Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Lockheed L-1011 TriStar
View on Wikipedia
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar (pronounced "El-ten-eleven")[1] is an American medium-to-long-range, wide-body trijet airliner built by the Lockheed Corporation. It was the third wide-body airliner to enter commercial operations, after the Boeing 747 and the McDonnell Douglas DC-10. The airliner has a seating capacity of up to 400 passengers and a range of over 4,000 nautical miles (7,410 km; 4,600 mi). Its trijet configuration has three Rolls-Royce RB211 engines with one engine under each wing, and a third engine center-mounted in the rear fuselage with an S-duct air inlet on the top of the fuselage. The aircraft has an autoland capability, an automated descent control system, and available lower deck galley and lounge facilities.
Key Information
The L-1011 TriStar was produced in two fuselage lengths. The original L-1011-1 first flew in November 1970 and entered service with Eastern Air Lines in 1972. The shortened, longer range L-1011-500 first flew in 1978 and entered service with British Airways a year later. The original-length TriStar was also produced as the high gross weight L-1011-100, the up-rated engine L-1011-200, and the further upgraded L-1011-250. Post-production conversions for the L-1011-1 with increased takeoff weights included the L-1011-50 and L-1011-150.
The L-1011 TriStar's sales were hampered by two years of delays due to developmental and financial problems at Rolls-Royce, the sole manufacturer of the aircraft's engines. Between 1968 and 1984, Lockheed manufactured a total of 250 TriStars, assembled at the Lockheed plant located at the Palmdale Regional Airport in southern California north of Los Angeles. After L-1011 production ended, Lockheed withdrew from the commercial aircraft business due to its below-target sales.[2] As of 2025, only one L-1011 is in service, as Stargazer.
Development
[edit]Origins
[edit]In the 1960s, American Airlines approached Lockheed and competitor Douglas (later McDonnell Douglas) with the need for an airliner that could carry 250 passengers on transcontinental routes.[3] Lockheed had not produced civilian airliners since 1961 with the L-188 Electra. In the 1950s the Electra was designed for turboprop propulsion, which Lockheed successfully used on the C-130 Hercules military transport. Even after the Electra overcame vibration problems that caused several crashes early in its career, the market for large airliners would soon shift over to jet airliners such as the Boeing 707 and Douglas DC-8.[4][5][6] Lockheed won contracts for jet military transports with the C-141 StarLifter, and pioneered very large jet transports with the large C-5 Galaxy with its high-bypass turbofan engines. Boeing lost the military contract, but its private-venture 747 would later capture a much larger civilian airliner market for wide-body airliners.
Having experienced difficulties with some of its military programs, Lockheed was eager to re-enter the civilian market with a smaller wide-body jet, and its response was the L-1011 TriStar. Douglas Aircraft answered American Airlines with the DC-10, which had a similar three-engine configuration and dimensions.[7] Despite their similarities, the L-1011 and DC-10's engineering approach differed greatly. McDonnell, who had recently taken over Douglas Aircraft, directed DC-10 development on a "very firm budget, and cost overruns were unacceptable – even at the expense of safety", and the conservative approach meant reusing Douglas DC-8 technology. By contrast, Lockheed would "take the most advanced technology of the day and when that technology was lacking, Lockheed created it" for the L-1011[8] to give it lower noise emissions, improved reliability, and higher efficiency over first-generation jet airliners. The TriStar name was selected in a Lockheed employee naming contest for the airliner.[citation needed] The advanced technology that went into the TriStar resulted in a high purchase price.[citation needed]



The TriStar's design featured a twin-aisle interior with a maximum of 400 passengers and a three-engine layout. The TriStar was originally conceived as a "jumbo twin", but a three-engine design was ultimately chosen to give the aircraft enough thrust to take off from existing runways.[7] Also, before the establishment of Extended Operations standards by the FAA in the 1980s, commercial jets with only two engines were not allowed to fly more than 60 minutes away from an airport, making trans-oceanic flights impossible. The main visible difference between the TriStar and its similar trijet competitor, the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, is the center engine position: the DC-10's engine is mounted above the fuselage for simplicity of design and more economical construction, while the TriStar's engine is installed in the rear fuselage with air entering through an S-duct for reduced drag and improved stability.[9][10] Lockheed was able to keep the pressure loss in the S-duct similar to that in a straight duct by limiting the duct curvature. Incorporating the S-duct made the airframe lighter than with a straight duct installation. The research undertaken during the design of the L-1011 indicated that losses of using an S-duct were more than compensated for by the above savings.[11] A further major difference between the L-1011 and the DC-10 was Lockheed's selection of the Rolls-Royce RB211 as the only engine option for the L-1011.[12][13] As originally designed, the RB211 turbofan was an advanced three-spool design with a carbon fiber fan,[14] which would have better efficiency and power-to-weight ratio than any competing engine like the General Electric CF6 that powered the DC-10. In theory, the triple spool would produce the same or more power as existing double spool engines while having a smaller cross section that would reduce drag.[8][9]
American Airlines opted for the Douglas DC-10, although it showed considerable interest in the L-1011. American intended to convince Douglas to lower its price for the DC-10, which it did.[15] Without the support of American, the TriStar was launched on orders from TWA and Eastern Air Lines.[citation needed]

Although the TriStar's design schedule closely followed that of its competitor, McDonnell Douglas beat Lockheed to market by a year due to delays in powerplant development. In February 1971, after massive development costs associated with the RB211, Rolls-Royce went into receivership.[16][17] This halted L-1011 final assembly and Lockheed investigated the possibility of a US engine supplier.[18] However the engineering was finalized at that stage in the TriStar's development and its S-duct, which was designed to fit the smaller cross-section of the triple spool RB-211 engine that would have reduced drag, was too small in diameter to accommodate an existing double spool engine.[9] One option presented was potential outsource of RB-211 production to Canadian manufacturer Orenda Engines.[19]
The British government agreed to approve a large state subsidy to restart Rolls-Royce operations on condition that the U.S. government guarantee the bank loans Lockheed needed to complete the L-1011 project.[Note 1] Despite some opposition, not least from the then Governor of California, Ronald Reagan, the U.S. government provided these guarantees.[21] For the rest of the RB211 project, Rolls-Royce remained a government-owned company.[22]
Production
[edit]
The TriStar's internal Lockheed model number is L-093. The TriStar was manufactured in Lockheed facilities in Burbank and Palmdale, California. The prototype L-1011 first flew on November 16, 1970.[23] The L-1011 was certified on April 14, 1972, with the first airliner delivered to Eastern Air Lines on April 26, 1972.[23] In 1972, its unit cost was US$20 million (~$113 million in 2024).[24] To further publicize the new aircraft, an L-1011, possibly the prototype, was taken on a world tour during 1972 by famed Lockheed test pilot Tony LeVier. In a demonstration by test pilots LeVier and Charles Hall, 115 crew members, employees, and reporters embarked on the TriStar for a 4-hour, 13-minute flight from Palmdale to Dulles Airport "with the TriStar's AFCS [Automatic Flight Control System] feature engaged from takeoff roll to landing", and Lockheed touted it as "a groundbreaking moment: the first cross-country flight without the need for human hands on the controls".[3]
Lockheed discovered fairly early on that the TriStar suffered from higher than estimated structural weight, engine weight, and specific fuel consumption. To rectify this problem and to meet performance guarantees, Lockheed developed a structural kit that allowed maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) to be increased on production aircraft from 409,000 to 430,000 pounds (186,000 to 195,000 kg). However, the weight problems affected the weight and desirability of early production L-1011-1 aircraft, known as Group 1 (serial numbers 1002 through to 1012).[citation needed]
Group 1 aircraft have an Operating empty weight (OEW) of 252,700 pounds (114,600 kg), about 12,700 pounds (5,800 kg) higher than later aircraft, while Group 2 aircraft (serial numbers 1013 through 1051) have an OEW of 247,000 pounds (112,000 kg), some 4,700 pounds (2,100 kg) lower. These aircraft, in general, also have different center of gravity envelopes with the forward center of gravity limit on the early aircraft being more restrictive at higher gross weights. Groups 1 and 2 aircraft (serial numbers 1002 to 1051) are upgradeable only to -50 or -150 specifications, although the Group 1 aircraft (up to serial number 1012) still maintain their operating disadvantages. All L-1011-1 aircraft from serial number 1052 onwards are Group 3 aircraft and are fully upgradeable to all variants up to -250 specification.

Costs at Rolls-Royce were controlled and its efforts largely went into the original TriStar engines, which needed considerable modifications between the L-1011's first flight and service entry. The competition, notably General Electric, was very quick to develop its CF6 engine with more thrust, which meant that a heavier "intercontinental" DC-10-30 could be more quickly brought to market. The flexibility afforded to potential customers by a long-range DC-10 put the L-1011 at a serious disadvantage. Rolls-Royce went on to develop the high-thrust RB211-524 for the L-1011-200 and -500, but this took many years.[25]
The resultant delay in Lockheed and Rolls-Royce offering a high gross variant with a longer range, coupled with the TriStar's delayed introduction, meant that only 250 TriStars were sold compared to over 400 DC-10s.[9] Lockheed needed to sell 500 airliners to break even, but in 1981, the company announced production would end with the delivery of the 250th and last L-1011 on order in 1984.[26][27]
The TriStar's failure to achieve profitability caused Lockheed to withdraw from the civilian aircraft business.[2] The TriStar's rivalry with the DC-10 has been seen as a "case study in what can happen when two manufacturers attempt to split a market that simply could not support both aircraft". Lockheed lacked the resources to follow up with several proposals based on the TriStar wing and airframe, including a wide-body twinjet and a stretched quad-jet (one of the quadjet proposals consisting of two underwing engines and two rear fuselage-mounted engines). McDonnell Douglas was also financially weakened and could only develop the MD-11, a refinement of the DC-10, instead of an all-new design to challenge the next generation of twinjets like the Boeing 777.[8]
Ultimately, both the L-1011 and the DC-10/MD-11 were doomed by this next generation of widebody twinjets such as the Boeing 777 and the Airbus A330 - as the rules on ETOPS gradually extended to longer distance routes - thanks largely to the improving reliability and performance of jet engines which made trijet aircraft less cost efficient to operate; widebody twinjets become the dominant configuration for long haul operations.
