Hubbry Logo
Benjamin WadeBenjamin WadeMain
Open search
Benjamin Wade
Community hub
Benjamin Wade
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Benjamin Wade
Benjamin Wade
Benjamin Wade
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Benjamin Franklin "Bluff" Wade (October 27, 1800 – March 2, 1878) was an American lawyer and politician who served as a United States Senator for Ohio from 1851 to 1869. He is known for his leading role among the Radical Republicans.[1] Had the 1868 impeachment of U.S. President Andrew Johnson led to a conviction in the Senate, as president pro tempore of the U.S. Senate, Wade would have become acting president for the remaining nine months of Johnson's term.

Key Information

Born in Massachusetts, Wade worked as a laborer on the Erie Canal before establishing a law practice in Jefferson, Ohio. As a member of the Whig Party, Wade served in the Ohio Senate between 1837 and 1842. After a stint as a local judge, Wade was sworn into the United States Senate in 1851. An opponent of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and the Kansas–Nebraska Act, Wade joined the nascent Republican Party as the Whigs collapsed.[2] He established a reputation as one of the most radical American politicians of the era, favoring women's suffrage, trade union rights, and equality for African-Americans.[1]

During the Civil War, Wade was highly critical of President Abraham Lincoln's leadership.[1] In opposition to Lincoln's post-war plans, which he deemed too lenient and conciliatory, Wade sponsored the Wade–Davis Bill, which proposed strict terms for the re-admittance of Confederate states. He also helped pass the Homestead Act of 1862 and the Morrill Act of 1862. In 1868, the House of Representatives impeached President Johnson for his defiance of the Tenure of Office Act; Wade's unpopularity with his senatorial Moderate Republican colleagues was a factor in Johnson's acquittal by the Senate, having been president pro tempore at the time and next in line for the presidency should Johnson be removed from the presidency. He lost his Senate re-election bid in 1868, though remained active in law and politics until his death in 1878. Although frequently criticized for his radicalism during his time, particularly as he opposed Lincoln's ten-percent plan, Wade's contemporary reputation has been lauded for his lifelong unwavering and persistent commitment to civil rights and racial equality.

Early life and education

[edit]

Wade was born in Feeding Hills, Massachusetts, on October 27, 1800, to Mary and James Wade. Benjamin Wade's first job was as a laborer on the Erie Canal. He also taught school before studying law in Ohio with Elisha Whittlesey. After being admitted to the bar in 1828, he began practicing law in Jefferson, Ohio.

Wade formed a partnership with Joshua Giddings, a prominent anti-slavery figure, in 1831. He became the prosecuting attorney of Ashtabula County by 1836, and as a member of the Whig Party, Wade was elected to the Ohio State Senate, serving two two-year terms between 1837 and 1842. He established a new law practice with Rufus P. Ranney and was elected presiding judge of the third district in 1847. Between 1847 and 1851, Wade was a judge of common pleas in what is now Summit County (Ohio).

In 1851 Wade was elected by his legislature to the United States Senate. There, he associated with such eventual Radical Republicans as Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner. He fought against the controversial Fugitive Slave Act and the Kansas–Nebraska Act.[1] After the decline of the Whigs' power, Wade joined the Republican Party. He was also critical of how certain aspects of capitalism were practiced in the 19th century, opposing the imprisonment of debtors and special privileges for corporations.[2]

Career

[edit]

American Civil War

[edit]
Wade's home in Jefferson, Ohio

In March 1861, Wade became chairman of the Committee on Territories, and in July 1861, along with other politicians, he witnessed the defeat of the Union Army at the First Battle of Bull Run. There, he was almost captured by the Confederate Army. After arriving back at Washington, D.C., he was one of those who blamed the attack on the supposed incompetence of the leadership of the Union Army. From 1861 to 1862 he was chairman of the important Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, and in 1862, as chairman of the Senate Committee on Territories, was instrumental in abolishing slavery in the Federal Territories.

During the American Civil War, Wade was highly critical of President Abraham Lincoln; in a September 1861 letter, he privately wrote that Lincoln's views on slavery "could only come of one born of poor white trash and educated in a slave State."[1] He was especially angry when Lincoln was slow to recruit African-Americans into the armies, and actively advocated for the bill that abolished slavery and had a direct hand in the passing of the Homestead Act of 1862 and the Morrill Land-Grant Act of 1862.

Wade was also critical of Lincoln's Reconstruction Plan; in December 1863, he and Henry Winter Davis sponsored a bill that would run the South, when conquered, their way.[1] The Wade–Davis Bill mandated that there be a fifty-percent White male Iron-Clad Loyalty Oath, Black male suffrage, and Military Governors that were to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The House of Representatives passed the bill on May 4, 1864, by a margin of 73 ayes to 59 nays; the Senate passed it on July 2, 1864, by a margin of 18 ayes to 14 nays and was brought to Lincoln's desk. Wade signed, along with Davis, the Wade–Davis Manifesto, which accused the president of seeking reelection by the executive establishment of new state governments.[3]

On July 28, 1866, the 39th Congress passed an act to adjust the peacetime establishment of the United States military. Wade proposed that two of the cavalry regiments should be composed of African-American enlisted personnel. After strong opposition, the legislation was passed which provided for the first black contingent in the regular U.S. Army, consisting of six regiments: 9th and 10th Cavalry and the 38th, 39th, 40th, and 41st Infantry Regiments. These units, made up of black enlisted personnel and white officers, were not the first of such units to serve on the Western Frontier. During late 1865 through early 1866, companies from the 57th US Colored Infantry Regiment and the 125th United States Colored Infantry Regiment had been assigned to posts in New Mexico Territory to provide protection for settlers in the area, and escort those going further west.

Blunt, outspoken, and above all uncompromising, Wade was among the best known of the Radicals in American politics. He played a major role in founding the new Republican Party,[1][2] emancipating the slaves, and battling the enemies of the Freedmen's Bureau. Wade thought Lincoln was laggard in battling slavery, but Lincoln proved the better politician, building a deeper coalition in support of policies that would hold the Union together by destroying the economic base of plantation slavery that supported the Confederacy. Later when the groundwork for Radical Republicanism was being laid, Wade contended that under a new economic and social structure in the South shaped by free labor, both blacks and whites would "finally occupy a platform according to their merits."[4] He also fiercely opposed the admittance to representation of Southern states that continued denying suffrage to blacks.[5]

As the descendant of leading Puritans, and an activist in the militant Western Reserve in Ohio, Wade's constituents enthusiastically supported his radicalism. His defeat for reelection in the Senate in 1868 demonstrated that his statewide base was shaky. In addition to his anti-slavery activities, he also fought for land grants, women's rights, and labor reform.[6]

Impeachment of Johnson, later years

[edit]
Wade in his later years.

