Hubbry Logo
Homestead strikeHomestead strikeMain
Open search
Homestead strike
Community hub
Homestead strike
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Homestead strike
Homestead strike
from Wikipedia

Homestead Strike
The Pennsylvania State Militia arrives to quell the hostilities, art by Thure de Thulstrup
DateJuly 1 – November 20, 1892
Location
GoalsNo wage decrease
Resulted inDefeat of strikers, a major setback to the unionization of steel workers
Parties
Lead figures
Number
c. 6,500
300
6,000
Casualties and losses
  • Deaths: 7[1]
  • Injuries: 11
None
Designation markers

The Homestead strike, also known as the Homestead steel strike, Homestead massacre, or Battle of Homestead, was an industrial lockout and strike that occurred in the United States, in 1892. It began on July 1, 1892, culminating in a battle in which strikers defeated private security agents on July 6, 1892.[5] The governor responded by sending in the National Guard to protect strikebreakers. The dispute occurred at the Homestead Steel Works in the Pittsburgh-area town of Homestead, Pennsylvania, between the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers (the AA) and the Carnegie Steel Company. The final result was a major defeat for the union strikers and a setback for their efforts to unionize steelworkers. The battle was a pivotal event in U.S. labor history.

Background

[edit]

Carnegie Steel made major technological innovations in the 1880s, especially the installation of the open-hearth system at Homestead in 1886. It now became possible to make steel suitable for structural beams and for armor plate for the United States Navy, which paid far higher prices for the premium product. In addition, the plant moved increasingly toward the continuous system of production. Carnegie installed vastly improved systems of material-handling, like overhead cranes, hoists, charging machines, and buggies. All of this greatly sped up the process of steelmaking, and allowed the production of vastly larger quantities of the product. As the mills expanded, the labor force grew rapidly, especially with unskilled workers. However, while Carnegie Steel grew and progressed, workers at Homestead were seeing their wages drop.[6]

Union

[edit]
Pro-Union pamphlet with lyrics to a song in support of workers

The Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers (AA) was an American labor union formed in 1876. It was a craft union representing skilled iron and steelworkers.

The AA's membership was concentrated in ironworks west of the Allegheny Mountains. The union negotiated national uniform wage scales on an annual basis; helped regulate working hours, workload levels and work speeds; and helped improve working conditions. It also acted as a hiring hall, helping employers find scarce puddlers and rollers.[7]

The AA organized the independently owned Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Works in Homestead in 1881. The AA engaged in a strike at the Homestead works on January 1, 1882, in an effort to prevent management from including a non-union clause in the workers' contracts, known as a "yellow-dog contract". The violence occurred on both sides, and the plant brought in numerous strikebreakers. The strike ended on March 20, in a complete victory for the union.[8]

The AA struck the steel plant again on July 1, 1889, when negotiations for a new three-year collective bargaining agreement failed. The strikers seized the town and once again made common cause with various immigrant groups. Backed by 2,000 townspeople, the strikers drove off a trainload of strikebreakers on July 10. When the sheriff returned with 125 newly deputized agents two days later, the strikers rallied 5,000 townspeople to their cause. Although victorious, the union agreed to significant wage cuts that left tonnage rates less than half those at the nearby Jones and Laughlin works, where technological improvements had not yet been made.[9]

Carnegie officials conceded that the AA essentially ran the Homestead plant after the 1889 strike. The union contract contained 58 pages of footnotes defining work rules at the plant and strictly limited management's ability to maximize output.[10]

For its part, the AA saw substantial gains after the 1889 strike. Membership doubled, and the local union treasury had a balance of $146,000. The Homestead union grew belligerent, and relationships between workers and managers became tense.[11]

Nature of the 1892 strike

[edit]

The Homestead strike was organized and purposeful, a harbinger of the type of strike which marked the modern age of labor relations in the United States.[12] The AA strike at the Homestead steel mill in 1892 was different from previous large-scale strikes in American history such as the Great Railroad Strike of 1877 or the Great Southwest Railroad Strike of 1886. Earlier strikes had been largely leaderless and disorganized mass uprisings of workers.[citation needed]

Plans of Carnegie and Frick

[edit]
Black and white photograph of Andrew Carnegie
Black and white photograph of Henry Clay Frick
Andrew Carnegie (left) and Henry Clay Frick pictured in c. 1893

Andrew Carnegie placed industrialist Henry Clay Frick in charge of his company's operations in 1881. Frick resolved to break the union at Homestead. "The mills have never been able to turn out the product they should, owing to being held back by the Amalgamated men," he complained in a letter to Carnegie.[13]

Carnegie was publicly in favor of labor unions. He condemned the use of strikebreakers and told associates that no steel mill was worth a single drop of blood.[14] But Carnegie agreed with Frick's desire to break the union and "reorganize the whole affair, and ... exact good reasons for employing every man. Far too many men required by Amalgamated rules."[15] Carnegie ordered the Homestead plant to manufacture large amounts of inventory so the plant could weather a strike. He also drafted a notice (which Frick never released) withdrawing recognition of the union.[16]

With the collective bargaining agreement due to expire on June 30, 1892, Frick and the leaders of the local AA union entered into negotiations in February. With the steel industry doing well and prices higher, the AA asked for a wage increase; the AA represented about 800 of the 3,800 workers at the plant. Frick immediately countered with a 22% wage decrease that would affect nearly half the union's membership and remove a number of positions from the bargaining unit. Carnegie encouraged Frick to use the negotiations to break the union: "...the Firm has decided that the minority must give way to the majority. These works, therefore, will be necessarily non-union after the expiration of the present agreement."[17] Carnegie believed that the Amalgamated was a hindrance to efficiency; furthermore it was not representative of the workers. It admitted only a small group of skilled workers. It was in its own way an elitist, discriminatory organization that was not worthy of the republic, Carnegie felt.[18]

Sepia colored letter
Portion of the typed and signed copy of the letter sent to Andrew Carnegie describing the plans and munitions that would be on the barges when the Pinkertons arrived to confront the strikers in Homestead.

Frick announced on April 30, 1892, that he would bargain for 29 more days. If no contract was reached, Carnegie Steel would cease to recognize the union. Carnegie formally approved Frick's tactics on May 4. Then Frick offered a slightly better wage scale and advised the superintendent to tell the workers, "We do not care whether a man belongs to a union or not, nor do we wish to interfere. He may belong to as many unions or organizations as he chooses, but we think our employees at Homestead Steel Works would fare much better working under the system in vogue at Edgar Thomson and Duquesne."[19]

Lockout

[edit]

Frick locked workers out of the plate mill and one of the open hearth furnaces on the evening of June 28. When no collective bargaining agreement was reached by June 29, Frick locked the union out of the rest of the plant. A high fence topped with barbed wire, begun in January, was completed and the plant sealed to the workers. Sniper towers with searchlights were constructed near each mill building, and high-pressure water cannons (some capable of spraying boiling-hot liquid) were placed at each entrance. Various aspects of the plant were protected, reinforced, or shielded.[20]

At a mass meeting on June 30, local AA leaders reviewed the final negotiating sessions and announced that the company had broken the contract by locking out workers a day before the contract expired. The Knights of Labor, which had organized the mechanics and transportation workers at Homestead, agreed to walk out alongside the skilled workers of the AA. Workers at Carnegie plants in Pittsburgh, Duquesne, Union Mills and Beaver Falls struck in sympathy the same day.[21]

The Declaration of the Strike Committee, dated July 20, 1892 reads in part,

The employees in the mill of Messrs. Carnegie, Phipps & Co., at Homestead, Pa., have built there a town with its homes, its schools and its churches; have for many years been faithful co-workers with the company in the business of the mill; have invested thousands of dollars of their savings in said mill in the expectation of spending their lives in Homestead and of working in the mill during the period of their efficiency. … "Therefore, the committee desires to express to the public as its firm belief that both the public and the employees aforesaid have equitable rights and interests in the said mill which cannot be modified or diverted without due process of law; that the employees have the right to continuous employment in the said mill during efficiency and good behavior without regard to religious, political or economic opinions or associations; that it is against public policy and subversive of the fundamental principles of American liberty that a whole community of workers should be denied employment or suffer any other social detriment on account of membership in a church, a political party or a trade union; that it is our duty as American citizens to resist by every legal and ordinary means the unconstitutional, anarchic and revolutionary policy of the Carnegie Company, which seems to evince a contempt [for] public and private interests and a disdain [for] the public conscience. . . .[22]

Political cartoon, of boss with whip, which is critical of Andrew Carnegie for lowering wages even though protective tariffs were implemented for industry.

The strikers were determined to keep the plant closed. They secured a steam-powered river launch and several rowboats to patrol the Monongahela River, which ran alongside the plant. Men also divided themselves into units along military lines. Picket lines were thrown up around the plant and the town, and 24-hour shifts established. Ferries and trains were watched. Strangers were challenged to give explanations for their presence in town; if one was not forthcoming, they were escorted outside the city limits. Telegraph communications with AA locals in other cities were established to keep tabs on the company's attempts to hire replacement workers. Reporters were issued special badges which gave them safe passage through the town, but the badges were withdrawn if it was felt misleading or false information made it into the news. Tavern owners were even asked to prevent excessive drinking.[23]

Frick was also busy. The company placed ads for replacement workers in newspapers as far away as Boston, St. Louis and even Europe.[24]

But unprotected strikebreakers would be driven off. On July 4, Frick formally requested that Sheriff William H. McCleary intervene to allow supervisors access to the plant. Carnegie corporation attorney Philander Knox gave the go-ahead to the sheriff on July 5, and McCleary dispatched 11 deputies to the town to post handbills ordering the strikers to stop interfering with the plant's operation. The strikers tore down the handbills and told the deputies that they would not turn over the plant to nonunion workers. Then they herded the deputies onto a boat and sent them downriver to Pittsburgh.[25]

Frick had ordered the construction of a solid board fence topped with barbed wire around mill property. The workers dubbed the newly fortified mill "Fort Frick".

Battle on July 6

[edit]
Hughey O'Donnell, Chairman of the Advisory Committee of the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers.

