Hubbry Logo
Colfax massacreColfax massacreMain
Open search
Colfax massacre
Community hub
Colfax massacre
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Colfax massacre
Colfax massacre
Colfax massacre
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Colfax massacre
Part of the Reconstruction era

Gathering the dead after the Colfax massacre, published in Harper's Weekly, May 10, 1873
DateApril 13, 1873
Location
Colfax, Louisiana, United States
31°31′01″N 92°42′42″W / 31.51691°N 92.71175°W / 31.51691; -92.71175
Result
  • Attackers put on trial
  • Attackers later released
Belligerents

Courthouse attackers

Courthouse occupiers

Casualties and losses
3 dead Between 62 and 153 dead
Colfax massacre is located in Louisiana
Colfax massacre
class=notpageimage|
Location within Louisiana
Colfax massacre is located in the United States
Colfax massacre
Colfax massacre (the United States)
Former historical marker in Colfax. Erected in 1950, the marker was removed in May 2021 due to allegedly biased language (it uses the term "riot" and refers to the incident as "the end of carpetbag misrule in the South").

The Colfax massacre, sometimes referred to as the Colfax riot, occurred on Easter Sunday, April 13, 1873, in Colfax, Louisiana, the parish seat of Grant Parish. An estimated 62–153 black men were murdered while surrendering to a mob of former Confederate soldiers and members of the Ku Klux Klan.

After the contested 1872 election for governor of Louisiana and local offices, a group of White men armed with rifles and a small cannon overpowered Black freedmen and state militia occupying the Grant Parish courthouse in Colfax.[1][2] Most of the freedmen were killed after surrendering, and nearly another 50 were killed later that night after being held as prisoners for several hours. Estimates of the number of dead have varied over the years, ranging from 62 to 153; three Whites died but the number of Black victims was difficult to determine because many bodies were thrown into the Red River or removed for burial, possibly at mass graves.[3]

Historian Eric Foner described the massacre as the worst instance of racial violence during Reconstruction.[1] In Louisiana, it had the most fatalities of any of the numerous violent events occurring after the disputed gubernatorial contest in 1872 between Republicans and Democrats. Foner wrote, "...every election [in Louisiana] between 1868 and 1876 was marked by rampant violence and pervasive fraud".[4] Although the Fusionist-dominated state "returning board," which ruled on vote validity, initially declared John McEnery and his Democratic slate the winners, the board eventually divided, with a faction declaring Republican William P. Kellogg the victor. A Republican federal judge in New Orleans ruled that the Republican-majority legislature be seated.[5]

Federal prosecution and conviction of a few perpetrators at Colfax by the Enforcement Acts was appealed to the Supreme Court. In a major case, the court ruled in United States v. Cruikshank (1876) that protections of the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply to persons acting individually, but only to the actions of state governments. After this ruling, the federal government could no longer use the Enforcement Act of 1870 to prosecute actions by paramilitary groups such as the White League, which had chapters forming across Louisiana beginning in 1874. Intimidation, murders, and Black voter suppression by such paramilitary groups were instrumental to the Democratic Party regaining political control of the state legislature by the late 1870s.

During the late 20th and early 21st centuries, historians have given renewed attention to the events at Colfax and the resulting Supreme Court case.[6]

State and national background

[edit]

In March 1865, Unionist planter James Madison Wells became governor. As the Democratic-dominated legislature passed Black Codes that restricted rights of freedmen, Wells began to favor allowing Black people to vote and temporarily disenfranchising ex-Confederates. To accomplish this, he scheduled a new constitutional convention for July 30, 1866.[7]

It was postponed because of the New Orleans massacre that day, in which armed Southern White Democrats attacked Black Americans who had a parade in support of the convention. Anticipating trouble, the mayor of New Orleans had asked the local military commander to police the city and protect the convention. The US Army failed to respond promptly to the mayor's request and a group of White residents attacked numerous unarmed Black residents, resulting in 38 deaths, 34 Black and four White, and more than 40 wounded, most of them Black folks.[8]

When President Andrew Johnson blamed the massacre on Republican agitation, a popular national reaction against Johnson's policies resulted in national voters electing a majority Republican Congress in 1866. It passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 despite Andrew Johnson's veto. Earlier, the Freedmen's Bureau and the occupation armies had prevented Southern Black Codes, which had limited the rights of freedmen and other Black people (including their choices of work and living locations), from becoming effective.[9][10] On July 16, 1866, Congress extended the life of the Freedmen's Bureau, also despite Johnson's veto. On March 2, 1867, they passed the Reconstruction Act, over Johnson's veto, which required that Black men be given the franchise—in Southern states but not in Northern states—and that reconstructed Southern states ratify the Fourteenth Amendment before admission to the Union.[11][12]

By April 1868, a biracial coalition in Louisiana had elected a Republican-majority state legislature, but violence increased before the fall election. Almost all of the victims were Black and some White Republicans who were protecting the Black Republican freedmen. Insurgents also attacked people physically or burned their homes to discourage them from voting. President Johnson, a Democrat, prevented the Republican governor of Louisiana from using either the state militia or US forces to suppress the insurgent groups, such as the Knights of the White Camelia.[13][page needed]

Background in Grant Parish

[edit]

The Red River area of Winn and Rapides parishes was a combination of large plantations and subsistence farmers; before the war, African Americans had worked as slaves on the plantations. William Smith Calhoun, a major planter, had inherited a 14,000-acre (57 km2) plantation in the area from his father Meredith Calhoun.[14] A former slaveholder, he lived with a mixed-race woman as his common-law wife and had come to favor Black political equality, encouraging the political organization of the local African American-based Republican party.[15]

On election day in November 1868, Calhoun led a group of freedmen to vote. The ballot box was originally at a store owned by John Hooe,[16] who had threatened to whip freedmen "if they voted Republican".[17] Calhoun arranged for the ballot box to be moved to a plantation store owned by a Republican. In addition, he oversaw the submission of 150 Black votes from freedmen on his plantation land.[18] The Republicans received 318 votes, and the Democrats received 49.[19] A group of Whites threw the ballot box into the Red River, and Democrats arrested Calhoun, alleging election fraud. With the original ballot box gone, Democrat Michael Ryan went on to claim a landslide victory.[20]

The election was also marked by violence. Election commissioner Hal Frazier, a Black Republican, was murdered by Whites.[21] After this, Calhoun drafted a bill to create a new parish out of parts of Winn and Rapides parishes, which passed the Republican legislature; as a major planter, Calhoun thought he would have more political influence in the new parish, which had a Black majority. Other new parishes were created by the Republican state legislature to try to develop areas of Republican political control.

Enforcement against the Klan

[edit]

According to Lane, after Ulysses S. Grant became president in 1869, he "lobbied hard for the Fifteenth Amendment" (ratified February 3, 1870),[22] which guaranteed that Black men, most of whom were newly freed slaves, would have the right to vote.[23] However, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) continued violent attacks and killed scores of Black residents in Arkansas, South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi and elsewhere.[24] In response, on May 31, 1870, Congress passed an Enforcement Act which prohibited groups of people from banding together to violate citizens' constitutional rights.[25] Soon afterwards on April 20, 1871, Congress passed the Ku Klux Klan Act, which Grant used to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and sent federal troops to South Carolina, a state with particularly egregious Klan activity.[26]

Louisiana and Grant Parish

[edit]

Governor Henry Clay Warmoth struggled to maintain political balance in Louisiana. Among his appointments, he installed William Ward, a Black Union veteran, as commanding officer of Company A, 6th Infantry Regiment, Louisiana State Militia, a new unit to be based in Grant Parish to help control the violence there and in other Red River parishes. Ward, born a slave in 1840 in Charleston, South Carolina, had learned to read and write as a valet to a master in Richmond, Virginia. In 1864 he escaped and went to Fortress Monroe, where he joined the Union Army and served until after General Robert E. Lee's surrender. About 1870 he came to Grant Parish, where he had a friend. He quickly became active among local Black Republican Party members. After his appointment to the militia, Ward recruited other freedmen for his forces, several of whom were veterans of the war.[27]

Louisiana election of 1872

[edit]

In Louisiana, Republican governor Henry Clay Warmoth defected to the Liberal Republicans (a group that opposed President Grant's Reconstruction policies) in 1872. Warmoth previously supported a constitutional amendment that allowed former Confederates, who had been denied the right to vote, to be re-enfranchised. A "Fusionist" coalition of Liberal Republicans and Democrats nominated ex-Confederate battalion commander and Democrat John McEnery to succeed him as governor. In return, Democrats and Liberal Republicans were to send Warmoth to Washington as a US Senator. Opposing McEnery was Republican William Pitt Kellogg, one of Louisiana's US Senators. Voting on November 4, 1872, resulted in dual governments, as a Fusionist (Liberal Republicans and Democrat)-dominated returning board declared McEnery the winner while a faction of the board proclaimed Kellogg the winner. Both administrations held inaugural ceremonies and certified their lists of local candidates.

