Hubbry Logo
Isolation (microbiology)Isolation (microbiology)Main
Open search
Isolation (microbiology)
Community hub
Isolation (microbiology)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Isolation (microbiology)
Isolation (microbiology)
Isolation (microbiology)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In microbiology, isolation is the technique of separating one strain from a mixed population of living microorganisms.[1] This allows identification of microorganisms in a sample taken from the environment, such as water or soil, or from a person or animal.[2] Laboratory techniques for isolating bacteria and parasites were developed during the 19th century, and for viruses during the 20th century.

History

[edit]

The laboratory techniques of isolating microbes first developed during the 19th century in the field of bacteriology and parasitology using light microscopy. 1860 marked the successful introduction of liquid medium by Louis Pasteur. The liquid culture pasteur developed allowed for the visualization of promoting or inhibiting growth of specific bacteria. This same technique is utilized today through various mediums like Mannitol salt agar, a solid medium. Solid cultures were developed in 1881 when Robert Koch solidified the liquid media through the addition of agar[3]

Proper isolation techniques of virology did not exist prior to the 20th century. The methods of microbial isolation have drastically changed over the past 50 years, from a labor perspective with increasing mechanization, and in regard to the technologies involved, and with it speed and accuracy.[citation needed]

General techniques

[edit]
Bacteria extracted from soil sample.

In order to isolate a microbe from a natural, mixed population of living microbes, as present in the environment, for example in water or soil flora, or from living beings with skin flora, oral flora or gut flora, one has to separate it from the mix.

Traditionally microbes have been cultured in order to identify the microbe(s) of interest based on its growth characteristics. Depending on the expected density and viability of microbes present in a liquid sample, physical methods to increase the gradient as for example serial dilution or centrifugation may be chosen. In order to isolate organisms in materials with high microbial content, such as sewage, soil or stool, serial dilutions will increase the chance of separating a mixture.

In a liquid medium with few or no expected organisms, from an area that is normally sterile (such as CSF, blood inside the circulatory system) centrifugation, decanting the supernatant and using only the sediment will increase the chance to grow and isolate bacteria or the usually cell-associated viruses.

If one expects or looks for a particularly fastidious organism, the microbiological culture and isolation techniques will have to be geared towards that microbe. For example, a bacterium that dies when exposed to air, can only be isolated if the sample is carried and processed under airless or anaerobic conditions. A bacterium that dies when exposed to room temperature (thermophilic) requires a pre-warmed transport container, and a microbe that dries and dies when carried on a cotton swab will need a viral transport medium before it can be cultured successfully.

Bacterial and fungal culture

[edit]

Inoculation

[edit]

Laboratory technicians inoculate the sample onto certain solid agar plates with the streak plate method or into liquid culture medium, depending what the objective of the isolation is:

Incubation

[edit]

After the sample is inoculated into or onto the choice media, they are incubated under the appropriate atmospheric settings, such as aerobic, anaerobic or microaerophilic conditions or with added carbon dioxide (5%), at different temperature settings, for example 37 °C in an incubator or in a refrigerator for cold enrichment, under appropriate light, for example strictly without light wrapped in paper or in a dark bottle for scotochromogen mycobacteria, and for different lengths of time, because different bacteria grow at a different speed, varying from hours (Escherichia coli) to weeks (e.g. mycobacteria).

At regular, serial intervals laboratory technicians and microbiologists inspect the media for signs of visible growth and record it. The inspection again has to occur under conditions favoring the isolate's survival, i.e. in an 'anaerobic chamber' for anaerobe bacteria for example, and under conditions that do not threaten the person looking at the plates from being infected by a particularly infectious microbe, i.e. under a biological safety cabinet for Yersinia pestis (plague) or Bacillus anthracis (anthrax) for example.

Identification

[edit]

When bacteria have visibly grown, they are often still mixed. The identification of a microbe depends upon the isolation of an individual colony, as biochemical testing of a microbe to determine its different physiological features depends on a pure culture. To make a subculture, one again works in aseptic technique in microbiology, lifting a single colony off the agar surface with a loop and streaks the material into the 4 quadrants of an agar plate or all over if the colony was singular and did not look mixed.

Example of gram staining on a gram positive rod.

Gram staining allows for visualization of the bacteria's cell wall composition based on the color the bacteria stains after a series of staining and decolorization steps.[5] This staining process allows for the identification of gram-negative and gram positive bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria will stain a pink color due to the thin layer of peptidoglycan. If a bacteria stains purple, due to the thick layer of peptidoglycan, the bacteria is a gram-positive bacteria.[5]

In clinical microbiology numerous other staining techniques for particular organisms are used (acid fast bacterial stain for mycobacteria). Immunological staining techniques, such as direct immunofluorescence have been developed for medically important pathogens that are slow growing (Auramine-rhodamine stain for mycobacteria) or difficult to grow (such as Legionella pneumophila species) and where the test result would alter standard management and empirical therapy.

Biochemical testing of bacteria involves a set of agars in vials to separate motile from non-motile bacteria. In 1970 a miniaturized version was developed, called the analytical profile index.

Successful identification via e.g. genome sequencing and genomics depends on pure cultures.

