Hubbry Logo
Battle of Spring HillBattle of Spring HillMain
Open search
Battle of Spring Hill
Community hub
Battle of Spring Hill
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Battle of Spring Hill
Battle of Spring Hill
Battle of Spring Hill
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Battle of Spring Hill
Part of the American Civil War

Army commanders Schofield and Hood
DateNovember 29, 1864 (1864-11-29)
Location
Maury County, Tennessee
Result Union victory
Belligerents
United States United States of America Confederate States of America Confederate States of America
Commanders and leaders
John M. Schofield John Bell Hood
Units involved
IV Corps
XXIII Corps[1]		 Army of Tennessee[1]
Strength
7,000[2] 12,000[2]
Casualties and losses
350 (64 KIA, 281 WIA, ~5 Missing[3] 500 (~120 KIA, ~350 WIA, 25+ missing)[3]

The Battle of Spring Hill was fought November 29, 1864, at Spring Hill, Tennessee, as part of the Franklin-Nashville Campaign of the American Civil War. The Confederate Army of Tennessee, commanded by Lt. Gen. John Bell Hood, attacked a Union force under Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield as it retreated from Columbia through Spring Hill. Because of a series of command failures, the Confederates were unable to inflict serious damage on the Federals and could not prevent their safe passage north to Franklin during the night. The next day, Hood pursued Schofield and attacked his fortifications in the Battle of Franklin, resulting in severe Confederate casualties.

Background

[edit]

Following his defeat in the Atlanta campaign, Hood had hoped to lure Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman into battle by disrupting his supply lines from Chattanooga to Atlanta. After a brief period in which he pursued Hood, Sherman elected instead to conduct his March to the Sea from Atlanta to Savannah, Georgia. He left forces under the command of Maj. Gen. George H. Thomas, the commander of the Army of the Cumberland, to defend Tennessee and defeat Hood: principally the IV Corps from the Army of the Cumberland, commanded by Maj. Gen. David S. Stanley, and the XXIII Corps from the Army of the Ohio, commanded by Maj. Gen. John Schofield.[4]

Hood moved through northern Alabama and concentrated his army at Florence from October 30 to November 21, waiting for supplies and to link up with his newly assigned cavalry commander, Maj. Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest. Rather than attempting to pursue Sherman through Georgia, Hood decided to execute a new plan: move north into Tennessee, defeat Thomas's army before it could concentrate, seize the important manufacturing center of Nashville, and continue north into Kentucky, possibly as far as the Ohio River. From this point, he could travel east to Virginia to join up with Gen. Robert E. Lee at Petersburg. His theater commander, Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard, urged Hood to take immediate action in an attempt to distract Sherman's advance, emphasizing the importance of moving before Thomas could consolidate his forces.[5]

The Army of Tennessee marched north from Florence on November 21 in three columns: Maj. Gen. Benjamin F. Cheatham's corps on the left, Lt. Gen. Stephen D. Lee's in the center, and Lt. Gen. Alexander P. Stewart's on the right, all screened aggressively by Forrest's cavalry. Schofield, who commanded Stanley's corps as well as his own, retreated in the face of this advance, marching rapidly north from Pulaski to Columbia. The Federals were able to reach Columbia and erect fortifications just hours before the Confederates arrived.[6]

On November 24–29, the "Battle of Columbia" was a series of skirmishes and artillery bombardments against Columbia. On November 28, Thomas directed Schofield to begin preparations for a withdrawal north to Franklin. He was expecting (incorrectly) that Maj. Gen. Andrew J. Smith's XVI Corps arrival from Missouri was imminent and he wanted the combined force to defend against Hood on the line of the Harpeth River at Franklin instead of the Duck River at Columbia. Schofield sent his 800-wagon supply train out in front, guarded by part of the IV Corps division of Brig. Gen. George D. Wagner. On the same day, Hood sent the three cavalry divisions under Nathan Bedford Forrest miles east of Columbia, where they crossed the river and headed north.[7]

On November 29 Hood sent Cheatham's and Stewart's corps on a flanking march north, crossing the Duck River at Davis's Ford east of Columbia while two divisions of Lee's corps and most of the army's artillery remained on the southern bank to deceive Schofield into thinking a general assault was planned against Columbia. Hood, riding near the head of the column with Cheatham's corps, planned to interpose his army between Schofield and Thomas, hoping to defeat Schofield as the Federals retreated north from Columbia. Stewart's corps followed Cheatham, and they were followed by the division of Maj. Gen. Edward "Allegheny" Johnson (Lee's corps). The rest of Lee's corps remained south of Columbia, demonstrating with artillery fire against Schofield's men north of the Duck.[8]

Cavalry skirmishing between Brig. Gen. James H. Wilson's Union cavalry and Forrest's Confederate troopers continued throughout the day as the Confederates advanced. Forrest's wide turning movement with 4,000 troopers had forced Wilson north to Hurt's Corner, preventing the Union horsemen from interfering with Hood's infantry advance. By 10 a.m. on November 29, Forrest ordered his men to turn west toward Spring Hill. Wilson sent multiple messages to Schofield warning of Hood's advance, but it was not until dawn on November 29 that Schofield believed the reports, understood the deception represented by Lee's artillery bombardment, and realized the predicament he was in. He sent Stanley north with the IV Corps division of Brig. Gen. Nathan Kimball, the remainder of Wagner's division, and the bulk of the Federal reserve artillery. Their mission initially was to protect the trains, but also to hold the crossroads at Spring Hill to allow the entire army to withdraw safely to Franklin.[9]

Opposing forces

[edit]

Union

[edit]
Further information: Battle of Franklin (1864) Union order of battle

Confederate

[edit]
Further information: Battle of Franklin (1864) Confederate order of battle

Battle

[edit]
Actions at Spring Hill, afternoon, November 29, 1864
  Confederate
  Union

Forrest's cavalrymen approached Spring Hill on the Mount Carmel Road and at about 11:30 a.m. ran into pickets from the IV Corps. Stanley had moved north rapidly and formed up positions with Wagner's division that protected the village of Spring Hill on three sides. To the northwest of the village, the lines of Col. Emerson Opdycke's brigade protected the enormous supply trains, Brig. Gen. Luther P. Bradley's brigade. Lane's brigade rushed forward and pushed back the dismounted cavalrymen, primarily Brig. Gen. Frank C. Armstrong's Mississippi brigade. Forrest received a message from Hood to hold the position at all hazards until the infantry could arrive. Maj. Gen. Patrick R. Cleburne's division of Cheatham's corps arrived midafternoon on Forrest's left. The cavalrymen, low on ammunition, pulled out of the line and moved north to be ready to cover a further advance of Hood's army, or to block Schofield's withdrawal.[10]

