Hubbry Logo
Elias HoweElias HoweMain
Open search
Elias Howe
Community hub
Elias Howe
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Elias Howe
Elias Howe
Elias Howe
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Elias Howe Jr. (/haʊ/; July 9, 1819 – October 3, 1867) was an American inventor best known for his creation of the modern lockstitch sewing machine.

Key Information

Early life

[edit]

Elias Howe Jr. was born on July 9, 1819, to Dr. Elias Howe Sr (1792–1867) and Polly (Bemis) Howe (1791–1871) in Spencer, Massachusetts. Howe spent his childhood and early adult years in Massachusetts, where he apprenticed in a textile factory in Lowell beginning in 1835. After mill closings due to the Panic of 1837, he moved to Cambridge, Massachusetts, to work as a mechanic with carding machinery, apprenticing along with his cousin Nathaniel P. Banks. In the beginning of 1838, he apprenticed in the shop of Ari Davis, a master mechanic in Cambridge who specialized in the manufacture and repair of chronometers and other precision instruments.[1] It was in the employ of Davis that Howe seized upon the idea of the sewing machine.

He married Elizabeth Jennings Ames, daughter of Simon Ames and Jane B. Ames, on March 3, 1841, in Cambridge.[2] They had three children: Jane Robinson Howe (1842–1912), Simon Ames Howe (1844–1883), and Julia Maria Howe (1846–1869). He then married Rose Halladay.

Invention of sewing machine and career

[edit]
Howe's sewing machine

Howe was not the first to conceive of the idea of a sewing machine. Many other people had formulated the idea of such a machine before him, one as early as 1790, and some had even patented their designs and produced working machines, in one case at least 80 of them.[3] However, Howe originated significant refinements to the design concepts of his predecessors, and on September 10, 1846, he was awarded the first United States patent (U.S. patent 4,750) for a sewing machine using a lockstitch design. His machine contained the three essential features common to most modern machines: a needle with the eye at the point, a shuttle operating beneath the cloth to form the lock stitch, and an automatic feed.

A possibly apocryphal account of how he came up with the idea for placing the eye of the needle at the point is recorded in a family history of his mother's family:

He almost beggared himself before he discovered where the eye of the needle of the sewing machine should be located. It is probable that there are very few people who know how it came about. His original idea was to follow the model of the ordinary needle, and have the eye at the heel. It never occurred to him that it should be placed near the point, and he might have failed altogether if he had not dreamed he was building a sewing machine for a savage king in a strange country. Just as in his actual working experience, he was perplexed about the needle's eye. He thought the king gave him twenty-four hours in which to complete the machine and make it sew. If not finished in that time death was to be the punishment. Howe worked and worked, and puzzled, and finally gave it up. Then he thought he was taken out to be executed. He noticed that the warriors carried spears that were pierced near the head. Instantly came the solution of the difficulty, and while the inventor was begging for time, he awoke. It was 4 o'clock in the morning. He jumped out of bed, ran to his workshop, and by 9, a needle with an eye at the point had been crudely modeled. After that it was easy. That is the true story of an important incident in the invention of the sewing machine.[4]

Despite securing his patent, Howe had considerable difficulty finding investors in the United States to finance production of his invention, so his elder brother Amasa Bemis Howe traveled to England in October 1846 to seek financing. Amasa was able to sell his first machine for £250 to William Thomas of Cheapside, London, who owned a factory for the manufacture of corsets, umbrellas and valises. Elias and his family joined Amasa in London in 1848, but after business disputes with Thomas and failing health of his wife, Howe returned nearly penniless to the United States. His wife Elizabeth, who preceded Elias back to the United States, died in Cambridge, Massachusetts shortly after his return in 1849.[5]

Despite his efforts to sell his machine, other entrepreneurs began manufacturing sewing machines. Howe was forced to defend his patent in a court case that lasted from 1849 to 1854 because he found that Isaac Singer with cooperation from Walter Hunt had perfected a facsimile of his machine and was selling it with the same lockstitch that Howe had invented and patented. He won the dispute and earned considerable royalties from Singer and others for sales of his invention. [6]