Frick's intent was to open the works with nonunion men on July 6. Knox devised a plan to get the Pinkertons onto the mill property. With the mill ringed by striking workers, agents from the Pinkerton National Detective Agency, which Frick had contracted to provide security at the plant in April 1892, planned to access the plant grounds from the river. Three hundred Pinkerton agents assembled on the Davis Island Dam on the Ohio River about five miles below Pittsburgh at 10:30 p.m. on the night of July 5, 1892. They were given Winchester rifles, placed on two specially-equipped barges and towed upriver.[26] They were also given badges which read "Watchman, Carnegie Company, Limited".[27] Many had been hired out of lodging houses at $2.50 per day and were unaware of what their assignment was in Homestead.[28]

The strikers were prepared for the Pinkerton agents; the AA had learned of the Pinkertons as soon as they had left Boston for the embarkation point. The small flotilla of union boats went downriver to meet the barges. Strikers on the steam launch fired a few random shots at the barges, then withdrew—blowing the launch whistle to alert the plant. The strikers blew the plant whistle at 2:30 a.m., drawing thousands of men, women and children to the plant.[29]

Pinkertons attempt to land

[edit]

The Pinkertons attempted to land under cover of darkness about 4 a.m. A large crowd of families had kept pace with the boats as they were towed by a tug into the town. A few shots were fired at the tug and barges, but no one was injured. The crowd tore down the barbed-wire fence and strikers and their families surged onto the Homestead plant grounds. Some in the crowd threw stones at the barges, but strike leaders shouted for restraint.[30]

The Pinkerton agents attempted to disembark, and more shots were fired. Conflicting testimony exists as to which side fired the first shot in this encounter. (Shooting having begun earlier when the barges were being towed up the river) John T. McCurry, a boatman on the steamboat Little Bill (which had been hired by the Pinkerton Detective Agency to ferry its agents to the steel mill) and one of the men wounded by the strikers, said: "The armed Pinkerton men commenced to climb up the banks. Then the workmen opened fire on the detectives. The men shot first, and not until three of the Pinkerton men had fallen did they respond to the fire. I am willing to take an oath that the workmen fired first, and that the Pinkerton men did not shoot until some of their number had been wounded."[31] But according to The New York Times, the Pinkertons shot first.[32] The newspaper reported that the Pinkertons opened fire and wounded William Foy, a worker.[32] Regardless of which side opened fire first, the first two individuals wounded were Frederick Heinde, captain of the Pinkertons,[33] and Foy. The Pinkerton agents aboard the barges then fired into the crowd, killing two and wounding eleven. The crowd responded in kind, killing two and wounding twelve. The firefight continued for about 10 minutes.[34]

The battle at the landing between the Pinkertons and strikers.

The strikers then huddled behind the pig and scrap iron in the mill yard, while the Pinkertons cut holes in the side of the barges so they could fire on any who approached. The Pinkerton tug departed with the wounded agents, leaving the barges stranded. The strikers soon set to work building a rampart of steel beams further up the riverbank from which they could fire down on the barges. Hundreds of women continued to crowd on the riverbank between the strikers and the agents, calling on the strikers to 'kill the Pinkertons'.[35]

The strikers continued to sporadically fire on the barges. Union members took potshots at the ships from their rowboats and the steam-powered launch. The burgess of Homestead, John McLuckie, issued a proclamation at 6:00 a.m. asking for townspeople to help defend the peace; more than 5,000 people congregated on the hills overlooking the steelworks. A 20-pounder brass cannon was set up on the shore opposite the steel mill, and an attempt was made to sink the barges. Six miles away in Pittsburgh, thousands of steelworkers gathered in the streets, listening to accounts of the attacks at Homestead; hundreds, many of them armed, began to move toward the town to assist the strikers.[36]

Artist's impression of a striker hiding behind a large shield and watching the Pinkerton men.

The Pinkertons attempted to disembark again at 8:00 a.m. A striker high up the riverbank fired a shot. The Pinkertons returned fire, and four more strikers were killed (one by shrapnel sent flying when cannon fire hit one of the barges).[37] Many of the Pinkerton agents refused to participate in the firefight any longer; the agents crowded onto the barge farthest from the shore. More experienced agents were barely able to stop the new recruits from abandoning the ships and swimming away. Intermittent gunfire from both sides continued throughout the morning. When the tug attempted to retrieve the barges at 10:50 a.m., gunfire drove it off. More than 300 riflemen positioned themselves on the high ground and kept a steady stream of fire on the barges. Just before noon, a sniper shot and killed another Pinkerton agent.[38] A Pinkerton agent on one of the barges was A.L. Wells, a Bennett Medical College student, who had joined the "expedition" to earn enough money during the summer months. During the fighting, he played a vital role and attended to the injured on the barge.[39]

After a few more hours, the strikers attempted to burn the barges. They seized a raft, loaded it with oil-soaked timber and floated it toward the barges. The Pinkertons nearly panicked, and a Pinkerton captain had to threaten to shoot anyone who fled. But the fire burned itself out before it reached the barges. The strikers then loaded a railroad flatcar with drums of oil and set it afire. The flatcar hurtled down the rails toward the mill's wharf where the barges were docked. But the car stopped at the water's edge and burned itself out. Dynamite was thrown at the barges, but it only hit the mark once (causing a little damage to one barge). At 2:00 p.m., the workers poured oil onto the river, hoping the oil slick would burn the barges; attempts to light the slick failed.[40]

Calls for state intervention

[edit]

The AA worked behind the scenes to avoid further bloodshed and defuse the tense situation. At 9:00 a.m., outgoing AA international president William Weihe rushed to the sheriff's office and asked McCleary to convey a request to Frick to meet. McCleary did so, but Frick refused. He knew that the more chaotic the situation became, the more likely it was that Governor Robert E. Pattison would call out the state militia.[41]

Sheriff McCleary resisted attempts to call for state intervention until 10 a.m. on July 6. In a telegram to Governor Pattison, he described how his deputies and the Carnegie men had been driven off, and noted that the workers and their supporters actively resisting the landing numbered nearly 5,000. Pattison responded by requiring McCleary to exhaust every effort to restore the peace. McCleary asked again for help at noon, and Pattison responded by asking how many deputies the sheriff had. A third telegram, sent at 3:00 p.m., again elicited a response from the governor exhorting McCleary to raise his own troops.[42]

Pinkerton surrender

[edit]
Pinkerton men leave the barges after their surrender during the Homestead strike

At 4:00 p.m., events at the mill quickly began to wind down. More than 5,000 men—most of them armed mill hands from the nearby South Side, Braddock and Duquesne works—arrived at the Homestead plant. Weihe wanted to prevent further trouble at Homestead, so he pleaded with Frick to confer with representatives of the Amalgamated to return to Homestead and stop the armed conflict.[43][page needed] Weihe urged the strikers to let the Pinkertons surrender, but he was shouted down. Weihe tried to speak again, but this time his pleas were drowned out as the strikers bombarded the barges with fireworks left over from the recent Independence Day celebration. Hugh O'Donnell, a heater in the plant and head of the union's strike committee, then spoke to the crowd. He demanded that each Pinkerton be charged with murder, forced to turn over his arms and then be removed from the town. The crowd shouted their approval.[44]

The Pinkertons also wished to surrender. At 5:00 p.m., they raised a white flag and two agents asked to speak with the strikers. O'Donnell guaranteed them safe passage out of town. Upon arrival, their arms were stripped from them. With heads uncovered, to distinguish them from the mill hands, they passed along between two rows of guards armed with Winchesters.[45] As the Pinkertons crossed the grounds of the mill, the crowd formed a gantlet through which the agents passed. Men and women threw sand and stones at the Pinkerton agents, spat on them and beat them. Several Pinkertons were clubbed into unconsciousness. Members of the crowd ransacked the barges, then burned them to the waterline.[46]

As the Pinkertons were marched through town to the opera house (which served as a temporary jail), the townspeople continued to assault the agents. The press expressed shock at the treatment of the Pinkerton agents, and the torrent of abuse helped turn media sympathies away from the strikers.[47] The strike committee met with the town council to discuss the handover of the agents to McCleary. But the real talks were taking place between McCleary and Weihe in McCleary's office. At 10:15 p.m., the two sides agreed to a transfer process. A special train arrived at 12:30 a.m. on July 7. McCleary, the international AA's lawyer and several town officials accompanied the Pinkerton agents to Pittsburgh.[48]

But when the Pinkerton agents arrived at their final destination in Pittsburgh, state officials declared that they would not be charged with murder (per the agreement with the strikers) but rather simply released. The announcement was made with the full concurrence of the AA attorney. A special train whisked the Pinkerton agents out of the city at 10:00 a.m. on July 7.[49]

William Pinkerton in his testimony before Congress stated that three Pinkerton agents died in the strike—two because of injuries[50] and a third injured agent committed suicide.[51][52] The total number of Pinkertons, according to the agents themselves, who died was seven and who were wounded was eleven.[53][54] According to one newspaper report, an agent under cannon fire jumped off a barge and drowned.[55][56] John Shingle, the captain of the steamboat Little Bill was killed.[57][2] Between thirty-three to thirty-five agents and one crewman of the Little Bill were reported in the hospital injured.[58][59] The total number of captured Pinkertons was 324.[60] A roster of 266 names[61] and 360 Winchester rifles and enough provisions to feed a regiment for a week were also taken from the barges.[62]

Arrival of the state militia

[edit]
State militia passing the railroad station to disperse groups of strikers.

