Hubbry Logo
Guru ArjanGuru ArjanMain
Open search
Guru Arjan
Community hub
Guru Arjan
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Guru Arjan
Guru Arjan
Guru Arjan
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Guru Arjan[3][4] (Gurmukhi: ਗੁਰੂ ਅਰਜਨ, pronunciation: [gʊɾuː əɾd͡ʒənᵊ]; 15 April 1563 – 30 May 1606)[2] was the fifth of the ten total Sikh Gurus. He compiled the first official edition of the Sikh scripture called the Adi Granth, which later expanded into the Guru Granth Sahib. He is regarded as the first of the two Gurus martyred in the Sikh faith.[note 1]

Guru Arjan was born in Goindval, in the Punjab, the youngest son of Bhai Jetha, who later became Guru Ram Das, and Mata Bhani, the daughter of Guru Amar Das.[5][6] He completed the construction of the Darbar Sahib at Amritsar, after the fourth Sikh Guru founded the town and built a sarovar.[7][8][9] Arjan compiled the hymns of previous Gurus and of other saints into Adi Granth, the first edition of the Sikh scripture, and installed it in the Harimandir Sahib.[7]

Guru Arjan reorganized the masand system initiated by Guru Ram Das, by suggesting that the Sikhs donate, if possible, one-tenth of their income, goods or service to the Sikh organization (dasvandh). The Masand not only collected these funds but also taught tenets of Sikhism and settled civil disputes in their region. The dasvand financed the building of gurdwaras and langars (shared communal kitchens).[10]

Guru Arjan was arrested under the orders of the Mughal Emperor Jahangir accusing him of supporting a rebellion under Khusrau Mirza.[7][11][12][13] He was asked to convert himself to Islam.[14][15] He refused and, as a result, was tortured and executed in 1606 CE.[14][16] Historical records and the Sikh tradition are unclear as to whether Arjan was executed by drowning or died during torture.[14] The Sikh tradition states the Guru's execution was a part of the ongoing persecution of the Sikhs under the Mughal Empire.[17][18] His martyrdom is considered a watershed event in the history of Sikhism.[14][19] It is remembered as Shaheedi Divas of Guru Arjan in May or June according to the Nanakshahi calendar released by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee in 2003.[20]

Biography

[edit]

Early life

[edit]

Guru Arjan was born in Goindval to Bibi Bhani and Jetha Sodhi. Bibi Bhani was the daughter of Guru Amar Das, and her husband Jetha Sodhi later came to be known as Guru Ram Das. Arjan's birthplace site is now memorialized as the Gurdwara Chaubara Sahib.[21] He had two brothers: Prithi Chand and Mahadev.[22][23] Various Sikh chroniclers give his birth year as 1553 or 1563, the latter is accepted by scholarly consensus as the actual year of birth with 15 April as the accepted birth date.[24]

Guru Arjan spent the first 11 years of his life in Goindwal and the next seven years with his father in Ramdaspur.[22] Per Sikh tradition, he had stayed for two years in Lahore during his youth after being sent by his father to attend the wedding of his first cousin Sahari Mal's son as well as to establish a Sikh congregation.[25] He was appointed as the Sikh Guru in 1581 after the death of his father.[26] Guru Ram Das was a Khatri of the Sodhi sub-caste. With Arjan's succession, the Guruship remained in the Sodhi family of Guru Ram Das.[27]

Marriages

[edit]

According to historians, Guru Arjan wedded twice.[28] His first wife was Mata Ram Dei, whom he married on 20 June 1579.[28] His second wife was Mata Ganga, their wedding taking place on 19 May 1589.[28] Popular Sikh tradition omits his first wife and claims he was only married to Ganga.[28]

Succession and time as Guru

[edit]
Fresco of Baba Buddha crowning Guru Arjan as the next guru by placing tilak on his forehead, known as the Gurgadi ceremony. Guru Ram Das is depicted to the immediate bottom right of Arjan.

Guru Ram Das chose Arjan, the youngest, to succeed him as the fifth Sikh Guru. Mahadev, the middle brother chose the life of an ascetic.[29] His choice of Guru Arjan as successor, as throughout most of the history of Sikh Guru successions, led to disputes and internal divisions among the Sikhs.[7][30]

The succession dispute regarding Guru Arjan created a schism that yielded different narratives for the two factions.[29] In the orthodox Sikh tradition, Prithi Chand is remembered as vehemently opposing Guru Arjan, creating a factional sect of the Sikh community.[31] The Sikhs following Arjan referred to the breakaway faction as Minas (literally, "scoundrels"). Prithi Chand and his followers attempted to assassinate the young Hargobind thrice.[32][33] Prithi Chand also befriended Mughal agents.[29] Subsequent written competing texts written by the Minas, on the other hand, offered a different explanation for the attempt on Hargobind's life, and present him as devoted to his younger brother Arjan. The eldest son of Prithi Chand, Miharvan, is mentioned in both traditions as having received tutelage from both Prithi Chand and Arjan as a child.[34]

The competing texts acknowledge the disagreements. They state Prithi Chand left Amritsar, became the Sahib Guru after the martyrdom of Guru Arjan and one who disputed the succession of Hargobind as the next Guru.[35] The followers of Prithi Chand considered themselves the true followers of Guru Nanak as they rejected the increasing emphasis on militarization of the panth under Hargobind to resist Mughal persecution in the wake of Arjan's martyrdom, in favor of non-violent interiorization.[29] In addition to Prithi Chand, a son of Guru Amar Das named Baba Mohan had also challenged the authority of Arjan.[36] These challenging claims were asserted by the early Sikh sects in part by their manuscripts of Sikh hymns. Baba Mohan possessed the Goindval pothi containing the hymns of Nanak and other early Gurus, while Prithi Chand possessed the Guru Harsahai pothi then believed to have been the oldest scripture from the time of Nanak.[36] This, state scholars, may have triggered Guru Arjan to create a much enlarged, official version of the Adi Granth.[36]

Upon the first parkash of the Adi Granth according to Gurbilas, Guru Arjan said, “Listen you all to my directive. And believe it as ever true. Accept the Granth as equal with the Guru. And think no distinctions between the two.”[37]

The mainstream Sikh tradition recognised Guru Arjan as the fifth Guru, and Hargobind as the sixth Guru.[19][31][38] Arjan, at age 18, became the fifth Guru in 1581 inheriting the title from his father. After his execution by the Muslim officials of the Mughal Empire, his son Hargobind became the sixth Guru in 1606 CE.[19]

Execution

[edit]
Painting of the torture and martyrdom of Arjan by the Punjabi painter Sri Ram (1876 – 1926)

Guru Arjan died in Mughal custody; this has been one of the defining, though controversial, issues in Sikh history.[39][40]

