3.1 2.3 1.790 3.8 78.5 82.7
2010 16,574,989 184,397 136,058 48,339 11.1 8.2 2.9 2.0 1.796 3.8 78.8 82.7
2011 16,655,799 180,060 135,741 44,319 10.8 8.1 2.7 1.8 1.759 3.6 79.2 82.8
2012 16,730,348 175,959 140,813 35,146 10.5 8.4 2.1 0.8 1.723 3.7 79.1 82.8
2013 16,779,575 171,341 141,245 30,096 10.2 8.4 1.8 1.2 1.679 3.8 79.4 83.0
2014 16,829,289 175,181 139,073 35,434 10.3 8.2 2.1 2.1 1.713 3.6 79.9 83.3
2015 16,900,726 170,510 147,134 23,376 10.0 8.7 1.3 3.3 1.658 3.3 79.7 83.1
2016 16,979,000 172,520 148,997 23,523 10.2 8.8 1.3 4.7 1.663 3.5 79.9 83.1
2017 17,081,507 169,836 150,214 19,622 9.9 8.8 1.1 4.7 1.619 3.6 80.1 83.3
2018 17,181,084 168,525 153,363 15,162 9.8 8.9 0.9 5.0 1.586 3.5 80.2 83.3
2019 17,282,163 169,680 151,885 17,795 9.8 8.8 1.0 6.3 1.574 3.6 80.5 83.6
2020 17,407,585 168,681 168,678 3 9.7 9.7 0.0 3.9 1.545 3.8 79.7 83.1
2021 17,475,415 179,441 170,972 8,469 10.2 9.8 0.4 6.2 1.624 3.3 79.7 83.0
2022 17,590,672 167,504 170,112 -2,608 9.5 9.6 -0.1 12.7 1.487 3.8 80.1 83.1
2023 17,811,291 164,487 169,521 -5,034 9.2 9.5 -0.3 8.2 1.430 3.6 80.3 83.3
2024 17,942,942 166,143 172,165 -6,022 9.2 9.6 -0.4 5.5 1.44 (e) 80.5 83.3
2025 18,045,532

Current vital statistics

[edit]

Source: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek

Period Live births Deaths Natural increase
January—September 2024 125,252 128,476 -3,224
January—September 2025 125,480 129,170 -3,690
Difference Increase +228 (+0.18%) Negative increase +694 (+0.54%) Decrease -466
Source:[22]

Total fertility rates by province

[edit]
2023[23]
Province TFR
Flevoland 1.64
Zeeland 1.62
Drenthe 1.61
Friesland 1.59
Overijssel 1.56
Gelderland 1.53
The Netherlands 1.43
North Brabant 1.43
Limburg 1.39
Noord-Holland 1.29
Groningen 1.27
Utrecht
South Holland

Structure of the population

[edit]
Population by Sex and Age Group (Census 01.I.2011): [24]
Age Group Male Female Total %
Total 8 243 482 8 412 317 16 655 799 100
0–4 472 308 450 798 923 106 5.54
5–9 503 882 481 347 985 229 5.92
10–14 510 974 487 766 998 740 6.00
15–19 514 830 491 914 1 006 744 6.04
20–24 522 667 512 062 1 034 729 6.21
25–29 504 117 497 421 1 001 538 6.01
30–34 503 323 501 441 1 004 764 6.03
35–39 560 289 561 279 1 121 568 6.73
40–44 653 664 642 261 1 295 925 7.78
45–49 655 302 642 990 1 298 292 7.79
50–54 601 040 595 279 1 196 319 7.18
55–59 546 952 543 295 1 090 247 6.55
60–64 553 446 550 206 1 103 652 6.63
65-69 390 725 399 835 790 560 4.75
70-74 302 542 334 976 637 518 3.83
75-79 219 108 280 213 499 321 3.00
80-84 139 348 221 480 360 828 2.17
85-89 66 949 145 107 212 056 1.27
90-94 18 812 57 379 76 191 0.46
95+ 3 204 15 268 18 472 0.11
Age group Male Female Total Percent
0–14 1 487 164 1 419 911 2 907 075 17.45
15–64 5 615 630 5 538 148 11 153 778 66.97
65+ 1 140 688 1 454 258 2 594 946 15.58
Population Estimates by Sex and Age Group (01.I.2021): [24]
Age Group Male Female Total %
Total 8 686 536 8 788 879 17 475 415 100
0–4 439 516 418 110 857 626 4.91
5–9 461 357 438 470 899 827 5.15
10–14 488 746 465 532 954 278 5.46
15–19 527 596 504 139 1 031 735 5.90
20–24 563 311 544 175 1 107 486 6.34
25–29 575 570 557 372 1 132 942 6.48
30–34 570 427 556 062 1 126 489 6.45
35–39 530 309 523 777 1 054 086 6.03
40–44 516 034 517 454 1 033 488 5.91
45–49 562 979 569 595 1 132 574 6.48
50–54 644 880 641 251 1 286 131 7.36
55–59 633 972 629 585 1 263 557 7.23
60–64 566 770 570 891 1 137 661 6.51
65-69 496 148 507 630 1 003 778 5.74
70-74 474 058 496 978 971 036 5.56
75-79 303 655 340 405 644 060 3.69
80-84 196 115 253 008 449 123 2.57
85-89 97 307 160 502 257 809 1.48
90-94 31 861 73 187 105 048 0.60
95-99 5 514 18 631 24 145 0.14
100-104 406 2 040 2 446 0.01
105-109 5 84 89 <0.01
110+ 0 1 1 <0.01
Age group Male Female Total Percent
0–14 1 389 619 1 322 112 2 711 731 15.52
15–64 5 691 848 5 614 301 11 306 149 64.70
65+ 1 605 069 1 852 466 3 457 535 19.79

Migration and origin groups

[edit]

Between 1590 and 1800 the estimated share of foreign-born population was consistently above 5%.[25]

According to Eurostat, in 2010 there were 1,800,000 foreign-born residents in the Netherlands, corresponding to 11.1% of the total population. Of these, 1,400,000 (8.5%) were born outside the EU (including those from Dutch colonies) and 428,000 (2.6%) were born in another EU member state. The most common countries of birth being: Belgium, Germany, Poland and the United Kingdom.[26] On 1 January 2016, 26.2% of persons aged 0–50 had at least one parent born in a foreign country. 11.4% of persons aged 0–50 of 'Dutch background' belonged to the 'third generation', the majority descending from Western immigrants. The third generation constitutes persons born from two second generation immigrants or one second generation immigrant and one person with a Dutch background. First and second generation immigrants and the third generation were 34.5% of the population aged 0–50.[27]

As the result of immigration from overseas, the Netherlands have a sizeable minority of non-indigenous peoples. There is also a considerable level of emigration, in majority consisting of former immigrants. In 2005, some 121,000 people left the country, while 94,000 entered it. Out of a total of 101,150 people immigrating into the Netherlands in 2006, 66,658 were from Europe, Oceania, the Americas or Japan, and 34,492 were from other (mostly developing) countries. Out of a total of 132,470 emigrants, 94,834 were going to Europe, Oceania, the Americas or Japan and 37,636 to other countries.[28]

A large number[25] of immigrants come from countries in Western Europe, mostly from the neighbouring countries of Germany and Belgium. There were five subsequent waves of immigration to the Netherlands in recent history.

  1. In the late-1940s and into the 1950s, following the end of the Second World War, people from the newly independent Republic of Indonesia repatriated or emigrated to the Netherlands - mainly Indo-European (people of mixed European and Indonesian ancestry of Dutch nationality) and supporters of the Republic of South Maluku.
  2. Between 1960 and 1974, migrants from Greece, Portugal, Spain, Turkey and Morocco came to work in the Netherlands as guest workers. They were expected to return to their own country and many did, but others remained and in the 1970s and 1980s were joined by their families. Until 2004, when marriage immigration was restricted, their children usually married others from their home country.[citation needed]
  3. After 1974, people emigrated from the newly independent Suriname and from the Netherlands Antilles, which remained part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. In 1974, about forty thousand Surinamese migrated while still retaining Dutch citizenship; between 1975 and 1980 there was a transitional arrangement allowing migration. Antilleans have the Dutch nationality and behave like typical labour migrants, travelling to and from the country in response to the employment available.
  4. During the 1970s and 1980s, the number of asylum seekers was low, consisting e.g. of Chileans fleeing from political oppression and/or persecution. In the 1990s, asylum migration sharply increased,[29] largely consisting of Yugoslavs, Somalis, Iraqis, Iranians, Ethiopians, Eritreans, Afghans and Vietnamese, fleeing war or famine.[30] Between 2000 and 2014 asylum migration strongly decreased due to the strict "Cohen Law". However, the Syrian Civil War from 2011 resulted in a large influx of Syrian asylum seekers in 2015 and 2016; about ninety thousand Syrians had been granted asylum by 2018.
  5. Since the 2000s, migrant workers and their families from the newly joined EU member states in Central and Eastern Europe, including: Poland, and Bulgaria, and non-EU states , Ukraine and the former Yugoslavia.[citation needed] In addition, a number of Spaniards, Greeks, Italians, and Portuguese also migrated due to the impact of the Great Recession in those countries. In 2005, non-Western ethnic population comprised 1.7 million individuals, about 10% of the population in the country.[31]

Illegal immigration to the Netherlands results in automatic deportation[32] but this is often not enforced for various reasons such as unknown country of origin, etc. Many Dutch provinces in 2012 had quotas for deporting illegal immigrants.[33][34][35][36]

By 2017, persons with a migration background, both western and non-western, formed a majority in Amsterdam (2011), Rotterdam (2013) and The Hague, the three largest cities of the Netherlands.[37]

In 2005, the governmental Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau in its annual report, noted recurring integration problems for ethnic minorities. While during the economic boom of the 1990s their unemployment and dependence on welfare had strongly decreased, the economic downturn between 2001 and 2004 disproportionally affected immigrant groups. This would be explained by their functioning as a labour reserve, by their lower educational levels and by lower language skills. The report also noted that per capita social interactions between native Dutch and immigrant populations tended to decline over time, partly explainable by the size growth of immigrant groups. Integration levels strongly varied between groups. Surinamese and Antilleans were well economically integrated, but the latter less so culturally. Cultural integration was limited for Turks, but better for Moroccans. Of the asylum seekers, Somalis were among the least integrated into Dutch society, while Iranians were the best integrated with the highest education levels and modern lifestyles. Though the educational levels of the second generation were a significant improvement over those of the first generation, they still lagged behind the native Dutch who themselves on average had been attending ever higher school types. While half of all native Dutch pupils in 2005 proceeded to higher secondary education (HAVO and VWO), for Turks and Moroccans the share was a fifth and for Somali pupils even lower.[31]