Forrest's men moved south and he directed the brigade of Brig. Gen. Tyree H. Bell of Chalmer's division to drive off what he thought was a small force of cavalry from a knoll south of McCutcheon's Creek. They were actually engaging with Bradley's brigade, which drove them back immediately with heavy artillery support. The chastened Forrest remarked, "They was in there sure enough, wasn't they, Chalmers?"[11]

The first command miscommunication of the battle took place upon Hood's arrival as he established his headquarters at the Absalom Thompson house, "Oaklawn". Cheatham had ordered his division under Maj. Gen. William B. Bate to move against Spring Hill in concert with Cleburne, forming up on the Irishman's left. Hood then personally ordered Bate to move towards the Columbia Pike and "sweep toward Columbia." Neither Bate nor Hood bothered to inform Cheatham of this change in orders. Bate's men advanced about 3,000 yards in battle formation before they reached the pike, a journey taking over two hours. At about 5:30 p.m., his lead element, sharpshooters under Maj. Thomas D. Caswell, fired on a Federal column approaching from their left—Maj. Gen. Thomas H. Ruger's division of the XXIII Corps, the vanguard of Schofield's main body. But before the two divisions could engage in battle, an officer from Cheatham's staff arrived to insist that Bate follow Cheatham's original orders and join Cleburne's attack. Late that night, Bate reported the contact with the Federal column, but Cheatham discounted the importance of the encounter.[12]

Back in Columbia, Schofield became convinced at about 3 p.m. that the Confederates would not attack him there and at 3:30 he joined two brigades from Ruger's division on the march to Spring Hill. He ordered his remaining force to remain until dark and then join him on the march north. As soon as Schofield departed, Stephen D. Lee coincidentally began an attack against the Union position, although he had considerable difficulty deploying pontoon bridges for the river crossing. By the time the bulk of his two divisions were able to cross, the senior Union commander left behind at Columbia, Brig. Gen. Jacob D. Cox, began his withdrawal and the final troops departed up the Franklin Pike by 10 p.m.[13]

Cleburne's 3,000 men began an en echelon attack against Bradley's brigade at about 4 p.m. From right to left, his brigades were led by Brig. Gens. Mark P. Lowrey, Daniel C. Govan, and Hiram B. Granbury. Bell's cavalry brigade supported on the right, although they remained low on ammunition and had little effect in the fight. Whereas Cheatham was expecting Cleburne to drive north into Spring Hill, Hood's intention was to use this formation to sweep toward the turnpike and wheel left to intercept Schofield's arriving units, but he apparently had not observed the location of the Union positions south of the town. The stairstep echelon formation was therefore less effective against Bradley's fortified position on their right and front, allowing only Lowrey's brigade to engage them initially. After Lowrey requested assistance, Cleburne personally led Govan's Arkansas brigade forward, wheeling them into a northern alignment against Bradley's right flank. The attack by Govan and Lowrey outflanked Bradley and his men fled in disorder. Cleburne's two brigades chased them vigorously, and they were stopped short of the turnpike only by heavy fire from the IV Corps artillery, placed earlier by Stanley on a knoll north of the creek.[14]

By this time, Cheatham's division under Maj. Gen. John C. Brown (Cheatham's own division before he assumed corps command) had crossed Rutherford Creek and was moved into position by Cheatham for another attack on Spring Hill, on Cleburne's right. In the gathering darkness, the sounds of Brown's guns would be the signal for Cleburne's men to resume their attack. Brown did not attack, however. His brigade commander on the right, Brig. Gen. Otho F. Strahl, reported that there were Union troops in position on his right flank and front and that Forrest's cavalrymen, promised to protect his right flank, did not seem to be present. Since his brigade under Brig. Gen. States Rights Gist had not yet arrived to join the attack, Brown decided to consult with his corps commander before proceeding.[15]

Positions at Spring Hill after dark

Cheatham was at that time attempting to find Bate and steer him into the combined attack. Brown sent two staff officers to find Cheatham and halted his troops while he awaited a decision. By the time Cheatham and Brown were able to speak, at around 6:15 p.m., the battlefield was in total darkness, and the two officers decided that an assault conducted then without knowing the condition of their right flank might be a disaster. Cheatham rode off to Hood's headquarters to consult with the army commander. Hood was furious that the attack had not proceeded as he intended and that the pike was still open. Cheatham said that he needed assistance from Stewart to protect his right flank, so Hood dispatched a staff officer to find Stewart. Having been up since 3 a.m., Hood was by this time very fatigued. He indulged in a large dinner at Oaklawn, which included considerable "toasting" of drinks, and went to bed at 9 p.m., confident that whatever setbacks his army had suffered during the day, they would be able to correct them in the morning and bag Schofield.[16]

Earlier in the afternoon, Hood had brought up Stewart's corps across Rutherford Creek and directed him to move north of Spring Hill and cut off the Federal column. After taking a wrong turn, Stewart ended up at Forrest's headquarters at the Caldwell house. There he conferred with Forrest about the positions of the army, when suddenly one of Cheatham's staff officers arrived and directed in Hood's name that Stewart's corps move to support Brown's attack. After Stewart's column retraced its route, he arrived at Brown's command post, but was confused about the apparent disagreement in orders he was receiving, so he traveled back to Hood's headquarters for clarification. He informed Hood that because his men were tired and had been on the move since daylight—it was now 11 p.m.—he had ordered them to bivouac while they waited. Hood accepted the situation and told Stewart to head in the direction of Franklin in the morning after the men had rested.[17]

Aftermath

[edit]

