Hubbry Logo
Laser weaponLaser weaponMain
Open search
Laser weapon
Community hub
Laser weapon
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Laser weapon
Laser weapon
Laser weapon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The US-Israeli Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) was used to shoot down rockets and artillery shells before being canceled in 2005 as a result of "its bulkiness, high costs and poor anticipated results on the battlefield".[1]

A laser weapon[2] is a type of directed-energy weapon that uses lasers to inflict damage. Whether they will be deployed as practical, high-performance military weapons remains to be seen.[3][4] One of the major issues with laser weapons is atmospheric thermal blooming, which is still largely unsolved. This issue is exacerbated when there is fog, smoke, dust, rain, snow, smog, foam, or purposely dispersed obscurant chemicals present. In essence, a laser generates a beam of light that requires clear air or a vacuum to operate.[5]

The YAL-1, a modified Boeing 747, owned by USAF. It was canceled in December 2011 and scrapped in September 2014.
YAL-1 live test

Laser-based directed energy weapons generally have two primary types: low-power laser dazzlers that blind optical systems or human eyes, and high-power lasers that can physically damage or destroy targets, such as enemy aircraft and ammunition.

Many types of low-power laser have been identified as having the potential to be used as incapacitating non-lethal weapons. They can cause temporary or permanent vision loss when directed at the eyes. The extent, nature, and duration of visual impairment resulting from exposure to laser light depend on various factors, such as the laser's power, wavelength(s), collimation of the beam, orientation of the beam, and duration of exposure. Even lasers with a power output of less than one watt can cause immediate and permanent vision loss under certain conditions, making them potentially non-lethal but incapacitating weapons. However, the use of such lasers is morally controversial due to the extreme handicap that laser-induced blindness represents. The Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons bans the use of weapons designed to cause permanent blindness. Weapons designed to cause temporary blindness, known as dazzlers, are used by military and sometimes law enforcement organizations. Incidents of pilots being exposed to lasers while flying have prompted aviation authorities to implement special procedures to deal with such hazards.[6]

High-power laser weapons capable of directly damaging or destroying a target in combat are still in the experimental stage. The general idea of laser-beam weaponry is to hit a target with a train of brief pulses of light. The United States Navy has tested the very short-range (1 mile), 30-kW Laser Weapon System or LaWS to be used against targets like small UAVs, rocket-propelled grenades, and visible motorboat or helicopter engines.[7][8] It has been described as "six welding lasers strapped together." A 60 kW system, HELIOS, is being developed for destroyer-class ships as of 2020.[9] India's DRDO successfully tested a 30 kW directed energy weapon (DEW), designated Mk-II (A) DEW, in April 2025 which can annihilate drones at a range of 5 km.[10]

Air defense systems

[edit]

Laser-based directed-energy weapons have been under development for defense purposes, particularly for the destruction of incoming missiles. One such example is the Boeing Airborne Laser, constructed inside a Boeing 747 and designated as the YAL-1. This system was designed to eliminate short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles during their boost phase.[11] It was canceled in 2012.

Another laser-based defense system was researched for the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI, nicknamed "Star Wars") and its successor programs. This project aimed to employ ground-based or space-based laser systems to destroy incoming intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). However, various practical challenges, such as directing a laser over a large distance through the atmosphere, complicated the implementation of these systems. Optical scattering and refraction would bend and distort the laser beam, making it difficult to aim and reducing its efficiency.

A related concept from the SDI project was the nuclear-pumped X-ray laser, an orbiting atomic bomb surrounded by laser media in the form of glass rods. When the bomb detonated, the rods would be exposed to highly-energetic gamma-ray photons, causing spontaneous and stimulated emission of X-ray photons within the rod atoms. This process would result in optical amplification of the X-ray photons, generating an X-ray laser beam that would be minimally affected by atmospheric distortion and capable of destroying ICBMs in flight. However, the X-ray laser would be a single-use device, as it would destroy itself upon activation. Some initial tests of this concept were conducted with underground nuclear testing, but the results were not promising. Research into this approach to missile defense was discontinued after the SDI program was canceled.

Iron Beam

[edit]
Main article: Iron Beam

Iron Beam is a laser-based air defense system which was unveiled at the Singapore Airshow on 11 February 2014[12] by Israeli defense contractor Rafael Advanced Defense Systems.[13] The system is designed to destroy short-range rockets, artillery, and mortar bombs; it has a range of up to 7 km (4.3 mi), too close for the Iron Dome system to intercept projectiles effectively.[13][14] In addition, the system could also intercept unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).[15] Iron Beam will constitute the sixth element of Israel's integrated air defense system,[13] in addition to Arrow 2, Arrow 3, David's Sling, Barak 8, and Iron Dome.[16]

Iron Beam uses a fiber laser to destroy an airborne target. Whether acting as a stand-alone system or with external cueing as part of an air-defense system, a threat is detected by a surveillance system and tracked by vehicle platforms in order to engage.[17]

Iron Beam is expected to be operational by the end of 2025.[18][19]

Anti-drone systems

[edit]
USS Preble (DDG-88) firing its HELIOS laser system, 3 February 2025

In the 21st century, several countries have developed anti-drone laser systems to counter the increasing threat of small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These systems are designed to detect, track, and destroy drones using high-powered lasers, offering a cost-effective and flexible solution for airspace protection.

In the United States, Lockheed Martin demonstrated the capabilities of its ATHENA laser system in 2017, which uses a 30-kilowatt ALADIN laser to target and destroy UAVs.[20] Another American company, Raytheon, developed the High-Energy Laser Weapon System (HELWS) in 2019, which is capable of detecting and destroying drones at a distance of up to three kilometers.[20]

Turkey has also invested in the development of laser weapons, with companies like Roketsan producing the ALKA system, which combines laser and electromagnetic weapons to incapacitate and destroy single or group targets.[20] Other Turkish companies, such as Aselsan and TUBITAK BILGEM, have also demonstrated laser systems capable of targeting small UAVs and explosive devices.[20]

Germany is another leader in the development of combat laser systems, with defense company Rheinmetall working on stationary and mobile versions of its High Energy Laser (HEL) system since the 2000s.[20] Rheinmetall's lasers are designed to protect against a variety of threats, including small and medium-sized UAVs, helicopters, missiles, mines, and artillery shells.[20]

Israel has also been actively developing laser weapons, with companies like Rafael Advanced Defense Systems demonstrating the compact Drone Dome system in 2020, which is designed to destroy UAVs and their swarms.[20] Another Israeli system, called Light Blade, was developed by OptiDefense to counter terrorist threats such as mini UAVs and explosive devices attached to balloons or kites.[20]

The development and deployment of these anti-drone laser systems show the increasing importance of protecting airspace from emerging threats, while also providing a cost-effective and flexible solution for defense forces around the world.

First announced in December 2024, on 13 April 2025, the Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces released the first footage of a laser weapon system, called “Tryzub”, in use destroying a fibre optic FPV drone. It is fitted into the back of a van and can be used against ground targets.[21]

On 16 May 2025, Ukraine revealed a small laser turret called SlimBeam, fitted to a remote controlled weapon station, capable of blinding optical sensors at 2 km and destroying drones at 800 meters. It can be remotely operated by a web-based system to reduce the risk to the operators of enemy fire. It could also be used for sabotage by targeting various locks or other objects.[22]

Electrolaser

[edit]
Main article: Electrolaser

An electrolaser first ionizes its target path, and then sends an electric current down the conducting track of ionized plasma, somewhat like lightning. It functions as a giant, high-energy, long-distance version of the Taser or stun gun.

Pulsed energy projectile

[edit]
Main article: Pulsed energy projectile

Pulsed Energy Projectile or PEP systems emit an infrared laser pulse which creates rapidly expanding plasma at the target. The resulting sound, shock and electromagnetic waves stun the target and cause pain and temporary paralysis. The weapon is under development and is intended as a non-lethal weapon in crowd control though it can also be used as a lethal weapon.

Dazzler

[edit]

A dazzler is a directed-energy weapon intended to temporarily blind or disorient its target with intense directed radiation. Targets can include sensors or human vision. Dazzlers emit infrared or invisible light against various electronic sensors, and visible light against humans, when they are intended to cause no long-term damage to eyes. The emitters are usually lasers, making what is termed a laser dazzler. Most of the contemporary systems are man-portable, and operate in either the red (a laser diode) or green (a diode-pumped solid-state laser, DPSS) areas of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Initially developed for military use, non-military products are becoming available for use in law enforcement and security.[23][24]

PHASR Rifle

The personnel halting and stimulation response rifle (PHASR) is a prototype non-lethal laser dazzler developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory's Directed Energy Directorate, U.S. Department of Defense.[25] Its purpose is to temporarily disorient and blind a target. Blinding laser weapons have been tested in the past, but were banned under the 1995 United Nations Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons, which the United States acceded to on 21 January 2009.[26] The PHASR rifle, a low-intensity laser, is not prohibited under this regulation, as the blinding effect is intended to be temporary. It also uses a two-wavelength laser.[27] The PHASR was tested at Kirtland Air Force Base, part of the Air Force Research Laboratory Directed Energy Directorate in New Mexico.

  • ZM-87
  • PY132A is a Chinese anti-drone dazzler.[28]
  • Soviet laser pistol was a prototype weapon designed for cosmonauts.
  • Optical Dazzling Interdictor, Navy (AN/SEQ-4 ODIN) is a U.S. laser to be field tested in 2019 on an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer.[29]

Operational use

[edit]

On 19 November 2025, British Defence Secretary John Healey, stated that the Russian intelligence-gathering vessel Yantar had entered the United Kingdom’s wider waters north of Scotland during the previous weeks,[30][31] and was allegedly engaging in espionage and the mapping of UK's undersea cables.[30][31] In response, the UK deployed a Royal Navy frigate and RAF P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft to monitor and track the ship, during which Yantar reportedly directed dazzler system lasers at British pilots.[31][30] Healey described the Russian actions as "deeply dangerous", noting that this was the second visit of Yantar to UK waters in the same year, and warning that Britain was prepared to respond if the vessel attempted to travel further south.[30][31]

Examples

[edit]
See also: Electrolaser § Examples of electrolasers

Leading Western companies in the development of laser weapons have been Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Rheinmetall and MBDA.[32][33][34][35][36]