In 2007, non-Western groups were generally socio-economically disadvantaged. Of the four largest non-Western groups, Turks and Moroccans were the most disadvantaged. In 2006, only 38.7% of Moroccans and 43.9% of Turks aged 15–64 were employed, meaning their unemployment rate was about four times that of the native Dutch (17.2% for Moroccans and 15.1% for Turks), and 30% received some type of social welfare.[25]

The 2008 financial crisis and the Euro area crisis affected immigrant groups particularly hard. In 2012, at 12% non-Western migrants were six times more likely than native Dutch to receive social welfare benefits, with 2% for the Dutch.[38]

Western and non-Western fraction of low-income households and source of income. Data sourced from Statistics Netherlands.[39]

According to a 2010 Statistics Netherlands report, the third generation of non-Western immigrants was predominantly young with 80% being younger than 15, while growing with 10% each year. The third generation have a similar employment rate as the native Dutch and receive a similar amount of social benefits. The third non-Western generation follow adult education more frequently than both the native Dutch and non-Western immigrants. The non-Western immigrant population as a whole has 1.5 to 2 times the benefit dependence compared to the natives. The non-Western third generation had a rate slightly higher than the native Dutch as crime suspects, but lower than for non-Western immigrants as a whole.[40][41]

According to Statistics Netherlands, nearly 53% of refugee households have a low income, six times the Netherlands average (8.2%).[39] For Syrian and Eritrean households the share is about 80%. At 33% the poverty risk is lowest among Iranian refugee households. The group of Syrian households at risk of poverty grew from ten thousand (76% of all Syrian households in 2016) to eighteen thousand (79% of all Syrian households) in 2018. Households of Polish, Romanian or Bulgarian origin have a greater than average risk of poverty even though households from these Eastern European countries generally depend on work for their income. Migrant workers from Eastern Europe generally perform low-skilled work while migrants from Western Europe are often highly educated.[39]

Immigrants from foreign countries are divided into several ethnic groups. For example, there are both Russians and Chechens from Russia, Turks and Kurds from Turkey, Serbs and Albanians from Serbia and immigrants from Iran are divided into Persians, Azeris and Kurds.[42]

Net migration of the Netherlands, 1995-present

[edit]
Netherlands Migration Data
Year Immigration Emigration Net immigration
1995 96,099 82,195 +13,904
1996 108,749 91,945 +16,804
1997 109,860 81,973 +27,887
1998 122,407 79,289 +43,118
1999 119,151 78,779 +40,372
2000 132,850 78,977 +53,873
2001 133,404 82,566 +50,838
2002 121,250 96,918 +24,332
2003 104,514 104,831 -317
2004 94,019 110,235 -16,216
2005 92,297 119,725 -27,428
2006 101,150 132,470 -31,320
2007 116,819 122,576 -5,757
2008 143,516 117,779 +25,737
2009 146,378 111,897 +34,481
2010 154,432 121,351 +33,081
2011 162,962 133,194 +29,768
2012 158,374 144,491 +13,883
2013 164,772 145,669 +19,103
2014 182,949 147,862 +35,087
2015 204,615 149,509 +55,106
2016 230,739 151,545 +79,194
2017 234,957 154,292 +80,665
2018 243,737 157,366 +86,371
2019 269,064 161,029 +108,035
2020 220,853 152,494 +68,359
2021 252,528 145,330 +107,198
2022 403,108 179,310 +223,798
2023 335,668 198,310 +137,358
2024 316,305 208,537 +107,768

National origins

[edit]
Population of the Netherlands by country of birth
Pie chart showing the breakdown of the Netherlands by national origin (2022)
  1. Dutch (74.8%)
  2. Turks (2.44%)
  3. Moroccans (2.38%)
  4. Surinamese (2.05%)
  5. Indos (1.99%)
  6. Germans (1.95%)
  7. Poles (1.26%)
  8. Curaçao (0.77%)
  9. Belgians (0.70%)
  10. Other (11.7%)

As of 1 January 2022, 4,438,900 citizens are of non-Dutch/Frisian origin. A majority of these (50,86%) are from seven backgrounds alone: Turks (inc. Kurds), Moroccans (inc. Berbers), Surinamese, Indonesians (inc. Moluccans), Germans, Poles and Curaçao.[43]

With the huge expansion of the European Union during the 2000s, the Netherlands has seen a rise in the number of immigrants coming from new member states. Migrant workers from these countries are estimated to be about 100,000 as of 2007.[44] Legal migrants from new EU-member states doubled between 2007–11 to 200,000,[45] with estimates totaling up to 300,000. Of the Poles who initially moved to the Netherlands in 2004, about a quarter had returned to Poland by 2006.[46] In addition, a large number of Syrians moved to the Netherlands in the 2010s mostly as refugees, with the population increasing seven-fold between 2014 and 2019. Both Poles and Syrians have overtaken the population of Antilleans during the decade.[43] More than 36,000 Roma live in the Netherlands.[47] Dutch Roma, Sinti and Dutch Jews were decimated by the Holocaust.[48][49] However, the Jewish population has seen growth in the Netherlands in recent years.[50]

As of 1 January 2022:[43]

