Hubbry Logo
Generational list of programming languagesGenerational list of programming languagesMain
Open search
Generational list of programming languages
Community hub
Generational list of programming languages
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Generational list of programming languages
Generational list of programming languages
Generational list of programming languages
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Programming language
lists

This is a "genealogy" of programming languages. Languages are categorized under the ancestor language with the strongest influence. Those ancestor languages are listed in alphabetic order. Any such categorization has a large arbitrary element, since programming languages often incorporate major ideas from multiple sources.

ALGOL based

[edit]

APL based

[edit]
  • APL
    • A+
    • J (also under FL)
    • K (also under LISP)
    • NESL
    • PDL (also under Perl)

BASIC based

[edit]

Batch languages

[edit]

C based

[edit]

C# based

[edit]

COBOL based

[edit]

COMIT based

[edit]

DCL based

[edit]

ed based

[edit]

Eiffel based

[edit]

Forth based

[edit]

Fortran based

[edit]

FP based

[edit]

HyperTalk based

[edit]

Java based

[edit]

JavaScript based

[edit]

JOSS based

[edit]

JOSS also inspired features for several versions of BASIC, including Tymshare's SUPER BASIC and DEC's BASIC-PLUS.

Lisp based

[edit]

ML based

[edit]

PL/I based

[edit]

Prolog based

[edit]

SASL based

[edit]

SETL based

[edit]
  • SETL
    • ABC
      • Python (also under ALGOL)
        • Julia (also under Lisp, Ruby, ALGOL)
        • Nim (also under Oberon)
        • Ring (also under C, BASIC, Ruby, C#, Lua)[1]
        • Swift (also under Ruby, Objective-C, and Haskell)
        • Boo
        • Cobra (syntax and features)

sh based

[edit]

Simula based

[edit]

Tcl based

[edit]

Others

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Generational list of programming languages

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The generational list of programming languages refers to a classification system that organizes programming languages into five distinct generations based on their evolution in terms of abstraction from hardware, ease of human use, and underlying paradigms, spanning from binary machine instructions in the mid-20th century to declarative and AI-oriented approaches in more recent decades. This framework emerged as computers advanced, with each generation reflecting technological and conceptual shifts in . The first generation (1GL) consists of machine languages, which use binary or code directly executable by hardware, such as sequences like "0100010111100011" to perform operations like moving values to registers; these were the earliest form of programming, labor-intensive and error-prone due to their low-level nature. The second generation (2GL) introduced assembly languages, employing mnemonic symbols (e.g., "MOV R" for moving data) that assemblers translate into , marking the transition to slightly more readable instructions while remaining closely tied to specific architectures; this began in the 1950s and improved programmer productivity over pure . Third-generation languages (3GLs), starting in the , represent high-level procedural languages independent of machine specifics, featuring constructs like "" and assignments such as "A = B + C + D"; compilers convert them to , enabling broader applicability and examples include for scientific computing, for business, BASIC for beginners, for systems programming, and for object-oriented development. Fourth-generation languages (4GLs), emerging in the 1980s, are very high-level and non-procedural, focusing on domain-specific tasks like database queries or report generation rather than step-by-step instructions; SQL exemplifies this for data manipulation, reducing coding complexity for end-user applications. Finally, fifth-generation languages (5GLs), from the onward, emphasize declarative paradigms where programmers specify what outcomes are desired through rules, constraints, or natural language-like expressions rather than how to achieve them, often supporting and visual programming; notable examples include for and tools like or VPL for event-driven, data-flow interfaces in AI and systems. This generational progression highlights the field's shift toward higher , , and specialization, influencing modern practices and tools.

Low-Level Foundations (1GL and 2GL)

Machine Languages

Machine languages, also known as first-generation programming languages (1GL), consist of binary or sequences that directly encode (CPU) instructions executable by without any intermediary or translation. These languages represent the most fundamental level of programming, where each bit pattern corresponds to a specific operation, such as loading , performing arithmetic, or branching , tailored precisely to the architecture of a particular processor. Originating in the mid-20th century, 1GL formed the basis for all subsequent , as it is the only form of code that hardware can natively process. Historically, early examples of machine language programming emerged with the first electronic computers. The , completed in 1945, exemplifies a proto-1GL approach through its wiring-based configuration, where programmers manually plugged cables and set switches to route signals between function units, effectively programming the machine for tasks like ballistic trajectory calculations without stored . By 1949, the at the advanced this to true stored-program , running its inaugural binary instructions on May 6 to compute tables of square numbers and prime lists, loaded via paper tape into mercury . These systems marked the transition from electromechanical calculators to programmable digital computers, with enabling repeatable execution of algorithms. Key characteristics of machine languages include the complete absence of human-readable syntax, rendering them platform-specific and incomprehensible without detailed knowledge of the target hardware's instruction set. Programmers entered code using like front-panel switches, punched cards, or tape, often requiring meticulous manual conversion from logical designs to binary equivalents—a process prone to errors due to the numeric opacity. During the 1940s and 1950s, 1GL was indispensable for computers, initializing core functions, and running foundational software before higher abstractions existed. For simple tasks like basic arithmetic or manipulation, programs frequently spanned hundreds to thousands of instructions, amplifying the tedium and risk of transcription mistakes. The inherent limitations of machine languages—their verbosity, hardware dependency, and vulnerability to —drove the evolution toward assembly languages around 1949, which introduced symbolic mnemonics to simplify coding while retaining low-level control.

Assembly Languages

Assembly languages, known as second-generation programming languages (2GL), represent a pivotal advancement in low-level programming by employing symbolic mnemonics—such as ADD for addition or MOV for data movement—and labels to stand in for binary machine instructions, which an assembler program then converts directly into . This approach improved upon first-generation machine languages by enhancing human readability and reducing errors in coding, while remaining closely tied to the underlying hardware . Historically, the first , known as Contracted Notation, was developed in 1947 by for the Automatic Relay Calculator (ARC). One of the earliest practical implementations emerged in 1949 for the computer at the , developed by David Wheeler under , marking a significant use of symbolic assembly to simplify programming tasks. By 1952, led the creation of an assembler for IBM's 701 Defense Calculator, IBM's inaugural commercial scientific computer, which facilitated more efficient instruction coding for complex calculations. Throughout the , innovations like IBM's Autocoder introduced macro facilities, allowing programmers to define reusable instruction sequences and further streamline code generation for machines such as the IBM 705. Key characteristics of assembly languages include their profound hardware dependency, necessitating detailed awareness of processor registers, memory addressing modes, and instruction sets specific to each machine, which limited portability but enabled fine-grained control over system resources. Macros provided a mechanism for code reuse by expanding predefined symbols into full instruction blocks during assembly, though programmers still managed low-level details like absolute addressing and interrupt handling. Their first widespread adoption occurred in military applications, notably on MIT's Whirlwind computer in 1951, where symbolic programming significantly reduced development time compared to pure machine code, aiding real-time simulations for naval projects. By the late 1950s and into 1960, assembly languages proved essential in constructing early operating systems—such as those for IBM mainframes—and bootstrapping compilers, by offering a manageable layer for implementing system-level routines and optimization algorithms. Assembly languages also briefly influenced the transition to third-generation languages; for instance, the Fortran compiler relied on assembly techniques to generate efficient from high-level statements, bridging low-level precision with algorithmic abstraction.

Third-Generation Languages (3GL): Procedural Foundations

Fortran-Based Languages

, developed by in 1957 under the leadership of , marked the advent of the first high-level, (3GL) designed specifically for scientific and engineering computations. It introduced a fixed-form syntax, where statements were entered in specific columns (typically 7-72 for code, with columns 1-5 for labels and column 6 for continuations), facilitating the expression of mathematical formulas in a manner resembling algebraic notation. This design prioritized numerical precision and efficiency on early computers like the , enabling programmers to abstract away machine-specific details while performing complex calculations. The language evolved through several key revisions, each enhancing its capabilities for in scientific domains. Fortran II, released in 1958, introduced subroutines and functions, allowing modular code organization and reuse, which significantly improved program structure over the initial version. Fortran IV in 1962 added support for complex data types, essential for engineering simulations involving imaginary numbers, alongside better logical operations and handling. The 1978 standard, Fortran 77, incorporated structured with block IF statements (including ELSE and ENDIF), character data types, and parameterized DO loops, promoting more readable and maintainable code. Subsequent standards further modernized the language: Fortran 90 (1991) supported free-form , modules for encapsulation, and array sections for vectorized operations; Fortran 2003 added object-oriented features like type extension and inheritance; Fortran 2018 introduced DO CONCURRENT constructs for explicit parallelism, facilitating on multicore systems; Fortran 2023 (ISO/IEC 1539:2023), published in November 2023, introduced features such as abstract interfaces and further parallelism enhancements for modern computing needs. Fortran's core characteristics emphasize reliability in numerical computing, with static strong typing for intrinsic types like , REAL, and COMPLEX, ensuring during compilation. It excels in array-centric operations, treating arrays as first-class objects for element-wise arithmetic and slicing, which optimizes performance on vector processors without explicit loops in many cases. However, early versions offered limited facilities, relying on basic formatted READ and WRITE statements; enhancements in Fortran 77 and later, such as direct-access files and stream I/O, addressed these shortcomings for data-intensive applications. Fortran's enduring influence stems from its by the (ISO) as ISO/IEC 1539:1991, which promoted portability across diverse hardware platforms and fostered a vast ecosystem of scientific software. This has sustained its relevance, with reports indicating that accounts for over 70% of code in environments, including supercomputers dedicated to simulations in physics, climate modeling, and engineering as of 2025. Unlike ALGOL's focus on recursive algorithms and block scoping, prioritizes imperative, array-based numerics for large-scale computations.

ALGOL-Based Languages

, short for Algorithmic Language, emerged as a pivotal family emphasizing structured, block-based syntax for expressing algorithms in a portable manner. Developed through international collaboration, the lineage began with , introduced in 1958 as the first block-structured language, which organized code into nested blocks to enhance readability and modularity. This foundational design addressed limitations in earlier languages by introducing compound statements and scoping, laying the groundwork for paradigms. The evolution continued with ALGOL 60 in 1960, which formalized recursion and stack-based execution, enabling procedures to call themselves and supporting deeper algorithmic complexity. The seminal "Report on the Algorithmic Language ALGOL 60," published in the Communications of the ACM, provided a rigorous, machine-independent specification using Backus-Naur Form (BNF) for the first time, establishing a standard for language definition that influenced compiler design worldwide. ALGOL 68, released in 1968, advanced this further by prioritizing orthogonality—allowing independent combination of language features—and introducing "modes" for flexible typing, including union types and stronger type safety. Key characteristics of ALGOL-based languages include parameter passing via call-by-value and call-by-name (later call-by-reference in ), which provided precise control over argument evaluation but introduced implementation challenges, such as the computational overhead of call-by-name leading to numerous variants and subsets for practical use. Dynamic arrays, declared with flexible bounds, allowed runtime adaptability, though their integration with parameter passing often required careful management to avoid inefficiencies. These features, combined with a focus on algorithmic clarity, shared procedural roots with contemporaries like but prioritized portability over domain-specific optimizations. The family spawned influential derivatives that extended its principles for specific domains. Pascal, developed by in 1970, was designed primarily for teaching , incorporating strong typing and simplified syntax to enforce good practices among students. Ada, first standardized as MIL-STD-1815 in 1980 for U.S. Department of Defense applications, with ANSI approval in 1983, built on ALGOL's strong typing with added packages for modularity and to ensure reliability in safety-critical systems. , introduced by Wirth in 1978, added explicit modules for separate compilation and , addressing scalability in larger programs. , released in 1987, further refined this lineage toward simplicity by integrating a lightweight operating system and omitting unnecessary features, promoting in design. ALGOL's syntax has profoundly shaped the structure of many modern programming languages, with elements like block delimitation, conditional statements, and loop constructs appearing in languages from C to Python. In recent years, efforts to revive ALGOL 68 have included revisions and implementations incorporating parallelism, such as parallel clauses for concurrent execution, as seen in ongoing GCC front-end developments in the 2020s.