Wade initially expressed optimism in President Andrew Johnson, telling the Tennessee Democrat, "we have faith in you."[7] However, along with most other Radical Republicans, he would become highly critical of Johnson.[2] Wade supported the Freedmen's Bureau and Civil Rights Bills (which he succeeded in extending to the District of Columbia) and was a strong partisan of the Fourteenth Amendment. He also strengthened his party in Congress by forcefully advocating the admission of Nebraska and Kansas. These actions made him so prominent that at the beginning of the 40th Congress (in 1867), Wade became the President pro tempore of the U.S. Senate,[2] which meant that he was next in line for the presidency (as Johnson had no vice president).

Chief Justice of the United States Salmon P. Chase administering juror's oath to Wade for the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson

After many fallouts with the Republican-dominated Congress, the Judiciary Committee voted to impeach President Johnson (who had been a Democrat). When Johnson was impeached, Wade was sworn in as one of the senators sitting in judgment, but was greatly criticized because of his unseemly interest in the outcome of the trial. Although most senators believed that Johnson was guilty of the charges, they did not want the extremely radical Wade to become acting president. One newspaper wrote, "Andrew Johnson is innocent because Ben Wade is guilty of being his successor."[8]

According to John Roy Lynch (R-MS, 1873–77, 1882–83), one of the twenty-two African Americans elected to Congress from the South during Reconstruction, in his book Facts Concerning Reconstruction:

It was believed by many at the time that some of the [moderate] Republican Senators that voted for acquittal [of Andrew Johnson] did so chiefly on account of their antipathy to the man who would succeed to the presidency in the event of the conviction of the [sitting] president. This man was Senator Benjamin Wade, of Ohio, President pro tempore of the Senate who as the law then stood, would have succeeded to the presidency in the event of a vacancy in the office from any cause. Senator Wade was an able man … He was a strong party man. He had no patience with those who claimed to be [Radical] Republicans and yet refused to abide by the decision of the majority of the party organization [as did Grimes, Johnson, Lincoln, Pratt, and Trumbull] … the sort of active and aggressive man that would be likely to make for himself enemies of men in his own organization who were afraid of his great power and influence, and jealous of him as a political rival. That some of his senatorial Republican associates should feel that the best service they could render their country would be to do all in their power to prevent such a man from being elevated to the Presidency … for while they knew he was an able man, they also knew that, according to his convictions of party duty and party obligations, he firmly believed he who served his party best served his country best…that he would have given the country an able administration is concurrent opinion of those who knew him best.[9]

Indeed, some of the Moderate Republican senators who voted to acquit Johnson, including William P. Fessenden of Maine, acted out of antipathy towards the staunchly pro-civil rights Wade, who they did not want to become president.[10] Northern business interests also disdained Wade due to his advocacy of labor unions, high protective tariffs, and a "soft" monetary policy.[11]

Wade lost in the 1868 election as the Democrats gained control over the state legislature.[12] Prior to Wade's defeat presidential candidate Ulysses S. Grant was urged by his fellow Republicans to choose Wade as his vice presidential running mate; but he refused, instead choosing another radical, Speaker Schuyler Colfax (presiding officer of the House), who coincidentally married Wade's niece, Ellen Maria Wade, shortly after the election. Wade returned to his Ohio law practice. Though no longer a government official, Wade continued to contribute to the world of law and politics. He became an agent of the Northern Pacific Railroad, continued his party activities, became a member of the commission researching the likelihood of the purchase of the Dominican Republic in 1871 and served as an elector for Rutherford Hayes in the election of 1876.

Stalwart politics, antipathy towards President Hayes

[edit]
Wade, who maintained lifelong support for civil rights, became disenchanted with President Hayes' leniency towards the South.

Among Wade's political activities in his post-Congress years included his taking part among the Republican "Stalwart" faction, the wing of the GOP which supported the Reconstruction policies of President Ulysses S. Grant and opposed civil service reform during the 1870s.[13] He became a lobbyist for Jay Cooke and the Northern Pacific Railroad in the 1870s.[14]

Although Wade enthusiastically supported Rutherford B. Hayes' 1876 campaign for president, he became disillusioned with Hayes' withdrawal of remaining federal troops from the South, an action he viewed as constituting a betrayal of Republican principles.[15] He wrote in a subsequently published letter to Uriah Hunt Painter of The New York Times:

I do remember it, after what has since transpired, with indignation and a bitterness of soul that I never felt before. You know with what untiring zeal I labored for the emancipation of the slaves of the South and to procure justice for them before and during the time I was in Congress, and I supposed Governor Hayes was in full accord with me on this subject. But I had been deceived, betrayed, and even humiliated by the course he has taken . . . I feel that to have emancipated these people and then to leave them unprotected would be a crime as infamous as to have reduced them to slavery once they are free.

Throughout the summer and fall of 1877, Wade continued his forceful denunciation of the Hayes administration, asserting in November that the president would never have received his vote had he knew Hayes intended to "abandon the Southern Republicans and put in his Cabinet a rebel who had fought four years to destroy the Government."[15] Wade disdained Hayes' selection of David M. Key, a former Confederate officer, to the position of United States Postmaster General. However, Wade's lack of power at this point made him helpless.[15]

Death

[edit]

Wade, amidst his expressed frustration and grief over President Hayes' betrayal of the Republican Party's commitment to civil rights, fell ill.[16] His progressively worsening health, attributed by doctors to a form of typhoid fever, would subsequently result in his death. On March 1, 1878, Wade, while lying on his bed, summoned his wife Caroline and whispered his last words:[16]

I cannot speak at all.

In the following morning,[16] Wade died in Jefferson, Ohio. News reporting quickly spread; The New York Times, which had long criticized him frequently, published an obituary titled: "The Last of the Congressional Champions of Freedom."[16]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Benjamin Wade

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Benjamin Franklin Wade (October 27, 1800 – March 2, 1878) was an American lawyer, judge, and politician who served as a Senator from from 1851 to 1869. A key figure among the , Wade was a staunch opponent of slavery's expansion and a critic of more moderate Union policies during the Civil War. He co-authored the Wade-Davis Bill, which proposed a stricter plan for reconstructing the Southern states than President Abraham Lincoln's approach, requiring loyalty oaths from a majority of white male citizens and guaranteeing for Black men. As chairman of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, he investigated Union military setbacks and pushed for aggressive prosecution of the conflict. Wade's opposition to President Johnson's lenient Reconstruction policies led him to support the president's in , and as of the , he stood next in line for the , heightening the stakes of the trial. His blunt, uncompromising style earned him the nickname "Bluff Ben," but also contributed to his defeat in the 1868 election amid Democratic gains and internal Republican divisions. Beyond abolition and Reconstruction, Wade advocated for women's and labor rights, reflecting his commitment to broader egalitarian reforms.