Design
[edit]Engines
[edit]The RB211 and its features, despite the delays in its development, provided the L-1011 with then-unmatched fuel economy and noise levels.[28]: 23
Reversers and nozzle
[edit]
The RB211 has thrust reverse using the bypass air from the fan. Reverse is selected when the engine is at idle. An escape path for the air is opened up around the nacelle and blocker doors close off the duct just behind. The air passes through a grid of turning vanes which send the air in a forward direction for reverse thrust. Initially the RB211 design also had thrust reversal for the core exhaust. Aerodynamic interference with the flaps diminished the braking effect from the flaps, so the core flow reverser was deleted; in its place an 11-degree afterbody was incorporated, which improved the specific range by 1.5%. Further improvements led to a 15-degree afterbody, enabling the L-1011 "to beat its predicted specific air range at 0.85 Mach by between 3.5 and 5.5 percent, the exact figure depending on cruise weight."[28]: 26–27
All-flying tail
[edit]Instead of the trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS) found on most jetliners of its time, the L-1011 incorporated an all-flying tail – a stabilator. The aft portion had a geared (anti-servo) elevator that was linked to and moved with the stabilator, changing the stabilator's camber and improving the overall control surface effectiveness. Lockheed's main drive away from a THS was "[eliminating] mis-trim and runaway trim problems that have contributed to a number of accidents in the past."[28]: 30–31 [29] The fact that the elevators are not moved directly led to the failure in recognizing the jamming (trailing edge up) of the left elevator aboard Delta Air Lines Flight 1080 in 1977.[30]
Fuel system
[edit]The L-1011-1 has four wing tanks; each inboard tank feeds the respective wing engine, and the two outboard tanks feed the tail engine via a flow equalizer.[28]: 33 The additional center tank of the long-range variants, which is two halves, is located between the wing halves. Each center tank half acts as additional capacity to its adjacent inboard wing tank; filling it by way of ejector pumps. When the center tank is filled, it is used to crossfeed all three engines in flight (by way of the ejector pumps and crossfeed valves) until the center tank is empty and the remaining tanks are equalized.[31]

Landing gear
[edit]The nose landing gear had two attachment points forward and aft, allowing a short-enough tug to push or pull the plane from directly underneath, a feature to allow operations where there wasn't enough forward space at some airports, which was more common at the time.[28]: 34
Electrical system and avionics
[edit]
The L-1011 was the first jetliner to have an integrated drive generator (IDG).[28]: 34
The FMS on the L-1011, certified by the FAA in September 1977, offered many features that have since become common. The features were aimed at greatly reducing crew workload and improving fuel efficiency. Of those are a Mach/IAS cruise control, an automatic Rough Air Mode that detects turbulence and adjusts the engine power setting accordingly, and a descent mode that figures out the optimum location to start a descent by "back computing" from a preselected point, allowing "on-altitude and on-speed" arrival.[28]: 36–38
The L-1011 also featured a highly advanced autopilot system and was the first widebody to receive FAA certification for Cat-IIIc autolanding, which approved the TriStar for completely blind landings performed by the aircraft's autopilot in zero-visibility weather.[32] The L-1011 used an inertial navigation system to navigate;[33][34] this included aligning the navigation system by entering current coordinates of longitude and latitude.[8]
It also had a unique direct lift control (DLC) system, which allowed for smooth approaches when landing, without having to use significant pitch changes while on the approach path.[35][36] DLC helps maintain the aircraft on the glideslope during final approach by automatically deploying spoiler panels on the wings. Thus, rather than maintaining the descent by adjusting pitch, DLC helps control the descent while maintaining a more consistent pitch angle, using four redundant hydraulic systems.
Other components and systems
[edit]The APU, which was the Pratt and Whitney ST6L,[37] was capable of operating up to 30,000 feet; its two square-shaped inlet doors are situated on the bottom fuselage on the aircraft's centerline towards the rear of the plane.[28]: 28 Compared to the typical three-system of its era, the L-1011 had four independent 3,000-psi hydraulic systems.[28]: 29
Part of the production process also used a unique autoclave system for bonding fuselage panels together; this made the L-1011 extremely resistant to corrosion.
Operational history
[edit]Commercial
[edit]
TWA heralded the TriStar as one of the safest aircraft in the world in promotional literature in the 1980s when concern over the safety record of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, flown by rival airlines, was at its peak.[23] The L-1011 has been involved in five fatal accidents, only one of which was due to a problem with the aircraft.[38]
Delta Air Lines was the type's largest customer.[39] Delta retired its TriStars in 2001 to replace them with the Boeing 767-400ER. Cathay Pacific eventually became the largest non-U.S. operator of the type by acquiring many of the Eastern Air Lines examples when Eastern went bankrupt, operating as many as 21 aircraft. Cathay Pacific retired its L-1011s in October 1996 and replaced the type with the Airbus A330-300. TWA retired its remaining L-1011s in September 1997.
To secure the Japanese market, Lockheed secretly bribed several members of the Japanese government to subsidize All Nippon Airways' purchase of L-1011s; this caused a significant scandal when the bribes were uncovered.[40][41] The discovered scale to what has become known as the Lockheed bribery scandal led to the arrest of Japanese Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka, as well as several other officials.[42] Within Lockheed, board chairman Daniel Haughton and vice chairman and president Carl Kotchian resigned their posts on February 13, 1976.[43] Tanaka was eventually tried and found guilty of violating foreign exchange control laws but was not charged with bribery, a more serious criminal offense.[44][45] Crucially for Lockheed, the fallout from the scandal included the loss of a contract worth over $1 billion.[46]
The Soviet Union at that time lacked a widebody airliner. Development of its own Ilyushin Il-86 was delayed;[47][48] consequently, in the mid-1970s, the Soviets started negotiations to buy 30 TriStars and license-produce up to 100 a year.[49][50] The talks collapsed as US President Jimmy Carter made human rights an important consideration in US foreign policy.[51][52] The TriStar was also listed by the Coordinating Committee as embodying advanced technology forbidden for sale to potential enemies, which presented a serious obstacle to the export deal.
The last three airlines to operate the L-1011 in scheduled service were Brussels Airlines (codeshare with Hewa Bora Airways), Thai Sky Airlines, and Lloyd Aereo Boliviano, with final flights in August 2007, February 2008, and May 2008, respectively.[53] In later years the L-1011 has been used by smaller start-up carriers, particularly in Africa and Asia. These operators mainly do their business in the ad hoc charter and wet leasing businesses. ATA Airlines (formerly known as American Trans Air) fleet included over 19 TriStars, but operations dwindled to only three L-1011-500s before the company's shutdown in April 2008.
Military
[edit]The TriStar has also been used as a military tanker and passenger/cargo aircraft. The British Royal Air Force had nine aircraft of four variants. The aircraft were six ex-British Airways and three Pan Am L-1011-500s.[54][55][56] All of the aircraft served with No. 216 Squadron, and were based at RAF Brize Norton. The TriStar was replaced in RAF service by the Airbus A330 MRTT under the Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft program.[57] 216 Squadron was officially disbanded on March 20, 2014, and flew its last sorties with the TriStar on March 24, 2014.[58]
Other
[edit]
In the early 1990s, Orbital Sciences began to use a converted L-1011-100 named Stargazer to launch Pegasus rockets into orbit around Earth. This venture effectively rendered the small Scout rocket obsolete.[59][60] This aircraft was also used in support of the X-34 and X-43 programs. NASA performed aerodynamic research on Orbital Sciences' L-1011 in 1995.[61] In 2014, three L-1011s in the world were airworthy.[62] As of 2019, Stargazer is the only active L-1011.[63]
Variants
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010) |
The earlier versions of the L-1011, such as the -1, -100, and -150 can be distinguished from the later models by the design of the middle engine nacelles. The earlier version nacelle has a round intake, whereas the later models have a small vertical fin between the bottom of the middle engine intake and the top of the fuselage.
The two L-1011 aircraft delivered to Pacific Southwest Airlines were configured with internal airstair doors that led into an entry hall in what was normally the forward lower baggage hold. This was to allow operations from airfields that did not have terminal buildings with jet bridges. These two aircraft were later in service with Aeroperú and Worldways Canada.
L-1011-1
[edit]
The L-1011-1 (FAA certification L-1011-385-1) was the first production model of the L-1011, designed for short- and medium-range flights. This variant served as the basis for subsequent variants. This type was purchased by Air Canada, ANA, Cathay Pacific, Eastern, and other operators with regional trunk routes requiring a widebody aircraft. Pacific Southwest Airlines purchased two L-1011-1 models with lower deck seating.[64] This variant was also one of the few widebodies to have the option for a full-height built-in airstair.[23]
The L-1011-1 was first delivered to Eastern Air Lines on April 5, 1972. A total of 160 L-1011-1 TriStars were built before production ended in 1983, although the majority of these, 119 or 75% of the total, were completed during a four-year period from 1972 to 1975. Most sales of the L-1011-1 were to US operators, with just three airlines, Delta, Eastern, and TWA, taking delivery of 110 combined. A further two aircraft were placed with a fourth US airline, Pacific Southwest Airlines.[23]
L-1011-100
[edit]
The L-1011-100 (FAA certification L-1011-385-1-14) was the second production model of the L-1011 and first flew in 1975 and featured a new center fuel tank and higher gross weights that increased the aircraft's range by nearly 930 miles (1,500 km). Launch orders for the L-1011-100 were placed by Saudia and Cathay Pacific, for two each, in May 1974. Deliveries began in June 1975.
The variant was also purchased by several airlines with longer-range routes, such as TWA, Air Canada, and BEA (which merged with BOAC to form British Airways). The first two L-1011-100s (serial numbers 1110 and 1116) were delivered new to Saudia with the same fuel capacity as the L-1011-1 (FAA certification L-1011-385-1-14); these were later upgraded to L-1011-200 specification.
L-1011-50
[edit]The L-1011-50 was an upgraded version of the L-1011-1 with an increase in maximum takeoff weight from 430,000 pounds (195,000 kg) to either 440,000 pounds (200,000 kg) or 450,000 pounds (204,000 kg). Fuel capacity was not increased. The -50 was available only as a conversion package for the L-1011-1 and was never built new.
L-1011-150
[edit]The L-1011-150 was a development of the L-1011-1 with its maximum takeoff weight increased to 470,000 pounds (210,000 kg). It was available only as a conversion for the L-1011-1. The -150 involves the conversion of Group 1 and Group 2 L-1011-1 aircraft to an MTOW of 470,000 pounds (210,000 kg), an increase of 40,000 pounds (18,000 kg), about 10%, from the L-1011-1, giving the aircraft a slightly better range than the -50, but without the additional center-section fuel tank, less than the L-1011-100 aircraft. The first aircraft was converted by MBB at Lemwerder in Germany during the winter of 1988–89 and was subsequently handed over to Air Transat of Canada on May 11, 1989.
L-1011-200
[edit]
The L-1011-200 (FAA certification L-1011-385-1-15), the third production model of the L-1011, was introduced in 1976. Although otherwise similar to the -100, the -200 uses Rolls-Royce RB.211-524B engines to improve its performance in hot and high-altitude conditions. Gulf Air used -200 models to replace its earlier-generation Vickers VC10 fleet.
Other than the engines, the basic TriStar -200 is identical to the -100, with center-section fuel, having a MTOW of 466,000 pounds (211,000 kg), and fuel capacity of 26,400 US gallons (100,000 L) as the -100. An increase of gross weight to 474,000 pounds (215,000 kg) is possible, with the heavier aircraft offered by Lockheed as -200I or -200(Improved). Saudi Arabian Airlines (Saudia) was a launch customer for the -200 series and operated a sizable fleet until 1998. A total of 24 L-1011-200 aircraft were built new, with the first delivered to Saudia on May 28, 1977. Like other TriStar improvements, a conversion program has also been offered.
L-1011-250
[edit]The L-1011-250 was an upgrade developed for late-model L-1011-1 aircraft and all L-1011-100 and L-1011-200 aircraft. The more powerful engines, lengthened wing, active-load-control ailerons and other systems that had been developed for the L-1011-500 were adapted into the baseline model. The changes resulted in increases in maximum takeoff weight to 510,000 pounds (230,000 kg) and fuel capacity from 23,600 US gal (89,335 L) to 31,632 US gal (119,735 L). This variant also used the upgraded RB211-524B4I engine, which could be easily retrofitted to the existing RB211-524B powerplants of the L-1011-200, but it required a re-engining on the L-1011-1 and L-1011-100, which used the original RB211-22B. The conversion allowed the L-1011 to match the performance of the long-range McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30. Although it could be applied to all L-1011 models, the upgrade was only undertaken by Delta on six late-model L-1011-1 aircraft.
L-1011-500
[edit]
The L-1011-500 (FAA certification L-1011-385-3) was the last L-1011 variant to enter production. It was a longer-range variant first flight-tested in 1978. Its fuselage length was shortened by 14 feet (4.3 m) and MTOW increased to allow higher fuel loads.[citation needed] More powerful RB.211-524 engines, increased wingspan, active-load-control ailerons and other improved systems were features introduced by Lockheed to exploit newly available technologies in the late 1970s. The -500 variant was popular among international operators and formed a significant portion of the L-1011 fleet of Delta and British Airways. However, it entered service seven years after the similar DC-10-30 entered service.[citation needed]

The TriStar 500 first flew on October 16, 1978, with the first delivery to British Airways on April 27, 1979. It entered service with British Airways on May 7, 1979, flying between London and Abu Dhabi. The last L-1011 produced was a TriStar 500, operated by the Las Vegas Sands.[citation needed]
Dimensions
[edit]The TriStar 500 has an overall length of 164 feet 2 inches (50.04 m) and wingspan increased to 164 feet 4 inches (50.09 m) (early TriStar versions originally had the TriStar 1 wing with a span of 155 feet 4 inches (47.35 m)).
