Hubbry Logo
Flight attendantFlight attendantMain
Open search
Flight attendant
Community hub
Flight attendant
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Flight attendant
Flight attendant
from Wikipedia

Flight attendant
An Austrian Airlines flight attendant directing a passenger to his seat
Occupation
Synonyms
  • Air host/hostess
  • Steward/stewardess
Occupation type
Profession
Activity sectors

A flight attendant is a member of the aircrew whose primary responsibility is ensure the safety of passengers in the cabin of an aircraft across all stages of flight. Their secondary duty is to see to the comfort of passengers. Flight attendants are also known as a steward (MASC) or stewardess (FEM), or air host (MASC) or air hostess (FEM) and are collectively referred to as cabin crew.

History

[edit]
Dutch flight attendants, Istanbul, 1959

The role of a flight attendant derives from that of similar positions on passenger ships or passenger trains, but has more direct involvement with passengers because of the confined quarters on aircraft. Additionally, the job of a flight attendant revolves around safety to a much greater extent than those of similar staff on other forms of transportation. Flight attendants on board a flight collectively form a cabin crew, as distinguished from pilots and engineers in the cockpit.

The German Heinrich Kubis was the world's first flight attendant, in 1912 aboard a Zeppelin.[1] Kubis first attended to the passengers on board the DELAG Zeppelin LZ 10 Schwaben. He also attended to the famous LZ 129 Hindenburg and was on board when it burst into flames. He survived by jumping out a window when it neared the ground.[2]

Origins of the word "steward" in transportation are reflected in the term "chief steward" as used in maritime transport terminology. The term purser and chief steward are often used interchangeably describing personnel with similar duties among seafaring occupations. This lingual derivation results from the international British maritime tradition (i.e. chief mate) dating back to the 14th century and the civilian United States Merchant Marine on which U.S. aviation is somewhat modelled. Due to international law, conventions and agreements, in which all ships' personnel who sail internationally are similarly documented, see Merchant Mariner's Document, by their respective countries, the U.S. Merchant Marine assigns such duties to the chief steward in the overall rank and command structure of which pursers are not positionally represented or rostered.

Nelly Diener, the first female flight attendant in Europe, hired in May 1934. She was killed on the plane pictured behind her, in the July 1934 Swissair Tuttlingen accident.

Imperial Airways of the United Kingdom had "cabin boys" or "stewards"; in the 1920s.[3] In the US, Stout Airways was the first to employ stewards in 1926, working on Ford Trimotor planes between Detroit and Grand Rapids, Michigan. Western Airlines (1928) and Pan American World Airways (Pan Am) (1929) were the first US carriers to employ stewards to serve food. Ten-passenger Fokker aircraft used in the Caribbean had stewards in the era of gambling trips to Havana, Cuba from Key West, Florida. Lead flight attendants would in many instances also perform the role of purser, steward, or chief steward in modern aviation terminology.

The first female flight attendant was a 25-year-old registered nurse named Ellen Church.[4] Hired by United Airlines in 1930,[5] she also first envisioned nurses on aircraft. Other airlines followed suit, hiring nurses to serve as flight attendants, then called "stewardesses" or "air hostesses", on most of their flights. In the United States, the job was one of only a few in the 1930s to permit women, which, coupled with the Great Depression, led to large numbers of applicants for the few positions available. Two thousand women applied for just 43 positions offered by Transcontinental and Western Airlines in December 1935.[6]

Washing dishes during a Qantas Airlines flight, 1949

Female flight attendants rapidly replaced male ones, and by 1936, they had all but taken over the role.[5] They were selected not only for their knowledge but also for their physical characteristics.[7] A 1936 article in The New York Times described the requirements:

The girls who qualify for hostesses must be petite; weight 100 to 118 pounds;[a] height 5 feet to 5 feet 4 inches;[b] age 20 to 26 years. Add to that the rigid physical examination each must undergo four times every year, and you are assured of the bloom that goes with perfect health.[5]

Three decades later, a 1966 New York Times classified ad for stewardesses at Eastern Airlines listed these requirements:

A high school graduate, single (widows and divorcees with no children considered), 20 years of age (girls 1912 may apply for future consideration). 5'2" but no more than 5'9[c] weight 105 to 135[d] in proportion to height and have at least 20/40 vision without glasses.[8]

Appearance was considered one of the most important factors to become a stewardess. At that time, airlines believed that the exploitation of female sexuality would increase their profits; thus the uniforms of female flight attendants were often formfitting, complete with white gloves and high heels.[9]

Flight attendant circa 1970

In the United States, they were required to be unmarried and were fired if they decided to marry.[6] The requirement to be a registered nurse on an American airline was relaxed as more women were hired,[6] and disappeared almost entirely during World War II as many nurses joined military nurse corps.

Ruth Carol Taylor was the first African-American flight attendant in the United States.[10] Hired in December 1957,[11] on 11 February 1958, Taylor was the flight attendant on a Mohawk Airlines flight from Ithaca to New York, the first time such a position had been held by an African American.[12] She was let go within six months as a result of Mohawk's then-common marriage ban.[13] Patricia Banks Edmiston became the first black flight attendant for Capitol Airlines in 1960 following a legal complaint which resulted in the airline being required to hire her.[14]

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) first complainants were female flight attendants complaining of age discrimination, weight requirements, and bans on marriage.[15] (Originally female flight attendants were fired if they reached age 32 or 35 depending on the airline, were fired if they exceeded weight regulations, and were required to be single upon hiring and fired if they got married.[16]) In 1968, the EEOC declared age restrictions on flight attendants' employment to be illegal sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[17] Also in 1968, the EEOC ruled that sex was not a bona fide occupational requirement to be a flight attendant.[18] The restriction of hiring only women was lifted at all airlines in 1971 due to the decisive court case of Diaz v. Pan Am.[19] The Airline Deregulation Act was passed in 1978, and the no-marriage rule was eliminated throughout the US airline industry by the 1980s.[20] The last such broad categorical discrimination, the weight restrictions,[21] were relaxed in the 1990s through litigation and negotiations.[22] Airlines still often have vision and height requirements and may require flight attendants to pass a medical evaluation.[23]

Overview

[edit]

The role of a flight attendant is to "provide routine services and respond to emergencies to ensure the safety and comfort of airline passengers".[24]

Typically flight attendants require holding a high school diploma or equivalent, and in the United States, the median annual wage for flight attendants was $50,500 in May 2017, higher than the median for all workers of $37,690.[24][25]

The number of flight attendants required on flights is mandated by each country's regulations. In the U.S., for light planes with 19 or fewer seats, or, if weighing more than 7,500 lb (3,400 kg), 9 or fewer seats, no flight attendant is needed; on larger aircraft, one flight attendant per 50 passenger seats is required.[26]

The majority of flight attendants for most airlines are female, though a substantial number of males have entered the industry since 1980.[27]

Responsibilities

[edit]
An EgyptAir flight attendant performing a pre-flight safety demonstration

Prior to each flight, flight attendants and pilots go over safety and emergency checklists, the locations of emergency equipment and other features specific to that aircraft type. Boarding particulars are verified, such as special needs passengers, small children travelling alone, or VIPs. Weather conditions are discussed including anticipated turbulence. A safety check is conducted to ensure equipment such as life-vests, torches (flash lights) and firefighting equipment are on board and in proper condition. They monitor the cabin for any unusual smells or situations. They assist with the loading of carry-on baggage, checking for weight, size and dangerous goods. They make sure those sitting in emergency exit rows are willing and able to assist in an evacuation. They then give a safety demonstration or monitor passengers as they watch a safety video. They then must "secure the cabin" ensuring tray tables are stowed, seats are in their upright positions, armrests down and carry-ons stowed correctly and seat belts are fastened prior to take-off.[28]

Aeroflot flight attendant, Belgrade (2017)

Once up in the air, flight attendants will usually serve drinks and/or food to passengers using an airline service trolley. The duty has led to the mildly derogatory slang term "trolley dolly".[29] When not performing customer service duties, flight attendants must periodically conduct cabin checks and listen for any unusual noises or situations. Checks must also be done on the lavatory to ensure the smoke detector has not been disabled or destroyed and to restock supplies as needed. Regular cockpit checks must be done to ensure the health and safety of the pilot(s). They must also respond to call lights dealing with special requests. During turbulence, flight attendants must ensure the cabin is secure. Prior to landing, all loose items, trays and rubbish must be collected and secured along with service and galley equipment. All hot liquids must be disposed of. A final cabin check must then be completed prior to landing. It is vital that flight attendants remain aware as the majority of emergencies occur during take-off and landing.[30] Upon landing, flight attendants must remain stationed at exits and monitor the aircraft and cabin as passengers disembark the plane. They also assist any special needs passengers and small children off the aeroplane and escort children, while following the proper paperwork and ID process to escort them to the designated person picking them up.

Flight attendants for Germanwings delivering in-flight services

Flight attendants are trained to deal with a wide variety of emergencies, and are trained in first aid. More frequent situations may include a bleeding nose, illness, small injuries, intoxicated passengers, aggressive and anxiety stricken passengers. Emergency training includes rejected take-offs, emergency landings, cardiac and in-flight medical situations, smoke in the cabin, fires, depressurisation, on-board births and deaths, dangerous goods and spills in the cabin, emergency evacuations, hijackings, and water landings. [citation needed]

Cabin chimes and overhead panel lights

[edit]

On most commercial airliners, flight attendants receive various forms of notification on board the aircraft in the form of audible chimes and coloured lights above their stations. While the colours and chimes are not universal and may vary between airlines and aircraft types, these colours and chimes are generally the most commonly used:

  • Pink (Boeing) or Red (Airbus): interphone calls from the cockpit to a flight attendant and/or interphone calls between two flight attendants, the latter case if a green light is not present or being used for the same purpose (steady with high-low chime), or all services emergency call (flashing with repeated high-low chime). On some airlines Airbus' aircraft (such as Delta Air Lines), this light is accompanied by a high-medium-low chime to call the purser. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner uses a separate red light to indicate a sterile flight deck while using pink for interphone calls from the cockpit.
  • Blue: call from passenger in seat (steady with single high chime).
  • Amber: call from passenger in lavatory (steady with single high chime), or lavatory smoke detector set off (flashing with repeated high chime).
  • Green: on some aircraft (some airlines Airbus aircraft, and the Boeing 787), this colour is used to indicate interphone calls between two flight attendants, distinguishing them from the pink or red light used for interphone calls made from the flight deck to a flight attendant, and is also accompanied with a high-low chime like the pink or red light. On the Boeing 787, a flashing green light with a repeated high-low chime is used to indicate a call to all flight attendant stations.