Howe contributed much of the money he earned to providing equipment for the 17th Connecticut Volunteer Infantry of the Union Army during the Civil War, in which Howe served as a private in Company D. Due to his faltering health he performed light duty, often seen walking with the aid of his shillelagh, and took on the position of Regimental Postmaster, serving out his time riding to and from Baltimore with war news. He'd enlisted August 14, 1862, and then mustered out July 19, 1865.[7][8]

Involvement in inventing the zipper

[edit]

Howe received a patent in 1851 for an "Automatic, Continuous Clothing Closure". Perhaps because of the success of his sewing machine, he did not try to seriously market it, missing recognition he might otherwise have received.[9]

Adult life and legacy

[edit]
Howe commemorative, 1940 issue

Between 1854 and 1871/72, Elias's older brother, Amasa Bemis Howe (died in 1868), and later his son Benjamin Porter Howe, owned and operated a factory in New York City, producing sewing machines under the name of the Howe Sewing Machine Co., which won a gold medal at the London Exhibition of 1862. Between 1865 and 1867, Elias himself established The Howe Machine Co. in Bridgeport, Connecticut, that was operated by Elias's sons-in-law, the Stockwell Brothers, until about 1886. Elias Howe's sewing machine won a gold medal at the Paris Exhibition of 1867,[1] and that same year he was awarded the Légion d'honneur by Napoleon III for his invention.[10] In 1873, Benjamin P. Howe sold the Howe Sewing Machine Co. factory and name to the Howe Machine Co., which merged the two companies.

Elias Howe died at age 48, on October 3, 1867, of gout and a massive blood clot. He was buried in Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn, New York. His second wife, Rose Halladay, who died on October 10, 1890, is buried with him. Both Singer and Howe were multi-millionaires.[11]

Howe's father died two months later on December 28, 1867, one day after his 75th birthday.

Howe was commemorated with a 5-cent stamp in the Famous American Inventors series issued October 14, 1940.[12]

The 1965 Beatles movie Help! is dedicated to his memory. [13]

In 2004 he was inducted into the United States National Inventors Hall of Fame.[1]

Genealogy

[edit]

Howe was a descendant of John Howe (1602–1680) who arrived in Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630 from Brinklow, Warwickshire, England, and settled in Sudbury, Massachusetts.[citation needed] Howe was also a descendant of Edmund Rice, another early immigrant to Massachusetts Bay Colony.[2][14]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Elias Howe

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Elias Howe (July 9, 1819 – October 3, 1867) was an American inventor best known for developing and patenting the first practical lockstitch , a device that transformed garment manufacturing by enabling faster and more efficient stitching compared to hand-sewing methods. Born in , to a large family facing financial hardship, Howe apprenticed as a mechanic and worked in textile factories, including a brief stint at the Lowell Machine Shop from 1835 to 1837, where he gained early exposure to machinery that later influenced his inventive pursuits. Inspired by a conversation in 1839 about the need for a , Howe began experimenting in , and by 1845 had constructed an improved prototype featuring a needle with the eye at the point, a shuttle for forming the lockstitch, and an automatic feed mechanism. On September 10, 1846, he received U.S. Patent No. 4,750 for this design, marking the first U.S. patent for a lockstitch and building on earlier, less practical attempts dating back to 1790. Despite initial struggles to commercialize his invention—leading him to travel to in 1847 to demonstrate and license it—Howe faced patent disputes, notably with , but ultimately prevailed in court, securing royalties that made him wealthy by the 1850s. He founded the Howe Machine Company in , in 1865, further promoting his technology. Howe's drastically reduced production times for clothing; for instance, tasks that once took weeks by hand could be completed in days, empowering and significantly impacting the worldwide, including empowering female workers in regions like 19th-century America and later developing countries. Married to Elizabeth Jennings Ames in 1841, with whom he had three children, Howe died in , New York, leaving a legacy as a pioneer in industrial automation and sewing technology.