The Battle of Spring Hill was a minor affair in terms of casualties—about 350 Union and 500 Confederate—but the result of miscommunication and simply bad military management was that during the night all of Schofield's command, including Cox, passed from Columbia through Spring Hill while the Confederate commanders slept. The passage of the army did not go unnoticed by some of the soldiers, but no concerted effort was made to block the pike. Brig. Gen. Lawrence S. Ross's cavalry brigade attempted to block the passage of the supply trains north of Spring Hill, at Thompson's Station, but accompanying Federal infantry drove them off. A private soldier woke up the commanding general at 2 a.m. and reported he saw the Union column moving north, but Hood did nothing beyond sending a dispatch to Cheatham to fire on passing traffic.[18]

By 6:00 a.m. on November 30, all of Schofield's army was well north of Spring Hill and its vanguard had reached Franklin, where it began to build breastworks south of town. In the morning Hood discovered Schofield's escape, and after an angry conference with his subordinate commanders in which he blamed all but himself for the failure, ordered his army to resume its pursuit, setting up the disastrous Battle of Franklin that afternoon.[19]

The Spring Hill incident was an object lesson in the breakdown of command responsibility and communication. Hood was partially responsible. He had come to Spring Hill with no plan save to outrace Schofield to Nashville. His absence from the field made him ignorant of several crucial matters. When he finally had learned by midnight that the Rebel line was not facing the pike, he still shunned personal observation, being too confident of Schofield's position.

Thomas L. Connelly, Autumn of Glory[20]

Spring Hill had been, arguably, Hood's best chance to isolate and defeat the Union army (Thomas L. Connelly, historian of the Army of Tennessee, argues that the importance of Spring Hill has been overblown and that Schofield had three alternative routes to either Franklin or Nashville.) Recriminations for the lost opportunity soon began flying. Rumors circulated about Brown being drunk, but they were never substantiated and he was later elected governor of Tennessee. Hood believed that Cheatham was most responsible, although he also had criticism for two of Cheatham's division commanders, Cleburne and Brown. His official report said, "Major-General Cheatham was ordered to attack the enemy at once vigorously and get possession of the pike, and, although these orders were frequently and earnestly repeated, he made but a feeble and partial attack, failing to reach the point indicated." Historians Thomas L. Connelly, Eric Jacobson, and Wiley Sword have each assigned blame to both Hood and Cheatham.[21]

A variety of theories about Hood's personal failures have occupied historians for years. One of the more persistent is that the general was debilitated from ingesting laudanum in the evening, attempting to relieve the pain and irritation to his amputated leg by the long, damp ride over rough roads that day. Eric Jacobson's book, For Cause & for Country, lists many authors who have supported this story, but he states that "there is no evidence that Hood took any sort of drugs, or even alcohol, at Spring Hill."[22]

Battlefield Preservation

[edit]
Map of Spring Hill Battlefield core and study areas by the American Battlefield Protection Program.

Portions of landscape have been altered, but most essential features remain. Industrial and residential development and associated road and communication infrastructure are rapidly overtaking the historic battlefield. Protected lands include Rippavilla, Inc. (98.44 acres), Civil War Preservation Trust (70.00 acres), Tennessee Land Trust (82.70 acres), and Maury County Parks and Recreation Department (20.00 acres).[1] The Civil War Preservation Trust was renamed Civil War Trust in 2011 and in May 2018 became a division of American Battlefield Trust. The Trust and its partners have acquired and preserved a total of 195 acres (0.79 km2) of the battlefield in three transactions since 1996.[23]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Battle of Spring Hill

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Battle of Spring Hill was a tactical engagement on November 29, 1864, in , during the Franklin-Nashville Campaign of the , where Confederate General John Bell Hood's sought to block the retreat of Union Major General John M. Schofield's but failed to prevent its nighttime withdrawal along the Columbia Pike to Franklin, despite partially enveloping the Union position. Hood, commanding approximately 40,000 Confederates after crossing the Duck River, directed cavalry under and infantry divisions led by figures such as to seize the vital crossroads at Spring Hill and cut off Schofield's roughly 30,000 Union troops from their base at Nashville. Skirmishing erupted as Forrest's troopers clashed with Union rearguards, followed by Cleburne's division launching assaults against reinforced Union lines under Brigadier General Thomas J. Wood, which repelled the attacks amid heavy fighting in the afternoon and evening. The battle resulted in a Union victory, with estimated casualties totaling 850—350 for the Union and 500 for the Confederates—relatively light compared to subsequent clashes but marking a critical Confederate operational failure due to disjointed command and failure to block the road fully. This lapse allowed Schofield to extricate his army intact under cover of darkness, preserving Union strength for the defense of Tennessee and setting the stage for Hood's costly frontal assault at Franklin the next day, November 30. The engagement's significance lies in its demonstration of Hood's aggressive but uncoordinated strategy, which squandered a potential decisive blow against Schofield's outnumbered force, contributing to the broader collapse of Confederate hopes in the Western Theater and culminating in the Union triumph at Nashville in December 1864. Controversies persist over Hood's accountability for the missed opportunity, with Confederate subordinates later criticizing delays and miscommunications in official reports, underscoring tactical shortcomings amid the campaign's high stakes.

Historical Context

The Franklin-Nashville Campaign

Following the Confederate evacuation of on September 2, 1864, the under General , who had assumed command on July 18, 1864, after the removal of General , faced acute strategic pressures. The loss of , a key industrial and rail hub, demoralized the Confederacy and bolstered Union morale ahead of the , prompting Confederate President to authorize an aggressive offensive to regain initiative. Hood's plan aimed to maneuver westward into , disrupt Union supply lines, draw Major General William T. Sherman's forces from Georgia, and ultimately invade to threaten Nashville, a vital Union base, while potentially linking with other Confederate forces to shift the western theater's momentum. This invasion reflected the Confederacy's desperation to offset Sherman's successes by forcing a recall of Union troops and exploiting 's rail networks for a push toward the . On the Union side, Sherman initiated his March to the Sea from on November 15, 1864, abandoning direct pursuit of Hood to conduct a destructive advance on Savannah, thereby shifting defensive responsibilities in to George H. , commanding the Department of the Cumberland from Nashville. organized reinforcements, including John M. Schofield's , which was redeployed northward from Georgia to screen Nashville and contest Hood's advance. Schofield's force adopted a mobile posture, withdrawing methodically along the line to consolidate with , prioritizing the protection of Nashville's fortifications and rail connections over immediate confrontation. This transition from offensive operations against Hood in Georgia to a defensive-pursuit underscored Union confidence in 's preparations, including the accumulation of over 55,000 troops by late November, against Hood's roughly 38,000 effectives. Hood's offensive commenced in earnest in late October 1864, with his army transferring to , before crossing the near the end of , seeking to outflank Union positions at the Duck River and interpose between Schofield's detached elements and Nashville. Earlier probes, such as the failed assault at Allatoona Pass on , had tested Union resolve but failed to divert Sherman significantly, highlighting the risks of Hood's dispersed operations amid supply shortages and harsh weather. By early , Confederate cavalry under raided westward to disrupt Union logistics, setting the stage for Hood's main thrust toward , in a bid to destroy isolated Union commands before they unified under . This campaign encapsulated the Confederacy's high-stakes gamble to reverse western theater defeats through bold maneuver, though logistical constraints and Union numerical superiority foreshadowed its challenges.

