Hubbry Logo
Hard waterHard waterMain
Open search
Hard water
Community hub
Hard water
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hard water
Hard water
Hard water
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A bathtub faucet with built-up calcification from hard water in Southern Arizona

Hard water is water that has a high mineral content (in contrast with "soft water"). Hard water is formed when water percolates through deposits of limestone, chalk or gypsum,[1] which are largely made up of calcium and magnesium carbonates, bicarbonates and sulfates.

Drinking hard water may have moderate health benefits. It can pose critical problems in industrial settings, where water hardness is monitored to avoid costly breakdowns in boilers, cooling towers, and other equipment that handles water.

In domestic settings, hard water is often indicated by a lack of foam formation when soap is agitated in water, and by the formation of limescale in kettles and water heaters.[2] Wherever water hardness is a concern, water softening is commonly used to reduce hard water's adverse effects.

Origins

[edit]

Natural rainwater, snow and other forms of precipitation typically have low concentrations of divalent cations such as calcium and magnesium. They may have small concentrations of ions such as sodium, chloride and sulfate derived from wind action over the sea.

Where precipitation falls in drainage basins formed of hard, impervious and calcium-poor rocks, only very low concentrations of divalent cations are found and the water is termed soft water.[3] Examples include Snowdonia in Wales and the Western Highlands in Scotland.

Areas with complex geology can produce varying degrees of hardness of water over short distances.[4][5]

Types

[edit]

Permanent hardness

[edit]

The permanent hardness of water is determined by the water's concentration of cations with charges greater than or equal to 2+. Usually, the cations have a charge of 2+, i.e., they are divalent. Common cations found in hard water include Ca2+ and Mg2+, which frequently enter water supplies by leaching from minerals within aquifers.

Common calcium-containing minerals are calcite and gypsum. A common magnesium mineral is dolomite (which also contains calcium). Rainwater and distilled water are soft, because they contain few of these ions.[3]

The following equilibrium reaction describes the dissolving and formation of calcium carbonate and calcium bicarbonate (on the right):

CaCO3 (s) + CO2 (aq) + H2O (l) ⇌ Ca2+ (aq) + 2 HCO−
3 (aq)

The reaction can go in either direction. Rain containing dissolved carbon dioxide can react with calcium carbonate and carry calcium ions away with it. The calcium carbonate may be re-deposited as calcite as the carbon dioxide is lost to the atmosphere, sometimes forming stalactites and stalagmites.

Calcium and magnesium ions can sometimes be removed by water softeners.[6]

Permanent hardness (mineral content) is generally difficult to remove by boiling.[7] If this occurs, it is usually caused by the presence of calcium sulfate/calcium chloride and/or magnesium sulfate/magnesium chloride in the water, which do not precipitate out as the temperature increases. Ions causing the permanent hardness of water can be removed using a water softener, or ion-exchange column.

Temporary hardness

[edit]
See also: Carbonate hardness

Temporary hardness is caused by the presence of dissolved bicarbonate minerals (calcium bicarbonate and magnesium bicarbonate). When dissolved, these types of minerals yield calcium and magnesium cations (Ca2+, Mg2+) and carbonate and bicarbonate anions (CO2−
3 and HCO−
3). The presence of the metal cations makes the water hard.

However, unlike the permanent hardness caused by sulfate and chloride compounds, this "temporary" hardness can be reduced either by boiling the water or by the addition of lime (calcium hydroxide) through the process of lime softening.[8] Boiling promotes the formation of carbonate from the bicarbonate and precipitates calcium carbonate out of solution, leaving water that is softer upon cooling.

Effects

[edit]

With hard water, soap solutions form a white precipitate (soap scum) instead of producing lather, because the 2+ ions destroy the surfactant properties of the soap by forming a solid precipitate (the soap scum). A major component of such scum is calcium stearate, which arises from sodium stearate, the main component of soap:

2 C17H35COO− (aq) + Ca2+ (aq) → (C17H35COO)2Ca (s)

Hardness can thus be defined as the soap-consuming capacity of a water sample, or the capacity of precipitation of soap as a characteristic property of water that prevents the lathering of soap. Synthetic detergents do not form such scums.

A portion of the ancient Roman Eifel Aqueduct in Germany. After being in service for about 180 years, the aqueduct had mineral deposits of up to 20 cm (8 in) thick along the walls.

Because soft water has few calcium ions, there is no inhibition of the lathering action of soaps and no soap scum is formed in normal washing. Similarly, soft water produces no calcium deposits in water heating systems.

Hard water also forms deposits that clog plumbing. These deposits, called "scale", are composed mainly of calcium carbonate (CaCO3), magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2), and calcium sulfate (CaSO4).[3] Calcium and magnesium carbonates tend to be deposited as off-white solids on the inside surfaces of pipes and heat exchangers.

This precipitation (formation of an insoluble solid) is principally caused by thermal decomposition of bicarbonate ions but also happens in cases where the carbonate ion is at saturation concentration.[9] The resulting build-up of scale restricts the flow of water in pipes. In boilers, the deposits impair the flow of heat into water, reducing the heating efficiency and allowing the metal boiler components to overheat.

In a pressurized system, this overheating can lead to the failure of the boiler.[10] The damage caused by calcium carbonate deposits varies according to the crystalline form, for example, calcite or aragonite.[11]

The presence of ions in an electrolyte, in this case, hard water, can also lead to galvanic corrosion, in which one metal will preferentially corrode when in contact with another type of metal when both are in contact with an electrolyte. The softening of hard water by ion exchange does not increase its corrosivity per se. Similarly, where lead plumbing is in use, softened water does not substantially increase plumbo-solvency.[12]

In swimming pools, hard water is manifested by a turbid, or cloudy (milky), appearance to the water. Calcium and magnesium hydroxides are both soluble in water. The solubility of the hydroxides of the alkaline-earth metals to which calcium and magnesium belong (group 2 of the periodic table) increases moving down the column. Aqueous solutions of these metal hydroxides absorb carbon dioxide from the air, forming insoluble carbonates, and giving rise to turbidity. This often results from the pH being excessively high (pH > 7.6). Hence, a common solution to the problem is, while maintaining the chlorine concentration at the proper level, to lower the pH by the addition of hydrochloric acid, the optimum value is in the range of 7.2 to 7.6.

Softening

[edit]
Main article: Water softening

In some cases it is desirable to soften hard water. Most detergents contain ingredients that counteract the effects of hard water on the surfactants. For this reason, water softening is often unnecessary. Where softening is practised, it is often recommended to soften only the water sent to domestic hot water systems to prevent or delay inefficiencies and damage due to scale formation in water heaters.

A common method for water softening involves the use of ion-exchange resins, which replace ions like Ca2+ by twice the number of mono cations such as sodium or potassium ions.

Washing soda (sodium carbonate, Na2CO3) is easily obtained and has long been used as a water softener for domestic laundry, in conjunction with the usual soap or detergent.

Water that has been treated by a water softening may be termed softened water. In these cases, the water may also contain elevated levels of sodium or potassium and bicarbonate or chloride ions.

Health considerations

[edit]

The World Health Organization says that "there does not appear to be any convincing evidence that water hardness causes adverse health effects in humans".[2] In fact, the United States National Research Council has found that hard water serves as a dietary supplement for calcium and magnesium.[13]

Some studies have shown a weak inverse relationship between water hardness and cardiovascular disease in men, up to a level of 170 mg calcium carbonate per litre of water. The World Health Organization has reviewed the evidence and concluded the data was inadequate to recommend a level of hardness.[2]

Recommendations have been made for the minimum and maximum levels of calcium (40–80 ppm) and magnesium (20–30 ppm) in drinking water, and a total hardness expressed as the sum of the calcium and magnesium concentrations of 2–4 mmol/L.[14]

Other studies have shown weak correlations between cardiovascular health and water hardness.[15][16][17]

The prevalence of atopic dermatitis (eczema) in children may be increased by hard drinking water.[18][19] Living in areas with hard water may also play a part in the development of AD in early life. However, when AD is already established, using water softeners at home does not reduce the severity of the symptoms.[19]

Measurement

[edit]

Hardness can be quantified by instrumental analysis. The total water hardness is the sum of the molar concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+, in mol/L or mmol/L units. Although water hardness usually measures only the total concentrations of calcium and magnesium (the two most prevalent divalent metal ions), iron, aluminium, and manganese are also present at elevated levels in some locations.

The presence of iron characteristically confers a brownish (rust-like) colour to the calcification, instead of white (the colour of most of the other compounds).

Water hardness is often not expressed as a molar concentration, but rather in various units, such as degrees of general hardness (dGH), German degrees (°dH), parts per million (ppm, mg/L, or American degrees), grains per gallon (gpg), English degrees (°e, e, or °Clark), or French degrees (°fH, °f or °HF; lowercase f is used to prevent confusion with degrees Fahrenheit). The table below shows conversion factors between the various units.

