Hubbry Logo
Pox partyPox partyMain
Open search
Pox party
Community hub
Pox party
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pox party
Pox party
Pox party
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Pox parties, also known as flu parties, are social activities in which children are deliberately exposed to infectious diseases such as chickenpox. Such parties originated to "get it over with" before vaccines were available for a particular illness or because childhood infection might be less severe than infection during adulthood, according to proponents.[1][2] For example, measles[3] is more dangerous to adults than to children over five years old.[1][4][5] Deliberately exposing people to diseases has since been discouraged by public health officials in favor of vaccination, which has caused a decline in the practice of pox parties,[6] although flu parties saw a resurgence in the early 2010s.[7]

Another, more modern, method of intentional contagion involves shipping infectious material. In many parts of the world, shipping infectious items is illegal[8] or tightly regulated.[9][10]

Effectiveness and risk

[edit]

Parents who expose their children to varicella zoster virus in this manner often do so out of the belief that acquiring immunity to chickenpox via infection is safer and more effective than receiving a vaccination.[11] Similar ideas have been applied to other diseases such as measles. Pediatricians have warned against holding pox parties, however, citing dangers arising from possible complications associated with chickenpox, such as encephalitis, chickenpox-associated pneumonia, and invasive group A strep.[12][13] These serious complications (e.g., brain damage or death) are vastly more likely than vaccine adverse events.[14][15] Before the chickenpox vaccine became available, 100 to 150 children in the U.S. died from chickenpox annually.[13][16] In the UK, chickenpox vaccinations are not routine, and around 25 people die a year from the disease, with 80% of victims being adults, in the late 1990s.[17] The chickenpox vaccine is now recommended by health officials, citing vastly superior safety when compared with infection.[8][18]

Some parents have attempted to collect infectious materials, such as saliva, licked lollipops, or other infected items from people who claimed to have children infected with chickenpox.[12] Others use social networking services to make contact with these strangers. The unknown person then mails the potentially infectious matter to the parent, who would then give it to their child in the hope that the child will become infected.[8][12]

These practices are unlikely to reliably transmit the chickenpox virus because varicella zoster cannot survive for long on the surface of such items.[19] Those items can, however, transmit other diseases, including hepatitis B, group A streptococcal infection, and staphylococcal infections — dangerous diseases to which the parents never intended to expose their children.[12] Additionally, in the United States, deliberately sending infectious matter through the U.S. Postal Service is illegal.[8][12]

While chickenpox parties are still held today, they are far less common than before the chickenpox vaccine was introduced.[20]

History

[edit]

In the United States, chickenpox parties were popularized before the introduction of the varicella vaccine in 1995.[12][21][22] Children were also sometimes intentionally exposed to other common childhood illnesses, such as mumps and measles.[23] Before vaccines for these infections became available, parents regarded these diseases as almost inevitable.[23][full citation needed]

Flu parties

[edit]

During the 2009 swine flu pandemic in Canada, doctors noted an increase in what was termed flu parties or flu flings. These gatherings, as with the pox parties, were designed explicitly to allow a parent's children to contract the "swine flu" influenza virus.[24] Researchers such as Dr. Michael Gardam noted that because the pandemic was caused by a flu subtype to which very few people were previously exposed, parents would be just as likely to contract the disease and further its spread.[24] Although these events were heavily discussed in the media, very few were confirmed to have happened.[25]

COVID-19 party

[edit]

A COVID-19 party (also called coronavirus party, corona party, and lockdown party) is a gathering held with the intention of catching or spreading COVID-19. It is a type of pox party where the intentional spread of disease is chosen to build up post-infection immunity.[26][27] Parties have been reported to occur during the omicron wave, due to the belief that omicron causes only mild infection. Experts caution that infection with COVID runs the risk of hospitalization, and increasingly common side effects such as MIS-C and long COVID.[27][26]

A number of news reports in the United States have suggested that parties have occurred with this intention early in the pandemic. However, such reports appear to involve sensational and unsubstantiated media coverage[28] or misleading headlines which misrepresent the content of an article.[29] Such stories have been compared to[30] urban legends.[31]

In the Netherlands,[32][33][34][35] the term "coronavirus party" and other similar terms may refer to a party that is organized during the COVID-19 pandemic but without any intention of spreading the virus.[36] As the party occurs during the COVID-19 pandemic, it may involve breaking existing regulations and restrictions to prevent COVID-19 infections (i.e., on people gatherings).

History

[edit]
Street party in Copenhagen, Denmark, with police (middle) telling people to leave due to restrictions[37]

In March 2020 Andy Beshear, the governor of Kentucky, reported that young people were taking part in parties and later testing positive for COVID-19. "The partygoers intentionally got together 'thinking they were invincible' and purposely defying state guidance to practice social distancing," he said. A CNN headline on 25 March 2020 stated, "A group of young adults held a coronavirus party in Kentucky to defy orders to socially distance. Now one of them has coronavirus."[38] On the same day NPR published the headline "Kentucky Has 39 New Cases; 1 Person Attended A 'Coronavirus Party'".[39] Both headlines misrepresented the content of the article and the quotes they used from Beshear, who did not mention intentional parties for catching COVID-19 but rather that young people were attending parties and becoming sick with COVID-19.[29]

On 6 May, The Seattle Times reported that Meghan DeBold, director of the Department of Community Health in Walla Walla, Washington, said that contact tracing had revealed people wanting to get sick with COVID-19 and get it over with had attended COVID parties. DeBold is quoted as saying, "We ask about contacts, and there are 25 people because: 'We were at a COVID party'".[40] An opinion piece for The New York Times by epidemiologist Greta Bauer on 8 April 2020 said she had heard "rumblings about people ... hosting a version of 'chickenpox parties'... to catch the virus".[41] Rolling Stone states that Bauer did not cite "direct evidence of the existence of these parties."[42] The New York Times reported on 6 May 2020 that stories such as the Walla Walla Covid Party "may have been more innocent gatherings" and county health officials retracted their statements.[43]