Early life

Childhood and family background

Benjamin Franklin Wade was born on October 27, 1800, in Feeding Hills, near Springfield in , to , a farmer, and Mary Upham Wade. He was the youngest of ten children in a family of English descent tracing back to Jonathan Wade, who emigrated from , to in 1632. The Wades lived modestly on a farm, facing the typical economic constraints of rural households at the turn of the century. From an early age, Wade contributed to the family through manual labor, including work as a canal digger on the , experiences that exposed him to physical toil and the rigors of subsistence living. These formative years in a resource-scarce environment fostered habits of self-reliance and diligence, as the family navigated limited opportunities in post-Revolutionary . In the fall of 1821, the Wade family migrated westward to Andover in , joining the influx of ambitious settlers drawn to the fertile but undeveloped lands of the Western Reserve. This relocation immersed Wade in frontier conditions, where clearing land and basic survival demanded resilience amid isolation and rudimentary infrastructure, further reinforcing an ethos shaped by hardship rather than inherited advantage. Wade pursued legal training through informal apprenticeship rather than formal education, studying under figures such as Congressman Elisha Whittlesey while teaching school in Ohio. He was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1827 following this self-directed preparation. Upon admission, Wade established a law practice in Jefferson, Ashtabula County, Ohio, where he developed a reputation for vigorous courtroom advocacy in local civil and criminal disputes. In 1831, he formed a partnership with Joshua R. Giddings, enhancing his professional standing through collaborative handling of cases. Elected as prosecuting attorney for Ashtabula County in 1835, Wade prosecuted violations of state laws, gaining experience in public legal enforcement until 1836. In 1847, the elected Wade as presiding judge of the third judicial district's Court of Common Pleas, encompassing Ashtabula, Trumbull, Geauga, and Portage counties, where he served until 1851 and demonstrated a suited to judicial impartiality amid frontier legal challenges.

Rise in Ohio politics

State legislature service

Benjamin F. Wade entered Ohio state politics as a Whig, securing election to the in 1837 and serving nonconsecutive terms from 1837 to 1838 and 1841 to 1842. These terms provided Wade with foundational experience in legislative governance amid Ohio's rapid economic expansion and sectional tensions. As a Whig, he supported party platforms emphasizing economic development over the Democrats' more agrarian and oriented policies, which often aligned with Southern interests. In the , Wade advocated for , including infrastructure projects like canals and roads to connect Ohio's interior to markets, reflecting Whig commitments to state-led growth following the completion of early canals in the and . Serving on the judiciary committee during his second term, he contributed to reports addressing legal and financial reforms, amid ongoing debates over Ohio's volatile banking system plagued by institutions and the need for stricter regulation to stabilize currency and credit. Whig legislators, including Wade, pushed for measures to charter reliable banks and curb speculative excesses, countering Democratic resistance that prioritized intervention. Wade also engaged in early state-level discussions on anti-slavery issues, opposing policies perceived to favor Southern slaveholding interests and aligning with Northern reformers against the extension of slavery's influence into free states. His forthright style emerged in these debates, earning him a reputation for unyielding oratory that challenged Democratic majorities and highlighted divisions over banking, improvements, and moral questions tied to national politics. This local service sharpened Wade's reformist approach, emphasizing practical governance reforms over compromise with pro-Southern elements.

Initial national elections

Wade first sought a seat in the in 1843 as a Whig candidate from Ohio's 19th congressional district but was unsuccessful in the . His breakthrough to national office occurred in 1851, when the Whig-controlled selected him to fill the vacancy created by Thomas Ewing's as a member of President Millard Fillmore's cabinet; Wade was sworn in on March 15, 1851, for the remainder of the term ending March 3, 1853. Although nominated by Whigs, Wade's selection reflected support from anti-slavery Free Soilers in the legislature, drawn to his vocal opposition to the and the Fugitive Slave Act. Upon entering the , Wade quickly emerged as a leader in organizing early Republican resistance to pro- expansionism. In 1854, he delivered a major address on March 3 against the Kansas-Nebraska bill, charging that its repeal of the Missouri Compromise's prohibition on north of 36°30' would ignite sectional conflict and betray free-soil principles. His efforts helped coalesce the nascent Republican Party's senatorial bloc, which filibustered and debated the measure intensely before its narrow passage. Wade secured re-election to a full six-year term in January 1857 by the legislature, now aligned under the Republican banner following the party's 1854-1856 formation from anti-Nebraska Whigs, Free Soilers, and Democrats; this victory entrenched 's representation of radical anti- views in the upper chamber.

Pre-Civil War Senate career

Anti-slavery positions

In the state , Wade emerged as a vocal critic of laws facilitating the return of slaves. On February 21, 1839, he delivered a major speech opposing a proposed stricter state fugitive slave law urged by commissioners, contending that such measures compelled free citizens to aid in the capture of escaped slaves, thereby undermining personal liberty and moral conscience. This stance reflected his broader belief that conflicted with the principles of free labor and republican self-government, as it degraded wage earners by associating labor with bondage. Upon election to the U.S. Senate in 1851, Wade continued his opposition to slavery's expansion, denouncing the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850—part of the Compromise of 1850—as a tyrannical infringement on northern rights that forced complicity in human bondage without due process. He advocated for the containment of slavery within existing states, arguing it posed an existential threat to free institutions by fostering aristocracy and economic dependency rather than independent toil. In debates over western territories, Wade framed slavery's spread as a moral and constitutional violation that eroded the equality of labor and citizenship guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence. Wade's commitment extended to supporting antislavery efforts in , where he backed free-state settlers against proslavery incursions following the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which he vigorously opposed for reopening territories to slavery via and igniting violence that tested the republic's foundations. He warned that unchecked extension would corrupt democratic processes and invite , positioning as essential to preserving the Union's egalitarian character.

