Hubbry Logo
Alan Brooke, 1st Viscount AlanbrookeAlan Brooke, 1st Viscount AlanbrookeMain
Open search
Alan Brooke, 1st Viscount Alanbrooke
Community hub
Alan Brooke, 1st Viscount Alanbrooke
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Alan Brooke, 1st Viscount Alanbrooke
Alan Brooke, 1st Viscount Alanbrooke
Alan Brooke, 1st Viscount Alanbrooke
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Field Marshal Alan Francis Brooke, 1st Viscount Alanbrooke (23 July 1883 – 17 June 1963), was a senior officer of the British Army. He was Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS), the professional head of the British Army, during the Second World War, and was promoted to field marshal on 1 January 1944.[3]

Key Information

Brooke trained as an artillery officer and became Commandant of the School of Artillery, Larkhill in 1929. He held various divisional and corps level commands before the Second World War and became C-in-C Home Forces in 1940.

Brooke became Chief of the Imperial General Staff in 1941. In that role he focused on strategy and, in particular, on the Mediterranean theatre. Here, his principal aims were to rid North Africa of Axis forces and knock Italy out of the war, thereby opening up the Mediterranean for Allied shipping. This progress in the Mediterranian allowed the cross-Channel invasion from southern England to Normandy in France when the Allies were ready and the Germans sufficiently weakened. He then developed the strategy for pushing back the German forces from Normandy across France and finally into Germany itself. As chairman of the Chiefs of Staff Committee, Brooke was the foremost military advisor to Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and had the role of co-ordinator of the British military efforts in the Allies' victory in 1945.

After retiring from the British Army, Brooke served as Lord High Constable of England during the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II in 1953. His "war diaries" are famous for their criticism of some of Churchill's policies and for Brooke's forthright views on other leading figures of the war.

Background and early life

[edit]

Alan Brooke was born on 23 July 1883 at Bagnères-de-Bigorre, Hautes-Pyrénées, to a prominent Anglo-Irish family from West Ulster. The Brookes had a long military tradition as the "Fighting Brookes of Colebrooke", with a history of service in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, and World War I.[4] He was the seventh and youngest child of Sir Victor Brooke, 3rd Baronet, of Colebrooke Park, Brookeborough, County Fermanagh, and the former Alice Bellingham, second daughter of Sir Alan Bellingham, 3rd Baronet, of Castle Bellingham in County Louth.[5] Brooke's father died when he was just eight years old.[4][6]

Brooke was educated at a day school in Pau, France, where he lived until the age of 16; he was bi-lingual in French (which he spoke with a heavy Gascon accent and spoke as a first language as a result of his upbringing in the French Pyrenees)[4] and English.[7] He spoke both French and English very fast, leading some Americans later in life to distrust a "fast-talking Limey."[8] He was also fluent in German, and had learnt Urdu and Persian.[9][10]

Brooke, desiring a military career, "only just" qualified for the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich in 1900, coming sixty-fifth out of seventy-two in the entrance exam, but passed out at seventeenth. Had he done any better he would have qualified for a commission in the Royal Engineers, as was his initial intention, and possibly would not have ended up on the General Staff after the Great War.[11]

Brooke was commissioned into the Royal Regiment of Artillery as a second lieutenant on 24 December 1902.[12] Due to his high placing at Woolwich Brooke was allowed to choose which branch of the Royal Artillery to join. His choice was the Royal Field Artillery, with which he served in Ireland and India in the years leading up to the outbreak of the First World War in the summer of 1914. He also received his "jacket"[a] upon being selected to join the Royal Horse Artillery.[10]

First World War

[edit]
From right to left: Lawrence Cosgrave, Brooke, Edward Morrison and Andrew McNaughton during the First World War

During the war, he was assigned to an ammunition column of the Royal Horse Artillery on the Western Front, where he gained a reputation as an outstanding planner of operations. He later was transferred to the 18th Division.[14] At the Battle of the Somme in 1916, he introduced the French "creeping barrage" system, thereby helping the protection of the advancing infantry from enemy machine gun fire.[15] Brooke was with the Canadian Corps from early 1917 and planned the barrages for the Battle of Vimy Ridge. In 1918 he was appointed GSO1 as the senior artillery staff officer in the First Army.[16] Brooke ended the conflict as a lieutenant-colonel with the Distinguished Service Order and Bar and was mentioned in despatches six times.[17][18]

As with many others of his generation, the war left its mark upon Brooke. In October 1918, shortly before the Armistice of 11 November 1918, he wrote

One trip up to Lens where I wandered among the ruins...such ruin and such desolation. I climbed on to a heap of stones which represents the place where the Church once stood, and I looked down on the wreckage. One could spend days down there just looking down picturing to oneself the tragedies that have occurred in every corner of this place. If the stones could talk and could repeat what they have witnessed, and the thoughts they had read on dying men's faces I wonder if there would ever be any wars.[19][20]

When the Armistice did eventually arrive Brooke was in London on leave. He watched the crowds of people celebrating but felt mixed feelings, as he himself later wrote:

That wild evening jarred on my feelings. I felt untold relief at the end being there at last, but was swamped with floods of memories of those years of struggle. I was filled with gloom that evening, and retired to bed early.[21]

On 31 March 1942 he wrote:

... on the lack of good military commanders: Half our Corps and Divisional Commanders are totally unfit for their appointments, and yet if I was to sack them I could find no better! They lack character, imagination, drive and power of leadership. The reason for this state of affairs is to be found in the losses we sustained in the last war of all our best officers, who should now be our senior commanders.[22]

Between the wars

[edit]

During the interwar period, Brooke attended the first post-war course at the Staff College, Camberley in 1919. He managed to impress both his fellow students and the college's instructors during the relatively brief time he was there.[23] He then served as a staff officer with the 50th Division from 1920 to 1923.[24][25] Brooke then returned to Camberley, this time as an instructor, before attending the Imperial Defence College. He was later appointed as an instructor at the college,[24][25] and while there he became acquainted with most of the officers who became leading British commanders of the Second World War. From 1929 onwards Brooke held a number of important appointments: Inspector of Artillery, Director of Military Training and then General Officer Commanding (GOC) of the Mobile Division (later the 1st Armoured Division) in 1935.[26] In 1938, on promotion to lieutenant-general, he took command of the Anti-Aircraft Corps (renamed Anti-Aircraft Command in April 1939) and built a strong relationship with Air Chief Marshal Hugh Dowding, the AOC-in-C of Fighter Command, which laid a vital basis of co-operation between the two commands during the Battle of Britain the following year. In July 1939 Brooke moved to command Southern Command. By the outbreak of the Second World War, Brooke was already seen as one of the British Army's foremost generals.[27][23]

Second World War

[edit]

Commander in Flanders, France and Britain

[edit]
Lieutenant-General Brooke, GOC II Corps, with Major-General Bernard Montgomery, GOC 3rd Division, and Major-General Dudley Johnson, GOC 4th Division, pictured here in either 1939 or 1940.

Following the outbreak of the Second World War, in September 1939, Brooke commanded II Corps in the British Expeditionary Force (BEF)—which included in its subordinate formations the 3rd Infantry Division, commanded by the then Major-General Bernard Montgomery, as well as Major-General Dudley Johnson's 4th Infantry Division. As corps commander, Brooke had a pessimistic view of the Allies' chances of countering a German offensive. He was sceptical of the quality and determination of the French Army, and of the Belgian Army. This scepticism appeared to be justified when he was on a visit to some French front-line units and was shocked to see unshaven men, ungroomed horses and dirty vehicles.[28]

Lieutenant-General Sir Alan Brooke sits for a portrait being painted by Reginald Eves, 30 April 1940.

He had also little trust in Lord Gort, Commander-in-Chief of the BEF, who Brooke thought took too much interest in details while being incapable of taking a broad strategic view. Gort, on the other hand, regarded Brooke as a pessimist who failed to spread confidence, and was thinking of replacing him.[29] Brooke correctly predicted that the Allied powers' Plan D envisioning an advance along the Meuse would allow the Wehrmacht to outflank them, but British High Command dismissed his warnings as defeatist.[30]

When the German offensive began, Brooke, aided by Neil Ritchie, his Brigadier General Staff (BGS), distinguished himself in the handling of the British forces in the retreat to Dunkirk. His II Corps faced rapid German Army armoured advances following the Allied defeat at the Battle of Sedan.[30] In late May 1940 it held off the major German attack on the Ypres-Comines Canal but then found its left flank exposed by the capitulation of the Belgian army. Brooke swiftly ordered Montgomery's 3rd Division to switch from the Corps' right flank to cover the gap. This was accomplished in a complicated night-time manoeuvre. Pushing more troops north to counter the threat to the embarking troops at the Dunkirk evacuation from German units advancing along the coast, II Corps retreated to their appointed places on the east or south-east of the shrinking perimeter of Dunkirk.[31] Brooke's actions not only saved his own forces from capitulation, but prevented the Germans from seizing the 20-mile gap left by the Belgian surrender and capturing the entire BEF before it could safely evacuate.[30]

The C-in-C Home Forces, General Sir Alan Brooke (left), during a visit to Northern Command with General Sir Ronald Adam (right), conferring around a 6-inch coastal defence gun, 6 August 1940.

Then on 29 May Brooke was ordered by Gort to return to England, leaving the Corps in Montgomery's hands.[31] According to Montgomery, Brooke was so overcome with emotion at having to leave his men in such a crisis that "he broke down and wept" as he handed over to Montgomery on the beaches of La Panne.[32] He was told by Gort to "proceed home ... for (the) task of reforming new armies" and so returned on a destroyer (30 May). Then "on June 2nd set out for the War Office to find out what I was wanted for" with a "light heart" and with no responsibility, and was then told by John Dill (CIGS) that he was to "return to France to form a new BEF"; he later said that hearing the command from Dill was "one of his blackest (moments) in the war". He had already realised that there was no hope of success for the "Brittany plan" (Breton redoubt) to keep an allied redoubt in France. After General Maxime Weygand warned him that the French Army was collapsing and could offer no further resistance, he decided that he needed to convince his superiors to allow him to withdraw his forces to Cherbourg and Brest for evacuation to Britain.[30] He told Secretary of State for War Anthony Eden that the mission had "no military value and no hope of success" although he could not comment on its political value.[33] In his first conversation with Prime Minister Winston Churchill (Brooke had been rung by Dill who was at 10 Downing Street) he insisted that all British forces should be withdrawn from France. Churchill initially objected but was eventually convinced by Brooke; around 200,000 British and Allied troops were successfully evacuated from ports in northwestern France.[15][34][35][36]

General Sir Alan Brooke, C-in-C Home Forces (fifth from right, facing camera) inspecting a Tetrarch light tank at the Staff College, Camberley, 6 January 1941.