Early Life

Birth and Family Background

Elias Howe Jr. was born on July 9, 1819, in , to Elias Howe Sr. and Polly Bemis Howe. His father worked as a farmer who also operated a and on the family property, providing a modest livelihood in the rural Worcester County landscape. Polly Bemis Howe, born in 1791, came from a local family and married Elias Sr. in 1816, supporting the household amid the economic constraints of early 19th-century agriculture. The Howe consisted of eight children, raised in a working-class environment marked by financial struggles and reliance on manual labor. As one of the younger siblings, Howe grew up in a home where resources were limited, and family members contributed to operations from an early age. His father's milling activities exposed him to basic mechanical processes, such as grinding grain and sawing , which sparked his innate interest in machinery and tools during childhood. Howe's formal education was rudimentary, confined to intermittent attendance at a local district school until approximately age 12, as farm duties often took precedence over schooling in such rural settings. By that point, the family's economic pressures required his full-time involvement in agricultural work, limiting further academic pursuits but allowing hands-on experience with the practical mechanics of the household mills. This socioeconomic context of modest means and mechanical surroundings laid the groundwork for his later inventive inclinations.

Apprenticeship and Early Work

At a young age, Elias Howe demonstrated an early interest in , influenced by his family's involvement in tools on their farm in , where he assisted from around age six by inserting wire teeth into strips. This hands-on experience fostered his mechanical curiosity, drawing from his father's background as a and occasional carpenter who built local structures. By age eleven in , Howe was bound out as an apprentice to a neighboring , but his hereditary lameness limited his ability to perform farm labor, leading him to return home after about a year to resume lighter work in the family mill. In 1835, at age sixteen, Howe moved to Lowell, Massachusetts, to pursue formal training in machinery, securing a position as a learner or apprentice at the Lowell Machine Shop, where he helped build cotton-processing equipment for two years. The economic Panic of 1837 forced the shop's closure, leaving him unemployed and prompting his relocation to the Cambridgeport area near Boston later that year. There, at age eighteen, he found work as a journeyman mechanic and apprentice in small shops, including that of instrument maker Ari Davis at 11 Cornhill Street, repairing chronometers, nautical instruments, and optical devices. His earnings during these early years were meager, starting at about fifty cents per day in Lowell—equivalent to roughly $3 weekly—and rising modestly to $9 per week by 1840 in Boston, barely sufficient for survival amid widespread industrial instability. Howe's living conditions reflected the hardships of young industrial workers; he shared modest boarding houses with fellow machinists and laborers, enduring persistent that often left him exhausted and unable to afford full meals after long shifts. His physical frailty, stemming from lifelong lameness, compounded these challenges, making demanding manual tasks particularly taxing. During his time at Davis's shop around , Howe gained exposure to discussions of existing sewing aids, including hand-cranked prototypes developed by inventors like Walter Hunt in the early , which sewed straight lines efficiently but struggled with curves. This sparked his interest in improving such devices, as colleagues speculated that a practical could bring immense wealth, planting the seed for his later innovations.

Development of the Sewing Machine

Conceptualization and Design Process

In 1841, while employed as a in , Elias Howe was inspired to develop a following a at the shop of instrument maker Ari Davis, where a visiting capitalist lamented the lack of a viable device and offered a substantial reward for its . This discussion, which likely referenced earlier European efforts such as Barthélemy Thimonnier's chain-stitch demonstrated in during the and , prompted Howe to conceptualize a more secure stitching method using two threads. Drawing on his experience with textile machinery from , Howe envisioned automating the hand- process to alleviate his family's financial burdens, as his wife Elizabeth supported them through . Howe's design process began in earnest in 1843 after he relocated to , where he constructed initial wooden prototypes in a makeshift . By October 1844, he had assembled a rudimentary model using wood and wire to test the core mechanism, refining it iteratively through despite limited tools and resources. Assistance came from fellow Thomas Hall, who aided in model construction, and crucially from George Fisher, a local who provided a $500 loan and attic workspace in December 1844 in exchange for half interest in any . These prototypes marked an iterative effort, evolving from basic frames to functional components by April 1845. The key innovation in Howe's design was the lockstitch mechanism, which used a curved, eye-pointed needle descending vertically from above to pierce the fabric and form a loop with the upper thread on the underside. A reciprocating shuttle then carried the under-thread through this loop, interlocking the two threads as the needle withdrew, creating a strong, reversible stitch that resisted unraveling—unlike prior chain-stitch designs. This setup, powered by a hand-cranked , represented a in precision and durability, though early models required constant adjustments to maintain tension. Testing revealed the machine's potential but also its limitations; by May 1845, a refined successfully sewed straight seams at up to 250 stitches per minute, far surpassing hand-sewing speeds, and by it produced complete suits. However, it struggled with thicker fabrics due to inconsistent thread tension and mechanical unreliability. Throughout this period, Howe endured significant personal hardships, working long hours in poverty-stricken conditions, often skipping meals in a cramped , and relying on family support amid financial desperation that strained his household.

