Infective endocarditis
View on Wikipedia| Infective endocarditis | |
|---|---|
| Other names | Bacterial endocarditis |
| A mitral valve vegetation caused by bacterial endocarditis | |
| Specialty | Cardiology, infectious disease |
| Symptoms | Fever, small areas of bleeding into the skin, heart murmur, feeling tired, low red blood cells[1] |
| Complications | Valvular insufficiency, heart failure, stroke, kidney failure[1][2] Blood clot in a lung artery (pulmonary embolism)[3] Enlarged and painful spleen, kidney damage, damage to the distal extremities such as fingers and toes.[4] |
| Causes | Bacterial infection, fungal infection[1] |
| Risk factors | Valvular heart disease including rheumatic disease, congenital heart disease,[5] artificial valves, hemodialysis, intravenous drug use, electronic pacemakers[6][7] |
| Diagnostic method | Based on symptoms, blood cultures, ultrasound[1] |
| Treatment | Antibiotics, heart surgery[1] |
| Prognosis | 25% risk of death[6] |
| Frequency | 5 per 100,000 per year[6] |
Infective endocarditis is an infection of the inner surface of the heart (endocardium), usually the valves.[1] Signs and symptoms may include fever, small areas of bleeding into the skin, heart murmur, feeling tired, and low red blood cell count.[1][8] Complications may include backward blood flow in the heart, heart failure – the heart struggling to pump a sufficient amount of blood to meet the body's needs, abnormal electrical conduction in the heart, stroke, and kidney failure.[1][2][8][9]
The cause is typically a bacterial infection and less commonly a fungal infection.[1] Risk factors include valvular heart disease, including rheumatic disease, congenital heart disease, artificial valves, hemodialysis, intravenous drug use, and electronic pacemakers.[6][7][5] The bacteria most commonly involved are streptococci or staphylococci.[1] Diagnosis is suspected based on symptoms and supported by blood cultures or ultrasound of the heart.[1] There is also a noninfective form of endocarditis.[1]
The usefulness of antibiotics following dental procedures for prevention is unclear.[10] Some recommend them for people at high risk.[1] Treatment is generally with intravenous antibiotics.[1] The choice of antibiotics is based on the results of blood cultures.[1] Occasionally heart surgery is required.[1] The number of people affected is about 5 per 100,000 per year.[6] Rates, however, vary between regions of the world.[6] Infective endocarditis occurs in males more often than in females.[1] The risk of death among those infected is about 25%.[6] Without treatment, it is almost universally fatal.[1] Improved diagnosis and treatment options have significantly enhanced the life expectancy of patients with infective endocarditis, particularly with congenital heart disease.[5]
Classification
[edit]Infective endocarditis is divided into three categories of acute, subacute, and chronic based on the duration of symptoms.[11] Acute infective endocarditis refers to the presence of signs and symptoms of infective endocarditis that are present for days up to six weeks.[11] If these signs and symptoms persist for more than six weeks but less than three months, this is subacute infective endocarditis.[11] Chronic infective endocarditis refers to the presence of such signs and symptoms when they persist for more than three months.[11]
- Subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) is often due to streptococci of low virulence (mainly viridans streptococci) and mild to moderate illness which progresses slowly over weeks and months (>2 weeks) and has low propensity to hematogenously seed extracardiac sites.
- Acute bacterial endocarditis (ABE) is a fulminant illness over days to weeks (<2 weeks), and is more likely due to Staphylococcus aureus, which has much greater virulence or disease-producing capacity and frequently causes metastatic infection.[12]
This classification is now discouraged because the ascribed associations (in terms of organism and prognosis) were not strong enough to be relied upon clinically. The terms short incubation (meaning less than about six weeks) and long incubation (greater than about six weeks) are preferred.[13]
Culture results
[edit]Infective endocarditis may also be classified as culture-positive or culture-negative. By far the most common cause of "culture-negative" endocarditis is prior administration of antibiotics and can occur in up to 31% of cases.[14][7]
Sometimes microorganisms can take a longer period to grow in the culture media, for example Cutibacterium spp.[15] and the HACEK bacteria group. Some organisms are said to be fastidious because they have demanding growth requirements. Some examples include pathogens like Aspergillus species, Brucella species, Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydia species. Due to delay in growth and identification in these cases, patients may be erroneously classified as "culture-negative" endocarditis.[16]
Heart side
[edit]Endocarditis can also be classified by the side of the heart affected:
- People who intravenously inject opioids such as heroin or methamphetamine may introduce infection which can travel to the right side of the heart, classically affecting the tricuspid valve, and most often caused by S. aureus.[12]
- Regardless of cause, left-sided endocarditis is the most common, while right-sided endocarditis accounts for 5-10% of cases and is more common in people who inject IV drugs and in patients with congenital heart disease.[12][7]
Infection setting
[edit]Another form of endocarditis is healthcare-associated endocarditis when the infecting organism is believed to be transmitted in a health care setting like a hospital, dialysis unit, or a residential nursing home. Nosocomial endocarditis is a form of healthcare associated endocarditis in which the infective organism is acquired during a stay in a hospital and it is usually secondary to presence of intravenous catheters, total parenteral nutrition lines, pacemakers, etc.[17]
Valve type
[edit]Finally, the distinction between native-valve endocarditis and prosthetic-valve endocarditis is clinically important. Prosthetic valve endocarditis can be early (within 1 year of surgery) or late (> 1 year following valvular surgery).[7]
- Early prosthetic valve endocarditis is usually due to intraoperative contamination or postoperative bacterial contamination, which is usually nosocomial in nature.
- Late prosthetic valve endocarditis is usually due to community-acquired microorganisms.[17]
Prosthetic valve endocarditis is commonly caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis as it is capable of growing as a biofilm on plastic surfaces.[18] Cutibacterium acnes almost exclusively causes endocarditis on prosthetic heart valves.[15]
Signs and symptoms
[edit]- Fever occurs in 97% of people; malaise and endurance fatigue in 90% of people.[19]
- A new or changing heart murmur, weight loss, and coughing occurs in 35% of people.[19]
- Vascular phenomena: septic embolism (a piece of infected debris or tissue breaking off and traveling through the bloodstream to a distant site) (causing thromboembolic problems such as a stroke or gangrene of the fingers), Janeway lesions (painless hemorrhagic cutaneous lesions on the palms and soles),[20] bleeding in the brain, conjunctival hemorrhage, splinter hemorrhages, kidney infarcts, and splenic infarcts.[21] Infective endocarditis can also lead to the formation of mycotic aneurysms.[11][8]
- Immunologic phenomena: glomerulonephritis which allows for blood and albumin to enter the urine,[12] Osler's nodes ("ephemeral spots of a painful nodular erythema, chiefly in the skin of the hands and feet"), Roth's spots on the retina, positive serum rheumatoid factor
- Other signs may include night sweats, rigors, anemia, spleen enlargement[22]
Cause
[edit]Many microorganisms can cause infective endocarditis. These are generally isolated by blood culture, where the patient's blood is drawn and any growth is noted and identified. The term bacterial endocarditis (BE) is commonly used, reflecting the fact that most cases of IE are due to bacteria; however, infective endocarditis (IE) has become the preferred term.[7]
Bacterial
[edit]Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of infective endocarditis in most parts of the world and is responsible for about 31% of cases.[11] Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of endocarditis in people who use intravenous drugs.[23] Viridans streptococci and Enterococci are the second and third most common organisms responsible for infective endocarditis.[11] Viridans streptococci are a common cause of infective endocarditis in South America. Other Streptococci are also a frequent cause. Infective endocarditis due to Streptococcus bovis occurs more commonly in Europe than in North America.[11] Infection with the HACEK group of bacteria is also a rare cause of infective endocarditis in North America.[24]
The viridans group includes S. oralis, S. mitis, S. sanguis, S. gordonii, and S. parasanguis. The primary habitats for these organisms are the oral cavity and the upper respiratory tract.[25] These bacteria are present in the normal oral flora and enter the bloodstream due to disruption of tissues in the mouth when dental surgical procedures are performed (tooth extractions) or genitourinary manipulation. Similarly, HACEK organisms are a group of bacteria that live on the dental gums and can be seen in people who inject drugs who contaminate their needles with saliva. Patients may also have a history of poor dental hygiene or pre-existing valvular disease.[26]
Viridans alpha-hemolytic streptococci, which are present in the mouth, are the most frequently isolated microorganisms when the infection is acquired in a community setting. In contrast, Staphylococcus bloodstream infections are frequently acquired in a health care setting where they can enter the bloodstream through procedures that cause breaks in the integrity of skin, such as surgery, catheterization, or during access of long term indwelling catheters or secondary to intravenous injection of recreational drugs.[citation needed]
Enterococcus can enter the bloodstream as a consequence of abnormalities in the gastrointestinal or genitourinary tracts.[citation needed]
Some organisms, when isolated, give valuable clues to the cause, as they tend to be specific.
- Pseudomonas species, which are very resilient organisms that thrive in water, may contaminate street drugs that have been contaminated with drinking water. P. aeruginosa can infect a child through foot punctures, and can cause both endocarditis and septic arthritis.[27]
- S. bovis and Clostridium septicum, which are part of the natural flora of the bowel, are associated with colon cancers. When they present as the causative agent in endocarditis, it usually prompts a colonoscopy to be done immediately due to concerns regarding spread of bacteria from the colon through the bloodstream due to the cancer breaking down the barrier between the inside of the colon (lumen) and the blood vessels which drain the bowel.[28][29]
- Less commonly reported bacteria responsible for so called "culture negative endocarditis" include Bartonella, Chlamydia psittaci, and Coxiella.[30] Such bacteria can be identified by serology, culture of the excised valve tissue, sputum, pleural fluid, and emboli, and by polymerase chain reaction or sequencing of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA.