List of Directed Energy Weapons
Name Description Year Status Citation
Project Excalibur United States government nuclear weapons research program to develop a nuclear pumped x-ray laser as a directed energy weapon for ballistic missile defense. 1980s Canceled [37]
Soviet laser pistol First handheld laser weapon intended for use by cosmonauts in outer space. 1984 No longer used
1K17 Szhatie Experimental Soviet self-propelled laser weapon. Never went beyond the experimental stage
17F19DM Polyus/Skif-DM Soviet laser-armed orbital weapon that failed during deployment. 1987 Failed
Terra-3 Soviet laser facility thought to be a powerful anti-satellite weapon prototype; later found to be a testing site with limited satellite tracking capabilities. Abandoned, partially disassembled
US Army Missile Command laser Ruggedized tunable laser emitting narrow-linewidth in the yellow-orange-red part of the spectrum. 1991 Never went beyond the experimental stage [38]
Boeing YAL-1 Airborne gas or chemical laser mounted in a modified Boeing 747, intended to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles over enemy territory. 2000s Canceled, scrapped [39][40][41][42][43]
Precision Airborne Standoff Directed Energy Weapon Directed energy weapon project 2008 Canceled
Laser Close-In Weapon System Anti-aircraft laser unveiled at the Farnborough Airshow. 2010 Experimental [44]
ZEUS-HLONS (HMMWV Laser Ordnance Neutralization System) First laser and energy weapon used on a battlefield for neutralizing mines and unexploded ordnance. Niche application
High Energy Liquid Laser Area Defense System (HELLADS) Directed energy weapon project Status unknown
Mid-Infrared Advanced Chemical Laser (MIRACL) Experimental U.S. Navy deuterium fluoride laser tested against an Air Force satellite 1997 Canceled
Maritime Laser Demonstrator (MLD) Laser for use aboard U.S. Navy warships 2011 Status unknown [45][46]
Personnel Halting and Stimulation Response (PHaSR) Non-lethal hand-held weapon developed by the United States Air Force's Directed Energy Directorate to "dazzle" or stun a target Status unknown [47]
Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) Weaponized deuterium fluoride laser developed in a joint research project by Israel and the U.S. for shooting down aircraft and missiles Discontinued [48]
Beriev A-60 Soviet/Russian CO2 gas laser mounted on an Ilyushin Il-76MD transport. Two units built, with one of them sporting the 1LK222 Sokol Eshelon laser system. Experimental [49]
High Energy Laser-Mobile Demonstrator (HEL-MD) A laser system mounted on a Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT) designed by Boeing. Its current power level is 10 kW, which will be boosted to 50 kW, and expected to eventually be upgraded to 100 kW. Targets that can be engaged are mortar rounds, artillery shells and rockets, unmanned aerial vehicles, and cruise missiles. Status unknown [50]
Fiber Laser developed by Lockheed Martin A 60 kW fiber laser developed by Lockheed Martin to be mounted on the HEMTT that maintains beam quality at high power outputs while using less electricity than solid-state lasers. 2014 Status unknown [51][52][53]
Free-electron laser FEL technology is being evaluated by the US Navy as a candidate for an antiaircraft and anti-missile directed-energy weapon. The Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility's FEL has demonstrated over 14 kW power output. Compact multi-megawatt class FEL weapons are undergoing research. Ongoing [54][55][56][57][58]
Portable Efficient Laser Testbed (PELT) Directed energy weapon project Status unknown [59]
Laser AirCraft CounterMeasures (ACCM) Directed energy weapon project Status unknown [60]
Mobile Expeditionary High-Energy Laser (MEHEL) 2.0 Experimental directed energy weapon integrated on Stryker 8x8 armored vehicle. Experimental [61][62]
Area Defense Anti-Munitions (ADAM) Experimental directed energy weapon. Experimental [63]
Advanced Test High Energy Asset (ATHENA) Directed energy weapon project. Status unknown [64]
Self-Protect High-Energy Laser Demonstrator (SHiELD) Directed energy weapon project to protect aircraft from missiles. Cancelled [65]
Silent Hunter (laser weapon) Chinese fiber-optic laser air-defense system. Described as being able to penetrate five 2 millimeter steel plates at a range of 800 meters and 5 millimeters of steel at 1,000 meters. Operational [66][67][68]
Russian Sokol Eshelon Experimental airborne laser weapon developed by Russia, mounted on the Beriev A-60. Experimental
Russian Peresvet Mobile air-defense laser undergoing service testing as close-range mobile ICBM escorts. Undergoing service testing [69]
Raytheon laser High-energy laser developed by Raytheon Company that can be mounted on a MRZR and used to disable an unmanned aerial system from approximately 1 mile away. Status unknown [70]
ZKZM-500 Short-range antipersonnel less-lethal weapon that uses a laser to cause temporary blindness, skin burns, and pain. In production [71]
Northrop Grumman electric laser Electric laser capable of producing a 100-kilowatt ray of light, with potential to be mounted in aircraft, ship, or vehicle. 2009 Experimental [72][73]
Northrop Grumman laser gun Laser gun successfully tested by the U.S. Navy, mounted on the former USS Paul F. Foster and demonstrated destructive capability on a high-speed cruising target. 2011 Experimental [74]
Skyguard (area defense system) Proposed area defense system. Proposed
Laser Close-In Weapon System Anti-aircraft laser unveiled at the Farnborough Airshow. 2010 Experimental [75]
Area Defense Anti-Munitions (ADAM) Experimental fiber laser developed by Lockheed Martin. Tested at 10 kilowatts against rockets. Ongoing development [76][77]
Maritime Laser Demonstrator (MLD) Laser for use aboard U.S. Navy warships. 2011–2014 Active deployment [45][46]
Almaz HEL Russian truck-mounted directed energy weapon. [78]
Boeing Laser Avenger Small anti-drone weapon mounted on an AN/TWQ-1 Avenger combat vehicle. Experimental
Portable Efficient Laser Testbed (PELT) Anti-riot less-lethal weapon. Status unknown [79]
Laser AirCraft CounterMeasures (ACCM) Directed energy weapon project. Status unknown [citation needed]
High Energy Liquid Laser Area Defense System (HELLADS) Counter-RAM aircraft or truck-mounted laser under development by General Atomics under a DARPA contract. 150 kilowatt goal. Status unknown
ARMOL Turkish laser weapon that passed acceptance tests in 2019. 2019 Experimental [80]
AN/SEQ-3 Laser Weapon System (LaWS) 30 kW directed-energy weapon developed by the United States. Field tested on USS Ponce in 2014 and later moved to USS Portland (LPD-27) after Ponce was decommissioned. The AN/SEQ-3 development has been superseded by the HELIOS which also has better tracking of small drones. 2014 Fielded Prototype [7][81]
HELMA-P 2 kW anti-drone weapon for the French military designed by CILAS and Ariane Group with a range of up to one kilometre. Developed between 2017-2019, land trials were undertaken in 2020 and 2021 while 12–14 June 2023 it was trialled at sea aboard the French destroyer Forbin mounted inside a shipping container. The developer aims to increase its output to 5 kW. 2017 Prototype [82]
India's laser weapon 1 kW truck-mounted laser weapon tested by DRDO in August 2017 in Chitradurga ATR. Can create a hole in a metal sheet kept at a distance of 250 meters in 36 seconds. 2013 Technology demonstrator [83]
Integrated Drone Detection and Interdiction System 2 kW truck-mounted laser weapon developed by DRDO and operated by the Indian Army along Line of Control. Seven units in service, 9 more to be ordered. Range: 1 km 2015 Operational [10][84]
Integrated Drone Detection and Interdiction System Mk-II Based on 10 kW Chemical Oxygen Iodine Laser (COIL) technology demonstrator. Range: 2 km. Indian Army and Air Force expected to order 16 systems. Production [85][86][83]
DRDO Mk-II (A) DEW 30 kW truck-mounted laser weapon and utilises integral electro-optical fire-control system. Based on 10 kW Chemical Oxygen Iodine Laser (COIL) technology demonstrator. Range: 5 km against fixed-wing drones, helicopters, missiles. Testing and Production [10][83]
DRDO Surya 300 kW laser weapon system Range: 20 km. In development [10][87]
DragonFire 50 kW scalable laser directed-energy weapon in development by the United Kingdom intended for use against small boats, drones and artillery shells/missiles. Completed the first two of four planned service acceptance trials in 2022. Sea trials aboard a Type 23 frigate are due to begin in 2023 and run for two years. Land based vehicle mounted applications as a point defence system are also being considered. 2017 In development [88][89]
High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) A 60 kW laser weapon system to be tested on an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer and intended for use against small boats and drones, future versions may also be powerful enough to target missiles or aircraft. Unlike the preceding LaWS which attempted to synchronise six separate fiber lasers into a single coherent beam the HELIOS has Spectral Beam Combination where several individual wavelengths of laser are overlapped on top of each other through a single fiber optic emitter. No longer relying on a burst of accumulated capacitor energy also grants a new capability for sustained low emission to dazzle a drone. 2021 Prototype [29]
Pulsed energy projectile (PEP) A controversial, truck-mounted, riot control, less-lethal laser weapon designed to stun civilians
Technology Maturation Laser Weapon System Demonstrator (LWSD) A laser weapon system installed on the USS Portland (LPD-27) that successfully destroyed a small unmanned aerial vehicle in May 2020 2020 Experimental [29][90]
Iron Beam An Israeli laser weapon system for anti-rocket, anti-drone close range defense. In development [91][92]
Light Blade An Israeli laser system deployed as part of the Iron Dome defense system to shoot down balloons 2020 In use [93]
Minotaur Developed by Hellenic company Soukos Robotics, the SR-42 is a large anti-drone system consisting of radio jammer, microwave jammer, optical dazzler, 12.7mm gun and laser weapon mounted on a unmanned BTR 8×8 vehicle and was unveiled at the Defence Exhibition Athens (DEFEA) in July 2021. It is designed to hit drones every 2–3 seconds with 62 individual blue-violet lasers forming a combined output of 300 kW, its engagement range is 1 to 25 km, up to an altitude of 10 km. However to reduce thermal signature it is powered entirely by batteries with no onboard power generation giving a maximum engagement duration of 2 hours.[94] The SR-32 is version of the same laser and microwave jammer mounted on a towed trailer, it has 26 lasers producing a combined output of 100 kW with a range of 1 to 10 Km and a ceiling of 1.7 Km 2021 Experimental [95]
Cheongwang Block I Laser South Korean Hanwha Aerospace 20-kW anti-drone system. Demonstrated in 2023, officially integrated into active service on October 4, 2024.[96] 2024 In deployment [97]
10 kW-Class High-Power Laser EW Vehicle Japanese 10-kW anti-drone system. Entered into service in November 2024. 2024 In deployment [98]
ODIN- Optical Dazzling Interdictor, Navy installed on 8 US Navy warships as of 2024 the ODIN uses a dazzling laser on incoming drone and missile sensors and cameras to confuse them so that they cannot guide correctly or find their target. While primarily designed for uncrewed flying objects, the system could also be used on crewed vehicles to cause glare in a pilot’s vision. 2020 in deployment [99]
The Beriev A-60 is still experimenting with the Sokol Eshelon laser as an intended anti-satellite weapon.

Most of these projects have been canceled, discontinued, never went beyond the prototype or experimental stage, or are only used in niche applications like dazzling, blinding, mine clearance or close defense against small, unprotected targets. Effective, high performance laser weapons seem to be difficult to achieve using current or near-future technology.[4][3][100]

Problems

[edit]
See also: Thermal blooming

Laser beams begin to cause plasma breakdown in the atmosphere at energy densities of around one megajoule per cubic centimeter. This effect, called "blooming," causes the laser to defocus and disperse energy into the surrounding air. Blooming can be more severe if there is fog, smoke, dust, rain, snow, smog, or foam in the air.

Techniques that may reduce these effects include:

  • Spreading the beam across a large, curved mirror that focuses the power on the target, to keep energy density en route too low for blooming to happen. This requires a large, very precise, fragile mirror, mounted somewhat like a searchlight, requiring bulky machinery to slew the mirror to aim the laser.
  • Using a phased array. For typical laser wavelengths, this method would require billions of micrometer-size antennae. There is currently no known way to implement these, though carbon nanotubes have been proposed. Phased arrays could theoretically also perform phase-conjugate amplification (see below). Phased arrays do not require mirrors or lenses, and can be made flat and thus do not require a turret-like system (as in "spread beam") to be aimed, though range will suffer if the target is at extreme angles to the surface of the phased array.[101]
  • Using a phase-conjugate laser system. This method employs a "finder" or "guide" laser illuminating the target. Any mirror-like ("specular") points on the target reflect light that is sensed by the weapon's primary amplifier. The weapon then amplifies inverted waves, in a positive feedback loop, destroying the target, with shockwaves as the specular regions evaporate. This avoids blooming because the waves from the target pass through the blooming, and therefore show the most conductive optical path; this automatically corrects for the distortions caused by blooming. Experimental systems using this method usually use special chemicals to form a "phase-conjugate mirror". In most systems, however, the mirror overheats dramatically at weapon-useful power levels.
  • Using a very short pulse that finishes before blooming interferes, but this requires a very high power laser to concentrate large amounts of energy in that pulse which does not exist in a weaponized or easily weaponizable form.[a]
  • Focusing multiple lasers of relatively low power on a single target. This is increasingly bulky as the total power of the system increases.