Patenting and Initial Challenges

On September 10, 1846, Elias Howe Jr. was granted U.S. No. 4,750 for his lockstitch , marking the first such for a practical design in the United States. The 's key claims centered on a curved needle with an eye positioned within one-eighth of an inch of its pointed end, held by a vibrating to pierce the fabric and carry the upper thread, forming a loop. A small shuttle, carrying a of lower thread, was driven through this loop by a picker-staff to interlock the threads in a lockstitch, while a tension —employing a lifting-rod to create the loop and a or clipping-piece to regulate thread unwinding—ensured even stitching. These elements, detailed in the specification, addressed longstanding issues in prior machines by enabling reliable, straight-seam at speeds up to 250 stitches per minute. In late 1846, Howe's brother Amasa sold the English rights to William , a corset maker, for £250; Thomas obtained a British for the lockstitch mechanism in October 1846. This led Howe to travel to in 1847 to adapt and demonstrate the machine. Early attempts to license or sell the design to manufacturers and tailors following the U.S. patent failed due to skepticism about the machine's reliability and market viability. Despite building a second model for demonstrations, Howe's public showings in that year failed to attract buyers, as garment makers viewed the device as a threat to hand-sewing labor and questioned its durability for coarse fabrics. The inability to manufacture the machine affordably exacerbated these challenges, as Howe's rudimentary workshop lacked the capital for production scaling, leading to mounting debts that forced him to pawn his original prototype and patent documents. To fund patent fees, he mortgaged his father's farm, yet initial sales attempts collapsed, leaving him in financial ruin by late 1846. Amid these struggles, family pressures intensified, compelling reliance on familial support while he sought viability for his invention.

Trip to England and Exploitation

In 1847, facing financial desperation after failing to commercialize his in the United States, Elias Howe traveled to to seek better opportunities. He sailed on February 5 aboard the Carrick in class, cooking his own meals to cut costs. Upon arrival, the English rights to Howe's machine had been sold for £250 to , a prominent manufacturer of , umbrellas, and leather goods who employed over 500 workers. Thomas, recognizing potential for adapting the device to thicker materials like those used in corset production, hired Howe at a modest of £3 per week to modify the machine. Howe successfully adapted the sewing machine over eight months, strengthening its components to handle coarse threads and heavy fabrics for corset manufacturing, which impressed Thomas and led to the device's use in his factory. However, Thomas exploited Howe's vulnerability by claiming primary credit for the invention, reducing Howe's role to minor repairs after the modifications were complete, and refusing to honor a verbal agreement for royalties of £3 per machine sold. Despite Thomas patenting Howe's design in Britain (GB 11,464, December 1, 1846) and reportedly earning up to a million dollars from it by the 1860s, he paid Howe only minimal wages and withheld the full purchase amount, leaving the inventor in dire straits. During this period, Thomas arranged for Howe's wife, Elizabeth, and their three young children to join him in London; however, due to deteriorating circumstances and Elizabeth's illness with tuberculosis, the family returned to the US ahead of Howe. By 1849, after nearly starving and pawning his original machine model and U.S. patent papers to scrape together funds, Howe returned to the in April, arriving penniless with just half a crown in his pocket. He traveled again, working as a cook on the voyage, and was aided by his English friend Charles Inglis, a coachmaker who had provided small loans and shelter during the hardships in . Tragically, Elizabeth died of on April 30, 1849, in , shortly after Howe's arrival; he borrowed money from his father to reach her bedside in time but could not afford proper attire. The personal toll was immense—Howe fell into deep depression amid ongoing , the loss of his household goods in a en route home, and the weight of his unfulfilled , forcing him to take odd jobs such as manual labor to support his children.