Culture-independent identification of bacteria

[edit]

The most rapid method to identify bacteria is by sequencing their 16S rRNA gene after amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which method does not require isolation.[citation needed] Since most bacteria cannot be grown with conventional methods (particularly environmental or soil bacteria) metagenomics or metatranscriptomics are used, shotgun sequencing or PCR directed sequencing of the genome. Sequencing with mass spectrometry as in Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI-TOF MS) is used in the analysis of clinical specimens to look for pathogens. Whole genome sequencing is an option for a singular organism that cannot be sufficiently characterized for identification. Small DNA microarrays can also be used for identification.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Isolation (microbiology)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , isolation refers to the techniques employed to separate a single type of , such as or fungi, from a mixed in a sample or environment, resulting in a pure culture that contains only that for further study and analysis. This process is essential because microorganisms in natural settings often exist in complex communities, making it necessary to obtain isolated colonies to accurately identify pathogens, assess susceptibility, and genomes. The development of isolation methods traces back to the late during the "" of , pioneered by scientists like and , who established protocols for cultivating pure bacterial cultures from infected tissues or environmental sources. Key techniques include the streak plate method, where a sample is successively streaked across an to dilute cells and promote the growth of isolated colonies; the pour plate method, involving mixing the sample with molten before solidification to distribute microbes throughout the medium; and the spread plate method, in which a diluted sample is evenly spread over a solidified surface. These approaches rely on aseptic handling to prevent contamination and are typically performed using selective or differential media that favor the growth of target microbes while inhibiting others. Isolation remains a of microbiological and clinical diagnostics, enabling the detailed examination of microbial , factors, and interactions, as well as supporting applications in , , and . Advances in isolation have expanded to include molecular and cultivation-independent methods, but traditional culturing techniques continue to underpin the field due to their reliability in yielding viable pure cultures for functional studies.

Historical Development

Early Observations

The earliest observations of microorganisms laid the groundwork for understanding microbial life, beginning with advancements in during the . In 1665, published , where he coined the term "cell" to describe the box-like structures he observed in thin slices of cork under a compound microscope, resembling the small rooms in a ; these were actually the cell walls of dead tissue. Hooke also sketched detailed illustrations of mold, depicting its hairy, branching structures, which demonstrated basic techniques like slicing and illuminating specimens for microscopic viewing. These observations highlighted the cellular nature of and sparked interest in smaller life forms. Building on such work, advanced in the 1670s with his single-lens instruments, magnifying up to 270 times, allowing him to observe "animalcules"—the first recorded sightings of and . In 1674, he examined pond water, describing green streaks of filamentous algae like Spirogyra composed of spirally arranged globules, and noted diverse motile forms swimming in various directions. By 1683, van Leeuwenhoek scraped from his teeth and an elderly man's mouth, revealing multitudes of tiny, rapidly moving animalcules that darted like fish or spun like tops, underscoring the ubiquity and diversity of microbes in everyday environments such as water and oral samples. His letters to the Royal Society documented over 200 types of these microorganisms, including , protists, nematodes, and rotifers, establishing microbes as a distinct realm of life. The 19th century saw intense debates over —the idea that life could arise from non-living matter—which indirectly emphasized the need for controlled observation and isolation of microbes. Proponents like argued that a "vital force" in air caused microbial growth in boiled , while critics like showed that prolonged boiling and sealing prevented contamination. In the 1860s, decisively disproved spontaneous generation through his swan-neck flask experiments, where he boiled nutrient in flasks with long, curved necks that allowed air entry but trapped airborne dust and microbes; the remained sterile until the necks were broken, allowing contamination and growth. These results demonstrated that microbes arise from pre-existing life, not spontaneously, and implied the necessity of isolating samples from external contaminants to study them accurately. A key precursor to microbial differentiation emerged in 1884 when Hans Christian Gram developed a staining method while examining lung tissue from pneumonia patients. The technique involved applying crystal violet dye, fixing it with iodine, decolorizing with alcohol, and counterstaining with safranin, revealing two bacterial types: those retaining the purple dye (Gram-positive, due to thick peptidoglycan cell walls) and those taking up the red counterstain (Gram-negative, with thinner walls and outer membranes). This differential staining enabled clearer visualization and classification of microbes in mixed samples, paving the way for more precise isolation and identification techniques in subsequent decades.

Key Milestones in Technique Evolution

In the late , the foundation of modern microbial isolation techniques was laid by , who in 1881 introduced the plate method using nutrient gelatin poured onto flat glass plates to obtain pure cultures of bacteria. This innovation allowed for the separation and propagation of individual bacterial colonies from mixed samples, building on his earlier 1876 isolation of the anthrax bacillus () and enabling the rigorous testing of causal links between microbes and diseases through what became known as . That same year, Fannie Angelina Hesse, working alongside her husband Walther Hesse in Koch's laboratory, proposed agar—a seaweed-derived gelling agent she had encountered in culinary applications—as a superior alternative to gelatin, which liquefied at incubation temperatures suitable for many microbes. Agar's stability at higher temperatures and resistance to enzymatic digestion by bacteria and fungi revolutionized solid media preparation, facilitating reliable culturing of diverse microorganisms and becoming the standard for isolation techniques thereafter. Advancing these methods, , an assistant in Koch's laboratory, invented the in 1887 as a lidded, shallow glass container specifically designed for sterile manipulation and incubation of plates, minimizing contamination and improving the practicality of colony observation and subculturing. Complementing this, in the 1880s, Koch's collaborators Friedrich Loeffler and Georg Theodor August Gaffky refined the streak-plate technique, a dilution method involving successive streaking of inoculum across surfaces to yield isolated colonies, which enhanced the efficiency of obtaining pure cultures from complex environmental or clinical samples. The pour-plate method, developed by Robert Koch in 1881, further refined isolation techniques by mixing diluted samples directly with molten agar before pouring into plates, allowing for the enumeration and isolation of both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria embedded within the medium. The post-1940s antibiotic era further transformed isolation by inspiring selective media formulations that incorporated compounds like penicillin and streptomycin to suppress unwanted microbial growth, thereby targeting specific pathogens in mixed populations and supporting advancements in clinical diagnostics and research.