Chief purser

[edit]

The chief purser (CP), also titled as in-flight service manager (ISM), flight service manager (FSM), customer service manager (CSM) or cabin service director (CSD) is the senior flight attendant in the chain of command of flight attendants. While not necessarily the most-senior crew members on a flight (in years of service to their respective carrier), chief pursers can have varying levels of "in-flight" or "on board" bidding seniority or tenure in relation to their flying partners. To reach this position, a crew member requires some minimum years of service as flight attendant. Further training is mandatory, and chief pursers typically earn a higher salary than flight attendants because of the added responsibility and managerial role.

Purser

[edit]

The purser is in charge of the cabin crew, in a specific section of a larger aircraft, or the whole aircraft itself (if the purser is the highest ranking). On board a larger aircraft, pursers assist the chief purser in managing the cabin. Pursers are flight attendants or a related job, typically with an airline for several years prior to application for, and further training to become a purser, and normally earn a higher salary than flight attendants because of the added responsibility and supervisory role.

Qualifications

[edit]

Training

[edit]

Minimum entry requirements for a career as a flight attendant is usually the completion of the final year of high school; e.g. the International Baccalaureate. Many prospective attendants have a post-secondary school diploma in an area such as tourism and a number hold degrees having worked in other occupations, often as teachers. Graduates holding degrees, including those with studies in one or more foreign languages, communication studies, business studies, public relations or nursing can be favoured by employers.[31][32]

Flight attendants are normally trained in the hub or headquarters city of an airline over a period that may run from four weeks to six months, depending on the country and airline. The main focus of training is safety, and attendants are evaluated for each type of aircraft in which they work. One of the most elaborate training facilities was Breech Academy, which Trans World Airlines (TWA) opened in 1969 in Overland Park, Kansas. Other airlines also sent their attendants to the school. However, during the fare wars, the school's viability declined and it closed around 1988.

Safety training includes, but is not limited to: emergency passenger evacuation management, use of evacuation slides / life rafts, in-flight firefighting, first aid, CPR, defibrillation, ditching/emergency landing procedures, decompression emergencies, crew resource management, and security.

In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration requires flight attendants on aircraft with 20 or more seats and used by an air carrier for transportation to hold a Certificate of Demonstrated Proficiency. It shows that a level of required training has been met. It is not limited to the air carrier at which the attendant is employed (although some initial documents showed the airlines where the holders were working), and is the attendant's personal property. It does have two ratings, Group 1 and Group 2 (listed on the certificate as "Group I" and "Group II"). Either or both of these may be earned depending upon the general type of aircraft, (propeller or turbojet), on which the holder has trained.[33]

There are also training schools, not affiliated with any particular airline, where students generally not only undergo generic, though otherwise practically identical, training to flight attendants employed by an airline, but also take curriculum modules to help them gain employment. These schools often use actual airline equipment for their lessons, though some are equipped with full simulator cabins capable of replicating a number of emergency situations. In some countries, such as France, a degree is required, together with the Certificat de formation à la sécurité (Safety training certificate).[34]

Language

[edit]

Multilingual flight attendants are often in demand to accommodate international travellers. The languages most in demand, other than English, are French, Russian, Hindi, Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, Bengali, Japanese, Arabic, German, Portuguese, Italian, and Turkish.[35] In the United States, airlines with international routes pay an additional stipend for language skills on top of flight pay, and some airlines hire specifically for certain languages when launching international destinations. Carole Middleton recalled when interviewed in 2018 that "you had to be able to speak another language" when working in the industry in the 1970s.[36]

Height

[edit]

Most airlines have height requirements for safety reasons, making sure that all flight attendants can reach overhead safety equipment. Typically, the acceptable height for this is over 152 cm (60 in) but under 185 cm (73 in) tall. Regional carriers using small aircraft with low ceilings can have height restrictions.[37] Some airlines, such as EVA Air, have height requirements for purely aesthetic purposes.

Presentation

[edit]
Singapore Girls dressed in Singapore Airlines's distinctive sarong kebaya uniforms

The overall presentation of flight attendants' has transformed over the decades. Many early uniforms had a strongly military appearance; hats, jackets, and skirts showed simple straight lines and military details like epaulettes and brass buttons. Many uniforms had a summer and winter version, differentiated by colours and fabrics appropriate to the season: navy blue for winter, for example, khaki for summer. But as the role of women in the air grew, and airline companies began to realise the publicity value of their female flight attendants, more feminine lines and colours began to appear in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Some airlines began to commission designs from high-end department stores and still others called in noted designers or even milliners to create distinctive and attractive apparel. During the 1960s, Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) was known for brightly coloured female flight attendant uniforms that included short miniskirts. In the early 1970s, the uniform changed to hotpants.[38]

Haute couture

[edit]

In the 1930s, the first flight attendant uniforms were designed to be durable, practical, and inspire confidence in passengers with the first female flight attendants dressing in uniforms resembling nurses' outfits. The first female flight attendants for United Airlines wore green berets, green capes and nurse's shoes and other airlines, such as Eastern Air Lines, actually dressed female flight attendants in nurses' uniforms.[39] However, by the 1960s a number of airlines were promoting their flight attendant's uniforms as evoking the refinement of haute couture. In March 1962, Air France launched a new model designed by Marc Bohan at Dior, introducing the "Air France" model into its Haute couture collection.[40] Hainan Airlines debuted their new flight attendant's uniforms at the 2017 Laurence Xu Haute Couture Show at Paris Couture Week.[41]

During the 1960s, Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) was known for brightly coloured female flight attendant uniforms that included short miniskirts. In the early 1970s, the uniform changed to hotpants.[38] Photo shows PSA flight attendants in 1960s.

Since the 1980s, Asian airlines, especially national flag carriers, usually feature the traditional dress and fabrics of their respective country in their female flight attendants' uniform. It was meant as a marketing strategy to showcase their national culture as well as to convey welcoming warmth and hospitality. For example, Thai Airways flight attendants are required to change from their corporate purple suits into traditional Thai costume prior to passengers boarding.[42] Garuda Indonesia, Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines female flight attendants wear modified kebayas, with batik motifs on them. For example, Garuda Indonesia's design, called 'Lereng Garuda Indonesia' is inspired by the traditional batik motif of 'Parang Gondosuli'.[43] Vietnam Airlines flight attendants wear red áo dài and Air India flight attendants wear a sari on all passenger flights.

Uniform and makeup

[edit]

During the mid-1990s, several U.S.-based airlines required female flight attendants to wear shoes with heels. Minimum heel heights ranged from 12 to 2 in (13 to 51 mm) mandated by US Airways.[44] Flight attendants at times avoided censure by changing into more comfortable shoes during flights, since their supervisors were less likely to be present there.[45]

In 2015, the Israeli airline El Al introduced a requirement that female flight attendants wear high heels until passengers had been seated.[46] The airline's workers' union stated that the requirement would endanger the health and safety of the flight attendants and instructed its members to ignore the rule. Later that year the requirement was removed.[47]

Until 2016, some female crew members on British Airways were required to wear British Airways' standard "ambassador" uniform, which has not traditionally included trousers.[48]

In 2019, Virgin Atlantic began to allow its female flight attendants to wear trousers and not wear makeup.[49]

In 2023, Qantas declared that it had ended uniform rules based on gender. Female flight attendants are no longer required to wear high heels, male flight attendants can wear makeup, and flight attendants of any gender can wear the same type of jewellery and have long hair in a ponytail or bun.[50][51]

Health conditions

[edit]

A 2018 study found higher instances of melanoma, breast, uterine, gastrointestinal, cervical, and thyroid cancers reported in flight attendants in contrast to the general population.[52] Specifically, the increased cancer cases reported were seen in breast cancer (3.4% of flight crew compared to 2.3% in the general population - a 50% increase), cervical cancer (1.0% compared to 0.70%), gastrointestinal cancer (0.47% compared to 0.27% – a 74% increase), thyroid cancer (0.67% compared to 0.56%) and higher rates of both melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers with reports of the latter increasing with every five years spent in the job.[52] The study did not look into what causes this increase, but the authors said increased exposure to ionizing radiation from time spent in the thinner upper atmosphere, poor cabin air quality as well as disrupted sleep and meal cycles could be factors.[53]

Other studies have found increased rates of breast and skin cancer,[54] reduced respiratory health,[55] adverse reproductive and perinatal outcomes,[56] musculoskeletal injuries,[57] and higher rates of mental health conditions in flight attendants.[58]

Radiation

[edit]

Flight attendants and crew members are known to be exposed to cosmic ionizing radiation which is a form of radiation that comes from space and intensifies as altitude above sea level increases. The International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization lists ionizing radiation as a known human carcinogen.[57] Passengers are also exposed to this type of cosmic radiation, but they spend considerably less time on average in the air than crew members. An online travel agency report found, in particular, that travelling adults in Britain spend on average 306 hours on flights to holiday destinations during their lifetime.[59] In contrast, according to the US Federal Aviation Administration, a flight attendant can spend up to 30 hours of flight time in seven consecutive days and in some cases more.[60] The effect of cosmic radiation on air crew members is a subject of a growing body of research.[61][62]

Cabin crew members are also regularly exposed to more UV radiation than the general population, which can make these workers more vulnerable to skin cancers.[63]

The U.S. National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) reports that aircrew have the largest average annual effective dose of all U.S. radiation workers.[62]

Cabin air quality

[edit]

Poor cabin air quality is a subject of ongoing study in relation to symptoms such as headache, fatigue, fever, and respiratory difficulties among many others that have been reported by flight attendants, particularly on long-haul routes. There is also much concern regarding the transmission of contagious diseases, particularly tuberculosis. An open question remains whether these complaints are due to poor cabin air quality or to other factors inherent in flights, such as lowered barometric pressure, hypoxia, low humidity, etc.[64] Other chemical contaminants found in the cabin may include engine leakages, pesticides and flame retardants, which contain compounds that may act as hormone disruptors and increase the risk of some cancers.[65]

Sleep disruption

[edit]

Flight attendants often have disrupted sleep cycles. They are more likely to have disruptions in their sleep patterns because they may work at night, cross time zones, and have irregular schedules. There is some evidence linking sleep disruptions to increased cancer risk.[66] Flight attendants may also have different lifestyle behaviours related to diet, physical activity, and health care than the general population which could affect overall health and cancer risk.[67]

Secondhand tobacco smoke

[edit]

Many of the flight attendants working today were exposed to second-hand in-flight smoke until 1998 with partial smoking bans enacted in 1988. The long-term effects of this historical secondhand smoke exposure have not been well characterized.[68]

