Hubbry Logo
Sterilization (microbiology)Sterilization (microbiology)Main
Open search
Sterilization (microbiology)
Community hub
Sterilization (microbiology)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sterilization (microbiology)
Sterilization (microbiology)
from Wikipedia
Microorganisms growing on an agar plate

Sterilization (British English: sterilisation) refers to any process that removes, kills, or deactivates all forms of life (particularly microorganisms such as fungi, bacteria, spores, and unicellular eukaryotic organisms) and other biological agents (such as prions or viruses) present in fluid or on a specific surface or object.[1] Sterilization can be achieved through various means, including heat, chemicals, irradiation, high pressure, and filtration. Sterilization is distinct from disinfection, sanitization, and pasteurization, in that those methods reduce rather than eliminate all forms of life and biological agents present. After sterilization, fluid or an object is referred to as being sterile or aseptic.

Applications

[edit]

Foods

[edit]

One of the first steps toward modernized sterilization was made by Nicolas Appert, who discovered that application of heat over a suitable period of time slowed the decay of foods and various liquids, preserving them for safe consumption for a longer time than was typical. Canning of foods is an extension of the same principle and has helped to reduce food borne illness ("food poisoning"). Other methods of sterilizing foods include ultra-high temperature processing (which uses a shorter duration of heating), food irradiation,[2][3] and high pressure (pascalization).[4]

In the context of food, sterility typically refers to commercial sterility, defined as "the absence of microorganisms capable of growing in the food at normal non-refrigerated conditions at which the food is likely to be held during distribution and storage" according to the Codex Alimentarius.[5]

Medicine and surgery

[edit]
Joseph Lister, a pioneer of antiseptic surgery.
Apparatus to sterilize surgical instruments (1914–1918)

In general, surgical instruments and medications that enter an already aseptic part of the body (such as the bloodstream, or penetrating the skin) must be sterile. Examples of such instruments include scalpels, hypodermic needles, and artificial pacemakers. This is also essential in the manufacture of parenteral pharmaceuticals.[6]

Preparation of injectable medications and intravenous solutions for fluid replacement therapy requires not only sterility but also well-designed containers to prevent entry of adventitious agents after initial product sterilization.[6]

Most medical and surgical devices used in healthcare facilities are made of materials that are able to undergo steam sterilization.[7] However, since 1950, there has been an increase in medical devices and instruments made of materials (e.g., plastics) that require low-temperature sterilization. Ethylene oxide gas has been used since the 1950s for heat- and moisture-sensitive medical devices. Within the past 15 years, a number of new, low-temperature sterilization systems (e.g., vaporized hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid immersion, ozone) have been developed and are being used to sterilize medical devices.[8]

Spacecraft

[edit]

There are strict international rules to protect the contamination of Solar System bodies from biological material from Earth. Standards vary depending on both the type of mission and its destination; the more likely a planet is considered to be habitable, the stricter the requirements are.[9]

Many components of instruments used on spacecraft cannot withstand very high temperatures, so techniques not requiring excessive temperatures are used as tolerated, including heating to at least 120 °C (248 °F), chemical sterilization, oxidization, ultraviolet, and irradiation.[10]

Quantification

[edit]

The aim of sterilization is the reduction of initially present microorganisms or other potential pathogens. The degree of sterilization is commonly expressed by multiples of the decimal reduction time, or D-value, denoting the time needed to reduce the initial number to one tenth () of its original value.[11] Then the number of microorganisms after sterilization time is given by:

.

The D-value is a function of sterilization conditions and varies with the type of microorganism, temperature, water activity, pH, etc.. For steam sterilization (see below), typically the temperature, in degrees Celsius, is given as an index.[citation needed]

Theoretically, the likelihood of the survival of an individual microorganism is never zero. To compensate for this, the overkill method is often used. Using the overkill method, sterilization is performed by sterilizing for longer than is required to kill the bioburden present on or in the item being sterilized. This provides a sterility assurance level (SAL) equal to the probability of a non-sterile unit.[citation needed]

For high-risk applications, such as medical devices and injections, a sterility assurance level of at least 10−6 is required by the United States of America Food and Drug Administration (FDA).[12]

Heat

[edit]

Steam

[edit]

Steam sterilization, also known as moist heat sterilization, uses heated saturated steam under pressure to inactivate or kill microorganisms via denaturation of macromolecules, primarily proteins.[13] This method is a faster process than dry heat sterilization. Steam sterilization is performed using an autoclave, sometimes called a converter or steam sterilizer. The object or liquid is placed in the autoclave chamber, which is then sealed and heated using pressurized steam to a temperature set point for a defined period of time. Steam sterilization cycles can be categorized as either pre-vacuum or gravity displacement. Gravity displacement cycles rely on the lower density of the injected steam to force cooler, denser air out of the chamber drain.[14] In comparison, pre-vacuum cycles create a vacuum in the chamber to remove cool dry air prior to injecting saturated steam, resulting in faster heating and shorter cycle times. Typical steam sterilization cycles are between 3 and 30 minutes at 121–134 °C (250–273 °F) at 100 kPa (15 psi), but adjustments may be made depending on the bioburden of the article being sterilized, its resistance (D-value) to steam sterilization, the article's heat tolerance, and the required sterility assurance level. Following the completion of a cycle, liquids in a pressurized autoclave must be cooled slowly to avoid boiling over when the pressure is released. This may be achieved by gradually depressurizing the sterilization chamber and allowing liquids to evaporate under a negative pressure, while cooling the contents.[citation needed]

Proper autoclave treatment will inactivate all resistant bacterial spores in addition to fungi, bacteria, and viruses, but is not expected to eliminate all prions, which vary in their heat resistance. For prion elimination, various recommendations state 121–132 °C (250–270 °F) for 60 minutes or 134 °C (273 °F) for at least 18 minutes.[15] The 263K scrapie prion is inactivated relatively quickly by such sterilization procedures; however, other strains of scrapie and strains of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CKD) and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) are more resistant. Using mice as test animals, one experiment showed that heating BSE positive brain tissue at 134–138 °C (273–280 °F) for 18 minutes resulted in only a 2.5 log decrease in prion infectivity.[16]

Most autoclaves have meters and charts that record or display information, particularly temperature and pressure as a function of time. The information is checked to ensure that the conditions required for sterilization have been met. Indicator tape is often placed on the packages of products prior to autoclaving, and some packaging incorporates indicators. The indicator changes color when exposed to steam, providing a visual confirmation.[17]

Biological indicators can also be used to independently confirm autoclave performance. Simple biological indicator devices are commercially available, based on microbial spores. Most contain spores of the heat-resistant microbe Geobacillus stearothermophilus (formerly Bacillus stearothermophilus), which is extremely resistant to steam sterilization. Biological indicators may take the form of glass vials of spores and liquid media, or as spores on strips of paper inside glassine envelopes. These indicators are placed in locations where it is difficult for steam to reach to verify that steam is penetrating that area.

For autoclaving, cleaning is critical. Extraneous biological matter or grime may shield organisms from steam penetration. Proper cleaning can be achieved through physical scrubbing, sonication, ultrasound, or pulsed air.[18]

Pressure cooking and canning is analogous to autoclaving, and when performed correctly renders food sterile.[19][failed verification]

To sterilize waste materials that are chiefly composed of liquid, a purpose-built effluent decontamination system can be utilized. These devices can function using a variety of sterilants, although using heat via steam is most common.[citation needed]

Dry

[edit]
Dry heat sterilizer

Dry heat was the first method of sterilization and is a longer process than moist heat sterilization. The destruction of microorganisms through the use of dry heat is a gradual phenomenon. With longer exposure to lethal temperatures, the number of killed microorganisms increases. Forced ventilation of hot air can be used to increase the rate at which heat is transferred to an organism and reduce the temperature and amount of time needed to achieve sterility. At higher temperatures, shorter exposure times are required to kill organisms. This can reduce heat-induced damage to food products.[20]

The standard setting for a hot air oven is at least two hours at 160 °C (320 °F). A rapid method heats air to 463.15 K (190.00 °C; 374.00 °F) for 6 minutes for unwrapped objects and 12 minutes for wrapped objects.[21][22] Dry heat has the advantage that it can be used on powders and other heat-stable items that are adversely affected by steam (e.g., it does not cause rusting of steel objects).