Hardness unit conversion
1 mmol/L 1 ppm, mg/L 1 dGH, °dH 1 gpg 1 °e, °Clark 1 °fH
mmol/L 1 0.009991 0.1783 0.171 0.1424 0.09991
ppm, mg/L 100.1 1 17.85 17.12 14.25 10
dGH, °dH 5.608 0.05603 1 0.9591 0.7986 0.5603
gpg 5.847 0.05842 1.043 1 0.8327 0.5842
°e, °Clark 7.022 0.07016 1.252 1.201 1 0.7016
°fH 10.01 0.1 1.785 1.712 1.425 1

The various alternative units represent an equivalent mass of calcium oxide (CaO) or calcium carbonate (CaCO3) that, when dissolved in a unit volume of pure water, would result in the same total molar concentration of Mg2+ and Ca2+. The different conversion factors arise from the fact that equivalent masses of calcium oxide and calcium carbonates differ and that different mass and volume units are used. The units are as follows:

  • Parts per million (ppm) is usually defined as 1 mg/L CaCO3 (the definition used below).[20] It is equivalent to mg/L without chemical compound specified, and to American degree.
  • Grain per gallon (gpg) is defined as 1 grain (64.8 mg) of calcium carbonate per U.S. gallon (3.79 litres), or 17.118 ppm.
  • 1 mmol/L is equivalent to 100.09 mg/L CaCO3 or 40.08 mg/L Ca2+.
  • A degree of General Hardness (dGH or 'German degree' (°dH, deutsche Härte)) is defined as 10 mg/L CaO or 17.848 ppm.
  • A Clark degree (°Clark) or English degree (°e or e) is defined as one grain (64.8  mg) of CaCO3 per Imperial gallon (4.55 litres) of water, equivalent to 14.254 ppm.
  • A French degree (°fH or °f) is defined as 10 mg/L CaCO3, equivalent to 10 ppm.

Hard/soft classification

[edit]

As it is the precise mixture of minerals dissolved in the water, together with water's pH and temperature, that determine the behaviour of the hardness, a single-number scale does not adequately describe hardness. However, the United States Geological Survey uses the following classification for hard and soft water:[5]

Classification mg-CaCO3/L (ppm) mmol/L dGH/°dH gpg
Soft 0–60 0–0.60 0–3.37 0–3.50
Moderately hard 61–120 0.61–1.20 3.38–6.74 3.56–7.01
Hard 121–180 1.21–1.80 6.75–10.11 7.06–10.51
Very hard ≥ 181 ≥ 1.81 ≥ 10.12 ≥ 10.57

Seawater is considered to be very hard due to various dissolved salts. Typically seawater's hardness is in the area of 6,570 ppm (6.57 grams per litre).[21] In contrast, fresh water has a hardness in the range of 15 to 375 ppm, generally around 60 ppm.[22]

Indices

[edit]

Several indices are used to describe the behaviour of calcium carbonate in water, oil, or gas mixtures.[23][better source needed]

Langelier saturation index (LSI)

[edit]

The Langelier saturation index[24] (sometimes Langelier stability index) is a calculated number used to predict the calcium carbonate stability of water.[25] It indicates whether the water will precipitate, dissolve, or be in equilibrium with calcium carbonate. In 1936, Wilfred Langelier developed a method for predicting the pH at which water is saturated in calcium carbonate (called pHs).[26] The LSI is expressed as the difference between the actual system pH and the saturation pHs:[27]

LSI = pH (measured) − pHs
  • For LSI > 0, water is supersaturated and tends to precipitate a scale layer of CaCO3.
  • For LSI = 0, water is saturated (in equilibrium) with CaCO3. A scale layer of CaCO3 is neither precipitated nor dissolved.
  • For LSI < 0, water is under-saturated and tends to dissolve solid CaCO3.

If the actual pH of the water is below the calculated saturation pHs, the LSI is negative and the water has a very limited scaling potential. If the actual pH exceeds pHs, the LSI is positive, and being supersaturated with CaCO3, the water tends to form scale. At increasing positive index values, the scaling potential increases.

In practice, water with an LSI between −0.5 and +0.5 will not display enhanced mineral dissolving or scale-forming properties. Water with an LSI below −0.5 tends to exhibit noticeably increased dissolving abilities while water with an LSI above +0.5 tends to exhibit noticeably increased scale-forming properties.

The LSI is temperature-sensitive. The LSI becomes more positive as the water temperature increases. This has particular implications in situations where well water is used.

The temperature of the water when it first exits the well is often significantly lower than the temperature inside the building served by the well or at the laboratory where the LSI measurement is made. This increase in temperature can cause scaling, especially in cases such as water heaters. Conversely, systems that reduce water temperature will have less scaling.

  • Water analysis:
    • pH = 7.5
    • TDS = 320 mg/L
    • Calcium = 150 mg/L (or ppm) as CaCO3
    • Alkalinity = 34 mg/L (or ppm) as CaCO3
  • LSI formula:
    • LSI = pH − pHs
    • pHs = (9.3 + A + B) − (C + D) where:
      • °C = Temperature in degrees centigrade
      • A = ⁠log10[TDS] − 1/10⁠ = 0.15
      • B = −13.12 × log10(°C + 273) + 34.55 = 2.09 at 25 °C and 1.09 at 82 °C
      • C = log10[Ca2+ as CaCO3] – 0.4 = 1.78
        • (Ca2+ as CaCO3 is also called calcium hardness, and is calculated as 2.5[Ca2+])
      • D = log10[alkalinity as CaCO3] = 1.53

Ryznar stability index (RSI)

[edit]

The Ryznar stability index (RSI)[24]: 525  uses a database of scale thickness measurements in municipal water systems to predict the effect of water chemistry.[25]: 72 [28] It was developed from empirical observations of corrosion rates and film formation in steel mains.

This index is defined as:[29]

RSI = 2 pHs – pH (measured)
  • For 6.5 < RSI < 7 water is considered to be approximately at saturation equilibrium with calcium carbonate
  • For RSI > 8 water is undersaturated and, therefore, would tend to dissolve any existing solid CaCO3
  • For RSI < 6.5 water tends to be scale form

Puckorius scaling index (PSI)

[edit]

The Puckorius scaling index (PSI) uses slightly different parameters to quantify the relationship between the saturation state of the water and the amount of limescale deposited.

Other indices

[edit]

Other indices include the Larson-Skold Index,[30] the Stiff-Davis Index,[31] and the Oddo-Tomson Index.[32]

Regional information

[edit]

The hardness of local water supplies depends on the source of water. Water in streams flowing over volcanic (igneous) rocks will be soft, while water from boreholes drilled into porous rock is normally very hard.

Australia

[edit]

Analysis of water hardness in major Australian cities by the Australian Water Association shows a range from very soft (Melbourne) to hard (Adelaide). Total hardness levels of calcium carbonate in ppm are:

Canada

[edit]

Prairie provinces (mainly Saskatchewan and Manitoba) contain high quantities of calcium and magnesium, often as dolomite, which are readily soluble in the groundwater that contains high concentrations of trapped carbon dioxide from the last glaciation.

In these parts of Canada, the total hardness in ppm of calcium carbonate equivalent frequently exceeds 200 ppm, if groundwater is the only source of potable water. The west coast, by contrast, has unusually soft water, derived mainly from mountain lakes fed by glaciers and snowmelt.

Some typical values are:

England and Wales

[edit]
Hardness water level of major cities in England and Wales
Area Primary source Level[51]
Manchester Lake District (Haweswater, Thirlmere) Pennines (Longdendale Chain) 1.750 °Clark / 25 ppm[52]
Birmingham Elan Valley Reservoirs 3 °Clark / 42.8 ppm[53]
Bristol Mendip Hills (Bristol Reservoirs) 16 °Clark / 228.5 ppm[54]
Southampton Bewl Water 18.76 °Clark / 268 ppm[55]
London (EC1A) Lee Valley Reservoir Chain 19.3 °Clark / 275 ppm[56]
Wrexham (LL11) Hafren Dyfrdwy 4.77 °Clark[57]

Information from the Drinking Water Inspectorate shows that drinking water in England is generally considered to be 'very hard', with most areas of England, particularly east of a line between the Severn and Tees estuaries, exhibiting above 200 ppm for the calcium carbonate equivalent.

Water in London, for example, is mostly obtained from the River Thames and River Lea, both of which derive a significant proportion of their dry weather flow from springs in limestone and chalk aquifers. Wales, Devon, Cornwall, and parts of northwest England are softer water areas and range from 0 to 200 ppm.[58] In the brewing industry in England and Wales, water is often deliberately hardened with gypsum in the process of Burtonisation.

Generally, water is mostly hard in urban areas of England where soft water sources are unavailable. Several cities built water supply sources in the 18th century as the Industrial Revolution and urban population burgeoned.

Manchester was a notable such city in North West England and its wealthy corporation built several reservoirs at Thirlmere and Haweswater in the Lake District to the north. There is no exposure to limestone or chalk in their headwaters and consequently the water in Manchester is rated as 'very soft'.[52] Similarly, tap water in Birmingham is also soft as it is sourced from the Elan Valley Reservoirs in Wales, even though groundwater in the area is hard.

Ireland

[edit]

The EPA has published a standards handbook for the interpretation of water quality in Ireland in which definitions of water hardness are given.[59] Section 36 discusses hardness. Reference to original EU documentation is given, which sets out no limit for hardness. The handbook also gives no "Recommended or Mandatory Limit Values" for hardness.

