Hubbry Logo
Mortar (weapon)Mortar (weapon)Main
Open search
Mortar (weapon)
Community hub
Mortar (weapon)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mortar (weapon)
Mortar (weapon)
from Wikipedia
United States Army soldiers firing an M120 mortar (round visible in smoke) during the war in Afghanistan

A mortar today is usually a simple, lightweight, man-portable, muzzle-loaded cannon consisting of a smooth-bore (although some models use a rifled barrel) metal tube fixed to a base plate (to spread out the recoil) with a lightweight bipod mount and a sight. Mortars are typically used as indirect fire weapons for close fire support with a variety of ammunition. Historically, mortars were heavy siege artillery. Mortars launch explosive shells (technically called bombs)[1] in high arching ballistic trajectories.

History

[edit]

Mortars have been used for hundreds of years. The earliest reported use of mortars was in Korea in a 1413 naval battle when Korean gunsmiths developed the wan'gu (gourd-shaped mortar) (완구, 碗口).[2] The earliest version of the wan'gu dates back to 1407.[3] Ch'oe Hae-san (1380–1443), the son of Ch'oe Mu-sŏn (1325–1395), is generally credited with inventing the wan'gu.[4] In the Ming dynasty, general Qi Jiguang recorded the use of a mini cannon called the hu dun pao that was similar to the mortar.[5]

The first use in siege warfare was at the 1453 siege of Constantinople by Mehmed the Conqueror. An Italian account of the 1456 siege of Belgrade by Giovanni da Tagliacozzo states that the Ottoman Turks used seven mortars that fired "stone shots one Italian mile high".[6] The time of flight of these was apparently long enough that casualties could be avoided by posting observers to give warning of their trajectories.[7]

Engraving depicting the Venetian siege of the Acropolis of Athens, September 1687. The trajectory of the shell that hit the Parthenon, causing its explosion, is marked.

Early mortars, such as the Pumhart von Steyr, were large and heavy and could not be easily transported. Simply made, these weapons were no more than iron bowls reminiscent of the kitchen and apothecary mortars whence they drew their name. An early transportable mortar was invented by Baron Menno van Coehoorn in 1701.[8][9] This mortar fired an exploding shell, which had a fuse that was lit by hot gases when fired. The Coehorn mortar gained quick popularity, necessitating a new form of naval ship, the bomb vessel. Mortars played a significant role in the Venetian conquest of Morea, and in the course of this campaign an ammunition depot in the Parthenon was blown up. An early use of these more mobile mortars as field artillery (rather than siege artillery) was by British forces in the suppression of the Jacobite rising of 1719 at the Battle of Glen Shiel. High angle trajectory mortars held a great advantage over standard field guns in the rough terrain of the West Highlands of Scotland.

US Army 13-inch mortar "Dictator" was a rail-mounted gun of the American Civil War.

The mortar had fallen out of general use in Europe by the Napoleonic era, although Manby Mortars were widely used on the coast to launch lines to ships in distress, and interest in their use as a weapon was not revived until the beginning of the 20th century. Mortars were heavily used by both sides during the American Civil War. At the Siege of Vicksburg, General Ulysses S. Grant reported making mortars "by taking logs of the toughest wood that could be found, boring them out for 3 or 5 kg (6 or 12 lb) shells and binding them with strong iron bands. These answered as Coehorns, and shells were successfully thrown from them into the trenches of the enemy".[10]

During the Russo-Japanese War, Lieutenant General Leonid Gobyato of the Imperial Russian Army applied the principles of indirect fire from closed firing positions in the field; and with the collaboration of General Roman Kondratenko, he designed the first mortar that fired navy shells.

German 7.5 cm Minenwerfer

Trench mortar was a term used during the World War I to designate few short-range artillery weapons of different sizes. Their ranges were so short that they had to be fired directly from the frontline trenches, hence the name.[11] The German Army studied the Siege of Port Arthur, where heavy artillery had been unable to destroy defensive structures like barbed wire and bunkers. Consequently, they developed a short-barrelled rifled muzzle-loading mortar called the Minenwerfer. Heavily used during World War I, they were made in three sizes: 7.58, 17 and 25 cm (2.98, 6.69 and 9.84 in). The British invented the lightweight Stokes mortar.

Types

[edit]

Stokes mortar

[edit]
Wilfred Stokes with example of his WWI mortar and bombs

It was not until the Stokes mortar was devised by Sir Wilfred Stokes in 1915 during the First World War that the modern mortar transportable by one person was born. In the conditions of trench warfare, there was a great need for a versatile and easily portable weapon that could be manned by troops under cover in the trenches. Stokes' design was initially rejected in June 1915 because it was unable to use existing stocks of British mortar ammunition, and it took the intervention of David Lloyd George (at that time Minister of Munitions) and Lieutenant Colonel J. C. Matheson of the Trench Warfare Supply Department (who reported to Lloyd George) to expedite manufacture of the Stokes mortar. The weapon proved to be extremely useful in the muddy trenches of the Western Front, as a mortar round could be aimed to fall directly into trenches, where artillery shells, because of their low angle of flight, could not possibly go.[12]

The Stokes mortar was a simple muzzle-loaded weapon, consisting of a smoothbore metal tube fixed to a base plate (to absorb recoil) with a lightweight bipod mount. When a mortar bomb was dropped into the tube, an impact sensitive primer in the base of the bomb would make contact with a firing pin at the base of the tube and detonate, firing the bomb towards the target. The Stokes mortar could fire as many as 25 bombs per minute and had a maximum range of 730 m (800 yd), firing the original cylindrical unstabilised projectile.[13]

A modified version of the mortar, which fired a modern fin-stabilised streamlined projectile and had a booster charge for longer range, was developed after World War I;[14] this was in effect a new weapon. By World War II, it could fire as many as 30 bombs per minute and had a range of over 2,300 m (2,500 yd) with some shell types.[15] The French developed an improved version of the Stokes mortar as the Brandt Mle 27, further refined as the Brandt Mle 31; this design was widely copied with and without license.[16][17] These weapons were the prototypes for all subsequent light mortar developments around the world.

Mortar carrier

[edit]
The German 60 cm Karl-Gerät heavy siege mortar in August 1944
Interior of an Israeli Defence Force M113 mortar carrier showing the placement of an 81 mm mortar

Mortar carriers are vehicles which carry a mortar as a primary weapon. Numerous vehicles have been used to mount mortars, from improvised civilian trucks used by insurgents, to modified infantry fighting vehicles, such as variants of the M3 half-track and M113 armored personnel carrier, to vehicles specifically intended to carry a mortar. Simpler vehicles carry a standard infantry mortar while in more complex vehicles the mortar is fully integrated into the vehicle and cannot be dismounted from the vehicle. Mortar carriers cannot be fired while on the move, and some must be dismounted to fire.

There are numerous armoured fighting vehicles and even main battle tanks that can be equipped with a mortar, either outside or inside of the cabin. The Israeli Merkava tank uses a 60 mm (2.4 in) mortar as a secondary armament. The Russian army uses the 2S4 Tyulpan self-propelled 240 mm (9.4 in) heavy mortar which is one of the largest mortars in current use.

