Hubbry Logo
JealousyJealousyMain
Open search
Jealousy
Community hub
Jealousy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Jealousy
Jealousy
Jealousy
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia


Relationships
(Outline)
Types
Genetic or adoptive
By marriage
Partner(s)
Intimate and sexual
Activities
Endings
Emotions and feelings
Practices
Abuse
Part of a series on
Emotions
Emotions

Jealousy generally refers to the thoughts or feelings of insecurity, fear, and concern over a relative lack of possessions or safety.

Jealousy can consist of one or more emotions such as anger, resentment, inadequacy, helplessness or disgust. In its original meaning, jealousy is distinct from envy, though the two terms have popularly become synonymous in the English language, with jealousy now also taking on the definition originally used for envy alone. These two emotions are often confused with each other, since they tend to appear in the same situation.[1]

A jealousy scene shown on the Dong Ho painting of Vietnam

Jealousy is a typical experience in human relationships, and it has been observed in infants as young as five months.[2][3][4][5] Some researchers claim that jealousy is seen in all cultures and is a universal trait.[6][7][8] However, others claim jealousy is a culture-specific emotion.[9]

Jealousy can either be suspicious or reactive,[10] and it is often reinforced as a series of particularly strong emotions and constructed as a universal human experience. Psychologists have proposed several models to study the processes underlying jealousy and have identified factors that result in jealousy.[11] Sociologists have demonstrated that cultural beliefs and values play an important role in determining what triggers jealousy and what constitutes socially acceptable expressions of jealousy.[12] Biologists have identified factors that may unconsciously influence the expression of jealousy.[13]

Throughout history, artists have also explored the theme of jealousy in paintings, films, songs, plays, poems, and books, and theologians have offered religious views of jealousy based on the scriptures of their respective faiths.

Etymology

[edit]

The word stems from the French jalousie, formed from jaloux (jealous), and further from Low Latin zelosus (full of zeal), in turn from the Greek word ζῆλος (zēlos), sometimes "jealousy", but more often in a positive sense "emulation, ardour, zeal"[14][15] (with a root connoting "to boil, ferment"; or "yeast").[citation needed] The "biblical language" zeal would be known as "tolerating no unfaithfulness" while in middle English zealous is good.[16] One origin word gelus meant "possessive and suspicious" the word then turned into jelus.[16]

Since William Shakespeare's use of terms like "green-eyed monster",[17] the color green has been associated with jealousy and envy, from which the expression "green with envy", is derived.

Theories

[edit]

Scientific examples

[edit]
Jealousy (1927), László Moholy-Nagy

People do not express jealousy through a single emotion or a single behavior.[18][19][20] They instead express jealousy through diverse emotions and behaviors, which makes it difficult to form a scientific definition of jealousy. Scientists instead define it in their own words, as illustrated by the following examples:

  • "Romantic jealousy is here defined as a complex of thoughts, feelings, and actions which follow threats to self-esteem and/or threats to the existence or quality of the relationship, when those threats are generated by the perception of potential attraction between one's partner and a (perhaps imaginary) rival."[21]
  • "Jealousy, then, is any aversive reaction that occurs as the result of a partner's extradyadic relationship that is considered likely to occur."[22]
  • "Jealousy is conceptualized as a cognitive, emotional, and behavioral response to a relationship threat. In the case of sexual jealousy, this threat emanates from knowing or suspecting that one's partner has had (or desires to have) sexual activity with a third party. In the case of emotional jealousy, an individual feels threatened by her or his partner's emotional involvement with and/or love for a third party."[23]
  • "Jealousy is defined as a defensive reaction to a perceived threat to a valued relationship, arising from a situation in which the partner's involvement with an activity and/or another person is contrary to the jealous person's definition of their relationship."[24]
  • "Jealousy is triggered by the threat of separation from, or loss of, a romantic partner, when that threat is attributed to the possibility of the partner's romantic interest in another person."[25]

These definitions of jealousy share two basic themes. First, all the definitions imply a triad composed of a jealous individual, a partner, and a perception of a third party or rival. Second, all the definitions describe jealousy as a reaction to a perceived threat to the relationship between two people, or a dyad. Jealous reactions typically involve aversive emotions and/or behaviors that are assumed to be protective for their attachment relationships. These themes form the essential meaning of jealousy in most scientific studies.

Comparison with envy

[edit]

Popular culture uses the word jealousy as a synonym for envy. Many dictionary definitions include a reference to envy or envious feelings. In fact, the overlapping use of jealousy and envy has a long history.

The terms are used indiscriminately in such popular 'feel-good' books as Nancy Friday's Jealousy, where the expression 'jealousy' applies to a broad range of passions, from envy to lust and greed. While this kind of usage blurs the boundaries between categories that are intellectually valuable and psychologically justifiable, such confusion is understandable in that historical explorations of the term indicate that these boundaries have long posed problems. Margot Grzywacz's fascinating etymological survey of the word in Romance and Germanic languages[26] asserts, indeed, that the concept was one of those that proved to be the most difficult to express in language and was therefore among the last to find an unambiguous term. Classical Latin used invidia, without strictly differentiating between envy and jealousy. It was not until the postclassical era that Latin borrowed the late and poetic Greek word zelotypia and the associated adjective zelosus. It is from this adjective that are derived French jaloux, Provençal gelos, Italian geloso, Spanish celoso, and Portuguese cioso.[27]

Perhaps the overlapping use of jealousy and envy occurs because people can experience both at the same time. A person may envy the characteristics or possessions of someone who also happens to be a romantic rival.[28] In fact, one may even interpret romantic jealousy as a form of envy.[29] A jealous person may envy the affection that their partner gives to a rival – affection the jealous person feels entitled to themselves. People often use the word jealousy as a broad label that applies to both experiences of jealousy and experiences of envy.[30]

Although popular culture often uses jealousy and envy as synonyms, modern philosophers and psychologists have argued for conceptual distinctions between jealousy and envy. For example, philosopher John Rawls[31] distinguishes between jealousy and envy on the ground that jealousy involves the wish to keep what one has, and envy the wish to get what one does not have. Thus, a child is jealous of her parents' attention to a sibling, but envious of her friend's new bicycle. Psychologists Laura Guerrero and Peter Andersen have proposed the same distinction.[32] They claim the jealous person "perceives that he or she possesses a valued relationship, but is in danger of losing it or at least of having it altered in an undesirable manner," whereas the envious person "does not possess a valued commodity, but wishes to possess it." Gerrod Parrott draws attention to the distinct thoughts and feelings that occur in jealousy and envy.[33][34]

The common experience of jealousy for many people may involve:

  • Fear of loss
  • Suspicion of or anger about a perceived betrayal
  • Low self-esteem and sadness over perceived loss
  • Uncertainty and loneliness
  • Fear of losing an important person to another
  • Distrust

The experience of envy involves:

  • Feelings of inferiority
  • Longing
  • Resentment of circumstances
  • Ill will towards envied person often accompanied by guilt about these feelings
  • Motivation to improve
  • Desire to possess the attractive rival's qualities
  • Disapproval of feelings
  • Sadness towards other's accomplishments

Parrott acknowledges that people can experience envy and jealousy at the same time. Feelings of envy about a rival can even intensify the experience of jealousy.[35] Still, the differences between envy and jealousy in terms of thoughts and feelings justify their distinction in philosophy and science.

In psychology

[edit]

Jealousy involves an entire "emotional episode" including a complex narrative. This includes the circumstances that lead up to jealousy, jealousy itself as emotion, any attempt at self regulation, subsequent actions and events, and ultimately the resolution of the episode.  The narrative can originate from experienced facts, thoughts, perceptions, memories, but also imagination, guesses and assumptions. The more society and culture matter in the formation of these factors, the more jealousy can have a social and cultural origin. By contrast, jealousy can be a "cognitively impenetrable state", where education and rational belief matter very little.[36]

One possible explanation of the origin of jealousy in evolutionary psychology is that the emotion evolved in order to maximize the success of our genes: it is a biologically based emotion selected to foster the certainty about the paternity of one's own offspring. A jealous behavior, in women, is directed into avoiding sexual betrayal and a consequent waste of resources and effort in taking care of someone else's offspring.[37] There are, additionally, cultural or social explanations of the origin of jealousy. According to one, the narrative from which jealousy arises can be in great part made by the imagination. Imagination is strongly affected by a person's cultural milieu. The pattern of reasoning, the way one perceives situations, depends strongly on cultural context. It has elsewhere been suggested that jealousy is in fact a secondary emotion in reaction to one's needs not being met, be those needs for attachment, attention, reassurance or any other form of care that would be otherwise expected to arise from that primary romantic relationship.

While mainstream psychology considers sexual arousal through jealousy a paraphilia, some authors on sexuality have argued that jealousy in manageable dimensions can have a definite positive effect on sexual function and sexual satisfaction. Studies have also shown that jealousy sometimes heightens passion towards partners and increases the intensity of passionate sex.[38][39]

Jealousy in children and teenagers has been observed more often in those with low self-esteem and can evoke aggressive reactions. One such study suggested that developing intimate friends can be followed by emotional insecurity and loneliness in some children when those intimate friends interact with others. Jealousy is linked to aggression and low self-esteem.[40] Research by Sybil Hart, PhD, at Texas Tech University indicates that children are capable of feeling and displaying jealousy at as young as six months.[41] Infants showed signs of distress when their mothers focused their attention on a lifelike doll. This research could explain why children and infants show distress when a sibling is born, creating the foundation for sibling rivalry.[42]

In addition to traditional jealousy comes Obsessive Jealousy, which can be a form of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.[43] This jealousy is characterized by obsessional jealousy and thoughts of the partner.