Most Mughal historians considered Guru Arjan's execution as a political event, stating that the Sikhs had become formidable as a social group, and Sikh Gurus became actively involved in the Punjabi political conflicts.[14][40] A similar theory floated in the early 20th-century, asserts that this was just a politically-motivated single execution.[41] According to this theory, there was an ongoing Mughal dynasty dispute between Jahangir and his son Khusrau suspected of rebellion by Jahangir, wherein Arjan blessed Khusrau and thus the losing side. Jahangir was jealous and outraged, and therefore he ordered the Guru's execution.[7][11][12][13] But according to Jahangir's own autobiography, most probably he didn't understand the importance of Sikh gurus. He referred to Arjan as a Hindu, who had "captured many of the simple-hearted of the Hindus and even of the ignorant and foolish followers of Islam, by his ways and manners...for the three or four generations (of spiritual successors) they had kept this shop warm." The execution of Arjan marks a sharp contrast to Jahangir's tolerant attitude towards other religions such as Hinduism and Christianity.[42][43]

But even earlier, there has been dispute between emperor Akbar and Guru Arjan and his peasant base regarding the new land revenue system of Mughal empire. Akbar had visited the guru at Goindwal and land revenue of Bari doab was subsequently exempted.[44]

The Gurdwara Dera Sahib in Lahore, Pakistan, commemorates the spot where Guru Arjan Dev is traditionally believed to have died.

The Sikh tradition has a competing view. It states that the Guru's execution was a part of the ongoing persecution of the Sikhs by Islamic authorities in the Mughal Empire,[17] and that the Mughal rulers of Punjab were alarmed at the growth of the Panth.[15][40][45] According to Jahangir's autobiography Tuzk-e-Jahangiri (Jahangirnama) which discussed Arjan's support for his rebellious son Khusrau, too many people were becoming persuaded by Arjan's teachings and if Arjan did not become a Muslim, the Sikh Panth had to be extinguished.[40][note 2]

In 1606 CE, the Guru was imprisoned in Lahore Fort, where by some accounts he was tortured and executed,[15][46] and by other accounts, the method of his death remains unresolved.[40] The traditional Sikh account states that the Mughal emperor Jahangir demanded a fine of 200,000 rupees and demanded that Arjan erase some of the hymns in the text that he found offensive. The Guru refused to remove the lines and pay the fine which, the Sikh accounts state, led to his execution.[47] Some Muslim traditional accounts such as of Latif in 19th-century states that Arjan was dictatorial, someone who lived in splendour with "costly attire", who had left aside the rosary and the clothes of a saint (fakir).[48] Shaikh Ahmad Sirhindi cheered the punishment and execution of Arjun, calling the Sikh Guru an infidel.[49][note 3] In contrast, Mian Mir – the Sufi friend of Arjan, lobbied when Jehangir ordered the execution and the confiscation of Arjan's property, then got the confiscation order deferred, according to Rishi Singh.[52]

Some scholars state that the evidence is unclear whether his death was due to execution, torture or forced drowning in the Ravi river.[12][53][54] J.S. Grewal notes that Sikh sources from the seventeenth and eighteenth-century contain contradictory reports of Arjan's death.[55] J. F. Richard states that Jahangir was persistently hostile to popularly venerated saints, not just Sikhism.[56] Bhai Gurdas was a contemporary of Arjan and is a noted 17th-century Sikh chronicler.[57] His eyewitness account recorded Arjan's life, and the order by Emperor Jahangir to torture the Guru to death.[58]

A contemporary Jesuit account, written by Spanish Jesuit missionary Jerome Xavier (1549–1617), who was in Lahore at the time, records that the Sikhs tried to get Jahangir to commute the torture and death sentence to a heavy fine, but this attempt failed.[59] Dabistan-i Mazahib Mobad states Jahangir tortured Arjan in the hopes of extracting the money and public repudiation of his spiritual convictions, but the Guru refused and was executed.[60] Jerome Xavier, in appreciation of the courage of Guru Arjun, wrote back to Lisbon, that Arjan suffered and was tormented.[3]

Detail of a depiction of Guru Arjan Dev's martyrdom, from the front-page of the Thursday, 13 April 1933 Vaisakhi edition of 'The Khalsa', published from Lahore.

According to the Sikh tradition, before his execution, Arjan instructed his son and successor Hargobind to take up arms, and resist tyranny.[61] His execution led the Sikh Panth to become armed and pursue resistance to persecution under the Mughal rule.[15][62] Michael Barnes states that the resolve and death of Arjun strengthened the conviction among Sikhs that, "personal piety must have a core of moral strength. A virtuous soul must be a courageous soul. Willingness to suffer trial for one's convictions was a religious imperative".[3]

There are several stories and versions about how, where and why Arjan died.[63][64][65] Recent scholarship[66][67] have offered alternative analyses, wary of "exaggerating fragmentary traces of documentary evidence in historical analysis". The alternate versions include stories about the role of Arjan in a conflict between the Mughal Emperor Jahangir and his son who Jahangir suspected of trying to organize a patricidal coup. An alternate version highlights the role of a Hindu minister of Jahangir named Chandu Shah. He, in one version, takes revenge on Arjan for not marrying his son Hargobind to Chandu Shah's daughter. In another Lahore version, Chandu Shah actually prevents Arjan from suffering torture and death by Muslims by paying 200,000 rupees (100,000 crusados) to Jahangir, but then keeps him and emotionally torments him to death in his house.[68] Several alternative versions of the story try to absolve Jahangir and the Mughal empire of any responsibility,[64][69] but have no trace or support in the documentary evidence from early 17th century, such as the records of Jesuit priest Jerome Xavier and the memoirs of Jahangir.[14][16][70]

Legacy

[edit]

Amritsar

[edit]
Guru Arjan hunting while mounted on horseback with a hawk. Painting from Faizabad, circa 1760.

Guru Arjan's father Guru Ram Das founded the town named after him "Ramdaspur", around a large man-made water pool called "Ramdas Sarovar". Arjan continued the infrastructure-building effort of his father. The town expanded during the time of guru Arjan, financed by donations and constructed by voluntary work. The pool area grew into a temple complex with the Gurdwara Harmandir Sahib near the pool. Guru Arjan installed the scripture of Sikhism inside the new temple in 1604.[7] The city that emerged is now known as Amritsar, and is the holiest pilgrimage site in Sikhism.[7][71]

Continuing the efforts of Ram Das, guru Arjan established Amritsar as a primary Sikh pilgrimage destination. He wrote a voluminous amount of Sikh scripture including the popular Sukhmani Sahib. Guru Arjan is credited with completing many other infrastructure projects, such as water reservoirs called Santokhsar (Pond of Contentment) and Gongsar (Pond of Bells),[72] founding the towns of Tarn Taran, Kartarpur and Hargobindpur.[73][74]

Community expansion

[edit]

While having completing the Harmandir Sahib with dasvand donations during the first decade of his guruship between 1581 and 1589, creating a rallying point for the community and a center for Sikh activity, and a place for the installment of the Adi Granth, Guru Arjan had also gone on a tour of Majha and Doaba in Punjab, where he would found the towns. Due to their central location in the Punjab heartland, the ranks of Sikhs would swell, especially among the Jat peasantry, and create a level of prosperity for them; Arjan would serve not only as a spiritual mentor but as a true emperor (sacchā pādshāh) for his followers in his own right.[73]