Sexual harassment

[edit]

Flight attendants are exposed to verbal and sexual harassment.[69] Studies in the United States and Australia have found that the vast majority (two-thirds) of flight attendants experience sexual harassment in the course of their careers, including sexual assault, inappropriate touching and sexual comments both by colleagues and passengers.[70][71]

Flight attendants describe the verbal sexual harassment as comments that are "nasty, unwanted, lewd, crude, inappropriate, uncomfortable, sexual, suggestive, and dirty". They also report being subjected to passengers' explicit sexual fantasies, propositions, request for sexual "favours" and pornographic videos and pictures.[70]

The studies also found that 70% of flight attendants who experience sexual harassment on the job "chose not to report the incident because they did not think it would be dealt with appropriately or they were concerned reporting it would make the situation worse" and "their airline was not doing enough to put a stop to harassment",[72] and that "they have not noticed any employer efforts over the past year to address sexual harassment at work."[70]

Emotional labour

[edit]

The concept of emotional labour as the process of managing feelings and expressions to fulfil the emotional requirements of a job through a publicly visible facial and bodily display within the workplace (as opposed to the concept of emotion work, i.e. the management of one's feelings in private life) was first established and linked to the profession of flight attendants by Professor Emerita of Sociology Arlie Hochschild, in her book, The Managed Heart.[73] According to Hochschild, flight attendants do emotional labour to enhance the status of the customer and entice further sales by their friendliness,[74] and support this effort by evoking feelings that make the "nice" display seem natural.[75] With regard to how flight attendants are supposed to use their smile in the job, the author writes:

[I]n the flight attendant's work, smiling is separated from its usual function, which is to express a personal feeling, and attached to another one—expressing a company feeling. The company exhorts them to smile more, and "more sincerely," at an increasing number of passengers. The workers respond to the speed-up with a slowdown: they smile less broadly, with a quick release and no sparkle in the eyes, thus dimming the company's message to the people. It is a war of smiles.[76]

Hochschild notes that corporate logic in the airline industry generates a series of links between competition, market expansion, advertising, heightened passenger expectations about rights to display, and company demands for acting; and when conditions allow this logic to work, private use of emotional exchange gives way to corporate use of emotional exchange.[77]

Hochschild also writes of how flight attendants are trained to control passengers' feelings during times of turbulence and dangerous situations while suppressing their own fear or anxiety.[73]

The emotional labour performed by flight attendants and cross-cultural aspects of it have since been actively studied and are a topic of ongoing research.[78][79][80][81]

Sponsorship and advertising

[edit]
Air Serbia flight attendants (Tourist Fair Belgrade 2017)
Thai Airways wrap advertising on a double-decker bus in Hong Kong featuring a flight attendant

In the 1960s and 1970s, many airlines began advertising the attractiveness and friendliness of their flight attendants. National Airlines began a "Fly Me"; campaign using attractive female flight attendants with taglines such as "I'm Lorraine. Fly me to Orlando." Braniff International Airways presented a campaign known as the "Air Strip" with similarly attractive young female flight attendant changing uniforms mid-flight.[82] In the United States, many airlines had a policy such that only unmarried women could be flight attendants,[83] as well as a mandatory retirement age of 32 for flight attendants because of the belief women would be less appealing and attractive after this age. Many of the women were recruited as seniors in college and in beauty pageants.[84]

In 1968, the EEOC declared age restrictions on flight attendants' employment to be illegal sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[17] Emirates have long sponsored international sporting events and employ their flight attendants to present awards at Wimbledon and other events.[85][86]

Unions

[edit]

Flight attendant unions were formed, beginning at United Airlines in the 1940s, to negotiate improvements in pay, benefits and working conditions.[87] Those unions would later challenge what they perceived as sexist stereotypes and unfair work practices such as age limits, size limits, limitations on marriage, and prohibition of pregnancy. Many of these limitations have been lifted by judicial mandates. The largest flight attendants' union is the Association of Flight Attendants, representing nearly 60,000 flight attendants at 19 airlines within the US.[88]

The Association of Professional Flight Attendants[89] represents the flight attendants of American Airlines, the world's largest carrier. APFA is the largest independent flight attendant union in the world.[90]

In the UK, cabin crew can be represented by either Cabin Crew '89, or the much larger and more powerful Transport and General Workers' Union.

In Australia, flight attendants are represented by the Flight Attendants' Association of Australia (FAAA). There are two divisions: one for international crews (long-haul) and one for domestic crews (short-haul).

In New Zealand, flight attendants can be represented by either the Flight Attendants and Related Services Association (FARSA) or by the Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union (EPMU).

In Canada, flight attendants are represented by either the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) or by the Canadian Flight Attendants Union (CFAU).

Discrimination

[edit]

Originally female flight attendants were required to be single upon hiring, and were fired if they got married, exceeded weight regulations, or reached age 32 or 35 depending on the airline.[16] In the 1970s, the group Stewardesses for Women's Rights protested sexist advertising and company discrimination, and brought many cases to court. In 1964, United States President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act into law which prohibited sex discrimination and led to the creation of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 1968. The EEOC ruled that sex was not a bona fide occupational requirement to be a flight attendant. For flight attendants, this meant that they had an official governing body to report offences to and allowed them to successfully challenge age ceiling and marriage bans in relation to their effectiveness as employees.[91]

In 1968, the EEOC declared age restrictions on flight attendants' employment to be illegal sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[17] The restriction of hiring only women was lifted at all airlines in 1971 due to the decisive court case of Diaz v. Pan Am.[19] The no-marriage rule was eliminated throughout the US airline industry by the 1980s.[20] The last such broad categorical discrimination, the weight restrictions,[21] were relaxed in the 1990s through litigation and negotiations.[22] By the end of the 1970s, the term stewardess had generally been replaced by the gender-neutral alternative flight attendant. Also, during the 1980s and 1990s, more men were allowed to apply as flight attendants, helping to create more usage of this term. More recently the term cabin crew or cabin staff has begun to replace 'flight attendants' in some parts of the world, because of the term's recognition of their role as members of the crew.

Roles in emergencies

[edit]

Actions of flight attendants in emergencies have long been credited in saving lives; in the United States, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and other aviation authorities view flight attendants as essential for safety, and are thus usually required on Part 121 aircraft operations.[92] Studies, some done in light of the 1985 Manchester Airport disaster (British Airtours Flight 28M), have concluded that assertive cabin crew are essential for the rapid evacuation of aeroplanes.[93][94] Notable examples of cabin crew actions include:

11 September 2001

[edit]

The role of flight attendants received heightened prominence after the September 11 attacks when flight attendants (such as Sandra W. Bradshaw and CeeCee Lyles of United Airlines Flight 93; Robert Fangman of United Airlines Flight 175; Renee May of American Airlines Flight 77; and Betty Ong and Madeline Amy Sweeney of American Airlines Flight 11) actively attempted to protect passengers from assault, and also provided vital information to air traffic controllers on the hijackings, as did many passengers.[95]

In the wake of these attacks, many flight attendants at major airlines were laid off because of decreased passenger loads.[95]

Other emergencies

[edit]
  • In April 1936, flight attendant Nellie Granger aided survivors after the crash of TWA Flight 1, then walked 4 mi (6.4 km) through a snowstorm to find help, before returning to the crash scene.[96][97]
  • Senior Purser Neerja Bhanot saved the lives of passengers and crew when Pan Am Flight 73 was hijacked. She was killed while protecting children from the terrorists. After her death she received the Special Courage Award from the United States Department of Justice and India's highest civilian honour for bravery, the Ashoka Chakra.
  • Naila Nazir, Pakistani flight attendant (employee of Pakistan International Airlines) who received 1985's Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) Heroism Award for her brave handling of tense and dangerous situation during the 13 days of the Flight PK-326 hijacking ordeal.[98][99]
  • 1985 Manchester Airport disaster (British Airtours Flight 28M), the two forward flight attendants, Arthur Bradbury and Joanna Toff, repeatedly crawled into the smoke filled and burning cabin to drag a number of passengers to safety, and were subsequently awarded the Queen's Gallantry Medal. The two rear flight attendants, Sharon Ford and Jacqui Ubanski, who opened the rear doors but were overwhelmed by fire and smoke were awarded the same medal posthumously.
  • Scandinavian Airlines System Flight 751, when cabin crew recognised an emergency landing was imminent and commanded the passengers to "bend down ... hold your knees" to adopt the brace position.[100]
  • Atlantic Southeast Airlines Flight 529, whose sole flight attendant, Robin Fech, provided emergency briefings, brace and evacuation commands to the passengers when the Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia aircraft sustained serious damage to one of its engines and crash landed. The NTSB accident report commended "the exemplary manner in which the flight attendant briefed the passengers and handled the emergency".[101]
  • BOAC Flight 712, where a flight attendant, Barbara Jane Harrison, died saving passengers from an on-board fire and was posthumously awarded the George Cross.
  • British Airways Flight 5390, in which a flight attendant was able to prevent a pilot from being lost through a cockpit window that had failed.
  • Southern Airways Flight 242, on which the cabin crew provided safety briefings to their passengers, and on their own initiative, warned passengers of the impending crash by commanding passengers to adopt the brace position. At least one flight attendant is known to have assisted in rescuing trapped passengers.[102]
  • Air Florida Flight 90, in which Kelly Duncan, the lone surviving flight attendant, passed the only life vest she could find to a passenger. She is recognised in the NTSB report for this "unselfish act".[103]
  • TWA flight attendant Uli Derickson who protected passengers during the TWA Flight 847 hijacking by assisting with negotiation efforts.
  • TWA Flight 843, when a TWA Lockheed L-1011 Tristar aircraft crashed after an aborted takeoff in 1992. The aircraft was destroyed by fire. Nine flight attendants, along with five off-duty flight attendants, evacuated all 292 persons on board without loss of life. The NTSB in their after accident report noted, "The performance of the flight attendants during the emergency was exceptional and probably contributed to the success of the emergency evacuation."[104][105]
  • On British Airways Flight 2069, cabin crew stopped the plane from being crashed by a mentally ill passenger.[106]
  • Crew on American Airlines Flight 63 prevented shoe bomber Richard Reid from blowing up the plane.[107]
  • Flight attendants on QantasLink Flight 1737 prevented their plane from being hijacked by a passenger with mental health issues. Two of them were taken to hospital with stab wounds.[108]
  • Aloha Airlines Flight 243 suffered a decompression which tore an 18 ft (5.5 m) section of fuselage away from the plane. The only fatality was flight attendant C.B. Lansing who was blown out of the aeroplane. Flight attendant Michelle Honda was thrown violently to the floor during the decompression but, despite her injuries, crawled up and down the aisle reassuring passengers.[109]
  • Flight attendants on Air Canada Flight 797 (Sergio Benetti, Judi Davidson, Laura Kayama) used procedures which were not specifically taught in training such as moving passengers to the front of the aircraft to move them away from the fire and smoke, and passing out towels for passengers to cover their nose and mouths with while the cabin was filling with smoke. Chief Flight Attendant Sergio Benetti was the first to open the front door of the aircraft, and escaped out that way, leaving all passengers and other crew behind.
  • US Airways flight attendant Richard DeMary helped to evacuate surviving passengers and another crew member from the burning wreckage of USAir Flight 1016, which crashed during a go-around in adverse weather conditions after a failed landing attempt at Charlotte Douglas International Airport.[110]
  • Flight attendants on US Airways Flight 1549 successfully evacuated all passengers from the aircraft within 90 seconds even though the rear was rapidly filling with water.
  • Nine cabin crew members aboard Air France Flight 358 successfully evacuated the aircraft within 90 seconds after the A340-300 overran a runway at Toronto Pearson International Airport. The NTSB stated that the actions of the cabin crew contributed to the 100% survival rate.
  • The flight attendants of Philippine Airlines Flight 434 kept the passengers calm after a bomb exploded during the flight from Cebu to Tokyo. Though one passenger was killed during the explosion, they took care of the injured passengers.
  • Paul Hayes, the director of air safety at Ascend, a British-based aviation consultancy, told Reuters, "The cabin crew (of Japan Airlines Flight 516) must have done an excellent job. It was a miracle that all the passengers got off considering the wreckage shown in many images.[111]

