Hubbry Logo
SavannaSavannaMain
Open search
Savanna
Community hub
Savanna
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Savanna
Savanna
Savanna
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A tree savanna at Tarangire National Park in Tanzania in East Africa
A grass savanna at Kruger National Park in South Africa

A savanna or savannah is a mixed woodland-grassland (i.e. grassy woodland) biome and ecosystem characterised by the trees being sufficiently widely spaced so that the canopy does not close. The open canopy allows sufficient light to reach the ground to support an unbroken herbaceous layer consisting primarily of grasses.[1][2][3] Four savanna forms exist; savanna woodland where trees and shrubs form a light canopy, tree savanna with scattered trees and shrubs, shrub savanna with distributed shrubs, and grass savanna where trees and shrubs are mostly nonexistent.[4]

Savannas maintain an open canopy despite a high tree density.[5] It is often believed that savannas feature widely spaced, scattered trees. However, in many savannas, tree densities are higher and trees are more regularly spaced than in forests.[6][7][8][9] The South American savanna types cerrado sensu stricto and cerrado dense typically have densities of trees similar to or higher than that found in South American tropical forests,[6][8][9] with savanna ranging from 800 to 3300 trees per hectare (trees/ha) and adjacent forests with 800–2000 trees/ha. Similarly Guinean savanna has 129 trees/ha, compared to 103 for riparian forest,[7] while Eastern Australian sclerophyll forests have average tree densities of approximately 100 per hectare, comparable to savannas in the same region.[10]

Savannas are also characterised by seasonal water availability, with the majority of rainfall confined to one season. They are associated with several types of biomes, and are frequently in a transitional zone between forest and desert or grassland, though mostly a transition between desert to forest.[11] Savanna covers approximately 20% of the Earth's land area.[12] Unlike the prairies in North America and steppes in Eurasia, which feature cold winters, savannas are mostly located in areas having warm to hot climates, such as in Africa, Australia, South America, and India.[13]

Etymology

[edit]

The word derives from the Spanish sabana, which is itself a loanword from Taíno, which means "treeless grassland" in the West Indies.[14][15]

The word originally entered English as the Zauana in a description of the ilands of the kinges of Spayne from 1555.[16][18] This was equivalent in the orthography of the times to zavana (see history of V). Peter Martyr reported it as the local name for the plain around Comagre, the court of the cacique Carlos in present-day Panama. The accounts are inexact,[20] but this is usually placed in present-day Madugandí[21] or at points on the nearby Guna Yala coast opposite Ustupo[22] or on Point Mosquitos.[23] These areas are now either given over to modern cropland or jungle.[24]

Distribution

[edit]
A savanna woodland in Northern Australia demonstrating the regular tree spacing characteristic of some savannas

Many grassy landscapes and mixed communities of trees, shrubs, and grasses were described as savanna before the middle of the 19th century, when the concept of a tropical savanna climate became established. The Köppen climate classification system was strongly influenced by effects of temperature and precipitation upon tree growth, and oversimplified assumptions resulted in a tropical savanna classification concept which considered it as a "climatic climax" formation. The common usage to describe vegetation now conflicts with a simplified yet widespread climatic concept. The divergence has sometimes caused areas such as extensive savannas north and south of the Congo and Amazon Rivers to be excluded from mapped savanna categories.[25]

In different parts of North America, the word "savanna" has been used interchangeably with "barrens", "prairie", "glade", "grassland" and "oak opening".[26] Different authors have defined the lower limits of savanna tree coverage as 5–10% and upper limits range as 25–80% of an area. Two factors common to all savanna environments are rainfall variations from year to year, and dry season wildfires.[4] In the Americas, e.g. in Belize, Central America, savanna vegetation is similar from Mexico to South America and to the Caribbean.[27] The distinction between woodland and savanna is vague and therefore the two can be combined into a single biome as both woodlands and savannas feature open-canopied trees with crowns not usually interlinking (mostly forming 25–60% cover).[14]

Over many large tropical areas, the dominant biome (forest, savanna or grassland) can not be predicted only by the climate, as historical events plays also a key role, for example, fire activity.[28] In some areas, indeed, it is possible for there to be multiple stable biomes.[29] The annual rainfall ranges from 500 mm (19.69 in) to 1,270 mm (50.00 in) per year, with the precipitation being more common in six or eight months of the year, followed by a period of drought. Savannas may at times be classified as forests.[13]

In climatic geomorphology it has been noted that many savannas occur in areas of pediplains and inselbergs.[30] It has been posited that river incision is not prominent but that rivers in savanna landscapes erode more by lateral migration.[30] Flooding and associated sheet wash have been proposed as dominant erosion processes in savanna plains.[30]

Ecology

[edit]

The savannas of tropical America comprise broadleaved trees such as Curatella, Byrsonima, and Bowdichia, with grasses such as Leersia and Paspalum. Bean relative Prosopis is common in the Argentinian savannas. In the East African savannas, Acacia, Combretum, baobabs, Borassus, and Euphorbia are a common vegetation genera. Drier savannas there feature spiny shrubs and grasses, such as Andropogon, Hyparrhenia, and Themeda. Wetter savannas include Brachystegia trees and Pennisetum purpureum, and elephant grass type. West African savanna trees include Anogeissus, Combretum, and Strychnos. Indian savannas are mostly cleared, but the reserved ones feature Acacia, Mimosa, and Zizyphus over a grass cover comprising Sehima and Dichanthium. The Australian savanna is abundant with sclerophyllous evergreen vegetation, which include the eucalyptus, as well as Acacia, Bauhinia, Pandanus with grasses such as Heteropogon and kangaroo grass (Themeda).[4]

Animals in the African savanna generally include the giraffe, elephant, buffalo, zebra, gnu, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, and antelope, where they rely on grass and/or tree foliage to survive. In the Australian savanna, mammals in the family Macropodidae predominate, such as kangaroos and wallabies, though cattle, horses, camels, donkeys and the Asian water buffalo, among others, have been introduced by humans.[4]

Threats

[edit]

It is estimated that less than three percent of savanna ecosystems can be classified as highly intact.[31] Reasons for savanna degradation are manifold, as outlined below.

Changes in fire management

[edit]
Bushfire in Kakadu National Park, Australia

Savannas are subject to regular wildfires and the ecosystem appears to be the result of human use of fire. For example, Native Americans created the Pre-Columbian woodlands of North America by periodically burning where fire-resistant plants were the dominant species.[32] Fire-stick farming appears to have been responsible for the widespread occurrence of savanna in tropical Australia and New Guinea,[33] and savannas in India are a result of human fire use.[34] The maquis shrub savannas of the Mediterranean region were likewise created and maintained by anthropogenic fire.[35]

Intentional controlled burns typically create fires confined to the herbaceous layer that do little long term damage to mature trees. This prevents more catastrophic wildfires that could do much more damage.[36] However, these fires either kill or suppress tree seedlings, thus preventing the establishment of a continuous tree canopy which would prevent further grass growth. Prior to European settlement aboriginal land use practices, including fire, influenced vegetation[37] and may have maintained and modified savanna flora.[3][33] It has been suggested by many authors[37][38] that aboriginal burning created a structurally more open savanna landscape. Aboriginal burning certainly created a habitat mosaic that probably increased biodiversity and changed the structure of woodlands and geographic range of numerous woodland species.[33][37] It has been suggested by many authors[38][39] that with the removal or alteration of traditional burning regimes many savannas are being replaced by forest and shrub thickets with little herbaceous layer.