Adi Granth

[edit]

According to the Sikh tradition, Arjan compiled the Adi Granth by collecting hymns of past Gurus from many places, then rejecting those that he considered as fakes or to be diverging from the teachings of the Gurus.[75] His approved collection included hymns from the first four Gurus of Sikhism, those he composed, as well as 17 Hindu bards and 2 Muslim bards (Bhagats).[76][77] The compilation was completed on 30 August 1604, according to the Sikh tradition and installed in the Harmandir Sahib temple on 1 September 1604.[78]

Arjan was a prolific poet who composed 2,218 hymns. More than half of the volume of Guru Granth Sahib and the largest collection of hymns has been composed by Arjan. According to Christopher Shackle and Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair, Arjan's compositions combined spiritual message in an "encyclopedic linguistic sophistication" with "Braj Bhasha forms and learned Sanskrit vocabulary".[79]

After Arjan completed and installed the Adi Granth in the Harimandir Sahib, Mughal emperor Akbar was informed of the development with the allegation that it contained teachings hostile to Islam. He ordered a copy be brought to him. Arjan sent him a copy on a thali (plate), with the following message that was later added to the expanded text:

In this thali (dish) you will find three things – truth, peace and contemplation:
in this too the nectar Name which is the support of all humanity.

— AG 1429, Translated by William Owen Cole and Piara Singh Sambhi[80]

The Akbarnama by Abu'l-Fazl Allami mentions that Arjan met the Mughal emperor Akbar and his cortege in 1598. According to Louis Fenech, this meeting likely influenced the development of Sikh manuscriptology and the later martial tradition.[81]

One of the Sikh community disputes following Guru Ram Das was the emergence of new hymns claiming to have been composed by Nanak. According to the faction led by Arjan, these hymns were distorted and fake, with some blaming Prithi Chand and his Sikh faction for having composed and circulated them.[29][82] The concern and the possibility of wrong propaganda, immoral teachings and inauthentic Gurbani led Arjan to initiate a major effort to collect, study, approve and compile a written official scripture, and this he called Adi Granth, the first edition of the Sikh scripture by 1604.[32][35]

The composition of both Prithi Chand and his followers have been preserved in the Mina texts of Sikhism, while the mainstream and larger Sikh tradition adopted the Guru Granth Sahib scripture that ultimately emerged from the initiative of Arjan.[35][83]

Literature

[edit]

Guru Arjan produced a large amount of literature, which roughly equals that which had been produced by his predecessors combined. Guru Arjan's written works closely follow and are a continuation of the style of his father, Guru Ram Das. For example, Arjan uses the same set of thirty rāgs that his father had set his hymns to and the language of his compositions are favoured toward Sanskritic/Hindi vocabulary. Whilst his individual poems are not as vivid as those authored by Guru Nanak, his vast reworkings accumulate to create a sense of unity within the Ād Granth. Furthermore, Guru Arjan acted as an editor for the compilation of a Sikh scripture, such as by providing supplementary commentary appended to the saloks of the Bhagat Bani and his adoption of the bhagats' shabad hymns. In-addition, he included the Bhatt Bani into the Sikh corpus. He authored vār compositions and added his own verses to the vār compositions which had been originally authored by his predecessors. His eminent work is the Sukhmani Sahib.[84]

[edit]
  • Gurgadi ceremony of Guru Arjan being pronounced as fifth Guru.
    Gurgadi ceremony of Guru Arjan being pronounced as fifth Guru.
  • Guru Arjan miniature painting, ca.1800.
    Guru Arjan miniature painting, ca.1800.
  • Guru Arjan with Sri Chand, miniature painting.
    Guru Arjan with Sri Chand, miniature painting.
  • Guru Arjun Dev painting from the family workshop of Nainsukh of Guler.
    Guru Arjun Dev painting from the family workshop of Nainsukh of Guler.
  • Fresco of Guru Arjan Dev from Goindwal Baoli Sahib.
    Fresco of Guru Arjan Dev from Goindwal Baoli Sahib.
  • Guru Arjan compiling the Adi Granth with Bhai Gurdas.
    Guru Arjan compiling the Adi Granth with Bhai Gurdas.
  • Photograph from Gurdwara Lal Khoohi of the place where Guru Arjan is believed to have been incarcerated
    Photograph from Gurdwara Lal Khoohi of the place where Guru Arjan is believed to have been incarcerated

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Guru Arjan

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Guru Arjan Dev (1563–1606) served as the fifth Guru of the from 1581 until his death, succeeding his father and preceding his . Born into a Sikh family, he was immersed from childhood in the teachings of prior Gurus and contributed to the institutionalization of the Sikh community through devotional poetry, urban development, and scriptural compilation. His most enduring achievement was the assembly of the Adi Granth in 1604, a comprehensive anthology of sacred hymns (bani) from the first five Gurus, select Hindu and Muslim saints, and his own compositions, authenticated via scrutiny of earlier manuscripts and oral recitations to preserve doctrinal integrity. Arjan also directed the construction of the (later known as the ) within the tank in , establishing it as a central pilgrimage site symbolizing equality and openness with entrances on all four sides. In 1606, he was arrested and executed under orders from Mughal , who in his memoirs cited Arjan's alleged support for the emperor's rebel Khusrau as justification for punishment, though Sikh accounts emphasize involving torture for refusing to alter the Adi Granth or convert; scholarly analysis highlights intertwined political and religious factors, with Jahangir's account providing a primary contemporary perspective but potentially downplaying imperial overreach. This event marked a pivotal shift toward in and is commemorated as the first martyrdom (shahadat) in the tradition.

Early Life

Birth and Family

Guru Arjan was born on April 15, 1563 (Vaisakh Vadi 7, Samvat 1620), in Goindwal, , then part of the . He was the youngest son of (born Bhai Jetha, a Sodhi Khatri) and , the daughter of the third Sikh . His father, , founded the city of and served as the fourth Sikh from 1574 to 1581, emphasizing and expansion of Sikh institutions. Mata Bhani, known for her devotion and role in preserving Sikh traditions, was instrumental in the family's spiritual lineage. Guru Arjan had two elder brothers: (also known as Prithia), the eldest, and Mahadev, the middle son; tensions later arose between Arjan and over succession matters. In adulthood, Guru Arjan married Mata Ganga in 1589 (or circa 1579 per some accounts), and they had one son, Hargobind, born in 1595, who succeeded him as the sixth .

Education and Formative Influences

Guru Arjan was born on April 15, 1563, in Goindval, immersed from infancy in the teachings of the preceding , with tutoring focused on recognizing the central to Sikh devotion. His early religious upbringing occurred under his father, , in an environment emphasizing recitation, selfless service, and meditation on the divine name. Traditional Sikh accounts attribute his foundational literacy in script and deep study of to instruction from , the revered elder Sikh who had served all prior Gurus. He further received education in Persian, , and , with scholarly analysis suggesting proficiency in Persian possibly gained through local Muslim maktabs, equipping him for engaging with diverse textual traditions. These formative experiences, rooted in his family's direct lineage from , cultivated exceptional spiritual insight and poetic talent evident from youth.