Opposition to compromise measures

Wade delivered a speech opposing the Kansas–Nebraska bill on March 3, 1854, in the U.S. , arguing that its repeal of the 's territorial restrictions on slavery violated longstanding precedents and invited contention. He voted against the act's final passage on May 30, 1854, by a tally of 23 to 14. In his February 6, 1854, remarks, Wade had described the as a revered barrier whose abrogation would provoke strife, a forecast validated by the armed clashes known as , which erupted in 1855 and claimed over 50 lives by 1859 amid rival pro- and anti-slavery settlers. In late 1860, amid secession threats following Lincoln's election, Wade rejected the Crittenden Compromise, voting against its proposals on December 18, 1860. The measure aimed to amend the Constitution by extending the 36°30′ parallel dividing slave and free territories westward indefinitely, guaranteeing slavery's protection south of that line in both states and territories while prohibiting congressional interference north of it except by local legislatures. Wade and fellow Republicans viewed this as codifying slavery's expansion into federal lands previously restricted, effectively conceding moral ground without curbing southern demands. Wade maintained that such bipartisan pacts deferred sectional tensions without resolving underlying conflicts, citing the Missouri Compromise's 34-year endurance as illusory stability shattered by its 1854 repeal, which reignited disputes over slavery's territorial spread. Empirical patterns from earlier accords, including the balance of slave and free states that failed to quell agitation, reinforced his insistence on principled opposition over expedient deals that empirically prolonged rather than prevented crisis. This stance aligned with his prioritization of non-negotiable limits on slavery's growth, eschewing measures that geographically entrenched it amid mounting evidence of irreconcilable divides.

Civil War involvement

Chairmanship of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War

The Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War was established by in December 1861 following early Union defeats, with Senator Benjamin F. Wade of elected as its chairman on December 20, 1861, a position he held until the committee's dissolution in May 1865. Composed primarily of , the committee conducted secret investigative hearings into military operations, contracts, and leadership to assess accountability for failures and to advocate for more aggressive prosecution of the war against the Confederacy. Under Wade's leadership, it prioritized probing incompetence and corruption, issuing reports that exposed logistical shortcomings and command hesitations contributing to setbacks. Wade directed early investigations into the on July 21, 1861, and the on October 21, 1861, where Union forces suffered disorganized routs due to poor planning and leadership. The committee's reports, signed by Wade as chairman, detailed how inadequate preparation and failure to pursue retreating Confederate troops prolonged the conflict, recommending stricter oversight of generals and supplies. In grilling during probes into the of 1862, Wade criticized the commander's excessive caution and overestimation of enemy strength, arguing that an army of 150,000 could decisively defeat the Confederacy if unleashed aggressively. These sessions highlighted Wade's insistence on total commitment to victory, including calls for confiscation of rebel resources to weaken Southern logistics, though the committee's partisan focus on Democratic-leaning officers drew charges of undermining military morale. The committee's published reports, totaling over 8,000 pages across multiple volumes, amplified public and congressional pressure on the Lincoln administration to replace hesitant commanders and adopt bolder strategies, contributing to shifts like McClellan's removal in November 1862 despite Lincoln's occasional resistance to the panel's interference. Wade's forceful for rigorous —described by contemporaries as the "foremost spirit" driving the panel—helped expose graft in contracts and armaments, fostering a congressional consensus for escalated war efforts, though critics argued the secretive methods and selective targeting prioritized political Radicalism over impartial oversight. This dual legacy of exposing real deficiencies while risking operational leaks underscored the committee's role in wartime congressional assertiveness.

Advocacy for emancipation and military rigor

As chairman of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, formed in December 1861 following Union defeats at Bull Run and Ball's Bluff, Benjamin Wade pressed for the explicit adoption of as a core objective to deprive the Confederacy of its enslaved labor force, which sustained its agriculture and . The committee, dominated by under Wade's influence, investigated military setbacks and recommended policies linking to vigorous prosecution of the war, including the revocation of protections for in loyal border states where practicable. This stance predated President Lincoln's preliminary of September 22, 1862, by advocating 's destruction as essential to breaking Southern resolve rather than merely restoring the Union intact. Wade insisted on enlisting black troops to bolster Union numbers and erode Confederate manpower, arguing that excluding African Americans from service wasted potential reinforcements while allowing the South to retain field hands for its armies. The Joint Committee endorsed black enlistment as a strategic imperative, contributing to the eventual recruitment of approximately 180,000 African American soldiers by war's end, which expanded Union forces amid high white volunteer desertion rates exceeding 10% in some Eastern armies by 1863. He further demanded unyielding penalties against Confederate leaders, including confiscation of property and potential military tribunals for high-ranking officers, to eliminate incentives for prolonged resistance and signal that treason would face irreversible consequences. Wade critiqued tentative strategies as empirically flawed, pointing to repeated stalled offensives—such as the Peninsula Campaign's 1862 failures, where Union forces suffered over 15,000 casualties without decisive gains—as evidence that half-measures preserved Southern cohesion and extended the conflict. By withholding full and black recruitment, he contended, the North squandered advantages in manpower and morale, allowing desertions and battlefield stalemates to persist until more totalizing policies shifted the war's momentum toward Union victory in 1865.

Wade-Davis Bill and conflicts with Lincoln

In February 1864, Senator of co-sponsored the Wade-Davis Bill with Representative of , proposing a congressional framework for Reconstruction that demanded stricter loyalty requirements for readmitting Southern states to the Union. The legislation required that 50 percent of a state's prewar voters—excluding those who had voluntarily supported the Confederacy—take an "iron-clad" oath affirming past and future to the U.S. Constitution, a threshold far more rigorous than President Abraham Lincoln's 10 percent plan announced in December 1863, which allowed states to reorganize upon oath-taking by just 10 percent of voters. Additional provisions mandated provisional governors appointed with consent, exclusion of former Confederates from office and service, and congressional approval for state constitutional conventions, aiming to ensure and prevent rebel resurgence under executive leniency. The bill passed the on May 26 and the on July 2, 1864, reflecting Radical Republican insistence on congressional authority over wartime Reconstruction to safeguard emancipation and Unionist reforms. Lincoln, prioritizing swift restoration and ongoing military efforts in states like and where his 10 percent plan had advanced provisional governments, allowed the bill to expire via upon Congress's adjournment on July 4, without signing or returning it. In a July 8 proclamation, Lincoln defended his inaction, arguing the bill's plan conflicted with his constitutional duty to restore states "to their proper practical relation in the Union" and critiqued its rigid oath as potentially unjust, while reiterating his preference for provisional setups that could evolve with war outcomes. This nullified congressional efforts to override executive discretion, exposing Wade's long-standing frustration with Lincoln's perceived indulgence toward ex-rebels, whom Wade viewed as unrepentant threats requiring punitive measures to secure lasting loyalty. Wade and Davis retaliated with the Wade-Davis Manifesto, published August 5, 1864, in , charging Lincoln with executive overreach akin to by substituting his unilateral policy for 's war powers under Article I. The document asserted that alone held authority to define Reconstruction terms during rebellion, decrying the as an attempt to "confer such a " and warning that Lincoln's approach risked entrenching disloyal elements in Southern governance. Wade, as Senate co-author, framed the conflict as a defense of legislative primacy against presidential encroachment, heightening tensions within the Republican Party and underscoring Radical demands for ironclad safeguards over clemency-driven reintegration. The episode crystallized Wade's opposition to Lincoln's Reconstruction preview, foreshadowing deeper rifts over postwar policy while failing to enact the bill's stringent framework.