The consumption of herbage by introduced grazers in savanna woodlands has led to a reduction in the amount of fuel available for burning and resulted in fewer and cooler fires.[40] The introduction of exotic pasture legumes has also led to a reduction in the need to burn to produce a flush of green growth because legumes retain high nutrient levels throughout the year, and because fires can have a negative impact on legume populations which causes a reluctance to burn.[41]

Grazing and browsing animals

[edit]
Grevy's zebras grazing

The closed forest types such as broadleaf forests and rainforests are usually not grazed owing to the closed structure precluding grass growth, and hence offering little opportunity for grazing.[42] In contrast the open structure of savannas allows the growth of a herbaceous layer and is commonly used for grazing domestic livestock.[43] As a result, much of the world's savannas have undergone change as a result of grazing by sheep, goats and cattle, ranging from changes in pasture composition to woody plant encroachment.[44]

Iberian pigs feeding on acorns of an holm oak

The removal of grass by grazing affects the woody plant component of woodland systems in two major ways. Grasses compete with woody plants for water in the topsoil and removal by grazing reduces this competitive effect, potentially boosting tree growth.[45] In addition to this effect, the removal of fuel reduces both the intensity and the frequency of fires which may control woody plant species.[46] Grazing animals can have a more direct effect on woody plants by the browsing of palatable woody species. There is evidence that unpalatable woody plants have increased under grazing in savannas.[47] Grazing also promotes the spread of weeds in savannas by the removal or reduction of the plants which would normally compete with potential weeds and hinder establishment.[37] In addition to this, cattle and horses are implicated in the spread of the seeds of weed species such as prickly acacia (Acacia nilotica) and stylo (Stylosanthes species).[40] Alterations in savanna species composition brought about by grazing can alter ecosystem function, and are exacerbated by overgrazing and poor land management practices.

Introduced grazing animals can also affect soil condition through physical compaction and break-up of the soil caused by the hooves of animals and through the erosion effects caused by the removal of protective plant cover. Such effects are most likely to occur on land subjected to repeated and heavy grazing.[48] The effects of overstocking are often worst on soils of low fertility and in low rainfall areas below 500 mm, as most soil nutrients in these areas tend to be concentrated in the surface so any movement of soils can lead to severe degradation. Alteration in soil structure and nutrient levels affects the establishment, growth and survival of plant species and in turn can lead to a change in woodland structure and composition. That being said, impact of grazing animals can be reduced. Looking at Elephant impact on Savannas, the overall impact is reduced in the presence of rainfall and fences.[49]

Tree clearing

[edit]
Savanna in eastern South Africa
Eucalyptus savanna in Western Sydney

Large areas of Australian and South American savannas have been cleared of trees, and this clearing continues today. For example, land clearing and fracking threaten the Northern Territory, Australia savanna,[50] and 480,000 ha of savanna were being cleared annually in Queensland in the 2000s, primarily to improve pasture production.[37][51] Substantial savanna areas have been cleared of woody vegetation and much of the area that remains today is vegetation that has been disturbed by either clearing or thinning at some point in the past.

Clearing is carried out by the grazing industry in an attempt to increase the quality and quantity of feed available for stock and to improve the management of livestock. The removal of trees from savanna land removes the competition for water from the grasses present, and can lead to a two to fourfold increase in pasture production, as well as improving the quality of the feed available.[52] Since stock carrying capacity is strongly correlated with herbage yield, there can be major financial benefits from the removal of trees,[53] such as assisting with grazing management: regions of dense tree and shrub cover harbors predators, leading to increased stock losses, for example,[54] while woody plant cover hinders mustering in both sheep and cattle areas.[55]

A number of techniques have been employed to clear or kill woody plants in savannas. Early pastoralists used felling and girdling, the removal of a ring of bark and sapwood, as a means of clearing land.[56] In the 1950s arboricides suitable for stem injection were developed. War-surplus heavy machinery was made available, and these were used for either pushing timber, or for pulling using a chain and ball strung between two machines. These two new methods of timber control, along with the introduction and widespread adoption of several new pasture grasses and legumes promoted a resurgence in tree clearing. The 1980s also saw the release of soil-applied arboricides, notably tebuthiuron, that could be utilised without cutting and injecting each individual tree.

In many ways "artificial" clearing, particularly pulling, mimics the effects of fire and, in savannas adapted to regeneration after fire as most Queensland savannas are, there is a similar response to that after fire.[57] Tree clearing in many savanna communities, although causing a dramatic reduction in basal area and canopy cover, often leaves a high percentage of woody plants alive either as seedlings too small to be affected or as plants capable of re-sprouting from lignotubers and broken stumps. A population of woody plants equal to half or more of the original number often remains following pulling of eucalypt communities, even if all the trees over 5 metres are uprooted completely.

Exotic plant species

[edit]
Acacia savanna, Taita Hills Wildlife Sanctuary, Kenya.

A number of exotic plants species have been introduced to savannas around the world. Amongst the woody plant species are serious environmental weeds such as prickly acacia (Acacia nilotica), Rubbervine (Cryptostegia grandiflora), Mesquite (Prosopis spp.), Lantana (Lantana camara and L. montevidensis) and Prickly Pear (Opuntia spp.). A range of herbaceous species have also been introduced to these woodlands, either deliberately or accidentally including Rhodes grass and other Chloris species, Buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris), Giant rat's tail grass (Sporobolus pyramidalis) parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) and stylos (Stylosanthes spp.) and other legumes. These introductions have the potential to significantly alter the structure and composition of savannas worldwide, and have already done so in many areas through a number of processes including altering the fire regime, increasing grazing pressure, competing with native vegetation and occupying previously vacant ecological niches.[57][58] Other plant species include: white sage, spotted cactus, cotton seed, rosemary.[citation needed]

Climate change

[edit]

Human induced climate change resulting from the greenhouse effect may result in an alteration of the structure and function of savannas. Some authors[59] have suggested that savannas and grasslands may become even more susceptible to woody plant encroachment as a result of greenhouse induced climate change. However, a recent case described a savanna increasing its range at the expense of forest in response to climate variation, and potential exists for similar rapid, dramatic shifts in vegetation distribution as a result of global climate change, particularly at ecotones such as savannas so often represent.[60]

Savanna ecoregions

[edit]
Tropical savanna in Kenya.
Temperate savanna in New South Wales.
Mediterranean savanna in the Alentejo region, Portugal.
Nile Delta flooded savanna.
A montane savanna in the Colombian Andes.

