Hubbry Logo
Model United NationsModel United NationsMain
Open search
Model United Nations
Community hub
Model United Nations
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Model United Nations
Model United Nations
Model United Nations
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Delegates attending a committee
Delegates attending a Model United Nations committee session in Jakarta, Indonesia
Conference assembly
Conference assembly at the Turkish International Model United Nations in Istanbul, Turkey

Model United Nations (MUN), also known as Model UN, is an educational simulation of the United Nations (UN), where students learn diplomacy, international relations, global issues, and how the UN is run. During a model UN conference, students simulate the roles of representatives of countries, organizations, or individuals to collaborate and present global issues.[1]

MUN students may be involved in research, public speaking, debating, writing, critical thinking, teamwork, and leadership.[2] While MUN is primarily an extracurricular activity, some schools integrate it into their curriculum as a class. Its goals include developing understanding of global issues and encouraging civic engagement.[3]

Student delegates may prepare for conferences by conducting research, drafting position papers, and formulating policy proposals. These are discussed and amended during sessions, culminating in drafting and voting on written policies called "resolution papers." Awards are often presented to recognize exceptional participants or delegations.

MUN is available for students from elementary to university levels, with conferences tailored to each age group.[4] Students typically attend conferences as part of delegations from their school or university, though some participate independently.[5]

History

[edit]

Model United Nations began as a series of League of Nations simulations. The first simulations were called "international assemblies", the first of which was held at University of Oxford in November 1921, with the potential first ever simulation being on 12 November 1921.[6]

In 1922, Mir Mahmood, the president of the first Oxford International Assembly, traveled to Harvard University to promote these simulations and inspired the Harvard Liberal Club to create the first American International Assembly, hosted at Harvard University on January 10, 1923.[7][8]

Harvard's first International Assembly included fifteen nations: The United States of America, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Great Britain, India, China, France, Germany, Greece, Holland, Italy, Japan, Russia, and Sweden. Delegates discussed "The Status of the Island of Rhodes" and "The International Traffic in Opium."[7]

After World War II, Model League of Nations transitioned to Model United Nations after the formation of the League's successor organization, the United Nations, in 1945.[9] Today, some Model United Nations conferences include a wide variety of topics in their committee offerings,[10] some, even simulating the League of Nations.

The first recorded instance of an international assembly conference named "Model United Nations" was at Swarthmore College on 5 April 1947.[11] Over 150 students from over 41 colleges were reported as participating. The delegates simulated a General Assembly, and recommended that member states, "establish an international control and development of atomic energy", "conclude a treaty on disarmament.", that the UN adopts "a uniform system for citizenship of refugees.", that the UN amend the charter to adopt a definition of aggression, and that nations "promote the reconstruction of devastated areas through economic assistance through the U.N."[11][12]

Another historic Model United Nations was held at St. Lawrence University from 11 to 13 February 1949.[13] It was initiated by Dr. Harry Reiff, head of the History and Government Department, with the assistance of departmental colleague Otto L. George.[14] The 1949 St. Lawrence University Model UN conference included delegates from regional colleges and universities, including Adelphi University, Alfred University, Champlain College, Clarkson University, McGill University, Middlebury College, Potsdam College, Saint Michael's College, and The University of Vermont.[15][16][17] The conference continued annually for many years at St. Lawrence,[18][19] and has recently been revived on the campus.[20]

The three oldest conferences in the world that are still active today were established in the early 1950s. They are Berkeley Model United Nations (BMUN) at Berkeley (1952)[21][22] Harvard Model United Nations (HMUN) at Harvard (1953)[23] and Model United Nations of the Far West (MUNFW), which has held college-level conferences since 1951. The first was held at Stanford University, where Ralph Bunche was the honoured speaker.[24][25]

Academic aspects

[edit]

Participation in Model UN is meant to foster skills in negotiation, speaking, and communication.[10][26] Material issues of diplomacy and policy are approached through a quasi-academic process. In addition, crisis committees, which deal with crisis scenarios which can be contemporary or historical, can develop leadership skills and the ability to adapt and deal with unexpected situations.[27] In preparation for a conference, topics are chosen for each committee. Typically, research and background guides are made available by the organizers of a conference. Based on these guides, delegates of each committee are often expected to research and formulate a position for the country or group they represent, and submit a position paper.[28] The purpose of writing a position paper is to familiarize delegates with the substantial topics of debate, encourage academic research and writing, and to enable substantial preparation for conferences.[28]

Procedures

[edit]
Delegates negotiating during an unmoderated caucus in Kiel, Germany

In order to maintain decorum, Model UN committees use parliamentary procedures derived from Robert's Rules of Order.[10] In addition, the United Nations has spearheaded efforts to introduce new Model UN rules of procedure that are more closely aligned with those used by the actual UN.[29][30][31][32] Since there is no governing body for Model UN, each conference differs in their rules of procedure.[33][34]

The following rules of procedure apply to general MUNs but may not apply to every MUN:

Points and motions

[edit]

Points and motions outline how topics are prioritized, the way resolutions are voted on, and how they facilitate the general flow of debate.[34] Points are used to discuss topics that are outside of substantive debate. They are more personal and don't require a vote. There are several types of points, including a point of information (POI), which is asked after a speech, a point of order, a point of parliamentary inquiry, and a point of personal privilege.