The handbook does indicate that above the midpoint of the ranges defined as "Moderately Hard", effects are seen increasingly: "The chief disadvantages of hard waters are that they neutralise the lathering power of soap [...] and, more important, that they can cause blockage of pipes and severely reduced boiler efficiency because of scale formation. These effects will increase as the hardness rises to and beyond 200 mg/L CaCO
3."

South Africa

[edit]

South Africa comprehensively tracks the quality of its water supply, and metropolitan municipalities conduct regular testing at water supply sites. The country has published guidelines on water quality for domestic, recreational, industrial, irrigation, livestock, aquacultural, and aquatic uses.[60][61][62]

South Africa spans 1,221,037 square kilometers and its geography varies greatly. The country has certain regions with very soft water, and some with very hard water. This variance occurs even within its major cities, with water hardness varying quite significantly between suburbs or city regions.

Water hardness data for some of South Africa's metro areas, including its 3 largest cities by population (Cape Town, Johannesburg, and Durban), can be found in the table below.

South African Water Hardness Data
City Municipality Province Supply Location / Provider Water Hardness (ppm) Category[63] Reference
Cape Town City of Cape Town Western Cape Constantia Nek (Southern Suburbs) 44 Soft 2019[64]
Cape Town City of Cape Town Western Cape Kloof Nek (City Bowl) 60 Soft to Moderate 2019[64]
Cape Town City of Cape Town Western Cape Witzandz (West Coast) 126 Hard 2019[64]
Cape Town City of Cape Town Western Cape Brooklands (False Bay) 217 Very Hard 2019[64]
Durban eThekwini KwaZulu-Natal Harris 36 Soft 2020[65]
Durban eThekwini KwaZulu-Natal Durban Heights 42 Soft 2020[65]
Durban eThekwini KwaZulu-Natal Amanzimtoti 51 Soft 2020[65]
Durban eThekwini KwaZulu-Natal Mzinto 70 Moderate 2020[65]
Johannesburg City of Johannesburg Gauteng Rand Water 80 Moderate 2022[66]
Pretoria City of Tshwane Gauteng Rand Water 80 Moderate 2022[67]

United States

[edit]

A collection of data from the United States found that about half the water stations tested had hardness over 120 mg per liter of calcium carbonate equivalent, placing them in the categories "hard" or "very hard".[5] The other half were classified as soft or moderately hard. More than 85% of American homes have hard water.[citation needed]

The softest waters occur in parts of the New England, South Atlantic–Gulf, Pacific Northwest, and Hawaii regions. Moderately hard waters are common in many of the rivers of the Tennessee, Great Lakes, and Alaska regions. Hard and very hard waters are found in some of the streams in most of the regions throughout the country. The hardest waters (greater than 1,000 ppm) are in streams in Texas, New Mexico, Kansas, Arizona, Utah, parts of Colorado, southern Nevada, and southern California.[68][69]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hard water

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Hard water is that contains high concentrations of dissolved minerals, primarily calcium and magnesium ions, which it acquires as percolates through and rock formations such as , , and . These minerals make the water "hard" by interfering with the lathering ability of and forming insoluble precipitates. is quantified as the total concentration of calcium and magnesium, expressed in milligrams per liter (mg/L) as (CaCO₃) equivalents, with classifications including soft (0–60 mg/L), moderately hard (61–120 mg/L), hard (121–180 mg/L), and very hard (>180 mg/L). In households, hard water leads to practical challenges, such as reduced efficiency of soaps and detergents—requiring more product to achieve lather—and the buildup of scale, a deposit that can clog , reduce water heater efficiency, and leave spots on glassware and fixtures after washing. This scaling occurs because the calcium and magnesium ions react with or ions to form insoluble carbonates, particularly when is heated. It affects approximately 85% of U.S. homes, making it a widespread issue that often prompts the use of softening treatments like ion-exchange resins to replace calcium and magnesium with sodium ions. From a health perspective, hard water poses no known adverse effects and may offer benefits, as the calcium and magnesium contribute essential dietary minerals that support bone , cardiovascular function, and overall intake. Studies suggest an inverse association between hard water consumption and cardiovascular mortality, potentially due to magnesium's protective role, though remains under investigation. Similarly, the minerals in hard water have been linked to reduced risks of certain cancers, such as gastric and esophageal types, and improved density, with no of toxicity at typical environmental levels. While some notes minor concerns like potential links to skin conditions in sensitive individuals or kidney stone recurrence in predisposed , these are not conclusively tied to hardness alone and are outweighed by the neutral-to-positive nutritional profile.

Origins and Composition

Geological Sources

Hard water primarily originates from that interacts with soluble rock formations in the , particularly in aquifers where water percolates through mineral-rich layers. Aquifers, which are permeable underground layers of rock or that store and transmit water, serve as key reservoirs for hard water development. These formations allow rainwater and to infiltrate and dissolve minerals over time, enriching the water with dissolved solids that contribute to its . The most significant geological sources include , composed mainly of , as well as and dolomite deposits. Limestone and , both sedimentary rocks formed from ancient marine organisms, are prevalent in regions with carbonate platforms, where they readily dissolve in slightly acidic water derived from atmospheric . Dolomite, a magnesium-rich carbonate rock, similarly contributes to mineral dissolution in similar environments. deposits, which consist of , also play a role, especially in evaporite sequences where water flows through these soluble , adding sulfate ions alongside carbonates. These rock types are commonly found in sedimentary basins that have accumulated over geological timescales, such as those from the or eras. Rainwater is a fundamental in this , beginning with that absorbs from the atmosphere, forming weak that enhances the of minerals. As this water seeps through soil and into underlying rock layers, it interacts with minerals in the and , progressively dissolving them. In areas of topography—characterized by the chemical dissolution of soluble rocks like —this is accentuated, creating extensive cave systems, sinkholes, and underground channels that facilitate the movement of mineral-laden water. Sedimentary basins, such as the in the United States or the in , exemplify how prolonged geological history in these settings leads to with high mineral content. Specific rock types like and , polymorphs of , exhibit varying influenced by environmental factors such as and . , the more stable polymorph, has a lower (Ksp ≈ 3.36 × 10^{-9} at 25°C) than (Ksp ≈ 6.0 × 10^{-9}), making aragonite slightly more soluble; however, the presence of from rainwater enhances dissolution of both in low conditions, with predominant in most geological settings. These solubilities are modulated by ; for instance, higher temperatures generally increase dissolution rates for carbonates, a process observed in geothermal aquifers. Such interactions underscore the role of calcium and magnesium ions in the resulting water composition.

Dissolved Minerals

Hard water hardness primarily arises from the presence of dissolved divalent cations, with calcium ions (Ca²⁺) and magnesium ions (Mg²⁺) serving as the main contributors. These ions originate from the interaction of water with geological formations such as and dolomite. The concentration of these cations is conventionally expressed in equivalents of (CaCO₃), a unit that standardizes measurements by accounting for the equivalent reacting weights of Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ relative to CaCO₃. These metal cations are typically paired with various anions in solution, including bicarbonates (HCO₃⁻), sulfates (SO₄²⁻), and chlorides (Cl⁻), forming soluble salts such as (Ca(HCO₃)₂), (MgSO₄), and (CaCl₂). Bicarbonates often predominate in waters influenced by carbonate rocks, while sulfates and chlorides are more common in areas with deposits or intrusion. The of these hardness-causing compounds, particularly , is governed by equilibrium reactions sensitive to environmental factors. The basic dissolution equilibrium for (the common form of CaCO₃) is given by: CaCO3⇌Ca2++CO32−\text{CaCO}_3 \rightleftharpoons \text{Ca}^{2+} + \text{CO}_3^{2-} with a solubility product KspK_{sp} approximately equal to 3.36×10−93.36 \times 10^{-9} at 25°C. This is significantly influenced by the of (CO₂) in the atmosphere or dissolved in , as CO₂ reacts to form (H₂CO₃), which dissociates to produce and lowers the , thereby increasing the of CaCO₃ through the formation of more soluble . Higher CO₂ partial pressures can thus elevate dissolved calcium levels in natural waters. While hardness specifically quantifies the Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ content, total dissolved solids (TDS) encompass a broader array of inorganic and organic substances in , including non-hardness-contributing ions like sodium (Na⁺), iron (Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺), and manganese (Mn²⁺). Iron and manganese are commonly dissolved in groundwater in some areas but do not contribute to hardness; instead, they can cause water quality issues such as staining on fixtures and laundry. represents only a of TDS, typically 10-50% in natural waters, with the derived from monovalent ions and other minerals that do not affect lathering or scaling behavior.