A savanna can simply be distinguished by the open savanna, where grass prevails and trees are rare; and the wooded savanna, where the trees are densest, bordering an open woodland or forest. Specific savanna ecoregions of several different types include:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Savanna

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A savanna is a characterized by continuous cover of perennial grasses interspersed with individual trees or clusters of trees that do not form a closed canopy, occurring in regions with warm to hot s and seasonal patterns featuring a pronounced . These ecosystems are transitional between closed and or biomes, shaped primarily by where annual rainfall ranges from 50 to 150 centimeters, most of which falls during a lasting several months. Vegetation in savannas consists mainly of C4 grasses adapted to and , alongside drought-resistant trees such as acacias and baobabs whose deep roots access during dry periods. is notably diverse, particularly in African savannas, supporting large migratory herds of herbivores like zebras, wildebeests, and , preyed upon by apex predators including lions and , with the system maintained by frequent natural wildfires that prevent woody encroachment while promoting grass regeneration. Savannas occupy vast areas across south of the , as well as parts of , , and , serving as critical carbon sinks and reservoirs despite pressures from , , and variability that can shift their boundaries or degrade productivity.

Definition and Characteristics

Climatic and Soil Conditions

Savannas are defined climatically by a pronounced wet-dry , with annual typically ranging from 500 to 1500 millimeters, of which 70 to 90 percent falls during a concentrated lasting 4 to 6 months, often driven by influences or convective storms, while the ensuing imposes water deficits that inhibit continuous tree cover and favor recurrent fires. This rainfall regime contrasts sharply with moister tropical forests, where even distribution supports closed canopies, as the savanna's pulsed leads to pulses that grasses exploit more efficiently than trees via deeper rooting and rapid regrowth. Temperatures in savanna environments average 20 to 30°C annually, with monthly means rarely dipping below 18°C and exhibiting high diurnal amplitudes exceeding 10°C, alongside negligible risk due to proximity to the or topographic sheltering, conditions that sustain C4 photosynthetic pathways in dominant grasses while disadvantaging frost-vulnerable forest species. Dominant savanna soils comprise and Ultisols, highly weathered profiles low in base cations, , and , with pH often below 5.5 and minimal retention owing to rapid and leaching under alternating saturation and , factors that curtail microbial nutrient cycling and tree seedling survival compared to the fertile, mull layers of adjacent woodlands. Edaphic constraints like shallow depths over or impeded drainage further enforce openness by restricting root exploration, while localized enrichments from mound activity—elevating and by factors of 2 to 10—generate fertility islands that sporadically support clusters amid matrix impoverishment.

Vegetation and Structural Features

Savanna vegetation features an open mosaic of grasses and trees, characterized by woody canopy cover typically ranging from 10% to 30%. This structure arises from competitive dynamics where grasses dominate the due to their rapid growth and tolerance to frequent disturbances, while trees occupy scattered positions, preventing canopy closure. Dominant grasses belong to the C4 photosynthetic pathway, such as species in the genera and Hyparrhenia, which exhibit high flammability and rapid post-fire recovery through tillering and basal resprouting. Trees, including genera like and Baikiaea, are often drought-deciduous or semi-evergreen, with physiognomies adapted to sparse spacing that maintains herbaceous dominance below. Structural zonation within savannas progresses from grass-dominated plains with minimal tree cover to denser woodland forms, influenced primarily by soil depth variations that affect root access to resources. In shallower soils, grass cover prevails due to limited tree rooting depth, whereas deeper profiles enable greater tree establishment and canopy development up to woodland thresholds. This gradient reflects partitioning of belowground niches, with grasses concentrating fine roots in upper soil layers for quick nutrient uptake and trees extending taproots to depths exceeding 10 meters in species like Acacia. Empirical studies indicate that savanna grasses allocate 40-60% of biomass to roots, enhancing drought survival through extensive fibrous systems that exploit surface moisture pulses. Vegetative adaptations underscore resilience to disturbance regimes inherent in savanna dynamics. Trees possess thick bark and epicormic buds for post-fire resprouting, allowing survival of surface burns that grasses facilitate through fuel accumulation. Grasses, in turn, employ clonal growth via rhizomes and tillers, regenerating foliage within weeks of disturbance to reclaim light and space before regrowth shades the . Such traits partition resources temporally and spatially, with grasses thriving in disturbance-favored gaps and trees leveraging persistent access to deeper reserves, sustaining the heterogeneous over seasonal cycles.

Etymology and Historical Context

Origins of the Term

The term savanna derives from the Spanish sabana, borrowed from the zabana, denoting open, treeless plains or grasslands observed in the by early European explorers. This indigenous term captured flat, grassy landscapes with sparse or no tree cover, often featuring tall grasses. The earliest recorded Spanish usage appears in Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo y Valdés's 1535 Historia general y natural de las Indias, where he defines sabana as "land without trees, but with much tall grass," based on observations from Spanish expeditions in the . Oviedo's account reflects initial European documentation of these ecosystems during the , initially applied to tropical American terrains rather than African or other regions. The word entered English by 1555, via translations of explorer narratives, initially referring to similar open plains in the before broader application to analogous biomes. Early distinctions emphasized savannas' tropical latitude and fire-prone nature, setting them apart from temperate steppes (colder, arid Eurasian grasslands) or prairies (North American temperate plains with denser grass cover and less fire influence). This etymological root underscores the term's origin in colonial encounters with and South American landscapes, predating its extension to African savannas in scientific literature.

Evolution of Scientific Understanding

In the mid-19th century, European explorers traversing central and provided initial empirical descriptions of savanna landscapes as open, fire-influenced systems distinct from closed forests. , during expeditions from 1851 to 1873, documented vast grassy plains dotted with acacias and other trees, observing that indigenous burning practices prevented woody encroachment and maintained the herbaceous layer, challenging perceptions of these regions as underdeveloped woodlands. At the close of the , German Schimper advanced a more systematic framework in his treatise Pflanzengeographie auf physiologischer Grundlage, classifying savannas as stable climax formations shaped by seasonal rainfall deficits (typically 500–1500 mm annually) and nutrient-poor soils, resulting in discontinuous cover rather than dense canopies. This edaphic-climatic determinism dominated early 20th-century , portraying savannas as predictable endpoints of succession under tropical-subtropical gradients, with grass dominance attributed to water stress inhibiting establishment. Mid-20th-century field observations shifted emphasis toward disturbance regimes, with South African ecologist John Bews arguing in works from the 1910s onward for dynamic complexes responsive to , , and edaphic variability over rigid climaxes. By the –1970s, experimental burns and exclusion studies in East and southern African savannas quantified how annual s suppress woody recruitment by 70–90% in mesic sites (>650 mm ), establishing savannas as non-equilibrium systems. Post-2000 analyses of MODIS further integrated these insights, revealing bimodal global distributions of woody cover (peaks at <20% and >60%), indicative of alternative stable states between savanna and forest, with tipping points at ~40% cover or 650 mm rainfall where - feedbacks enforce . Empirical resolution of debates—such as claims of savannas as degraded forests from or arrested grasslands—confirms them as hybrid biomes sustained by interacting abiotic and biotic processes, neither relics of prior forest nor primary grass expansions but self-reinforcing equilibria.