On 23 June, Carsyn Leigh Davis was said to have died from COVID-19 at the age of 17 after her mother took her to a COVID party at her church, despite Carsyn having a history of health issues, including cancer. However, according to the coroner's report, there is no mention of a COVID party but rather a church function with 100 children where she did not wear a mask and where social distancing protocols were not followed. According to David Gorski, writing for Science-Based Medicine, the church party was called a "Release Party" and there is no evidence that the party was held so that people could intentionally catch COVID-19.[31]

Response

[edit]

Some news agencies consider COVID-19 parties to be a myth. Rolling Stone called "shaming people on the internet for not properly socially distancing" the favorite new American pastime. They state that these headlines are meant to be virally shared, and they considered the reality to be that young people had simply attended parties where they caught COVID-19, rather than deliberately attending them to contract COVID-19. Rolling Stone attributed the popularity of the stories to "generational animosity" and said that the coronavirus party stories "gives people cooped up in their homes a reason to pat themselves on the back and congratulate themselves for their own sacrifices". The Seattle Times article from Walla Walla backtracked the day after publishing their COVID-19 party story by stating they may not have been accurate.[42]

Wired criticized reports on CNN and others[44] of supposed college students in Tuscaloosa, Alabama throwing parties with infected guests then betting on the contagion that ensues. "They put money in a pot and they try to get Covid," said City Council member Sonya McKinstry, who was the story's lone source.[28][31] "Whoever gets Covid-19 first gets the pot. It makes no sense." Wired says that these stories spread like a game of telephone with "loose talk from public officials and disgracefully sloppy journalism". "It is, of course, technically impossible to rule out the existence of Covid-19 parties. Maybe somewhere in this vast and complex nation, some foolish people are getting infected on purpose. It is also possible that the miasma of media coverage will coalesce into a vector of its own, inspiring Covid parties that otherwise would not have happened. But so far there's no hard evidence that even a single one has taken place—just a recurring cycle of breathless, unsubstantiated media coverage."[28]

Investigator Benjamin Radford researched the claims from the media and stated that there was nothing new to these stories, and that the folklore world has seen stories of people believing that being inoculated against smallpox may turn people into cows. These stories cycle through social media, and include "poisoned Halloween candy, suicide-inducing online games, Satanists, caravans of diseased migrants, evil clowns, and many others." Other childhood diseases such as chickenpox and measles in years before vaccines to prevent these illnesses, some parents would hold 'pox parties' which Radford claims are still "often promoted by anti-vaccination groups". "Assuming you have a willing and potentially infectious patient (who's not bedridden or in a hospital)" holding a COVID-19 party would be problematic for many reasons, including not knowing if someone has COVID-19 or the flu as well as not knowing a person's viral load, according to Radford. He described the entire premise of the parties as "dubious".[29]

All stories reported in the media had "all the typical ingredients of unfounded moral panic rumors", according to Radford. This includes teachers, police, school districts, governors "who publicize the information out of an abundance of caution. Journalists eagerly run with a sensational story, and there's little if any sober or skeptical follow-up".[29] On 10 July 2020, a WOAI-TV station from San Antonio, Texas ran a story interviewing the Chief Medical Officer of Methodist Healthcare, Dr. Jane Appleby, who according to WOAI said she had heard from someone that a patient told their nurse right before dying that they had attended a COVID party to see if the virus was real or not, and now they regretted attending the party. Radford considers the stories "classic folklore (a friend-of-a-friend or FOAF) tale presented in news media as fact", noting that they were often anonymous third-hand story with no verifiable names or other details. He described the "deathbed conversation" ending to the story as being a "classic legend trope".[30]

Cultural depictions

[edit]

The TV series South Park ("Chickenpox") and The Simpsons ("Milhouse of Sand and Fog") each aired an episode featuring a pox party intended to spread varicella.[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pox party

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A pox party is a deliberate social gathering in which parents expose non-immune children to an infected with (varicella-zoster ), aiming to induce mild and confer lifelong immunity before the disease potentially manifests more severely in adulthood. These events, prevalent in the pre-vaccine particularly during the mid-20th century through the , reflected a common parental strategy to "get it over with" when was viewed as an inevitable childhood rite, with empirical observations indicating lower complication rates in pediatric cases compared to adults. typically yields robust, long-lasting humoral and cellular immunity, including T-cell responses that may reduce shingles incidence via exogenous boosting from community exposure, though this benefit diminishes post-vaccination widespread adoption. Health authorities, citing data on risks like secondary bacterial superinfections, encephalitis, and rare mortality (approximately 1 in 60,000 U.S. pediatric cases pre-vaccine), now deem pox parties obsolete and hazardous, prioritizing the varicella vaccine's efficacy in preventing outbreaks with a safer profile. Controversies persist among vaccine-skeptical groups favoring unadulterated immunity over perceived vaccine limitations, such as potential waning protection or breakthrough , occasionally sparking ethical debates and public backlash, as in recent proposals for organized exposure .