In sociology

[edit]
Main article: Social aspects of jealousy

Anthropologists have claimed that jealousy varies across cultures. Cultural learning can influence the situations that trigger jealousy and the manner in which jealousy is expressed. Attitudes toward jealousy can also change within a culture over time. For example, attitudes toward jealousy changed substantially during the 1960s and 1970s in the United States. People in the United States adopted much more negative views about jealousy. As men and women became more equal it became less appropriate or acceptable to express jealousy.[citation needed]

A study was done in order to cross examine jealousy among four different cultures, Ireland, Thailand, India and the United States.[44] These cultures were chosen to demonstrate differences in expression across cultures. The study posits that male-dominant cultures are more likely to express and reveal jealousy.[44] The survey found that Thais are less likely to express jealousy than the other three cultures.[44] This is because the men in these cultures are rewarded in a way for showing jealousy due to the fact that some women interpret it as love.[44] This can also be seen when watching romantic comedies when males show they are jealous of a rival or emotionally jealous women perceive it as men caring more.[44]

Romantic jealousy

[edit]
Romantic jealousy can appear when we perceive attention between a romantic interest and a third person.

Romantic jealousy arises as a result of romantic interest.

It is defined as "a complex of thoughts, feelings, and actions that follow threats to self-esteem and/or threats to the existence or quality of the relationship when those threats are generated by the perception of a real or potential romantic attraction between one's partner and a (perhaps imaginary) rival."[45] Different from sexual jealousy, romantic jealousy is triggered by threats to self and relationship (rather than sexual interest in another person). Factors, such as feelings of inadequacy as a partner, sexual exclusivity, and having put relatively more effort into the relationship, are positively correlated to relationship jealousy in both genders.

Communicative responses

[edit]

As romantic jealousy is a complicated reaction that has multiple components, i.e., thoughts, feelings, and actions, one aspect of romantic jealousy that is under study is communicative responses. Communicative responses serve three critical functions in a romantic relationship, i.e., reducing uncertainty, maintaining or repairing relationship, and restoring self-esteem.[46] If done properly, communicative responses can lead to more satisfying relationships after experiencing romantic jealousy.[47][48]

There are two subsets of communicative responses: interactive responses and general behavior responses. Interactive responses is face-to-face and partner-directed while general behavior responses may not occur interactively.[46] Guerrero and colleagues further categorize multiple types of communicative responses of romantic jealousy. Interactive responses can be broken down to six types falling in different places on continua of threat and directness:

  • Avoidance/Denial (low threat and low directness). Example: becoming silent; pretending nothing is wrong.
  • Integrative Communication (low threat and high directness). Example: explaining feelings; calmly questioning partner.
  • Active Distancing (medium threat and medium directness). Example: decreasing affection.
  • Negative Affect Expression (medium threat and medium directness). Example: venting frustration; crying or sulking.
  • Distributive Communication (high threat and high directness). Example: acting rude; making hurtful or abrasive comments.
  • Violent Communication/Threats (high threat and high directness). Example: using physical force.

Guerrero and colleagues have also proposed five general behavior responses. The five sub-types differ in whether a response is 1) directed at partner or rival(s), 2) directed at discovery or repair, and 3) positively or negatively valenced:

  • Surveillance/ Restriction (rival-targeted, discovery-oriented, commonly negatively valenced). Example: observing rival; trying to restrict contact with partner.
  • Rival Contacts (rival-targeted, discovery-oriented/repair-oriented, commonly negatively valenced). Example: confronting rival.
  • Manipulation Attempts (partner-targeted, repair-oriented, negatively valenced). Example: tricking partner to test loyalty; trying to make partner feel guilty.
  • Compensatory Restoration (partner-targeted, repair-oriented, commonly positively valenced). Example: sending flowers to partner.
  • Violent Behavior (-, -, negatively valenced). Example: slamming doors.

While some of these communicative responses are destructive and aggressive, e.g., distributive communication and active distancing, some individuals respond to jealousy in a more constructive way.[49] Integrative communication, compensatory restoration, and negative affect expression have been shown to lead to positive relation outcomes.[50] One factor that affects the type of communicative responses elicited in an individual is emotions. Jealousy anger is associated with more aggressive communicative response while irritation tends to lead to more constructive communicative behaviors.

Researchers also believe that when jealousy is experienced it can be caused by differences in understanding the commitment level of the couple, rather than directly being caused by biology alone. The research identified that if a person valued long-term relationships more than being sexually exclusive, those individuals were more likely to demonstrate jealousy over emotional rather than physical infidelity.[51]

Through a study conducted in three Spanish-Speaking countries, it was determined that Facebook jealousy also exists. This Facebook jealousy ultimately leads to increased relationship jealousy and study participants also displayed decreased self esteem as a result of the Facebook jealousy.[52]

Sexual jealousy

[edit]
Main article: Sexual jealousy
Woman displaying jealousy while imagining her partner with another woman

Sexual jealousy may be triggered when a person's partner displays sexual interest in another person.[53] The feeling of jealousy may be just as powerful if one partner suspects the other is guilty of infidelity. Fearing that their partner will experience sexual jealousy the person who has been unfaithful may lie about their actions in order to protect their partner. Experts often believe that sexual jealousy is in fact a biological imperative. It may be part of a mechanism by which humans and other animals ensure access to the best reproductive partners.

It seems that male jealousy in heterosexual relationships may be influenced by their female partner's phase in her menstrual cycle. In the period around and shortly before ovulation, males are found to display more mate-retention tactics, which are linked to jealousy.[54] Furthermore, a male is more likely to employ mate-retention tactics if their partner shows more interest in other males, which is more likely to occur in the pre-ovulation phase.[55]

Contemporary views on gender-based differences

[edit]

According to Rebecca L. Ammon in The Osprey Journal of Ideas and Inquiry at UNF Digital Commons (2004), the Parental Investment Model based on parental investment theory posits that more women than men ratify sex differences in jealousy. In addition, more women over men consider emotional infidelity (fear of abandonment) as more distressing than sexual infidelity.[56] According to the attachment theory, sex and attachment style makes significant and unique interactive contributions to the distress experienced. Security within the relationship also heavily contributes to one's level of distress. These findings imply that psychological and cultural mechanisms regarding sex differences may play a larger role than expected. The attachment theory also claims to reveal how infants' attachment patterns are the basis for self-report measures of adult attachment. Although there are no sex differences in childhood attachment, individuals with dismissing behavior were more concerned with the sexual aspect of relationships. As a coping mechanism these individuals would report sexual infidelity as more harmful. Moreover, research shows that audit attachment styles strongly conclude with the type of infidelity that occurred. Thus psychological and cultural mechanisms are implied as unvarying differences in jealousy that play a role in sexual attachment.[57]

In 1906, The American Journal of Psychology had reported that "the weight of quotable (male) authority is to the effect that women are more susceptible to jealousy". This claim was accompanied in the journal by a quote from Confucius: "The five worst maladies that afflict the female mind are indocility, discontent, slander, jealousy and naive."[58]

Emotional jealousy was predicted to be nine times more responsive in females than in males. The emotional jealousy predicted in males also held turn to state that males experiencing emotional jealousy are more violent than women experiencing emotional jealousy.[59]

There are distinct emotional responses to gender differences in romantic relationships. For example, due to paternity uncertainty in males, jealousy increases in males over sexual infidelity rather than emotional. According to research more women are likely to be upset by signs of resource withdraw (i.e. another female) than by sexual infidelity. A large amount of data supports this notion. However, one must consider for jealousy the life stage or experience one encounters in reference to the diverse responses to infidelity available. Research states that a componential view of jealousy consist of specific set of emotions that serve the reproductive role.[citation needed] However, research shows that men would be angry and point the blame for sexual infidelity, but women would be more hurt by emotional infidelity. Despite this fact, anger surfaces when both parties involved are responsible for some type of uncontrollable behavior, sexual conduct is not exempt. Some behavior and actions are controllable such as sexual behavior. However hurt feelings are activated by relationship deviation. No evidence is known to be sexually dimorphic in both college and adult convenience samples.[clarification needed] The Jealousy Specific Innate Model (JSIM) proved to not be innate, but may be sensitive to situational factors. As a result, it may only activate at stages. For example, it was predicted that male jealousy decreases as females reproductive values decreases.[60]

A second possibility that the JSIM effect is not innate but is cultural. Differences have been highlighted in socio-economic status specific such as the divide between high school and collegiate individuals. Moreover, individuals of both genders were angrier and blamed their partners more for sexual infidelities but were more hurt by emotional infidelity. Jealousy is composed of lower-level emotional states (e.g., anger and hurt) which may be triggered by a variety of events, not by differences in individuals' life stage. Although research has recognized the importance of early childhood experiences for the development of competence in intimate relationships, early family environment is recently being examined as we age). Research on self-esteem and attachment theory suggest that individuals internalize early experiences within the family which subconsciously translates into their personal view of worth of themselves and the value of being close to other individuals, especially in an interpersonal relationship.[61]

In animals

[edit]

A study by researchers at the University of California, San Diego, replicated jealousy studies done on humans on canines. They reported, in a paper published in PLOS ONE in 2014, that a significant number of dogs exhibited jealous behaviors when their human companions paid attention to dog-like toys, compared to when their human companions paid attention to non-social objects.[62]

In addition, Jealousy has been speculated to be a potential factor in incidences of aggression or emotional tension in dogs.[63][64] Mellissa Starling, an animal behavior consultant of the University of Sydney, noted that "dogs are social animals and they obey a group hierarchy. Changes in the home, like the arrival of a baby, can prompt a family pet to behave differently to what one might expect."[65]

Applications

[edit]

In fiction, film, and art

[edit]
A painting by Miyagawa Isshō shows a young onnagata catching his older lover with a love letter from a rival, c. 1750.