National origins/Migration background 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2010
Dutch (& Frisians) 13 151 772 (74.77%) 13 169 507 (75.36%) 13 186 880 (75.75%) 13 196 025 (76.36%) 13 209 225 (76.88%) 13 218 754 (77.39%) 13 226 829 (77.90%) 13 235 405 (78.31%) 13 234 545 (78.64%) 13 236 494 (78.89%) 13 236 618 (79.12%) 13 215 458 (79.73%)
Turks (& Kurds) 429 978 (2.444%) 422 030 (2.415%) 416 864 (2.395%) 409 877 (2.37%) 404 459 (2.35%) 400 367 (2.34%) 397 471 (2.34%) 396 555 (2.35%) 396 414 (2.36%) 392 923 (2.34%) 392 923 (2.35%) 384 164 (2.32%)
Moroccans (& Berbers) 419 272 (2.38%) 414 186 (2.37%) 408 864 (2.35%) 402 492 (2.33%) 396 539 (2.31%) 391 088 (2.29%) 385 761 (2.27%) 380 755 (2.25%) 374 996 (2.23%) 368 838 (2.20%) 362 954 (2.17%) 349 270 (2.11%)
Surinamese 359 814 (2.05%) 358 266 (2.05%) 356 402 (2.05%) 353 909 (2.05%) 351 681 (2.05%) 349 978 (2.05%) 349 022 (2.06%) 348 662 (2.06%) 348 291 (2.07%) 344 734 (2.05%) 344 734 (2.06%) 342 016 (2.06%)
Indos (& Moluccans) 349 301 (1.986%) 352 266 (2.016%) 356 029 (2.045%) 358 773 (2.08%) 361 594 (2.10%) 364 328 (2.13%) 366 849 (2.16%) 369 661 (2.19%) 372 233 (2.21%) 374 847 (2.23%) 377 618 (2.26%) 382 319 (2.31%)
Germans 342 925 (1.95%) 345 746 (1.98%) 349 284 (2.006%) 351 552 (2.03%) 354 136 (2.06%) 356 875 (2.09%) 360 116 (2.12%) 364 125 (2.15%) 368 512 (2.19%) ? ? 379 017 (2.29%)
Poles 220 980 (1.26%) 209 278 (1.2%) 198 024 (1.14%) 185 497 (1.07%) 173 050 (1.01%) 161 158 (0.94%) 149 831 (0.88%) 137 794 (0.82%) 123 003 (0.73%) 111 121 (0.66%) 100 775 (0.60%) 77 178 (0.47%)
Antilleans 165 477 (0.94%) 160 429 (0.92%) 158 487 (0.91%) 155 492 (0.90%) 153 469 (0.90%) 150 981 (0.89%) 148 926 (0.88%) 146 855 (0.87%) 145 499 (0.87%) 143 992 (0.86%) 138 113 (0.83%) 134 486 (0.82%)
Syrians 126 260 (0.72%) 113 126 (0.65%) 105 440 (0.61%) 98 090 (0.57%) 90 771 (0.53%) 72 903 (0.43%) 43 838 (0.26%) 22 568 (0.13%) 13 744 (0.08%) 11 665 (0.07%) 11 025 (0.07%) 10 263 (0.06%)
Belgians 123 136 (0.7%) 122 197 (0.7%) 121 019 (0.695%) 119 769 (0.69%) 118 725 (0.69%) 117 495 (0.69%) 116 389 (0.69%) 115 687 (0.68%) ? ? ? ?
Former Soviets[a] ? 110 877 92 128 (0.53%) 84 498 (0.49%) 80 013 (0.47%) 76 102 (0.45%) ? ? ? ?
British 97 844 (0.56%) 97 614 (0.56%) 91 154 (0.53%) 88 390 (0.51%) 86 293 (0.51%) 84 466 (0.50%) 82 879 (0.49%) ? ? ? ?
Former Yugoslavs[b] ? 91 951 87 536 (0.51%) 85 504 (0.50%) 84 243 (0.50%) 83 261 (0.49%) ? ? ? ?
Chinese 84 453 (0.48%) 81 735 (0.47%) 77 648 (0.45%) 74 234 (0.43%) 71 229 (0.42%) 68 697 (0.40%) 66 088 (0.39%) ? ? ? ?
Iraqis 67 757 (0.39%) 66 216 (0.38%) 63 008 (0.36%) 61 255 (0.36%) 59 497 (0.35%) 56 269 (0.33%) ? ? ? ? ?
Indians 65 399 (0.37%) 58 460 (0.33%) 48 724 (0.28%) 36 818 (0.22%) 32 682 (0.19%) ? ? ? ? ?
Italians 64 398 (0.37%) 61 367 (0.35%) 56 645 (0.33%) 53 703 (0.31%) 50 925 (0.30%) 48 366 (0.28%) ? ? ? ? ?
Afghans 54 991 (0.31%) 51 830 (0.3%) 49 122 (0.28%) 47 776 (0.28%) 46 701 (0.27%) 44 339 (0.26%) ? ? ? ? ?
Spaniards 54 269 (0.31%) 50 466 (0.29%) 46 741 (0.27%) 42 926 (0.25%) 41 572 (0.24%) ? ? ? ? ?
French 52 389 (0.3%) 50 207 (0.29%) 47 009 (0.27%) 45 558 (0.27%) 43 836 (0.26%) 42 070 (0.25%) ? ? ? ? ?
Iranians (Persians, Azeris and Kurds) 52 099 (0.3%) 49 723 (0.29%) 44 379 (0.26%) 42 464 (0.25%) 40 893 (0.24%) 38 458 (0.23%) ? ? ? ? ?
Bulgarians 50 305 (0.29%) 44 874 (0.26%) 40 216 (0.23%) 34 809 (0.20%) 27 729 (0.16%) 25 520 (0.15%) ? ? ? ? ?
Americans 49 246 (0.28%) 47 408 (0.27%) 44 399 (0.26%) 40 022 (0.23%) 38 494 (0.23%) ? ? ? ? ?
Romanians 48 563 (0.28%) 43 161 (0.25%) 39 340 (0.225%) 34 185 (0.20%) 25 551 (0.15%) 23 020 (0.14%) ? ? ? ? ?
Somalis 41 064 (0.23%) 40 701 (0.23%) 40 251 (0.23%) 39 947 (0.23%) 39 737 (0.23%) 39 457 (0.23%) 39 465 (0.23%) ? ? ? ? ?
Bosnians 39 265 (0.22%) 38 927 (0.22%) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Brazilians 38 125 (0.22%) 35 285 (0.2%) 33 348 (0.19%) 30 104 (0.17%) 24 725 (0.14%) 23 675 (0.14%) ? ? ? ? ?
South Africans (Afrikaners) 31 693 (0.18%) 28 562 (0.16%) 23 738 (0.14%) 20 859 (0.12%) 19 877 (0.12%) ? ? ? ? ?
Greeks 31 480 (0.18%) 28 856 (0.16%) 28 100 (0.16%) 25 709 (0.15%) 22 141 (0.13%) 20 769 (0.12%) ? ? ? ? ?
Portuguese 31 306 (0.18%) 29 092 (0.17%) 28 802 (0.17%) 27 450 (0.16%) 25 637 (0.15%) 24 930 (0.15%) ? ? ? ? ?
Egyptians 29 483 (0.17%) 28 399 (0.16%) 26 152 (0.15%) 23 956 (0.14%) 23 198 (0.14%) ? ? ? ? ?
Ethiopians 28 635 (0.16%) 27 139 (0.15%) 23 777 (0.14%) 19 528 (0.11%) 16 347 (0.10%) ? ? ? ? ?
Hungarians 28 210 (0.16%) 26 853 (0.15%) 24 898 (0.14%) 22 870 (0.13%) 22 080 (0.13%) ? ? ? ? ?
Pakistanis 27 261 (0.15%) 25 938 (0.15%) 23 855 (0.14%) 22 897 (0.13%) 22 137 (0.13%) 21 447 (0.13%) ? ? ? ? ?
Ghanaians 26 694 (0.15%) 25 999 (0.15%) 24 460 (0.14%) 23 430 (0.14%) 23 168 (0.14%) ? ? ? ? ?
Filipinos 26 658 (0.15%) 25 365 (0.14%) 23 128 (0.13%) 22 000 (0.13%) 20 937 (0.12%) 20 073 (0.12%) ? ? ? ? ?
Vietnamese (Kinh) 25 135 (0.14%) 24 594 (0.14%) 23 488 (0.14%) 22 023 (0.13%) 21 435 (0.13%) ? ? ? ? ?
Thai 23 390 (0.13%) 22 642 (0.13%) 21 364 (0.12%) 20 106 (0.12%) 19 513 (0.11%) ? ? ? ? ?
Cape Verdeans 23 150 (0.13%) 22 980 (0.13%) 22 632 (0.13%) 22 285 (0.13%) 22 157 (0.13%) ? ? ? ? ?
Colombians 21 853 (0.12%) 20 515 (0.12%) 18 351 (0.11%) 16 607 (0.10%) 15 892 (0.09%) ? ? ? ? ?
Hongkongers 18 363 (0.1%) 18 332 (0.10%) 18 367 (0.11%) 18 357 (0.11%) 18 300 (0.11%) ? ? ? ? ?
Australians 17 722 (0.10%) 17 688 (0.10%) 17 349 (0.10%) 16 597 (0.10%) 16 127 (0.09%) ? ? ? ? ?
Canadians 17 266 (0.1%) 16 997 (0.10%) 16 614 (0.10%) 16 240 (0.09%) 15 944 (0.09%) 15 625 (0.09%) ? ? ? ? ?
Austrians 16 216 (0.09%) 16 130 (0.09%) 16 055 (0.09%) 15 777 (0.09%) 15 674 (0.09%) ? ? ? ? ?
Rest of Sub-Saharan Africa ? 108 621 (0.63%) 97 026 (0.57%) 91 797 (0.54%) ? ? ? ? ?
Rest of Europe ? 77 245 (0.45%) 68 592 (0.40%) 65 849 (0.39%) ? ? ? ? ?
Rest of Americas (except Caribbean) ? 52 425 (0.30) 47 048 (0.28%) 45 256 (0.27%) ? ? ? ? ?
Rest of North Africa and Middle East ? 55 180 (0.32%) 46 231 (0.27%) 44 059 (0.26%) ? ? ? ? ?
Rest of East and Southeast Asia ? 38 279 (0.22%) 34 562 (0.20%) 33 473 (0.20%) ? ? ? ? ?
Rest of Caribbean ? 28 861 (0.17%) 21 514 (0.13%) 20 956 (0.12%) ? ? ? ? ?
Rest of South Asia ? 18 672 (0.11%) 17 448 (0.10%) 16 762 (0.10%) ? ? ? ? ?
Rest of Oceania ? 6 479 (0.04%) 6 062 (0.04%) 5 916 (0.03%) ? ? ? ? ?
Others ? 1 094 826 (6.48%) 1 587 433 (9.43%) 1 437 462 (8.57%) 1 437 462 (8.59%) 1 387 255 (8.37%)
Total 17 590 672 17 475 415 17 407 575 17 282 163 17 181 084 17 081 507 16 979 120 16 900 726 16 829 289 16 779 575 16 730 348 16 577 612
Region of the World[51] 2024[52] 2023[53] 2022[51] 2021 2019 2018 2017 2016
Netherlands 12 941 748 (72.13%) 12 978 154 (72.86%) 13 013 279 (73.97%) 13 169 507 (75.36%) 13 196 025 (76.36%) 13 209 225 (76.88%) 13 218 754 (77.39%) 13 226 829 (77.90%)
Europe (Except Netherlands) 1 677 093 (9.35%) 1 617 454 (9.08%) 1 477 069 (8.39%) 1 237 807 (7.25%) 1 204 908 (7.10%)
Asia 1 661 731 (9.26%) 1 594 551 (8.95%) 1 523 493 (8.66%)
Americas 855 488 (4.77%) 804 097 (4.51%) 815,554 (4.63%)
Africa 806 882 (4.50%) 785 016 (4.41%) 761 277 (4.32%)
North Africa and Middle East 1 148 300 (6.64%) 1 081 636 (6.33%) 1 033 393 (6.09%)
East and South East Asia 561 047 (3.25%) 551 542 (3.23%) 548 340 (3.23%)
Caribbean and Suriname 538 262 (3.11%) 524 961 (3.07%) 520 959 (3.07%)
Sub-Saharan Africa 243 175 (1.41%) 222 585 (1.30%) 212 811 (1.25%)
Americas (Except Caribbean and Suriname) 161 893 (0.94%) 144 346 (0.85%) 138 942 (0.82%)
South Asia 91 251 (0.53%) 76 403 (0.45%) 70 891 (0.42%)
Oceania 32 019 (0.18%) 24 423 (0.14%) 24 390 (0.14%) 22 828 (0.14%) 22 659 (0.13%) 22 043 (0.13%)
Immigrants and people of migrant backgrounds
Nationality Population (2022)[54]
Turkey 429,978
Morocco 419,272
Suriname 359,814
Indonesia 349,301
European Union Germany 342,925
European Union Poland 220,980
Syria 126,260
European Union Belgium 123,136
United Kingdom 97,844
China 84,453
Iraq 67,757
India 65,399
European Union Italy 55,001
Afghanistan 54,991
European Union Spain 54,269
European Union France 52,389
Iran 52,099
European Union Bulgaria 50,305
United States 49,246
European Union Romania 48,563
Somalia 41,064
Bosnia and Herzegovina 39,265
Brazil 38,125
South Africa 31,693
European Union Greece 31,480
European Union Portugal 31,306
Egypt 29,483
Ethiopia 28,635
European Union Hungary 28,210
Pakistan 27,261
Ghana 26,694
Philippines 26,658
Cape Verde 23,150
Thailand 23,390
Colombia 21,853
Hong Kong 18,363
Australia 17,722
Canada 17,266
European Union Austria 16,216
Net immigrants in the Netherlands in 2022[55]
Rank Country Number Percentage
1 Ukraine 82,767 37
2 Syria 16,276 7.2
3 Turkey 12,040 5.4
4 India 10,903 4.9
5 European Union Poland 10,025 4.5
6 European Union Romania 6,043 2.7
7 European Union Bulgaria 5,527 2.5
8 South Africa 4,616 2
9 Afghanistan 3,278 1.7
10 European Union Greece 3,270 1.7
Top 10 total 154,745 69.1
Other 69,053 30.9
Total 223,798 100

Emigration

[edit]

The Netherlands have seen considerable emigration. In the 1950s and early 1960s, 560,000 people migrated to Canada, Australia, the United States, South Africa and New Zealand, in response to low wage levels and a government programme aiming to reduce the perceived overpopulation. At least 60,000 of these migrants were Indo-European (mixed Dutch-Indonesian) repatriates that moved on, mostly to the United States, or returned to Indonesia after being repatriated to the Netherlands from the former Dutch East Indies during and after the Indonesian Revolution. The official emigration policy combined with a strong economic growth already in the early 1950s led to serious manpower shortages.

In 2005, some 121,000 people migrated from the Netherlands. There is considerable migration towards neighbouring states, Belgium, Germany and the United Kingdom and to the Netherlands Antilles. Furthermore, almost half of the current emigration consists of people returning to their country of birth, including rejected asylum seekers, after the more stringent migration laws were implemented.