After failing to win their case in state court, the Kellogg forces appealed to federal judge Edward Durell in New Orleans to intervene and order that Kellogg and the Stalwart Republican-majority legislature were to be seated, and for Grant to authorize US Army troops to protect Kellogg's government. This action was widely criticized across the nation by Democrats and both factions of the Republican Party because it was considered to be a violation of the rights of states to manage their own (non-federal-office) elections. Thus, investigating committees of both chambers of the federal Congress in Washington were critical of the Kellogg choice. The House majority ruled Durell's action illegal and the Senate majority concluded that the Kellogg regime was "not much better than a successful conspiracy". In 1874 a House investigating committee in Washington recommended that Judge Durell be impeached for corruption and illegally interfering in the Louisiana 1872 state elections, but the judge resigned in order to avoid impeachment.[28][29]

McEnery's faction tried to take control of the state arsenal at Jackson Square, but Kellogg had the state militia seize dozens of leaders of McEnery's faction and control New Orleans, where the state government was located.[13][page needed] McEnery returned to try to take control with a private paramilitary group. In September 1873 his forces, more than 8,000 strong, entered the city and defeated the city/state militia of about 3500 in New Orleans. The Democrats took control of the state house, armory and police stations, where the state government was then located, in what was known as the Battle of Jackson Square. His forces held those buildings for three days before retreating before Federal troops arrived.[4][30] Warmoth was subsequently impeached by the state legislature due to a bribery scandal resulting from his actions in the 1872 election.

Warmoth appointed Democrats as parish registrars, and they ensured the voter rolls included as many Whites and as few freedmen as possible. A number of registrars changed the registration site without notifying Black residents. They also required Black voters to prove they were over 21, while knowing that former slaves did not have birth certificates. In Grant Parish, one plantation owner threatened to expel Black people from homes they rented on his land if they voted Republican. Fusionists also tampered with ballot boxes on election day. One was found with a hole in it, apparently used for stuffing the ballot box. As a result, Grant Parish Fusionists claimed a landslide victory, even though Black voters outnumbered Whites by 776 to 630.

Warmoth issued commissions to Fusionist Democrats Alphonse Cazabat and Christopher Columbus Nash, elected parish judge and sheriff, respectively. Like many White men in the South, Nash was a Confederate veteran (as an officer, he had been held for a year and a half as a prisoner of war at Johnson's Island in Ohio). Cazabat and Nash took their oaths of office in the Colfax courthouse on January 2, 1873. They dispatched the documents to Governor McEnery in New Orleans.

William Pitt Kellogg issued commissions to the Republican slate for Grant Parish on January 17 and 18. By then Nash and Cazabat controlled the small, primitive courthouse. Republican Robert C. Register insisted that he, not Alphonse Cazabat, was the parish judge and that Republican Daniel Wesley Shaw, not Nash, was to be the sheriff. On the night of March 25, the Republicans seized the empty courthouse and took their oaths of office. They sent their oaths to the Kellogg administration in New Orleans.[31]

Grant Parish was one of a number of new parishes created by the Republican government in an effort to increase local control in the state. Both the land and its people were originally associated with the Calhoun family, whose plantation had covered more than the borders of the new parish. The freedmen had been slaves of the plantation. The parish also included the less-developed hill country. The total population had a narrow majority of 2400 freedmen, who mostly voted Republican, and 2200 Whites, who voted as Democrats. Statewide political tensions were represented in the rumors going around each community, often about White fears of attacks or outrage from Black people, which added to local tensions.[32]

Colfax courthouse conflict

[edit]

Fearful that the Democrats might try to control the local parish government, Black people started to create trenches around the courthouse and drilled to keep alert. The Republican officeholders stayed there overnight. They held the town for three weeks.[33]

On March 28, Nash, Cazabat, Hadnot, and other White Fusionists called for armed Whites to retake the courthouse on April 1. Whites were recruited from nearby Winn and surrounding parishes to join their effort. The Republicans Shaw, Register, and Flowers and others began to recruit armed Black men to defend the courthouse.[34]

Black Republicans Lewis Meekins and state militia captain William Ward, a Black Union veteran, raided the homes of the opposition leaders: Judge William R. Rutland, Bill Cruikshank, and Jim Hadnot. Gunfire erupted between White and Black militias on April 2 and again on April 5, but the shotguns were too inaccurate to do any harm. The two sides arranged for peace negotiations. Peace ended when a White man shot and killed a Black bystander named Jesse McKinney. Another armed conflict on April 6 ended with the White militia fleeing from armed Black militia.[35] With the threat of violence in the community, Black women and children joined the men at the courthouse for protection.

William Ward, the commanding officer of Company A, 6th Infantry Regiment, Louisiana State Militia, headquartered in Grant Parish, had been elected state representative from the parish on the Republican ticket.[36] He wrote to Governor Kellogg seeking US troops for reinforcement and gave the letter to William Smith Calhoun for delivery. Calhoun took the steamboat LaBelle down the Red River but was captured by Paul Hooe, Hadnot, and Cruikshank. They ordered Calhoun to tell the Black community members to leave the courthouse.

The Black defenders refused to leave although threatened by parties of armed Whites commanded by Nash. To recruit men during the rising political tensions, Nash had contributed to lurid rumors that Black men were preparing to kill all the White men and take the White women as their own.[37] On April 8 the anti-Republican Daily Picayune newspaper of New Orleans inflamed tensions and distorted events by the following headline:

THE RIOT IN GRANT PARISH. FEARFUL ATROCITIES BY THE NEGROES. NO RESPECT SHOWN TO THE DEAD.[38]

Such news attracted more Whites from the region to Grant Parish to join Nash; all were experienced Confederate veterans. They acquired a four-pound cannon that could fire iron slugs. As the Klansman Dave Paul said, "Boys, this is a struggle for White supremacy."[39]

Suffering from tuberculosis and rheumatism, on April 11 the militia captain Ward took a steamboat downriver to New Orleans to seek armed help directly from Kellogg. He was not there for the following events.[40]

Massacre

[edit]

Cazabat had directed Nash as sheriff to end what he called a riot. Nash gathered an armed White paramilitary group and veteran officers from Rapides, Winn and Catahoula parishes. He did not move his forces toward the courthouse until noon on Easter Sunday, April 13. Nash commanded more than 300 armed White men, most on horseback and armed with rifles. Nash reportedly ordered the defenders of the courthouse to leave. When that failed, Nash gave women and children camped outside the courthouse thirty minutes to leave. After they left, the shooting began. The fighting continued for several hours with few casualties. When Nash's paramilitary maneuvered the cannon behind the building, some of the defenders panicked and left the courthouse.

About 60 defenders ran into nearby woods and jumped into the river. Nash sent men on horseback after the fleeing Black Republicans, and his paramilitary group killed most of them on the spot. Soon Nash's forces directed a Black captive to set the courthouse roof afire. The defenders displayed white flags for surrender: one made from a shirt, the other from a page of a book. The shooting stopped.