Fundamental Principles

Selective vs. Differential Approaches

In , selective media are designed to favor the growth of specific microorganisms while inhibiting others, thereby isolating target microbes from complex samples. These media incorporate antimicrobial agents, such as dyes, salts, or antibiotics, that suppress the proliferation of unwanted species without completely halting all growth. For instance, contains bile salts and , which inhibit most and select for Gram-negative enteric bacteria like . This selectivity is crucial in clinical and environmental samples where dominant populations might otherwise overwhelm rarer targets. Differential media, in contrast, permit the growth of a broad range of microorganisms but enable visual differentiation based on metabolic reactions or physiological traits. These media often include indicators, such as pH-sensitive dyes or substrates, that produce distinct color changes, colony morphologies, or zones of reaction. A classic example is blood agar, which reveals patterns in streptococci—alpha- produces a greenish zone, beta- a clear zone, and gamma- no change—allowing presumptive identification without further testing. Such distinctions aid in rapid screening during isolation workflows. Many media combine selective and differential properties to enhance efficiency, simultaneously isolating and identifying microbes. (EMB) agar exemplifies this: its dyes inhibit (selective for Gram-negatives), while and produces a metallic green sheen in strong fermenters like E. coli, pink colonies in weak fermenters, and colorless growth in non-fermenters. Enrichment cultures extend these principles in liquid media through serial dilutions or specialized setups that amplify rare microbes by providing optimal nutrients and conditions while diluting competitors. The , for example, uses layered sediments with carbon and sulfur sources to enrich anaerobic photosynthetic and sulfur-cycling soil bacteria, creating stratified microbial communities over weeks. Despite their utility, selective and differential approaches have limitations, particularly in detecting unculturable or fastidious microbes that evade standard media due to unmet growth requirements like specific symbioses or signaling molecules. Estimates suggest that only 1-20% of environmental microbes can be cultured this way, prompting reliance on culture-independent methods for comprehensive analysis.

Enrichment and Pure Culture Concepts

A pure culture in refers to a population of cells derived from a single parental cell, consisting of only one or strain of , free from contamination by others. This concept was foundational to establishing in infectious diseases, as articulated in Robert Koch's postulates from the , particularly the second postulate requiring the isolation of the suspected from a diseased host and its growth in pure culture on artificial media. Koch emphasized that pure cultures were essential for reliable pathogenicity studies, enabling controlled experimentation without interference from mixed microbial populations. Enrichment is a preliminary technique to amplify the proportion of target microorganisms in a complex environmental or clinical sample by exploiting their unique physiological requirements, thereby increasing their relative abundance before isolation attempts. This process involves inoculating the sample into media or conditions that favor the growth of the desired microbe while inhibiting competitors, such as incorporating high salt concentrations (e.g., 15-30% NaCl) to select for halophiles that thrive in saline environments. Similarly, for anaerobes, enrichment can employ oxygen-free setups like anaerobic chambers or media with reducing agents to prevent oxidative damage and promote proliferation of oxygen-sensitive . These selective conditions, often building on principles of selective media, enhance detection of low-abundance targets that might otherwise be overlooked in direct plating. To achieve pure cultures from enriched samples, the streak plate method employs a dilution series on solid media, where a mixed inoculum is systematically spread across the plate surface using a sterile loop in overlapping quadrants, progressively reducing cell to yield isolated derived from single cells. Each distinct represents a potential pure , as spatial separation minimizes cross-contamination during growth. Following initial isolation, subculturing confirms and maintains purity by aseptically transferring a single to fresh media, allowing repeated for uniform morphology and absence of contaminants under microscopic examination. Enrichment and isolation face challenges, notably the outcompetition of slow-growing or stressed target microbes by faster-proliferating species in mixed inocula, which can skew population dynamics and lead to false negatives. To address this, the most probable number (MPN) method provides a statistical quantification of viable target cells in liquid enrichments through serial dilutions and replica inoculations into selective broths, estimating population density without relying on visible colony formation. This approach is particularly useful in scenarios where plating is impractical due to microbial heterogeneity or low viability.

Culture-Based Methods

Inoculation and Sampling Techniques

In , sampling techniques are essential for collecting microbial specimens from diverse sources while maintaining sterility to avoid and ensure representative isolation. Environmental sampling often involves swabbing surfaces with sterile cotton or synthetic swabs moistened in saline or transport media to capture surface-associated microbes, such as those on equipment or natural substrates. For soil samples, in sterile saline or phosphate buffer is a standard method to reduce particle load and achieve countable microbial concentrations, typically performed in a 10-fold dilution series up to 10^-6 or higher depending on microbial density. Fluid aspiration from sources like water bodies uses sterile syringes or through 0.45 μm membranes to concentrate microbes, preventing loss during transfer. Clinical sampling, such as s, employs with alcohol-disinfected skin and direct into aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles containing nutrient broth to detect bacteremia rapidly. Inoculation techniques transfer the sampled material onto or into growth media to initiate microbial proliferation under controlled conditions. Streak plating, using a sterile or wire loop flamed to redness and cooled, involves sequential across plates to dilute cells and isolate individual colonies, a method pioneered by for pure culture isolation. Spread plating employs a sterile glass or plastic spreader to evenly distribute a fixed volume (e.g., 0.1 mL) of diluted sample over the surface, ideal for quantitative enumeration of colony-forming units (CFUs). Pour plating mixes the inoculum with molten (cooled to 45-50°C) before solidification, embedding microbes within the medium to recover anaerobic or heat-sensitive organisms, though it risks thermal injury to some . For liquid media, into tubes or shake flasks uses pipettes or loops to introduce samples, often with agitation at 150-200 rpm for aeration during initial enrichment phases. Sterility protocols are integral to these processes to exclude exogenous microbes that could confound isolation. Flame sterilization of loops and needles by passing through a until red-hot, followed by cooling in air or sterile , is a foundational aseptic technique developed in the late 19th century. Work in hoods or cabinets provides unidirectional HEPA-filtered airflow, creating a sterile workspace for handling open vessels and reducing airborne contaminants by up to 99.99%. All manipulations occur under these conditions, with tools and media autoclaved at 121°C for 15 minutes to achieve sterility assurance levels of 10^-6. Media selection influences inoculation success, with nutrient-rich agar for general isolation or selective formulations to target specific taxa, as detailed in fundamental principles of microbial culture. Sample types vary by context: clinical specimens like throat swabs or urine are inoculated directly via calibrated loops for pathogen detection, while environmental samples from wastewater require filtration and enrichment to amplify low-abundance microbes. These techniques ensure the initial microbial load is viable and uncontaminated, setting the stage for subsequent isolation steps.