Multiple case reports of infective endocarditis caused by unusual organisms have been published. Cutibacterium spp., which are normal skin flora, have been responsible for infective endocarditis, preferably in patients with prosthetic heart valves, in rare cases leading to death.[31]Tropheryma whipplei has caused endocarditis without gastrointestinal involvement.[32] Citrobacter koseri was found in an immunocompetent adult.[33] Neisseria bacilliformis was found in a person with a bicuspid aortic valve.[34]
Dental operations
[edit]One in eight cases of infective endocarditis is thought to be caused by viridans streptococci infection associated with dental procedures such as cleaning or tooth extraction[25][obsolete source]. This was thought to be more clinically significant than it is[citation needed]. However, it is important that a dentist or a dental hygienist be told of any heart problems before commencing treatment. Prophylactic antibiotics were regularly administered to patients with certain heart conditions as a precaution, although this practice has changed in the US, with new American Heart Association guidelines released in 2007,[35] and in the UK as of March 2008 due to new NICE guidelines.
Fungal
[edit]Fungal endocarditis (FE) is often fatal and one of the most serious forms of infective endocarditis. The types of fungi most seen associated with this disease are:
Candida albicans is found as a spherical or oval budding yeast. It is associated with endocarditis in people who inject drugs, patients with prosthetic valves, and immunocompromised patients. It forms biofilms around thick-walled resting structures like prosthetic heart valves and additionally colonizes and penetrates endothelial walls.[25] C. albicans is responsible for 24-46% of all the cases of FE, and its mortality rate is 46.6–50%.[36]
Other fungi demonstrated to cause endocarditis are Histoplasma capsulatum and Aspergillus.[30] Aspergillus contributes to roughly 25% of FE cases.[36] Endocarditis with Tricosporon asahii has also been reported in a case report.[37]
Risk factors
[edit]Risk factors for infective endocarditis are based on the premise that in a healthy individual, bacteremia (bacteria entering the bloodstream) is cleared quickly with no adverse consequences.[38] However, if a heart valve is damaged, the bacteria can attach themselves to the valve, resulting in infective endocarditis. Additionally, in individuals with weakened immune systems, the concentration of bacteria in the blood can reach levels high enough to increase the probability that some will attach to the valve. Some significant risk factors are listed here:[11][38]
- Artificial heart valves
- Intracardiac devices, such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
- Unrepaired cyanotic congenital heart defects
- History of infective endocarditis
- Neoplastic disease
- Chronic rheumatic heart disease, which is an autoimmune response to repeated Streptococcus pyogenes infection (mostly in the developing world)
- Age-related degenerative valvular lesions
- Congenital heart valve abnormalities
- Hemodialysis, a medical procedure that filters the blood of individuals with kidney failure
- Poor oral hygiene
- IVDU (IV drug user)
- Co-existing immunosuppressing conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, alcohol use disorder, chronic liver disease, and HIV/AIDS
Pathogenesis
[edit]
Damaged valves and endocardium contribute to the development of infective endocarditis.[38] Specifically, the damaged part of a heart valve forms a local blood clot, a condition known as non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE). The platelet and fibrin deposits that form as part of the blood clotting process allow bacteria to take hold and form vegetations. As previously mentioned, the body has no direct methods of combating valvular vegetations because the valves do not have a dedicated blood supply. This combination of damaged valves, bacterial growth, and lack of a strong immune response results in infective endocarditis.[citation needed]
Damage to the valves and endocardium can be caused by:[38]
- Altered, turbulent blood flow. The areas that fibrose, clot, or roughen as a result of this altered flow are known as jet lesions. Altered blood flow is more likely in high-pressure areas, so ventricular septal defects or patent ductus arteriosus can create more susceptibility than atrial septal defects.
- Catheters, electrodes, and other intracardiac prosthetic devices.
- Solid particles from repeated intravenous injections.
- Chronic inflammation. Examples include auto-immune mechanisms and degenerative valvular lesions.
The risk factors for infective endocarditis provide a more extensive list of conditions that can damage the heart.
Diagnosis
[edit]
In general, the Duke criteria should be fulfilled in order to establish the diagnosis of endocarditis.[11][39] Although the Duke criteria are widely used, they have significant limitations.[11] For example, the sensitivity of the Duke criteria for detecting infective endocarditis decreases when prosthetic heart valves are present.[11]
As the Duke criteria rely heavily on the results of echocardiography, research has addressed when to order an echocardiogram by using signs and symptoms to predict occult endocarditis among people who inject drugs[40][41][42] and among non drug-abusing patients.[43][44] However, this research is over twenty years old and it is possible that changes in the epidemiology of endocarditis and bacteria such as staphylococci make the following estimates incorrect.
The blood tests C reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin have not been found to be particularly useful in helping make or rule out the diagnosis.[45]
Ultrasound
[edit]Echocardiography is the main type of diagnostic imaging used to establish the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.[11] There are two main types of echocardiography used to assist with the diagnosis of IE: transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).[11]
The transthoracic echocardiogram has a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 65% and 95% if the echocardiographer believes there is 'probable' or 'almost certain' evidence of endocarditis.[46][47] However, in endocarditis involving a prosthetic valve, TTE has a sensitivity of approximately 50%, whereas TEE has a sensitivity exceeding 90%.[11] The TEE also has an important diagnostic role when the TTE does not reveal IE but diagnostic suspicion remains high, since TEE is more sensitive for infective endocarditis and is better able to characterize infection-related damage to the heart valves and surrounding tissues.[11]
Guidelines support the initial use of TTE over TEE in people with abnormal blood cultures, a new heart murmur, and suspected infective endocarditis.[11] TEE is the preferred initial form of imaging in people with suspected infective endocarditis who have a moderate to high pretest probability of infective endocarditis, including people with prosthetic heart valves, blood cultures growing Staphylococcus, or have an intracardiac device (such as a pacemaker).[11]
-
Ultrasound showing infectious endocarditis[48]
-
Ultrasound showing infectious endocarditis[48]
-
Ultrasound showing infectious endocarditis[48]
-
Ultrasound showing another case of infectious endocarditis[49]
Modified Duke criteria
[edit]Established in 1994 by the Duke Endocarditis Service and revised in 2000, the Duke criteria are a collection of major and minor criteria used to establish a diagnosis of infective endocarditis.[39][50] According to the Duke criteria, diagnosis of infective endocarditis can be definite, possible, or rejected.[38] A diagnosis of infective endocarditis is definite if either the following pathological or clinical criteria are met:
One of these pathological criteria:
- Histology or culture of cardiac vegetation, embolized vegetation, or intracardiac abscess from the heart finds microorganisms
- Active endocarditis
One of these combinations of clinical criteria
- Two major clinical criteria
- One major and three minor criteria
- Five minor criteria
Diagnosis of infective endocarditis is possible if one of the following combinations of clinical criteria is met:
- One major and one minor criterion
- Three minor criteria are fulfilled
Major criteria
[edit]Positive blood culture with typical IE microorganism, defined as one of the following:[38]
- A typical microorganism consistent with IE from two separate blood cultures, as noted below:
- Viridans-group streptococci, or
- Streptococcus bovis including nutritional variant strains, or
- HACEK group, or
- Staphylococcus aureus, or
- Community-acquired enterococci, in the absence of a primary focus
- Microorganisms consistent with IE from persistently positive blood cultures are defined as:
- Two positive cultures of blood samples drawn >12 hours apart, or
- Three or a majority of ≥four separate blood cultures (with first and last sample drawn at least one hour apart)
- Coxiella burnetii detected by at least one positive blood culture or IgG antibody titer for Q fever phase 1 antigen >1:800. This was previously a minor criterion
Evidence of endocardial involvement with a positive echocardiogram is defined as
- Oscillating intracardiac mass on valve or supporting structures, in the path of regurgitant jets, or on implanted material in the absence of an alternative anatomic explanation, or
- Abscess, or
- New partial dehiscence of prosthetic valve or new valvular regurgitation (worsening or changing of preexisting murmur not sufficient)
Minor criteria
[edit]- Predisposing factor: known cardiac lesion, recreational drug injection
- Fever >38 °C
- Vascular phenomena: arterial emboli, pulmonary infarcts, Janeway lesions, conjunctival hemorrhage
- Immunological phenomena: glomerulonephritis, Osler's nodes, Roth's spots, Rheumatoid factor
- Microbiologic evidence: Positive blood culture (that doesn't meet a major criterion) or serologic evidence of infection with an organism consistent with IE but not satisfying the major criterion
Updated (2023) Modified Duke Criteria for Infective Endocarditis: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition, and the Duke criteria (established in 1994 and revised in 2000) have been fundamental for the diagnosis of the disease. However, the landscape of microbiology, diagnostics, epidemiology, and treatment for IE has evolved significantly over the years. The 2023 modified Duke criteria address these changes: Updated (2023) Modified Duke Criteria for Infective Endocarditis
Risk
[edit]Among people who do not use intravenous drugs and have a fever in the emergency department, there is a less than 5% chance of occult endocarditis. Mellors in 1987 found no cases of endocarditis nor of staphylococcal bacteremia among 135 febrile patients in the emergency room.[44] The upper confidence interval for 0% of 135 is 5%, so for statistical reasons alone, there is up to a 5% chance of endocarditis among these patients. In contrast, Leibovici found that among 113 non-selected adults admitted to the hospital because of fever, there were two cases (1.8% with 95%CI: 0% to 7%) of endocarditis.[43]
Among people who do use intravenous drugs and have a fever in the emergency department, there is about a 10% to 15% prevalence of endocarditis. This estimate is not substantially changed by whether the doctor believes the patient has a trivial explanation for their fever.[42] Weisse found that 13% of 121 patients had endocarditis.[40] Marantz also found a prevalence of endocarditis of 13% among such patients in the emergency department with fever.[42] Samet found a 6% incidence among 283 such patients, but after excluding patients with initially apparent major illness to explain the fever (including 11 cases of manifest endocarditis), there was a 7% prevalence of endocarditis.[41] During the Opioid epidemic in the United States, hospitals observed an increase in stroke associated with infective endocarditis.[51]