Reconstruction efforts

Critique of presidential plans

Wade rejected President Andrew Johnson's Reconstruction policies, particularly the May 29, 1865, amnesty proclamation and subsequent state readmissions, as excessively lenient and conducive to the resurgence of Confederate . Johnson's approach, which pardoned most former rebels upon oath-taking and enabled rapid state reorganization under provisional governors, permitted the swift enactment of Black Codes in Southern legislatures by late 1865, such as Mississippi's November laws mandating annual labor contracts for freedmen and punishing with forced . These codes, by empirically demonstrating Southern intent to reinstitute racial subjugation through legal restrictions on mobility, labor, and , underscored Wade's causal assessment that unpunished recalcitrance would perpetuate slavery's social structures under new guises, invalidating . In response, Wade advocated expanding the , established March 3, 1865, to provide sustained aid, education, and legal protection for freedmen against such encroachments, supporting the February 19, 1866, override of Johnson's veto on its extension amid evidence of Bureau agents documenting widespread abuses under Black Codes. He further pressed for temporary military governance over Southern districts to enforce loyalty tests and dismantle disloyal apparatuses, arguing that executive clemency alone failed to secure the war's causal fruits—permanent loyalty and reform—by allowing unregenerate elements to dominate restored governments. Wade contended that such leniency dishonored the Union dead, whose sacrifices demanded rigorous measures to break the causal chain linking antebellum to post-war oppression, prioritizing empirical enforcement over conciliatory restoration to prevent rebel resurgence. This stance reflected Radical Republican insistence on congressional supremacy, viewing Johnson's plans—rooted in rapid reintegration without punitive safeguards—as empirically shortsighted given documented Southern defiance.

Push for black suffrage and congressional control

Wade endorsed the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified by Congress on June 13, 1866, which granted citizenship and equal protection to freedmen but omitted explicit voting rights, arguing it provided a foundational framework yet required supplementary measures for political empowerment. He insisted on immediate legislative guarantees for black male suffrage, positing that without enfranchisement, former slaves could not counter entrenched Southern white elites who sought to restore pre-war power structures through discriminatory laws and violence. This stance aligned with Radical Republican causal logic: suffrage acted as a structural barrier against oligarchic resurgence, enabling freedmen to participate in governance and dilute the influence of unrepentant Confederates. In advocating congressional primacy, Wade supported the of 1867, first enacted on March 2, which divided the former Confederacy—excluding —into five military districts overseen by Union generals, imposing federal supervision to quell widespread disorder including murders and intimidation targeting blacks. These acts mandated that Southern states draft new constitutions enfranchising black males and ratify the Fourteenth Amendment as prerequisites for readmission, thereby asserting legislative authority to override executive leniency and ensure provisional stability. Wade viewed this framework as constitutionally compelled under Congress's war powers and the , rejecting presidential overreach that risked premature state autonomy without safeguards against re-subjugation. The measures temporarily curbed anarchy, registering over 700,000 black voters in Southern states by 1867 and facilitating Republican alliances that secured initial order, though enforcement relied on military presence amid ongoing resistance. Wade's push framed enfranchisement not as abstract equity but as pragmatic defense: black votes, comprising up to 30% of electorates in states like South Carolina, formed a counterweight to the planter class's dominance, preventing a swift return to de facto servitude under nominal Union restoration. This congressional veto power, he contended, derived from the rebellion's scale—over 600,000 dead and billions in damages—necessitating rigorous federal intervention beyond mere amnesty.

Impeachment of Andrew Johnson

Leadership in radical opposition

As a leading Radical Republican in the , Benjamin F. Wade orchestrated opposition to President Andrew Johnson's Reconstruction policies, which prioritized rapid Southern readmission over stringent safeguards for freedmen's rights and punishment of Confederate leaders. Wade and his allies argued that Johnson's approach risked nullifying the Union's military sacrifices by allowing former rebels to reclaim political dominance without meaningful reforms. Wade contributed to the Senate's override of Johnson's veto of the on April 6, 1866, passing it 33–15 and codifying birthright citizenship and equal legal protections for irrespective of race. Together with Senator , Wade drove overrides of subsequent vetoes on the First Reconstruction Act (March 2, 1867, Senate vote 38–10) and related measures, dividing the into five military districts, mandating new state constitutions, and enforcing black male suffrage via the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification. These actions, part of 15 successful overrides overall, asserted congressional supremacy to prevent Southern states from enacting black codes that perpetuated . To curtail Johnson's executive patronage and protect officials like Secretary of War , Wade backed the Tenure of Office Act, enacted March 2, 1867, and upheld over veto, which barred removal of Senate-confirmed appointees without congressional approval—a direct response to Johnson's efforts to install sympathetic administrators obstructing radical policies. Wade also rallied Senate Republicans against Johnson's pardons, which totaled approximately 13,000 to 14,000 ex-Confederates by mid-1868, restoring their property (including confiscated lands) and civil rights; radicals contended these acts causally empowered former slaveholders to disenfranchise blacks and derail Reconstruction, as evidenced by rising violence against freedmen in pardoned elites' domains. By enforcing party unity through speeches and committee coordination, Wade positioned these countermeasures as vital to securing the war's emancipatory outcomes against executive sabotage.