Artistic depictions of jealousy occur in fiction, films, and other art forms such as painting and sculpture. Jealousy is a common theme in literature, art, theatre, and film. Often, it is presented as a demonstration of particularly deep feelings of love, rather than a destructive obsession.

A study done by Ferris, Smith, Greenberg, and Smith[66] looked into the way people saw dating and romantic relationships based on how many reality dating shows they watched.[67] People who spent a large amount of time watching these reality dating shows "endorsed" or supported the "dating attitudes" that would be shown on the show.[67] While the other people who do not spend time watching reality dating shows did not mirror the same ideas.[67] This means if someone watches a reality dating show that displays men and women reacting violently or aggressively towards their partner due to jealousy they can mirror that.[67] This is reflected in romantic movies as well.[67] Jessica R. Frampton conducted a study looking into romantic jealousy in movies. The study found that there were "230 instances of romantic jealousy were identified in the 51 top-grossing romantic comedies from 2002–2014"[67] Some of the films did not display romantic jealousy however, some featured many examples of romantic jealousy.[67] This was due to the fact that some of the top-grossing movies did not contain a rival or romantic competition.[67] While others such as Forgetting Sarah Marshall was said to contain "19 instances of romantic jealousy."[67] Out of the 230 instances 58% were reactive jealousy while 31% showed possessive jealousy.[67] The last 11% displayed anxious jealousy it was seen the least in all 230 cases.[67] Out of the 361 reactions to the jealousy found 53% were found to be "Destructive responses."[67] Only 19% of responses were constructive while 10% showed avoidant responses.[67] The last 18% were considered "rival focused responses" which lead to the finding that "there was a higher than expected number of rival-focused responses to possessive jealousy."[67]

In religion

[edit]
Main article: Jealousy in religion

Jealousy in religion examines how the scriptures and teachings of various religions deal with the topic of jealousy. Religions may be compared and contrasted on how they deal with two issues: concepts of divine jealousy, and rules about the provocation and expression of human jealousy.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Jealousy

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Jealousy is a negative encompassing , , and insecurity triggered by the perceived of a third party encroaching on a valued relationship or possession, most commonly in romantic contexts. Distinct from , which entails desiring what another holds without direct rivalry, jealousy inherently involves a triad dynamic of the self, a rival, and the object at stake, often motivating protective or retaliatory actions. From an evolutionary standpoint, jealousy functions as an adaptive psychological mechanism shaped by to preserve bonds, avert paternity uncertainty for males, and secure partner commitment for females, with revealing consistent sex differences in triggers—men exhibiting greater distress over sexual , women over emotional . These patterns, documented in large-scale surveys and experimental paradigms, underscore jealousy's role in facilitating mate retention tactics amid ancestral reproductive costs, though individual variation arises from genetic, environmental, and relational factors. While adaptive in moderation to signal relational investment and deter rivals, jealousy can be effectively managed through psychological strategies. In early romantic contexts, including non-exclusive dating where interactions with or curiosity about others is common, strong or possessive expressions of jealousy—such as distress over a partner's mentions of or inquiries about another person—may signal underlying insecurity and can appear unattractive or undermine developing trust. Individuals are encouraged to first reflect internally on personal triggers such as low self-esteem or fear of abandonment, prioritize self-confidence and self-care, and, if expressing the feeling, do so calmly using "I" statements focused on personal emotions without accusations or attempts at control. Additional strategies include open communication of feelings without accusations, building self-esteem through personal activities, hobbies, and self-care, challenging irrational negative thoughts by examining evidence of trust in the relationship, fostering independence by recognizing the health benefits of separate social lives and personal growth, and avoiding controlling behaviors such as checking a partner's messages or social media. These approaches help reduce insecurity, prevent escalation into pathological forms, and support relational health; professional therapy (individual or couples) is recommended if jealousy is intense or persistent. Pathological jealousy correlates with diminished self-control, heightened aggression, and relational dissolution, as evidenced by behavioral studies linking intense jealousy to impulsive actions and emotional dysregulation. Empirical research further highlights jealousy's prevalence across cultures and species, suggesting deep phylogenetic roots, yet its expression can exacerbate mental health issues like anxiety and depression when unchecked by cognitive appraisal.

Definitions and Conceptual Foundations

Etymology and Historical Usage

The English term "jealousy" entered the language around 1200 CE via Old French jalousie, denoting zeal, emulation, or fervent devotion, derived from Late Latin zelosus ("full of zeal") and ultimately from Ancient Greek zēlos ("ardor, emulation, or jealousy"). This root carried dual valences: positive emulation of virtue in others, as in Aristotle's Rhetoric where zēlos signifies pain at one's own lack of perceived goods possessed by superiors, spurring self-improvement, contrasted with phthonos (envy), a distress at undeserved advantages in equals or inferiors. By the 13th century in Middle English, "jelous" had evolved to imply suspicious vigilance or apprehension of rivalry, particularly in guardianship of possessions or relationships, reflecting a semantic shift from zealous ardor to possessive distrust. In classical Greek usage, concepts akin to jealousy appeared under phthonos or zēlos, often in socio-political contexts like , where overt expressions of begrudging were socially yet evident in oratory and as motivations for or litigation against perceived upstarts. further delineated phthonos in (c. 350 BCE) as irrational pain at another's unmerited success, distinguishing it from righteous nemesis ( at undeserved fortune), though lacking a precise triad-based romantic jealousy; instead, it emphasized horizontal among peers, influencing later philosophical views on emotions as socially disruptive. Roman adaptations via Latin zelus retained zealous connotations, as in Cicero's writings, but by , Christian texts repurposed it for divine exclusivity, evident in scriptural translations like the Vulgate's zelotes for God's possessive covenantal demands. Medieval European usage, shaped by feudal and chivalric norms, extended "jalousie" to connote watchful suspicion over a spouse's , as in 12th-century troubadour poetry and narratives, where it blended emulation of rivals with of cuckoldry, prefiguring dramatic portrayals. By the , English literature—such as Shakespeare's (1603)—crystallized jealousy as a destructive passion involving triadic , suspicion of , and self-torment, diverging from ancient emulation toward modern psychological , though retaining echoes of zealous intensity in religious contexts like Puritan sermons decrying worldly attachments. This evolution underscores a transition from communal or divine vigilance to individualized romantic , informed by cultural shifts in property, , and emotional expression.

Distinction from Envy

Jealousy involves a triadic structure, encompassing an individual, a valued possession or relationship, and a perceived rival threatening to usurp it, often manifesting as of loss, suspicion, and . In contrast, operates dyadically, focusing on toward another's superior qualities, achievements, or possessions, accompanied by feelings of inferiority and a desire to attain or diminish what the other holds. This distinction aligns with empirical findings from self-report studies, where participants differentiated by emotions of longing and without direct , while jealousy evoked and toward the interloper. Psychological research underscores that jealousy typically arises in interpersonal contexts like romantic partnerships, where it functions to safeguard exclusive bonds against or , whereas emerges from social comparisons across domains such as status, , or abilities, potentially motivating self-improvement or benign rather than protection. can escalate to malicious forms, such as upon the envied person's misfortune, but lacks the possessive vigilance central to jealousy; for instance, one might a colleague's promotion without fearing personal loss, yet feel jealous if a partner's shifts to that colleague. These differences persist despite colloquial overuse, where "jealous" is misapplied to envious scenarios, obscuring the emotions' adaptive roles in human motivation. From an evolutionary standpoint, jealousy evolved as a mate-guarding mechanism to ensure paternity certainty and resource investment in offspring, particularly sensitive to sexual infidelity in males and emotional infidelity in females, as evidenced by cross-cultural surveys and physiological responses like elevated heart rate during rival scenarios. Envy, however, drives resource acquisition and status-seeking to enhance reproductive fitness, with studies showing it correlates with upward social comparisons that spur effort or, in pathological cases, sabotage, but without the triadic threat inherent to jealousy. Overlap occurs when envy fuels jealous rivalry, yet the core causal triggers—loss aversion versus deprivation—remain distinct, supported by neuroimaging data indicating differential activation in brain regions like the anterior cingulate for envy-related pain and insula for jealous threat detection.