Flying surfaces
[edit]Lockheed developed some aerodynamic improvements for the TriStar 500 which included a modified wing-to-body fairing, a fillet below the central intake, extended wingtips, and "active ailerons" or active control system (ACS). The new fairing reduced drag, while the fillet reduced noise in the rear cabin. The wingtip extensions increased aspect ratio, thus reducing induced drag, but resulted in increased bending. The ACS developed to solve this, provided gust alleviation, improving ride during flight, reduced fuel burn, and increased fatigue life.
Earlier TriStar 500s were delivered with the standard wing; these were later retrofitted with ailerons and extended wingtips. Pan Am was the first customer to order the -500 with the extended wingtips and active ailerons. Aircraft serial number 1176, the first for Pan Am, was the first TriStar 500 to be fitted with them as standard.
Powerplant
[edit]
The TriStar 500 is equipped with higher thrust RB211-524B engines. Initially rated at 50,000 lbf (220 kN) thrust each, the higher-thrust 53,000 lbf (240 kN) -524B4 Improved (also referred to as the -524B4I) later became available, which also had improved fuel efficiency.
Performance
[edit]Originally certified with an MTOW of 496,000 pounds (225,000 kg), an increased MTOW of 504,000 pounds (229,000 kg) was later certified in 1979, and all earlier production aircraft were certified at this weight. A further increase, to 510,000 pounds (230,000 kg), is also available, and most TriStar 500s are thought to have had this increase. Standard fuel capacity is 31,600 US gallons (120,000 L), giving the TriStar 500 a range of about 5,200 nautical miles (9,600 km) with 246 passengers and baggage.
Cabin
[edit]The TriStar 500's maximum passenger capacity is 315, although no aircraft were operated with that number of seats. A typical two-class layout might include 21 First Class and 229 Economy Class for a maximum of 250 passengers. More spacious three-class layouts used on longer routes include 233 with 12 First Class, 32 Business Class, and 189 Economy Class with Delta Air Lines. The aircraft is equipped with six exits, two fewer than the long-body TriStars, thus reducing the exit limit maximum.
Operators
[edit]One L-1011 TriStar is in service as of 2024 which is the Stargazer air-launch mothership, operated by Northrop Grumman Space Systems.[65][66][67]
Accidents and incidents
[edit]
As of December 2011, the L-1011 has been involved in 35 aviation occurrences,[68] including 10 hull-losses,[69] with 540 fatalities.[70] Of the four pioneering widebody aircraft (Boeing 747, McDonnell Douglas DC-10, L-1011, and Airbus A300/A310 family), the Lockheed L-1011 had comparatively few accidents and a better safety record than its competitors.[71][72][73]
- On December 29, 1972, Eastern Air Lines Flight 401, an L-1011, crashed in the Florida Everglades as a result of the flight crew's failure to monitor the flight instruments during a malfunction of the landing gear position indicator system. The crash resulted in 101 fatalities, and was the subject of two TV movies, Crash and The Ghost of Flight 401. It was also the subject of a Mayday episode.[74][75]
- On April 19, 1974, an L-1011 owned by TWA with the fleet number of 11007 caught fire at Logan Airport in Boston. It had landed four hours previously and there was no one on board. It was subsequently written off.[citation needed]
- On April 12, 1977, Delta Air Lines Flight 1080, on takeoff from San Diego, had a left stabilizer jammed undetected in the full trailing-edge-up position.[76] This failure resulted in a large noseup and rolling moment that almost exceeded the capability of the flight controls.[77] The airplane was just about to stall in the clouds when Captain Jack McMahan,[78] with unusual insight, reduced power on the wing engines and began using the throttles to supplement the remaining flight controls, using differential and collective engine thrust.[79] Cabin crew moved all the passengers forward in the cabin to redistribute weight and help get the nose down. Steve Heidt, the flight engineer, said, "It probably didn't help much, but in that situation, we figured every little bit would help."[76] All the way from San Diego to Los Angeles, the aircraft flew with its pitch controlled by differential thrust between tail and wing engines, while the left roll tendency was compensated by wing differential thrust, and made a successful emergency landing in Los Angeles.[80] According to an incident analysis by Warren VanderBurgh, comprehensive crew training played a critical role in control recovery.[81]
- On August 19, 1980, a fire destroyed the L-1011-200 used for Saudia Flight 163 on the ground after the pilots made an emergency landing at Riyadh's former International Airport due to fire in the rear of the aircraft. Delays in initiating the evacuation of the aircraft led to the deaths of all 301 occupants.[82][83]
- On December 23, 1980, Saudia Flight 162, an L-1011, had a tire explode and penetrate the passenger cabin whilst in flight. The aircraft lost cabin pressure and two passengers were ejected through a hole in the cabin floor. The aircraft was later repaired and returned to service.[84]
- On September 22, 1981, Eastern Air Lines Flight 935 departed Newark, New Jersey, and suffered an uncontained failure of its number two (tail) engine at 14,500 feet (4,400 m), while en route to San Juan, Puerto Rico.[85][86] The fragments from that engine damaged three of its four hydraulic systems resulting in fluid loss in them. The rudder pedals also jammed. The fragments struck but did not puncture the lines for the other hydraulic system; the captain was able to safely land the aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport, with some limited use of the outboard spoilers, the inboard ailerons and the horizontal stabilizer, plus differential engine power of the remaining two engines. There were no injuries. The L-1011 having four hydraulic systems (instead of three like the DC-10) allowed for a safe landing.[87][88]
- On May 5, 1983, Eastern Air Lines Flight 855, an L-1011 with registration N334EA, while flying from Miami to Nassau, shut down the number 2 engine due to low oil pressure and began a return to Miami. Both of the remaining engines later failed. Without power, Flight 855 descended from 13,000 to 4,000 feet (1,200 m) before the number 2 engine was restarted and the aircraft landed in Miami without injuries. Incorrect engine maintenance had led to the loss of oil on all three engines.[89]
- On April 5, 1984, a Saudia Lockheed L-1011 TriStar on final approach to Damascus from Jeddah was hijacked by a Syrian national. The hijacker demanded to be taken to Istanbul, Turkey, but changed his mind and requested to go to Stockholm. After landing in Istanbul to refuel, the pilot pushed the hijacker out the emergency exit whereupon he was arrested.[90]

- On May 27, 1985, British Airtours Flight 101, registration G-BBAI, from Palma Airport, Mallorca, Spain overran the runway on landing at Leeds Bradford International Airport, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. 12 of the 412 people on board suffered minor injuries when exiting down steep rear ramps. The aircraft was severely damaged,[91] but was eventually repaired and returned to service.[92]
- On August 2, 1985, Delta Air Lines Flight 191, an L-1011, crashed while approaching Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport in microburst conditions. Eight of 11 crew members and 128 of the 152 passengers on board died, as well as one person on the ground after his vehicle was struck by the L-1011.[93][94]
- On October 18, 1985, a Jordanian Airlines L-1011 experienced an inflight fire at 24,000 feet while on approach to Singapore. The fire burned through the rear pressure bulkhead, causing explosive depressurization of the cabin. The air rushing out of the cabin extinguished the fire, saving the aircraft. All 118 passengers and crew survived. The aircraft was later repaired and placed back into service.[95][96]
- On May 3, 1986, Air Lanka Flight 512 (now SriLankan Airlines), an L-1011, was destroyed on the ground in Colombo, Sri Lanka, after a bomb exploded in the rear cargo hold, severing the tail and resulting in 21 deaths.[97]
- On June 28, 1991, LTU International L-1011 registration D-AERI, suffered an interior fire during maintenance in a hangar at Düsseldorf Airport. Four engineers escaped injury, and the aircraft was declared a total loss.[98]
- On July 30, 1992, TWA Flight 843, an L-1011, had its takeoff aborted by the captain after liftoff from John F. Kennedy International Airport, in response to a false stall warning. The aircraft landed too hard, breaking a wing spar and starting a fire. All 292 passengers and crew evacuated safely, with only 10 minor injuries. The airliner was destroyed by fire.[99]
- On August 23, 1995, Delta Air Lines Flight 157, an L-1011 TriStar 1, suffered a rapid decompression after the pressure bulkhead failed. The flight crew initiated an emergency descent to 14,000 feet, and the plane landed safely at Los Angeles International Airport with no deaths or injuries to the 226 passengers or 10 crew. The aircraft was substantially damaged and later written off.[100]
Aircraft on display
[edit]- N1011 – L-1011-1 on display at the Delta Flight Museum in Atlanta, Georgia. This is the forward upper fuselage of the prototype aircraft and is painted in Delta colors.[101]
- C-FTNA – L-1011-1 on display at the Lyon–Saint-Exupéry Airport in Lyon, France. After Air Transat flight TSC906 was damaged in a hailstorm, the plane returned to Lyon and was written off. It is still used today for emergency training.[102][103]
- N31019 – L-1011-50 on display at the National Airline History Museum in Kansas City, Missouri, at the Charles B. Wheeler Downtown Airport.[104] Its original operator was Trans World Airlines.[105]
- TT-DWE – L-1011-100 on display at the Emirates National Auto Museum in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. This aircraft was originally delivered to British Airways.[citation needed]
- HZ-AHP – L-1011-200 on display originally in the former Saudia paint job as a gate guardian at the Royal Saudi Air Force Museum in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. In 2018, the plane was repainted to celebrate the 88th Saudi National Day.[106] Since 2019, the paint job now promotes Saudi Vision 2030.[107]
- 9Y-TGN – L-1011-500 on display at the Chaguaramas Military History and Aerospace Museum in Chaguaramas, Trinidad. This aircraft was previously operated by BWIA West Indies Airways.[108]
- N910TE – L-1011-1 on display with TriStar Experience at Kansas City International Airport. It was previously in storage in Tucson after being retired by the Flying Hospital group as P4-MED in favor of an MD-10. N910TE is the only L-1011-1 with working RB211-22b engines.[109][110][111]
- HS-AXE (Thai Sky Airlines), formerly N718DA (Delta) L-1011-1 was converted to a bar/restaurant located in Bangkok, Thailand.[112]
- 9Q-CHC (Hewa Bora Airways), MSN 1209 formerly C-GAGI (Air Canada) and N767DA (Delta) L-1011-385-3 TriStar 500 moved to Parc de la Vallée de la Nsele near Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo where it will be converted to a bar/restaurant.[113]
- CS-TMP (Luzair) MSN 1248 formerly JY-AGJ (Royal Jordanian) L-1011-385-3 TriStar 500 moved to Underwater Military Museum Dive Site, Aqaba, Jordan on 26 August 2019 for use as a tourist dive site.[114]
- N102CK (Gee Bee Airways), MSN 1198, in Kitty Hawk basic colours, formerly G-BHBM (British Airways) L-1011 TriStar 200F, stored at the apron of Kavala Airport LGKV/KVA - Greece, since November 2004.