Motions are used to discuss procedural matters, and they help to further the discussion on a committee topic. A delegate may request the committee as a whole to perform a particular action, such as moving to voting procedure. If a motion is objected to, it may not be entertained at the discretion of the chair. Most motions will require a vote in order to pass;[34] the number of votes required to pass these motions works according to a Quorum – this is the minimum number of delegates required to make decisions in a committee.[10] The motions used at any given time in a Model UN committee change, according to where the committee is in the flow of debate.[34]

Flow of debate

[edit]

Most MUN committees follow a flow of debate.[34] This starts with a speakers list, followed by formal/informal debate and then voting procedure. A dais will maintain a list of speakers, and the delegates follow the order written on the 'speaker list'. Delegates may be added to the speaker list by raising their placards or sending a note to the chair. During this time, delegates talk to the entire committee. They make speeches,[35] answer questions, and debate on resolutions and amendments. If there are no other motions, the committee goes back to the speaker list by default.

Formal/Informal debate includes both moderated and unmoderated caucuses. Caucus is an opportunity to discuss policy ideas. A moderated caucus is more formal and is run by the committee chair; an unmoderated caucus is a time where delegates move around the room and have a more informal discussion on the topic.[34] In both moderated and unmoderated caucuses, the committee enters a recess and suspends its formal rules of procedure. During a moderated caucus, delegates may speak once recognized by the chair, and speeches are typically limited to a shorter duration. Entering a moderated caucus requires a motion followed by a vote. In contrast, an unmoderated caucus allows delegates to engage in informal discussions with other delegates and staff without needing recognition from the chair.[32][36]

Resolutions

[edit]

A resolution is a legal document that expresses the general opinion of the committee. Once passed, it can be seen as a list of actions that one's committee recommends.[37][38]

Resolutions are the written compilation of the ideas discussed during debate.[38] They are considered the final results of conversations, writings, and negotiations. Resolutions must go through a draft, approval by the dais, and consequent debate and modification.[39]

MUN Resolutions are composed of both preambulatory and operative clauses. Preambulatory clauses help to outline the general problems that a resolution will fix, whereas operative clauses suggest possible solutions and help to display solutions in an organized and easily understandable way.[37]

Conference management

[edit]

MUN societies and conferences are run by a group of administrators known as the secretariat. A secretariat is headed by a Secretary-General. Other members of the secretariat could include the Director-General, Under-Secretaries-General and President of General Assembly.[40]

Committee dais

[edit]

Each committee usually has a dais that is composed of a chair (also known as moderator or director), one or more vice-chairs and a team of note-passers (also known as pages, runners, security, admins, or similar).[41]

In crisis committees,[27] there can also be a crisis staff composed of a crisis director, assistant director, and crisis staffers. These members are responsible for facilitating the back-room portion of a committee.

Languages

[edit]
Placard for the United Kingdom in Spanish at the International Model United Nations of Buenos Aires (MINUBA) in Argentina

Traditionally, English has been the official and working language of most conferences. However, as Model UN has become more popular around the world, and as conferences in countries such as the United States have sought to appeal to underrepresented minorities (such as the Spanish-speaking community), committees using languages other than English, or which are bilingual, have become common.[42] However, this is still not a mainstream phenomenon, especially in the United States, where most bilingual or Spanish language committees are found only at conferences hosted in Puerto Rico or the South West.[43]

Attire

[edit]

Nearly all Model United Nations conferences require delegates to wear Western business attire. Dressing professionally is an important way to show respect for the nation, organization, or individual one is representing, as well as for the rest of one's committee. Whilst formal western business attire is standard, there are still many MUNs where it is common for delegates to wear the traditional clothes of the nation they represent, which ensures a diverse and unique representation of culture and a fun environment. Ultimately, dress code is fully dependent on what the specific conference has listed out in its rules and regulations.[44]

Committees

[edit]