Global Distribution

Geographic Extent and Major Regions

Savannas encompass approximately 20% of Earth's land surface, equivalent to 20–33 million km², forming a significant portion of global terrestrial ecosystems in tropical and subtropical zones. These areas are distributed across continents where seasonal rainfall patterns, driven by and monsoons, maintain a wet-dry regime typically between 5°–25° north and south of the ./The_Physical_Environment_(Ritter)/09:_Climate_Systems/9.04:_Low_Latitude_Climates/9.4.03:Tropical_Wet_Dry(Savanna)_Climate) Africa contains the largest continuous savanna tracts, comprising over 40% of the global total and spanning regions like the Serengeti-Mara plains in and the woodlands across southern and , often at altitudes from sea level to 1,500 meters. features prominent savannas such as the in and , and the in , covering millions of km² in the and Amazon basins' transitional zones. Australia's tropical savannas dominate the northern interior, extending over 1.9 million km² influenced by flows. Smaller but significant extents occur in and , including monsoon-affected grasslands in the and Myanmar-Thailand border areas. Recent analyses using MODIS data from the 2010s onward indicate that core savanna areas remain relatively stable globally, though peripheral zones show fragmentation due to land-use pressures, with persistence varying across 20–23 million km² of monitored extents.

Classification of Savanna Types

Savannas are structurally according to woody canopy cover, which determines the balance between grassy and scattered trees or shrubs. Grass savannas feature sparse woody with less than 10% canopy cover, dominated by continuous grass layers; tree savannas exhibit 10-30% cover with dispersed trees amid grasses; and wooded savannas approach 30-40% cover, transitioning toward denser woodlands while retaining a prominent herbaceous layer. These thresholds reflect empirical observations of penetration and dynamics, distinguishing savannas from pure grasslands or forests. Floristic classifications emphasize dominant plant assemblages, with Acacia-dominated types prevalent in arid zones due to their and nitrogen-fixing capabilities; baobab-influenced savannas on edaphically variable sites, where thick-trunked species store water; and palm savannas confined to riparian or seasonally flooded margins, supporting species like or adapted to wet-dry cycles. These types arise from species-specific responses to rainfall gradients and soil properties, as evidenced by biogeographic analyses of African assemblages. Functional distinctions differentiate savannas maintained by recurrent fires, where grass fuels promote open canopies, from edaphically constrained variants limited by nutrient-poor or shallow soils that suppress woody encroachment regardless of fire suppression. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) ecoregional framework integrates these traits, delineating savanna units by fire frequency, soil limitations, and vegetation feedbacks, such as in African systems where edaphic grasslands persist on infertile substrates. Satellite metrics like the (NDVI) enable monitoring of structural and functional transitions, capturing shifts in and canopy density driven by or edaphic changes, with time-series data revealing type conversions at scales.

Ecological Processes

Flora and Plant Adaptations

Savanna flora is characterized by a mix of herbaceous grasses and scattered woody plants adapted to seasonal droughts, nutrient-poor soils, and frequent disturbances like fire, which shape life-history strategies favoring persistence over rapid growth. Dominant woody genera such as Acacia in African savannas and Eucalyptus in Australian savannas exhibit fire adaptations including thick bark that insulates cambium from lethal temperatures during low-intensity fires, enabling survival and subsequent resprouting from epicormic buds. Thick bark thickness correlates positively with fire frequency across ecosystems, providing a protective investment that allows mature trees to maintain canopy dominance despite recurrent topkill of juveniles. Coexistence between grasses and trees arises from niche partitioning driven by resource competition, particularly for and , under variable rainfall regimes. Grasses, primarily from the family encompassing approximately 12,000 species globally, exploit shallow with rapid aboveground growth to intercept following rains, while trees access deeper reserves through extensive systems, reducing overlap in resource use. This vertical partitioning, as posited in Walter's two-layer hypothesis, sustains grass dominance in the by limiting tree sapling establishment in upper soil layers during wet periods. Empirical measurements reveal grasses allocate substantial belowground to enhance and uptake in oligotrophic savanna soils, with systems often concentrated in the top 30 cm where fine surface area exceeds area for efficient resource capture. In fire-prone systems, this belowground investment supports regrowth after aboveground tissue loss, complementing woody resprouting strategies and maintaining herbaceous cover amid disturbance-driven dynamics. Woody similarly prioritize allocation during establishment, with studies showing up to high proportions of in roots to compete for limited subsurface against grasses. Transitional zones between savannas and forests host elevated plant diversity, where such adaptations facilitate and coexistence under fluctuating selective pressures.

Fauna and Biodiversity Patterns

African savannas are characterized by assemblages of large mammalian herbivores and their predators, forming robust trophic structures. Iconic species include browser herbivores such as giraffes, kudu, impala, and the African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), which acts as an ecosystem engineer by browsing woody vegetation; these browsers prefer nutritious leaves, twigs, and pods from species including Acacia spp. (such as Acacia tortilis, Acacia nigrescens, Acacia karroo, Acacia mellifera), Commiphora spp., Grewia spp., Terminalia sericea, Dichrostachys cinerea, and Sclerocarya birrea, with Acacia species particularly important due to their abundance, palatability, and nutritional value. The African lion (Panthera leo) serves as an apex predator, and migratory ungulates such as plains zebra (Equus quagga) and wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), which sustain high predator densities through seasonal movements. In the Serengeti ecosystem, these dynamics support large herbivore standing crop biomass correlating closely with annual rainfall, often exceeding 30 kg/ha in productive areas due to grazing pressure from millions of individuals during migrations. Long-term studies illustrate top-down regulation by ; for instance, in during the 1970s, elevated densities following droughts led to widespread woodland destruction, reducing tree cover and altering habitat for subordinate herbivores and predators. This browsing suppressed woody encroachment, maintaining dominance and influencing community composition, with impacts persisting post-population declines from and starvation. In Australian savannas, assemblages differ markedly, dominated by herbivores such as the (Osphranter rufus) and ( agilis), which graze selectively on grasses and forbs, alongside smaller macropods and monotremes, with fewer large predators like the (Canis dingo). These species exhibit adaptations to seasonal , including energy-efficient locomotion, supporting lower but resilient levels compared to African counterparts. Insects and birds play critical roles in trophic interactions beyond mammals; bees predominate in pollination networks, facilitating reproduction of savanna flora, while frugivorous birds and ants mediate seed dispersal, enhancing plant recruitment and genetic diversity across patchy landscapes. Empirical metrics reveal biodiversity patterns with alpha diversity—local species richness—peaking in mesic savannas where intermediate rainfall supports diverse niches, and beta diversity—turnover between sites—elevated by habitat heterogeneity from herbivore grazing and fire mosaics. In Neotropical savannas, structural complexity further boosts small mammal alpha and beta diversity, underscoring how faunal interactions amplify regional gamma diversity.