Ascension to Guruship

Preceding Gurus and Succession Context

The Sikh Guruship originated with Dev, born in 1469 and serving as the first Guru until his death in 1539, during which he established core Sikh principles including the rejection of caste distinctions, emphasis on one God, and communal living through practices like langar. selected his devoted disciple, originally named Lehna, as successor to perpetuate the spiritual mission based on merit rather than familial ties, renaming him Dev, who led from 1539 to 1552 and advanced Sikh identity by standardizing the script for scriptural preservation. in turn appointed in 1552, who guided the community until 1574 at age 95, instituting social reforms such as prohibiting sati and expanding the langar system to challenge gender and caste hierarchies. Guru Amar Das chose his son-in-law Jetha, recognizing his humility and service, elevating him to Guru Ram Das from 1574 to 1581; Ram Das founded the city of Amritsar (originally Ramdaspur) by excavating a sacred tank, fostering urban and institutional growth for the Sikh sangats. In a departure toward hereditary succession, Guru Ram Das designated his youngest son, Arjan Dev, born in 1563, as the fifth Guru in 1581, bypassing elder sons and Mahadev due to Arjan's demonstrated piety and devotion, as evidenced by traditional accounts of Ram Das performing the ceremonial transfer with five coins and a while bowing to Arjan. This selection, officiated by the revered who had served prior Gurus, underscored continuity in spiritual authority amid emerging familial tensions, setting the stage for Arjan's expansions while highlighting the Gurus' preference for divine light over bloodline exclusivity in earlier transitions.

Installation as Fifth Guru

, the fourth Sikh Guru, nominated his youngest son Arjan Dev as his successor prior to his death, bypassing his elder sons Prithia and Mahadev due to Arjan's demonstrated spiritual devotion and humility. passed away on 16 September 1581 in Goindval, marking the end of his guruship that had begun on 16 September 1574. The gurgaddi (installation) ceremony for Arjan Dev as the fifth followed immediately, conducted by , a revered elder Sikh who had served all preceding Gurus and performed similar rites for them. In this traditional ritual, applied a tilak—a sacred mark—to Arjan's forehead, symbolizing the formal transfer of spiritual authority and leadership of the Sikh . The event solidified the continuity of guruship within the Sodhi family and emphasized the principle of divine selection over hereditary entitlement alone.

Guruship and Achievements

Compilation of the Adi Granth

Guru Arjan initiated the compilation of the Adi Granth to authenticate and preserve the sacred compositions of his predecessor Gurus, his own hymns, and those of Hindu and Muslim saints known as bhagats, amid concerns over potential forgeries and alterations in circulating pothis (scriptural volumes). He dispatched trusted , including , to collect original manuscripts from the families of earlier Gurus, such as those held by Guru Amar Das's descendants in Goindwal. The process involved meticulous verification, exclusion of unauthentic verses, and organization of the 5,894 hymns into 31 ragas (musical measures), with additional sections for vars and sloks. Bhai Gurdas, a revered Sikh scholar and poet who had served under previous Gurus, served as the primary scribe, transcribing the dictation from Guru Arjan over several years, while supervising four additional copyists: Bhai Haria, Bhai Sant Das, Bhai Ram Das, and Bhai Mahan Dev. The compilation, which commenced during Guru Arjan's early guruship and spanned approximately a decade, culminated on August 29, 1604 (16 Bhadro Sudi, Samvat 1661), with the volume comprising around 974 pages in its original form. Following completion, the Adi Granth was installed in the Harmandir Sahib on September 1, 1604, under the supervision of , marking its role as the central scripture for Sikh worship and doctrine. The Adi Granth included contributions from six Sikh Gurus—primarily Guru Nanak (974 shabads), Guru Angad (62), Guru Amar Das (907), Guru Ram Das (638), and Guru Arjan (2,218)—alongside 15 bhagats such as Kabir (541 hymns) and Sheikh Farid (4 shlokas), emphasizing universal spiritual truths over sectarian boundaries. This editorial rigor ensured doctrinal consistency, rejecting politically sensitive or divergent texts, and laid the foundation for the later Guru Granth Sahib by establishing a canonical text resistant to Mughal-era interpolations.

Expansion of Amritsar and Community Institutions

Guru Arjan completed the excavation of the , initiated by his father in 1577, thereby solidifying as a central sacred site for Sikh pilgrims. He also constructed the nearby Santokhsar Sarovar to accommodate the increasing influx of devotees, extending the infrastructural legacy of Ramdaspur into a more expansive urban settlement. These developments drew settlers, merchants, and artisans, transforming the town into a thriving commercial and religious hub with organized markets and residential areas radiating from the sarovars. In 1589, Guru Arjan laid the foundation for the Harmandir Sahib within the Amrit Sarovar, overseeing its construction over the next fifteen years until completion in 1604; the structure's design, with entrances on all four sides and positioned at ground level, emphasized accessibility and equality for all visitors regardless of caste or status. This architectural centerpiece not only enhanced Amritsar's spiritual prominence but also stimulated surrounding economic activity, as annual gatherings like Baisakhi attracted thousands, fostering a self-sustaining community economy based on pilgrimage-related services. To organize the expanding Sikh populace, Guru Arjan formalized the masand system by appointing dedicated representatives across regions; these masands collected voluntary offerings (), propagated Sikh teachings, resolved local disputes, and coordinated remittances to , thereby centralizing community administration and resource allocation under the Guru's oversight. This network, numbering in the dozens by the early 1600s, enabled efficient of dispersed congregations, reinforced doctrinal unity, and supported institutional growth such as communal kitchens (langar) and educational centers in , which served as models for peripheral outposts. The system's emphasis on —masands were periodically summoned for audits—minimized and aligned local efforts with Amritsar's role as the faith's nerve center.

Architectural Contributions and Urban Development

Guru Arjan completed the excavation and construction of the Amrit Sarovar, a sacred pool measuring approximately 500 meters by 500 meters, which had been initiated by his father in 1577. This tank, central to the emerging Sikh pilgrimage site, symbolized spiritual purification and drew settlers to the area, fostering early urban growth around its periphery. In December 1588, corresponding to the 1st of Magh in 1645 Bikrami Samvat, Guru Arjan arranged for the of the Harmandir Sahib to be laid by the Muslim Sufi Hazrat at the pool's center. He personally supervised the temple's design and construction, which emphasized egalitarian access through doorways on all four sides, rejecting hierarchical orientations common in contemporary religious . The structure, built primarily of and featuring a low dome, was finished by 1604, after which the Adi Granth was installed within it. Beyond the temple complex, Guru Arjan expanded the settlement of Chakk Ram Das—renamed —into a structured urban center by constructing radiating bazaars and streets that connected the sarovar to surrounding areas, facilitating trade and . These developments included the addition of markets for essential goods, water infrastructure like wells, and community buildings, transforming the site into a self-sustaining hub that attracted diverse populations and supported economic activity through Sikh institutions such as the masand system. He also oversaw the completion of the nearby Santokhsar Sarovar, enhancing the area's water resources and capacity to accommodate growing numbers of visitors. This planned expansion laid the morphological foundation for 's grid-like pattern, prioritizing the religious core while enabling radial expansion for habitation and commerce.