Types of Hardness

Temporary Hardness

Temporary hardness refers to the portion of water hardness caused by the presence of dissolved bicarbonates of and , primarily (Ca(HCO₃)₂) and (Mg(HCO₃)₂). These compounds form when (CO₂) dissolved in reacts with insoluble (CaCO₃) or magnesium carbonate (MgCO₃) in geological formations such as or , producing soluble bicarbonates:
\ceCaCO3(s)+CO2(g)+H2O(l)−>Ca(HCO3)2(aq)\ce{CaCO3 (s) + CO2 (g) + H2O (l) -> Ca(HCO3)2 (aq)}
\ceMgCO3(s)+CO2(g)+H2O(l)−>Mg(HCO3)2(aq)\ce{MgCO3 (s) + CO2 (g) + H2O (l) -> Mg(HCO3)2 (aq)} This process is facilitated by formed from atmospheric or biogenic CO₂ in rainwater, making temporary hardness predominant in surface waters and shallow aquifers where CO₂ levels are relatively high due to organic or atmospheric exchange. The key characteristic of temporary hardness is its removability through boiling, which decomposes the bicarbonates into insoluble carbonates, water, and carbon dioxide gas. For calcium bicarbonate, the reaction is:
\ceCa(HCO3)2(aq)−>CaCO3↓+CO2↑+H2O(l)\ce{Ca(HCO3)2 (aq) -> CaCO3 \downarrow + CO2 \uparrow + H2O (l)}
A similar decomposition occurs for magnesium bicarbonate, though magnesium carbonate may partially redissolve under certain conditions. The precipitated carbonates form a scale known as fur or limescale, which adheres to surfaces like kettles and pipes. In contrast, permanent hardness, caused by non-bicarbonate salts, persists after boiling and requires alternative treatments. In settings, temporary can be demonstrated and distinguished from permanent using a simple test combined with a lathering . A sample of hard water is divided, with one portion boiled and cooled before testing; solution is added incrementally to both until a stable lather forms. The boiled sample requires significantly less , indicating reduced due to , while unboiled or permanently hard water shows little change. This method highlights the thermal instability of bicarbonates and provides a practical way to quantify the temporary component of total .

Permanent Hardness

Permanent hardness constitutes the non-carbonate component of water hardness, arising primarily from the dissolution of calcium and magnesium sulfates and chlorides, such as (CaSO₄), (MgSO₄), and (CaCl₂). These soluble salts impart a persistent content to the water, contributing to its overall hardness without involvement of ions. Unlike temporary hardness, which stems from bicarbonates and can precipitate upon heating, permanent hardness remains unaffected by boiling due to the stability of these anions. This form of hardness typically originates in groundwater sources where water percolates through evaporite deposits, including gypsum (CaSO₄·2H₂O) and other sulfate-rich sedimentary layers, leading to the uptake of divalent cations. Such geological interactions are prevalent in arid or semi-arid regions with ancient evaporite formations, resulting in elevated sulfate and chloride levels that characterize deeper aquifers. For instance, dissolution of gypsum directly introduces calcium ions paired with sulfate, enhancing the non-carbonate hardness profile. Permanent hardness cannot be eliminated through simple thermal processes and necessitates alternative treatments, such as resins that replace calcium and magnesium ions with sodium, or chemical using agents like lime or soda ash. In assessments, it is quantified separately but combined with temporary hardness to determine total , which influences applications in domestic, industrial, and agricultural settings. This distinction aids in evaluating the full scale-forming potential of water, as permanent components often dominate in untreated supplies.

Measurement and Classification

Units and Testing Methods

Water hardness is quantified using units that express the concentration of calcium and magnesium ions as their equivalent in calcium carbonate (CaCO₃). The standard units are parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per liter (mg/L), where 1 ppm is equivalent to 1 mg/L of CaCO₃. Another common unit, particularly in the United States, is grains per gallon (gpg), with a conversion factor of 1 gpg equaling approximately 17.1 ppm or mg/L as CaCO₃. These equivalents allow for standardized reporting regardless of the actual ions present, as hardness is calculated by converting the concentrations of calcium and magnesium ions to CaCO₃ equivalents using factors of 2.5 for Ca and 4.12 for Mg (ratios of the molecular weight of CaCO₃ to the atomic weights of Ca and Mg, respectively) and summing the results. Laboratory testing methods provide accurate quantification of hardness. The most widely used technique is with (EDTA), a chelating agent that binds calcium and magnesium s; serves as the indicator, changing from red to blue at the endpoint in a buffered solution at pH 10. This method determines total hardness and can be adapted for calcium or magnesium hardness by masking one with specific reagents. For higher precision, especially in distinguishing individual concentrations, (AAS) measures calcium and magnesium directly by atomizing the sample in a and quantifying light absorption at specific wavelengths (422.7 nm for Ca and 285.2 nm for Mg). Field kits offer practical, approximate assessments for on-site use. Soap titration involves adding a standardized soap solution to the water sample until a persistent lather forms, with the volume of soap consumed proportional to ; this method estimates total but is less accurate due to interferences. Test strips, impregnated with indicators that react to levels, provide quick colorimetric results ranging from 0 to 425 ppm, suitable for home or preliminary fieldwork. The evolution of testing methods reflects advances in . Early approaches, dating to 1841 when Thomas patented the first standardized soap-based test to assess lathering capacity, relied on empirical observations of consumption. By the mid-20th century, instrumental techniques like AAS emerged for precise ion detection, while EDTA titration became a standard in the due to its simplicity and reliability, as outlined in ASTM D1126.

Hardness Categories

Water hardness is commonly classified into categories based on the concentration of (CaCO₃) equivalents, typically measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L) or parts per million (ppm), which are equivalent for this purpose. The (USGS) provides a widely referenced scale: soft water ranges from 0 to 60 mg/L, moderately hard from 61 to 120 mg/L, hard from 121 to 180 mg/L, and very hard above 180 mg/L. These thresholds reflect the total dissolved calcium and magnesium ions that contribute to hardness. In the United States, hardness is also expressed in grains per gallon (gpg), where 1 gpg equals approximately 17.1 mg/L CaCO₃. Under this unit, the USGS categories translate to soft (0 to 3.5 gpg), moderately hard (3.5 to 7 gpg), hard (7 to 10.5 gpg), and very hard (over 10.5 gpg). The (WHO) does not define rigid categorical classifications but considers water hard at or above 120 mg/L CaCO₃, with levels exceeding 200 mg/L potentially warranting attention for aesthetic or operational reasons in supplies. European standards, often aligned with mg/L CaCO₃, show variations; for instance, the Drinking Water Inspectorate classifies soft water as up to 100 mg/L, slightly hard as 100 to 150 mg/L, moderately hard as 150 to 200 mg/L, and hard as 200 to 300 mg/L. These differences arise from regional water quality priorities and historical measurement practices, with favoring metric units like mg/L while the incorporates gpg for consumer familiarity in water treatment contexts. The categories carry implications for everyday use, particularly in and efficiency. Soft (0 to 60 mg/L) allows optimal lathering and , whereas moderately hard and harder categories (above 60 mg/L) reduce performance by forming insoluble precipitates, requiring more product for equivalent results. concerns typically emerge when exceeds 150 mg/L, as this level marks the onset of noticeable nuisances in and laundering without posing direct health risks.
Categorymg/L CaCO₃ (USGS)gpg (USGS)Example Implications
Soft0–600–3.5Excellent lathering
Moderately Hard61–1203.5–7Slight reduction in cleaning efficiency
Hard121–1807–10.5Increased use needed
Very Hard>180>10.5Significant inefficiency

Stability and Scaling Indices

Langelier Saturation Index (LSI)

The Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) is a calculated value that indicates the degree of saturation of (CaCO₃) in , thereby assessing its potential to either precipitate scale or dissolve protective coatings, which can lead to . It is defined as the difference between the measured of the and the theoretical pH at which the would be saturated with CaCO₃ (_s):
LSI=pH−pHs\text{LSI} = \text{pH} - \text{pH}_s
This index was developed by Wilfred F. Langelier, a professor of at the , in his paper on chemical equilibria relevant to and control. The saturation pH (pH_s) is computed using the formula:
pHs=(9.3+A+B)−(C+D)\text{pH}_s = (9.3 + A + B) - (C + D)
where the factors account for key chemistry parameters. Specifically, A=(log⁡10(TDS)−1)/10A = (\log_{10} (\text{TDS}) - 1)/10, with TDS the in mg/L (ionic strength correction); B=−13.12log⁡10(T+273)+34.55B = -13.12 \log_{10} (T + 273) + 34.55, with TT the in °C (temperature correction). The terms C=log⁡10[\ceCa2+]−0.4C = \log_{10} [\ce{Ca^{2+}}] - 0.4, with [\ceCa2+][\ce{Ca^{2+}}] expressed as calcium hardness in mg/L as CaCO₃; and D=log⁡10(alkalinity)D = \log_{10} (\text{alkalinity}), with as total alkalinity in mg/L as CaCO₃ (to adjust for equilibrium shifts). Interpretation of the LSI value provides insight into water stability: a positive LSI (> 0) suggests the water is supersaturated with CaCO₃, promoting scaling and potential on surfaces; a negative LSI (< 0) indicates undersaturation, increasing the risk of corrosion as the water dissolves existing CaCO₃ deposits or pipe linings. An ideal range of -0.3 to +0.3 balances minimal scaling with sufficient protection against corrosion. The LSI is widely applied in managing water systems prone to scaling or corrosion, such as cooling towers in industrial facilities and swimming pools, where maintaining equilibrium prevents equipment damage and ensures operational efficiency.