Hood's Invasion of Tennessee

Following delays in northwest Alabama due to supply shortages and indecisiveness over crossing points along the Tennessee River, General John Bell Hood ordered his Army of Tennessee to advance into Tennessee on November 20-21, 1864. The army, having initially crossed the Tennessee River at Florence, Alabama, between October 19 and 22, had concentrated near Tuscumbia for resupply but faced persistent logistical strains, including limited rations and dependence on foraging. Hood's strategy emphasized rapid maneuver through mountain passes toward Lawrenceburg and Pulaski to outflank Major General John M. Schofield's Union forces entrenched at Columbia on the Duck River. The primary Confederate objective was to intercept and destroy Schofield's detached command—comprising the XXIII and IV Corps, totaling around 30,000 men—before it could retreat northward and consolidate with George H. Thomas's larger army at Nashville. By leveraging local numerical superiority and surprise, Hood aimed to sever Union supply lines along the Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad and force a decisive engagement on favorable terms, potentially compelling Thomas to sally forth prematurely or allowing Hood to threaten Nashville directly. This approach sought to reverse Confederate fortunes in the Western Theater by exploiting the temporary division of Union forces. Logistical challenges compounded the campaign's risks, as the Confederate army operated with minimal wagon trains to maintain mobility, relying on captured depots and local resources amid harsh weather and depleted Southern infrastructure. Hood's insistence on aggressive pursuit prioritized speed over consolidation, contributing to disorganized advances but also heightening the potential for envelopment. Initial clashes near Spring Hill on would test this bold design, as Confederate columns sought to block Schofield's line of retreat along the Columbia Pike.

Opposing Forces

Union Army of the Ohio

The Union Army of the Ohio, commanded by John M. Schofield, formed the core detachment under the Department of the Cumberland during the Franklin-Nashville Campaign of November 1864. It primarily comprised the XXIII , led by Jacob D. Cox, augmented by a provisional division from the IV under David S.. Stanley, totaling approximately 27,000 effectives focused on delaying Confederate advances while retreating northward. This organization emphasized divisions suited for defensive maneuvers, with supporting batteries and detachments for screening movements. Schofield's forces held material advantages in artillery, including rifled guns and ample ammunition that outmatched Confederate field pieces in range and accuracy, enabling effective during threatened positions. Entrenching tools distributed among infantry units allowed for swift construction of field works, bolstering defensive postures against superior numbers. Telegraph lines, maintained by the U.S. Military Telegraph Corps, provided rapid communication with George H. Thomas's headquarters in Nashville, permitting real-time updates on Confederate movements and reinforcements. These assets supported an adaptable strategy prioritizing wagon train security and phased withdrawals over static engagements. However, vulnerabilities included elongated supply lines from Nashville, rendering the army dependent on vulnerable wagon convoys for rations and ammunition, which necessitated constant rear-guard protection. Leadership dynamics featured friction between Schofield and , as Schofield advocated flexible retreat adjustments to evade entrapment—such as bypassing initial hold orders at key points—while stressed broader departmental coordination and caution against premature abandonment of terrain. This tension underscored Schofield's operational focus on preserving force integrity amid pursuit, leveraging initiative within 's overarching directives.

Confederate Army of Tennessee

The Confederate Army of Tennessee, commanded by Lieutenant General , entered the Franklin-Nashville campaign with approximately 38,000–40,000 effectives, predominantly infantry organized into three corps supplemented by cavalry. Hood, who had previously lost the use of his right arm at Gettysburg in 1863 and his left leg at Chickamauga later that year—requiring him to direct operations from a litter or ambulance—emphasized aggressive offensive maneuvers to compensate for the army's defensive setbacks in the . This doctrine reflected Hood's belief that bold attacks could shatter Union forces and reverse Confederate fortunes in the Western Theater by threatening Nashville and drawing Major General William T. Sherman's army northward. The army's structure included the First Corps under Major General , the Second Corps under Lieutenant General , and the Third Corps under Lieutenant General , with Major General commanding a separate cavalry corps of about 6,000 troopers. Recent reinforcements from Georgia and had bolstered numbers following Atlanta's fall, and morale was elevated by the successful pursuit of Union forces from Columbia in late November 1864, fostering a sense of momentum despite prior attrition. However, coordination challenges persisted among the corps commanders, who were often independent-minded and aggressive—exemplified by division commander Major General , whose tactical acumen and prior advocacy for radical measures like arming enslaved people highlighted tensions with Hood's centralized control. Hood's strategy represented a high-risk gamble, prioritizing rapid advances over logistical caution in hopes of exploiting Union detachment vulnerabilities, even as rainy weather and stretched supply lines strained the force. This approach, rooted in Hood's combat experience and personal resilience, aimed to leverage the army's fighting spirit against a retreating foe but underscored underlying fragilities in command unity and troop exhaustion from continuous marches.