On July 7, the strike committee sent a telegram to Governor Pattison to attempt to persuade him that law and order had been restored in the town. Pattison replied that he had heard differently. Union officials traveled to Harrisburg and met with Pattison on July 9. Their discussions revolved not around law and order, but the safety of the Carnegie plant.[63]

Pattison, however, remained unconvinced by the strikers' arguments. Although Pattison had ordered the Pennsylvania militia to muster on July 6, he had not formally charged it with doing anything. Pattison's refusal to act rested largely on his concern that the union controlled the entire city of Homestead and commanded the allegiance of its citizens. Pattison refused to order the town taken by force, for fear a massacre would occur. But once emotions had died down, Pattison felt the need to act. He had been elected with the backing of a Carnegie-supported political machine, and he could no longer refuse to protect Carnegie interests.[64]

The steelworkers resolved to meet the militia with open arms, hoping to establish good relations with the troops. But the militia managed to keep its arrival to the town a secret almost to the last moment. At 9:00 a.m. on July 12, the Pennsylvania state militia arrived at the small Munhall train station near the Homestead mill (rather than the downtown train station as expected). Their commander, Major General George R. Snowden, made it clear to local officials that he sided with the owners. When Hugh O'Donnell, the head of the union's strike committee attempted to welcome Snowden and pledge the cooperation of the strikers, Snowden told him that the strikers had not been law abiding, and that "I want you to distinctly understand that I am the master of this situation."[65] More than 4,000 soldiers surrounded the plant. Within 20 minutes they had displaced the picketers; by 10:00 a.m., company officials were back in their offices. Another 2,000 troops camped on the high ground overlooking the city.[66]

The company quickly brought in strikebreakers and restarted production under the protection of the militia. Despite the presence of AFL pickets in front of several recruitment offices across the nation, Frick easily found employees to work the mill. The company quickly built bunk houses, dining halls and kitchens on the mill grounds to accommodate the strikebreakers. New employees, many of them black, arrived on July 13, and the mill furnaces relit on July 15. When a few workers attempted to storm into the plant to stop the relighting of the furnaces, militiamen fought them off and wounded six with bayonets.[67] But all was not well inside the plant. A race war between nonunion black and white workers in the Homestead plant broke out on July 22, 1892.[68]

Desperate to find a way to continue the strike, the AA appealed to Whitelaw Reid, the Republican candidate for vice president, on July 16. The AA offered to make no demands or set any preconditions; the union merely asked that Carnegie Steel reopen the negotiations. Reid wrote to Frick, warning him that the strike was hurting the Republican ticket and pleading with him to reopen talks. Frick refused.[69]

Attempted assassination and collapse of the strike

[edit]
Two men are sitting at a desk while a third man enters the office carrying a gun
Berkman's attempt to assassinate Frick, as illustrated by W. P. Snyder for Harper's Weekly in 1892

Frick, too, needed a way out of the strike. The company could not operate for long with strikebreakers living on the mill grounds, and permanent replacements had to be found. On July 18, the town was placed under martial law, further disheartening many of the strikers.[70]

National attention became riveted on Homestead when, on July 23, Alexander Berkman, a New York anarchist with no connection to steel or to organized labor, plotted with his lover Emma Goldman to assassinate Frick. He came in from New York, gained entrance to Frick's office, then shot and stabbed the executive. Frick survived and continued his role; Berkman was sentenced to 22 years in prison.[71]

The Berkman assassination attempt undermined public support for the union and prompted the final collapse of the strike. Hugh O'Donnell was removed as chair of the strike committee when he proposed to return to work at the lower wage scale if the unionists could get their jobs back. On August 12, the company announced that 1,700 men were working at the mill and production had resumed at full capacity. The national AFL refused to intervene, the East European workers ignored the union and it had no strategy left. The union voted to go back to work on Carnegie's terms; the strike had failed and the union had collapsed.[72]

[edit]

The company had waged a second front in state court, and was winning. On July 18, sixteen of the strike leaders were charged with conspiracy, riot and murder. Each man was jailed for one night and forced to post a $10,000 bond. The union retaliated by charging company executives with murder as well. The company men, too, had to post a $10,000 bond, but they were not forced to spend any time in jail. One judge issued treason charges against the Advisory Committee on August 30 for making itself the law. Most of the men could not raise the bail bond, and went to jail or into hiding. A compromise was reached whereby both sides dropped their charges.[73]

The strike's conclusion

[edit]
Puck illustration in which Schwab asks Carnegie whether it might be wiser to use the wealth from industry to benefit the worker rather than donate it to institutions for the privileged few.

Support for the strikers evaporated. The AFL refused to call for a boycott of Carnegie products in September 1892. Wholesale crossing of the picket line occurred, first among Eastern European immigrants and then among all workers. The strike had collapsed so much that the state militia pulled out on October 13, ending the 95-day occupation. The AA was nearly bankrupted by the job action. Weekly union relief for a member averaged $6.25 but totaled a staggering $10,000 per week when including 1,600 strikers. With only 192 out of more than 3,800 strikers in attendance, the Homestead chapter of the AA voted, 101 to 91, to return to work on November 20, 1892.[74]

In the end, only four workers were ever tried on the actual charges filed on July 18. Three AA members were found innocent of all charges. Hugh Dempsey, the leader of the local Knights of Labor District Assembly, was found guilty of conspiring to poison[75] nonunion workers at the plant—despite the state's star witness recanting his testimony on the stand. Dempsey served a seven-year prison term. In February 1893, Knox and the union agreed to drop the charges filed against one another, and no further prosecutions emerged from the events at Homestead.[76]

The striking AA affiliate in Beaver Falls gave in the same day as the Homestead lodge. The AA affiliate at Union Mills held out until August 14, 1893. But by then the union had only 53 members. The union had been broken; the company had been operating the plant at full capacity for almost a year, since September 1892.[77]

Aftermath

[edit]

The Homestead strike broke the AA as a force in the American labor movement. Many employers refused to sign contracts with their AA unions while the strike lasted. A nationwide 1893 Depression saw prices for steel plunge; other steel companies sought wage decreases similar to those imposed at Homestead.[78]

An organizing drive at the Homestead plant in 1896 was suppressed by Frick. The economy recovered by 1897. In May 1899, three hundred Homestead workers formed an AA lodge, but Frick ordered the Homestead works shut down and the unionization effort collapsed.[citation needed]

The Bost Building, AA headquarters during the strike and today a National Historic Landmark

De-unionization efforts throughout the Midwest began against the AA in 1897 when Jones and Laughlin Steel refused to sign a contract. By 1900, not a single steel plant in Pennsylvania remained unionized. The AA presence in Ohio and Illinois continued for a few more years, but the union continued to collapse. Many lodges disbanded, their members disillusioned. Others were easily broken in short battles. Carnegie Steel's Mingo Junction, Ohio, plant was the last major unionized steel mill in the country. But it, too, successfully withdrew recognition without a fight in 1903.[79]

AA membership sagged to 10,000 in 1894 from its high of over 24,000 in 1891. A year later, it was down to 8,000. A 1901 strike against Carnegie's successor company, U.S. Steel, collapsed. By 1909, membership in the AA had sunk to 6,300. A nationwide steel strike of 1919 also was unsuccessful.[80] The AA maintained a rump membership in the steel industry until its takeover by the Steel Workers Organizing Committee in 1936. The two organizations officially disbanded and formed the United Steelworkers on May 22, 1942.[citation needed]

In 1999 the Bost Building in downtown Homestead, AA headquarters throughout the strike, was designated a National Historic Landmark. It is used as a museum devoted not only to the strike, but also the steel industry in the Pittsburgh area. A railroad bridge over the Monongahela River near the site of the battle is named Pinkerton's Landing Bridge in honor of the dead. Two sites were each designated with a Pennsylvania state historical marker: the site where Pinkerton attempted to land, and the two adjoining cemeteries of St. Mary's and Homestead where are buried the remains of six of the seven Carnegie Steel Company workers that were killed.[3] The Pinkerton landing site was also named a Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation Historic Landmark.[4]

Modern site

[edit]

The pump house where the gunfight occurred remains as a museum and meeting hall. There are several historical markers as well as a metal commemorative sign with the US Steel logo that reads "In honor of the workers".