Nash's group approached and called for those surrendering to throw down their weapons and come outside. What happened next is disputed. According to the reports of some Whites, James Hadnot was shot and wounded by someone from the courthouse. "In the Negro version, the men in the courthouse were stacking their guns when the White men approached, and Hadnot was shot from behind by an overexcited member of his own force."[41] Hadnot died later, after being taken downstream by a passing steamboat.[42]

In the aftermath of Hadnot's shooting, the White paramilitary group reacted with mass murders of the Black men. As more than 40 times as many Black people died as did White people, historians generally describe the event as a massacre. The White paramilitary group killed unarmed men trying to hide in the courthouse. They rode down and killed those attempting to flee. They dumped some bodies into the Red River. About 50 Blacks survived the afternoon and were taken prisoner. Later that night they were summarily killed by their captors, who had been drinking alcohol. Only one Black man from the group, Levi Nelson, survived. He was shot by Cruikshank but managed to crawl away unnoticed. He later served as one of the Federal government's chief witnesses against those who were indicted for the attacks.[43]

Kellogg sent state militia colonels Theodore DeKlyne and William Wright to Colfax with warrants to arrest 50 White men and to install a new, compromise slate of parish officers. DeKlyne and Wright found the smoking ruins of the courthouse at Colfax, and many bodies of men who had been shot in the back of the head or the neck. They described that one body was charred, another man's head beaten beyond recognition, and another had a slashed throat. Surviving Blacks told DeKlyne and Wright that Blacks dug a trench around the courthouse to protect it from what they saw as an attempt by White Democrats to steal an election. They were attacked by Whites armed with rifles, revolvers and a small cannon. When Blacks refused to leave, the courthouse was burned, and the Black defenders were shot down. While the Whites accused Blacks of violating a flag of truce and rioting, Black Republicans said that none of this was true. They accused Whites of marching captured prisoners away in pairs and shooting them in the back of the head.[44]

On April 14, some of Governor Kellogg's new police force arrived from New Orleans. Several days later, two companies of Federal troops arrived. They searched for White paramilitary members, but many had already fled to Texas or the hills. The officers filed a military report in which they identified by name three Whites and 105 Blacks who had died, plus noted they had recovered 15–20 unidentified Blacks from the river. They also noted the savage nature of many of the killings, suggesting an out-of-control situation.[45]

The exact number of dead was never established: two US Marshals, who visited the site on April 15 and buried dead, reported 62 fatalities;[46] a military report to Congress in 1875 identified 81 Black men by name who had been killed, and also estimated that between 15 and 20 bodies had been thrown into the Red River, and another 18 were secretly buried, for a grand total of "at least 105";[47] a state historical marker from 1950 noted fatalities as three Whites and 150 Blacks.[48]

The historian Eric Foner, a specialist in the Civil War and Reconstruction, wrote about the event:

The bloodiest single instance of racial carnage in the Reconstruction era, the Colfax massacre taught many lessons, including the lengths to which some opponents of Reconstruction would go to regain their accustomed authority. Among Blacks in Louisiana, the incident was long remembered as proof that in any large confrontation, they stood at a fatal disadvantage.[1]

"The organization against them is too strong. ..." Louisiana Black teacher and Reconstruction legislator John G. Lewis later remarked. "They attempted [armed self-defense] in Colfax. The result was that on Easter Sunday of 1873 when the sun went down that night, it went down on the corpses of two hundred and eighty negroes."[1]

Aftermath

[edit]

James Roswell Beckwith, the US Attorney based in New Orleans, sent an urgent telegram about the massacre to the US Attorney General. The massacre in Colfax gained headlines of national newspapers from Boston to Chicago.[49] Various government forces spent weeks trying to round up members of the White paramilitaries, and a total of 97 men were indicted. In the end, Beckwith charged nine men and brought them to trial for violations of the Enforcement Act of 1870. It had been designed to provide federal protection for civil rights of freedmen by the Fourteenth Amendment against actions by terrorist groups such as the Klan.

The men were charged with one murder, and charges related to a conspiracy against the rights of freedmen. There were two succeeding trials in 1874. William Burnham Woods presided over the first trial and was sympathetic to the prosecution[citation needed]. Had the men been convicted, they would not have been able to appeal their decision to any appellate court according to the laws of the time. However, Beckwith was unable to secure a conviction—one man was acquitted, and a mistrial was declared in the cases of the other eight.

In the second trial, three men were found guilty of sixteen charges. However, the presiding judge, Joseph Bradley of the United States Supreme Court (riding circuit), dismissed the convictions, ruling that the charges violated the state actor doctrine, failed to prove a racial rationale for the massacre, or were void for vagueness. Sua sponte, he ordered that the men be released on bail, and they promptly disappeared.[50][51]

When the federal government appealed the case, it was heard by the US Supreme Court as United States v. Cruikshank (1875). The Supreme Court ruled that the Enforcement Act of 1870 (which was based on the Bill of Rights and 14th Amendment) applied only to actions committed by the state and that it did not apply to actions committed by individuals or private conspiracies (See, Morrison Remick Waite). This meant that the Federal government could not prosecute cases such as the Colfax killings. The court said plaintiffs who believed their rights were abridged had to seek protection from the state. Louisiana did not prosecute any of the perpetrators of the Colfax massacre; most southern states would not prosecute White men for attacks against freedmen. Thus, enforcement of criminal sanctions under the act ended.[52]

The publicity about the Colfax massacre and subsequent Supreme Court ruling encouraged the growth of White paramilitary organizations. In May 1874, Nash formed the first chapter of the White League from his paramilitary group, and chapters soon were formed in other areas of Louisiana, as well as the southern parts of nearby states. Unlike the former KKK, they operated openly and often curried publicity. One historian described them as "the military arm of the Democratic Party."[53] Other paramilitary groups such as the Red Shirts also arose, especially in South Carolina and Mississippi, which also had Black majorities of population, and in certain counties in North Carolina.

Paramilitary groups used violence and murder to terrorize leaders among the freedmen and White Republicans, as well as to repress voting among freedmen during the 1870s. Black American citizens had little recourse. In August 1874, for instance, the White League threw out Republican officeholders in Coushatta, Red River Parish, assassinating the six Whites before they left the state, and killing five to 15 freedmen who were witnesses. Four of the White men killed were related to the state representative from the area.[54] Such violence served to intimidate voters and officeholders; it was one of the methods that White Democrats used to gain control of the state legislature in the 1876 elections and ultimately to end Reconstruction in Louisiana.

Remembrances

[edit]
"Liberty Monument", a piece of pottery which was created in 1873 by White artists Wallace and Cornwall Kirkpatrick, owners of Anna Pottery in Anna, Illinois. It depicts Lady Liberty at the top, it depicts the Colfax massacre as its main scene, and it also depicts Schuyler Colfax, criticizing his involvement in the Crédit Mobilier scandal. This photo was taken at the Winterthur Museum, Garden and Library in 2022.

In Louisiana as well as in the rest of the United States, the scale of the massacre and the political conflict which it represents are significant in relation to the history of Reconstruction, the history of racism against African Americans and the history of racism in the United States.[6]

In 1920, a committee met in Colfax to purchase a monument to memorialize the three White men who died. This monument stands in the Colfax Cemetery and it reads "Erected to the memory of the Heroes, / Stephen Decatur Parish / James West Hadnot / Sidney Harris / Who fell in the Colfax Riot fighting for White Supremacy."[55][56]

In 1950, Louisiana erected a state highway marker which read that the event of 1873 was "the Colfax Riot," as the event was traditionally known in the White community. The marker states, "On this site occurred the Colfax Riot, in which three white men and 150 negroes were slain. This event on April 13, 1873, marked the end of carpetbag misrule in the South."[52][55][57] The marker[58] was removed on May 15, 2021, for eventual placement in a museum.[59][60] On April 13, 2023, the 150th anniversary of the Colfax massacre, the removed marker was replaced by a seven-foot granite monument that lists 57 Black people confirmed to have been killed in the massacre and has artwork about the experience of Black people during Reconstruction.[61]

Renewed attention

[edit]

The Colfax massacre is one of the events of Reconstruction and late 19th-century American history which have received renewed national attention during the early 21st century, as much attention as the 1923 massacre in Rosewood, Florida received near the end of the 20th century. In 2007 and 2008, two new books about the topic were published: Leeanna Keith's The Colfax Massacre: The Untold Story of Black Power, White Terror, and the Death of Reconstruction,[62] and Charles Lane's The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction.[63] In his book, Lane addressed the political and legal implications of the Supreme Court case, which were derived from the prosecution of several men who were member of the White paramilitary groups.[64] In addition, a film documentary is in preparation.[citation needed]