Historical Development

Pre-Vaccine Era Practices

Before the licensure of the in , deliberate exposure to () was a common parental in the United States and other Western to induce childhood . Parents frequently organized informal gatherings or playdates between healthy children and those actively infected, facilitating transmission to "get it over with" while symptoms were expected to be milder and recovery quicker. This practice reflected the disease's high contagiousness and near-universal , with nearly all children contracting it by age 10 in the pre-vaccine period. Epidemiological data from the pre-1960s era underscore the rationale: annual U.S. incidence exceeded 3-4 million cases, predominantly among children under 15, with over 90% of adults reporting prior childhood infection. Such ubiquity normalized herd-level exposure, where communities accepted recurrent outbreaks in schools and households as inevitable, prompting proactive measures to time infections early rather than risk postponement. Mortality rates hovered around 100-150 deaths yearly, mostly in vulnerable groups, but population-level patterns showed childhood cases rarely escalating beyond itchy rashes and fever. The for pediatric onset derived from observed disparities in severity, with adults facing elevated risks of complications like bacterial superinfections or pneumonitis—up to times higher hospitalization rates compared to school-aged children. Historical accounts and clinical observations confirmed that while pediatric infections yielded robust, durable immunity with minimal long-term sequelae, deferred cases in adolescents or adults often prolonged recovery and increased morbidity, reinforcing the cultural norm of early deliberate exposure as a pragmatic against worse outcomes.

Post-Vaccine Emergence and Evolution

The varicella vaccine, licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on March 17, 1995, led to a sharp decline in chickenpox cases, with overall incidence dropping more than 97% by the 2020s due to routine childhood vaccination. Despite this reduction in natural transmission, which diminished opportunities for spontaneous exposure, deliberate pox parties persisted in underground networks among parents skeptical of the vaccine's long-term efficacy or safety, who sought natural infection for purported stronger immunity. These practices adapted to limited access to infected individuals by leveraging emerging digital tools for coordination. In the 2000s, as natural cases became rarer, participants increasingly turned to online forums and social media to locate sources of the virus and organize gatherings, marking a shift from neighborhood-based events to facilitated, sometimes interstate exchanges. Groups on platforms like Facebook emerged by the early 2010s, enabling vaccine-hesitant parents to share swabs or scabs from active infections for mailing, though such methods raised additional biosafety concerns without medical oversight. These adaptations reflected broader anti-vaccine sentiments, with revivals occasionally linked to movements questioning pharmaceutical interventions amid debates over vaccine mandates. A notable illustration of the practice's political dimensions occurred in 2019, when publicly disclosed that he had intentionally exposed his nine unvaccinated children to by taking them to a home with an infected child, arguing it provided superior compared to . 's admission, made during a radio interview, drew widespread scrutiny but underscored how high-profile figures could normalize the approach within certain conservative or liberty-focused circles skeptical of government-mandated immunization.

Immunological Foundations

Natural vs. Vaccine-Induced Immunity

Natural infection with varicella-zoster virus (VZV) entails widespread viral replication in epithelial cells and T lymphocytes, culminating in extensive antigen presentation to the immune system and the generation of high-avidity neutralizing antibodies alongside potent, virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses. This comprehensive immune priming establishes durable humoral and cellular memory, conferring near-lifelong protection against reinfection, as evidenced by rare documented second episodes of chickenpox in naturally immune individuals. The live attenuated varicella vaccine, derived from the Oka strain, induces immunity through controlled replication that stimulates antibody production and T-cell activation, but with reduced viral load and antigen diversity relative to wild-type infection. Following two doses, the vaccine demonstrates approximately 90% effectiveness against any form of chickenpox and over 95% against moderate-to-severe disease, based on post-licensure surveillance data. However, longitudinal studies reveal waning of vaccine-induced protection, with antibody titers and efficacy declining after 10-15 years, contributing to breakthrough infections in 15-20% of recipients despite initial seroconversion. Comparative analyses indicate that immunity outperforms vaccine-induced responses in preventing reinfection, as pre-vaccine populations exhibited virtual elimination of second varicella episodes through endogenous boosting and broader immunological , whereas vaccination yields milder but recurrent breakthroughs without equivalent long-term robustness. Differences in T-cell profiles further this, with exposure fostering distinct long-term cellular immunity profiles compared to vaccination, potentially enhancing resistance to viral evasion. These immunological distinctions arise from the attenuated vaccine's limited replication, which may not fully replicate the antigenic challenge of primary .

Long-Term Immunity and Population-Level Effects

Natural varicella-zoster (VZV) infections in childhood historically conferred robust, lifelong immunity characterized by periodic subclinical boosting from exposures to wild-type , which sustained cell-mediated immunity and reduced the of VZV reactivation as zoster () in adulthood. This exogenous boosting mechanism involved asymptomatic immune that maintained VZV-specific T-cell responses, thereby suppressing latent reactivation in dorsal root ganglia. Universal varicella programs, such as the one introduced in 1995, have markedly reduced the circulation of wild-type VZV by over 90% in vaccinated cohorts, thereby diminishing opportunities for such natural boosting in previously infected adults. Population-level modeling and epidemiological indicate that this reduction disrupts the historical equilibrium, potentially shifting the VZV from mild childhood varicella to increased zoster incidence in younger adults, including the child-rearing . Post-vaccination in the has documented a near-doubling of age-adjusted hospitalization incidence, rising from 8.8 per 100,000 in 1995 to 16.8 per 100,000 in 2012, with significant increases observed across age groups under 60 years and no offsetting declines attributable to . Similarly, international studies, including analyses from and , early post-vaccination surges in zoster rates peaking 10–15 years after program , linking this trend causally to the loss of boosting exposures. Early modeling from 2002 anticipated that highly effective varicella vaccination would likely elevate zoster incidence by eliminating natural boosting, prompting debates on whether the net public health benefits—primarily reduced childhood disease—outweigh the redirected long-term viral burden to adult reactivations requiring separate zoster vaccines. While varicella vaccine strains exhibit lower reactivation potential than wild-type VZV, the overall population-level shift underscores unresolved questions about immunity durability without ongoing natural reinforcement.