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Homestead Strike Historical Marker". explorepahistory.com. Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  2. ^ a b Pinkertons (killed): J.W. Kline of Chicago; T.J. Conners of New York; James O'Day (suicide); Kelly of Philadelphia; Michael Commas [died of injuries]; "John Doe" Drowned in river; Edward Speer [died of injuries]; John Shingle (Steamboat Captain) See notes 54–58
  3. ^ a b c "PHMC Historical Markers Search" (Searchable database). Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Retrieved January 25, 2014.
  4. ^ a b Historic Landmark Plaques 1968–2009 (PDF). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation. 2010. Retrieved July 2, 2010.
  5. ^ "American Experience: Strike at Homestead Mill". Public Broadcasting System. Archived from the original on April 8, 2000.
  6. ^ Warren (2000); Krass (2002)[page needed]
  7. ^ Brody, p. 50.
  8. ^ Krause, pp. 174–192; Body, pp. 50–51.
  9. ^ Brody, p. 52; Krause, pp. 42, 174, 246–249.
  10. ^ Brody, p. 53.
  11. ^ Brody, pp. 54–55.
  12. ^ Technically, the Homestead job action began as a lockout, not a strike. Foner, p. 208.
  13. ^ Quoted in George Harvey, Henry Clay Frick: The Man (New York: Beard Books, 1928; reprinted 2002), p. 177. ISBN 1-58798-127-0
  14. ^ Standiford, Les (2005). Meet You in Hell: Andrew Carnegie, Henry Clay Frick, and the Bitter Partnership That Transformed America. Crown Publishing Group. p. 161. ISBN 978-0-307-23837-5. Retrieved May 26, 2013.
  15. ^ Quoted in James H. Bridge, The Inside History of the Carnegie Steel Company (New York: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1903; rev. ed. 1992), p. 206. ISBN 0-405-04112-8
  16. ^ Carnegie, a pacifist, purposefully avoided the moral dilemmas raised by the Homestead strike by beginning a European vacation before the strike began. When questioned in Scotland about Frick's actions, Carnegie washed his hands of any responsibility and declared that Frick was in charge. Brody argues that Carnegie felt Frick was doing the right thing by bringing in strikebreakers and busting the union, but Frick was doing a poor job of it. See Brody, p. 59 fn. 18
  17. ^ Letter from Carnegie to Frick dated April 4, 1892, quoted in Foner, p. 207.
  18. ^ Krass p 277
  19. ^ Quoted in Krass p. 278; Krause, pp. 284–310, contains the best discussion of the bargaining timeline and exchange of proposals.
  20. ^ Foner, pp. 207 (fn); 208; Krause, pp. 302, 310.
  21. ^ Foner, pp. 207 (fn), 208, 210–211.
  22. ^ "Bronze marker of the 1892 Edwin Rowe depiction" (PDF). battleofhomestead.org. January 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 7, 2016.
  23. ^ Foner, pp. 208–209; Krause, p. 311; Brody, p. 59;
  24. ^ Foner, p. 209.
  25. ^ Krause, p. 26. claims these were plant guards specially deputized, but Krause is more authoritative in this regard.
  26. ^ Foner, p. 209; Krause, pp. 15, 271. The barges, bought specifically for the Homestead lockout, contained sleeping quarters and kitchens and were intended to house the agents for the duration of the strike.
  27. ^ Humanities, National Endowment for the (July 7, 1892). "The Wheeling Daily Intelligencer. (Wheeling, W. Va.) 1865–1903, July 07, 1892, Image 1". The Wheeling Daily Intelligencer. ISSN 2333-8547. Retrieved March 31, 2019.
  28. ^ Humanities, National Endowment for the (July 11, 1892). "Pittsburgh dispatch. (Pittsburgh [Pa.]) 1880–1923, July 11, 1892, Image 8". Pittsburg Dispatch. p. 8. ISSN 2157-1295. Retrieved April 12, 2019.
  29. ^ Foner, p. 209; Krause, p. 16. Krause indicates that at least a thousand people turned out.
  30. ^ Krause, pp. 16–18. Brody cites Andrew Carnegie, who claimed that Frick had not extended the barbed-wire fence to the riverbank, thus allowing the strikers access to the plant grounds. Brody, p. 59. But Foner says that the strikers tore down the fence near the water's edge. Foner, p. 209. Supporting Foner, see Krause, p. 17.
  31. ^ "What a Boatman Saw". The New York Times. July 7, 1892.
  32. ^ a b "Mob Law at Homestead". The New York Times. July 7, 1892.
  33. ^ Heinde, sometimes spelled Hynd, makes the claim he was the first one wounded on the Pinkerton side. See: "The Wounded at Pittsburgh". The New York Times. July 7, 1892.
  34. ^ Krause is the most accurate source on the number of dead, including the names of the killed and wounded. Krause, pp. 19–20.
  35. ^ Krause, pp. 20–21.
  36. ^ Krause, pp. 21–22; Brody, p. 59.
  37. ^ One striker was reported killed by "friendly fire" from the cannon, see: Rock Island Daily Argus, July 07, 1892, p. 1, Pittsburgh Dispatch, July 7, 1892, p. 2, reports Silas Wain killed by cannon fire from the opposite bank; while another striker died as a victim of the cannon backfiring, see: The Hocking Sentinel, July 14, 1892, p. 1, reports John Willard "head blown to pieces".
  38. ^ Krause, pp. 22–25, 30; Brody, p. 59.
  39. ^ Homestead p. 74
  40. ^ Krause, p. 24; Foner, p. 210.
  41. ^ Krause, pp. 25–26. Frick had sought several times to have the Pinkerton agents deputized. He guessed correctly that the strikers would attack the Pinkertons, and attacking duly deputized county law enforcement officers would provide grounds for claiming insurrection. McCleary, sympathizing with the workers, refused Frick's demands. See Krause, pp. 26–28.
  42. ^ Krause, pp. 29–30.
  43. ^ Bemis, Edward W. "The Homestead Strike." Journal of Political Economy. June 1894.
  44. ^ Krause, pp. 32–34.
  45. ^ "The Incident of the 6th of July." The Illustrated American. July 16, 1892, p. 4[dead link] Accessed 2012-03-15.
  46. ^ Dubofsky and Dulles, p. 154; Krause, pp. 34–36. Krause documents two more incidents which occurred during the surrender. A striker seized a Pinkerton agent's rifle and attempted to break it in two. He succeeded in shooting himself in the stomach, and died. Later, as the agents passed through the gantlet, a woman poked out an agent's eye with her umbrella. (The man who accidentally shot himself was Thomas Weldon, see: On July 7, 1892 the Evening World of New York.)
  47. ^ Krause, pp. 36–38. Krause points out that much of the press' lurid reporting played heavily on misogynistic ideals of women as respectable and docile. The press also often described the women of the town as 'Hungarians,' playing on nativist hatreds.
  48. ^ Krause, pp. 38–39.
  49. ^ Krause, pp. 40–41.
  50. ^ The two (J.W. Klein and T.J. Conners) are listed by name among the eight known dead according to the corner on July 8, 1892. See Pittsburgh Dispatch, July 08, 1892, Image 1
  51. ^ See Congressional Record: "Investigation of the Employment of Pinkerton Detectives in Connection with The Labor Troubles at Homestead PA, 52nd Congress, 1st Session/House of Representatives/Misc Doc no. 335/Washington DC Printing Office 1892". pp. 191–192 (191)
  52. ^ Humanities, National Endowment for the (July 8, 1892). "Pittsburgh dispatch. (Pittsburgh [Pa.]) 1880–1923, July 08, 1892, Image 2". Pittsburg Dispatch. p. 2. ISSN 2157-1295. Retrieved April 7, 2019.Pittsburgh Dispatch., July 12, 1892, Page 7, Image 7 On July 10, 1892 a Pinkerton named James "Jimmy" O'Day committed suicide at Chesterton Indiana after suffering brain damage from injuries
  53. ^ Humanities, National Endowment for the (July 8, 1892). "Pittsburgh dispatch. (Pittsburgh [Pa.]) 1880–1923, July 08, 1892, Image 2". Pittsburg Dispatch. p. 2. ISSN 2157-1295. Retrieved April 7, 2019.
  54. ^ New-York tribune., July 07, 1892, Image 1The Indianapolis journal., July 09, 1892, Page 2, Image 2 reports of those Pinkertons who were recruited from Philadelphia only one -a man named Kelly-was killed on a barge. Accessed April 9,2019 Humanities, National Endowment for the (July 7, 1892). "The evening world. (New York, N.Y.) 1887–1931, July 07, 1892, Sporting Extra, Image 1 reports a Pinkerton named Michael Commas had died of injuries in hospital that morning". The Evening World. ISSN 1941-0654. Retrieved April 7, 2019. Fort Frick or the Siege of Homestead by Myron R. Stowall p. 254 reports a Pinkerton guard Edward A R. Speer died of injuries 11 days after the strike; which occurred July 17, 1892 see Pittsburgh dispatch., July 18, 1892, p. 2, Image 2. Speer had been accidentally shot by one of his own men Pittsburgh dispatch., July 07, 1892, p 2, Image 2
  55. ^ The weekly intelligencer., July 09, 1892, Image 1
  56. ^ Evening star. [volume, July 15, 1892, p. 7, Image 7 reports that three days before an unknown Body was found in the River near Pittsburgh Pa; a Pinkerton agent claimed the dead man was not a Pinkerton-but he paid the funeral expenses to the undertaker
  57. ^ The Hocking sentinel., July 14, 1892, Image 1
  58. ^ Humanities, National Endowment for the (July 7, 1892). "The evening world. (New York, N.Y.) 1887–1931, July 07, 1892, Sporting Extra, Image 1". The Evening World. ISSN 1941-0654. Retrieved April 7, 2019.
  59. ^ Pittsburgh dispatch., July 08, 1892, Image 1
  60. ^ New-York tribune., July 07, 1892, Image 1.
  61. ^ Homestead p. 87
  62. ^ Boston Evening Transcript July 7, 1892
  63. ^ Krause, pp. 332–334.
  64. ^ Krause, pp. 32, 333–334; Foner, p. 212;
  65. ^ Paul Kahan, The Homestead Strike: Labor, Violence, and American Industry, 2014, p. 90
  66. ^ Krause, pp. 337–338.
  67. ^ Foner, pp. 211, 212; Krause, pp. 337–339
  68. ^ Krause, p. 346.
  69. ^ Brody, pp. 55–56; Krause, pp. 343–344.
  70. ^ Foner, pp. 213–214; Krause, p. 345.
  71. ^ Warren, p. 89; Krause, pp. 354–355
  72. ^ Krause, pp. 355–357.
  73. ^ Krause, pp. 348–350.
  74. ^ Krause, pp. 356–357; Foner, pp. 215–217.
  75. ^ The official charge was conspiracy to poison. "In mid-January 1893, Hugh Dempsey, a leading K. of L. official in the Pittsburgh area, and three others were found guilty of having conspired to poison, during September and October, a number of non-union men..." Aaron and Miller, p. 170. See also:
    • Montgomery, p. 39
    • "The Homestead Poisoners; Trial of Hugh Dempsey for Conspiracy Continued". The New York Times. January 14, 1893
    • "Hugh Dempsey to be Pardoned"]. The New York Times. January 30, 1896.
  76. ^ Krause, p. 348.
  77. ^ Foner, p. 217.
  78. ^ Brody, p. 57.
  79. ^ Brody, pp. 57–58.
  80. ^ Foner, p. 218.

General and cited references

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
![The Battle at the Landing during the Homestead Strike][float-right] The Homestead Strike was a major labor conflict from June to 1892 at the Carnegie Steel Company's Homestead mill near Pittsburgh, , where skilled workers organized under the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers resisted management's proposed wage reductions amid declining steel prices and a push for operational efficiencies. , acting as plant manager while was abroad, locked out union workers on July 1 after contract expiration and fortified the facility to enable non-union operations with strikebreakers. On July 6, Frick hired approximately 300 Pinkerton agents to secure the mill, but thousands of armed strikers blockaded their approach by river barge, leading to a four-hour exchange of gunfire that resulted in at least ten deaths—seven strikers and three agents—and dozens wounded before the surrendered. Governor Pattison then deployed the state to restore order and safeguard the mill, allowing Carnegie Steel to resume production without union interference. The protracted strike ended in defeat for the workers in late , with the union effectively dismantled at Homestead, union leaders blacklisted, and surviving employees accepting lower wages and longer hours under non-union conditions that facilitated the company's shift toward using less-skilled labor. The episode exemplified the intense class tensions of the , highlighting management's use of private security forces and state intervention to counter organized labor's demands for wage stability and workplace influence amid competitive market pressures.