COBOL-Based Languages

COBOL, developed in 1959 by the Conference on Data Systems Languages (CODASYL), was designed as an English-like programming language specifically for business data processing and accounting applications, emphasizing readability for non-technical users such as accountants. Its initial specification aimed to create a common language for business-oriented tasks across different computer systems, drawing from earlier efforts like FLOW-MATIC to promote portability in commercial environments. The language's standards evolved through several key revisions. The first formal standard, often referred to as COBOL-61, was established by ANSI in , providing a baseline for . COBOL-85, standardized by ANSI in 1985 and later by ISO/IEC 1989, introduced features like nested IF statements to enhance in complex . Subsequent updates included COBOL 2002, which added object-oriented extensions such as classes, methods, and to support modern programming paradigms while maintaining . COBOL 2014, under ISO/IEC 1989:2014, further modernized the language by permitting free-form , reducing the rigid column-based formatting inherited from punch-card eras. COBOL's syntax is characterized by a verb-noun structure that mimics English sentences, such as "ADD A TO B GIVING C," promoting for business procedures. It places a strong emphasis on the Data Division, where input, working storage, and output data are meticulously defined with detailed record structures, file descriptions, and usage clauses to ensure precise handling of business records like invoices or ledgers. However, this focus on explicit declarations contributes to its verbosity, often requiring extensive boilerplate for simple operations compared to more concise procedural languages. Derivatives of emerged to address specific business needs, particularly in banking and reporting. PL/B, developed in the for banking applications on limited hardware like Datapoint systems, extended COBOL's English-like style with enhanced screen and file manipulation for interactive business processing. FACT, also from the , specialized in report generation and data formatting, building on COBOL's procedural model but optimizing for output-oriented tasks in commercial reporting. More recently, , originally released as OpenCOBOL in 2001, provides an open-source implementation compliant with COBOL 85, 2002, and 2014 standards, enabling modern development on non-proprietary platforms. In 2025, remains integral to business , powering approximately 80% of global financial transactions through its reliable handling of high-volume, mission-critical operations in banking and . An estimated 800 billion lines of code are actively in use worldwide as of 2025. This underscores its entrenched role in enterprise systems where stability and precision outweigh the costs of maintenance. Recent evolution has focused on , with integrations in the 2020s allowing programs to interface with via the (JNI), enabling legacy to leverage Java's ecosystem for web services and without full rewrites. This contrasts with more academic styles like ALGOL's, prioritizing verbose clarity for business audits over algorithmic brevity.

PL/I-Based Languages

PL/I, introduced by IBM in 1964 as Programming Language/I, emerged as an ambitious multi-paradigm language designed to unify the domains of scientific computing, business data processing, and systems programming by integrating key elements from , , and . Initially known as NPL (New Programming Language), it was developed in collaboration with the SHARE user group to address the limitations of specialized languages, aiming for a single, versatile tool capable of handling everything from to file manipulation and low-level operations. The language's core characteristics included support for multitasking through built-in concurrency primitives and via on-conditions, which allowed programs to intercept and manage runtime errors—such as arithmetic overflows or I/O failures—without abrupt termination. Separate compilation facilitated modular development, permitting independent compilation of program units while maintaining strong typing and data abstraction. However, these innovations came at the cost of significant complexity, with critics noting the language's overabundance of features led to verbose syntax, unpredictable semantics, and challenging implementation, ultimately limiting its widespread adoption. PL/I played a pivotal role in early systems software, serving as the implementation language for parts of IBM's OS/360 operating system and the System/360 version of the Sabre airline reservation system. Its influence extended to subsequent languages, including contributions to C's control structures and declaration syntax, where PL/I's structured approach informed decisions on operator precedence and type handling despite C's deliberate simplification. Limited derivatives arose from PL/I's framework, including PL/C, a subset developed at in the early 1970s as an educational tool to teach with reduced complexity. PL/M, introduced in 1973 by for Intel's 8008 and 8080 microprocessors, adapted PL/I's high-level constructs for embedded systems and development, blending them with assembly-like control. JOVIAL, an earlier 1959 ALGOL-based language for military applications, incorporated PL/I-inspired enhancements in later variants for improved data handling and modularity. By 2025, PL/I persists in niche roles within legacy mainframe environments, particularly on IBM z/OS systems, where it supports the maintenance of mission-critical applications amid ongoing modernization efforts.

BASIC-Based Languages

BASIC, originally developed as Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code, emerged in 1964 at Dartmouth College under the leadership of professors John G. Kemeny and Thomas E. Kurtz, designed specifically as a simple language to enable students without prior programming experience to access computing resources interactively. This educational focus emphasized ease of use over complexity, allowing non-experts to write and execute programs via a timesharing system that supported multiple users simultaneously. Its simplicity echoed the teaching-oriented goals of earlier languages like ALGOL, but prioritized accessibility for beginners in a shared computing environment. The language gained widespread adoption through Microsoft's implementation in 1975, which introduced integer-only arithmetic to fit the constraints of early hardware and became the first commercial product for the company. This version powered the , one of the earliest microcomputers, enabling hobbyists to program personal machines without expertise and sparking the home computing revolution. Early dialects relied on line numbers for program organization and , with statements like facilitating jumps between lines, which, while flexible, often led to unstructured "spaghetti code" but lowered the barrier for novice programmers. Microsoft further evolved BASIC with Visual Basic in 1991, integrating it with a graphical user interface builder that allowed drag-and-drop event-driven programming for Windows applications, transforming it into a tool for rapid software development. This shift emphasized visual design over pure code, making it accessible for creating user interfaces without deep systems knowledge. VB.NET, released in 2002 as part of the .NET Framework, incorporated object-oriented features such as classes, inheritance, and exception handling, aligning BASIC with modern software paradigms while maintaining backward compatibility for legacy code. Derivatives extended BASIC's legacy into specialized domains. , introduced by in 1985, added compilation capabilities to produce standalone executables, improving performance for DOS-based applications and bridging interpretive ease with executable efficiency. , launched in 2004 as an open-source project, extended QuickBASIC syntax with modern features like 64-bit support, inline assembly, and cross-platform compilation, preserving compatibility for legacy code while enabling contemporary development. Small Basic, released by in 2008, targeted children and beginners with a simplified environment featuring built-in graphics libraries and a focus on creative coding, fostering computational thinking through short, intuitive programs. Later iterations of BASIC dialects introduced structured programming elements, such as blocks and subroutines, to mitigate the pitfalls of unrestricted usage, though the core appeal remained its forgiving syntax and immediate feedback for educational and prototyping purposes. These evolutions underscore BASIC's role in democratizing programming, from shared mainframes to personal devices, consistently prioritizing user-friendliness over enterprise-scale rigor.

Early Symbolic and AI-Influenced Languages

Lisp-Based Languages

, developed in 1958 by John McCarthy at MIT, was designed as a list-processing inspired by to enable computation and in applications. Its core innovation lay in treating code as manipulable data structures, laying the groundwork for homoiconic programming where programs could generate and modify other programs dynamically. Early implementations, such as those on the , introduced automatic garbage collection to manage memory for dynamic list structures, marking the first widespread use of this technique in a programming language. The Lisp family expanded through dialects that preserved its foundational list-based syntax using S-expressions—parenthesized prefix notation that unifies code and data representation—while adapting to diverse needs. Common Lisp, emerging from efforts in the 1970s and standardized by ANSI in 1994 (with roots in the 1984 publication Common Lisp: The Language), provided a comprehensive, object-oriented extension supporting multiple paradigms including procedural, functional, and imperative styles. Scheme, introduced in 1975 by Guy L. Steele and Gerald Jay Sussman, emphasized minimalism and lexical scoping to promote functional programming and teaching, influencing subsequent lightweight Lisps. Clojure, created in 2007 by Rich Hickey, modernized Lisp for the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) by integrating immutable data structures and concurrency primitives, enabling seamless interoperation with Java ecosystems. Derivatives of Lisp have specialized in domain-specific applications while retaining core traits like via macros, which allow users to extend the language itself, though the heavy use of parentheses often poses a learning barrier. Lisp, developed in the early 1980s for the GNU editor, powers extensible text editing and has become integral to the tool's customization capabilities. , released in 1986 by , extends CAD software like through scripting for geometric modeling and automation. Racket, evolving from PLT Scheme since 1995, focuses on and , providing tools for creating domain-specific languages in education and . Lisp dialects have seen continued interest in parallelism through libraries like lparallel for concurrent programming, addressing modern multicore architectures while maintaining its symbolic processing strengths central to AI. Historically, Lisp dialects have powered foundational AI systems, from early expert systems to contemporary tools in symbolic reasoning, underscoring their enduring role in research despite shifts toward more imperative languages.

COMIT-Based Languages

COMIT, developed by Victor H. Yngve at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the late 1950s, represented a pioneering effort in string processing languages, specifically tailored for pattern-directed manipulation in mechanical translation systems. Intended to empower linguists to create experimental programs on general-purpose computers like the 700 series, it focused on handling texts, words, and linguistic constituents through a compiler-interpreter architecture that translated high-level rules into machine-oriented code. This design addressed the need for flexible operations on symbolic data, predating more general-purpose tools and sharing symbolic roots with early AI languages like . The core of COMIT lay in its rule-based structure, where each rule comprised a named left half for specifying patterns and conditions within a workspace , an separating it from the right half for performing actions such as substitution or rearrangement, and optional routing or directives for . String manipulation occurred at the level of multi-character constituents rather than individual characters, supporting classification via subscripts and context-sensitive matching; if a failed to match, the system automatically backtracked by advancing to the next rule, enabling non-deterministic search without explicit loops or . These features facilitated sophisticated text transformations, such as reordering phrases in translation examples like converting "THE MAN IS OLD" to "THE OLD MAN," all without the benefit of later innovations like regular expressions. COMIT II, released around 1965, enhanced the original with syntactic simplifications for easier authoring, expanded facilities for handling complex data structures, and improved efficiency in rule execution while preserving compatibility for existing programs. Derivatives emerged as close kin, including in 1962, which drew inspiration from COMIT's but diverged with more dynamic typing, garbage collection, and first-class patterns, ultimately supplanting COMIT in practical use. Later, (1977) built on this lineage through SNOBOL's influence, introducing goal-directed execution where expressions evaluate to success or failure values, along with generators for iterative computation, to streamline string scanning and search algorithms. Employed in early machine translation research at MIT, COMIT enabled the syntactic analysis and generation of sentences, testing transformational grammars and random English production, though its specialized nature confined adoption largely to academic settings. By the late , it had been overshadowed by more versatile successors like , limiting its broader industrial uptake. As of 2025, COMIT-based languages endure primarily as historical milestones, their backtracking and rule-driven string techniques indirectly shaping modern implementations in libraries like those in , via the evolutionary path through .