Gun-mortars

[edit]
2B9 Vasilek 82 mm gun mortar

Gun-mortars are breech-loaded mortars usually equipped with a hydraulic recoil mechanism, and sometimes equipped with an autoloader. They are usually mounted on an armoured vehicle and are capable of both direct fire and indirect fire. The archetypes are the Brandt Mle CM60A1 and Brandt 60 mm LR, which combine features of modern infantry mortars together with those of modern cannon. Such weapons are most commonly smoothbore, firing fin-stabilised rounds, using relatively small propellant charges in comparison to projectile weight. While some have been fitted with rifled barrels, such as the 2S31 Vena and 2S9 Nona. They have short barrels in comparison to guns and are much more lightly built than guns of a similar calibre – all characteristics of infantry mortars. This produces a hybrid weapon capable of engaging area targets with indirect high-angle fire, and also specific targets such as vehicles and bunkers with direct fire. Such hybrids are much heavier and more complicated than infantry mortars, superior to rocket-propelled grenades in the anti-armour and bunker-busting role, but have a reduced range compared to modern gun-howitzers and inferior anti-tank capability compared to modern anti-tank guided weapons. However, they do have a niche in, for example, providing a multi-role anti-personnel, anti-armour capability in light mobile formations. Such systems, like the Soviet 120 mm (4.7 in) 2S9 Nona, are mostly self-propelled (although a towed variant exists). The AMOS (Advanced Mortar System) is an example of an even more advanced gun mortar system. It uses a 120 mm automatic twin-barrelled, breech-loaded mortar turret, which can be mounted on a variety of armoured vehicles and attack boats. A modern example of a gun-mortar is the 2B9 Vasilek.

Spigot mortar

[edit]
A Blacker Bombard during training

A spigot mortar consists mainly of a solid rod or spigot, onto which a hollow tube in the projectile fits—inverting the normal tube-mortar arrangement. At the top of the tube in the projectile, a cavity contains propellant, such as cordite. There is usually a trigger mechanism built into the base of the spigot, with a long firing pin running up the length of the spigot activating a primer inside the projectile and firing the propellant charge. The advantage of a spigot mortar is that the firing unit (baseplate and spigot) is smaller and lighter than a conventional tube mortar of equivalent payload and range. It is also somewhat simpler to manufacture. Further, most spigot mortars have no barrel in the conventional sense, which means ammunition of almost any weight and diameter can be fired from the same mortar.

The disadvantage is that while most mortar bombs have a streamlined shape towards the back that fits a spigot mortar application well, using that space for the spigot mortar tube takes volume and mass away from the payload of the projectile. If a soldier is carrying only a few projectiles, the projectile weight disadvantage is not significant. However, the weight of a large quantity of the heavier and more complex spigot projectiles offsets the weight saved.

A near-silent mortar can operate using the spigot principle. Each round has a close-fitting sliding plug in the tube that fits over the spigot. When the round is fired, the projectile is pushed off the spigot, but before the plug clears the spigot it is caught by a constriction at the base of the tube. This traps the gases from the propelling charge and hence the sound of the firing. After World War II the Belgium Fly-K silent spigot mortar was accepted into French service as the TN-8111.[18][19]

A 40 mm (1.6 in) caseless underbarrel spigot launcher, the Battelle Pogojet has been developed by Armor Development Group.[20][21][22][23][24]

A hedgehog launcher on display. Note the exposed spigot on the lower left launcher.

Spigot mortars generally fell out of favour after World War II and were replaced by smaller conventional mortars. Military applications of spigot mortars include:

  • The 230 mm (9.1 in) petard mortar used on the Churchill AVRE by Britain in World War II.[25]
  • The 320 mm (13 in) Type 98 mortar used by Japan in World War II to some psychological effect in the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa
  • The Blacker Bombard and PIAT anti-tank launchers used by Britain in World War II.
  • The Hedgehog launcher, used from the deck of a ship, used 24 spigot mortars which fired a diamond pattern of anti-submarine projectiles into the sea ahead of the ship. A sinking projectile detonated if it struck a submarine, and the pattern was such that any submarine partly in the landing zone of the projectiles would be struck one or more times.

Non-military applications include the use of small-calibre spigot mortars to launch lightweight, low-velocity foam dummy targets used for training retriever dogs for bird hunting. Simple launchers use a separate small primer cap as the sole propellant (similar or identical to the cartridges used in industrial nail guns).

Improvised

[edit]
Improvised mortars in Batey ha-Osef Museum, Tel Aviv, Israel

Insurgent groups often use improvised, or "homemade" mortars to attack fortified military installations or terrorise civilians. They are usually constructed from heavy steel piping mounted on a steel frame. These weapons may fire standard mortar rounds, purpose-made shells, repurposed gas cylinders filled with explosives and shrapnel, or any other type of improvised explosive, incendiary or chemical munitions. These were called "barrack busters" by the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA).

Syrian civil war

[edit]

Improvised mortars used by insurgents in the Syrian civil war are known as hell cannons. Observers have noted that they are "wildly inaccurate" and responsible for thousands of civilian deaths.[26]

Sri Lankan civil war

[edit]

Improvised mortars used in the Sri Lankan civil war by the rebel Tamil Tigers are known as "Pasilan 2000", also known as a "rocket mortar" or "Arti-mortar" like the 122 mm (4.8 in) cannon, successor to the Baba mortar used by the LTTE for ground operations since the 1980s. As Baba mortar rounds contained tar, they caused a fire when they hit the ground.[27] The Baba, the prototype mortar, was crude. But with time the weapon has improved.

The Pasilan 2000, the improved version, has been developed with characteristics similar to a rocket launcher. The Pasilan 2000 was a heavy mortar fired from a mobile launcher mounted on a tractor. The shell does not emit constant muzzle flares like artillery or MBRL. This is ideal for LTTE's camouflage and conceals attacking style. Once a round is fired, forward observers/spies/civilian spotters can correct the fire. The way the tube is installed is similar to the positioning of rocket pods. The length and calibre of the barrel indicate Pasilan 2000 system has common features to the Chinese made Type 82 130 mm (5.1 in) 30-tube MLRS (introduced by the Palestinian Liberation Army (PLA) in the early 1980s) rather than rail-guided Katyusha variants such as the Qassam Rocket. The warhead weight is 70 kg (150 lb) and it is filled with TNT. It had a range of 15 to 25 km (10 to 15 mi). The rocket has since then undergone some modifications. The Pasilan 2000 was more lethal than Baba mortar. But it was not heavily used for ground attacks during the Eelam War IV.[28][29]

Modern

[edit]

Design

[edit]
L16 mortar consisting of barrel, base plate and bipod
Looking down an L16 mortar barrel. Note: fixed firing pin.

Most modern mortar systems consist of four main components: a barrel, a base plate, a bipod and a sight. Modern mortars normally range in calibre from 60 to 120 mm (2.4 to 4.7 in). However, both larger and smaller mortars have been produced. The modern mortar is a muzzle-loaded weapon and relatively simple to operate. It consists of a barrel into which the gunners drop a mortar round. When the round reaches the base of the barrel it hits a fixed firing pin that fires the round. The barrel is generally set at an angle of between 45 and 85 degrees (800 to 1500 mils), with the higher angle producing a shorter horizontal trajectory. Some mortars have a moving firing pin, operated by a lanyard or trigger mechanism.