Flaming

[edit]

Flaming is done to inoculation loops and straight-wires in microbiology labs for streaking. Leaving the loop in the flame of a Bunsen burner or alcohol burner until it glows red ensures that any infectious agent is inactivated or killed. This is commonly used for small metal or glass objects, but not for large objects (see Incineration below). However, during the initial heating, infectious material may be sprayed from the wire surface before it is killed, contaminating nearby surfaces and objects. Therefore, special heaters have been developed that surround the inoculating loop with a heated cage, ensuring that such sprayed material does not further contaminate the area. Another problem is that gas flames may leave carbon or other residues on the object if the object is not heated enough. A variation on flaming is to dip the object in a 70% or more concentrated solution of ethanol, then briefly leave the object in the flame of a Bunsen burner. The ethanol will ignite and burn off rapidly, leaving less residue than a gas flame[citation needed]

Incineration

[edit]

Incineration is a waste treatment process that involves the combustion of organic substances contained in waste materials. This method also burns any organism to ash. It is used to sterilize medical and other biohazardous waste before it is discarded with non-hazardous waste. Bacteria incinerators are mini furnaces that incinerate and kill off any microorganisms that may be on an inoculating loop or wire.[23]

Tyndallization

[edit]

Named after John Tyndall, tyndallization[24] is an obsolete and lengthy process designed to reduce the level of activity of sporulating microbes that are left by a simple boiling water method. The process involves boiling for a period of time (typically 20 minutes) at atmospheric pressure, cooling, incubating for a day, and then repeating the process a total of three to four times. The incubation allow heat-resistant spores surviving the previous boiling period to germinate and form the heat-sensitive vegetative (growing) stage, which can be killed by the next boiling step. This is effective because many spores are stimulated to grow by the heat shock. The procedure only works for media that can support bacterial growth, and will not sterilize non-nutritive substrates like water. Tyndallization is also ineffective against prions.

Glass bead sterilizers

[edit]

Glass bead sterilizers work by heating glass beads to 250 °C (482 °F). Instruments are then quickly doused in these glass beads, which heat the object while physically scraping contaminants off their surface. Glass bead sterilizers were once a common sterilization method employed in dental offices as well as biological laboratories,[25] but are not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to be used as a sterilizers since 1997.[26] They are still popular in European and Israeli dental practices, although there are no current evidence-based guidelines for using this sterilizer.[25]

Chemical sterilization

[edit]
Chemiclav

Chemicals are also used for sterilization. Heating provides a reliable way to rid objects of all transmissible agents, but it is not always appropriate if it will damage heat-sensitive materials such as biological materials, fiber optics, electronics, and many plastics. In these situations, chemicals either in a gaseous or liquid form, can be used as sterilants. While the use of gas and liquid chemical sterilants avoids the problem of heat damage, users must ensure that the article to be sterilized is chemically compatible with the sterilant being used and that the sterilant is able to reach all surfaces that must be sterilized (typically cannot penetrate packaging). In addition, the use of chemical sterilants poses new challenges for workplace safety, as the properties that make chemicals effective sterilants usually make them harmful to humans. The procedure for removing sterilant residue from the sterilized materials varies depending on the chemical and process that is used.[citation needed]

Ethylene oxide

[edit]
EO sterilisation sticker on a box of medical supplies. The colour turns from red to blue permanently in the presence of EO

Ethylene oxide (EO, EtO) gas treatment is one of the common methods used to sterilize, pasteurize, or disinfect items because of its wide range of material compatibility. It is also used to process items that are sensitive to processing with other methods, such as radiation (gamma, electron beam, X-ray), heat (moist or dry), or other chemicals. Ethylene oxide treatment is the most common chemical sterilization method, used for approximately 70% of total sterilizations, and for over 50% of all disposable medical devices.[27][28]

Ethylene oxide treatment is generally carried out between 30 and 60 °C (86 and 140 °F) with relative humidity above 30% and a gas concentration between 200 and 800 mg/L.[29] Typically, the process lasts for several hours. Ethylene oxide is highly effective, as it penetrates all porous materials, and it can penetrate through some plastic materials and films. Ethylene oxide kills all known microorganisms, such as bacteria (including spores), viruses, and fungi (including yeasts and moulds), and is compatible with almost all materials even when used repeatedly. It is flammable, toxic, and carcinogenic; however, only with a reported potential for some adverse health effects when not used in compliance with published requirements. Ethylene oxide sterilizers and processes require biological validation after sterilizer installation, significant repairs, or process changes.

The traditional process consists of a preconditioning phase (in a separate room or cell), a processing phase (more commonly in a vacuum vessel and sometimes in a pressure rated vessel), and an aeration phase (in a separate room or cell) to remove EO residues and lower by-products such as ethylene chlorohydrin (EC or ECH) and, of lesser importance, ethylene glycol (EG). An alternative process, known as all-in-one processing, also exists for some products whereby all three phases are performed in the vacuum or pressure rated vessel. This latter option can facilitate faster overall processing time and residue dissipation.

The most common EO processing method is the gas chamber. To benefit from economies of scale, EO has traditionally been delivered by filling a large chamber with a combination of gaseous EO, either as pure EO, or with other gases used as diluents; diluents include chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), and carbon dioxide.[30]

Ethylene oxide is still widely used by medical device manufacturers.[31] Since EO is explosive at concentrations above 3%,[32] EO was traditionally supplied with an inert carrier gas, such as a CFC or HCFC. The use of CFCs or HCFCs as the carrier gas was banned because of concerns of ozone depletion.[33] These halogenated hydrocarbons are being replaced by systems using 100% EO, because of regulations and the high cost of the blends. In hospitals, most EO sterilizers use single-use cartridges because of the convenience and ease of use compared to the former plumbed gas cylinders of EO blends.

It is important to adhere to patient and healthcare personnel government specified limits of EO residues in and/or on processed products, operator exposure after processing, during storage and handling of EO gas cylinders, and environmental emissions produced when using EO.

The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has set the permissible exposure limit (PEL) at 1 ppm – calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) – and 5 ppm as a 15-minute excursion limit (EL). The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) immediately dangerous to life and health limit (IDLH) for EO is 800 ppm.[34] The odor threshold is around 500 ppm,[35] so EO is imperceptible until concentrations are well above the OSHA PEL. Therefore, OSHA recommends that continuous gas monitoring systems be used to protect workers using EO for processing.[36]

Nitrogen dioxide

[edit]

Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) gas is a rapid and effective sterilant for use against a wide range of microorganisms, including common bacteria, viruses, and spores. The unique physical properties of NO2 gas allow for sterilant dispersion in an enclosed environment at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. The mechanism for lethality is the degradation of DNA in the spore's core through nitration of the phosphate backbone, which kills the exposed organism as it absorbs NO2. This degradations occurs at even very low concentrations of the gas.[37] NO2 has a boiling point of 21 °C (70 °F) at sea level, which results in a relatively high saturated vapour pressure at ambient temperature. Because of this, liquid NO2 may be used as a convenient source for the sterilant gas. Liquid NO2 is often referred to by the name of its dimer, dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4). Additionally, the low levels of concentration required, coupled with the high vapour pressure, assures that no condensation occurs on the devices being sterilized. This means that no aeration of the devices is required immediately following the sterilization cycle.[38] NO2 is also less corrosive than other sterilant gases, and is compatible with most medical materials and adhesives.[38]

The most-resistant organism (MRO) to sterilization with NO2 gas is the spore of Geobacillus stearothermophilus, which is the same MRO for both steam and hydrogen peroxide sterilization processes. The spore form of G. stearothermophilus has been well characterized over the years as a biological indicator in sterilization applications. Microbial inactivation of G. stearothermophilus with NO2 gas proceeds rapidly in a log-linear fashion, as is typical of other sterilization processes. Noxilizer, Inc. has commercialized this technology to offer contract sterilization services for medical devices at its Baltimore, Maryland (USA) facility.[39] This has been demonstrated in Noxilizer's lab in multiple studies and is supported by published reports from other labs. These same properties also allow for quicker removal of the sterilant and residual gases through aeration of the enclosed environment. The combination of rapid lethality and easy removal of the gas allows for shorter overall cycle times during the sterilization (or decontamination) process and a lower level of sterilant residuals than are found with other sterilization methods.[38] Eniware, LLC has developed a portable, power-free sterilizer that uses no electricity, heat, or water.[40] The 25 liter unit makes sterilization of surgical instruments possible for austere forward surgical teams, in health centers throughout the world with intermittent or no electricity and in disaster relief and humanitarian crisis situations. The 4-hour cycle uses a single use gas generation ampoule and a disposable scrubber to remove NO2 gas.[41]

Ozone

[edit]

Ozone is used in industrial settings to sterilize water and air, as well as a disinfectant for surfaces. It has the benefit of being able to oxidize most organic matter. On the other hand, it is a toxic and unstable gas that must be produced on-site, so it is not practical to use in many settings.[42]

Ozone offers many advantages as a sterilant gas; ozone is a very efficient sterilant because of its strong oxidizing properties (E=2.076 vs SHE[43]) capable of destroying a wide range of pathogens, including prions, without the need for handling hazardous chemicals since the ozone is generated within the sterilizer from medical-grade oxygen. The high reactivity of ozone means that waste ozone can be destroyed by passing over a simple catalyst that reverts it to oxygen and ensures that the cycle time is relatively short. The disadvantage of using ozone is that the gas is very reactive and very hazardous. The NIOSH's IDLH for ozone is 5 ppm, 160 times smaller than the 800 ppm IDLH for ethylene oxide. NIOSH[44] and OSHA have set the PEL for ozone at 0.1 ppm, calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average. The sterilant gas manufacturers include many safety features in their products but prudent practice is to provide continuous monitoring of exposure to ozone, in order to provide a rapid warning in the event of a leak. Monitors for determining workplace exposure to ozone are commercially available.

Glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde

[edit]

Glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde solutions (also used as fixatives) are accepted liquid sterilizing agents, provided that the immersion time is sufficiently long. To kill all spores in a clear liquid can take up to 22 hours with glutaraldehyde and even longer with formaldehyde. The presence of solid particles may lengthen the required period or render the treatment ineffective. Sterilization of blocks of tissue can take much longer, due to the time required for the fixative to penetrate. Glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde are volatile, and toxic by both skin contact and inhalation. Glutaraldehyde has a short shelf-life (<2 weeks), and is expensive. Formaldehyde is less expensive and has a much longer shelf-life if some methanol is added to inhibit polymerization of the chemical to paraformaldehyde, but is much more volatile. Formaldehyde is also used as a gaseous sterilizing agent; in this case, it is prepared on-site by depolymerization of solid paraformaldehyde. Many vaccines, such as the original Salk polio vaccine, are sterilized with formaldehyde.

Hydrogen peroxide

[edit]

Hydrogen peroxide, in both liquid and as vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), is another chemical sterilizing agent. Hydrogen peroxide is a strong oxidant, which allows it to destroy a wide range of pathogens. Hydrogen peroxide is used to sterilize heat- or temperature-sensitive articles, such as rigid endoscopes. In medical sterilization, hydrogen peroxide is used at higher concentrations, ranging from around 35% up to 90%. The biggest advantage of hydrogen peroxide as a sterilant is the short cycle time. Whereas the cycle time for ethylene oxide may be 10 to 15 hours, some modern hydrogen peroxide sterilizers have a cycle time as short as 28 minutes.[45]

Drawbacks of hydrogen peroxide include material compatibility, a lower capability for penetration and operator health risks. Products containing cellulose, such as paper, cannot be sterilized using VHP and products containing nylon may become brittle.[46] The penetrating ability of hydrogen peroxide is not as good as ethylene oxide[citation needed] and so there are limitations on the length and diameter of the lumen of objects that can be effectively sterilized. Hydrogen peroxide is a primary irritant and the contact of the liquid solution with skin will cause bleaching or ulceration depending on the concentration and contact time. It is relatively non-toxic when diluted to low concentrations, but is a dangerous oxidizer at high concentrations (> 10% w/w). The vapour is also hazardous, primarily affecting the eyes and respiratory system. Even short-term exposures can be hazardous and NIOSH has set the IDLH at 75 ppm,[34] less than 1/10 the IDLH for ethylene oxide (800 ppm). Prolonged exposure to lower concentrations can cause permanent lung damage and consequently, OSHA has set the permissible exposure limit to 1.0 ppm, calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average.[47] Sterilizer manufacturers go to great lengths to make their products safe through careful design and incorporation of many safety features, though there are still workplace exposures of hydrogen peroxide from gas sterilizers documented in the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.[48] When using any type of gas sterilizer, prudent work practices should include good ventilation, a continuous gas monitor for hydrogen peroxide, and good work practices and training.[49][50]

Vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP) is used to sterilize large enclosed and sealed areas, such as entire rooms and aircraft interiors.

Although toxic, VHP breaks down in a short time to water and oxygen.

Peracetic acid

[edit]

Peracetic acid (0.2%) is a recognized sterilant by the FDA[51] for use in sterilizing medical devices such as endoscopes. Peracetic acid which is also known as peroxyacetic acid is a chemical compound often used in disinfectants such as sanitizers. It is most commonly produced by the reaction of acetic acid with hydrogen peroxide by using an acid catalyst. Peracetic acid is never sold in un-stabilized solutions which is why it is considered to be environmentally friendly.[52] Peracetic acid is a colorless liquid and the molecular formula of peracetic acid is C2H4O3 or CH3COOOH.[53] More recently, peracetic acid is being used throughout the world as more people are using fumigation to decontaminate surfaces to reduce the risk of COVID-19 and other diseases.[54]

Potential for chemical sterilization of prions

[edit]

Prions are highly resistant to chemical sterilization.[55] Treatment with aldehydes, such as formaldehyde, have actually been shown to increase prion resistance. Hydrogen peroxide (3%) used for 1 hour was shown to be ineffective, providing less than 3 logs (10−3) reduction in contamination. Iodine, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, and peracetic acid also fail this test (1 hour treatment).[56] Only chlorine, phenolic compounds, guanidinium thiocyanate, and sodium hydroxide reduce prion levels by more than 4 logs; chlorine (too corrosive to use on certain objects) and sodium hydroxide are the most consistent. Many studies have shown the effectiveness of sodium hydroxide.[57]

Radiation sterilization

[edit]

Sterilization can be achieved using electromagnetic radiation, such as ultraviolet light (UV), X-rays, and gamma rays, or irradiation by subatomic particles such as electron beams.[58] Electromagnetic or particulate radiation can be energetic enough to ionize atoms or molecules (ionizing radiation), or less energetic (non-ionizing radiation).[citation needed]

Non-ionizing radiation sterilization

[edit]

UV irradiation (from a germicidal lamp) is useful for sterilization of surfaces and some transparent objects. Many objects that are transparent to visible light absorb UV. UV irradiation is routinely used to sterilize the interiors of biological safety cabinets between uses, but is ineffective in shaded areas, including areas under dirt (which may become polymerized after prolonged irradiation, so that it is very difficult to remove).[59] It also damages some plastics, such as polystyrene foam if exposed for prolonged periods of time.

Ionizing radiation sterilization

[edit]
Efficiency illustration of the different radiation technologies (electron beam, X-ray, gamma rays)

The safety of irradiation facilities is regulated by the International Atomic Energy Agency of the United Nations and monitored by the different national Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC). The radiation exposure accidents that have occurred in the past are documented by the agency and thoroughly analyzed to determine the cause and improvement potential. Such improvements are then mandated to retrofit existing facilities and future design.

Gamma radiation is very penetrating, and is commonly used for sterilization of disposable medical equipment, such as syringes, needles, cannulas and IV sets, and food. It is emitted by a radioisotope, usually cobalt-60 (60Co) or caesium-137 (137Cs), which have photon energies of up to 1.3 and 0.66 MeV, respectively.

Use of a radioisotope requires shielding for the safety of the operators while in use and in storage. With most designs, the radioisotope is lowered into a water-filled source storage pool, which absorbs radiation and allows maintenance personnel to enter the radiation shield. One variant keeps the radioisotope under water at all times and lowers the product to be irradiated in the water in hermetically sealed bells; no further shielding is required for such designs. Other uncommonly used designs are dry storage, providing movable shields that reduce radiation levels in areas of the irradiation chamber, etc. An incident in Decatur, Georgia, USA, where water-soluble caesium-137 leaked into the source storage pool, required Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) intervention[60] and led to the use of this radioisotope being almost entirely discontinued in favor of the more costly, non-water-soluble cobalt-60. Cobalt-60 gamma photons have about twice the energy, and hence greater penetrating range, of caesium-137-produced radiation.

Electron beam processing is also commonly used for sterilization. Electron beams use an on-off technology and provide a much higher dosing rate than gamma or X-rays. Due to the higher dose rate, less exposure time is needed and thereby any potential degradation to polymers is reduced. Because electrons carry a charge, electron beams are less penetrating than both gamma and X-rays. Facilities rely on substantial concrete shields to protect workers and the environment from radiation exposure.[61]

High-energy X-rays (produced by bremsstrahlung) allow irradiation of large packages and pallet loads of medical devices. They are sufficiently penetrating to treat multiple pallet loads of low-density packages with very good dose uniformity ratios. X-ray sterilization does not require chemical or radioactive material: high-energy X-rays are generated at high intensity by an X-ray generator that does not require shielding when not in use. X-rays are generated by bombarding a dense material (target) such as tantalum or tungsten with high-energy electrons, in a process known as bremsstrahlung conversion. These systems are energy-inefficient, requiring much more electrical energy than other systems for the same result.

Irradiation with X-rays, gamma rays, or electrons does not make materials radioactive, because the energy used is too low. Generally an energy of at least 10 MeV is needed to induce radioactivity in a material.[62] Neutrons and very high-energy particles can make materials radioactive, but have good penetration, whereas lower energy particles (other than neutrons) cannot make materials radioactive, but have poorer penetration.

Sterilization by irradiation with gamma rays may however affect material properties.[63][64]

Irradiation is used by the United States Postal Service to sterilize mail in the Washington, D.C. area. Some foods (e.g., spices and ground meats) are sterilized by irradiation.[65]

Subatomic particles may be more or less penetrating and may be generated by a radioisotope or a device, depending upon the type of particle.

Sterile filtration

[edit]

Fluids that would be damaged by heat, irradiation, or chemical sterilization, such as drug solution, can be sterilized by microfiltration using membrane filters. This method is commonly used for heat labile pharmaceuticals and protein solutions in medicinal drug processing. A microfilter with pore size of usually 0.22 μm will effectively remove microorganisms.[66] Some Staphylococcal species have, however, been shown to be flexible enough to pass through 0.22 μm filters.[67] In the processing of biologics, viruses must be removed or inactivated, requiring the use of nanofilters with a smaller pore size (20–50 nm). Smaller pore sizes lower the flow rate, so in order to achieve higher total throughput or to avoid premature blockage, pre-filters might be used to protect small pore membrane filters. Tangential flow filtration (TFF) and alternating tangential flow (ATF) systems also reduce particulate accumulation and blockage.