In 2007, the Red River Heritage Association, Inc. was formed as a group which intended to construct a museum in Colfax, collect materials and store them in the museum, and interpret the history of Reconstruction in Louisiana, especially in the Red River area.[citation needed] In 2008, on the 135th anniversary of the Colfax massacre, an interracial group commemorated the event. It laid flowers on the place where some of the victims had fallen and it also held a forum to discuss the history of the massacre.[65]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Colfax massacre

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Colfax massacre occurred on April 13, 1873, in , when a white Democratic force numbering around 150 attacked and overwhelmed approximately 300 armed Republican militiamen defending the Grant Parish amid a contested state election, resulting in three white fatalities and an estimated 60 to 150 deaths, many executed after surrendering. The clash stemmed from the disputed 1872 Louisiana gubernatorial election, where both Republican and Democratic factions claimed victory and refused to yield control of local offices, leading Republicans—bolstered by federal Reconstruction policies—to occupy the to assert their authority over a parish with a voting majority. After hours of fighting, during which the defenders repelled initial assaults but suffered from cannon fire that ignited the , the surviving forces surrendered under a , only for many to be shot in what eyewitness accounts described as deliberate killings rather than battlefield combat. This event, the bloodiest single incident of racial violence in U.S. Reconstruction history, highlighted the intensifying use of tactics by white Democrats to dismantle biracial Republican governments, contributing to the erosion of federal protections for civil and culminating in the 1876 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Cruikshank, which invalidated prosecutions of the attackers by ruling that the Fourteenth Amendment did not empower Congress to regulate private conspiracies against individual .

Antecedents and Broader Context

Reconstruction Policies in Louisiana

The , passed by Congress on March 2, 1867, and subsequent amendments, imposed military rule on as part of the (shared with ), dissolving existing state governments controlled by former Confederates and requiring a new constitutional convention to extend to black males, ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, and temporarily disenfranchise individuals who had voluntarily aided the rebellion. These measures aimed to restructure Southern political institutions by prioritizing loyalty oaths and federal oversight, with military commanders empowered to register voters and supervise elections, effectively sidelining unpardoned ex-rebels from participation. The Louisiana Constitutional Convention of 1867–1868 produced a new charter, adopted in April 1868, which enshrined universal adult male irrespective of race or color for those who had not supported the Confederacy, thereby enfranchising approximately 100,000 black voters while excluding many white former Confederates through loyalty requirements and office-holding bans. Key provisions abolished slavery without compensation to owners, mandated free integrated public schools supported by state taxation (including the founding of institutions like ), and introduced labor protections such as a and a nine-hour workday to address post-emancipation economic disruptions. Civil rights clauses, notably Article 13, prohibited in public accommodations including theaters, taverns, and conveyances, with provisions for legal that enabled early lawsuits against segregationist practices. These reforms, enforced initially through federal troops and later the of 1870–1871, shifted political power toward Republicans, including black legislators who held about one-third of seats in the state assembly, but generated widespread noncompliance and violence from disenfranchised groups seeking to restore pre-war hierarchies.

Formation of Grant Parish and Local Power Dynamics

Grant Parish was established on March 4, 1869, by Act 82 of the Republican-controlled legislature during the , carved from the northern portion of Rapides Parish and the southern portion of Winn Parish, encompassing roughly 700 square miles of piney woods and red clay uplands. The new parish was named in honor of , who had recently been elected president and symbolized Union victory and federal enforcement of Reconstruction policies under Governor Henry Clay Warmoth's administration. This legislative act reflected a deliberate Republican strategy to reorganize local governments by creating smaller, more manageable electoral units in rural areas with substantial populations of newly enfranchised freedmen, thereby diluting Democratic strongholds in larger parishes and fostering Republican majorities at the parish level. The parish's demographics, with freedmen comprising a significant portion of the voting-age to the economy's legacy in adjacent areas, enabled Republicans—comprising laborers, scalawags (native Unionists), and some carpetbaggers (Northern transplants)—to dominate initial elections following formation. In its first local contests, Grant Parish delivered over 60% of votes to Republican candidates, securing control of offices such as , assessor, and , which were housed in the Colfax . This power shift inverted prewar hierarchies, where local authority had rested with Democratic planters and merchants tied to the Confederate cause, now marginalized by federal military oversight and the 14th and 15th Amendments' guarantees of and . Opposition coalesced among white Democrats, often ex-Confederate veterans and their allies, who viewed the parish's creation and Republican governance as illegitimate impositions by federal bayonets and black ballots, eroding traditional social controls over labor and politics. These groups, including secretive organizations like the Knights of the White Camelia, employed intimidation tactics—such as threats, economic coercion, and sporadic —to suppress black turnout and undermine Republican officials, setting the stage for contested elections that prioritized armed enforcement over ballot outcomes. By 1872, this rivalry had polarized the parish, with Republicans relying on federal for protection while Democrats fused with conservative factions to mobilize armed resistance, exploiting the rural isolation and weak state apparatus to challenge courthouse control.

Federal Enforcement Acts and Paramilitary Responses

The , also known as the Force Acts, comprised three statutes enacted by the U.S. Congress between May 1870 and April 1871 to counteract systematic violence against and Republican supporters in the post-Civil War South. The first act, passed on May 31, 1870, enforced the Fifteenth Amendment by prohibiting discrimination in voting and authorizing federal oversight of elections. The second, enacted February 28, 1871, expanded federal jurisdiction over conspiracies interfering with civil rights. The third, the signed by President on April 20, 1871, targeted secret societies like the by criminalizing conspiracies to deprive citizens of constitutional rights, allowing suspension of , and empowering the president to deploy federal troops or declare in cases of insurrection. These measures responded to reports of widespread terrorism, including whippings, murders, and voter intimidation, which had suppressed black political participation and undermined Reconstruction governments. In , where Republican state control relied heavily on black voters, the acts aimed to dismantle organizations perpetrating such violence, notably the Knights of the White Camelia, founded in New Orleans in July 1867 as a secret Democratic-aligned society modeled after the . This group, often called Louisiana's Klan equivalent, mobilized armed members to target freedmen, Unionists, and white Republicans through intimidation, economic coercion, and lethal attacks, contributing to events like the of September 1868, where an estimated 200 to 300 were killed amid election-related unrest. Federal prosecutions under the acts led to some arrests and convictions in Louisiana by 1871-1872, temporarily disrupting Klan activities, but enforcement faced resistance from local juries and officials sympathetic to Democrats. Paramilitary responses persisted as Democrats reorganized into semi-open rifle clubs and vigilance committees, which served as armed auxiliaries to challenge Republican authority without direct KKK affiliation. These groups, drawing from former Confederate soldiers, drilled publicly and stockpiled weapons, framing their actions as against perceived federal overreach while intimidating communities to deter voting and formation. By late 1872, amid statewide disputes, such organizations had proliferated in rural parishes like Grant, where they mobilized to contest outcomes favoring Republicans, illustrating the acts' limited deterrent effect against entrenched local resistance rooted in opposition to enfranchisement and biracial . This dynamic of federal legal intervention clashing with defiance foreshadowed armed standoffs over disputed offices.