Incubation and Growth Optimization

Incubation in microbiology involves maintaining controlled environmental conditions to facilitate the proliferation of target microorganisms following , thereby enhancing isolation efficiency. is a critical parameter, with microbes classified based on their optimal growth ranges: psychrophiles thrive below 20°C, often between 0°C and 15°C; mesophiles, including most , grow best between 20°C and 45°C; and thermophiles prefer temperatures above 45°C, up to 65°C or higher for extreme variants. For human-associated pathogens like or , incubation at 37°C mimics body temperature and promotes robust growth. Atmospheric composition must also be tailored to the microbe's oxygen requirements to prevent inhibition or toxicity. Aerobic bacteria are incubated in ambient air with approximately 21% oxygen, while strict anaerobes require oxygen-free environments achieved through gas packs, anaerobic chambers, or chemical generators that produce and to scavenge oxygen. Microaerophiles, such as , demand reduced oxygen levels (2-10%) and elevated (5-10%), often maintained using specialized gas-generating envelopes in sealed jars at 37-42°C. Humidity control is essential, particularly for fungi and moisture-sensitive cultures, where relative humidity levels of 70-95% prevent desiccation of agar plates or liquid media during extended incubation. Light exposure is generally minimized for non-photosynthetic microbes to avoid phototoxic effects, but photosynthetic organisms like cyanobacteria require specific wavelengths (e.g., 400-700 nm) and photoperiods to support chlorophyll-based growth. Incubation duration varies by microbial type and growth rate; fast-growing typically require 24-48 hours to reach visible or colony formation, whereas slow-growing species like may need 3-8 weeks under humidified conditions at 35-37°C with 5-10% CO₂. Fungal cultures often extend to 2-4 weeks to capture dimorphic or mycelial development. Optimization further involves adjusting pH to the microbe's tolerance, with most as neutrophiles favoring a neutral range around 7.0 to maintain enzymatic activity and integrity. Growth progress is monitored non-invasively via measurements, such as optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀), where values correlate with cell density (e.g., OD₆₀₀ of 0.5 approximates 10⁸ cells/mL for E. coli), allowing real-time assessment without disrupting cultures. These parameters collectively support selective enrichment by favoring the target microbe's proliferation over contaminants.

Purification and Colony Selection

Purification in involves separating individual microbial cells or from mixed populations to obtain pure cultures, typically after initial incubation has allowed visible growth on plates. This step ensures that subsequent analyses or applications, such as identification or genetic studies, are performed on genetically homogeneous populations. Techniques focus on mechanical dilution, visual selection, and verification to isolate colony-forming units (CFUs) derived from single cells. The quadrant streaking method is a primary technique for achieving isolation by progressively diluting the inoculum across an . In this procedure, a sterile inoculating loop is used to spread the sample in a back-and-forth motion over the first quadrant, covering about one-fourth of the plate's surface; the plate is then rotated 90 degrees, and the loop is dragged from the edge of the first streak into the second quadrant, repeating for the third and fourth quadrants to further reduce cell density. This results in isolated colonies in the final quadrant, where single cells can grow into visible, pure clusters without interference from neighboring cells. The method relies on aseptic handling, with the loop flamed between quadrants to prevent cross-contamination, and is effective for most when performed on following 24-48 hours of incubation at optimal temperatures. Once isolated colonies appear, assessment of colony morphology provides a preliminary means to select and confirm potential pure cultures based on observable traits. Key characteristics include size (e.g., punctiform for <1 mm or larger diameters), shape (round, irregular, or filamentous), color (white, pigmented, or translucent), edge (entire, undulate, or lobed), and texture (smooth, rough, or mucoid). For instance, mucoid colonies, which appear shiny and viscous due to polysaccharide production, often indicate capsule-forming such as certain species, aiding in distinguishing them from non-encapsulated variants. (flat, raised, or convex) and opacity (transparent to opaque) further refine selection, allowing microbiologists to pick well-separated colonies with consistent morphology to avoid mixed populations. This visual evaluation is typically done under low magnification or with a dissecting before transfer. Replica plating extends purification by enabling the screening and transfer of multiple while preserving their spatial arrangement, particularly useful for selecting mutants or antibiotic-resistant strains from initial isolates. Developed by Joshua and , the technique involves pressing a sterile velvet-covered disk onto the master plate to pick up cells from each , then imprinting the disk onto secondary plates with selective media (e.g., containing antibiotics). that grow on selective plates but correspond to positions on the master indicate resistant variants, allowing isolation without direct exposure of the original population to stressors. This indirect selection method revolutionized by facilitating of thousands of . Microscopy confirmation, often via Gram staining, verifies the purity of selected colonies by examining cellular morphology and uniformity under a light microscope. A thin smear from the colony is heat-fixed on a slide, stained with , iodine, decolorized with , and counterstained with ; pure cultures exhibit consistent Gram reaction (purple for Gram-positive or pink for Gram-negative) and morphology (e.g., cocci or ) across all cells viewed at 1000× magnification with . The presence of multiple morphologies or unexpected cell types signals contamination, prompting re-isolation. can also be used for unstained samples to assess or structure without staining. Viability checks through subculturing ensure that isolated colonies are alive and free of contaminants before long-term use. A single colony is transferred aseptically to fresh broth (e.g., tryptic soy broth) or agar using a flamed loop, then incubated under conditions matching the original growth (e.g., 37°C for 24 hours); turbidity in broth or new colony formation confirms viability and purity if morphology remains uniform. Suspected mixed colonies are subcultured via streaking to re-isolate, with controls (uninoculated media) verifying no external contamination. This iterative process maintains culture integrity for downstream applications.

