Hubbry Logo
Al-TabariAl-TabariMain
Open search
Al-Tabari
Community hub
Al-Tabari
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Al-Tabari
Al-Tabari
from Wikipedia

Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Jarīr ibn Yazīd al-Ṭabarī (Arabic: أَبُو جَعْفَر مُحَمَّد بْن جَرِير بْن يَزِيد ٱلطَّبَرِيّ; 839–923 CE / 224–310 AH), commonly known as al-Ṭabarī (Arabic: ٱلطَّبَرِيّ), was a Sunni Muslim scholar, polymath, historian, exegete, jurist, and theologian from Amol, Tabaristan, present-day Iran. Among the most prominent figures of the Islamic Golden Age, al-Tabari is widely known for his historical works and expertise in Quranic exegesis, and has been described as "an impressively prolific polymath".[2] He authored works on a diverse range of subjects, including world history, poetry, lexicography, grammar, ethics, mathematics, and medicine.[2][3] Among his most famous and influential works are his Quranic commentary, Tafsir al-Tabari, and historical chronicle, Tarikh al-Tabari.

Key Information

Al-Tabari followed the Shafi'i school for nearly a decade before he developed his own interpretation of Islamic jurisprudence. His understanding of it was both sophisticated and remarkably fluid, and, as such, he continued to develop his ideas and thoughts on juristic matters right until the end of his life.[4]

Al-Tabari's school of jurisprudence "flourished among Sunni ulama for two centuries after his death", before it eventually became extinct.[5] It was commonly designated as the Jariri school.

Biography

[edit]

Tabari was born in Amol, Tabaristan (some 20 km south of the Caspian Sea) in the winter of 838–39.[6] He has been described as either of Persian or Arab origin.[7][8][9][10][11][12] He memorized the Qur'an at seven, was a qualified prayer leader at eight, and began to study the prophetic traditions at nine. He left home to study in 236 AH[13] (850/1 AD), when he was twelve. He retained close ties to his hometown. He returned at least twice, the second time in 290 AH (903 AD), when his outspokenness caused some uneasiness and led to his quick departure.[14]

He first went to Ray (Rhages), where he remained for some five years.[15] A major teacher in Rayy was Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Humayd al-Razi, who had earlier taught in Baghdad, but was now in his seventies[16] While in Ray, he also studied Muslim jurisprudence according to the Hanafi school.[17] Among other material, ibn Humayd taught Jarir Tabari the historical works of ibn Ishaq, especially al-Sirah, the life of Muhammad.[18] Tabari was thus introduced in youth to pre-Islamic and early Islamic history. Tabari quotes ibn Humayd frequently, but little is known about Tabari's other teachers in Rayy.[16]

Tabari then travelled to study in Baghdad under Ahmad ibn Hanbal, who, however, had recently died (in late 855 or early 856).[19] Tabari possibly made a pilgrimage prior to his first arrival in Baghdad.[19] He left Baghdad probably in 242 AH (856/7 AD)[20] to travel through the southern cities of Basra, Kufah and Wasit.[19] There, he met a number of eminent and venerable scholars.[20] In addition to his previous study of Hanafi law, Tabari also studied the Shafi'i, Maliki and Zahiri rites.[21] Tabari's study of the latter school was with the founder, Dawud al-Zahiri,[22] and Tabari hand-copied and transmitted many of his teacher's works.[23] Tabari was then well-versed in four of the five remaining Sunni legal schools, before founding his own independent, yet eventually extinct, school. His debates with his former teachers and classmates were known, and served as a demonstration of said independence.[24] Notably missing from this list is the Hanbali school, the fourth largest legal school within Sunni Islam in the present era. Tabari's view of Ibn Hanbal, the school's founder, became decidedly negative later in life. Tabari did not give Ibn Hanbal's dissenting opinion any weight at all when considering the various views of jurists, stating that Ibn Hanbal had not even been a jurist at all but merely a recorder of Hadith.[25]

On his return to Baghdad, he took a tutoring position from the vizier, Ubaydallah ibn Yahya ibn Khaqan.[26] This would have been before A.H. 244 (858), since the vizier was out of office and in exile from 244 to 248 (858–9 to 862).[26] There is an anecdote telling that Tabari had agreed to tutor for ten dinars a month, but his teaching was so effective and the boy's writing so impressive that the teacher was offered a tray of dinars and dirhams. The ever-ethical Tabari declined the offer, saying he had undertaken to do his work at the specified amount, and could not honorably take more.[27] That is one of a number of narratives about him declining gifts or giving gifts of equal or greater amount in return.[27]

In his late twenties, he travelled to Syria, Palestine, India and Egypt.[28] In Beirut, he made the highly significant connection of al-Abbas ibn al-Walid ibn Mazyad al-'Udhri al-Bayruti (c. 169–270/785–86 to 883–84). Al-Abbas instructed Tabari in the Syrian school's variant readings of the Qur'an and transmitted through his father al-Walid the legal views of al-Awza'i, Beirut's prominent jurist from a century earlier.[citation needed]

Tabari arrived in Egypt in 253 AH (867 AD),[29] and some time after 256/870, he returned to Baghdad,[30] possibly making a pilgrimage on the way. If so, he did not stay long in the Hijaz. Tabari had a private income from his father while he was still living, and then the inheritance.[31] He took money for teaching. Among Tabari's students was Ibn al-Mughallis, who was also a student of Tabari's own teacher Muhammad bin Dawud al-Zahiri; Ibn al-Mughallis lavished Tabari with almost excessive praise.[32][33] He never took a government or a judicial position.[34]

Tabari was some fifty years old when al-Mu'tadid became caliph. He was well past seventy in the year his History was published. During the intervening years, he was a famous (if somewhat controversial) personality. Among the figures of his age, he had access to sources of information equal to anyone, except, perhaps, those who were directly connected with decision making within the government. Most, if not all, the materials for the histories of al-Mu'tadid, al-Muktafi, and the early years of al-Muqtadir, were collected by him about the time the reported events took place. His accounts are as authentic as one can expect from that period.[35] Tabari final years were marked by conflict with the Hanbalite followers of Al-Hasan ibn 'Ali al-Barbahari, a student of the students of Ibn Hanbal. Tabari was known for his view that Hanbalism was not a legitimate school of thought, as Ibn Hanbal was a compiler of traditions and not a proper jurist.[36] The Hanbalites of Baghdad would often stone Tabari's house, escalating the persecution to the point where Abbasid authorities had to subdue them by force.[37] The Baghdad chief of police tried to organize a debate between Tabari and the Hanbalites to settle their differences. While Tabari accepted, the Hanbalites did not show up, but instead came later to pelt his house with stones again. The constant threat of violence from the Hanbalites hung over Tabari's head for the rest of his life.[38]