Electoral Crisis of 1872

Statewide Election Disputes

The 1872 Louisiana gubernatorial election, held on November 4, pitted Republican against Democrat , amid intense factionalism within the Republican Party and alliances between Democrats and dissident Republicans. Incumbent Republican Governor Henry Clay Warmoth, alienated from the pro-Grant "customhouse" faction, endorsed McEnery as part of a fusion ticket combining Democrats and Liberal Republicans, which aimed to challenge federal Republican dominance. This infighting fragmented Republican support, while Democrats mobilized against Reconstruction-era policies, alleging in the state apparatus. Election returns were immediately contested, with both candidates claiming victory based on preliminary tallies showing razor-thin margins. The state Returning Board, empowered to review and certify results by discarding fraudulent or intimidated precincts, split into rival panels: one aligned with Warmoth declared McEnery the winner, while a competing panel, backed by supporters, certified narrow victory after invalidating numerous returns from Democratic strongholds citing evidence of ballot stuffing and voter suppression by fusionist paramilitaries. Allegations of permeated the process from both sides—Republicans documented fusionist irregularities in reports like "The Louisiana Adjustment" (1875), while Democrats highlighted Republican manipulation of the board as a mechanism for retaining power despite popular discontent. Warmoth's subsequent by the legislature, on charges of attempting to steal the election through board control, further escalated the chaos, leaving as acting governor for 35 days. The disputes extended beyond the governorship to legislative seats, resulting in parallel state governments: faction controlled the State House with federal backing, while McEnery's supporters formed a rump legislature and urged armed resistance. President intervened on May 22, 1873, recognizing Kellogg as the legitimate governor and deploying federal troops to enforce his installation, a decision rooted in prioritizing electoral continuity under Reconstruction laws despite the irregularities. This federal validation intensified Democratic grievances, framing Kellogg's administration as illegitimate and fueling paramilitary mobilization, including the , which later clashed violently in events like the in September 1874. The unresolved tensions from these statewide contests cascaded to parish levels, manifesting in local office disputes that precipitated armed standoffs such as at Colfax.

Grant Parish Governorship Contest

<xai:function_call name="web_search">

Grant Parish Louisiana 1872 election sheriff judge dispute William Ward </xai:function_call> <xai:function_call name="web_search">

Colfax massacre background local election Grant Parish </xai:function_call><|separator|> Function: Query: Colfax massacre background local election Grant Parish [web:40] Colfax Riot | National Archives - https://www.archives.gov/fort-worth/highlights/columbus-nash Content: Sep 17, 2024 · ... Grant Parish courthouse in Colfax, LA. This event, known as the Colfax Riot or Massacre, resulted in the death of three white and an unknown ... ====== [web:41] Colfax massacre - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colfax_massacre Content: The , sometimes referred to as the Colfax riot, occurred on Sunday, April 13, 1873, in , the parish seat of Grant ... ====== [web:42] White Mob Kills 150 Black Citizens After Gubernatorial Election In ... - https://calendar.eji.org/racial-injustice/apr/13 Content: Only three white men died. The was precipitated by the hotly contested 1872 Louisiana gubernatorial election. During the , as ... ====== [web:43] Colfax massacre | Research Starters - EBSCO - https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/colfax-massacre Content: The , occurring on April 13, 1873, in , stands as a significant and tragic event during the in the United ...Missing: background | Show results with:background ====== [web:44] Reconstruction in : The Colfax Massacre: The Setting - https://lasc.libguides.com/c.php?g=997145&p=7223636 Content: Aug 21, 2025 · ... amendment, colfax, colfax massacre, colfax riot, cruikshank, , grant parish, kellogg, marr, massacre, reconstruction. ====== [web:45] The Colfax Massacre and Reconstruction - H-Net Reviews - https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=24487 Content: From the beginning, Keith argues that, despite the fact that the whites had labeled the fight a , it was essentially a that took the lives of 70 to ...Missing: background | Show results with:background ====== [web:46] Colfax Massacre Reports | Teaching American History - https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/colfax-massacre-reports/ Content: 11–14, https://goo.gl/fsC5mu; Committee of 70, “History of The Riot at Colfax, Grant Parish, Louisiana, April 13th, 1873: With a Brief Sketch of the Trial of ... ====== [web:47] Colfax Massacre - 64 Parishes - https://64parishes.org/entry/colfax-massacre-adaptation Content: Jun 22, 2023 · In 1873 white Louisianans responded to Reconstruction policies with violence, resulting in a massacre that claimed as many as 150 lives.Missing: background | Show results with:background ====== [web:48] Colfax riot or massacre: a brutal defining moment - Detroit Legal News - https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Articles?DataId=1374797 Content: Apr 11, 2013 · What happened in Colfax 140 years ago was a massacre or a riot, depending on who you talk to. The scars of the pivotal event aren't visible in ...Missing: background | Show results with:background ====== [web:49] Colfax massacre: Uncovering Louisiana's dark secret - KTAL - https://www.ktalnews.com/news/louisiana/colfax-massacre-uncovering-louisianas-dark-secret/ Content: Aug 12, 2025 · John Bel Edwards was the Governor of Louisiana at that time, and although the state was onboard with reframing the “race riot” as a “massacre,” ...Missing: background | Show results with:background<|separator|> Assistant: Based on the search results, the "Grant Parish Governorship Contest" refers to the dispute over the control of local government offices in Grant Parish during the 1872 Louisiana gubernatorial election. This election was a significant part of the broader political and social tensions in Louisiana during the Reconstruction era. In 1872, the gubernatorial election in was contested between Republican and Democrat . The election results were disputed, leading to dual governments in the state, with Kellogg recognized by the federal government and McEnery by the . This dispute extended to the local level in Grant Parish, a Republican stronghold. In Grant Parish, the local election for parish offices, including the sheriff and judge, mirrored the statewide contest. Republicans, led by figures like William Ward, claimed victory and attempted to assert control over the parish government. This led to a violent on April 13, 1873, known as the Colfax Massacre. The "Governorship Contest" in Grant Parish was thus a microcosm of the broader electoral crisis, with local Republicans seeking to maintain control against Democratic challengers. This local contest was crucial in the lead-up to the Colfax Massacre, as it involved armed resistance and ultimately, the tragic loss of lives. To summarize, the "Grant Parish Governorship Contest" refers to the struggle for control of offices in Grant Parish during the 1872 Louisiana gubernatorial election, which was a key event in the broader political and social tensions of the .

Escalation to Armed Standoff

Republican Occupation of the Courthouse

In March 1873, Republican officeholders and their supporters in Grant Parish, citing certification of their victories in the November 1872 elections by the state returning board aligned with Governor William P. Kellogg, seized control of the parish courthouse in Colfax to assert authority and block Democratic claimants from installing themselves. This action mirrored statewide dual governance disputes, where Republicans relied on federal backing under Reconstruction policies to maintain contested offices amid allegations of from both parties. The occupying force consisted mainly of African American freedmen enrolled in the state , numbering initially around 100 men under Kellogg's appointees, with additional black residents joining to bolster defenses against Democratic threats. included local militia captains such as Caesar Anderson, a Union , alongside white officials like parish judge Richard Warden and sheriff's deputy William Ward. The group fortified the structure with logs, cotton bales, and earthworks, armed primarily with Enfield rifles and limited ammunition supplied through Republican networks. The occupation endured for several weeks with intermittent small-arms fire directed at Democratic gatherings outside town, but without decisive engagements until the final assault. Republicans viewed the holdout as a legitimate defense of electoral outcomes against intimidation, while Democrats portrayed it as an unlawful seizure by a racially aligned faction disruptive to local order. By early , reinforcements swelled the defenders to an estimated 200-300, reflecting mobilization of freedmen committed to upholding Republican control in the .

Democratic Mobilization and Preparations

Following the Republican occupation of the Grant Parish courthouse in late March 1873, supporters of the Democratic-Liberal Republican "Fusion" ticket, who claimed victory in the disputed local elections, began organizing to reclaim control. On April 1, 1873, a mass meeting was convened in Colfax, initiated by James W. Hadnot and other local figures, to rally opposition to the Republican hold and coordinate responses to the standoff. This gathering drew white residents from surrounding areas, many former Confederate soldiers, amid broader tensions from the unresolved 1872 statewide election contest between Republican William P. Kellogg and Fusionist . Key leadership fell to Christopher Columbus Nash, the Fusion candidate for sheriff who had been elected but denied office by Republican authorities, alongside figures such as Alfonse Cazabat, the Fusion judge candidate, and Hadnot, a leader in the Knights of the White Camellia, a secretive anti-Reconstruction group. Nash formally summoned a during the week leading to April 13, assembling approximately 150 armed men from nearby parishes, equipped primarily with rifles and shotguns, supplemented by a small mounted on and loaded with iron slugs scavenged from a local . These preparations reflected a deliberate effort to enforce what Fusionists regarded as their legitimate electoral mandate, with the group encamping about four miles northwest of Colfax on Sunday morning. The mobilized force advanced toward the under Nash's command, initially approaching under a flag of truce to demand surrender and offering safe passage to occupants if they dispersed peacefully. This tactical approach aimed to minimize resistance while asserting control, though it preceded escalation into combat when negotiations failed. The organization's structure drew on paramilitary traditions from the post-Civil War era, with participants motivated by opposition to Republican governance and federal Reconstruction policies, though contemporary accounts from congressional investigations emphasize the posse's self-presentation as rather than vigilantes.