Relations with Mughal Authorities

Interactions with Emperor Akbar

Emperor , known for his policy of (sulh-i-kul), met Guru Arjan in 1598 during his tour of , as recorded in the by court historian , which portrays the encounter as an act of imperial benevolence toward the Sikh community. The meeting occurred on November 24, 1598, at Goindwal, where Guru Arjan, then aged 35, hosted Akbar at his residence en route from to . During the visit, partook in the communal langar (free kitchen), sitting equally with the congregation, and listened to recitations of Sikh hymns, including Asa Di Var, which impressed him with their devotional quality and emphasis on aligned with his own syncretic interests. In response to reports of crop failure and scarcity that year, remitted the land revenue arrears for the region, providing economic relief to agrarian communities including Sikh settlements, an action attributed directly to his favorable impression of the Guru. These interactions reflect broadly amicable Mughal-Sikh relations under Akbar's reign (1556–1605), contrasting with later tensions under ; Abul Fazl's account, while from a Mughal perspective emphasizing Akbar's patronage, aligns with Sikh traditions highlighting mutual respect without recorded coercion or conflict. No further direct meetings are documented, but Akbar's policies of non-interference in religious matters facilitated the Guru's expansions in unhindered during this period.

Emerging Tensions and Political Dynamics

Following the death of Emperor Akbar on 27 October 1605 and the ascension of his son on 3 November 1605, the previously cordial relations between the and Mughal authorities deteriorated under 's more orthodox rule, which emphasized Islamic conformity and viewed independent religious figures with suspicion. 's memoirs, Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, portray Guru Arjan as a Hindu leader in Goindwal who falsely posed as a akin to , amassing a large following among the "simple-hearted" through syncretic practices blending elements of and , which deemed heretical and a potential to imperial authority. This perception of as a heterodox movement gaining temporal influence, evidenced by the expansion of and the Guru's economic networks, heightened Mughal concerns over divided loyalties in . A pivotal event exacerbating these tensions occurred in April 1606, when 's eldest son, Prince Khusrau, rebelled against his father, fleeing toward and with an army. En route, likely at Tarn Taran near , Khusrau sought and received a from Guru Arjan, including a tilak mark, a , and five rupees, which Jahangir later interpreted as explicit support for the rebellion and disloyalty to the throne. After swiftly defeating and capturing Khusrau—blinding him in the process— learned of the encounter and summoned Guru Arjan to for interrogation, framing it in his memoirs as a "foolish act" by the Guru that invited imperial retribution. explicitly ordered that the Guru be compelled to abandon his "" and embrace , or face execution, reflecting a policy of suppressing perceived religious innovators who could mobilize followers politically. Sikh historical traditions further attribute emerging friction to personal and administrative animosities, particularly involving Chandu Shah, a wealthy banker and revenue official in Lahore's Mughal court. According to these accounts, Chandu harbored a grudge after Guru Arjan rejected between Chandu's daughter and the Guru's young son Hargobind, citing Chandu's arrogance and unequal status; Chandu allegedly petitioned with complaints against the Guru, amplifying accusations of . However, 's primary account omits Chandu entirely, focusing instead on the Guru's doctrinal deviations and the Khusrau incident as causal factors, suggesting that while local officials may have facilitated enforcement, the tensions stemmed fundamentally from imperial political consolidation and religious enforcement amid succession instability. These dynamics marked a shift from Akbar's tolerance—during which he had granted lands and visited Sikh sites—to 's proactive suppression of autonomous power centers in the empire's periphery.

Martyrdom

Arrest and Alleged Reasons

In early 1606, following the rebellion of Prince against his father, Emperor , Guru Arjan was on imperial orders and summoned to . , en route to challenge 's authority after the latter's accession in 1605, had visited the Guru at Tarn Taran near , where he reportedly received blessings and possibly material support. This encounter, occurring amid the prince's failed bid for the , formed the basis of the charges against the Guru. Jahangir's memoirs, the Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, explicitly cite the Guru's endorsement of Khusrau—described as obeisance, offerings, and blessings—as an act of rather than religious observance, warranting execution to curb . The portrayed Guru Arjan as an influential figure masquerading as a spiritual leader, attracting followers across religious lines, including , whose sway threatened imperial stability. This contemporary Mughal account, though self-justifying, provides the primary documented rationale, emphasizing political disloyalty over doctrinal heresy. Sikh historical traditions, recorded in later janamsakhis and rahitnamas, attribute the arrest to intrigues by personal adversaries, notably Chandu Shah, a Mughal official resentful after the Guru rejected a marriage proposal involving his daughter. Chandu allegedly fabricated accusations of and lobbied , amplifying perceptions of the Guru's growing temporal power through institutions like the Adi Granth and Amritsar's expansion. Some accounts invoke , claiming orthodox Muslim influencers like Sheikh Ahmad Sirhindi urged action against the Guru's egalitarian teachings, which blurred Hindu-Muslim boundaries. These narratives, while emphasizing martyrdom as divinely ordained resistance, lack the immediacy of 's record and reflect shaped by subsequent . Scholarly reconciles the political trigger—Khusrau's rebellion—with underlying tensions from the Sikh community's rising autonomy, which alarmed Mughal authorities amid 's consolidation of power.

Torture and Death

Guru Arjan endured five days of intense physical tortures in starting around late May 1606, primarily at the site now known as Lal Khoohi, a red sandstone structure associated with his incarceration. Sikh historical traditions, preserved in and later Sikh texts, detail methods including being seated on a heated iron tawa (plate) over fire, having scalding sand poured onto his body, and immersion in boiling cauldrons of , all aimed at compelling him to renounce his faith or alter . These accounts emphasize his steadfast refusal to comply, reciting hymns amid the agony, which reinforced narratives of rather than mere political retribution. Mughal Emperor Jahangir's autobiography, Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, provides a contemporary but contrasting perspective, admitting that after arresting Guru Arjan for allegedly aiding the rebel prince Khusrau Mirza with financial support, officials imposed a heavy fine and subjected him to tortures under orders to execute him discreetly to prevent unrest among followers. Jahangir claimed the Guru was released post-torture but succumbed to injuries shortly thereafter on 30 May 1606 (4 Jeth 1663 Bikrami), framing the death as justified punishment for sedition without detailing specific methods, which aligns with Mongol Yasa law practices of torment without overt bloodshed for high-status figures. Following the tortures, Guru Arjan was permitted a final bath in the near , where, per Sikh sources, he waded in, proclaimed his suffering as divine will, and mysteriously vanished beneath the waters, interpreted as transcendence rather than or . His body, recovered later, showed extensive burns and wounds, leading to secret by followers to evade further Mughal interference. Scholarly analysis reconciles these by noting Mughal records' brevity on details due to political sensitivity, while Sikh traditions amplify the ordeal to underscore martyrdom's inspirational role, with no primary evidence contradicting the occurrence of lethal torments ordered by .