Ryznar Stability Index (RSI)

The Ryznar Stability Index (RSI) is an empirical index introduced by John W. Ryznar in 1944 to evaluate the potential for calcium carbonate scale formation and corrosion in water systems, derived from observations of scale thickness in municipal distribution networks. It modifies the theoretical framework of the Langelier Saturation Index by using field data to better predict real-world behaviors. The index is computed with the formula: RSI=2 pHs−pH\text{RSI} = 2 \, \mathrm{pH_s} - \mathrm{pH} where pHs\mathrm{pH_s} represents the saturation pH for equilibrium, and pH\mathrm{pH} is the measured pH of the water. This calculation incorporates factors such as temperature, calcium hardness, alkalinity, and total dissolved solids to assess saturation levels. A key distinction of the RSI lies in its empirical foundation, which accounts for the protective effects of thin scale films against corrosion—unlike purely equilibrium-based models—while recognizing that excessive deposition leads to problematic buildup. Values are interpreted as follows: RSI below 6.0 signals heavy scaling potential; between 6.0 and 7.5 denotes balanced water with minimal scaling or corrosive tendencies; and RSI above 7.5 indicates corrosive conditions due to inadequate scale protection. The RSI finds primary application in industrial boilers and municipal water systems for optimizing treatment to prevent pipe scaling and material degradation. Its limitations include reduced accuracy in high-alkalinity waters where buffering effects alter predictions, as well as inapplicability to non-calcium carbonate scales like phosphates or silicates, and interference from scale inhibitors or crystal modifiers.

Puckorius Scaling Index (PSI)

The Puckorius Scaling Index (PSI) is a modified version of the Ryznar Stability Index tailored for predicting calcium carbonate scaling in low-flow cooling water systems, where surface films and limited mixing can lead to localized supersaturation not captured by earlier indices. Developed by Paul R. Puckorius and J. Maxey Brooke in the early 1980s, it emphasizes the water's buffering capacity and the maximum precipitate formation possible under equilibrium conditions after potential pH shifts due to carbon dioxide degassing or concentration effects. This index is particularly valuable in environments with high cycles of concentration and elevated pH levels, improving accuracy over the RSI by better accounting for film pH elevations in low-velocity areas. The PSI is computed as PSI=2×pHs−pHeq\text{PSI} = 2 \times \text{pH}_s - \text{pH}_\text{eq}, where pHs\text{pH}_s is the saturation pH for (dependent on calcium hardness, , temperature, and total dissolved solids), and pHeq\text{pH}_\text{eq} is the estimated equilibrium pH reflecting alkalinity-driven buffering, given by pHeq=1.465log⁡10(M⋅Alk)+4.54\text{pH}_\text{eq} = 1.465 \log_{10} (\text{M} \cdot \text{Alk}) + 4.54 with M · Alk as the molar alkalinity of the recirculated water in moles per liter. An alternative expression simplifies the scaling prediction as PSI=pHs−(alog⁡10[Ca2+]+b)\text{PSI} = \text{pH}_s - (a \log_{10} [\text{Ca}^{2+}] + b), where coefficients aa and bb are derived from measurements to adjust for buffering influences on precipitate potential. Temperature effects are integrated via pHs\text{pH}_s, while film-forming factors are addressed through pHeq\text{pH}_\text{eq}, which models the stabilized pH at heat-transfer surfaces under low flow. Interpretation of PSI values focuses on scaling likelihood: below 6.0 indicates probable scaling due to supersaturation and low buffering against precipitation; between 6.0 and 6.6 suggests marginal conditions with potential for light deposition; and above 6.6 denotes non-scaling behavior, where the water remains undersaturated or stable. These thresholds help guide treatment adjustments, such as acid dosing or inhibitor addition, to maintain PSI around 6.5 in operational systems. In applications, the PSI is extensively used in HVAC systems and industrial cooling towers to optimize water chemistry, preventing scale buildup that reduces heat transfer efficiency by up to 30% in untreated hard water scenarios. Its advantages include superior handling of temperature-driven pH shifts and surface film dynamics compared to the RSI, which relies on measured pH and underpredicts scaling in low-flow regimes; empirical validations in cooling systems show PSI correlating more closely with observed deposition rates. For contextual comparison with related indices, the table below outlines typical value ranges and their implications for calcium carbonate stability, based on standard guidelines for cooling water evaluation:
IndexHeavy ScalingModerate Scaling/MarginalNon-Scaling/StableAggressive (Corrosive)
LSI> +0.40 to +0.4-0.4 to 0< -0.4
RSI< 5.55.5 to 6.56.5 to 7.5> 7.5
< 6.06.0 to 6.6> 6.6> 7.5
These ranges are approximate and system-specific, with providing tighter control for scaling prediction in concentrated waters. For LSI, the non-scaling range includes mild potential.

Other Indices

The Stability Index (SI), also known as the Stiff-Davis Stability Index (S&DSI), is an extension of traditional saturation indices designed for waters with high (TDS), such as or in processes. It calculates the driving force for scaling by adjusting the pH of saturation (pH_s) to account for effects, using the formula S&DSI = pH - pH_s, where pH_s incorporates TDS corrections via activity coefficients. Unlike simpler indices, S&DSI predicts lower scaling tendencies in high-salinity environments, making it suitable for (RO) systems where LSI overestimates precipitation potential. The Precipitation Potential (CCPP) quantifies the net mass of CaCO₃ that would precipitate or dissolve in a given sample to achieve equilibrium, providing a more precise measure of scaling or corrosive behavior than qualitative indices. It is computed by modeling the closed-system reaction where excess Ca²⁺ and HCO₃⁻ form CaCO₃ and release H⁺, often expressed as CCPP (mg/L as CaCO₃) = amount precipitated or dissolved based on initial concentrations, , and pH adjustments to reach saturation. This index is particularly useful in distribution systems and to predict pipe encrustation or dissolution, especially when precise chemical dosing for stabilization is required. Positive CCPP values indicate scaling potential, while negative values suggest risk, with applications in optimizing lime addition during softening. Limitations include its sensitivity to and ionic assumptions, recommending its use over broader indices like LSI when quantitative estimates are needed for high-hardness waters. The Larson-Skold Index () assesses potential in hard waters by evaluating the ratio of protective / anions to aggressive and anions, using the LS = ([HCO₃⁻] + [CO₃²⁻]) / ([Cl⁻] + [SO₄²⁻]), expressed in equivalents per liter. Values below 1.0 indicate high corrosivity toward due to anion-driven pitting, as observed in municipal systems with elevated sulfates. It is applied in industrial and contexts, such as oilfield waters or cooling systems, to predict uniform or localized where scaling indices overlook anion effects. LS is preferred over main indices in scenarios involving high / content, like coastal effluents, but it does not account for calcium directly, limiting its use for pure scaling predictions. Emerging assessments post-2000 have incorporated specialized indices for niche stability issues, such as formation and silica scaling in RO and plants, often building on CCPP-like models to include inhibition or microbial growth factors. For instance, silica scaling indices evaluate ratios ([SiO₂] / limit) adjusted for and , aiding in prediction during . These are chosen for their focus on non-carbonate scales in modern treatment, though they require site-specific calibration due to variable dynamics.

Effects of Hard Water

Household and Plumbing Impacts

Hard water causes scale buildup, primarily composed of deposits, in household systems, water heaters, kettles, and pipes, which restricts water flow and reduces operational efficiency. Without softening, hard water can cause scale buildup in home pipes and appliances over months or years, gradually reducing house-wide water pressure. This accumulation insulates heating elements, leading to increased consumption for heating ; for instance, scale can increase energy use in water heaters by 5-15%, depending on thickness and type. In , the deposits narrow pipe diameters over time, potentially causing drops and necessitating more frequent cleaning or repairs to maintain adequate flow. The interaction of hard water minerals with soaps and detergents results in reduced lathering and the formation of insoluble scum, requiring households to use typically 20-50% more detergent for hard water over 14 °dH than the standard for medium water to achieve effective cleaning. This inefficiency not only increases consumption of cleaning products but also leaves residues that cause spotting on glassware and dishes after drying, as the minerals precipitate out during . Scale and mineral deposits from hard water shorten the lifespan of appliances such as water heaters and dishwashers, leading to premature failures and higher replacement expenses. Additionally, the buildup demands regular , including descaling and part replacements, which can add hundreds of dollars annually to household operating costs through elevated energy bills and service calls. Aesthetically, hard water contributes to visible bathtub rings formed by and mineral residues adhering to surfaces, while in , the minerals bind to fabrics, causing , dullness, and a shortened lifespan for and . These effects are particularly noticeable in areas with hardness levels exceeding 120 mg/L as .