Tabari died on 17 February 923.[38] Some sources suggest that Abbasid authorities buried Tabari at night in secret as they feared mob violence by the Hanbalites,[39] but these reports are uncertain, and other sources agree that he was buried in the morning after his death. Either way, he was buried in his home.[38] Regardless, Tabari was remembered positively by contemporaries such as Ibn Duraid,[38] and the Hanbalites were condemned by Abbasid authorities in their entirety for persecuting opponents, roughly a decade later. They even prevented people from meeting with him, and Ibn Jarir remained trapped in his home until he died.[40] The period in which Tabari lived was full of religious differences and political unrest, which was characterized by the stigmatization and accusation of individuals.[41]

Tomb of al-Tabari in Baghdad, Iraq

Personal characteristics

[edit]

He is described as having a dark complexion, large eyes and a long beard. He was tall and slender[42] and his hair and beard remained black until he was very old. He was attentive to his health, avoiding red meat, fats, and other foods he deemed unhealthy. He was seldom sick before his last decade, when he suffered from bouts of pleurisy. When he was ill, he treated himself (to the disapproval of physicians). He had a sense of humor, though serious subjects he treated seriously. He had studied poetry when young and enjoyed writing, reciting and participating in poetic exchanges. It is said that he was asked in Egypt about al-Tirimmah, and was able to recite this 7th century poet's work for Egyptians who had merely heard al-Tirimmah's name.[43] Ali ibn al-Athir, in his memoirs, he confirmed these features. He was witty and urbane, clean, and well mannered.[44] He avoided coarse speech, instead displaying refined eloquence.[42] He had a good grounding in grammar, lexicography, and philology. Such were considered essential for Qur'anic commentary. He knew Persian and was acquainted with the origins of various foreign loan words in Arabic from a number of other languages.[citation needed]

He died in Baghdad on 17 February 923.[38]

Bal'ami's 14th century Persian version of Universal History by Tabari

Tabari's ordeal with Hanbalites

[edit]

His ijtihad (independent judgement) led to criticism from the Zahiri and some Hanbali followers. Though his conflict with the leaders of the Zahiri school was resolved, his disagreements with the Hanbalis were more deep-set, leading to a violent altercation in which he was besieged in his own home. The disagreement was mainly jurisprudential -- al-Tabari did not seem to think much of ibn Hanbal as a jurist, but mainly saw him as a scholar of hadith. Al-Tabari was also accused of being a Jahmite heretic, while his respect for 'Ali ibn Abi Talib exposed him to accusations of Shi'ite sympathies. At the same time, he incurred the wrath of the Shi'ites by defending the previous three caliphs.[45]

In Baghdad, three Hanbalites (who do not seem further identifiable) asked al-Tabari about his views on a tradition attributed to Mujahid ibn Jabr, concerning the explanation of the verse 79 from Surat al-Isra' in the Qur'an about the Praiseworthy Station of Muhammad, known as "al-Maqam al-Mahmud".[46][47]

The verse is: And rise at ˹the last˺ part of the night, offering additional prayers, so your Lord may raise you to a station of praise.[Quran 17:79]

In the books of Tafsir (interpretation of the Qur'an), authors said that the Praiseworthy Station (al-Maqam al-Mahmud) said in the above verse is the most highest place in Paradise, which will be granted to the Muhammad and none else, and the position of intercession (Shafa'a) will be giving to him by permission of God on behalf of the believers on the Day of Judgment. Muhammad will intercede on their behalf, so that God will relieve them of the suffering of such a situation. However, the Hanbalites interpreted the Praiseworthy Station as the seat of Muhammad by God on the Throne, despite the overall weakness of the narrations supporting it.[48]

Al-Tabari is said to have declared bluntly that it was absurd. Moreover, he recited:[49]

ولا له في عرشه جليس سبحان من ليس له أنيس
Glory to Him (God), Who has no comrade nor companion sitting on His Throne

Upon hearing this, the fanatic Hanbali followers attacked him fiercely, and stoned his residence and caused a serious disturbance which had to be subdued by force. Trouble with the Hanbalites that took a similar form was also reported at the time of al-Tabari's death. In connection with it, Nazuk is mentioned as chief of police. He was appointed to this position only in 310/922, the year al-Tabari died, but he appears to have held high positions in the police before, and may already have been in charge of al-Tabari's protection against potential Hanbalite violence. In 309/921, the wazir 'Ali b. 'Isa had offered al-Tabari the opportunity to debate the matter with the Hanbalites in his residence. Al-Tabari agreed, but the Hanbalites did not show up. However, shortly before his death, Hanbalite rioters supposedly pelted his house with stones so numerous that they formed a large wall in front of it.[50][51][52][47]

According to Franz Rosenthal, "The role of Hanbalite hostility, though real, seems to have been exaggerated in connection with his death as it was in his life."[38] He further adds that "Those who knew Tabari best always played down the inconveniences he suffered from the Hanbalites."[53]

Works

[edit]
Opening lines of the Quran from a Persian translation of Tabari's commentary

Al-Tabari wrote history, theology and Qur'anic commentary. His principal and most influential works were:

His legal texts, commentaries and Qur'anic exegesis, and history, produced respectively, were published throughout his lifetime. Biographers stress his reverence for scholarship, objectivity, and independent judgement (ijtihad).[54] He rates the credibility of his sources from a theological rather than an historical standpoint, yet he opposed religious innovation. In one anecdote, Abu Kamil suggested him when he was near death, to forgive his enemies, which he agreed to, apart from one who called him an innovator.[55] Tabari was generally conciliatory, moderate, and affable.[56]