JOSS-Based Languages

The JOHNNIAC Open Shop System (JOSS) was conceived in early November 1960 at the by J. C. Shaw as an experimental project to enable conversational computing for non-programmers solving small mathematical problems. Formally proposed in March 1961, it aimed to provide continuous and intimate human-computer interaction through , marking it as one of the earliest online computing services. Development began in May 1963 on the JOHNNIAC , with the system becoming partially operational that year and fully so by January 1964, supporting up to eight remote typewriter consoles for simultaneous user access. Primarily used at RAND for defense-related simulations and numerical computations, JOSS facilitated immediate problem-solving without requiring professional programming skills, serving hundreds of staff members by the late . JOSS featured an English-like syntax designed for readability and simplicity, using familiar mathematical notation such as "÷" for division and "•" for multiplication, with commands like "PRINT" for output and "FOR" loops for iteration (e.g., "FOR I = 1 (1) 10"). It operated as an interpreted system with no compilation step, providing immediate execution and feedback in a read-eval-print loop (REPL) style, along with exact arithmetic to nine decimal places and support for direct/indirect addressing modes. This conversational approach emphasized user-friendliness, allowing programs to be entered and modified interactively via teletype terminals, and it maintained a complete isomorphism between internal program states and external representations for transparency. Tailored for short, ad-hoc calculations rather than large-scale applications, JOSS's design prioritized accessibility for scientists and engineers over complex control structures. In 1965, JOSS II was developed as an enhanced version, implemented on the computer to address scalability issues with the aging JOHNNIAC, supporting up to 16 users with extended language features including conditional expressions, formulas, and long-term program storage. While JOSS II retained the core interactive philosophy, it improved via typewriters and expanded facilities for more sophisticated numerical tasks. The system remained in use at RAND and affiliated sites through the 1970s, but demand for more powerful commercial time-sharing solutions led to its obsolescence by the decade's end. Derivatives of JOSS were limited, with FOCAL (FOrmula CALculator), developed in 1968 for the PDP-8 minicomputer by Richard Merrill, serving as a direct variant that adopted JOSS's line-numbered structure, command syntax, and focus on interpretive mathematical for scientific users. Other minor dialects, such as , emerged as adaptations for specific hardware, but none achieved widespread adoption. JOSS's innovations in interactivity profoundly influenced subsequent languages, including BASIC's emphasis on beginner-friendly, immediate-execution environments, and early systems like APL through shared concepts of online access and user-centric design. By pioneering REPL-based conversational programming in 1961, JOSS laid foundational groundwork for modern interactive interfaces.

Systems and Scripting Languages

C-Based Languages

The C programming language was developed by at Bell Laboratories in 1972, primarily to create portable software for the Unix operating system. Its design emphasized efficiency, low-level access to hardware, and simplicity, making it a foundational tool for . The first formal description appeared in the 1978 book by Ritchie and , which became a seminal reference. Subsequent standardization efforts solidified C's portability and reliability. The ANSI X3.159-1989 standard, also known as or C89, was published in 1989 and introduced features like the , const qualifiers, and enum support to enhance and expressiveness. In 1999, the ISO/IEC 9899:1999 () standard added support for complex numbers via _Complex types, inline functions, and variable-length arrays, improving numerical computations and flexibility. The C11 standard (ISO/IEC 9899:2011) further extended concurrency with threads via <threads.h> and atomic operations in <stdatomic.h>, enabling safer parallel programming without external libraries. Most recently, the C23 standard (ISO/IEC 9899:2024), finalized in 2023, introduced bit-precise integer types (_BitInt) and attributes for better hardware optimization and code annotation. C's core characteristics include direct pointer manipulation for memory addressing, manual memory management through functions like malloc and free, high portability across architectures, and low-level control that sacrifices built-in safety for performance. Pointers enable efficient implementation but introduce risks like buffer overflows due to the absence of bounds checking. This combination has made C the dominant language for operating system development, with the vast majority of major kernels—such as , , and BSD—written primarily in C for its predictability and minimal runtime overhead. C's influence extends to numerous derivatives that build on its syntax and paradigms while addressing specific needs. C++, created by Bjarne Stroustrup in 1985 as "C with Classes," added object-oriented features like classes, inheritance, and polymorphism to support large-scale software engineering. Objective-C, developed in 1984 by Brad Cox and Tom Love at Stepstone Corporation, extended C with Smalltalk-inspired message-passing for dynamic object interaction, becoming central to Apple's ecosystem. Go, designed in 2009 by Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike, and Ken Thompson at Google, incorporates C-like syntax with built-in concurrency via goroutines and channels for scalable server applications. Rust, initiated in 2010 by Graydon Hoare under Mozilla sponsorship, enforces memory safety through ownership and borrowing rules at compile time, preventing common C errors like data races without a garbage collector. Swift, introduced by Apple in 2014 under Chris Lattner, modernizes C's foundations with type inference and optionals for safer iOS and macOS development. These languages have amplified C's legacy in critical domains. For instance, Rust's adoption in embedded systems has grown significantly, increasing by 28% over two years in commercial projects as of 2025, driven by its safety guarantees in resource-constrained environments. C's syntax has also shaped higher-level languages, such as , which adopted its brace-enclosed blocks and semicolon-terminated statements for familiarity among systems programmers.

Shell (sh)-Based Languages

Shell-based languages emerged as essential tools for command-line automation and scripting in systems, beginning with the (sh). Developed by Stephen Bourne at AT&T Bell Labs, the was released in 1977 as the default command interpreter for , introducing foundational scripting capabilities such as variables, conditionals, loops, and command substitution to facilitate interactive use and . These features enabled users to automate system tasks efficiently, marking a shift from earlier, more limited shells like the . Key derivatives built upon this foundation, enhancing interactivity and functionality. The (ksh), created by David Korn at [Bell Labs](/page/Bell Labs) and announced in 1983, introduced user-defined functions, improved command history, and job control, making it suitable for both interactive sessions and complex scripts. Bash (Bourne-Again SHell), developed by Brian Fox for the GNU Project in 1989, extended sh compatibility while adding features like command-line editing, job control, and indexed arrays in later versions for handling lists of data. Zsh, authored by Paul Falstad in 1990, prioritized extensibility with built-in support for plugins and themes via frameworks like Oh My Zsh, offering advanced autocompletion and spelling correction. Further evolutions include , released in 2005 by Axel Liljencrantz, which emphasizes user-friendliness through out-of-the-box , autosuggestions, and a simpler configuration syntax without sacrificing power. Microsoft's , launched in 2006, adapted the shell paradigm for Windows environments, incorporating .NET objects for structured data handling in pipelines rather than plain text. These languages share core characteristics optimized for operating system tasks, including piping for chaining commands— a concept originating in Unix Version 3 in 1973 and formalized in shells for streaming data between processes—along with variable assignment and weak typing, where variables primarily store strings with implicit coercion for arithmetic or other operations. This design promotes rapid prototyping but requires careful handling to avoid errors from type ambiguity. Bash, as the default shell on most Linux distributions, remains the most widely used for automation, powering the majority of system administration scripts. Shell scripts often integrate with C programs through exec calls for performance-critical components. The lineage evolved through standardization with the shell specification (IEEE 1003.2) in 1988, ensuring portability across Unix variants by defining a common command language and utilities. Modern advancements include Bash version 5.3, released in July 2025, which added clearer error messages for variable issues, improved for , and microsecond-precision timestamps, further enhancing scripting reliability and performance. This progression underscores shell-based languages' enduring role in scripting ecosystems, balancing simplicity with extensibility for diverse automation needs.

Editor (ed)-Based Languages

Editor (ed)-based languages encompass a family of line-oriented text processing tools that originated in early Unix development, serving as foundational precursors to modern scripting and text manipulation paradigms. These languages emphasize command-driven operations on streams of text, focusing on , substitution, and line editing without requiring interactive sessions. Their design prioritizes efficiency in handling large files or input streams, influencing subsequent utilities for automated text transformation. The progenitor of this family is ed, a line-oriented stream editor authored by in 1971 as the inaugural for Unix. ed operates by applying commands to specific lines or ranges, enabling tasks such as insertion, deletion, and substitution in a non-visual, scriptable manner; it became a standard component of Unix systems and exemplified minimalist text processing. An extension, ex, developed by in 1976, built upon ed's command set to provide enhanced line editing capabilities and served as the direct precursor to the visual editor vi. A key non-interactive derivative is (stream editor), created by Lee E. McMahon in 1974 at as a batch-mode evolution of ed. sed processes input streams—typically from files or pipes—applying edits in a single pass, making it ideal for automated workflows like filtering and reformatting text without user intervention. Core characteristics include commands such as s/pattern/replacement/ for global or line-specific substitutions, which incorporate basic regular expressions for (e.g., anchoring with ^ or $, or grouping with parentheses). For instance, sed is commonly employed in Unix pipelines to process log files, such as extracting error lines or replacing timestamps: grep "ERROR" access.log | sed 's/^.*$$//; s/$$.*$//' to isolate log entries. Further derivatives include , developed in 1977 by , Peter Weinberger, and at , which draws inspiration from ed and to enable pattern-directed scanning and reporting on structured text data. Unlike pure editors, awk supports procedural constructs for field-based processing, such as splitting lines by delimiters and performing actions on matches, positioning it as an ed-inspired tool for data extraction. Another evolution is Vimscript, introduced in 1991 with the first public release of Vim by , which extends ex commands into a full for customizing the Vim editor through mappings, functions, and automation. Ed-based languages persist in niche roles within Unix-like environments, valued for their lightweight efficiency in scripting and pipelines; Vimscript, in particular, supports customization for Vim users, who comprise a dedicated segment of developers favoring modal editing workflows. These tools often integrate with shell piping to chain operations, such as combining sed with other filters for real-time text analysis.

Batch Languages

Batch languages, also known as scripts, emerged as specialized tools for automating sequential job execution on early systems, primarily for non-interactive, scheduled operations. These languages focus on defining job steps, , and without requiring real-time user input, enabling efficient handling of repetitive tasks in enterprise environments. One of the foundational batch languages is (JCL), developed by in the mid-1960s for the OS/360 operating system. Released in 1965, JCL allows users to specify programs to execute, along with details for data sets, devices, and execution parameters, forming the basis for batch job submission on mainframe systems. In modern contexts, such as IBM's , JCL retains its core syntax while supporting enhancements like symbolic parameters and procedure libraries for streamlined job management. Windows Batch scripting, introduced in 1981 with 1.0, provides a similar capability for personal and server environments through files with .bat extensions. These scripts execute commands via the command-line interpreter (), automating tasks like file operations and program launches on and subsequent Windows systems. Extensions like .cmd files, introduced in , build on this by enabling delayed variable expansion and additional error-handling features not available in early .bat implementations. Key characteristics of batch languages include built-in support for file input/output operations, such as defining datasets in JCL via DD statements or redirecting in Windows Batch with > and < operators, and basic conditional logic through constructs like IF/THEN/ELSE for error level checks or existence tests. However, early versions lacked native looping mechanisms; JCL relies on external programs or restarts for repetition, while Windows Batch initially used GOTO for crude iteration until the FOR loop was added in MS-DOS 2.0 in 1983. Derivatives of batch languages emphasize script-based extensions for enhanced scheduling and control, such as cmd.exe's advanced features for variable scoping and function-like calls, though tools like Control-M primarily integrate batch scripts into broader workflow automation rather than extending the language itself. Over time, batch languages have evolved toward more structured paradigms, with Microsoft PowerShell serving as an object-oriented successor that incorporates batch-style automation while adding pipeline processing and .NET integration for complex tasks. Batch languages share some overlap with shell scripting in enabling system automation, but they prioritize offline job sequencing over interactive command interpretation.

DCL-Based Languages

The Digital Command Language (DCL) was introduced in 1978 as the primary command-line interpreter for the VAX/VMS operating system, now known as , enabling users to interact with the system and automate tasks through structured scripting. DCL provides a procedural syntax for executing system operations, file management, and process control, forming the foundation for command-line operations in high-availability environments. DCL scripts, known as command procedures, are stored in files with the .COM extension and executed sequentially to perform batch-like automation of jobs, similar to batch languages but integrated deeply with OpenVMS clustering and resource management. These procedures support conditional logic, loops, and parameter passing, allowing for complex workflow orchestration in enterprise settings. Key characteristics of DCL include the use of symbols as dynamic variables (e.g., MYSYMBOL="value")forstoringandmanipulatingdata,lexicalfunctionssuchasFMY_SYMBOL = "value") for storing and manipulating data, lexical functions such as FSEARCH for file inquiries and FEXTRACTforstringoperations,andbuilt−inerrortrappingviaconstructslikeONERRORTHENGOTOlabeltohandleexceptionsgracefully.[](https://docs.vmssoftware.com/vsi−openvms−dcl−dictionary−a−m/)ExtensionsliketheEXTRACT for string operations, and built-in error trapping via constructs like ON ERROR THEN GOTO label to handle exceptions gracefully.[](https://docs.vmssoftware.com/vsi-openvms-dcl-dictionary-a-m/) Extensions like the SET command further enhance flexibility by allowing runtime configuration of process attributes, environment variables, and symbol definitions without recompilation. Derivatives of DCL remain limited, with its procedural and symbol-based paradigm influencing command languages like TACL (Tandem Advanced Command Language) in HP NonStop systems, though TACL incorporates additional fault-tolerant features tailored to distributed processing. The core evolution of DCL has focused on internal extensions rather than widespread branching into new languages. DCL continues to power significant portions of high-reliability systems, particularly in finance, where OpenVMS's clustering and uptime capabilities support critical transaction processing and stock exchange operations. OpenVMS V9.2, initially released in July 2022 with x86-64 support, received updates including V9.2-1 in June 2023, V9.2-2 in January 2024, and V9.2-3 in November 2024, extending DCL's compatibility to modern hardware while maintaining backward compatibility for legacy scripts as of November 2024.