Health and Biological Effects

Hard water, characterized by elevated levels of calcium and magnesium ions, provides a notable dietary source of these essential minerals, contributing 5–20% of daily intake for individuals with suboptimal diets. Epidemiological links higher water hardness to reduced (CVD) mortality, with meta-analyses indicating up to a 40% lower risk in areas with harder water compared to softer sources. Specifically, moderate hardness levels (121–180 mg/L as CaCO₃) are associated with 12–20% reductions in risks of , , coronary heart disease, and , independent of genetic factors. These benefits stem from the of magnesium, which supports regulation and anti-arrhythmic effects, and calcium, which aids vascular health. Regarding bone health, consumption of hard water supports mineralization, particularly in vulnerable populations. Studies show that waters with 155–318 mg/L calcium increase density in the spine and by 0.5–10%, reducing risk through enhanced trabecular thickness and mechanical strength. Bicarbonate-rich hard waters further mitigate , preserving integrity in young females by lowering urinary acid excretion and activity. Conversely, soft water areas raise concerns for , as low intake from drinking sources correlates with higher CVD risks, including arrhythmias and , due to reduced overall absorption. Common myths attribute hard water directly to kidney stones, hair loss, or skin issues, but scientific evidence refutes these claims. Cohort studies of thousands of participants find no association between water hardness and stone formation rates, despite elevated urinary calcium; increased citrate levels in hard water may even offer protective effects. Direct links to dermatological problems like eczema arise indirectly from soap interactions rather than hardness alone, with no verified causal evidence for or damage. On biological effects, the states that hard water poses no known adverse health risks and sets no upper limit for consumption, emphasizing its safety and potential benefits. In aquatic ecosystems, very high hardness (>720 mg/L CaCO₃) impairs by reducing fertilization rates and egg size, while Ca:Mg imbalances (e.g., ratios >8:1 or <1:20) cause severe deformities such as corkscrew bodies, edema, and yolk sac necrosis in species like rare minnows, leading to high larval mortality. Post-2010 research reinforces these patterns through meta-analyses showing inverse associations between hard water magnesium and hypertension, with supplementation analogs lowering blood pressure by 2–3 mmHg. Recent 2020s studies highlight improved trace mineral bioavailability in hard water, enhancing systemic uptake of calcium and magnesium for cardiovascular and skeletal outcomes without toxicity at typical levels.

Environmental and Industrial Impacts

Hard water elevates alkalinity in aquatic ecosystems, particularly in rivers, where increased levels of calcium and magnesium ions can accelerate algal growth and contribute to eutrophication by enhancing nutrient availability for algae. This process disrupts aquatic habitats, reduces oxygen levels, and alters biodiversity, with studies showing rising alkalinity trends in U.S. rivers like the Potomac and Patuxent due to geological and human influences. In agriculture, hard water raises soil pH, leading to compaction that diminishes aeration and nutrient uptake, such as phosphorus and zinc, resulting in stunted root development and lower crop yields. Additionally, mineral deposits from hard water cause scaling in irrigation systems, clogging nozzles and pipes, which reduces water distribution efficiency and increases energy demands for pumping. In industrial settings, hard water induces severe scaling in boilers, especially in power plants, where calcium carbonate deposits act as insulators, impairing heat transfer; a 1/8-inch (approximately 3 mm) layer can reduce efficiency by 20-25%, while thinner deposits like 1 mm may cause around 10% losses, escalating fuel consumption and operational costs. The textile industry faces dyeing inefficiencies from hard water, as calcium and magnesium ions reduce reactive dye solubility and exhaustion rates at hardness levels of 50 °dH, leading to uneven shades, lower color depth, and increased chemical usage. Hard water also complicates wastewater treatment by promoting scale buildup in pipes and equipment, which restricts flow, heightens energy needs for pumping, and elevates maintenance expenses in treatment facilities. The economic ramifications of hard water are substantial, with significant costs for industrial maintenance due to scaling and related damages, including heightened repair costs for boilers and irrigation infrastructure. Globally, these issues drive increased energy use, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions; for instance, limescale from hard water accounts for over 8 million tonnes of CO2 yearly in the UK due to reduced heating efficiency. Emerging 2020s research links climate change to fluctuating water hardness, as droughts concentrate minerals through reduced dilution in freshwater systems, potentially worsening scaling and agricultural stresses in vulnerable regions. Stability indices like the Langelier Saturation Index can predict such scaling risks in industrial and environmental contexts.

Softening and Treatment Methods

Chemical Precipitation Techniques

Chemical precipitation techniques for softening hard water involve adding chemicals such as lime (calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)₂) and soda ash (sodium carbonate, Na₂CO₃) to induce the formation of insoluble precipitates, primarily calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) and magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)₂), which are then removed through sedimentation and filtration. These methods target both temporary hardness (due to bicarbonates) and permanent hardness (due to sulfates and chlorides) by raising the water's pH and promoting ion insolubilization. Lime softening primarily addresses temporary hardness by adding Ca(OH)₂, which reacts with calcium and magnesium bicarbonates to form precipitates. The key reaction for calcium bicarbonate is: Ca(HCO3)2+Ca(OH)2→2CaCO3↓+2H2O\text{Ca(HCO}_3)_2 + \text{Ca(OH)}_2 \rightarrow 2\text{CaCO}_3 \downarrow + 2\text{H}_2\text{O} For magnesium bicarbonate, the process requires additional lime: Mg(HCO3)2+2Ca(OH)2→Mg(OH)2↓+2CaCO3↓+2H2O\text{Mg(HCO}_3)_2 + 2\text{Ca(OH)}_2 \rightarrow \text{Mg(OH)}_2 \downarrow + 2\text{CaCO}_3 \downarrow + 2\text{H}_2\text{O} This elevates the pH to 10.3–10.6 for effective calcium removal and higher for magnesium. Cold lime softening occurs at ambient temperatures and is suitable for moderate hardness levels, while hot lime softening uses elevated temperatures (around 90–100°C) to enhance magnesium precipitation efficiency and reduce overall chemical needs. Soda ash addition specifically targets permanent hardness by converting non-carbonate calcium ions into precipitable CaCO₃. The reaction with calcium sulfate, for example, is: CaSO4+Na2CO3→CaCO3↓+Na2SO4\text{CaSO}_4 + \text{Na}_2\text{CO}_3 \rightarrow \text{CaCO}_3 \downarrow + \text{Na}_2\text{SO}_4 Similarly, for calcium chloride: CaCl2+Na2CO3→CaCO3↓+2NaCl\text{CaCl}_2 + \text{Na}_2\text{CO}_3 \rightarrow \text{CaCO}_3 \downarrow + 2\text{NaCl} In the combined lime-soda ash process, lime handles bicarbonate-related hardness while soda ash addresses sulfate and chloride forms, achieving residual hardness of 50–85 mg/L as CaCO₃ after treatment. These techniques are widely applied in municipal water treatment plants for large-scale softening, particularly where groundwater sources exhibit high hardness levels exceeding 200 mg/L as CaCO₃. They also aid in removing associated contaminants like iron and manganese. Advantages include cost-effectiveness for bulk treatment and corrosion prevention through controlled residual hardness; however, disadvantages encompass significant sludge production from precipitates, necessitating dewatering and disposal systems, as well as the need for post-treatment recarbonation to lower pH and stabilize the water.

Ion Exchange Processes

Ion exchange processes represent a primary method for water softening by selectively removing hardness-causing ions, such as calcium (Ca²⁺) and magnesium (Mg²⁺), from water supplies. In this process, water passes through a bed of synthetic cation exchange resin, typically in the sodium (Na⁺) form, where the resin's exchangeable ions swap places with the hardness ions in a reversible reaction. The resin beads, composed of a polystyrene matrix cross-linked with divinylbenzene and functionalized with sulfonic acid groups, attract and bind divalent cations like Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ more strongly than monovalent Na⁺ due to electrostatic and coordination effects, effectively reducing water hardness to near zero levels. This mechanism ensures targeted removal without altering other water constituents significantly, making it suitable for residential and industrial applications. Once the resin's exchange sites are saturated with hardness ions, regeneration restores its capacity by flushing the bed with a concentrated brine solution, usually sodium chloride (NaCl), which displaces the captured Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ ions, allowing them to be rinsed away as waste. The process operates in a service cycle for softening followed by backwash, brine application, and rinse stages during regeneration, typically automated in modern systems to occur based on water usage or timer settings. Common types include salt-based systems using NaCl for cost-effectiveness and high efficiency, while potassium chloride (KCl) alternatives serve as sodium-free options, though they require about 30% more regenerant by weight to achieve equivalent capacity due to weaker exchange kinetics. Resin capacity varies with salt dosage; for instance, a standard dosage yields 20,000 to 32,000 grains of hardness removal per cubic foot of resin, with service flow rates of 4 to 10 gallons per minute per square foot of bed area to maintain exchange efficiency. In household applications, ion exchange softeners are deployed as point-of-entry (POE) systems, treating all incoming water at the main supply line to prevent scale buildup throughout the home, or as point-of-use (POU) units for specific outlets like kitchen faucets, though POE configurations dominate due to comprehensive protection. These systems achieve 90-99% removal of hardness ions under optimal conditions, significantly extending appliance life and reducing detergent use. However, drawbacks include the addition of sodium to treated water—approximately 46 mg/L per 100 mg/L of hardness removed as —which may concern those on low-sodium diets, and the generation of saline brine waste (up to 50-100 gallons per regeneration cycle) that requires proper disposal to avoid septic overload or environmental salinization. In the 2020s, eco-friendly variants have emerged, such as high-efficiency regenerators that minimize salt and water use by 50-75% through demand-initiated cycles and fine-mesh resins, alongside KCl-based systems that reduce sodium discharge while maintaining performance, though at higher upfront costs. These advancements address brine disposal challenges by integrating rinse water recycling or low-waste protocols, promoting sustainability without compromising softening efficacy.