Countermeasures

[edit]

Essentially, a laser generates a beam of light which will be delayed or stopped by any opaque medium and perturbed by any translucent or less than perfectly transparent medium just like any other type of light. A simple, dense smoke screen can and will often block a laser beam. Infrared or multi-spectrum[102] smoke grenades or generators will also disturb or block infrared laser beams. Any opaque case, cowling, bodywork, fuselage, hull, wall, shield or armor will absorb at least the "first impact" of a laser weapon, so the beam must be sustained to achieve penetration.

The Chinese People's Liberation Army has invested in the development of specialized coatings that can deflect beams fired by U.S. military lasers. Laser light can be deflected, reflected, or absorbed by manipulating physical and chemical properties of materials. Artificial coatings can counter certain specific types of lasers, but a different type of laser may match the coating's absorption spectrum enough to transfer damaging amounts of energy. The coatings are made of several different substances, including low-cost metals, rare earths, carbon fiber, silver, and diamonds that have been processed to fine sheens and tailored against specific laser weapons. China is developing anti-laser defenses because protection against them is considered far cheaper than creating competing laser weapons.[103]

Dielectric mirrors, inexpensive ablative coatings, thermal transport delay, and obscurants are also being studied as countermeasures.[104] In not a few operational situations, even simple, passive countermeasures like rapid rotation (which spreads the heat and does not allow a fixed targeting point except in strictly frontal engagements), higher acceleration (which increases the distance and changes the angle quickly), or agile maneuvering during the terminal attack phase (which hampers the ability to target a vulnerable point, forces a constant re-aiming or tracking with close to zero lag, and allows for some cooling) can defeat or help to defeat non-highly pulsed, high-energy laser weapons.[105]

[edit]
Main article: Weapons in science fiction

Arthur C. Clarke envisaged particle beam weapons in his 1955 novel Earthlight, in which energy would be delivered by high-velocity beams of matter.[106] After the invention of the laser in 1960, it briefly became the death ray of choice for science fiction writers.[107] By the late 1960s and 1970s, as the laser's limits as a weapon became evident, the ray gun began to be replaced by similar weapons with names that better reflected the destructive capabilities of the device, such as the blaster in Star Wars or phasers in Star Trek, which were originally lasers.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Laser weapon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A is a that delivers a concentrated beam of coherent to damage or destroy targets primarily through effects, such as heating, melting, or vaporizing materials on impact. These systems exploit the principles of , where excited atoms or molecules release photons in phase to form a high-intensity, capable of precise deposition at the . Unlike kinetic projectiles, require sustained power input rather than physical , enabling potentially unlimited engagements limited only by electrical supply and , though empirical tests demonstrate effectiveness against small, fast-moving threats like drones while facing challenges from atmospheric and beam control in adverse weather. Military development of laser weapons has focused on high-energy lasers (HEL) for roles including air and , with the investing heavily in scalable solid-state systems since the early . Notable achievements include the U.S. Navy's deployment of the Laser Weapon System (LaWS) for shipboard counter-unmanned aerial vehicle operations and the integration of the High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance () on Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, which has demonstrated empirical success in neutralizing small boats and drones during tests. By 2025, the U.S. military operates or tests at least several dozen HEL prototypes, with power levels advancing to 300 kW-class for protection, reflecting causal progress driven by improvements in efficiency and beam combining technologies despite persistent hurdles in power scaling and environmental resilience. Key advantages include low per shot—often under $1 for —and immunity to kinematic countermeasures, allowing rapid, repeated engagements without resupply logistics, as validated in field trials against swarms. However, defining characteristics encompass vulnerabilities to dust, , or rain-induced beam scattering, high upfront system costs exceeding millions per unit, and the need for continuous line-of-sight tracking, which empirical data indicate limit operational reliability in contested environments without hybrid kinetic backups. These systems represent a toward energy-based lethality, prioritizing empirical validation over speculative hype, with ongoing advancements poised to counter proliferating low-cost threats if engineering challenges in management and aperture size are resolved.

History of Development

Early Concepts and Theoretical Foundations

The theoretical underpinnings of laser weapons derive from Albert Einstein's 1917 formulation of , in which an incoming induces an excited atom to release an identical , enabling amplification of coherent . This process, distinct from , provided the quantum mechanical basis for in optical media, a prerequisite for lasing action. Building on this, Charles Townes and Arthur Schawlow proposed the optical —later termed —in a 1958 paper, theorizing that in a resonant cavity could generate a directed, high-intensity beam suitable for applications requiring precise energy deposition. The first operational , a ruby device constructed by , demonstrated this principle on May 16, 1960, producing a pulsed output of approximately 1 megawatt peak power in a collimated beam. Military theorists quickly recognized the weapon potential of such devices, conceptualizing them as directed-energy systems capable of delivering effects at light speed to vaporize or deform targets via rapid localized heating exceeding material melting points. Initial models posited that irradiance above 10 kW/cm² could induce through absorption, leading to molecular bond rupture, plasma ignition, and mechanical shock waves—effects scalable with , pulse duration, and atmospheric transmission. For instance, wavelengths (e.g., 10.6 μm CO₂ lasers) were favored early for efficient energy coupling to metals and composites, though options were explored for reduced and atmospheric . These foundations emphasized causal realism in beam-target interactions: energy deposition follows Beer-Lambert absorption laws, with destructive thresholds determined empirically by fluence (J/cm²) rather than speculative narratives. By 1962, U.S. Department of Defense analyses outlined architectures for anti-aircraft and , projecting requirements for continuous-wave outputs in the megawatt range to counter relativistic target velocities and achieve dwell times under 1 second for hard-kill effects. Theoretical challenges included beam quality degradation from —nonlinear atmospheric self-focusing due to index-of-refraction gradients—and the need for to mitigate turbulence-induced phase aberrations, as quantified by the for coherence length. Early simulations, grounded in for electromagnetic propagation, underscored that vacuum performance vastly exceeded real-world efficacy, necessitating trade-offs in power efficiency (initially <1% for solid-state s) against cooling demands to prevent medium degradation. These concepts privileged empirical validation over optimism, revealing lasers' advantages in precision and scalability but highlighting fundamental limits like diffraction-limited spot size scaling with and diameter.

Cold War-Era Programs and Prototypes

In the United States, laser weapon research accelerated in the with the development of for directed energy applications. The Baseline Demonstration Laser (BDL), a (HF) produced by for the Department of Defense, achieved operation in 1973 as the world's first high-energy prototype. This was followed by the Navy-ARPA Chemical Laser (NACL), an HF system that integrated with a Navy pointer tracker and demonstrated 250 kW output during tests from 1975 to 1978, marking the first integrated high-energy laser system for naval applications. The Mid-Infrared Advanced (MIRACL), a deuterium fluoride (DF) system, emerged in the mid-1980s as a megawatt-class continuous-wave prototype. Integrated with the Sea Lite Beam Director at , MIRACL successfully engaged dynamic targets including BQM-34 drones, Vandal supersonic missiles, and high-altitude objects, validating its potential for air and . Concurrently, the Airborne Laser Laboratory (ALL), housed in a modified KC-135 operational from 1977, tested gas-dynamic lasers up to 400 kW against aerial targets, pioneering airborne directed-energy concepts despite challenges with beam control and atmospheric effects. Soviet laser programs, assessed by U.S. intelligence as high-priority with investments surpassing American efforts, focused on anti-satellite (ASAT) and air defense roles from the 1960s onward. Facilities like hosted prototypes capable of sensor jamming at low Earth orbits by the late 1970s, with the system demonstrating tracking and potential dazzling of U.S. reconnaissance satellites, including a 1984 incident affecting the Challenger's optics. U.S. estimates projected Soviet ground-based lasers achieving sensor kills at altitudes up to 800 km within a year of 1978 assessments and prototype air defense systems by the early 1980s. Key Soviet prototypes included the , an Il-76-based airborne platform that conducted laser tests starting with its first flight in 1981, evaluating beam propagation for anti-aircraft applications. The Polyus (Skif-DM) spacecraft, launched unsuccessfully on May 15, 1987, via Zenit rocket, incorporated a one-megawatt intended for ASAT operations against low-Earth orbit threats, representing an ambitious space-based prototype amid responses to U.S. proposals. These efforts highlighted parallel technological pursuits but were constrained by reliability issues, pointing inaccuracies, and the era's computational limits, with no verified combat deployments achieved before the Cold War's end.

Modern Advancements and Maturation (2000s–2025)

In the early 2000s, joint US-Israeli efforts advanced prototype testing with the Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL), a deuterium fluoride chemical laser that successfully intercepted a short-range Katyusha rocket on June 6, 2000, during live-fire trials at White Sands Missile Range. Subsequent tests demonstrated THEL's effectiveness against mortar rounds, including salvos simulating real threats, though the program shifted focus due to chemical laser inefficiencies and pursuit of mobile variants like the Mobile Tactical High Energy Laser (MTHEL). Concurrently, the US Missile Defense Agency developed the Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser, modifying a Boeing 747-400F with a megawatt-class chemical oxygen iodine laser; milestones included the first in-flight firing of its illumination and tracking lasers in 2007, followed by destruction of ballistic missile surrogates in January and February 2010. The YAL-1 program ended in 2012 amid challenges with beam control at range, logistical demands, and high costs, redirecting emphasis toward solid-state lasers for greater scalability and reduced operational complexity. The 2010s marked a pivot to solid-state technologies, enabling compact, electrically driven systems less reliant on hazardous chemicals. The US Navy's Laser Weapon System (LaWS), a 30-kilowatt , achieved initial deployment aboard the USS Ponce in August 2014, with operational authorization by December 2014 as the first Department of Defense laser approved for fleet use against small surface threats and drones, at an engagement cost of approximately $1 per shot. This maturation reflected improvements in beam quality, power efficiency, and integration with existing sensors, though early systems faced limitations in adverse weather and required short dwell times for effect. Parallel programs tested high-energy lasers against unmanned aerial vehicles and mortars, laying groundwork for counter-unmanned aircraft system (C-UAS) roles. By the 2020s, laser systems scaled to higher powers and platform integrations, with the Navy's High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (), a 60-kilowatt-class system upgradable to 150 kilowatts, successfully engaging an aerial drone target during 2024 tests aboard a , demonstrating extended range up to 8 kilometers. The Army deployed prototype directed-energy weapons for C-UAS overseas in 2024, with plans for 300-kilowatt systems by 2025 to counter missiles and drones, amid reports of at least 22 operational or advanced-test lasers by mid-2025. Internationally, Israel's , a 100-kilowatt ground-based , completed final trials in 2025 and entered operational service in the fourth quarter, achieving first documented combat interceptions of Hezbollah drones earlier that year. China publicly unveiled the LY-1 directed-energy system in 2025, while Russia deployed Chinese-origin lasers against Ukrainian drones, signaling broader proliferation among at least 18 nations by October 2025. These developments underscore maturation toward reliable, cost-effective defenses against low-end threats, driven by advances in diode-pumped fiber lasers and to mitigate atmospheric attenuation.