Home Forces

[edit]

After returning for a short spell at Southern Command Brooke was appointed in July 1940 Commander-in-Chief, Home Forces, with orders to take charge of anti-invasion preparations. Thus it would have been Brooke's task to direct the land battle in the event of a German amphibious invasion of Great Britain. Contrary to his predecessor General Sir Edmund Ironside, who favoured a static coastal defence, Brooke developed a mobile reserve which was to swiftly counterattack the enemy forces before they were established. A light line of defence on the coast was to assure that the landings were delayed as much as possible. Writing after the war, Brooke acknowledged that he also "had every intention of using sprayed mustard gas on the beaches".[37][38]

Senior officers discuss operations during Exercise 'Bumper', 2 October 1941. On the left, the Chief Umpire, Lieutenant-General Bernard Montgomery, talks to the C-in-C Home Forces (soon CIGS), General Sir Alan Brooke.

Brooke believed that the lack of a unified command of the three services was "a grave danger" to the defence of the country. Despite this, and the fact that the available forces never reached the numbers he thought were required, Brooke considered the situation far from "helpless" if the Germans were to invade. "We should certainly have a desperate struggle and the future might well have hung in the balance, but I certainly felt that given a fair share of the fortunes of war we should certainly succeed in finally defending these shores", he wrote after the war.[39][40] But in the end, the German invasion plan was never taken beyond the preliminary assembly of forces.[41]

Chief of the Imperial General Staff

[edit]
General Sir Alan Brooke looking at a globe at his desk in the War Office in London, pictured here sometime in 1942.

In December 1941 Brooke succeeded Field Marshal Sir John Dill as Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS), the professional head of the British Army, in which appointment he also represented the British Army on the Chiefs of Staff Committee.[42]

In March 1942 he succeeded Admiral of the Fleet Sir Dudley Pound as chairman of the Chiefs of Staff Committee.[43]

As CIGS, Brooke was the functional head of the British Army, and as chairman of the Chiefs of Staff Committee, which he dominated by force of intellect and personality, he took the leading military part in the overall strategic direction of the British war effort. In 1942, Brooke joined the Western Allies' ultimate command, the U.S.-British Combined Chiefs of Staff.[44]

Despite the traditional distrust that had existed between the military and the political side of the War Office, he got along quite well with his political counterpart, the Secretary of State for War, first the Conservative politician David Margesson and later Sir James Grigg, the former head civil servant of the department, who in an unusual move was promoted to the ministerial post.[45]

The Prime Minister, Mr Winston Churchill with military leaders during his visit to Tripoli, 1943. The group includes: Lieutenant-General Sir Oliver Leese, General Sir Harold Alexander, General Sir Alan Brooke and General Sir Bernard Montgomery.

Brooke's focus was primarily on his Mediterranean strategy for the Mediterranean theatre. Here, his principal aims were to rid North Africa of Axis forces and knock Italy out of the war, thereby opening up the Mediterranean for Allied shipping. Later, to mount the cross-Channel invasion when the Allies were ready and the Germans sufficiently weakened.[46]

Brooke's and the British view of the Mediterranean operations contrasted with the American commitment to an early invasion of western Europe, which led to several heated arguments at conferences of the Combined Chiefs of Staff.[47]

Brooke (on the left) and Churchill visit Bernard Montgomery's mobile headquarters in Normandy, France, shortly after the Normandy landings, 12 June 1944.

At the Casablanca Conference in January 1943, it was decided that the Allies should invade Sicily, under the command of General Dwight D. Eisenhower, a decision that effectively postponed the planned invasion of Western Europe until 1944. The Casablanca agreement was in fact a compromise, brokered largely by Brooke's old friend Field Marshal Sir John Dill, Chief of the British Joint Staff Mission in Washington, D.C. "I owe him [Dill] an unbounded debt of gratitude for his help on that occasion and in many other similar ones", Brooke wrote after the war.[48]

The post of CIGS was less publicised than command of an important theatre of war, an example being the many press releases on General Montgomery but few, if any, about the CIGS. However, the CIGS chose the generals who commanded the operational theatres and decided what men and munitions they should have. When it came to finding the right commanders he often complained that many officers who would have been good commanders had been killed in the First World War and that this was one reason behind the difficulties the British had in the beginning of the war.[49] When General Sir Claude Auchinleck was to be replaced as the commander of the British Eighth Army in 1942, Brooke preferred Lieutenant-General Bernard Montgomery (Montgomery was both Brooke's ex-pupil and his protégé [50]) instead of Lieutenant-General William Gott, who was Churchill's candidate. Soon thereafter Gott was killed when his aircraft was shot down and Montgomery received the command. Brooke would later reflect upon the tragic event which led to the appointment of Montgomery as an intervention by God.[51]

A few days earlier Brooke had been offered Auchinleck's main job of Commander-in-Chief Middle East. Brooke declined, believing he now knew better than any other general how to deal with Churchill. He recorded that it would take a new CIGS six months to learn to handle Churchill, and "during those six months anything might happen".[52]

General Sir Bernard Montgomery in his staff car with General Sir Harold Alexander and General Sir Alan Brooke, during an inspection of the 8th Indian Division HQ, Italy, 15 December 1943.

A year later, the war had taken a different turn and Brooke no longer believed it necessary to stay at Churchill's side. He therefore looked forward to taking command of the Allied invasion of Western Europe, a post Brooke believed he had been promised by Churchill on three occasions. During the first Quebec Conference in August 1943, it was decided that the command would go to General George Marshall. (Although in the event Marshall's work as U.S. Army Chief of Staff was too important for him to leave Washington, D.C., and Dwight Eisenhower was appointed instead.) Brooke was disappointed, both at being passed over and of the way the decision was conveyed to him by Churchill, who according to Brooke "dealt with the matter as if it were one of minor importance".[53]

Statue of Field Marshal The Viscount Alanbrooke, Ministry of Defence Building, Whitehall, London.

Brooke or "Brookie" as he was often known, is reckoned to be one of the foremost of all the heads of the British Army. He was quick in mind and speech and deeply respected by his military colleagues, both British and Allied, although his uncompromising style could make the Americans wary.[54]

As CIGS, Brooke had a strong influence on the grand strategy of the Western Allies. The war in the west unfolded more or less according to his plans, at least until 1943 when the American forces were still relatively small in comparison to the British. Among the most crucial of his contributions was his opposition to an early landing in France, which was important for delaying Operation Overlord until June 1944.[47]

He was a cautious general with a great respect for the German war machine. Some American planners thought that Brooke's participation in the campaigns of the First World War and in the two evacuations from France in the Second World War made him lack the aggression they believed necessary for victory.[55] According to historian Max Hastings, Brooke's reputation as a strategist was "significantly damaged" by his remarks at the Trident Conference in Washington in May 1943, where he claimed that no major operations on the continent would be possible until 1945 or 1946.[56] His diary says that he wanted "operations in the Mediterranean to force a dispersal of German forces, help Russia, and thus eventually produce a situation where cross Channel operations are possible" but that Churchill "entirely repudiated" (or half repudiated) the paper we (the CCOS) had agreed on; Harry Hopkins got him to withdraw his proposed amendments but that Churchill had aroused suspicions with his talk of "ventures in the Balkans."[57]

Relationship with Churchill

[edit]

During the years as CIGS, Brooke had a stormy relationship with Winston Churchill. Brooke was often frustrated with the Prime Minister's habits and working methods, his abuse of generals and constant meddling in strategic matters. At the same time Brooke greatly admired Churchill for the way he inspired the Allied cause and for the way he bore the heavy burden of war leadership. In one typical passage in Brooke's war diaries Churchill is described as a "genius mixed with an astonishing lack of vision – he is quite the most difficult man to work with that I have ever struck but I should not have missed the chance of working with him for anything on earth!"[58]

Shortly after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Churchill and his senior military staff used the Arcadia Conference in Washington to decide the general strategy for the war. The American Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall came up with the idea of a Combined Chiefs of Staff that would make final military decisions (subject to approval by President Roosevelt and Churchill). Marshall sold it to Roosevelt and together the two sold the idea to Churchill. Churchill's military aides were much less favourable, and Brooke was strongly opposed. However, Brooke was left behind in London to handle the daily details of running the British war effort, and was not consulted. The combined board was permanently stationed in Washington, where Field Marshal Dill represented the British half. The Combined Board did have thirteen in-person full meetings, which Brooke attended.[59]

Seated in May 1943 around a conference table aboard the RMS Queen Mary are, left to right: Air Chief Marshal Sir Charles Portal, Admiral of the Fleet Sir Dudley Pound, General Sir Alan Brooke, Winston Churchill.

When Churchill's many fanciful strategic ideas collided with sound military strategy it was only Brooke on the Chiefs of Staff Committee who was able to stand up to the Prime Minister. Churchill said about Brooke: "When I thump the table and push my face towards him what does he do? Thumps the table harder and glares back at me. I know these Brookes – stiff-necked Ulstermen and there's no one worse to deal with than that!"[60][61] It has been claimed that part of Churchill's greatness was that he appointed Brooke as CIGS and kept him for the whole war.[62]

Winston Churchill with Field Marshal Sir Bernard Montgomery and Field Marshal Sir Alan Brooke during the Prime Minister's tour of troops taking part in the Rhine crossing, 25 March 1945.

Brooke was particularly annoyed by Churchill's idea of capturing the northern tip of Sumatra.[63] But in some cases Brooke did not see the political dimension of strategy as the Prime Minister did. The CIGS was sceptical about the British intervention in the Greek Civil War in late 1944 (during the Dekemvriana), believing this was an operation which would drain troops from the central front in Germany. But at this stage the war was practically won and Churchill saw the possibility of preventing Greece from becoming a communist state.[64]

Winston Churchill with his Chiefs of Staff in the garden of 10 Downing Street, 7 May 1945. Seated, left to right: Air Chief Marshal Sir Charles Portal; Field Marshal Sir Alan Brooke; Winston Churchill; Admiral of the Fleet Sir Andrew Cunningham. Standing, left to right: Major-General Leslie Hollis; General Sir Hastings Ismay.