Ammunition

[edit]

Mortar round with propellant rings about to be fired

Ammunition for mortars generally comes in two main varieties: fin-stabilised and spin-stabilised. Examples of the former have short fins on their posterior portion, which control the path of the bomb in flight. Spin-stabilised mortar bombs rotate as they travel along and leave the mortar tube, which stabilises them in much the same way as a rifle bullet. Both types of rounds can be either illumination (infrared or visible illumination), smoke, high explosive, and training rounds. Mortar bombs are often referred to, incorrectly, as "mortars".[30]

Operators may fire spin-stabilised rounds from either a smoothbore or a rifled barrel. Rifled mortars are more accurate but slower to load. Since mortars are generally muzzle-loaded, mortar bombs for rifled barrels usually have a pre-engraved band, called an obturator, that engages with the rifling of the barrel. Exceptions to this are the US M2 110 mm (4.2 in) mortar and M30 mortar, whose ammunition has a sub-calibre expandable ring that enlarged when fired. This allows the projectile to slide down the barrel freely but grip the rifling when fired. The system resembles the Minié ball for muzzle-loading rifles. For extra range, propellant rings (augmentation charges) are attached to the bomb's fins. The rings are usually easy to remove, because they have a major influence on the speed and thus the range of the bomb. Some mortar rounds can be fired without any augmentation charges, e.g., the 81 mm L16 mortar.

L16 81 mm mortar fired by JGSDF soldiers
Data for 81 mm L16 mortar [31]
Charge Muzzle velocity
m/s (ft/s)
Range
m (yd)
Primary 73 (240) 180–520 (200–570)
Charge 1 110 (360) 390–1,120 (430–1,220)
Charge 2 137 (450) 580–1,710 (630–1,870)
Charge 3 162 (530) 780–2,265 (853–2,477)
Charge 4 195 (640) 1,070–3,080 (1,170–3,370)
Charge 5 224 (730) 1,340–3,850 (1,470–4,210)
Charge 6 250 (820) 1,700–4,680 (1,860–5,120)

Precision guided

[edit]
Soldiers standing in front of an M1064 mortar carrier, holding a XM395 Precision Guided Mortar Munition prototype at Fort Benning, Georgia, February 2006

The XM395 Precision Guided Mortar Munition (PGMM) is a 120 mm guided mortar round developed by Alliant Techsystems.[32] Based on Orbital ATK's Precision Guidance Kit for 155 mm artillery projectiles, XM395 combines GPS guidance and directional control surfaces into a package that replaces standard fuses, transforming existing 120 mm mortar bodies into precision-guided munitions.[33] The XM395 munition consists of a GPS-guided kit fitted to standard 120 mm smoothbore mortar rounds that includes the fitting of a nose and tail subsystem containing the maneuvering parts.[34][35]

The Strix mortar round is a Swedish endphase-guided projectile fired from a 120 mm mortar currently manufactured by Saab Bofors Dynamics. STRIX is fired like a conventional mortar round. The round contains an infrared imaging sensor that it uses to guide itself onto any tank or armoured fighting vehicle in the vicinity where it lands. The seeker is designed to ignore targets that are already burning. Launched from any 120 mm mortar, STRIX has a normal range of up to 4.5 km (2.8 mi). The addition of a special sustainer motor increases the range to 7.5 km (4.7 mi).

The GMM 120 (Guided Mortar Munition 120; known as Patzmi; also referred to as Morty) is a GPS and/or laser-guided mortar munition, which was developed by Israel Military Industries.[36][37] Another Israeli guided mortar is Iron Sting, developed by Elbit. The Russian KM-8 Gran is also laser-guided.[38]

Compared to long range artillery

[edit]
Self-propelled mortar based on K-4386 during the "Armiya 2020" exhibition

Modern mortars and their ammunition are generally much smaller and lighter than long range artillery, such as field guns and howitzers, which allows light (60 mm or 2.4 in) and medium (81 and 82 mm or 3.19 and 3.23 in) mortars to be considered light weapons; i.e. capable of transport by personnel without vehicle assistance.

Mortars are short-range weapons and often more effective than long range artillery for many purposes within their shorter range. In particular, because of its high, parabolic trajectory with a near vertical descent, the mortar can land bombs on nearby targets, including those behind obstacles or in fortifications, such as light vehicles behind hills or structures, or infantry in trenches or spider holes. This also makes it possible to launch attacks from positions lower than the target of the attack. (For example, long-range artillery could not shell a target 1 km (0.6 mi) away and 30 m (100 ft) higher, a target easily accessible to a mortar.)

Mortar trajectory comparison

In trench warfare, mortars can use plunging fire directly into the enemy trenches, which is very hard or impossible to accomplish with long range artillery because of its much flatter trajectory. Mortars are also highly effective when used from concealed positions, such as the natural escarpments on hillsides or from woods, especially if forward observers are being employed in strategic positions to direct fire, an arrangement where the mortar is in relatively close proximity both to its forward observer and its target, allowing for fire to be quickly and accurately delivered with lethal effect. Mortars suffer from instability when used on snow or soft ground, because the recoil pushes them into the ground or snow unevenly. A Raschen bag addresses this problem.

Fin-stabilised mortar bombs do not have to withstand the rotational forces placed upon them by rifling or greater pressures, and can therefore carry a higher payload in a thinner skin than rifled artillery ammunition. Because of the difference in available volume, a smooth-bore mortar of a given diameter will have a greater explosive yield than a similarly sized artillery shell of a gun or howitzer. For example, a 120 mm (4.7 in) mortar bomb has approximately the same explosive capability as a 152 or 155 mm (6.0 or 6.1 in) artillery shell. Also, fin-stabilised munitions fired from a smooth-bore, which do not rely on the spin imparted by a rifled bore for greater accuracy, do not have the drawback of veering in the direction of the spin.

Largest mortars

[edit]

From the 17th to the mid-20th century, very heavy, relatively immobile siege mortars were used, of up to 1 m (39 in) calibre, often made of cast iron and with an outside barrel diameter many times that of the bore diameter. An early example was Roaring Meg, with a 390 mm (15.5 in) barrel diameter and firing a 100 kg (220 lb) hollow ball filled with gunpowder and used during the English Civil War in 1646.

The largest mortars ever developed were the Belgian "Monster Mortar" (610 mm or 24 in) developed by Henri-Joseph Paixhans in 1832, Mallet's Mortar (910 mm or 36 in) developed by Robert Mallet in 1857, and the "Little David" (910 mm) developed in the United States for use in World War II. Although the latter two had a calibre of 910 mm, only the "Monster Mortar" was used in combat (at the Battle of Antwerp in 1832).[39] The World War II German Karl-Gerät was a 600 mm (24 in) mortar and the largest to see combat in modern warfare.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A mortar is a muzzle-loaded, , indirect-fire weapon system that launches shells or other projectiles at high angles of , typically between 45 and 90 degrees, to arc over obstacles and strike targets from above. This design enables close support by delivering high-, , illumination, or training rounds with ranges varying from 3,490 meters for 60-mm systems to 7,200 meters for 120-mm variants, making it a portable and versatile asset for maneuver units. Mortars trace their origins to 16th-century , evolving from ancient catapults and early bombards into specialized short-barreled cannons for warfare, with key advancements like adjustable elevations introduced in the . By the , cast-iron models such as the U.S. 13-inch seacoast mortar achieved ranges up to 4,325 yards, seeing use in conflicts like the American Civil War's Petersburg Campaign. The modern infantry mortar emerged during , when British engineer Sir Wilfred Stokes developed the Stokes 3-inch mortar in 1915 to counter , influencing subsequent designs like the French of 1931, designed by , which shaped U.S. 60-mm and 81-mm systems employed in . In contemporary operations, mortars serve as an organic element at and levels, with systems like the U.S. 's M224 (60-mm), M252 (81-mm), and carrier-mounted 120-mm variants integrating digital fire control for rapid, precise targeting via GPS and inertial sensors. These weapons emphasize mobility, with crews able to emplace and fire in under a minute, providing , area denial, or illumination while minimizing exposure in dynamic environments from urban combat to open terrain.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