Industrial and Economic Context

Late 19th-Century Steel Industry Dynamics

The American industry underwent rapid transformation in the late 19th century, propelled by technological breakthroughs that shifted production from to on a massive scale. The , commercialized in the United States after 1864, revolutionized by blowing air through molten in a converter to remove impurities, enabling output in under an hour at costs far below traditional methods. This innovation, combined with the emerging open-hearth furnace—adopted widely from the 1880s for its ability to produce larger batches of higher-quality using scrap and ore—drove efficiency gains, with prices plummeting due to scaled production and reduced labor intensity per ton. By 1880, U.S. production stood at 1.25 million long tons annually, surging to over 4 million tons by amid booming demand from railroads, bridges, and urban infrastructure. Economic dynamics intensified as supply outpaced demand in localized markets, fostering cutthroat competition among producers. Protective tariffs, averaging 30-40% on imports through the of 1890, insulated domestic firms from European rivals, particularly British Bessemer steel, allowing U.S. output to eclipse global leaders by the decade's end. However, overcapacity from new mills led to price erosion; steel rail prices, a key benchmark, declined sharply from the onward as technological efficiencies halved production costs, squeezing profit margins and prompting aggressive cost-cutting strategies. Firms pursued to control raw materials like and coke, as well as transportation via railroads and lake vessels, minimizing external dependencies and enabling against competitors. These pressures culminated in industry-wide consolidation efforts by the 1890s, as fragmented operations struggled with volatility. Andrew Carnegie's , formalized in 1892 through mergers of prior ventures, exemplified this by dominating Pittsburgh's output and undercutting rivals through relentless efficiency, producing 25% of U.S. steel by 1900. Yet, falling revenues—exacerbated by export competition and domestic —compelled managements to target labor expenses, with wages comprising up to 60% of costs in finishing operations, heightening tensions between owners seeking scalability and workers organized against reductions. The looming further amplified these strains, as rail demand faltered and inventories swelled, underscoring the causal link between technological abundance and economic in the sector.

Carnegie Steel Company: Formation and Competitive Pressures

Andrew Carnegie initiated his steel manufacturing ventures in the early 1870s, constructing the Edgar Thomson Steel Works in Braddock, Pennsylvania, with operations commencing in 1875 as one of the first major Bessemer process facilities in the United States. This plant focused on producing steel rails, capitalizing on railroad expansion demands and Carnegie's prior experience in rail transportation investments. In 1883, Carnegie purchased the Homestead Steel Works, established in 1881 along the Monongahela River, which specialized in heavy armor plates and structural beams, further diversifying output. These acquisitions exemplified Carnegie's strategy of vertical integration, securing control over iron ore mines, coke ovens, and shipping to minimize costs and supply chain vulnerabilities. The formal incorporation of the occurred in November 1892, unifying Carnegie's disparate mills into a single entity that dominated global production, outputting over 2 million tons annually by the decade's end. Between 1889 and 1899, production surged from 332,111 tons to 2,663,412 tons, driven by technological upgrades and capacity expansions that outpaced industry averages. Annual profits approximated $4 million in 1892, reflecting robust demand despite cyclical fluctuations, with the company generating a record $4.5 million in the year preceding the Homestead dispute. This growth positioned Carnegie Steel as the largest , rail, and coke producer worldwide by the late 1880s. Competitive pressures intensified in the early as steel prices plummeted amid overproduction and an impending , compelling firms to slash expenses for survival. Non-unionized competitors, such as those in and , operated at lower labor costs, eroding for unionized plants like Homestead where skilled workers commanded premium wages under Amalgamated Association contracts. Carnegie's management, led by , viewed union elimination as essential to align costs with rivals, prioritizing scale efficiencies and technological rationalization over to sustain profitability in a price-driven sector. Homestead's status as the union's final stronghold in amplified these stakes, as retaining high-wage agreements threatened the company's edge against de-unionized operations achieving 20-30% lower per-ton costs.

Labor Dynamics at Homestead

The Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers

The Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers (AA), established in , emerged as a key craft union advocating for skilled laborers in the burgeoning iron and steel sector, focusing on issues like wages, hours, and workplace safety amid rapid industrialization. By the early 1890s, its national roster included roughly 24,000 members, positioning it among the era's most influential industrial organizations despite challenges from employer resistance and internal divisions over organizing unskilled workers. At the , maintained a robust foothold through eight dedicated lodges, primarily enrolling skilled trades such as rollers, heaters, puddlers, and machinists whose expertise was indispensable for high-quality output in an industry reliant on manual precision before widespread . These members, comprising several hundred of the plant's total of about 3,800, had negotiated successive agreements with Carnegie Steel since the early , yielding wages 20-30% above non-union benchmarks and rules limiting arbitrary hiring or technological shifts that could displace veterans. Such pacts often incorporated a sliding scale tying pay to prevailing billet prices, providing stability but also exposing workers to market fluctuations without guaranteed minimums. Though the AA's craft focus empowered it to bottleneck production—effectively shielding broader plant standards for unskilled, non-union laborers—it represented only a fraction of Homestead's employees, fostering tensions as management sought to exploit growing pools of semi-skilled immigrants and machinery to erode craft monopolies and trim costs amid competitive pressures from rivals like Jones & Laughlin. This dynamic rendered the union a prime target for de-unionization, as evidenced by prior skirmishes, including a successful 1889 strike at Homestead that reinforced the AA's leverage but alerted executives to its strategic vulnerabilities. Locally, the AA operated via advisory committees, with leaders like Hugh O'Donnell coordinating defenses against encroachments, emphasizing solidarity and preparedness for the 1892 contract expiration on June 30.

Contract Negotiations and Pre-Strike Tensions

The three-year agreement between the and the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers (AA) at the Homestead steelworks, established following the 1889 strike resolution, was scheduled to expire on June 30, 1892. Negotiations commenced in early 1892, with company president , acting with Andrew Carnegie's approval while the latter vacationed in , demanding wage reductions as a condition for renewal. Frick targeted cuts for approximately 325 workers, focusing on skilled positions under union jurisdiction, amid a broader company strategy to tie compensation more rigidly to fluctuating prices via an adjusted sliding scale system, which had already led to prior wage concessions by employees. The , representing about 800 skilled laborers out of the plant's 3,800 workforce, countered by seeking to preserve existing wage structures or secure modest increases, viewing the proposals as an erosion of hard-won gains from 1889. Frick refused compromise, issuing non-negotiable ultimatums that prioritized operational flexibility over union input, driven by competitive necessities in an industry where non-union mills operated at lower labor costs. This hardline approach reflected management's long-term intent to diminish the AA's authority, which had enforced uniform pay scales and limited managerial discretion on hiring and production methods. Pre-strike tensions intensified in May 1892 when Frick ordered the erection of a three-mile around the 425-acre facility, reinforced with three strands of and guarded by , signaling preparations for confrontation and restricting access. Local observers, including the Dispatch, noted the absence of genuine bargaining, with Frick's stance exacerbating worker grievances over stagnant despite steel price declines. As the deadline neared without resolution, Frick declared on June 28 that the plant would shut down post-expiration, initiating a lockout on June 29 that halted operations and mobilized union members for defense.

Onset of the Dispute

Frick's Wage Reduction Proposals

In February 1892, as the three-year agreement between and the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers approached its expiration on June 30, , serving as the company's chairman while was in , initiated negotiations for a new contract at the . The Amalgamated Association initially sought a wage increase, but Frick countered with proposals for substantial reductions to align labor costs with prevailing market conditions and competitive pressures in the steel industry. Frick's wage scale proposals tied compensation to the market price of billets via a sliding scale mechanism, which would result in an average reduction of approximately 18 percent for affected workers, though some estimates placed the cuts as high as 22 percent for certain roles. These cuts targeted around 325 skilled employees whose pay had previously been negotiated under union contracts, while aiming to depress overall wage levels to facilitate the introduction of more efficient machinery and non-union labor in expanding departments. Beyond direct pay reductions, the proposals sought to restrict the union's jurisdiction to only a few departments, such as the plate mill, allowing Carnegie Steel to operate the majority of the Homestead plant—where most production occurred—without union interference or constraints. Management justified the reductions as necessary for economic survival amid falling steel prices and , arguing that high Homestead wages, which ranged from $4 to $7.60 per day for skilled workers, hindered competitiveness against lower-cost producers like those in the . Frick's stance reflected a broader to dismantle the Amalgamated Association's influence, which he viewed as an obstacle to operational flexibility and cost control, a position aligned with Carnegie's directives for efficiency. By May 1892, Frick issued an ultimatum demanding acceptance of the terms by June 24, threatening individual dealings with workers otherwise, underscoring the non-negotiable intent to impose the new scale unilaterally if needed.

Union's Rejection and Lockout Initiation

The Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers, representing about 800 skilled workers at the Homestead plant, rejected Frick's proposed wage reductions in late June 1892, as the existing three-year contract approached its expiration on June 30. Frick's scale demanded cuts of up to 20 percent for rolling mill crews and 25 percent for other positions, affecting roughly 325 union members amid a depressed market, though the company had already imposed two prior reductions in the preceding 18 months. The union viewed the terms as an ultimatum aimed at undermining , refusing to accept non-union operation of the facility or further erosion of pay scales tied to market fluctuations. On June 25, Frick declared an end to negotiations and announced the wage cuts, prompting the Amalgamated's formal rejection by the deadline he had set around June 24. In response, Frick ordered the plant's closure, initiating the lockout on the night of June 28 by barring entry to non-essential areas and halting production to pressure the union into capitulation. By June 29, with no agreement reached, the lockout expanded to all departments except the machine shop, idling the entire workforce of approximately 3,800 and shifting the dispute from negotiation to confrontation, as management stockpiled resources in anticipation of prolonged conflict. This move effectively transformed the labor action into a defensive standoff, with strikers organizing to prevent non-union replacements from accessing the works.

Military Preparations and Standoff

Management's Hiring of Pinkerton Agents

Henry Clay Frick, acting as chairman of the during Andrew Carnegie's absence in , initiated contact with the Pinkerton National Detective Agency on June 25, 1892, to secure private guards for the Homestead plant amid escalating labor tensions. This decision followed the expiration of the union contract on June 30 and Frick's implementation of a lockout, as local proved insufficient to protect company property from potential sabotage or interference by the Amalgamated Association's supporters, who effectively controlled access to the mill. The contract stipulated the deployment of approximately 300 armed Pinkerton agents, a force selected for its experience in labor disputes, having previously assisted Frick in protecting operations during strikes in his coke fields in 1884 and 1889. Frick's rationale emphasized safeguarding non-union replacement workers and resuming production without union interference, advertising for scabs while preparing to bypass the striking workforce of about 3,800. Carnegie, informed via transatlantic correspondence, tacitly endorsed the measure, aligning with prior uses of to maintain operational continuity against organized labor resistance. By July 4, Frick detailed the arming and logistical preparations to Carnegie, including the agents' transport via two barges on the to discreetly approach the plant without alerting strikers. , equipped with rifles and under strict orders to avoid provocation unless attacked, represented a calculated escalation to enforce management's right to operate independently, reflecting broader industrial practices where private agencies filled gaps left by limited public policing in remote industrial sites. This hiring underscored Frick's determination to dismantle union influence at Homestead, prioritizing over concessions.