Core Types and Manifestations

Psychologists classify into three primary types—reactive, anxious, and —each characterized by distinct cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components, as identified in empirical studies using multidimensional scales. Reactive emerges as an immediate response to a real or perceived , such as a partner's flirtation or , triggering intense emotional including , hurt, and distress; research on romantic couples demonstrates that this type correlates with higher relationship commitment when moderated by , though it can escalate to conflict if unchecked. Anxious , conversely, involves chronic cognitive rumination and apprehension about hypothetical rivals, often without concrete evidence, and is linked to insecure attachment styles; twin studies of over 7,700 Finnish participants reveal genetic of around 28% for such proneness, alongside environmental influences like low . Possessive manifests behaviorally through controlling actions, such as monitoring a partner's communications or restricting social interactions, aimed at preempting loss; surveys of and married individuals indicate this type predicts lower relationship satisfaction and higher rates of . These types often co-occur but differ in their adaptive potential: reactive forms may function as short-term signals of relational investment, while anxious and possessive variants frequently indicate underlying vulnerabilities like dependency, with longitudinal data from couples showing the latter associated with dissolution risks over 2-5 years. Empirical validation comes from factor-analytic studies employing tools like the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale, which separate these dimensions through self-report items validated across cultures, revealing consistent patterns in heterosexual and same-sex relationships. Manifestations of jealousy span emotional, cognitive, and somatic domains, with physiological studies documenting elevated , spikes, and activation during induced jealousy scenarios via functional MRI. Emotionally, it evokes a blend of of abandonment and toward the rival, as seen in prototype analyses where participants rate core scenarios involving triadic threats. Cognitively, it prompts obsessive comparisons and threat appraisals, with diary studies of 200+ couples tracking daily jealousy episodes linked to reduced trust and increased vigilance behaviors like partner tracking apps. Behaviorally, expressions range from constructive communication to destructive acts, including verbal accusations or ; archival data from reports attribute 20-30% of incidents to jealousy triggers, underscoring its potential for escalation. In broader contexts beyond romance, such as or dynamics, jealousy mirrors these patterns but centers on resource competition rather than exclusivity; observational studies of children aged 2-5 years show reactive protests during diversion, evolving into anxious withdrawal by , with estimates paralleling adult romantic forms. Overall, these manifestations reflect jealousy as a multifaceted response calibrated to perceived relational costs, though individual differences in expression are influenced by , with men showing more behavioral intensity in mate-guarding paradigms.

Evolutionary and Biological Perspectives

Adaptive Functions and Mate Protection

Jealousy functions adaptively by alerting individuals to potential threats from intrasexual rivals, thereby motivating behaviors that protect exclusive access to mates and preserve reproductive investments. In evolutionary terms, this emotion addresses recurrent ancestral problems such as partner defection and resource diversion, prompting vigilance, resource allocation to the relationship, and derogation of competitors to maintain pair-bonds critical for offspring viability. Experimental evidence demonstrates that jealousy elicits compensatory actions, such as increased partner monitoring or affection displays, in response to infidelity cues, supporting its role in relationship retention rather than mere pathology. A core adaptive mechanism of jealousy lies in mate guarding, which encompasses tactics like physical proximity, verbal vigilance, and concealment of attractive features to deter rivals. These behaviors mitigate the fitness costs of , particularly for males facing paternity uncertainty due to internal , where cuckoldry could lead to misdirected parental effort. Empirical studies confirm that men's jealousy intensifies with perceived loss of paternity opportunities, as manipulated scenarios reducing exclusivity heighten emotional responses compared to scenarios preserving genetic certainty. For females, jealousy similarly guards against emotional that signals resource withdrawal, ensuring continued provisioning for dependent young. Cross-cultural patterns reinforce these functions: societies with elevated paternal investment show stronger jealous reactions to infidelity threats, correlating with lower rates and higher mate retention efficacy. Jealousy thus operates as a proximate mechanism solving ultimate problems of protection, with individual variations in intensity predicted by factors like partner attractiveness or rival status—men paired with highly fertile mates exhibit heightened guarding, while women with resource-secure partners display amplified vigilance. This framework, grounded in comparative and human behavioral data, posits jealousy as a universal shaped by asymmetric reproductive costs, though its expression modulates with cultural norms and personal history.

Sex Differences: Empirical Evidence on Sexual vs. Emotional Infidelity

Empirical research in has consistently identified sex differences in responses to partner , with men exhibiting greater distress to sexual and women to emotional . In a seminal 1992 study by and colleagues, participants rated the upsetting nature of hypothetical scenarios involving a partner's sexual (e.g., "having with another person") versus emotional (e.g., "forming a deep emotional attachment to another person"). Men reported significantly higher distress to sexual (effect size d = 1.25 in forced-choice ), while women reported higher distress to emotional (d = -0.96), a pattern replicated across three studies using both self-report ratings and physiological measures like , where men showed elevated responses to sexual scenarios. Subsequent replications have affirmed the robustness of these findings. A 2018 study by Buss et al. analyzed data from over 1,000 participants using forced-choice and continuous rating methods, confirming that men were more likely to select as more distressing (63% of men vs. 27% of women), with the sex difference holding across diverse samples and methods, including implicit measures like response latency. evidence from 37 societies further supports this, as men universally prioritized threats, attributed to paternity risks, while women's responses aligned with emotional and resource loss concerns. Meta-analyses provide a synthesized view, revealing a moderate difference in forced-choice paradigms (d ≈ 0.55-0.68) but smaller effects in continuous self-reports of distress, where both sexes report greater overall hurt from emotional , though men emphasize sexual aspects more (d = 0.24 for focus on sexual infidelity). A 2012 meta-analysis by Sagarin et al., encompassing 47 studies and over 12,000 participants, found sexual infidelity elicited more and in both sexes compared to emotional infidelity, but the sex-specific pattern persisted, particularly in men's heightened physiological and behavioral responses to sexual cues. These differences emerge reliably in adulthood, with a 2021 longitudinal study showing no sex difference in early but robust divergence by late teens, suggesting maturation tied to reproductive strategies. Recent investigations, including a 2023 study of university students, replicate the pattern: 60% of men versus 17% of women selected sexual as more distressing in forced-choice, with relationship status modulating intensity but not reversing the sex effect. While some variability arises from measurement (e.g., explicit vs. implicit), the empirical consistency across paradigms, cultures, and time underscores adaptive origins, with men's responses guarding against cuckoldry costs and women's against relational abandonment, though critics note potential sociocultural influences on effect sizes without disproving the core asymmetry.

Physiological and Neuroscientific Underpinnings

Jealousy elicits measurable physiological responses indicative of autonomic arousal and stress activation. Studies have demonstrated increases in , , and (skin conductance) when individuals imagine scenarios of romantic , with these responses being more pronounced for sexual infidelity in men and emotional infidelity in women. These patterns align with evolutionary predictions, as the psychophysiological reactivity supports rapid threat detection and response in mate-guarding contexts. Hormonally, jealousy is associated with elevations in testosterone and cortisol levels, which facilitate aggressive or defensive behaviors. In human males contemplating jealousy-inducing situations, testosterone concentrations rise, potentially priming dominance assertions or mate retention tactics. Similarly, surges accompany jealous states, reflecting hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation akin to responses. However, evidence for direct links between ovarian hormones like progesterone or and anxious jealousy in women remains weak, with no significant within-subject correlations observed across menstrual cycles. Neuroimaging research reveals jealousy activates regions involved in threat processing, emotion regulation, and . Functional MRI (fMRI) scans show heightened activity in the , particularly the right amygdala during imagery of sexual , underscoring its role in fear and appraisal. The insula and exhibit activation tied to emotional , processing distress from perceived relational loss. Sex differences are evident: men display greater engagement of subcortical structures like the and for sexual threats, while women recruit prefrontal areas more for emotional ones, suggesting modular neural processing shaped by reproductive costs. Frontal regions, including the (vmPFC), contribute to evaluative aspects, integrating jealousy with on pair-bond maintenance. in the further modulate jealousy intensity, with variations linked to endophenotypes of . These findings, derived from controlled provocation paradigms, highlight jealousy's embeddedness in conserved circuits for social vigilance, though individual influences baseline reactivity.