Fundamental Physics and Operation

Core Principles of Laser Directed Energy

High-energy laser directed energy weapons function by emitting a of coherent , typically in the spectrum, to deposit onto a target with precision. The underlying physics relies on , a process first theorized by in 1917, where excited atoms or molecules in a gain medium release in phase with an incident photon, amplifying light intensity while maintaining spatial and temporal coherence. This coherence minimizes , enabling the laser to maintain a small spot size over distance—often diffraction-limited—and achieve levels exceeding 1 kW/cm², sufficient to ignite, melt, or ablate materials like metals or composites. Systems require a power source to pump the gain medium (e.g., solid-state crystals, fibers, or gases) to , followed by optical amplification and beam directing via mirrors or lenses. Beam propagation occurs at the (approximately 3 × 10^8 m/s in ), providing near-instantaneous energy delivery without or , contrasting with kinetic weapons that follow Newtonian trajectories. In practice, high-energy lasers (HELs) output at least 1 kW, scalable to tens or hundreds of kilowatts for tactical effects, with continuous-wave modes sustaining dwell time for cumulative heating or pulsed modes delivering peak powers for shock or plasma induction. Damage mechanisms are primarily thermal: absorbed energy raises target temperature rapidly (e.g., melts at ~1,500°C), leading to , structural weakening, or ignition of propellants in missiles or drones, with effects scalable by and exposure duration per the q=ρcdTdt+k∇2Tq = \rho c \frac{dT}{dt} + k \nabla^2 T, where qq is from the beam. Non-thermal effects, such as induced plasma shielding, can occur at ultra-high intensities but typically limit rather than enhance lethality. Atmospheric propagation introduces causal challenges rooted in molecular absorption, by particulates, and nonlinear effects like , where beam-heated air creates density gradients that defocus the wavefront. Wavelength selection (e.g., 1–2 μm for fiber lasers) minimizes absorption bands, while correct turbulence via real-time phase conjugation, extending effective range to several kilometers under clear conditions. Cooling systems are essential, as inefficient energy extraction (often <30% wall-plug efficiency) generates that must be dissipated to prevent medium degradation or system failure. These principles enable scalable, magazine-depth engagements limited primarily by electrical power supply rather than expendable munitions.

Energy Generation and Beam Propagation

High-energy laser weapons generate directed energy through in specialized gain media, requiring input power densities in the kilowatts to megawatts range for tactical effects. Early developmental systems, such as the Tactical High-Energy Laser (THEL) and (ABL), employed chemical oxygen-iodine lasers (COIL), where atomic iodine is excited via energy transfer from chemically generated singlet delta oxygen, producing output at 1.315 μm with efficiencies around 30%. These systems relied on reactions involving , , and gas, yielding high pulse energies but constrained by finite chemical fuel supplies and logistical demands for hazardous materials. Contemporary military laser weapons prioritize electrically driven solid-state and fiber lasers for enhanced deployability and sustainability. Diode-pumped fiber lasers, using ytterbium-doped silica fibers, convert electrical power to optical output with wall-plug efficiencies exceeding 40%, scalable to hundreds of kilowatts through coherent or spectral beam combination of multiple fiber amplifiers. Examples include the U.S. Navy's HELIOS system, delivering over 150 kW from compact, all-solid-state architecture, and the U.S. Army's 50 kW-class lasers integrated on Stryker vehicles, powered by vehicle generators or batteries. These electric systems avoid chemical replenishment, enabling near-infinite dwell times limited only by prime power availability, though they demand advanced thermal management to dissipate waste heat. Beam propagation in laser weapons involves collimating and directing the output via precision , such as beam expanders and gimbal-mounted telescopes, to achieve diffraction-limited focus at ranges up to tens of kilometers. Atmospheric transmission governs effective range, with attenuation from molecular absorption (e.g., by H2O and CO2 at specific bands) quantified by Beer's law, I = I0 e^{-βL}, where β incorporates absorption and coefficients and L is path length. For 1-2 μm wavelengths common in fiber lasers, clear-weather transmission exceeds 90% over 1 km horizontally, but aerosol and rain reduce this significantly. Turbulence induces distortions via fluctuations, causing beam wander, spread, and scintillation, while —nonlinear self-focusing from beam-heated air parcels—further degrades at high fluences above 10 kW/cm². mitigate these via real-time sensing (e.g., Shack-Hartmann sensors) and correction with deformable mirrors, restoring Strehl ratios above 0.5 for on-target intensities sufficient for hard-kill effects. Systems like those in incorporate fast beam control loops operating at kilohertz rates, compensating for platform motion and aero-optical effects in naval or airborne applications. Propagation modeling integrates these factors, predicting engagement envelopes under varying visibility and elevation angles to optimize wavelength and power scaling.

Classification of Laser Weapons

Continuous-Wave High-Energy Lasers

Continuous-wave high-energy lasers (CW HEL) in directed energy weapons emit a steady stream of coherent photons, sustaining power output to achieve thermal damage through prolonged beam dwell on , such as igniting fuels or structural components. These systems differ from pulsed lasers by prioritizing average power over peak intensity, enabling effects like material via heating rates that exceed target dissipation capabilities, typically requiring 10-100 kW for practical engagement ranges against drones or missiles. Solid-state configurations, dominant in modern CW HEL, leverage or slab amplifiers for beam combining, achieving efficiencies above 30% while minimizing size and weight for platform integration. The U.S. Navy's (LaWS), operational on USS Ponce from 2014 to 2017, exemplified early CW HEL deployment with a 33 kW output derived from six commercial fiber lasers, demonstrating intercepts of small unmanned aerial vehicles and speedboats at ranges up to 1 mile using shipboard power without expendable munitions. LaWS highlighted CW advantages in cost-per-shot, estimated at under $1, contrasting kinetic interceptors costing thousands. Advancing from LaWS, the High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance () system, a 60 kW-class CW laser scalable to 150 kW, was delivered by for installation on Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, including USS Preble. In fiscal year 2024 tests, HELIOS successfully neutralized an airborne drone target, validating continuous-wave lethality against dynamic threats while incorporating surveillance for . Lockheed Martin's progression in CW technology included a 300 kW demonstrator delivered to the U.S. military in , emphasizing reduced size, weight, and power demands through efficient beam scaling, with plans for 500 kW systems to extend effective ranges against hardened targets like cruise missiles. The U.S. Army targeted 50 kW CW lasers for vehicles by the mid-2020s, focusing on counter-unmanned aerial system roles, though integration delays persist due to thermal management and atmospheric propagation challenges. CW HEL systems face limitations from beam quality degradation in adverse weather and the need for precise tracking to maintain dwell times of seconds, yet their speed-of-light delivery and low collateral risk position them as force multipliers for layered defense architectures. Ongoing solid-state innovations, including diode-pumped amplifiers, continue to enhance output stability and ruggedness for operational environments.

Pulsed and Specialized Laser Systems

Pulsed weapons deliver energy in discrete, high-intensity bursts rather than a continuous stream, achieving peak powers that can exceed average output by factors of thousands or more. This enables effects such as rapid surface , plasma channel formation, and mechanical disruption of targets, often with less collateral than continuous-wave systems. In atmospheric propagation, pulsed operation reduces —a defocusing effect from beam-heated air—since pulse durations (typically nanoseconds to femtoseconds) are shorter than the time required for significant air or refractive index changes. The (PEP) exemplifies an early specialized pulsed system, designed for non-lethal counter-personnel effects by firing a 1-microsecond laser pulse (at around 1.06 micrometers ) to ablate a thin layer of target material, creating an expanding plasma that generates a supersonic shockwave, bright flash, and loud for incapacitation up to 10 meters. Developed under U.S. Marine Corps and programs starting in the early , PEP underwent field testing but faced technical limitations in consistently producing the required pressure waveform for reliable bio-effects, leading to program reassessment by 2008. Ultrashort pulsed lasers (USPLs), a advanced specialized variant with pulse durations under 1 and peak powers reaching 1-5 terawatts, leverage filamentation—self-guided plasma channels—to propagate through and deliver precise, high-fluence for hard-kill effects against missiles, drones, or . The U.S. Army's 2025 initiatives target tactical USPL prototypes for air defense, emphasizing scalable systems with terawatt-class output to enable deep penetration and minimal blooming. The Office of Naval Research supports USPL development for maritime applications, funding subsystems for high-peak-power and atmospheric compensation to suit shipboard directed weapons. As of 2025, private firms like Applied Energetics hold contracts for prototype USPL units, with fieldable systems projected for testing against drone threats. These efforts prioritize solid-state architectures for compactness and efficiency over legacy gas or chemical lasers.

Military Applications by Platform

Ground-Based Systems for Air and Missile Defense

Ground-based laser systems for air and employ high-energy lasers mounted on stationary or mobile platforms to engage aerial threats including drones, rockets, mortars, and short-range missiles. These weapons deliver concentrated energy to and destroy , providing a cost-effective alternative to kinetic interceptors with engagements costing fractions of a in . The U.S. Army's Directed Energy Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (DE M-SHORAD) integrates a 50-kilowatt-class high-energy onto combat vehicles for mobile counter-unmanned aerial system (C-UAS) and capabilities. Prototypes were deployed overseas in February 2024 for operational evaluation, with field tests in June 2025 at confirming integration with kinetic systems like the Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense rather than full replacement. The system acquires, tracks, and defeats threats using Raytheon-developed technology, marking the Army's initial operational deployment of a vehicle-mounted high-energy . Israel's , produced by , is a 100-kilowatt-class high-energy laser weapon system designed to intercept short-range rockets, , mortars, and drones within its multi-layered air defense architecture. Development concluded in September 2025, enabling production and delivery of initial units to the by year's end for integration alongside systems like . Variants such as Iron Beam-M and Lite Beam have achieved operational status, with deployments in active scenarios demonstrating real-world utility against low-cost threats. The system's precision and minimal debris generation suit urban environments, enhancing affordability for high-volume intercepts. Earlier joint U.S.- efforts under the (THEL) program tested a deuterium fluoride prototype against Katyusha rockets in 2004 and 2005, achieving successful intercepts but facing cancellation around 2006 due to size, logistics, and advancements in technology. Modern systems like DE M-SHORAD and leverage compact , addressing prior limitations in mobility and power efficiency for tactical applications. The has pursued shipboard high-energy laser (HEL) systems primarily to counter unmanned aerial systems (UAS), small boats, and asymmetric threats in maritime environments. The (LaWS), a 30 kW-class , was forward-deployed on the amphibious transport dock in the U.S. Fifth Fleet area of operations starting in late 2014, where it demonstrated effectiveness against small drones and boats during operational testing in the . However, LaWS represented an earlier prototype, with subsequent programs emphasizing scalability and integration into combat systems. The High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) program, developed by Lockheed Martin, delivers 60 kW of power with potential upgrade to 150 kW, integrating laser capabilities with surveillance and low-power dazzling functions for non-lethal effects. HELIOS was first installed on the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Preble (DDG-88) in 2019, marking an initial at-sea integration with the Aegis combat system. By 2021, operational installations occurred on additional destroyers including USS Dewey (DDG-105) and USS Stockdale (DDG-106), enabling layered defense against drones and missiles. In fiscal year 2024, USS Preble successfully engaged and neutralized an aerial drone target using during a live-fire exercise, validating its lethality against airborne threats at tactically relevant ranges. Further testing in the in 2025 confirmed 's role in countering Houthi drone attacks, with reporting active shipboard employment against hostile UAS. Despite these milestones, U.S. Fleet Forces Command in January 2025 criticized the Navy's progress in scaling directed-energy weapons for widespread deployment, highlighting persistent challenges in power generation, cooling, and atmospheric propagation over water. Allied navies have advanced similar capabilities. The United Kingdom's DragonFire , a 50 kW-class system developed for the Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyers, completed trials from to 2025, firing over 300 shots and destroying 30 representative drone . Initial high-power engagements against aerial occurred in January 2024, with acceleration toward operational fielding on four destroyers beginning in 2027. China's has developed the LY-1 shipborne HEL system, unveiled in September 2025, designed for intercepting drones and cruise missiles by disrupting sensors and structures, though independent verification of at-sea deployments remains limited.