- N388LS, the former Las Vegas Sands L-1011-500, was damaged beyond repair in 2013 by floods while it was parked at Bangkok Airport. In 2018, the aircraft's body was disassembled and reassembled for display at Chic Chic Market, Nong Khai.[citation needed]
- 9L-LFB, the former All Nippon Airways JA8522, was last operated by Air Rum until 2010. It was stored on a local beach in Cotonou, in the country of Benin, since 2014, and features a preserved interior. Guests can tour the aircraft's interior by paying an entry fee. [1]
Specifications
[edit]
| Variant | L-1011-1 | L-1011-200 | L-1011-500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cockpit crew | Three | ||
| Seating | 256 (mixed-class) | 246 (mixed-class) | |
| Exit limit | 400[a] | 330[a] | |
| Interior width | 18 feet 11 inches (5.77 m) | ||
| Length | 177 ft 8+1⁄2 in (54.17 m) | 164 ft 2+1⁄2 in (50.05 m) | |
| Wingspan | 155 ft 4 in (47.35 m) | 164 ft 4 in (50.09 m) | |
| Height | 55 ft 4 in (16.87 m) | ||
| Wing area | 3,456 sq ft (321.1 m2) | 3,541 sq ft (329.0 m2) | |
| MTOW | 430,000 lb (200,000 kg) | 466,000 lb (211,374 kg) | 510,000 lb (231,332 kg) |
| OEW | 241,700 lb (110,000 kg) | 248,400 lb (113,000 kg) | 245,400 lb (111,000 kg) |
| Fuel capacity | 23,814 US gal (90,150 L) | 26,502 US gal (100,320 L) | 31,642 US gal (119,780 L) |
| Engines (×3) | Rolls-Royce RB211-22 | RB211-524B | |
| Thrust (×3) | 42,000 lbf (187 kN) | 50,000 lbf (222 kN) | |
| Mmo[116] | Mach 0.90 (516 kn; 956 km/h) | ||
| Max speed[b] | 539 kn (998 km/h) | 539 kn (998 km/h) | 539 kn (998 km/h) |
| Cruise[c] | 520 kn (963 km/h) | 515 kn (954 km/h) | 525 kn (972 km/h) |
| Stall[d] | 108 kn (200 km/h) | 110 kn (204 km/h) | 114 kn (211 km/h) |
| Range[e] | 2,680 nmi (4,963 km) | 3,600 nmi (6,667 km) | 5,345 nmi (9,899 km) |
| Ferry range[f] | 4,250 nmi (7,871 km) | 4,935 nmi (9,140 km) | 6,090 nmi (11,279 km) |
| Ceiling[116] | 42,000 ft (12,800 m) | 43,000 ft (13,100 m) | |
Deliveries
[edit]| 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 39 | 41 | 24 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 24 | 28 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 249 |
Notable appearances in media
[edit]- The band El Ten Eleven, a Los Angeles post-rock duo, derives its name from the L-1011.[117]
- The parody artist Bob Rivers, wrote a song called "Beat Up Old Jetliner" that mentions the L-1011.[citation needed][importance?]
See also
[edit]Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
Related lists
References
[edit]- Notes
- Citations
- ^ Simons, Graham M. (May 30, 2018). "9 – Enter The TriStar!". Colours in the Sky: The History of Autair and Court Line Aviation. Casemate Publishers. ISBN 978-1-5267-2557-8.
the L-1011 (pronounced 'Ell-ten-eleven) or TriStar, was a medium-to-long-range, wide-body trijet airliner
- ^ a b Greenwald, John; Hannifin, Jerry & Kane, Joseph J. (December 21, 1981). "Catch a Falling TriStar". Time. Archived from the original on October 17, 2007. Retrieved January 6, 2007.
- ^ a b "L-1011: Luxury Among the Clouds". March 27, 2018.
- ^ "Accident Synopsis 09291959". AirDisaster.com. 2008. Archived from the original on May 27, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ "NASA Wind Tunnel Tests". National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Archived from the original on October 30, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ "Disasters: Electra's Tragedy". Time. October 17, 1960. Archived from the original on September 25, 2009.
- ^ a b "Lockheed L-1011". Chasing the Sun. PBS. Archived from the original on August 5, 2001. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ a b c d "Requiem for a Trijet Masterpiece - the Lockheed L-1011". September 30, 2015.
- ^ a b c d "The Lockheed L1011 - Saying Goodbye to Another Trijet". March 24, 2014.
- ^ The Aeronautical Journal. Vol. 78. Royal Aeronautical Society. 1974. pp. 392, 398. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ SAE Transactions. Society of Automotive Engineers. 1970. p. 1436. Retrieved December 11, 2008.
- ^ "Three Shaft Engine Design". Rolls-Royce. Archived from the original on October 16, 2006. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ Pugh, Peter (2001). The Magic of a Name: The Rolls-Royce Story, Part Two: The Power Behind the Jets. London: Icon Books. pp. 120–122. ISBN 1-84046-284-1.
- ^ "The New Steel". Flight International. October 24, 1968.
- ^ Boyne, Walter J. (1998). Beyond the Horizons: The Lockheed Story. New York: St. Martin's Press. p. 354. ISBN 978-0-312-19237-2.
- ^ "Lockheed's Rough Ride with Rolls-Royce". Time. February 15, 1971. Archived from the original on November 7, 2012.
- ^ Wood, Robert (November 12, 1970). "Jumbo Jet engines for Lockheed push Rolls-Royce in red". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
- ^ Lindsey, Robert (February 5, 1971). "Lockheed Seeks U.S. Engine Now: Retooling Cost of a Switch Could Run to $100-million". The New York Times.
- ^ "Canadian 'key' has no plans". Montreal Gazette. February 9, 1971.
- ^ Lewis, Antony (November 12, 1970). "British Grant Set for Rolls-Royce: Government to Spend up to $100-Million in Rescue Bid". The New York Times.
- ^ "New Life for TriStar". Time. May 17, 1971. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ "Rolls-Royce Still Alive and Kicking". Montreal Gazette. February 18, 1972.
- ^ a b c d e Donald, David, ed. (1997). "Lockheed L-1011 TriStar". The Complete Encyclopedia of World Aircraft. New York: Barnes & Noble Books. p. 579. ISBN 0-7607-0592-5.
- ^ "Airliner price index". Flight International. August 10, 1972. p. 183.
- ^ "Engine Update". Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology. Vol. 48. 1976. p. 5.
- ^ Jones, Jack (December 8, 1981). "Saddened Lockheed workers still view L-1011 with pride". 'Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
- ^ "Lockheed to stop l-1011 production". Sumter Daily Item. December 8, 1981.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Upton, Jim. (2001). Lockheed L-1011 Tristar. North Branch, MN: Specialty Press Publishers and Wholesalers. ISBN 1-58007-037-X. OCLC 48491576.
- ^ Beach, J. B. (February 1, 1968). "Designing the Lockheed L-1011 to Meet Airline Needs Beyond 1970". SAE Technical Paper Series. Vol. 1. Warrendale, PA. p. 2229. doi:10.4271/680545.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ LisbonJet, Publicada por. "Delta flight 1080 incident". Retrieved December 10, 2020.
- ^ Commercial Aircraft Airframe Fuel Systems Survey and Analysis (PDF). FAA Technical Center. 1982. pp. 41–44. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 21, 2020.
- ^ Young, David (September 18, 1977). "Look Ma, no hands—learning how to land a jumbo jet". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
- ^ "LTN-92 Laser Gyro INS" (PDF). Northrop Grumman. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 27, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ Report: Lockheed L1011-500 Tristar, CS-TMP (PDF). Air Accidents Investigation Branch. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 22, 2009. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ Report: Lockheed L1011-385-1-14, G-BBAF (PDF) (Report). Air Accidents Investigation Branch. p. 5. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ Kocivar, Ben (December 1970). "Giant Tri-Jets Are Coming". Popular Science. Vol. 197, no. 6. pp. 50–52. ISSN 0161-7370.
- ^ "ST6L-73 Tristar Auxiliary Power Unit". gas turbine world. Retrieved January 31, 2025.
- ^ "Lockheed L-1011". Super70s.com. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
- ^ "Delta History: Lockheed L-1011". Delta Museum. Archived from the original on February 3, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ Nevin, Loouis (February 27, 1976). "Payoff scandal could prove costly to Lockheed; Japanese might halt orders". The Bulletin.
- ^ "Lockheed's Japanese data asked in Senate subpoena". The New York Times. April 3, 1976. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ Kamm, Henry (January 24, 1977). "Lockheed Scandal in Japan headed for its trial phase". The New York Times.
- ^ Lindsey, Robert (July 3, 1977). "Kotchian calls himself the Scapegoat". The New York Times.
- ^ "Bribery Shokku At the Top". Time. August 9, 1976. Archived from the original on August 23, 2007. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ Hunziker, Steven; Kamimura, Ikuru. "The Lockheed Scandal". Kakuei Tanaka: A Political Biography Of Modern Japan. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ "Lockheed loses big Japanese contract". St. Petersburg Times. February 11, 1976.[permanent dead link]
- ^ "Facts: The Ilyushin Il-86". CNN. July 28, 2002. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ "Soviet Wide-Bodied Jet begins regular service to East Berlin". Los Angeles Times. July 4, 1981. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
- ^ Birtles, Philip (1989). Lockheed TriStar. Modern Civil Aircraft No 8. London: Ian Allan. ISBN 978-1-85310-934-8.
- ^ "A British paper said Russia may buy the jet engine used in the Tristar". Los Angeles Times. November 1, 1973. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
- ^ Neikirk, Bill (March 27, 1977). "World hears Carter human rights call". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
- ^ Jacoby, Tamar (June 1986). "Did Carter fail on human rights?". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on May 27, 2012.
- ^ "Routes Trivia: Where Did All The TriStars Go?". Routesonline. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
- ^ Frawley, Gerard (2002). The International Directory of Military Aircraft, 2002–2003. Fyshwick, ACT, Australia: Aerospace Publications. p. 44. ISBN 1-875671-55-2.
- ^ Prokesch, Steven (July 7, 1990). "British Air Purchasing Boeing 747s". The New York Times.
- ^ "TriStar Tankers...The RAF Goes Widebody". Air International. Vol. 29, no. 6. Bromley, UK: Fine Scroll. December 1985. pp. 271–277.
- ^ Craig, Hoyle (March 27, 2008). "UK signs £13 billion tanker deal". FlightGlobal.
- ^ Hoyle, Craig (March 24, 2014). "RAF TriStars to fly final sortie". Flight International. Retrieved March 25, 2014.
- ^ "Tristar used to launch Pegasus". Orbital.com. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ "Orbital Sciences Corporation L-1011, Stargazer carries HESSI spacecraft from Vandenberg AFB to the Kennedy Space Center". Air and Space. February 1, 2002.
- ^ "Dryden L-1011 Tristar". NASA Photo Collection. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. July 16, 2011. Archived from the original on June 5, 1997.
- ^ Howarth, Nigel (April 15, 2014). "Contrasting fortunes for old freighters in the California desert". Aviation Week & Space Technology. Archived from the original on May 24, 2014. Retrieved May 24, 2014.
- ^ Clark, Stephen. "Rockets purchased by Stratolaunch back under Northrop Grumman control". Spaceflight Now.
- ^ "US Airways History". US Airways. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ "Pegasus/L-1011". Orbital ATK. 2015. Retrieved March 28, 2015.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (April 3, 2012). "Pegasus Launch Report: Launch of NASA X-ray telescope targeted for June". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved March 28, 2015.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (October 10, 2019). "Rockets purchased by Stratolaunch back under Northrop Grumman control". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
- ^ "Lockheed L-1011 Tristar incidents". Aviation-Safety.net. July 9, 2020. Retrieved July 11, 2020.
- ^ "Lockheed L-1011 Tristar hull-losses". Aviation-Safety.net. July 9, 2020. Retrieved July 11, 2020.
- ^ "Lockheed L-1011 Tristar Statistics". Aviation-Safety.net. July 9, 2020. Retrieved July 11, 2020.
- ^ "1970: Lockheed L-1011 Tristar". LockheedClassics.com. Archived from the original on April 28, 2012. Retrieved August 25, 2012.
- ^ "Lockheed L.1011 Tristar". Century of Flight. Archived from the original on April 26, 2013. Retrieved August 25, 2012.