Membrane filters used in production processes are commonly made from materials such as mixed cellulose ester or polyethersulfone (PES). The filtration equipment and the filters themselves may be purchased as pre-sterilized disposable units in sealed packaging or must be sterilized by the user, generally by autoclaving at a temperature that does not damage the fragile filter membranes. To ensure proper functioning of the filter, the membrane filters are integrity tested post-use and sometimes before use. The nondestructive integrity test assures that the filter is undamaged and is a regulatory requirement.[68] Typically, terminal pharmaceutical sterile filtration is performed inside of a cleanroom to prevent contamination.

Preservation of sterility

[edit]
A curette in sterile packaging.

Instruments that have undergone sterilization can be maintained in such condition by containment in sealed packaging until use.

Aseptic technique is the act of maintaining sterility during procedures.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Sterilization in is the process of destroying or eliminating all forms of microbial life, including vegetative cells, spores, viruses, and fungi, to render an object, surface, or substance free from viable microorganisms and incapable of transmitting . This complete eradication distinguishes sterilization from disinfection, which targets only pathogenic microbes while potentially leaving spores or non-pathogenic forms intact. In healthcare and laboratory settings, sterilization is essential for preventing the transmission of infectious diseases through contaminated instruments, equipment, and materials, thereby minimizing the risk of healthcare-associated (HAIs). For instance, proper sterilization ensures that surgical tools and medical devices are safe for reuse, reducing the probability of microbial survival to levels that pose negligible risk. Beyond clinical applications, sterilization plays a critical role in research by maintaining aseptic conditions during experiments, culturing, and sample handling to avoid cross-contamination and ensure accurate results. Common sterilization methods in microbiology encompass both physical and chemical approaches, selected based on the material's compatibility and the required efficacy. Physical methods include steam sterilization (autoclaving), which uses moist heat under pressure to achieve temperatures of 121°C for 15-30 minutes, effectively killing resistant endospores; dry-heat sterilization, applied to heat-sensitive items at 160-180°C; and radiation (e.g., gamma rays or electron beams) for sterilizing pharmaceuticals and single-use plastics. Chemical methods, such as ethylene oxide gas or hydrogen peroxide plasma, are favored for heat-labile materials like endoscopes, penetrating packaging to destroy microbes without damaging delicate structures. Filtration, a non-thermal physical technique, removes microbes from heat-sensitive liquids like media or sera by passing them through 0.22 μm pore-size membranes. The efficacy of sterilization processes is validated through biological indicators, such as spores for steam methods, which confirm the destruction of the most resistant microbial forms under controlled conditions. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and CDC emphasize monitoring parameters such as temperature, pressure, and exposure time to ensure compliance with standards, particularly in high-risk environments where incomplete sterilization could lead to outbreaks. Advances in low-temperature sterilization technologies continue to address challenges with complex medical devices, enhancing safety without compromising material integrity.

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Sterilization in microbiology refers to a process that destroys or eliminates all forms of microbial life, including (both vegetative cells and spores), viruses, fungi, and , achieving a state where the probability of any viable surviving is effectively zero. This complete inactivation targets viable microorganisms to ensure sterility, distinguishing it from disinfection, which reduces but does not eliminate all microbial forms, particularly resistant spores. The scope of sterilization encompasses applications in aseptic techniques, medical device processing, pharmaceutical production, and practices where absolute microbial absence is required to prevent and risks, but it excludes routine or surface that merely removes visible . While non-viable microbial remnants may persist, the primary focus remains on viable organisms to assure sterility in controlled environments. The concept originated in 19th-century , pioneered by in the 1860s through experiments demonstrating heat-based sterilization to refute and control spoilage in beverages. These foundational studies evolved into modern standards, such as those established by international bodies like the (ISO), emphasizing validated processes for microbial elimination across diverse settings. Key biological targets include highly resistant forms such as bacterial endospores from species like Clostridium botulinum, which demand rigorous conditions for inactivation due to their protective structures enabling survival in extreme environments.

Principles of Microbial Inactivation

Sterilization processes in microbiology achieve microbial inactivation through targeted disruption of essential cellular components, rendering microorganisms non-viable. Core mechanisms include the denaturation of proteins and enzymes, which alters their three-dimensional structure and impairs critical functions such as metabolism and replication; disruption of cell membranes, leading to leakage of cellular contents and loss of integrity; damage to nucleic acids like DNA and RNA, preventing genetic replication and transcription; and coagulation of cellular contents, which solidifies protoplasm and halts all biological activity. Microbial resistance to inactivation poses significant challenges, primarily due to structural adaptations. Endospores, formed by genera such as and , exhibit high resistance through a dehydrated core stabilized by dipicolinic acid complexed with calcium ions, which protects against , , and chemicals by maintaining low and shielding macromolecules. Biofilms, communities of microorganisms encased in an extracellular polymeric matrix, enhance resistance by limiting penetration of sterilants and providing a protective barrier that can increase tolerance up to 1,000-fold compared to planktonic cells. Prions, although non-microbial proteinaceous agents, are notably resistant due to their misfolded, aggregated that withstands most conventional sterilization methods. Effective sterilization requires controlled parameters to ensure lethality, including sufficient exposure time, temperature, and concentration of the sterilant to achieve penetration into microbial structures and achieve a logarithmic reduction in population, where each log represents a 90% decrease in viable cells (e.g., a 6-log reduction leaves 1 survivor in 1 million). Penetration is crucial, as it determines contact with resistant forms like endospores embedded in materials or biofilms. These factors collectively ensure probabilistic elimination of viable microorganisms, with processes designed to meet sterility assurance levels. Lethality in sterilization arises from distinct types: thermal methods induce coagulation of proteins and cellular contents through ; chemical agents cause , which covalently modifies nucleic acids and proteins, or oxidation, which generates reactive species damaging lipids and enzymes; employs to produce free radicals that induce strand breaks in ; and physical approaches rely on size exclusion, such as , to mechanically remove microorganisms without chemical alteration.

Sterility Assessment and Validation

Quantification of Microbial Kill

The quantification of microbial kill in sterilization processes relies on key metrics that describe the rate and extent of population reduction under controlled conditions. The decimal reduction time, or D-value, represents the time required at a specified to achieve a 90% reduction (one log cycle) in the microbial population, serving as a fundamental measure of thermal resistance. For instance, in steam sterilization, the D-value (D_{121°C}) for spores of typically ranges from 1 to 2 minutes, highlighting the organism's resilience as a benchmark for . Thermal resistance is further characterized by the Z-value, which quantifies the temperature increase needed to alter the D-value by a factor of 10 (one log cycle). In , the Z-value is commonly around 10°C, indicating that a 10°C rise in temperature reduces the required exposure time by 90% for the same level of kill. This parameter allows extrapolation of lethality across temperature variations, essential for optimizing sterilization cycles. Survivor curve analysis underpins these metrics by modeling microbial inactivation as a kinetic , where the logarithm of survivor numbers decreases linearly with exposure time. The relationship is expressed as: log10(NtN0)=t[D](/page/D)\log_{10} \left( \frac{N_t}{N_0} \right) = -\frac{t}{[D](/page/D*)} Here, NtN_t is the number of survivors at time tt, N0N_0 is the initial population, and DD is the decimal reduction time at the given condition. This log-linear kinetics assumes random, independent inactivation events, enabling prediction of survivor numbers from experimental data plotted on semi-logarithmic scales. Biological indicators provide practical validation of these kinetic models through challenge testing with highly resistant microorganisms. Spores of are widely used due to their high D-values in processes, typically inoculated at 10^5 to 10^6 per carrier and subjected to the sterilization cycle; absence of growth post-incubation confirms effective microbial kill. Protocols involve placing indicators at the most challenging sites within the load, followed by recovery in nutrient media to assess viability, ensuring the process achieves the targeted reduction.

Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) and Standards

The (SAL) is defined as the probability that a single viable will survive on an item after exposure to a sterilization process. This metric quantifies the reliability of sterilization by expressing the likelihood of non-sterility, typically as a negative exponent of 10; for instance, an SAL of 10610^{-6} indicates a probability of one viable surviving in one million units processed. In sterilization, an SAL of 10610^{-6} is the standard target to ensure , though alternative levels such as 10510^{-5} may be justified through for certain applications. The SAL is calculated using the SAL=N0×10(t/D)SAL = N_0 \times 10^{-(t/D)}, where N0N_0 is the microbial (), tt is the exposure time, and DD is the decimal reduction time (D-value) for the under the process conditions. This equation integrates microbial inactivation kinetics over the process, often requiring an overkill approach to achieve the target SAL without precise knowledge. In the overkill method, the process is designed to deliver at least a 12-log reduction in microbial , sufficient for an SAL of 10610^{-6} assuming a worst-case of 10610^6 colony-forming units. This conservative strategy uses highly resistant biological indicators to verify , ensuring the process exceeds the actual microbial challenge. Key international standards guide the application and validation of SAL in sterilization. ISO 11138-1:2017 establishes general requirements for the production, labeling, test methods, and performance characteristics of biological indicators used to monitor and validate sterilization processes across various modalities. For moist heat sterilization specifically, ISO 17665:2024 outlines requirements for process development, validation, and routine control, emphasizing the achievement of the target SAL through physical and biological parameters. ANSI/AAMI ST67:2019 provides requirements and risk-based guidance for selecting an appropriate SAL for products labeled as sterile, applicable to both manufacturing and healthcare settings. In hospital environments, ANSI/AAMI ST8:2013/(R)2018 sets minimum construction and performance criteria for steam sterilizers, incorporating SAL verification through biological and physical monitoring. Regulatory bodies enforce SAL compliance for medical devices. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) designates SAL as the primary specification for sterilization validation, requiring demonstration of 10610^{-6} for terminally sterilized devices via methods like overkill or bioburden-based approaches. Under the European Union's Medical Device Regulation (MDR 2017/745), sterile devices must maintain an SAL of 10610^{-6} or better, validated per harmonized standards such as EN ISO 11135:2014/A1:2019 and EN ISO 11137-1:2025, with packaging designed to preserve sterility until use. Validation of sterilization cycles to achieve the SAL involves bioburden testing and half-cycle exposure protocols. Bioburden testing quantifies the initial microbial load on products prior to sterilization, informing the required and ensuring process robustness under worst-case conditions. In half-cycle exposure, biological indicators are subjected to half the routine process time at identified cold spots, targeting a 6- to confirm the full cycle delivers the necessary overkill for an SAL of 10610^{-6}. These methods, combined with physical monitoring, verify in challenging scenarios such as loaded chambers or variable load configurations.