A mortar is a muzzle-loaded, , indirect-fire that launches projectiles at high trajectories, typically between 45° and 85° , to provide short-to-medium range for units. It is designed primarily to deliver suppressive, neutralizing, or destructive effects against area or point targets, including screening with or illumination, and is characterized by its simplicity, portability, and use in all phases of . The operating principles of a mortar rely on a drop-fire mechanism, where the fin-stabilized is inserted fin-end first into the muzzle of the tube and slides down until its primer strikes a fixed , igniting an adjustable charge that propels it outward. The resulting ballistic is governed by the of the barrel, the size of the charge (often in incremental zones), and the 's weight, producing a high-angle arc that allows the round to descend nearly vertically onto the target. As a crew-served , typically operated by a including a gunner, assistant gunner, and bearers, mortars emphasize rapid setup and deployment from defilade positions, with aiming achieved through a sight unit that aligns the tube based on direction data. Range capabilities vary by , generally from a minimum of 70 to 200 meters to a maximum of 7,200 meters or more for systems between 60 mm and 120 mm, influenced by charge settings, , type, and environmental factors like temperature and wind. Fire rates achieve 20 to 30 rounds per minute during initial bursts, dropping to 4 to 20 rounds per minute for sustained fire to manage heat and supply, enabling quick delivery of high volumes against close . Compared to direct-fire weapons, mortars offer the key advantage of engaging targets behind cover or in defilade without requiring line-of-sight, lobbing projectiles over obstacles like features or fortifications to support maneuver elements effectively in complex environments. This indirect-fire capability enhances survivability and tactical flexibility, providing immediate, responsive support against dug-in or obscured threats.

Basic Components

A standard mortar system consists of several essential physical components that enable its assembly, aiming, and firing in high-angle trajectories. The barrel, also known as the tube or , is a cylinder typically constructed from , serving as the primary structure that houses the during muzzle-loading and propels it upon ignition. For instance, the 60 mm M224 barrel measures approximately 1.0 meter in length, the 81 mm M252 about 1.3 meters, and the 120 mm M120 around 1.8 meters, allowing for varying ranges and stabilities depending on the . The baseplate anchors the mortar to the ground, absorbing recoil forces during firing to maintain stability and prevent displacement. Designs differ by model and terrain requirements; lighter variants like the 60 mm M7 use an aluminum circular plate with four spades for 360-degree rotation, whereas heavier systems such as the 120 mm M9 employ a rounded-triangle configuration with spades and handles for enhanced support on uneven surfaces. Supporting the barrel, the bipod or mount provides adjustability for precise aiming, typically allowing from 0 to 90 degrees and traverse up to 15 degrees or more in some configurations. Constructed from or aluminum alloys, it includes mechanisms like traversing handwheels (adjusting deflection in 5-10 mil increments per turn) and elevating cranks, along with integrated sights or pointing devices for alignment within a few mils of accuracy. For example, the 81 mm M177 bipod features buffer cylinders for shock absorption, while the 120 mm M191 includes cross-leveling and leg extensions for versatile mounting on ground or vehicles. The firing mechanism initiates , commonly through a drop-fire where causes the to strike a fixed in the breech cap, or via a trigger for controlled release in some models. Safety features, such as selector switches, removable pins, and alignment boresights, prevent premature detonation and ensure reliable operation; for instance, the 60 mm M224 includes a trigger housing with a "T" position. Operationally, a mortar crew of 3 to 5 personnel handles assembly, aiming, and firing, with roles divided for efficiency: the supervises, the gunner adjusts the mount and sights, the assistant gunner loads and releases rounds, and ammunition bearers prepare and transport components. Portability is achieved by disassembling the system into manageable loads weighing 20 to 50 kg per part, such as the 60 mm components carried by 1-2 individuals or the 120 mm sections requiring 4-5 for manpack transport.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Mortars

The mortar as a distinct piece emerged in during the , evolving from early experiments to serve as a high-angle fire weapon for warfare. One of the earliest documented uses of large bombards, precursors to mortars, occurred during the Ottoman of in 1453, where Sultan employed massive bombards to lob stone projectiles weighing up to 1,500 pounds over the city's formidable walls. These early devices, often constructed from or , fired at steep elevations to bypass fortifications, marking a shift from direct-fire cannons to indirect tactics essential for breaching entrenched defenses. By the late 17th century, innovations focused on portability, with Dutch engineer Baron Menno van Coehoorn inventing the lightweight Coehorn mortar around 1673–1674 during the Siege of Grave. This tube, typically 4.2 inches in and weighing about 200 pounds, could be carried by four men and fired a 4.4-pound explosive shell with a time fuse, enabling rapid deployment in assaults on fortifications. The design spread across , with the British adopting a similar 4.2-inch version in the for light operations, transitioning from heavy cast-iron bombards to more maneuverable and models that reduced weight while maintaining destructive potential against overhead cover. In the , mortars saw widespread use in prolonged sieges, such as during the (1861–1865), where both Union and Confederate forces employed mortars in 12- and 24-pounder variants at battles like Vicksburg and Petersburg. These portable pieces, firing shells up to 1,200 yards, supported infantry advances by dislodging entrenched troops, while larger seacoast mortars hurled 200-pound projectiles over 4,000 yards in naval bombardments, such as the reduction of New Orleans. The continued to integrate mortars into their arsenal for fortress assaults in European and colonial campaigns, adapting European designs to enhance their siege capabilities against resistant strongholds. Despite these advances, early mortars suffered from significant limitations, including low mobility for larger models requiring up to 10-man crews for and emplacement, and effective ranges typically under 1 kilometer due to short barrels and low muzzle velocities. Inaccuracy plagued operations, stemming from inconsistent black powder combustion that caused variable trajectories and erratic fuse timings, often necessitating multiple adjustments with wedges or blocks for . These constraints confined mortars primarily to static roles, where their high-arcing fire provided psychological terror and area suppression rather than precision strikes.