Identification of Isolated Microbes

Once a pure culture has been obtained through purification techniques, identification of the isolated microbe involves a series of phenotypic and genotypic characterizations to determine its taxonomic identity. This typically begins with basic morphological observations, progresses to biochemical and serological assays, and may incorporate molecular methods for confirmation, ensuring accurate within microbial . Morphological identification relies on microscopic examination of cell structure and arrangement, providing initial clues about the microbe's or . Common bacterial shapes include (rod-shaped cells), cocci (spherical cells), and spirilla (spiral forms), with arrangements such as chains, clusters, or pairs further distinguishing taxa like streptococci or staphylococci. Spore formation, observed via endospore staining, is a key feature in certain Gram-positive like Clostridium and Bacillus species, where appear as refractile structures within vegetative cells, indicating resilience to harsh environments. These observations are performed using stains like Gram or simple dyes under light or , offering a rapid, low-cost preliminary assessment. Biochemical tests assess metabolic capabilities to generate a profile unique to specific microbes, building on morphological data for more precise identification. The catalase test detects the enzyme that decomposes into water and oxygen, producing bubbles in positive organisms like staphylococci, while negatives include streptococci. The oxidase test identifies activity via color change on reagent-impregnated disks, distinguishing aerobic such as Pseudomonas from oxidase-negative Enterobacteriaceae. Commercial systems like API strips (e.g., API 20E for Enterobacteriaceae) contain miniaturized compartments for up to 20 dehydrated biochemical tests, including sugar fermentation, enzyme production, and decarboxylase activity; results yield a numerical profile compared to databases for species-level identification with over 90% accuracy in many cases. Serological methods exploit antigen-antibody interactions to confirm identity through visible reactions, particularly useful for pathogens with known serotypes. assays mix bacterial suspensions with specific polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies; clumping indicates antigenic match, as in serotyping where O and H antigens react with antisera to differentiate over 2,500 serovars. These tests, often slide or tube-based, provide rapid results within minutes to hours and are standard in clinical for identifying isolates like Streptococcus groups via Lancefield antisera. For definitive confirmation, especially when phenotypic traits overlap, molecular methods like 16S rRNA gene sequencing target conserved and variable regions of this universal bacterial and sequencing of the ~1,500 gene allows comparison to reference databases, achieving genus-level identification in over 90% of cases and species-level in 65-83%, though limitations exist for closely related taxa. This technique serves as a bridge to culture-independent approaches but is applied here post-culturing for validation. Phenotypic data from these tests are matched against established databases for comprehensive . Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology compiles detailed descriptions of bacterial taxa, including morphological, biochemical, and ecological traits, serving as a primary reference for deterministic identification since its inception in 1923. Systems like MIDI's Sherlock Microbial Identification use of cellular methyl esters (FAME) to generate profiles compared to libraries of over 2,000 strains, offering 95-99% accuracy for common when combined with other data. These resources ensure isolated microbes are reliably placed within taxonomic frameworks.

Culture-Independent Methods

Molecular Detection Strategies

Molecular detection strategies in facilitate the targeted identification and isolation of microorganisms from complex samples without relying on culture-based methods, which often fail to capture unculturable or slow-growing . These approaches leverage amplification, hybridization, or antigen-antibody interactions to detect specific genetic or protein markers, enabling rapid and sensitive analysis in environmental, clinical, and contexts. By focusing on conserved or pathogen-specific sequences and antigens, such techniques provide insights into microbial presence, abundance, and , complementing traditional isolation by addressing the limitations of pure culture requirements. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, particularly those targeting the 16S rRNA gene, are foundational for bacterial detection from environmental DNA. The 16S rRNA gene, a conserved molecular marker present in all bacteria, is amplified using broad-range primers to generate amplicons of approximately 1,300–1,500 base pairs, followed by sequencing for taxonomic assignment against databases like GenBank. This approach achieves genus-level identification in over 90% of cases and species-level resolution in 65–83% of isolates, outperforming conventional biochemical methods for rare or fastidious bacteria. In environmental applications, such as water samples, real-time quantitative broad-range PCR detects as few as 1–10 colony-forming units (CFU) per reaction, using optimized extraction protocols involving lysozyme, lysostaphin, and proteinase K to enhance sensitivity from low-biomass matrices. These methods are particularly valuable for detecting unculturable bacteria, though challenges include intragenomic heterogeneity and database incompleteness, which can lead to 1–14% unidentified isolates. Quantitative PCR (qPCR), an advanced variant, extends PCR capabilities to quantify specific pathogens by monitoring amplification in real time via fluorescent probes like , providing cycle threshold (Ct) values that correlate with microbial load. In diagnostics, reverse transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) has been pivotal for viruses, such as , where it targets genes like the nucleocapsid (N) or spike (S) to detect and quantify viral from nasopharyngeal swabs or saliva, achieving high as the gold standard during the 2020s . Ct values below 30 typically indicate active infection, enabling estimation for severity assessment, with results obtainable in hours using automated systems. This quantification aids in outbreak tracking and treatment monitoring, though it requires skilled handling to mitigate false negatives from sample degradation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) offers spatial detection of microbes in their native environments, such as biofilms, by using fluorescently labeled probes (12–20 , 40–60% ) that hybridize to targets like 16S/23S rRNA in fixed cells. The process involves sample fixation, permeabilization, probe hybridization, and imaging via confocal laser scanning microscopy, revealing microbial identity, distribution, and interactions without disrupting community structure. In biofilms, FISH variants like catalyzed reporter deposition FISH (CARD-FISH) amplify signals for low-abundance taxa, enabling visualization of microcolonies, co-aggregation, and layered architectures in or wastewater systems. This method detects both culturable and unculturable organisms with high specificity, though probe design must account for sequence variability to avoid cross-hybridization. Immunoassays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (), provide protein-based detection for viral isolation by capturing s with specific antibodies, offering a culture-independent alternative for rapid screening. In antigen-capture , monoclonal antibodies immobilize targets like the -CoV nucleocapsid protein on a plate, followed by enzymatic detection yielding colorimetric signals proportional to concentration, with a sensitivity of ~50 pg/mL and linearity from 100 pg/mL to 3.2 ng/mL. For patients, this assay detected in 84.6% of sera within 10 days of symptom onset, with 98.5% specificity in healthy controls and no with other coronaviruses. These assays are cost-effective and suitable for high-throughput clinical use, peaking in detection 6–10 days post-infection, though they may miss early or low-level . Probe-based methods, including DNA microarrays, enable simultaneous detection of multiple microbial targets through hybridization of labeled sample nucleic acids to surface-immobilized probes. Arrays feature hundreds to thousands of probes targeting conserved genes like 16S rRNA or virulence factors, allowing identification of bacterial pathogens in blood or respiratory samples with sensitivities as low as 3.1 fg DNA or 1,900 RNA copies. For instance, rRNA gene arrays detect 23 bloodstream pathogens, while functional arrays profile resistance and toxin genes across diverse taxa, facilitating co-infection diagnosis and novel agent discovery as seen in SARS investigations. This high-throughput parallelism surpasses single-target PCR for complex samples, though it requires prior knowledge of probe sequences and can be limited by hybridization stringency.