Model United Nations conferences regularly simulate the bodies of the United Nations, the European Union, government cabinets, regional bodies such as ASEAN, PNA, as well as corporate boards, NGOs or so-called Press Corps. Idiosyncrasies and fictional committees also exist. Some examples for fantasy and fictional committees include Ministry of Magic and Lord of the Rings.[45] An example for such a special committee that does not have a parallel in the actual United Nations which deals with a crisis is known as a 'crisis committee.'[27][46] In this committee, a crisis is given to a team of students and the teams must come up with solutions.[47] Crisis committees traditionally focus on a single historical event, but recently, current and future events have been used as well. The event may be fictional or non-fictional.[46][48]

Crisis committees

[edit]

Crisis is a specialized form of Model UN where participants can emulate a variety of entities, from a board of directors to historical figures. Crisis committees tend to be much smaller in size than their classic counterparts, and revolve around a quickly developing series of events known as a "crisis."[27] Delegates are assigned positions, and must create directives consisting purely of operative actions. This means that rather than solving problems with resolutions, delegates pass directives.[27] While delegates are working to solve the crisis at hand through directives, they are also often tasked with individual objectives that can be achieved with the submission of crisis notes.[27] Delegates may sometimes find out what other committee members have been doing through crisis updates.[27]

Unlike regular committees, crisis committees have two distinct forums: the in-room and the out-room (also known as the front-room and the back-room, respectively). The in-room consists of delegate activity in the committee, including the usual speaking, while the out-room refers to directives sent to staffers (also known as directors), communication with other crisis committees. Directives can either be written by an individual, several individuals working together, or the whole committee.[49]

Staffers can update crisis events based partly on a preset direction and partly on interaction from delegates and committees. Crisis committees are also subject to more variation in rules and experimentation than regular committees. One relatively common variant is the "midnight crisis," where delegates attend a committee session at night to respond to an emergency situation.[50][49] There also may be crisis committees that interact with each other, where resolutions that are written impact debate in other committees.[50][49]

Organization

[edit]

Model United Nations conferences are usually organized by high school clubs or college clubs. Some other model united nations conferences are organized by a group of youth, and not affiliated with any educational institutions, such as EquityMUN.[51]

Model UN by region and country

[edit]
Main article: List of model United Nations conferences

Although Model United Nations originated in the United States, MUN clubs and conferences are not isolated to that country. Rather, like the actual UN, Model UN is found in countries around the globe.[52] Because Model UN is decentralized and has grown autonomously around the world, there are significant differences in how MUN is done between regions.[53]

Africa

[edit]

Botswana

[edit]

The majority of MUN conferences held in Botswana are centered around the capital city, Gaborone. Model United Nations events have also happened online, with Youth International Conclave[54] hosting an event to encourage more of the youth to take part.[55]

Nigeria

[edit]

Lagos Model United Nations[56] is one of Africa's pioneer MUN Conferences. Set in Lagos, it is the largest MUN Conference in West Africa,[57][58] and attracts over 400 delegates each year. The Conference is hosted by the Faculty of Law, University of Lagos, and simulates up to 10 committees of the United Nations annually. The Conference began in 2016, due to the desire of the founders to organize a conference in Nigeria, after participating in several Model United Nations conferences worldwide, including National Model United Nations and Rome Model United Nations.[56][57]

Beyond the simulation of committees, the Conference offers other activities for delegates such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Workshop and the Idea Fair.[57] The SDG Workshop is a platform for SDG experts to share their experiences with the delegates, while the Idea Fair[57] is an opportunity for young innovators working on different SDGs to win a cash grant.[59]

Other countries

[edit]

The other conferences in Africa include NAIMUN[60] in Marrakech. Established in August 2012 by a coalition of North African youths, NAIMUN is the largest student-run Model United Nations conference in Africa and the Middle East, with 4 sub-branches in Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria and Egypt.[61]

Asia-Pacific

[edit]

Afghanistan

[edit]

The Kabul Model United Nations was established in Kabul in 2012 [62][63] The objectives are to bring young female and male individuals together to discuss global issues and promote diplomacy, human rights, peace building, and social welfare.[63] Participants include university students up to the age of 30. They come from four or five Afghanistan provinces to develop critical thinking and public speaking skills.[64]

Armenia

[edit]

Model United Nations conferences are held in Armenia by Shirakatsi lyceum also there are two more conferences named DiliMUN(held in Dilijan) and YereMUN(held in Yerevan).