World War I Innovations

The stalemate of during necessitated the development of portable, high-angle fire weapons that could deliver over parapets and into enemy positions, bypassing the limitations of flat-trajectory field guns. These mortars addressed the defensive advantages of entrenched lines by allowing units to provide close suppression and explosive support without exposing crews to direct observation. From to , all major combatants rapidly proliferated such systems, evolving from improvised mine throwers to standardized weapons that transformed tactical engagements. A landmark British innovation was the , invented in January 1915 by engineer Sir Wilfred Stokes and quickly adopted as the standard mortar. This 3-inch (76 mm) weapon featured a simple tube mounted on a baseplate and bipod, with the barrel weighing about 49 pounds (22 kg) for easy portability by a small crew; its total assembled weight reached around 126 pounds (57 kg). The design used a drop-fire mechanism where projectiles ignited on impact with a fixed , achieving a maximum range of 800 yards (730 m) with standard ammunition, extendable to 1,100 yards (1,000 m) with improved charges. To facilitate , the barrel incorporated a corrugated exterior for structural strength with reduced material, enabling rapid manufacturing; by war's end, over 50,000 units had been produced across Allied forces, including licensed versions. The Germans pioneered early trench mortars with the series, introduced in 1914 as support weapons rather than formal . These rifled "mine throwers" ranged from the lightweight 7.58 cm leichter Minenwerfer, weighing about 150 pounds (68 kg) and firing up to 1,100 yards (1,000 m), to the heavier for greater destructive power against fortifications. Over 3,000 light models alone were fielded by 1916, emphasizing mobility for battalion-level use. The French, meanwhile, adapted the Stokes design in 1916 and experimented with larger calibers, prioritizing high-explosive rounds for suppression that influenced postwar Brandt mortars. and followed suit with adaptations, such as the Italian Mortaio da 45 light mortar and Russian copies of captured Minenwerfer, integrating them into alpine and eastern front operations by 1916. These innovations enabled critical tactics like creeping barrages, where mortar fire advanced ahead of assaults to pin defenders, and provided on-call suppression during raids. Mortar fire, combined with , inflicted approximately 60% of all battlefield casualties in , with trench mortars proving especially lethal in close-quarters battles like the Somme, where they accounted for a significant portion of the 420,000 British losses through fragmentation and blast effects in confined positions.

World War II and Postwar Evolution

During , mortars proliferated across major combatants, building on designs like the British for enhanced infantry support. The standardized the M2 60mm mortar, which achieved a maximum range of approximately 1,800 meters, and the M1 81mm mortar, with a range of up to 3,000 meters, both providing versatile high-angle fire for company and battalion levels. The adopted the 82mm PM-37 mortar, directly inspired by the French Brandt design, offering a 3,000-meter range and compatibility with captured Western 81mm ammunition for sustained frontline use. relied on the 50mm leGrW 36 for light infantry support at shorter ranges of about 1,100 meters and the heavier 120mm GrW 42, reaching 5,700 meters, to deliver concentrated fire in defensive positions. Global production of mortars and ammunition scaled massively, with millions of rounds manufactured to meet wartime demands, enabling their critical role in diverse environments. In the Pacific theater, U.S. forces used 60mm and 81mm mortars for amphibious assaults, providing rapid suppressive fire from island positions. On the Eastern Front, including the urban fighting at Stalingrad, Soviet and German mortars proved decisive in close-quarters combat, where their indirect fire navigated rubble and buildings to target entrenched enemies. Postwar, NATO allies pursued standardization to streamline logistics, exemplified by the U.S. 81mm mortar introduced in 1952, which reduced weight by nearly 40 pounds compared to the M1 while extending range to 4,500 meters through refined barrel and charge designs. Fin-stabilized rounds became widespread in the , improving ballistic stability and accuracy by ensuring consistent spin and trajectory without . From the to , materials shifted toward lighter alloys and composites, reducing mortar weights for greater mobility, as seen in updated 81mm systems that prioritized portability for mechanized units. During the , mortars adapted to specialized roles, including anti-tank missions with shaped-charge rounds to penetrate armor and illumination variants for night operations, enhancing versatility in defensive and offensive scenarios. Doctrinally, mortars integrated deeply into tactics, coordinating with , armor, and for layered . Improved charges extended effective ranges to around 6 kilometers for medium mortars by the 1970s, allowing deeper strikes while maintaining rapid deployment. This evolution emphasized mortars' role as a , responsive asset in fluid battlefields.

Types and Variants

Smoothbore Mortars

Smoothbore mortars represent the predominant design in contemporary applications, characterized by a muzzle-loading barrel with a smooth interior that lacks to impart spin on projectiles. These weapons fire fin-stabilized rounds, with calibers typically spanning 50 mm for support to 120 mm for battalion-level fire missions. The barrel is paired with a bipod mount for adjustable and traverse, enhancing portability as the entire system can be disassembled into loads carried by a small crew of two to four personnel. Operationally, mortars utilize a drop-fire mechanism, where the charge ignites upon impact with a fixed at the base, enabling high-angle trajectories that exceed 80 degrees for lobbing rounds over obstacles or into defilade positions. This configuration supports rapid deployment, with setup times often under one minute when emplaced on the bipod, allowing crews to achieve first-round fire quickly in dynamic environments. Representative systems include the U.S. M224 60 mm mortar, which delivers a maximum range of 3.49 km with a total weight of 17.2 kg in conventional mode, and the Israeli Soltam K6 120 mm mortar, capable of reaching 7.2 km while providing heavier suppressive effects equivalent to 155 mm in explosive yield. The advantages of mortars stem from their mechanical simplicity, which minimizes and costs—typically around €370,000 for a complete 120 mm towed system—while requiring only basic training for effective use due to the intuitive drop-loading process and lack of complex breech mechanisms. These traits have made them the standard weapon for over 98% of heavy mortar inventories in modern armies, emphasizing mobility over the more elaborate self-propelled alternatives. Variants of mortars adapt to mission needs, ranging from handheld configurations for to vehicle-towed setups for sustained fire. For instance, the U.S. M224 60 mm mortar supports handheld firing by a single operator for ranges from 70 meters to approximately 1,300 meters in mode, prioritizing agility in close-quarters scenarios, whereas the 120 mm is designed for towing behind light vehicles to enable prolonged barrages with larger loads. Early handheld examples, such as the Japanese Type 89 50 mm from the era, influenced modern portable designs by demonstrating the feasibility of lightweight, soldier-carried systems weighing under 5 kg.

Spigot Mortars

Spigot mortars represent a specialized variant of weapons that dispense with a traditional barrel, instead employing a fixed rod or spigot to launch . In this , the features a hollow tube that slides over the spigot, with the charge typically contained within the tail or attached to the base of the rod. Upon ignition, the expanding gases propel the upward and forward, while a piston-like mechanism in some variants contains the muzzle blast to reduce . Projectiles are usually detonated by impact fuses or time-delay mechanisms, and the absence of a barrel or results in a simpler, barrel-less launch system that prioritizes ease of production over precision . Historically, spigot mortars saw prominent use during , particularly in anti-tank roles where lightweight, man-portable systems were essential. The British Projector, Infantry, Anti-Tank (), introduced in 1942, exemplified this application; it launched a 3.25-inch (83 mm) shaped-charge bomb via a spring-assisted spigot mechanism, achieving an effective range of about 100 meters against armored vehicles. Weighing around 15 kg when loaded, the PIAT allowed infantry to engage tanks at close range without the bulk of recoilless rifles. Another key example was the , developed in 1941 by Lieutenant-Colonel Stewart Blacker, a 29 mm spigot mortar designed for units to fire 14-pound anti-personnel or 20-pound anti-tank bombs up to 200 meters, emphasizing rapid deployment in defensive positions against potential invasion. These weapons addressed urgent wartime needs for inexpensive, producible anti-armor tools, with over 20,000 Blacker Bombards manufactured by 1943. In modern contexts, spigot mortars remain rare but persist in niche applications, such as or training scenarios where low observability is critical. The Russian 2B25, an 82 mm "silent" spigot mortar developed by the Burevestnik Central Research Institute and entering service around 2018, is a prime example; it launches 3.3 kg bombs with a 1.9 kg to a maximum range of 1,200 meters, using a captive to suppress noise to approximately 135 dB—comparable to a suppressed rifle—and minimize flash for covert use by units. The 2B25 has seen use by Russian forces in the Russo-Ukrainian War since . At 13 kg total weight, the 2B25 suits austere environments, offering simplicity in assembly and operation without complex barrel alignment. Such systems highlight spigot mortars' advantages in reduced weight and logistical footprint, for instance, being about 20-30% lighter than equivalent mortars for similar portability. However, their adoption is limited to specialized munitions, as most militaries favor conventional designs for broader effectiveness. Despite these benefits, spigot mortars suffer from inherent limitations that curtailed their widespread use post-World War II. Their lack of a stabilizing barrel contributes to lower accuracy, with dispersion patterns wider than alternatives due to unguided flight paths reliant on stabilization alone. Ranges are typically capped under 2 km, as seen in the 2B25's 1,200-meter limit, restricting them to short-range support rather than sustained . Additionally, slower rates of fire—often 10-15 rounds per minute—and heavier individual projectiles compared to tube-loaded equivalents increase crew fatigue in prolonged engagements. These drawbacks led to their phase-out in favor of more versatile and rifled mortars, confining spigots to occasional anti-tank or low-signature roles.