- ^ Birtles, Phillip (1998). Lockheed L-1011 TriStar. Airliner Color History. St. Paul, Minnesota: Motorbooks International. p. 111. ISBN 978-0-7603-0582-9.
- ^ Job, Macarthur (1994). "Chapter 12: Hey – what's happening here?". Air Disaster. Vol. 1. Fyshwick, ACT, Australia: Aerospace Publications. pp. 99, 101–102. ISBN 1-875671-11-0.
- ^ "35 years after jetliner crash, hero gets his due". NBC News. Associated Press. December 25, 2007.
- ^ a b "The Saving Of Flight 1080". Washington Post. October 8, 1978.
- ^ Burcham, Frank W. Jr.; Maine, Trindel A.; Fullerton, C. Gordon & Webb, Lannie Dean (September 1996). Development and Flight Evaluation of an Emergency Digital Flight Control System Using Only Engine Thrust on an F-15 Airplane (PDF). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA TP-3627. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 15, 2020. Retrieved November 17, 2015.
- ^ "Delta Flight 1080 Jammed Elevator Incident". American Aviation Historical Society. Archived from the original on November 18, 2015. Retrieved March 10, 2025.
- ^ Burcham et al. (1996), p. 11.
- ^ Jonckheere, Edmond A.; Lohsoonthorn, Poonsuk & Bohacek, Stephan K. (1999). "From Sioux City to the X-331" (PDF). Annual Reviews in Control. Vol. 23. pp. 91–108.
- ^ "Control Malfunctions & Flight Instrument Anomalies". November 15, 2013. Archived from the original on December 11, 2021 – via YouTube.
- ^ "265 on Saudi jet die in fiery landing". Milwaukee Journal. August 20, 1980.[permanent dead link]
- ^ "260 feared dead as burning jet's doors jam shut". Spokesman-Review. August 20, 1980.[permanent dead link]
- ^ "2 Children die in freak mishap aboard Saudi Arabian jetliner". Los Angeles Times. December 24, 1980. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
- ^ "ASN Aircraft accident: Eastern Airlines L-1011, September 22, 1981". Aviation-Safety.net. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ "NTSB Identification: DCA81AA027". National Transportation Safety Board. Retrieved December 19, 2011.
- ^ "More DC-10 troubles hinted". Chicago Tribune. November 28, 1981. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
- ^ "Engines of jumbo jets have troubled history". Milwaukee Journal. November 28, 1981.[permanent dead link]
- ^ Thompson, Steven. "The Story of Eastern Flight 855". FlyTristar. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ Accident description at the Aviation Safety Network
- ^ "Report on the Accident to Lockheed Tristar G-BBAI at Leeds Bradford Airport on 27 May 1985" (PDF). Accidents Investigation Branch. Retrieved July 17, 2017.
- ^ Ranter, Harro. "Runway excursion Accident Lockheed L-1011-385-1 TriStar G-BBAI, Monday 27 May 1985". asn.flightsafety.org. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
- ^ Delta Air Lines Flight 191 Crash (PDF). National Transportation Safety Board. Archived from the original on August 17, 2014. Retrieved August 25, 2012.
- ^ Magnuson, Ed (April 18, 2005). "Like a Wall of Napalm". Time. Archived from the original on January 19, 2008.
- ^ Accident description for JY-AGE at the Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved on November 18, 2020.
- ^ Hill, Richard D. Investigations and characteristics of major fire-related accidents in civil air transports over the last ten years (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center. Retrieved August 25, 2012.
- ^ "1986: Bomb kills 21 in Sri Lanka". BBC. May 3, 1986.
- ^ "Accident information : Lockheed L-1011 TriStar LTU International D-AERI". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved June 17, 2019.
- ^ Aircraft Accident Report, Trans World Airlines Flight 843 (PDF). National Transportation Safety Board. March 31, 1993. Archived from the original on June 15, 2007.
- ^ "Accident Description". Aviation Safety Network. August 23, 1995. Retrieved July 7, 2020.
- ^ "Prototype Lockheed L-1011". Delta Flight Museum. Archived from the original on August 5, 2016. Retrieved June 9, 2016.
- ^ "Accident information : Lockheed L-1011 TriStar Air Transat C-FTNA". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved June 18, 2018.
- ^ "45.7112164°N, 5.0838171°E" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved June 18, 2018.
- ^ "Lockheed L-1011 TriStar". Airline History Museum. Archived from the original on August 15, 2016. Retrieved September 20, 2016.
- ^ "Lockheed L-1011 Tristar". Airline History Museum. Retrieved July 24, 2024.
- ^ "TriStar Receives Patriotic Scheme". www.key.aero. July 27, 2017. Retrieved July 1, 2025.
- ^ "Aircraft Photo of HZ-AHP | Lockheed L-1011-385-1-15 TriStar 200 | AirHistory.net #250104". AirHistory.net. Retrieved June 30, 2025.
- ^ "Chaguaramas Military History & Aerospace Museum". Trinidad and Tobago Sights. Fodor's. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
- ^ "Jumbo jet arrives at KCI to serve as STEM classroom for students". July 16, 2017.
- ^ "TriStar L1011 / N91011". TriStar History. Archived from the original on March 27, 2015. Retrieved March 28, 2015.
- ^ "TriStar History and Preservation, Inc. to preserve a former TAP Air Portugal Lockheed L-1011 TriStar in TWA colors at Kansas City". World Airline News. January 10, 2015. Archived from the original on August 26, 2016. Retrieved June 9, 2016.
- ^ "Changchui | Thailand | ช่างชุ่ย ChangChui". ChangChui.
- ^ "[Hidden Gem] Hewa Bora Airways' Lockheed L-1011 TriStar - Parc de la Vallée de la Nsele, Congo-Kinshasa". September 14, 2019.
- ^ Mark Evans (May 14, 2020). "Lockheed TriStar joins Aqabas Underwater Military Museum". Scuba Diver Magazine. Retrieved March 2, 2021.
- ^ Taylor, John W. R. (1982). Jane's All The World's Aircraft 1982–83. London: Jane's Yearbooks. pp. 405–406. ISBN 0-7106-0748-2.
- ^ a b "Type Certificate No. A23WE" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. January 11, 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 15, 2016. Retrieved December 3, 2018.
- ^ Levine, Matthew (November 6, 2012). "El Ten Eleven Transitions (Fake, 2012)". Bar None Records. Archived from the original on May 23, 2013. Retrieved November 13, 2012.
Further reading
[edit]- Bright, C. D. (1978). The Jet Makers: The Aerospace Industry from 1945 to 1972. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 0-7006-0172-4.
- Ingells, D. J. (1973). L-1011 TriStar and the Lockheed Story. Blue Ridge Summit, Pennsylvania: TAB-Aero. ISBN 978-0-8168-6650-2.
- Newhouse, John (1982). The Sporty Game: The High-Risk Competitive Business of Making and Selling Commercial Airliners. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-394-51447-5.
- Simons, Graham M. (2021). Lockheed TriStar: The Most Technologically Advanced Commercial Jet of Its Time. Barnsley, South Yorkshire: Air World Books. ISBN 9781526758828.
- Yenne, Bill (1987). Lockheed. New York: Crescent Books. ISBN 0-517-60471-X.
External links
[edit]- "Presenting the Lockheed L-1011", Flight, November 2, 1967, archived from the original on January 5, 2015
- "L-1011-500 TriStar technical profile" (PDF). Lockheed. 1980.
- "Lockheed L-1011 TriStar". Forecast International. August 2001. Archived from the original on July 24, 2018.
- Gerard Frawley (2003), "Aircraft Technical Data & Specifications - Lockheed L-1011", The International Directory of Civil Aircraft – via Airliners.net
- David Learmount (April 20, 2012). "The TriStar heritage 40 years on". Flightglobal.
- Andre Malhao (1999–2020), TriStar500,
non-commercial and unofficial website
Lockheed L-1011 TriStar
View on GrokipediaDevelopment
Origins and Market Context
In the mid-1960s, Lockheed, having shifted focus to military aviation after the turboprop Electra's production ended in 1961, sought to diversify by re-entering the commercial jet market amid surging global air travel demand. Airlines required efficient wide-body aircraft for medium-capacity routes that did not warrant the Boeing 747's high-volume, long-haul focus, which Pan American Airways had ordered in April 1966 for up to 500 passengers. American Airlines specifically approached Lockheed and Douglas in the early 1960s for a smaller alternative capable of carrying about 250 passengers over transcontinental or medium transoceanic distances, such as New York to London or Dallas to Latin America, emphasizing short-field performance and economic viability.[11][4] Lockheed's response targeted this niche against competitors like the quadjet Boeing 747 and the rival trijet McDonnell Douglas DC-10, which American selected in 1968. The trijet layout was chosen to optimize range, payload, and runway performance for routes balancing efficiency with regulatory demands for engine redundancy on extended overwater flights, where twinjets faced restrictions under FAA rules limiting diversions. This configuration avoided the higher fuel consumption and maintenance complexity of four engines while enabling quieter cabins and better overall economics than larger jets amid pre-1970s fuel price stability.[4][11] Initial design studies began around 1966, leading to formal proposals by 1968 that incorporated advanced automation to appeal to carriers prioritizing reliability and passenger comfort. The program launched on March 1, 1968, secured by Eastern Air Lines' order for 50 aircraft and Trans World Airlines' commitment for 33 more, positioning the L-1011 to capture market share in a sector projected to grow with expanding international networks.[12][13]Design and Engineering Decisions
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar's design emphasized aerodynamic efficiency and pilot workload reduction through innovative control surfaces, including an all-flying tail, or stabilator, which replaced the conventional trimmable horizontal stabilizer to provide enhanced longitudinal stability and precise handling without the added weight and complexity of separate elevator and stabilizer mechanisms.[14] This configuration allowed the entire horizontal tail to pivot as a unit in response to yoke inputs, contributing to smoother pitch control particularly during high-speed flight and turbulence.[15] Complementing this was the direct lift control (DLC) system, which deployed outboard spoilers symmetrically to modulate lift directly without altering pitch attitude, enabling finer adjustments to descent rate and glideslope during approach and landing for reduced vertical touchdown scatter and improved passenger comfort.[16][17] Cabin design prioritized passenger comfort and operational efficiency, accommodating 250 to 400 passengers in a twin-aisle layout depending on configuration, with no entry doors positioned over the wings to facilitate unobstructed evacuation slides and optimal class zoning.[8] The trijet propulsion arrangement, featuring two engines under the wings and a third rear-mounted via an S-duct, positioned powerplants away from the fuselage, significantly lowering cabin noise levels compared to contemporaries and enhancing the onboard experience.[18][4] This rear-engine placement also supported a cleaner underfuselage profile, aiding ground clearance and maintenance access while aligning with Lockheed's philosophy of integrating military-derived redundancy principles into civil aviation for robust structural integrity, though specific fail-safe adaptations drew from the company's experience with large transport aircraft like the C-5 Galaxy.[3] These choices reflected Lockheed's commitment to advancing automation and reliability in widebody airliners, prioritizing first-flight efficiency and long-term operational economics over simpler designs, even as they introduced complexities in integration.[19] The resulting airframe balanced high-capacity interiors with aerodynamic refinements, such as a swept wing with extended span options for better lift-to-drag ratios in later variants, though the baseline emphasized stability over extreme range at the expense of higher development risks.[7]Rolls-Royce RB211 Engine Challenges
Lockheed selected the Rolls-Royce RB211 turbofan engine for the L-1011 TriStar in March 1968, opting for this unproven design over established alternatives from Pratt & Whitney and General Electric due to promises of superior fuel efficiency from its high-bypass ratio, reduced noise via advanced fan technology, and lighter weight enabled by innovative composite materials.[20][21] The RB211's three-spool architecture and initial plan for Hyfil carbon-fiber fan blades positioned it as a technological leap, but this choice locked Lockheed into sole dependency on Rolls-Royce, forgoing engine competition that competitors like the McDonnell Douglas DC-10 enjoyed with multiple suppliers.[10] Development encountered severe technical obstacles, particularly with the fan blades, as the original narrow-chord Hyfil composites failed bird-strike and durability tests, necessitating a costly redesign to wider-chord titanium blades that increased weight and complexity while requiring extensive revalidation.[22] These issues delayed RB211 certification from the targeted 1970 timeline to March 1972, stalling TriStar flight testing and integration since the prototype's November 1970 maiden flight used incomplete engines.[10] The redesign's overruns, estimated at hundreds of millions in unrecovered costs, stemmed from the engine's ambitious specifications exceeding Rolls-Royce's prior experience with high-bypass fans.[22] By February 1971, these escalating costs triggered Rolls-Royce's bankruptcy, with the company citing RB211 losses exceeding £100 million as the primary cause, threatening the entire TriStar program amid Lockheed's own financial strains.[23] The UK government nationalized Rolls-Royce and provided a £130 million bailout to ensure continuity, while the US administration under President Nixon exerted diplomatic pressure on Britain to honor contracts, averting potential cancellation of 50 TriStar orders worth $750 million.[24] This intervention preserved the engine supply but imposed renegotiated terms, including price hikes that further burdened Lockheed without resolving underlying certification setbacks.[25]Production Delays and Financial Strain