Australia

[edit]

Model United Nations conferences in Australia are typically separated into tertiary and high school levels. At the high school level, the large majority of model United Nations events are organized by the various state and territory branches of UN Youth Australia through the Evatt competition or UN Youth various conferences and summits,[65] or by the many branches of Rotary Australia.[66]

Bahrain

[edit]

The Bahrain Universities Model United Nations occurs yearly. It draws more than 200 delegates from local universities and from across the Middle East.[67][68]

Bangladesh

[edit]

Model United Nations has been practiced in Bangladesh since 2002, when the Model United Nations on Combating Terrorism – Bangladesh Model United Nations first took place.[69][70] Since then, plenty of Model United Nations conferences have been held in the country. Model United Nations became a popular simulation in Bangladesh around 2013.[71]

MUN in Bangladesh grew rapidly after the formation of the first university-based MUN club of the country, Dhaka University Model United Nations Association, in 2011.[citation needed] Dhaka University National Model United Nations (DUNMUN) started in 2012.[72][73][74]

Mainland China

[edit]

Model United Nations first came to mainland China in 1995, when the China Foreign Affairs University held the country's first collegiate model United Nations conferences.[75][76][77] Arriving in mainland Chinese high schools in 2005, Model UN expanded rapidly. Peking University (PKU) students, after attending Harvard's HMUN, organized the first national model UN conference for high school students in mainland China.[78] PKU's conference was initially backed by UNA-USA, however support was curtailed in 2010 due to the Great Recession.

Between 2005 and 2010, national Model United Nations conferences such as those organized by PKU and the rivaling Fudan University in Shanghai drew the best high school students from around the country, who competed for limited spaces. Over time, lesser-known national conferences, as well as regional and even local conferences for high school students, began to develop and gradually spread to cities beyond Beijing and Shanghai.[79]

Most Model United Nations conferences in mainland China are organized through private or academic enterprises; however, some government-affiliated MUNs have also flourished, and recently, unofficial student-run grassroots conferences have begun to dominate the Chinese MUN scene.[79]

India

[edit]

Delegates from across India attend the Doon School Model United Nations.[80] The Harvard MUN India hosted over 1700 attendees in 2019.[81] Delegates also participate in the I.I.M.U.N.[82]

Israel

[edit]

In 2008, Reichman University established the first United Nations Model Club at the academic level in Israel. Since then, university-level MUN in Israel has grown to include over 10 universities and colleges and is led by the Israeli Model United Nations Association. Some universities hold a yearly conference of their own, such as Tel Aviv University's TLVMUN.[83]

Kuwait

[edit]

The American Creative Academy Model United Nations (ACAMUN), the American School of Kuwait Model United Nations (ASKMUN), and the Bayan Bilingual School Model United Nations (BBSMUN) are the most popular Model United Nations organizations in the State of Kuwait amongst high schoolers. Comparatively, the American University of Kuwait Model United Nations (AUKMUN) is the leading Model United Nations organization amongst university and collegiate leveled people, with AUKMUN being recognized and well-respected by the United Nations in Kuwait due to the highly regarded submission of a proposal based on climate finance and cap-trade policies written by executive members.[84]

Lebanon

[edit]

Most recently, the Notre Dame University- Louaize has hosted its most successful NDU MUN Conference yet during the academic year 2024–2025, despite external challenges, setting a high standard for upcoming years among all MUN hosts.[85] NDU MUN has reasserted itself as a major player in the Lebanese MUN field, hosting for several months, more than 500 students from across different schools.

Another notable conference is the Beirut Model United Nations (BEYMUN),[86] held at the American University of Beirut. BEYMUN is known for its international outreach, attracting university students from across Lebanon and abroad to discuss global issues through a dynamic and academically rigorous simulation.[87]

New Zealand

[edit]

A high number of New Zealand high schools operate their own MUN events, with UN Youth New Zealand functioning as a managing organization.[88][89] UN Youth NZ also organizes regional and national events, along with Aotearoa Youth Declaration, the Pacific Project, and New Zealand's THIMUN delegation.[90]

Oman

[edit]

In Oman, a variety of Model United Nations (MUN) conferences are organized annually, both in online and offline formats, providing students with numerous opportunities to engage in debating, diplomacy, and international relations. Among these, the Indian School Muscat Model United Nations (ISMMUN) holds particular significance as the largest school-run MUN conference in the Gulf region.[91]

Pakistan

[edit]

The first MUN in Pakistan was held in 2006 and since then, the number of MUN conferences in the country has grown, attracting participants from schools,[92] colleges, and universities across the country. Some notable MUNs in Pakistan include the Aitchison College Model United Nations (ACMUN), Youth International Conclave Model United Nations,[93] and Karachi Grammar School Model United Nations (KGSMUN). The Aitchison College Model United Nations Society was established in 2009. Most notably, they won the overall Best Delegation at HMUN China for two years in a row, and for a record third time.[94]

Another major conference in Pakistan is the "Lahore University of Management Sciences Model United Nations" in Lahore, Pakistan which hosts more than 400 delegates.[95]

MUN is also popular in elite high schools such as LGS, Beaconhouse School System as well as the Eton of Pakistan, Aitchison College and attract a huge variety of students. There is also a PNA committee.