Object-Oriented Language Families

Simula-Based Languages

Simula 67, developed by Kristen Nygaard and Ole-Johan Dahl at the Norwegian Computing Center in Oslo, Norway, was introduced in 1967 as an extension of specifically for programming complex simulation tasks. It is recognized as the first object-oriented programming language, pioneering the concepts of classes and objects to model entities in simulations, where classes served as templates for creating instances that encapsulated data and behavior. Dahl and Nygaard presented the language at the IFIP Working Conference on Simulation Languages in Oslo in May 1967, emphasizing its ability to handle discrete event simulations through innovative structures like coroutines for concurrent process management. Key characteristics of Simula 67 included prefix notation for block structures, which allowed classes to be prefixed to subclasses for inheritance, and support for virtual machines through dynamic binding of procedures, enabling flexible simulation environments. The language was primarily used for discrete event simulation, such as modeling road traffic or industrial processes, where coroutines facilitated the suspension and resumption of processes via statements like "hold" for time advancement. Simula 67's class mechanism, inspired by visualizing run-time structures, treated objects as active entities rather than passive data, laying the groundwork for modular simulation modeling. Derivatives and extensions of Simula expanded its application in specialized modeling domains. For instance, DISCO, developed in the late 1970s, extended Simula 67 to handle combined continuous and discrete-event systems by adding classes like VARIABLE and CONTINUOUS for differential equation solving, while retaining Simula's process interaction and class hierarchy. These extensions were applied in simulations of industrial processes, biological systems, and complex events like rocket launches, demonstrating Simula's adaptability without requiring separate translators. Simula's object model also influenced later languages, such as in 1972, where drew on its goal-oriented objects to evolve pure object-oriented paradigms, though Smalltalk shifted away from simulation-specific features. As a precursor to modern object-oriented languages like Java, Simula 67 established core principles of encapsulation and inheritance that underpin contemporary programming. By 2025, Simula-based languages remain niche, primarily in academic and research simulations where legacy systems or specialized discrete event modeling persist, though their direct use has largely been supplanted by more general-purpose tools.

Eiffel-Based Languages

Eiffel is an object-oriented programming language designed by Bertrand Meyer and first described in 1986, with a core focus on increasing software reliability through the design-by-contract methodology. This approach integrates formal specifications directly into the code via preconditions, which define required conditions before a routine executes; postconditions, which specify outcomes upon completion; and class invariants, which maintain object states throughout execution. By treating these contracts as integral to the language semantics, Eiffel enables systematic verification and debugging, reducing errors in complex systems. Building on earlier object-oriented concepts, it prioritizes software quality over performance trade-offs in its foundational design. Key characteristics of Eiffel include automatic memory management via a sophisticated garbage collector that reclaims unused objects without manual intervention, ensuring efficient resource handling in large applications. The language supports multiple inheritance but incorporates mechanisms like renaming and selective exporting to avoid common issues such as the diamond problem, promoting safer code reuse. Eiffel's strong static typing and void-safety features further enhance reliability by preventing null pointer dereferences at compile time. These elements have made Eiffel suitable for safety-critical applications, including those in defense, aerospace, and finance, where contract enforcement aids certification and fault tolerance. Eiffel's design principles have influenced subsequent languages, notably contributing to the development of assertions in Java, where similar runtime checks for program invariants draw from design-by-contract ideas to improve debugging and validation. Derivatives of Eiffel include Sather, an open-source language originating around 1990 at the International Computer Science Institute, which was initially based on Eiffel but optimized for better computational performance while retaining object-oriented features like classes and inheritance. In the 2000s, Eiffel's ecosystem expanded with SCOOP (Simple Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming), a model for distributed and concurrent systems that extends the language to handle inter-object communication securely without shared mutable state. Recent advancements in the Eiffel environment, as of 2025, include updates to EiffelStudio that enhance diagram tools and platform integration for streamlined development. Ongoing research explores AI-assisted code generation and verification within Eiffel, using tools like AutoProof to produce and validate bug fixes, ensuring contracts remain enforceable in AI-generated code.

Java-Based Languages

Java is a high-level, object-oriented programming language developed by James Gosling and his team at Sun Microsystems, initially released in May 1995 as a core component of the Java platform, which includes the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) for executing bytecode in a platform-independent manner. The language was designed to support applications for consumer electronics, emphasizing simplicity, robustness, and security, with its syntax largely derived from C to facilitate familiarity for developers experienced in systems programming. Over time, Java has evolved to address modern programming needs; for instance, Java 8, released in March 2014, introduced lambda expressions and the Stream API to enable functional-style programming and improve concurrency handling. More recently, Java 25, released in September 2025 as the latest long-term support (LTS) version, builds on these advancements with further enhancements to performance and language features, while incorporating virtual threads as a standard feature stemming from Project Loom since Java 21 (September 2023). This evolution reflects Java's ongoing adaptation to demands for scalable, efficient software in enterprise environments. Key characteristics of Java include its "write once, run anywhere" (WORA) principle, achieved through compilation to JVM bytecode that executes on any device with a compatible JVM, ensuring portability across operating systems and hardware. The language enforces strong static typing, which catches type-related errors at compile time, and deliberately omits explicit pointers to prevent direct memory manipulation, thereby enhancing security and reducing common vulnerabilities like buffer overflows. These features make Java particularly suited for large-scale, mission-critical applications in enterprise, web servers, and mobile ecosystems. By 2025, Java powers software on over 3 billion devices worldwide as of 2024, underscoring its pervasive adoption in sectors ranging from finance to embedded systems. Prominent derivatives of Java extend its JVM foundation while addressing specific limitations, such as verbosity or lack of functional paradigms. Scala, released in 2004 by Martin Odersky, integrates object-oriented and functional programming, allowing seamless interoperability with Java code while adding features like pattern matching and higher-order functions. Kotlin, developed by JetBrains and first released in 2011, targets Android development with concise syntax, null safety, and coroutines for asynchronous programming, and by 2025, it is used in about 70% of professional Android applications. Similarly, Ceylon, introduced by Red Hat in 2011, focuses on modularity and type safety, providing tools for better code organization in large projects through hierarchical modules and union/intersection types. These languages maintain Java's cross-platform strengths while enhancing developer productivity in specialized domains like mobile and scalable web services.

C#-Based Languages

C# is a modern, object-oriented programming language developed by Microsoft and first released in July 2000 as part of the .NET Framework initiative. Designed by Anders Hejlsberg, it draws inspiration from C++ and Java, combining the power of C++ with the simplicity and productivity of Java while introducing features tailored for the .NET ecosystem. Over the years, C# has evolved significantly, with version 14 released in November 2025 alongside .NET 10, building on earlier innovations like primary constructors in C# 12 (November 2023) that allow parameters to be declared directly in class and struct definitions for more concise initialization. These updates emphasize streamlined syntax and enhanced developer productivity within the .NET platform. Key characteristics of C# include Language Integrated Query (LINQ), which enables SQL-like querying of data structures directly in code, asynchronous programming via async/await keywords for non-blocking operations, and automatic garbage collection managed by the .NET runtime to handle memory allocation and deallocation efficiently. The .NET 10 release in November 2025 further unified and advanced the platform beyond the .NET 8 merger (November 2023) of the legacy .NET Framework with .NET Core into a single, cross-platform runtime, improving performance, security, and support for cloud-native applications. Derivatives of C# are relatively limited but notable, including F#, a functional-first language created by Don Syme at Microsoft Research and first released in 2005, which runs on the .NET Common Language Runtime (CLR) and integrates functional programming paradigms like immutable data and pattern matching with object-oriented features. Another example is Boo, a statically typed, Python-inspired language developed in 2003 by Rodrigo B. de Oliveira for the .NET platform, emphasizing clean syntax and extensibility though it has seen limited adoption. C# powers critical infrastructure in Microsoft's ecosystem, serving as the primary language for developing applications on Azure, where it supports serverless functions, web APIs, and cloud services through seamless integration with Azure SDKs. In game development, C# is extensively used via the Unity engine, which accounted for 51% of games released on Steam in 2024 and remains a dominant force in mobile and indie sectors as of 2025. This .NET-centric evolution positions C# as a pragmatic choice for Windows, cloud, and enterprise applications, sharing syntactic similarities with Java but optimized for Microsoft's unified runtime.

Mathematical and Array-Oriented Languages

APL-Based Languages

APL, an array-oriented programming language, was developed by Kenneth E. Iverson and first described in his 1962 book A Programming Language. It employs a distinctive set of glyphs to represent operations, enabling concise mathematical notation and vectorized computations on multidimensional arrays as the central data type. This design prioritizes expressiveness for array manipulation, drawing from Iverson's earlier work on mathematical notation at starting in 1957. Key characteristics of APL include right-to-left evaluation, where expressions are parsed and executed from right to left with uniform operator precedence, and support for tacit programming, a point-free style that composes functions implicitly without naming arguments. These features allow for compact, functional expressions that apply operations across entire arrays idiomatically. In 1984, IBM released APL2, extending the language with nested arrays—structures permitting arrays within arrays for more flexible data representation and recursion—while maintaining compatibility with original APL semantics. Derivatives of APL addressed limitations like the need for special keyboards by adapting the notation to standard ASCII characters and optimizing for specific domains. J, developed in 1990 by Iverson and Roger Hui, reinterprets APL primitives using ASCII symbols and emphasizes tacit definitions for portability across systems. K, created by Arthur Whitney in the early 1990s, streamlined APL's array processing for high-performance applications, particularly in finance, with a minimalist syntax. Building on K, Q emerged in the late 1990s as a query language integrated with kdb+, a column-oriented database released in 2003, enabling efficient handling of time-series data. Dyalog APL, first developed in the early 1980s by British company Dyalog Ltd., provides a modern, ISO-standard-compliant implementation with enhancements for object-oriented extensions and parallel processing. These languages have found niche applications in fields requiring rapid array computations, such as financial analytics, where K and Q power real-time data processing in high-frequency trading systems. In the 2020s, improved Unicode support across implementations like GNU APL and Dyalog has facilitated broader adoption by standardizing glyph encoding and easing integration with contemporary tools.

Forth-Based Languages

Forth, a stack-oriented programming language, was developed by Charles H. Moore in 1970 to enhance programming efficiency on limited hardware, initially for controlling radio telescopes at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. It pioneered indirect threaded code, where executable code consists of addresses pointing to other code segments, enabling compact and portable implementations across diverse systems. Core to Forth's design is its use of Reverse Polish Notation (RPN), a postfix notation where operators follow their operands on a data stack, eliminating the need for parentheses and simplifying expression evaluation without recursion in basic arithmetic. Programmers define new "words" (functions) using colon definitions, such as : DOUBLE DUP + ;, which extend the language interactively and factor complex behaviors into reusable components. The ANSI Forth standard, ratified in 1994 as X3.215, formalized these elements, including the RECURSE word for enabling recursion within definitions (e.g., for computing factorials), though it does not mandate support for mutual recursion or unlimited stack depth, leaving such extensions to implementations. Forth's minimalism and real-time responsiveness have made it suitable for embedded and control applications, including distributed real-time systems for industrial automation and instrumentation. In space exploration, Forth powered instrument controllers on missions such as NASA's Cassini spacecraft for its magnetospheric imager and the for science instrument software, leveraging its reliability in resource-constrained environments. It excels in real-time control due to its direct hardware access and low overhead, allowing immediate execution without traditional compilation delays. Derivatives have evolved Forth for modern needs while retaining its stack-based paradigm. Gforth, the GNU project's portable implementation released in 1995, supports the ANSI standard with optimizations for Unix-like systems and integrates with tools like GCC for high performance. Factor, introduced in 2003 by Slava Pestov, builds on Forth as a high-level, dynamically typed language with garbage collection and object-oriented features, targeting general-purpose scripting and application development. SwiftForth, developed by FORTH, Inc., provides a contemporary integrated development environment for Windows, Linux, and macOS, emphasizing debugging and deployment for embedded targets with just-in-time compilation. As of 2025, Forth variants like Mecrisp-Stellaris continue to thrive in IoT microcontrollers, such as STM32 series, for their small footprint (under 25 KB) and interactive firmware development in low-power devices. This family influences scripting languages through its extensible, interactive model, promoting rapid prototyping in constrained environments.