Risks and Complications

Acute Health Risks of Natural Exposure

Natural infection with varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in otherwise healthy children typically manifests as a mild, self-limiting illness characterized by a pruritic vesicular rash, fever, and malaise, resolving within 5-10 days without long-term sequelae in the majority of cases. However, acute complications can arise, with secondary bacterial superinfections of skin lesions being the most frequent, often due to scratching that introduces pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pyogenes, leading to cellulitis, abscesses, or necrotizing fasciitis in severe instances. These bacterial complications accounted for a substantial portion of pre-vaccine era morbidity, contributing to dehydration from reduced oral intake amid discomfort. Rarer but more serious viral-mediated acute risks include pneumonia, encephalitis, and cerebellar ataxia, occurring at incidences of approximately 1 in 400 cases for pneumonia (predominantly in adults but possible in children), 1 in 33,000-40,000 for encephalitis, and transiently in up to 1 in 4,000 for ataxia. Encephalitis may present with headache, altered mental status, and seizures, while pneumonia involves cough, dyspnea, and radiographic infiltrates, both carrying risks of permanent neurologic or respiratory sequelae if untreated. In the pre-vaccine United States, empirical data from the 1990s indicated approximately 10,500-13,500 annual hospitalizations for varicella complications out of roughly 4 million cases, yielding a hospitalization rate of 2-3 per 1,000 infections in healthy children. Mortality from acute VZV remained low, with 100-150 annually pre-vaccine, the in previously healthy individuals under 20 years old, equating to a case-fatality rate of about 1 in 40,000 infections overall. These fatalities were often linked to unchecked complications like bacterial or , exacerbated by factors such as high from close-contact exposure, though most infections—over 99%—resolved without hospitalization or . In deliberate exposure scenarios akin to pox parties, the absence of controlled dosing introduces variability in inoculum size, potentially amplifying acute risks beyond sporadic transmission, though direct comparative data are limited.

Differential Risks Across Age Groups and Populations

Chickenpox infection tends to be milder in healthy children compared to adults, with complication rates significantly lower in pediatric populations. In immunocompetent children, the disease is typically self-limiting, manifesting as a pruritic rash with fever, whereas adults experience more severe symptoms and higher rates of complications such as pneumonia and encephalitis. Mortality from varicella is approximately 20 to 30 times higher in adults than in children, with adult rates around 0.6 per 1,000 infections. Pneumonia, a leading complication in adults, occurs in 5% to 15% of adult varicella cases, compared to rare instances in children, underscoring the elevated respiratory risks post-puberty to factors like reduced immune resilience and comorbidities. Empirical from surveillance indicate that healthy children under 10 years rarely require hospitalization, with rates below 0.5%, while adult hospitalization exceeds 10% in unvaccinated cases. Certain populations face disproportionately high risks, including neonates, pregnant women, and the immunocompromised. Neonatal varicella, particularly when maternal infection occurs around delivery (5 days before to 2 days after birth), carries a mortality risk of up to 30% without intervention, due to immature immunity and potential disseminated disease. In pregnancy, maternal varicella in the first 20 weeks confers a 2% risk of congenital varicella syndrome in the fetus, characterized by limb hypoplasia, skin scarring, and neurological deficits; risk peaks at 0.8% to 4.1% between 13 and 20 weeks. Immunocompromised individuals, such as those with HIV, leukemia, or on immunosuppressive therapy, exhibit severe outcomes including visceral dissemination, with complication rates approaching 30% and mortality up to 20% in untreated pediatric cases. These vulnerabilities highlight why deliberate exposure is confined to healthy, pre-adolescent children, where baseline risks remain empirically low, avoiding the amplified dangers observed in adults and susceptible subgroups.

Methods and Contemporary Practices

Traditional and Modern Organization of Parties

In the pre-vaccine era, prior to the licensure of the in , chickenpox parties were organized informally through local networks and word-of-mouth among parents. When a child in a neighborhood or contracted the , parents of susceptible children would arrange playdates or small gatherings at private homes or playgrounds to enable close contact and deliberate transmission. These events emphasized direct interaction, such as shared play or meals, between infected index cases and uninfected attendees to maximize exposure risk. Contemporary adaptations leverage digital platforms for broader coordination, particularly through closed social media groups on sites like Facebook, where parents post announcements about infected children and recruit participants from regional or even interstate networks. Participants may travel hours or across state lines to attend in-person gatherings at homes or neutral venues, with organizers verifying infection status via photos of rashes or medical notes. Rare extensions include attempts to mail contaminated items, such as lollipops swabbed with saliva from infected children; in November 2011, a Tennessee mother advertised these online, prompting federal warnings and investigations for violating interstate disease transmission laws. Isolated daycare-linked cases have also surfaced, as in a March 2024 British Columbia, Canada, tribunal ruling where parents received a $2,250 refund plus fees after suing a provider for breach of contract over an unnotified chickenpox exposure incident leading to their children's expulsion. Post-exposure protocols reported by participating parents generally involve home monitoring for symptoms, with onset expected 10 to after contact. Children are kept isolated from or settings upon rash appearance until all lesions crust over, typically 5 to 7 days later, to contain unintended spread while awaiting confirmatory . Parents often prepare with over-the-counter remedies for fever and itching, alongside measures like nail trimming to reduce secondary bacterial risks during the illness phase.