The prototype Lockheed L-1011 conducted its first flight on November 16, 1970, from the company's Palmdale, California facility, marking the start of flight testing for the widebody airliner.[26][27] This event followed assembly at Plant 10 in Palmdale, where production ramp-up had begun amid efforts to meet launch customer commitments.[28] Extensive testing, encompassing thousands of hours to validate the aircraft's advanced autopilot, direct-lift control, and structural integrity, extended the certification timeline. The Federal Aviation Administration granted type certification in April 1972, approximately 17 months after the maiden flight, delaying entry into service relative to competitors like the McDonnell Douglas DC-10.[5][29] Initial deliveries commenced shortly thereafter, with Eastern Air Lines receiving the first production L-1011-1 on April 26, 1972, enabling revenue operations on routes such as Miami to New York.[30] However, these production delays compounded financial pressures at Lockheed, as manufacturing scale-up at Palmdale strained cash flows amid fixed tooling and labor commitments.[4] By mid-1971, cumulative overruns had escalated program costs well beyond initial estimates of around $1 billion, prompting Lockheed to seek emergency financing. The U.S. government approved $250 million in loan guarantees under the Emergency Loan Guarantee Act of 1971, averting potential bankruptcy and enabling completion of certification and early deliveries.[31][32] Total development expenditures ultimately surpassed $2 billion, reflecting the high fixed costs of certifying such an ambitious design in a competitive market.[33]Technical Features
Airframe and Aerodynamics
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar airframe featured a conventional semi-monocoque fuselage fabricated from aluminum alloy materials with a circular cross-section optimized for pressurization and structural efficiency.[34] The baseline L-1011-1 measured 54.17 meters (177 feet 8 inches) in overall length, while the wingspan stood at 47.34 meters (155 feet 4 inches) across production models.[11] Fuselage modifications in variants included stretches to 56.95 meters (186 feet 10 inches) in the L-1011-200 for increased capacity and shortenings to 50.05 meters (164 feet 2 inches) in the L-1011-500 to enhance fuel capacity and range.[35] The wing design incorporated advanced high-lift devices, including nine leading-edge slats with Krueger flaps on inboard sections and Fowler flaps on outboard panels, enabling effective takeoff and landing performance on shorter runways.[36] Aerodynamically, the supercritical airfoil sections delayed drag divergence at transonic cruise speeds, reducing wave drag and supporting efficient long-range operations.[37] The clean wing, unencumbered by forward engine nacelles, further minimized interference drag. Unique to the TriStar's trijet layout, the center engine mounted in the tail cone received airflow via an S-duct intake elevated above the fuselage, which protected against ground debris ingestion while contributing to overall drag reduction of up to 4 percent compared to alternative configurations.[38] This placement enhanced yaw stability and significantly lowered cabin noise levels by distancing engines from passenger areas.[5] The S-duct's curvature maintained pressure losses akin to straight ducts, preserving engine performance without compromising aerodynamic efficiency.[39]Propulsion and Power Systems
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar utilized three Rolls-Royce RB211-22B high-bypass ratio turbofan engines, each delivering 42,000 lbf (187 kN) of thrust, with the configuration consisting of two under-wing engines and one center-mounted in an S-duct at the rear fuselage.[22][1] These engines incorporated thrust reversers on all three units to enhance braking performance during landing, and their design included features such as extended fan cowls to suppress noise from the cold stream exhaust.[40] The RB211's innovative three-spool architecture—comprising low-, intermediate-, and high-pressure sections—enabled higher thermodynamic efficiency and lower specific fuel consumption than two-spool rivals, though real-world operations revealed that the trijet layout imposed inherent penalties in overall propulsion efficiency compared to emerging twin-engine designs due to the additional drag and weight of the third engine.[22][41] The aircraft's fuel system featured four main wing tanks and auxiliary center-section tanks, providing a baseline capacity of 23,814 US gallons (90,150 liters) for the L-1011-1, with later variants expanding this through additional tanks or higher-density fuel allowances.[42] Automated transfer logic governed fuel sequencing, drawing from outboard tanks to supply the center engine and auxiliary power unit while pumping from inner center tanks (1A and 3A) to inboard tanks (1 and 3) to preserve longitudinal center-of-gravity limits during flight.[17] This system prioritized engine-specific feeds—left tank to left engine, right to right, and outboards to center—while incorporating cross-feed capabilities for imbalance correction, though empirical data from service indicated occasional manual interventions were needed under asymmetric failure conditions to avoid exceeding CG envelopes.[17] Electrical power generation relied on three engine-driven integrated drive generators (IDGs), each rated at 90 kVA and 400 Hz, providing constant-frequency output via variable-speed drives to support avionics, lighting, and hydraulic pumps.[17] The tail-mounted ST6L-73 auxiliary power unit (APU), comprising a gas generator section with axial and centrifugal compressors driving pneumatic and electrical loads up to 90 kVA, served as the primary ground power source and in-flight backup, with its location forward of the center engine inlet ensuring accessibility but exposing it to potential ingestion risks during high-power operations.[43] In practice, the APU's reliability supported extended ground operations, yet its single-unit design represented a single point of failure absent in dual-APU contemporaries, constraining dispatch flexibility under certain regulatory minima.[43]Avionics and Flight Control Systems
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar incorporated the Avionic Flight Control System (AFCS), a highly redundant setup that automated many flight phases to minimize pilot workload and improve handling qualities.[29] This system featured triple hydraulic channels and dual-dual computing architecture, enabling fail-operational performance even after a failure.[29] The AFCS integrated autopilot functions that permitted hands-off operation from cruise descent through touchdown, a capability advanced for its era.[8] Central to navigation was the inertial navigation system (INS), which relied on gyroscopic sensors aligned to the aircraft's initial longitude and latitude for dead-reckoning over long distances without ground-based updates.[14] This setup supported precise positioning in oceanic or remote routes, reducing dependence on radio aids.[44] The TriStar achieved FAA certification for Category IIIB autoland upon entering service in April 1972, allowing automatic landings with decision heights as low as 50 feet and runway visual range down to 150 meters.[8] This was the first such approval for a widebody trijet, leveraging redundant radar altimeters, localizer/glideslope receivers, and flight directors for zero-visibility operations when equipped.[7] Later variants and operators extended to full Category IIIB with zero decision height.[10] Flight controls included an all-flying tailplane, or stabilator, hydraulically actuated without a separate elevator, which enhanced pitch stability and responsiveness compared to conventional trimmable stabilizers.[3] Elements of the AFCS incorporated fly-by-wire assist functions, including direct lift control that used electronically managed spoilers to adjust lift independently of pitch for precise handling—a feature not present in the DC-10—as well as early digital signaling akin to partial fly-by-wire for stabilizer positioning, predating widespread adoption in commercial airliners.[45] The system's active controls also foreshadowed collision avoidance through envelope protection limits on bank angles and speeds.[46]Other Innovations and Systems
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar incorporated a center fuselage-mounted body landing gear with two wheels alongside the primary wing-mounted main landing gears featuring four-wheel bogies, facilitating short-field operations by distributing weight more evenly on runways or unprepared surfaces.[47] This configuration supported takeoff and landing distances reduced by up to 1,000 feet compared to trijet competitors without body gear.[48] The braking system included autobrakes that automatically applied a pilot-selected deceleration rate upon touchdown—typically 8-12 feet per second squared—and anti-skid protection operating on individual wheels for both primary and backup modes, enhancing stopping performance and tire longevity on contaminated runways.[17] Environmental controls relied on an integrated pneumatic system (IPS) that bled hot, pressurized air from the engines to drive cabin air conditioning packs, outflow valves for pressurization, and dedicated cooling for avionics bays, achieving cabin altitudes equivalent to 8,000 feet (2,440 meters) at a 41,000-foot cruise while minimizing compressor workload.[49] [36] Pressurization redundancy featured dual outflow valves with automatic, standby, and manual modes, capable of maintaining differential pressures up to 8.9 psi, while passenger oxygen deployed via ceiling-mounted masks linked to chemical generators providing 12-22 minutes of flow at 15,000 feet equivalent.[50] [51] Hydraulic and electrical systems emphasized quadruple redundancy informed by Lockheed's military transport designs, such as the C-5 Galaxy, to ensure fail-operational integrity. Four independent hydraulic circuits—each with separate reservoirs, engine-driven pumps, and accumulators—powered flight surfaces, gear extension/retraction, and brakes, allowing full control retention after loss of any three systems, unlike the three-system setup in rival aircraft.[52] [53] Electrical distribution utilized four engine generators plus an APU unit feeding 115/200 VAC buses with automatic load shedding and transfer capabilities, supporting ancillary functions like galley power and anti-icing without single-point vulnerabilities.[54]Variants
L-1011-1 Baseline
The L-1011-1 constituted the initial production variant of the Lockheed TriStar series, establishing the standard configuration referenced in subsequent derivatives. Optimized for short- to medium-range routes, it accommodated 256 passengers in a typical two-class layout comprising first class and economy sections.[3][55][56] This baseline model featured a maximum takeoff weight of 430,000 pounds and a range of approximately 2,680 nautical miles with full passenger complement, positioning it 250 nautical miles shorter than comparable competitors like the McDonnell Douglas DC-10 for similar payloads.[5] The Federal Aviation Administration certified the L-1011-1 on April 14, 1972, enabling commercial operations shortly thereafter.[5] The first delivery occurred to Eastern Air Lines on April 5, 1972, followed by Trans World Airlines initiating passenger service the same year.[55][57] Delta Air Lines received its initial aircraft and commenced revenue flights on December 15, 1973.[9] Production of the L-1011-1 totaled 160 units, accounting for the majority of the TriStar family built before overall program cessation in 1984.[55] These aircraft primarily served U.S. carriers on domestic and transcontinental routes, underscoring the variant's role as the foundational TriStar design.[12]Extended Range and Capacity Variants
The L-1011-100 variant extended operational range through auxiliary fuel tanks integrated into the wing structure, providing approximately 930 additional nautical miles over the baseline model's capabilities.[58] This modification supported transatlantic and longer domestic routes, with fuel capacity enhancements enabling greater flexibility for operators like Delta Air Lines.[9] The L-1011-200 incorporated upgraded Rolls-Royce RB211-524 engines featuring pinion gearing to deliver higher thrust ratings, particularly optimized for hot-and-high airport performance.[59] These engines allowed a maximum range of 4,918 nautical miles with full fuel loads and 3,680 nautical miles with maximum passenger payload, facilitating service on extended routes in challenging climates.[60] The L-1011-500 featured a shortened fuselage measuring 164 feet 2 inches in length—reduced from the standard 177 feet 8 inches—to improve aerodynamic efficiency and fuel economy for ultra-long-haul operations.[61] First entering revenue service with British Airways on May 7, 1979, operating the London Heathrow to Abu Dhabi route, the -500 prioritized range over cabin volume while maintaining trijet reliability.[62][63] Across these variants, capacity enhancements focused on high-density seating arrangements, with the airframe certified for up to 400 passengers in all-economy configurations to maximize revenue on dense short-to-medium sectors.[42] Operators such as Eastern Air Lines implemented such layouts, balancing the TriStar's spacious twin-aisle interior against demand for higher load factors.[11] This flexibility complemented range improvements, allowing airlines to adapt the aircraft for varying mission profiles without structural redesigns.[60]Specialized Modifications