SASL-Based Languages

SASL, developed by David Turner at the University of St Andrews in 1975, introduced non-strict semantics to functional programming, enabling lazy evaluation where expressions are computed only when needed. This purely applicative language, based on a sugared lambda calculus, supported higher-order functions and pattern matching, facilitating concise expressions for mathematical computations without side effects. SASL's implementation using SK combinator reduction marked an early advancement in efficient graph reduction for functional languages. Turner's subsequent work led to derivatives like Miranda in 1985, a polymorphic typed successor that refined SASL's lazy evaluation with strong type inference and list comprehensions for declarative data manipulation. Miranda's stream-based I/O and layout-sensitive syntax influenced practical applications in education and prototyping. Haskell, emerging in 1987 from a committee effort to standardize lazy functional languages, evolved these ideas further; its 1990 report incorporated monads for structured input/output and effect handling, building directly on Miranda's foundations while adding type classes for ad-hoc polymorphism. Haskell's higher-order functions and list comprehensions, inherited from this lineage, enable powerful abstractions like parser combinators and domain-specific embedded languages. These SASL-based languages share conceptual ties to the ML family through common functional roots but prioritize lazy evaluation for infinite data structures and modular composition. Primarily academic in scope, their innovations merged into broader functional paradigms, with Haskell achieving widespread adoption in research and industry for symbolic computation and concurrency.

Logic, Functional, and Set-Based Languages

Prolog-Based Languages

Prolog, a logic programming language, was developed in 1972 by Alain Colmerauer at the University of Marseille-Luminy in France as part of a project for natural language processing. It emerged from artificial intelligence research efforts, building on ideas from earlier systems like for symbolic computation. Prolog programs are expressed using Horn clauses, which consist of facts, rules, and queries in a declarative form, enabling the language to represent knowledge and perform automated reasoning. At its core, Prolog relies on unification, a process that matches terms to find substitutions satisfying logical expressions, and backtracking, a search mechanism that explores alternative paths when a solution fails. These features support depth-first search for solving queries, making Prolog suitable for rule-based systems. The cut operator (!) provides control over this nondeterministic behavior by committing to choices and pruning search trees, though overuse can complicate debugging and reduce the declarative purity of code. Nondeterminism, while powerful for generating multiple solutions, can lead to efficiency issues in large-scale applications without careful optimization. Several derivatives extend Prolog's paradigm for specific needs. Mercury, first released in 1995 by researchers at the University of Melbourne, introduces strong static typing and mode analysis to catch errors at compile time, compiling to efficient C code for real-world applications. SWI-Prolog, initiated in 1987 at the University of Amsterdam, enhances portability and includes a built-in HTTP server framework for web-based services and REST APIs. Logtalk, with its first public alpha in 1998, adds object-oriented features like encapsulation, inheritance via prototypes and classes, and categories for modular code reuse atop standard Prolog backends. Prolog and its derivatives continue to influence declarative programming, particularly in domains requiring logical inference. As of 2025, Prolog remains a key tool in expert systems for knowledge representation and decision-making, powering applications in fields like legal tech and AI reasoning. The ISO/IEC 13211 standard, with Part 2 on modules published in 2000 and ongoing updates like the 2025 technical specification for grammar rules, ensures portability and modularity in modern implementations.

ML-Based Languages

ML (Meta Language) originated in 1973 as part of the University of Edinburgh's LCF theorem-proving project, led by Robin Milner, introducing the polymorphic Hindley-Milner type system that enables powerful type inference while maintaining static typing. This system allows flexible, generic programming akin to dynamic languages but with compile-time safety, influencing subsequent statically typed functional languages. Standard ML, formalized in 1983, standardized the core ML features, including a module system for structuring large programs and strong support for functional abstraction. It emphasized purity in design, with revisions in 1990 and 1997 refining type safety and exception handling without altering the foundational polymorphic typing. OCaml, released in 1996, extended the Caml dialect of ML with an integrated object system designed by Didier Rémy and Jérôme Vouillon, enabling object-oriented programming with full static type safety and no runtime overhead for type checks. This addition allowed seamless mixing of functional, imperative, and object paradigms, making OCaml suitable for systems programming and rapid development. Key derivatives include F#, developed by Microsoft Research in 2005 as a .NET-integrated variant of OCaml, prioritizing concise syntax for data-intensive applications while leveraging the Common Language Runtime for interoperability with C# and other .NET languages. Another is SML/NJ (Standard ML of New Jersey), a compiler initiated in the mid-1980s at Bell Labs and Princeton, providing an interactive environment with advanced optimizations for research and production use. ML-based languages share core characteristics such as pattern matching for concise data deconstruction and control flow, a module system for modular composition and information hiding, and eager (strict) evaluation by default, which ensures predictable performance in imperative contexts. These features, combined with ML's type inference, reduce boilerplate annotations; for instance, in , this can save approximately 20% of code length compared to explicitly typed equivalents in languages like . OCaml has seen industrial adoption, notably at Facebook (now Meta), where it powers tools like the Hack compiler for PHP-like scripting and the Flow static type checker for JavaScript, enabling scalable analysis of large codebases. In 2025, MLton remains a leading whole-program optimizer for Standard ML, providing advanced optimizations for large-scale applications. ML-based languages emphasize typed functional computation over untyped logic programming.

FP-Based Languages

FP (Functional Programming), introduced by John Backus in his 1977 ACM Turing Award lecture, is an applicative programming system designed to liberate programming from the von Neumann bottleneck by emphasizing function-level composition over imperative state changes. Backus proposed FP as a theoretical notation for constructing programs using a small set of primitive functions and higher-order combining forms, such as composition (∘), construction (<>), and insertion (/), to build complex functions from simpler ones without variables or assignments. This approach supports vector processing by treating data structures as atomic objects, enabling efficient parallel evaluation; for example, an inner product can be expressed concisely as IP = (/ +) ∘ (×) ∘ Trans, where functions operate on entire arrays rather than individual elements. A core characteristic of FP is its strict avoidance of side effects, ensuring that function applications are pure and independent, which facilitates algebraic manipulation of programs and potential parallelism. Programs in FP adopt an applicative style, where expressions are evaluated by reducing function applications without reliance on storage or sequential history, contrasting with word-at-a-time imperative models. Although FP was primarily theoretical and aimed at formalizing a new algebra of programs, it influenced the development of subsequent function-level languages by highlighting the power of compositional functional abstraction. FL, developed as a practical successor to FP in the 1980s at , extends the function-level paradigm with support for defining new functional forms and handling complex data flows in a strict model. Unlike FP's notation-focused design, FL incorporates mechanisms for and modularity while preserving no side effects and applicative , though it saw limited adoption beyond research prototypes. The ideas from FP and FL contributed indirectly to modern functional languages like by promoting pure, compositional styles, though FP's strictness differs from approaches in languages such as SASL. Overall, FP-based languages remain rare in practice, having merged into broader functional paradigms that prioritize practicality over pure algebraic notation.

SETL-Based Languages

SETL (Set Language) is a developed by Jacob T. Schwartz in 1970 at the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, , designed to facilitate the expression of abstract algorithms using the mathematical theory of sets as its foundational paradigm. The language treats finite sets and tuples (ordered sequences) as primitive data types, enabling concise manipulation of complex data structures without low-level concerns like or pointers. This set-theoretic approach allows programmers to focus on algorithmic logic rather than implementation details, making SETL particularly suited for exploratory and specification-oriented programming. Key characteristics of SETL include support for logical quantifiers such as forall, exists, and notexists, which enable declarative expressions over sets, as in checking properties like primality: forall i in {2..p-1} | p mod i /= 0. Set comprehensions provide a powerful notation for constructing sets, exemplified by {p in {2..n} | forall i in {2..p-1} | p mod i /= 0} to generate primes up to n. The language is dynamically typed, with no compile-time restrictions on set or tuple contents, allowing flexible nesting and polymorphism while enforcing strict value semantics to avoid side effects common in imperative languages. These features promote readability and brevity, often reducing code volume significantly compared to traditional procedural languages. Derivatives of include SETL2, an optimized evolution developed in the late by in consultation with Schwartz and Robert Dewar at NYU, introducing enhancements for efficiency and modularity while maintaining backward incompatibility to refine the core set-based model. has been applied in and development, notably in the NYU Ada/Ed project, where it prototyped the first validated Ada 83 , leveraging its high-level constructs for tasks like semantic analysis and code optimization algorithms. Its influence extends to modern languages; for instance, 's set operations informed the design of Python's set via the intermediate language ABC, emphasizing efficient, abstract data processing. As of 2025, SETL remains primarily an academic and research tool, with active implementations such as GNU SETL and setlX supporting educational use in algorithm design and . However, its conceptual contributions—particularly quantifiers, comprehensions, and dynamic set handling—persist in contemporary libraries and languages, underpinning abstract in domains like and symbolic computation.

Modern Scripting and Web Languages

Tcl-Based Languages

Tcl, or Tool Command Language, is a high-level, interpreted designed for embedding into applications, particularly as a command language for tools. Developed by at the , Tcl originated in 1988 as a solution for integrating user interfaces with underlying C-based programs in tools. Its core philosophy emphasizes simplicity and extensibility, making it suitable for and automation tasks. A defining characteristic of Tcl is that everything in the language is represented as a , with all operations ultimately manipulating data, which simplifies and integration but requires careful handling of types. This string-centric model allows Tcl to maintain a interpreter while supporting complex behaviors through its command-based syntax, where commands are invoked as space-separated words. Extensions to Tcl are typically implemented , enabling seamless integration with existing applications by registering new commands that bridge the scripting layer to native code. Key derivatives of Tcl include , released in 1990 as a toolkit that extends Tcl with cross-platform widgets for building desktop applications. Expect, also from 1990 and authored by Don Libes at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, builds on Tcl to automate interactive programs like or ftp by scripting expected responses and outputs. For resource-constrained environments, Jim Tcl emerged in 2005 as a , embeddable reimplementation of Tcl, focusing on a small footprint while preserving compatibility with core Tcl features. Tcl remains prominent in (EDA), where it serves as the primary scripting language for tools from vendors like and , facilitating design flows, verification, and simulation in workflows. Like traditional shell scripting, Tcl excels in gluing together system components but distinguishes itself through its embeddability within larger C-based systems. The language continues to evolve, with Tcl 9.0 initially released in September 2024 (with updates through November 2025, including version 9.0.3) introducing 64-bit integer support, enhanced handling, and improved facilities for asynchronous programming, marking the first major version update in over two decades. in Tcl, available since earlier versions but refined in 9.0, enable by allowing procedures to yield control without full context switches, supporting efficient handling of generators and state machines.