Airborne and Drone-Integrated Systems

The Boeing YAL-1, a modified Boeing 747-400F equipped with a megawatt-class chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL), represented an early U.S. effort to develop airborne laser weapons for ballistic missile defense. Initiated in 1996, the program achieved first light in 2007 and successfully destroyed a ballistic missile target during a test on February 11, 2010, at 1.5 km altitude over the Pacific Ocean. However, the system faced insurmountable challenges including excessive size, weight exceeding 40,000 kg for the laser module alone, high operational costs estimated at $1 billion per aircraft, and logistical demands for toxic chemical fuels, leading to its cancellation in February 2011 after $5.3 billion in expenditures. Subsequent U.S. airborne laser initiatives shifted to solid-state lasers for pod-mounted self-defense systems. The U.S. Air Force's Self-protect High Energy Laser Demonstrator () program, launched in 2016, aimed to integrate a 150 kW-class laser into a pod comparable to an external for fighters like the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II, targeting incoming missiles and drones. Ground and airborne tests in 2019 demonstrated successful shoot-downs of air-launched missiles, but persistent issues with beam control amid aircraft vibrations, atmospheric at high altitudes, and power generation limited efficacy. By May 2024, the Air Force abandoned and related gunship laser efforts, citing technical immaturity and reallocating funds to ground and naval systems, though continues development of tactical airborne laser pods for complementary kinetic defenses. Russia's , a modified Il-76MD , has pursued capabilities since the Soviet era. First flown in 1981 with laser integration tests beginning in 1983, the platform successfully damaged an aerial target at 10,000 m altitude on April 27, 1984, using a high-energy turret. Upgrades in the incorporated advanced for potential anti-satellite roles, with reported flights resuming in 2017 amid claims of enhanced power for blinding sensors or destroying low-orbit assets, though verifiable combat demonstrations remain absent and the program's operational status is opaque due to limited transparency from Russian sources. Drone-integrated laser systems address airborne platform constraints by leveraging smaller, unmanned vehicles for shorter-range engagements against drones and missiles. In April 2025, confirmed development of an air-to-air high-energy for the MQ-9 , designed to neutralize enemy unmanned aerial systems at tactically relevant distances, capitalizing on the drone's endurance and lower altitude operations to mitigate atmospheric beam degradation. Similarly, a 2025 rendering depicted the MQ-20 Avenger unmanned combat air vehicle with an integrated nose-mounted weapon, signaling progress toward scalable directed energy effectors on high-speed drones for swarm defense and precision strikes, though full operational integration awaits advancements and flight testing. These systems promise enhanced mobility over ground-based counterparts, enabling rapid repositioning and persistent coverage, but contend with fundamental physics limitations such as in turbulent airflows and thermal management under flight stresses, necessitating hybrid approaches with microwaves or kinetics until efficiencies improve.

Key Examples and Technologies

Iron Beam and Anti-Drone Variants

The Iron Beam is a 100 kW-class high-energy laser weapon system (HELWS) developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems for the Israeli Defense Forces, designed primarily for short-range interception of aerial threats such as rockets, mortars, artillery, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Operating at ranges from hundreds of meters to several kilometers, it delivers precise, speed-of-light engagements with minimal collateral damage and a per-shot cost of approximately $2.50 to $3.50, leveraging electrical power for an effectively unlimited magazine. In accelerated operational testing during the Swords of Iron conflict, an adapted version achieved its combat debut in October 2024, successfully downing scores of Hezbollah drones and other threats as part of Israel's multi-layered air defense integration with systems like Iron Dome. Anti-drone capabilities are central to 's design, enabling neutralization of UAVs through damage to critical components like sensors and airframes, with high efficacy against low-cost, swarm-based threats that overwhelm traditional interceptors. Comprehensive trials in September 2025 validated its performance in full operational scenarios, including UAV interceptions alongside rockets and mortars. Smaller, tactical variants—derived from Iron Beam technology and displayed at defense expos—have been fielded to counter drone incursions from , prioritizing rapid, low-signature engagements against commercial micro-UAVs (C-mUAVs). The LITE BEAM represents a specialized 10 kW anti-drone variant, optimized for engaging C-mUAVs at distances up to 2 kilometers with compact, deployable hardware suitable for forward operating bases. The 450, a long-range featuring a 450 mm aperture and proprietary for beam stabilization, enhances anti-drone performance through extended effective range and faster target acquisition, with development finalized in September 2025 and initial IDF deliveries slated for late 2025. Mobile configurations, such as the IRON BEAM-M, provide tactical flexibility for ground forces facing dynamic drone threats, while a naval variant is in development to protect vessels from UAV swarms and anti-ship missiles. These collectively address the proliferation of inexpensive drones by offering scalable, cost-effective directed-energy solutions that bypass constraints.

Electrolaser and Pulsed Energy Projectiles

An , also known as a laser-induced plasma channel (LIPC) weapon, operates by firing an ultrashort-pulse to ionize air molecules along its path, creating a conductive plasma filament that persists briefly after the laser pulse ends. This channel guides a high-voltage electrical discharge from the weapon to the target, effectively extending the range of electroshock effects beyond traditional tasers. The U.S. Army's initiated research into LIPC technology around 2012, aiming to develop a system capable of directing lightning-like bolts at conductive targets such as vehicles or electronics, which would conduct electricity better than surrounding air or ground. Early prototypes demonstrated the feasibility of steering electrical discharges over distances of tens to hundreds of meters, with potential applications in disabling enemy equipment without kinetic projectiles. However, challenges including plasma channel stability in varying atmospheric conditions, power requirements for sustained conductivity, and safety risks from unintended arcing have limited progress to laboratory demonstrations, with no confirmed field deployments as of 2025. Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEP) differ from electrolasers by employing a high-energy laser pulse that generates a localized plasma burst upon striking a target, producing a shockwave and thermal effects for incapacitation rather than conducting electricity through air. Developed primarily by the U.S. Department of Defense's Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate in the early , PEP systems were intended as crew-served, non-lethal tools for and personnel deterrence, delivering controllable bio-effects like intense or temporary disorientation at ranges up to 50 meters without permanent injury. Initial tests in 2005 confirmed the plasma explosion's ability to induce neuromuscular disruption via rapid waves and heat, outperforming chemical agents in precision. Despite successful prototypes, the program faced termination around 2008 due to ethical concerns over inflicting "maximum " without visible marks—potentially enabling undetectable —and difficulties scaling power sources for reliable field use. No major advancements or revitalizations have been reported since, with PEP remaining in conceptual or archival status amid broader shifts toward lethal high-energy lasers. Both technologies represent pulsed laser variants emphasizing non-kinetic effects but highlight trade-offs: electrolasers prioritize electrical conduction for versatile targeting of conductive objects, while PEPs focus on direct-impact plasma for human incapacitation. Development efforts underscore directed-energy challenges, including energy efficiency and environmental robustness, with neither achieving operational maturity despite early promise in counter-personnel and counter-material roles.

Dazzler and Non-Lethal Systems

![PHASR rifle prototype][float-right] Dazzler laser systems are non-lethal directed-energy weapons designed to temporarily impair an individual's vision through intense illumination, disorienting targets without causing permanent eye damage. These systems emit visible or near-visible light to overwhelm the , creating a blinding flash or spot that hinders aiming or targeting capabilities. Developed primarily for military and applications, dazzlers provide an intermediate force option between verbal commands and lethal engagement, particularly useful against threats like small boat attacks, drone operators, or hostile personnel at standoff distances. International regulations, including the 1995 (Protocol IV to the ), prohibit the development, production, and use of lasers specifically engineered to cause permanent blindness but permit temporary dazzlers provided they incorporate safeguards against unintended permanent injury, such as automatic shutoff at eye-safe distances. Compliance protocols emphasize selection (e.g., 532 nm lasers for high visibility), power density limits, and range-dependent attenuation to ensure effects dissipate beyond operational ranges. The U.S. Department of Defense adheres to these via directives like DoDI 6055.15, which mandates eye-safety testing and nominal ocular hazard distances for all systems. Prominent examples include the U.S. Air Force's Personnel Halting and Stimulation Response (PHASR) , a prototype unveiled in November 2005 by the Air Force Research Laboratory's Directed Energy Directorate. The PHASR employed dual-wavelength lasers—one visible for dazzling and one invisible for rangefinding—to temporarily blind targets at ranges up to 500 meters, with the system designed to halt aggressors by impairing their without physical contact. Testing confirmed its ability to dazzle without permanent harm, though it was never fielded operationally due to integration challenges and evolving priorities in non-lethal weapons. BAE Systems developed a shipboard laser dazzler demonstrated in January 2011 for commercial maritime defense against , capable of illuminating small vessels at over 1 mile to disorient attackers and prevent accurate weapon fire, such as from AK-47s or RPGs. Sponsored initially for use, the system used low-power visible lasers compliant with blinding protocols, proving effective in trials against moving targets without risking permanent retinal damage. Similar efforts include DARPA-backed dazzlers by LE Systems using diode-pumped solid-state (DPSS) lasers at 532 nm for enhanced intensity and portability. Earlier non-lethal laser concepts trace to Soviet developments around , including a pyrotechnic flash-based for temporary blinding at short ranges, influencing later Western designs focused on precision and safety. Chinese systems like the ZKZM-500, reported in the , extended dazzler principles to handheld crowd-control devices, though details on deployment remain limited and unverified beyond claims. Effectiveness across these systems hinges on environmental factors like atmospheric clarity and target aversion response, with studies indicating temporary vision impairment lasting seconds to minutes, sufficient for tactical advantage but requiring operator training to avoid protocol violations.