, enabling enhanced short-field performance and greater payload capacity compared to standard models.[64] This variant was primarily implemented through post-production conversions rather than new manufacturing, with limited adoption due to the TriStar program's overall production constraints.[10] In the military domain, the Royal Air Force procured nine second-hand L-1011-500 aircraft from British Airways and Pan American World Airways between 1982 and 1984, converting six to tanker-transport roles. The TriStar K1 configuration, used on three airframes, included two underwing hose-and-drogue refueling pods for aerial refueling operations, supporting RAF strategic airlift and tanker missions primarily with No. 216 Squadron at RAF Brize Norton until retirement in 2014.[65][66] These conversions involved minimal external modifications beyond the refueling equipment, preserving the aircraft's commercial fuselage while adapting it for defense needs.[67] A unique civilian adaptation emerged with the Stargazer, an L-1011-100 (manufacturer serial number 1012) acquired by Orbital Sciences Corporation in 1992 and modified in 1994 by Marshall Aerospace. This conversion reinforced the upper fuselage to carry the Pegasus air-launched rocket, enabling satellite deployments from altitudes over 40,000 feet (12,000 m); the aircraft conducted its first Pegasus launch in 1994 and continues operations under Northrop Grumman as of 2024, marking the last flying TriStar.[68][69] Lockheed explored unbuilt concepts such as convertible freighter variants, including proposals for rapid passenger-to-cargo reconfiguration, but market demand and the program's cessation precluded development.[6]Operational History
Commercial Deployment
Eastern Air Lines became the launch customer for the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar, taking delivery of the first production aircraft on April 6, 1972, and commencing commercial passenger service on April 26, 1972, with flights between Miami and New York.[7] The airline initially deployed the TriStar on high-density domestic routes, including shuttle services, leveraging its capacity for up to 256 passengers in a typical three-class configuration.[12] Delta Air Lines assembled the largest TriStar fleet, operating up to 70 aircraft at its peak, with service beginning in 1973 on domestic and transatlantic routes such as Atlanta to London and New York to Paris.[9] Other major U.S. operators included Trans World Airlines (TWA), which flew 39 TriStars primarily on transatlantic services like New York to London and Frankfurt, and Pacific routes to Athens and Tel Aviv, and Eastern, which expanded to 44 aircraft for intra-U.S. and Latin American flights.[70] Internationally, British Airways utilized TriStars for European and transatlantic operations from London Heathrow, while Cathay Pacific employed them on Pacific routes from Hong Kong to the United States and Europe.[71] In service, the TriStar demonstrated operational advantages including dispatch reliability rates of 98.9 percent, surpassing initial targets, which supported consistent schedule adherence.[39] Its low noise certification—takeoff at 98.0 dB, sideline at 96.9 dB, and approach at 100.2 dB—enabled access to noise-sensitive urban airports and curfew-restricted slots, such as those at London Heathrow.[17] A total of 250 TriStars entered commercial service worldwide, serving peak operations through the 1980s on medium- to long-haul routes.[4] By the 1990s and early 2000s, most fleets were retired as airlines shifted to twin-engine jets offering superior fuel efficiency under extended-range twin-engine operational performance standards (ETOPS), with Delta completing phase-out in 2001.[9]
Military and Research Applications
The Royal Air Force operated nine L-1011-500 TriStars in dual-role configurations as air-to-air refueling tankers and troop transports from 1983 to 2014.[72] Six aircraft were acquired from British Airways in December 1982, with three additional units purchased from Pan American Airways in 1984.[73] Variants included the K1 and KC1 for refueling duties equipped with hose-and-drogue systems, and the C2 and C2A for passenger and cargo transport capable of carrying up to 265 personnel or 16 tonnes of freight over 4,000 miles.[65] [74] These aircraft supported operations by delivering over 250,000 troops and supplies globally, including during conflicts in the Falklands, Gulf War, and Afghanistan.[75] The fleet was retired following the final operational flight on March 24, 2014.[76] NASA utilized modified L-1011 TriStars for aeronautical research programs focused on enhancing efficiency and safety. In the late 1970s, a cooperative NASA-Lockheed effort tested active controls on the L-1011 to improve energy efficiency through automated flight management.[46] Subsequent projects included wing vortex flow visualization using smoke generators to study aerodynamic wakes, aiding in the understanding of trailing vortices for safer aircraft spacing.[77] In 2012, an L-1011 supported the Adaptive Performance Optimization experiment, employing variable camber wings to reduce drag and fuel consumption by adapting to flight conditions in real-time.[78] [79] The Stargazer, registered N140SC, represents the sole remaining airworthy L-1011, converted in 1994 by Orbital Sciences (now Northrop Grumman) into a launch platform for the Pegasus XL rocket.[80] This modification enables air-launch of small satellites into orbit from altitudes above 40,000 feet, supporting scientific and commercial payloads since its first mission in 1994.[81] As of August 2025, Stargazer continues operations from Mojave Air and Space Port, with recent flights confirming its ongoing role despite the last Pegasus launch occurring in 2021.[82] [83]Retirement and Final Uses
The majority of L-1011 TriStars were retired from passenger service by major airlines in the late 1990s and early 2000s, driven by high operating costs, engine maintenance challenges, and the rise of more efficient twin-engine widebodies. Delta Air Lines conducted its final revenue passenger flight with the type on July 31, 2001, operating TriStar 1 N728DA on a roundtrip from Atlanta to Orlando.[9] Smaller operators and charters extended use into the mid-2000s, with the last documented commercial passenger operations concluding around 2008.[84] Post-retirement, dozens of airframes were ferried to storage facilities, including the Southern California Logistics Airport in Victorville, California, where they underwent part-out, disassembly, or long-term desert preservation amid harsh environmental conditions accelerating corrosion.[85] Efforts to repurpose surplus TriStars as freighters faced significant barriers, including the aircraft's structural weight limitations, inferior payload-range capabilities compared to the DC-10, and elevated maintenance demands from the complex S-duct intake on the tail-mounted RB211 engine, which complicated inspections and increased downtime costs.[86] Lockheed explored conversions, such as modifying 13 ex-Delta airframes in the early 2000s, but secured no firm customers, limiting successful freighter adaptations to a handful operated briefly by niche cargo firms like Kitty Hawk International.[87] The absence of a dedicated freighter variant or certified passenger-to-freighter program further diminished viability against competitors with established conversion ecosystems.[6] On the ground, retired TriStars found roles in training and simulation. The FAA's Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Research Facility at Atlantic City International Airport utilizes an L-1011 equipped with fire-hardened test chambers to simulate onboard blazes and evaluate suppression systems, supporting ARFF protocol development.[88] Other airframes served as fire training hulks for emergency responders, undergoing controlled burns to practice widebody incident response. One early prototype fuselage, derived from Delta's fleet, was retained for instructional purposes at the Delta Flight Museum. In flight, a single modified L-1011-100, designated Stargazer (N140SC), continues specialized operations as of 2025, launching Pegasus XL rockets for Northrop Grumman from sites like Vandenberg Space Force Base, marking the type's sole remaining airworthy example outside preservation.[80]Safety and Incidents
Accident Statistics
A total of 250 Lockheed L-1011 TriStar aircraft were produced between 1970 and 1984.[26] Over its operational history from 1972 into the 2000s, the type was involved in 35 reported occurrences, including 10 hull losses, resulting in approximately 540 fatalities.[89][14] The hull loss rate stood at 4% of the fleet (10 out of 250 aircraft), lower than the McDonnell Douglas DC-10's rate of about 7.4% (33 hull losses out of roughly 446 produced).[90][58] Fatality rates per million flight hours were estimated at 66 for the L-1011, comparable to the DC-10's 74 but slightly higher than the Boeing 747's 61 as of the late 1980s; however, the L-1011 exhibited no recurrent design-related failures akin to the DC-10's cargo door issues, with most losses attributed to external factors such as adverse weather or crew errors by official investigations.[91][90]| Metric | L-1011 TriStar Value |
|---|---|
| Total Produced | 250 |
| Hull Losses | 10 |
| Total Occurrences | 35 |
| Fatalities | ~540 |
| Hull Loss Rate (% of fleet) | 4% |
Notable Incidents and Lessons Learned
On December 29, 1972, Eastern Air Lines Flight 401, operating a Lockheed L-1011-1 (N310EA) from New York to Miami, crashed into the Florida Everglades approximately 18 miles northwest of Miami International Airport, killing 101 of the 176 occupants.[92] The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determined the probable cause as the flight crew's failure to monitor the aircraft's flight instruments following an inadvertent disconnection of the autopilot during troubleshooting of a burned-out nose landing gear position indicator light bulb.[92] The crew's fixation on the minor equipment malfunction, compounded by inadequate cross-checking and breakdown in crew coordination, allowed the aircraft to descend unnoticed from 2,000 feet into the swamp.[92] This accident highlighted deficiencies in crew resource management (CRM), prompting the FAA to mandate enhanced training protocols emphasizing altitude awareness, instrument monitoring, and assertive communication among crew members to prevent distraction-induced deviations from basic flight duties.[92] On August 19, 1980, Saudia Flight 163, a Lockheed L-1011-200 (HZ-AHK) en route from Riyadh to Jeddah, experienced an in-flight fire originating in the aft cargo compartment shortly after takeoff, prompting an emergency return to Riyadh International Airport where it landed safely but failed to evacuate, resulting in the deaths of all 301 occupants from smoke inhalation and toxic gases.[93] The Saudi accident investigation attributed the fire's initiation to a possible oxygen system leak or electrical fault, but the catastrophe ensued post-landing due to crew incapacitation from heat, fumes, and hydraulic failures exacerbated by the flight engineer's erroneous shutdown of air conditioning packs, which caused cabin overpressurization and trapped smoke.[94] Contributing factors included the captain's decision to taxi to a remote area before evacuation, cultural cockpit hierarchy inhibiting junior crew input, and inadequate smoke penetration barriers in cargo holds.[94] The incident underscored the critical need for improved cargo compartment fire isolation, rapid evacuation drills overriding non-essential procedures, and CRM adaptations to address authority gradients in diverse crews, influencing global standards for post-fire evacuation and smoke hazard mitigation in wide-body aircraft.[93] On August 2, 1985, Delta Air Lines Flight 191, a Lockheed L-1011-1 (N726DA) approaching Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, encountered a microburst windshear during final approach, leading to a loss of control, impact with the ground short of the runway, and a subsequent fireball that killed 134 of the 163 occupants and one person on the ground.[95] The NTSB identified the primary cause as the flight crew's penetration of a thunderstorm's rain shaft into an undetected microburst, producing downdrafts exceeding 30 knots and windshear gradients that overwhelmed the aircraft's performance margins despite go-around attempts.[95] Contributing elements were the lack of onboard predictive windshear detection systems and insufficient meteorological awareness of microburst hazards at the time.[95] This event catalyzed FAA requirements for predictive windshear radar installation on transport-category aircraft, mandatory windshear escape maneuver training, and enhanced airport Doppler radar deployment to forecast and alert on microbursts, significantly reducing windshear-related accidents thereafter.[95]Evaluation of Safety Features