United Arab Emirates

[edit]

The United Arab Emirates Universities Model United Nations occurs yearly. It draws more than 300 delegates from local universities and from across the Middle East.[96][97] Many schools also have their own MUN conferences, including DIAMUN at Dubai International Academy and GFSMUN at GEMS Founders School Dubai.[98]

Dubai International Academy Model United Nations is the largest student led Model United Nations conference in the MENA region, hosting more than 700 delegates from across the world at its annual conference.[99][100]

Vietnam

[edit]

There has been an increasing number of conferences, including invitational ones such as UNISMUN, SAMSUN, and many other non-invitational ones. These conferences are often organized by schools or student-led organizations with varying scales and exclusivity. One of the most inclusive Model United Nations conferences in the country is the Vietnam National Model United Nations (VNMUN), open to not only Vietnamese in all parts of the country but also international students studying around the world.[101]

Europe

[edit]

Denmark

[edit]

MUN is relatively popular in Denmark, with BIGMUN being the largest conference in Scandinavia.[102]

Germany

[edit]

MUN is popular amongst university and high school students in Germany. Examples include the Model United Nations of Munich (MunoM) since 2004 and the country's largest conference, Oldenburg Model United Nations (OLMUN).[103] Most model United Nations Conferences in Germany debate in the English language. Exceptions to that are high school conferences including the ones organized by (DMUN e.V.) in Stuttgart (MUNBW), Kiel (MUNSH), and Potsdam (MUNBB), as well as the ones organized by (SvEN, Simulation Vereinte Nationen). At the college level, BIMUN/SINUB in Bonn takes place as a multi-lingual conference with live interpretation. The Technical University of Munich's MUNTUM e.V., alongside MUNAM e.V. from Ludvig Maximilian University, organizes IsarMUN, a large annual conference targeted towards University and high-school students across the world.[104]

Every year, usually at the end of February, the MUN conference BayernMUN (Engl. BavariaMUN) takes place at the Nuremberg Castle in Nuremberg. Organised by the United Nations Society Nuremberg (UNSN) e. V., BayernMUN welcomes about 150 to 200 pupils and students not only from Bavaria and Germany, but even from abroad, including students from overseas universities.[105]

The Netherlands

[edit]

The largest MUN conference in the Netherlands is The Hague International Model United Nations (THIMUN) conference, which includes over 3500 participants, coming from around 200 schools and 100 countries.[106][better source needed] Although it is not located near the United Nations Headquarters in New York, it is one of the pioneer model United Nations conferences in the world, since it has been founded in 1968[citation needed] and located in the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) world city of the Hague.[107] A whole network of conferences is marked by its THIMUN affiliation, a label which describes the universality of the procedures that rule the conference, and make it part of the UN recognized foundation.[clarification needed] In 1995, the THIMUN Foundation was accredited as a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) associated with the United Nations Department of Public Information.[108][better source needed] Additionally, THIMUN has established its own conferences' network throughout time: THIMUN Qatar, THIMUN Singapore, THIMUN Online MUN (O-MUN) and THIMUN Latin America conferences have been set up from 2005.[109][110] The second, third, and fourth biggest MUN-conferences of the Netherlands are MUNISH (Model United Nations at the International School of the Hague, HMUN (Haarlem Model United Nations) and ISUMUN (International School Utrecht Model United Nations).

Portugal

[edit]

The Iberian Model United Nations (IMUN), held in Lisbon, is the largest MUN in Portugal and one of the largest high school MUN conferences in Europe.[111][112][113] IMUN's keynote speakers have included prominent politicians, diplomats, United Nations officials, and rights activists, such as internationally awarded author Richard Zimler, U.S. Ambassador Robert A. Sherman,[114][112] and President of Portugal Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa.[115][116]

Spain

[edit]

MUN first arrived in Spain in 2006 with the organization of the Catalonia Model United Nations (C'MUN) in Barcelona.[117] In 2019 Madrid hosted the Harvard World Model United Nations (WorldMUN), and among the 2,300 participants were 500 Spanish students belonging to 20 different universities.[118][119] Madrid's bid for WorldMUN was led by the Spanish Alliance for Model United Nations (SAMUN), which reunited the students of the four public universities of Madrid: Complutense University of Madrid, Autonomous University of Madrid, Charles III University of Madrid and King Juan Carlos University.[119]

North America

[edit]

United States

[edit]
Main article: Model United Nations in the United States

Model United Nations is popular across the United States, with MUN clubs and conferences being found in every region.[120] However, because Model UN is decentralized and has grown autonomously, there are significant differences in how MUN is done between regions.[121]

Different formats and rules of procedure (ROPs) are followed by different conferences, with prominent formats including THIMUN, HMUN, and UNA-USA.