Conventional Thermal Methods

Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist heat sterilization, also known as steam sterilization, employs saturated under pressure to achieve microbial inactivation through thermal energy transfer. This method relies on the of steam, which releases to rapidly and uniformly heat the load, ensuring effective penetration into porous materials and cavities. The standard process involves autoclaving at 121°C and 15 psi (pounds per square inch) for 15 to 30 minutes, depending on the load size and type, to destroy vegetative cells, viruses, fungi, and bacterial spores. The mechanism of microbial kill in involves the and denaturation of proteins and enzymes, leading to irreversible of cellular structures. This is particularly effective against resistant bacterial spores, such as those of , as the presence of moisture facilitates protein , disrupting spore coats and core components. The released during enhances efficiency, allowing lower temperatures and shorter exposure times compared to dry heat methods while achieving high sterility assurance. Common equipment includes gravity displacement autoclaves, which rely on steam to displace cooler air downward through natural convection; prevacuum autoclaves, which use vacuum pulses to remove air before steam admission for faster cycles; and steam-flush pressure pulse systems, which combine vacuum and steam pulses for efficient air removal in complex loads. Air elimination is critical to prevent cold spots, and the Bowie-Dick test is routinely performed in prevacuum and dynamic air-removal sterilizers to verify adequate air evacuation by assessing steam penetration into a folded towel pack. This technique is widely applied to heat-tolerant items in , healthcare, and pharmaceutical settings, including culture media, surgical instruments, glassware, and injectable solutions. For instance, gravity displacement autoclaves are suitable for processing laboratory media and pharmaceutical products, while prevacuum systems are preferred for wrapped instruments to ensure uniform sterilization without moisture retention. Its efficacy against spores makes it ideal for decontaminating regulated medical waste and preparing sterile . Despite its advantages, carries limitations, including the risk of on certain metals due to residual moisture or contaminants like chlorides, and it is unsuitable for heat-sensitive materials such as certain plastics or that may deform or degrade. and routine control must adhere to ISO 17665, which outlines requirements for developing, validating, and monitoring moist heat sterilization to ensure consistent lethality and sterility assurance levels of 10^{-6} or better for medical devices.

Dry Heat Sterilization

Dry heat sterilization employs elevated temperatures in the absence of to achieve microbial inactivation, primarily through conduction, , and of . This method is particularly suited for heat-stable materials that cannot tolerate , such as certain powders, oils, and glassware. The process typically occurs in hot air ovens, where items are exposed to temperatures ranging from 160°C to 180°C for durations of 2 to 4 hours, depending on the load and desired sterility assurance. For instance, common regimens include 170°C for 60 minutes or 160°C for 120 minutes to ensure complete destruction of bacterial spores. In batch operations, static-air or hot air ovens facilitate uniform heat distribution, with the latter using fans for faster circulation and reduced cycle times. For continuous processing in , tunnel sterilizers expose pre-cleaned containers to hot, filtered air in sequential zones of heating, sterilization (often exceeding 250°C), and cooling, enabling high-throughput and sterilization of vials, ampoules, and syringes. These systems maintain unidirectional to minimize while achieving a of 10^{-6}. The primary mechanism of microbial inactivation in dry heat involves oxidative damage to cellular components, including proteins, , and nucleic acids, leading to denaturation, , and eventual . This oxidative process follows a logarithmic survival curve, indicative of a monomolecular reaction, and is more pronounced in aerobic environments due to free radical formation. Compared to moist heat, dry heat is slower because it relies on direct transfer without the enhanced penetration of ; the Z-value, representing the temperature increase needed for a tenfold reduction in decimal reduction time (D-value), is approximately 20°C for resistant spores like those of . Applications of dry heat sterilization are prominent in pharmaceutical cleanrooms for sterilizing moisture-sensitive items, including glass containers, powders, oils, and metallic instruments that require to reduce endotoxins by at least 3 logs. It is also used for substances and equipment impenetrable to , such as certain surgical tools and petroleum-based products, ensuring compliance with standards for parenteral . Despite its efficacy, dry heat sterilization has notable limitations, including poor heat penetration into dense or wrapped loads, which prolongs exposure times and increases energy consumption compared to moist methods. Validation is challenging due to potential uneven heating, necessitating extensive heat distribution and penetration studies with thermocouples and biological indicators like spores placed in worst-case locations. High temperatures can also damage heat-labile materials, limiting its versatility.

Other Thermal Techniques

Other thermal techniques in encompass specialized methods that apply heat in non-conventional ways to achieve sterilization, often tailored for small-scale tools, heat-sensitive materials, or waste disposal where standard moist or dry heat processes are impractical. These approaches leverage direct , high-temperature , intermittent exposure, or heated media to inactivate microorganisms, including spores and resilient agents like prions, but they differ from bulk thermal methods by focusing on rapid, targeted applications. Flaming involves direct exposure of small metal instruments, such as inoculating loops and , to an open flame from a until they glow red hot, typically for a few seconds, providing rapid surface sterilization by of microbial proteins. This technique is widely used in settings for aseptic transfers, as it quickly kills vegetative cells and spores on the instrument surface without requiring additional equipment. However, flaming is superficial and limited to heat-resistant metals, offering no penetration into complex or porous items. Incineration employs high-temperature , generally at 800–1200°C, to completely destroy biohazardous waste, including contaminated materials, animal carcasses, and , by oxidizing and reducing it to ash. This method is particularly effective for large volumes of infectious waste in labs and healthcare facilities, achieving total microbial inactivation through sustained and . Notably, at temperatures exceeding 1000°C effectively eliminates prions, which are highly resistant to other thermal and chemical treatments, making it a preferred disposal option for transmissible spongiform encephalopathy-contaminated materials. Tyndallization, also known as fractional or intermittent sterilization, consists of exposing heat-sensitive liquids or media to flowing at 100°C for 30 minutes on each of three successive days, with incubation periods in between to allow germination. This process first kills vegetative during initial exposures, then targets emerging spores in subsequent cycles, achieving sterility without the high pressures of autoclaving. Developed in the for nutrient broths and sugar solutions that degrade under intense heat, it remains useful for preparing microbiological media intolerant to . Glass bead sterilizers utilize a container of small glass beads heated to 200–250°C, into which the tips of fine instruments like inoculation loops or surgical tools are inserted for 15–30 seconds to transfer heat and denature microbial proteins. This dry heat method provides quick sterilization for small metal items in rodent surgery or lab procedures, avoiding open flames and minimizing risks. It is especially practical in cabinets where Bunsen burners pose hazards. These techniques share limitations, including unsuitability for large volumes or complex geometries due to poor heat penetration and the potential for post-process recontamination if instruments are not handled aseptically. Flaming and glass bead methods, while efficient for surfaces, cannot guarantee sterility for internal structures or non-metallic items, and is restricted to waste rather than reusable equipment. Overall, they complement conventional sterilization but require validation for specific microbial loads to ensure efficacy.