The balance of the Chiefs of Staff Committee was tilted in October 1943 when Admiral Sir Dudley Pound, Brooke's predecessor as chairman, retired as a result of poor health and Admiral Sir Andrew Cunningham succeeded Pound as First Sea Lord and naval representative on the Chiefs of Staff Committee. Brooke as a consequence got a firm ally in his arguments with Churchill.[65] This was reflected in the most serious clash between the Prime Minister and the Chiefs of Staff, regarding the British preparations for final stages of the Pacific War. Brooke and the rest of the Chiefs of Staff wanted to build up the forces in Australia while Churchill preferred to use India as a base for the British effort. It was an issue over which the Chiefs of Staff were prepared to resign, but in the end a compromise was reached.[66]

Despite their many disagreements Brooke and Churchill held an affection for each other. After one fierce clash Churchill told his chief of staff and military adviser, General Sir Hastings Ismay, that he did not think he could continue to work any longer with Brooke because "he hates me. I can see hatred looking from his eyes." Brooke responded to Ismay: "Hate him? I don't hate him. I love him. But the first time I tell him that I agree with him when I don't will be the time to get rid of me, for then I can be no more use to him." When Churchill was told this he murmured, "Dear Brookie."[67]

The Chiefs of Staff, Air Marshal Sir Charles Portal, Admiral Sir Andrew Cunningham and Field Marshal Sir Alan Brooke, inspect a Naval Guard of Honour at the airport in Berlin before the start of the Potsdam Conference, July 1945.

The partnership between Brooke and Churchill was a very successful one. According to historian Max Hastings, their partnership "created the most efficient machine for the higher direction of the war possessed by any combatant nation, even if its judgments were sometimes flawed and its ability to enforce its wishes increasingly constrained".[68]

Brooke's diary entry for 10 September 1944 is particularly revealing of his ambivalent relationship with Churchill:

...And the wonderful thing is that 3/4 of the population of the world imagine that Churchill is one of the Strategists of History, a second Marlborough, and the other 1/4 have no idea what a public menace he is and has been throughout this war! It is far better that the world should never know, and never suspect the feet of clay of this otherwise superhuman being. Without him England was lost for a certainty, with him England has been on the verge of disaster time and again.... Never have I admired and despised a man simultaneously to the same extent. Never have such opposite extremes been combined in the same human being.[69]

War diaries

[edit]

Brooke kept a diary during the whole of the Second World War.[70] Originally intended for his wife, Benita, the diaries were later expanded on by Lord Alanbrooke, as he had become, in the 1950s. They contain descriptions on the day-to-day running of the British war effort (including some indiscreet references to top secret interceptions of German radio traffic),[71] Brooke's thoughts on strategy, as well as frequent anecdotes from the many meetings he had with the Allied leadership during the war.[70]

The diaries have become famous mostly because of the frequent remarks on and criticisms of Churchill. Although the diaries contain passages expressing admiration of Churchill, they also served as a vent for Brooke's frustration with working with the Prime Minister. The diaries also give sharp opinions on several of the top Allied leaders. The American generals Eisenhower and Marshall, for example, are described as poor strategists and Field Marshal Sir Harold Alexander as unintelligent. Among the few individuals of whom Brooke seems to have kept consistently positive opinions, from a military standpoint, were General of the Army Douglas MacArthur,[72] Field Marshal Sir John Dill, and Joseph Stalin. Brooke admired Stalin for his quick brain and grasp of military strategy. Otherwise he had no illusions about the man, describing Stalin thus: "He has got an unpleasantly cold, crafty, dead face, and whenever I look at him I can imagine his sending off people to their doom without ever turning a hair."[73]

The first (abridged and censored) version published in the 1950s was edited by the distinguished historian Sir Arthur Bryant: 1957 (The Turn of the Tide[74]) and 1959 (Triumph in the West). Originally Brooke intended that the diaries were never to be published but one reason that he changed his mind was the lack of credit to him and the Chiefs of Staff in Churchill's own war memoirs, which essentially presented their ideas and innovations as the Prime Minister's own. Although censorship and libel laws accounted for numerous suppressions of what Brooke had originally written concerning persons who were still alive, the Bryant books became controversial even in their truncated state, mainly as a result of the comments on Churchill, Marshall, Eisenhower, Gort, and others. Churchill himself did not appreciate the books.[75][70] In 1952, both Churchill and Lord Beaverbrook threatened legal action against a biography of Stanley Baldwin by G. M. Young, and a settlement was reached by lawyer Arnold Goodman to remove the offending sentences. Publisher Rupert Hart-Davis had the "hideously expensive" job of removing and replacing seven leaves from 7,580 copies of the biography.[76] Diary entries also refer to intercepts of German signals decrypted at Bletchley Park (which Brooke visited twice), which were secret until 1974.[77]

In 2001, Alex Danchev of Keele University and Daniel Todman of Cambridge University published an unexpurgated version of the Brooke Diaries including original critical remarks that Brooke made at various times that had been suppressed in the Bryant versions. Danchev and Todman also criticised Bryant's editing, but this is balanced by an assessment by Dr Christopher Harmon, advisor to the Churchill Centre and Professor at the US Marine Corps University. Bryant was inhibited by Lord Alanbrooke's desire not to publish in full his critical diary entries about people who were still alive when Bryant's books were published.[78][79]

Post-war career

[edit]

Following the Second World War and his retirement from the regular army, Lord Alanbrooke, as he was now, who could have chosen almost any honorary position he wanted, chose to be the Colonel Commandant of the Honourable Artillery Company. He held this position from 1946 to 1954. In addition, he served on the boards of several companies, both in industry and in banking. He was director of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, the Midland Bank, the National Discount Company and the Belfast Banking Company. Alanbrooke was particularly fond of being a director of the Hudson's Bay Company where he served for eleven years from 1948.[80]

According to historian Andrew Sangster, there was a reason for his choice to work in the private sector - i.e. not to stay in the military. Lord Alanbrooke ended the Second World War not well off: he had to move from his house and publishing his memoirs helped because such books sold well at that time.[81]

Marriages and children

[edit]

Lord Alanbrooke was married twice. After six years of engagement, in 1914 he married Jane Richardson, daughter of Colonel John Mervyn Ashdall Carleton Richardson, a neighbour who lived at Rossfad, County Fermanagh, Ulster.[82][83] Six days into their honeymoon, the then Alan Brooke was recalled to active duty when the First World War started. The couple had one daughter and one son:

Jane Brooke died of complications from an operation to repair a broken vertebra following a car accident in 1925 in which her husband was at the steering wheel. Jane's death deeply affected Brooke, who blamed himself for the accident and felt guilt over it for the rest of his life.[26][84]

Brooke married secondly Benita Lees (1892–1968), daughter of Sir Harold Pelly, 4th Baronet and the widow of Sir Thomas Lees, 2nd Baronet, in 1929. The marriage was very happy for the uxorious Brooke. They too had a daughter and a son:

During the war the couple lived in Hartley Wintney in Hampshire. After the war, their financial situation forced the couple to move into the gardener's cottage of their former home, where they lived for the rest of their lives. Their last years were darkened by the death of their daughter, Kathleen, in a riding accident in 1961.[86][82]

Interests

[edit]

Lord Alanbrooke had a love of nature. Hunting and fishing were among his great interests. His foremost passion, however, was birds. He was a noted ornithologist, especially in bird photography. In 1944, he ordered the RAF not to use an island off the coast of Norfolk as a bombing range because of its significance to nesting roseate terns.[26] He was president of the Zoological Society of London between 1950 and 1954, and vice-president of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) between 1949 and 1961.[87][88] He was an honorary member of the Royal Photographic Society from February 1954 until his death.[89]

Death

[edit]
Lord Alanbrooke's gravestone

On 17 June 1963, Lord Alanbrooke suffered a heart attack and died quietly in his bed with his wife beside him. The same day, he had been due to attend the Garter Service in St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle. Nine days later he was given a funeral in Windsor and buried in St Mary's Church, Hartley Wintney.[86] He was succeeded in the viscountcy and barony by his elder son, Thomas.[90]

Honours

[edit]
Garter-encircled Shield of Arms of Alan Brooke, 1st Viscount Alanbrooke, KG, GCB, OM, GCVO, DSO & Bar

United Kingdom

[edit]

Brooke was created Baron Alanbrooke, of Brookeborough in the County of Fermanagh, in 1945,[91] and Viscount Alanbrooke, of Brookeborough in the County of Fermanagh, in 1946.[92][93] Other awards included:

Lord Alanbrooke also served as Chancellor of Queen's University Belfast from 1949 until his death. At the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II he was appointed Lord High Constable of England, thus commanding all troops taking part in the event.[114] In 1993, a statue of Field Marshal Lord Alanbrooke was erected in front of the Ministry of Defence in Whitehall in London. The statue is flanked by statues of Britain's other two leading generals of the Second World War, William Slim and Bernard Montgomery.[115]

Foreign decorations

[edit]

Coat of arms

[edit]

His coat of arms as issued to him by the College of Arms is: "Or, a cross engrailed per pale Gules and Sable, in dexter chief a crescent for difference."