Fire, Hydrology, and Nutrient Dynamics

Fires occur frequently in savannas, typically with return intervals of 1 to 5 years, acting as a keystone disturbance that maintains the grassland-woodland mosaic by favoring resprouting graminoids over less fire-tolerant succulents and woody plants. Satellite-derived burn scar data from MODIS instruments reveal that large portions of savanna landscapes, such as those in , experience annual burning rates exceeding 50%, with empirical analyses confirming fire's role in suppressing recruitment through top-kill of seedlings and saplings. This selective pressure arises from the grass-fueled nature of fires, where continuous fuel from herbaceous layers enables rapid ignition and spread during dry seasons, preventing woody encroachment absent such disturbances. Hydrological regimes in savannas are characterized by pulsed wet-dry seasonality, with intense rains causing seasonal flooding that enriches riparian zones through deposition while limiting tree establishment via alternating waterlogging and drought stresses. In savannas, flood durations of up to 300 days per year at certain elevations create anaerobic conditions that hinder woody development, reinforcing grass dominance as trees struggle with physiological stress from oxygen deprivation followed by . This cyclic curtails deep-rooted tree invasion into open areas, as evidenced by transitions where reduced flooding correlates with increased tree cover in otherwise savanna-like settings. Nutrient dynamics in savannas feature low overall fertility due to rapid decomposition of organic matter under high temperatures and microbial activity, coupled with leaching losses during wet seasons that deplete soil stocks of mobile elements like nitrogen and potassium. Fires counteract this poverty by volatilizing organic nitrogen but recycling ash-bound macronutrients such as phosphorus and cations back to the surface, where they become immediately available post-burn before subsequent rains can leach them away. Decomposition rates accelerate in the warm, aerobic conditions typical of savanna soils, ensuring quick turnover but minimal accumulation, which sustains the system's oligotrophic state. These processes interact synergistically: post-fire nutrient pulses from ash deposition elevate soil mineral concentrations, temporarily boosting grass productivity and biomass accumulation that fuels subsequent fires, thereby closing the disturbance-nutrient cycle essential to savanna persistence. For instance, fires can increase vegetation nitrogen and phosphorus by 16% and 42%, respectively, enhancing herbaceous regrowth rates before leaching dilutes the flush. Hydrological pulses further modulate this by flushing nutrients into streams during floods, yet the rapid cycling prevents buildup that might favor competitive woody species over grasses.

Human Interactions and Utilization

Indigenous and Traditional Management

Indigenous peoples in savanna regions have employed and practices for millennia to maintain openness and ecological patchiness, often replicating natural disturbance regimes disrupted by megafauna extinctions. In northern and southeastern , Aboriginal groups conducted frequent low-intensity cool-season burns, which promoted grass regrowth, reduced fuel loads for catastrophic s, and created heterogeneous mosaics supporting diverse and . These practices, evidenced by archaeological and ethnohistorical records, actively shaped open eucalypt savannas rather than passively in pristine , countering earlier characterizations of minimal impact. In African savannas, pastoralist societies such as the Maasai and others practiced livestock mobility and , moving herds seasonally to allow vegetation recovery and distribute nutrients via corrals, thereby preventing woody encroachment and degradation. Historical observations from the , including explorer accounts in , describe vast expanses sustaining high ungulate densities alongside human herds without evident , attributable to these adaptive strategies that mimicked herd behaviors of extinct proboscideans and other large herbivores in suppressing tree recruitment. Such management fostered "grazing lawns" with short grasses that limited fire intensity while enhancing forage quality, as confirmed by long-term ecological studies linking pastoral mobility to sustained . These traditional approaches demonstrate causal mechanisms where controlled disturbances counteract succession toward closed woodlands, preserving savanna structure through empirical patterns of reduced shrub density and increased grass dominance observed in unmanaged versus traditionally tended areas. Unlike static enclosures, the dynamic nature of indigenous systems—integrating fire timing with herd movements—avoided the over-densification seen in sedentary models, supporting resilient ecosystems prior to colonial disruptions.

Pastoralism, Agriculture, and Land Use

Extensive cattle ranching occupies significant portions of savanna landscapes, particularly in regions like the Brazilian , where cultivated pastures cover approximately 28% of the 200 million biome, supporting low-input production systems that rely on native and improved grasses for high meat output. These pastures produce annual grass biomass yields ranging from 3 to 4 t/ha under managed conditions, enabling carrying capacities of 0.1 to 0.5 large stock units (LSU) per in mesic savannas with moderate rainfall. Moderate intensities emulate the browsing pressure of native herbivores, limiting woody establishment through direct consumption and reduced grass competition, thereby maintaining dominance and curbing bush encroachment that could otherwise alter ecosystem structure. Crop agriculture integrates with pastoral systems in wetter savanna margins, such as the West African Sudan Savanna, where rainfed and predominate, yielding 1 to 2 t/ha under typical smallholder practices influenced by and seasonal rainfall. These crops leverage the savanna's nutrient dynamics for or with grazing lands, enhancing overall land productivity without full conversion to arable use. Dry season expansion of such farming, however, encounters persistent irrigation constraints due to erratic access and depletion in rain-shadow periods, limiting scalability beyond supplemental systems. Land use patterns in savannas thus prioritize dual-purpose systems where and selective cropping preserve herbaceous cover while generating economic returns, with empirical data indicating that balanced stocking rates sustain regeneration rates comparable to ungrazed benchmarks, fostering resilience in structure against succession toward .

Economic and Cultural Significance

Savannas underpin substantial economic activity through , particularly in African regions where viewing generates approximately $12 billion in annual revenues across countries such as , , and . This sector relies on the charismatic megafauna of savanna ecosystems, drawing millions of visitors to protected areas and contributing to local employment and development. Savanna soils represent a critical yet underappreciated , with grasslands and savannas holding potential for sequestering up to 48 GtC in the top 2 meters under optimal management, including controlled fire regimes that prevent woody encroachment and enhance retention. These ecosystems store the majority of their carbon belowground, buffering atmospheric CO2 more effectively than previously modeled in drier variants. Culturally, savannas form the backdrop for indigenous pastoralist societies like the Maasai, whose traditions revolve around herding as a measure of , , and spiritual blessing, with creation narratives emphasizing divine endowment of in these landscapes. Totemic reverence for savanna , such as lions among certain Ugandan and Kenyan , embeds conservation in systems, where prohibitions against harming clan animals promote . Biodiversity in savannas delivers essential regulating services, including by native that supports yields in adjacent agricultural zones and hydrological that sustains flows for downstream and human use. These functions, alongside nutrient cycling, enhance resilience for surrounding food systems without overlapping direct land conversion practices.

Conservation Efforts

Protected Areas and Policies

Protected areas in savanna ecosystems, often designated as national parks under IUCN Category II, encompass large natural or near-natural landscapes aimed at safeguarding ecological processes, characteristic species, and minimal human intervention beyond and . These areas typically enforce no-take zones for harvesting while permitting controlled visitor access, as seen in many African savanna reserves. In , where savannas predominate, such protected areas cover varying proportions of the ; for instance, South Africa's savanna includes 36% under protection, though continental medians hover around 4-18% depending on the region. Prominent examples include in , spanning nearly 20,000 km² of heterogeneous savanna, and in , renowned for its migratory herds and fire-managed grasslands. Management in these sites often involves fencing to control poaching and disease, with fully fenced along its western boundary by 1961 to prevent incursions into agricultural zones. Empirical assessments indicate mixed ; while over 80% of Africa's savanna conservation lands show deterioration based on population indicators, select reserves demonstrate population recoveries for . Success metrics highlight recoveries in large herbivores, particularly rhinos, attributed to intensified and fencing efforts. In , black rhino numbers have increased by approximately 28% over the past three decades through protections in reserves, rising from near-extirpation risks to over 2,000 individuals continent-wide by 2023, with private and state lands contributing significantly. Without such interventions post-1960s, models estimate fewer than 300 black rhinos would remain in . Challenges persist, including edge effects from surrounding land uses, which can extend several kilometers into reserves, altering vegetation and increasing snaring risks for carnivores near boundaries. However, data from intact core zones in fenced parks like reveal resilience, with maintained and structural diversity in savanna vegetation despite peripheral pressures. Fencing surveys across 63 African protected areas underscore benefits like reduced but note drawbacks such as altered migration patterns.