Strikers' Fortifications and Arming

Following the lockout initiated on June 30, 1892, the striking workers at the , organized under the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers' advisory committee chaired by Hugh O'Donnell, established a defensive perimeter around the plant to prevent non-union strikebreakers from entering. The committee implemented a military-style organization, including eight-hour picket shifts, river patrols along the , and a signaling system to monitor approaches from land and water. Strikers constructed makeshift barricades and redoubts using materials available at the mill, such as stacks of and billets, to fortify key access points, particularly the river landing and roads leading to the works. These fortifications were positioned to provide cover during potential confrontations, with lookouts posted continuously to detect intruders. The workers armed themselves primarily with personal firearms, including rifles, carbines (some dating to the Civil War era), and shotguns, with several hundred strikers carrying such weapons in organized picket lines. A temporary was set up to distribute rifles, shotguns, and to volunteers guarding the plant. Strike sympathizers from surrounding areas contributed additional arms and, during the escalation, delivered a to the mill, which was positioned overlooking the river but was abandoned after errant fire wounded and killed one striker.

The July 6 Battle

Pinkertons' Attempted Landing

On the night of July 5, 1892, roughly 300 Pinkerton National Detective Agency operatives assembled from recruits in New York and Chicago boarded two covered barges, the Iron Mountain and Monongahela, which were towed by tugs up the Monongahela River from a staging point below Pittsburgh toward the Homestead Steel Works. The agents, consisting largely of unemployed men, drifters, and a few students, were armed with approximately 250 Winchester rifles, 300 pistols, and ample ammunition distributed en route. Their objective was to land at the mill's waterfront, secure the facility against strikers, and enable Carnegie Steel to resume operations using non-union strikebreakers under protection. The barges departed after midnight and approached Homestead around 3 to 4 a.m. on July 6, but lookout strikers spotted them passing key bridges and river points, alerting the community via telegrams and messengers. By dawn, thousands of steelworkers, their families, and local sympathizers had gathered along the riverbank and fortified positions overlooking the intended landing site south of the plant, determined to prevent the agents from disembarking. As the tugboats halted near the shore around 7 a.m., Pinkerton leaders attempted negotiations via megaphone, warning the crowd to disperse and asserting their legal right to protect company property, but the strikers refused and urged the agents to retreat. The operatives then prepared to force a , raising an American flag on one as a symbol of authority, but faced immediate volleys of stones, bricks, and sporadic gunfire from the shore, prompting the agents to return fire defensively while remaining pinned on the water. Just before 8 a.m., made a concerted push to disembark under cover of their rifles, marking the critical phase of the attempted incursion amid escalating tension.

Escalation to Gunfire and Casualties

On July 6, 1892, around 4:00 AM, the two barges carrying approximately 300 Pinkerton agents reached the Homestead steelworks along the , where thousands of armed strikers had gathered to prevent their at the pump house. As the barges approached the shore, strikers opened fire with rifles and threw stones, wounding Pinkerton commander John Heinde in the thigh; the agents initially withheld return fire. This initial volley from the strikers prompted the Pinkertons to retaliate, leading to an intense exchange of gunfire that wounded over 30 strikers immediately. The battle persisted for approximately 13 hours, with confined to their barges and unable to disembark effectively, while strikers maintained positions on shore and fired from elevated points near structures like Open Hearth Furnace No. One. Attempts by the to raise a of surrender were reportedly shot down four times by striker sharpshooters, prolonging the conflict until around 5:00 PM when the agents finally surrendered under guarantees of safe passage. The disputed initiation of gunfire reflects accounts varying by source affiliation, with some Pinkerton testimonies claiming strikers fired first without provocation, while union-aligned narratives emphasize defensive response to an armed incursion. Casualties from the engagement included 3 Pinkerton agents killed and dozens wounded, alongside 9 strikers dead and numerous injuries among the workers. These figures, drawn from inquests and contemporary reports, underscore the ferocity of the clash, with deaths resulting directly from rifle fire during the standoff. The , upon surrender, were disarmed, marched through the town amid hostility from the crowd, and temporarily held before release, marking the immediate tactical victory for the strikers but escalating the broader dispute.

Surrender and Immediate Repercussions

Following approximately twelve hours of intermittent gunfire and bombardment, the 300 Pinkerton agents trapped on the barges raised a and surrendered around 5 p.m. on July 6, 1892, after negotiations mediated by local figures guaranteed their safety in exchange for evacuation from the plant grounds. Despite these assurances, the agents encountered immediate hostility upon disembarking; an estimated 5,000 strikers and residents surrounded them, disarming the force and subjecting many to physical assaults, including kicks, beatings with clubs, and stonings during a forced march through Homestead's streets. The Pinkertons were ultimately herded into the Homestead Opera House for temporary confinement, where they received limited medical attention before being loaded onto trains and removed from the area the next morning, July 7. Approximately half of the agents sustained injuries ranging from minor bruises to severe wounds, though none died during the immediate post-surrender chaos. The day's clash produced seven striker fatalities and three Pinkerton deaths, alongside dozens of wounded on both sides, with total casualties exacerbated by the use of , , and a small by the defenders. This violence, combined with reports of the agents' mistreatment—described in contemporary accounts as a "gauntlet" of —prompted condemnation from newspapers across the , eroding public support for the union and framing the workers as aggressors rather than victims of corporate overreach. The shift in media narrative intensified calls for state intervention, setting the stage for the deployment of the four days later.

State Intervention and Operational Resumption

Governor Pattison's Militia Mobilization


Following the defeat of the Pinkerton agents on July 6, 1892, armed strikers maintained control over access to the Homestead steelworks, preventing Carnegie Steel management from resuming operations. Henry Clay Frick appealed to Pennsylvania Governor Robert E. Pattison for military aid to protect the plant and facilitate reopening with non-union labor.
Pattison, a Democrat with constituents sympathetic to organized labor, initially declined direct intervention, insisting that Allegheny County Sheriff Heiny McCleary first exhaust local resources to restore order. McCleary deployed deputies to serve arrest warrants on strike leaders for their role in the July 6 violence but faced overwhelming resistance from crowds of over 5,000 armed workers, rendering arrests impossible without broader support.
On July 10, 1892, after McCleary's repeated telegrams detailed the breakdown of civil authority, Pattison issued orders mobilizing the full Pennsylvania National Guard to enforce the sheriff's directives and secure the Carnegie works. Approximately 8,500 troops under Major General George R. Snowden began assembling, with initial contingents departing Harrisburg early the next morning.
The militia arrived in Homestead on July 12, surrounding the plant, dispersing striker assemblies near the rail station, and taking possession of the facility from the advisory committee of workers. This deployment shifted control to state forces, allowing strikebreakers to enter under guard and marking a decisive turn against the union's defensive strategy. Pattison stated the troops would remain until law and order were fully restored, regardless of duration.

Reopening the Plant and Worker Returns

Following the arrival of the on July 12, 1892, comprising approximately 8,500 troops, initiated limited production at the Homestead plant under military protection. The escorted strikebreaking laborers—non-union workers imported to replace the strikers—into the facility, enabling partial resumption of operations within days of their deployment. This approach allowed management, led by , to bypass the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers and maintain control amid ongoing labor resistance. By November 1892, the plant had transitioned to fuller non-union operations, incorporating African American and Eastern European immigrant workers to fill roles previously held by union members. The Amalgamated Association, facing financial exhaustion and eroded support, voted on November 20, 1892, by a margin of 101 to 91, to terminate the strike and permit members to return to work under the company's terms, which included acceptance of the proposed wage reductions and abandonment of . Original strikers returned individually rather than as a union body, with many compelled to forgo organized representation; however, a significant portion faced , barring them from industry employment thereafter. This capitulation marked the effective defeat of the union at Homestead, ushering in a 44-year period of non-union labor at the plant until broader industry organizing efforts in . Management's strategy of replacement hiring and prolonged lockout thus succeeded in reshaping the workforce, prioritizing operational continuity over pre-strike labor agreements.

Assassination Attempt and Strike Unraveling

Alexander Berkman's Attack on Frick

On July 23, 1892, Alexander Berkman, a 21-year-old Russian-born anarchist unaffiliated with the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers or the Homestead strikers, entered the office of Henry Clay Frick in Pittsburgh's Frick Building with the intent to assassinate him as a symbolic act against capitalist oppression amid the ongoing Homestead Strike. Berkman, who had arrived in Pittsburgh by train shortly after the National Guard's deployment, posed as a job-seeker using a forged calling card and gained access to Frick's private office. Berkman drew a .32-caliber concealed in a pocket and fired three shots at Frick at close range, striking him in the neck, left ear lobe, and abdomen, before Frick grappled with him and called for aid. During the struggle, Berkman stabbed Frick in the thigh with a sharpened file he carried as a , but Frick's aides subdued Berkman, who made no attempt to flee and proclaimed his anarchist motives, stating the act avenged the strikers' deaths and aimed to incite . Frick, despite severe wounds requiring surgical intervention to remove bullets and staunch bleeding, exhibited remarkable resilience, dictating from his the following day and returning to work within weeks, an outcome attributed to his robust and prompt medical care. Berkman faced charges of felonious , with denied, and was convicted in September 1892, receiving a 22-year sentence at the Western Penitentiary in for the shooting and related offenses; he served 14 years before pardon in 1906. The assassination attempt, while intended by Berkman to bolster labor resistance, alienated public sympathy from the strikers, portraying the conflict as influenced by anarchistic violence rather than legitimate union grievances, and was publicly disavowed by strike leaders who emphasized their non-violent stance. Berkman's act stemmed from his ideological commitment to "," a tactic espoused in anarchist circles to demonstrate the vulnerability of industrial titans, though it lacked coordination with the Homestead Advisory Committee and drew condemnation from figures like , his associate, for its isolated execution.