Chemical Sterilization Methods

Gaseous Agents

Gaseous sterilization employs penetrating gases in enclosed systems to inactivate microorganisms on heat- and moisture-sensitive materials, such as plastics and complex medical devices, by exploiting the gases' ability to diffuse through and surfaces. These methods are particularly valuable for items that cannot withstand processes, offering effective microbial kill via chemical reactions that disrupt cellular structures, though they require controlled environments to manage and residuals. Ethylene oxide (EtO) is a widely used alkylating agent that sterilizes by reacting with nucleophilic sites on proteins, DNA, and RNA, preventing microbial replication and causing cell death. The process operates at temperatures of 30–60°C with exposure times typically ranging from 2–6 hours within an overall cycle of 8–12 hours, allowing deep penetration into plastics, lumens, and wrapped items. However, EtO residuals are toxic and carcinogenic, necessitating extended aeration to reduce levels below safety thresholds, with validation guided by ISO 11135 standards that emphasize half-cycle testing for efficacy. Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) provides low-temperature sterilization at around 30°C, enabling rapid cycles with dwell times as short as 15–32 minutes at concentrations of 700–18,000 ppm and 20–60% relative humidity, making it suitable for medical devices like surgical instruments and combination products. It inactivates microbes through oxidative damage, including DNA strand breaks, and is often employed in systems combining vaporized hydrogen peroxide with NO₂ for enhanced compatibility with materials such as stainless steel and polymers. This approach minimizes cytotoxicity and supports faster turnaround compared to traditional gases, though it requires precise control of humidity and gas levels. Ozone (O₃), an oxidizing gas generated in situ from oxygen via electrical discharge or UV light, achieves sterilization at 20–30°C by directly attacking microbial cell membranes, proteins, and DNA through oxidation and hydroxyl radical formation. It is effective for decontaminating rooms, spaces, and surfaces at concentrations of 20–400 ppm with high humidity (>70–90%), demonstrating rapid inactivation of bacteria and fungi, but exhibits poor compatibility with certain materials like rubber and adhesives due to corrosive degradation. The general process for gaseous sterilization involves preconditioning through humidification to achieve 40–75% relative humidity, facilitating gas solubility and microbial susceptibility; followed by exposure to the sterilant under controlled temperature, pressure, and concentration; and concluding with aeration to remove residuals via heated air circulation at 35–60°C. Efficacy is validated using biological indicators such as Bacillus atrophaeus spores (ATCC 9372), which resist alkylation and oxidation, ensuring a sterility assurance level through half-cycle exposure demonstrating at least 6-log reduction.

Liquid Agents

Liquid chemical agents are employed in for high-level disinfection and sterilization processes, particularly suitable for heat-sensitive, immersible medical devices and surfaces where direct contact ensures efficacy. These agents typically involve immersion in aqueous solutions that inactivate microorganisms through chemical reactions targeting cellular components, achieving sterility assurance levels comparable to methods under controlled conditions. Unlike gaseous agents, which offer superior penetration into complex geometries, liquid methods rely on prolonged exposure and mechanical agitation for uniform distribution, making them ideal for items like endoscopes and surgical instruments that cannot withstand autoclaving. Aldehydes such as and represent cornerstone liquid sterilants due to their ability to cross-link proteins and nucleic acids, disrupting and reproduction. , often used at 2% concentration in alkaline solutions, requires a 10-hour immersion at room temperature to achieve sporicidal activity against bacterial endospores, though it is effective for high-level disinfection of fiberoptic endoscopes and other lensed instruments with 20-90 minute immersion times; the longer exposure for full sterilization is not typically practical for routine use. , typically at 4-8% in aqueous solutions, functions similarly by alkylating amino and sulfhydryl groups, though its use has declined due to concerns; it was historically applied for sterilizing dialysis equipment via immersion for several hours. Both agents maintain activity in the presence of but necessitate thorough rinsing to prevent residual to patients. Hydrogen peroxide serves as an oxidative liquid sterilant, available in concentrations ranging from 6% to 25% for immersion-based protocols, where it generates hydroxyl radicals that damage microbial DNA, proteins, and lipids. In solution form, it exhibits sporicidal effects after 6 hours of exposure at 20-25°C, making it suitable for decontaminating immersible medical devices like respiratory equipment; accelerated low-temperature vaporization of hydrogen peroxide (around 40-60°C) enhances its penetration for semi-critical items without full liquid submersion. This agent's broad-spectrum activity includes viruses, bacteria, and fungi, with minimal residue concerns as it decomposes to water and oxygen. Peracetic acid, a potent oxidizer used at 0.2% concentrations, offers rapid sterilization cycles of 10-30 minutes at ambient temperatures by denaturing proteins and disrupting cell membranes through perhydrolysis reactions. Its sporicidal efficacy stems from the formation of , effective against a wide range of pathogens including difficile spores, and it decomposes into acetic acid, water, and oxygen—environmentally benign byproducts that simplify . Commonly applied in pharmaceutical and for sterilizing tanks and piping, peracetic acid's instability requires on-site generation or stabilized formulations to maintain potency. Despite their utility, liquid chemical agents present limitations including potential of metals and degradation of plastics, necessitating compatibility testing for treated materials. Worker exposure risks, such as respiratory from vapors, demand stringent ventilation and during handling. Additionally, efficacy in narrow lumens or crevices is compromised without agitation or forced flow, often requiring pre-cleaning to remove biofilms that shield microorganisms.

Challenges with Prions

Prions are infectious agents composed of misfolded proteins, such as the isoform PrP^Sc associated with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), which lack nucleic acids and exhibit exceptional resistance to denaturation processes that target conventional microbial structures. This proteinaceous nature renders prions impervious to many standard chemical sterilants that rely on disrupting nucleic acids or cellular components, posing unique challenges in sterilization protocols where complete inactivation is critical to prevent iatrogenic transmission. Chemical methods alone demonstrate limited efficacy against prions; for instance, immersion in 1 N (NaOH) for 1 hour achieves partial inactivation but requires subsequent processing for reliability, while , a common liquid sterilant, proves ineffective without adjunct measures due to prions' stability. Similarly, at 20,000 ppm available offers some reduction in infectivity but can corrode instruments and is not sufficient standalone. Emerging has explored , such as those in formulations like Environ LpH, which show promise in reducing prion infectivity by several logs in brain homogenates, though their mechanisms involve protein complexation rather than denaturation and require validation for routine use. Combined approaches enhance outcomes, with protocols integrating chemical exposure and heat—such as 1 N NaOH immersion followed by autoclaving at 121°C for 30-60 minutes—demonstrating greater than 5-log reduction in infectivity in model systems. Alternatively, at 20,000 ppm combined with steam at 134°C for 18 minutes has been effective, though instrument compatibility remains a concern. Regulatory bodies like the (WHO) emphasize physical destruction methods, such as , over purely chemical sterilization for -contaminated surgical instruments in high-risk scenarios, recommending stringent combined protocols only when disposal is impractical and advising of potentially exposed tools.

Radiation and Filtration Methods

Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation

Radiation-based sterilization in employs electromagnetic or particle to inactivate microorganisms through physical and chemical disruption, offering a chemical-free alternative to or gaseous methods. , which includes gamma rays and electron beams, penetrates materials deeply to achieve high sterility assurance levels (SAL), while , such as , is limited to surface or fluid applications due to its shallow penetration. These techniques are widely used for heat-sensitive items in pharmaceutical and medical contexts, guided by international standards to ensure efficacy and safety. Ionizing radiation primarily utilizes gamma rays emitted from cobalt-60 (Co-60) sources or electron beams (E-beam) accelerated to energies around 10 MeV for sterilization. Gamma irradiation from Co-60 delivers omnidirectional photons that penetrate densely packed products, typically requiring a dose of 25 kGy to achieve an SAL of 10^{-6} for microbial inactivation. E-beam systems, operating at 10 MeV, provide directed high-energy electrons for faster processing but with shallower penetration compared to gamma rays, suitable for thinner or less dense materials. The primary mechanism involves the generation of free radicals from water molecules in microbial cells, which indirectly damage DNA by causing strand breaks and base modifications, leading to reproductive death of bacteria, viruses, and spores. Non-ionizing radiation, particularly ultraviolet-C (UV-C) at 254 nm wavelength, targets surface sterilization by directly absorbing into microbial DNA, forming that prevent replication. This method excels in decontaminating air, , and exposed surfaces in controlled environments but cannot penetrate solids or opaque materials effectively, limiting its use to non-packaged applications. Principles of microbial inactivation by emphasize dose-dependent damage to cellular components, with ionizing forms causing both direct and indirect radical-mediated effects. The sterilization process incorporates precise to verify absorbed doses, often using pellets analyzed via electron spin resonance (ESR) for accurate measurement during validation and routine control. Applications include sterilizing single-use plastics like syringes and tubing, as well as heat-labile pharmaceuticals and biologics, where ensures sterility without residues. These methods adhere to ISO 11137 standards, which outline requirements for process development, validation, and in radiation sterilization of products. Despite their , limitations include shadowing effects in E-beam , where uneven exposure occurs behind dense areas, potentially requiring product reconfiguration. Material degradation, such as embrittlement or discoloration in polymers, can arise from oxidative chain scission at doses above 25 kGy, necessitating compatibility testing. While no chemical residuals are introduced, the high for facilities and sources like Co-60 contribute to elevated operational expenses compared to other methods.