One exception was the accident on Air Canada Flight 797, when the investigative board found that "misleading" reports about the fire by the flight attendant in charge "influenced the captain's decision to delay the initiation of a descent", and that such "delay increased the time for the fire to propagate and the time that passengers were exposed to the toxic environment before the aeroplane could be evacuated". The accident killed 23 passengers; none of the flight attendants sustained any injuries. Chief Flight Attendant Sergio Benetti was the first to open the front door of the aircraft, and escaped that way, leaving all passengers and other crew behind.

[edit]

Notable flight attendants

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A flight attendant is a trained professional in the aircraft cabin crew whose primary duty is to ensure the safety and security of passengers and crew during all phases of flight, including pre-flight preparations, takeoff, cruising, and emergency evacuations. This role, mandated by regulations such as those from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for aircraft with 20 or more passenger seats, emphasizes rapid response to threats like fires, decompressions, or unruly behavior over ancillary services. While flight attendants also handle passenger comfort through meal and beverage service, this secondary function supports morale but does not supersede safety protocols, a distinction reinforced by post-9/11 operational shifts prioritizing security vigilance. The profession traces its origins to early aviation, with Heinrich Kubis serving as the first flight attendant on a 1912 zeppelin flight, though commercial airplane cabin crews emerged in the 1930s when airlines like United hired registered nurses such as Ellen Church—the first female flight attendant—on May 15, 1930, to reassure passengers amid the novelty and perceived risks of air travel. Initially dominated by women selected for nursing skills and appearance to market flying as glamorous, the role evolved from male stewards in prior airships to a safety-focused occupation requiring physical fitness, emergency training, and recurrent drills in procedures like ditching or hijacking response. Qualification demands rigorous initial and ongoing , including instruction on , , and at least five hours of supervised duty performance, culminating in competence checks and issuance of a standalone Certificate of Demonstrated Proficiency by the FAA to the individual after completing required training and proficiency demonstrations, as required under 49 U.S.C. § 44728, with airline tied to operational approvals. Notable for life-saving interventions in incidents like evacuations—where crews have demonstrated the capacity to evacuate a full in under 90 seconds—the position underscores causal priorities of human factors in , where empirical data from accidents highlights crew as a critical buffer against mechanical failures or .

History

Origins and Early Commercial Aviation (1920s-1950s)

In the early 1920s, as commercial passenger aviation emerged with multi-engine aircraft capable of carrying more than pilots and minimal crew, airlines began employing male stewards to assist passengers on longer routes. For instance, Imperial Airways in the United Kingdom introduced stewards on its Handley Page W.8 flights starting in 1924, where they handled baggage, served light refreshments, and ensured passenger comfort amid the rudimentary conditions of open cockpits and unpressurized cabins. Similarly, in the United States, Stout Air Services utilized stewards on Ford Trimotor operations from 1927, focusing on basic service duties as flights transitioned from mail-carrying to passenger transport. These early cabin crew members were typically drawn from maritime or railway backgrounds, reflecting the era's limited aviation-specific training, and their primary role emphasized logistical support rather than formalized safety protocols. A pivotal shift occurred in 1930 when Boeing Air Transport, a predecessor to , hired the first female flight attendants—known as stewardesses—to enhance passenger confidence on its routes. , a and aspiring pilot, proposed the idea to airline executives, arguing that nurses could provide medical reassurance during turbulent flights prone to and minor injuries; she commenced service on May 15, 1930, aboard a flight from to . Initial requirements mandated that stewardesses hold nursing credentials, weigh no more than 118 pounds, stand under 5 feet 4 inches tall, and remain unmarried, with the profession designed to project calm professionalism amid the hazards of early , including frequent emergency landings. While some carriers like Pan American World Airways continued employing male pursers into for international routes, the introduction of women rapidly standardized the role, as airlines leveraged their presence to market as safe and hospitable. Through the 1930s and 1940s, stewardesses' duties expanded to include cabin cleaning, meal preparation using portable stoves, and rudimentary first aid, though safety remained paramount given the absence of modern pressurization and the prevalence of fabric-covered aircraft vulnerable to weather. accelerated training standardization, with U.S. airlines collaborating on curricula that incorporated emergency procedures learned from military air transport, leading to mandatory certification by the post-1945. By the 1950s, as loomed on the horizon, the profession saw high turnover due to mandatory retirement at age 32 or upon in many carriers, yet airlines invested in grooming and training to align with growing passenger volumes, which reached over 25 million annually in the U.S. by 1955. This era cemented the stewardess as a symbol of aviation's maturation, though underlying motivations included cost savings from lower female wages compared to male counterparts.

Post-War Expansion and Standardization (1960s-1980s)

The advent of commercial jet aircraft, such as the Boeing 707 introduced in 1958, revolutionized air travel by enabling faster, longer non-stop flights and dramatically increasing passenger volumes, which doubled in the United States between 1958 and 1965. This expansion required airlines to hire and train thousands more flight attendants to handle larger aircraft capacities and growing demand, shifting the profession from a niche role to a mass occupation with standardized procedures across carriers. By the 1970s, air transport accounted for a significantly larger share of domestic passenger-miles compared to 1960, when it represented only 2 percent, fueling further crew growth. Training programs became more uniform during this era, emphasizing safety protocols alongside service, under increasing regulatory oversight from the (FAA). In 1968, typical requirements for United States stewardesses—still exclusively female—included being aged 21 to 27, unmarried, between 5 feet 2 inches and 5 feet 9 inches tall, with weight proportionate to height not exceeding 135 pounds, and completing seven weeks of intensive training covering emergency procedures, , and specifics. The FAA permitted expanded use of approved flight simulators for crew training in 1970, enhancing standardization and proficiency in handling high-altitude emergencies on jetliners. Cabin crew qualifications were formalized under 14 CFR Part 121, mandating recurrent training and proficiency checks to ensure consistent safety standards across airlines. Labor organizing intensified as the workforce grew, with unions securing better wages and challenging discriminatory policies amid strikes that disrupted operations. The 1970 strike involved 5,000 stewardesses and 281 pursers demanding improved contracts after 16 months of negotiations. National Airlines faced a 127-day walkout in 1975, highlighting tensions over pay and conditions, which ultimately led to settlements favoring workers. By the late 1970s and into the 1980s, successful lawsuits eliminated marriage bans and ages, allowing older and married women to remain, while men began joining crews, as at in 1973; these changes marked a transition from glamour-focused hiring to merit-based standards. The term "stewardess" gradually gave way to "," reflecting broadened roles and demographics.

Deregulation, Globalization, and Modern Challenges (1990s-Present)

The effects of U.S. airline deregulation, initiated by the 1978 Airline Deregulation Act, intensified in the 1990s amid rising competition from low-cost carriers and hub consolidations, compressing flight attendant compensation and benefits. Analysis of 1980 and 1990 U.S. Census microdata reveals a 10 percent drop in relative earnings for airline workers, including cabin crew, attributable to deregulatory pressures. By 1992, flight attendants' wages had fallen 39 percent below counterfactual projections absent deregulation, driven by concessions during bankruptcies and mergers that introduced split pay scales and eroded job security. These dynamics prompted innovative union tactics, such as the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA's "CHAOS" (Create Havoc Around Our System) strategy, first deployed in 1993 against Alaska Airlines to disrupt operations selectively without full walkouts. Globalization accelerated cabin crew demands through exponential growth in long-haul international routes, fostering multinational workforces and necessitating adaptations to diverse passenger cultures and languages. Expansion of alliances like (founded 1997) and (1999) integrated crews across borders, heightening coordination challenges in multilingual cockpits and cabins while elevating exposure to and irregular schedules. This shift diversified recruitment, with airlines in and the —such as Emirates and —hiring globally and imposing rigorous service standards, but it also amplified health risks like fatigue from extended duty times on transoceanic flights. Contemporary challenges encompass security enhancements post-2001 terrorist attacks, where flight attendants received federal mandates for threat vigilance and training under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, alongside persistent labor strains and health vulnerabilities. The inflicted acute disruptions, with uncertainty shocks correlating to 7-13 percent workforce reductions, including mass furloughs of cabin crew and union concessions on protections. Recovery phases revealed exacerbated issues, with cabin crews reporting elevated rates of anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances compared to pre-pandemic baselines, compounded by mask mandates and protocols. Labor militancy resurged, as evidenced by flight attendants' 99.47 percent strike authorization vote in August 2023 over pay and scheduling grievances, mirroring ongoing disputes at carriers like where entry-level attendants earned near-poverty wages prompting welfare reliance. Staffing shortages post-2022, fueled by retirements and burnout, have further intensified workloads amid rebounding demand.