Gun-Mortars

Gun-mortars represent a hybrid class of artillery systems that integrate the indirect high-angle fire capabilities of traditional mortars with the direct low-angle fire of conventional guns, enabling versatile battlefield support in both suppressive and precision roles. These weapons are typically breech-loaded with rifled barrels, providing enhanced accuracy and stability for direct fire while maintaining the plunging trajectory essential for indirect engagements. They feature full 360-degree traverse and wide elevation ranges, often from 0 to 80 degrees, allowing seamless switching between firing modes without repositioning the platform. Calibers generally exceed 120mm to balance portability with destructive power, making them suitable for integration into mechanized units. The evolution of gun-mortars began in the as part of broader efforts to adapt for fast-paced mechanized warfare, where rapid response and multi-role flexibility were prioritized over specialized systems. Soviet designers, responding to the needs of airborne and , pioneered this concept to bridge the operational gap between lightweight mortars and heavier howitzers, emphasizing self-propelled mounting for enhanced mobility and on dynamic fronts. This development reflected a shift toward combined-arms tactics, where could support assaults directly or provide overhead fire without dedicated vehicle swaps. Prominent examples include the Russian , a 120mm self-propelled system introduced in 1981, which achieves ranges of 8 to 15 km in indirect mode and supports against armored targets with a maximum rate of 10 rounds per minute. The U.S. , developed in the early 2000s as part of the program, features a lightweight 120mm rifled gun-mortar design capable of firing standard mortar rounds at high angles or tank-like projectiles at low angles, though it remains in developmental stages without full fielding. In applications, gun-mortars are predominantly mounted on armored vehicles or self-propelled to ensure rapid deployment alongside mechanized forces, often referencing designs for enhanced cross-country mobility. They excel in scenarios requiring quick suppression of enemy positions or anti-armor engagements at close range, delivering high-explosive or shaped-charge rounds with minimal setup time. Fire rates in direct mode can reach 10 rounds per minute, providing intense, localized that complements advances or defends against breakthroughs.

Improvised Mortars

Improvised mortars are typically constructed using readily available materials to enable rapid production in conflict zones, often adapting basic principles from standard mortar designs such as a barrel and baseplate. These devices commonly employ heavy piping as the barrel, mounted on a welded baseplate for stability, with improvised charges made from scavenged explosives or homemade mixtures to launch projectiles. Calibers generally range from 50 to 150 mm, allowing compatibility with repurposed shells or cylinders, and firing is achieved through simple mechanisms like string-pulled igniters or battery-powered electrical systems for remote . In the (2011–present), rebel groups extensively used the "Hell Cannon," an improvised mortar system that evolved from basic designs to more complex variants for siege warfare. Constructed from metal pipes or barrels supported by vehicle tires and stabilizing feet, these weapons launched projectiles fashioned from or oxygen cylinders filled with explosives and shrapnel, achieving ranges of up to 1.5 km. While inaccurate at longer distances due to inconsistent propulsion and lack of precision aiming, the Hell Cannons proved terror-inducing in urban battles, particularly around , where their barrage effects disrupted government positions despite limited targeting reliability; numerous variants emerged, including multi-barreled and electronically ignited models mounted on vehicles. Armed opposition groups' use of such imprecise improvised mortars contributed to war crimes through indiscriminate attacks on civilian areas, causing significant non-combatant deaths in . During the Sri Lankan Civil War (1983–2009), the (LTTE) developed the Pasilan 2000 as a key improvised mortar for guerrilla operations, serving as a successor to earlier designs like the Baba Mortar. This system utilized metal tubing for the barrel and incorporated homemade explosive charges in projectiles to deliver fragmentation effects, enabling effective ambushes in jungle terrain where mobility and surprise were critical. Though crude in construction and prone to operational unreliability, the Pasilan 2000 supported LTTE tactics by providing support against Sri Lankan forces in asymmetric engagements. The use of improvised mortars carries substantial risks, including high rates of malfunctions from poor-quality components and inconsistent manufacturing, which can lead to misfires or premature explosions endangering operators. In , these weapons have exacerbated civilian casualties due to their inherent inaccuracy and deployment in populated areas, prompting international condemnation for indiscriminate harm. Over time, improvised mortars have evolved into more integrated systems, such as -enhanced variants, further complicating threat mitigation in prolonged conflicts.

Modern Design and Technology

Structural Features

Modern mortars incorporate advanced materials to balance durability, portability, and performance under demanding conditions. High-strength alloys, such as used in bipod components like buffers, clamps, and elevation gears, enable lightweight designs for 81mm systems, with the bipod weighing approximately 22 pounds compared to 27 pounds in legacy models. Nickel-based superalloys like 718 are employed for mortar tubes, offering yield strengths of 149 at 1200°F to withstand high-temperature firing without degradation. Corrosion-resistant coatings, including anodized aluminum and layers, protect against environmental exposure, ensuring reliability in all-weather operations. Recoil management systems are critical for operator safety and platform stability, particularly in larger calibers. Hydraulic buffers and dual recoil dampers absorb significant , reducing forces to under 100 kN in vehicle-mounted 120mm mortars, with some designs achieving less than 30 tonnes of at maximum charge for ranges up to 10 km. Muzzle brakes further mitigate backward force by redirecting gases, absorbing 20-70% of depending on configuration. Baseplates feature retractable spikes that anchor into soft ground, enhancing stability by distributing loads and preventing displacement during sustained fire. Aiming and fire control integrate traditional and digital elements for precise targeting. Optical sights, such as quadrant elevation devices, allow manual adjustment for high-angle trajectories, providing accurate lays in and . Modern systems incorporate digital computers like the Mortar Fire Control System-Mounted (MFCS-M), which perform ballistic calculations in under 10 seconds and link via radios to GPS-enabled devices such as the (PLGR) for automated positioning and fire direction. As of 2025, mortar designs emphasize adaptability and stealth. Drone-compatible mounts and command-and-control (C2) integrations enable real-time targeting data from unmanned aerial systems, improving responsiveness in dynamic environments. Modular configurations, such as the Ground Deployed Advanced Mortar System (GDAMS), support both 81mm and 120mm ammunition, enabling interoperability with legacy systems. Reduced-signature features, including patented blast diffusers and captive-piston mechanisms, suppress firing noise and gas emissions—down to levels comparable to a subsonic —minimizing detection by enemy sensors.