Among people with staphylococcal bacteremia (SAB), one study found a 29% prevalence of endocarditis in community-acquired SAB versus 5% in nosocomial SAB.[52] However, only 2% of strains were resistant to methicillin and so these numbers may be low in areas of higher resistance.[citation needed]
Prevention
[edit]Not all people with heart disease require antibiotics to prevent infective endocarditis. Heart diseases have been classified into high, medium, and low risk of developing IE. Those falling into the high-risk category require IE prophylaxis before endoscopies and urinary tract procedures. Diseases listed under high risk include:[7]
- Prior endocarditis
- Unrepaired cyanotic congenital heart diseases
- Completely repaired congenital heart disease in their first 6 months
- Prosthetic heart valves or valves repaired with any prosthetic material
- Incompletely repaired congenital heart diseases
- Cardiac transplant valvulopathy
The following are the antibiotic regimens recommended by the American Heart Association for antibiotic prophylaxis:[35]
- Oral amoxicillin one hour before the procedure
- Intravenous or intramuscular ampicillin one hour before the procedure
- In patients allergic to penicillins
- Azithromycin or clarithromycin orally, one hour before the procedure
- Cephalexin orally one hour before the procedure
- Clindamycin orally one hour before the procedure
In the UK, NICE clinical guidelines no longer advise prophylaxis because there is no clinical evidence that it reduces the incidence of IE, and there are negative effects (e.g., allergy and increased bacterial resistance) of taking antibiotics that may outweigh the benefits.[53]
Antibiotics were historically commonly recommended to prevent IE in those with heart problems undergoing dental procedures (known as dental antibiotic prophylaxis). There is, however, insufficient evidence to support whether antibiotics are effective or ineffective at preventing IE when given prior to a dental procedure in people at high risk.[54] They are less commonly recommended for this procedure.[55]
In some countries, e.g., the US, high-risk patients may be given prophylactic antibiotics such as penicillin or clindamycin for penicillin-allergic people before dental procedures.[25] Prophylactics should be bactericidal rather than bacteriostatic.[25] Such measures are not taken in certain countries e.g. Scotland due to the fear of antibiotic resistance.[56] Because bacteria are the most common cause of infective endocarditis, antibiotics such as penicillin[25] and amoxicillin (for beta lactamase-producing bacteria) are used in prophylaxis.[citation needed]
Treatment
[edit]High-dose antibiotics are the cornerstone of treatment for infective endocarditis. These antibiotics are administered by the intravenous (IV) route to maximize diffusion of antibiotic molecules into vegetation(s) from the blood filling the chambers of the heart. This is necessary because neither the heart valves nor the vegetations adhering to them are supplied by blood vessels. Antibiotics are typically continued for two to six weeks, depending on the characteristics of the infection and the causative microorganisms. Antibiotic treatment lowers the risk of embolic complications in people with infective endocarditis.[11]
In acute endocarditis, due to the fulminant inflammation, empirical antibiotic therapy is started immediately after the blood has been drawn for culture to clarify the bacterial organisms responsible for the infection. This usually includes vancomycin and ceftriaxone IV infusions until the infecting organism is identified and the susceptibility report with the minimum inhibitory concentration becomes available. Once this information is available, this allows the supervising healthcare professional to modify the antimicrobial therapy to target the specific infecting microorganism. The routine use of gentamicin to treat endocarditis has fallen out of favor due to the lack of evidence to support its use (except in infections caused by Enterococcus and nutritionally variant streptococci) and the high rate of complications.[57] In cases of subacute endocarditis, where the person's hemodynamic status is usually stable, antibiotic treatment can be delayed until the causative microorganism can be identified.[citation needed]
Viridans group streptococci and Streptococcus bovis are usually highly susceptible to penicillin and can be treated with penicillin or ceftriaxone.[58] Relatively resistant strains of viridans group streptococci and Streptococcus bovis are treated with penicillin or ceftriaxone along with a shorter two-week course of an aminoglycoside during the initial phase of treatment.[58] Highly penicillin-resistant strains of viridans group streptococci, nutritionally variant streptococci like Granulicatella sp., Gemella sp., Abiotrophia defectiva,[59] and Enterococci are usually treated with a combination therapy consisting of penicillin and an aminoglycoside for the entire duration of 4–6 weeks.[58]
Some people may be treated with a relatively shorter course of treatment[58] (two weeks) with benzyl penicillin IV if infection is caused by viridans group streptococci or Streptococcus bovis as long as the following conditions are met:
- Endocarditis of a native valve, not of a prosthetic valve
- A MIC ≤ 0.12 mg/l
- No complication such as heart failure, arrhythmia, or pulmonary embolism occurs
- No evidence of extracardiac complications like septic thromboembolism
- No vegetations > 5 mm in diameter conduction defects
- Rapid clinical response and clearance of bloodstream infection
Additionally, oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus native valve endocarditis of the right side can also be treated with a short 2-week course of a beta-lactam antibiotic such as nafcillin with or without aminoglycosides.

The main indication for surgical treatment is regurgitation or stenosis. In active infective endocarditis, the surgery should remove enough leaflet tissue to ensure eradication of the infectious process.[60] Subsequent valve repair can be performed in limited disease.[60] Replacement of the valve with a mechanical or bioprosthetic artificial heart valve is necessary in certain situations:[61]
- Patients with significant valve stenosis or regurgitation causing heart failure
- Evidence of hemodynamic compromise in the form of elevated end-diastolic left ventricular or left atrial pressure or moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension
- Presence of intracardiac complications like paravalvular abscess, conduction defects, or destructive penetrating lesions
- Recurrent septic emboli despite appropriate antibiotic treatment
- Large vegetations (> 10 mm)
- Persistently positive blood cultures despite appropriate antibiotic treatment
- Prosthetic valve dehiscence
- Relapsing infection in the presence of a prosthetic valve
- Abscess formation
- Early closure of the mitral valve
- Infection caused by fungi or resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
The guidelines were recently updated by both the American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology. There was a recent meta-analysis published that showed surgical intervention at seven days or less is associated with lower mortality.[62]
Prognosis
[edit]Infective endocarditis is associated with 18% in-hospital mortality.[24] However, adult patients with congenital heart disease can have relatively lower mortality, down to 5% due to younger age, right-sided endocarditis, and management by multidisciplinary teams. As many as 50% of people with infective endocarditis may experience embolic complications.[11]
Epidemiology
[edit]In developed countries, the annual incidence of infective endocarditis is 3 to 9 cases per 100,000 persons.[38] Infective endocarditis occurs more often in men than in women.[11] There is an increased incidence of infective endocarditis in persons 65 years of age and older, which is probably because people in this age group have a larger number of risk factors for infective endocarditis. In recent years, over one-third of infective endocarditis cases in the United States was healthcare-associated.[38] Another trend observed in developed countries is that chronic rheumatic heart disease accounts for less than 10% of cases. Although a history of valve disease has a significant association with infective endocarditis, 50% of all cases develop in people with no known history of valvular disease.[citation needed]
History
[edit]Few diseases present greater difficulties in the way of diagnosis than malignant endocarditis, difficulties which in many cases are practically insurmountable. It is no disparagement to the many skilled physicians who have put their cases upon record to say that, in fully one-half, the diagnosis was made post mortem.
— William Osler, 1885
Lazare Riviére first described infective endocarditis affecting the aortic valve in 1616.[11] In 1806, Jean-Nicolas Corvisart coined the term vegetation to describe collections of debris found on a mitral valve affected by infective endocarditis.[11] The British physician Joseph Hodgson was the first to describe the embolic complications of infective endocarditis in 1815.[11] It was not until 1878 that Theodor Klebs first suggested that infective endocarditis had a microbial infectious origin.[11] In 1909, William Osler noted that heart valves that experienced degeneration and were sclerotic or poorly functioning had a higher risk of being affected.[11] Later, in 1924, Emanuel Libman and Benjamin Sacks described cases of vegetative endocarditis that lacked a clear microbial origin and were often associated with the autoimmune condition systemic lupus erythematosus.[11] In 1944, physicians reported on the first successful use of penicillin to treat a case of infective endocarditis.[11]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r "Infective Endocarditis – Cardiovascular Disorders". Merck Manuals Professional Edition. September 2017. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
- ^ a b Njuguna B, Gardner A, Karwa R, Delahaye F (February 2017). "Infective Endocarditis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries". Cardiology Clinics. 35 (1): 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2016.08.011. hdl:1805/14046. PMID 27886786.
- ^ "Endocarditis". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved June 4, 2022.
- ^ "Endocarditis". Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved 2022-06-09.
- ^ a b c Verzelloni Sef, A; Jaggar, SI; Trkulja, V; Alonso-Gonzalez, R; Sef, D; Turina, MI (22 March 2023). "Factors associated with long-term outcomes in adult congenital heart disease patients with infective endocarditis: A 16-year tertiary single-centre experience". European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 63 (5). doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezad105. PMID 36946284.
- ^ a b c d e f g Ambrosioni J, Hernandez-Meneses M, Téllez A, Pericàs J, Falces C, Tolosana JM, Vidal B, Almela M, Quintana E, Llopis J, Moreno A, Miro JM (12 April 2017). "The Changing Epidemiology of Infective Endocarditis in the Twenty-First Century". Current Infectious Disease Reports. 19 (21) 21. doi:10.1007/s11908-017-0574-9. PMID 28401448. S2CID 24935834.
- ^ a b c d e f g Habib, G; Lancellotti, P; Antunes, MJ; Bongiorni, MG; Casalta, JP; Del Zotti, F; Dulgheru, R; El Khoury, G; Erba, PA; Iung, B; Miro, JM; Mulder, BJ; Plonska-Gosciniak, E; Price, S; Roos-Hesselink, J; Snygg-Martin, U; Thuny, F; Tornos Mas, P; Vilacosta, I; Zamorano, JL (21 November 2015). "2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)". European Heart Journal. 36 (44): 3075–3128. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319. PMID 26320109.
- ^ a b c Kumar M, Anstadt EJ, Lopetegui Lia N, Siddiqi MH (May 2019). "Streptococcus viridans Endocarditis Affecting All Four Valves". Cureus. 11 (5) e4635. doi:10.7759/cureus.4635. PMC 6623990. PMID 31312561.
- ^ Merkler, Alexander E.; Chu, Stacy Y.; Lerario, Michael P.; Navi, Babak B.; Kamel, Hooman (2015-08-11). "Temporal relationship between infective endocarditis and stroke". Neurology. 85 (6): 512–516. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001835. ISSN 1526-632X. PMC 4540247. PMID 26163428.