HyperTalk-Based Languages

HyperTalk, introduced in 1987 as the for Apple's hypermedia system, was designed to enable non-programmers to create interactive applications through an accessible, English-like syntax. Developed by under the vision of , who created , the language emphasized message-passing as its core paradigm, where scripts respond to events by sending and handling messages between objects such as cards, buttons, and fields in a stack-based environment. This event-driven model allowed users to define handlers for actions like mouse clicks or navigation, using simple commands such as "on mouseUp go to next card end mouseUp," making it intuitive for and educational applications. Key characteristics of include its procedural structure with control flows like and repeat loops, combined with chunk expressions for manipulating text and visual elements, such as "the text of field 1." It pioneered aspects of visual programming by integrating scripting directly into a graphical interface, where users could build and script hypermedia stacks visually without compiling code, democratizing software creation for hobbyists and educators. 's approachable design also influenced subsequent Apple technologies, notably , which generalized its object querying and event-handling concepts for inter-application communication via . Derivatives of extended its legacy into cross-platform development. MetaCard, released in 1998, introduced a compatible xTalk for building standalone applications beyond the Mac, evolving into Runtime Revolution (later simply ) after its acquisition in 2003, which added support for Windows, , and web deployment. By 2010, it was rebranded as , maintaining HyperTalk's English-like syntax while enhancing it for modern needs, such as database integration and custom extensions. In 2025, continues to support , enabling native and Android deployments from a single codebase, with updates as of October 2025 improving Android compatibility (e.g., API 35 support) and for networked applications via the tsNet external.

JavaScript-Based Languages

JavaScript, originally developed by at Communications Corporation in 1995 as a for web browsers, became standardized as (ECMA-262) in 1997. Designed initially to enhance interactivity on web pages within , it adopted a C-like syntax to appeal to developers familiar with languages like C and , facilitating quick adoption in client-side scripting. The language's core specification has evolved through annual updates by the ECMA Technical Committee 39 (TC39), with 2015 (ES6) introducing class syntax for patterns, enabling more structured code organization via syntactic sugar over prototypes. Further advancements continued in subsequent editions: 2023 (ES2023) added array methods such as toSorted(), toReversed(), toSpliced(), and with(), promoting immutable operations to reduce side effects in styles; ES2024 introduced features like Promise.withResolvers and ArrayBuffer.prototype.transfer; and ES2025 (released June 2025) added iterator helper methods (e.g., map, filter for iterables), new Set methods (e.g., toReversed, toSorted), RegExp.escape(), and support for import attributes and modules. Derivatives of JavaScript have extended its ecosystem by addressing limitations in expressiveness and safety. , released by in October 2012, adds static typing to JavaScript, compiling to plain JavaScript while catching type-related errors at development time to improve scalability in large codebases. , launched in December 2009 by Jeremy Ashkenas, offers a more concise syntax that transpiles to JavaScript, eliminating semicolons and curly braces to reduce boilerplate and enhance readability. Dart, announced by in October 2011, supports through transpilation to JavaScript, providing features like sound null safety and isolates for concurrency, though its browser runtime ambitions shifted toward cross-platform apps via Flutter. JavaScript powers approximately 98.9% of websites as a client-side language (as of 2025), underscoring its dominance in web development. On the server side, Node.js—built on the V8 JavaScript engine—holds significant adoption, with usage among professional developers reaching around 40% for backend technologies in recent surveys, enabling full-stack JavaScript applications. Key characteristics include prototype-based inheritance for object creation, asynchronous programming via async/await (introduced in ES2017) for handling promises without callback hell, and dynamic typing that, while flexible, can lead to runtime errors due to lack of compile-time type checks. The language's evolution includes the Temporal Dead Zone (TDZ), introduced in ES6, which prevents access to let and const variables before their declaration in a block scope, even if hoisted, to enforce stricter scoping and reduce bugs in modular code. This mechanism, particularly relevant in ES modules, ensures declarations are respected temporally, promoting reliable code in modern web applications where modules replace global scripts.

Fourth-Generation Languages (4GL): Declarative and Domain-Specific

Database Query Languages

Database query languages represent a key category of fourth-generation languages (4GLs), emphasizing declarative paradigms for data retrieval and manipulation in relational and other structured data stores, abstracting away procedural details common in third-generation languages (3GLs) like or . These languages allow users to specify desired results—such as selecting and joining datasets—without explicitly controlling execution steps like loops or iteration paths, enabling database engines to optimize queries automatically. This focus on "what" rather than "how" distinguishes them from , facilitating efficient ad-hoc querying in enterprise environments. The foundational database query language is Structured Query Language (SQL), developed in 1974 by and at IBM's San Jose Research Laboratory as part of the System R project to implement Edgar F. Codd's . Originally named (Structured English QUEry Language), it was shortened to SQL due to issues and standardized by ANSI in 1986 and ISO in 1987. SQL's core syntax revolves around declarative clauses like SELECT for specifying output columns, FROM for source tables, WHERE for filtering rows, and JOIN for combining related tables, eliminating the need for explicit loops or procedural logic in basic queries. For example, a query to retrieve employee details with department information might use:

SELECT e.name, d.department_name FROM employees e JOIN departments d ON e.dept_id = d.id WHERE e.salary > 50000;

SELECT e.name, d.department_name FROM employees e JOIN departments d ON e.dept_id = d.id WHERE e.salary > 50000;

This retrieves and correlates across tables without manual iteration, relying on the database optimizer for efficient execution plans. SQL has evolved through multiple ISO standards, with SQL:2023 introducing enhanced support for data types and simplified dot-notation syntax for querying within relational contexts, such as JSON_TABLE functions to treat as relational rows. Earlier, SQL:2011 added temporal table features, enabling system-versioned tables that automatically track historical changes with periods for valid-time (application-managed) or transaction-time (system-managed) semantics, queried via predicates like OVERLAPS or CONTAINS. These updates address modern needs for auditing and time-based analytics without custom procedural code. As of 2025, SQL powers the top relational database management systems (DBMS) like , , , and , which dominate popularity rankings and are used in the vast majority of production databases. Key derivatives extend SQL's declarative model into procedural or domain-specific variants. PL/SQL, introduced by in the late 1980s, embeds SQL within blocks of procedural code, adding control structures like loops and exceptions while retaining declarative queries for data operations. Similarly, (T-SQL), developed by in partnership with Sybase and first released in 1989, enhances SQL with procedural extensions for stored procedures, triggers, and error handling in SQL Server environments. For non-relational data, Cypher—created by Andrés Taylor for in 2011—provides a declarative using (e.g., (a:[Person](/page/Person))-[:KNOWS]->(b:[Person](/page/Person))) to traverse nodes and relationships, influencing the ISO GQL standard. These languages maintain SQL's emphasis on , supporting complex data manipulation in specialized domains like enterprise reporting and graph analytics.

Report and Application Generators

Report and application generators represent a key subset of fourth-generation programming languages (4GLs), designed to automate the creation of business reports and form-based applications with minimal procedural coding. These tools emerged in the late 1950s and gained prominence in the 1970s and 1980s, focusing on declarative specifications that allow users to define desired outputs—such as formatted reports or interactive screens—rather than detailing step-by-step execution. By abstracting low-level details, they enable rapid development for data-intensive tasks in enterprise environments, often integrating with databases to process and present information efficiently. A foundational example is the Report Program Generator (RPG), developed by in 1959 for its 1401 mainframe to streamline business report creation from punched-card data. RPG emphasized columnar specifications for input, calculation, and output, making it accessible to non-programmers in accounting and operations roles. Over decades, it evolved into RPG IV (introduced in 1994), supporting modular programming and integration with modern systems while retaining its core focus on report generation. In the 1980s, tools like Progress 4GL (now OpenEdge ABL), released by in 1984, extended 4GL principles to full application development, including forms for and dynamic reports. Progress enabled declarative definitions of user interfaces and , facilitating client-server architectures for () systems. Similarly, LANSA, founded in 1987, introduced its RDML 4GL for midrange platforms, specializing in visual form design and report automation to build transaction-based applications without extensive coding. Dedicated report generators proliferated in the 1970s, with Information Builders' FOCUS, launched in 1975, providing a non-procedural for ad-hoc reporting and on mainframes. FOCUS used English-like commands to query, transform, and format data into tabular or graphical outputs, often building on SQL-retrieved datasets for enhanced flexibility. Another enduring tool, CA-Easytrieve (originally developed around 1972 by Ribek Corporation and acquired by in the 1980s), focused on batch report generation from sequential files, offering built-in sorting, summarizing, and labeling capabilities to reduce custom coding needs. Derivatives in the 1990s, such as (marketed by Crystal Services starting in 1991), built on these foundations by adding visual designers for pixel-perfect reports, connecting to various data sources including ODBC-compliant databases. These tools prioritized ease of use for business analysts, generating outputs like invoices or summaries without deep programming knowledge. Core characteristics of these 4GL generators include non-procedural paradigms, where developers specify "what" results are needed rather than "how" to compute them, and screen painters—graphical tools for designing forms and layouts interactively. This approach contrasts with third-generation languages by emphasizing through code generation and reuse, often halving development time for standard business applications. As of 2025, RPG and similar 4GL generators remain integral to many legacy systems, particularly on platforms, supporting ongoing operations in industries like and where stability outweighs frequent overhauls. In the , evolution has centered on web integration, with enhancements like RPG's support for APIs and embedding allowing legacy reports to render in browsers or mobile interfaces. For instance, modernized applications now deploy forms via web services, bridging mainframe-era tools with cloud-native environments.

Fifth-Generation Languages (5GL): Intelligent and Constraint-Based

Logic Programming Extensions

(CLP) emerged in 1987 as a significant extension of paradigms, integrating constraint solving to enable more expressive for complex search and optimization problems, positioning it within the fifth-generation language (5GL) category focused on . Building on Prolog's unification mechanism, CLP replaces strict term matching with constraint posting over variables that represent domains—such as finite sets, rationals, or reals—allowing integrated solvers to propagate constraints and prune search spaces efficiently. This approach facilitates solving non-deterministic problems by delaying variable instantiation until constraints narrow possibilities, enhancing scalability for combinatorial tasks without explicit algorithmic control. Key implementations in the advanced CLP's practicality, with originating in 1990 as an integration of the Sepia engine and Megalog database components, evolving into a comprehensive platform supporting finite domain and real arithmetic solvers for industrial applications. Similarly, SICStus Prolog, initiated in the mid-1980s by the Swedish Institute of Computer Science, incorporated constraint handling rules and finite domain constraints by the early , enabling efficient modeling of like timetabling and . These systems emphasized multi-paradigm integration, combining logic rules with specialized propagators for global constraints, such as all-different or cumulative, to outperform traditional in large-scale problems. CLP derivatives have found prominent use in AI-driven scheduling, where they model temporal and resource constraints for applications like workforce rostering and , as exemplified by Google's library which embeds CLP solvers for real-world optimization. In the 2020s, hybrid approaches merging CLP with have gained traction, incorporating techniques like constraint acquisition from or neuro-symbolic reasoning to automate solver configuration and handle uncertain domains, as explored in ongoing research tracks combining constraint propagation with learned heuristics. This evolution underscores CLP's role in bridging declarative logic with data-driven intelligence, fostering adoption in AI systems requiring both explainability and performance.

Natural Language and AI Interfaces

Fifth-generation programming languages (5GL) emphasize natural language and AI interfaces to facilitate human-like programming, where users express intentions in everyday language rather than rigid syntax, with AI handling translation to executable code. These interfaces emerged as part of broader efforts to make computing more accessible, drawing briefly from logic programming roots in systems like Prolog for inference mechanisms. Key characteristics include intent-based processing, where machine learning (ML) models parse user goals, and ambiguity resolution through contextual analysis and probabilistic inference to disambiguate vague inputs. Efforts in the 1980s and 1990s, such as Japan's (FGCS) project (1982–1992), explored interfaces integrated with for inference and problem-solving, though adoption remained limited due to computational constraints of the era. In 1988, the , integrated into Mathematica by , introduced symbolic programming with built-in natural language understanding, allowing users to input queries in prose-like form for computation and visualization, prioritizing conceptual expression over procedural details. Derivatives like , launched by Apple in 1993, extended this approach with an English-like syntax for scripting macOS applications, enabling non-programmers to automate workflows through descriptive commands such as "tell application 'Finder' to open folder 'Documents'." Modern advancements are exemplified by , released in 2021 by and , which accepts prompts like "write a function to sort a list" and generates code via large language models (LLMs), streamlining development for diverse users. These systems resolve ambiguities using ML techniques, such as transformer-based mechanisms, to infer context from partial or imprecise descriptions. Post-2020, the evolution of natural language programming has accelerated through integration with LLMs like GPT series, enabling more robust ambiguity resolution and intent extraction in real-time applications, from no-code platforms to AI-assisted IDEs. This shift has driven broader adoption, with forecasting that 70% of new enterprise applications will leverage no-code/low-code tools incorporating AI interfaces by 2025, underscoring their impact on democratizing programming.