Prelude to the Battle

Union Retreat from Columbia

On November 28, 1864, Union commander Major General John M. Schofield ordered the withdrawal of his Army of the Ohio from positions south of Columbia, Tennessee, after reconnaissance reports confirmed Confederate General John Bell Hood's forces were crossing the Duck River at fords several miles south of the town, threatening to envelop the Union left flank and sever supply lines along the Columbia Pike. This decision aimed to reposition approximately 31,000 Union troops northward to link with Major General George H. Thomas's main force concentrating near Nashville, preventing isolation amid Hood's aggressive invasion of Tennessee. The retreat proceeded via the fortified Duck River crossings at Columbia, where Union forces had repulsed earlier Confederate probes from November 24 to 27, maintaining control long enough to execute the maneuver without immediate collapse. As Confederate cavalry under Major General intensified probing attacks on November 28, skirmishes erupted at the Duck River bridges and adjacent fords, with Union and holding off assaults that sought to disrupt the crossing. These engagements involved elements of the Union XXIII Corps and IV Corps, resulting in light casualties but buying critical time for the bulk of Schofield's , , and wagon trains—numbering over 1,000 vehicles—to file across under covering fire. Rear-guard units, including batteries from the , delayed Confederate advances until the bridges could be prepared for demolition or abandonment, though the Union maintained an exodus rather than a . Union engineers, leveraging prior preparations, had repaired the damaged railroad bridge and erected a across the Duck River earlier in the week, enabling the rapid and systematic transfer of forces despite rising water levels and enemy pressure. These feats of , completed under fire by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, underscored the logistical foresight that preserved during the pullback, allowing Schofield to advance toward Spring Hill by evening while leaving only token resistance south of the river. The withdrawal, though tense, avoided significant losses and set the conditions for subsequent maneuvers in the Franklin-Nashville Campaign.

Confederate Pursuit and Initial Clashes

Following the Union withdrawal from Columbia on November 28–29, 1864, General ordered his , after crossing the Duck River early on November 29, to advance along multiple routes paralleling the Columbia Pike toward Spring Hill, aiming to interpose between Major General John M. Schofield's and its reinforcements at Nashville. Hood explicitly directed Lieutenant General Benjamin F. Cheatham's corps to cooperate with Major General Nathan Bedford Forrest's cavalry in seizing and holding Spring Hill to block the pike, issuing these orders around 8:00 a.m. after observing Union movements from the east bank of the river. Cheatham's corps led the infantry pursuit, with Patrick R. Cleburne's division forming the and pressing forward from the Duck River crossings toward Spring Hill, reaching the area's outskirts by approximately 3:00 p.m. and initiating skirmishes with Union pickets along the approaches. These early probes encountered resistance from detached Union elements, but Cleburne's troops gained initial ground, positioning themselves southeast of the town amid growing awareness of stronger Federal infantry presence beyond the initial cavalry screens. Further complicating the advance, B. Bate's division within Cheatham's received conflicting directives—first from Cheatham to support Cleburne, then from Hood to sweep northward toward Columbia—resulting in repeated marches and countermarches that exacerbated road congestion on the narrow routes and delayed coordinated encirclement efforts. In one such initial clash near Rally Hill, elements of Bate's division probed Union positions held by Godfrey Weitzel's brigade (temporarily under Wagner's division oversight), suffering repulse after brief fighting that inflicted light casualties but highlighted the logistical frictions impeding Hood's trap. These delays prevented the full convergence of Confederate forces by dusk, allowing Schofield's column to maintain temporary control of the pike despite the narrowing gap.

Course of the Battle

Hood's Orders and Confederate Advance

On November 29, 1864, Confederate General issued directives for a aimed at interposing his between Union Major General George H. Thomas's forces at Nashville and Major General John M. Schofield's retreating , by seizing control of Spring Hill and the vital Columbia Turnpike. Hood's intent focused on rapid closure of the pike to trap Schofield's main body, leaving Lieutenant General Stephen D. Lee's corps to demonstrate against Columbia while the bulk of the army—comprising Lieutenant Generals Benjamin F. Cheatham's and Alexander P. Stewart's corps, supported by Major General Nathan Bedford Forrest's cavalry—crossed the Duck River upstream and advanced northwest. Verbal orders to Cheatham emphasized urgency, instructing him to move Cleburne's division across Rutherford Creek immediately upon crossing and "push forward" to join Forrest's cavalry in attacking Spring Hill, with expectations of encountering disorganized Union elements offering minimal coordinated resistance due to Schofield's hasty withdrawal from Columbia. Cleburne's division, spearheading the infantry advance after Forrest's troopers secured initial crossings, forded Rutherford Creek around midday and proceeded along Rally Hill Pike toward Spring Hill, approximately 3 miles distant, in column formation with Brigadier General Hiram B. Granbury's Texas brigade trailing as support. The division covered the ground at a brisk pace, encountering only light skirmishing from Union cavalry vedettes and detached pickets of Brigadier General George D. Wagner's division, which inflicted few casualties and delayed progress negligibly amid open fields and woods. Granbury's men, following closely, took position behind a farm fence roughly 80-100 yards from the pike by late afternoon, preparing to extend the line, as Cleburne's leading brigades—under Brigadier General Mark P. Lowrey—shifted direction to avoid enfilading fire from isolated Union batteries but maintained forward momentum with limited opposition. Communication challenges emerged early in the execution, as Hood's verbal instructions to Cheatham proved ambiguous regarding precise coordination and timing for securing the pike before nightfall, leading to hesitancy in pressing the assault without full support. Cheatham relayed orders to Cleburne to advance astride the turnpike but subsequently directed a temporary halt for alignment with John C. Brown's division, despite the directive's emphasis on double-quick speed to exploit the perceived Union vulnerability. This pause, compounded by unclear relays between Hood's headquarters and forward units, allowed initial gaps in the Confederate deployment, though Cleburne's men remained poised within striking distance of Spring Hill by dusk.

Engagements at Spring Hill

As Confederate infantry under Maj. Gen. Patrick R. Cleburne approached Spring Hill via the Rally Hill Pike around midday on November 29, 1864, they encountered resistance from Brig. Gen. George H. Wagner's Union division, positioned to defend the Columbia Pike crossroads. Cleburne's forces launched a limited assault, followed by a more determined division-level attack involving Brig. Gen. Hiram B. Granbury's brigade, but these efforts were halted by concentrated fire from Union artillery and , including elements of the 103rd Infantry entrenched across the pike. Further fighting erupted near key defensive points such as the Thompson farm and surrounding ridges south of the town, where Wagner's troops, supported by arriving reinforcements from Brig. Gen. Nathan Kimball's division of the IV Corps, repelled probing Confederate advances. Granbury's brigade pushed forward with minimal initial opposition in some sectors but ultimately faltered against Union volleys and positioned west of the pike. These actions exemplified Confederate tactical aggression but suffered from disjointed execution, as units advanced piecemeal without unified coordination. By late afternoon, additional fragmented infantry assaults against the reinforced Union lines at the town were decisively repulsed, with curtailing further and preventing seizure of the vital . Union casualties totaled approximately 350, while Confederates suffered around 500, reflecting the intensity of the limited clashes despite the overall failure to interdict .