Memorials

[edit]
[edit]

Brooke was portrayed in the television drama Churchill and the Generals by Eric Porter[131] and in the film Churchill by Danny Webb.[132]

He is memorably described by the narrator in Anthony Powell's novel, The Military Philosophers (the 9th volume in his roman-fleuve, A Dance to the Music of Time), who refers to:[133]

...the hurricane-like imminence of a thickset general, obviously of high rank, wearing enormous horn-rimmed spectacles. He had just burst from a flagged staff-car almost before it had drawn up by the kerb. Now he tore up the steps of the building at the charge, exploding through the inner door into the hall. An extraordinary current of physical energy, almost of electricity, suddenly pervaded the place. I could feel it stabbing through me. This was the CIGS.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Alan Brooke, 1st Viscount Alanbrooke

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Alan Francis Brooke, 1st Alanbrooke (23 July 1883 – 17 June 1963), was a senior officer who served as Chief of the Imperial General Staff from December 1941 to 1946, acting as the principal military strategist and advisor to during the decisive years of the Second World War. Born in , , to an Protestant family with deep military roots, Brooke was commissioned into the Royal Artillery in 1902 and earned distinction in the First World War through frontline service and staff roles, receiving the for gallantry. In the Second World War, he commanded II Corps of the British Expeditionary Force in until the in 1940, then led Home Forces in preparing Britain's defenses against invasion, before ascending to the as CIGS, where he prioritized the defeat of over peripheral operations, restrained Churchill's more impulsive proposals, and coordinated with Allied leaders to orchestrate the eventual cross-Channel invasion and continental victory. Promoted to in 1944, Brooke's postwar diaries, published after his death, revealed his candid assessments of Allied shortcomings and leadership tensions, underscoring his pivotal, often unheralded role in averting strategic missteps amid the pressures of . Elevated to the as Alanbrooke in 1946, he later held ceremonial positions including Master Gunner of the Ordnance and Constable of the Tower of London until his death.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Childhood

Alan Francis Brooke was born on 23 July 1883 in , , , to an Anglo-Irish family with deep roots in . His father, Sir Victor Alexander Brooke, 3rd (1843–1891), was a and avid sportsman from the of , owning the Colebrooke estate near ; Sir Victor had created the baronetcy through his grandfather's efforts in Irish politics and landownership. Brooke's mother was Alice Sophia Mary Bellingham, from another Anglo-Irish gentry family, and he was the sixth of their sons, part of a large brood reflecting the family's Protestant establishment status in Ireland. The family resided primarily in France due to Sir Victor's business pursuits in Paris, where he worked as a stockbroker while maintaining ties to his Irish estates and indulging in hunting and natural history expeditions across Europe. Brooke spent his early childhood in this continental environment, receiving private tutoring that instilled fluency in French before he fully mastered English, fostering an early cosmopolitan outlook amid the family's Anglo-Irish heritage. Sir Victor's death in 1891, when Brooke was eight, prompted a shift; the family returned to Britain, where Brooke continued preparatory education before entering formal military training. This early loss and relocation underscored the precarity of gentry fortunes reliant on imperial networks, shaping Brooke's pragmatic worldview from youth.

Military Training and Early Influences

Brooke entered the Royal Military Academy at in 1900 after attending a cramming school in , achieving a of 65th out of 72 candidates upon entry. The academy's curriculum emphasized technical proficiency in gunnery, mathematics, and field operations, aligning with his aptitude for quantitative analysis, which proved advantageous in roles. Upon successful completion of training, he was commissioned as a in the Royal Regiment of Artillery on 24 December 1902. His initial assignment involved service in southern from 1902 to 1906, where routine drills and live-fire exercises provided foundational experience in battery command and coordination under peacetime conditions. In 1906, Brooke transferred to , serving with units until 1909 amid varied terrain that tested observational skills and logistical adaptability essential for mobile warfare. These early postings cultivated a pragmatic approach to tactics, influenced by the Royal Artillery's doctrine prioritizing precision over assaults, though peacetime constraints limited exposure to combat dynamics until the First World War.

First World War Service

Western Front Engagements

Alan Brooke arrived on the Western Front in September 1914 as a in R Battery, , part of the British Expeditionary Force. His unit supported operations in the early mobile phase of the war before transitioning to . By mid-1916, promoted to major, Brooke served as for the artillery of the 18th (Eastern) Division under Major-General Ivor Maxse during the . On 1 July 1916, the division assaulted village, where Brooke coordinated the artillery support, introducing the French-inspired creeping barrage technique to shield advancing infantry by maintaining a moving curtain of fire ahead of them. This innovation minimized exposure to enemy machine guns in the intervening ground, contributing to the division's successful capture of objectives amid heavy casualties elsewhere on the front. For his leadership in planning and executing the barrage, Brooke was awarded the . In February 1917, Brooke transferred as General Staff Officer Grade 2 () to the Canadian Corps, assisting in developing fire plans for major operations. He masterminded the barrage for the from 9 to 12 April 1917, coordinating over 1,000 guns to deliver a precise creeping barrage that advanced at 100 yards every three minutes, synchronized with infantry movements via detailed rehearsals and communication systems. This plan, involving a preliminary of 1.5 million shells, devastated German defenses and enabled the Canadian Corps to seize the ridge—a key tactical victory—while limiting incidents through innovative ranging and liaison methods. Brooke remained with the Canadian Corps through subsequent engagements, including the Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele) in late 1917, refining artillery tactics amid challenging muddy terrain that complicated gun positioning and supply. His contributions to barrage coordination earned a bar to his DSO in 1918, recognizing sustained excellence in artillery staff work across multiple offensives. By war's end, Brooke's emphasis on precise, adaptive fire support had established him as a leading artillery tactician on the Western Front.

Command Responsibilities and Personal Development

During the First World War, Alan Brooke served primarily as an artillery staff officer on the Western Front, initially with an ammunition column of the Royal Horse Artillery before transitioning to more senior planning roles. His responsibilities focused on coordinating artillery fire support for infantry advances, emphasizing precise barrage tactics to minimize friendly casualties and maximize effectiveness against German positions. In 1916, during the , Brooke played a key role in implementing the "creeping barrage" technique—adapted from French methods—where artillery fire advanced incrementally ahead of advancing troops to suppress enemy defenses. This innovation improved synchronization between artillery and infantry, though Brooke later attributed the core idea to prior French usage rather than claiming original invention. By early 1917, he joined the as a staff officer, overseeing artillery planning for operations including the in April 1917, where he coordinated the corps' artillery assets alongside additional heavy guns to deliver a devastating preliminary bombardment and rolling barrages that contributed to the Canadian success in capturing the ridge. As senior artillery staff officer in the Canadian Corps, Brooke managed logistics, staff coordination, and operational planning, ensuring efficient ammunition supply and fire direction across multiple divisions during the in 1918. Later that year, he advanced to General Staff Officer Grade 1 (GSO1) for in the First Army, directing large-scale gun deployments and against German . These roles honed his expertise in tactics, with his work earning multiple mentions in dispatches for effective handling. Brooke's wartime experiences fostered rapid professional growth, elevating him from major to brevet lieutenant-colonel by the on 11 November 1918. The demands of planning under fire refined his methodical approach to operations, instilling a preference for detailed preparation and realism about infantry-artillery integration limitations, lessons that informed his interwar writings and later commands. His reputation as an outstanding operational planner emerged from these staff duties, distinguishing him among officers despite the war's high attrition.

Interwar Period

Staff Appointments and Promotions

Following the Armistice of 11 November 1918, Brooke was promoted to brevet lieutenant-colonel on 1 January 1919, reflecting his wartime service record. That year, he was selected for the inaugural postwar course at the , commencing in January 1920, which underscored his emerging status among promising officers. From 1 January 1923 to 20 January 1927, Brooke served as an instructor at the , where he contributed to officer training in tactical and operational doctrine. He then attended the Imperial Defence College from 1927 to 1929, gaining exposure to higher strategic and inter-service policy issues. His substantive promotion to was backdated to 1 January 1923 and formalized on 26 February 1929. On 4 February 1929, Brooke received a temporary brigadier's rank and assumed the role of of the School of at Larkhill, holding the position until 14 March 1932, where he oversaw gunnery instruction and modernization efforts. Subsequently, from 15 March 1932 to 6 April 1934, he returned to instructional duties as a member of the directing staff at the Imperial Defence College. Brooke commanded the 8th Infantry Brigade from 7 April 1934 to 30 September 1935, marking a shift toward field command responsibilities. He was promoted to major-general on 1 June 1935 and appointed Inspector of Artillery at the from 8 November 1935 to 14 August 1936. From 15 August 1936 to 23 November 1937, he served as Director of Military Training at the , influencing army-wide training policies amid rearmament. In November 1937, Brooke took command of the Mobile Division (redesignated the 1st Armoured Division in 1938) until 14 July 1938, emphasizing mechanized warfare development. Promoted to lieutenant-general on 15 July 1938 (backdated to 27 June), he then led the Anti-Aircraft Corps until 24 March 1939, followed by command of Anti-Aircraft Command from 1 April to 28 July 1939, and briefly Southern Command until 31 August 1939. These successive promotions and staff roles at the and educational institutions highlighted Brooke's expertise in , training, and emerging air defense priorities during the interwar rearmament phase.

Tactical Innovations and Publications

During his appointment as Commandant of the School of Artillery at Larkhill from 1929 to 1932, Brooke introduced reforms to artillery training that emphasized its role as an integral component of operations rather than a standalone branch, incorporating practical exercises in coordination with maneuvers to enhance effectiveness. This shift addressed interwar deficiencies in joint training, drawing from his experiences with creeping barrages and predictive fire, and aimed to prepare gunners for rapid, decentralized support in fluid engagements. As Director of Military Training at the from February 1936 to August 1937, Brooke oversaw experiments with mechanized and armored formations, advocating for tactical doctrines that integrated tanks, , and artillery to counter potential continental threats, including early emphasis on anti-tank defenses and mobile reserves. These efforts contributed to the evolution of manuals, such as updates to training emphasizing battle drills and anti-mechanized tactics, though implementation lagged due to budgetary constraints and institutional conservatism. Brooke's command of the Mobile Division from July 1937 to 1938 further tested these concepts in practice, as the unit—comprising experimental tank battalions, , and elements—conducted maneuvers to develop doctrines for rapid exploitation and defensive counterattacks, foreshadowing principles later refined in . His lectures and directives during this period influenced emerging publications like provisional armored training pamphlets, though no standalone books by Brooke appeared until his postwar diaries; instead, his ideas shaped official guidance on tactical flexibility amid rising European tensions.