Role as potential successor

The United States Senate elected Benjamin F. Wade as on March 2, 1867, during the 40th Congress. This role positioned him next in the line of presidential succession after the vice presidency, which remained vacant following Andrew Johnson's assumption of the presidency upon Abraham Lincoln's in April 1865. Wade's potential ascension carried significant stakes amid Johnson's impeachment trial, which began in March 1868 after the approved articles on February 24, 1868. Opponents of radical Reconstruction policies viewed Wade's prospective presidency with alarm, fearing it would entrench aggressive congressional control over the South and accelerate measures like , thereby consolidating Radical Republican dominance in the executive branch. Some senators, including moderates, cited Wade's unpopularity and lame-duck status as reasons to hesitate on conviction, influencing the narrow outcome. Despite accusations of —fueled in part by reports of Wade preparing a cabinet list in anticipation of success—Wade refrained from overt efforts to sway his colleagues' votes during the trial, which was presided over by rather than the . He cast his for on the key articles, but the acquitted Johnson on May 26, 1868, by a 35-19 margin, falling one vote short of the required two-thirds threshold and thus preventing Wade's elevation.

Trial outcome and implications

The Senate trial concluded with Andrew Johnson's acquittal on May 16, 1868, as Republican Senator of delivered the decisive not-guilty vote on the eleventh , yielding a 35–19 margin that fell one vote short of the two-thirds threshold required for conviction. This result, mirrored on other pivotal articles, upheld Johnson's tenure but severely curtailed his , transforming him into a lame-duck executive with diminished capacity to obstruct congressional Reconstruction measures through vetoes or appointments. The proceedings revealed fissures in Senate Republican unity, with seven party members ultimately voting to acquit, motivated by fears of eroding constitutional norms and the radical policies likely under Wade. Radicals perceived the outcome as a critical missed chance to supplant Johnson with a leader committed to stringent enforcement of Reconstruction, thereby demoralizing their coalition and temporarily empowering moderate and conservative Republicans who prioritized institutional stability over partisan removal. Short-term repercussions included sustained congressional momentum against Johnson's resistance, facilitating the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification on July 9, 1868, and the Fifteenth Amendment's proposal the following year to codify citizenship rights and voting protections amid ongoing Southern defiance. Over the longer horizon, the narrow acquittal delineated 's practical boundaries, reinforcing executive independence and cautioning future Congresses against wielding it as a routine tool for policy disputes, thus preserving a measure of despite radical frustrations.

Later years

Electoral defeat and party shifts

In early 1868, amid the fallout from the failed , Benjamin Wade sought re-election to his Senate seat from , but the state's , following Democratic gains in the elections that yielded a narrow majority, instead selected Democrat on to succeed him, with Wade's term concluding on March 3, 1869. The vote in the legislature was closely contested, reflecting divisions exacerbated by voter rejection of a November state on black male suffrage, a measure Wade had vigorously advocated. Radical Republicans had earlier promoted Wade as a potential vice-presidential for at the party's May 1868 national convention, aiming to secure a staunch advocate of Reconstruction in the line of succession, but Grant opted for Speaker , a figure viewed as more conciliatory toward party moderates. Wade nonetheless backed Grant's presidential bid against Democrat , prioritizing Republican unity on Reconstruction amid the national election on November 3, 1868. Wade's ouster from the underscored the ebbing power of the radical faction within the Republican Party, as moderates consolidated influence under incoming administration and intra-party tensions over aggressive Reconstruction policies contributed to electoral setbacks for figures like Wade. Retiring from public office, he resumed private law practice in and took on roles as counsel for railroad interests, including the Northern Pacific, marking a personal shift amid the broader decline of radical dominance as Grant-era scandals began to erode party cohesion in the early 1870s.

Antipathy toward Rutherford B. Hayes

Despite initially supporting by serving as a Republican elector for him in the 1876 presidential election, Benjamin F. Wade quickly developed strong opposition to Hayes's policies following his inauguration on March 5, 1877. Wade denounced Hayes's decision to withdraw federal troops from the remaining Reconstruction states of and in late April 1877, viewing it as the fulfillment of an informal "corrupt bargain" struck to secure Hayes's disputed victory over amid the Electoral Commission's resolution of contested southern electoral votes. In a public letter dated April 22, 1877, and published in major newspapers, Wade condemned the administration's southern approach as misguided capitulation that prioritized appeasement over enforcement of Republican Reconstruction goals, arguing it would empower former Confederates and undermine federal oversight of civil rights protections. Wade's critiques emphasized the causal risks of ending military enforcement, predicting that troop withdrawal would enable a Democratic resurgence in the , directly eroding and leading to widespread disenfranchisement of . He framed Hayes's actions in speeches and correspondence as a of the party's commitment to radical reforms, asserting that yielding to —many of whom were ex-Confederates—sacrificed the hard-won gains of congressional Reconstruction for short-term political expediency. This perspective aligned with Wade's long-held radical Republican stance prioritizing congressional control and black political empowerment, which he saw Hayes's policy as dismantling. Subsequent historical developments, including the rapid passage of southern state laws imposing poll taxes, literacy tests, and other barriers post-1877, empirically substantiated Wade's warnings by effecting near-total black disenfranchisement and paving the way for Jim Crow segregation by the 1890s.

Final activities and death

Following his service on the Santo Domingo Commission in 1871, Wade returned to private life at his home in Jefferson, , where he had resumed his law practice upon leaving the in 1869. The Benjamin F. Wade House, a two-story clapboard structure with a dating to the Civil War era, served as his residence during these years. Wade died on March 2, 1878, at age 77, in Jefferson, , after a week-long illness. He was buried in Oakdale in Jefferson.

Political ideology

Core radical Republican beliefs

Benjamin Wade maintained that the federal government's authority must supersede that of individual states to eradicate the remnants of and safeguard the Union, viewing unchecked state sovereignty as the root cause of and ongoing disloyalty. Co-authoring the Wade-Davis Bill in , he insisted on ional imposition of loyalty oaths, , and Black male suffrage as prerequisites for Southern readmission, rejecting executive clemency that risked reinstating rebel influence. This stance reflected a conviction that only national intervention could causally sever the institutional ties binding the South to human bondage, preventing cycles of and ensuring constitutional fidelity. Eschewing aristocratic hierarchies, Wade advocated a meritocratic order where advancement derived from individual effort rather than inherited privilege or coerced labor, critiquing Southern as a parasitic whose wealth depended on slavery's inefficiencies rather than or industry. He extended this scrutiny to Northern economic concentrations, decrying capitalist tendencies that degraded laborers while enriching a new monied class, and supported measures like land redistribution from Confederate estates to foster self-reliant freedmen and workers. In , Wade endorsed protective tariffs to shield nascent American manufacturing from foreign competition, aligning with Republican efforts to build industrial self-sufficiency as a bulwark against agrarian dependency. Yet he warned that such protections, if captured by vested interests, invited that corroded the personal integrity and public vigilance requisite for republican self-governance, as evidenced by his probes into wartime misconduct via the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War.