Patent Infringement Lawsuits and Royalties

Upon returning to the in 1849 after an unsuccessful venture in , Elias Howe discovered that several American manufacturers, including I. M. Singer & Co. and & Baker, were producing sewing machines that incorporated key elements of his 1846 lockstitch patent without authorization. This infringement spurred Howe to defend his aggressively, leading him to file a series of lawsuits starting around 1849 against Singer, & Baker, and other competitors, with key rulings in 1854. The pivotal litigation was Howe v. Singer, in which Howe accused Isaac Singer of violating his patent through the use of an eye-pointed needle and shuttle mechanism to form a lockstitch. A federal commission ruled in Howe's favor in 1854, affirming the validity of his patent and ordering royalties from infringers, though appeals and related suits extended the conflict into the late 1850s. This case, along with parallel actions against Grover & Baker, established Howe's priority of invention and set a precedent for enforcing sewing machine patents amid a burgeoning "patent thicket" of overlapping claims. To resolve the escalating legal battles and avoid mutual destruction, Howe, Singer, Wheeler & Wilson, and Grover & Baker formed the Sewing Machine Combination on October 24, 1856—the first major U.S. —agreeing to cross-license their core covering the lockstitch, feed mechanisms, and related features. This agreement granted members access to each other's technologies while imposing standardized licensing fees on non-members, stabilizing the industry and curtailing further infringement suits among the principals. The effectively monopolized production until Howe's primary expired in 1867, after a seven-year extension granted in 1860. Under the Combination's terms, Howe, as a non-manufacturer, received royalties of $5 for each sewing machine sold in the United States and $1 for each exported, a reduction from his earlier $25-per-machine demand but sufficient to yield substantial income. By 1860, these royalties had generated $444,000 for Howe, and by 1867, they exceeded $2 million, transforming him from near poverty to wealth and funding his later endeavors. The pool's licensing structure also lowered overall fees to $15 per machine initially (dropping to $7 by 1860), enabling broader market access while ensuring Howe's ongoing financial benefits from the foundational lockstitch innovation.

Other Inventions and Contributions

Automatic Clasp Fastener Patent

In 1851, Elias Howe Jr. received U.S. Patent No. 8,540 for an "Improvement in Fastenings for Garments," a device designed as an automatic clasp fastener for securing edges of clothing, boots, and similar items. The invention consisted of flanged ribs attached to the fabric edges of a garment, along which a series of metal clasps could slide; these clasps were interconnected by short links and a continuous cord featuring looped ends and beads to regulate movement, allowing the fastener to engage or disengage by pulling the cord. Intended primarily for ladies' boots and garments requiring quick closure, the design aimed to provide a reliable alternative to buttons or hooks, minimizing the risk of accidental disengagement during wear. The mechanism operated by sliding the connected clasps along the to align and secure the fabric edges, with the cord ensuring even tension and preventing the clasps from separating prematurely; diagrams in the illustrated closed configurations for boots and partially open states for , highlighting its versatility for vertical or horizontal fastening. However, the device's reliance on rigid metal components introduced practical limitations, including the need for precise clasp-to-rib alignment that could bend or misfit with repeated use, leading to binding or loosening. Additionally, the friction from sliding clasps risked fraying the underlying fabric over time, and the absence of elements made it prone to slippage under stress, rendering it bulkier and less durable than later iterations. Patented amid Howe's ongoing legal and financial struggles to establish his , the clasp fastener received no significant commercialization or royalties, as Howe did not pursue manufacturing or improvements, likely due to his focus on sewing-related disputes. Despite these shortcomings, the is recognized as an early conceptual precursor to the modern , demonstrating a sliding clasp for automated fastening, though Howe is not credited with its development—subsequent advancements, such as Whitcomb L. Judson's "clasp locker" , built upon and refined similar ideas for practical use.

Military Service in the Civil War

Following the outbreak of the in 1861, Elias Howe demonstrated strong patriotic support for the Union cause, drawing on the substantial royalties he earned from his patents to fund military efforts. He played a key role in recruiting the 17th Volunteer , which was organized in August 1862 at , and personally financed much of its equipment, including horses for the officers and a full regimental band. At the age of 42 and already in declining health, Howe enlisted as a private in Company D of the 17th Infantry, becoming the first Bridgeport resident to sign up for service. Due to his physical condition, he was excused from combat duties and instead performed light tasks, such as serving as the regimental postmaster by carrying messages on foot. The regiment participated in major engagements, including the in July 1863, where Howe was present with the unit during the fighting, though he avoided direct involvement in the front lines. Howe emerged from the war without combat wounds, but the rigors of camp life and exposure contributed to a further deterioration in his health, which persisted in the years following his discharge in 1865. In the postwar period, he continued his commitment to former soldiers by supporting veterans' initiatives; a local post in Bridgeport was named in his honor, reflecting his enduring contributions to the Union effort.