World War II Operational Commands

II Corps in France and Dunkirk Evacuation

Lieutenant General Alan Brooke was appointed commander of II Corps on 29 September 1939. The corps, initially consisting of the 3rd and 4th Infantry Divisions, formed part of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) and deployed to northern in late September and early October 1939, establishing positions along the Franco-Belgian border near . During the ensuing period until May 1940, Brooke prioritized intensive training in mobile tactics and artillery coordination, informed by his analysis of dynamics and skepticism toward static defenses. The German offensive launched on 10 May 1940, with invasions of , the Netherlands, and , prompted the BEF's advance into under the Dyle Plan. German forces' breakthrough through the rapidly encircled Allied units, forming the pocket by mid-May. Brooke, commanding II Corps in the BEF's reserve, identified the vulnerability early; on 23 May, he recorded in his diary that "nothing but a can save the BEF now." On 21 May, Brooke oversaw the counter-attack at (Frankforce), deploying the 1st Army Tank Brigade alongside infantry from the 50th (Northumbrian) Division against Erwin Rommel's 7th Panzer Division, inflicting approximately 400 German casualties and temporarily disrupting their momentum despite British losses of over 200 tanks and vehicles. This action provided a brief respite, though it highlighted the BEF's equipment deficiencies against German armor. II Corps then conducted rearguard operations, incorporating the 5th and 50th Divisions for holding actions southward. Faced with orders on 25 May from BEF commander Lord Gort to attack southeast toward Lens to link with French forces, Brooke deemed the maneuver unfeasible given enemy superiority and instead repositioned II Corps to defend the Ypres-Comines Canal line, anchoring the eastern flank of the perimeter. From 26 to 28 May, II Corps—with four divisions repelling assaults by German XIX Army Corps—held this critical sector through concentrated artillery fire from 72 25-pounder guns and heavier batteries in reverse-slope positions, preventing encirclement and buying time for evacuation. This defensive stand, Brooke's independent judgment amid collapsing Allied coordination, was instrumental in securing the beaches for Operation Dynamo. Brooke departed by boat on 30 May 1940, after coordinating the corps' withdrawal, leaving rearguards to continue the fight until the perimeter's final contraction. His corps' efforts contributed to the overall success of , which evacuated 338,226 British and Allied troops between 26 May and 4 June, preserving the BEF's core for future operations despite material losses. Brooke's emphasis on realistic assessment over futile offensives underscored his command's effectiveness in a campaign marked by strategic miscalculations higher up the chain.

Leadership of Home Forces

General Sir Alan Brooke was appointed Commander-in-Chief of Home Forces on 19 July 1940, replacing General Sir at a time when German invasion plans, codenamed , posed an acute threat following the and the fall of . In assuming command of a depleted —lacking modern equipment, experienced troops, and cohesive organization—Brooke prioritized the rapid reconstitution of defensive capabilities across the , integrating regular formations, newly raised divisions, and the Local Defence Volunteers (later ) into a unified structure. His diaries later reflected the intense personal strain of this period, describing the invasion preparations as "tearing me to pieces daily" due to the need to balance limited resources against uncertain enemy intentions. Brooke overhauled defensive doctrine, de-emphasizing Ironside's rigid stop-line system of linear fortifications in favor of elastic defenses reliant on mobile reserves for counter-attacks against potential beachheads. He established areas responsible for coastal sectors, positioning reserves forward to enable swift responses, while directing resources toward beach obstacles, anti-tank defenses, and improved training regimens. Large-scale inspections and maneuvers, including major 1941 exercises simulating invasion scenarios, exposed deficiencies in coordination and firepower but drove incremental improvements in troop readiness and combined-arms tactics. Despite these reforms, Home Forces remained vulnerable: anti-tank guns were scarce, many senior officers lacked recent combat experience, and exercises revealed persistent challenges in mounting effective mobile operations against a determined foe. Brooke's leadership stabilized the army sufficiently to deter or blunt an assault during the critical summer and autumn of , though the waning invasion threat after the eased immediate pressures. He relinquished the post on 25 December 1941 to become Chief of the Imperial General Staff.

Chief of the Imperial General Staff

Appointment and Strategic Oversight

General Sir Alan Brooke was appointed Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS) effective 1 December 1941, succeeding General Sir John Dill, who was reassigned as head of the British military mission in Washington. This appointment occurred amid mounting crises, including the entry of Japan into the war following Pearl Harbor on 7 December and the precarious position of Soviet forces against the German advance. Prime Minister Winston Churchill selected Brooke for his proven leadership in evacuating forces from Dunkirk and organizing home defenses, recognizing his capacity for realistic strategic judgment. As CIGS, Brooke assumed responsibility as the professional head of the , serving as the primary military adviser to Churchill and the on army matters and broader . He also chaired the , exerting influence over inter-service coordination and ensuring unified direction of Britain's war effort, often dominating discussions through intellectual rigor and insistence on feasible plans grounded in available resources. Under his oversight, prioritized the long-term buildup of forces capable of a cross-Channel , rejecting premature operations that risked irreplaceable assets without decisive impact. Brooke's approach to strategic oversight emphasized causal analysis of enemy strengths and Allied limitations, advocating for concentration of effort against as the principal foe rather than diversionary campaigns. He maintained meticulous records in his war diaries, which reveal his role in tempering optimistic projections and enforcing data-driven assessments of operational feasibility, such as evaluating the risks of operations in the Mediterranean or based on troop numbers, , and terrain. This framework guided resource prioritization, ensuring that British forces, numbering around 2.5 million by mid-1942 under his purview, were trained and equipped for high-intensity continental warfare rather than scattered commitments.

Key Decisions on Resource Allocation and Priorities

As Chief of the Imperial General Staff from December 1941, Alan Brooke directed the allocation of Britain's constrained industrial and manpower resources toward rebuilding the army for a decisive cross-Channel of , emphasizing the need to amass sufficient ground forces despite competing demands from the Royal Air Force's campaign and naval requirements. He advocated prioritizing equipment production for armored and divisions capable of sustaining prolonged continental operations, projecting a re-entry into no earlier than 1944 to ensure adequate preparation, while resisting premature dispersals that could undermine this build-up. This approach involved coordinating with the to secure munitions allocations for and tanks over excessive output, reflecting his assessment that air power alone could not defeat without a major land commitment. Brooke's decisions balanced immediate Mediterranean imperatives against long-term European priorities, approving the commitment of VIII Army resources to under in November 1942 to neutralize Axis forces and safeguard imperial supply routes, despite initial reservations about diverting troops from home defense and invasion preparations. He capped subsequent escalations, insisting at the January 1943 that operations beyond clearing should not exceed one British and one American division to preserve landing craft, shipping, and manpower—totaling around 600,000 troops—for the invasion planned for 1944. This restraint extended to opposing Churchill's proposals for Balkan or Norwegian ventures, which Brooke deemed resource-draining distractions from the main effort against . On manpower, Brooke navigated Britain's acute shortages—peaking at conscription debates in 1942—by prioritizing the retention of skilled personnel for the field army over transfers to war industries or expanded aircrew training, maintaining 21 active divisions by mid-1943 while supplementing with and Allied contingents to offset domestic limits estimated at under 3 million eligible males. He endorsed selective reinforcements for Montgomery's forces in , allocating 200,000 tons of shipping priority in early 1943 to enable the final push against Rommel, but vetoed broader dilutions that risked weakening the 36-division target for . These choices, grounded in Brooke's insistence on "balanced forces" capable of exploiting breakthroughs, ensured the British contribution to comprised 22 divisions with integrated air and naval support, though critics later argued they delayed Mediterranean momentum post-Sicily.

Coordination with Allied Commanders

As Chief of the Imperial General Staff, Alan Brooke served as the principal representative on the (CCS), the supreme Anglo-American military body established in December 1941 to coordinate Allied strategy. The CCS, comprising Brooke, British Admiralty and Air Ministry chiefs, and their American counterparts including , met regularly during wartime conferences such as Arcadia (December 1941–January 1942), (January 1943), and (May 1943) to align on priorities like the "Germany first" policy and resource allocation for operations including and . Brooke's contributions emphasized logistical realism and a focus on defeating Germany through a decisive cross-Channel invasion, often tempering more optimistic or peripheral American proposals. Brooke maintained a professional working relationship with Marshall, despite temperamental differences—Brooke's cautious, detail-oriented approach contrasting Marshall's broader vision—enabling effective collaboration on . In CCS meetings, such as those at in 1945, Brooke proposed practical measures like daily scheduling at 1430 hours and advocated for balanced fronts, arguing that Italian operations supported Western offensives while Marshall highlighted resource constraints. Their coordination proved instrumental in sustaining the alliance amid contentious debates, with Marshall reportedly respecting Brooke's strategic acumen. Relations with General , appointed for in December 1943, were more strained privately, though Brooke publicly supported the arrangement after British preferences for a home commander were overruled. In CCS discussions, Brooke relayed Eisenhower's operational insights, such as conferences with General on North African plans in January 1943. However, Brooke's war diaries reveal sharp criticisms, describing Eisenhower as "hopeless" as a general for prioritizing politics over military duties, reflecting Brooke's view that Eisenhower lacked the professional depth for supreme command. Despite these reservations, Brooke's oversight ensured British forces integrated into Eisenhower's commands, contributing to unified execution of Northwest Europe campaigns from June 1944.

Strategic Philosophy and Debates

Emphasis on Continental Focus over Periphery

Alan Brooke, as Chief of the Imperial General Staff, adhered to Britain's longstanding tradition of the "continental commitment," which emphasized preparing expeditionary forces for decisive engagement on the European mainland against the primary enemy, rather than expending resources on indirect or peripheral theaters that risked diluting the main effort. This approach, shaped by historical precedents like the and , informed Brooke's insistence on building overwhelming superiority in air, land, and naval power before attempting a cross-Channel , viewing peripheral operations as supplements only if they directly weakened German reserves or secured flanks without compromising the core buildup. Brooke repeatedly cautioned against Churchill's enthusiasm for expansive peripheral strategies, such as operations in , the Aegean, or the , arguing they would scatter limited British and Commonwealth forces across secondary fronts, echoing the resource-draining errors of Gallipoli in 1915. In his war diaries, he recorded profound frustration with Churchill's "failure to grasp overall strategy," particularly the Prime Minister's fixation on "peripheral attacks" that ignored logistical constraints and the need to concentrate on defeating Germany's continental army. For instance, during 1942 planning, Brooke opposed premature "" raids across the Channel, favoring instead the Torch landings in (, November 1942) as a controlled peripheral move to eliminate Axis forces in by May 1943, thereby freeing divisions for the primary continental assault without indefinite Mediterranean entanglement. By 1943, Brooke's influence ensured that Mediterranean campaigns, including the Sicily invasion (Operation Husky, July 1943) and initial Italian landings (September 1943), were curtailed to prevent diversion from the Normandy invasion (, June 1944). He advocated halting advances beyond to avoid "bleeding" British reserves in attritional , prioritizing the transfer of nine divisions and supporting air units to Britain for the cross-Channel operation, which he deemed the only path to causal victory over through direct confrontation of its main forces. This stance aligned with empirical assessments of German dispositions, where peripheral gains yielded marginal strategic returns compared to the decisive potential of a Western Front breakthrough. Brooke's diaries underscore his meta-concern with Churchill's , noting on 17 July 1942 that such diversions threatened the "whole basis of our future strategy."