Education by background

[edit]

According to a 2016 study by Statistics Netherlands, students with a non-western background generally study at a lower level of secondary education. 48 percent of those with a Dutch background were at HAVO or VWO level at third year, compared to 23 percent for Dutch Turks, 28 percent for Dutch Moroccans, 35 percent for Dutch Surinamese and 31 percent for Dutch Antilleans. Some backgrounds fared better: over 40 percent of Dutch Afghans studied at HAVO/VWO level, and for Dutch Iranians the rate was 50 percent, which was above native Dutch students.[56]

Employment and income

[edit]

Unemployment, youth ages 15–24

total: 7.2%. Country comparison to the world: 130th
male: 7.7%
female: 6.6% (2018 est.)

Religion

[edit]

In 2013, Statistics Netherlands found that 26% of the population identified as Roman Catholic, 16% as Protestant, 5% as Muslim, and 6% as "other" (the last includes other Christian denominations, Hindus 0.6%, Jews 0.1%, and Buddhists 0.4%). The agency interviewed 355,237 people in the period 2010–2013.[57] In 2019, the Central Bureau of Statistics reported that for the first time non-religious people were in the majority in the Netherlands. Only 49% of people older than 15 years reported to be religious; in 2012 that was still 54%. The largest religion was still Catholicism (24%), while 5% identified with Islam.[58]

Religion in Netherlands (2019) by the CIA[59]
  1. No religion (54.1%)
  2. Roman Catholic (20.1%)
  3. Protestantism (14.8%)
  4. Muslim (5.00%)
  5. Other religions (5.90%)

Language

[edit]

The main language is Dutch, while Frisian (known as West Frisian outside of the Netherlands) is also a recognized language in the province of Friesland and is used by the government and schools there. Several dialects of Low Saxon (Nedersaksisch in Dutch) are spoken in much of the north and east and are recognized by the Netherlands as regional languages according to the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Another group of dialects granted the status of regional language is Limburgish, which is spoken in the south-eastern province of Limburg. Major immigrant languages are Indonesian, Turkish, Arabic, Berber, Papiamento, German and Polish.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The demographics of the Netherlands pertain to a population exceeding 18 million as of mid-2025, one of the highest densities globally at approximately 544 inhabitants per square kilometer, sustained by net immigration amid sub-replacement fertility and an aging structure with life expectancy around 82 years. Population growth, which reached about 37,000 in the first half of 2025, has been driven entirely by migration, as deaths outpaced births by nearly 9,000 in early 2025, reflecting a native Dutch fertility rate persistently below 1.5 children per woman. Ethnically, the population remains predominantly of Dutch origin, comprising roughly 75-80% with Western European backgrounds, though the share with non-Western migration backgrounds—particularly from Turkey, Morocco, and more recently Syria and other Middle Eastern or African countries—has risen to over 20%, fueled by family reunification, asylum, and labor inflows totaling 316,000 immigrants in 2024. Urbanization is pronounced, with over 90% residing in urban areas, concentrated in the Randstad megalopolis, while regional disparities exist, including higher densities in provinces like South Holland and lower in rural Drenthe; these dynamics pose challenges for housing, infrastructure, and integration amid debates over sustained high migration levels.

Total Population

Current Size and Projections

As of the end of August 2025, the population of the Netherlands was 18,100,436. This figure reflects registered inhabitants and incorporates monthly adjustments for births, deaths, and migration. In the first half of 2025, the population increased by 36,900 persons, entirely attributable to net immigration of 41,900, offsetting a natural decrease of 5,000 due to 9,000 more deaths than births. Such patterns underscore migration as the dominant driver of recent growth, amid persistently low fertility and rising mortality from an aging demographic. Statistics (CBS) projects continued expansion under its medium variant forecast. The population is projected to reach 18.14 million in 2026, an increase from 18.04 million in 2025, with a 95% forecast interval of 18.09 to 18.18 million. Longer-term projections include reaching 18.98 million by 2037 (crossing the 19 million threshold), 19.69 million by 2050, 20.06 million by 2060, and 20.63 million by 2070. These estimates assume sustained net migration around 20,000–30,000 annually, gradual stabilization near 1.6 children per woman, and gains to 82 years for men and 86 for women by mid-century. Alternative scenarios yield wider ranges: a low variant projects 18.9 million by 2070, while a high variant anticipates 22.3 million, with 95% confidence intervals spanning 17.5–24.1 million. Long-term growth hinges on immigration trends, as natural population change remains negative or negligible; CBS notes uncertainty in fertility due to delayed childbearing and smaller family sizes, compounded by structural aging where the over-65 share rises from 20% in 2025 to 28% by 2070. The of the grew from just over 2 million inhabitants in 1795 to 5.1 million by 1900, reflecting gradual improvements in , reduced impacts, and early declines in mortality rates amid limited industrialization. This expansion occurred at an average annual growth rate of approximately 0.8 percent, constrained by high to overseas colonies and urban centers, as well as periodic epidemics and economic pressures. By the late , data indicated a population of around 5.1 million in 1899, setting the stage for accelerated growth in the driven by public health advancements and infrastructure development. From 1900 to 1950, the population doubled to over 10 million, despite the disruptions of neutrality and occupation, during which direct military losses were minimal but indirect effects like the 1944-1945 Hunger Winter caused excess mortality of about 20,000-30,000 civilians. Annual growth averaged 1.1 percent, supported by falling from 120 per 1,000 live births in 1900 to around 30 by 1950, and rising from 44 years to 70 years over the same period. The post-war , peaking with total fertility rates above 3 children per woman in the 1950s and early 1960s, propelled further increases, with the population reaching 11.5 million by 1960. Since , the population has risen from 11.5 million to approximately 17.9 million by 2023, a 56 percent increase at an average annual rate declining from 1.2 percent in the to 0.7 percent in recent decades. This sustained growth has increasingly relied on net immigration, as natural increase turned near-zero following fertility declines below replacement level (1.6-1.7 births per woman since the ), with migrants contributing over 80 percent of annual gains in the and . Key inflows included labor migration from Mediterranean countries in the -, family reunification from former colonies, and asylum seekers from conflict zones in the and , offsetting aging demographics and low native birth rates.
YearPopulation (millions)Annual Growth Rate (%)
19005.1-
195010.11.1
196011.51.2
200015.90.5
202317.80.7

Population Density and Geography

Overall Density

The Netherlands exhibits one of the highest population densities in , with 533 inhabitants per square kilometer of land area recorded in 2024. This metric is computed by (CBS) using the registered population divided by the land surface area, excluding inland water bodies, which total approximately 33,700 square kilometers. As of 1 January 2025, the population reached 18,044,027, reflecting continued growth primarily driven by net migration, which sustains the elevated density despite a land area constrained by geography and historical land reclamation efforts. This density underscores the country's efficient land utilization, where about 55% of the territory remains dedicated to , facilitated by advanced systems and intensive farming practices. Urban concentration in the region—encompassing the provinces of , , , and —amplifies local densities exceeding 1,000 per square kilometer, while eastern and northern provinces average below 500. data, derived from municipal registers, provide robust empirical tracking, minimizing estimation errors inherent in less rigorous international comparisons. Projections indicate will rise to around 550 per square kilometer by 2030, assuming moderate and stable area, as urban expansion faces limits from flood-prone and environmental policies. Such figures position the ahead of most large European nations in density rankings, excluding principalities, highlighting adaptations like multi-story and infrastructure to accommodate pressures without proportional land consumption.

Urban-Rural Distribution

The maintains one of the highest urbanization rates globally, with 93.18 percent of the population residing in urban areas as of 2023. This equates to roughly 16.66 million urban dwellers out of a total exceeding 17.8 million, leaving a rural population of 6.82 percent, or approximately 1.22 million individuals. By , the urban share had risen slightly to 93.45 percent, reflecting a continued, albeit gradual, shift from rural to urban living. Urban concentration is pronounced in the Randstad metropolitan region in the west, encompassing provinces such as , , and , where high-density cities like , , and account for a disproportionate share of the populace. In contrast, rural areas predominate in the northern (e.g., Friesland, Groningen) and eastern (e.g., , ) provinces, as well as parts of the south, characterized by lower population densities and agricultural focus. The rural population has declined steadily, dropping from 7.11 percent in 2022 and further from 7.76 percent in 2020, driven by migration to urban centers for employment and services. This distribution aligns with the World Bank's classification, which relies on national definitions of urban localities—typically settlements exceeding a certain threshold or criterion—yielding figures consistent across international sets. Historical illustrate a long-term trend: rural residency fell from over 40 percent in 1960 to under 8 percent by 2020, underscoring the country's transformation into a predominantly urban society amid postwar and development.

Vital Statistics

Fertility Rates and Births

The (TFR) in the , representing the average number of children a would bear if current age-specific rates prevailed throughout her childbearing years, stood at 1.43 live births per in 2023. This marked a decline from 1.49 in 2022 and reflects a broader recent downward trajectory below the replacement level of 2.1 required for long-term population stability absent migration. In 2023, 164,297 live births were recorded, a marginal decrease from 2022, with over 75,000 women becoming first-time mothers. Preliminary data for 2024 indicate 165,404 live births, accompanied by 2,448 twin births and 32 higher-order multiples, stable from prior years. Historically, the TFR exceeded 3.0 in the and early amid the postwar , driven by high birth rates among younger women, before plummeting to a low of 1.57 in 1979 due to delayed childbearing, increased female labor participation, and contraceptive availability. A partial recovery occurred in the early 2000s, peaking near 1.82 in 2010, attributed to policy supports like and childcare subsidies that mitigated postponement effects, but rates have since resumed declining amid sustained low period and rising . By 2023, the mean age at first birth reached 30.3 years, contributing to compressed fertility schedules and fewer total births. Fertility varies by migration background, with women of Dutch origin exhibiting a TFR of 1.5, lower than among those with non-Dutch origins, though rates are falling across all groups and remain sub-replacement in each. Immigrants, particularly from non-Western countries, historically displayed elevated TFRs upon arrival—often 1.5 to 2 times native levels—due to selectivity for family-oriented migrants and disruption effects, but these converge toward native norms over generations as socioeconomic integration advances and origin-country declines. This pattern results in births to mothers with migration backgrounds comprising a disproportionate share relative to their weight, sustaining a modest upward pull on the national TFR despite overall contraction. Stillbirths remain low at around 3.5 per 1,000 births, with no significant trend deviation in recent data.