Initially, Tabari belonged to the Shafi'ite madhhab (school) of fiqh (Islamic law), and was welcomed by them. He established his own madhhab, usually designated the Jariri madhhab after his patronymic. His school failed to endure in the competitive atmosphere of the times. As a youth in Baghdad, he had applied to the Hanbalite's but received a hostile rejection.[57]

Al-Tabari's jurisprudence belongs to a type which Christopher Melchert has called "Rationalism", largely associated with the Shafi'i madhhab. It was characterized by strong scripturalist tendencies. He appears, like Dawud al-Zahiri, to restrict consensus historically, defining it as the transmission by many authorities of reports on which the Sahaba agreed unanimously. Like Dawud al-Zahiri, he also held that consensus must be tied to a text and cannot be based on legal analogy.[58]

While we still lack a satisfactory scholarly biography of this remarkable scholar, interested readers now have access to a meticulous and well-annotated translation of the sections from al-Tabari's chronicle, which constitute the most important primary source for the history of his reign. Anyone familiar with al-Tabari's chronicle knows what a formidable challenge it poses for a translator, especially for one attempting to make it accessible to an audience that includes non-specialists. There is first of all the obstacle of al-Tabari's Arabic prose, which varies greatly in style and complexity, according to the source he is using (and apparently quoting verbatim). The sections in the McAuliffe translation, drawn mostly from al-Mada'ini and 'Umar ibn Shabba, do not represent the most obscure passages to be found in al-Tabari, but they are nonetheless full of linguistic ambiguities and difficulties for the translator.[59]

He wrote extensively; his voluminous corpus containing three main titles:

The first of the two large works, generally known as the Annals (Arabic Tarikh al-Tabari). This is a universal history from the time of Qur'anic Creation to 915, and is renowned for its detail and accuracy concerning Muslim and Middle Eastern history. Tabari's work is one of the major primary sources for historians. The History commenced with the Creation, followed by accounts regarding the patriarchs, prophets, and rulers of antiquity. The history of the Sasanian Empire came next. For the period of Muhammad's life, al-Ṭabarī drew upon the extensive researches of 8th-century Medinan scholars. Although pre-Islamic influences are evident in their works, the Medinan perspective of Muslim history evolved as a theocentric (god-centred) universal history of prophecy, culminating in the career of Muhammad and not as a continuum of tribal wars and values. The sources for al-Ṭabarī's History covering the years from the Prophet’s death to the fall of the Umayyad dynasty (661–750 CE) were short monographs, each treating a major event or the circumstances attending the death of an important person. Al-Ṭabarī supplemented this material with historical reports embodied in works on genealogy, poetry, and tribal affairs. Further, details of the early ʿAbbāsid period were available to him in a few histories of the caliphs that unfortunately have come down only in the fragments preserved by al-Ṭabarī. Almost all of these accounts reflected an Iraqi perspective of the community; coupled with this is al-Ṭabarī’s scant attention to affairs in Egypt, North Africa, and Muslim Spain, so that his History does not have the secular “universal” outlook sometimes attributed to it. From the beginning of the Muslim era (dated from 622, the date of the hijrah—the Prophet Muhammad’s migration from Mecca to Medina), the History is arranged as a set of annals according to the years after the hijrah. It terminates in the year 915.

His second great work was the commentary on the Qur'an, (Arabic Tafsir al-Tabari), which was marked by the same fullness of detail as the Annals. Abul-Qaasim Ibn 'Aqil Al-Warraq says: " Imām Ibn Jarir once said to his students: “Are you all ready to write down my lesson on the commentary of the entire Holy Quran?" They enquired as to how lengthy it would be. "30 000 pages"! he replied. They said: "This would take a long time and cannot be completed in one lifetime. He therefore made it concise and kept it to 3000 pages (note, this was in reference to the old days when they used ink and hard-paper which was a bit long format today). It took him seven years to finish it from the year 283 until 290.


A perusal of Tabari shows that he in fact relied on a variety of historians and other authors, such as Abu Mihnaf, Sayf b. 'Umar, Ibn al-Kalbi, 'Awana ibn al-Hakam, Nasr b. Muzahim, al-Mada'ini, 'Urwa b. al-Zubayr, al-Zuhri, Ibn Ishaq, Waqidi, Wahb b. Munabbih, Ka'b al-Ahbar, Ibn al-Matni, al Haggag b. al-Minhal, Hisham b. 'Urwa, al-Zubayr b. Bakkar and so forth, in addition to oral accounts that were circulating at the time. In recounting his history, Tabari used numerous channels to give accounts. These are both channels that are given by the same author in a work, such as for example three different accounts that start with the isnad al-Harita.[60]

Although no subject in history, recitation of the Quran and its interpretation, poetry, grammar and vocabulary, ethics, mathematics, and theology remained untouched by Tabari, he is primarily known as the author and author of history.

Translations of Tabari's book

[edit]

Theodor Nöldeke, the German orientalist in 1878 has also translated the Sassanid section of Tabari's history into German, and has since been reprinted several times.[61][62]

Dutch orientalist Michael Jan de Goeje, in several volumes, translated Tabari's history book into Dutch, The book was later translated into English and republished in 1998 by State University of New York Press and Paris Diderot University. Hermann Zotenberg published the history of Tabari in French Language in four volumes in Paris.[63] His book on the nativities and history was translated into Latin by Giovanni da Siviglia and published in Venice in 1503. Franz Rosenthal translated in 1989 Tabari history book of three volumes, with title "History of the Middle East".[64]

Clifford Edmund Bosworth, published the book History of Tabari in three volumes with an introduction by Ehsan Yarshater in 1999 in the United States, Albania and France.[65] Planning for the translation of this great chronicle book into English in forty volumes began in 1971, led by Ehsan Yarshater as General Editor and assisted by an Editorial Board Ihsan Abbas, American University of Beirut, Clifford Edmund Bosworth University of Manchester, Jacob Lassner Wayne State University, as Supervising Editor, and Franz Rosenthal in Yale University. Estelle Whelan at the Columbia Center for Iranian Studies served as Editorial Coordinator.[66]

Ignác Goldziher Hungarian scholar, wrote in 1920 a book focusing on Tabari, titled in German as "Die Richtungen der islamischen Koranauslegung", and it was published by Brill Publishers.[67] Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary also published the complete History of the Prophets and Kings in 17 volumes in his center.[68] W. Montgomery Watt researched the history of Tabari, and from 1987 to 1999 published the book History of Tabari entitled "Muhammad at Mecca".[69] Also Manuscripts Tabari history, Tabari interpretation and translation of Tabari history stored in Central Library of Astan Quds Razavi.[70]