Criticisms of Overly Optimistic Planning

Alanbrooke consistently critiqued strategic proposals that rested on overly optimistic assessments of Allied capabilities and enemy resilience, particularly those advanced by Churchill for peripheral theaters. In his war diaries, he recorded instances where Churchill's enthusiasm led to reliance on inflated intelligence from Director of Military Intelligence Eric Shearer, describing the Prime Minister as "overconfident" and prone to accepting uncritical reports that underestimated German defensive strengths. This pattern manifested early in discussions of operations like the 1940 Norwegian campaign, where Alanbrooke, as a senior planner, highlighted logistical impossibilities and the risks of dispersed forces against a concentrated German thrust, yet initial British commitments proceeded on hopes of rapid Scandinavian alliances that proved illusory. A prominent example occurred with the Italian campaign following the July 1943 Sicily landings. While Alanbrooke endorsed the invasion of as a logical extension of North African successes to knock out of the war, he privately doubted the feasibility of swift advances up the mainland, cautioning against assumptions of collapsed Italian resistance and underestimating terrain, weather, and German reinforcements. His diaries reveal frustration with optimistic projections at the in January 1943, where Allied leaders, including Churchill, anticipated minimal opposition post-Mussolini; in reality, the campaign stalled at Gustav Line defenses by early 1944, tying down 20 Allied divisions for 18 months at a cost of over 300,000 casualties, validating Alanbrooke's reservations about overextended supply lines and divided commitments. Alanbrooke's broader strategic philosophy prioritized a "Germany-first" continental focus, viewing peripheral ventures as distractions fueled by undue optimism about indirect attrition. He argued in Chiefs of Staff meetings that such plans ignored Britain's limited resources—evidenced by shipping shortages delaying preparations—and overestimated air and naval interdiction's impact on Axis logistics, as seen in persistent German supply flows to despite bombing. Critics like American planners accused him of excessive pessimism, but his diaries counter that true realism demanded rejecting "madcap" schemes, such as Churchill's 1942 proposals for Balkan interventions, which Alanbrooke deemed logistically unviable given the Wehrmacht's proven maneuverability.

Assessments of Bombing and Technological Reliance

Alan Brooke, as Chief of the Imperial General Staff, maintained a persistent skepticism toward the RAF's strategic bombing offensive as a means to decisively defeat Nazi Germany, viewing it as a supplementary rather than primary instrument of victory. He argued that air power alone could not compel surrender or dismantle the German economy sufficiently to avoid the necessity of a large-scale land invasion, emphasizing instead the irreplaceable role of ground forces in occupying territory and breaking enemy will. In his war diaries, Brooke frequently critiqued overoptimistic RAF assessments of bomb damage, observing that despite campaigns like the 1943-1944 raids on the Ruhr, German industrial production—such as aircraft output—continued to increase, reaching peaks of over 40,000 planes annually by late 1944, underscoring the limitations of area bombing against dispersed and fortified targets. Brooke's evaluations highlighted causal factors such as German adaptive measures—including underground factories, alternatives, and workforce mobilization—that mitigated bombing's effects, rather than accepting RAF claims of near-collapse in enemy morale or logistics. He supported targeted strikes, such as the Transportation Plan preceding in 1944, which disrupted rail networks and facilitated by reducing German reinforcements, but only as integrated with amphibious and armored operations; standalone strategic efforts, he contended, diverted resources from building the 50-division Anglo-American army essential for continental victory. This stance reflected his broader strategic philosophy, informed by interwar observations of air power's failures in and the Low Countries, where bombing proved unable to prevent rapid ground conquests. Regarding technological reliance, Brooke advocated caution against prioritizing unproven innovations or air-centric doctrines over foundational military elements like trained and supremacy. He resisted diversions of steel and labor to exotic projects—such as early jet prototypes or excessive airborne divisions—without rigorous testing, arguing in Chiefs of Staff meetings that Britain's resource constraints demanded focus on reliable, mass-producible equipment like Sherman tanks and 25-pounder guns, which had proven effective in by 1943. While acknowledging and signals intelligence's tactical value, as in the where convoy losses dropped below 1% monthly by 1943, Brooke warned against over-dependence on such technologies without robust conventional backups, citing risks of electronic countermeasures or supply disruptions. His diaries reveal frustrations with Churchill's enthusiasm for gadgetry-driven schemes, like fuel pipelines, insisting that victory hinged on manpower quality and logistical realism rather than technological panaceas. This empirical grounding stemmed from firsthand experience in 1940's , where mechanical breakdowns amid poor terrain underscored technology's subservience to operational fundamentals.

Relationship with Churchill

Daily Interactions and Restraint of Impulses

Alanbrooke's daily interactions with Churchill as Chief of the Imperial General Staff involved frequent, often protracted consultations that highlighted their contrasting temperaments and work habits. From his appointment in December 1941, Alanbrooke attended regular meetings at or , where Churchill—typically rising late and favoring post-dinner sessions—would interrogate strategic options amid clouds of cigar smoke and glasses of whisky. These encounters, sometimes extending past midnight, clashed with Alanbrooke's preference for concluding work by 8 p.m. and resuming at 9 a.m., leaving him physically and mentally fatigued yet compelled to engage to shape policy. Central to these interactions was Alanbrooke's role in restraining Churchill's impulsive strategic impulses, such as advocacy for high-risk peripheral operations in or the that risked diluting resources needed for a continental offensive against . Rather than direct confrontation, which could undermine the Chiefs of Staff's collective authority, Alanbrooke employed measured rebuttals grounded in logistical realities, troop readiness figures, and intelligence assessments—for example, citing the inadequacy of shipping and for premature invasions during 1942-1943. His diaries record private exasperation at Churchill's "wild schemes," yet in the moment, he deferred open clashes, recognizing the Prime Minister's political acumen and inspirational value outweighed his military lapses. Alanbrooke similarly restrained his own impulses toward or blunt , contemplating departure at least a dozen times amid mounting frustrations, particularly after setbacks like the fall of in 1942 or during debates over the Torch landings in later that year. On one occasion in 1944, thwarted over a favored project, Churchill accused the CIGS of personal animosity, prompting Alanbrooke to suppress retorts and reaffirm commitment to duty. This self-control preserved the advisory framework, enabling Alanbrooke to channel Churchill's energy toward viable priorities like bolstering Home Forces and coordinating with Allies, as evidenced by his success in prioritizing preparations over Mediterranean diversions by mid-1943.

Points of Agreement and Fundamental Tensions

Alan Brooke and aligned on essential strategic imperatives during the Second World War, including the "Germany first" policy, which prioritized the defeat of over immediate full-scale engagement with following the latter's entry into the conflict in December 1941. They concurred on the critical need to secure the Mediterranean theater, advocating for operations to clear Axis forces from prior to expansions into and , thereby protecting vital supply lines and imperial interests. Shared views extended to the buildup of capabilities, the reorganization and re-equipment of the , and the imperative to draw the into the European war as expeditiously as possible. Fundamental tensions stemmed from contrasting philosophies: Churchill's reliance on intuition, opportunism, and bold peripheral initiatives frequently collided with Brooke's emphasis on methodical, long-term and aversion to dissipating limited resources on high-risk diversions. Brooke opposed Churchill's 1942 proposal for a renewed invasion of , viewing it as a wasteful distraction from building forces for a decisive cross-Channel assault. Similarly, he resisted Churchill's advocacy for operations in the or , such as those targeting , deeming them strategic misadventures reminiscent of past failures like the campaign. Brooke's war diaries reveal private exasperation with Churchill's "temperamental" and "peevish" demeanor, exemplified by entries lamenting the prime minister's fixation on unfeasible ideas, as in his 13 May 1943 reflection: "God knows where we would be without him, but God knows where we shall go with him." Despite these frictions, their partnership endured through mutual respect—Brooke valuing Churchill's courage and inspirational qualities, and Churchill relying on Brooke's unflinching professionalism to temper impulsive decisions, such as during the 14 debate over deploying the 52nd Division, where Brooke's firm counsel prevailed. This dynamic, though strained by Brooke's role as de facto strategic "nanny," proved instrumental in aligning Britain's with realistic objectives, preventing catastrophic overreach while advancing toward .

War Diaries and Postwar Revelations

Diary Composition During the War

Alan Brooke initiated his war diaries on 2 September 1939, the day after the German , as he prepared to command II Corps of the British Expeditionary Force in . The entries, spanning until the war's end in 1945, were handwritten in small notebooks, capturing daily events, strategic deliberations, and personal reflections amid the pressures of high command. Framed as private notes to his second wife, Benita, the diaries functioned as a outlet for Brooke to unburden frustrations with political leaders, Allied commanders, and operational setbacks, while documenting his rationale for key decisions. He explicitly warned on of at least one volume, "ON NO ACCOUNT MUST THIS BE LET OUT," underscoring their intended for familial posterity rather than . The originals were periodically lodged with Benita for safekeeping, ensuring continuity despite Brooke's frequent relocations and the risks of wartime capture. Composition occurred contemporaneously with events, often in terse, unpolished prose reflective of exhaustion from 16- to 18-hour workdays as Chief of the Imperial General Staff from onward. Brooke's , described as execrable, occasionally rendered portions illegible even to editors decades later, yet preserved raw immediacy over polished narrative. This method prioritized fidelity to his —venting toward figures like or Dwight Eisenhower—over formal documentation, distinguishing the diaries from official records. The practice demanded discipline amid secrecy constraints; Brooke avoided shorthand or codes that might compromise security if seized, relying instead on vague allusions to sensitive . By war's end, the volumes formed a comprehensive, if subjective, exceeding 1,000 pages, reliant on Brooke's photographic for details unfiltered by postwar revisionism.