- ^ Cahill TJ, Harrison JL, Jewell P, Onakpoya I, Chambers JB, Dayer M, Lockhart P, Roberts N, Shanson D, Thornhill M, Heneghan CJ, Prendergast BD (June 2017). "Antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (PDF). Heart. 103 (12): 937–944. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309102. PMID 28213367. S2CID 25918810.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab Hubers SA, DeSimone DC, Gersh BJ, Anavekar NS (May 2020). "Infective Endocarditis: A Contemporary Review". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 95 (5): 982–997. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.12.008. PMID 32299668.
- ^ a b c d Mitchell RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL, Abbas AK, Fausto N (2007). Robbins Basic Pathology (8th ed.). Saunders/Elsevier. pp. 406–8. ISBN 978-1-4160-2973-1.
- ^ Morris AM (January 2006). "How best to deal with endocarditis". Current Infectious Disease Reports. 8 (1): 14–22. doi:10.1007/s11908-006-0030-8. PMID 16448596. S2CID 10450799.
- ^ "Endocarditis". The Lecturio Medical Concept Library. Retrieved 18 July 2021.
- ^ a b Sohail MR, Gray AL, Baddour LM, Tleyjeh IM, Virk A (April 2009). "Infective endocarditis due to Propionibacterium species". Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 15 (4): 387–94. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02703.x. PMID 19260876.
- ^ Holland T, Baddour L, Bayer A, Hoen B, Miro J, Fowler V (1 September 2016). "Infective endocarditis". Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2 16059. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.59. PMC 5240923. PMID 27582414.
- ^ a b Kasper DL, Brunwald E, Fauci AS, Hauser S, Longo DL, Jameson JL (2005). Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. McGraw-Hill. pp. 731–40. ISBN 978-0-07-139140-5. OCLC 54501403.
- ^ Otto M (August 2009). "Staphylococcus epidermidis--the 'accidental' pathogen". Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 7 (8): 555–67. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2182. PMC 2807625. PMID 19609257.
- ^ a b Amal M, Deepi G, Jeffrey W, Joshua B, DeAngelis M, Peter D, et al. (2007). Emergency medicine: avoiding the pitfalls and improving the outcomes. Blackwell/BMJ Books. p. 63. ISBN 978-1-4051-4166-6.
- ^ Misin, Andrea; Bella, Stefano Di; Priolo, Luigi; Luzzati, Roberto (2017). "Image of the month: 'Diagnostic hands': Janeway lesions". Clinical Medicine. 17 (4): 373–374. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.17-4-373. ISSN 1470-2118. PMC 6297653. PMID 28765422.
- ^ Ferro JM, Fonseca AC (2014). "Infective endocarditis". Neurologic Aspects of Systemic Disease Part I. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Vol. 119. pp. 75–91. doi:10.1016/B978-0-7020-4086-3.00007-2. ISBN 978-0-7020-4086-3. PMID 24365290.
- ^ "Heart Valves and Infective Endocarditis". American Heart Association. Retrieved 18 July 2021.
- ^ Chan KL, Embil JM (2016). Endocarditis: Diagnosis and Management. Springer. p. 39. ISBN 978-3-319-27784-4.
- ^ a b Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler VG, Bayer AS, Karchmer AW, Olaison L, Pappas PA, Moreillon P, Chambers ST, Chu VH, Falcó V, Holland DJ, Jones P, Klein JL, Raymond NJ, Read KM, Tripodi MF, Utili R, Wang A, Woods CW, Cabell CH (March 2009). "Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study". Archives of Internal Medicine. 169 (5): 463–73. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.603. PMC 3625651. PMID 19273776.
- ^ a b c d e f Bagg J (2006). Essentials of microbiology for dental students (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-856489-8. OCLC 61756542.
- ^ HACEK Group Infections at eMedicine
- ^ "Pseudomonas aeruginosa". Topics in Infectious Diseases Newsletter. August 2001. Archived from the original on July 24, 2008.
- ^ Gold JS, Bayar S, Salem RR (July 2004). "Association of Streptococcus bovis bacteremia with colonic neoplasia and extracolonic malignancy". Archives of Surgery. 139 (7): 760–5. doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.7.760. PMID 15249410.
- ^ Chew SS, Lubowski DZ (November 2001). "Clostridium septicum and malignancy". ANZ Journal of Surgery. 71 (11): 647–9. doi:10.1046/j.1445-1433.2001.02231.x. PMID 11736823. S2CID 7571197.
- ^ a b Lamas CC, Eykyn SJ (March 2003). "Blood culture negative endocarditis: analysis of 63 cases presenting over 25 years". Heart. 89 (3): 258–62. doi:10.1136/heart.89.3.258. PMC 1767579. PMID 12591823.
- ^ Clayton JJ, Baig W, Reynolds GW, Sandoe JA (August 2006). "Endocarditis caused by Propionibacterium species: a report of three cases and a review of clinical features and diagnostic difficulties". Journal of Medical Microbiology. 55 (Pt 8): 981–987. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.46613-0. PMID 16849716.
- ^ Dreier J, Szabados F, von Herbay A, Kröger T, Kleesiek K (October 2004). "Tropheryma whipplei Infection of an acellular porcine heart valve bioprosthesis in a patient who did not have intestinal Whipple's disease". Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 42 (10): 4487–93. doi:10.1128/JCM.42.10.4487-4493.2004. PMC 522317. PMID 15472298.
- ^ Dzeing-Ella A, Szwebel TA, Loubinoux J, Coignard S, Bouvet A, Le Jeunne C, Aslangul E (December 2009). "Infective endocarditis due to Citrobacter koseri in an immunocompetent adult". Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 47 (12): 4185–6. doi:10.1128/JCM.00957-09. PMC 2786675. PMID 19812281.
- ^ Masliah-Planchon J, Breton G, Jarlier V, Simon A, Benveniste O, Herson S, Drieux L (June 2009). "Endocarditis due to Neisseria bacilliformis in a patient with a bicuspid aortic valve". Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 47 (6): 1973–5. doi:10.1128/JCM.00026-09. PMC 2691068. PMID 19386832.
- ^ a b Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Baddour LM, Levison M, et al. (October 2007). "Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group". Circulation. 116 (15): 1736–54. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.183095. PMID 17446442.
- ^ a b Yuan SM (2016). "Fungal Endocarditis". Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 31 (3): 252–255. doi:10.5935/1678-9741.20160026 (inactive 12 July 2025). PMC 5062704. PMID 27737409.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link) - ^ Izumi K, Hisata Y, Hazama S (October 2009). "A rare case of infective endocarditis complicated by Trichosporon asahii fungemia treated by surgery". Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 15 (5): 350–3. PMID 19901894.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Hoen B, Duval X (April 2013). "Clinical practice. Infective endocarditis". The New England Journal of Medicine. 368 (15): 1425–33. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1206782. PMID 23574121.
- ^ a b Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK (March 1994). "New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service". The American Journal of Medicine. 96 (3): 200–9. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(94)90143-0. PMID 8154507.
- ^ a b Weisse AB, Heller DR, Schimenti RJ, Montgomery RL, Kapila R (March 1993). "The febrile parenteral drug user: a prospective study in 121 patients". The American Journal of Medicine. 94 (3): 274–80. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(93)90059-X. PMID 8452151.
- ^ a b Samet JH, Shevitz A, Fowle J, Singer DE (July 1990). "Hospitalization decision in febrile intravenous drug users". The American Journal of Medicine. 89 (1): 53–7. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(90)90098-X. PMID 2368794.
- ^ a b c Marantz PR, Linzer M, Feiner CJ, Feinstein SA, Kozin AM, Friedland GH (June 1987). "Inability to predict diagnosis in febrile intravenous drug abusers". Annals of Internal Medicine. 106 (6): 823–8. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-106-6-823. PMID 3579068.
- ^ a b Leibovici L, Cohen O, Wysenbeek AJ (June 1990). "Occult bacterial infection in adults with unexplained fever. Validation of a diagnostic index". Archives of Internal Medicine. 150 (6): 1270–2. doi:10.1001/archinte.150.6.1270. PMID 2353860.
- ^ a b Mellors JW, Horwitz RI, Harvey MR, Horwitz SM (April 1987). "A simple index to identify occult bacterial infection in adults with acute unexplained fever". Archives of Internal Medicine. 147 (4): 666–71. doi:10.1001/archinte.147.4.666. PMID 3827454.
- ^ Yu CW, Juan LI, Hsu SC, Chen CK, Wu CW, Lee CC, Wu JY (June 2013). "Role of procalcitonin in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: a meta-analysis". The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 31 (6): 935–41. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2013.03.008. PMID 23601504.
- ^ Shively BK, Gurule FT, Roldan CA, Leggett JH, Schiller NB (August 1991). "Diagnostic value of transesophageal compared with transthoracic echocardiography in infective endocarditis". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 18 (2): 391–7. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(91)90591-V. PMID 1856406.
- ^ Erbel R, Rohmann S, Drexler M, Mohr-Kahaly S, Gerharz CD, Iversen S, Oelert H, Meyer J (January 1988). "Improved diagnostic value of echocardiography in patients with infective endocarditis by transoesophageal approach. A prospective study". European Heart Journal. 9 (1): 43–53. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062389. PMID 3345769.
- ^ a b c "UOTW #27 – Ultrasound of the Week". Ultrasound of the Week. 26 November 2014. Archived from the original on 9 May 2017. Retrieved 27 May 2017.
- ^ "UOTW #60 – Ultrasound of the Week". Ultrasound of the Week. 5 October 2015. Archived from the original on 9 May 2017. Retrieved 27 May 2017.
- ^ Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG, Ryan T, Bashore T, Corey GR (April 2000). "Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis". Clinical Infectious Diseases. 30 (4): 633–8. doi:10.1086/313753. PMID 10770721.
- ^ Salehi Omran, Setareh; Chatterjee, Abhinaba; Chen, Monica L.; Lerario, Michael P.; Merkler, Alexander E.; Kamel, Hooman (March 2019). "National Trends in Hospitalizations for Stroke Associated With Infective Endocarditis and Opioid Use Between 1993 and 2015". Stroke. 50 (3): 577–582. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024436. ISSN 0039-2499. PMC 6396300. PMID 30699043.