Ammunition and Propulsion

Mortar ammunition consists of fin-stabilized shells designed for high-angle , ensuring stability through a tail fin assembly that deploys upon launch. These rounds typically feature warheads such as high-explosive (HE) for fragmentation and blast effects against personnel and light , white (WP) or red (RP) smoke for screening and incendiary purposes, illumination for battlefield lighting, and practice rounds for training. options include impact (point-detonating) for direct hits, proximity for airbursts over troops or positions, and time (mechanical) for controlled in flight. Round weights generally range from 1 kg for 60 mm calibers to 20 kg for 120 mm systems, balancing portability with payload capacity. Propulsion in modern mortars relies on incremental charges attached to the round's tail, allowing operators to adjust and range by selecting 1 to 4 increments for lighter calibers or up to 9 for heavier ones; these charges are often bags or plastic-wrapped packets for ease of handling and resistance. The primary is nitrocellulose-based, either single-base (pure with stabilizers like ) or double-base ( combined with for higher energy), which burns progressively to generate gas pressure without . This system achieves muzzle velocities of 100–300 m/s, varying by , charge, and —for instance, approximately 158 m/s for a 60 mm round at full charge and up to 300 m/s for 120 mm systems—enabling ranges from hundreds of meters to over 7 km. The ballistics of unguided mortar rounds follow the principles of under , approximated by the range formula R=v2sin(2θ)gR = \frac{v^2 \sin(2\theta)}{g}, where vv is the , θ\theta is the elevation angle, and gg is (approximately 9.81 m/s²). To derive this, consider the horizontal component of velocity vx=vcosθv_x = v \cos \theta and the t=2vsinθgt = \frac{2 v \sin \theta}{g} for symmetric (neglecting air resistance and Earth's curvature for short ranges); substituting yields R=vxt=v2sin(2θ)gR = v_x \cdot t = \frac{v^2 \sin(2\theta)}{g}. Maximum range occurs at θ=45\theta = 45^\circ, where sin(90)=1\sin(90^\circ) = 1, though mortars often use higher angles (up to 85°) for obstacle clearance, reducing range but increasing plunging effect. Firing tables account for these variables, incorporating charge-specific velocities and environmental factors like . Extended-range variants enhance performance through base-bleed units, which expel gas from the base to reduce drag and extend flight by 20–35%, or rocket-assisted , igniting a sustainer motor post-launch to boost velocity and increase range by up to 50% (e.g., from 7 km to over 10 km for 120 mm rounds).

Precision-Guided Systems

Precision-guided mortar systems represent a significant advancement in capabilities, enabling high-accuracy strikes against stationary and moving targets while minimizing . These systems typically incorporate guidance kits such as GPS combined with inertial (INS) for all-weather precision, or semi-active (SAL) homing for engagements designated by ground or aerial spotters. For instance, the U.S. Army's XM395 Accelerated Precision Mortar Initiative (APMI) is a 120mm GPS-guided round designed for rapid defeat of personnel targets, achieving a (CEP) of 10 meters at ranges up to 7.2 kilometers. Similarly, and inertial options allow for flexibility against dynamic threats, with control mechanisms like roll-stabilization and canards ensuring trajectory corrections during flight. Key examples include the Israeli 120mm munition developed by , which operates in multiple modes—GPS/INS, SAL+GPS/INS, or SAL+INS—for ranges of 1 to 12 kilometers, delivering a CEP of less than 1 meter in SAL mode and under 10 meters in GPS mode. The Russian , produced by the Kalashnikov Group, is a laser-guided 120mm mortar projectile compatible with legacy 120mm mortar systems and 122mm when paired with the Malakhit , enabling first-shot hits on high-value targets like enemy positions at ranges up to 9 kilometers. These systems often feature modular warheads with multi-mode fuzing (e.g., point , delay, or proximity) to adapt to diverse targets, and their roll-stabilized designs with aerodynamic control surfaces enhance stability and precision. The primary advantages of precision-guided mortars lie in their efficiency and reduced logistical burden compared to unguided counterparts. They can achieve mission effects with 1-2 rounds instead of 10-20, conserving and enabling sustained operations in resource-constrained environments. In , their pinpoint accuracy—often under 10 meters CEP—limits unintended damage to civilians and infrastructure, supporting in complex battlespaces. By 2025, developments have integrated (AI) for enhanced targeting, with U.S. Army programs like employing AI algorithms to automate target detection and generate firing solutions for indirect fires, including mortars, reducing engagement times from minutes to seconds. Counter-drone variants are emerging, such as guidance kits adapted for UAV-launched mortar rounds, allowing precision strikes against low-flying threats like surveillance drones. Additionally, integration with (UAV) spotters has advanced through joint training exercises, where small UAS provide real-time designation and adjustments for mortar fire, improving responsiveness in dynamic scenarios.

Deployment and Comparisons

Mortar Carriers

Mortar carriers are specialized designed to mount mortars, providing enhanced mobility, protection, and sustained compared to traditional man-portable systems. These platforms integrate mortars into wheeled or tracked , allowing for rapid deployment in dynamic environments. Truck-mounted variants, such as the U.S. Army's M1129 Mortar Carrier, utilize an 8x8 wheeled configuration equipped with a 120 mm Soltam/Cardom Recoil Mortar System (RMS), offering a maximum range of approximately 7.2 km with standard ammunition. Tracked carriers, like the Swedish CV90-based systems, provide superior cross-country performance, with the enabling operations in varied terrain while carrying heavy mortar loads. Key benefits of mortar carriers include rapid repositioning, often achievable in under two minutes through integrated tactics, which minimizes exposure to enemy detection and counter-fire. Automated loading mechanisms further enhance operational tempo, supporting firing rates of 6-8 rounds per minute in sustained fire modes for many systems. Additionally, armored enclosures provide crew protection meeting or exceeding Level 4 standards against small arms and fragments in variants like the CV90 platform. Notable examples illustrate the diversity of mortar carrier designs. The Finnish Patria NEMO is a remote-operated turret system mounting a 120 mm mortar, integrated onto light tracked or wheeled vehicles for high mobility and 360-degree traverse, with a firing rate up to 10 rounds per minute. The Swedish Advanced Mortar System (AMOS), a twin 120 mm breech-loaded mortar turret mounted on the CV90 tracked chassis, enables multiple rounds simultaneous impact (MRSI) capability, delivering up to 14 rounds in quick succession over ranges exceeding 8 km. Similarly, the Russian 2S41 Drok, based on the wheeled Typhoon-VDV platform, features an 82 mm mortar with a maximum range of 6 km and off-road speeds up to 70 km/h on improved terrain, emphasizing airborne troop support. Despite these advantages, mortar carriers present logistical challenges, requiring more fuel, maintenance, and transport resources than man-portable mortars, which increases demands in prolonged operations. They also remain vulnerable to , as their larger signatures and fixed firing positions can be targeted by enemy and detection systems if not frequently repositioned. As of 2025, emerging systems like the U.S. Global Ordnance Scorpion Light 81mm mobile mortar, tested by the and , further advance rapid deployment with emplacement and displacement times under 30 seconds.