Moshe Pearlman, Ismail Poonawala, Fred Donner, Hugh N. Kennedy, Khalid Yahya Blankinship, R. Stephen Humphreys, Michael G. Morony, G. R. Hawting, Martin Hinds, Carole Hillenbrand, George Saliba, and Yohanan Friedmann authors and researchers were prominent, they published a collection of books on the history of Tabari with different titles.[71][72][73]

Texts relating to al-Tabari

[edit]

Al-Azdi was an extremely early witness to the reception of al-Tabari's text - indeed, much earlier than the sources that are customarily used to improve our understanding of the Tarikh al-rusul wa-l-muluk, e.g., Miskawayh, Ibn Asakir, Ibn al-Athir, and Ibn Khallikan. Second, since al-Azdi was writing in the decades following al-Tabari, his Tarikh can say something about the reception of al-Tabari Tarikh among those who immediately followed the great master. That al-Tabari's history was immensely significant we can all agree; but as to precisely how he became so significant there is no clear consensus. Returning to Forand's insight, al-Azdi frequently drew on the same authorities tapped by al-Tabari, but whose works are for the most part now lost, such as Abu Ma'shar (170/786), Abu Mikhnaf (157/774), al-Haytham ibn 'Adi (207/822), al-Madaini (around 228/843), and 'Umar ibn Shabba (262/878).[74]

Realistic depictions alternate with formalized and archetypal narrative. Tabari is careful to give his reports of these conquests a religious frame (expressions such as "Nu'aym wrote to 'Umar about the victory that God had given him" [pp. 25–26] abound), though it is worth noting that Tabari describes the initiation of the campaign in pragmatic rather than ideological terms. He states that 'Umar's decision to invade came as a result of his realization Yazdegerd was making war on him every year, and when it was suggested to him that he would continue to do this until he was driven out of his kingdom" (p. 2). The religious frame in Tabari's account is therefore not inflexible or exclusive.[75]

Reception

[edit]

In 2015, a statue of Jarir Tabari, along with another Iranian scientist, Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi, was erected in the courtyard of the National Library of Tajikistan.[76] There are streets and schools named after him in Riyadh, Doha, Amol, Qazvin, Khobar, Aqaba, Madaba, Beirut, Dhahran, Heliopolis, Kuwait, Homs, Hama and Baghdad.

Abdolhossein Zarrinkoob and Lefebvre Lucidio in a speech at the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, founded the Tabari History Research Structure Institute.[77] The Jarir Tabari first international commemoration in 1989, with a suggestion by Mohammad Ebrahim Bastani Parizi was held by Kayhan magazine at Mazandaran University.[78] In 1987, The ERTU (Egyptian Radio and Television Union) produced the first TV series that presented the life of Jarir Tabari under the name “Imam al-Tabari”, it was directed by Magdy Abou Emira starring Ezzat El Alaili. In addition to Egypt, the biographical series was shown on Arabic channels in other countries.[79][80]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī (c. 839–923 CE) was a Persian Sunni Muslim , , and exegete whose exhaustive compilations of transmitted reports form foundational sources for Islamic and Qurʾānic interpretation, notably the annalistic chronicle Taʾrīkh al-rusul waʾl-mulūk spanning creation to 915 CE and the multi-volume tafsīr Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān. Born in Āmol in the region of Ṭabaristan (modern-day northern ), al-Ṭabarī memorized the Qurʾān by age seven and pursued advanced studies in , , and related disciplines across centers of learning including Rayy, , Kūfa, Baṣra, and , training under figures such as Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. After traveling extensively in the Islamic world, he settled in around 870 CE, where he authored dozens of works, established a short-lived juridical school known as the Jaririyya, and emphasized rigorous citation of sources with their chains of transmission (isnād) to preserve authentic reports. Al-Ṭabarī's Taʾrīkh aggregates narratives from pre-Islamic prophets through Abbasid caliphal events, offering raw historical data via parallel accounts rather than synthesized judgment, which later scholars mined for verifiable details amid a mix of corroborated facts and unexamined traditions. His tafsīr, completed around 890 CE, systematically interprets verses by prioritizing explanations from the Qurʾān itself, prophetic sayings, and early companions, compiling variant opinions to highlight interpretive diversity without dogmatic resolution. These methodologies—chain-based verification and encyclopedic aggregation—cemented his legacy as a preserver of early Islamic intellectual heritage, influencing subsequent and despite occasional clashes with contemporaries over theological rigor.

Early Life and Education

Birth and Family Background

Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Jarīr ibn Yazīd al-Ṭabarī was born in the city of , capital of —a mountainous province in northern south of the —toward the end of 224 AH, equivalent to winter 838–839 CE, during the of al-Muʿtasim bi-llāh. The exact date eludes precise confirmation, as al-Ṭabarī himself expressed uncertainty regarding it in later accounts. His nisba "al-Ṭabarī" directly references his regional origins in , while fuller patronymics trace his lineage as ibn Jarīr ibn Yazīd (with some variants extending to ibn Kathīr ibn Ghālib). Details on his are sparse in historical records, but his father, Jarīr, served as a landowner of modest means who actively fostered his son's intellectual pursuits after interpreting a dream—wherein the young appeared defending Islamic law—as a divine portent of scholarly destiny. This paternal support enabled early access to education despite the family's limited resources, allowing al-Ṭabarī to memorize the Qurʾān by age seven under his father's care. Accounts of his ethnic background vary, with some attributing Persian descent to his Tabaristani roots amid the region's predominantly Iranian population, though others suggest possible settler ancestry from early Muslim expansions; no consensus resolves this ambiguity. No records mention siblings or his mother's role explicitly.