Analogous Deliberate Exposure Events

Deliberate exposure events analogous to pox parties have been reported for , particularly during the 2009 H1N1 (" flu") pandemic, where parents in the UK and organized gatherings to intentionally infect children, aiming to induce immunity before were widely available. Such "swine flu parties" drew warnings from authorities, including the CDC, which stated they were not recommended due to unpredictable severity and potential complications like . These events mirrored pox party logic but saw documentation beyond media reports and discussions, with no large-scale empirical data on participation rates or outcomes. Proposals for "flu parties" targeting seasonal strains have surfaced sporadically but remain uncommon, attributed to the pathogen's milder typical effects in healthy individuals and its high transmissibility, which reduces perceived benefits of controlled exposure compared to varicella. Modeling studies from the era suggested that swine flu parties could increase overall mortality by accelerating spread without guaranteeing mild cases, reinforcing their rarity for ongoing seasonal flu. During the from to , "COVID parties" emerged in various locations, including college students and European young adults, where participants deliberately sought to immunity, often citing early perceptions of low severity in . A notable example occurred in , in , where local officials reported student-organized inviting confirmed cases, leading to infections but also hospitalizations among some attendees. These gatherings, sometimes linked to anti-vaccine or lockdown-skeptical communities, faced criticism for ignoring variant-specific lethality risks, with uptake remaining marginal compared to pox parties due to SARS-CoV-2's higher case fatality rate and unknowns in long-term effects. Empirical evidence indicates such contributed to localized clusters but did not achieve widespread adoption, as documented surges were more often tied to uncontrolled social mixing than intentional parties.

Debates and Perspectives

Arguments Favoring Natural Exposure

Proponents of pox parties contend that varicella elicits a more durable than vaccination, with clinical demonstrating that primary childhood confers persisting for over 60 years in the of cases, effectively preventing reinfection in immunocompetent individuals. In comparison, vaccine against varicella wanes over time, with longitudinal studies reporting breakthrough rates rising to 58.2 per 1000 person-years by nine years post-vaccination and overall effectiveness stabilizing at 89-90% after despite two doses. Deliberate exposure also avoids vaccine-associated risks, including anaphylaxis reported at rates of approximately 1.3 per million doses across pediatric vaccinations, with varicella-specific formulations carrying similar low but non-zero probabilities of severe allergic reactions.01160-4/fulltext) Natural infection, by engaging the full viral antigen repertoire, may further yield superior T-cell immunity profiles compared to vaccine-induced responses, potentially enhancing cross-protection against variant strains. From a risk-benefit standpoint, pre-vaccine reveal varicella's -level burden as manageable, with an average of 90 annual U.S. deaths from 1970-1994 amid universal childhood exposure, equating to a of roughly 0.4 per million and affirming the disease's low in healthy children, thereby justifying parental to pursue during optimal low-risk ages rather than deferring via . This approach aligns with empirical observations of tolerable morbidity prior to interventions, where severe complications remained exceptional outliers.

Arguments Against Natural Exposure

Public health authorities, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), contend that pox parties heighten the of varicella transmission to susceptible groups, such as immunocompromised persons, infants, and pregnant women, who face elevated complication rates from secondary spread. An illustrative case occurred during the 2018-2019 outbreak at Asheville Waldorf in North Carolina, a setting with high exemption rates, where 36 students contracted , constituting the state's largest such incident in decades and demonstrating community-level from concentrated exposures. Critics further highlight the inherent unpredictability of severity in ostensibly healthy children, where complications like bacterial superinfections of the skin, , , , and rare fatalities can arise without prior indicators. The CDC reports that, even though most pediatric cases are mild, pre-vaccination showed 10,500 to 13,500 U.S. hospitalizations for varicella, with bacterial infections as the predominant issue in children and no reliable means to foresee severe outcomes. Such intentional exposures impose an avoidable load on healthcare , generating cases that necessitate treatment for symptoms, secondary infections, and monitoring, thereby diverting resources from other priorities—despite natural varicella's routine prior to availability. The U.S. varicella program has prevented over 91 million infections and $23.4 billion in medical costs in its first 25 years, illustrating the quantifiable strain from unmitigated circulation that deliberate parties could exacerbate.

Scientific and Empirical Evidence Review

Empirical studies on deliberate varicella exposure via pox parties are limited by ethical constraints prohibiting randomized trials, necessitating reliance on observational data from natural outbreaks, comparative immunity analyses, and post-vaccination surveillance. Natural varicella infection in children typically induces robust, lifelong humoral and cell-mediated immunity, conferring near-complete protection against severe reinfection, as evidenced by seroprevalence surveys showing sustained antibody levels decades post-infection. In contrast, vaccine-induced immunity demonstrates initial effectiveness of approximately 80-90% against any varicella after one dose, but wanes significantly over time, with breakthrough rates rising from 1.6 per 1000 person-years shortly after vaccination to higher incidences beyond five years. Proxy data from varicella outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations underscore limitations in vaccine protection, with breakthrough cases comprising 51-80% of incidents in school settings, often linked to waning immunity rather than primary vaccine failure. Two-dose regimens improve effectiveness to 90-92% against moderate-to-severe disease, yet still permit milder breakthroughs and require ongoing boosting, unlike the durable response from natural exposure. Causal analyses indicate that reduced wild-type virus circulation post-vaccination diminishes exogenous boosting—repeated low-level exposures that reinforce immunity—potentially elevating herpes zoster (shingles) incidence in adults, with meta-analyses reporting upticks in hospitalizations for ages 10-49 after program implementation. Epidemiological evidence favors early childhood natural exposure for minimizing long-term risks, as adult-onset varicella carries 20-30 times higher complication rates, including pneumonia and encephalitis, compared to pediatric cases. Studies on household exposures demonstrate that contact with active chickenpox cases reduces subsequent shingles risk by up to 30% over 20 years, attributing this to immune boosting absent in vaccinated cohorts lacking community transmission. While vaccines have curtailed overall varicella incidence by 85-97% in implemented programs, this reduction trades off against sustained shingles burdens, challenging claims of unqualified superiority by highlighting incomplete herd effects and the need for separate zoster vaccination in later life.