Restoration and Management Strategies

Prescribed burning has been applied as a primary technique to counteract woody encroachment in savannas, with empirical studies demonstrating its capacity to halt or partially reverse shrub and tree proliferation by suppressing resprouting and seedling establishment. High-intensity fires, when applied successively, reduced resprouting rates by up to 50% in mesic savanna experiments, though full reversal often requires integration with other methods like to address persistent stocks. In grassland-savanna transitions, three decades of prescribed fires stabilized woody cover increases observed from 1939 to 2014, preventing further encroachment without achieving net reduction, highlighting the need for fire regimes mimicking historical frequencies of every 2-5 years. Rotational grazing systems, involving periodic rest periods for pastures, have shown measurable improvements in savanna ecosystem function, including enhanced soil stability and native grass composition after several years of implementation. Short-duration rotations in semi-arid savannas increased landscape functionality indices by promoting even grazing distribution and reducing selective overgrazing, with benefits accruing over 5-10 years in Australian and African contexts. Combining rotational grazing with fire exclusion zones further supported wild herbivore coexistence by maintaining grass cover, as evidenced in Kenyan rangelands where cattle-free paddocks preserved biodiversity hotspots. Invasive species removal, such as targeted control of gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus) in northern Australian savannas, has been intensified post-2020 through dedicated funding and mechanical-chemical methods, aiming to restore -prone grass layers. These efforts, backed by AU$500,000 allocations in 2020 for operational teams, reduced invasive fuel loads that exacerbate late-season wildfires, facilitating native grass recovery within 3-5 years in pilot sites. monitoring has advanced savanna management for carbon abatement, with dynamic emission factor models using geospatial data to optimize early dry-season burns, generating Australian Carbon Credit Units equivalent to millions of tonnes of CO2 avoided annually from 2020-2025 projects. Community-based initiatives integrate restoration with eco-tourism revenues, as in Kenyan conservancies where local management funded habitat rehabilitation, yielding sustained income streams that supported anti-poaching and grass restoration covering thousands of hectares.

Threats and Resilience

Anthropogenic Pressures

Conversion of savanna habitats to cropland has accelerated since the mid-20th century, driven primarily by demand for commodities like soybeans and . In the Brazilian , over 30 million hectares of native savanna have been cleared for in recent decades, with soy expansion accounting for much of the habitat loss; this represents a significant portion of the biome's original extent, where deforestation rates reached peaks of over 1 million hectares annually in the early before partial slowdowns. Globally, tropical savannas have experienced greater proportional losses and fragmentation than forests since the 1980s, with cropland expansion correlating strongly with reduced intact areas, though causal attribution varies by region due to confounding factors like policy changes. In African savannas, agricultural conversion has similarly intensified, contributing to less than 3% of ecoregions remaining highly intact. Invasive alien plants, such as , exacerbate pressures by altering fuel structures and fire dynamics. This invades savanna edges and grasslands, increasing vertical fuel continuity that ladders surface fires into high-intensity canopy events, thereby shifting from open woodland to denser thickets; experimental confirms this mechanism, though interactions with clearing practices can amplify native loss. hunting further compounds degradation by depleting large herbivores that serve as dispersers, including whose removal reduces dispersal of large-seeded trees and correlates with altered regeneration patterns; declines of 50-90% in hunted savanna areas demonstrate causal links to trophic downgrading, distinct from natural predation. Habitat fragmentation from expanding road networks intensifies edge effects, including heightened fire incidence along linear disturbances. In savanna landscapes, roads create edges that statistically correlate with increased wildfire burned area and intensity due to easier ignition access and altered microclimates, though global models show mixed directions of impact depending on fuel loads. Empirical studies in African and South American savannas link road proximity to elevated edge fires, facilitating invasion and further conversion, with causal evidence from remote sensing of fire spread patterns. Some degradation forms, such as overgrazing-induced soil compaction or invasive dominance, prove reversible through targeted management like rotational grazing or mechanical clearing, restoring grass cover and biodiversity metrics within 5-10 years in experimental plots.

Climate Variability and Natural Fluctuations

During the approximately 21,000 years ago, savannas expanded significantly across tropical regions, including parts of and , due to drier and cooler conditions associated with lower sea levels and altered dynamics. Paleoclimate reconstructions from and cores indicate that open grasslands and savanna-like replaced denser forests in areas now dominated by rainforests, reflecting shifts driven primarily by orbital and obliquity changes that intensified seasonal rather than fluctuations in atmospheric CO2 levels. These expansions and contractions, recurring over glacial-interglacial cycles, demonstrate savanna dynamism tied to Milankovitch-scale forcings, with responding more to hydrological variability than to concentrations. In the , savanna rainfall exhibits pulsed variability within established norms, as evidenced by lake sediment and dust flux records from showing episodic droughts interspersed with wetter phases, such as the mid- . The region's droughts in the 1970s–1980s and early 2010s, characterized by rainfall deficits up to 20–30% below long-term means, aligned with these natural oscillations, followed by partial recovery through increased vegetation greenness observed in (NDVI) data from 1982 onward. Grass-dominated understories in savannas facilitate this resilience, with C4 grasses exhibiting rapid photosynthetic recovery and tillering post-drought, buffering against prolonged die-offs compared to woody components. Empirical models of savanna dynamics highlight rainfall-fire feedbacks as key amplifiers of local variability, where interannual pulses modulate fuel loads and ignition frequency without necessitating external anthropogenic drivers. In semi-arid systems, higher rainfall increases grass , elevating intensity and extent, which in turn suppresses tree recruitment and maintains open canopy structures; this nonlinear response stabilizes savanna against moderate perturbations. Post-disturbance regrowth is swift, with NDVI metrics indicating recovery times of 1–3 years in -affected areas, underscoring inherent buffering via seed banks and resprouting mechanisms. Such feedbacks and regenerative capacities position savannas as resilient to intrinsic climatic pulses, with paleodata confirming repeated expansions and stabilizations over millennia independent of recent CO2 rises.