Initial Studies and Travels

Al-Tabari began his education in his hometown of in , where he memorized the entire Qur'an by the age of seven and started transcribing narratives by age nine under his father's guidance. These initial studies focused on foundational religious sciences, including Qur'anic and basic transmission, reflecting the traditional emphasis on early mastery in Islamic scholarship. At age twelve, around 236 AH (850-851 CE), al-Tabari embarked on his first major journey for knowledge (riḥla fi ṭalab al-ʿilm), traveling approximately 150 kilometers to Ray in northern Persia, where he remained for about five years. In Ray, he advanced his studies in Islamic and under scholars such as Muhammad ibn Humayd al-Razi (d. 248/862 CE), building a foundation for his later expertise in narration collection. By age seventeen, around 241 AH (855 CE), al-Tabari proceeded to , intending to study with , though the latter had died shortly before his arrival. There, he engaged with Shafi'i under teachers like al-Hasan al-Za'farani and Abu Sa'id al-Istakhri, alongside Qur'anic readings with Ahmad ibn Yusuf al-Taghlibi. He extended his travels to nearby centers in , including , where he studied with figures such as Muhammad ibn Musa al-Harshi and Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-A'la al-San'ani, and , focusing on poetry under al-Tha'lab. These visits, around 857 CE, prioritized gathering diverse transmissions for and . Al-Tabari's journeys continued to the and , passing through to study with Ibrahim al-Juzajani and for Qur'anic recitation with al-'Abbas ibn al-Walid al-'Udhri. In () around 253 AH (867 CE), he delved into Shafi'i and Maliki with scholars including Rabi' ibn Sulayman al-Muradi, Abu Ibrahim al-Muzani, and Sa'd ibn 'Abd Allah ibn 'Abd al-Hakam. He also toured and , amassing historical and traditional data through direct scholarly interactions, which informed his comprehensive approach to narration without initial critical filtering. By his early twenties, these travels had equipped him with mastery over multiple disciplines, establishing his reputation among contemporaries.

Scholarly Methodology

Principles of Isnad and Narration Collection

Al-Tabari's approach to narration collection was rooted in the rigorous standards of scholarship, emphasizing the isnad (chain of transmission) as the primary mechanism for assessing reliability. He required complete, connected chains tracing reports back to original transmitters, such as eyewitnesses or authorized texts, and narrated only what he had directly heard from teachers or verified sources. This method extended to both historical and exegetical works, where he avoided unsubstantiated personal opinions or derivations without supporting transmission. In compiling narrations for al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, al-Tabari gathered reports exhaustively from diverse informants, including those later deemed weak (e.g., , Hisham al-Kalbi), without initial filtering for authenticity. His principle was to document all variants—regardless of perceived strength—to preserve the raw tradition and enable evaluation via narrator criticism (jarh wa ta'dil) and text scrutiny (matn). He occasionally incorporated disconnected (mursal) chains but prioritized continuous ones, often citing intermediaries explicitly (e.g., "narrated to me from so-and-so"). Al-Tabari refrained from imposing his own judgments on veracity, instead presenting conflicting accounts impartially with formulas like "a difference exists in this matter" or "some report...," thereby shifting the burden of authentication to readers versed in hadith sciences. In the work's introduction, he cautioned that it contained potential fabrications, underscoring his role as compiler rather than arbiter. This non-selective aggregation, while risking inclusion of spurious material, facilitated of historical events through traceable lineages, contrasting with more interpretive contemporaries. For Jami' al-Bayan fi Ta'wil al-Qur'an, he applied similar isnad principles but with heightened scrutiny, favoring transmissions from the Prophet, Companions, and Successors while reporting secondary variants (e.g., Israelite narratives via ) for completeness. After enumerating options, he selected the preferred interpretation based on evidential preponderance, often invoking consensus (ijma') where chains aligned. This dual emphasis on exhaustive collection and chain verification preserved empirical traces of early Islamic transmission, though it demanded critical engagement to discern causal validity amid variants.

Critical Evaluation and Reporting of Variants

Al-Tabari's approach to critical evaluation centered on the scrutiny of isnad (chains of transmission) for continuity and the credibility of narrators, drawing from hadith scholarship to assess reliability without always explicitly grading reports as sahih (sound) or da'if (weak). He prioritized narrations traceable to early authorities such as the Companions (sahabah) and Successors (tabi'un), verifying origins where possible, as seen in his exegesis of verses like Quran 2:65 and 18 (Sura al-Kahf), where he cross-referenced multiple chains to establish plausibility. However, he included transmissions from narrators later deemed unreliable, such as al-Kalbi or al-Waqidi, adhering to the compilatory method of hadith scholars by providing the full isnad for reader assessment rather than preemptively excluding them. In his Quranic (Jami' al-Bayan), al-Tabari reported an extensive array of interpretive variants for each verse, often presenting dozens of opinions derived from linguistic, legal, and sources, before articulating his preferred interpretation based on the preponderance of evidence from authentic chains and philological analysis. He critically weighed alternatives—such as literal versus metaphorical readings (e.g., humans transformed into apes in Quran 2:65)—rejecting unsubstantiated personal conjecture and favoring views aligned with prophetic traditions, while noting evidential strengths without dogmatic imposition. This method preserved scholarly diversity, enabling subsequent evaluation, though it occasionally led to inclusion of anthropomorphic or speculative reports if supported by early isnad. For his historical chronicle (Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk), al-Tabari adopted a similarly exhaustive reporting strategy, compiling akhbar (historical reports) chronologically and presenting conflicting variants verbatim with their isnad, such as disputes over the first male convert to Islam or precise event timelines, without resolving contradictions through forced harmonization. He maintained neutrality by phrasing differences as "some have said" and segmenting narratives to juxtapose variances, allowing implicit evaluation via chain comparison rather than authorial fiat, though he occasionally remarked on improbabilities based on source preponderance. This impartiality reflected his commitment to transmitting received material intact, prioritizing completeness over selective curation, and provided a foundational model for later historians by embedding critical tools within the text itself.