Sterile Filtration

Sterile filtration is a physical method employed in to achieve sterility by mechanically removing microorganisms from fluids through porous membranes, without relying on or chemical agents. This technique is particularly valuable for sterilizing heat-sensitive solutions where thermal methods could degrade the product. The process relies on the size-exclusion principle, where microbes larger than the membrane's pore size are retained, ensuring the filtrate meets sterility requirements as defined by pharmacopeial standards. Sterilizing-grade filters typically feature nominal pore sizes of 0.2 μm or 0.22 μm, which are effective at retaining most , as bacterial cells generally exceed 0.2 μm in diameter under standard conditions. Common membrane materials include polyethersulfone (PES) for its high flow rates and low protein binding, and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) for its chemical resistance and compatibility with a broad range of solvents. Filters are classified as absolute if they guarantee retention of all particles above the specified size or as sterilizing-grade if validated to achieve complete microbial removal through bacterial challenge testing. The filtration process can operate in dead-end mode, where the entire volume passes perpendicularly through the , or in tangential flow mode, where the flows parallel to the surface to minimize accumulation of retentate and extend filter life. testing, essential for verifying filter performance post-use or pre-sterilization, includes methods such as the test, which measures the required to force gas through wetted pores, and the diffusive flow test, which detects leaks via gas rates. These tests are standardized under ASTM F838, which outlines bacterial retention validation using challenge organisms like diminuta to confirm values exceeding 7 for sterilizing-grade filters. In pharmaceutical applications, sterile filtration is widely used for heat-labile liquids such as intravenous solutions, biologicals, and vaccines, where it removes and particulates larger than the pore size. However, most es, which are generally smaller than 0.2 μm, are not retained by standard sterile filtration and require additional virus removal processes for . For viral clearance in biologics, specialized nanofiltration or other methods are employed in addition to sterile filtration. However, standard 0.2 μm filters may not reliably retain , which can measure as small as 0.1 μm, necessitating specialized 0.1 μm membranes for applications requiring removal, such as media. This method ensures sterility assurance levels (SAL) of 10^{-6} or better when combined with low pre-filtration. Limitations of sterile filtration include susceptibility to clogging from high particulate loads or viscous fluids, which can reduce throughput and require frequent filter replacement. It is less suitable for fluids with high , as excessive microbial content accelerates , and validation focuses on reduction studies to predict performance under process conditions. Additionally, the technique does not inactivate microbes smaller than the pore size, emphasizing the need for upstream clarification.

Emerging Sterilization Technologies

Plasma and Supercritical Fluid Methods

Low-temperature plasma, also known as cold plasma, represents an emerging sterilization method in microbiology that utilizes ionized gases to generate reactive species for microbial inactivation without excessive heat. This technology typically employs radio-frequency (RF) or microwave discharges to create plasma from gases such as argon/oxygen mixtures or ambient air, producing short-lived reactive oxygen species (ROS) like hydroxyl (OH) radicals and other oxidants. These species, along with ultraviolet (UV) radiation and physical etching effects, disrupt microbial cell membranes, damage DNA, and cause spore shrinkage, combining chemical oxidation with mechanical disruption to achieve broad-spectrum efficacy against bacteria, fungi, viruses, and spores. Operating at temperatures below 50°C for cycles of 1-10 minutes, cold plasma is particularly suited for heat-sensitive materials like medical implants and devices, where traditional thermal methods would cause degradation. The efficacy of cold plasma sterilization is demonstrated by its ability to achieve at least a 6-log reduction in microbial load, meeting sterility assurance levels (SAL) of 10^{-6} for resistant endospores such as those of . For instance, treatments can inactivate and biofilms in as little as 5 minutes for pathogens like . Key advantages include the absence of toxic chemical residuals, as the plasma byproducts decompose into harmless water and oxygen, and its eco-friendly profile due to low energy consumption and lack of hazardous emissions. gas plasma systems, a variant of this technology, have received FDA clearance for sterilization, with multiple 510(k) approvals for systems like STERRAD post-2010, enabling their use in healthcare settings for sensitive instruments. Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) sterilization leverages the unique properties of CO2 in its supercritical state—above its critical point of 31.1°C and 73.8 bar (approximately 73 atm)—to penetrate materials like a gas while exerting liquid-like solvating power for microbial inactivation. Often enhanced with additives such as or water, scCO2 facilitates disruption through lipid extraction, intracellular acidification via formation, and physical rupture under pressure, effectively targeting vegetative , fungi, viruses, and even spores when combined with sterilants. This method operates at mild temperatures around 31-40°C and pressures of 100-200 bar, allowing deep penetration into complex structures without damage, making it ideal for applications like sterilizing spices, biological tissues, and pharmaceutical scaffolds. Studies show scCO2 achieves 6- to 9-log reductions in microbial populations, such as complete inactivation of Bacillus cereus spores at 60°C and 205 bar over 2-4 hours, surpassing requirements for sterility in biomedical materials. Its primary benefits stem from leaving no toxic residuals upon depressurization, as CO2 evaporates completely, and its environmentally sustainable nature, avoiding organic solvents or irradiation while preserving product integrity like nutrient content in foods. The FDA has cleared scCO2 processes for certain medical devices since 2022, including as a terminal sterilization step in manufacturing, with ongoing collaborations to expand adoption as of 2025; highlighting its growing role as a green alternative to ethylene oxide.

Advanced UV and Other Innovations

Advancements in ultraviolet (UV) technology have focused on light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and excimer lamps to enhance microbial inactivation while improving portability and safety. UV-LED systems operating in the narrow-band 260-280 nm range target DNA and RNA of microorganisms, achieving superior spore inactivation compared to broader-spectrum sources, with dual-wavelength (260 nm and 280 nm) setups demonstrating over 3-log reduction of bacteria like Escherichia coli in water at doses of ≤12 mJ/cm² within minutes of exposure. These portable devices are particularly effective for on-site disinfection of surfaces and liquids, such as in water treatment, where fungal spores like Aspergillus niger exhibit approximately 2-log immediate inactivation under controlled UV-LED irradiation at doses of 255–290 mJ/cm². In the 2020s, excimer lamps emitting at 222 nm (far-UVC) have improved efficacy for continuous air disinfection, inactivating airborne human coronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2 by over 99.9% at doses below human safety thresholds (e.g., 4–6 J/m² for 90% inactivation of proxy coronaviruses, extrapolated to SARS-CoV-2). Far-UVC at 222 nm penetrates only the outer dead layer of and eyes, minimizing to living tissues while providing broad-spectrum action, with post-2020 studies—including 2024–2025 clinical trials on ocular and low-dose continuous exposure—confirming no increased risk of or in susceptible models after prolonged exposure up to 10 kJ/m². This enables safe, real-time sterilization in occupied spaces, such as hospitals, without halting operations. Pulsed broad-spectrum light, generated by flash lamps spanning UV to (100-1000 nm), delivers high-intensity pulses for rapid surface , achieving 1-5 log reductions of , yeasts, and molds in seconds through photochemical DNA damage and thermal disruption. In packaging applications, this non-thermal method sterilizes materials like and without residues or distortion, often exceeding 6-log reduction for spores like Bacillus subtilis in aseptic processing lines. Other innovations include high-intensity (HIFU) for liquid sterilization, where 2-MHz focused beams generate acoustic pressures up to 16 MPa to disrupt bacterial cell walls non-thermally, yielding approximately 2-log inactivation of planktonic E. coli in suspensions within 10 minutes. complements this for food applications, combining with UV effects to achieve 4-5 log reductions of pathogens like and in products such as milk and juices in under 20 seconds, preserving nutritional quality while extending .

Applications

Food and Pharmaceutical Industries

In the , sterilization plays a crucial role in ensuring product safety and extending shelf life by eliminating pathogens such as and heat-resistant bacterial spores, including those of . through retort processing, a moist heat method, involves heating low-acid foods ( > 4.6) in sealed containers to 121°C for a sufficient duration to achieve commercial sterility, typically targeting a 12-log reduction in C. botulinum spores. This process is essential for products like soups, , and meats, preventing while maintaining nutritional integrity under controlled conditions. Aseptic complements thermal sterilization by processing products like ultra-high temperature (UHT) at 138–140°C for 2–5 seconds before filling into pre-sterilized containers, allowing room-temperature storage for months without . These methods integrate with and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems to identify and control microbial hazards at critical processing stages, such as heating and sealing, ensuring compliance with regulations. In the , sterilization ensures the integrity of products, particularly injectables, by preventing microbial that could lead to infections or product degradation. Terminal sterilization, often using gamma at doses of 25–40 kGy, is applied to filled vials and syringes to achieve sterility post-packaging, preserving the stability of heat-sensitive formulations like certain antibiotics and . Aseptic filling, an alternative for drugs, involves processing and filling components in a controlled environment to maintain sterility throughout, with final products subjected to rigorous validation. Compliance with (USP) General Chapter <71> requires sterility testing via membrane filtration or direct inoculation methods, confirming the absence of viable microorganisms in representative samples. control in ISO-certified cleanrooms is paramount, with pre-filtration limits typically below 10 colony-forming units (CFU) per 100 mL to minimize risks during production. Representative examples illustrate these applications' versatility. Gamma irradiation at 7–10 kGy effectively reduces microbial loads in spices and herbs, controlling pathogens like without significantly altering flavor or nutritional profiles, as approved by regulatory bodies for commercial use. For pharmaceutical oral liquids, sterile filtration through 0.22 μm membranes removes and particulates from solutions like syrups or suspensions, ensuring sterility when would degrade active ingredients. These techniques highlight the balance between efficacy and product quality in industrial settings. Challenges in these industries include nutrient degradation from thermal processing, where high temperatures accelerate the loss of heat-labile vitamins like C and by up to 50% in some canned goods, necessitating formulation adjustments or milder alternatives. Off-flavors, such as metallic or cooked notes from oxidation or Maillard reactions, can emerge in sterilized products, impacting consumer acceptance and requiring antioxidants or optimized processing parameters. Integrating HACCP principles helps mitigate these by monitoring critical limits for time, temperature, and , though it demands ongoing validation to address variability in raw materials.