Mortality and Life Expectancy

Life expectancy at birth in the reached 81.9 years in 2023, with men at 80.3 years and women at 83.3 years. Preliminary data for 2024 indicate a slight increase for men to 80.5 years, while women's remained at 83.3 years. These figures position the Netherlands above the average, reflecting improvements in healthcare and living standards. The crude death rate stood at 9.5 deaths per 1,000 population in 2023, down slightly from 9.6 in 2022, with 169,521 total deaths recorded. In 2024, deaths rose to 172,165, yielding a rate of approximately 9.6 per 1,000. has declined to 3.2 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2022, among the lowest globally, supported by advanced neonatal care. Historically, has risen steadily from 71.4 years in 1950 to over 82 years by 2024, driven by reductions in infectious diseases, better nutrition, and medical advancements, though progress slowed during the in 2020–2021 before rebounding. At age 65, remaining was 19.9 years in 2023, up from 19.7 in 2022. Disparities persist by sex and socioeconomic factors, with women's higher expectancy linked to lower cardiovascular mortality rates, though recent trends show converging gaps.

Natural Population Change

The natural population change in the Netherlands, defined as the excess of live births over deaths excluding migration, remained positive for much of the postwar period but turned negative starting in 2023 due to persistently low rates around 1.4 children per woman and an aging structure. In 2022, approximately 167,500 births occurred alongside roughly 169,800 deaths, yielding a small natural decrease that was offset by migration for overall growth. This shift accelerated in 2023, with 164,400 live births recorded against 169,000 deaths, resulting in a natural decline of about 4,600—the first annual negative figure in postwar records, making net migration the sole driver of increase that year. Preliminary data for 2024 indicate further deterioration, with an average of 455 daily births (totaling around 166,000 annually) and 472 daily deaths (around 172,000 annually), producing a natural decrease of approximately 6,000. In the first half of 2025, the gap widened to nearly 9,000 more deaths than births, reflecting sustained trends in below-replacement fertility and elevated mortality from demographic aging despite at birth exceeding 82 years. These dynamics stem from fertility declining below the 2.1 replacement level since the 1970s, compounded by postwar reaching advanced ages, with deaths now outpacing births amid stable but insufficient natality. Projections from anticipate continued natural declines unless fertility rebounds, though policy interventions have had limited impact on total rates hovering near historic lows of 1.43 in 2023.
YearLive BirthsDeathsNatural Change
2022167,504~169,800-2,296
2023164,400169,000-4,600
2024~166,000~172,000~-6,000
Note: 2022 and 2024 figures are approximate based on reported aggregates; exact 2024 data pending final release.

Age and Sex Structure

Age Pyramid

The age-sex pyramid of the Netherlands in 2023 illustrates a contracting structure typical of low-fertility, high-longevity societies, featuring a narrow base, a broad middle, and a moderately tapering apex. The base, representing ages 0-14, accounts for about 15% of the population, reflecting sustained total fertility rates below the 2.1 replacement level since the mid-1970s. A noticeable bulge appears in the 50-70 age range, corresponding to the post-World War II baby boom cohorts born between 1946 and 1964, which now form a significant portion of the working-age and early retirement population. In 2022, the distribution showed 21% aged 0-19, 59% aged 20-64 (with sub-bulges in 20-39 at 26% and 40-64 at 33%), and 20% aged 65 and over (15% aged 65-79 and 5% aged 80+). This structure underscores an aging population, with the share of those 65+ rising from 8% in 1950 to over 20% today, driven by declining mortality and cohort survival. Immigration has contributed a relative widening in the 20-30 age bands, introducing younger adults that partially offset the narrow youth cohorts. Sex disparities are evident, with males slightly outnumbering up to age 40, after which female predominance increases due to higher male mortality rates, reaching a of about 60 males per 100 females among those 80+. Projections indicate the evolving toward an shape by mid-century, with further contraction at the base from persistent low native , sustained elderly expansion, and immigration-dependent replenishment of prime working ages. Short-term projections from the CBS Bevolkingsprognose 2023-2070 (published December 2023) indicate that the number of children aged 0-17 is expected to be stable or slightly declining as of January 2026 due to low fertility rates around 1.5 children per woman, with detailed age-specific projections showing gradual decreases in younger age groups; precise figures are available via CBS StatLine datasets on population prognosis by age. The total population stood at approximately 17.9 million on , , supporting these demographic dynamics. Historical shifts in the pyramid highlight the transition from a expansive form in 1950—driven by higher postwar birth rates—to the current constrictive profile, with the baby boom echo fading and longevity extending the upper tiers. This evolution aligns with broader European trends but is accentuated in the Netherlands by early and consistent fertility declines post-1960s.

Median Age and Dependency Ratios

The median age of the population in the Netherlands is 43.6 years, with males at 42.8 years and females at 44.3 years, based on 2023 estimates. This marks an increase from approximately 40 years in the early 2010s, driven by sustained low fertility rates below replacement level since the 1970s and gains in life expectancy exceeding 82 years. Statistics Netherlands reported the mean population age at 42.6 years as of early 2024, underscoring the ongoing aging trend amid a shrinking proportion of youth cohorts. The total age dependency ratio stood at 55.1% in , indicating 55.1 dependents (aged 0-14 and 65+) per 100 individuals of working age (15-64 years). This ratio breaks down into a dependency ratio of 23.5% and an old-age dependency ratio of 31.8%. The old-age component has risen sharply from around 20% in 2000, primarily due to the retirement of the generation born post-World War II, while has partially offset declines in the youth ratio by introducing younger cohorts, though native remains low at 1.5 births per woman. Rising dependency ratios strain public finances, particularly the pay-as-you-go state pension system (AOW), where benefits are funded by current workers' contributions. Projections indicate the old-age could reach 40% or higher by 2040 without policy adjustments, necessitating higher labor participation, delayed retirement, or increased to maintain fiscal . These dynamics highlight the causal interplay between demographic structure, choices, and in shaping long-term societal support burdens.

Sex Ratios

The overall in the , defined as the number of males per 100 s, stood at 99.0 as of January 1, 2025, reflecting a slight female majority in the total of 18,044,027, with 8,978,451 males and 9,065,576 s. This ratio has remained stable around 98 to 99 males per 100 females in recent years, influenced by higher male mortality rates across the life course, particularly in older age groups where female exceeds that of males by several years. At birth, the is higher, averaging 1.052 s per birth in 2023, aligning with the biological norm observed globally of approximately 105 births per 100 births absent significant interventions. This initial surplus diminishes over time due to elevated and mortality, resulting in near parity in younger age cohorts under 15 years, where ratios hover around 1.05, and a pronounced skew in cohorts aged 65 and older, often exceeding 70 s per 100 s. pyramids illustrate this pattern, showing broader bases in youth narrowing progressively toward the apex dominated by s. Variations persist across subgroups; for instance, among the native Dutch population, the ratio mirrors national trends, while migrant cohorts may exhibit temporary imbalances due to sex-selective migration patterns, though aggregate data indicate minimal distortion to the overall structure. Historical data from reveal a gradual decline in the total from around 100 in the mid-20th century to the current level, attributable to demographic aging and persistent sex differentials in mortality rather than biases.

Urbanization

Major Cities and Agglomerations

The Netherlands features a high degree of , with over 90% of its residing in urban areas, predominantly concentrated in the western conurbation. This densely populated ring-shaped urban agglomeration, encompassing the provinces of , , and , along with parts of , had approximately 8.4 million inhabitants as of recent estimates, representing about 46% of the national total. The includes the four principal cities—Amsterdam, , (Den Haag), and —and their extensive suburbs, forming a continuous metropolitan landscape characterized by intensive and connectivity. Municipal population figures, as reported by Statistics Netherlands (CBS), highlight the scale of these centers. As of 1 January 2024, Amsterdam, the capital, recorded 931,298 residents within its municipal boundaries, making it the most populous municipality. Rotterdam followed with around 654,000 inhabitants, The Hague with approximately 568,000, and Utrecht with 394,000. These figures reflect municipal administrative areas, which often incorporate suburban zones integral to the urban fabric. Other notable cities outside the core Randstad include Eindhoven (243,000), Groningen (236,000), and Almere (229,000), contributing to secondary agglomerations in the south and north.
RankMunicipalityProvincePopulation (1 Jan 2024)
1931,298
2654,000
3568,000
4394,000
5243,000
Population growth in these urban municipalities has been driven largely by , with the absorbing the majority of net inflows since 2016, though rates slowed in 2024 compared to peripheral regions. Beyond the , the Eindhoven metropolitan area, centered on the municipality of , supports a functional urban region of over 1 million people, fueled by high-tech industry. Similarly, the Arnhem-Nijmegen agglomeration in the east has around 750,000 residents, while northern centers like form smaller but significant clusters. These agglomerations underscore the ' polycentric urban structure, with economic specialization differentiating roles—e.g., as a global hub, Rotterdam as Europe's largest port city.

Functional Urban Areas

Functional urban areas (FUAs) in the Netherlands, as delineated by the and , consist of high-density urban cores with at least 50,000 inhabitants and adjacent commuting zones where at least 15% of the workforce commutes to the core, reflecting economic and labor market integration beyond municipal boundaries. This methodology captures polycentric dynamics in the densely populated western region known as the , where multiple FUAs overlap in influence but are defined separately. Approximately 80% of the Dutch population lives in FUAs centered on cities exceeding 50,000 residents, underscoring the country's high degree of driven by historical , , and economic agglomeration in coastal and riverine zones. The five largest FUAs—Amsterdam, , (Den Haag), , and —collectively house over one-third of the national , serving as hubs for , , government, and high-tech industries.
Functional Urban AreaPopulation (2024)
2,259,981
1,559,177
1,049,025
735,652
547,779
Data from Eurostat's functional urban areas dataset, reflecting 1 January estimates. These figures exclude smaller FUAs such as or , which contribute to the overall urban share but are regionally significant for specialized sectors like and . Population in these areas has been sustained by net and toward employment centers, though commuting patterns indicate ongoing sprawl into surrounding rural municipalities.