Psychological Dimensions

Theories in Individual and Clinical Psychology

In , jealousy is interpreted as a manifestation of unresolved Oedipal conflicts, where individuals project early rivalries with parental figures onto adult relationships, fearing loss of affection to a perceived rival. described pathological jealousy as a projection of the subject's own unconscious onto the partner, as elaborated in his 1911 analysis of the Schreber case and further in his 1922 paper on neurotic mechanisms. However, these formulations lack empirical validation and have been critiqued for overemphasizing unconscious drives without causal evidence from controlled studies. Later psychoanalysts like extended this to infantile envy and jealousy, positing innate destructive impulses toward the mother's as precursors to adult relational threats, though such views remain speculative and untestable via modern experimental methods. Attachment theory provides a more empirically grounded framework, linking jealousy to individual differences in early bonding patterns. Individuals with anxious attachment styles exhibit heightened jealousy due to for abandonment cues, interpreting partner interactions as threats to relational ; a 2023 study of young adults found that attachment anxiety positively correlated with jealousy intensity, mediated by elevated and responses. In contrast, securely attached persons report lower jealousy, experiencing threats as manageable rather than existential, while avoidant styles may suppress overt jealousy but harbor underlying resentment. This theory's strength lies in its integration of longitudinal data, such as twin studies showing in attachment-related jealousy proneness, independent of differences. Potent root causes of extreme jealousy and intense rejection feelings in romantic relationships include anxious or insecure attachment driving validation needs; high rejection sensitivity from past experiences amplifying reactions to perceived threats; low self-esteem tying self-worth to partner approval; past trauma like infidelity or neglect heightening vigilance; and unresolved dynamics such as mismatched libidos or poor communication exacerbating individual vulnerabilities. Cognitive-appraisal models conceptualize jealousy as a stress response triggered by perceived relational threats, following Richard Lazarus's framework where primary appraisals evaluate the rival's potential to erode exclusivity or intimacy. Gregory White and Paul Mullen's 1989 cognitive theory delineates jealousy as arising from attributions of partner controllability and rival desirability, with ruminative thoughts amplifying emotional distress; empirical tests confirm that cognitive jealousy—intrusive suspicions of —predicts relational dissatisfaction more than behavioral monitoring alone. In clinical contexts, this informs interventions like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which targets maladaptive appraisals to reduce jealousy; for instance, reframing ambiguous partner behaviors as non-threatening has shown efficacy in reducing symptoms in outpatient samples. Individual differences in jealousy are robustly predicted by personality traits, with higher and lower associated with intensified responses across self-report and behavioral measures. A 2022 path analysis of 847 adults revealed as the strongest predictor of romantic jealousy, channeling through heightened threat perception, while inversely moderated it by fostering . Clinically, when jealousy escalates to obsessional forms—characterized by persistent delusions of —it correlates with functional impairment, verbal aggression, and comorbidity with disorders like OCD or , as evidenced by community surveys using the Obsessional Jealousy Severity Scale. Treatment emphasizes , distinguishing adaptive vigilance from , with evidence favoring integrated approaches combining attachment-informed training and over purely psychodynamic exploration.

Romantic and Sexual Jealousy Dynamics

Romantic jealousy encompasses emotional responses to perceived threats to an intimate bond, whereas arises specifically from fears of a partner's sexual involvement with a rival, though the two often intertwine in monogamous relationships as multifaceted reactions involving cognitive appraisals, affective distress, and behavioral strategies. These dynamics typically unfold through heightened vigilance, such as monitoring a partner's interactions, or confrontational behaviors aimed at reasserting exclusivity, with emotional components including , , and . In empirical assessments, cognitive jealousy—manifesting as ruminative thoughts about rivals—correlates strongly with attachment anxiety (r = 0.50, p < 0.001), while behavioral jealousy, such as possessive actions, links to anxiety (r = 0.41, p < 0.001) but shows weaker ties to avoidance. Individual differences shape these dynamics profoundly; for instance, individuals with ambivalent attachment exhibit elevated cognitive (M = 3.24) and behavioral jealousy (M = 2.77) compared to those with (M = 2.07 and 2.11, respectively), fostering cycles of mistrust and intensified relational scrutiny. Women tend to experience greater emotional and cognitive jealousy, emphasizing threats to relational investment, while men report heightened tied to exclusivity concerns, influencing response patterns like resource guarding or rival . A common manifestation of romantic and sexual jealousy involves perceived threats from a spouse's or partner's workplace colleagues, often of the opposite sex, due to frequent professional interactions that may raise concerns about emotional or sexual infidelity. This form of jealousy frequently stems from psychological factors such as insecurity, low self-esteem, fear of abandonment, possessiveness, or anxious attachment styles, which can amplify cognitive and behavioral responses like monitoring a partner's communications or activities. Evolutionarily, it functions as an adaptive mechanism to protect valued mating bonds, with men typically exhibiting greater sensitivity to cues of sexual threat. While mild jealousy is a normal response that can motivate relationship maintenance, excessive forms can become pathological, leading to maladaptive controlling behaviors such as excessive monitoring or attempts to isolate the partner from colleagues or other perceived rivals. Relationship-specific factors, including duration and satisfaction levels, further modulate intensity, with shorter or less secure bonds amplifying reactive responses that may temporarily reinforce commitment but risk escalation to controlling tactics. Overall, these jealousy dynamics exert a small negative influence on relationship quality (r = -0.07), with anxious forms showing a moderate (r = -0.33, p < 0.05) through eroded trust and satisfaction, though reactive jealousy displays a nonsignificant positive trend (r = 0.15) by prompting communicative resolutions in some cases. In extreme manifestations, unchecked sexual or romantic jealousy contributes to , accounting for 17% of cases in surveyed Philippine populations and 45% of female homicides by partners in as of 2017 data. Such outcomes underscore the adaptive intent of jealousy—to safeguard pair bonds—but highlight its potential for relational dissolution when cognitive distortions or insecure attachments dominate, independent of or relationship type moderators like .

Pathological Forms: Morbid and Delusional Jealousy

Morbid jealousy, also termed , refers to a persistent preoccupation with unfounded suspicions of a partner's infidelity, accompanied by intense emotional distress and behaviors that impair functioning or pose risks to self or others. This condition manifests as irrational thoughts, compulsive checking, accusations, or , often unresponsive to reassurance or evidence. Unlike adaptive jealousy, which may signal relational threats, morbid forms lack proportional basis and escalate to dysfunction, with associations to in up to 20-30% of cases involving partner . Morbid jealousy encompasses two primary subtypes: obsessive and delusional. Obsessive morbid jealousy involves intrusive doubts and rituals resembling obsessive-compulsive disorder, where individuals recognize the irrationality but cannot suppress the thoughts, leading to anxiety-driven behaviors like repeated interrogations. In contrast, delusional jealousy, known as Othello syndrome, features fixed, false beliefs of spousal infidelity held with absolute conviction, constituting a psychotic delusion without into its implausibility. This subtype derives its name from Shakespeare's , wherein the protagonist's unfounded conviction drives tragedy, mirroring real-world presentations of and . Etiologically, morbid jealousy arises from interacting factors including psychiatric disorders, substance use, and neurological insults. It frequently co-occurs with , where chronic intoxication exacerbates , as seen in cases of alcohol-induced psychotic disorder. Other triggers include mood disorders like bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia-spectrum illnesses, and organic conditions such as , , or right-hemisphere brain lesions, which disrupt executive function and emotional regulation. Epidemiological data indicate delusional jealousy prevalence of approximately 1.1% among psychiatric inpatients, rising to 7% in organic psychoses, with higher rates in males (up to 68%) and married individuals (86%). Community prevalence remains undocumented due to underreporting and stigma. Treatment strategies differentiate by subtype and underlying cause. For obsessive forms, cognitive-behavioral therapy targeting cognitive distortions and exposure-response prevention yields efficacy, often combined with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Delusional variants necessitate antipsychotics like risperidone or olanzapine to address the psychotic core, alongside addressing comorbidities such as alcohol withdrawal or neurological rehabilitation; however, poor insight complicates adherence, with relapse risks upon stressor recurrence. Prognosis varies, with better outcomes in non-organic cases responsive to pharmacotherapy, but persistent forms linked to neurodegeneration portend chronicity and elevated suicide or homicide risks.

Coping Strategies for Jealousy in Romantic Relationships

In the early stages of dating or in non-exclusive relationships, jealousy may arise when a prospective partner mentions or inquires about interactions with others. Strongly expressing jealousy or upset in such contexts can signal insecurity, appear unattractive, and potentially damage emerging connections. Jealousy is a normal emotion but should be managed internally first through self-reflection on underlying triggers, such as low self-esteem or fear of abandonment. If expressing feelings, it should be done calmly using "I" statements without accusations or attempts to control (e.g., "I feel uneasy when you mention another person..."). In non-exclusive dating, interactions with or curiosity about multiple individuals is common; focusing on building self-confidence, engaging in self-care, and avoiding over-investment emotionally or possessive behaviors (such as monitoring) is recommended. Unhealthy possessiveness can undermine trust and may indicate deeper issues. Non-pathological jealousy in romantic relationships, such as insecurity arising when a partner attends social gatherings with opposite-sex individuals (e.g., drinking parties or mixed-group events), can be effectively managed through evidence-based psychological strategies. These approaches, informed by cognitive-behavioral principles and relationship counseling, aim to reduce distress, challenge maladaptive thoughts, and promote trust and individual well-being. Open communication is a foundational step. Individuals should express anxious feelings honestly and calmly to their partner without accusations, using "I" statements to convey emotions (e.g., "I feel anxious when you attend drinking parties with female friends"). In contemporary contexts, jealousy is often triggered by a partner's social media behavior, such as following an ex. Experts recommend approaching such conversations calmly and privately when both partners are relaxed. Use "I" statements to express feelings without assigning blame (e.g., "I feel insecure when I see you following your ex on social media, and I'd like to talk about it."). Explain the reasons behind these feelings, such as triggered jealousy or insecurity, then actively listen to the partner's perspective without interruption. Collaborative questions, such as "What does following them mean to you?" or "How can we make each other feel more secure?", facilitate mutual understanding. The emphasis should be on building trust through transparency and reassurance rather than seeking to control the partner's actions. If appropriate, discuss mutual boundaries regarding social media interactions with exes. This collaborative approach can strengthen the relationship and foster greater security. Seeking understanding from the partner and encouraging empathy through role reversal—asking the partner to imagine how they would feel in the same situation—can deepen mutual insight. Establishing mutual agreements, such as maintaining contact during the event or providing a brief update afterward, can offer reassurance while respecting autonomy. Consistent open discussions about the frequency, context, and details of such social events further strengthen trust and prevent misunderstandings. This facilitates reassurance and mutual understanding. Building self-esteem and independence is essential. Engaging in personal hobbies, self-care activities, and independent social interactions strengthens confidence separate from the relationship, reducing reliance on partner presence for validation. When anxiety arises during a partner's absence, distracting oneself by spending time with friends or pursuing enjoyable activities can help manage distress. Recognizing that separate social lives are healthy allows time apart to be used for personal growth. Irrational negative thoughts, such as unfounded suspicions of infidelity, should be identified and challenged. This involves questioning their basis and recalling concrete evidence of trust and positive relationship experiences to counter cognitive distortions. Controlling behaviors must be avoided, including checking a partner's social media, messages, or location, as such actions typically heighten anxiety and undermine trust. Any agreements for reassurance should remain consensual and non-intrusive to preserve relationship health. When jealousy is intense, persistent, or impairs functioning and relationship quality, professional intervention is recommended. Individual cognitive-behavioral therapy or couples therapy can provide targeted tools to address underlying patterns, serving as both treatment for severe cases and prevention for milder ones. These strategies generally reduce insecurity and contribute to healthier, more resilient relationships.