Controversies and Debates

Fire Regime Management

Fire regime management in savannas centers on controlled burning to avert fuel accumulation from suppression policies, which foster infrequent, high-intensity late-dry-season wildfires that amplify greenhouse gas emissions and degrade ecosystems. Indigenous practices, involving frequent low-intensity early-dry-season fires, historically curbed fire severity and supported landscape heterogeneity, whereas modern exclusions have precipitated larger fires, as seen in northern Australia's savannas where absence of such management correlates with intensified late-season blazes. Studies from 2021 to 2023, leveraging satellite data, reveal that early-dry-season burning curtails overall emissions by preempting expansive late-season fires, which burn under hotter, drier conditions yielding higher carbon release factors. Yet, this approach elevates transient pollution in proximate settlements, as documented in Darwin where savanna management projects heightened local air quality concerns despite net emission reductions. Prescribed burns sustain by generating pyrodiversity—varied burn patches that bolster and forage availability, challenging blanket suppression as optimal. from Kenyan and Australian savannas indicates burned plots host greater bird abundances and diversities than unburned ones, while African grassland trials affirm enhanced habitats post-prescribed fires. Debates intensify over carbon credit programs incentivizing early burning, which conservationists critique for imposing homogenized regimes that overlook savanna variability and may prioritize abatement over trade-offs. Advocates highlight revenue for indigenous communities and regime restoration, but warn against uncritical adoption without tailoring to local , as uniform late-fire avoidance risks ecological simplification.

Grazing and Woody Encroachment

In savannas, woody encroachment—the proliferation of trees and shrubs at the expense of grasses—is often attributed to , but indicates that appropriate levels of herbivory, including by domestic under proper , can maintain tree-grass balance by suppressing establishment and juvenile woody . For instance, intensive creates short-grass lawns that inhibit tree recruitment, as observed in South African savannas where reduced grass from historical limited woody cover over decades. Similarly, large native browsers like mechanically damage and selectively reduce woody vegetation density, preventing unchecked expansion; exclusion of such herbivores correlates with increased tree cover in African systems. Domestic analogs, such as at moderate stocking rates, mimic these effects by promoting grass recovery and sustaining forage productivity without inducing , countering narratives that equate with inevitable degradation. Debates persist on optimal stocking densities, with trials demonstrating that adaptive, rotational systems prevent invasions common in undergrazed or fire-suppressed areas, as higher pressure disrupts woody dominance without long-term loss. In South African rangelands, maintaining stocking rates aligned with —typically 20-40% utilization—has stabilized savanna structure against bush thickening, challenging myths that overlook rotational benefits like enhanced nutrient cycling and resilience to variability. herbivores, in particular, target palatable shrubs and trees, fostering diverse understories; simulations and field data show savannas with intact browser guilds exhibit lower woody than those depleted by or exclusion. Counterarguments highlight risks of high-density grazing during droughts, where excessive pressure can exacerbate forage depletion and temporarily favor unpalatable woody regrowth due to reduced grass competition. However, historical pastoral adaptations, including seasonal mobility and destocking, have enabled savanna systems to rebound, as evidenced by pre-colonial African herds sustaining productivity amid cyclic dry spells without widespread desertification. Recent restoration efforts from 2020-2025 emphasize targeted grazing over mechanical clearing or afforestation, with studies in oak savannas reporting over 40% reductions in shrub density via controlled cattle browsing, preserving herbaceous layers more effectively than tree-planting alone. These approaches underscore herbivory's role in causal dynamics, where absence of grazers or browsers, not excess, often drives encroachment by allowing woody plants to escape natural checks.

Attribution of Changes to Climate vs. Human Factors

The attribution of observed changes in savanna ecosystems to variability versus factors remains contentious, with causal analyses often revealing a dominance of anthropogenic influences like regime alterations and land-use practices over climatic drivers alone. Peer-reviewed modeling indicates that current global distributions of tropical forests and savannas are shaped by interactions among , frequency, and human disturbances, where suppression and grazing exclusion have promoted woody encroachment in many regions, independent of or shifts. Empirical observations from 2000–2020 further challenge climate-centric narratives, documenting widespread in savanna-dominated , with approximately 70% of this vegetation increase attributable to CO2 fertilization effects enhancing water-use efficiency in C4 grasses and shrubs, thereby countering drought-induced dieback projected by some models. IPCC assessments acknowledge climate change's role in altering savanna and structure, such as through intensified drying in semi-arid zones potentially favoring degradation, yet they highlight substantial in net land-cover shifts between savanna, , and biomes due to confounding human . Critics of predominant IPCC attributions argue that unverified model projections of CO2-driven savanna-to- transitions overlook historical paleorecords of cyclic woody-herbaceous shifts tied to orbital forcings and , rather than linear anthropogenic warming, and emphasize verifiable metrics like reduced late-dry-season s from exclusion policies as primary encroachment drivers. In the woodlands of , spanning over 2.7 million km², woodland extent has remained roughly stable from the 1980s to 2020s despite regional warming of 1–1.5°C, with fluctuations primarily linked to and rather than climatic tipping points. Satellite-derived tree-cover trends provide a more robust basis for attribution than equilibrium models, revealing that human-mediated fire reductions—often through protected-area policies—have amplified bush thickening in Australian and African savannas by 20–50% since the mid-20th century, exceeding climate variance signals in controlled comparisons. Conversely, where traditional early-season burning persists, as in parts of indigenous-managed savannas, carbon emissions and encroachment are mitigated without invoking climatic , underscoring causal primacy of land-use legacies over atmospheric CO2 or rainfall anomalies. This empirical prioritization reveals that while modulates savanna resilience, human interventions in disturbance regimes explain the majority of directional changes observed through 2025.