Public Health and Societal Responses

Policy Positions and Interventions

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends two doses of the varicella vaccine for children, adolescents, and adults lacking evidence of immunity, positioning vaccination as the primary strategy for preventing chickenpox over natural exposure methods. Following the licensure of the varicella vaccine in 1995, CDC campaigns emphasized immunization to reduce transmission and complications, implicitly framing deliberate exposure events like pox parties as outdated and hazardous due to risks of severe illness, secondary bacterial infections, and potential for outbreaks. The World Health Organization (WHO) similarly endorses varicella vaccination in national programs where feasible, advocating for routine immunization to curb morbidity rather than relying on controlled infections, though it notes the vaccine's effectiveness exceeds 90% with two doses. In response to outbreaks linked to unvaccinated individuals, U.S. authorities enforce school mandates requiring proof of varicella immunity—via or documented prior —for entry into across all 50 states and of Columbia. Detected exposures prompt quarantines for susceptible students; for instance, during a 2025 chickenpox outbreak in schools, unvaccinated children in contact with cases were required to isolate for two weeks while occurred. Such interventions aim to contain spread in institutional settings, with CDC guidelines advising post-exposure within five days for those without immunity to mitigate subsequent . Internationally, policies vary but consistently prioritize and discourage intentional exposure amid concerns over unintended transmission. In the , where varicella vaccination is not routinely offered through the national program, a 2025 incident at a soft play center in drew swift condemnation after parents planned an unpermitted chickenpox exposure event, prompting the venue owner to label it "selfish" and "dangerous" due to risks to uninformed attendees. Media coverage amplified public health warnings from the National Health Service (NHS), which advises against such gatherings to prevent complications like encephalitis, highlighting how isolated proposals can trigger regulatory scrutiny and venue prohibitions without formal legislation. This response underscores a pattern where institutional backlash, often media-fueled, reinforces anti-exposure stances even in low-mandate contexts, potentially extending beyond empirical outbreak data to broader precautionary measures.

Notable Incidents and Case Studies

In 2011, U.S. federal authorities issued warnings against mailing items contaminated with , such as lollipops licked by infected children, classifying as illegal under federal laws prohibiting the of biological hazards akin to contagions like . officials specifically alerted parents to cease ordering such items for remote "pox parties," citing risks of unintended spread and potential legal consequences, though no widespread prosecutions were documented in immediate reports. On March 20, 2019, publicly stated that he had deliberately exposed his nine children to at a gathering with an infected to confer immunity, eschewing and describing the outcome as successful recovery without reported complications. , a Republican, framed the decision as preferable to for building lifelong immunity, drawing media scrutiny but no legal action, and highlighting political divides on vaccine alternatives. In March 2024, a tribunal ordered a daycare provider to refund parents approximately $2,250, including a $1,200 deposit and fees for 13 days, after the operator planned to expose children—including the complainants' vaccinated offspring—to an infected peer without consent, prompting withdrawal from the program. The ruling emphasized unauthorized risk imposition, but no actual infections occurred in this case, underscoring tensions between parental autonomy and childcare oversight. Empirical on pox party outcomes indicate rarity of severe complications, with pre-vaccine studies showing fewer than 1% of pediatric chickenpox cases requiring hospitalization and deaths occurring in approximately 1 in 60,000 infections among healthy children, though deliberate exposures amplify transmission uncertainties. Documented party-linked severe incidents remain scarce in , with most reported resolving asymptomatically or mildly, per surveillance, despite official cautions on potential for bacterial superinfections or . In the United States, prohibits the mailing of materials containing infectious agents, including viruses like varicella-zoster, under 18 U.S.C. § , which classifies such items as nonmailable injurious articles punishable by fines or imprisonment 10 years. This was invoked in when authorities warned against trading chickenpox-infected lollipops or swabs via or private carriers, deeming it equivalent to mailing biological hazards like , regardless of to confer immunity. No federal statute explicitly bans in-person gatherings for deliberate exposure to chickenpox, as these do not involve interstate transport of biohazards. At the state level, pox parties lack specific prohibitions, with officials in cases like a 2015 Louisiana incident stating that such events do not violate criminal law absent demonstrable harm. State child endangerment statutes, such as New York Penal § 260.10, criminalize knowingly placing a in situations likely to injure physical welfare, potentially applicable if deliberate exposure results in severe complications, though prosecutions for chickenpox parties remain rare to the 's typically mild course in healthy children. Broader communicable laws in over half of states prohibit intentional exposure of others to contagious pathogens, but these target high-risk transmissions (e.g., or ) rather than routine childhood illnesses like varicella, and do not typically extend to parental decisions for their own children without third-party harm. Civil liability may arise under tort law for negligence if a pox party contributes to outbreaks affecting uninvolved parties, such as immunocompromised individuals, enabling suits for damages from resulting infections. No U.S. jurisdiction imposes blanket bans on such gatherings, reflecting the absence of codified public health mandates specifically targeting low-mortality diseases post-vaccination era.