Metagenomic and Sequencing Approaches

Metagenomics involves the direct extraction of DNA from environmental or complex biological samples, such as or gut microbiomes, followed by to analyze the collective genetic material of microbial communities without prior cultivation. This approach, pioneered in the early , enables the reconstruction of microbial genomes and functional profiles from uncultured organisms, revealing that traditional culture methods overlook. sequences all DNA fragments randomly, allowing assembly into contigs that represent individual microbial genomes or metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). A targeted variant, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, amplifies specific hypervariable regions of the bacterial gene to profile taxonomic composition. Commonly, primers targeting the V4 region, such as 515F and 806R, are used to generate amplicons suitable for high-throughput sequencing platforms like Illumina, providing resolution at the or level in diverse samples. This method excels in estimating relative abundances and detecting rare taxa, though it is limited to and and does not capture functional genes. Single-cell genomics addresses limitations of bulk sequencing by isolating individual microbial cells for genome recovery, particularly from unculturable species. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) is often employed to separate cells based on staining properties, followed by multiple displacement amplification (MDA) to amplify the minute DNA content (femtograms) from a single cell into sufficient material for sequencing. This technique has enabled the sequencing of over 1,000 uncultured bacterial genomes from environmental samples, providing insights into novel metabolic pathways. Bioinformatics pipelines process raw sequencing data to infer community structure and diversity. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are generated by clustering sequences at 97% similarity using tools like QIIME or mothur, while denoising algorithms in DADA2 produce amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) for finer resolution. Alpha diversity metrics, such as Shannon index, quantify richness and evenness within samples, whereas measures, like Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, assess compositional differences between samples. Post-2010 advances in long-read sequencing technologies, particularly PacBio's , have improved metagenomic assemblies by producing reads exceeding 10 kb, reducing fragmentation in complex communities. These long reads facilitate better resolution of repetitive regions and strain-level variants, enhancing MAG completeness from 70-80% with short reads to over 90% in some cases. Integration with short-read data via hybrid assembly pipelines has further boosted accuracy in reconstructing high-quality genomes from low-abundance microbes.

Isolation of Specific Microbe Types

Bacteria and Archaea

Isolation of bacteria and archaea, both prokaryotic microbes, relies on culture-based techniques adapted to their rapid division rates, metabolic diversity, and environmental adaptations. Bacteria often exhibit fast growth, doubling in as little as 20 minutes under optimal conditions, enabling efficient isolation through standard plating methods on nutrient-rich media. Their diverse metabolisms, including aerobic, anaerobic, and fermentative pathways, necessitate selective media to target specific groups; for instance, eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar is widely used to isolate and differentiate Gram-negative enteric bacteria like Escherichia coli, where lactose-fermenting colonies produce a characteristic metallic green sheen due to dye uptake and acid production. This selectivity exploits metabolic differences, facilitating purification from mixed samples such as clinical or environmental sources. Archaea, in contrast, often inhabit extreme environments and require specialized media to replicate these conditions during isolation. Many are extremophiles, thriving at high temperatures, , or extremes that inhibit . For example, species of the Thermococcus, hyperthermophilic archaea from deep-sea hydrothermal vents, are isolated using artificial seawater-based media supplemented with elemental and peptides, incubated anaerobically at 60–92°C to support their . These conditions, including pressure simulation in some protocols, are critical to prevent by mesophilic and to promote archaeal colony formation on media or in enrichments. A significant challenge in prokaryotic isolation is the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state, where bacteria and archaea remain metabolically active yet fail to grow on standard media due to stress responses like nutrient limitation or temperature shifts. VBNC cells can be resuscitated through methods such as stress removal (e.g., transferring to nutrient-rich media at permissive temperatures), addition of autoinducers like acyl-homoserine lactones for quorum sensing restoration, or exposure to resuscitation-promoting factors (RPFs) derived from predatory bacteria. These approaches have successfully revived VBNC E. coli and Vibrio species, highlighting the need for viability assays like LIVE/DEAD staining alongside culturing to detect and recover these dormant forms. Environmental sampling for low-abundance prokaryotes, such as oligotrophic in water, employs dilution plating to reduce and mimic scarcity. Seawater samples are serially diluted up to 10^6-fold and spread on low- , allowing slow-growing oligotrophs like or Pelagibacter to form visible colonies without overgrowth by copiotrophs. This extinction dilution technique has isolated facultatively oligotrophic marine from open sites, revealing their adaptations to dilute nutrients. Syntrophic bacteria, which depend on interspecies hydrogen transfer for growth in anaerobic consortia, pose unique isolation challenges due to their inability to thrive axenically. Emerging CRISPR-based methods enable targeted within microbial communities, allowing selective disruption of competing genomes or enhancement of syntroph viability for subsequent purification; for example, phage-delivered systems have been used to edit specific bacteria in mixed cultures, facilitating isolation of syntrophic partners like sulfate-reducers. These tools address gaps in traditional co-culture approaches by providing locus-specific modifications without full community disassembly.