Views on labor, women, and civil rights

Wade championed civil rights for freed as essential to preventing post-emancipation disorder, supporting the Fourteenth Amendment's grant of citizenship and equal protection in 1868 and the Fifteenth Amendment's enfranchisement of black male voters in 1870. He contended that empirical patterns of Southern violence against freedmen—such as the Memphis riot of May 1866, where 46 blacks were killed and 75 injured, and the New Orleans riot of July 1866, resulting in up to 200 black deaths—demonstrated the causal necessity of federal guarantees for black suffrage to deter oligarchic resurgence and maintain public order. This stance extended Radical Republican logic that denying votes to former slaves incentivized white supremacist reprisals, as unchecked local majorities historically enabled mob rule over minority protections. On , Wade endorsed as a logical outgrowth of free labor principles, arguing it empowered productive citizens against arbitrary exclusions; he backed early congressional efforts, including advocacy during the when the issue intersected with Reconstruction debates on universal equality. His position contrasted with more conservative Republicans, prioritizing empirical equity in voting over traditional norms, though he acknowledged practical barriers like societal resistance limited immediate viability. Regarding labor, Wade supported trade unions as safeguards for workers' bargaining power, drawing from his own early experiences as a canal laborer and viewing organized labor as antithetical to exploitative hierarchies akin to . In an 1867 Senate speech, he defended high tariffs and soft policies to bolster wage earners, stating that labor deserved maximal rewards without undue capitalist suppression, thereby tying union rights to broader economic realism over laissez-faire abstractions. Yet, his advocacy reflected over-optimism about integrating labor reforms into Republican orthodoxy, underestimating industrial capital's capacity to co-opt or undermine unions, as evidenced by persistent wage stagnation and strike suppressions in the despite such endorsements. These views positioned Wade as a bridge between abolitionist equality and proletarian , though causal realities of entrenched power structures tempered their long-term efficacy.

Achievements versus criticisms

Wade's chairmanship of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War advanced Radical Republican demands for a harder prosecution of the Civil War, including emancipation as a military necessity, which pressured President Lincoln to issue the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and supported the Thirteenth Amendment's ratification in 1865, abolishing slavery nationwide. These measures integrated approximately 180,000 African American troops into Union forces by war's end, weakening the Confederacy's labor base and contributing to its collapse in April 1865. As co-author of the Wade-Davis Bill in 1864, Wade advocated stricter readmission criteria for Southern states, requiring a 50% loyalty oath among white males and slavery's abolition, influencing subsequent congressional overrides of President Johnson's vetoes on the Reconstruction Acts of 1867, which imposed military districts to enforce new constitutions granting black male suffrage. These acts yielded short-term protections for freedmen's rights, enabling thousands of African Americans to vote and hold office in Southern state governments by 1868. Critics, including military officers, condemned the Joint Committee's investigative tactics under Wade's leadership as overly partisan and procedurally unfair, employing leading questions and hearsay without affording witnesses legal counsel or confrontation rights, which eroded trust between Congress and Union generals. The committee's lack of military expertise—most members, including Wade, were civilians—further alienated commanders, potentially hindering operational coordination despite exposing some incompetence. Radical policies' punitive framework, such as disenfranchising former Confederates and mandating federal oversight, provoked organized white supremacist violence, including Ku Klux Klan terrorism that killed thousands of African Americans between 1865 and 1876, undermining black political gains and facilitating Democratic "Redemption" takeovers in Southern states by 1877. This backlash arose partly from underestimating the South's entrenched resistance and the limits of sustained federal enforcement, as Northern political will eroded amid economic pressures and scandals, leading to troop withdrawals and the erosion of Reconstruction-era reforms. While Wade's uncompromising stance secured constitutional amendments enshrining and voting rights—enduring legacies despite reversals—these outcomes highlight a trade-off: immediate advancements in civil equality against intensified sectional antagonism that federal institutions proved unable or unwilling to contain indefinitely.

Legacy

Immediate historical reception

Upon his death on March 2, 1878, Benjamin F. Wade received tributes from who lauded his unwavering commitment to anti-slavery principles and civil rights advocacy, portraying him as one of the last congressional champions of freedom. Contemporary accounts emphasized his steadfast integrity, with obituaries describing the close of an "honorable career" marked by unyielding opposition to human bondage. However, even among fellow Republicans, his uncompromising style drew mixed reactions, often remembered as irascible and self-defeating, reflecting the polarizing nature of his radicalism. Democrats and conservative Republicans caricatured Wade as overly authoritarian during the 1860s, particularly amid Reconstruction debates and the 1868 impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson, where his potential ascension to the presidency fueled accusations of opportunistic power-grabbing. Such views painted Radical leaders like Wade as dictatorial threats to executive authority and national reconciliation, exacerbating partisan rifts. Conservatives, relieved by the shift toward moderation under President Ulysses S. Grant, saw his influence's decline as a restoration of pragmatic governance. Wade's post-1868 electoral fortunes empirically underscored this division: the Ohio Republican legislature opted for the more moderate as his successor in January 1869, citing Wade's extreme stances on issues like currency expansion and Reconstruction as alienating business interests and party moderates. His failed bid for the 1868 vice-presidential nomination further highlighted radicalism's diminishing appeal amid voter fatigue with sectional strife.

Modern reassessments

Historians since the mid-20th century have reevaluated Benjamin Wade's contributions to Reconstruction, crediting his advocacy for and military governance of the as prescient efforts to institutionalize amid entrenched opposition, in contrast to the Dunning School's early 20th-century depiction of radicals as driven by punitive spite rather than principled opposition to oligarchic restoration. This shift aligns with broader revisionist scholarship emphasizing Reconstruction's potential for egalitarian reform, where Wade's co-sponsorship of the Wade-Davis Bill—requiring 50% loyalty oaths and barring ex-Confederates from office—reflected a realistic appraisal of leniency's risks, as evidenced by Johnson's subsequent pardons enabling redeemer backlash. Persistent critiques, particularly from conservative analysts, argue that Wade's uncompromising stance, including support for land redistribution to freedmen, constituted ideological overreach that deepened sectional animosities by disregarding Southern social structures, thereby hastening northern fatigue and the 1877 Compromise's abandonment of federal protections. Quantitative data on Reconstruction-era violence—over 2,000 documented political murders by groups like the between 1865 and —undermine claims of excess radicalism, instead pointing to causal failures in enforcement, such as the withdrawal of troops post-1873, which permitted white supremacist resurgence rather than idealism's inherent flaws. Wade's first-principles-based , evident in his 1850 rejection of the as a mere deferral of slavery's expansionist logic, proved prescient when such pacts unraveled into by , validating radicals' insistence on eradication over accommodation to avert perpetual conflict. However, systemic left-wing orientations in academic often minimize this necessity, framing radical measures as optional while privileging narratives that attribute Reconstruction's truncation to inevitable regional exhaustion over insufficient coercive power against entrenched interests.