Ethical Frameworks and Philosophical Debates

Ethical frameworks applied to pox parties draw on principles of , non-maleficence, and , emphasizing parental in low-risk medical decisions for children. Philosophers like , through the , argue that liberties, including choices about exposure, should only be restricted to prevent to others, not to enforce perceived personal benefits like when alternatives pose minimal . In this view, deliberate exposure align with deontological for provided no unconsenting parties are endangered. Proponents outline criteria for ethical pox parties, including that the disease must present sufficiently low to participants, such as varicella's infrequent complications in healthy children—estimated at a severe complication rate of 8.5 per 100,000 cases in those under 16 years old—parental , and measures like to uphold non-maleficence toward non-participants. A in the Journal of Medical Ethics defends these conditions as compatible with liberal policies on parental and vaccination exemptions, arguing that for mild childhood illnesses, controlled exposure can fulfill immunity needs without vaccines' potential side effects, provided risks are transparently weighed. This framework prioritizes realistic risk assessment over blanket prohibitions, noting varicella's historical management through such events before widespread vaccination. Critiques of paternalism highlight its moral hazard in overriding parental choices for marginal societal gains, such as slightly herd immunity from vaccines, when empirical indicate net low harm from pox parties in healthy cohorts. Bioethics discussions contend that state interventions, justified under beneficence or , often undervalue autonomy absent clear of substantial child endangerment, as varicella's complication rates remain low even without vaccines in otherwise fit populations. Such paternalism risks eroding trust in institutions, particularly when alternatives like natural boosting—evident in pre-vaccine eras—demonstrated effective population-level control without coercion. Balancing individual autonomy against communitarian concerns involves weighing community transmission risks against personal rights, with evidence favoring limited restrictions for diseases like chickenpox where managed exposure yields lifelong immunity comparable to or exceeding vaccination efficacy in preventing outbreaks. Communitarian ethics, which prioritize collective welfare, may advocate broader controls to minimize any externalities, yet first-principles evaluation reveals these often amplify minor threats while ignoring data on varicella's contained spread under quarantine protocols. In healthy groups, the net ethical calculus supports parental discretion, as overriding it for speculative communal benefits contravenes causal realism about disease dynamics and underestimates families' capacity for informed risk management.

Cultural Representations

Depictions in Media and Literature

Depictions of pox parties in have overwhelmingly emphasized risks and disapproval, framing them as outdated or irresponsible practices. A ABC News article quoted pediatricians warning that such gatherings could lead to severe complications, including bacterial superinfections and rare but , positioning parties as antithetical to evidence-based . Similarly, a 2005 NPR report portrayed them as choices by vaccine-skeptical parents aiming for natural immunity, but underscored expert consensus against deliberate exposure due to unpredictable outcomes. These portrayals reflect a pattern in mainstream outlets, where narratives prioritize amplification of adverse potential over historical precedents of routine childhood infection. Neutral or positive references appear infrequently, often confined to retrospective accounts of pre-vaccine eras when chickenpox was viewed as an inevitable milestone. For example, a 2005 Washington Post piece noted parental revival of parties for unvaccinated children, citing beliefs in lifelong immunity benefits, though it balanced this with physician critiques of the approach as a "dangerous game." Such depictions echo older parenting literature, where infection was normalized as a "rite of passage" before the 1995 varicella vaccine introduction, as referenced in analyses of historical attitudes toward mild childhood illnesses. In literature and fiction, direct portrayals of organized pox parties remain rare, with chickenpox more commonly invoked as a generic backdrop for family dynamics rather than intentional exposure events. Broader cultural analogues emerge in works critiquing vaccine hesitancy, such as novels or films depicting anti-vaccination communities, where practices akin to pox parties symbolize defiance against institutional medicine but are often cast with heightened dramatic peril to underscore folly. Post-2020 coverage intensified scrutiny, analogizing pox parties to COVID-19 "infection parties" amid pandemic restrictions, with media highlighting ethical lapses in deliberate spread. The Guardian in 2021 declared "the chickenpox party is over," advocating universal vaccination to eliminate such customs entirely. Incidents like the 2020 Twitter suspension of content promoting "chickenpox-style" COVID gatherings for herd immunity further illustrate this shift, where historical tolerance gave way to unequivocal condemnation in public discourse. This evolution mirrors broader media tendencies to equate natural exposure strategies with recklessness, particularly in outlets aligned with public health orthodoxy.