Later Life and Legacy

Personal Life and Family

Elias Howe married Elizabeth Jennings Ames on March 3, 1841, in . The couple had three children: Jane Robinson Howe (born 1842), Simon Ames Howe (born 1844), and Julia Maria Howe (born 1846). Elizabeth supported the family through work during Howe's early struggles with his invention, but she died in 1849 at age 32, leaving him to raise their young children alone. Following Elizabeth's death, Howe remarried Rose Halladay around 1854; the couple had no children together and resided primarily in , New York, after the mid-1850s, where Howe established a comfortable home amid his growing prosperity. His financial success from sewing machine royalties ultimately provided stability for his family, allowing the children from his first marriage to pursue opportunities in and . Howe's lineage traced back to early Massachusetts settlers through his mother, Polly Bemis, whose family had arrived in the colony in the 1630s; descendants, including son Simon Ames Howe, continued in manufacturing endeavors related to mechanical innovations.

Death and Posthumous Recognition

Howe's health began to decline in the years following his Civil War service, where exposure to camp conditions and the physical demands of even light duties exacerbated his existing ailments, compounded by the overwork from years of legal battles and business management. On October 3, 1867, while visiting his daughter's home in , New York, Howe died at the age of 48 from . His funeral was a significant public event, held on October 7, 1867, at the First Universalist Church in Cambridgeport, , where the church was crowded with mourners, including representatives from the industry in New York, , and beyond. He was subsequently buried in in . Contemporary obituaries lauded Howe as a profound benefactor of mankind for his transformative , emphasizing his contributions to alleviating human labor. In the decades following his death, posthumous recognition included a field-stone at his birthplace in , dedicated in 1919 to honor his legacy as an inventor. Howe's 1867 will provided for the distribution of his substantial estate—estimated at around two million dollars from sewing machine royalties—to his family members and various charities, ensuring support for his wife, children, and philanthropic causes.

Influence on the Garment Industry

Howe's sewing machine revolutionized garment production by introducing a practical lockstitch mechanism that enabled efficient mass manufacturing of clothing on an unprecedented scale. Prior to its adoption, hand-sewing a man's shirt required approximately 14 hours, but the machine reduced this to about 1 hour and 15 minutes, dramatically accelerating output and allowing factories to produce standardized apparel at lower costs. This innovation spurred the rapid growth of the ready-to-wear clothing sector, which expanded significantly by the 1870s as affordable, off-the-rack garments became accessible to broader populations. The economic effects were profound, transforming the U.S. and apparel landscape during the mid-19th century. The value of ready-made production surged from $40 million in 1850 to more than $70 million by 1860, reflecting the machine's role in scaling operations and meeting rising consumer demand. Overall also grew robustly, with cotton goods alone valued at $177 million in , underscoring the invention's contribution to industrial expansion. While this boom created thousands of jobs in factories and related trades, it simultaneously fostered conditions, where workers—often immigrants and women—endured long hours, low pay, and hazardous environments to keep production costs down. Socially, the sewing machine reshaped labor dynamics, particularly for women, by facilitating greater participation in industrial work. The census revealed tailoresses accounting for 83% of female craft occupations, with an augmented labor force participation rate for free women reaching 56.6% when including unreported family helpers in garment-related tasks; female operatives in mills increased by over 12,500 from 1850 to . This shift drew more women into roles, though it often meant transitioning from home-based to regimented industrial labor. The machine's influence extended globally through aggressive exports, especially by Singer, which disseminated models worldwide and captured a dominant by the late , adapting production to diverse cultural contexts. In historiography, Howe's invention is credited with exemplifying mechanization's dual role in liberating labor from tedium while intensifying industrial exploitation, marking a key step in the shift from artisanal to factory-based economies. Its legacy endures in modern garment manufacturing, where computerized sewing machines—evolving directly from the lockstitch principle—integrate for precision stitching, , and high-speed production in global supply chains.