Medical and Surgical Contexts

In medical and surgical contexts, sterilization is essential for preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) by ensuring that instruments and devices entering sterile body areas are free of viable s. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) outlines the Spaulding classification system, which categorizes medical devices based on infection risk: critical items (e.g., surgical instruments entering sterile tissue) require sterilization; semicritical items (e.g., endoscopes contacting mucous membranes) need high-level disinfection; and noncritical items (e.g., blood pressure cuffs) require low- or intermediate-level disinfection. This framework guides reprocessing protocols to minimize risks, with sterilization reserved for high-risk applications to achieve a of 10^{-6}, meaning the probability of a viable microorganism surviving is less than one in a million. In surgical settings, flash sterilization—using at 132°C for 3 minutes under 27-28 psi in displacement autoclaves—enables rapid processing of unwrapped instruments needed urgently during procedures, though it is not recommended for routine use due to potential incomplete penetration in complex loads. Central processing departments in hospitals typically handle low-temperature methods like (EtO) gas for heat-sensitive implants, such as orthopedic prosthetics, involving preconditioning, gas exposure (typically 8-12 hours total cycle), and to remove residuals, ensuring compatibility with moisture- and heat-vulnerable materials. For example, (H2O2) gas plasma systems sterilize laparoscopic tools in cycles of 45-75 minutes at low temperatures (around 50°C), diffusing vapor that forms free radicals to inactivate microbes without damaging delicate or . Monitoring efficacy involves process challenge devices (PCDs), which simulate worst-case loads with biological indicators like spores to validate cycle performance. In medical contexts, reprocessing semicritical devices like flexible endoscopes often employs (PAA) at concentrations of 0.2-0.35% for high-level disinfection or sterilization, with automated systems allowing 10-30 minute cycles followed by rinsing to address risks in lumens. Single-use devices, such as catheters and syringes, are commonly pre-sterilized via gamma using sources (doses of 25-40 kGy), a suitable for high-volume production that penetrates without residues. These practices have contributed to reducing HAIs, including surgical site infections (SSIs), which occur in approximately 1-3% of procedures despite adherence to guidelines. Post-2020, amid COVID-19-related shortages of sterile supplies, healthcare facilities emphasized rapid-cycle technologies like low-temperature plasma and vaporized H2O2 to support device reuse and maintain surgical throughput, highlighting vulnerabilities in supply chains.00057-3/fulltext)

Aerospace and Environmental Uses

In aerospace applications, sterilization is critical for planetary protection to prevent forward contamination of extraterrestrial environments by Earth microorganisms. During the Viking missions to Mars in the 1970s, spacecraft components underwent dry-heat microbial reduction (DHMR) at approximately 110–112°C for up to 24 hours to achieve a significant bioburden reduction, ensuring compliance with early planetary protection protocols. Ethylene oxide (EtO) gas was also employed for sterilizing heat-sensitive parts of Mars landers, providing an effective alternative to thermal methods for delicate instrumentation. NASA's procedural guidelines, outlined in NPG 5340.1, standardize microbiological assays and bioburden limits for spacecraft hardware, mandating DHMR as the primary technique for rovers and landers to meet Category IVa planetary protection requirements, typically targeting a spore bioburden of less than 300 per square meter. For modern rovers like those in the Mars Science Laboratory mission, DHMR involves heating assembled hardware to 110°C for 24 hours or equivalent time-temperature combinations to reduce microbial loads by at least 4 logs. Environmental sterilization methods are essential for maintaining ultra-clean conditions in controlled facilities such as ISO 5 cleanrooms, where (H2O2) vapor is widely used for room-wide bio-decontamination. This gaseous process achieves a 6-log reduction of spores at concentrations of 35% H2O2 with 20-minute exposure times, effectively targeting resistant microbes without residue concerns. (UV-C) irradiation complements H2O2 in cleanrooms by inactivating airborne and surface microorganisms through DNA damage, often integrated into pass-through systems to prevent ingress of contaminants during material transfer. In biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) laboratories, bio-decontamination relies on vaporized H2O2 or for suite and equipment sterilization, ensuring containment of high-risk pathogens during maintenance or transfer, with protocols requiring validation to confirm sporicidal efficacy. Ozone-based systems provide an example of environmental sterilization in (HVAC) units within controlled settings, where combined ozone and UV-C treatments reduce airborne pathogens by at least 2 logs, minimizing microbial in high-stakes environments. Key challenges include mitigating forward contamination risks during space missions, as governed by COSPAR guidelines, which categorize targets like Mars under strict controls to limit inadvertent microbial release probabilities to less than 1 × 10^{-5} per mission. Emerging plasma-based technologies, such as the Active Plasma Sterilizer (APS), offer low-temperature alternatives for habitat decontamination on future lunar or Martian outposts, achieving rapid microbial inactivation through reactive species without damaging sensitive electronics.

Sterility Maintenance and Monitoring

Preservation Strategies

Preservation strategies in sterilization microbiology focus on preventing microbial recontamination after the initial sterilization process, ensuring long-term sterility during storage, , and handling of items such as medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and biological materials. These methods rely on physical barriers, controlled environments, and procedural protocols to inhibit microbial ingress and growth, thereby extending the usable while maintaining a high . Packaging plays a critical role in maintaining post-sterilization sterility by providing a microbial barrier that allows sterilizing agents to penetrate while preventing subsequent contamination. pouches, made from fibers, offer breathable barriers compatible with methods like , , and , effectively resisting microbial penetration and supporting device integrity. Foil-laminated materials are commonly used for radiation-sterilized items to block light and moisture, enhancing protection against oxidative degradation. For surgical applications, double-wrapping techniques, often employing spunbond-meltblown-spunbond () fabrics or combined layers, provide an additional barrier layer, reducing the risk of breach during handling and storage. Environmental controls are essential to minimize airborne contaminants and inhibit microbial regrowth in storage areas. Cleanrooms classified under standards, such as ISO Class 5 or higher, maintain low particle counts through high-efficiency particulate air () filtration, creating controlled atmospheres for handling sterile items; these spaces often incorporate laminar flow hoods that direct filtered air unidirectionally over work surfaces to sustain localized sterility. , achieved by reducing relative below 30-60%, further inhibits microbial regrowth by limiting water availability, a key factor in preventing spore or vegetative cell in packaged materials. Aseptic techniques during handling ensure that sterility is not compromised post-process. Personnel employ sterile gloving to avoid direct contact with non-sterile surfaces, coupled with no-touch handling protocols that prioritize indirect manipulation of items using or drapes, thereby minimizing transfer of or environmental microbes. Shelf-life extension can also be achieved through modified atmosphere packaging, where oxygen levels are reduced and inert gases like or are introduced to suppress aerobic microbial activity, particularly in pharmaceutical and food applications. Key factors influencing package integrity include and light exposure, which can degrade materials over time and create pathways for . Excessive above 60% promotes microbial proliferation on packaging surfaces or weakens seals, while or visible light accelerates breakdown in materials like . Studies on gamma-sterilized medical devices packaged in have demonstrated stability for at least five years under controlled conditions, with no loss of microbial barrier function when integrity is maintained.

Validation and Quality Control

Validation and quality control in sterilization processes involve systematic monitoring and assurance mechanisms to verify that microbial inactivation meets required sterility assurance levels (SAL), typically targeting 10^{-6} as per ISO 11137 standards. These practices ensure ongoing compliance with regulatory requirements, preventing risks in microbiology-dependent applications such as pharmaceutical production and manufacturing. Monitoring encompasses physical, chemical, and biological indicators to evaluate sterilization . Physical indicators, including and charts from recording devices, track cycle parameters like heat exposure in autoclaves to confirm operational conditions. Chemical indicators, such as sterilization tape that changes color upon exposure to heat or , provide immediate visual confirmation of process attainment. Biological indicators, utilizing spore strips of resistant microorganisms like , directly assess lethality by incubating post-cycle samples to detect survivor viability, offering the most reliable measure of microbial kill. For sterilizers, daily Bowie-Dick tests simulate air removal using a test pack to detect penetration failures, ensuring uniform distribution as mandated by ISO 17665. Quality control integrates audits, investigations, and release protocols under frameworks like , which requires regular internal audits to evaluate the for sterilization. Failure investigations analyze deviations, such as indicator inconsistencies, through root cause assessment and corrective actions to maintain process integrity. Parametric release for sterilization allows product distribution based on verified physical parameters like readings, bypassing routine biological testing when validated controls demonstrate consistent SAL achievement. Revalidation is triggered by equipment modifications, process failures, or shifts in operational conditions to reconfirm sterilization performance. Trend analysis of levels—microbial counts on pre-sterilization items—guides revalidation frequency, identifying upward patterns that may necessitate cycle adjustments per ISO 11737 guidelines. Post-2020 developments, influenced by supply chain disruptions from the , have incorporated digital logging for real-time data capture via electronic record systems, enhancing traceability and compliance in sterilization monitoring. applications now optimize cycle parameters, such as predictive modeling for energy-efficient heat distribution, reducing variability amid material shortages while upholding sterility standards.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.