References

  1. https://bioguide.congress.gov/search/bio/W000005
  2. https://www.senate.gov/senators/FeaturedBios/Featured_Bio_Wade.htm
  3. https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1851-1900/The-Wade-Davis-Reconstruction-Bill/
  4. http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/chron/civilwarnotes/wade.html
  5. https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/benjamin-franklin-wade/
  6. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/biographies/benjamin-wade
  7. https://ohiogenealogyexpress.com/ashtabula/ashtaco_1878_bios/ashtaco_1878_bios_w.html
  8. https://www.ohiocivilwarcentral.com/benjamin-franklin-wade/
  9. https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/benjamin-franklin-wade-facts/
  10. https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms009336.3
  11. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=wrlj
  12. https://ohiosenate.gov/about/senators-through-the-ages
  13. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=wright1462286336&disposition=inline
  14. https://resources.ohiohistory.org/ohj/search/display.php?page=54&ipp=20&searchterm=toledo%20strike&vol=37&pages=439-591
  15. https://ohioopen.library.ohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1073&context=oupress
  16. https://resources.ohiohistory.org/ohj/search/display.php?page=116&ipp=20&searchterm=shakers&vol=99&pages=51-71
  17. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/417633/summary
  18. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009598669
  19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1dfnv5c
  20. https://resources.ohiohistory.org/ohj/search/display.php?page=79&ipp=20&searchterm=array&vol=68&pages=161-176
  21. https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key=ha009598669
  22. http://www.thecivilwarmuse.com/index.php?page=kansas-nebraska-act-of-1854
  23. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/crittenden-compromise/
  24. https://lastbesthopeofearth.com/2023/11/27/the-civil-war-benjamin-f-wade-remarks-in-the-u-s-senate/
  25. https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/investigations/joint-committee-conduct-of-war.htm
  26. https://levin-center.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2-Portraits-in-Oversight-Joint-Committee-on-the-Conduct-of-the-Civil-War-Levin-Center-at-Wayne-Law.pdf
  27. https://www.essentialcivilwarcurriculum.com/the-joint-committee-on-the-conduct-of-the-war.html
  28. https://archive.org/details/howbullrunbattle00unit
  29. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jala/2629860.0023.203/--amateurs-at-war-abraham-lincoln-and-the-committee?rgn=main%3Bview=fulltext
  30. https://www.jmichaelmartinez.com/post/2019/10/15/congressional-lions-benjamin-f-wade
  31. https://levin-center.org/joint-committee-on-the-conduct-of-the-civil-war/
  32. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/radical-republicans
  33. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/wade-davis-bill
  34. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/Wade-DavisBill.htm
  35. https://history.house.gov/HouseRecord/Detail/15032436200?current_search_qs=%253FTerm%253DSearch%2526TermType%253DAll%2526Doctype%253DLegislationandFloorProceedings%2526State%253D%2526CongressNumberList%253D%2526PreviousSearch%253DSearch%25252cAll%25252cLegislationandFloorProceedings%25252c%25252cTitle%2526CurrentPage%253D3%2526SortOrder%253DTitle%2526Command%253DMost%252BRecommended
  36. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/wade-davis-bill/
  37. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/wade-davis-bill
  38. https://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/gna/Quellensammlung/05/05_wadedavismanifesto_1864.htm
  39. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/black-codes
  40. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/civil_war/SenatesWorkContinues.htm
  41. https://www.history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1851-1900/The-Wade-Davis-Reconstruction-Bill/
  42. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalhistoriclandmarks/benjamin-f-wade-home.htm
  43. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/civil_war/VictoryTragedyReconstruction.htm
  44. https://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/impeach/imp_account.html
  45. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/topic_display.cfm?tcid=105
  46. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Benjamin-F-Wade
  47. https://www.senate.gov/about/officers-staff/president-pro-tempore/presidents-pro-tempore.htm
  48. https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/impeachment/impeachment-johnson.htm
  49. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/20/andrew-johnson-impeachment-donald-trump-215166
  50. https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/impeachment/andrew-johnsons-impeachment-and-legacy-civil-war-lecture
  51. https://www.historynet.com/whatever-happened-to-benjamin-wade/
  52. https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-man-whose-impeachment-vote-saved-andrew-johnson
  53. https://www.nps.gov/anjo/andrew-johnson-and-impeachment.htm
  54. https://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/25165
  55. https://thereconstructionera.com/historian-stephanie-mccurry-on-the-uses-of-the-johnson-impeachment/
  56. https://www.ohiosos.gov/elections/election-results-and-data/historical-election-comparisons/united-states-senators-from-ohio-1803---present/
  57. https://fascinatingpolitics.com/2025/09/17/benjamin-wade-the-controversial-radical-republican/
  58. https://www.nytimes.com/1877/04/23/archives/the-southern-policy-denounced-letter-from-exsenator-wadethe-place.html
  59. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SD18770428.2.4
  60. https://www.archives.gov/research/african-americans/vote
  61. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/4979/benjamin_franklin-wade
  62. https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/46/1/53/102853/White-Supremacy-Terrorism-and-the-Failure-of
  63. https://www.nytimes.com/1878/03/03/archives/death-of-hon-bf-wade-close-of-an-honorable-carrer-the-last-of-the.html
  64. https://www.atlantahistorycenter.com/blog/the-dunning-school-the-biased-study-of-reconstruction-that-shaped-gone-with-the-wind/
  65. https://thereconstructionera.com/360-2/
  66. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v42/n18/eric-foner/worst-president-in-history
  67. https://chroniclesmagazine.org/society-culture/the-reinvention-of-reconstruction/
  68. https://www.friendsofthelincolncollection.org/lincoln-lore/reconstruction-what-went-wrong/
  69. https://jacobin.com/2021/11/build-back-better-civil-war-reconstruction-capital-austerity
  70. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2615&context=etd_all
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.