Membrane and Other Modern Methods

Reverse osmosis (RO) represents a prominent membrane technology for hard water softening, utilizing high-pressure semi-permeable membranes to separate dissolved hardness ions such as calcium and magnesium from water. The process achieves rejection rates of 95-99% for these divalent ions, producing high-purity softened water suitable for both domestic and industrial applications. The permeate flux in RO systems is governed by the equation
J=A(ΔP−Δπ)J = A (\Delta P - \Delta \pi)
where JJ is the water flux through the membrane, AA is the intrinsic permeability coefficient of the membrane, ΔP\Delta P is the transmembrane pressure difference, and Δπ\Delta \pi is the osmotic pressure difference across the membrane. Operating pressures typically range from 10-80 bar depending on feed water salinity, with energy consumption for brackish hard water treatment falling between 1-5 kWh/m³, making it more efficient than thermal methods for large-scale deployment. Nanofiltration (NF), a pressure-driven membrane process with larger pore sizes than RO (typically 0.1-10 nm), offers selective removal of divalent hardness ions while permitting passage of monovalent ions like sodium and chloride, resulting in partial softening with retention of some beneficial minerals. NF membranes achieve 50-90% hardness reduction, ideal for applications requiring moderate demineralization without excessive energy input. Energy requirements for NF are lower than RO, often 0.5-2 kWh/m³, due to operating pressures of 5-20 bar, providing a cost-effective alternative for treating moderately hard water in municipal or point-of-use systems. This selectivity enhances overall process efficiency compared to full ion removal techniques like ion exchange. Beyond pressure-driven membranes, alternative modern methods include template-assisted crystallization (TAC), which employs catalytic resin beads to nucleate hardness ions into non-adherent microcrystals, preventing scale formation on surfaces without ion removal or chemical addition. TAC demonstrates over 90% scale reduction in controlled tests, offering a salt-free option for residential plumbing protection. Electromagnetic treatment devices generate fields to purportedly modify crystal structure and inhibit scaling, though post-2015 studies indicate limited efficacy, with scale inhibition effectiveness typically under 10% and inconsistent results in real-world conditions. Distillation, involving evaporation and condensation, completely eliminates hardness ions by leaving them in the residual brine, but its high energy demand (often 10-20 kWh/m³ equivalent) limits it to small-scale or integrated hybrid systems. Recent innovations in the 2020s include solar-powered portable RO units, which integrate photovoltaic panels with compact membrane modules to enable off-grid softening for remote or disaster-stricken areas, producing up to 200 gallons per day with minimal operational costs. In desalination contexts, such RO advancements yield significant cost benefits, with levelized costs as low as $0.50-1.00/m³ for brackish water treatment, driven by reduced energy expenses and scalability in hybrid solar-RO setups.

Regional Variations

North America

In the United States, hard water is widespread, affecting approximately 85% of households, with particularly high levels in the Midwest and Southwest regions due to geological influences such as limestone aquifers. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) classifies water hardness based on milligrams per liter (mg/L) of calcium carbonate equivalent, where levels above 180 mg/L are considered very hard; for example, groundwater from the Edwards Aquifer in Texas often exceeds 200 mg/L, contributing to elevated regional averages in states like Texas (150–350+ mg/L) and Arizona (200–350+ mg/L). In Canada, water hardness varies significantly by province, with the Prairie regions experiencing some of the highest levels in the country owing to the dissolution of minerals from sedimentary rock formations. In Saskatchewan, for instance, municipal water supplies in cities like Regina average around 287 mg/L, while some rural areas exceed 300 mg/L, classifying them as very hard; in contrast, waters around the , such as those in Ontario, are generally softer, with surface sources often below 180 mg/L. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not establish enforceable standards or legal limits for water hardness, as it poses no direct health risks, but it endorses classification guidelines aligning with USGS categories: soft (0–60 mg/L), moderately hard (61–120 mg/L), hard (121–180 mg/L), and very hard (>180 mg/L). To address hardness in affected areas, regional treatment programs are implemented; for example, numerous public water systems in employ processes to reduce calcium and magnesium concentrations, targeting effluent hardness of 80–120 mg/L through at pH levels of 9.5 or higher.

Europe

In , hard water is prevalent in regions underlain by and formations, particularly in the southeast, where typical levels range from to over mg/L as CaCO3, classifying much of the supply as hard to very hard. This geological influence has been documented through long-term monitoring by water authorities, with historical records from bodies like the Inspectorate showing consistent high mineral content since the early due to sourcing from permeable aquifers. In contrast, upland and northern areas supplied by surface waters exhibit softer profiles, generally below 150 mg/L. Across , water hardness varies regionally, with eastern counties like and Meath experiencing harder supplies often exceeding 300 mg/L as CaCO3 owing to limestone bedrock, while western regions such as Kerry and Galway yield softer water under 100 mg/L from granitic terrains and peaty catchments. , by comparison, predominantly features soft water, with most supplies below 100 mg/L as CaCO3, attributed to rainfall-dominated surface sources over non-calcareous , as confirmed by national quality assessments. In , hardness distribution reflects diverse : Alpine-influenced areas in countries like , , and receive soft runoff from granitic and metamorphic rocks, typically under 100 mg Ca/L, leading to low overall hardness. Conversely, Mediterranean basins, including much of and , produce harder water from karstic aquifers, with examples in central and southern surpassing 300 mg/L as CaCO3 in -dependent supplies. These patterns are mapped through European databases, highlighting and as key drivers. The European Union's Directive (98/83/EC, recast as 2020/2184) sets parametric values for numerous contaminants but does not impose a maximum limit on water hardness, recognizing it as a non-health-related aesthetic ; however, member states often adopt national guidelines, such as recommended upper thresholds around 250 mg/L as CaCO3 in some countries to mitigate scaling issues. The 2020 recast emphasizes risk-based management and cross-border cooperation for shared aquifers, with updates in the 2020s incorporating enhanced monitoring protocols for transboundary resources like the and basins to ensure consistent quality amid climate variability.

Africa and Australia

In South Africa, hard water is prevalent in the basin due to the dissolution of dolomite formations, which contribute elevated levels of calcium and magnesium ions, resulting in total exceeding 300 mg/L as CaCO3 in many sources. Mining activities in the region, particularly and extraction, exacerbate water quality issues by introducing additional minerals and salts through and runoff, indirectly increasing overall hardness and salinity in surface and supplies. These conditions pose challenges for domestic use and , necessitating treatment to mitigate scaling in and systems. In , inland bore water, especially in the Murray-Darling Basin, exhibits very high levels, often surpassing 500 mg/L as CaCO3, attributed to geological sources of calcium and magnesium in fractured rock aquifers. Coastal regions, by contrast, typically feature softer water with below 200 mg/L due to less mineral-rich aquifers and dilution from rainfall, highlighting a stark regional variation driven by and . This inland affects and household appliances, prompting widespread use of softening technologies in arid zones. Across broader African contexts, in the region, such as the , often contains hard water influenced by dissolution in ancient formations, with some brackish variants requiring management for potable use. In , desalination projects target brackish hard water sources to address scarcity, as seen in where facilities treat with up to 5,000 mg/L, including high calcium and magnesium content. Recent droughts in the 2020s have intensified hard water challenges in both and by concentrating minerals through reduced dilution and increased , leading to elevated and in rivers and aquifers. In the Murray-Darling Basin, prolonged dry conditions have driven salinity rises, correlating with hardness increases that strain water . Adaptation initiatives, such as climate-resilient water policies in Australia's Murray-Darling Basin and resilient infrastructure projects in , incorporate hardness mitigation through enhanced treatment and monitoring to bolster supply reliability amid arid vulnerabilities.

Other Regions

In Asia, hard water is common in India's Ganges River basin, where total hardness levels typically range from 100 to 200 mg/L as CaCO₃, primarily due to the dissolution of limestone in the Himalayan geology feeding the river. This contributes to challenges in water use for households and agriculture across densely populated regions. In contrast, water hardness in China varies significantly; while some tributaries exhibit moderate to high levels, the main Yangtze River generally shows lower hardness, with measurements between 106.75 and 342 mg/L, classifying much of it as soft to moderately hard depending on the section. In , rivers in the Andean region, such as those in and , often feature hard water due to volcanic minerals leaching into the waterways, resulting in very hard compositions in hypothermal, acidic conditions with low carbonate content. Conversely, the and its tributaries are predominantly soft, with low hardness attributed to acidic inputs from numerous tributaries that limit mineral accumulation. Global outliers highlight diverse patterns; island nations like benefit from soft geothermal waters, with hardness typically below 4°dH (around 70 mg/L as CaCO₃) due to low calcium and magnesium from basaltic . In the Middle East, brackish sources are characterized by high hardness, often exceeding 600 mg/L, compounded by elevated and temperatures in arid environments. International trends, as outlined in guidelines, emphasize monitoring hardness to prevent issues like scaling and , with global surveys indicating variable prevalence but no adverse health effects from typical levels. As of 2025, rapid in emerging economies continues to heighten demands for infrastructure, particularly to address hard water impacts on supply systems and industrial efficiency.