Operational Deployments and Testing

Field Deployments in Conflict Zones

The United States Army deployed two high-energy laser prototypes, known as the Indirect Fire Protection Capability-High Energy Laser (IFPC-HEL) systems, to an undisclosed overseas location in April 2024 for operational use against enemy drones threatening U.S. troops and allies. These 50-kilowatt-class lasers, developed by Boeing and Lockheed Martin, were integrated into existing air defense architectures to provide layered protection in active threat environments, marking the first confirmed field deployment of such systems by the U.S. military in a combat zone. Reports indicate the systems successfully engaged and neutralized incoming unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), demonstrating practical efficacy against low-cost swarm threats in real-world conditions, though exact locations and engagement details remain classified. In the , confirmed the operational deployment of its indigenous Tryzub laser weapon system by February 2025, utilizing it to counter Russian drones and aerial targets. The system, capable of engaging threats at ranges exceeding one mile and altitudes up to two kilometers, was publicly demonstrated in April 2025 intercepting drones and missiles, with Ukrainian officials stating it had already achieved combat successes against slow-moving, low-flying UAVs deployed by Russian forces. Independent analyses note Tryzub's effectiveness stems from its directed-energy beam's ability to disable electronics and airframes without ammunition costs, though production scaling remains limited by power and targeting constraints in frontline conditions. , in response, reportedly deployed Chinese-supplied laser systems in June 2025 to repel Ukrainian drone incursions, highlighting reciprocal adoption of the technology amid escalating aerial attrition. Israel achieved the first confirmed combat use of laser weapons in May 2025, employing systems derived from the program to intercept drones launched from Gaza and adjacent areas. By September 2025, —a ground-based high-power laser integrated with batteries—completed final trials and entered operational deployment along the Gaza border, designed to neutralize rockets, mortars, and UAVs at a cost of approximately $2 per intercept compared to thousands for missiles. The system's rollout followed accelerated development amid persistent threats, with confirming its ability to track and destroy short-range projectiles in real-time field tests under combat-like conditions. Deployment focused on southern fronts, where it supplemented kinetic interceptors against and incursions, though atmospheric interference from dust and humidity posed intermittent challenges.

Recent U.S. and Allied Testing Milestones

In fiscal year 2024, the U.S. Navy successfully tested the High-Energy Laser with Integrated Optical Dazzler and Surveillance () system aboard the USS Preble, engaging and neutralizing an during at-sea trials off the coast of . The 60-kilowatt-class demonstrated precision tracking and destruction capabilities against drone threats, marking a key step toward integration on Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. The U.S. Army advanced its directed energy programs with tests at , , in summer 2024, where soldiers operated 50-kilowatt high-energy lasers alongside small missiles to counter incoming threats, validating layered defense concepts against drones and rockets. Earlier, the Air Force's Tactical High-power Operational Responder (THOR) completed a two-year testing phase in 2023, successfully engaging multiple drone targets in a swarm scenario during field demonstrations. Among U.S. allies, the achieved a milestone in January 2024 with the DragonFire , conducting the first high-power laser firing against aerial targets at the Ministry of Defence's Range, demonstrating precision hits on objects the size of a one-pound coin from one kilometer away. This test advanced the program's timeline, accelerating potential deployment on warships by 2027. Israel completed developmental testing of the ground-based laser system in September 2025, intercepting rockets, drones, and mortars in final trials, paving the way for operational deployment by year's end to complement the . The system, developed by Rafael and Elbit, achieved certification for production following successful engagements at ranges up to several kilometers.

Advantages and Strategic Benefits

Cost-Effectiveness and Precision Targeting

Laser weapons demonstrate significant cost-effectiveness compared to traditional kinetic interceptors, primarily due to their minimal per engagement. Systems like the UK's DragonFire laser neutralize aerial threats for approximately $13 per shot, in contrast to missiles that can exceed $1 million each. Similarly, Israel's achieves interceptions at $2 to $5 per shot, far below the $40,000 to $50,000 cost of an Tamir missile. The U.S. Navy's system emphasizes low cost-per-kill through its reliance on electrical power rather than expendable munitions, enabling sustained operations against swarms without depleting finite inventories. This paradigm shift favors defenders facing asymmetric threats, where adversaries deploy low-cost drones or rockets en masse, rendering missile-based defenses economically unsustainable after repeated engagements. Precision targeting further enhances the strategic value of laser systems, as their speed-of-light propagation allows near-instantaneous engagement with pinpoint accuracy. Directed energy beams can focus on specific vulnerabilities, such as drone sensors or warheads, minimizing compared to explosive interceptors that risk debris scatter. The system's integrated optical capabilities support both lethal and non-lethal modes, enabling graduated responses from dazzling to destructive burns, which reduces unintended escalation. In testing, such precision has demonstrated the ability to disable targets without full kinetic destruction, preserving operational tempo in dense threat environments like maritime chokepoints. However, realization of these benefits hinges on overcoming beam control challenges in adverse , ensuring consistent performance across varied operational scenarios. Overall, the combination of economic scalability and surgical accuracy positions lasers as a force multiplier against proliferating precision-guided threats.

Scalability Against Mass Threats

Laser weapons offer inherent scalability against mass threats such as drone swarms and barrages due to their reliance on electrical power rather than expendable munitions, enabling repeated engagements without logistical resupply constraints. High-energy laser (HEL) systems can theoretically sustain fire indefinitely, limited primarily by and power generation capacity, allowing defenses to counter low-cost, high-volume attacks that overwhelm traditional kinetic interceptors. For instance, modular architectures facilitate power scaling to higher outputs, enhancing dwell time efficiency against clustered targets. Specific systems demonstrate practical scalability in testing and deployment. Israel's laser interceptor, operationalized in 2025, is designed to neutralize short-range rockets, mortars, and drones in barrages, with capabilities to handle simultaneous aerial threats at the , reducing interception costs to equivalents compared to $50,000-per-shot missiles. A NATO-developed 100 kW truck-mounted laser, tested in 2025, can neutralize up to 20 drones per minute by rapidly sequencing beam engagements. The U.S. Navy's system, integrated on Arleigh Burke-class destroyers like USS Preble, has downed aerial drones in 2025 tests, with automated targeting poised to extend efficacy against swarms through high-speed beam director slewing. However, scalability faces physical constraints inherent to laser physics, particularly serial engagement where a single beam must dwell on each target sequentially to achieve thermal damage, limiting throughput against high-velocity salvos or dispersed swarms. Unlike high-power (HPM) directed-energy variants that enable area effects for multiple simultaneous targets, HELs require precise tracking and sufficient energy per pulse, potentially bottlenecking defenses during intense barrages unless multiple emitters are networked. Analysts note that while lasers excel against slower drone threats, countering salvos demands integrated multi-weapon architectures to distribute workload, as a lone system cannot parallelize beams without advanced beam combining.

Technical and Practical Challenges

Atmospheric and Power Limitations

Atmospheric propagation poses significant constraints on high-energy laser (HEL) weapons, primarily through absorption, scattering, and nonlinear effects that degrade beam quality and reduce on-target irradiance. Absorption occurs when laser photons are captured by atmospheric molecules such as water vapor, carbon dioxide, and oxygen, converting energy into heat; for instance, at the 10.6 μm wavelength of CO₂ lasers, attenuation can exceed 1 dB/km in humid conditions due to strong molecular absorption bands. Shorter wavelengths around 1 μm, used in fiber and solid-state lasers, experience lower gaseous absorption but remain vulnerable to aerosol and particulate effects, with total attenuation potentially reaching several dB/km in foggy or dusty environments. Scattering by aerosols and particulates further diverts energy, limiting effective range to under 10 km for ground-based systems under adverse weather; for example, China's LY-1 shipborne laser weapon sees performance degradation in rain, fog, or dust, with its detailed effective range not publicly disclosed. Thermal blooming exacerbates these issues for continuous-wave or high-pulse-energy lasers, where absorbed energy heats the air along the beam path, creating refractive index gradients that cause the beam to self-defocus and spread. This nonlinear effect scales with laser power density, becoming dominant above ~100 kW for 1 μm beams in clear air, reducing fluence on distant targets by factors of 10 or more without adaptive optics mitigation. Atmospheric turbulence induces additional beam wander and scintillation, with optical path differences up to several wavelengths over kilometer scales, further limiting precision against fast-moving threats like missiles. These factors collectively restrict ground- and sea-level HEL efficacy to ranges of 1–5 km in realistic conditions, prompting designs like airborne platforms to elevate beams above dense lower atmosphere layers. However, space-based lasers targeting terrestrial assets like ships or buildings must still propagate through the entire atmospheric column, subjecting the beam to absorption, dispersion, scattering, and thermal blooming that significantly reduce power at the target. Power limitations stem from the immense electrical demands of HEL systems, which require sustained outputs of 100 kW to 1 MW for tactical effects against hardened targets, though realistic operational levels of 100–500 kW suffice for fragile threats like drones or missiles but not for destroying massive, armored structures such as ships or buildings, drawing from generators or shipboard supplies that strain mobile platforms. The thermal damage is localized to the small beam diameter (centimeters to meters), heating or melting specific points rather than inducing widespread explosion or demolition, and requires seconds to minutes of continuous dwell time on the same spot for meaningful effects. Handheld lethal laser weapons remain unavailable due to the need for kilowatts of power to achieve deadly effects, which exceeds the capabilities of current portable batteries; energy density limitations result in overheating, explosion risks, or the requirement for bulky external power sources like backpacks, preventing compact, self-contained designs. Efficient power conversion remains challenging, with diode-pumped solid-state lasers achieving wall-plug efficiencies below 30%, necessitating input powers exceeding 300 kW for 100 kW output beams and generating comparable waste heat. Thermal management is critical, as uncooled systems risk diode array failure or beam distortion; liquid cooling loops must dissipate megajoules per second, adding mass and complexity that limit deployment on vehicles or aircraft. Supply chain vulnerabilities and integration with intermittent sources like batteries further hinder scalability, with military assessments noting that current prime power systems fall short for multi-engagement scenarios without breakthroughs in compact generators.

Integration and Reliability Issues

Integration of high-energy laser (HEL) systems into military platforms presents significant engineering hurdles due to constraints on , , power, and compatibility with existing architectures. For naval vessels, systems like the High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance () require full integration into combat management systems such as , which complicates installation compared to simpler bolt-on prototypes like the Laser Weapon System (LaWS), demanding extensive modifications to shipboard electronics and structures. and ground vehicles face additional challenges from limited capacities, where HEL components must compete with radars, sensors, and munitions, often necessitating trade-offs in mission range or endurance. Power delivery remains a core issue, as HELs demand megawatt-level bursts that exceed standard platform generators, frequently requiring dedicated units that increase and logistical footprints. Reliability concerns further impede operational deployment, with HEL systems exhibiting lower mean time between failures (MTBF) than conventional kinetics due to thermal stresses on and amplifiers. Early programs like the (THEL) demonstrated reliability shortfalls from reliance on toxic chemical fuels, leading to maintenance-intensive operations and eventual cancellation despite successful intercepts. Contemporary solid-state lasers mitigate some but introduce vulnerabilities to environmental factors, including atmospheric from , , or , which degrade beam coherence and reduce dwell times against moving targets. The U.S. Navy has initiated reliability assessments for , tracking metrics like maintainability and supply support, yet field tests reveal persistent issues with component overheating and beam control stability under prolonged engagements. For systems like China's LY-1, real combat deployment details remain unknown. In large-scale systems relying on commercial diodes, integration costs escalate substantially due to the need for custom optics, controls, and power systems adapted for defense requirements. Commercial lasers often lack the extreme reliability suited to harsh military environments, while their inferior beam quality intensifies atmospheric effects such as thermal blooming and turbulence. Militaries require ruggedness beyond that of off-the-shelf diodes, driving further engineering modifications. Military reports highlight scalability gaps, where prototype successes in controlled tests fail to translate to sustained operations amid supply chain immaturity for high-precision optics and cooling systems. The U.S. Army's directed-energy efforts for air defense, including the Indirect Fires Protection Capability-High Energy Laser (IFPC-HEL), grapple with manufacturing affordability and ruggedization for mobile platforms, delaying transitions from labs to forward deployments. Recent program setbacks, including fiscal 2024 test anomalies in HEL prototypes, underscore the need for enhanced fault-tolerant designs to achieve uptime comparable to missile interceptors, currently estimated at under 50% in simulated combat scenarios. Overall, these integration and reliability barriers stem from the immature technology base, requiring iterative prototyping and adversarial testing to mature toward warfighter acceptance by the late 2020s.