Erosion of Strike Support and Union Collapse

The assassination attempt on by anarchist on July 23, 1892, marked a turning point in public perception of the Homestead strikers. Although Berkman acted independently of the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers, the incident linked the strike to radical violence in the public mind, eroding sympathy that had initially favored the workers after the July 6 battle with Pinkerton agents. Newspapers and commentators increasingly portrayed the union as aligned with extremism, further alienating potential supporters and shifting opinion toward management. The deployment of the , numbering 8,500 troops, on July 12, 1892, enabled Carnegie Steel to regain control of the Homestead plant and resume operations with strikebreakers by mid-August. This military intervention neutralized the strikers' fortifications and , while the influx of over 1,700 non-union workers diluted the strike's effectiveness and sowed divisions among Homestead's labor force. Financial strain mounted on the union as strike funds dwindled, prompting some members to return to work amid threats of permanent replacement. By November 1892, with winter approaching and solidarity fracturing, the Amalgamated Association voted to end the strike, allowing workers to return on the company's terms without recognition of the union. Frick's refusal to negotiate with the union post-battle accelerated its collapse at Homestead, where it was effectively dissolved, and blacklisting of leaders prevented reorganization. Union membership nationwide fell sharply from 24,000 in 1892 to 10,000 by 1894 and 8,000 by 1895, reflecting broader de-unionization in the steel industry that persisted until 1918.

Trials of Strikers for Conspiracy and Violence

Following the violent confrontation on July 6, 1892, between strikers and Pinkerton agents, Allegheny County authorities arrested sixteen strike leaders on July 18, charging them with , , and murder in connection with the deaths of seven Pinkerton detectives. These initial indictments targeted advisory committee members, including Hugh O'Donnell, the strike's primary organizer, alleging they orchestrated the armed resistance that led to the fatalities. Each spent one night in jail before posting $10,000 bonds, a substantial sum that strained union resources amid ongoing strike costs. Subsequent investigations expanded the scope, with over 160 additional strikers indicted for lesser offenses such as , , and related to the battle's , while the core leadership faced murder trials for the Pinkerton killings. Trials commenced in Allegheny County courts in late 1892 and extended into 1893, prosecuted by John B. Scott under pressure from Carnegie Steel officials, who provided evidence and witnesses to implicate union orchestration of the gunfire. The proceedings featured testimony from survivors on both sides, but defense arguments emphasized against armed intruders and questioned the legality of the Pinkertons' barge approach without legal process. Meanwhile, the entire strike committee was briefly arrested on charges for allegedly obstructing state militia deployment, though these were quickly dismissed due to lack of evidence. Pittsburgh-area juries, drawn from working-class communities sympathetic to the strikers' grievances against corporate power, acquitted all defendants in the and conspiracy cases by mid-1893, often after brief deliberations that reflected local distrust of Carnegie Steel's tactics. O'Donnell and his co-defendants were found not guilty in a consolidated , with the verdict hinging on insufficient proof of premeditated by union leaders. Remaining charges against rank-and-file strikers were dropped en masse, as no convictions were secured despite extensive testimony; this outcome drained union finances through legal fees and distracted leadership from sustaining the strike, contributing to its collapse. The acquittals underscored resistance to corporate-influenced prosecutions but offered no lasting vindication, as prevented most defendants from reemployment in steel.

Outcomes for Pinkertons and Management Figures

The Pinkerton agents, numbering approximately 300, surrendered to the strikers on July 6, 1892, following a four-hour exchange of gunfire at the Homestead mill landing that resulted in three agent deaths and numerous injuries among their ranks. Captured agents faced physical abuse and detention by the crowd until the arrival of the Pennsylvania National Guard on July 12, after which they were escorted to Pittsburgh without facing criminal charges, as grand jury investigations attributed primary responsibility for the violence to the strikers. The agency's failed operation, contracted by Carnegie Steel for $26,000 plus expenses, drew widespread condemnation for employing armed private forces against workers, contributing to the passage of the Anti-Pinkerton Act on August 18, 1893, which prohibited the federal government from hiring private detective agencies for labor dispute interventions. Henry Clay Frick, as chairman of Carnegie Steel, emerged from the strike with operational control intact, implementing non-union hiring and wage reductions that reduced average daily pay by up to 20% for reemployed workers by November 1892. Despite the assassination attempt by , which left Frick seriously wounded but unyielding—he reportedly told Berkman, "I am not afraid of you"—Frick oversaw the resumption of full production under protection, driving company profits from under $2 million in 1893 to nearly $40 million by 1900 through efficiency gains and labor cost controls. No legal penalties befell Frick or other executives, as state investigations cleared management of charges, though tensions with escalated, culminating in Frick's 1897 lawsuit against Carnegie for contract breaches, a settlement that netted him $25 million, and his resignation as chairman in 1899 to pursue independent coke and ventures. Andrew Carnegie, vacationing in during the strike's violent phase, had authorized Frick's hardline tactics via cable, including the Pinkerton deployment, but publicly distanced himself afterward amid accusations of hypocrisy given his writings on labor harmony. The episode tarnished Carnegie's philanthropist image temporarily, yet Carnegie Steel avoided union contracts industry-wide post-Homestead, enabling and technological upgrades that positioned the firm for its 1901 merger into , from which Carnegie personally profited over $225 million without facing personal liability or prosecution. Lower-level management figures, such as plant superintendent William Schultz, similarly encountered no repercussions, retaining roles in the reorganized non-union workforce.

Immediate Aftermath

Employment Shifts and Wage Structures Post-Strike

Following the strike's conclusion on November 20, 1892, Carnegie Steel rehired approximately 2,000 of the original 3,800 workers at the Homestead plant, selectively excluding union officials, strike leaders, and individuals implicated in post-strike violence or , while integrating several hundred non-union replacement workers previously recruited during the lockout. This reemployment process prioritized operational resumption over prior union contracts, effectively around 1,000 strikers and shifting the workforce composition toward less organized labor. The expulsion of the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers from the facility dismantled collective bargaining, enabling Carnegie Steel to impose unilateral employment terms and hire freely from non-union pools, a practice that expanded rapidly in subsequent years as the company prioritized mechanization and unskilled labor over craft-based skilled roles. By 1900, union representation at Homestead had dwindled to negligible levels, reflecting a broader industry transition to open-shop policies that reduced skilled worker leverage and increased turnover among lower-paid immigrants and day laborers. Wage structures reverted to management-determined scales without union input, incorporating the 18-20% reductions proposed pre-strike for certain job categories, alongside elimination of 500 positions and enforcement of 12-hour shifts to align labor costs with fluctuating prices under a modified sliding scale tied solely to market rates rather than negotiated protections. Contemporary worker accounts document average daily earnings falling from $10–$12 pre-strike to $7 immediately afterward, with further erosion to $3 by 1903 amid intensified production demands and diluted skill premiums. These adjustments yielded substantial cost savings, as evidenced by Carnegie Steel's net profits climbing to $106 million over the ensuing nine years through 1901, underscoring the causal link between union dissolution and enhanced operational flexibility in wage and staffing decisions.

Community and Economic Disruptions in Homestead

The failure of the Homestead Strike imposed immediate economic strain on the community, as the lockout of several hundred workers beginning July 1, 1892, halted production at the mill, which served as the economic backbone of —a town predominantly populated by steelworkers and their families. Local businesses, reliant on mill employee spending, experienced reduced patronage during the strike's four-month duration, contributing to broader financial distress amid an already fluctuating national economy. Families endured acute hardships, with strikers and their dependents facing destitution from lost wages; relief efforts were limited, and lower-paid immigrant steelworkers, lacking robust support networks, were particularly vulnerable to and coerced returns to work. Social divisions deepened along ethnic lines, as some groups faded in strike support while others held firm, fostering resentment between loyal unionists and those who accepted reemployment under company terms by late October 1892. Carnegie Steel's resumption of operations with non-union replacement workers—accompanied by the construction of company housing for them—further disrupted community cohesion, as targeted over 100 union activists indicted for violence, limiting their future employment prospects. By 1893, most former strikers had been rehired without union protections, but at reduced wages reflecting the company's imposed cuts of up to 18 percent on certain roles, eroding prior high earning standards that had distinguished Homestead mills. These disruptions compounded with the onset of the 1893 economic depression, plunging the town into severe hard times; the collapse of the Amalgamated Association locally entrenched de-unionization, diminishing power and exposing workers to unchecked managerial control over wages and conditions. Political fissures among residents, split between Republican and Democratic loyalties, hindered unified recovery efforts, prolonging instability in a once buoyed by organized labor's influence.

Long-Term Consequences

Decline of Craft Unionism in Steel

The defeat of the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers (AAISW) during the Homestead Strike in marked a for in the industry, as the union's failure to hold the mill led to its expulsion from Carnegie Steel's operations and a rapid erosion of its influence elsewhere. Homestead had represented one of the AAISW's strongest bastions, with eight lodges encompassing skilled workers who had secured contracts through ; the strike's violent outcome, including the deaths of workers and , discredited the union's defensive strategies and allowed management to impose non-union conditions, hiring replacements without regard for union affiliation. Membership in the AAISW, which had peaked at approximately 24,000 workers prior to the strike, plummeted to around within months afterward, reflecting widespread demoralization and resistance to rehiring union members. The association's craft-oriented structure, focused on skilled trades like puddling and rolling, proved ill-suited to the industry's shift toward mechanized, continuous-process production methods—such as the Bessemer converter and open-hearth furnaces—which reduced the proportion of highly skilled labor from about 20% in the to under 10% by the early , diluting the union's over a shrinking base. Carnegie Steel's post-strike open-shop policy, enforced rigorously by , set a for other producers like , which avoided union contracts until the 1930s and prioritized efficiency gains from non-union labor flexibility; this anti-union stance, combined with the AAISW's inability to organize unskilled immigrants and machine tenders—who comprised the growing majority of the workforce—accelerated the decline, leaving marginalized in by the . The violence at Homestead further alienated potential allies, including moderate labor groups and the public, portraying craft unions as obstructive to industrial amid falling prices from $35 per gross ton in 1890 to $22 in 1892.