References

  1. https://www.usgs.gov/water-science-school/science/hardness-water
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3775162/
  3. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/solubility-product-equilibrium-constant-ionic-solution-salt-Ksp-d_1952.html
  4. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Inorganic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_and_Websites_%28Inorganic_Chemistry%29/Descriptive_Chemistry/Main_Group_Reactions/Hard_Water
  5. https://www.purolite.com/index/core-technologies/application/softening/Why-do-we-get-hard-water
  6. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jced.4c00670
  7. https://www.usgs.gov/water-science-school/science/contamination-groundwater
  8. https://extension.psu.edu/iron-and-manganese-in-private-water-systems/
  9. https://www.ysi.com/water-hardness
  10. https://www.safewater.org/fact-sheets-1/2017/1/23/tds-and-ph
  11. https://www.lenntech.com/ro/temporary-hardness.htm
  12. https://www.docbrown.info/page01/AqueousChem/AqueousChem3.htm
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/water-hardness
  14. https://edu.rsc.org/experiments/testing-the-hardness-of-water/426.article
  15. https://www.corrosionpedia.com/definition/868/permanent-hardness
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263225000535
  17. https://www.ngwa.org/what-is-groundwater/About-groundwater/dissolved-mineral-sources-and-significance
  18. https://byjus.com/jee/hardness-of-water-types-and-removal/
  19. https://water.mecc.edu/courses/ENV148/lesson20b.htm
  20. https://aqua-chem.com/water-chemistry-caco3-equivalents/
  21. https://www.open.edu/openlearncreate/pluginfile.php/653808/mod_resource/content/4/OSA_EL_Determining_the_hardness_of_river_water_by_EDTA_titration.pdf
  22. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/1540c/report.pdf
  23. https://www.hach.com/parameters/hardness
  24. http://www.waterworkshistory.us/bio/Baker/1948Softening.pdf
  25. https://www.astm.org/d1126-17.html
  26. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/do-you-have-information-about-water-hardness-united-states
  27. https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/water-sanitation-and-health/chemical-hazards-in-drinking-water/hardness
  28. https://www.dwi.gov.uk/consumers/learn-more-about-your-water/water-hardness-hard-water/
  29. https://www.healthvermont.gov/environment/drinking-water/hardness-drinking-water
  30. https://corrosion-doctors.org/Cooling-Water-Towers/Index-Langelier.htm
  31. https://water.mecc.edu/courses/ENV115/LSI.htm
  32. https://www.usgs.gov/mission-areas/water-resources/science/corrosivity
  33. https://www.lenntech.com/calculators/langelier/index/langelier.htm
  34. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1944.tb20016.x
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3963649/
  36. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/sir20245035/full
  37. https://www.scrantonassociates.com/sssi.pdf
  38. https://www.lenntech.com/calculators/ryznar/index/ryznar.htm
  39. https://www.phta.org/pub/?id=0944f15c-1866-daac-99fb-94b844527165
  40. https://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Cooling-Water-Towers/Index-Ryznar.htm
  41. https://content.ampp.org/corrosion/article/47/4/280/5364/A-New-Practical-Index-for-Calcium-Carbonate-Scale
  42. https://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Corrosion-by-Water/Scaling-indices.htm
  43. https://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Cooling-Water-Towers/Index-Puckorius.htm
  44. https://www.valvemagazine.com/articles/indices-that-measure-water-scaling
  45. https://content.ampp.org/materials-performance/article/62/11/64/39487/Scaling-Indices
  46. https://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Cooling-Water-Towers/Index-Stiff-Davis.htm
  47. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands/mands-pdfs/WQeval_documentation.pdf
  48. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/1/42
  49. https://www.suezwaterhandbook.com/water-and-generalities/fundamental-physical-chemical-engineering-processes-applicable-to-water-treatment/neutralisation-remineralisation/the-calcium-carbonate-balance
  50. https://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Cooling-Water-Towers/Index-Larson-Skold.htm
  51. https://www.corrosionpedia.com/definition/6667/larson-skold-index
  52. https://www.ornl.gov/news/scientists-reveal-molecular-mysteries-control-silica-scaling-water-treatment
  53. https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/442/442-664/442-664.html
  54. https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/pnnl-22921.pdf
  55. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=10003H3V.TXT
  56. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Water/Water-Quality/Aesthetics/Hard-Water
  57. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Water/Water-Quality/Aesthetics/Home-Treatment
  58. https://objects.lib.uidaho.edu/uiext/uiext30924.pdf
  59. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/rj4304706
  60. https://rex.libraries.wsu.edu/esploro/fulltext/report/Home-Water-Softening/99900501901901842?repId=12332640920001842&mId=13332983430001842&institution=01ALLIANCE_WSU
  61. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/wash-documents/wash-chemicals/hardness-bd.pdf?sfvrsn=a13853a9_4
  62. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/12/17/3255
  63. https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-025-01166-7
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2265038/
  65. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.813202/full
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334505744_Water_to_prevent_kidney_stones_tap_vs_bottled_soft_vs_hard_-_does_it_matter
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4907526/
  68. https://essic.umd.edu/local-water-alkalinity-could-impact-river-life/
  69. https://aqualab.is/resources/common-hard-water-analysis-services-problems-in-agriculture/
  70. https://watsonwell.com/solving-hard-water-problems-farm-irrigation-systems/
  71. https://www.nationalboard.org/index.aspx?pageID=164&ID=224
  72. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.14504/ajr.6.2.1
  73. https://water.co.id/en/artikel/impact-of-hard-water-on-the-efficiency-of-water-and-wastewater-treatment-systems
  74. https://www.morningagclips.com/how-hard-water-impacts-equipment-lifespan-and-maintenance/
  75. https://environmentjournal.online/features/hard-water-is-responsible-for-over-8-million-tonnes-of-co2/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825214002086
  77. https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/sites/default/files/topic/OpCert/DWSGLimeSoftening.pdf
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/carbonate-hardness
  79. https://www.suezwaterhandbook.com/water-and-generalities/fundamental-physical-chemical-engineering-processes-applicable-to-water-treatment/chemical-precipitations
  80. https://www.egr.msu.edu/~hashsham/courses/ene806/docs/Water%20Softening%201.pdf
  81. https://www.mrwa.com/WaterWorksMnl/Chapter%2016%20Lime%20Softening.pdf
  82. https://extensionpubs.unl.edu/publication/g1491/2014/html/view
  83. https://www.watertechnologies.com/handbook/chapter-08-ion-exchange
  84. https://www.dupont.com/water/technologies/ion-exchange-ix.html
  85. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/factsheet/softening.html
  86. https://www.culligan.com/blog/what-size-water-softener-do-i-need
  87. https://www.chemaqua.com/en-us/blog/2019/06/18/how-to-calculate-softener-capacity/
  88. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/purchasing-and-maintaining-water-softener
  89. https://www.pentair.com/en-us/commercial-filtration/resources-and-education/issues-solutions/softening-ion-exchange.html
  90. https://www.apecwater.com/blogs/water-health/water-softeners-and-health
  91. https://www.energy.gov/femp/articles/reverse-osmosis-optimization
  92. https://www.globalwaterintel.com/articles/the-growing-importance-of-energy-efficient-ro-in-industrial-wastewater-recycling-and-re-use-danfoss
  93. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/115397/Koskela_Tiina.pdf
  94. https://watereuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Webinar-WateReuse-08-06.pdf
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0011916400886956
  96. https://crystalquest.com/products/rover-portable-reverse-osmosis-filtration-system
  97. https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/map-water-hardness-united-states
  98. https://www.leafhome.com/blog/water-solutions/water-hardness-by-state
  99. https://publications.gc.ca/Collection/H48-10-1-49-1995E.pdf
  100. https://www.aquatell.ca/pages/water-hardness-by-city-saskatchewan
  101. https://fwrj.com/techarticles/1120%20t3.pdf
  102. https://www.dwi.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/hardness-map.pdf
  103. https://www.water.ie/help/water-quality/hard-water
  104. https://dwqr.scot/public-water-supply/drinking-water-quality-faqs/water-hardness/
  105. https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/1089/2021/
  106. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/water/drinking-water_en
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0075951123000919
  108. https://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/schedule-f-nsw-murray-darling-basin-fractured-rock-water-quality-management-plan0.pdf
  109. https://www.waterquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/irrigation-guidlelines-draft-9.2.pdf
  110. https://www.deswater.com/DWT_articles/vol_231_papers/231_2021_1.pdf
  111. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02044-3
  112. https://www.mdba.gov.au/water-management/managing-water-quality/water-quality-threats/salinity
  113. https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol29/iss1/art1/
  114. https://www.csis.org/analysis/building-resilient-water-systems-sub-saharan-africa
  115. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-014-0235-1
  116. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/6/1028
  117. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/17/17/2539
  118. https://www.rainforestcruises.com/guides/amazonian-river-types-blackwater-whitewater-clearwater
  119. https://www.borgenmagazine.com/water-quality-iceland/
  120. https://germanwaterpartnership.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/FREIGABE___06320001-Messe-IFAT-Cerafiltec-V3-3.pdf
  121. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/water-and-sanitation/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.