Countermeasures and Defenses

Material and Tactical Mitigations

Material mitigations against laser weapons primarily involve surface treatments designed to reflect incident energy or dissipate it through , thereby increasing the dwell time required for damage. mirrors and reflective coatings can achieve reflectivity exceeding 99.99% at specific laser wavelengths, such as those used in high-energy laser systems, by exploiting wavelength-selective interference layers. Ablative coatings, often applied as sprays to missiles or unmanned aerial (UAVs), vaporize upon heating to carry away , delaying structural failure; these materials, including polymers with high , have demonstrated effectiveness in slowing laser-induced ignition in laboratory tests against drone targets. Advanced variants incorporate like nanoalumina or nanosilica, which enhance thermal resistance by scattering or absorbing wavelengths common in weaponized lasers, as evaluated for UAV in 2024 studies. Bragg mirrors and ceramic coatings provide additional passive shielding for air assets, reflecting energy or insulating underlying structures, though their diminishes against multi- or adaptive systems. These material approaches are limited by the need for precise matching—lasers tunable beyond the coating's design band can penetrate—and , which impacts vehicle performance; empirical tests show even simple can serve as a rudimentary ablative layer for short exposures. Tactical mitigations leverage and environmental manipulation to deny lasers their line-of-sight or sustained dwell time requirements. Rapid maneuvering by UAVs or missiles disrupts targeting locks, as lasers demand continuous tracking for seconds to minutes to achieve damage thresholds, with evasive patterns reducing effective engagement windows. Swarm tactics, deploying decoy drones alongside primary assets, overwhelm laser systems' limited field-of-view and power allocation, forcing resource dilution; U.S. analyses indicate swarms can saturate defenses even against kilowatt-class lasers. Obscurants such as smoke screens or dispersants scatter or absorb beam energy, with particle sizes tuned to laser wavelengths (e.g., 1-10 micrometers for near-infrared) proven to attenuate propagation in field simulations. Rotational dynamics, such as spinning projectiles, distribute loads across surfaces, mitigating localized ; this is inherent in stabilized munitions and has been quantified in vulnerability assessments where dwell time per spot falls inversely with rotation rate. These tactics, while effective against current directed-energy systems, face challenges from advancing in lasers that compensate for atmospheric distortion and tracking errors.

Adversarial Developments

Russia has deployed the Peresvet laser weapon system to five strategic missile divisions since 2018, primarily to dazzle or blind optical sensors on reconnaissance satellites, thereby masking intercontinental ballistic missile deployments and enhancing silo perimeter defense. This mobile, truck-mounted system integrates with upgraded air defense perimeters around ICBM sites, as part of broader nuclear force modernization efforts documented in 2025 assessments. In July 2025, Russian forces tested the Posokh laser air defense system against drone targets, demonstrating capabilities to neutralize unmanned aerial vehicles through directed energy, amid ongoing adaptations to counter low-cost swarm threats in Ukraine. China's has integrated directed energy weapons, including ground-based , into its counterspace arsenal to deny U.S. -based intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets during potential conflicts. The U.S. Department of Defense report on Chinese military developments highlights rapid advancements in high-energy systems for anti- roles, though operational deployments remain opaque and potentially exaggerated in state disclosures. These systems aim to disrupt adversary targeting by temporarily blinding sensors, paralleling U.S. concerns over escalating domain competition. Iran unveiled the Seraj laser-based air defense system in January 2025 during exercises near the Fordow nuclear facility, claiming it provides high-precision interception of aerial threats including drones and missiles. By August 2025, Iran had deployed the Chinese-origin Silent Hunter fiber-optic laser system, with power outputs up to 30-100 kW, to safeguard high-value assets against low-flying unmanned threats, marking a reliance on imported technology amid domestic limitations. Such developments, while unverified in independent testing, signal proliferation of directed energy capabilities to asymmetric actors, potentially complicating Western precision strike operations.

Controversies and Broader Implications

The primary legal constraint on laser weapons arises from Protocol IV to the (CCW), adopted in 1995 and entering into force on July 30, 1998, which prohibits the employment of laser weapons specifically designed, as their sole combat function or as one of their combat functions, to cause permanent blindness to the or through . As of 2024, the protocol has been ratified by over 100 states parties, obliging them to exert best efforts to avoid incidental permanent blindness during lawful use of other laser systems and to review new weapons for compliance under Article 36 of Additional Protocol I to the . Modern high-energy laser (HEL) systems, such as those developed for anti-drone or anti-missile defense, are generally designed to inflict thermal damage on material targets rather than human eyes, thereby complying with the protocol's intent, though incidental blinding remains permissible if it results from legitimate combat operations rather than deliberate design. Ethical debates center on whether directed energy weapons (DEWs), including lasers, conform to just war principles of distinction, proportionality, and avoidance of unnecessary suffering. Proponents argue that lasers' precision and speed enable targeted incapacitation of threats like swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles, potentially reducing and overall human casualties compared to kinetic munitions, which scatter fragments and cause indiscriminate blast effects. This aligns with assessments framing DEWs as morally superior when they mitigate foreseen harms through controlled escalation from non-lethal to lethal effects, provided alternatives are less effective or more destructive. Critics, however, contend that the low per engagement—effectively unlimited "ammunition" from electrical power—could lower the threshold for initiating force, eroding proportionality by encouraging overuse against minimally threatening targets and blurring lines between and warfare in adjustable-power scenarios. Further ethical concerns involve the novel mechanisms of from DEWs, such as thermal burns or temporary sensory disruption, which challenge traditional norms against superfluous harm due to uncertain long-term impacts and potential for non-kinetic effects mimicking prohibited blinding without explicit . In non-lethal applications, such as , reports highlight risks of skin damage or neurological effects from untested exposure levels, prompting calls for rigorous independent verification before deployment to ensure effects remain proportionate to threats. These debates underscore a tension between technological advancement's promise of humane precision and the causal risk of normalizing escalatory or covert harms in asymmetric conflicts, with no comprehensive treaty yet addressing DEWs beyond blinding-specific bans.

Geopolitical and Deterrence Impacts

Laser weapons enhance deterrence by providing a cost-effective means to counter proliferating low-cost threats such as drones and cruise missiles, potentially shifting the economic calculus of aggression in favor of defenders. Unlike kinetic interceptors costing millions per engagement, lasers operate at approximately £10 per shot, enabling sustained defense without depleting finite munitions stocks. This capability preserves higher-end interceptors for strategic threats, thereby strengthening overall defensive postures and discouraging massed attacks that might otherwise overwhelm traditional systems. The tunable effects of directed energy—from non-lethal dazzling to destructive burns—allow for graduated responses, aligning with by signaling resolve without immediate escalation to lethal force. The proliferation of laser development among major powers has spurred an , with the , , and investing heavily to maintain or achieve superiority. The U.S. has deployed systems like the High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance () on naval vessels such as the USS Preble, tested in 2024, to counter drone swarms in contested maritime environments. showcased high-power microwave directed-energy systems at the Zhuhai Airshow in November 2024, mounted on mobile platforms for anti-drone roles, reflecting a focus on asymmetric advantages in potential Taiwan conflicts. continues directed-energy research, integrating lasers into aerial and ground systems to bolster defenses against unmanned threats observed in . This competition extends to allies like the , which trialed the DragonFire laser in 2024, and , underscoring a multipolar race that could accelerate technological maturation but risks instability if breakthroughs confer decisive edges. Geopolitically, laser weapons influence hotspots by bolstering deterrence against saturation attacks, as evidenced by U.S. strategies to create a "hellscape" of defenses in the using layered directed-energy systems. In regions like the , naval lasers mitigate risks from inexpensive drone swarms, potentially deterring adventurism by raising the cost of probing defenses without provoking broader conflict. Lessons from , where drones have proliferated, highlight how lasers could disrupt adversary command-and-control by targeting sensors, eroding offensive momentum and reinforcing stalemates. However, the low of laser engagements may lower escalation thresholds, as repeated low-intensity uses could normalize directed-energy applications, complicating traditional deterrence based on observable, high-cost strikes. Overall, while lasers promise to restore defensive advantages eroded by cheap precision-guided threats, their integration risks dynamics that prioritize offense-defense imbalances, potentially undermining strategic stability unless accompanied by transparency measures or discussions. Effective deployment hinges on overcoming atmospheric limitations, yet successful fielding could redefine , favoring nations with robust power generation and integration capabilities.