South America

[edit]

Brazil

[edit]

The Americas Model United Nations (AMUN[122]) was the first MUN Conference to be held in Latin America, accomplishing 21 years of history in 2018 with the edition Bring Walls Down, Build Up Connections.[123]

Peru

[edit]

At the university level, Model United Nations started in Peru in 2006 with the United Nations Studies Circle (CENU), a college team from the University of Lima founded to compete at Harvard National Model United Nations. This team would evolve into a full-scale organization, the Peruvian Association for the Study of the United Nations (AENU Peru for its Spanish acronym), a non-for-profit NGO charged with task of promoting MUN in Peru and creating Peru's first "National Delegation", thus creating the Peruvian Universities Debate Team (PU). Starting their new trademark since 2011, PU's has garnered the Best Large Delegation award at Harvard World Model United Nations 2014 held in Brussels, Belgium, and the Best Large Delegation award at Harvard National Model United Nations - Latin America 2017, held in Lima, Peru.[124]

In 2014, the Peruvian Debate Society (PDS) was founded by experienced MUN delegates as a new alternative towards competing in Harvard International Relations Council conferences. PDS has achieved the Best Large Delegation award at Harvard National Model United Nations Latin America in 2018.[125] The team won the Best Large Delegation award at the 2018 edition of WorldMUN, held in Panama City. A year later, at WorldMUN 2019 in Madrid, they won an Outstanding Large Delegation award.[125]

At high school level, MUN has been a popular extracurricular activity since 2012, with the first high school conference Lima Model United Nations (LiMUN) 2012, followed by Villa Maria Model United Nations (VMMUN) 2015, Newton Model United Nations (NewMUN) 2015, and Carmelitas Model United Nations 2015, being the latter school the host for the first Ivy League Model United Nations Conference Peru (ILMUNC 2016). Each school delegation hosts its own conference, including Lima, Cusco, Arequipa and Piura.[126]

Notable participants

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Model United Nations

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Model United Nations (MUN) is an extracurricular educational simulation of proceedings in which student participants assume the roles of delegates representing member states or other entities to debate international topics, negotiate positions, and propose resolutions mimicking diplomatic processes. MUN traces its origins to intercollegiate simulations of of Nations beginning in 1927 at , evolving into models after , with the first documented UN procedure conference occurring at in 1947 focused on nuclear issues, and the oldest continuously operating conference starting in 1952. The activity aims to develop participants' skills in research, , , and understanding multilateral through preparation on assigned countries' policies and committee sessions replicating UN bodies like the General Assembly or Security Council. Benefits include enhanced and compromise abilities, though empirical studies highlight limits in deeply conveying real-world power dynamics or policy complexity beyond role-playing. Globally, hundreds of thousands of students from primary through university levels engage annually in thousands of conferences, fostering international networks but drawing occasional critique for emphasizing performative elements like awards over substantive geopolitical realism.

History

Origins in the Early 20th Century

The earliest simulations precursor to Model United Nations emerged in the as student-led recreations of the League of Nations, established in 1920 to promote international cooperation post-World War I. The first recorded such event occurred in November 1921 at the , where students organized an "International Assembly" mimicking League procedures to debate global issues, though attendance was limited to about 30 participants primarily from British universities. This initiative, led by figures like Mir Mahmood, aimed to foster understanding of multilateral diplomacy amid the League's early challenges, such as enforcement weaknesses evident in disputes like the 1923 . The concept quickly spread to the United States, influenced by Oxford's model; in 1922, Mahmood visited Harvard University, inspiring a simulation there in January 1923 that is often cited as the first American instance, involving students debating League resolutions on topics like disarmament. By 1927, formalized Model League of Nations assemblies proliferated, with the inaugural national-scale event at Syracuse University drawing delegates from multiple colleges to role-play member states and draft mock covenants addressing issues like economic sanctions. These early exercises emphasized procedural fidelity to the League's Covenant, including committee structures and voting, but participation remained elite, confined to Ivy League and select Midwestern institutions, reflecting limited accessibility before broader educational adoption. Through the 1930s, regional assemblies expanded, such as the Middle Atlantic Model League of Nations (active 1927–1939), which by 1929–1930 involved over 35 U.S. states and focused on simulating failures like the League's inaction during the Manchurian Crisis of 1931–1932, providing participants hands-on critique of collective security's causal shortcomings. Attendance grew modestly to hundreds annually across events like those at in 1929, yet these simulations waned by the late 1930s amid rising and World War II's onset, which disrupted internationalist education; for instance, many assemblies ceased after 1939 due to wartime priorities. Primary accounts from organizers, preserved in university archives, underscore the pedagogical intent: to instill realism about interstate bargaining's incentives, rather than , though empirical records of long-term participant impact from this era remain sparse.