Sociological and Cultural Contexts

Social Functions and Relationship Maintenance

Jealousy serves as a mechanism for safeguarding romantic pair bonds by prompting vigilance against potential rivals and motivating behaviors that reinforce partner commitment. In evolutionary terms, it functions adaptively to minimize the costs of , such as loss of paternal investment or , thereby promoting relationship stability. Empirical studies indicate that jealousy triggers mate retention strategies, including resource provisioning, emotional expressions of , and derogation of competitors, which correlate with perceived relationship quality. Research on married couples demonstrates that self-reported jealousy levels predict the frequency of both low-cost (e.g., vigilance, public signals of possession) and high-cost (e.g., coercion, violence) retention tactics, with moderate jealousy associated with constructive maintenance efforts. A study of 293 Peruvian young adults found positive associations between jealousy and relationship maintenance behaviors, such as positivity and openness, alongside satisfaction, suggesting jealousy reinforces relational investment when not pathological. Conversely, while extreme jealousy can erode trust, baseline jealousy levels appear to sustain bonds by deterring defection, as evidenced by higher marital happiness scores linked to stronger responses to jealousy-eliciting scenarios in longitudinal assessments. In , jealousy facilitates reciprocity and equity in relationships by signaling intolerance for unequal emotional or sexual investments, thus discouraging free-riding on a partner's . data from mate retention inventories, validated in diverse samples including Brazilian couples, confirm that jealousy mediates the adoption of vigilance tactics, which predict lower rates over time. These functions underscore jealousy's role in upholding alliances essential for long-term pair-bonding, though individual differences in attachment modulate its expression toward adaptive versus disruptive outcomes.

Cultural Variations and Gender Norms

Cross-cultural research indicates that jealousy over partner is a near-universal response, with both men and women exhibiting negative reactions, though the intensity and focus vary by societal factors such as paternal investment levels and prevalence. In a 2019 study of the Tsimane forager-horticulturalists in compared to Americans, participants across both groups rated scenarios negatively, but Tsimane men showed less distress over a partner's sexual relative to emotional involvement, attributed to lower emphasis on paternity certainty in high-fertility, resource-scarce environments. Similarly, an analysis of 18 small-scale societies found that higher paternal provisioning and lower reported correlated with stronger jealous responses overall, suggesting ecological pressures shape jealousy as a mechanism for mate guarding. Gender norms interact with these variations, often amplifying sex-specific patterns rooted in reproductive asymmetries, though cultural context modulates expression. Men typically report greater jealousy toward sexual , while women toward emotional , a pattern replicated in over 30 countries, including conservative societies like and liberal ones like the , with the direction consistent despite magnitude differences tied to indices. In cultures with rigid gender roles, such as those endorsing in , male jealousy enforces norms of female sexual exclusivity to ensure paternity, while tolerating male , leading to higher rates of possessive behaviors and violence linked to perceived breaches. Comparisons across individualistic (e.g., , ) and collectivistic (e.g., , ) societies reveal differences in jealousy expression: Western participants emphasized internal emotional distress, whereas Asian respondents focused on relational harmony and social repercussions, influenced by norms prioritizing group cohesion over individual autonomy. predicts emotional jealousy more strongly than , but cultural norms better explain variations in sexual jealousy intensity, as seen in surveys where collectivist ideals heighten women's vigilance over emotional bonds to secure long-term . These patterns underscore how norms, shaped by historical paternity risks and resource allocation, adapt jealousy without erasing underlying sex differences.

Contemporary Debates on Jealousy in Non-Traditional Relationships

In consensual non-monogamy (CNM), including and open relationships, proponents argue that jealousy can be reframed and mitigated through practices like compersion—deriving pleasure from a partner's other attachments—and , potentially leading to lower overall jealousy intensity compared to monogamous structures. A 2022 study found that individuals in CNM reported lower jealousy levels overall, attributing this to deliberate emotional regulation strategies, though sex differences persisted with men showing stronger responses to sexual even in non-monogamous contexts. However, these findings rely on self-selected samples of CNM participants, who may represent those already adept at jealousy management, raising questions about generalizability to broader populations attempting non-traditional arrangements. Critics, drawing from , contend that jealousy serves as an adaptive mechanism for mate retention and paternity certainty, particularly intensified in males due to historical risks of cuckoldry, making its suppression in CNM biologically taxing and often unsustainable long-term. Empirical comparisons indicate jealousy experiences are qualitatively similar across monogamous and CNM women, but CNM requires ongoing that can strain relationships, with some qualitative accounts highlighting persistent insecurity despite ideological commitments. A 2024 analysis noted that while CNM individuals exhibit superior skills potentially buffering jealousy-induced disputes, baseline jealousy arousal remains comparable, suggesting non-monogamy does not eliminate the emotion but shifts its expression. Debates also center on psychological mediators like mindfulness and distress tolerance, which a 2024 study linked to reduced jealousy in polyamorous individuals via enhanced emotion regulation, yet these tools demand high self-awareness not universally present, and longitudinal data on relationship stability in CNM remains limited, with prevalence estimates at 3-7% of adults indicating rarity and potential self-selection for resilient personalities. Evolutionary critiques further argue that promoting CNM overlooks causal realities of human pair-bonding, where jealousy enforces monogamous norms evolutionarily favored for child-rearing, potentially leading to higher dissolution rates unmeasured in cross-sectional surveys biased toward successful cases. Overall, while some evidence supports jealousy as navigable in non-traditional relationships through practiced techniques, foundational biological imperatives suggest it poses inherent challenges, warranting caution in extrapolating from ideologically aligned samples.

Jealousy in Non-Human Animals

Behavioral Observations in and Dogs

In pair-bonded titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus), males display jealousy-like behaviors when observing their mate in close proximity to a potential rival male, including increased visual attention to the interaction, approach behaviors toward the mate or rival, and elevated levels indicative of stress. (fMRI) studies reveal heightened activity in brain regions associated with vigilance and arousal, such as the superior temporal sulcus and anterior cingulate cortex, during these scenarios, suggesting neural parallels to jealousy processing. These observations occur in controlled settings where monkeys view video stimuli of their partner with a stranger, contrasting with baseline interactions lacking rivals, and align with field reports of territorial defense against intruders threatening pair bonds. In chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), jealousy manifests in aggressive responses to social intruders, particularly when they approach familiar group members or resources, with individuals exhibiting tantrums, charging displays, or piloerection more frequently in the presence of rivals than in neutral conditions. Experimental paradigms introducing unfamiliar conspecifics elicit these behaviors, which intensify if the intruder directs toward valued social partners, supporting interpretations of rivalry-driven emotional responses rather than mere territoriality. Such patterns echo promiscuous systems where over mates or alliances triggers interference, though less tied to exclusive pair bonds than in titi monkeys. Domestic dogs ( familiaris) demonstrate jealousy-like behaviors in owner-directed interactions, exhibiting significantly higher rates of actions such as pushing or snapping at a perceived rival (e.g., a realistic dog-shaped stuffed animal receiving owner attention) compared to nonsocial stimuli like a toy or . In a 2014 study involving 36 dogs observed in home environments, subjects spent more time attempting to insert themselves between owner and rival (mean 4.37 interventions vs. 1.62 for nonsocial objects) and vocalizing attention-seeking cries, behaviors absent or reduced in control conditions without social threats. Brain imaging corroborates this, with fMRI scans showing activation in dogs viewing owners interacting with artificial dogs, habituating less when the interaction involves rewards to rivals, implying sensitivity to inequity in social bonds. These responses occur even without direct visual access to the rival in some protocols, suggesting cognitive representation of threats based on auditory or contextual cues. Critics argue such behaviors may reflect generalized attention-seeking or uncertainty rather than emotion-specific jealousy, as dogs respond similarly to ambiguous owner signals, but experimental controls isolating social vs. nonsocial triggers support a jealousy analogue tied to attachment.