The Events of April 13, 1873

Initial Assault and Battle

On Sunday, April 13, 1873, a force of approximately 140 to 300 white men, led by Christopher Columbus Nash—a Democratic claimant to the Grant Parish position—advanced on the Colfax , which had been fortified and occupied by 150 to 300 Black Republican militiamen and supporters since late . The defenders, including freedmen and members of the Louisiana state militia under leaders such as Levin Allen, had constructed earthworks and trenches around the building and were armed primarily with Enfield rifles, shotguns, and scatterguns, though some lacked weapons. Nash's attackers, many former Confederates equipped with rifles, pistols, and a small obtained from a local , initiated the assault around noon with cannon fire directed at the front of the courthouse. This initial bombardment had limited effect, as the defenders returned fire from their positions, repulsing the advance and inflicting casualties, including the death of at least one white leader. After roughly two hours of intermittent , Nash repositioned the to the rear of the , closer to the river, enabling more accurate and damaging fire that forced many defenders to retreat inside the structure. The white forces then charged, using gunfire to suppress resistance while a volunteer—sometimes described as a coerced man—carried a soaked in or pine knots to set the courthouse roof ablaze. Intense fighting ensued as flames spread, with defenders continuing to shoot from windows and openings until smoke and heat overwhelmed them; some attempted to flee to nearby woods but were pursued and shot. The battle lasted several hours, resulting in at least 60 Black deaths during the active phase, alongside minimal white losses, primarily from or direct engagements. Superior numbers, , and incendiary tactics ultimately breached the defenders' stronghold, compelling survivors to seek terms amid the destruction.

Surrender, Executions, and Aftermath of the Fighting

As the Republican defenders' position became untenable amid the courthouse fire set by the Democratic assailants during the late afternoon of April 13, 1873, approximately 60 to 70 African American militiamen remaining inside displayed makeshift white flags—a shirt sleeve and a book leaf—as signals of truce from the windows. About 37 of them then rushed out unarmed and surrendered, expecting protection under the terms offered. The surrendered men were escorted in pairs at by mounted white participants toward the rear of the burning structure, where they were systematically shot on command, with executioners using pistols at close range. An undetermined number of additional black fighters were killed while fleeing the flames or attempting to hide in nearby woods, contributing to the post-surrender death toll; autopsies on 59 recovered bodies revealed most had been shot in the back of the head with small-caliber weapons, indicating deliberate executions rather than . A few survivors escaped by feigning death amid the fallen. White forces reported two of their own killed earlier in the day—James Hadnot and R. J. Harris—amid accusations that blacks had violated the truce by firing first, though federal reports emphasized the executions as unprovoked killings of disarmed . In the hours following the executions, the site saw continued , with surrounding buildings ignited and some property looted by elements of the victorious Democratic , restoring white control over Grant Parish facilities by nightfall. Bodies lay unburied and exposed until April 15, when a deputy U.S. from New Orleans oversaw hasty interment in shallow graves and a makeshift near the to prevent and conceal evidence. No immediate federal military intervention occurred, as U.S. Army units were distant and arrived only days later to assess the scene, by which time local Democratic authorities had consolidated power and dispersed. The events prompted rapid state and federal inquiries, though initial reprisals against perpetrators were limited by sympathetic local juries and political pressures.

Casualties, Conduct, and Immediate Repercussions

Verified Death Toll and Wounded

A U.S. report on political violence in , compiled in 1875, estimated approximately 150 African American deaths in the Colfax confrontation, with most occurring after the defenders' surrender and 59 bodies recovered showing execution-style pistol wounds to the back of the head. This figure aligns with federal assessments and contemporary eyewitness accounts from Republican sources, which described systematic killings of surrendering and civilians fleeing the courthouse. Three white fatalities were confirmed among the Democratic forces, including two named individuals, Hudnot and Harris. A contemporaneous report by the Democratic-aligned Committee of Seventy, issued in 1874, provided lower estimates sympathetic to the assailants' perspective, claiming 64 total African American casualties (combining killed and wounded) and four white wounded, while attributing the violence to an initial breach of truce by Black forces. Scholarly analyses, drawing on these primary documents and later investigations, converge on roughly 150 African American deaths—predominantly members and supporters—as the most defensible figure, given the burning of bodies, dispersal of remains in fields, and absence of systematic burial records. Documentation of wounded survivors is limited and inconsistent, as many injured African Americans escaped into swamps or received no formal medical attention amid the chaos. The Committee of Seventy noted four white wounded, but federal reports make no equivalent tally for Black casualties, likely due to the high lethality of the post-surrender executions and lack of centralized care. Overall, the disparity in reported numbers reflects partisan biases in source collection, with Republican-led inquiries emphasizing mass executions and Democratic accounts minimizing them as battlefield losses.

Accounts of Atrocities from Both Sides

Republican-aligned and federal investigations documented several attributed to white Democratic forces in the lead-up to and during the April 13, 1873, confrontation. On April 5, armed white men shot and killed Jesse McKinney, a Republican, through the head while he was repairing a fence near Colfax, an incident described in congressional as an unprovoked that heightened tensions among local Black residents. During the subsequent assault on the , after Black defenders surrendered under promise of safe passage, white paramilitaries executed at least 37 prisoners—mostly by shots to the head or back—while others fled or were hunted down and killed, according to survivor accounts compiled in U.S. House reports. Democratic-leaning reports, such as those from the pro-McEnery Committee of Seventy, countered with allegations of misconduct by Black Republican militiamen. On , a party of Black men under schoolmaster Robert Flowers allegedly forced entry into Judge William Rutland's home, looted furnishings and provisions, desecrated a child's during an overnight occupation, and engaged in reported disorder. Over the following days, up to 400 armed Black militiamen occupied Colfax, erected earthworks around the courthouse, posted sentries, and barred white citizens from the town, actions framed in these accounts as intimidating seizures of . Specific claims of treachery emerged regarding the truce negotiations, where white envoys approaching under a —James W. Hadnot and an associate named Harris—were reportedly fired upon by Black forces, resulting in their deaths; this incident, cited in Democratic eyewitness statements, was portrayed as a violation of terms that escalated the fighting. While federal probes emphasized the scale of post-surrender executions by whites as the paramount outrage, Democratic narratives highlighted these earlier Republican actions as provocative aggressions justifying countermeasures, though congressional records noted limited corroboration for some plunder claims beyond partisan affidavits.

Restoration of Local Control

Following the armed confrontation on April 13, 1873, Democratic forces under the command of Christopher Columbus seized the Grant Parish courthouse in , thereby restoring white Democratic control over local government institutions previously held by Republicans. This takeover effectively nullified the disputed 1872 election results that had favored a Republican-fusionist administration, allowing Democrats to install their preferred officials without further legal contestation in the parish. , who had mobilized approximately 150 armed white men equipped with artillery, assumed the role of , while Alfonse Cazabat was appointed as parish judge, solidifying Democratic dominance in key administrative and judicial positions. The restoration marked the immediate collapse of Republican governance in Grant Parish, a microcosm of broader efforts to dismantle Reconstruction-era reforms through action. Prior to the event, Black militiamen and Republican officials had defended the to uphold their electoral mandate, but the overwhelming Democratic assault, resulting in an estimated 150 deaths primarily among Black defenders, cleared the way for unchallenged white rule. Federal authorities, including U.S. Attorney James Beckwith, initiated investigations, but these yielded limited , enabling local Democrats to frame the outcome as a reclamation of "" against perceived disorder from influence and armed Black resistance. This shift suppressed Black political participation in the parish, contributing to the erosion of voting rights and office-holding under the , as Democratic control prioritized white supremacist policies over the multiracial coalitions of Reconstruction. By mid-1873, Grant Parish aligned with statewide Democratic gains, foreshadowing the 1877 Compromise that formally ended federal oversight of Southern elections. Historical accounts from congressional reports emphasize the premeditated nature of the violence as a tool for partisan realignment, rather than spontaneous rioting, underscoring causal links between electoral disputes and extralegal power seizures.