Population Density Variations

The Netherlands records a national population density of 533 inhabitants per square kilometer in 2024, reflecting its status as one of Europe's most densely populated countries. This average masks substantial regional disparities, primarily driven by the concentration of economic activity, infrastructure, and historical settlement patterns in the western Randstad area—comprising the provinces of North Holland, South Holland, Utrecht, and Flevoland—contrasted with sparser distribution in peripheral rural regions. In the Randstad, densities exceed 1,000 persons per km² in core urban zones, with province reaching 1,391 inhabitants per km², attributable to major cities like and , as well as intensive for and . Conversely, northern provinces such as and exhibit densities around 190-250 per km², characterized by agricultural landscapes, peat meadows, and lower urbanization rates that limit population inflows. These variations stem from geographic factors like reclamation enabling dense settlement in the west, while flood-prone or less arable northern terrains historically supported fewer inhabitants. Urban-rural divides amplify these patterns, with metropolitan agglomerations in the west hosting over half the national on a fraction of the land, fostering high-density living amid green belts like the Groene Hart. Eastern and southern rural areas, including parts of and Limburg, maintain intermediate densities of 300-500 per km², balancing farming with suburban expansion. Ongoing migration to peri-urban zones slightly moderates extremes, yet core densities continue rising due to limited land availability and policy constraints on expansion.

Ethnic and National Composition

Native Dutch and European Descent

In Dutch official statistics, individuals of native Dutch descent—termed autochtoon—are those born in the Netherlands with both parents also born there. On 1 January 2024, this group comprised 72.1 percent of the 17.9 million inhabitants, or roughly 12.9 million people. This proportion reflects a continued decline from approximately 74 percent in 2023, driven by net positive migration and differential rates favoring groups with foreign backgrounds. The native Dutch population exhibits an aging demographic structure, with a skewed toward older age cohorts as of 2022, indicative of rates historically below 1.8 children per woman and limited natural increase. Regional variations exist, with higher concentrations in provinces like and , where shares exceed 85 percent, compared to urban areas like , where they fall below 50 percent. Projections from suggest further erosion, potentially reaching 58 percent by 2050 under high migration scenarios, underscoring the role of in overall . Persons of other European descent, primarily from neighboring countries such as , , and , constitute a supplementary segment within the broader European-origin population. First-generation migrants born in (excluding the ) represent about one-third of the 16.2 percent foreign-born as of late 2024, though second-generation Europeans remain a modest share due to shorter migration histories and assimilation patterns. This group, often integrated via free movement, bolsters sectors like and services but does not offset the numerical dominance of native Dutch within European descent overall. Combined, native Dutch and other European-origin residents form over 80 percent of the population, though precise aggregation under revised classifications emphasizes continental rather than "Western/non-Western" delineations since 2022.

Non-Western Immigrant Origins

Non-Western immigrants to the , classified by () as those originating from , most of (excluding and ), , , and excluding and , constitute a significant portion of the country's migrant . As of , approximately 14 percent of the Dutch had a non-Western migration background, encompassing both first-generation immigrants and their descendants born in the . This group totals around 2.5 million individuals out of a national of 17.8 million in 2023. The origins of these immigrants trace primarily to labor recruitment programs, decolonization, and asylum flows. Guest worker programs in the 1960s and 1970s brought large numbers from and , establishing enduring communities. As of recent CBS estimates referenced in demographic studies, the population with a Turkish migration background stands at about 410,000, while those with Moroccan origins number over 400,000, making them the two largest non-Western groups. Colonial ties account for migrants from and the former (now , , , and ), with Surinamese-origin individuals comprising roughly 350,000–400,000 and Antillean-origin around 160,000. More recent inflows have diversified origins, particularly through asylum and from conflict zones. Groups from , , , and have grown substantially since the , with Syrian and Iraqi backgrounds each exceeding 100,000 by the early 2020s, driven by admissions peaking in 2015–2016. Other notable sources include , , and various African nations such as and , though these remain smaller in scale compared to the foundational groups. In 2020, non-Western inflows totaled approximately 69,000, reflecting a mix of labor, study, and humanitarian categories.
Major Non-Western Migration Background GroupsApproximate Size (Migration Background, recent estimates)
410,000
425,000
350,000–400,000
/Caribbean160,000
Syria/Iraq (combined recent growth)>200,000
These figures include second-generation individuals, highlighting the established presence of these communities, though has begun transitioning away from the Western/non-Western dichotomy toward country-specific classifications for more granular analysis.

Mixed and Second-Generation Groups

In the , individuals with a migration background are classified by () into first-generation (born abroad) and second-generation (born in the Netherlands to at least one parent born abroad); the third generation—persons born in the Netherlands to parents also born in the Netherlands, but with foreign-born grandparents—is classified as having a Dutch background and excluded from migration background statistics. As of , the second-generation population totals approximately 2.1 million people, representing those born domestically but with foreign parental origins; this group constitutes about 12 percent of the total population of 17.9 million. This figure reflects ongoing patterns, with second-generation numbers rising from around 2 million in 2021 due to births among first-generation immigrants. Within the second-generation, a distinction exists between those with two foreign-born parents and those with one foreign-born parent (often termed mixed-origin or partially native Dutch background). In 2022, about 1.1 million second-generation individuals had exactly one foreign-born parent, accounting for roughly half of the group; of these, 44 percent had a parent from another European country, while the remainder originated from non-European backgrounds such as , , or . Mixed-origin individuals tend to exhibit higher rates of socioeconomic integration compared to those with two non-Western migrant parents, as evidenced by integration monitors showing improved and labor market participation among this subgroup over the past decade. The composition of second-generation groups mirrors historical immigration waves, with the largest cohorts descending from Turkish (around 200,000), Moroccan (similar scale), and Surinamese origins, though exact breakdowns vary by whether one or both parents are considered. Non-Western second-generation individuals, comprising the majority, face persistent challenges in full assimilation, including lower average educational outcomes and higher relative to native Dutch peers, though recent data indicate narrowing gaps in school completion and for younger cohorts born after 2000. These trends underscore the role of parental origin in shaping demographic outcomes, with mixed groups often bridging native and immigrant populations more effectively due to cultural and linguistic exposure from the Dutch parent.

Migration Patterns

Immigration Inflows and Policies

Immigration to the Netherlands has increased significantly since the 1990s, driven by EU free movement, asylum inflows, family reunification, and labor migration, with annual inflows peaking at over 400,000 in 2022 before declining slightly. In 2023, 336,000 immigrants arrived, a decrease of 67,000 from 2022, primarily due to fewer EU citizens and knowledge migrants. By 2024, inflows fell further to 316,000, reflecting a 25% drop in highly skilled labor migrants amid economic slowdowns and policy adjustments. Non-EU inflows constituted about 60% of totals in recent years, with major origins including Turkey, Morocco, Syria, and India, though EU nationals from Poland, Germany, and Romania remain prominent. Asylum inflows have fluctuated with global conflicts, accounting for 15-20% of total . First-time asylum applications totaled 38,000 in 2023 but dropped 16% to 32,000 in 2024, with , , and comprising the largest groups. added around 20,000-25,000 annually, often linked to prior asylum or labor migrants, while labor migration reached nearly 70,000 in 2023, dominated by highly skilled workers under the knowledge migrant scheme. Student inflows hovered at 40,000-50,000 yearly, though many transition to work permits post-graduation. EU/EEA free movement facilitated about 40% of inflows, enabling short-term and permanent relocations without visas.
YearTotal InflowsAsylum (First-Time)Labor MigrantsFamily Reunification
2022~403,000~35,000~60,000~20,000
2023336,00038,000~70,000~22,000
2024316,00032,000~52,000~25,000
Data approximated from CBS and IND reports; labor includes knowledge migrants. Dutch immigration policies emphasize controlled entry via residence permits for non-EU citizens, with Schengen visa requirements for short stays and EU directives shaping asylum and family rules. The Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND) processes applications, prioritizing skilled labor through the Highly Skilled Migrant program, which offers accelerated permits for those earning above salary thresholds (e.g., €5,008 monthly for over-30s in 2024). requires proof of stable income and housing, while asylum follows the Convention, granting temporary permits subject to review. Post-2023 elections, a coalition including the (PVV) introduced tightening measures: phasing out the 30% tax ruling for expatriates by reducing it incrementally from 2025, shortening residence permits from five to three years, and proposing periodic reassessment of asylum status. Citizenship residency requirements doubled from five to ten years in 2025 proposals, alongside higher fines for unauthorized and a 6.7% increase for permits. These reforms aim to curb net inflows amid housing shortages and integration challenges, though EU free movement limits full control. Emigration from the has shown an upward trend in recent years, with total outflows reaching 179,310 in 2022, up from 145,330 in 2021, and climbing further to approximately 198,000 in 2023. In the first nine months of 2024, 154,000 individuals departed, suggesting a continuation of elevated levels despite a slowdown in immigration. These figures encompass both Dutch nationals and foreign residents, with non-Dutch emigrants—often comprising return migrants or those moving within —forming a significant portion; for instance, in earlier years like 2007, Poles and were notable among leavers, though native Dutch accounted for nearly half of total emigrants. Among Dutch citizens specifically, emigration to countries rose 5% in 2022 to 43,000, reflecting a modest increase driven by factors such as high and dissatisfaction with public services and the sociopolitical environment. Demographically, emigrants tend to include younger adults and families seeking more , greater living space, and improved amid rising costs and overcrowding in the ; surveys indicate motivations like escaping high taxes, urban congestion, and suboptimal weather patterns. Primary destinations for Dutch emigrants remain neighboring countries and select overseas locations, with and topping the list due to proximity and lower housing costs, followed by for its climate, then the , , , and . Of the 2022 OECD-bound Dutch emigrants, about 20% headed to and 19% to . This pattern underscores a preference for culturally similar or economically accessible locales, though longer-distance moves to Anglophone nations persist among professionals and retirees. Overall, while total contributes to a positive net migration balance—144,558 in 2023—it signals underlying pressures on domestic livability that disproportionately affect native departures.