Immediate Consequences for Sikh Community

The martyrdom of Guru Arjan on 30 May 1606 precipitated the rapid succession of his eleven-year-old son, Hargobind, as the sixth Guru, an event that fundamentally altered the Sikh community's posture toward temporal power and self-preservation. Hargobind, upon assuming guruship, introduced the doctrine of miri-piri by donning two swords—one for miri (political or worldly authority) and one for piri (spiritual authority)—symbolizing the necessity of armed defense alongside religious devotion in response to state-sponsored . This innovation reflected a causal recognition that spiritual autonomy required martial readiness, as passive endurance had failed to avert the Guru's execution. The community's immediate response involved training in weaponry and organization into fighting units, marking the inception of Sikh militarization and a transition from bhakti-oriented to the sant-sipahi (saint-soldier) ethos. This evolution fostered heightened communal solidarity and a defensive , with beginning to view themselves as a distinct entity capable of resisting Mughal dominance rather than seeking accommodation. The martyrdom thus catalyzed a qualitative shift in the Panth's socio-political dynamics, embedding resilience against oppression as a core tenet. Concurrently, the faced exacerbated economic pressures from the Mughal fine of 200,000 rupees levied on Guru Arjan prior to his death, which he rejected, straining resources but reinforcing collective defiance as followers abstained from payment at his directive. Despite these hardships, the Panth's growth accelerated, with the young Guru's leadership drawing adherents committed to upholding the Adi Granth's egalitarian principles amid adversity.

Historical Interpretations

Sikh Traditional Accounts

Sikh traditional accounts, preserved in early compositions like the Vaars of —a contemporary eyewitness and of the Adi Granth—portray Arjan's death on May 30, 1606 (Jeth Sudi 4, 1663 Bikrami), as the inaugural martyrdom (shaheedi) in Sikh history, undertaken voluntarily in affirmation of faith amid and personal enmity. , in Var 24, Pauri 23, extols the Guru's exemplary composure under duress, declaring himself a sacrifice to Guru Arjan for embodying divine endurance, without explicit political causation but emphasizing spiritual resolve. These narratives attribute the to Emperor Jahangir's summons to following the Guru's ceremonial tilak (tika) bestowed on Prince , who visited after his 1606 defeat by Jahangir's forces; this act, interpreted by conspirators as disloyalty, intertwined with demands to excise verses from the Adi Granth perceived as heretical by Mughal orthodoxy. Personal vendettas amplified the ordeal, particularly from Chandu Shah, a Mughal official whose proposed marriage alliance for his daughter with the young Hargobind (future ) had been rejected by Arjan on grounds of incompatibility, fostering lasting hostility. Handed over to Chandu after refusing a fine and doctrinal alterations, the endured sequenced tortures designed to coerce submission: seated on a scalding iron plate (tawa), hot poured over his blistered body, and boiling water (kaphar) dashed upon him, yet he remained serene, reciting hymns from the without retaliation or pleas. Sikh lore, echoed in , depicts this as transcendent bliss (anand), with the Guru's body swelling from burns but his spirit unyielding, symbolizing the triumph of dharam (righteousness) over temporal power. Subsequently permitted a bath in the , Guru Arjan immersed himself, pronouncing final verses of acceptance before expiring peacefully, his body reportedly floating upstream as a sign of sanctity; this event, commemorated annually by on Shaheedi Divas (Martyrdom Day), is framed in hagiographies like the 19th-century by Bhai Santokh Singh as divinely ordained, catalyzing the Sikh community's shift toward fortified identity under . These accounts privilege religious motives—such as the Adi Granth's challenge to entrenched Hindu and Muslim hierarchies—over purely political ones, viewing the martyrdom as a foundational assertion of Sikh amid rising Mughal fundamentalism influenced by figures like Sheikh Ahmad Sirhindi.

Mughal and Persian Sources

In the Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, 's memoirs completed during his reign (1605–1627), the execution of Guru Arjan is recorded as a punitive measure against perceived and religious deception. The relevant entry, dated 22 1015 AH (corresponding to 19 1606 CE, shortly after the event), describes Guru Arjan as a "Hindu" figure residing at Goindwal on the who had amassed followers by masquerading as a saintly guide, thereby captivating Hindu minds through what Jahangir deemed heretical practices. Jahangir links the death directly to the Guru's reception of the rebel prince during his 1606 uprising against imperial authority; upon Khusrau's visit, Guru Arjan applied a tilak (forehead mark) to the prince, interpreted as an endorsement of his claim to the . Enraged by this act amid broader concerns over the Guru's growing influence, Jahangir ordered Murtaza Khan (the provincial governor of ) to summon and execute him, framing the decree as necessary to curb a threat to dynastic stability and religious propriety. This Mughal account omits any reference to , portraying the outcome as a routine enforcement of imperial will rather than exceptional , with the execution occurring on 30 May 1606 CE (Jeth Sudi 4, 1663 Bikrami). Jahangir's narrative emphasizes causal factors rooted in political disloyalty—Khusrau's provided the pretext—while underscoring the Guru's role in fostering a heterodox following that blurred lines between spiritual authority and temporal challenge, a dynamic viewed as intolerable in the Mughal orthodoxy favoring Islamic supremacy. As an autobiographical imperial record, it reflects the ruler's self-justification, attributing the Guru's influence to sorcery-like delusion rather than genuine piety, and classifies indistinctly within . Supplementary Persian chronicles from the Jahangir era, such as the Jahangir Nama and Waqiat-e-Jahangiri (variant court annals), corroborate the core events without introducing or framing the death as martyrdom, instead aligning with the emperor's rationale of suppressing a figure who combined religious with potential . Later compilations, including those in works like the Dabistan-i-Mazahib (mid-17th century), echo this perspective by noting Guru Arjan's execution under but attribute it to his independent doctrinal stance, which competed with established faiths without detailing punitive methods. These sources, produced within or proximate to Mughal administrative circles, prioritize causal explanations tied to state security and religious hierarchy, revealing an official lens that downplays humanitarian aspects to affirm the legitimacy of central authority.