Fungi and Yeasts

The isolation of fungi and yeasts in requires tailored approaches due to their eukaryotic , slower growth rates compared to , and diverse reproductive structures such as spores and hyphae. Unlike prokaryotes, these microbes often form larger, more visible colonies on plates, allowing for initial selection based on morphology, but their cultivation demands nutrient-rich, acidic media to suppress bacterial overgrowth and promote fungal development. Standard protocols emphasize selective media and environmental controls to achieve pure cultures, with incubation typically at 25–30°C for several days to weeks. Sabouraud dextrose (SDA) is a cornerstone medium for isolating pathogenic fungi, including dermatophytes, due to its low (around 5.6) and high dextrose content that favors fungal growth while inhibiting many . This medium is commonly supplemented with antibiotics such as (50 mg/L) or gentamicin (50 mg/L) to further suppress bacterial contaminants when isolating from clinical or environmental samples containing mixed . For dermatophytes like species, SDA enables the observation of characteristic woolly or powdery colonies after 7–14 days of incubation. Yeast isolation often employs dilution plating on malt extract agar (MEA), which provides fermentable sugars and peptides to support growth of and Candida species from sources like or . To enhance selectivity against molds and , cycloheximide (10–50 mg/L) is added, as many yeasts exhibit resistance to this eukaryotic while filamentous fungi are suppressed. Colonies appear creamy or white after 48–72 hours, allowing for streak purification to obtain axenic cultures. Spore germination techniques are essential for propagating fungi with dormant ascospores, such as those in or Byssochlamys species, where heat shocking at 60°C for 30–60 minutes activates metabolic processes and breaks . This treatment, followed by incubation on at 25–28°C, induces germ tube emergence and hyphal development, improving recovery rates from 10–20% in untreated spores to over 80%. Such methods are particularly useful in genetic studies or when isolating from heat-resistant environmental reservoirs. Morphological identification of isolated fungi and yeasts relies on microscopic and macroscopic features, distinguishing hyphal forms (septate or aseptate filaments) from yeast-like budding cells in dimorphic . For instance, produces black-pigmented conidia on velvety colonies with radiating hyphae, observable under lactophenol cotton blue staining, aiding preliminary genus-level classification. Pigmentation and colony texture—such as the green spores of —provide key diagnostic cues before molecular confirmation. In food sample isolation, mycotoxin production by fungi like and necessitates precautions to avoid toxin degradation during processing, such as using sterile techniques and low-temperature storage to preserve aflatoxins or ochratoxins for subsequent . Regulatory guidelines recommend integrating screening via HPLC post-isolation to assess risks in commodities like grains or nuts.

Viruses and Bacteriophages

Viruses and bacteriophages, being intracellular parasites, cannot be isolated through standard microbial techniques and instead require living host cells or organisms for replication and detection. Isolation methods for these non-cellular entities focus on propagating them in permissive hosts, quantifying infectious particles, and separating them from contaminants, often leveraging the cytopathic effects they induce in infected cells. Traditional approaches emphasize plaque formation as a hallmark of viral , while modern techniques incorporate to uncover unculturable viruses from environmental samples like . The plaque remains a cornerstone for isolating and titering , involving serial dilutions of a viral sample inoculated onto a of susceptible host cells, such as Vero cells, followed by overlaying with a semisolid medium like to restrict viral spread and visualize discrete plaques of cell lysis. Each plaque represents the progeny from a single infectious , enabling quantification in plaque-forming units per milliliter (PFU/ml), a direct measure of viable concentration. This method, originally developed by Dulbecco and Vogt for , has been adapted for numerous viruses including and herpesviruses, providing both isolation and infectivity assessment in a single . For bacteriophages, enrichment and isolation commonly employ the double-layer technique, where a bottom layer of solid supports a of host bacteria, and a top layer of soft mixed with the phage sample and bacterial host allows localized and plaque formation. Phages diffuse through the soft to infect nearby bacteria, leading to clear zones of that can be picked for further propagation and purification, facilitating the isolation of high-titer stocks from complex samples like or . This method, refined since the early era, ensures efficient enrichment by amplifying phage numbers through host cycles before plaque visualization. Viral propagation for isolation often utilizes embryonated chicken eggs, particularly for enveloped viruses like , where into the allantoic cavity allows in chorioallantoic membranes, yielding high-titer harvests after incubation at 33–37°C for 2–3 days. Alternatively, continuous cell lines such as Vero cells (derived from African green monkey kidney) support propagation of herpesviruses, including , through adsorption and multi-cycle replication in serum-free media, enabling scalable isolation from clinical specimens. These host systems mimic conditions, allowing viruses to complete their lifecycle and produce detectable cytopathic effects or hemagglutination for confirmation. Following propagation, purification of viruses and bacteriophages typically involves ultracentrifugation to pellet viral particles from host debris, often combined with cesium (CsCl) gradient centrifugation to separate intact virions based on their buoyant (around 1.3–1.4 g/ml for many viruses). In CsCl gradients, viruses band at equilibrium after high-speed spinning (e.g., 100,000–150,000 × g for 2–4 hours), allowing collection of pure fractions free from proteins and nucleic acids, as demonstrated in protocols for adenoviruses and bacteriophages. This step is crucial for downstream applications like electron microscopy or sequencing, yielding preparations with over 90% purity. Advances since 2015 have bridged gaps in viral isolation through metagenomic approaches, enabling the discovery of novel viruses without host cultivation by sequencing total nucleic acids from sewage viromes, which reveal diverse RNA and DNA viruses shed from human populations. For instance, metagenomic analysis of New York City wastewater identified thousands of viral contigs, including uncultured bacteriophages and eukaryotic viruses, expanding the known virosphere and informing surveillance. These culture-independent methods complement traditional isolation by identifying candidates for targeted propagation.