Role and Responsibilities

Core Safety and Emergency Preparedness

Flight attendants' primary responsibility is to ensure passenger , with service duties secondary to preparedness and response. Under U.S. (FAA) regulations, they must complete initial encompassing procedures, including aircraft evacuation, fire suppression, and , with at least 8 hours of ground for smaller aircraft and competence demonstrations. International standards from the (ICAO) mandate cabin crew proficiency in normal, abnormal, and procedures, including checklists for systems like oxygen deployment and exit operations. Pre-flight preparations involve verifying emergency equipment functionality, such as life vests, fire extinguishers, oxygen masks, and exit doors, while conducting briefings with the flight crew on potential hazards. During flight, attendants monitor cabin conditions, enforce safety compliance like seatbelt usage, and prepare for contingencies such as or decompression by securing loose items and positioning for rapid response. In medical emergencies, they apply techniques trained per FAA and ICAO guidelines, including use of automated external defibrillators where equipped. Emergency evacuations require attendants to assess conditions post-impact or ditching, then issue commands like "Unbuckle! Leave everything! This way!" to direct passengers through usable exits, aiming for full clearance in under 90 seconds using half the exits as per standards. Flight attendants initiate evacuations independently if the flight crew is incapacitated, as demonstrated in drills simulating incapacitation. Fire response includes deploying handheld extinguishers and protective breathing equipment to combat onboard fires, prioritizing passenger egress over suppression when flames threaten slides or paths. Empirical data from the (NTSB) analysis of 46 U.S. commercial evacuations between 1997 and 1999 involving 2,651 passengers shows flight attendants' trained actions facilitated safe outcomes in most cases, though suboptimal performance contributed to injuries in two incidents due to delayed commands or inadequate passenger control. A 2024 Japan Airlines runway collision evacuation of 376 occupants in 18 minutes before fire engulfment underscores effective crew coordination, with no fatalities attributed to attendant-led procedures despite visible smoke and structural damage. Recurrent training, required annually or after events, reinforces these skills through simulations, ensuring proficiency amid evolving threats like unruly passengers or interference, which NTSB reports identify as evacuation delays in 24 of 36 attendant surveys.

Passenger Service and Comfort

Flight attendants ensure passenger comfort by performing routine in-flight services, such as greeting boarding passengers, verifying tickets, assisting with seat selection and carry-on luggage stowing, and providing an initial orientation to cabin amenities. These pre-departure interactions set the tone for the journey and help mitigate early sources of dissatisfaction, including seating conflicts or accessibility issues. During flight, cabin crew members deliver beverages, snacks, and full meals according to airline-specific protocols, with service frequency varying by route length—typically one or more rounds on short-haul flights and multi-course offerings on long-haul segments. They respond to requests for essentials like pillows, blankets, headphones, or remedies, while monitoring cabin conditions to adjust , , and for optimal . Attendants also facilitate by assisting with in-flight systems and addressing technical issues, contributing to psychological comfort amid confined spaces. Empirical analysis of over 10,000 surveys reveals that crew attentiveness ranks highly among comfort determinants, positively correlating with overall satisfaction independent of physical space or factors. Flight attendants extend support to vulnerable groups, including , elderly passengers, and those with disabilities, by offering personalized aid such as meal tray assistance or mobility support within regulatory limits. This service-oriented balances with , though resource constraints on low-cost carriers can limit availability compared to full-service airlines.

Crew Hierarchy and In-Flight Operations

The holds ultimate authority over all flight operations, including cabin crew activities, as the final decision-maker for and compliance with regulations. The senior cabin crew member, also known as the , inflight service manager, or chief flight attendant—depending on the and flight length—reports directly to the , coordinating cabin , security, and service execution while serving as the primary interface between the and cabin . This role oversees a typically structured by and cabin zones, with senior flight attendants managing specific sections (e.g., or ) and supervising junior crew members who handle routine tasks. On long-haul flights with 10-20 attendants, this hierarchy ensures delegated responsibilities, such as zone leads monitoring behavior and readiness, to maintain without overburdening the captain. In-flight operations follow phased protocols prioritizing safety over service, beginning with a joint briefing involving and cabin to review passenger manifests, special needs (e.g., medical equipment or ), weather impacts, and emergency contingencies; this occurs 30-60 minutes pre-boarding. Flight attendants then inspect emergency equipment, including life vests, oxygen masks, fire extinguishers, and evacuation slides—verifying functionality per FAA-mandated checklists—and secure galleys and lavatories before allowing boarding. During passenger embarkation, enforce carry-on weight limits (typically 7-10 kg per bag), assist with stowage in overhead bins, and identify able-bodied passengers for potential evacuation roles, all while scanning for threats. Once airborne and cleared by the (usually after reaching 10,000 feet), flight attendants deliver safety demonstrations using verbal instructions, videos, or manuals, covering brace positions, exit locations, and oxygen deployment—tailored to aircraft type, such as or Airbus A320 configurations with 4-8 exits. In cruise phase, operations shift to dual monitoring: continual cabin surveillance for hazards like unsecured items or unruly behavior, alongside non-safety services like meal distribution (e.g., 200-500 trays on a full narrow-body flight) and beverage carts pushed aisle-by-aisle, with to prevent clutter. Crew rotate stations to mitigate , adhering to FAA limits of 8-16 hours based on flight duration. Descent preparations, initiated 30-45 minutes before , involve securing all service items, conducting final checks, and briefing passengers on procedures, with positioning at assigned stations for rapid response to diversions or evacuations—where the relays captain's orders via intercom for coordinated actions like door arming or slide deployment. Post-landing, operations conclude with deplaning assistance, cabin cleanup to remove 90% of visible trash, and reporting irregularities (e.g., issues) to ground staff, ensuring turnaround readiness within 30-90 minutes for short-haul flights. This sequence underscores as the causal priority, with service secondary to enable focus on threat detection and procedural compliance.

Qualifications and Training

Entry Requirements and Selection Criteria

Entry requirements for flight attendants vary by and regulatory but generally include a minimum age of 18 to 21 years, reflecting the need for maturity in handling emergencies and passenger interactions. In the United States, major carriers like Delta require applicants to be at least 21, while Southwest mandates 20 years at application; regional airlines may accept 18-year-olds. Internationally, bodies like the (EASA) set the minimum at 18, with airlines such as Emirates requiring 21 and at least one year of experience. A or equivalent (GED) is standard across U.S. carriers, ensuring basic for safety procedures and documentation. Applicants must possess legal work authorization in the operating country, a valid with sufficient validity (e.g., 14 months for ), and for United Airlines, at least 18 months validity remaining along with no travel restrictions to any countries served to be eligible for international routes; all qualified flight attendants can bid on international trips through a monthly seniority-based system, with higher seniority granting priority access to desirable long-haul routes, though no universal additional requirements such as language skills apply to all international flying, with some routes or roles like purser potentially requiring qualifications. Candidates must also be able to pass background checks and pre-employment screening as mandated by the U.S. . Physical fitness is essential, with height restrictions typically between 5 feet 0 inches and 6 feet 0 inches (without shoes) to access overhead compartments and equipment; many carriers, including Emirates, Qatar, Turkish, and Flydubai, require a minimum height of 160-170 cm for males without shoes and an arm reach of 212 cm on tiptoes, with these standards enforced by approximately 90% of airlines where absence often leads to immediate rejection. specifies 5 feet 2 inches to 6 feet 0 inches. Candidates must demonstrate proficiency, such as the ability to swim 25 m unaided and often 25 to 100 meters within 2 minutes 30 seconds, to simulate ditching scenarios. These airlines also typically require no visible tattoos or piercings and non-smoker status. fitness includes correctable vision to 20/20, hearing adequate for normal conversation, and absence of conditions like severe allergies or mobility impairments that could hinder evacuation duties. No specific (FAA) regulation dictates individual entry qualifications beyond post-hire training certification, but airlines enforce these to meet operational standards under 14 CFR Part 121. Fluency in English—spoken, read, and written—is required by FAA and EASA for communication of safety instructions, with additional languages valued for international routes. Customer service experience, such as 1 to 2 years in hospitality or retail, is preferred by carriers like Alaska Airlines and Emirates to ensure interpersonal skills for passenger management. Selection criteria emphasize traits like poise under pressure, , and , assessed through multi-stage processes. Applications begin online, followed by video submissions or group interviews evaluating and via scenarios. Individual interviews probe knowledge and adaptability, often culminating in medical evaluations and conditional job offers contingent on success. Airlines prioritize candidates demonstrating reliability and cultural fit, with rejection rates high due to the volume of applicants exceeding openings.

Initial Training Curriculum

Initial training for flight attendants, required under regulations such as the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) 14 CFR § 121.421, encompasses ground instruction, practical drills, and competency demonstrations tailored to specific types. Programs generally last 3 to 8 weeks, varying by airline; for example, conducts training over 3-4 weeks, while extends it to 6.5 weeks to include preparation. This duration accommodates classroom sessions on , hands-on simulations for emergencies, and evaluations ensuring proficiency in safety protocols before line operations. Core curriculum emphasizes cabin safety, mandating initial ground training on topics including aircraft evacuation procedures, fire detection and suppression, and handling of hazardous materials. Trainees receive instruction in first aid, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use, with performance-based drills to simulate medical emergencies. Emergency medical equipment training covers oxygen systems, life rafts, and decompression scenarios, requiring familiarity with aircraft-specific configurations for Group I (up to 8 hours minimum) and Group II airplanes (up to 16 hours minimum) in competence checks. Crew resource management (CRM) modules address team coordination, communication, and decision-making under stress, integrating human factors to mitigate errors in high-stakes environments. Passenger service components focus on operational duties, such as management, beverage and meal service, and with disruptive individuals, balanced against primary imperatives. Regulatory knowledge includes aviation security protocols, like responses and irregular operations (e.g., diversions), drawn from FAA and (IATA) guidelines. Practical elements incorporate live-fire exercises, door operation simulations, and full-scale evacuation drills to verify physical capability and procedural adherence, culminating in a Certificate of Demonstrated Proficiency, an official physical credential issued by the FAA—often referred to as the FAA card and similar to a pilot's license—proving the individual's certified flight attendant status and owned by the flight attendant rather than the airline, issued post-evaluation. Failure rates in these programs reflect rigorous standards, with airlines like PSA requiring physical readiness assessments to ensure trainees meet demands of rapid evacuations for up to 90 seconds per FAA benchmarks.