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar featured a fail-operational autoland system certified for Category IIIA operations from initial delivery in 1972, permitting automatic landings with visibility as low as 700-foot runways visual range and no decision height, thereby mitigating risks associated with fog or heavy precipitation that historically contributed to runway excursions or controlled flight into terrain.[39] This capability was enhanced by inertial navigation and triple-channel autopilot redundancies, allowing continued safe descent and touchdown even after failure of one or two channels.[29] Flight control systems incorporated triple hydraulic independence and fail-operational active controls, tested extensively in NASA-Lockheed programs starting in the early 1970s, which preserved maneuverability and stability during dual hydraulic or electrical outages, averting potential loss-of-control scenarios in over 99% of simulated failure modes per Lockheed certification data.[46] Built-in test equipment further supported rapid fault isolation, reducing downtime and enhancing overall dispatch reliability to levels exceeding 99% for major operators by the late 1970s.[13] Notwithstanding these advances, the aircraft's intricate avionics and propulsion architecture imposed elevated training requirements, with pilots needing 50-100 additional simulator hours compared to contemporaries like the Boeing 747 for proficiency in automated modes, potentially straining airline resources and introducing latent procedural vulnerabilities if recurrent training lapsed.[96] The S-duct configuration of the center Rolls-Royce RB211 engine, optimized for reduced drag and noise, nonetheless facilitated axial fire propagation from fan blade failures to fuselage structures due to constrained airflow and limited compartmentalization, manifesting in infrequent but high-severity thermal events that necessitated post-1980 design retrofits like enhanced firewalls.[97] Delta Air Lines, which operated 59 TriStars from 1979 to 2001, commended the type's hydraulic and electrical redundancies for enabling uneventful continuations after isolated failures, attributing dispatch reliability rates above 98% to inherent system robustness rather than exceptional maintenance.[98] These features collectively elevated safety benchmarks, informing FAA evolution toward Category IIIB/C autoland mandates in the 1980s and fail-operational criteria for future widebodies, as validated through TriStar service data integrated into advisory circulars.[13]Economic Performance
Sales Figures and Market Competition
Lockheed delivered a total of 250 L-1011 TriStar aircraft to airlines between April 1972 and 1984.[4][5] In direct competition within the widebody trijet market segment, McDonnell Douglas produced 446 DC-10s, encompassing 386 commercial passenger variants and 60 military KC-10 Extenders.[99] The Boeing 747, targeting a larger very-long-range segment, achieved far greater volume with 1,574 units built over its production run from 1968 to 2023.[100]| Aircraft Model | Total Units Produced/Delivered |
|---|---|
| Lockheed L-1011 TriStar | 250 [4] |
| McDonnell Douglas DC-10 (incl. KC-10) | 446 [99] |
| Boeing 747 | 1,574 [100] |
Financial Impact on Lockheed
The development of the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar incurred substantial cost overruns, ultimately resulting in approximately $2.5 billion in program losses for the company, exacerbated by delays from engine supplier Rolls-Royce and fixed-price contract constraints.[106] To achieve breakeven, Lockheed required sales of around 500 units, but production totaled only 250 aircraft before cessation in 1984, leaving the program far short of financial viability.[19][107] In July 1971, amid acute liquidity crises tied to the TriStar and concurrent military program shortfalls like the C-5A Galaxy, Lockheed faced imminent bankruptcy, prompting Congress to enact the Emergency Loan Guarantee Act, which authorized up to $250 million in federal guarantees for private loans to the firm.[31][108] This intervention, approved by President Nixon on August 2, 1971, provided critical short-term relief, particularly as the winding down of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War diminished anticipated military procurement revenues. The TriStar's fiscal burden precipitated Lockheed's permanent withdrawal from the commercial airliner sector following the program's end, redirecting corporate resources toward military contracts that ensured long-term stability, such as stealth technology developments including the F-117 Nighthawk.[106][107] By 1976, the airliner line had already accrued nearly $1 billion in pretax losses, underscoring its role in reshaping the company's strategic priorities away from civilian aviation.[109]Causal Analysis of Commercial Failure
Lockheed's strategic decision to center the L-1011 design around the unproven Rolls-Royce RB211 engine, selected for its promised efficiency gains via composite fan blades, exposed the program to severe delays when Rolls-Royce encountered technical hurdles and filed for bankruptcy on February 4, 1971.[5] This event necessitated a UK government bailout and nationalization of Rolls-Royce, postponing TriStar certification and first delivery until April 1972, over a year after the competing McDonnell Douglas DC-10 entered service in August 1971.[110] Lockheed's predominant military aviation background, exemplified by projects like the C-5 Galaxy, fostered a culture accustomed to flexible government funding and extended development cycles, which ill-prepared the company for the rigid timelines and cost sensitivities of commercial certification under FAA oversight.[5][3] The TriStar's engineering emphasis on cutting-edge features, such as an advanced autopilot capable of Category III landings and direct lift control for superior low-speed handling, elevated manufacturing complexity and resulted in direct operating costs that exceeded those of the simpler DC-10 by margins operators found prohibitive for medium-haul routes.[107] Maintenance burdens were amplified by the trijet configuration's three engines and intricate systems, deterring airlines seeking parity with the DC-10's lower per-flight-hour upkeep, particularly as fuel prices surged following the 1973 oil crisis.[45] Lockheed's failure to pivot toward more efficient twin-engine derivatives, unlike Boeing's subsequent 767, locked the TriStar into a niche eroded by rising energy costs and evolving regulatory preferences for etops-capable twins.[111] By the time production peaked, the widebody market had bifurcated: the Boeing 747 dominated high-density long-haul, while the DC-10 captured trijet demand with earlier availability and broader adaptability, leaving insufficient volume for the late-entering TriStar despite its technical refinements.[110] This misalignment, compounded by Lockheed's over-optimism in forecasting 400-500 sales based on pre-delay orders, culminated in only 250 units built, forcing the company to absorb losses exceeding $2.5 billion in today's dollars and exit commercial aviation entirely by 1984.[107][11]Legacy
Technological Influence
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar pioneered advanced automatic flight control systems (AFCS), incorporating electronic interfaces that served as precursors to fly-by-wire technology, thereby enhancing precision handling and operational efficiency.[4][112] This system allowed for automated descent control and integration with inertial navigation, reducing pilot workload and improving fuel economy through optimized flight paths.[113] A key innovation was the TriStar's CAT-IIIB autoland capability, certified in 1972, which enabled fully automatic landings in low-visibility conditions down to 50-foot decision heights, setting early benchmarks for redundant, fail-operational landing systems later refined in aircraft like the Airbus A320 and Boeing 777.[3][114][113] The dual-dual autopilot architecture provided the necessary redundancy for such operations without reliance on flight management systems, influencing the evolution of digital autoland standards.[115] In partnership with NASA, Lockheed evaluated active controls on the L-1011, including gust load alleviation and direct lift control, which demonstrated potential for reduced structural weight and improved ride quality, concepts that informed energy-efficient flight control advancements in subsequent widebody designs.[46] These tests, conducted in the 1970s, yielded data on maneuver load alleviation, contributing to the foundational understanding of relaxed stability systems.[46] The TriStar's trijet configuration emphasized thrust balance and redundancy for transoceanic routes under pre-ETOPS regulations, highlighting efficiency trade-offs in engine placement that, despite the later dominance of high-bypass twins, provided analytical insights into propulsion integration for medium- to long-range operations.[116] Operational data from the fleet, which achieved dispatch reliability rates of up to 99.98% over extended service, supported refinements in reliability modeling and predictive maintenance practices across the industry.[29][4] The aircraft's integrated drive generator, the first in a jetliner, further advanced electrical power systems reliability.Preservation Efforts
As of 2025, the sole airworthy Lockheed L-1011 TriStar is the Stargazer (N140SC), operated by Northrop Grumman to serve as a launch platform for Pegasus rockets from modified underbelly pylons.[117] This aircraft, originally delivered in 1978, undergoes specialized maintenance to remain flight-capable for these missions, with its last recorded flight activity noted in late 2024 awaiting further operations.[118] No other L-1011 airframes are certified for flight, as the fleet's retirement has led to widespread scrapping or storage without active upkeep.[6] Approximately five L-1011 airframes are preserved for static display in museums and aviation sites worldwide. The Delta Flight Museum in Atlanta exhibits the nose section of the original prototype (Ship 1), allowing visitors to explore early cockpit instrumentation from the 1970 first flight.[119] In Riyadh, the Royal Saudi Air Force Museum features a former Saudia L-1011-200 as a prominent gate guardian, showcasing the aircraft's external structure and historical livery.[120] Additional preserved examples include one at the Atlantic Canada Aviation Museum in Enfield, Nova Scotia, highlighting regional aviation heritage.[121] Efforts to restore additional airframes to operational condition encounter formidable obstacles, including the scarcity of obsolete spare parts after over four decades since production ended in 1984, and escalating costs for overhauling Rolls-Royce RB211 engines amid the retirement of remaining users.[6] These factors render full restorations economically prohibitive for most private or institutional collectors, limiting preservation to static exhibits rather than flyable replicas. Preserved TriStars contribute to educational initiatives through museum displays that demonstrate advanced 1970s avionics and trijet design principles. Complementing physical artifacts, virtual recreations such as the iniBuilds L-1011 add-on for Microsoft Flight Simulator, teased for release in 2025, enable detailed simulation of the aircraft's autopilot, inertial navigation, and S-duct engine integration for training and historical study.[122]Cultural Depictions
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar appeared in the 1992 action film Passenger 57, where a specific aircraft (N309EA, later operated by Faucett Perú) served as the hijacked plane central to the plot involving terrorists seizing control mid-flight.[123] The film's depiction emphasized the aircraft's size and layout in high-stakes sequences, reflecting early 1990s perceptions of widebody jets as vulnerable to such threats.[124] A BWIA International Airways L-1011 also featured briefly in the 2003 comedy Old School, appearing in a takeoff scene that highlighted the type's distinctive trijet configuration amid the film's nostalgic tone.[125] Among aviation enthusiasts, the TriStar earned the nickname "Whisperliner" from Eastern Air Lines, coined for its exceptionally quiet passenger cabin and takeoff noise levels enabled by the Rolls-Royce RB211 engines' design.[4] This moniker persists in online forums and historical accounts, symbolizing the aircraft's advanced noise suppression as a hallmark of its engineering focus on passenger comfort.[52] In 2020s retrospective videos on platforms like YouTube, the TriStar is frequently portrayed by aviation historians as an "over-engineered masterpiece," crediting its pioneering autopilot and autoland systems while attributing its limited production to Rolls-Royce delays and competition from the McDonnell Douglas DC-10.[126] These depictions underscore a narrative of technical brilliance overshadowed by commercial misfortunes, appealing to niche audiences valuing innovation over sales figures.Specifications
The baseline Lockheed L-1011-1 TriStar measured 177 feet 8 inches (54.17 meters) in length, had a wingspan of 155 feet 4 inches (47.34 meters), and stood 55 feet 4 inches (16.87 meters) in height.[55][127] It was powered by three Rolls-Royce RB211-22B high-bypass turbofan engines, each rated at 42,000 pounds-force (187 kilonewtons) of thrust.[128] Performance characteristics included a maximum operating speed of Mach 0.90, a service ceiling of 42,000 feet (12,800 meters), and a range of approximately 4,000 nautical miles (7,410 kilometers) with a typical load of 216 passengers.[55][128][129]| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Maximum takeoff weight | 430,000 pounds (195,000 kilograms)[130][127] |
| Fuel capacity | 23,700 U.S. gallons (90,000 liters)[130] |
| Wing area | 3,456 square feet (321 square meters)[55] |
References
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RSAF_Museum_Lockheed_L-1011_Tristar.jpg