The Union Night March

As Confederate forces under Lt. Gen. converged on Spring Hill during the afternoon of November 29, 1864, Union Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield determined that holding the crossroads indefinitely risked encirclement, opting instead to withdraw his northward along the Columbia Turnpike under cover of darkness to link with Maj. Gen. George H. Thomas at Franklin. Schofield reinforced Brig. Gen. David S. Stanley's IV Corps division, which had secured the town earlier, to screen the movement while prioritizing the passage of his supply train. By approximately 9 p.m., the leading elements of the Union wagon train—numbering around 800 vehicles stretching several miles—began threading through Spring Hill, followed closely by the main infantry columns totaling some 27,000 men. The march proceeded in tense silence, with troops maintaining order amid the narrow roads and potential for , as Schofield's staff coordinated the flow to avoid bottlenecks that could alert or trap the force. Confederate divisions under Maj. Gen. Samuel G. French and Lt. Gen. Edward C. Walthall, positioned within striking distance along the turnpike after earlier engagements, failed to interdict the Union passage due to disorganized bivouacs, unclear orders from higher command, and reluctance to launch uncoordinated night attacks. This inaction allowed the Federals to slip past undetected in significant measure, with Union soldiers later recounting the eerie proximity to enemy camps, though reports of hearing Confederate music were not systematically verified in primary accounts. By dawn on November 30, Schofield's command had cleared the danger zone, averting Hood's attempt to sever the Union retreat.

Aftermath

Casualties and Immediate Outcomes

The Battle of Spring Hill resulted in light casualties relative to the size of the opposing armies and the potential for a decisive Confederate , totaling an estimated 850 killed, wounded, and missing. Union losses numbered approximately 350, concentrated among Brigadier General George D. Wagner's forward division, which conducted a fighting withdrawal against repeated Confederate probes along the Columbia Pike. Confederate casualties reached about 500, incurred during uncoordinated assaults in the late afternoon and evening of November 29, 1864, which failed to sever the Union retreat route despite numerical superiority in the sector. Immediate tactical outcomes favored the Union, as John M. Schofield's preserved its cohesion, artillery, and wagon trains intact amid the nocturnal maneuver. The bulk of the force completed the march northward, reaching fortifications around Franklin by first light on November 30, 1864, without significant further disruption. For the Confederates under General John Bell , dawn revealed the escape of Schofield's command past the Spring Hill crossroads, eliciting reports of command dismay and prompting Hood to reorder a vigorous pursuit along the pike toward Franklin to reengage before the Union could consolidate.

Path to the Battle of Franklin

Following the Union forces' successful night march past Confederate positions at Spring Hill on November 29, 1864, John M. Schofield ordered his to continue northward to , approximately 18 miles away, to establish a defensive line before linking with George H. Thomas's main force at Nashville. Schofield's troops, having evaded encirclement, arrived in Franklin by the morning of and rapidly fortified positions along the Columbia Turnpike, utilizing existing earthworks, fences, and buildings to create a strong entrenchment system south of the town. This positioning allowed Schofield to consolidate his approximately men while awaiting reinforcements, despite the exhaustion from the continuous retreat from Columbia since November 26. General , commanding the Confederate , pursued aggressively after the Spring Hill fiasco, reaching Franklin by midday on November 30 with his force of around 31,000, still believing he held the initiative to disrupt Union plans. Hood rationalized a direct assault on the entrenched Union lines as necessary to prevent Schofield from escaping to Nashville, where Thomas's larger could reinforce and threaten a decisive counteroffensive; he perceived his troops' as superior despite their from the rapid march and recent engagements, aiming to exploit what he saw as a momentary vulnerability before the Federals could entrench further or receive aid. This decision, issued around 1:00 p.m., committed Hood to frontal attacks across open fields against prepared defenses, overriding objections from subordinates who favored maneuvering around the flanks or waiting for better conditions. The resulting Confederate assaults beginning at 4:00 p.m. on inflicted severe attrition on Hood's army, shattering its offensive capacity and setting the stage for vulnerability at Nashville, as the entered the subsequent engagement critically understrength and demoralized from the unyielding Union resistance at Franklin.

Analysis and Controversies

Command Failures and Miscommunications

Hood issued verbal orders on November 29, 1864, directing Alexander P. Stewart's to advance beyond Benjamin F. Cheatham's and position across the Franklin Pike north of Spring Hill to interdict Union reinforcements and block the retreat route, with the intent of enveloping Major General John M. Schofield's . However, Stewart's , comprising approximately men, experienced significant delays in execution; starting from positions south of the Duck River crossing earlier that morning, the column progressed slowly due to congested roads, and wagon trains impeding movement, and navigational uncertainties in the unfamiliar terrain, arriving near Spring Hill only in late afternoon after Cheatham's divisions had already engaged. These coordination gaps manifested in incomplete occupation of key terrain: while Cheatham's pressed attacks eastward of the pike against Union David S. Stanley's IV Corps defenders around 4:00 p.m., Stewart's leading divisions under Edward C. Walthall halted short of the village without extending fully to interlock lines or dispatching adequate pickets along the vital Columbia-Franklin road, leaving it unsecured despite Hood's explicit directive to "place it across the road." Dispatches from Hood, relayed via staff officers and even Governor acting as courier, urged immediate seizure of the pike but lacked follow-up verification of compliance, exacerbating the disconnect between headquarters intent and field execution as darkness fell around 5:30 p.m. Schofield capitalized on these operational lapses through decisive maneuvering; alerted by reports of Confederate flanking threats by midday, he accelerated the Union withdrawal, dispatching Stanley's IV northward along the pike under cover of and skirmishers to seize and hold Spring Hill by early afternoon, creating local superiority against isolated Confederate probes. With the road momentarily cleared after repulsing Cleburne's division assaults costing around 500 Confederate casualties, Schofield then funneled John A. Logan's temporary command of XXIII and wagon trains—totaling over 27,000 troops and 800 vehicles—through the unguarded gap in a disciplined night march commencing around 8:00 p.m., evading detection due to the absence of vigilant Confederate outposts and completing the transit to Franklin by dawn on November 30 without significant interdiction. This exploitation of temporal and spatial disarray in Confederate dispositions preserved Union mobility, as evidenced by post-battle reconnaissances confirming the pike's overnight patency.