Post-World War II Expansion

The formation of the in October 1945 prompted a swift transition in educational simulations from the defunct to the new international body. Early post-war conferences adapted pre-existing models, with the Middle Atlantic Model holding its inaugural session under the Model United Nations name in March 1946 at , marking the first such event explicitly tied to the UN structure. By April 1947, hosted what is recorded as the earliest conference fully employing UN procedures, drawing over 150 student delegates from more than 40 U.S. colleges to debate pressing issues including and international trusteeships. These initial gatherings emphasized procedural fidelity to UN committees, fostering skills in resolution drafting and diplomatic negotiation amid tensions. The 1950s saw accelerated institutionalization at the university level, with foundational conferences establishing precedents for larger-scale operations. The launched its Model UN in 1952, followed by Harvard University's in 1953, and subsequent events like the Harvard National Model UN, which introduced standardized formats influencing subsequent programs. These developments coincided with growing U.S. academic interest in , driven by postwar geopolitical shifts and the UN's expanding role in decolonization efforts. Expansion into gained traction in the 1950s and 1960s, as high school participation surged , often facilitated by university-hosted sessions that bridged collegiate and pre-collegiate levels. This period laid groundwork for broader accessibility, though conferences remained predominantly North American and focused on elite institutions until later global outreach.

Institutionalization and Growth (1980s–Present)

In the 1980s, Model United Nations programs underwent significant institutionalization through enhanced coordination by established organizations. The (UNA-USA) deepened its engagement by creating a Model UN and Youth Department to oversee and track activities at a global level, facilitating standardization and broader outreach beyond initial university settings. Concurrently, the National Model United Nations (NMUN), tracing its roots to 1927 as a simulation, bolstered its framework by establishing a New York Advisory Group in and securing non-governmental organization status with the Department of Public Information in 1982, which affirmed its alignment with UN processes. The 1990s marked accelerated growth and procedural formalization. NMUN launched the Southern Regional Model UN (SRMUN) in in 1990, which operated independently as a nonprofit by 1993, extending reach into new U.S. regions. The UN Institute for Training and Research endorsed NMUN's rules of procedure during this decade, promoting consistency across simulations. Internationally, Harvard University's World Model United Nations (WorldMUN) debuted in 1991, pioneering traveling conferences that drew participants from multiple continents and emphasized global diplomacy. Participation expanded notably, with NMUN•New York attracting around 2,500 students by 2001. From the 2000s onward, institutional maturity supported rapid scaling. NMUN appointed its first full-time in 2004 to address surging demand, followed by NMUN•New York hosting over 4,000 students in 2007—half from outside the U.S.—and the inception of NMUN• that year. International expansion continued with NMUN• in 2008, alongside high-profile addresses by UN Secretary-General . By the , governance refinements included retiring the National Collegiate Conference Association name in 2017 to streamline under NMUN branding. Today, NMUN conferences draw over 6,000 students from six continents annually, representing schools from 132 UN member states in recent sessions. Globally, Model UN engages hundreds of thousands of participants each year across primary, secondary, and levels, reflecting widespread adoption in educational curricula worldwide.

Adaptations to Recent Challenges (2020–2025)

The prompted a rapid transition in Model United Nations (MUN) programming from in-person to virtual formats beginning in early 2020, as conferences worldwide faced cancellations and restrictions on gatherings. Organizations like Model United Nations () adapted by converting their annual simulations to fully online events, utilizing platforms such as Zoom for committee sessions and document-sharing tools for resolutions, enabling participation despite lockdowns. Similarly, the Hague International Model United Nations (THIMUN) held its first entirely virtual conference in January 2021, accommodating approximately 1,600 delegates through streamed proceedings and moderated online debates. Virtual MUN introduced innovations such as asynchronous position paper submissions and pre-recorded speeches to mitigate time zone differences and technical glitches, while new formats like Distance Model United Nations (DMUNC) emerged in June 2020 as fully remote conferences focused on crisis simulations conducted via video calls. However, participants reported challenges including "Zoom fatigue," reduced interpersonal networking, and unequal access to reliable internet and devices, which exacerbated disparities for students in low-resource areas. These adaptations preserved core skills like but often diminished the immersive diplomatic experience, with some conferences incorporating breakout rooms for caucuses to simulate informal alliances. By 2022, as vaccination rates rose and restrictions eased, many MUN events reverted to in-person or hybrid models, blending physical attendance with virtual access to broaden participation; for instance, the Model UN in 2025 offered streamed hybrid sessions to include remote delegates alongside on-site events. Hybrid formats addressed lingering equity concerns by allowing flexibility for health or travel limitations, though they required enhanced moderation to integrate in-person and online voices equitably. Innovations persisted into 2025, including virtual reality-based MUN like VR-MUN, which used immersive tech for committee simulations to enhance beyond traditional video platforms. Overall, these shifts increased global reach—evident in expanded online offerings from groups like the DMUN Foundation—but highlighted ongoing needs for robust cybersecurity and training to counter disruptions like platform outages during high-stakes debates.