Other and Emerging Families

Unaffiliated or Multi-Influence Languages

Unaffiliated or multi-influence languages represent programming paradigms that eschew a singular lineage, instead synthesizing elements from diverse predecessors to achieve versatile, pragmatic designs. These languages often feature eclectic and semantics, enabling broad applicability across domains like scripting, , and , without adhering strictly to one foundational model. Their development reflects a deliberate blending of influences to address practical needs, such as text manipulation or , resulting in tools that prioritize expressiveness and ease of use over purist adherence to any one tradition. Perl, first released in 1987 by , exemplifies this multi-influence approach through its integration of features from and for text processing, C for , and various constructs for scripting efficiency. This eclectic heritage allows Perl to support multiple paradigms, including procedural, object-oriented, and functional styles, making it particularly suited for tasks like report generation and network administration. Perl's syntax, while sometimes criticized for its density, enables concise solutions to complex problems, influencing subsequent languages in the scripting . Python, developed by starting in 1991 at the Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), draws from ABC for its emphasis on readability and simplicity, for modular design, and for performance-critical extensions, creating a multi-paradigm language that supports imperative, object-oriented, and . Its clean, indentation-based syntax and extensive contribute to its widespread adoption in fields ranging from to scientific computing. As of November 2025, Python holds the top position in the TIOBE Programming Community Index with a 23.37% rating, underscoring its dominance driven by applications in AI and . The language's evolution includes enhancements in Python 3.12, released in October 2023, which refined matching with improved error messages and performance optimizations for more expressive . Ruby, created by Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto in 1995, amalgamates influences from Perl's practicality, Smalltalk's object-oriented purity, and 's flexibility, alongside elements from Eiffel and Ada, to form a dynamic, reflective language focused on developer productivity and elegance. This synthesis results in Ruby's hallmark features, such as blocks and , which facilitate concise code for web frameworks like . Ruby's design philosophy emphasizes "human-friendly" programming, borrowing dynamic typing from while incorporating Perl-like string handling, enabling its use in both scripting and large-scale applications.

Recent Developments (Post-2000)

The post-2000 era has seen the emergence of programming languages designed to address longstanding limitations in performance, concurrency, and domain-specific needs, often blending influences from earlier paradigms while incorporating modern features like and lightweight threading models. Julia, launched in February 2012, exemplifies this trend as a high-level optimized for numerical and scientific , drawing syntactic influences from and conceptual influences from languages like Python, , and to bridge the gap between expressive scripting and the raw speed of low-level languages like and . Its enables performance comparable to while supporting and via macros, facilitating efficient implementations in fields such as , where packages like Flux.jl have driven adoption in research areas including and . By 2024, Julia's ecosystem had matured to support scientific workflows, underscoring its viability for tasks previously dominated by older languages. Elixir, first released in 2011, builds on Ruby's elegant syntax for while leveraging the Erlang (BEAM) for robust concurrency and , making it ideal for scalable, distributed systems. Its actor-based model employs lightweight processes—effectively green threads scheduled by the runtime rather than the OS—allowing millions of concurrent operations with low latency, a feature that addresses scalability challenges in web and real-time applications. This design inherits Erlang's proven reliability for but enhances developer productivity through Ruby-like and . Among derivatives, , initiated in 2008, combines Python-inspired indentation-based syntax with compilation to C code for near-native efficiency, enabling systems-level programming without sacrificing readability or safety features like optional garbage collection. Its powerful macro system supports advanced , allowing code generation at to optimize for embedded and high-performance scenarios, thus filling efficiency gaps left by interpreted languages like Python. Similarly, Carbon, announced by in 2022 as an experimental successor to C++, emphasizes seamless interoperability with existing C++ codebases through features like inheritance and templates, while introducing modern safety mechanisms and faster build times via LLVM backend. This approach aims to evolve C++ incrementally, supporting performance-critical software with reduced complexity. The rise of has spurred languages like , introduced in 2017, which compiles a subset to WebAssembly binaries, providing low-level control and near-C speeds in browser environments without requiring a new syntax. By targeting WebAssembly's specification directly, it enables efficient, secure execution of complex algorithms in web applications, complementing JavaScript's dynamism with static typing and . These post-2000 innovations collectively prioritize usability, performance, and adaptability, often evolving from established languages like Python and to tackle contemporary demands in AI, distributed systems, and cross-platform development.