Recurrent Training and Proficiency Standards

Recurrent training for flight attendants, also known as cabin crew, is mandated by international and national aviation authorities to maintain proficiency in procedures, response, and operational skills. Under ICAO Annex 6 Standards and Recommended Practices, cabin crew must undergo annual recurrent training to ensure ongoing competence in core duties such as evacuation, fire suppression, and medical emergencies. This annual cycle aligns with requirements from bodies like the FAA and EASA, where training must occur within 12 calendar months prior to resuming duties, emphasizing drills and assessments to verify practical skills. In the United States, FAA regulations under 14 CFR Part 121 require recurrent to cover aircraft-specific procedures, including single-person demonstrations of operation and evacuation techniques, with proficiency demonstrated through observed . Flight attendants must complete at least five hours of supervised duty practice during initial phases, but recurrent sessions focus on refresher drills, such as ditching, decompression, and security threats, conducted in simulators or mock-ups to simulate real scenarios. For Part 135 operations, intervals are similarly annual, incorporating testing on crewmember responsibilities to prevent skill degradation. European standards via EASA's ORO.CC.140 stipulate annual recurrent training and checking, integrating (CRM), handling, and operator-specific protocols, with validity tied to successful completion of practical assessments. Proficiency is evaluated through competency-based checks, where failure in key areas like or may necessitate additional remedial sessions; for multi-operator work, recency must align with the most recent training's validity period. Globally, ICAO guidance in Doc 10002 emphasizes varying content annually to address emerging risks, such as recognition or post-pandemic hygiene, while retaining core elements like annual CPR/AED refreshers to sustain retention rates above 80% in simulated tests. Airlines often exceed minimums by incorporating e-learning modules for theoretical updates, followed by hands-on proficiency checks, with non-compliance risking grounding until retrained; data from carriers indicate this regimen reduces incident rates by reinforcing in high-stress evacuations, where 90-second door operations remain a benchmark.

Appearance Standards and Uniforms

Uniform Design and Evolution

Flight attendant uniforms originated in the 1930s with practical, nurse-inspired designs to convey safety and professionalism, featuring dark green double-breasted coats, gray skirts, and caps for early carriers like Boeing Air Transport (later United Airlines). These ensembles included white gloves and structured hats, emphasizing functionality amid rudimentary aircraft conditions and a focus on passenger reassurance through medical-like attire. By the early 1930s, airlines introduced distinctive uniforms to enhance the prestige of aviation staff. Post-World War II, uniforms shifted toward glamour to align with commercial aviation's growth and passenger appeal, incorporating tailored suits, pillbox hats, and feminine silhouettes in the and . Military influences persisted with jackets featuring brass buttons, gored skirts, and white silk blouses, as seen in ' propeller-era designs from 1940-1959. Designers entered the field in 1950, with Sorelle Fontana creating outfits for , marking a transition to fashion-forward elements like clean short-sleeve crepe dresses paired with wool jackets. The from the late 1950s brought vibrant, mod-inspired uniforms in the , influenced by contemporary trends such as miniskirts, bold colors, and mix-and-match components. Notable examples include Air France's 1962 designs by Christian Dior's and Braniff International's 1965 Emilio ensembles featuring space-age prints and shorter hemlines. adopted Jean ' mod minidresses from 1968 to 1970, while Delta introduced male flight attendant uniforms in 1973 with navy suits and gray pants. In the , uniforms reflected synthetic fabrics, pants options for practicality—such as Delta's 1970 above-the-knee designs in bold colors—and a move away from overt glamour toward professional functionality amid and shifting societal norms. This evolution continued into modern eras, prioritizing safety with flame-retardant, breathable materials, ergonomic features for mobility, and brand-specific styling that balances comfort and visibility without compromising operational demands. Contemporary designs incorporate moisture-wicking fabrics and storage for efficiency, reflecting a return to core safety roles over marketing allure.

Grooming, Fitness, and Professional Presentation

Flight attendants are subject to stringent grooming standards enforced by airlines to maintain a image and ensure uniformity. Hair must be neat, clean, and styled conservatively, with secured in approved styles such as buns or ponytails during duty, and colors limited to natural shades. for male attendants is permitted but must be trimmed neatly, often not exceeding one inch in length, while female attendants in certain uniforms may be prohibited from it entirely. Fingernails require , neat trimming, and uniform polish color if applied, free of chips, to project and . Makeup policies vary by but emphasize subtlety and consistency, with carriers like mandating full application during shifts, including specific shades for lips and eyes, and requiring men to conceal gray hair or bald spots. Visible tattoos and piercings beyond ears are generally prohibited or must be covered to uphold brand aesthetics. These rules, derived from airline manuals, prioritize a polished appearance that aligns with customer expectations of service , though enforcement can differ across carriers and regions. Physical fitness standards focus on functionality for safety duties rather than aesthetics alone, with most airlines requiring a vertical reach of 74 to 82 inches to access overhead bins and emergency equipment. Height minima typically range from 4 feet 11 inches to 5 feet 2 inches for women and higher for men, ensuring ability to perform tasks like evacuations, while weight is expected to be proportional to height, often guided by BMI ranges of 18.6 to 24.9 for optimal mobility. Candidates undergo medical exams assessing overall health, including vision, hearing, and stamina for prolonged standing, stooping, and equipment handling. Professional presentation extends grooming and fitness into demeanor and posture, demanding attendants maintain composure, alertness, and a fit physique to handle irregular schedules and physical demands without compromising . Airlines monitor ongoing compliance through recurrent checks, as lapses in fitness or grooming can affect operational readiness and public perception. While some standards have relaxed on non-visible tattoos in recent years, core requirements persist to support the role's demands for and a brand image.

Compensation, Labor, and Work Conditions

Flight attendants' compensation primarily consists of hourly pay based on credited , rather than a fixed annual , with typical monthly guarantees of 70-80 hours depending on and policies. Starting hourly rates at major U.S. carriers range from $25 to $38, escalating to 6060-90 or more after 12-13 years of service; for instance, pays $28.88 per flight hour for new hires, rising to $67.11 by year 13, while offers up to $83 per hour for senior attendants equating to around $107,000 annually. Additional earnings include allowances of 2.402.40-2.90 per hour for domestic and international layovers, respectively, and potential premiums for international routes or holidays. Pay scales vary by profitability and union agreements, with regional carriers like starting at $25.84 per credit hour effective April 2025, yielding an estimated $27,000 annually for first-year attendants flying average hours. Benefits packages emphasize non-monetary perks alongside standard employee offerings. Core benefits include comprehensive health, dental, and vision insurance, 401(k) retirement plans with matching contributions, and paid time off such as 2-5 weeks of vacation based on tenure, plus 7-10 holidays. Travel privileges form a key attraction, providing unlimited free or deeply discounted flights for attendants and eligible family members on their airline and often partners, alongside employee profit-sharing programs at carriers like Delta and Southwest. These benefits offset irregular schedules but require maintaining active status and bidding seniority for preferred routes. Recent wage trends reflect union-driven negotiations amid post-pandemic labor shortages and rising operational costs, with U.S. flight attendant median annual pay reaching $67,130 as of May 2024 per data, up from prior years due to contract gains. In 2025, ratified a three-year deal in March delivering average 32% raises, including first-time boarding pay and retroactive adjustments, while ' October contract equalized pay scales with immediate increases and enhanced per diems. ' flight attendants rejected a July 2025 tentative agreement offering 26.9% immediate raises and up to 45.6% over five years, citing insufficient gains on non-wage issues like scheduling, signaling ongoing pressure for broader reforms such as pre-takeoff pay. Overall, salaries have risen 22% over the past five years, driven by competitive hiring and , though entry-level pay remains modest at $25,000-$35,000 annually before benefits.
AirlineStarting Hourly RateTop Hourly Rate (Seniority)Annual Estimate (Senior)
United Airlines$28.88$67.11 (Year 13)$80,000+
3030-33$83$107,000
VariesUp to $84$111,000
$35.50 (2025)N/A$46,000+ (Entry)

Union Influence, Negotiations, and Strikes

The Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA), formed in 1976, represents approximately 50,000 flight attendants across major U.S. carriers including , , and , advocating for on wages, safety protocols, and working conditions under the Railway Labor Act (RLA). Other significant unions include the Association of Professional Flight Attendants (APFA) at and the Transport Workers Union (TWU) at , which together cover tens of thousands more workers and have historically influenced industry standards by negotiating concessions on fatigue management and premium pay for irregular schedules. These organizations wield considerable leverage due to the safety-critical role of flight attendants, enabling them to pressure airlines during contract renewals, though the RLA's mediation requirements often prolong disputes and delay strikes. Negotiations typically involve multi-year cycles, with unions demanding pay increases tied to airline profitability—such as 30-40% raises post-COVID—and reforms to unpaid boarding time, which constitutes up to 20% of shift duties without compensation. For instance, AFA-CWA's 2022-2025 talks at stalled over demands for industry-leading wages, culminating in a tentative agreement in May 2025 that included substantial raises after over three years of impasse. Unions have innovated tactics like CHAOS ("Create Havoc Around Our System"), pioneered by AFA in 1993, involving targeted, intermittent walkouts on select flights to disrupt operations without triggering full RLA prohibitions, thereby amplifying while minimizing legal risks. Strikes remain rare but impactful, often authorized by overwhelming majorities yet averted through federal intervention. The 1993 APFA strike at , involving 23,000 flight attendants, halted operations for 32 days starting November 18, resulting in a with 11.5% immediate hikes and job protections after estimated losses exceeding $450 million for the carrier. More recently, flight attendants voted 99.6% to authorize a strike in 2024 amid stalled talks, pressuring toward concessions on pay equity. At United, a 99.9% strike authorization in June 2024 highlighted frustrations with protracted negotiations, though no full walkout occurred due to RLA cooling-off periods extending into 2025. Internationally, flight attendants struck on August 17, 2025, after expiration, disrupting thousands of flights until a tentative deal addressed unpaid labor, underscoring unions' ability to extract gains at the cost of operational chaos. These actions demonstrate unions' role in elevating compensation—median U.S. flight attendant pay rose 20% from 2020 to 2024 amid labor militancy—but also impose billions in airline and passenger disruptions, with critics noting that RLA constraints preserve airline profitability over swift resolutions.