- ^ Kaech C, Elzi L, Sendi P, Frei R, Laifer G, Bassetti S, Fluckiger U (April 2006). "Course and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a retrospective analysis of 308 episodes in a Swiss tertiary-care centre". Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 12 (4): 345–52. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01359.x. PMID 16524411.
- ^ "Prophylaxis against infective endocarditis: Antimicrobial prophylaxis against infective endocarditis in adults and children undergoing interventional procedures". NICE Clinical Guidelines. National Institute for Health Care and Excellence (UK). March 2008. Archived from the original on 2013-01-26. Retrieved 2013-04-30.
- ^ Rutherford SJ, Glenny AM, Roberts G, Hooper L, Worthington HV (May 2022). "Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing bacterial endocarditis following dental procedures". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022 (5) CD003813. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003813.pub5. PMC 9088886. PMID 35536541.
- ^ "Prophylaxis against infective endocarditis: antimicrobial prophylaxis against infective endocarditis in adults and children undergoing interventional procedures". National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2008.
- ^ "Drug Prescribing". SDCEP. Retrieved 2018-01-25.
- ^ Cosgrove SE, Vigliani GA, Fowler VG, Abrutyn E, Corey GR, Levine DP, Rupp ME, Chambers HF, Karchmer AW, Boucher HW (March 2009). "Initial low-dose gentamicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis is nephrotoxic". Clinical Infectious Diseases. 48 (6): 713–21. doi:10.1086/597031. PMID 19207079.
- ^ a b c d Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG, Bolger AF, Levison ME, et al. (June 2005). "Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America". Circulation. 111 (23): e394–434. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.165564. PMID 15956145.
- ^ Kalavakunta JK, Davenport DS, Tokala H, King A, Khagny M, Gupta V (January 2011). "Destructive Abiotrophia defectiva endocarditis". The Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 20 (1): 111–2. PMID 21404910.
- ^ a b Rostagno C, Carone E, Stefàno PL (2017). "Role of mitral valve repair in active infective endocarditis: long term results". J Cardiothorac Surg. 12 (1) 29. doi:10.1186/s13019-017-0604-6. PMC 5437579. PMID 28521809.
- ^ Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. (September 2008). "2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 52 (13): e1–142. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007. PMID 18848134.
- ^ Anantha Narayanan M, Mahfood Haddad T, Kalil AC, Kanmanthareddy A, Suri RM, Mansour G, Destache CJ, Baskaran J, Mooss AN, Wichman T, Morrow L, Vivekanandan R (2016). "Early versus late surgical intervention or medical management for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Heart. 102 (12): 950–7. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308589. PMID 26869640. S2CID 12007082.
External links
[edit]Infective endocarditis
View on GrokipediaClassification
By clinical course
Infective endocarditis is classically classified by clinical course into acute and subacute forms, a distinction that guides initial diagnostic and therapeutic approaches based on the tempo of disease progression. Acute infective endocarditis is characterized by a rapid onset over days to weeks, presenting with high fever exceeding 38.0°C, chills, malaise, and severe systemic symptoms such as acute heart failure, often in patients who appear critically ill. This form is typically associated with highly virulent pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus, which account for approximately 30-40% of native valve cases and can infect previously normal valves.[7][8][9] In contrast, subacute infective endocarditis develops insidiously over weeks to months, with low-grade fever, fatigue, weakness, and nonspecific systemic manifestations like weight loss and anemia, allowing untreated patients to survive for up to a year. It is commonly linked to less aggressive organisms, including viridans group streptococci, which cause about 20% of community-acquired cases and predominantly affect damaged or abnormal valves.[7][8][9][10] The acute form carries a more aggressive prognosis, with higher risks of rapid valvular destruction, septic shock, and mortality rates of 30-40% if untreated, necessitating prompt intervention to prevent metastatic infections. Subacute cases, while insidious, pose risks of embolization and gradual heart failure, often presenting diagnostic challenges due to their subtle progression. This classification originated from pre-antibiotic era observations in the late 19th century, notably described by Sir William Osler in 1885, who provided the first comprehensive English-language account of the disease's clinical patterns.[7][8][9][10][8]By microbiology
Infective endocarditis (IE) is predominantly caused by bacteria, which account for 80% to 90% of cases.[7] Among these, Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen overall, responsible for approximately 30% of cases in developed countries, particularly in acute forms, nosocomial infections, and those associated with intravenous drug use.[7] Coagulase-negative staphylococci, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, are frequent in prosthetic valve endocarditis due to their affinity for indwelling devices and biomaterials.[7] The viridans group streptococci, including species like Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans, typically cause subacute IE on native valves, often originating from oral flora.[7] Enterococci, especially Enterococcus faecalis, are notable in elderly patients or those with gastrointestinal or genitourinary sources, comprising about 15% to 18% of cases depending on the acquisition setting.[7] Fungal causes of IE are rare, representing 1% to 5% of all cases but carrying a high mortality rate of up to 50% to 80%.[11] Candida species, particularly Candida albicans, are the most common fungal pathogens, accounting for over 50% of fungal IE and often linked to intravenous catheters, prosthetic valves, or immunosuppression.[11] Aspergillus species rank second, comprising about 25% of fungal cases, and are associated with similar risk factors but tend to involve more aggressive tissue invasion.[12] Other rare microbial causes include the HACEK group of fastidious gram-negative bacteria (Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, and Kingella species), which collectively cause 3% to 10% of community-acquired cases and require prolonged incubation for culture growth.[7] Intracellular pathogens like Coxiella burnetii (causing Q fever endocarditis) and Bartonella species (e.g., B. henselae or B. quintana, often in homeless individuals or those with cat exposure) are also uncommon but significant in culture-negative scenarios.[7] IE is classified as culture-positive in 70% to 95% of cases, where standard blood cultures identify the pathogen, but culture-negative IE occurs in 5% to 30% of instances, varying by region and influenced by prior antibiotic exposure, fastidious organisms, or nonbacterial etiologies.[13] In industrialized regions, culture-negative rates are around 10%, commonly due to organisms like Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella spp., or the HACEK group.[13] The 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases criteria update incorporates serological evidence, such as Bartonella IgG titer ≥1:800, as a major diagnostic criterion to improve identification in these challenging cases.[13] Recent epidemiological trends show an increasing incidence of S. aureus-associated IE, driven largely by the rise in intravenous drug use, which has led to higher rates of right-sided endocarditis and healthcare burdens in affected populations.[14]By anatomical location
Infective endocarditis is classified anatomically based on the primary site of infection within the cardiac structures, which influences clinical presentation, complications, and management strategies. The majority of cases involve the heart valves, but infection can also affect prosthetic materials, intracardiac devices, or non-valvular endocardial surfaces. This classification helps in understanding the hemodynamic and embolic risks associated with each location. Native valve endocarditis accounts for 70-80% of all cases and predominantly affects the left-sided valves, with the mitral valve involved in approximately 40-50% of instances and the aortic valve in 30-40%. It is often associated with underlying conditions such as congenital heart defects, rheumatic heart disease, or degenerative valve changes that create turbulent blood flow and endothelial damage, facilitating bacterial adhesion. Right-sided native valve involvement is less common in this category, typically limited to the tricuspid valve in specific populations. Prosthetic valve endocarditis comprises 20–30% of cases and is subdivided into early-onset (within 6 months post-surgery, often nosocomial and linked to perioperative contamination) and late-onset (beyond 6 months, resembling community-acquired native valve disease). Early prosthetic valve endocarditis carries a higher mortality rate, up to 40-50%, and frequently necessitates surgical intervention due to the risk of paravalvular abscesses and valve dehiscence. Mechanical and bioprosthetic valves are equally susceptible, though the former may involve more aggressive pathogens in the early phase.[15] Left-sided endocarditis, involving the mitral or aortic valves, represents about 80–95% of cases and is characterized by a higher risk of systemic embolization to organs such as the brain, kidneys, or spleen due to the direct pathway into the arterial circulation. In contrast, right-sided endocarditis, affecting the tricuspid or pulmonic valves in 5–10% of patients overall, is more prevalent among intravenous drug users and predisposes to pulmonary septic emboli, leading to infarcts or abscesses in the lungs. Symptoms may vary by side, with left-sided disease often presenting with more severe systemic manifestations. Surgical considerations, such as the need for valve replacement, are more urgent in left-sided cases due to heart failure risks.[16] Intracardiac device-related endocarditis has become increasingly common with the rising implantation of cardiac devices like pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), affecting 1-2% of device recipients over their lifetime. Infection typically involves the leads or generator pocket, leading to bacteremia and vegetation formation on device components, which often requires complete device removal for cure. The incidence has grown by 5-10% annually in parallel with device utilization rates. Non-valvular endocarditis is rarer, involving structures such as the mural endocardium (e.g., in ventricular aneurysms), chordae tendineae, or intracardiac septal defects, and accounts for less than 5% of cases. These infections often arise in the context of prior cardiac surgery or shunts, where endothelial disruption allows seeding, and may present with atypical vegetations that mimic tumors on imaging.By acquisition setting