Scholarly Debates on Causation

In his autobiography Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, Emperor attributed Guru Arjan's arrest and subsequent death on May 30, 1606, primarily to political disloyalty, claiming the Guru had blessed and materially supported his rebel son during the prince's flight through in April 1606, an act interpreted as under Mongol yasa law prohibiting bloodshed but permitting . Jahangir further accused the Guru of propagating teachings that "captivated" and alike, diverting them from Islamic orthodoxy, though he framed the response as corrective punishment involving a heavy fine, potential conversion, and physical ordeal rather than outright execution. Historians debate the weight of political versus religious factors, with W.H. McLeod arguing that the event does not qualify as deliberate martyrdom in early Sikh terms, as no contemporary Sikh sources (pre-18th century) apply the label shahid or emphasize faith-based sacrifice; instead, McLeod posits Mughal retribution for perceived sedition amid the Guru's expanding influence, potentially including economic concerns over Sikh rural development attracting Jat converts who bolstered the community's resources. McLeod's skepticism toward later hagiographic Sikh accounts, which amplify torture for refusing to alter the Adi Granth or convert, contrasts with traditional interpretations but aligns with Jahangir's self-justifying narrative, though McLeod cautions against over-relying on the emperor's biased memoir. Pashaura Singh synthesizes these as interconnected: the Khusrau incident provided the proximate political trigger, enforced via yasa-style immersion in the Ravi River and exposure to heat, but intertwined with religious anxieties over the Guru's scriptural innovations and reports of Muslim defections to , influenced by like urging orthodoxy. J.S. Grewal similarly identifies the rebel blessing as immediate but underscores cumulative tensions from the Guru's mirī-pirī sovereignty model, Adi Granth compilation in 1604 challenging syncretic norms, and socio-economic growth via institutions like the masand system, which amassed wealth and followers rivaling Mughal provincial interests. A subsidiary debate concerns intent and outcome: described the "passing away" after brief custody, suggesting possible unintended death from ordered ordeals rather than premeditated killing, as corroborated by Persian sources like Bansavali-nama noting restraint from direct violence; Sikh-oriented scholars counter that the systematic —, —evidences religious malice, though empirical gaps in pre-1650 Sikh records limit verification beyond 's account. These interpretations reflect source limitations: Mughal texts prioritize imperial rationale, while Sikh postdate the event by decades, introducing devotional embellishments.

Legacy

Theological and Scriptural Influence

Guru Arjan's compilation of the Adi Granth in 1604 marked a foundational moment in Sikh , creating the first authorized Sikh scripture that integrated diverse devotional expressions into a cohesive monotheistic framework. The text encompassed hymns from the first five Gurus, Guru Arjan's own extensive compositions, and contributions from non-Sikh saints including Hindu bhagats like and , and the Muslim Sufi Sheikh , underscoring Sikhism's rejection of religious exclusivity in favor of universal divine truth. Structured into thirty-one ragas—musical modes each associated with specific times or emotions—the Adi Granth prescribed recitation through kirtan, embedding auditory devotion as integral to spiritual realization and theological practice. This organization not only preserved the hymns' poetic and melodic integrity but also reinforced core doctrines such as the oneness of God (Ik Onkar), the pursuit of truthful living (Kirat Karna), selfless service (Seva), and the eradication of caste distinctions, providing a scriptural bulwark against ritualistic or hierarchical deviations. Guru Arjan's personal hymns, exemplifying and surrender to divine will—as in "Jo ṫuḧ bʰaavæ so bʰalaa" (Whatever pleases You is good)—further shaped Sikh by prioritizing inner on the divine name (Naam ) over external forms. By authenticating and canonizing these writings, he established a fixed textual tradition that later affirmed as the eternal Guru in 1708, ensuring doctrinal continuity and resilience amid historical upheavals. This scriptural legacy transformed from an oral-guru-centric movement into a textually anchored faith, profoundly influencing its theological emphasis on resilience, inclusivity, and direct communion with the divine.

Impact on Sikh Identity and Militarization

The martyrdom of Guru Arjan on May 30, 1606, served as a pivotal catalyst for the evolution of Sikh identity, instilling a heightened sense of communal separatism and self-reliance amid Mughal imperial pressures. This event transformed the Sikh panth from a primarily devotional movement into one emphasizing resilience and collective defense, as the execution underscored the vulnerability of non-violent spiritual authority to state coercion. Historical analyses highlight how it fostered a distinct Sikh consciousness, distinct from both Hindu bhakti traditions and Islamic orthodoxy, by framing the community as bearers of an independent spiritual sovereignty threatened by external dominance. Under , Arjan's successor installed on June 24, 1606, this shift manifested in deliberate to safeguard the faith. Hargobind introduced martial practices, including the adoption of two swords symbolizing (temporal authority) and (spiritual authority), and the establishment of a personal guard of armed followers numbering in the hundreds by the early 1610s. He also constructed the in in 1608 as a seat of temporal power adjacent to the Harmandir , signaling the integration of political sovereignty with religious doctrine. These measures responded directly to Arjan's death, equipping to resist future persecutions through organized rather than passive endurance. The resulting sant-sipahi (saint-soldier) ethos solidified Sikh identity as a fraternity committed to dharma yudh (righteous warfare), influencing subsequent Gurus and laying groundwork for the community's expansion into a political force. By the 1620s, Hargobind's engagements with Mughal forces, such as the battles at in and Kartarpur in 1634, demonstrated this defensive militarism in practice, deterring further direct assaults on Sikh centers and reinforcing communal cohesion. Scholarly assessments attribute this trajectory to Arjan's , which empirically galvanized recruitment and loyalty, growing the Sikh following from scattered devotees to a structured cadre capable of sustaining resistance.

Broader Historical and Cultural Ramifications

Guru Arjan's execution in 1606 marked a transformative juncture in the dynamics between the emerging Sikh community and the , precipitating a trajectory of escalating conflict that reshaped regional power structures in . This event catalyzed a defensive within , transitioning from primarily devotional practices to organized resistance against imperial overreach, as evidenced by the subsequent Guru Hargobind's adoption of martial symbols and the formation of armed contingents. Scholarly analyses attribute this shift to the perceived existential threat posed by Mughal enforcement of orthodoxy under , fostering a causal chain of retaliatory actions that culminated in Sikh against later Mughal governors and laid groundwork for the 18th-century Sikh misls' territorial expansions. The martyrdom reinforced a doctrinal emphasis on and non-subjugation in Sikh theology, influencing broader Indic discourses on religious amid monarchical theocracies. By solidifying Sikh —distinct from syncretic movements or Islamic sufi traditions—it contributed to the cultural fragmentation of Punjab's pluralistic society, where Sikh institutions like the Harimandir Sahib emerged as centers of alternative authority, challenging Mughal fiscal and ideological dominance. This , rooted in empirical responses to rather than innate , echoed in later historical episodes, including the Khalsa's 1699 institutionalization under , which perpetuated a of righteous warfare (dharam yudh) against tyranny. Culturally, Guru Arjan's legacy permeated Punjabi expressive traditions, with his compositions in the Adi Granth inspiring literary forms, musical ragas, and iconographic motifs of endurance that persist in regional festivals and historiography. These elements not only preserved Sikh but also informed 19th- and 20th-century Punjabi identity assertions, from the Singh Sabha movement's scriptural revival to modern diaspora narratives framing Sikh resilience against colonial and postcolonial marginalization. While traditional Sikh accounts amplify inspirational aspects, Mughal chronicles like the Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri provide a counterpoint by framing the execution as punitive rather than confessional, underscoring interpretive debates; nonetheless, the event's ramifications objectively advanced Sikh communal cohesion and cultural distinctiveness in northern India's contested religious landscape.