Publication Controversies and Edits

The war diaries of Alan Brooke, covering 1939 to 1945, were initially prepared for private use by his wife but posthumously edited and published in abridged form by historian Sir in collaboration with Brooke himself. The first volume, The Turn of the Tide, 1939–1942, appeared in 1957, followed by Triumph in the West, 1943–1946 in 1959; these editions excised substantial material deemed sensitive for national security or to mitigate personal animosities, including Brooke's unfiltered critiques of Winston Churchill's strategic impulses and assessments of Allied leaders like . Bryant's editing, which Brooke approved while suppressing certain passages entirely, drew immediate scholarly for distorting the historical record by softening Brooke's candid evaluations—such as his frequent notations of Churchill's "foul moods" or "dangerous" diversions into peripheral operations—and presenting a more polished that aligned with postwar British . The volumes nonetheless sparked upon release, as even the sanitized excerpts revealed Brooke's blunt judgments, prompting debates over the CIGS's loyalty and candor toward the , with some contemporaries viewing the disclosures as ungracious despite Brooke's wartime restraint in public. A complete, unexpurgated edition, edited by Alex Danchev and Daniel Todman, was issued in 2001 by , restoring over 20% of omitted text and Brooke's postwar annotations, which exposed the full extent of the prior censorship and amplified the diaries' value as raw primary evidence while reigniting disputes over Bryant's interventions as potentially self-serving to Brooke's legacy. Danchev and Todman argued that the original edits not only concealed Brooke's strategic rationales but also obscured his personal toll from constant Churchill containment, though they noted Brooke's own complicity in the redactions to safeguard family and institutional reputations. This release prompted reevaluations, with historians like David Fraser praising the unvarnished diaries for illuminating high command frictions, while underscoring that Brooke's decision to publish derived partly from financial pressures in postwar rather than pure archival intent.

Insights into Leadership Dynamics

Alanbrooke's war diaries disclose the constant friction in high-level decision-making, where he positioned himself as a restraining influence on Churchill's intuitive but often erratic proposals. On 9 February 1944, he clashed intensely with Churchill over a five-page telegram outlining flawed war strategy, underscoring the prime minister's imaginative yet logistically deficient approach against Alanbrooke's emphasis on practical realities. Similarly, Alanbrooke successfully opposed Churchill's imposition of a visitor ban on the South Coast ahead of D-Day, securing Cabinet backing to maintain operational focus. These entries highlight a leadership dynamic reliant on Alanbrooke's self-control to channel Churchill's "superhuman genius" while mitigating risks from his "hand-to-mouth" planning and temperamental outbursts, such as describing him as "peevish like a spoilt child." The diaries further illuminate inter-Allied tensions, with Alanbrooke venting sharp criticisms of American commanders like George Marshall and Dwight Eisenhower, whom he viewed as strategically optimistic to a fault. He redirected Marshall's advocacy for an premature cross-Channel invasion, prioritizing buildup and feasibility over haste. Regarding Eisenhower, Alanbrooke questioned his command acumen in operations, reflecting broader British skepticism toward American broad-front tactics versus concentrated thrusts favored by figures like Montgomery, whom Alanbrooke mentored and defended despite acknowledging his ego. This reveals a dynamic of cautious alliance management, where Alanbrooke balanced deference to U.S. power with insistence on British strategic primacy. Internally, Alanbrooke portrayed leadership as an exhausting endeavor of enforcing realism amid opposition, noting on 17 August 1944 how "extraordinary" the fatigue was in "driving a plan through against opposition." His entries stress the necessity of projecting calm authority, even privately doubting peers' capacities, yet underscore collaborative necessities for victories like , where personal animosities yielded to unified effort among Churchill, Roosevelt, Marshall, Eisenhower, and himself. Despite frustrations, Alanbrooke affirmed Churchill's indispensability, writing that "without him was lost," encapsulating a pragmatic respect for complementary strengths in wartime hierarchies.

Postwar Career and Recognition

Elevation to Field Marshal and Peerage

Brooke's promotion to occurred on 1 January 1944, elevating him to the British Army's highest substantive rank amid his tenure as Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS). This advancement recognized his pivotal role in wartime strategy, including coordination of Allied operations and oversight of Home Forces preparations against potential invasion. The rank, held by only a select few officers, underscored his influence as chairman of the , where he advised Prime Minister on global military commitments. Following the Allied victory in , Brooke received peerages as honors for his service. He was created Baron Alanbrooke of Brookeborough, in the County of Fermanagh, in September 1945, shortly after the war's end in that theater. This barony granted him a seat in the , reflecting governmental acknowledgment of his contributions to national defense. Subsequently, on 29 January 1946, King George VI elevated him further to Viscount Alanbrooke of Brookeborough by , during the early Attlee administration. These titles, combining elements of his surname and birthplace near , , formalized his postwar status while he concluded his CIGS duties in 1946.

Advisory Roles and Retirement

Following his resignation as Chief of the Imperial General Staff on 25 June 1946, Brooke was succeeded by Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, despite Clement Attlee's preference for him to continue in the role amid postwar military transitions. This marked the end of his active military service after over four decades, during which he had shaped British strategy as chairman of the . In retirement, Brooke assumed honorary and ceremonial positions reflective of his stature. He served as Chancellor of from 1949 until his death in 1963, succeeding the and presiding over ceremonies, including his installation on 28 September 1949. He also held a directorship at from 1949 to 1963, providing after wartime service left him in modest circumstances. For the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II on 2 June 1953, Brooke was appointed , a hereditary office revived solely for the ceremony to escort the sovereign and manage ceremonial processions. This role underscored his symbolic prominence in British institutions but involved no ongoing advisory duties. Brooke maintained a low public profile thereafter, focusing on personal matters and the eventual publication of his war diaries, until his death from on 17 June 1963 at his home in , .

Personal Life and Character

Marriages, Family, and Private Struggles

Alan Brooke married Jane Mary Richardson, daughter of Colonel John Richardson of Rossfad, , on 28 July 1914, following a six-year . The couple had two children: a daughter, Rosemary Brooke, born on 25 October 1918, and a son, Thomas Brooke, later 2nd Viscount Alanbrooke, born on 9 January 1920. Jane Brooke died on 4 September 1925 from complications following a car accident near Ferghana, in which Brooke was driving; he attributed responsibility to himself for the crash, which involved overturning the vehicle and resulted in severe injuries to her. Brooke remarried on 7 December 1929 to Benita Blanche Pelly, daughter of Sir Harold Pelly, 4th , and widow of Sir Thomas Evans Keith Lees, 2nd . Their marriage produced two children: a daughter, Kathleen Benita Brooke, born on 23 January 1931, and a son, Alan Victor Harold Brooke, later 3rd Viscount Alanbrooke, born in 1932. Kathleen died on 20 November 1961 in a riding , adding to Brooke's personal bereavements. Thomas Brooke succeeded to the viscountcy upon his father's death in 1963 but died without issue on 19 December 1972, passing the title to his half-brother Alan. The tragic losses profoundly affected Brooke, fostering a more introverted disposition and contributing to private emotional strains amid his public military duties; he later dedicated his war diaries to Benita, reflecting deep familial attachment amid these hardships.

Non-Military Interests and Temperament

Alan Brooke harbored a profound interest in , pursuing and as lifelong avocations that began during his service in around 1910 and persisted through both world wars. He often turned to observing and filming birds, such as hobbies, to manage mental stress amid professional demands, even employing cine-photography techniques. This dedication extended to conservation efforts; in 1944, he directed the Royal Air Force to avoid disrupting bird colonies on off . Brooke's commitment to culminated in his presidency of the Zoological from 1954 until his death in 1963. He also enjoyed field sports, including and , activities he shared with his father and which provided recreation alongside his ornithological pursuits. Brooke possessed a temperament, characterized by in private settings, a forceful , and intolerance for incompetence, traits that rendered him both intellectually sharp and occasionally irascible in interactions. His second marriage in 1932 to Benita Blanche Pugh offered emotional stability, mitigating these tendencies and supporting his resilience during crises. Despite such personal intensity, Brooke maintained close family bonds and a private demeanor averse to public flamboyance or .

Legacy and Historical Assessment

Military Achievements and Enduring Influence


Alan Brooke's military achievements during the Second World War were marked by his effective field command in the Battle of France and his pivotal strategic role as Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS). In May 1940, commanding II Corps of the British Expeditionary Force, Brooke recognized the imminent collapse of French resistance against the German Blitzkrieg and advocated for the withdrawal of British troops to Dunkirk, facilitating the evacuation of over 338,000 Allied personnel between 26 May and 4 June. This decision preserved core British forces for home defense amid the fall of France. Appointed CIGS on 21 November 1941, Brooke served until 1946 as the professional head of the and principal military advisor to . He steered British strategy by opposing Churchill's impulsive proposals, such as interventions in in 1941 and an invasion of Sumatra, thereby conserving resources and avoiding peripheral drains on Allied strength. Brooke prioritized the Mediterranean theater, supporting operations like the (1942–1943) and the invasion of in July 1943, which secured vital supply lines and diverted German forces from other fronts. In planning the , Brooke, as Chairman of the , insisted on delaying until Allied forces were adequately prepared, citing American setbacks in as evidence of risks in premature action; U.S. General later affirmed this caution prevented disaster. He also critiqued in September 1944, prioritizing the capture of Antwerp's port over airborne assaults, which underscored his focus on logistical sustainability. These decisions contributed to the coordinated Allied effort that culminated in Germany's defeat in May 1945. Brooke's enduring influence lies in his formulation of pragmatic grand strategy that balanced British capabilities with Allied imperatives, bridging the , British services, and Anglo-American commands. His emphasis on defeating before shifting to and maintaining interservice consensus shaped the overall . Postwar recognition includes a Whitehall statue erected in 1995, inscribed "Master of Strategy," reflecting his reputation for shrewd oversight that sustained Britain's military contribution to victory. His war diaries, published in 1957, continue to inform historical analysis of high-level decision-making.

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Alanbrooke faced criticism for his perceived pessimism and conservative strategic outlook, which some historians argue delayed decisive action against . Detractors, including certain postwar analysts, contended that his repeated opposition to Churchill's proposals for early interventions—such as operations in in 1940 or the —reflected excessive caution that prioritized defensive rebuilding over offensive opportunities, potentially allowing Axis forces to consolidate gains. This view posits that Alanbrooke's focus on peripheral theaters, like the Mediterranean, diverted resources from a cross-Channel , contributing to a protracted . Further reproach centered on his staunch defense of General Bernard Montgomery, whom Alanbrooke backed amid controversies over operations like the Normandy breakout and Operation Market Garden in 1944, despite mounting evidence of tactical inflexibility and high casualties. Critics, including some American commanders, viewed this loyalty as favoritism that undermined accountability and exacerbated Anglo-American tensions, particularly as Montgomery's broad-front critiques clashed with General Dwight D. Eisenhower's approach. Alanbrooke's diaries, published posthumously, amplified these issues by revealing his disdain for American strategic priorities, such as an early push into northern Europe, which he deemed premature given Britain's manpower shortages and the need to secure flanks. Counterarguments emphasize that Alanbrooke's realism stemmed from empirical assessments of British capabilities post-Dunkirk, where the army's evacuation on May 26–June 4, 1940, left it with minimal equipment and required a focus on mobile defense and training over risky ventures. His advocacy for the Italian campaign following the Axis surrender on September 8, 1943, tied down approximately 26 German divisions, facilitated Allied air superiority in the Mediterranean, and eliminated Italy as a co-belligerent without jeopardizing the decisive buildup for , which he deemed infeasible before mid-1944 due to logistical constraints. Defenders highlight that his support for Montgomery preserved command stability during critical phases, as evidenced by Montgomery's own postwar acclaim for Alanbrooke as an unwavering superior, and argue that such backing reflected sound judgment of Montgomery's proven successes in and rather than blind loyalty. Alanbrooke's "pessimism" is reframed as causal , balancing Churchill's enthusiasm to avert defeats like those in in 1941, ultimately enabling the coalition's victory through coordinated, resource-matched operations rather than impulsive thrusts.