References

  1. https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/suny-microbiology-lab/chapter/bacteriological-culture-methods/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4284306/
  3. https://www2.nau.edu/~fpm/bio205/Sp-10/Chapter-03.pdf
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6961714/
  5. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/hooke.html
  6. https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/botany/chapter/cellular-structure-in-inanimate-life/
  7. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/leeuwenhoek.html
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10458164/
  9. https://www2.nau.edu/gaud/bio301/content/spngen.htm
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3342039/
  11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562156/
  12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18770544/
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971210023143
  14. https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/jb.37.5.485-493.1939
  15. https://microbenotes.com/streak-plate-method-principle-methods-significance-limitations/
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301523075_History_and_development_of_microbiological_culture_media
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3109405/
  18. https://asm.org/articles/2020/september/why-differential-selective-media-are-invaluable-to
  19. https://open.maricopa.edu/handsonmicrobiologyexperiments/chapter/selective-and-differential-media/
  20. https://learn.chm.msu.edu/vibl/content/differential.html
  21. https://asm.org/asm/media/protocol-images/eosin-methylene-blue-agar-plates-protocol.pdf
  22. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_Laboratory_Manual_%28Hartline%29/01%253A_Labs/1.28%253A_EMB_Agar
  23. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.847
  24. https://faculty.fiu.edu/~makemson/MCB3020Lab/Ex5WinoEnrichCult.pdf
  25. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jb.00345-12
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10027941/
  27. https://science.umd.edu/classroom/bsci424/BSCI223WebSiteFiles/KochsPostulates.htm
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8544537/
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/enrichment-culture
  30. https://www2.nau.edu/~fpm/bio205/chapter6.html
  31. https://asm.org/protocols/the-streak-plate-protocol
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4846335/
  33. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-microbio-labexperience/chapter/bacteriological-culture-methods/
  34. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/12/12/1499
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/most-probable-number-technique
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3768911/
  37. https://www.uwyo.edu/virtual_edge/lab06/environ_temp.htm
  38. https://bio.as.uky.edu/sites/default/files/2012-Fall-chapt6-308-complete.pdf
  39. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-mcc-microbiology/chapter/oxygen-requirements-for-microbial-growth/
  40. https://www.atcc.org/resources/culture-guides/bacteriology-culture-guide
  41. https://microbiology.mlsascp.com/mycobacteria-fungi.html
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11909208/
  43. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01977.x
  44. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_%28OpenStax%29/09%253A_Microbial_Growth/9.03%253A_The_Effects_of_pH_on_Microbial_Growth
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9562214/
  46. https://www.canr.msu.edu/smprv/uploads/files/Safe_Practices_for_Food_Processes_Chpt._3_Factors_that_Influence_Microbial_Growth.pdf
  47. https://bio.libretexts.org/Learning_Objects/Laboratory_Experiments/Microbiology_Labs/Microbiology_Labs_I/08%253A_Bacterial_Colony_Morphology
  48. https://asm.org/image-gallery/colony-morphology
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC169282/
  50. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mmbr.00001-06
  51. https://asm.org/articles/2020/february/identifying-bacteria-through-look%2C-growth%2C-stain
  52. https://asm.org/asm/media/protocol-images/endospore-stain-protocol.pdf?ext=.pdf
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC106835/
  54. https://www.biomerieux.com/us/en/our-offer/clinical-products/api.html
  55. https://asm.org/asm/media/protocol-images/bacterial-agglutination-protocol.pdf?ext=.pdf
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/agglutination-test
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2045242/
  58. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-13036-1
  59. https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article/11/7/nwae168/7671151
  60. https://www.pda.org/docs/default-source/website-document-library/chapters/presentations/new-england/identification-of-microorganisms-using-comparative-dna-sequencing.pdf?sfvrsn=6
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3351745/
  62. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2014.00209/full
  63. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/12/11/2140
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8544895/
  65. https://www.illumina.com/documents/products/appnotes/appnote_miseq_16S.pdf
  66. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.637526/full
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3815255/
  68. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-20384-3
  69. https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000871
  70. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13238-020-00724-8
  71. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-024-11001-x
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6459172/
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7506068/
  74. https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-024-04917-1
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-022-01730-w
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8860541/
  77. https://microbenotes.com/eosin-methylene-blue-emb-agar/
  78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9741109/
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0723202098800076
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9818539/
  81. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00103/full
  82. https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/aem.59.7.2150-2160.1993
  83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/329965/
  84. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41576-021-00443-8
  85. https://microbenotes.com/sabouraud-dextrose-agar-sda/
  86. https://www.asm.org/asm/media/protocol-images/sabouraud-agar-for-fungal-growth-protocols.pdf?ext=.pdf
  87. https://drfungus.org/knowledge-base/sabourauds-dextrose-agar-sda/
  88. https://eolabs.com/wp-content/uploads/new-msds-ifu-pdfs/KM0048-IFU-Rev-02.pdf
  89. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/yea.3888
  90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1537539/
  91. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1139/m68-052
  92. https://microbenotes.com/aspergillus-niger/
  93. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02993/full
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3679960/
  95. https://www.fda.gov/media/73568/download
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9143439/
  97. https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/MycotoxinHB.pdf
  98. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-09218-5
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4255882/
  100. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1214709/
  101. https://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2180-9-148
  102. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.594868/full
  103. https://www.atcc.org/resources/culture-guides/virology-culture-guide
  104. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2643781/
  105. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00290/full
  106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28785814/
  107. https://bio-protocol.org/exchange/protocoldetail?id=201&type=1
  108. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-94573-y
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7551614/
  110. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msystems.00876-19
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.