Major Works

Quranic Exegesis (Jami' al-Bayan fi Ta'wil al-Qur'an)

Jami' al-Bayan fi Ta'wil al-Qur'an, commonly known as , is the comprehensive Quranic commentary authored by Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari, spanning approximately 3,000 pages in classical editions and covering the entire verse by verse. Completed in the early CE before al-Tabari's death in 923 CE, it represents one of the earliest systematic in Islamic scholarship, drawing on a vast array of transmitted reports. The work prioritizes bil-ma'thur, relying on narrations from the , his companions, and successors, authenticated through chains of transmission (isnad). Al-Tabari's emphasizes exhaustive collection of variant interpretations, followed by critical based on evidentiary strength, linguistic , and contextual coherence, often selecting a preferred explanation (ikhtiar) while reporting alternatives without dismissal unless demonstrably weak. He incorporates discussions on (variant Quranic readings), abrogated verses (naskh), legal rulings (), and etymological insights, reflecting his expertise in and . This approach ensures transparency in sourcing, with thousands of hadiths and athar cited, enhancing the tafsir's credibility as a repository of early interpretive traditions despite occasional inclusion of weaker narrations common to the era. The exerted profound influence during the Abbasid period, serving as a foundational reference for subsequent scholars like and al-Razi, who built upon its transmitted corpus while introducing more rationalist elements. Its methodological rigor in prioritizing authenticated reports over personal opinion distinguished it from later works favoring tafsir bil-ra'y, establishing a benchmark for empirical fidelity in Quranic studies. Modern evaluations affirm its enduring value for reconstructing formative Islamic , though scholars note the need to cross-verify its narrations against primary collections due to al-Tabari's inclusive reporting style.

Historical Chronicle (Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk)

Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, translated as "The History of the Prophets and Kings," represents Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari's magnum opus in , compiled primarily in the final decades of his life and completed by 302 AH (915 CE). The chronicle extends from the creation of the universe and Adam through the prophets, ancient Persian and other pre-Islamic rulers, the , , the prophetic mission of , the and Umayyad caliphates, the Abbasid era, and contemporary events up to al-Tabari's time. This vast scope, exceeding 10,000 folios in its original manuscript, positions it as one of the earliest comprehensive universal histories in . Al-Tabari structured the work with an annalistic framework for post-Hijra events, detailing occurrences year by year from 1 AH onward to facilitate chronological precision, while pre-Islamic sections adopt a more linear narrative on prophetic lineages and dynasties such as , Romans, and Indians. He relied on an extensive corpus of prior sources, including biographical compilations like Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah for Muhammad's life, specialized monographs on individual caliphs and battles, and akhbar (historical reports) transmitted orally or in writing from earlier scholars such as and Ibn al-Kalbi. Central to al-Tabari's was the rigorous application of isnad (chains of transmission), mirroring scholarship, whereby he documented the full lineage of narrators for each report to enable verification of reliability. Rather than filtering or endorsing variants, he presented divergent accounts side by side—often numbering them sequentially—eschewing personal judgment to preserve the raw diversity of traditions, a practice that underscores his commitment to exhaustive documentation over interpretive synthesis. This non-selective aggregation, while yielding a of primary material, incorporates narrations ranging from well-attested to dubious, necessitating critical scrutiny by subsequent historians. The chronicle's influence endures through its role as a foundational source for Islamic historiography, informing later works like those of al-Mas'udi and , and its English translation in the SUNY Press series across 39 volumes plus an index affirms its scholarly utility despite the inclusion of unverified traditions. Al-Tabari's approach prioritized causal chains derived from transmitted evidence over speculative reconstruction, reflecting a proto-empirical in medieval historical writing.

Other Scholarly Contributions

Al-Tabari extended his scholarly efforts beyond and history into Islamic , producing works that emphasized comparative analysis of legal opinions. His Ikhtilāf al-fuqahāʾ (Differences Among the Jurists), composed around the late , compiles and critiques variant rulings from early scholars on topics including ritual purity, , and , often presenting multiple positions with their evidentiary chains before offering his preferred view based on scriptural priority. Though surviving primarily in fragments, such as the "Book of Jihad" section, it reflects his commitment to documenting scholarly diversity without dogmatic resolution, influencing later usuli works on legal methodology. In Laṭāʾif al-qawl fī aḥkām al-sharʿ al-Islāmī (Subtleties of Discourse on the Rulings of Islamic Law), al-Tabari outlined principles of (uṣūl al-fiqh) alongside applied rulings (furūʿ al-fiqh), integrating , , and consensus while prioritizing Quranic literalism over speculative . This text, less preserved than his major tomes, demonstrates his independent juristic reasoning, which he formalized into the short-lived (Jaririyya), advocating balanced reliance on transmission and intellect but attracting few followers post-310 AH due to competition from established madhhabs like Hanafi and Shafi'i. Al-Tabari also advanced linguistics through grammatical studies tied to scriptural interpretation, notably in works analyzing Quranic morphology and to resolve interpretive ambiguities. His approach to iʿrāb (case endings) and balāgha () complemented his methodology, underscoring transmission fidelity over conjectural emendation, though these contributions received less acclaim than his historical and exegetical output amid the era's focus on codification.

Professional Life and Conflicts

Al-Tabari first arrived in in 241 AH (855 CE), at approximately seventeen years of age, with the intention of studying under the prominent traditionist Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, though he learned upon arrival that Ibn Ḥanbal had died shortly before. He continued his education in the city, engaging with scholars in hadith, jurisprudence, and other disciplines, before undertaking further travels to regions including , , and in 253 AH (867 CE). Upon returning to around 870 CE, he established a permanent base there, supported by revenues from family estates in Ṭabarestān, which afforded him financial independence to focus on teaching and composition without reliance on patronage. This period marked the core of his professional career, during which he conducted regular teaching circles (ḥalaqāt) that drew students interested in Qur'anic exegesis, history, and legal reasoning, transmitting his methodologies to disciples such as Ibn al-Mughallis. In legal (), al-Tabari initially aligned with the Shāfiʿī doctrine after studying its principles following his return to Baghdad, adhering to it for about a decade. He later diverged to develop independent rulings, founding the Jarirī , a Sunni school of jurisprudence that emphasized primary sources—the Qur'an, , scholarly consensus (ijmāʿ), and analogical reasoning (qiyās)—while applying rigorous scrutiny to transmitted reports akin to his approaches in other fields. The Jarirī school represented a rationalist strain within Sunni , prioritizing interpretive analysis over strict adherence to singular authoritative opinions, though it incorporated traditionalist elements from his broad training across Hanafī, Shāfiʿī, and other influences encountered in and beyond. Al-Tabari contributed to fiqh through compositions such as Kitāb Marātib al-ʿUlamāʾ, a biographical catalog of jurists organized by interpretive classes, which underscored his emphasis on evaluating scholarly reliability in legal derivation. He also addressed points of juristic disagreement in works exploring variances among early scholars, promoting a methodical reconciliation grounded in evidentiary chains (isnād) and contextual analysis. Despite attracting followers in , the Jarirī waned after his death in 310 AH (923 CE), surviving for roughly 150 years before absorption into dominant schools, partly due to al-Tabari's reluctance to codify a comprehensive manual and his focus on expansive scholarship over institutional propagation.