References

  1. https://www.asme.org/topics-resources/content/elias-howe
  2. https://libguides.uml.edu/early_lowell/Elias_Howe_sewing_machine
  3. https://historycambridge.org/innovation/Sewing%20Machine.html
  4. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4750
  5. https://www.massmoments.org/moment-details/patent-office-rules-in-favor-of-elias-howe.html
  6. https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/LHB2-YT9/polly-bemis-1791-1871
  7. https://historycambridge.org/articles/elias-howe-jr-sewing-machine/
  8. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1867/05/history-of-the-sewing-machine/628018/
  9. https://recreating19cballroom.blogspot.com/2011/09/tale-of-two-howes.html
  10. https://www.si.edu/object/1846-elias-howe-jrs-sewing-machine-patent-model:nmah_630930
  11. https://www.thoughtco.com/elias-howe-profile-1991903
  12. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4750A/en
  13. https://www.bgc.bard.edu/research-forum/articles/183/number-1-standard-sewing-machine
  14. https://www.americanheritage.com/1846-one-hundred-and-fifty-years-ago
  15. https://historycambridge.org/articles/elias-howe-jr-inventor-of-the-sewing-machine-part-2/
  16. https://www.geni.com/people/Pvt-Elias-Howe-Jr-USA/6000000000893212296
  17. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co44744/sewing-machine-by-elias-howe
  18. https://www.contrado.com/blog/history-of-the-sewing-machine/
  19. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/how-singer-won-sewing-machine-war-180955919/
  20. https://arizonalawreview.org/pdf/53-1/53arizlrev165.pdf
  21. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/article/the-first-patent-litigation-explosion
  22. https://ipwatchdog.com/2012/05/03/americas-first-patent-thicket-sewing-machine-war-of-the-1850s/
  23. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w15061/w15061.pdf
  24. https://www.fiddlebase.com/the-sewing-machine-combination-or-sewing-machine-trust/
  25. https://ismacs.net/howe/the_howe_sewing_machine.html
  26. https://patents.google.com/patent/US8540A/en
  27. https://www.montana.edu/rmaher/engr125_fl07/petroski_ch4.pdf
  28. https://ykkamericas.com/history-of-the-zipper/
  29. https://blog.library.si.edu/blog/2010/05/03/the-up-an-down-history-of-the-zipper/
  30. https://www.invent.org/inductees/gideon-sundback
  31. https://newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/elias-howe-sewing-machine-inventor-gets-little-help-beatles/
  32. https://bportlibrary.org/hc/art/elias-howe-jr/
  33. https://www.nps.gov/civilwar/search-battle-units-detail.htm?battleUnitCode=UCT0017RI
  34. https://seventeenthcvi.org/engagements/gettysburg/
  35. https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=resources&s=char-dir&f=howe2
  36. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/515/elias-howe
  37. https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Howe-3050
  38. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/biography/elias-howe
  39. https://www.nytimes.com/1867/10/07/archives/the-late-mr-elias-howe-jrfuneral-services-at-cambridgeport-mass.html
  40. https://www.green-wood.com/2010/elias-howe-jr/
  41. https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=morris&book=progress&readAll=true
  42. https://www.digitalcommonwealth.org/search/commonwealth:fb494q587
  43. https://todayinsci.com/H/Howe_Elias/HoweEliasBio%281871%29.htm
  44. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/01/sewing-machines/513692/
  45. https://www.nyhistory.org/blogs/a-sewing-revolution
  46. https://www.stocks.co.uk/blog/how-did-sewing-machine-impact-industrial-revolution
  47. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/howe-patents-his-sewing-machine
  48. https://usa.ipums.org/usa/resources/voliii/pubdocs/1900/Population/03322287no164-208ch7.pdf
  49. https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/sweatshops/online/history/1820-1880
  50. https://docs.iza.org/dp14449.pdf
  51. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1860/preliminary-report/1860e-05.pdf
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305967085_Selling_the_Sewing_Machine_Around_the_World_Singer%27s_International_Marketing_Strategies_1850-1920
  53. https://www.aei.org/economics/what-the-invention-of-the-sewing-machine-tells-us-about-automation-innovation-and-jobs/
  54. https://konsew.com/blog/the-history-of-sewing-machine-development-from-mechanical-to-computerized
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.