Comparison to Long-Range

Mortar systems, typically limited to maximum ranges of around 7-10 kilometers for standard 120mm rounds, employ high-angle trajectories (often 45-90 degrees) that allow projectiles to arc over obstacles such as or fortifications, providing effective close-support but restricting their reach compared to long-range like 155mm howitzers, which achieve 24-30 kilometers or more with flatter or medium trajectories for direct, extended strikes. In terms of mobility and deployment, mortars excel in rapid setup and portability; a of 4-5 soldiers can emplace a 120mm system in 1-2 minutes and displace within a minute using man-portable components or light vehicles, enabling units to maintain pace in dynamic maneuvers without large logistical footprints. In contrast, towed howitzers require 5-15 minutes for emplacement and displacement, involving larger crews (6-10 personnel) and towing vehicles for transport, which increases vulnerability to and complicates operations in contested environments. Logistically, mortar ammunition is more economical and simpler to sustain, with unguided 81mm rounds costing approximately $1,100 each as of 2024 and 120mm variants ranging from $500 to $2,000, while basic unguided 155mm shells cost around $3,000, escalating to over $10,000 for precision-guided variants; mortars also demand less maintenance due to their simpler design, though they inherently offer lower baseline precision without upgrades. Overall, mortars require smaller crews and loads, facilitating decentralized logistics at the level. Operationally, mortars serve primarily for immediate support, delivering quick-response (with flight times as low as 50 seconds) to suppress or neutralize threats in close proximity, earning them the moniker "infantryman's ." Long-range , by contrast, focuses on counter-battery roles, deep , and shaping the at extended distances, often requiring coordinated fire direction from higher echelons. As of 2025, advancements in mortar carriers and extended-range munitions are narrowing this gap, with systems like turreted 120mm platforms achieving parity in certain scenarios through enhanced mobility and reach up to 12 kilometers. Precision-guided mortar rounds further improve accuracy for these evolving roles.

Notable Examples

Largest Mortars

The largest mortars ever built represent extreme engineering feats, though many were experimental or limited in use, primarily for siege warfare where their immense destructive power could breach fortified positions, despite severe logistical constraints. The largest include the American , a 914 mm (36-inch) caliber mortar developed during for testing but never used in combat, and the British , also 914 mm, built in 1857 but not deployed. Among operational examples, the German Karl-Gerät 040, developed during , stands as one of the most colossal, with a 600 mm caliber barrel capable of firing concrete-piercing shells: heavy shells weighing 2,170 kg to a maximum range of 4.32 km, or lighter shells weighing 1,700 kg up to 6.64 km. This self-propelled siege mortar, weighing 124 tonnes in firing position, was transported via rail on specialized multi-axle carriages and required disassembly into components for long-distance movement, a process that demanded extensive support from engineering units. Engineering the Karl-Gerät presented formidable challenges, particularly in managing recoil forces that could exceed 680 tonnes of pressure, necessitating a sophisticated hydraulic recoil system where the mortar barrel recoiled 98 cm and the carriage an additional 78 cm to absorb the energy. Specialized ammunition, including 1-tonne-plus concrete demolition rounds filled with up to 280 kg of explosives, further complicated operations, as loading required a separate electric crane mounted on the vehicle due to the shells' mass. Despite its power, the saw limited deployment, primarily in the 1942 Siege of , where two units fired approximately 197 rounds to demolish Soviet fortifications, but its immobility—requiring extensive preparation such as 90 days for dug-out positions—and vulnerability to air attack rendered it impractical for fluid fronts. In the , large-caliber mortars have evolved toward vehicle-mounted systems for improved mobility, though they retain the core challenges of heavy and specialized . The Russian , a 240 mm self-propelled mortar introduced in the 1970s, weighs 27 tonnes on a tracked derived from a minelaying and fires rocket-assisted projectiles weighing 228 kg to ranges of up to 19 km. Its is managed through a hydraulic system and steel plate when firing, but the system's weight requires a to handle the 130-240 kg shells, limiting its rate of fire. Deployed in conflicts like the Soviet-Afghan War and more recently in , the Tyulpan excels in breaking fortified positions but suffers from slow reloading and exposure during emplacement. The South African G6-52, a 155 mm self-propelled on a 6x6 wheeled weighing around 46 tonnes, incorporates high-angle fire capability similar to mortars and achieves up to 52 km range using advanced projectiles. Recoil is controlled via a and hydro-pneumatic , allowing sustained fire rates of up to 8 rounds per minute, though the approximately 45 kg shells demand precise for extended operations. While more versatile than WWII giants, such systems remain niche, suited to siege-like scenarios in open terrain rather than rapid maneuvers, as their size hampers off-road performance compared to standard . Overall, these oversized mortars highlight the trade-offs in warfare: unparalleled bunker-busting potential from multi-tonne payloads, but offset by disassembly needs, recoil forces up to hundreds of tonnes, and vulnerability that confined their use to static sieges like , where mobility was secondary to raw demolition power.

Significant Historical Mortars

The , developed by British engineer Wilfred Stokes in 1915, emerged as a pivotal innovation during , providing infantry with a lightweight, portable weapon capable of delivering high-explosive rounds over trenches without the need for complex setups. Its simple tube design, base plate, and bipod allowed for rapid deployment and firing rates up to 20 rounds per minute, making it a game-changer for close-support fire in static . Adopted by the and later supplied to Allied forces including the and , the Stokes mortar's ease of manufacture from basic materials enabled mass production and widespread use on the Western Front, where it proved effective in suppressing machine-gun nests and wire entanglements. This design laid the foundation for modern infantry mortars, influencing the majority of subsequent developments through its emphasis on mobility and simplicity, with variants scaling up to larger calibers like 4-inch and 6-inch models that extended its tactical reach. Building on the Stokes legacy, the French Brandt 81mm mortar, invented by in the mid-1920s and formalized as the Mle 27/31 model, represented a significant evolution in medium-caliber support. Refining the original Stokes tube with improved design for stability and introducing pre-fragmented shells that enhanced lethal fragmentation patterns, it achieved greater accuracy and destructive power at ranges up to 1,900 meters with light projectiles. The Brandt design became a global standard, directly inspiring the U.S. M1 81mm mortar adopted in the late , which incorporated its barrel and baseplate innovations for American production. Deployed extensively by the during the and into , the mortar's rugged construction and crew-served efficiency—requiring just five operators for sustained fire—influenced worldwide, emphasizing rapid repositioning to avoid . In the , the 120mm PM-43 mortar, introduced in 1943 as an upgrade to the earlier M1938 model, served as a reliable heavy-support weapon throughout World War II's Eastern Front campaigns. Featuring a reinforced barrel and baseplate for improved durability in mud and snow, it delivered 15-kilogram high-explosive shells at ranges exceeding 5,700 meters, enabling deep strikes against German fortifications during offensives like the . Its design prioritized ruggedness for harsh climates, with a breakdown into transportable loads that facilitated deployment by horse or truck in mobile warfare. Postwar, the PM-43 was exported to numerous allies and neutral states, seeing continued service in conflicts including the and , where its firepower supported infantry assaults in varied terrains from jungles to mountains. Addressing gaps in earlier designs, the Israeli Soltam series of mortars, developed starting in the 1960s by , adapted Finnish technology to meet the ' needs for versatile fire support in asymmetric Middle East conflicts. The 120mm M-65 and larger 160mm M-66 models, with ranges up to 7,200 meters for the M-65 and greater for the M-66, integrated smoothly into mechanized units, often mounted on modified Sherman tanks for rapid reaction in wars like the and . These mortars' emphasis on quick setup and high-angle fire proved crucial in urban and hilly battles, providing suppressive barrages that shaped Israeli defensive tactics against numerically superior forces. Exported to regional partners and used into the post-Cold War era, including in operations through the 2000s, the Soltam lineage underscored the mortar's enduring role in modern .

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.