Ordeal with Hanbalites and Theological Disputes

In his later years in Baghdad, al-Tabari faced escalating hostility from Hanbalite traditionalists, particularly followers of (d. 329/941), who led a militant faction emphasizing strict adherence to the views of (d. 241/855). The primary catalyst was al-Tabari's refusal to classify Ibn Hanbal as a leading (faqih); instead, he regarded him primarily as a scholar (muhaddith), excluding him from discussions of major legal authorities in works like Ikhtilaf al-fuqaha (Differences of the s). This stance, rooted in al-Tabari's independent jurisprudential methodology and his , provoked accusations of belittling Ibn Hanbal's authority, which Hanbalites upheld as a core tenet transmitted through successors like al-Marrudhi (d. 275/888). Theological disputes amplified the tension, with Hanbalites branding al-Tabari a Jahmite heretic for allegedly rationalizing divine attributes or deviating from literalist interpretations, despite his own affirmation of the Quran's uncreatedness against Mu'tazilite views. Further smears accused him of rafd (heretical Shi'ism) due to his respectful narrations about ibn Abi Talib and inclusion of Shi'ite-leaning reports in his and , though these reflected his broad isnad-based approach rather than doctrinal affiliation. Hanbalite mobs, drawing popular support in Baghdad's lower classes, disrupted al-Tabari's teaching sessions, stoned his residence, and incited riots that prevented other scholars from associating with him, escalating around 302-309 AH (915-922 CE). Authorities intervened amid the unrest; in 309 AH (922 CE), ibn Isa ibn Dawud proposed a public debate to resolve the impasse, but Hanbalite leaders refused, prioritizing communal enforcement over rational discourse. Al-Tabari remained under effective in his home, limiting his public activities until his death on 17 310 AH (23 923 CE), with some accounts noting his funeral was held nocturnally to evade Hanbalite sabotage, though others describe a large . This ordeal underscored broader tensions between al-Tabari's eclectic, evidence-driven scholarship and the Hanbalites' populist traditionalism, yet it did not derail his productivity, as his major works were completed prior.

Death and Legacy

Final Years and Demise

In the final decades of his life, al-Tabari resided primarily in Baghdad, dedicating himself to teaching students, dictating his compositions, and engaging in legal and theological scholarship amid persistent hostility from Hanbalite traditionalists. Having completed his Tarikh al-Umam wa-al-Muluk around 302 AH (915 CE), he focused on transmitting knowledge through oral sessions and refining jurisprudential opinions within his Jariri school, which emphasized rational analogy (qiyas) over strict adherence to transmitted precedents favored by opponents. These activities occurred against a backdrop of earlier ordeals, including house confinement ordered by Caliph al-Mu'tadid in 280 AH (893 CE) following accusations of anthropomorphism (tashbih) in describing divine attributes, though he maintained his positions without recanting. Al-Tabari died in Shawwāl 310 AH (February 923 CE), aged approximately 86 lunar years. His passing followed a period of relative to avoid inflaming sectarian tensions, as Hanbalite mobs had previously besieged his residence over doctrinal disputes. The funeral was handled discreetly by Abbasid authorities to prevent violence from Hanbalite detractors, with burial occurring in his home attended initially by a small circle of friends and students; subsequent reports note crowds praying at the site for months afterward, reflecting enduring respect among broader scholarly circles despite polarized enmities.

Immediate Scholarly Succession

Following al-Tabari's death on 17 310 AH (October 23, 923 CE), his scholarly output—particularly his and —was preserved and disseminated primarily through direct transmission by his students, who memorized and copied his dictations during public teaching sessions in . Key among these was Aḥmad ibn Kāmil (d. 350/961), a and who not only studied under al-Tabari but also relayed biographical details about him and contributed to the continuity of his exegetical and historical methodologies. Another prominent transmitter was ʿAbd Allāh al-Farghānī (d. 362/972-73), a who personally knew al-Tabari and played a crucial role in circulating his , even authoring a that extended its chronological scope. These students ensured the integrity of al-Tabari's chains of narration (isnad), relying on his emphasis on aggregating variant reports from earlier authorities without undue synthesis, a practice that maintained the raw empirical diversity of sources. In jurisprudence, al-Tabari's independent Jarirī madhhab experienced brief adherence among immediate followers, exemplified by Muʿāfā ibn Zakariyāʾ al-Nahrawānī (d. 390/1000), a judge who explicitly followed al-Tabari's legal rulings derived from Qurʾanic literalism and prophetic traditions over analogical reasoning favored by rival schools. However, the madhhab did not establish a robust institutional lineage, as al-Tabari avoided formalizing a dedicated cadre of deputies, prioritizing individual scholarly autonomy; this contributed to its rapid decline within decades, overshadowed by the more organized Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Shāfiʿī, and Ḥanbalī schools. Other students, such as Ibn al-Mughallis, bridged al-Tabari's work to Zahirī influences from his own teachers, transmitting legal and exegetical texts that influenced subsequent generations indirectly through compilation rather than direct emulation. This pattern of transmission—decentralized and reliant on personal narration—reflected al-Tabari's commitment to verifiable chains over hierarchical succession, ensuring his contributions endured via textual fidelity rather than a named school.