Net Migration and Its Drivers

Net migration to the , defined as the difference between and , has remained positive and a primary driver of since natural increase turned negative around 2023. In 2023, totaled 336,000 while reached 198,000, yielding a net gain of 138,000. Preliminary data for 2024 indicate lower inflows, with 316,000 immigrants arriving, though full-year figures are pending; net migration in the first nine months stood at 89,000, down from 109,000 in the same period of 2023. Key drivers of immigration include asylum-seeking, , labor migration, and intra-EU mobility. Asylum inflows surged post-2015 due to conflicts in , , and , with net Syrian migration reaching 24,000 in 2024 alone, up from 18,000 in 2023; similar patterns hold for , , and . Labor migration, particularly knowledge workers from and non-EU countries, peaked in 2022-2023 but declined in 2024 amid policy tightening and economic slowdowns. sustains chain migration, especially from , , and , where initial asylum or labor entrants sponsor relatives. EU free movement contributed 106,000 immigrants in 2024, mainly from , , and , drawn by job opportunities in , , and services, though this fell from prior years. Emigration offsets some gains, with 92,000 departures in the first half of 2024 alone, including rising outflows of Dutch nationals to neighboring countries. Approximately 43,000 Dutch emigrated to destinations in 2022, a 5% increase, primarily to (for lower property taxes and commuting ease), (proximity and costs), and (lifestyle and retirement). Returning non-Western migrants and second-generation individuals also contribute, with over half of non-Dutch arrivals leaving within five years, often due to integration failures or better prospects elsewhere. Broader causal factors include the Netherlands' strong and welfare system attracting labor and refugees, contrasted with push factors like instability in origin countries; however, domestic pressures such as shortages and fiscal burdens from low-skilled inflows have prompted responses, including asylum caps and stricter family migration rules implemented in 2024. Net migration's persistence despite these measures reflects entrenched obligations and global displacement trends, with non-EU sources dominating long-term composition changes.
YearImmigrationEmigrationNet Migration
2022~403,000Not specifiedPositive, higher than 2023
2023336,000198,000+138,000
2024 (proj.)316,000PendingLower than 2023, ~122,000 est.

Integration and Socioeconomic Outcomes

Education by Background

Educational attainment in the Netherlands varies substantially by migration background, with native Dutch individuals consistently achieving higher levels than those from non-Western origins, even among second-generation groups. According to () data for the population aged 15-75 in 2025, 36% of those without a migration background hold a higher education qualification ( or WO bachelor's/master's), compared to 32% of non-Western individuals born abroad and 38% of those born in the . First-generation non-Western immigrants face the largest gaps, often due to lower starting qualifications and barriers upon arrival, while second-generation outcomes improve but remain below native levels for groups like Turkish and Moroccan descendants. In international assessments, these disparities are evident in school performance. The 2022 PISA results show non-immigrant students in the outperforming immigrants by 58 score points in —a gap equivalent to approximately 1.5 to 2 years of —after accounting for socioeconomic factors, with immigrant students more likely to come from disadvantaged backgrounds. Similar patterns hold in reading and science, where immigrant-background students score below the national average, contributing to persistent tracking into lower secondary levels like VMBO for non-Western groups historically. Recent trends indicate slight narrowing, as second-generation students increasingly enter higher tracks: in 2023/24, 49% of third-year secondary students overall attended HAVO or VWO (preparatory for higher education), with non-Dutch background students showing rising participation, though still lagging in completion rates for university-level degrees. The following table summarizes highest educational attainment for select groups aged 15-75 (2025 CBS data), categorized as high (HBO/WO), medium (VMBO/MBO-2/4/ HAVO/VWO equivalents), and low (basic/VMBO/MBO-1); percentages reflect shares within each subgroup:
Migration Background (Born in NL / Abroad)High (%)Medium (%)Low (%)
Native Dutch (no migration background)36197
Western (e.g., excl. NL, born abroad)431118
Non-Western overall (born NL / abroad)38 / 3218 / 167 / 20
Turkish (born NL / abroad)28 / 2521 / 189 / 29
Moroccan (born NL / abroad)31 / 1520 / 1810 / 30
Surinamese (born NL / abroad)39 / 2417 / 215 / 14
(born NL / abroad)38 / 2516 / 237 / 7
Indonesian (born NL / abroad)48 / 3614 / 214 / 8
For the 25-45 age cohort (focusing on second-generation outcomes), higher education shares among those with two non-Western parents range from 27% (Turkish) to 34% (Surinamese), versus 46% for native Dutch, highlighting slower convergence despite policy efforts like early support and affirmative tracking. Western-background groups, including , often match or exceed natives, reflecting selective migration and cultural alignment with Dutch educational norms. Dropout rates remain higher among non-Western youth, with noting that socioeconomic factors explain only part of the gap, pointing to cultural and familial influences on aspirations and performance.

Employment and Income Disparities

Non-Western migrants exhibit lower labor force participation and rates compared to native Dutch and Western migrants. In 2023, migrants of non-European origin were less frequently engaged in paid than the national average, with participation rates for groups such as those from , , , and the remaining below native levels even among second-generation individuals, though showing improvement over the first generation. Refugee-origin migrants, including those from , , , , and , recorded the lowest outcomes among non-Western subgroups. In contrast, Indonesian migrants—a non-Western exception linked to historical ties—demonstrated above-average integration. Unemployment disparities persist, with foreign-born individuals facing higher rates than natives. data for 2023 indicate unemployment among those born abroad averaged around 5% in quarterly measures, exceeding the native Dutch rate embedded in the overall national figure of approximately 3.5%. Non-Western immigrants, particularly recent arrivals and refugees, contribute to this gap, as their activity and inactivity rates deviate markedly from native patterns, even post-COVID recovery where non-Dutch groups saw relatively stronger rebounds but started from lower bases. Second-generation non-Western youth experience reduced but still elevated unemployment relative to peers of Dutch origin, reflecting incomplete convergence in labor market access. Income levels reveal similar divides, with non-Western and especially refugee-background households earning below the median. CBS analysis from 2023 highlights that migrants from refugee-sending countries have the lowest disposable incomes, compounded by higher reliance on social benefits, which decreases over generations but remains elevated compared to natives. Native Dutch and Western migrants typically achieve incomes closer to or exceeding the average, while non-Western first-generation groups, including Turkish and Moroccan origins, lag due to lower-wage occupations and benefit dependency. Welfare utilization underscores these patterns: non-Western migrants are more prone to social assistance and than natives, with subgroups showing the highest rates, though overall dependency has declined across origins amid post-pandemic labor market tightening. These disparities correlate with fiscal outcomes, as evidenced by net contributions: Western immigrants yielded positive public finances in assessed periods, whereas non-Western groups imposed net costs, driven by and shortfalls. Integration policies have narrowed gaps for second-generation cohorts in Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese, and Antillean groups, yet structural differences in skills, , and cultural sustain elevated benefit reliance and income inequality relative to the native population.

Crime and Social Cohesion Issues

Non-Western immigrants and their descendants are substantially overrepresented in Dutch relative to their share of the , which constitutes about 13% as of 2023. Suspect rates for non-Western groups are typically 3 to 4 times higher than for native Dutch, with particular elevation in violent offenses, crimes, and delinquency; for example, in earlier data from 2009, non-Western migrant suspect rates reached 3.8% compared to 1% for natives, and patterns have persisted despite overall crime declines. Groups originating from , the , , and show the most pronounced disparities, with Moroccan-Dutch and Antillean-Dutch historically exhibiting the highest involvement, though rates among Moroccan minors have decreased from peaks in 2012 (over 100 per 1,000 in some cohorts) to lower but still elevated levels by 2023. These differences extend into the criminal justice system, where ethnic minorities comprise a disproportionate share of populations—around 55% of adult prison sentences involve non-Western backgrounds despite comprising under 15% of the populace—and Dutch-born youth with at least one migrant parent are 28% more likely to receive incarceration than those without such backgrounds. A WODC attributes part of this to potential ethnic biases in prosecution and sentencing but concludes that socioeconomic factors alone do not account for the full gap, implying contributions from cultural attitudes toward , , and norms that diverge from Dutch standards. Homicide data further illustrates this, with roughly half of victims and offenders in recent years having non-Western origins, exceeding their demographic weight. Social cohesion challenges arise from these patterns, including ethnic segregation in urban enclaves that fosters parallel societies with limited intergroup contact and trust. Surveys indicate that higher ethnic diversity at the neighborhood level correlates with lower perceived cohesion, particularly among native Dutch residents, though aggregate national trust metrics show no uniform decline since the 2000s. Specific manifestations include rising honor-based violence, with incidents increasing in 2023—primarily affecting women—and concentrated among immigrant communities from (25% of cases), , , and , often involving , , or to enforce familial or communal honor codes incompatible with Dutch legal norms. Gang activity exacerbates fragmentation, with youth groups and networks like the "Mocro Maffia"—predominantly of Moroccan origin—driving escalations in drug-related violence, including over 100 mob-style killings since 2012 and recruitment of underage immigrants into trafficking. Recent episodes, such as 2025 youth clashes in towns like and , leading to school closures, frequently involve non-Western background perpetrators in retaliatory assaults, underscoring failures in integration that prioritize cultural preservation over assimilation. These dynamics have fueled public perceptions of declining safety and cohesion, with consistently ranked among top societal concerns in polls.

Religion

Historical Secularization

The Netherlands experienced a distinctive form of known as verzuiling (pillarization) from the late until the mid-, in which society was segmented into parallel institutions aligned with religious and ideological groups—primarily Protestant, Catholic, socialist, and liberal pillars—each providing separate , media, labor unions, and . This structure, which emerged as a consociational response to religious tensions following the 19th-century school funding struggles, effectively preserved high levels of religious affiliation and practice by insulating communities from cross-pillar influences, with encompassing over 90% of the population by the early based on baptismal and household registration data. Depillarization (ontzuiling) commenced after , gaining momentum in the and accelerating through the amid economic prosperity, increased , penetration like television, and the erosion of pillar-specific institutions, which exposed individuals to diverse worldviews and diminished the social enforcement of religious conformity. This process coincided with broader European modernization trends but proceeded more rapidly in the due to the prior rigidity of pillarization, leading to a breakdown in the ideological segregation that had sustained religiosity; by the 1970s, the term ontzuiling was widely used to describe the shift toward a more integrated, individualized society. Statistical evidence from official records illustrates the pace of : in 1849, religious affiliation was near-universal, with 56% of the population Protestant and 38% Roman Catholic, reflecting church-based methods. By 1960, church membership stood at approximately 79%, but non-membership rose to 42% by the late 1970s as de-churching accelerated, particularly among younger cohorts. Church attendance declined even more sharply, from around 40-50% weekly in the to under 20% by the , with Protestant groups experiencing steeper drops than Catholics initially. Contributing factors included the post-war welfare state's provision of social services traditionally handled by churches, rising educational attainment fostering critical inquiry, and the 1960s cultural liberalization—marked by permissive shifts in family law, contraception access, and youth rebellion—which prioritized personal autonomy over doctrinal adherence. Unlike gradual declines elsewhere, Dutch secularization was punctuated by mass exits from churches in the 1960s and 1970s, driven by generational turnover rather than isolated apostasy, resulting in a cultural norm of ietsisme (vague spirituality) over organized faith by the 1980s. This trajectory, while influenced by affluence and urbanization, underscores causal links between institutional fragmentation and the retreat from collective religious identity.