Judicial Proceedings

State and Federal Investigations

Following the violence on April 13, 1873, state authorities conducted an official investigation into the events at the Colfax . The probe, carried out under a politically contested where Democratic factions held significant local influence, determined that African American defenders had initiated the conflict by firing the first shots, framing the outcome as a provoked response rather than unprovoked aggression. This conclusion aligned with contemporaneous accounts from white participants and local Democratic sympathizers, who emphasized the occupation as an illegal by Republican forces. Federal investigations, initiated promptly by U.S. marshals and the Department of Justice under Reconstruction enforcement statutes, contrasted sharply with the state findings. In the immediate aftermath, federal agents gathered survivor testimonies and physical evidence, documenting widespread executions of surrendering black militiamen. This groundwork supported a federal grand jury impaneled in New Orleans later in 1873, which issued indictments against approximately 20 white participants for violations of the Enforcement Acts, including conspiracy to deprive citizens of constitutional rights. Nine individuals, including William Cruikshank, were arrested and held pending trial in the U.S. Circuit Court starting October 1873. The most comprehensive federal scrutiny came via congressional inquiry, culminating in U.S. House Report No. 261 (43rd , 2nd Session, 1875) from the Select on the Condition of Affairs in . The report detailed forensic evidence from the site, including the examination of 59 bodies showing execution-style wounds to the head, and estimated total fatalities at around 150, nearly all post-surrender. It characterized the killings as "deliberate, barbarous, cold-blooded " by a mobilized white force, rejecting claims of . Broader context was provided through General Philip Sheridan's data compilation, tallying 2,141 political murders and 2,115 woundings across from 1866 to 1875, underscoring systemic violence against Republicans. These federal efforts, while yielding initial indictments, highlighted enforcement limitations in hostile Southern jurisdictions, where witness intimidation and sympathetic local juries undermined prosecutions.

Trials, Convictions, and Presidential Pardon

Following the Colfax clash, federal prosecutors, led by U.S. Attorney James Beckwith, secured indictments against approximately 97 white men under sections of the of 1870 and 1871, charging them with conspiring to deprive freedmen of rights secured by the , including assembly, bearing arms, and equal protection. State-level efforts to prosecute for faltered amid local white solidarity and jury intimidation, yielding no convictions despite eyewitness accounts of executions post-surrender. An initial federal trial in Alexandria, Louisiana, in 1874 ended in mistrial due to a hung jury. A retrial in New Orleans from May 18 to June 10, 1874, before Judge Robert D. Dick and a mostly white jury, produced convictions on conspiracy charges against three defendants: William J. Cruikshank, John P. Hadnot, and William B. Irwin. The trio was found guilty on the first 16 counts of the indictment for banding together to hinder freedmen's rights, facing potential sentences of up to 10 years' imprisonment and fines, though direct murder charges were avoided as prosecutors deemed them unattainable under biased local conditions. The convicted men appealed to the U.S. Circuit Court, where Justice Joseph P. Bradley upheld the verdicts in 1874, affirming federal authority over such conspiracies. Further appeal reached the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Cruikshank (92 U.S. 542, 1876), which reversed the convictions on March 27, 1876. Chief Justice Morrison Waite's majority opinion ruled that the Enforcement Acts applied only to state actors, not private individuals, and that the Bill of Rights restrained federal, not private, infringements—effectively nullifying federal civil rights enforcement against non-state violence and freeing all defendants without need for executive intervention. No presidential pardon was issued, as the judicial reversal preempted sentencing; President Ulysses S. Grant's administration had pursued the prosecutions aggressively but lacked further recourse post-ruling.

United States v. Cruikshank and Constitutional Ramifications

Following the Colfax Massacre, federal prosecutors indicted approximately 32 white participants under Section 6 of the , charging them with conspiracy to deprive Black victims of rights secured by the First, Second, and Fourteenth Amendments, including the rights to peaceably assemble, bear arms, and equal protection of the laws. Nine defendants proceeded to trial in the U.S. for the District of , where three—William J. Cruikshank, John Hadnot, and William Irwin—were convicted on 32 counts related to the conspiracy, receiving sentences of up to six months' imprisonment and fines. The convictions rested on interpretations of the Enforcement Acts as authorizing federal intervention against private deprivations of constitutional rights, but the defendants appealed, arguing the acts exceeded congressional authority. The U.S. heard arguments in United States v. Cruikshank during January term 1876 and issued its decision on March 27, 1876, with Morrison R. Waite delivering the unanimous , reversing the convictions. The Court held that the First and Second Amendments constrain only the federal government, not private individuals, rendering counts alleging conspiracies to prevent assembly or arms-bearing inapplicable to non-governmental actors like the Colfax perpetrators. Similarly, the Fourteenth Amendment's protections against deprivation of life, liberty, or property without , and denial of equal protection, apply solely to , not private violence, thus invalidating federal prosecution of purely individual conspiracies under the . The ruling clarified that these acts did not confer new substantive rights but merely provided remedies for violations of pre-existing rights when attributable to state officials or color of . The decision's constitutional ramifications profoundly curtailed federal civil rights enforcement during Reconstruction, establishing that the offered no direct shield against private infringements and limiting the Fourteenth Amendment to state-centric abuses. By narrowing the scope of the , Cruikshank effectively immunized private paramilitary actions in the from federal absent state involvement, contributing to diminished prosecutions of groups like the and . This precedent, alongside contemporaneous rulings like United States v. Harris (1883), signaled the judiciary's retreat from expansive Reconstruction-era protections, facilitating the and the withdrawal of federal troops from and . Over time, the case's emphasis on doctrine persisted until the mid-20th century's selective incorporation of guarantees against states via the Fourteenth Amendment, though its bar on federal remedies for private conspiracies remained influential in constraining civil rights litigation until statutory expansions like the of 1968.

Historical Interpretations and Legacy

Role in the Decline of Reconstruction

The Colfax Massacre exemplified the intensifying violence by white Democrats against Republican-led governments in the , undermining the stability of Reconstruction regimes established under the of 1867. In , the April 13, 1873, clash arose from a disputed 1872 state election, where black Republicans defended a against a white seeking to install a rival claimant; the ensuing rout and executions of surrendering black militiamen highlighted the vulnerability of biracial coalitions to organized terror tactics, foreshadowing similar "redeemer" campaigns that toppled Reconstruction administrations across the region by 1877. Federal efforts to prosecute the perpetrators under the of 1870 and 1871 faltered, revealing practical and legal limits to Washington’s commitment to upholding civil and voting . Of approximately 150 deaths, only nine white perpetrators were initially indicted, and convictions of three in 1874 were overturned by the in United States v. Cruikshank (1876), which held that the Fourteenth Amendment protected citizens only against state action, not private conspiracies, thereby eviscerating federal authority to combat non-governmental violence like that at Colfax. This ruling, directly tied to the Colfax events, signaled to that intimidation tactics faced minimal repercussions, emboldening groups such as the and hastening the erosion of federal enforcement. The massacre accelerated Northern political fatigue with Reconstruction amid the and Grant administration scandals, shifting public and congressional priorities away from Southern reform. Republicans lost control of the in the elections partly due to perceptions of Reconstruction's costs and failures, including unchecked violence like Colfax, which demonstrated the inadequacy of military and judicial interventions in securing lasting black political gains. By eroding faith in federal intervention's efficacy, the event contributed causally to the , which withdrew troops from the South in exchange for Rutherford B. Hayes's presidency, effectively abandoning Reconstruction and enabling the imposition of Jim Crow segregation.