Infective endocarditis (IE) is categorized by acquisition setting to facilitate identification of infection sources, guide epidemiological investigations, and inform prevention strategies. This classification distinguishes cases based on the patient's exposure to healthcare environments or high-risk behaviors prior to symptom onset, typically defined as community-acquired, healthcare-associated (including nosocomial and non-nosocomial subtypes), and injection drug use (IDU)-associated.[17][18] Community-acquired IE represents the majority of cases, comprising 50% to 70% of all IE episodes in various cohorts, and arises from transient bacteremia unrelated to recent healthcare contact. These infections often stem from endogenous sources such as oral or skin flora entering the bloodstream during routine activities, including dental manipulations, minor surgical procedures, or gastrointestinal interventions. Viridans group streptococci are the dominant pathogens in this setting, accounting for up to 40% of community-acquired cases, with other streptococci and Streptococcus gallolyticus also common; outcomes are generally favorable with appropriate antimicrobial therapy, though complications like embolization can occur.[17][19][18] Healthcare-associated IE accounts for 20% to 30% of cases and is subdivided into nosocomial (hospital-onset >48 hours after admission) and non-nosocomial (recent outpatient healthcare exposure, such as within 90 days of hospitalization, dialysis, or invasive procedures) subtypes. Nosocomial cases, which form about 10% to 15% of all IE, frequently originate from indwelling intravenous catheters, surgical wounds, or invasive diagnostics, with Staphylococcus aureus implicated in 40% to 50% of instances and associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates of 25% to 40% compared to community-acquired IE. Non-nosocomial healthcare-associated IE, often linked to chronic conditions requiring frequent medical interventions like hemodialysis or chemotherapy, shows similar pathogen profiles but may involve enterococci more prominently (up to 25%); these cases carry elevated risks of complications due to delayed diagnosis and multidrug-resistant organisms.[17][18][19] IDU-associated IE constitutes 10% to 20% of cases overall but has risen significantly amid the opioid epidemic, reaching up to one-third of IE admissions in affected regions, and predominantly affects the tricuspid valve in young adults. This subtype results from direct introduction of skin flora or environmental contaminants into the bloodstream via non-sterile injection practices, with S. aureus causing 60% to 70% of episodes and gram-negative bacilli like Pseudomonas aeruginosa involved in 10% to 20%; right-sided involvement predominates (70% to 90%), though left-sided disease occurs in 20% to 30% of cases, conferring higher mortality (up to 20% in-hospital). The increasing prevalence underscores the need for harm reduction, as recurrent infections are common due to ongoing use.[17][20][21] Within these categories, IE is further differentiated as non-device-related (most cases, involving native or prosthetic valves without implanted hardware) versus device-related (10% to 20% of healthcare-associated IE), where the latter involves cardiac implantable electronic devices, vascular grafts, or indwelling catheters like those for dialysis, often leading to persistent bacteremia and requiring device removal for cure.[17][22] Outbreaks of IE are rare but have been documented in IDU populations due to contaminated heroin batches or shared needles introducing specific pathogens, such as clostridial species or unusual gram-negatives, highlighting the role of public health surveillance in injection networks.[23][24]Causes and risk factors
Microbial causes
Infective endocarditis (IE) is predominantly caused by bacteria, with gram-positive organisms accounting for 80-90% of identified cases worldwide.[7] Transient bacteremia serves as the primary mechanism for bacterial entry into the bloodstream, leading to seeding of the endocardium, particularly at sites of endothelial damage. Common portals include the oral cavity, where poor hygiene or dental procedures introduce viridans group streptococci (responsible for approximately 20% of community-acquired cases); the skin, via intravenous drug use or injections that facilitate entry of Staphylococcus aureus (causing about 30% of cases in developed countries); and the gastrointestinal or genitourinary tracts, where procedures or infections allow enterococci (in ~10% of cases) or Streptococcus gallolyticus (linked to colonic lesions in ~15% of streptococcal cases) to disseminate.[7][25] These bacteria adhere to damaged valves, forming vegetations that perpetuate infection.[7] Fungal causes are rare, comprising only 1-10% of IE cases, but carry high mortality due to aggressive tissue invasion and diagnostic challenges.[26] Candida species, especially C. albicans and C. parapsilosis, predominate, often entering via central venous catheters or broad-spectrum antibiotic use that disrupts normal flora, particularly in intensive care unit patients.[26] Aspergillus species follow, typically through airborne inhalation or direct extension in immunocompromised hosts.[26] Recent trends indicate an increasing incidence of fungal IE among immunocompromised individuals, such as organ transplant recipients or those on prolonged immunosuppression, driven by rising candidemia rates in aging populations.[27] This uptick, noted in reviews from 2023-2025, underscores the need for vigilant monitoring in high-risk settings.[27] Culture-negative IE accounts for 5-10% of cases, often resulting from prior antibiotic exposure that sterilizes blood cultures or from fastidious, intracellular pathogens.[25] Notable examples include Coxiella burnetii (Q fever agent), acquired via inhalation from livestock exposure, and Bartonella species (e.g., B. quintana or B. henselae), transmitted by vectors like lice or cats, respectively.[7][25] Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on valvular tissue has improved detection rates to ~66% in these scenarios, as highlighted in 2023 diagnostic updates.[25] Emerging challenges stem from antibiotic-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), which predominates in healthcare-associated IE (up to 50% of nosocomial cases) due to hospital exposures and device-related bacteremia, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), increasingly reported in patients with prior broad-spectrum antibiotic use or gastrointestinal procedures.[7][28] These resistant strains complicate empiric therapy and contribute to higher morbidity, with MRSA linked to more aggressive disease progression.[28]Predisposing factors
Infective endocarditis susceptibility is markedly increased by underlying cardiac conditions that disrupt normal blood flow or provide surfaces for microbial adhesion. Valvular abnormalities, such as mitral valve prolapse and bicuspid aortic valve, are common predisposing factors, as they generate turbulent flow and endothelial damage. Valvular insufficiency (regurgitation) represents an important predisposing condition because turbulent blood flow causes endothelial damage and promotes bacterial adhesion. However, there is no strong evidence that isolated elevated CRP levels directly increase the risk of developing IE in patients with valvular insufficiency; CRP serves as a marker of active inflammation or infection rather than a predisposing factor.[29] Congenital heart disease, particularly unrepaired cyanotic forms or repaired defects with residual valvular insufficiency, further elevates risk by creating similar hemodynamic disturbances. Prior episodes of infective endocarditis represent the highest risk, with recurrence rates up to 10% in affected individuals due to persistent structural vulnerabilities.[7] The presence of prosthetic materials significantly heightens susceptibility by introducing foreign surfaces conducive to biofilm formation and non-laminar flow patterns. Prosthetic heart valves, whether mechanical or bioprosthetic, are associated with a significantly increased incidence (0.3–1.2% per patient-year) compared to native valves, particularly in the early postoperative period.[30] Similarly, cardiac devices such as pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and ventricular assist devices promote adhesion through exposed synthetic components.[7] Behavioral risks play a critical role in host predisposition, primarily through direct endothelial injury or recurrent bacteremia. Intravenous drug use, often involving opioids, causes repeated vascular trauma and introduces pathogens directly into the bloodstream, accounting for approximately 10-30% of cases and leading to a notable rise in infections among young adults amid the ongoing opioid epidemic. Poor dental hygiene contributes via transient bacteremia from oral flora, with inadequate flossing or untreated gum disease increasing exposure to viridans streptococci.[7][31] Comorbidities that impair immune function or vascular integrity also predispose individuals to infective endocarditis. Diabetes mellitus is linked to higher infection rates and worse outcomes through microvascular damage and hyperglycemia-induced immune dysregulation. Chronic kidney disease, especially in patients on hemodialysis, elevates risk via frequent vascular access and uremia-related immunosuppression. Immunosuppressive states, including HIV infection and chemotherapy, further compromise host defenses, facilitating opportunistic pathogens.[7][32] Demographic factors influence overall vulnerability, with advanced age over 60 years associated with degenerative valve changes and multimorbidity, contributing to the majority of cases in developed countries. Male sex predominates with a 2:1 ratio, possibly due to higher rates of IV drug use and healthcare exposures. Conversely, recent trends indicate a surge in cases among younger adults, driven by opioid-related IV drug use, with hospitalizations for injection drug use-associated endocarditis increasing 12-fold from 2007 to recent years.[7][33]Pathophysiology
Initial adhesion and vegetation formation
The initial step in the pathogenesis of infective endocarditis involves endothelial damage to the cardiac endocardium, typically caused by turbulent blood flow across damaged or abnormal valves, which exposes subendothelial collagen and tissue factor.[7] This injury can also result from mechanical trauma, such as indwelling catheters or intravenous drug use, creating a receptive surface for thrombus formation.[7] Following endothelial disruption, platelet activation and fibrin deposition occur, leading to the formation of non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE), characterized by sterile vegetations composed of platelets and fibrin on the valve surfaces.[7] These sterile thrombi serve as a nidus for microbial colonization during episodes of bacteremia.[7] Microorganisms, particularly virulent pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus, adhere to the exposed extracellular matrix proteins such as fibronectin and fibrinogen within the NBTE lesions via specific adhesins, including fibronectin-binding proteins A and B (FnBPA and FnBPB).[34] This adhesion is facilitated by bacterial surface proteins that bind to the fibrin-platelet scaffold, promoting initial colonization and subsequent proliferation.[35] Once adhered, bacteria embed within a protective extracellular polymeric substance matrix, forming biofilms that shield them from host immune defenses and antimicrobial agents, thereby enabling persistent infection and vegetation enlargement.[36] This process adapts Virchow's triad—endothelial injury, hemodynamic stasis from turbulent flow, and hypercoagulability via platelet-fibrin deposition—to explain the localized thrombotic predisposition on endocardial surfaces.[7]Immune response and complications
The host immune response to infective endocarditis (IE) involves a robust inflammatory cascade triggered by persistent microbial antigens on valvular vegetations. Proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) are significantly elevated in serum during active infection, contributing to systemic symptoms like fever and malaise by promoting endothelial activation and acute-phase responses. [37] Complement activation, primarily through the classical pathway mediated by circulating immune complexes, further amplifies this response, leading to opsonization of pathogens but also potential tissue injury when dysregulated. [38] A major complication arises from embolization, where fragments of friable vegetations dislodge into the bloodstream, forming septic emboli that disseminate infection. These emboli commonly target the brain (causing ischemic strokes or abscesses in up to 65% of nonpulmonary cases), spleen (leading to infarction or abscess in 19–32% of cases), and kidneys (resulting in infarcts or acute renal injury in 6–14% of cases), often manifesting as focal organ dysfunction. [39] Local complications stem from the extension of infection beyond the valve, eroding surrounding structures. Valve perforation disrupts leaflet integrity, causing acute regurgitation, while perivalvular abscesses—particularly in the aortic root—can invade the annulus and myocardium, leading to ring abscesses. These abscesses frequently result in conduction abnormalities, such as high-degree atrioventricular heart block in 10–20% of aortic valve IE cases, due to proximity to the atrioventricular node. [17] Immune complex phenomena occur as bacterial antigens persist in circulation, forming complexes that deposit in vascular and glomerular endothelium. This deposition triggers glomerulonephritis, characterized by hypocomplementemia and renal inflammation in a subset of patients. Peripheral manifestations include Osler's nodes (painful, tender nodules on the finger pads from immune vasculitis) and Roth spots (retinal hemorrhages with pale centers), both recognized as minor diagnostic criteria for IE. [40] [17] Chronic sequelae primarily involve cardiac remodeling from ongoing valvular damage, culminating in heart failure due to severe regurgitation and ventricular dilation. In right-sided IE, the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines highlight an elevated embolic risk, particularly to the pulmonary circulation, where septic emboli can cause infarcts and respiratory compromise, necessitating vigilant monitoring for vegetation size greater than 10 mm. [41]Clinical presentation