Scheduling, Fatigue Management, and Job Demands

Flight attendants typically operate under irregular and variable schedules determined by bidding systems, where governs the selection of monthly "lines" of flying—pre-assigned pairings of flights—or reserve status for junior members. Senior flight attendants bid first for preferred lines, often securing more predictable domestic routes or days off, while those with less may be assigned to reserve , requiring availability for on-call assignments up to 18-20 days per month with minimal advance notice. For example, on an 8-hour long-haul flight, cabin crew schedules typically include pre-flight preparations, boarding, safety demonstrations, take-off and initial services (drinks/snacks), main meal service, passenger assistance, and scheduled rest periods of 1-2 hours each, taken in rotating shifts in designated crew rest areas (bunks) to ensure continuous cabin coverage; this is followed by pre-landing preparations and service, with variations by airline, aircraft, and regulations to maintain alertness and safety. Monthly flight hours average 65-85, excluding ground duties, overtime, or flights, with periods commonly spanning 12-14 hours per day, including nights, weekends, and holidays due to continuous operations. Fatigue management is regulated primarily through (FAA) duty period limitations under 14 CFR § 121.467, which mandate a minimum of nine consecutive hours of rest following a scheduled duty period of 14 hours or less, though this can be reduced to eight hours under unforeseen circumstances; a 2022 FAA final rule enhanced protections by prohibiting reductions below 10 hours for certain extended duties and aligning requirements more closely with pilot rest rules to mitigate cumulative risks. Airlines increasingly implement Fatigue Risk Management Programs (FRMPs), incorporating biomathematical models, education, and scheduling adjustments based on peer-reviewed linking irregular hours to disrupted circadian rhythms and elevated error rates. Empirical studies confirm high prevalence among cabin crew, with scoping reviews reporting unsatisfactory quality, daytime sleepiness, and increased susceptibility to disorders like , exacerbated by time-zone crossings and ultra-long-haul flights where inbound legs show significantly higher subjective levels. Job demands amplify risks through multifaceted responsibilities, including safety briefings, passenger assistance, meal service, and emergency preparedness across extended duties often involving multiple legs, , and post-9/11 security tasks that extend effective work time without compensatory rest. Physical strains from standing, lifting, and navigating , combined with in handling disruptive passengers or incidents, contribute to chronic impacts such as musculoskeletal issues and hormonal disruptions, with one study finding 61% of flight attendants reporting moderate-to-severe menstrual cramps versus 51% in comparison groups like teachers. Irregular schedules disproportionately affect women and senior crew, correlating with elevated symptoms and reduced recovery, underscoring the need for seniority-based protections and evidence-based countermeasures over anecdotal union advocacy.

Occupational Health Risks

Cosmic Radiation Exposure and Cancer Correlations

Flight attendants and other cabin crew experience elevated exposure to cosmic ionizing radiation (CIR) due to high-altitude flights, where the Earth's atmosphere provides less shielding from galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events. CIR consists primarily of high-energy protons and heavy ions that penetrate fuselages, delivering ionizing doses that can induce damage, including double-strand breaks, potentially contributing to through or genomic instability. Annual effective doses for cabin crew typically range from 1 to 5 millisieverts (mSv), with averages around 2-3 mSv for frequent flyers, exceeding the general population's natural background of approximately 2-3 mSv but remaining below occupational limits of 20 mSv set by bodies like the . Long-haul routes, particularly polar flights, can push exposures toward 6 mSv annually, prompting monitoring requirements in regions like the for crew exceeding 1 mSv per year. Epidemiological studies consistently report associations between cabin crew occupation and elevated cancer incidence for specific sites, though establishing direct causality from CIR remains challenging due to low-dose exposures, confounding factors like disrupting circadian rhythms, reproductive histories, and variables (e.g., alcohol use, UV exposure from layovers). While cosmic radiation exposure is higher for aircrew (1-6 mSv/year) compared to negligible levels for occasional passengers (0.02-0.05 mSv per transcontinental flight), studies indicate no significant increase in cancer risk attributable to cosmic radiation alone. In contrast, night shift work carries more substantial chronic health risks, including elevated breast cancer (e.g., ~3.3% risk increase per 5 years of night work), cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and sleep issues due to circadian disruption. In flight attendants, who experience both, combined cosmic radiation and shift work contribute to higher breast cancer rates (SIR 1.4-1.5), with potential synergistic effects, though circadian disruption appears more impactful for some risks. A 2018 cross-sectional study of over 5,000 U.S. flight attendants found a 1.5-fold higher prevalence of and non-melanoma skin cancers compared to the general population, alongside increases in uterine, gastrointestinal, , and cervical cancers. Similarly, a meta-analysis of pilots and cabin crew indicated approximately double the incidence relative to controls, potentially linked to CIR's high particles that evade typical repair mechanisms. risks appear particularly pronounced among female crew, with some cohorts showing standardized incidence ratios of 1.3-1.9, though adjustments for parity and use attenuate but do not eliminate the associations. Despite these correlations, comprehensive reviews highlight inconsistencies across studies, with no uniform observed and risks often modest (e.g., 10-50% relative increases for select cancers) amid healthy worker effects that might bias toward underestimation. CIR doses, while chronic, fall in the low-dose regime where the extrapolates risks from atomic bomb survivors, yet biological evidence suggests possible thresholds or adaptive responses at such levels, complicating attribution. A 2024 Korean cohort of air transportation workers, including flight attendants, reported no overall cancer excess but noted trends in radiation-sensitive sites like , underscoring the need for personalized and longitudinal tracking. Unlike pilots, cabin crew exposure remains unregulated in the U.S., with calls for monitoring to disentangle CIR effects from other occupational hazards. Ongoing research emphasizes deficiencies as a potential modifier, with flight attendants showing altered repair kinetics post-exposure .

Circadian Rhythm Disruption and Mental Health

Flight attendants frequently encounter disruptions due to irregular schedules, including long-haul flights across multiple time zones, night shifts, and variable durations, which desynchronize their internal biological clocks from environmental light-dark cycles. This misalignment, akin to chronic , results in persistent symptoms such as , , and fragmented sleep, with studies reporting unsatisfactory sleep quality in up to 70-80% of cabin crew members. Such disruptions correlate with elevated risks, including higher incidences of depression, anxiety, and stress compared to the general . A 2018 cross-sectional study of over 1,000 U.S. flight attendants found they reported 2 to 5.7 times greater prevalence of depression, anxiety, and than non-flight workers, attributing these partly to sleep disturbances from and . Similarly, a 2020 analysis of European cabin crew during the grounding revealed significant positive correlations between existential fears, job insecurity, and symptoms of depression (mean score increase of 15-20% post-grounding), exacerbated by pre-existing circadian desynchrony. Recent research further links specific circadian elements, such as meal timing and "meal ," to psychological outcomes; a 2024 cross-sectional study of 496 personnel showed that eating windows exceeding 12 hours or delayed meals aligning with shifts raised odds of depression by 1.5-2.0 times and anxiety by up to 2.5 times, independent of flight hours. Evening chronotypes—individuals preferring later sleep-wake cycles—among flight attendants also predict heightened depression risk, with a 2025 study identifying insecure attachment styles as an amplifying factor in this subgroup, suggesting circadian preference interacts with stressors. While these associations highlight circadian disruption as a causal contributor via mechanisms like altered melatonin production and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation, confounding factors such as and lifestyle must be considered; longitudinal data indicate cognitive deficits, including impairments, emerge after years of exposure but do not uniformly predict clinical mental disorders. Interventions like strategic light exposure and timed supplementation have shown preliminary efficacy in mitigating symptoms, though adoption remains limited in the industry.

Other Environmental and Physical Hazards

Flight attendants face significant risks from , which is the leading cause of non-fatal injuries in operations. According to a analysis of turbulence-related incidents from 2005 to 2016, flight attendants accounted for over three-quarters of such injuries within aircraft, with the majority occurring in the aft cabin section due to factors like work and unsecured movement during unexpected encounters. A study of U.S. cabin injuries reported 179 turbulence-related cases, with 45.8% classified as serious, including fractures and sprains, and a non-significant upward trend in incidence rates over the period examined. In 1997, one major U.S. carrier documented over 230 turbulence injuries among flight attendants, resulting in more than 2,800 lost workdays, underscoring the physical demands of standing duties and the biomechanical forces involved. Musculoskeletal disorders represent another prevalent , primarily from repetitive lifting of luggage, pushing carts, and awkward postures in confined spaces. A survey of South African flight attendants found 58% experienced work-related , predominantly in the lower back (84.1%) and shoulders (39.7%), linked to tasks like overhead bin loading of items weighing 5-10 kg. Among female cabin crew, 82% reported work-related musculoskeletal in at least one body region, with high rates in the feet/ankles and lower back attributed to prolonged standing, uneven cabin floors, and load-bearing activities. These disorders arise from ergonomic stressors, including trunk flexion and rotation during service, which exceed general population baselines for occupational strain. Environmental factors such as cabin air quality and pressure variations contribute to additional hazards. Exposure to potential contaminants from engine oil fumes during "fume events" has been associated with acute symptoms like , headaches, and respiratory , with peer-reviewed evidence indicating risks of neurological and cardiological effects from inhalation. Low cabin humidity (often below 20%) and pressure equivalent to 6,000-8,000 feet altitude exacerbate , dry eyes, and sinus issues, compounded by noise levels up to 85 dB that pose risks without consistent mitigation. risk elevates on long-haul flights exceeding 8 hours due to immobility periods and hypobaric conditions, though flight attendants' duties may partially offset passenger-level vulnerabilities; case reports document bilateral DVT in crew members, with overall incidence tied to flight duration.

Emergency Response and Heroism

Training for Crises and Evacuations

Flight attendants receive initial and recurrent training in and evacuation procedures as mandated by (FAA) regulations under 14 CFR § 121.417, which requires coverage of each airplane type, model, and configuration through methods including instruction, drills, demonstrations, and proficiency checks. This training equips crew to address scenarios such as cabin fires, smoke intrusion, rapid decompression, and security threats, prioritizing passenger egress and survival. Initial programs typically span several weeks, incorporating classroom theory on fire chemistry, oxygen system deployment, and physiological effects of emergencies, followed by practical sessions to ensure competence in assigned duties per 14 CFR § 121.421. Evacuation training focuses on achieving full aircraft clearance within 90 seconds, a standard derived from certification requirements in 14 CFR § 25.803, where simulated conditions test egress using half the required exits while accounting for factors like low visibility and passenger loads. practice commands such as "brace, brace, brace" and "unbuckle and come this way," emphasizing operation, slide inflation, and passenger flow control to mitigate or congestion, often in mock cabins replicating interiors. Drills include land-based evacuations, water ditching simulations with life vests and rafts, and handling impaired or non-compliant passengers, with proficiency verified through timed exercises. Crisis-specific elements cover fire suppression using handheld extinguishers on Class A, B, and electrical fires, requiring knowledge of fire propagation in confined spaces and coordination with flight crew, as outlined in FAA Advisory Circular 120-80B. Trainees conduct live-fire exercises in controlled environments to simulate galley or lavatory blazes, practicing protective breathing equipment (PBE) donning within seconds and source isolation. Decompression training involves rapid donning of masks, cabin pressurization dynamics, and post-event assessments, while security crises include hijacking response and non-lethal restraint techniques. Recurrent training occurs at least every 12 months, with additional drills mandated every 24 calendar months to maintain skills, including reevaluation of procedures amid evolving risks like those prompting FAA directives in September 2025. International standards from the (IATA) align with these, recommending operator-specific drills for human factors in emergencies, such as to enhance decision-making under stress. These programs, validated through competence checks, ensure flight attendants can execute coordinated responses that have empirically reduced fatalities in survivable accidents by facilitating orderly evacuations.