Memorials and Modern Scholarship

A bronze statue of Alan Brooke, sculpted by Ivor Roberts-Jones, stands in , , at Raleigh Green. The plinth bears inscriptions identifying him as " The Alanbrooke" and "Chief of the Imperial General Staff, KG, GCB, , GCVO, DSO," with "Master of Strategy" on the lower front. Unveiled in 1993, it commemorates his role as Winston Churchill's principal during . In , a honors Brooke in , , overlooking the . Funded by the Ulster-Scots Agency, it was unveiled on 6 June 2024 by Viscount Brookeborough, Lord of , and the Hon. Christopher Brooke. Brooke, whose family had roots despite his birth in , is recognized for his distinguished service as a . Brooke is buried in St Mary Churchyard, , , where he died on 17 June 1963 at age 79. The site serves as a modest memorial to his life, alongside Commonwealth war graves. The publication of Brooke's War Diaries 1939–1945, initially edited and released in volumes between 1957 and 1959, provided firsthand insights into Allied high command dynamics, though censored to protect sensitivities. The unexpurgated edition in 2001, edited by Alex Danchev and Daniel Todman, revealed candid assessments of Churchill's strategic impulses and inter-Allied tensions, reshaping scholarly understanding of British decision-making. Biographies such as David Fraser's Alanbrooke (1982) and Andrew Sangster's Alan Brooke: Churchill’s Right-Hand Critic (2021) portray him as a meticulous who prioritized realistic , advocating peripheral campaigns to build strength for the decisive European invasion. Modern assessments, including those from the , credit Brooke with preventing impulsive operations, maintaining Army morale post-Dunkirk, and ensuring Britain's survival as a through disciplined . While some contemporaries viewed his caution as pessimism, historians argue it reflected causal realism amid limited British capabilities against superior Axis forces early in the war. His legacy endures as the "master of " who bridged political vision with military feasibility, though underappreciated compared to flashier field commanders.

References

  1. https://www.geni.com/people/Field-Marshal-Alan-Brooke-1st-Viscount-Alanbrooke-KG-GCB-GCVO-OM-DSO/6000000011302059116
  2. https://ww2db.com/person_bio.php?person_id=60
  3. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/alan-brooke-first-viscount-alanbrooke
  4. https://www.tracesofwar.com/persons/13099/Brooke-Alan-Francis-1st-Viscount-Alanbrooke.htm
  5. https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/brooke-great-contemporary/
  6. https://www.amazon.com/War-Diaries-1939-1945-Marshall-Alanbrooke/dp/1842125265
  7. https://www.thepeerage.com/p10061.htm
  8. https://www.newulsterbiography.co.uk/index.php/home/viewPerson/1920
  9. https://archive.org/download/sirvictorbrookes00broorich/sirvictorbrookes00broorich.pdf
  10. https://www.keymilitary.com/article/master-strategy
  11. https://atom.aim25.com/index.php/brooke-alan-francis-1883-1963-1st-viscount-alanbrooke-of-brookeborough-field-marshal-2%3Bisaar?sf_culture=nl
  12. https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/british-and-irish-history-biographies/alan-francis-brooke-1st-viscount-alanbrooke
  13. https://vimyfoundation.ca/learn/vimy-ridge
  14. https://www.espritdecorps.ca/history-feature/the-battle-of-vimy-ridge-part-1-preparing-the-attack
  15. https://m.facebook.com/Cautley1/photos/alan-brooke-1st-viscount-alanbrooke-in-ww1during-the-war-he-was-assigned-to-an-a/1136259265174489/
  16. https://www.investors.com/news/management/leaders-and-success/alan-brooke-top-british-commander-ww2/
  17. https://ww2talk.com/index.php?threads/alanbrooke-the-british-commander-most-neglected-by-history.24980/page-3
  18. https://spartacus-educational.com/2WWbrookeA.htm
  19. https://www.generals.dk/general/Brooke/Alan_Francis/Great_Britain.html
  20. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Alan_Brooke%2C_1st_Viscount_Alanbrooke
  21. https://academic.oup.com/book/26427/chapter/194832660
  22. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/combat-studies-institute/csi-books/house.pdf
  23. http://pwencycl.kgbudge.com/B/r/Brooke_Alan.htm
  24. https://legionmagazine.com/after-dunkirk/
  25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2025.2504000
  26. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/a-blunder-by-hitler-and-the-fortitude-of-the-common-soldier-resulted-in-a-miracle-at-dunkirk/
  27. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/battle-of-arras-rommels-view/
  28. https://martinharrisonsmedalresearch.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/8/2/8782416/bef_1939-40.pdf
  29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44233022
  30. https://robertlyman.substack.com/p/has-the-british-army-forgotten-the
  31. https://codenames.info/operation/battle-of-the-ypres-comines-canal/
  32. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/desperation-at-dunkirk/
  33. http://bear.buckingham.ac.uk/587/
  34. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/sir-john-dill-and-winston-churchill-a-clash-in-strategy/
  35. https://dominiccummings.substack.com/p/people-ideas-machines-vi-the-war
  36. https://winstonchurchill.org/publications/finest-hour/finest-hour-112/alanbrooke-and-churchill/
  37. https://www.eurasiareview.com/13012018-british-strategic-culture-and-general-sir-alan-brooke-during-world-war-ii-analysis/
  38. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1941-43/d346
  39. https://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/p/2005/CMH_2/www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/70-7/70-7_07.htm
  40. https://www.keymilitary.com/article/man-moment
  41. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1943/d31
  42. https://www.sonsoflibertymuseum.org/combined-chiefs-of-staff-wwii.cfm
  43. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/History/WWII/Trident3.pdf
  44. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/words-war-43
  45. https://www.hoover.org/research/alliance-held
  46. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945Malta/d292
  47. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945Malta/d315
  48. https://www.historynet.com/meet-the-man-who-held-together-the-often-contentious-allies-during-wwii/
  49. https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/440425.Alan_Brooke_1st_Viscount_Alanbrooke?page=2
  50. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/alanbrookes-war-diaries-1939-1945/
  51. https://books.google.td/books?id=SruMeCBkw1oC
  52. https://winstonchurchill.org/publications/finest-hour/finest-hour-124/churchill-and-d-day-another-view/
  53. https://www.keymilitary.com/article/alanbrooke-conversation
  54. https://militaryhistorynow.com/2023/03/01/stumbling-towards-victory-how-the-allied-italian-campaign-was-marred-by-bad-strategy-flawed-commanders/
  55. https://aspectsofhistory.com/book_reviews/alan-brooke-churchills-right-hand-critic-by-andrew-sangster/
  56. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/AUPress/Papers/t_0051_smith_bombing_to_surrender.pdf
  57. https://books.google.com/books/about/War_Diaries_1939_1945.html?id=SruMeCBkw1oC
  58. https://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/22nd-february-1957/8/alanbrooke-and-churchill
  59. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v04/n16/brian-bond/hurricane-brooke
  60. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780198604464.001.0001/acref-9780198604464-e-267
  61. https://archive.org/details/wardiaries1939190000alan
  62. https://christopherbellew.com/living-with-alan-brooke/
  63. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/pdf/10.3828/archives.2002.6
  64. https://www.ucpress.edu/books/war-diaries-1939-1945
  65. https://www.nli.org.il/en/a-topic/987007278341305171
  66. https://artsandculture.google.com/entity/alan-brooke-1st-viscount-alanbrooke/m01ddnt?hl=en
  67. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alan-Francis-Brooke-1st-Viscount-Alanbrooke
  68. http://www.thepeerage.com/e425.htm
  69. https://peerages.historyofparliamentonline.org/peerages/1195
  70. https://peerages.historyofparliamentonline.org/letters_patents/1075
  71. https://alumni.qub.ac.uk/new-chancellor
  72. https://www.nature.com/articles/164856a0
  73. https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/field-marshal-viscount-alanbrooke-18831963-169032
  74. https://aspectsofhistory.com/author_interviews/andrew-sangster-on-alan-brooke/
  75. https://www.westcoastrarebooks.com/data/news/news_7_doc1.pdf
  76. https://thewryneck.blogspot.com/2022/04/book-review-role-of-birds-in-world-war.html
  77. https://www.shetlandmuseumandarchives.org.uk/blog/alanbrooke
  78. https://www.accountancyage.com/2001/01/01/leading-from-the-front/
  79. https://www.forcesnews.com/heritage/wwii/lord-alanbrooke-churchills-burden-and-bulwark
  80. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/montgomerys-manpower-crisis-at-caen/
  81. https://www.rusi.org/podcasts/talking-strategy/episode-16-alanbrooke-churchills-right-hand-general
  82. https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/montgomery-great-contemporary/
  83. https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2020/7/22/in-a-time-of-global-crisis-lessons-from-an-unhappy-warrior-reviewing-a-biography-of-alanbrooke
  84. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/2933477/283525.pdf
  85. https://www.londonremembers.com/memorials/alanbrooke-statue
  86. https://www.vanderkrogt.net/statues/object.php?webpage=ST&record=gblo033
  87. https://ulsterhistorycircle.org.uk/alan-frrancis-brooke-viscount-alanbrooke-field-marshal-2/
  88. https://www.tracesofwar.com/sights/107946/St-Mary-Old-Churchyard.htm
  89. https://www.nam.ac.uk/whats-on/legacy-field-marshal-lord-alanbrooke
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.