Signs and symptoms
Infective endocarditis typically presents with a combination of constitutional, cardiac, and peripheral manifestations, reflecting systemic infection and local valvular involvement. The clinical features vary based on the infecting organism's virulence, the affected valve, and the patient's underlying conditions, with symptoms often developing over days in acute cases or weeks to months in subacute forms.[7][42] Constitutional symptoms are nearly universal and often the initial complaints. Fever, typically exceeding 38°C, occurs in over 95% of patients, accompanied by chills, night sweats, malaise, fatigue, anorexia, weight loss, and generalized weakness.[7] These symptoms arise from the ongoing bacteremia and inflammatory response, and they may be low-grade and insidious in subacute presentations or high-grade with rigors in acute cases.[42][17] Cardiac manifestations include signs of valvular dysfunction and hemodynamic compromise. A new or changing heart murmur, indicative of regurgitation, is detected in 47-85% of cases, though it may be absent early on.[7][42][8] Symptoms of heart failure, such as dyspnea, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, edema, and fatigue, develop in up to 40% of patients, particularly with left-sided involvement leading to acute valvular insufficiency.[17][42] Chest pain or tachycardia may also occur, and conduction abnormalities like heart block can signal perivalvular extension.[7] Peripheral stigmata represent immune-mediated or embolic phenomena and aid in clinical recognition, though they are less common in modern series. Osler's nodes, painful tender nodules on the finger or toe pads, occur in fewer than 10% of cases and reflect vasculitis.[7] Janeway lesions, painless erythematous macules or hemorrhages on the palms or soles, are similarly infrequent (<10%) and result from septic emboli.[7] Splinter hemorrhages, linear subungual streaks under the nails, are seen in <10% and may appear in chronic cases.[7] Roth spots, retinal hemorrhages with pale centers, are rare but pathognomonic when present.[42] Digital clubbing may develop in prolonged subacute infections. Petechiae on the conjunctivae, oral mucosa, or extremities occur in up to 20-30% and are nonspecific.[42] Splenomegaly is noted in about 20-50% of left-sided cases due to immune hyperplasia or infarction.[42] Presentations differ by acuity and location. Acute infective endocarditis, often caused by Staphylococcus aureus, features rapid onset with severe sepsis, high fever, toxicity, and prominent cardiac decompensation, affecting even normal valves.[17][7] In contrast, subacute forms, typically due to viridans streptococci or enterococci, have an insidious course with prominent constitutional and peripheral symptoms over weeks.[42] Right-sided endocarditis, common in injection drug users, manifests with pulmonary symptoms such as cough, pleuritic chest pain, hemoptysis, and dyspnea from septic emboli to the lungs, alongside tricuspid regurgitation murmur.[17][42]Associated complications
Infective endocarditis (IE) frequently leads to embolic events, occurring in 13% to 49% of cases clinically, with asymptomatic events detected in up to 86% via imaging such as MRI.[43] These emboli, originating from valvular vegetations, commonly affect the cerebral circulation, causing ischemic strokes in 20% to 40% of left-sided IE patients, and may result in hemorrhagic transformation or meningitis.[43] Splenic involvement manifests as infarcts or abscesses, with subclinical events in up to 61% on contrast ultrasound, while renal emboli contribute to infarction and acute kidney injury.[43] In right-sided IE, pulmonary emboli predominate, affecting 34% to 55% of patients with vegetations ≥1 cm.[43] Cardiac complications arise from local extension of infection or embolization. Acute valvular regurgitation develops due to vegetation-induced valve destruction, often precipitating heart failure as a major sequela.[17] Perivalvular abscesses occur in 10% to 40% of native valve IE and up to 56% to 100% of prosthetic valve cases, potentially leading to fistulas or annular rupture.[17] Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a particularly severe form of IE, with complications including heart failure, prosthetic valve dehiscence, intracardiac fistula, pseudoaneurysm, embolic events (e.g., stroke), persistent bacteremia despite appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and higher mortality rates compared to native valve endocarditis. These complications often require aggressive surgical intervention for cure.[44][17] In complex PVE cases, particularly those with extensive annular abscesses, multiple valve involvement can occur and is associated with greater surgical complexity (e.g., requiring extensive reconstruction or multiple valve replacement), longer operative times, and poorer long-term survival (mean survival 6.4 ± 1.5 years in multiple-valve cases versus 11.5 ± 1.1 years in single-valve cases in a study of aortic PVE).[45] Conduction abnormalities, such as atrioventricular block, result from abscess extension near the conduction system, with new AV block showing an 88% positive predictive value for abscess presence.[17] Myocardial infarction from coronary emboli is less common but increases heart failure risk.[17] Neurological complications affect 20% to 40% of IE patients, primarily through embolic mechanisms. Ischemic stroke is the most frequent, presenting with focal deficits or encephalopathy, while intracranial hemorrhage occurs in 4% to 27% and may involve microhemorrhages in up to 57%.[46] Seizures arise in association with strokes, hemorrhages, or abscesses, and meningitis complicates 1% to 20% of cases, often with nuchal rigidity or headache.[46] Renal complications include immune-mediated glomerulonephritis and embolic injury, contributing to acute kidney injury (AKI) in 6% to 30% of patients, though some series report up to two-thirds affected.[47][48] Glomerulonephritis, characterized by hypocomplementemia and immune complex deposition, leads to proteinuria and hematuria, while embolic infarcts exacerbate AKI progression.[48] Other systemic issues encompass sepsis and multi-organ failure, with septic shock developing in approximately 12% of cases and carrying high mortality.[49] Recent cohorts highlight increasing mycotic aneurysms, occurring in 2% to 4% of left-sided IE, predominantly cerebral and risking rupture with 35% to 40% mortality.[43]Diagnosis
Diagnostic criteria
The diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) relies on standardized criteria that integrate clinical, microbiological, and imaging findings to classify cases as definite, possible, or rejected. The Modified Duke criteria, originally proposed in 2000, provide the foundational framework for this diagnosis.[50] These criteria are divided into major and minor categories: major criteria include evidence of endocardial involvement, such as echocardiographic findings of vegetations, abscesses, new valvular regurgitation, or dehiscence of a prosthetic valve, and microbiological evidence, such as persistently positive blood cultures for typical IE pathogens (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, viridans group streptococci) or a single positive culture for Coxiella burnetii or phase I IgG antibody titer >1:800 for that organism.[50] Minor criteria encompass predisposing heart conditions or injection drug use, fever greater than 38°C, vascular phenomena (e.g., septic emboli, mycotic aneurysm), immunologic phenomena (e.g., glomerulonephritis, Osler nodes), and microbiological or echocardiographic findings that do not meet major criteria thresholds.[50] In 2023, the Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (Duke-ISCVID) updated these criteria to incorporate advances in diagnostics and address limitations in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and culture-negative cases.[51] Key modifications include elevating cardiac computed tomography (CT), [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT ([18F]FDG PET/CT), and intraoperative inspection as major imaging criteria specifically for PVE and cardiac device-related IE, enhancing detection of perivalvular complications.[51] Microbiological updates expand typical pathogens to include Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Enterococcus faecalis, incorporate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or metagenomic sequencing on blood, valve tissue, or emboli for culture-negative IE (e.g., for Bartonella spp., Tropheryma whipplei), and specify serologic thresholds such as IgG titer ≥1:800 for both Coxiella burnetii and Bartonella species.[51] These changes aim to improve diagnostic accuracy in complex cases without altering the core structure of major and minor criteria. Under both the Modified Duke and 2023 Duke-ISCVID frameworks, IE is classified as definite if two major criteria are met, or one major criterion plus three minor criteria, or five minor criteria; additionally, pathologic evidence from histopathology or microscopy confirming endocardial involvement fulfills definite diagnosis.[50][51] Possible IE is diagnosed with one major and one minor criterion or three minor criteria alone, while rejected IE applies in the presence of a firm alternative diagnosis, resolution of manifestations after fewer than four days of antibiotics, or absence of pathologic evidence at surgery or autopsy despite prolonged antibiotic therapy.[50][51] The Modified Duke criteria demonstrate approximately 70% sensitivity for definite IE, with specificity around 80-90%, though integration of echocardiography boosts overall performance to around 85-90% sensitivity in validated cohorts.[52] The 2023 updates further enhance sensitivity to about 84% in external validations, particularly for PVE, without compromising specificity.[53] Despite these strengths, the criteria have limitations, including reduced sensitivity (around 50-70%) in culture-negative or early IE cases where microbiological evidence is absent, potentially delaying diagnosis in patients with fastidious organisms or prior antibiotic exposure.[51] External validation of the 2023 criteria is ongoing to confirm their performance across diverse populations.[51]Imaging modalities