References

  1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291847969_Life_and_Work_of_Guru_Arjan
  2. https://academic.oup.com/book/4017/chapter/145661820
  3. https://academic.oup.com/book/10787/chapter/158919311
  4. https://www.discoversikhism.com/sikh_gurus/foundation_of_sri_harmandir_sahib.html
  5. https://punjab.global.ucsb.edu/sites/default/files/sitefiles/journals/volume12/no1/3_singh.pdf
  6. https://old.sgpc.net/gurus/guruarjandev.asp
  7. https://www.sikhs.org/guru5.htm
  8. https://www.sikhmissionarysociety.org/sms/smspublications/guruarjandevjitheapostleofpeace/chapter1/
  9. https://www.sikhnet.com/news/guru-arjan-dev-ji
  10. https://www.sikhnet.com/news/guru-argun-dev-ji
  11. https://www.dsgmc.in/DharmParchar/SriGuruArjanDevJi
  12. https://dvnetwork.org/page/guru-arjan-dev-ji-martyr-and-visionary
  13. https://www.shankariasparliament.com/article/history-of-ten-sikh-gurus
  14. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sikhism/Guru-Angad
  15. https://bedifoundation.org/assets/img/Succession-of-Sikh-Gurus.pdf
  16. https://www.gktoday.in/question/who-was-chosen-as-successor-by-guru-ram-das-ji-in-1581-818664
  17. https://sikhizm.com/how-guru-ramdas-passed-gurgaddi-to-guru-arjan-dev-ji/
  18. https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/guru-ram-das/
  19. https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Sikh_Gurus_-_Important_dates
  20. https://sikhsewak.wordpress.com/shri-guru-ram-das-ji/
  21. https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Baba_Buddha
  22. https://www.discoversikhism.com/sikhs/baba_budha.html
  23. https://www.sikhnet.com/300saal/adigranth
  24. https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Adi_Granth
  25. https://sikhri.org/articles/from-pothi-to-guru-granth-sahib
  26. http://www.discoversikhism.com/sikhs/bhai_gurdas.html
  27. https://www.sikhdharma.org/the-completion-of-the-adi-granth-in-1604/
  28. https://www.sikhnet.com/news/guru-arjan-dev-ji-fifth-sikh-guru-who-compiled-guru-granth-sahib
  29. https://academic.oup.com/book/4017/chapter/145667520
  30. https://amritsar.nic.in/history/
  31. https://ctsikhs.com/our-gurus/guru-arjan-dev-ji/
  32. https://www.sikhism.net.in/world-religions/sikhism/sikh-gurus/guru-arjan-dev.php
  33. https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Masand_System
  34. https://takhatpatnasahib.in/en/sri-guru-arjan-dev-ji.php
  35. https://www.discoversikhism.com/sikh_gurus/sri_guru_arjan_sahib_ji.html
  36. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2408694.pdf
  37. https://www.goldentempleamritsar.org/famous-temples-in-india/amritsar/golden-temple/history.php
  38. https://sgpc.net/sri-harmandir-sahib-2/
  39. https://www.goldentempleamritsar.org/famous-temples-in-india/amritsar/golden-temple/who-built-harmandir-sahib.php
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326804172_Form_and_Structure_in_Planning_and_Development_of_Sikh_Cities-_Structure_and_Morphology_of_Sri_Anandpur_Sahib_Punjab
  41. https://gurduarablock33.wordpress.com/2019/05/19/guru-arjan-sahib-part-4-construction-in-amritsar-and-masand-system-changes/
  42. https://academic.oup.com/book/4017/chapter/145664772
  43. https://www.facebook.com/HeritageofPunjabSindh/posts/guru-arjans-meeting-with-akbar-persian-source-1598this-is-probably-the-first-ent/1012977867707186/
  44. http://www.discoversikhism.com/sikh_gurus/emperor_akbar_visits_guru_arjan.html
  45. https://organiser.org/2024/05/30/128360/bharat/guru-arjan-dev-jis-martyrdom-for-righteousness-changed-the-course-of-history/
  46. https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Guru_Arjan
  47. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/jahangir/
  48. https://www.scribd.com/document/99443991/Jahangir-orders-Guru-Arjun-Dev-s-death-Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri
  49. https://theprint.in/feature/guru-arjan-dev-the-martyr-whose-death-changed-the-course-of-sikhism/401897/
  50. https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Prince_Khusrau
  51. http://dharmanext.blogspot.com/2012/07/jahangir-orders-guru-arjun-devs-death.html
  52. https://sikhri.org/articles/guru-arjan-sahib-the-sovereign-martyr
  53. https://www.discoversikhism.com/sikh_gurus/arrest_of_guru_arjan.html
  54. https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Tuzk-e-Jahangiri
  55. https://www.discoversikhism.com/sikh_gurus/torture_of_guru_arjan.html
  56. https://www.eurasiareview.com/01112024-sikhs-sixth-guru-hargobind-jis-doctrine-of-miri-piri-champion-of-justice-and-equality-oped/
  57. https://dvnetwork.org/page/guru-hargobind-ji-the-warrior-saint
  58. https://www.sikhnet.com/news/guru-hargobind-ji-shaping-sikh-heritage
  59. https://academic.oup.com/book/4017/chapter/145673953
  60. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/guru-arjan-dev-death-anniversary-all-you-need-to-know-about-martyrdom-of-fifth-sikh-guru/articleshow/100622949.cms
  61. https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Reasons_for_the_martyrdom_of_Guru_Arjan
  62. https://archive.org/details/tuzukijahangirio00jahauoft
  63. https://www.thesikhencyclopedia.com/tuzuk-i-jahanglri/
  64. https://punjab.global.ucsb.edu/sites/default/files/sitefiles/journals/volume17/JPS_17_nos_1-2_Fenech.pdf
  65. https://library.gurmat.info/download/perspectives-on-guru-arjan-dev-contribution-and-martyrdom-navtej-singh.pdf
  66. https://www.sikhnet.com/news/eternal-lessons-guru-arjan-dev
  67. https://philosophy.institute/religions-of-the-world/sikh-scriptures-adi-granth-explained/
  68. https://scroll.in/article/880186/from-guru-hargobind-to-guru-gobind-singh-how-the-sikh-community-militarised-to-take-on-the-mughals
  69. https://sridarbarsahibsriamritsar.com/sikh-history/guru-hargobind-sahib-ji/
  70. https://punjab.global.ucsb.edu/sites/default/files/sitefiles/journals/volume18/11_InResponse.pdf
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275855782_Martyrdom_and_the_Execution_of_Guru_Arjan_in_Early_Sikh_Sources
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.