Debates on Leadership Blame

Historians and Confederate participants have long debated the allocation of blame for the failure to interdict Union forces at Spring Hill on November 29, 1864, with arguments centering on General John Bell Hood's strategic directives versus the execution by subordinates such as corps commander and division leaders William B. Bate and Patrick R. Cleburne. Critics of Hood, including post-war analysts like Wiley , contend that his orders emphasized aggressive frontal assaults without sufficient regard for the foggy conditions, wooded terrain, and Union entrenchments, leading to fragmented advances that allowed John M. Schofield's troops to slip past along the Columbia Pike. In his memoirs Advance and Retreat, Hood acknowledged the overall failure—"I failed utterly to bring on battle at Spring Hill"—but primarily attributed it to subordinates' delays and miscoordination, arguing his intent for a rapid envelopment was undermined by incomplete reconnaissance and tardy movements. Defenders of Hood, including some Southern officers and later biographers, shift responsibility to Cheatham's corps, which bore the main assault task; Cheatham reportedly hesitated after initial clashes, citing confusion from Hood's direct orders to Bate and Cleburne bypassing him, resulting in uncoordinated probes rather than a decisive push by midday. Bate's division, positioned to strike the Union left, advanced sluggishly amid dense underbrush and artillery fire, failing to sever the pike despite proximity, while Cleburne's troops engaged fiercely in afternoon skirmishes but could not exploit gaps due to ammunition shortages and flanking threats—exacerbated by Cleburne's fatal wounding at Franklin two days later, which removed a proven aggressive leader from further counsel. Major General Samuel G. French's division, ordered to anchor the right and block the road, exhibited inaction, with French later claiming unclear instructions amid the chaos, allowing Union wagons and infantry to march unmolested through the night. Southern perspectives, drawn from regimental accounts and Hood's campaign rationale, often portray the debacle as symptomatic of broader woes—exhaustion from the preceding Atlanta retreat, depleted ranks (numbering around 30,000 effectives), and fragmented command loyalty—rather than inherent flaws in Hood's bold maneuver to reverse Jefferson Davis's verdict on the army's viability. Cheatham, in correspondence and testimony, countered Hood's by insisting his executed feasible orders amid deteriorating visibility and enemy reinforcements, implying Hood's detachment from frontline realities contributed to unrealistic expectations. No formal Confederate ensued for Spring Hill specifics, but internal inquiries and post-Nashville recriminations, as documented in reports, highlighted mutual finger-pointing without resolution, underscoring systemic command frictions in the .

Strategic Assessments

The failure at Spring Hill on November 29, 1864, epitomized the strategic pitfalls of General John Bell Hood's campaign, where Confederate forces numbering around 30,000 under Hood's command positioned themselves to trap Major General John M. Schofield's approximately 20,000-man along the vital Columbia Pike. By neglecting to fully secure this retreat route despite initial successes in maneuvering ahead of the Union column, Confederate inaction—stemming from command confusion and fatigue—permitted Schofield's intact force to slip northward undetected during the night, evading destruction and retaining operational coherence. This lapse squandered a rare numerical superiority, estimated at nearly two-to-one in the immediate sector, which could have eliminated Schofield's and fragmented Union defenses in . Preservation of Schofield's army directly facilitated its junction with George H. Thomas's reinforcements at Nashville, swelling Union strength to over 55,000 against Hood's depleted ranks, and precipitated the Confederate rout on December 15–16, 1864. The , already strained by prior engagements, suffered irreplaceable losses in the ensuing battles of Franklin and Nashville, rendering it combat-ineffective and hastening its dissolution as a cohesive fighting force by early 1865. Hood's broader post-Atlanta offensive—launched after the city's fall on September 2, 1864, to wrest initiative through invasion and compel Union diversion—relied on such decisive cuts to enemy detachments; the Spring Hill debacle invalidated this approach by exposing the fragility of aggressive maneuvers against the North's superior manpower and logistics. Counterfactually, annihilation of Schofield's at Spring Hill might have isolated Nashville, allowing Hood's roughly 40,000-man invasion force to besiege or capture the city with minimal opposition, potentially forcing Thomas to redirect substantial troops from other fronts and altering resource allocations in the Western Theater. Instead, the missed interception preserved Union flexibility, contributing to the unhindered Confederate collapse westward while Major General William T. Sherman's 62,000-man force marched unopposed from to Savannah in – 1864. This outcome reinforced assessments of Hood's strategy as audacious yet fundamentally untenable, prioritizing high-risk gambits over sustainable amid the Confederacy's dwindling reserves of approximately 200,000 total troops against the Union's millions.

Legacy

Battlefield Preservation

The has preserved more than 195 acres of the Spring Hill Battlefield through acquisitions and partnerships since the early 2000s, focusing on core areas of Union and Confederate movements during the November 29, 1864, engagement. Key efforts include the Civil War Preservation Trust's purchase of an 84-acre parcel in , which safeguarded portions of the historic landscape associated with the battle's skirmishes. Additionally, the Rippavilla Plantation, encompassing 98 acres and linked to the battle's vicinity, was protected via a held by the Land Trust for , with management by the Battle of Franklin Trust and the City of Spring Hill. Recent initiatives have addressed ongoing threats from suburban development in the rapidly growing Spring Hill area, where residential and commercial expansion has encroached on remaining lands. In 2023, the Battle of Franklin Trust acquired 11.57 acres adjacent to the historic Cheairs home through a combination of private funding and grants from the Civil War Sites Preservation Fund, finalizing the purchase in August 2025 to prevent further fragmentation. These easement purchases and targeted acquisitions post-2000 have cumulatively protected over 200 acres, including sites critical to the Union night march and Confederate assaults. Archaeological efforts tied to preservation have yielded artifacts that confirm engagement lines and troop positions, such as bullets, shell fragments, and personal items recovered from preserved and threatened parcels. In May 2025, the City of Spring Hill accepted a of hundreds of Civil War-era artifacts unearthed during at the nearby Legacy Pointe site, highlighting the vulnerability of unpreserved areas and underscoring the need for ongoing protection to maintain interpretive integrity. These finds, documented through professional assessments, support historical accounts of the battle's intensity without altering established narratives.