Reception and Impact

Influence in Classical Islamic Traditions

Al-Tabari's Jami' al-Bayan fi Ta'wil al-Qur'an exerted profound influence on subsequent Quranic within classical Islamic scholarship, establishing a model of comprehensive transmission-based interpretation ( bi-l-ma'thur) that prioritized narrations from early authorities, including Companions and Successors, often presenting multiple conflicting reports without definitive resolution. This approach became a foundational reference during the Abbasid era (750–1258 CE), shaping the methodology of later exegetes who frequently cited or built upon its vast compilation of over 30,000 traditions. For instance, (d. 1373 CE) and (d. 1273 CE) regularly referenced al-Tabari's conclusions in their own works, expanding on his analytic engagement with and early Islamic reports while adopting his emphasis on source plurality. (d. 1505 CE) similarly drew from it as a primary corpus for validating interpretive chains, underscoring its role in standardizing as a reliant on authenticated transmission over speculative . In , al-Tabari's Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, completed around 915 CE, pioneered an annalistic universal history spanning from creation to his era, compiling reports from diverse informants via rigorous chains (isnads) and influencing medieval Muslim chroniclers by providing a comprehensive repository of early Islamic events. Later historians, including those in the 10th–14th centuries, routinely excerpted its material on prophetic narratives and the through Umayyad periods, often treating it as a baseline for reconstructing origins without al-Tabari's overt editorializing. This work spawned a subgenre of "continuations," where successors like al-Mas'udi (d. 956 CE) and (d. 1233 CE) extended its framework, adapting the chain methodology to maintain apparent impartiality amid sectarian tensions. Its methodological shift toward monographic selectivity over fragmented tribal lore elevated Islamic historical writing, emphasizing chronological precision and source verification, though critics noted its occasional inclusion of unverified legends. Al-Tabari's contributions to , via his Jariri , advocated an eclectic approach integrating Shafi'i principles with independent reasoning rooted in textual evidence and concepts tailored to Abbasid governance needs circa 9th–10th centuries CE. Though the waned after his in 923 CE due to lack of institutional support, its emphasis on transmission-authenticated rulings influenced classical debates, particularly in , by modeling a non-taqlid (non-imitation) that prioritized prophetic over analogical extension alone. This legacy persisted in hybrid legal compilations, informing traditionalist jurists against over-reliance on rationalist Mu'tazili innovations prevalent in the .

Evaluations in Modern Scholarship

Modern scholars acclaim al-Tabari as the preeminent historian of early , whose Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk compiles an unparalleled array of reports from creation through the early 10th century CE, serving as a foundational corpus for subsequent . Hugh Kennedy emphasizes al-Tabari's methodical aggregation of diverse sources with minimal authorial intervention, preserving variants that enable later analysts to trace evolutions in narrative traditions. Franz Rosenthal, in his translation and analysis of the work, underscores its bibliographic and chronological value, noting al-Tabari's reliance on over 20,000 informants across regions, which yields granular details on caliphal reigns and battles otherwise unattested. Al-Tabari's methodology, modeled on scholarship, prioritizes isnad chains to assess narrator piety and memory, yet he transmits conflicting accounts without definitive resolution, reflecting a commitment to exhaustive documentation over interpretive closure. This approach garners praise for transparency—allowing modern verification against archaeological or non-Muslim records—but draws criticism for insufficient skepticism toward weak transmissions, including pre-Islamic legends and miraculous attributions that inflate prophetic authority. Kennedy observes that while Abbasid-era sections benefit from contemporary oral chains, earlier phases suffer from telescoped timelines and hagiographic inflation, necessitating cross-referencing with Syriac chronicles or papyri for causal plausibility. In evaluations of source credibility, al-Tabari's relative neutrality—eschewing overt Shi'i or Sunni polemics—distinguishes him from partisans like al-Ya'qubi, rendering his text a neutral repository amid Abbasid-era factionalism. However, contemporary Islamic studies highlight systemic limitations of isnad-based history: unverifiable early chains prone to fabrication for legitimacy, as evidenced by duplicated motifs across reports, prompting revisionists to discount uncorroborated events like specific Ridda Wars troop numbers. Rosenthal cautions that al-Tabari's deference to "divine authority" in prophetic narratives embeds theological priors, diverging from empirical historiography that privileges material evidence over testimonial volume. Overall, al-Tabari's opus endures as an indispensable, if unpolished, archive, with Kennedy arguing its raw preservation of dissentients outperforms synthesized later works like Ibn al-Athir's, though modern applications demand auxiliary data to filter causal distortions from Abbasid propaganda or folkloric accretions. Projects like KITAB's citation mapping further quantify his dependencies, revealing over-reliance on derivatives for sira material, which amplifies inherited biases in Muhammad's biography.

Ongoing Debates and Criticisms

Modern scholars debate the reliability of al-Tabari's Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk due to its methodology of compiling numerous variant reports via isnad chains without systematic verification or preference for stronger transmissions, leading to the inclusion of potentially fabricated or erroneous accounts. Al-Tabari himself prefaced the work by stating he reported only what narrators deemed sound, yet experts emphasize that this approach treats the text as a neutral repository rather than a critically authenticated narrative, necessitating cross-referencing with other sources for historical accuracy. Criticisms extend to specific historical inaccuracies, such as al-Tabari's recounting of aiding Romans in Jerusalem's destruction, transmitted via multiple early Islamic scholars but contradicting established chronologies of Babylonian and Roman timelines around 587 BCE. This reflects broader concerns over the work's composition over two centuries after the Prophet Muhammad's death (d. 632 CE), amplifying risks of oral transmission distortions in early Islamic events. Traditional Islamic evaluators, including scholars, dismiss unique reports from al-Tabari as insufficiently authenticated for doctrinal use, viewing them as historical anecdotes rather than binding evidence. In tafsir studies, al-Tabari's Jami' al-Bayan faces scrutiny for aggregating interpretations from diverse, sometimes weak, authorities without rigorous filtering, embedding variant exegeses that modern analysts argue embed unsubstantiated legal or narrative elements into Qur'anic understanding. While praised for comprehensiveness, its reliability is contested in contemporary debates favoring source-critical methods over traditional aggregation, particularly for verses on or where embedded hadiths lack independent corroboration. Debates persist on interpretive biases, with some accusing al-Tabari of subtle Shi'ite sympathies in companion disputes, though this is refuted by Sunni traditionalists who attribute such claims to conflations with a Rafidi figure and affirm his orthodox stance amid Hanbali disputes. Conversely, his apparent —eschewing overt sectarian favoritism—renders the a key source for reconstructing Abbasid-era politics, yet limits it to moral-political framing over causal analysis, as critiqued in discourse-oriented scholarship. These evaluations underscore al-Tabari's enduring value as a primary compilation, balanced against the need for modern historiographical scrutiny to discern verifiable events from transmitted lore.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.