References

  1. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/323728
  2. https://www.vasectomyreversalflorida.com/blog/2024/08/the-history-of-chicken-pox-parties/
  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32840450/
  4. https://www.cdc.gov/chickenpox/about/index.html
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29070705/
  6. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjevyynnqj8o
  7. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/04/10/parents-still-seek-natural-exposure-to-viruses
  8. https://biology.indiana.edu/news-events/news/2021/foster-chickenpox-fascinating-evolutionary-history.html
  9. https://www.nvic.org/disease-vaccine/chickenpox/history
  10. https://historyofvaccines.org/diseases/chickenpox-varicella/
  11. https://publications.aap.org/redbook/book/755/chapter/14083489/Varicella-Zoster-Virus-Infections
  12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448191/
  13. https://www.cdc.gov/chickenpox/vaccination-impact/index.html
  14. https://www.idsociety.org/news--publications-new/articles/2022/chickenpox-now-rare-in-u.s.-due-to-routine-vaccination
  15. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=6772216&page=1
  16. https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/pox-parties-in-the-age-of-facebook/
  17. https://www.denverpost.com/2013/11/19/chickenpox-parties-are-apparently-a-thing/
  18. https://abcnews.go.com/US/kentucky-gov-matt-bevin-intentionally-exposed-kids-chicken/story?id=61829759
  19. https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/20/health/kentucky-governor-children-chickenpox
  20. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/21/us/kentucky-governor-chickenpox.html
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3991154/
  22. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/cmr.00052-13
  23. https://www.cdc.gov/chickenpox/hcp/vaccine-considerations/index.html
  24. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/198218
  25. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa064040
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2806663/
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X12007761
  28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31959424/
  29. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/226/Supplement_4/S385/6764827
  30. https://adc.bmj.com/content/110/8/586
  31. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/226/Supplement_4/S470/6764830
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8807174/
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0923181118302779
  34. https://elifesciences.org/for-the-press/1ccc3639/chickenpox-vaccination-does-increase-shingles-cases-but-mainly-in-young-adults
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4514040/
  36. https://journals.lww.com/ebp/fulltext/2022/01000/does_vaccinating_children_with_the_varicella.17.aspx
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X18312623
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10342939/
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0163445302909886
  40. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/14/8/813
  41. https://www.cdc.gov/chickenpox/hcp/clinical-signs/index.html
  42. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/969773-overview
  43. https://historyofvaccines.org/blog/editorial-is-chicken-pox-deadly-it-depends/
  44. https://www.immunize.org/wp-content/uploads/catg.d/p4202.pdf
  45. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/182/2/383/2190935
  46. https://www.cdc.gov/chickenpox/hcp/clinical-overview/index.html
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1344622302001207
  48. https://publications.ersnet.org/content/erj/21/5/886
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043324009634
  50. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/226/Supplement_4/S407/6764826
  51. https://publications.aap.org/pediatriccare/article/doi/10.1542/aap.ppcqr.396143/1544/Chickenpox
  52. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199403313301305
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673694929432
  54. https://www.cdc.gov/chickenpox/hcp/clinical-guidance/index.html
  55. https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-025-06024-6
  56. https://www.rch.org.au/clinicalguide/guideline_index/Chickenpox_%28varicella%29/
  57. https://omrf.org/2011/11/20/pox-parties-bad-idea/
  58. https://www.healio.com/news/pediatrics/20160312/hardly-harmless-the-dangerous-tradition-of-pox-parties
  59. https://www.wwlp.com/news/health/facebook-groups-organize-chickenpox-parties/amp/
  60. https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/what-pharmacists-should-know-about-the-chickenpox-party-trend
  61. https://www.nbc4i.com/news/u-s-world/more-parents-facebook-groups-hosting-chickenpox-parties/
  62. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2011/11/07/142098710/what-not-to-buy-online-lollipops-laced-with-chickenpox
  63. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/swapping-chicken-pox-infected-lollipops-illegal-idUSTRE7AB0SX/
  64. https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/daycare-provider-ordered-to-refund-bc-parents-after-chickenpox-party-dispute/
  65. https://archive.nytimes.com/schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/swine-flu-parties/
  66. https://www.smh.com.au/national/swine-flu-party-idea-foolhardy-20090702-d60l.html
  67. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/h1n1flu/qa.htm
  68. https://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/swine-flu-parties/
  69. https://www.al.com/live/2009/10/intentional_exposure_with_swin.html
  70. https://jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/download/20009274/310/2091
  71. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-parties-urban-legend-or-real-thing/
  72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346855185_The_sooner_the_better_Anxiety_and_deliberate_exposure_to_COVID-19_risk_among_young_adults_in_France
  73. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/immunity-covid-19-frontline-health-workers-deliberate-infection/story?id=69756590
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8014061/
  75. https://jcom.sissa.it/article/pubid/JCOM_1907_2020_A05/
  76. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/131/5/e1389/31311/Long-term-Effectiveness-of-Varicella-Vaccine-A-14
  77. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/healthy-living/canadian-immunization-guide-part-4-active-vaccines/page-24-varicella-chickenpox-vaccine.html
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264410X20300037
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6284515/
  80. https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2018/11/16/asheville-waldorf-chickenpox-outbreak-ncs-largest-decades/2024694002/
  81. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-carolina-chickenpox-outbreak-in-anti-vaccine-hot-spot-asheville-waldorf-school/
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7227623/
  83. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/226/Supplement_4/S400/6764825
  84. https://jkms.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e286
  85. https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.l6987
  86. https://www.britannica.com/procon/school-vaccine-mandates-debate
  87. https://www.masslive.com/westernmass/2025/10/chickenpox-outbreak-in-westfield-schools-underscores-declining-vaccination-rates.html
  88. https://www.cdc.gov/surv-manual/php/table-of-contents/chapter-17-varicella.html
  89. https://nypost.com/2025/03/13/lifestyle/selfish-parents-ripped-for-hosting-chickenpox-party-at-indoor-playground-with-unknowing-guests-around/
  90. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mailing-chickenpox-lollipops-called-illegal-risky/
  91. https://www.theregister.com/2011/11/08/pox_party/
  92. https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/20/matt-bevin-exposed-kids-chickenpox-instead-vaccine/3221848002/
  93. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/03/21/gop-governor-doesnt-believe-chickenpox-vaccines-he-took-his-nine-kids-pox-party-instead/
  94. https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/bc-daycare-sued-chickenpox-party
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC81074/
  96. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1716
  97. https://www.fox8live.com/story/30728561/chickenpox-party-draws-attention-of-child-protective-services/
  98. https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/260.10
  99. https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/is-it-a-crime-to-intentionally-get-someone-sick.html
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9235116/
  101. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/108/5/e79/63710/Severe-Complications-of-Varicella-in-Previously
  102. https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/vaccinepreventable/varicellachickenpox/factsheet/
  103. https://bioethicstoday.org/blog/varicella-variables-parental-authority-vs-public-personal-health/
  104. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/publichealth-ethics/
  105. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-medicine-and-ethics/article/communitarianism-and-the-ethics-of-communicable-disease-some-preliminary-thoughts/24A492536D9D12F1061195F5B2DD7D50
  106. https://www.npr.org/2005/03/09/4528430/chickenpox-parties-for-parents-wary-of-inoculations
  107. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/wellness/2005/09/20/a-pox-on-my-child-cool/7c1b126a-a3ed-4fd7-a214-610efa4b7253/
  108. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=studentpub
  109. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/may/02/the-chickenpox-party-is-over-as-scientists-call-for-uk-vaccine-rollout
  110. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/25/us/chickenpox-parties-federalist-twitter.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.