Historical Significance in the Western Theater

The Battle of Spring Hill exemplifies a pivotal "what if" juncture in the American Civil War's Western Theater, where Confederate forces under General positioned to interpose between Union John M. Schofield's and Nashville, potentially isolating and destroying it before reinforcements arrived. A successful on November 29, 1864, might have averted the subsequent Union victories at Franklin and Nashville, preserving Confederate momentum after the fall of and possibly extending resistance in by disrupting Union supply lines and morale. Historians note that such a triumph could have compelled Union General George H. Thomas to divide forces, buying time for Southern reinforcements or negotiations, though Union industrial superiority—evident in Schofield's intact 30,000-man force and rail access—likely would have limited long-term gains. In historiography, the engagement underscores command vulnerabilities over mythic narratives of inevitable Northern dominance, as analyzed in Eric Jacobson's 2006 study, which dismantles post-war excuses like alleged Union deception or Hood's wounding while highlighting persistent Southern resolve amid logistical strains. Jacobson's examination of primary accounts reveals how fragmented Confederate orders squandered tactical superiority, yet affirms the Army of Tennessee's aggressive ethos as a counter to material disparities, challenging Lost Cause rationalizations without denying the Confederacy's operational tenacity. This perspective reframes Spring Hill not as mere blunder but as a lens for causal command lapses, where Hood's failure to coordinate corps under Edward "Allegheny" Johnson and William Bate allowed Schofield's night march, sealing the campaign's trajectory toward Confederate collapse in the West by 1864. Broader campaign dynamics at Spring Hill illustrate the limits of asymmetric Confederate strategies reliant on audacious maneuvers against Union advantages in numbers, , and . Hood's bold flanking attempt leveraged terrain familiarity and troop spirit to offset a 2:1 deficit in effective strength, but miscommunications exposed the fragility of such high-risk offensives without reliable or unified execution. The outcome reinforced that while Southern aggression could generate opportunities—as Hood's army marched 20 miles to block the Columbia Turnpike—systemic disparities in sustainment ultimately constrained prolonged threats, hastening the Western Theater's shift to Union control and contributing to the Confederacy's strategic exhaustion by early 1865.

References

  1. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/civil-war/battles/spring-hill
  2. https://www.nps.gov/civilwar/search-battles-detail.htm?battleCode=tn035
  3. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/september-1/atlanta-falls-to-union-forces
  4. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/john-bell-hood/
  5. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3155&context=cwbr
  6. https://saberandscroll.scholasticahq.com/api/v1/articles/28625-general-john-bell-hood-his-leadership-during-the-1864-tennessee-campaign.pdf
  7. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/november-15/the-march-to-the-sea-begins
  8. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/civil-war/battles/nashville
  9. https://louis.uah.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=huntsville-historical-review
  10. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/shermans-march-sea
  11. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/civil-war/battles/franklin
  12. https://www.civilwarmonitor.com/article/john-bell-hood-and-indecision-along-the-tennessee-river/
  13. https://www.tcwpa.org/battle-site/spring-hill/
  14. https://www.essentialcivilwarcurriculum.com/the-telegraph.html
  15. https://emergingcivilwar.com/2023/11/29/ecw-podcast-john-schofield/
  16. https://www.worldhistory.org/Franklin-Nashville_Campaign/
  17. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/they-was-there-sure-enough
  18. https://emergingcivilwar.com/2014/12/19/bled-from-the-top-confederate-officer-corps-in-the-1864-tennessee-campaign/
  19. https://www.nps.gov/civilwar/search-battles-detail.htm?battleCode=TN034
  20. https://civilwarhistory-geneschmiel.com/2019/12/07/battle-of-franklin-pontoon-miscommunication-led-to-the-battle/
  21. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/spring-hill-1864
  22. https://duckriveragency.org/_assets_/plugins/Annotated%2520Bibliography/History/Civil_War_and_Reconstruction_%281861_to_1877%29/Spring_Hill_Battlefield.htm
  23. https://civilwartalk.com/threads/november-29-1864-the-battle-of-spring-hill.92501/
  24. https://www.historynet.com/spring-hill-confederate-might/
  25. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/24740/24740-h/24740-h.htm
  26. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5038&context=etd_theses
  27. https://civilwarnotebook.blogspot.com/2025/08/official-reports-of-campaign-in-north.html
  28. https://www.springhilltn.org/426/Battle-of-Spring-Hill
  29. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/spring-hill
  30. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/10-facts-battle-franklin
  31. https://civilwargazette.wordpress.com/2006/12/04/gen-hoods-official-report-of-the-battle-of-franklin-2/
  32. https://emergingcivilwar.com/2014/03/06/hood-on-hood-part-iii/
  33. https://www.historyonawhim.com/articles/confederacys-biggest-blunder
  34. https://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2006/08/08/for-cause-and-for-country-part-6/
  35. https://civilwartalk.com/threads/who-was-most-culpable-for-the-confederate-failure-at-spring-hill-on-november-29-1864.165775/
  36. https://www.longwood.edu/fileshare/civilwar150/media/civilwar150-episode219.pdf
  37. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/rebel-gamble-at-nashville/
  38. https://www.battlefields.org/visit/battlefields/spring-hill-battlefield
  39. https://www.hnn.us/article/civil-war-preservation-trust-successfully-protects
  40. https://www.landtrusttn.org/projects/rippavilla-spring-hill-tn/
  41. https://boft.org/battlefield-reclamation
  42. https://www.wkrn.com/news/local-news/historic-civil-war-era-battlefield-to-be-preserved-in-spring-hill/
  43. https://www.whatsupcolumbia.com/p/issue432
  44. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/environment/archaeology/documents/reportofinvestigations/arch_roi14_carter_house_2010.pdf
  45. https://cwba.blogspot.com/2006/05/review-for-cause-for-country.html
  46. https://books.google.com/books/about/For_Cause_and_Country.html?id=66RwEAAAQBAJ
  47. https://www.acwrt.org.uk/post/john-bell-hood-and-the-mysteries-of-spring-hill-eric-jacobson
  48. https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/battle-of-spring-hill/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.