Evolutionary Comparisons and Limitations

Jealousy-like behaviors in non-human animals, particularly primates, offer comparative insights into the evolutionary roots of human jealousy, often framed as adaptations for mate-guarding and resource protection to enhance reproductive success. In monogamous species such as titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus), male subjects exposed to scenarios where their pair-bonded female interacted with an unfamiliar male displayed increased activity in brain regions like the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens—areas linked to pair-bonding, territoriality, and reward processing in humans—alongside elevated testosterone levels, suggesting a neurobiological basis homologous to human sexual jealousy. Similarly, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) exhibit aggressive interventions, such as charging or vocalizing, when a bonded female consort engages with a potential rival male intruder, behaviors that align with evolutionary theories positing jealousy as a mechanism to deter cuckoldry and secure paternity in promiscuous mating systems. These observations support the hypothesis that jealousy emerged in primate lineages to mitigate paternity uncertainty, a selective pressure intensified by internal gestation and paternal investment, paralleling human patterns where sexual jealousy more strongly motivates mate retention strategies than emotional infidelity. Cross-species parallels extend to non-primates, such as dogs, where owner-directed behaviors like pushing between the owner and a social or snapping increase significantly in response to perceived rival , mirroring attachment-based jealousy but rooted in domesticated bonding rather than wild reproductive competition. Evolutionary models propose that such traits predate human-specific cognitive elaborations, with mate-guarding observed across mammals (e.g., in male birds during extra-pair copulations), indicating jealousy as a graded trait along the phylogenetic continuum rather than a human unique. However, these comparisons are constrained by definitional ambiguities; animal "jealousy" often conflates observable or proximity-seeking with the triad of appraisal (perceived threat to valued relationship), (distress), and response (retaliation), lacking evidence for the self-reflective social comparison central to variants. Key limitations in evolutionary comparisons arise from methodological challenges and interpretive biases. Behavioral assays in animals rely on proxies like spikes or proximity metrics, which may reflect generalized (e.g., or territoriality) rather than jealousy per se, as distinguishing requires inferring unobservable mental states without verbal report or theory-of-mind proxies absent in most . Anthropomorphic projections exacerbate this, with studies on dogs or vulnerable to experimenter expectations, as evidenced by debates over whether canine responses indicate true awareness or mere attachment disruption. Moreover, jealousy incorporates advanced —such as anticipating long-term relational costs or cultural norms—unsupported in , where behaviors align more with instinctive modules than flexible, context-dependent emotions; for instance, studies often overlook differences or female jealousy due to sample biases. Empirical gaps persist, with most data from captive settings limiting , and phylogenetic breadth skewed toward model organisms like , hindering robust inferences about jealousy’s deep evolutionary history. These constraints underscore that while data illuminate adaptive functions, they do not equate to emotional equivalence, emphasizing jealousy’s augmentation by symbolic thought and .

Representations and Implications

In Religion, Philosophy, and Historical Thought

In , jealousy is often distinguished between divine and human forms. The portrays as jealous, as in Exodus 34:14, which states, "for you shall worship no other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God," emphasizing zealous protection of covenantal exclusivity rather than envious desire for others' possessions. This divine jealousy motivates warnings against , such as in Exodus 20:5, where declares visiting iniquity on those who hate him, underscoring a possessive commitment to his people's . In , human jealousy veers toward sin when it manifests as or covetousness, condemned in Galatians 5:19-21 as a work of the flesh alongside , yet "godly jealousy" is affirmed, as in 2 Corinthians 11:2 where Paul expresses zeal akin to betrothing believers to Christ. Islamic theology similarly denounces hasad (destructive envy or jealousy) as a soul-corroding vice, originating with Iblis's refusal to bow to out of jealousy ( 7:11-12), and warns against it eroding faith, as in An-Nisa 4:54 critiquing toward prophetic favor. However, protective jealousy (), guarding and chastity, is valorized as a , particularly for men over women. Ancient Greek philosophy treated jealousy (phthonos or zelos) ambivalently, often as a rivalrous emotion blending pain at others' undeserved success with motivation for emulation. , in the Nicomachean Ethics (Book II), lists jealousy among passions like anger and fear, but in the distinguishes noble zelos—a reasonable spur to self-improvement—from base phthonos, which pains the envious without constructive aim, belonging to the inferior soul. , in dialogues like the Phaedrus and , associates jealousy with flawed and , excluding it from the divine or virtuous nature, as true goods evoke no begrudging; he links phthonos to irrational conflict, contrasting it with measured or emulation. In broader historical thought of , phthonos was socially deprecated as irrational and self-defeating, fueling democratic critiques of elite success and invoking () against hubristic displays, yet it permeated and as a check on excess. Later philosophers reframed jealousy through psychological realism. Nietzsche viewed —closely akin to jealousy—as a primal driver of , birthing slave from the weak's of the strong's excellence, yet dismissed overt jealousy as a vulgar soul's pudenda, urging its transcendence for self-overcoming. In Roman thought, extending Greek precedents, jealousy appeared in political and Stoic as a disrupting , with echoing Aristotelian distinctions in decrying envious factions while tolerating zealous in oratory. These perspectives highlight jealousy's dual : a potential catalyst for through , or a corrosive force when unchecked by reason or divine orientation.

Depictions in Literature, Art, and Media

Jealousy features prominently in literature as a catalyst for conflict and tragedy. In William Shakespeare's (performed circa 1603), the titular character's unfounded suspicions of his wife Desdemona's infidelity, fueled by Iago's deceit, escalate into murderous rage, illustrating jealousy as an irrational force overriding reason and evidence. Similarly, in Shakespeare's (1611), King Leontes' baseless jealousy toward his wife Hermione prompts tyrannical accusations and exile, underscoring its capacity to fracture familial bonds without factual basis. Other works, such as Graham Greene's (1951), explore romantic jealousy intertwined with loss and obsession, where the protagonist's of his ex-lover reveals self-destructive rather than genuine betrayal. In , jealousy is through symbolic representations of torment and . Peter Flötner's gilded wood Allegory of Jealousy? (circa 1500s) depicts a figure embodying envious , using exaggerated postures to convey internal strife amid interpersonal dynamics. Harry Marinsky's bronze Jealousy (1981), measuring 98 inches by 40 inches, portrays intertwined forms evoking possessive tension, drawing on historical motifs of jealousy as a visceral in relational conflicts. László Moholy-Nagy's Gelosia (1927) employs fragmented imagery to abstract jealousy as a modern psychological discord, reflecting early 20th-century explorations of through experimental media. Film and television often dramatize jealousy to heighten narrative tension, frequently portraying it as reactive to perceived threats. In Miloš Forman's Amadeus (1984), Antonio Salieri's envy of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's genius manifests as obsessive sabotage, based on Peter Shaffer's play and historical rivalries documented in Mozart's biographies from the 1780s. Romantic comedies, analyzed in a 2017 study of 40 films, predominantly show reactive jealousy—triggered by observable cues like flirtation—resolved through communication, contrasting destructive portrayals in tragedies. Contemporary media, including adaptations of , emphasize jealousy's role in escalating to violence, as seen in empirical reviews of cinematic jealousy where characters' actions defy rational self-interest due to emotional hijacking.

Modern Applications: Social Media, Parasocial Bonds, and Interpersonal Violence

Social media platforms facilitate heightened surveillance of partners' interactions, amplifying romantic jealousy through passive monitoring of likes, comments, and posts that suggest potential or emotional intimacy with others. Empirical research indicates that frequent use correlates with increased jealousy experiences, as users interpret ambiguous online cues—such as a partner's delayed response or interaction with ex-partners—as relational threats. Such triggers can often be addressed constructively through calm, private conversations using "I" statements to express feelings without blame, active listening to the partner's perspective, and collaborative discussions about boundaries and reassurance to build trust (see Coping Strategies for Jealousy in Romantic Relationships). A of young adults found a bidirectional relationship between social media-induced jealousy and (IPV) perpetration, where elevated jealousy at one time point predicted higher IPV six months later, and vice versa, suggesting a reinforcing cycle driven by digital transparency and mistrust. Parasocial bonds, characterized by one-sided emotional attachments to media figures such as celebrities or influencers, evoke jealousy when these figures form real-life romantic partnerships, mimicking rival threats in actual relationships. Recent experimental demonstrates that individuals with stronger parasocial romantic attachments report greater jealousy toward a celebrity's partner, particularly when perceiving the rival as dissimilar in traits or values, which intensifies feelings of exclusion and loss. This phenomenon extends to fan behaviors, including online harassment of perceived romantic rivals, as seen in cases where celebrities like disabled comments on posts due to possessive fan reactions in 2016. Exploratory qualitative studies further reveal that parasocial jealousy involves emotional distress akin to interpersonal , often rationalized by fans as protective of their imagined connection, though it lacks reciprocal validation. Jealousy rooted in and parasocial dynamics contributes to interpersonal , particularly IPV, by escalating perceived threats into aggressive responses. Cross-sectional and daily diary studies among emerging adults link trait and situational jealousy—often triggered by online evidence of —to physical and psychological , with jealousy serving as a proximal antecedent in up to 30% of reported IPV incidents in high-risk samples. In contexts involving cyber jealousy, such as monitoring a partner's , perpetrators exhibit higher rates of controlling behaviors that precede , including and coercive control, as documented in analyses of adolescent and cohorts. Peer-reviewed meta-syntheses confirm jealousy as a recurrent pathway to IPV globally, intersecting with suspicions amplified by , though cultural norms around possessiveness can mitigate or exacerbate violent outcomes depending on gender expectations and relational power dynamics.