September 11, 2001, and Notable Interventions

On , flight attendant placed a 25-minute call to an operations center shortly after the hijacking began at approximately 8:19 a.m., reporting that assailants had stabbed several crew members, sprayed an irritant in the cabin, and slit the throat of a passenger while claiming to possess a bomb. Ong provided specific details, including the seat numbers of three hijackers (15A, 9C, and 9D), which allowed authorities to identify and others from the passenger manifest, confirming the deliberate nature of the attack. Concurrently, flight attendant Amy Sweeney made airphone calls to her supervisor, relaying similar observations about the hijackers' use of knives to threaten passengers and crew, and noting the plane's course deviation toward ; these transmissions, lasting until moments before impact at 8:46 a.m., contributed to early FAA notifications of the unfolding plot. United Airlines Flight 175 saw flight attendant Robert Fangman report the hijacking via airphone to a San Francisco-based operator around 8:52 a.m., describing how hijackers had assaulted the cockpit crew and cabin attendants with knives, forcing passengers to the rear of the aircraft. This call, one of several from the flight, preceded the plane's crash into the South Tower at 9:03 a.m., and helped corroborate patterns from Flight 11. On United Flight 93, delayed takeoff enabled passengers and crew to learn of the earlier crashes via cell phone calls to family members; flight attendant CeeCee Lyles contacted her husband at 9:58 a.m., whispering that the plane had been hijacked and she loved him, while colleague Sandy Bradshaw used an airphone to alert ground staff and, per survivor accounts reconstructed from calls, rallied passengers by boiling water in the galley to deploy as a scalding weapon against the hijackers. Bradshaw's actions supported the passenger revolt that began around 9:57 a.m., causing the plane to crash in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, at 10:03 a.m., preventing it from reaching its presumed target in Washington, D.C. Across the four flights, 25 flight attendants perished, their reports furnishing the U.S. government with pivotal intelligence on al-Qaeda tactics despite the absence of reinforced cockpit doors at the time. Beyond 9/11, flight attendants have executed notable interventions in other crises. During the 1986 hijacking of in , , attendant shielded three children from gunfire, distributed passports to enable passenger escape identification, and opened an emergency exit to facilitate evacuation of over 40 survivors before terrorists killed her at age 22 while she protected others from execution. In the 1968 crash of at Heathrow, attendant re-entered a smoke-filled cabin to retrieve a passenger's brace, enabling additional rescues but perishing from burns and ; her actions saved dozens amid an engine fire that killed six. These instances underscore flight attendants' training emphasis on passenger safety and rapid decision-making under duress, often at personal risk.

Post-2001 Security Enhancements and Incidents

Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, U.S. authorities mandated enhanced security training for cabin crew members, including flight attendants, to address vulnerabilities exposed in the hijackings. The (FAA) required airlines operating under 14 CFR Part 121 to incorporate specialized security curricula into initial and recurrent training programs, focusing on threat recognition, de-escalation techniques, and coordination with crew during potential hijackings or attempts. This training emphasized for security events, building on pre-9/11 safety protocols but expanding to include non-cooperative passenger restraint and rapid reporting of suspicious activities via secure communication channels. By 2005, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) confirmed that these programs had been implemented across major carriers, with flight attendants receiving instruction on improvised barriers and defensive positioning to protect the . Procedural changes further integrated flight attendants into layered security defenses, such as protocols for restricting access when pilots exit for physiological needs. Airlines adopted temporary secondary barriers, often using carts or equipment to block the door, a practice formalized post-9/11 to mitigate risks during brief absences. In response to ongoing concerns about cabin-to- breaches, the FAA's 2024 Reauthorization Act mandated installation of permanent physical secondary barriers on new passenger aircraft by 2025, advocated by unions to enhance protection without relying solely on crew vigilance. These measures complemented reinforced doors installed by 2003, reducing flight attendants' direct entry needs while assigning them monitoring roles for unauthorized access attempts. Empirical data from FAA audits indicate these enhancements contributed to zero successful hijackings of U.S. commercial flights since , attributing to combined factors including armed air marshals and passenger awareness, with cabin crew serving as the primary on-board sentinels. Notable incidents underscore flight attendants' roles in post-9/11 threat mitigation. On December 25, 2009, aboard en route to , a observed flames from passenger Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's attempt to detonate explosives concealed in his underwear; she alerted the crew and passengers, facilitating restraint and without fatalities. Similar vigilance occurred in unruly passenger cases, which escalated post-2001, with FAA data logging over 5,000 incidents annually by the , often involving intoxication or requiring flight attendants to employ trained restraint holds and diversion requests. A 2013 analysis of U.S. carrier operations found that expanded security duties sometimes conflicted with service demands, yet empirically reduced breach risks, as no post-9/11 event escalated to hijacking despite rising disruptions. These outcomes reflect causal improvements from , though unions have critiqued incomplete , such as delayed secondary barrier mandates.

Controversies and Criticisms

Sexual Harassment Reports and Passenger Interactions

Flight attendants frequently report experiencing from passengers, with surveys indicating high prevalence rates. A 2018 survey by the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA), representing over 50,000 cabin crew members, found that 68% of respondents had encountered at some point in their careers, including 35% reporting verbal from passengers and 18% physical from passengers. A 2020 study published in the Annals of Work Exposures and Health, drawing from surveys of North American and U.K. flight attendants, reported that 26% of North American respondents and 11% of U.K. respondents experienced on the job, primarily from passengers, pilots, or coworkers, with underreporting noted due to fear of retaliation or inadequate airline support. Such incidents often involve unwanted verbal comments, advances, or physical contact, exacerbated by alcohol consumption among passengers. A 2006 Finnish study comparing flight attendants to hotel and restaurant workers found repeated rates of 31% among flight attendants, significantly higher than in the comparison groups (8% and 4%), attributing this to the confined, service-oriented environment of cabins. Preliminary data from a 2015 U.S. study indicated 24.6% of flight attendants experienced at least one instance of in the prior 12 months. A 2024 analysis of cabin crew perspectives on disruptive passenger behavior highlighted frequent unwanted sexual advances toward both male and female crew, often underreported despite posing safety risks in the close-quarters setting. Airline responses to these reports have included enhanced training and reporting protocols, though critics argue enforcement remains inconsistent. The U.S. defines in-flight to include verbal or physical of crew, urging immediate reporting to attendants or airline staff. The FBI, noting a rise in investigated cases, opened 96 in-flight investigations in 2023, many involving or unwanted touching that could target crew amid broader passenger interactions. Unions like AFA-CWA have pushed for mandatory alcohol limits and better tools, citing passenger intoxication as a common factor in 68% of experiences per their . While union surveys may reflect self-selected respondents inclined to report issues, converging from academic and government sources confirms as a persistent in passenger-facing roles.

Union Militancy and Economic Impacts

Flight attendant unions, particularly the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA) in the United States, have employed militant strategies such as strike authorizations and (Create Havoc Around Our System) tactic, involving intermittent work stoppages to pressure airlines for concessions on wages and work rules. In September 2024, AFA-CWA members at voted 99.6% to authorize a , demanding double-digit base pay increases and compensation for unpaid boarding time, while similar overwhelming approvals occurred at (99.2%) and (99.99%), reflecting coordinated efforts amid stagnant wages post-pandemic. These actions have imposed substantial economic costs on airlines through flight cancellations and revenue losses. The 2025 flight attendant , involving the Canadian Union of Public Employees, resulted in an estimated $270–375 million hit to the carrier's operating income, alongside disruptions for approximately 500,000 passengers and subsequent management job cuts unrelated to but exacerbated by the labor unrest. In the U.S., historical militancy in the 1980s, including prolonged strikes at Eastern Airlines and Continental, contributed to wage reductions and carrier failures, as unsuccessful actions eroded worker leverage amid and non-union competition. Broader industry effects include elevated operational costs from negotiated wage hikes—such as demands for 35–40% initial increases plus annual raises—which airlines often pass to consumers via higher fares or absorb through reduced profitability, with global labor unrest in 2025 raising aviation sector expenses by about 1.3%. Persistent disputes also amplify financial instability, as seen in threats of holiday-season strikes that deterred bookings and strained recovery from events like the downturn, ultimately burdening passengers with delays and taxpayers via ripple effects on connected sectors like .

Discrimination Claims Versus Empirical Outcomes

Despite persistent claims of gender discrimination in the airline industry, empirical workforce data indicate that flight attendants remain overwhelmingly female, comprising 78.9% to 86% of the occupation in the United States as of recent analyses. This overrepresentation relative to the general labor force—where women constitute about 47% of workers—suggests minimal systemic or retention for women, contrasting with historical challenges like ages or pregnancy policies that were litigated and reformed under Title VII in cases such as Burwell v. (1978). Individual lawsuits alleging gender-based harassment or stereotyping persist, with studies reporting 26% of North American flight attendants experiencing primarily from passengers or colleagues, yet aggregate employment outcomes do not reflect widespread exclusion. Racial discrimination claims have also surfaced, including settlements like ' $99,000 payment in 2025 for mistreatment of an Asian American employee of Mongolian ancestry and ongoing suits against carriers like Delta. However, ethnic composition data reveal a diverse cabin crew: attendants at 59%, or Latino at 15.8%, Black or African American at 10.2%, and Asian at 7.6%, aligning closely with or exceeding U.S. population proportions for several groups. This distribution, drawn from and industry surveys, implies that while isolated incidents occur—and some plaintiffs prevail, as in upheld age verdicts against United—broader hiring and retention patterns do not substantiate claims of pervasive racial exclusion, particularly when contrasted with underrepresentation in pilot roles (e.g., only 3.4% Black pilots). Age-related claims represent a more substantiated area of concern, with successful litigation such as the 2022 Tenth Circuit affirmation of a verdict awarding two United flight attendants $400,000 each for willful age discrimination in furloughs during the airline's 2001-2006 . Empirical outcomes here show longer careers possible post-reforms, though older attendants (e.g., a 79-year-old in a 2019 Delta suit) face scrutiny amid physical demands. Overall, while lawsuits highlight real vulnerabilities—especially for age and weight policies historically challenged under theories—the profession's demographics and employment stability for women and minorities underscore that discrimination claims often pertain to edge cases rather than defining industry-wide outcomes.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.