References

  1. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106717
  2. https://lasers.llnl.gov/education/nifs-guide-how-lasers-work
  3. https://theconversation.com/high-energy-laser-weapons-a-defense-expert-explains-how-they-work-and-what-they-are-used-for-225071
  4. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA557011.pdf
  5. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R46925
  6. https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/n/navy-shipboard-lasers.html
  7. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/directed-energy.html
  8. https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2025/08/will-2026-be-military-lasers-breakthrough-year/407339/
  9. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2024/01/directed-energy-the-focus-on-laser-weapons-intensifies.html
  10. https://www.inss.org.il/publication/laser-weapon/
  11. https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2005/08/einstein-predicts-stimulated-emission
  12. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1198&context=physsp
  13. https://ethw.org/Laser
  14. https://www.kirtland.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2269047/60-years-of-laser-technology-and-a-legacy-of-development/
  15. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA557756.pdf
  16. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA560558.pdf
  17. https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/laser-and-charged-particle-beam-weapons
  18. https://medcoeckapwstorprd01.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/pfw-images/dbimages/Laser%2520Ch%25202.pdf
  19. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/laser-weapons-get-real/
  20. https://unidir.org/directed-energy-weapons-a-new-look-at-an-old-technology/
  21. https://www.optica-opn.org/home/articles/volume_30/may_2019/features/creating_an_airborne_laser_lab/
  22. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1977-80v04/d51
  23. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/soviet-star-wars-8758185/
  24. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2000-07/news-briefs/thel-test-success
  25. https://www.aftc.af.mil/News/On-This-Day-in-Test-History/Article-Display-Test-History/Article/2462050/february-3-2010-testing-of-yal-1-airborne-laser-test-bed/
  26. https://secure.boeingimages.com/archive/YAL-1-Airborne-Laser-B-roll-2JRSXLJVPVPV.html
  27. https://www.onr.navy.mil/media-center/news-releases/historic-leap-navy-shipboard-laser-operates-persian-gulf
  28. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/systems/laws.htm
  29. https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2025/02/04/us-navy-hits-drone-with-helios-laser-in-successful-test/
  30. https://www.wired.com/story/laser-wars-us-military-laser-weapons/
  31. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/israeli-anti-missile-laser-system-iron-beam-ready-military-use-this-year-2025-09-17/
  32. https://debuglies.com/2025/09/05/unveiling-the-ly-1-directed-energy-laser-weapon-technological-configuration-tactical-utility-and-strategic-significance-of-chinas-high-power-laser-system-at-the-september-3-2025-military-p/
  33. https://www.laserwars.net/p/us-military-laser-weapons-programs-list
  34. https://www.photonicsonline.com/doc/the-laser-arsenal-the-military-s-new-speed-of-light-defense-systems-0001
  35. https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170045/
  36. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/Books/CTBSP-Exports/Effects-of-Directed-Energy-Weapons.pdf
  37. https://dsb.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/reports/2000s/ADA394880.pdf
  38. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA151279.pdf
  39. https://www.rtx.com/raytheon/what-we-do/integrated-air-and-missile-defense/lasers
  40. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/08/armys-laser-weapons-pretty-mature-could-contribute-to-next-gen-missile-defense/
  41. https://dsiac.dtic.mil/articles/power-generation-and-storage-for-directed-energy-systems/
  42. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36734846.pdf
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307435846_Atmospheric_Propagation_of_High-Energy_Laser_Beams
  44. https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-55-7-1757
  45. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1046505.pdf
  46. https://www.northropgrumman.com/what-we-do/aoa-xinetics/applications/high-power-laser-beam-control
  47. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/2053280/directed-energy-weapons-are-real-and-disruptive/
  48. https://www.jedonline.com/2023/03/06/de-101-directed-energy-weapons-a-technology-in-transition/
  49. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R44175
  50. https://optics.org/news/13/9/28
  51. https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2023-07-28-Lockheed-Martin-to-Scale-Its-Highest-Powered-Laser-to-500-Kilowatts-Power-Level
  52. https://dsiac.dtic.mil/articles/the-u-s-army-wants-pulsed-lasers-to-slice-missiles-in-half/
  53. https://www.onr.navy.mil/organization/departments/code-35/division-353/directed-energy-weapons-cdew-and-high-energy-lasers
  54. https://breakingdefense.com/2021/10/rapid-pulse-laser-weapons-could-be-the-pentagons-future-edge/
  55. https://dsiac.dtic.mil/articles/recent-advancements-in-ultrashort-pulse-lasers-shed-new-light-on-directed-energy-applications/
  56. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1125446.pdf
  57. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/pep.htm
  58. https://www.wired.com/2008/09/pulsed-laser-fi/
  59. https://www.army.mil/article/287875/army_research_leading_laser_defeat_innovation_backed_by_institutional_knowledge_rapid_adaptation
  60. https://www.onr.navy.mil/organization/departments/code-35/division-353/directed-energy-weapons-uspl-and-atmospheric-characterization/
  61. https://www.laserwars.net/p/applied-energetics-ultrashort-pulse-laser-weapon
  62. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2024/army/2024de_m-shorad.pdf?ver=aP_keA3PAt1C_pkWp_rAdQ%253D%253D
  63. https://www.army.mil/article/286677/us_army_tests_laser_weapons_aiming_at_a_future_of_energy_based_air_defense
  64. https://interestingengineering.com/military/stryker-becomes-laser-tank-drones
  65. https://www.rafael.co.il/news/rafael-israel-mod-iron-beam-450-development-completed-delivery-to-idf-soon/
  66. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2025/10/13/iron-beam-on-track-for-deployment-this-year
  67. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/09/lasers-iron-beam-iron-dome-israel-pew-pew/
  68. https://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/JDE/JV1N1P4-Shwartz.pdf
  69. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/02/u-s-navy-helios-laser-test-underscores-greater-advancements-in-directed-energy-weapons/
  70. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2022/july/now-arriving-high-power-laser-competition
  71. https://www.laserwars.net/p/navy-laser-weapon-red-sea
  72. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/01/state-of-navys-shipboard-laser-efforts-is-embarrassing-says-top-fleet-commander/
  73. https://www.naval-technology.com/news/dragonfire-laser-weapon-fired-over-300-shots-in-recent-test/
  74. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/advanced-future-military-laser-achieves-uk-first
  75. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3327271/last-line-defence-military-journal-sheds-light-chinas-new-ly-1-shipborne-laser-weapon
  76. https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/abl.htm
  77. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/05/17/air-force-abandons-plan-mount-laser-weapon-fighter-jet-after-scrapping-similar-gunship-project.html
  78. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1836495/air-force-research-laboratory-completes-successful-shoot-down-of-air-launched-m/
  79. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/2020/tactical-airborne-laser-pods-are-coming.html
  80. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/a-60.htm
  81. https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/what_is_the_a_60_an_il_76_weaponized_with_laser_that_russians_hope_will_help_against_nato_uavs-11019.html
  82. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/04/general-atomics-confirms-drone-killing-air-to-air-laser-is-in-development/
  83. https://www.twz.com/air/mq-20-avenger-depicted-with-laser-weapon-in-its-nose-a-sign-of-whats-to-come
  84. https://www.rafael.co.il/system/iron-beam/
  85. https://www.twz.com/news-features/israels-iron-beam-laser-air-defense-system-has-downed-enemy-drones
  86. https://eos-aus.com/news/the-hottest-new-defense-against-drones-lasers/
  87. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-18630622
  88. https://newatlas.com/laser-induced-plasma-channel/23117/
  89. https://www.army.mil/article/82262/picatinny_engineers_set_phasers_to_fry
  90. https://www.zdnet.com/article/new-military-weapon-shoots-lightning-bolts/
  91. https://defensereview.com/laser-induced-plasma-channel-lipc-lightning-bolt-on-a-laser-beam-laserlightning-weapon/
  92. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7077-maximum-pain-is-aim-of-new-us-weapon/
  93. https://www.theregister.com/2005/03/03/us_plasma_weapon/
  94. https://www.chemeurope.com/en/encyclopedia/Electrolaser.html
  95. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/132902/new-technology-dazzles-aggressors/
  96. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8275-us-military-sets-laser-phasrs-to-stun/
  97. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1177300.pdf
  98. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/605515p.pdf
  99. https://www.defenceiq.com/naval-maritime-defence/press-releases/bae-systems-develops-non-lethal-laser-to-defend-a
  100. https://www.laserfocusworld.com/lasers-sources/article/16566123/bae-laser-dazzle-system-enlisted-to-stop-somali-pirates
  101. https://spaceanddefense.io/emerging-battlefield-laser-tactics/
  102. https://www.laserwars.net/p/military-laser-guns-history
  103. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/04/24/army-has-officially-deployed-laser-weapons-overseas-combat-enemy-drones.html
  104. https://www.defensemagazine.com/article/ukraine-confirms-deployment-of-laser-weapons-a-game-changer-in-modern-warfare
  105. https://thedefensepost.com/2025/04/15/ukraine-unveils-laser-weapon/
  106. https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/18/europe/ukrainian-tryzub-laser-weapon-intl-latam
  107. https://interestingengineering.com/military/russia-china-laser-counter-ukraine-drones
  108. https://san.com/cc/israel-confirms-first-use-of-laser-weapons-in-combat/
  109. https://www.jns.org/israel-becomes-first-nation-to-deploy-historic-laser-defense-system/
  110. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68031257
  111. https://www.qinetiq.com/en/news/dragonfire-laser-achieves-another-uk-first
  112. https://govconexec.com/2024/04/uk-accelerates-dragonfire-laser-weapon-program-timeline/
  113. https://defense-update.com/20250917_iron-beam-450.html
  114. https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/13/europe/britain-air-defense-laser-dragonfire-intl-hnk-ml
  115. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-says-laser-missile-shield-cost-just-2-per-interception-2022-06-01/
  116. https://www.timesofisrael.com/iron-beam-laser-interception-system-set-to-become-operational-in-2025/
  117. https://thedefensepost.com/2025/02/04/us-navy-helios-laser/
  118. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2025/8/11/government-perspective-directed-energy-in-air-base-defense-can-save-the-arsenal
  119. https://www.naval-technology.com/features/navy-laser-weapon-systems/
  120. https://www.l3harris.com/newsroom/editorial/2023/06/l3harris-directed-energy-beam-directors-key-component-critical-asset
  121. https://www.ophiropt.com/blog/directed-energy-laser-devices-advantages-and-challenges/
  122. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/2016/webt-laser-swarms-drones.html
  123. https://www.csis.org/analysis/new-salvo-war
  124. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-867735
  125. https://interestingengineering.com/military/worlds-first-100kw-laser
  126. https://www.designnews.com/industry/uss-preble-downs-aerial-target-in-helios-laser-test
  127. https://blog.usni.org/posts/2020/12/28/defensive-directed-energy-weapons-enhancing-survivability
  128. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA321006.pdf
  129. https://www.twz.com/news-features/chinas-imposing-ly-1-high-power-laser-weapon-unveiled-at-huge-military-parade
  130. https://www.rp-photonics.com/thermal_blooming.html
  131. https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/237622/
  132. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1026290.pdf
  133. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/766/1/58/11525647/58_1_online.pdf
  134. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-105868.pdf
  135. https://www.ndia.org/-/media/ndia-eti/reports/directed-energy-weapon-supply-chains/directedenergyweaponsreportdeeti.pdf
  136. https://www.te.com/en/industries/defense-military/insights/powering-the-future-of-directed-energy-weapons.html
  137. https://www.militaryaerospace.com/power/article/55140201/laser-weapons-high-power-microwaves-high-energy-weapons
  138. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/1201lasers/
  139. https://breakingdefense.com/2019/03/lasers-beyond-the-power-problem/
  140. https://www.army.mil/article/133400/lethality_on_a_beam_of_light_scientists_test_high_energy_lasers
  141. https://defence-industry.eu/u-s-navy-successfully-tests-helios-laser-system-against-drone/
  142. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105868
  143. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA442911.pdf
  144. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA394880.pdf
  145. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2023/08/11/us-army-working-through-challenges-with-laser-weapons/
  146. https://www.laserwars.net/p/us-military-laser-weapon-program-problems
  147. https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/11/combat-lasers-versus-dielectric-mirrors-ablative-materials-countermeasures.html
  148. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1114135.pdf
  149. https://www.popsci.com/laser-guns-are-targeting-uavs-but-drones-are-fighting-back/
  150. https://shop.nanografi.com/blog/advanced-materials-for-unmanned-aerial-vehicle-uav-protection-against-laser/
  151. https://patents.google.com/patent/EP4147980A1/en
  152. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/779539/are-there-any-material-coatings-that-would-currently-be-effective-to-counter-the
  153. https://nps.edu/documents/10180/142489929/JDE_7-2_Johnson.pdf
  154. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/laser-weapon-countermeasures-defending-against-future-zayyan-dalai-v24yc
  155. https://www.atec.army.mil/wstc/dir/svad.html
  156. https://spie.org/news/photonics-focus/marapr-2024/zapping-enemy-targets
  157. https://nssaspace.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/20250516-S2-Space-Threat-Fact-Sheet-v8-RELEASE.pdf
  158. https://thebulletin.org/premium/2025-05/russian-nuclear-weapons-2025/
  159. https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-force-generation-and-technological-adaptations-update-july-25-2025/
  160. https://www.csis.org/analysis/chapter-8-extending-battlespace-space
  161. https://media.defense.gov/2024/Dec/18/2003615520/-1/-1/0/MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2024.PDF
  162. https://en.mehrnews.com/news/226836/Iran-unveils-daunting-laser-powered-air-defense-system
  163. https://armyrecognition.com/archives/archives-land-defense/land-defense-2024/iran-deploys-now-chinese-laser-weapon-system-to-protect-high-value-targets-against-aerial-threats
  164. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/ccw-protocol-iv/article-1
  165. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/CCW
  166. https://nuke.fas.org/control/ccw/index.html
  167. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1164883.pdf
  168. https://tnsr.org/2020/01/the-ethics-of-acquiring-disruptive-military-technologies/
  169. https://chesterfieldstrategy.com/2018/11/22/the-ethics-of-directed-energy-weapons/
  170. https://phr.org/our-work/resources/health-impacts-of-crowd-control-weapons-directed-energy-devices/
  171. https://aoav.org.uk/2024/aoavs-briefing-note-on-laser-weapons/
  172. https://asiatimes.com/2024/11/laser-wars-us-china-in-drone-killing-directed-energy-arms-race/
  173. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/2019-features/how-laser-weapons-are-changing-the-defense-equation.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.