Carnegie Steel's Expansion and Efficiency Gains

Following the suppression of the 1892 Homestead Strike, , unencumbered by union constraints at key facilities, pursued aggressive operational enhancements that boosted output and profitability. The elimination of the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers at Homestead enabled management to accelerate production paces, introduce mechanized processes, and reallocate labor without restrictions, which had previously capped work speeds to preserve skilled jobs. One illustrative example involved upgrading blast furnaces, where annual output per unit surged from 13,000 tons to 100,000 tons through technological refinements and intensified labor utilization. These efficiency measures coincided with substantial production expansion across Carnegie Steel's integrated operations, encompassing mining, coke production, and rolling mills. From to 1899, the company's output escalated from 332,111 tons to 2,663,412 tons, reflecting investments in capacity amid falling costs and streamlined logistics via railroad ownership. Profits similarly ballooned under Henry Clay Frick's oversight, rising from approximately $4 million annually in 1892 to $40 million by 1900, fueled by non-union wage structures and scaled-up volumes that outpaced competitors. Over the subsequent nine years, cumulative profits reached $106 million, underscoring the financial leverage gained from post-strike labor flexibility. Vertical integration further amplified these gains, as Carnegie secured control over upstream supplies like the iron ore deposits acquired in the 1890s, reducing dependency on external vendors and stabilizing costs during market fluctuations. By 1900, these strategies had positioned Carnegie Steel as the dominant U.S. producer, with output exceeding that of entire foreign steel industries, such as Britain's, thereby lowering per-ton prices and spurring demand in projects. This era of unchecked expansion culminated in the sale to J.P. Morgan's for $480 million, forming the Steel Corporation and validating the productivity model refined after Homestead.

Broader Impacts on American Industrialization

The failure of the Homestead Strike in precipitated a sharp decline in organized labor's influence within the American steel industry, enabling management to pursue aggressive cost reductions and operational efficiencies unhindered by constraints. Following the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers' defeat, implemented wage scales that reduced average daily earnings from $10 to as low as $4.75 for some roles, while strike leaders and replacing unionized workers with non-union labor. This de-unionization extended beyond Homestead, as other steel firms, observing the outcome, imposed similar wage decreases amid the , effectively eradicating union presence in major plants until . The resulting labor cost savings facilitated substantial capital reinvestment in and , propelling steel output from 4.2 million tons in 1890 to over 10 million tons by 1900, underpinning infrastructure projects like railroads and skyscrapers central to industrialization. The strike's violent resolution, involving private agents and state militia, established a precedent for corporate and intervention to protect property rights during industrial disputes, discouraging future labor militancy across sectors. perception shifted against unions due to the armed confrontation, which killed at least ten individuals including Pinkerton agents and a striker, fostering a of worker radicalism that justified employer resistance. This environment of weakened labor opposition allowed industrialists like to consolidate operations, culminating in the 1901 formation of Corporation—the world's first billion-dollar enterprise—which dominated production and innovation without union interference. Economically, the absence of union-enforced wage premiums correlated with accelerated productivity gains; steelworkers' stagnated relative to output increases, but this funded technological advancements such as the refinements, enhancing America's competitive edge in global markets. In the broader context of American industrialization, the Homestead episode reinforced a pro-business legal and cultural framework that prioritized operational continuity over worker concessions, contributing to the era's rapid economic transformation from agrarian to industrial dominance. By signaling that determined could prevail against even skilled unions, the strike influenced policies in emerging industries like automobiles and electrical , where anti-union strategies similarly suppressed organizing until federal in the 1930s. While labor advocates decry this as entrenching exploitation, empirical patterns show that diminished union bargaining power post-1892 aligned with a tripling of U.S. output by , driven by unchecked efficiency measures rather than wage-driven consumption. This causal dynamic underscores how the strike's legacy facilitated the scale and speed of industrialization, albeit at the cost of labor's short-term bargaining leverage.

Historical Debates and Perspectives

Attribution of Violence and Initiation of Hostilities

The arrival of approximately 300 Pinkerton National Detective Agency agents by barge on the on July 6, 1892, marked the flashpoint for armed confrontation at the . Hired by Carnegie Steel general manager to safeguard the replacement of locked-out union workers and resume operations, the agents approached under a signaling intent to , amid a crowd of over 3,000 armed strikers and sympathizers who had blockaded the facility since late June to prevent non-union labor entry. Eyewitness accounts and testimony from the subsequent Homestead murder trials consistently attributed the first shots to the strikers on the riverbank, with Pinkerton Captain Heidrick Cooper testifying that gunfire erupted from the shore as the barges neared the landing, before any Pinkerton response. Congressional interrogations of survivors similarly reported strikers initiating the volley, with one agent recounting shots striking the barges from 400 yards out, wounding personnel prior to retaliatory fire from the defenders. This sequence escalated into a sustained exchange lasting over six hours, resulting in three Pinkerton deaths, seven striker fatalities, and dozens wounded on both sides, until the agents surrendered after strikers ignited the barges with oil-soaked straw and forced their evacuation. Union narratives, propagated in labor periodicals and Amalgamated Association statements, countered that provoked the clash by advancing aggressively despite warnings, framing the agents' employment as an unprovoked invasion of community and justifying preemptive fire as against corporate aggression. However, Frick's congressional testimony emphasized that strikers had already seized control of the plant, armed patrols since , and issued ultimatums barring non-union access, rendering the Pinkerton deployment a necessary defense rather than initiation of hostilities—claims corroborated by prior striker threats documented in company records. These pro-labor accounts, while amplifying worker grievances over reductions, often overlooked the blockade's illegality under contract terms and law, which viewed the mill as entitled to protection. Historians note persistent ambiguity in pinpointing the absolute first bullet due to chaotic conditions and partisan reporting, yet forensic alignment with survivor depositions—favoring shore-originated —supports striker initiation of the kinetic phase, even as the underlying lockout stemmed from failed negotiations. Management's recourse to private agents, though escalatory, responded causally to union intransigence on open-shop demands, with Frick documenting repeated striker refusals to permit operations without concessions. Independent analyses, including those from period congressional probes, reject narratives of Pinkerton aggression as primary, attributing the violence's outbreak to strikers' fortified obstruction rather than defensive necessity. This attribution underscores broader tensions in labor disputes, where union militancy clashed with property rights, often miscast in sympathetic media as equitable resistance despite evidentiary tilt toward worker provocation.

Economic Realities: Wage Cuts vs. Union Monopoly Claims

In response to a sharp decline in steel prices—from $35 per gross ton in 1890 to $22 per ton by early 1892—Carnegie Steel's management, led by Henry Clay Frick, proposed wage reductions of approximately 18-20% for about 325 skilled workers at the Homestead plant, whose three-year union contract expired on June 30, 1892. These cuts were tied to a sliding scale mechanism, where wages fluctuated with market prices of steel billets, but Frick sought to eliminate the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers' (AAISW) broader contractual influence, arguing it prevented cost alignment with non-union competitors offering lower wages. Despite the company's record profits of $4.5 million in the prior year, Homestead's wages remained the highest in the industry, sustained by union-negotiated scales that exceeded those at Carnegie facilities without AAISW presence, such as Edgar Thomson Works. The AAISW, a craft union representing skilled puddlers, heaters, and rollers, maintained what management described as monopolistic control through restrictive work rules, including limits on workforce expansion, apprenticeship ratios, and output pacing, which preserved high wages for a shrinking pool of elite craftsmen amid the industry's transition to Bessemer converters and semi-skilled labor for mass production. These practices effectively cartelized skilled labor supply, insulating members from market pressures but elevating production costs at Homestead relative to newer, non-union mills in regions like Chicago or Alabama, where lower wages enabled undercutting on price. Frick contended that such union-enforced rigidities not only inflated labor expenses—contributing to Homestead's higher per-ton costs—but also obstructed technological efficiencies and scalability essential for survival in a commoditized market, as evidenced by Carnegie's successful non-union operations yielding superior output. Union advocates, however, framed the cuts as exploitative, noting prior concessions in that had already accepted the sliding scale and reductions during the prior slump, arguing that further erosion disregarded workers' contributions to Carnegie's profits and ignored the human costs of depressed markets. Yet empirical market dynamics—falling prices driven by overcapacity, favoring distant competitors, and technological shifts reducing demand for craft skills—necessitated cost rationalization to avert , as non-union firms absorbed by operating at slimmer margins; post-strike from Carnegie Steel confirmed that union elimination correlated with restored competitiveness and output growth, underscoring the causal link between labor rigidities and prior vulnerabilities.

Property Rights, Labor Rights, and Government Role

The Carnegie Steel Company's ownership of the Homestead mill conferred absolute property rights under , allowing management to dictate operational terms, including scales and workforce composition, without union veto. In 1892, lacking statutory protections for , the firm exercised its prerogative to propose a 20% reduction for non-union workers and lock out union members on , viewing the Amalgamated Association's resistance as an unlawful interference with private enterprise. Henry Clay Frick's decision to erect fences and hire 300 Pinkerton agents on July 6 to reclaim the facility underscored the prevailing legal norm that owners could employ private force to defend against strikers' blockades, which constituted trespass and seizure of capital assets. Courts subsequently upheld such actions, affirming that labor disputes did not suspend property owners' dominion over their holdings. Labor rights, in the absence of federal safeguards like the Wagner Act (enacted decades later), were limited to the common-law freedom to quit employment collectively, but not to coerce continued recognition through violence or exclusion of replacements. The Amalgamated Association's skilled workers had secured a three-year expiring in , but management's refusal to renew on equivalent terms reflected the era's doctrine, where unions held no inherent monopoly on jobs and strikes risked permanent replacement. Empirical data from the strike reveals that while union density at Homestead exceeded 80% pre-dispute, post-strike rehiring favored non-union labor, eroding craft exclusivity without violating workers' rights. Anarchist Alexander Berkman's attempted of Frick on July 23 further highlighted how extralegal tactics undermined labor's moral claims, as juries acquitted participants in the Pinkerton clash yet convicted union leaders for , prioritizing orderly resolution over sympathetic narratives. Pennsylvania Governor Robert E. Pattison's initial reluctance to intervene gave way to deploying 8,500 troops on July 12, justified by the July 6 battle's toll—seven strikers and three killed, dozens wounded—and subsequent riots that threatened public order and property integrity. This state action, compelled by telegraphed pleas from local officials citing anarchy, restored access for strikebreakers and enabled mill resumption by July 15, embodying government's constitutional duty to enforce contracts and prevent rather than arbitrate wage disputes. Pattison's correspondence emphasized neutrality, refusing union demands to expel while protecting Carnegie Steel's legal operations, a stance rooted in causal precedence: unchecked blockades historically escalated to widespread destruction, as in the 1877 railroad strikes. Critics decry this as pro-capital bias, yet the intervention averted broader economic paralysis in steel production, vital to national infrastructure, without federal overreach that might have enshrined union immunities prematurely.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.