Debates Over "Massacre" vs. "Battle" Framing

The characterization of the , 1873, events in , as either a "" or a "battle" has divided historical interpretations, reflecting broader ideological conflicts over Reconstruction-era . Mainstream , drawing on federal investigations, eyewitness testimonies, and casualty estimates of approximately 60 to 150 deaths versus three white fatalities, favors "" to underscore the disproportionate killing of mostly unarmed or surrendering Black Republicans defending a disputed against a white force. This framing highlights documented atrocities, including the execution of prisoners and the burning of the courthouse, as evidenced by U.S. Army reports and survivor accounts compiled in congressional records. In contrast, contemporaneous white Democratic narratives and subsequent Lost Cause accounts portrayed the clash as the "Battle of Colfax" or "Colfax Riot," emphasizing armed resistance—estimated at 200-300 members—and depicting it as a defensive response to alleged Republican election fraud and threats to white authority in Grant Parish. A 1930 article by Manie White Johnson in the Historical Quarterly, rooted in white supremacist perspectives, advanced the "riot" to minimize coordinated white aggression and portray the event as mutual civil unrest among impoverished classes, ignoring the racial targeting and post-surrender killings. Such framings often relied on partisan local sources, which federal probes critiqued for bias, as they downplayed the white 's superior organization and artillery. Modern debates resurfaced in amid efforts to replace a Grant Parish marker erected in the early , which described the events as a "" and echoed Lost Cause minimization by omitting the scale of Black casualties and federal prosecutions. Historians like LeeAnna Keith argue that "battle" or "" labels obscure the nature of the white assault, which served as a template for Redemption violence ending Reconstruction, supported by disparities in armament and the attackers' explicit aim to restore Democratic control. While some regional commentators persist in "battle" to highlight Black armament or intra-class strife, from trials like —which documented over 100 Black deaths without equivalent white losses—bolsters the "massacre" consensus among peer-reviewed scholarship, cautioning against terminology that equates aggressor and defender.

Memorials, Recent Scholarship, and Contemporary Views

A state historical marker erected in 1950 near the Colfax courthouse described the event as the "Colfax Riot," portraying it as a clash where "white citizens" repelled an armed group of "150 negroes and carpetbaggers" seeking to seize control, with no mention of or atrocities against Black defenders. This marker, criticized for white supremacist framing that minimized racial violence and celebrated Democratic paramilitary action, was removed in 2021 amid efforts to address Lost Cause , with the plaque preserved in a state museum rather than replaced on-site. In April 2023, coinciding with the 150th anniversary, the Colfax Memorial Organization unveiled a new monument listing the names of 57 identified victims killed during or after the , emphasizing their defense of democratic processes amid disputed local elections. The dedication ceremony, attended by descendants and state officials including Governor , highlighted themes of racial justice and the suppression of political gains, marking a shift from prior commemorations that omitted victim recognition. Recent scholarship has revisited the event through primary sources like congressional reports and local records, with LeeAnna Keith's 2008 book The Colfax Massacre: The Untold Story of Black Power, White Terror, and the Death of Reconstruction arguing it exemplified organized white paramilitary efforts to dismantle Black enfranchisement via disproportionate violence against an outnumbered but armed Republican militia. Complementing this, Charles Lane's contemporaneous The Day Freedom Died (2008) focuses on legal aftermath, contending the massacre's unpunished perpetrators emboldened federal retreat from enforcing Reconstruction protections, drawing on trial transcripts to illustrate judicial failures. A 2021 article by David M. Ballantyne examines gendered and racial narratives in post-event memory, using newspapers and folklore to trace how depictions of Black women's roles evolved from vilification to erasure in Southern accounts. Contemporary interpretations, prevalent in academic and circles, frame the Colfax events as a watershed of racial terrorism that accelerated Reconstruction's collapse by deterring Black political participation through exemplary violence, with estimates of 60 to 150 Black deaths underscoring the asymmetry against a force lacking artillery or reinforcements. Historians like reference it as evidence of systemic Democratic intimidation tactics that federal inaction tacitly endorsed, influencing rulings limiting civil rights enforcement. Efforts like the 2023 memorial reflect a push to center victim agency and counter earlier minimizations, though some regional perspectives persist in viewing the clash as a legitimate restoration of "local control" against extralegal occupation, attributing escalation to Black militiamen's initial courthouse seizure amid claims on . These divergent lenses highlight ongoing debates over causal factors, with empirical analyses prioritizing documented disparities in armament and post-surrender executions over partisan rationales.

References

  1. https://www.archives.gov/fort-worth/highlights/columbus-nash
  2. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/colfax-massacre-reports-2/
  3. https://64parishes.org/entry/reconstruction
  4. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/Civil_War_AdmissionReadmission.htm
  5. https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/reconstruction-acts-1867-1868
  6. https://64parishes.org/entry/louisiana-constitutions
  7. https://64parishes.org/entry/louisiana-constitution-of-1868
  8. http://genealogytrails.com/lou/grant/history.html
  9. https://www.grantchamber.org/about-1
  10. https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=136239
  11. https://lasc.libguides.com/c.php?g=997145&p=7223636
  12. https://mysite.du.edu/~mgree279/greenberger_county_manipulation.pdf
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-american-political-development/article/redrawing-the-south-county-creation-as-a-partisan-tool-during-reconstruction/B4D7F01165467B68935347DF7C3803C9
  14. https://www.learningforjustice.org/podcasts/teaching-hard-history/jim-crow-era/reconstruction-101-progress-and-backlash
  15. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/EnforcementActs.htm
  16. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/the-enforcement-acts/
  17. https://64parishes.org/entry/knights-of-the-white-camellia
  18. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/senate-stories/reconstruction-louisiana-and-the-case-of-pbs-pinchback.htm
  19. https://64parishes.org/entry/john-mcenery
  20. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3670&context=cwbr
  21. https://www.sos.la.gov/historicalresources/aboutlouisiana/louisianagovernors1861-1877/pages/johnmcenery.aspx
  22. https://64parishes.org/entry/william-pitt-kellogg-2
  23. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/april-13/colfax-massacre-louisiana
  24. https://64parishes.org/entry/colfax-massacre-adaptation
  25. https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-167/issue-34/house-section/article/H573-2
  26. https://repository.wellesley.edu/_flysystem/fedora/2023-11/WCTC_2020_LipinMargot_NoWhiteManCouldBePun.pdf
  27. https://lasc.libguides.com/c.php?g=997145&p=7216920
  28. https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/colfax-massacre/
  29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4233762
  30. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/colfax-massacre-reports/
  31. https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/6986/ClawsonDissertationFinal.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  32. https://blackpast.org/african-american-history/colfax-massacre-1873/
  33. http://www.racialviolenceus.org/Articles/hogue-colfax.pdf
  34. https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/d/inaf18.pdf
  35. https://www.fjc.gov/history/timeline/us-v-cruikshank
  36. https://www.britannica.com/event/Colfax-Massacre
  37. https://storyoftheweek.loa.org/2023/04/the-colfax-massacre-trial.html
  38. https://opencasebook.org/casebooks/551-shameful-or-ignored-supreme-court-cases/resources/7.2.3-u-s-v-cruikshank-cta-1874-bradley-j/
  39. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/92/542
  40. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/united-states-v-cruikshank/
  41. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/92/542/
  42. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/1873-colfax-massacre-crippled-reconstruction-180958746/
  43. https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/46/1/53/102853/White-Supremacy-Terrorism-and-the-Failure-of
  44. https://oyc.yale.edu/history/hist-119/lecture-25
  45. https://www.journalofthecivilwarera.org/2021/07/removing-the-white-supremacy-marker-at-colfax-louisiana-a-2021-success-story/
  46. https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Articles?DataId=1374797
  47. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/28/opinion/black-lives-civil-rights.html
  48. https://64parishes.org/entry/colfax-massacre
  49. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/colfax-massacre-monument-150th-anniversary-ceremony-rcna79151
  50. https://heartoflouisiana.com/colfax-massacre-memorial/
  51. https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/114/2/447/41837
  52. https://academic.macmillan.com/academictrade/9780805089226/thedayfreedomdied/
  53. https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/418084/remembering-the-colfax-massacre-race-sex-and-the-meanings-of-reconstruction-violence
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.