Current Affiliations

In 2023, 58 percent of the Dutch population aged 15 years and older reported no religious affiliation, reflecting ongoing since the mid-20th century. Among those affiliated with a , Roman Catholics formed the largest group at 17 percent, concentrated predominantly in the southern provinces such as Limburg and . Protestants accounted for 13 percent, mainly in the northern and eastern regions, including adherents to the (PKN) and smaller Reformed denominations. comprised 6 percent, primarily of non-Western immigrant backgrounds from , , and more recent cohorts from and . Other Christian groups, such as Orthodox Christians and independent evangelicals, along with non-Christian faiths like and , each represented about 3 percent of the population. Self-reported affiliation data from () derives from periodic surveys, which capture nominal belonging rather than active practice; actual hovers around 10-15 percent nationally, with Protestants showing higher participation rates than Catholics. The Jewish population, estimated at under 30,000 or roughly 0.2 percent, remains small and urban, centered in . These figures underscore a shift from near-universal —94 percent in 1849—to a religiously pluralistic but predominantly secular society today, influenced by cultural liberalization and immigration-driven minority growth. Preliminary data indicate a minor reversal, with religious affiliation rising to 44 percent from 42 percent the prior year—the first such increase after a decade of decline—attributed partly to higher retention among Muslim youth amid demographic pressures from migration. Nonetheless, continues to dominate, particularly among native-born Dutch under 40, where over 70 percent claim no .

Demographic Shifts by Faith

The Netherlands has undergone profound changes in its religious composition since the mid-20th century, transitioning from a predominantly Christian society to one marked by widespread secularization among the native population alongside growth in non-Christian faiths driven primarily by immigration. In 1849, nearly the entire population identified as Christian, with 56 percent Protestant and 38 percent Roman Catholic. By 2023, these figures had declined sharply to 13 percent Protestant and 17 percent Roman Catholic, reflecting a broader erosion of Christian affiliation that accelerated during the post-World War II era due to rising prosperity, education levels, and cultural shifts favoring individualism over institutional religion. This secularization is evident in the native Dutch cohort, where non-affiliation rose from around 40 percent in the 1960s to over 55 percent by the early 2020s, with church attendance plummeting to negligible levels outside orthodox enclaves. Parallel to this decline, has emerged as the fastest-growing religion, increasing its share from negligible levels pre-1970s to approximately 6 percent of the population by 2023, largely attributable to sustained immigration from Muslim-majority countries such as , , , and . Labor migration in the 1960s-1970s, , and asylum inflows since the 1990s have concentrated Muslim communities in urban areas like , , and , where they now form 10-15 percent of residents in certain neighborhoods. Higher rates among Muslim women—estimated at 2.5-3.0 children per woman in the first generation compared to the national average of 1.43—further amplify this growth, though rates converge toward native levels in subsequent generations.
YearProtestant (%)Catholic (%)Muslim (%)No Religion (%)Source
18495638<1<1
20201420555
20231317657
This table illustrates the stark divergence: Christian shares halved over decades, while Islam's rose steadily, with non-religion stabilizing at majority status among those of Dutch origin. Orthodox Protestant subgroups in the "" (e.g., , ) buck the trend with total rates exceeding 3.0, sustaining localized Christian demographics but comprising under 5 percent nationally. Other faiths, including (1 percent, from Surinamese migration) and (under 0.2 percent), remain marginal and stable. Recent data indicate a slight reversal in overall affiliation, with 44 percent reporting membership in a faith community in 2024—up from 42 percent in 2023—the first such increase, driven disproportionately by among youth aged 18-25, where conversions and retained immigrant outpace native secular drift. Immigrants' initial often intensifies post-arrival before potentially declining with integration, yet net effects favor persistence in closed communities. Projections suggest could reach 8-10 percent by 2050 under moderate migration scenarios, underscoring as the dominant causal factor in religious diversification amid native demographic stagnation. Mainstream sources like understate potential long-term shifts by focusing on self-identification rather than practice or descent, while academic analyses acknowledge bias toward optimistic integration narratives despite evidence of parallel societies.

Languages

Dutch and Regional Variants

Standard Dutch, or Algemeen Nederlands (General Dutch), serves as the official of the , used in , , , and media across all provinces. Approximately 98% of the speaks it proficiently, with efforts since the promoting a form based largely on 17th-century Hollandic urban speech from cities like and . Regional variants of Dutch consist of dialects forming a dialect continuum, broadly classified into supra-dialect groups: Hollandic (dominant in North and South , , and ; features softened 'g' sounds and specific vowel shifts), (in , with archaic maritime lexicon and distinct intonation), Brabantian (in North , retaining more conservative grammar and vocabulary akin to southern neighbors), and (in eastern , bridging central and eastern influences). These variants exhibit phonological differences—such as variable realization of the velar /x/ and mergers—but maintain substantial with standard Dutch, facilitated by nationwide broadcasting and compulsory schooling in the standard form since the . Beyond Dutch dialects, the Netherlands recognizes three distinct regional languages under the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages, ratified in 1996: West Frisian, , and . West Frisian (Frysk), an Anglo-Frisian language unrelated to Dutch dialects and closer to , is spoken by about 450,000 people primarily in province, where it holds co-official status alongside Dutch since provincial legislation in 1997, enabling its use in local administration, signage, and with over 50% of schools offering bilingual programs. Low Saxon (Nedersaksisch), a West Low German variety, is spoken by roughly 1.8 million individuals (10.9% of the population) in northeastern provinces including , , , and eastern , with dialects like Gronings and Twents featuring substrate influences from substrates; it gained recognition as a in 2018, supporting cultural preservation efforts but without official administrative use. (Limburgs), an East Low Franconian language with tonal pitch accents distinguishing it from non-tonal Dutch, is spoken by approximately 825,000 people in Limburg province and was recognized as a in 1997, with ongoing advocacy for expanded educational integration despite limited daily institutional application. The mandates promotion in media, culture, and justice for these languages in their territories, though standard Dutch remains the dominant vehicle for inter-regional communication and socioeconomic mobility.

Immigrant Language Use

In the Netherlands, immigrants predominantly retain their heritage languages in private and familial contexts, while Dutch proficiency is essential for integration into public life, , and . Data from the Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS) indicate that more than 8% of the aged 15 and older primarily speaks non-native languages—such as Turkish, variants, Polish, and English—at home, forming a significant portion of the 25% who do not mainly use Dutch. This pattern is more pronounced in urban provinces like Zuid-Holland (12.3% "other" languages) and (10.7%), where immigrant concentrations are higher. Dutch language proficiency among immigrants remains uneven, with acquisition often progressing slowly for first-generation arrivals. In 2021, 10% of migrants reported little or no ability to communicate in Dutch, while approximately 45% rated their skills as good or very good; over half arrived with minimal or no prior knowledge. Non-Western migrants, including those from , , and more recent cohorts from and other Middle Eastern countries, consistently show lower proficiency levels than Western migrants, with reading and speaking challenges persisting due to linguistic distance and limited pre-migration exposure. Civic integration programs mandate at least A2-level Dutch competency, yet completion rates vary, and low proficiency correlates with reduced labor market access and . Heritage language retention is strong among first-generation immigrants, particularly at home, where mother tongues facilitate cultural continuity and family confirm that immigrants in enclaves with high co-ethnic densities use Dutch less outside the home, reinforcing heritage language dominance in daily interactions and potentially slowing host mastery. Second-generation immigrants exhibit partial , with greater Dutch usage at home and school, though s endure in about 20-30% of cases depending on parental emphasis and community size; over generations, mother tongue proficiency declines as Dutch predominates. English serves as a bridge for some educated or Western-origin immigrants, but it supplements rather than replaces Dutch in official domains.

Multilingualism Policies

Dutch is the sole of the at the national level, with policies emphasizing its use in government, education, and public life to foster social cohesion. Frisian holds co-official status alongside Dutch exclusively in the province of Fryslân, where it may be used in administrative proceedings, courts, and education since the 2011 Wet gebruik Friese taal (Frisian Language Use Act), which implemented the 1997 European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. This recognition stems from a 2018 administrative agreement between the national government and Fryslân province, renewed in 2024 with €15 million invested over five years to promote Frisian usage, prevent illiteracy, and integrate it naturally without displacing Dutch. dialects receive cultural protection under the same charter but lack official status or mandatory use in public administration. Immigrant integration policies mandate proficiency as a core for civic participation and residency , reflecting a causal emphasis on linguistic assimilation to reduce segregation and enhance . Under the Civic Integration Act 2021, non-EU newcomers must achieve at least A2-level Dutch speaking and listening skills (up from prior thresholds) within three years of arrival, with exemptions rare and failure risking permit revocation or . This framework, updated in 2025 to include stricter language tests for and labor migrants, prioritizes reciprocal learning over English dominance, as widespread Dutch-English bilingualism among natives hinders immigrant acquisition. Government-subsidized courses and exams enforce this, with 2023 data showing 60% compliance rates among obligated groups, though enforcement has tightened amid rising non-Western . In education, policies center on Dutch-medium instruction to build national proficiency, with schools required to outline Dutch-focused language plans in their curricula, often prohibiting non-Dutch home languages in classrooms to accelerate acquisition. Bilingual programs exist in select secondary schools (e.g., TTO streams teaching 50% in English), introduced in 1989 and expanded to over 200 institutions by 2023, aiming for trilingualism (Dutch, English, plus one other) per guidelines, but these serve mainly native Dutch speakers and do not accommodate immigrant tongues systematically. Recent advisories from the Education Council (2025) urge viewing multilingualism—prevalent among 25% of pupils with non-Dutch backgrounds—as a resource to bolster Dutch skills via home-language bridging, countering traditional monolingual mandates that correlate with lower integration outcomes in diverse urban areas like . Nonetheless, links early Dutch immersion to better long-term cohesion, outweighing short-term multilingual pedagogies in high-immigration contexts.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.