References

  1. https://dictionary.apa.org/jealousy
  2. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-jealousy-5190471
  3. https://www.dictionary.com/e/jealousy-vs-envy/
  4. https://www.oprahdaily.com/life/wholeness/a61740730/jealousy-vs-envy/
  5. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2015/09/buss-haselton-jealousy-tics-2005.pdf
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5609545/
  7. https://www.psy.uq.edu.au/~uqbziets/Buss1992_Sex_differences_in_jealousy.pdf
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513821000611
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11363030/
  10. https://www.verywellmind.com/how-to-deal-with-jealousy-5189253
  11. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/living-forward/201712/7-ways-manage-jealousy-in-relationships
  12. https://www.verywellmind.com/healthy-ways-to-express-jealousy-in-relationships-5216590
  13. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-love-doctor/201007/jealousy-in-new-relationships
  14. https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3762&context=etd
  15. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244013476054
  16. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1371&context=animsent
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328328875_Jealousy_as_a_Specific_Emotion_The_Dynamic_Functional_Model
  18. https://www.etymonline.com/word/jealousy
  19. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/jealous
  20. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/envy/
  21. https://www.etymonline.com/word/jealous
  22. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jealous
  23. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/901016
  24. https://academic.oup.com/book/12789/chapter/162962874
  25. https://philpapers.org/rec/GASEAR
  26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8326472/
  27. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2015/09/evolution-of-envy.pdf
  28. https://drrebeccajorgensen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/25353937Types-of-Jealousy-and-Relationship-Quality.pdf
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886917302672
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9231668/
  31. https://indianapublications.com/articles/IJHSS_2%2811%29_43-52_CC_61a614dc44e0e4.70886864.pdf
  32. https://idlab.ucmerced.edu/sites/g/files/ufvvjh1066/f/page/documents/campos_walle_dahl_2010.pdf
  33. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-38506-007
  34. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2015/10/Buss-2002-human-mate-guarding.pdf
  35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12496732/
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30426835/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8006540/
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7566354_The_evolution_of_jealousy
  39. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.x
  40. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2018/03/Sexual-and-Emotional-Infidelity-PPS-2018.pdf
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513801000782
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513812000244
  43. https://www.niu.edu/jskowronski/publications/2012SagarinEtAl.pdf
  44. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-85997-7
  45. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158751/full
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29592639/
  47. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-07798-006
  48. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-015-0023-7
  49. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-athletes-way/201710/whats-going-in-jealous-mans-brain
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31881502/
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X23000508
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053811906006112
  53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16829139/
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8094533/
  55. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cns-spectrums/article/prefrontal-cortex-dopamine-and-jealousy-endophenotype/C080BA938B4875E1BF538F88EB5420D2
  56. https://www.evamarcuschamer.com/jealousy-and-envy/
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8063480/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10659228/
  59. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-freedom-change/202207/attachment-jealousy-and-excessive-reassurance-seeking
  60. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/jealousy
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11201850/
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042810017313
  63. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-97409-003
  64. https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2024/02/07/a-psychologist-explains-the-3-types-of-jealousy/
  65. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861481/full
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10107517/
  67. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2002.56.4.455
  68. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-13774-013
  69. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3802180
  70. https://psychologyinrussia.com/upload/iblock/595/jf1cqv1i4q4c3qysic2w9ipq85uhzli8/Psychology_3_2023_222_232_Chursina.pdf
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5380380/
  72. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1449&context=etd
  73. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/advances-in-psychiatric-treatment/article/aspects-of-morbid-jealousy/06CBB7BF78CC43C785AE6F7C0F0046C9
  74. https://brieflands.com/articles/ijpbs-7273
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5778221/
  76. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24048408/
  77. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2018.00129/full
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092493381732237X
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11407130/
  80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2667296023001295
  81. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-asymmetric-brain/202501/othello-syndrome-jealousy-and-the-right-side-of-the-brain
  82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2054570/
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6625799/
  84. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pnp.825
  85. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-psychiatry/article/othello-syndrome-psychosis-or-dementia-a-case-report/3AC8A8FD468F79FD0D1940FF5EE8C50D
  86. https://bumble.com/en/the-buzz/how-to-deal-with-jealousy
  87. https://www.yourtango.com/love/emotion-that-makes-people-unattractive
  88. https://www.helpguide.org/articles/relationships-communication/jealousy-and-envy.htm
  89. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/our-devices-our-selves/202206/my-partner-gets-jealous-when-i-text-my-ex
  90. https://www.verywellmind.com/how-to-deal-with-jealousy-in-a-relationship-5214613
  91. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324651402_The_Adaptive_Functions_of_Jealousy
  92. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2015/09/Buss-Shackelford-JPSP-1997.pdf
  93. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-evolutionary-perspectives-on-sexual-psychology/mate-retention/D3F0691A591F24924AC0E2FE47607BDE
  94. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316322883_Use_of_Mate_Retention_Strategies
  95. https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-023-01411-z
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10568137/
  97. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886915300015
  98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253428992_Mate_retention_in_marriage_Further_evidence_of_the_reliability_of_the_Mate_Retention_Inventory
  99. https://socialinteractionlab.psych.umn.edu/sites/socialinteractionlab.psych.umn.edu/files/files/media/huelsnitz_et_al_pspb_2018.pdf
  100. https://www.college.ucla.edu/2019/07/25/study-finds-cultural-differences-in-attitudes-toward-infidelity-jealousy/
  101. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31332300/
  102. https://www2.psy.uq.edu.au/~uqbziets/Buunk_1996_Sex_diffs_in_jealousy.pdf
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4816077/
  104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283415583_Jealousy_in_Four_Nations_A_Cross-Cultural_Analysis
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886914004802
  106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X22001890
  107. https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2055/19/1/article-p61.xml
  108. https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-problem-with-polyamory-a-social-scientific-view
  109. https://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=advance-archive
  110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/28324765.2023.2283006
  111. https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5118/6/2/19
  112. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40883958/
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10920412/
  114. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/bering-in-mind/polyamory-chic-gay-jealousy-and-the-evolution-of-a-broken-heart/
  115. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2017.00119/full
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5909987/
  117. https://cnprc.ucdavis.edu/blog/scientists-map-monogamy-jealousy-monkey-mind
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9382973/
  119. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2018.1332
  120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4108309/
  121. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8bt2b313
  122. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1319&context=animsent
  123. https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/912021
  124. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348039923_Dogs_aren%27t_jealous_-_they_are_just_asking_for_accurate_information
  125. https://www.ulm.edu/~palmer/JealousyandMate.htm
  126. https://www.frontiersin.org/news/2017/10/20/jealousy-neurobiology-brain-frontiers-in-ecology-and-evolution/
  127. https://news.berkeley.edu/2024/12/12/do-animals-get-jealous-like-people-researchers-say-its-complicated/
  128. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-27251-1
  129. https://aeon.co/essays/do-dogs-and-cats-actually-get-jealous-or-are-we-just-projecting
  130. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171019101010.htm
  131. https://biblehub.com/exodus/34-14.htm
  132. https://www.gotquestions.org/jealous-God.html
  133. https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Exodus%252034%253A14
  134. https://www.gotquestions.org/jealousy-Bible.html
  135. https://www.quranexplorer.com/blog/education-in-the-light-of-sunnah-and-qura%27an/jealousy_%28hasad%29_is_the_disease_of_soul
  136. https://myislam.org/quran-verses/jealousy/
  137. https://www.reddit.com/r/MuslimLounge/comments/zxps1i/the_importance_of_protective_jealousy_for_men/
  138. https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/2192.Aristotle?page=16
  139. https://academic.oup.com/book/12789/chapter/162963425
  140. https://philinq.it/index.php/philinq/article/view/175
  141. https://www.jstor.org/stable/290806
  142. https://antigonejournal.com/2022/04/short-history-of-envy/
  143. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/19227/1/19227.pdf
  144. https://www.theschooloflife.com/article/nietzsche-and-envy/
  145. http://nietzsche.holtof.com/reader/browse-human-all-too-human-quotes-103-date.html
  146. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2003/2003.12.28/
  147. https://blog.ted.com/9-memorable-manic-moments-of-jealousy-in-literature/
  148. https://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/jealousy
  149. https://flcenterlitarts.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/top-10-novels-about-jealousy/
  150. https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1952.460
  151. https://moaonline.org/jealousy-by-harry-marinsky/
  152. https://publicartarchive.org/art/Jealousy/e9bab819
  153. https://www.reddit.com/r/flicks/comments/16a8sm1/movies_with_themes_of_jealousy_competitiveness/
  154. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318807482_Green_on_the_Screen_Types_of_Jealousy_and_Communicative_Responses_to_Jealousy_in_Romantic_Comedies
  155. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003071693-12/portrayals-jealousy-cinema-greg-zeichner
  156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0736585323000205
  157. https://www.psypost.org/study-finds-a-bidirectional-link-between-social-media-jealousy-and-the-perpetration-of-violence-in-romantic-relationships/
  158. https://www.psypost.org/parasocial-jealousy-is-real-study-finds-fans-feel-more-threatened-when-rivals-differ-from-them/
  159. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367686895_The_green_side_of_parasocial_romantic_relationships_An_exploratory_investigation_of_parasocial_jealousy
  160. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/reel-relationships/202404/parasocial-relationships-do-we-know-whats-real-and-whats-not
  161. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-025-00893-2
  162. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/cyber.2018.0159
  163. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7459695/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.