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) serves as the first-line imaging modality for suspected infective endocarditis due to its non-invasive nature and accessibility. It effectively detects vegetations larger than 2 mm, which typically appear as irregular, mobile echogenic masses attached to valves or endocardium; in certain medical contexts, particularly Indian echocardiography reports, vegetations appearing as a bunch-like or clustered mass are descriptively termed "guchha" type (from Hindi for "bunch" or "cluster"), valvular regurgitation, and other cardiac abnormalities, with a sensitivity of 60-70% for native valve endocarditis and approximately 50% for prosthetic valve endocarditis.[54] TTE is particularly useful in initial screening for right-sided endocarditis in patients with good acoustic windows, though its diagnostic yield is limited by obesity, lung disease, or prosthetic materials that obscure visualization. TTE may not fully characterize complex valvular damage leading to regurgitation, particularly eccentric jets. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides higher resolution imaging of the heart, especially the atria and prosthetic valves, and is indicated when TTE is negative or non-diagnostic but clinical suspicion remains high. TEE achieves a sensitivity of 90-100% for detecting vegetations and perivalvular complications in native valves, outperforming TTE in prosthetic cases where sensitivity reaches 70-90%.[55] It is particularly valuable for identifying the mechanisms of valvular regurgitation in infective endocarditis, such as leaflet perforation, chordal rupture, or flail leaflet caused by vegetations, which commonly result in eccentric mitral regurgitation (MR) jets. These eccentric jets often direct along the atrial wall (e.g., posteriorly) and, due to the Coanda effect (wall-hugging phenomenon), cause color Doppler jet area to underestimate MR severity. Accurate quantification and mechanism identification require an integrative assessment, including vena contracta width, proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method (applied with caution in eccentric jets), volumetric methods, pulmonary vein flow reversal, and 3D TEE for enhanced visualization of perforation shape, size, location, and regurgitation severity. New or eccentric regurgitant jets may indicate underlying endocarditis even without initially visible vegetations. TEE is recommended as a complementary tool in all cases of prosthetic or device-related endocarditis to assess for abscesses, pseudoaneurysms, and fistula formation. Recent updates in the 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases criteria incorporate 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) as a major diagnostic criterion for prosthetic valve and cardiac device infective endocarditis.[13] This modality excels in identifying metabolic activity in infected tissues, with sensitivity of 70-90% for prosthetic valve involvement, and is particularly valuable for detecting perivalvular extensions, extracardiac emboli, and occult infection sites not visible on echocardiography. It is recommended for cases with inconclusive echocardiographic findings, especially within the first three months post-implantation to avoid false positives from inflammation. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play adjunctive roles in evaluating complications and anatomy in complex infective endocarditis cases. Multidetector CT offers high spatial resolution for identifying perivalvular abscesses, mycotic aneurysms, and embolic phenomena, with sensitivity exceeding 80% for these features, and is useful preoperatively to delineate coronary anatomy. MRI is superior for assessing neurological and musculoskeletal emboli, detecting silent brain lesions in up to 60% of cases, though it has limited direct utility in cardiac vegetation imaging. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines advocate a multi-modality imaging approach, integrating TTE/TEE with advanced techniques like 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT for high-risk patients, such as those with prosthetic valves or devices, to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide management. This strategy enhances the overall sensitivity of imaging from 60-70% with echocardiography alone to over 90% in challenging scenarios.Laboratory investigations
Laboratory investigations play a crucial role in supporting the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) by identifying microbiological evidence, inflammatory responses, and associated systemic effects. Blood cultures remain the cornerstone, with at least three sets obtained from separate venipuncture sites before initiating antibiotic therapy to maximize yield and identify the causative pathogen.[17] In culture-positive IE cases, blood cultures are positive in approximately 90% when drawn prior to antibiotics, with typical pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus or enterococci detected in two or more sets serving as a major diagnostic criterion per the 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria.[56] For suspected acute IE, cultures should be spaced 30-60 minutes apart if the patient is unstable, though standard practice recommends obtaining them over 1-2 hours to detect intermittent bacteremia.[57] Inflammatory markers are often elevated and provide supportive evidence, though they are nonspecific. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a highly sensitive marker of inflammation in IE, with levels elevated in nearly all cases (98–100% in published series) and typically markedly increased (median values around 80–90 mg/L in various cohorts); CRP is more sensitive than erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for supporting the diagnosis. ESR is typically >50 mm/h in approximately 56% of cases. CRP levels commonly exceed 10 mg/L in most patients, often much higher. These markers are not incorporated into the major or minor criteria of the Duke frameworks but are valuable for supporting clinical suspicion of IE, monitoring treatment response through serial measurements, and prognostic assessment, as persistently high CRP levels or a slow decline during therapy are associated with increased risk of complications and adverse outcomes.[29][58] Urinalysis frequently reveals renal involvement from immune complex deposition or emboli, with microscopic hematuria in up to 50% of cases and proteinuria in those with glomerulonephritis.[56] This finding supports a minor diagnostic criterion when accompanied by acute kidney injury and other features like cellular casts.[52] In culture-negative IE, which accounts for 10-30% of cases often due to prior antibiotics or fastidious organisms, serologic testing and PCR are essential for pathogens like Coxiella burnetii (Q fever), Bartonella species, and fungi. The 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria designate serologic evidence as a major criterion, specifying C. burnetii phase I IgG titer >1:800 or Bartonella IgG ≥1:800, while PCR detection of these organisms in blood or valve tissue also qualifies as major.[52] Fungal IE may require broad PCR panels on excised valve material, as serology is less standardized.[59] Additional tests include rheumatoid factor, which is positive in about 50% of subacute IE cases as part of immunologic phenomena and serves as a minor criterion.[52] Troponin levels may be elevated in approximately 27% of patients, indicating myocardial involvement such as abscess or ischemia, and are associated with increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 7.3).[60]Management
Antimicrobial therapy
Antimicrobial therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for infective endocarditis (IE), aiming to eradicate the infecting pathogen while minimizing toxicity and addressing potential complications. Therapy must be bactericidal, typically administered intravenously for extended periods, and tailored based on pathogen identification, susceptibility testing, and patient factors such as valve type and comorbidities. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines emphasize prompt initiation of empirical antibiotics after blood cultures are obtained, followed by de-escalation to targeted regimens once microbiology results are available, with multidisciplinary input from endocarditis teams to optimize outcomes.[30] Empirical therapy is initiated in suspected IE to cover common pathogens, including staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci, pending culture results. For community-acquired native valve endocarditis (NVE), the recommended regimen is vancomycin (30 mg/kg/day IV in two doses, adjusted for renal function) plus ceftriaxone (2 g IV every 12 hours), providing broad coverage without routine aminoglycoside addition to reduce nephrotoxicity risk. In prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) or nosocomial cases, the regimen includes vancomycin plus ceftriaxone plus rifampin (300 mg IV/PO every 8 hours), with gentamicin (1 mg/kg IV every 8 hours for the first 2 weeks) added if enterococcal infection is suspected, to address staphylococcal biofilms on foreign material. These recommendations are class I, level B, reflecting observational data and expert consensus.[30][5] Once the pathogen is identified, therapy is adjusted to targeted regimens based on minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and local resistance patterns. For penicillin-susceptible viridans group streptococci or Streptococcus gallolyticus causing NVE, options include penicillin G (12-18 million units/day IV continuous or in 4-6 doses) or ceftriaxone (2 g IV once daily) for 4 weeks, which is sufficient for uncomplicated cases without gentamicin synergy. In methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) IE, vancomycin (target trough 15-20 mg/L) or daptomycin (10 mg/kg IV once daily) is used for at least 6 weeks, with daptomycin preferred in cases of vancomycin failure or high MICs due to better tissue penetration. For Enterococcus faecalis, ampicillin (2 g IV every 4 hours) plus ceftriaxone (2 g IV every 12 hours) for 4-6 weeks is standard for NVE, avoiding gentamicin if renal impairment exists, as supported by randomized trial data showing equivalent efficacy to ampicillin-gentamicin combinations.[30] The total duration of therapy is typically 4-6 weeks for NVE and at least 6 weeks for PVE, starting from the first day of effective therapy, with longer courses for complicated cases involving perivalvular abscesses or persistent bacteremia. Recent evidence from the POET trial supports partial oral therapy in stable patients after an initial 10-day intravenous phase, randomizing them to oral regimens (e.g., linezolid or moxifloxacin-based) versus continued IV, demonstrating noninferiority for 90-day mortality and complications (13% vs. 12.6%). This approach, updated in 2023 Danish guidelines via the POETry implementation study, allows outpatient management in low-risk patients with negative follow-up blood cultures, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) confirmation of vegetation stability, and no signs of heart failure, reducing hospitalization length without increased adverse events.[30] Fungal IE, often caused by Candida or Aspergillus species, requires aggressive therapy due to high mortality (up to 50%), with liposomal amphotericin B (3-5 mg/kg IV daily) as first-line, combined with flucytosine (25 mg/kg PO four times daily) for 6 weeks minimum, followed by lifelong oral suppression with fluconazole (400 mg daily) in survivors. Surgical debridement is nearly always indicated alongside antifungals, as medical therapy alone yields poor cure rates.[30] Therapy monitoring involves serial blood cultures (negative within 3-7 days indicating response), serum antibiotic levels (e.g., vancomycin troughs, gentamicin peaks), inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP)—which is highly sensitive and elevated in nearly all cases of IE, with serial measurements providing valuable prognostic information as persistently elevated or slowly declining levels are associated with complications and adverse outcomes—and repeat echocardiography to assess vegetation size and complications.[29][61] The 2023 ESC guidelines stress the role of multidisciplinary endocarditis teams in overseeing therapy adjustments, with class I recommendation for their involvement to improve adherence and outcomes.[30] Rising antimicrobial resistance poses challenges, particularly with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), where incidence in IE has increased due to nosocomial spread, necessitating alternatives like daptomycin (8-12 mg/kg IV daily) combined with beta-lactams or linezolid (600 mg IV/PO twice daily) for 6 weeks, though data are limited to case series showing variable success rates (50-70% cure). Multidisciplinary consultation is essential for VRE cases to select regimens based on susceptibility and avoid monotherapy failures.[62][63]| Pathogen/Group | Regimen Example (NVE, uncomplicated) | Duration | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empirical (community-acquired) | Vancomycin + ceftriaxone | Until cultures available | [30] |
| Viridans streptococci (penicillin-susceptible) | Penicillin G or ceftriaxone | 4 weeks | [30] |
| MRSA | Vancomycin or daptomycin | ≥6 weeks | [30] |
| Enterococcus faecalis | Ampicillin + ceftriaxone | 4-6 weeks | [30] |
| Fungal (Candida) | Liposomal amphotericin B + flucytosine, then fluconazole suppression | ≥6 weeks + lifelong | [30] |
| VRE | Daptomycin + beta-lactam or linezolid | ≥6 weeks | [62] |