References

  1. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/exhibits/biomes/grasslands.php
  2. https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Geography_%28Physical%29/The_Physical_Environment_%28Ritter%29/13%253A_Earth_Biomes/13.03%253A_Savanna_Biome
  3. https://askabiologist.asu.edu/explore/savanna
  4. https://animals.sandiegozoo.org/habitats/savanna
  5. https://letstalkscience.ca/educational-resources/backgrounders/savanna-biome
  6. https://kids.nceas.ucsb.edu/biomes/savanna.html
  7. https://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/WWF-Study-Grasslands-and-Savannah-Ecosystems.pdf
  8. https://archive.cbts.edu/Fulldisplay/52ftm2/418091/Climate_Of_The_Tropical_Savanna.pdf
  9. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2745.14221
  10. https://www1.usgs.gov/csas/nvcs/unitDetails/860246
  11. https://www.blueplanetbiomes.org/savanna_climate.php
  12. https://www.studyiq.com/articles/savanna-climate/
  13. https://www.soils4teachers.org/tropical
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/savanna-soils
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279386542_Mineral_Nutrition_Tropical_Savannas
  16. http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c20/e6-142-se-18.pdf
  17. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000377
  18. https://fw.ky.gov/Wildlife/Documents/SavannaWoodlandManagement.pdf
  19. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04202.x
  20. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/12/1201
  21. https://www.cotf.edu/ete/modules/msese/earthsysflr/savannahP.html
  22. https://phys.org/news/2017-10-shallow-soils-savannas-south-america.html
  23. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/only-in-africa/forms-of-savanna-from-woodland-to-grassland/158943E8835AAF7A87E2F579674B82A5
  24. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2745.13475
  25. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01975.x
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11997740/
  27. https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/1833/2015/bg-12-1833-2015.pdf
  28. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.16613
  29. https://www.etymonline.com/word/savannah
  30. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/savanna
  31. http://talltimbers.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Blydenstein1968_op.pdf
  32. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/savannah_n
  33. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/674530
  34. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/f991d3b5-d05b-41a2-8cf6-9830e3d43b2c/9781000055832.pdf
  35. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-662-03340-1.pdf
  36. https://www.doc-developpement-durable.org/file/Culture/paysagisme/livres-doc/Grasses%2520and%2520grassland%2520ecology.pdf
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51716336_The_Global_Extent_And_Determinants_Of_Savanna_And_Forest_As_Alternative_Biome_States
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4978865/
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982218303154
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/201996049_Origin_of_the_savanna_biome
  41. https://www.pmfias.com/savanna-climate-tropical-wet-and-dry-climate-sudan-climate/
  42. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019GL082327
  43. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03689.x
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4310295/
  45. https://www.britannica.com/science/savanna/Environment
  46. https://spj.science.org/doi/10.34133/2022/9835284
  47. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1071439
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S025462991000133X
  49. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.3437
  50. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.15236
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7668043/
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1877343510000096
  53. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.70108
  54. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/food_practice/grasslands_and_savannahs/
  55. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11676-020-01155-1
  56. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2435.12372
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7708610/
  58. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2745.12035
  59. https://www.britannica.com/plant/Poaceae/Distribution-and-abundance
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7520225/
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3679411/
  62. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12390
  63. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2745.13786
  64. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.18648
  65. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-tropical-ecology/article/overlap-and-seasonal-shifts-in-use-of-woody-plant-species-amongst-a-guild-of-savanna-browsers/A1C9FB4DC300E82C9F1EEA9D5229D2CD
  66. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/africa-big-five-safaris-lions
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225942819_Biomass_and_Production_of_Large_African_Herbivores_in_Relation_to_Rainfall_and_Primary_Production
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006320773900931
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229567299_The_elephant_problem_at_Tsavo
  70. https://savanna2012.weebly.com/tropical-australian-savanna-animals.html
  71. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000029320.34895.7d
  72. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/oik.08231
  73. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/99/6/1444/5145111
  74. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.13801
  75. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0102380
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11923400/
  77. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1172&context=usdafsfacpub
  78. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2301255120
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2965040/
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10483644/
  81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2845373
  82. https://www.frames.gov/catalog/35379
  83. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.3807
  84. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225978047_Effect_of_winter_fire_on_primary_productivity_and_nutrient_concentration_of_a_dry_tropical_savanna
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254629914002270
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6231065/
  87. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstreams/95e2e4a8-3ac7-4797-b903-ca4136e4fdff/download
  88. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/4/3/61
  89. https://fireecology.springeropen.com/articles/10.4996/fireecology.0602043
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7708580/
  91. https://environment.yale.edu/news/article/traditional-ranching-practices-enhance-african-savanna
  92. https://pastoralismjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13570-019-0150-z
  93. https://bioone.org/journals/Rangeland-Ecology-and-Management/volume-72/issue-1/j.rama.2018.07.016/Behavioral-and-Ecological-Implications-of-Bunched-Rotational-Cattle-Grazing-in/10.1016/j.rama.2018.07.016.short
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11895754/
  95. https://www.fao.org/4/t7750e/t7750e08.htm
  96. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.14493
  97. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2395
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989420302602
  99. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10745-019-0072-9
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8931140/
  101. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/brasil/tnc-environmentalframeworkcattle.pdf
  102. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227621000302
  103. https://www.fao.org/4/y8344e/y8344e08.htm
  104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179114001303
  105. https://iwaponline.com/jwcc/article/13/9/3338/90240/Impacts-of-climate-change-on-crop-and-irrigation
  106. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12105
  107. https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/wildlife-tourism/
  108. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/bac95afc-35df-4b4a-a6f5-d098523b7eca/content
  109. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/drier-savannas-and-grasslands-store-more-climate-buffering-carbon-than-previously-thought
  110. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/cattle-economy-maasai/
  111. https://www.wildernessdestinations.com/journal/cultures-and-communities/african-totems-kinship-and-conservation
  112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X24000156
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4978870/
  114. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/pag-021.pdf
  115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320719315174
  116. https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=394
  117. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282851186_The_Kruger_Experience_Ecology_and_Management_of_Savanna_Heterogeneity
  118. https://rris.biopama.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/Serengeti%2520National%2520Park%2520-%25202020%2520COA%2520-%2520en.pdf
  119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320713002991
  120. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12844
  121. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2593
  122. https://www.savetherhino.org/africa/measuring-black-rhino-conservation-success-and-exciting-recovery-potential-for-the-future/
  123. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2688-8319.12159
  124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725003908
  125. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2650504/
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320718306578
  127. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12738
  128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304744925_An_examination_of_the_potential_efficacy_of_high_intensity_fires_for_reversing_woody_encroachment_in_savannas
  129. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319890214_Holding_the_line_three_decades_of_prescribed_fires_halt_but_do_not_reverse_woody_encroachment_in_grasslands
  130. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167880919301185
  131. https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2021/10/26/australias-fight-to-stop-invasive-gamba-grass-is-noble-but-not-enough
  132. https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/14/1039/2023/
  133. https://cer.gov.au/schemes/australian-carbon-credit-unit-scheme/accu-scheme-methods/savanna-fire-management-methods
  134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7237612/
  135. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/03/environmental-protection-cerrado-brazil-economy/
  136. https://www.worldwildlife.org/places/cerrado/
  137. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3aa2/pdf
  138. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320722003391
  139. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/54/7/677/223532
  140. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254629916337036
  141. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.160498
  142. https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/42414/Lindsey_Bushmeat_2013.pdf?sequence=1
  143. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-53460-6
  144. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S253006442500046X
  145. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7686326/
  146. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8477&context=igc
  147. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44185-024-00056-4
  148. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2311280120
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379122000336
  150. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7007574/
  151. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263510873_Holocene_dust_records_from_the_West_African_Sahel_and_their_implications_for_changes_in_climate_and_land-surface_conditions
  152. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6617823/
  153. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.14351
  154. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/10-1684.1
  155. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379123000422
  156. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-022-01352-2
  157. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg4618
  158. https://fireecology.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42408-023-00215-1
  159. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-02618-z
  160. https://www.preventionweb.net/news/indigenous-fire-management-began-more-11000-years-ago-new-research
  161. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843223003990
  162. https://www.publish.csiro.au/rj/fulltext/RJ23049
  163. https://www.conservationevidence.com/actions/320
  164. https://cales.arizona.edu/oals/ALN/aln55/trollope
  165. https://phys.org/news/2025-01-carbon-revenues-fuel-misguided-policies.html
  166. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25141-1
  167. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332221006618
  168. https://ogresearchconservation.org/carbon-revenues-fuel-misguided-policies-in-african-conservation/
  169. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2015.0437
  170. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982223004724
  171. https://www.rcsaustralia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/TeaguePaper.pdf
  172. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2993
  173. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8931791/
  174. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/download/20238/19869
  175. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2745.13195
  176. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/rec.14368
  177. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ad20ac
  178. https://e360.yale.edu/features/greening-drylands-carbon-dioxide-climate-change
  179. https://nicholas.duke.edu/news/earth-saw-record-high-greening-2020-whats-root
  180. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2022/11/SRCCL_Full_Report.pdf
  181. https://zerocarbon-analytics.org/science/the-ipcc-report-on-land-use-and-climate-change/
  182. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/44015
  183. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020RG000711
  184. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04687-7
  185. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29806964/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.