References

  1. https://www.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/content/techdigest/pdf/V26-N04/26-04-Hanke.pdf
  2. http://cs.furman.edu/~pbatchelor/csc101/lectures/tia7e_ch10_ppt.pdf
  3. https://venus.sod.asu.edu/VIPLE/Lectures/L09PL.pdf
  4. https://www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~pfodor/courses/CSE260/_L01_Introduction_Programming_Languages.pdf
  5. https://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/software-languages/
  6. https://jcsites.juniata.edu/faculty/rhodes/lt/plhistory.htm
  7. https://almanac.upenn.edu/archive/v42pdf/013096.pdf
  8. https://people.computing.clemson.edu/~mark/edsac.html
  9. https://cs.brown.edu/~adf/programming_languages.html
  10. https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall09/cos109/06langs.pdf
  11. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/computer-science/programming-languages
  12. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1109/MAHC.1983.10022
  13. https://xavierleroy.org/control-structures/book/main003.html
  14. https://computerhistory.org/blog/the-whirlwind-computer-at-chm/
  15. https://people.cs.rutgers.edu/~pxk/articles/big-ideas-os.html
  16. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/ibm-develops-fortran-computer-language
  17. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=755
  18. https://p.web.umkc.edu/pgd5ab/www/fortran_overview.htm
  19. https://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/FORTRAN/
  20. http://www.hpc.lsu.edu/training/weekly-materials/2014-Spring/Fortran-Spring-2014.pdf
  21. https://www.admin-magazine.com/HPC/Articles/Modern-Fortran-Part-1
  22. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/xl-fortran-linux/16.1.0?topic=specifications-fortran-2003
  23. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/using-fortran-do-current-for-accelerator-offload.html
  24. https://wg5-fortran.org/f2023.html
  25. https://fortran-lang.org/learn/intrinsics/type/
  26. https://learning.rc.virginia.edu/courses/fortran-introduction/arrays/
  27. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/fortran-compiler/developer-guide-reference/2024-2/fortran-i-o.html
  28. https://www.iso.org/standard/6128.html
  29. https://www.admin-magazine.com/HPC/Articles/Selecting-Compilers-for-a-Supercomputer
  30. https://www.nsc.liu.se/~boein/f77to90/a7.html
  31. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/960118.808369
  32. http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/cliff.jones/publications/OCRd/BBG63.pdf
  33. https://www.algol68-lang.org/docs/algol68-revised-report.pdf
  34. https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~necula/Papers/KnuthTroubleAlgol.pdf
  35. http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/sds/9xx/lang/900699C_Algol60_Ref_Nov66.pdf
  36. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/960118.808389
  37. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/234286.1057812
  38. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3747199.3747556
  39. https://www.phoronix.com/news/Algol-68-GCC-Patches-Updated
  40. http://groups.umd.umich.edu/cis/course.des/cis400/cobol/cobol.html
  41. https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/cobol-event-exhib-4681
  42. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/FIPS/fipspub21-2.pdf
  43. https://www.iso.org/standard/51416.html
  44. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cobol-zos/6.3.0?topic=appendixes-20022014-cobol-standard-features-implemented-in-enterprise-cobol-version-3-later-versions
  45. https://www.designgurus.io/answers/detail/how-to-prepare-for-coding-interviews-in-cobol
  46. https://www.microfocus.com/documentation/visual-cobol/vc60/DevHub/GUID-36151569-3DF1-4AC6-B602-6AE1B2E58D8C.html
  47. https://www.sunbelt-plb.com/about/plb-info/
  48. https://gnucobol.sourceforge.io/further-information.html
  49. https://www.sysmatch.com/new/learn-cobol
  50. https://www.rocketsoftware.com/en-us/insights/what-is-cobol
  51. https://www.integrativesystems.com/cobol-programmers/
  52. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.5.0?topic=world-cobol-java-programs
  53. https://www.cs.csub.edu/~melissa/cs350-f15/notes/notes02.html
  54. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/960118.808389
  55. https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/chist.html
  56. http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/360/pli/C28-6571-1_PL_I_Language_Specifications_Jul65.pdf
  57. https://cacm.acm.org/article/lessons-from-pl-i-a-most-ambitious-programming-language/
  58. https://www.nokia.com/bell-labs/about/dennis-m-ritchie/chist.html
  59. https://www.retrotechnology.com/dri/dri_plm.html
  60. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos-basic-skills?topic=zos-pli
  61. https://swimm.io/learn/application-modernization/10-mainframe-modernization-tools-to-know-in-2025
  62. https://calltolead.dartmouth.edu/stories/celebrating-birth-basic-and-beyond
  63. https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/stories/50-years-computer-language-basic
  64. https://ethw.org/Milestones:BASIC_Computer_Language%2C_1964
  65. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/smallbasic/a-brief-history-of-basic/336312
  66. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/smallbasic/microsofts-history-with-basic-altair-8800-trs-80-color-computer/335551
  67. https://www.minitab.com/content/dam/www/en/uploadedfiles/content/products/spm/BasicProgLang.pdf
  68. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/visual-basic/language-reference/statements/goto-statement
  69. https://www.computer.org/publications/tech-news/insider-membership-news/timeline-of-programming-languages
  70. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/visual-basic/whats-new/
  71. https://www.freebasic.net/wiki/wikka.php?wakka=CompilerQB
  72. https://www.freebasic.net/wiki/QuickBASIC
  73. https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/lisp.ps
  74. https://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Front/index.htm
  75. https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/scheme.html
  76. https://clojure.org/about/history
  77. https://racket-lang.org/history.html
  78. https://www.mt-archive.net/50/IFIP-1959-Yngve.pdf
  79. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/363018.363038
  80. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/String-Processing-Languages/9631375a6ba61a22825289959a856cb3db13f9da
  81. https://www.csee.umbc.edu/courses/undergraduate/331/resources/papers/sammet1972.pdf
  82. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/234286.1057830
  83. https://compileralchemy.substack.com/p/regex-engines-history-and-contributions
  84. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/800025.1198400
  85. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R0918.html
  86. https://bitsavers.org/pdf/rand/joss/P-3486_JOSS_Introduction_To_The_System_Implementation_Nov66.pdf
  87. https://www.epigeneticslab.net/2024/joss-intro
  88. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2008/R918.pdf
  89. https://web.stanford.edu/group/csli-suppes/techreports/IMSSS_164.pdf
  90. https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/history.html
  91. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55676142/why-are-operating-system-kernels-typically-written-in-c-or-c
  92. https://www.stroustrup.com/hopl2.pdf
  93. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3386332
  94. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2015/12/03Apple-Releases-Swift-as-Open-Source/
  95. https://www.trust-in-soft.com/resources/blogs/rusts-rise-hybrid-code-needs-advanced-analysis
  96. https://www.codingandbeyond.com/2024/09/17/bedrock-of-software-part-3-the-influence-of-c-on-modern-programming-languages/
  97. https://www.fanruan.com/en/glossary/software-development/bourne-shell
  98. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/Korn-shell
  99. http://kornshell.com/doc/faq.html
  100. https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/what-is-bash
  101. https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/linux-shells-explained/
  102. https://objectcomputing.com/resources/publications/sett/november-2017-sett-article-fish-shell
  103. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/powershell/its-a-wrap-windows-powershell-1-0-released/
  104. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/284723/when-was-pipelining-introduced
  105. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Fr7FpCNhnTP2i5iaG/type-safeness-in-shell
  106. https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/l-linux-shells/
  107. https://luplab.cs.ucdavis.edu/2021/11/04/the-hunt-for-posix-1-1988.html
  108. https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/
  109. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/biography/ken-thompson
  110. https://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/
  111. https://www.gnu.org/software/sed/manual/sed.html
  112. https://www.gnu.org/software/sed/manual/sed.html#Regular-Expressions
  113. https://tcm-sec.com/log-analysis-sed-awk-grep-regex/
  114. https://www.gnu.org/s/gawk/manual/gawk.html
  115. https://pikuma.com/blog/origins-of-vim-text-editor
  116. https://www.gnu.org/software/sed/manual/sed.html#Running-sed
  117. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/the-ibm-mainframe-how-it-runs-and-why-it-survives/
  118. https://vintageos.org/jcl.html
  119. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29484750/when-was-batch-created
  120. https://www.robvanderwoude.com/condexec.php
  121. https://www.ibmmainframeforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=8391
  122. https://syncromsp.com/blog/batch-scripting/
  123. https://gunkies.org/wiki/VMS
  124. https://wiki.vmssoftware.com/DCL
  125. https://wiki.vmssoftware.com/Command_procedure
  126. https://www.sfu.ca/sasdoc/sashtml/vms/z0247456.htm
  127. https://wiki.vmssoftware.com/SET_COMMAND
  128. http://nonstoptools.com/manuals/Tacl-Guide.pdf
  129. https://www.theregister.com/2018/02/06/openvms_vulnerability/
  130. https://vmssoftware.com/about/roadmap/
  131. https://www.mn.uio.no/ifi/english/about/ole-johan-dahl/bibliography/the-birth-of-object-orientation-the-simula-languages.pdf
  132. https://www.cs.tufts.edu/comp/150FP/archive/kristen-nygaard/hopl-simula.pdf
  133. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540113000795
  134. http://webhotel4.ruc.dk/~keld/research/DISCO/Disco80.pdf
  135. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~charlie/courses/15-214/2014-fall/slides/25-history-oo.pdf
  136. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/800025.1198392
  137. https://se.inf.ethz.ch/~meyer/publications/old/dbc_chapter.pdf
  138. https://se.inf.ethz.ch/~meyer/publications/eiffel/eiffel_jss.pdf
  139. https://archive.eiffel.com/doc/online/eiffel50/intro/language/tutorial.pdf
  140. https://www.ecma-international.org/wp-content/uploads/ECMA-367_2nd_edition_june_2006.pdf
  141. https://www.eiffel.com/values/void-safety/
  142. https://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2002_08/article1/index.html
  143. https://steveomohundro.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/szyperski_omohundro94_engineering_sather.pdf
  144. https://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2004_11/article3/
  145. https://www.eiffel.com/2025/eiffelstudio-25-02/
  146. https://se.inf.ethz.ch/~meyer/publications/AI/bugfixes.pdf
  147. https://www.oracle.com/news/announcement/oracle-releases-java-25-2025-09-16/
  148. https://www.jalasoft.com/blog/companies-that-use-java
  149. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/language-specification/introduction
  150. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/behind-the-tech/anders-hejlsberg-a-craftsman-of-computer-language
  151. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/whats-new/csharp-14
  152. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/how-async-await-really-works/
  153. https://dev.to/cristiansifuentes/new-features-in-net-10-c-14-the-experts-playbook-2025-2pe5
  154. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/the-early-history-of-f/
  155. https://boo-language.github.io/
  156. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/azure/
  157. https://www.juegostudio.com/blog/unity-game-development-guide-2025
  158. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/introduction
  159. https://computerhistory.org/blog/the-apl-programming-language-source-code/
  160. http://www.aplcloud.com/aboutapl.php
  161. https://public.dhe.ibm.com/ps/products/apl2/pubs/apl2lrm.pdf
  162. http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~blynn/c/apl.html
  163. https://mastering.dyalog.com/Tacit-Programming.html
  164. https://mlops.systems/posts/2021-12-29-j-language.html
  165. https://kx.com/
  166. https://www.dyalog.com/history-of-dyalog-ltd.htm
  167. https://code.kx.com/q/wp/surveillance/
  168. https://www.gnu.org/software/apl/apl.html
  169. https://www.forth.com/resources/forth-programming-language/
  170. https://gforth.org/manual/Defining-Words.html
  171. https://www.forth.org/svfig/Win32Forth/DPANS94.txt
  172. https://forth-standard.org/standard/core/RECURSE
  173. https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/forth/hopl.html
  174. https://www.forth.com/resources/space-applications/
  175. https://www.forth.com/resources/forth-apps/
  176. https://www.gnu.org/software/gforth/
  177. https://concatenative.org/wiki/view/Factor
  178. https://www.forth.com/swiftforth/
  179. https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/tfp12/tfp12.pdf
  180. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/history.pdf
  181. http://miranda.org.uk/
  182. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/234286.1057820
  183. https://www.cs.arizona.edu/classes/cs372/fall06/prolog.sli.pdf
  184. http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~hzhang/c188/notes/ch08b-cut.pdf
  185. https://mercurylang.org/about/motivation.html
  186. https://www.swi-prolog.org/features.html
  187. https://logtalk.org/2009/02/13/logtalk-10th-anniversary.html
  188. https://medium.com/the-thoughtful-engineer/prolog-the-forgotten-language-that-powers-legal-tech-and-ai-8f49bb455134
  189. https://www.iso.org/standard/20775.html
  190. https://www.cs.unc.edu/~stotts/COMP590-059-f21/FUNC/MLnotes/overview.html
  191. https://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/papers-we-love/milner-type-polymorphism.pdf
  192. https://pldi21.sigplan.org/details/hopl-4-papers/16/The-History-of-Standard-ML
  193. https://smlfamily.github.io/history/SML-history.pdf
  194. https://ocaml.org/about
  195. https://fsharp.org/
  196. https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~appel/papers/smlnj.pdf
  197. https://smlnj.org/
  198. https://courses.cs.vt.edu/~cs3304/Spring02/lectures/lect04.pdf
  199. https://code.facebook.com/posts/1505962329687926/flow-a-new-static-type-checker-for-javascript/
  200. https://code.facebook.com/posts/264544830379293/hack-a-new-programming-language-for-hhvm/
  201. http://mlton.org/Changelog
  202. https://worrydream.com/refs/Backus_1978_-_Can_Programming_Be_Liberated_from_the_von_Neumann_Style.pdf
  203. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/119830.119839
  204. https://dercuano.github.io/notes/backus-rebuttal.html
  205. https://setl.org/doc/setl.html
  206. https://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/SETL
  207. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/947783.948659
  208. https://cs.nyu.edu/media/publications/bacon_david.pdf
  209. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278690577_SETL_and_the_Evolution_of_Programming
  210. http://web.stanford.edu/~ouster/cgi-bin/tclHistory.php
  211. https://www.tcl-lang.org/doc/scripting.html
  212. https://www.tcl-lang.org/about/history.html
  213. https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/expect
  214. https://jim.tcl.tk/
  215. https://semiconductorjobs.co.uk/career-advice/which-programming-languages-should-you-learn-for-a-semiconductor-career-
  216. https://www.tcl-lang.org/software/tcltk/9.0.html
  217. http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/papers/hypertalk.pdf
  218. https://vintageapple.org/macbooks/pdf/HyperTalk_Beginners_Guide_An_Introduction_to_Scripting_1989.pdf
  219. http://www.hypercard.center/HyperTalkReference/hypertalkbasics/Writing-message-handlers
  220. https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~wcook/Drafts/2006/ashopl.pdf
  221. https://cancel.fm/stuff/share/HyperCard_Script_Language_Guide_1.pdf
  222. https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/06/livecode_interview/
  223. https://www.reid-it.co.uk/downloads/downlc.htm
  224. https://livecode.com/android-support-updated-new-create-preview-release/
  225. https://livecode.com/livecode-classic-10-0-1-stable-and-10-0-2-rc-1-released/
  226. https://www.w3schools.com/js/js_history.asp
  227. https://blog.risingstack.com/history-of-javascript-on-a-timeline/
  228. https://262.ecma-international.org/6.0/
  229. https://tc39.es/ecma262/2023/
  230. https://tc39.es/ecma262/2024/
  231. https://tc39.es/ecma262/2025/
  232. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/ten-years-of-typescript/
  233. https://coffeescript.org/
  234. https://www.cnet.com/culture/google-debuts-dart-a-javascript-alternative/
  235. https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cp-javascript
  236. https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2025/technology
  237. https://jsrocks.org/2015/01/temporal-dead-zone-tdz-demystified
  238. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/javascript/temporal-dead-zone-in-javascript/
  239. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=910
  240. https://blogs.oracle.com/sql/general-availability-of-the-sql2023-standard
  241. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2380776.2380786
  242. https://db-engines.com/en/ranking
  243. http://oracle-internals.com/blog/2020/04/29/a-not-so-brief-but-very-accurate-history-of-pl-sql/
  244. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/sql-server/blog/2012/02/15/new-video-the-history-of-sql-server/
  245. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3183713.3190657
  246. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/what-is-fourth-generation-programming-language/
  247. https://programmers.io/blog/rpg-programming-language/
  248. https://thorgroup.com/blog/the-evolution-of-rpg-programming-from-legacy-systems-to-modern-applications/
  249. https://www.progress.com/company/40-years
  250. https://www.itjungle.com/2019/01/07/lansa-bought-by-software-conglomerate-idera/
  251. https://intellyx.com/2018/02/25/lansa-low-code-platform-with-rad-and-4gl-heritage/
  252. https://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/information-builders-inc-history/
  253. https://www.bloorresearch.com/research/easytrieve-modernised/
  254. https://pages.community.sap.com/topics/crystal-reports/faq
  255. https://www.umsl.edu/~joshik/msis480/chapt05.htm
  256. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/generation-language
  257. https://lansa.com/blog/application-modernization/what-is-rpg-programming-language-used-for/
  258. https://www.srinsofttech.com/blog/rpg-programming-language/
  259. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1574652606800167
  260. https://personal.utdallas.edu/~gupta/courses/lpug/clp-tutorial.pdf
  261. https://eclipseclp.org/reports/tplp2012-eclipse.pdf
  262. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47822182_SICStus_Prolog_--_the_first_25_years
  263. https://sicstus.sics.se/sicstus/docs/3.7.1/html/sicstus_33.html
  264. https://jair.org/index.php/jair/SpecialTrack-CPML
  265. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667305325000675
  266. https://forethought.ai/blog/natural-language-understanding-what-is-it
  267. https://medium.com/data-science-collective/intent-driven-natural-language-interface-a-hybrid-llm-intent-classification-approach-e1d96ad6f35d
  268. https://www.wolfram.com/language/
  269. https://github.com/features/copilot
  270. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10555627
  271. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2023.1350306/full
  272. https://www.adalo.com/posts/traditional-coding-vs-no-code-adoption-statistics
  273. https://www.artima.com/articles/the-making-of-python
  274. https://perldoc.perl.org/perlfaq1
  275. https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.12.html
  276. http://python-history.blogspot.com/2009/02/early-language-design-and-development.html
  277. https://www.infoworld.com/article/4087563/c-sharp-rises-in-tiobe-language-popularity-index.html
  278. https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/
  279. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3277104.3277119
  280. https://julialang.org/blog/2012/02/why-we-created-julia/
  281. https://julialang.org/
  282. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157401372030071X
  283. https://invozone.com/blog/why-you-should-learn-elixir-programming-language-in-2021/
  284. https://elixir-lang.org/
  285. https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/introduction.html
  286. https://nim-lang.org/
  287. https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang
  288. https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/docs/project/goals.md
  289. https://www.assemblyscript.org/
  290. https://github.com/AssemblyScript/assemblyscript
  291. https://news.mit.edu/2018/mit-developed-julia-programming-language-debuts-juliacon-0827
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.