Educational Objectives and Evidence of Value

Intended Skills and Learning Outcomes

Participation in Model United Nations (MUN) is intended to cultivate research proficiency, as participants must investigate assigned countries' foreign policies, historical positions on global issues, and relevant resolutions to prepare position papers and speeches. This process emphasizes analytical reading of primary sources such as official UN documents and diplomatic records, fostering the ability to synthesize complex information into coherent arguments. MUN simulations aim to enhance and skills through structured sessions where delegates deliver formal addresses, respond to points of order, and engage in moderated caucuses to persuade others. Organizers highlight the development of persuasive communication, including clarity under time constraints and adaptation to audience perspectives, as core outcomes. Negotiation and consensus-building are targeted learning goals, with delegates practicing informal caucusing to draft resolutions that accommodate diverse national interests, mirroring real multilateral . These activities intend to build interpersonal skills such as , compromise without abandoning core positions, and formation. Additional intended outcomes include improved writing abilities for composing amendments and resolutions, as well as and in roles like chairing or bloc coordination. Broader educational objectives encompass greater awareness of dynamics, UN procedural mechanisms, and global interconnectedness, encouraging critical evaluation of policy trade-offs. While these skills are promoted by MUN programs, empirical assessments of their attainment vary, with some studies noting self-reported gains but limited controlled evidence of long-term transfer to professional contexts.

Empirical Studies on Participant Benefits

Empirical investigations into the benefits of Model United Nations (MUN) participation have predominantly utilized pre- and post-participation surveys, self-reported skill assessments, and knowledge tests among self-selected student samples, often in academic settings. These studies generally report positive associations with gains in factual and of international organizations, as well as such as and , though causal attribution remains limited by the absence of randomized controls and potential selection biases favoring motivated participants. A 2021 analysis of 139 students at the American Model conference found that prior engagement in MUN clubs approximately doubled the odds of achieving higher scores on a 10-question of , with a mean score of 7.2 out of 10 and 75% of respondents scoring 9 or higher. Club involvement provided stronger incentives for learning than formal alone, particularly benefiting participants by narrowing gender-based gaps. However, the cross-sectional and low response rate (9%) constrain generalizability, as participants were already engaged in the activity. Pre- and post-simulation surveys of 159 students across three simulations in a 2020 study demonstrated statistically significant increases in factual knowledge, such as correct identification of Security Council resolution processes rising from 52% to 59% in one cohort and permanent members from 74% to 83% in another. Procedural understanding and , including and , also improved, with more comprehensive simulations—incorporating and reflection phases—yielding the largest effects. Outcomes like successful of assigned country positions were fully achieved by 40-50% of participants in targeted assessments. These findings support simulations' pedagogical value over passive instruction but rely on non-randomized university samples. Self-reported data from 128 Indian students aged 11-25 with MUN experience, collected via a 2020 questionnaire using adapted scales, indicated perceived enhancements in nine higher-order thinking skills, with mean ratings of 3.67 to 3.87 on a 5-point scale; team skills (3.87) and communication skills (3.83) showed the strongest gains, while older participants (20-25 years) reported the highest overall development. The study linked MUN to shifts in career preferences toward technical fields and , but its reliance on subjective perceptions and judgmental sampling limits objective verification of skill acquisition. Earlier work, such as Powner and Allendoerfer's 2008 evaluation of techniques including simulations, has corroborated higher learning success in such formats compared to lectures, though not exclusively focused on MUN. Overall, while these studies suggest MUN fosters substantive of multilateral processes and interpersonal competencies, of broader outcomes like long-term advantages or retention remains anecdotal or mixed-methods derived, with quantitative rigor constrained by methodological limitations in participant selection and measurement.

Integration into Curricula and School Programs

Model United Nations (MUN) is commonly integrated into programs as an extracurricular club activity, where students organize teams to research topics, draft position papers, and attend conferences, often under faculty sponsorship. In many high schools, particularly , these clubs operate independently of formal coursework but may receive school endorsement and resources, with participation counting toward or requirements. To embed MUN within curricula, educators adapt simulations as in-class exercises or extended projects aligned with , , or global affairs units, treating them as practical applications of learned material such as debate techniques, , and policy evaluation. For example, the Association of Greater Boston's In-Class Model UN initiative delivers structured sessions during the school day, fostering interdisciplinary skills in , , and without requiring off-site travel. Similarly, MUN activities function as laboratory-style extensions of classroom lessons, incorporating debates and resolutions to reinforce objectives in or classes. In the , MUN programs map directly to elements of the for pupils aged 5–16, including citizenship education and geography, as well as A-level specifications in and , enabling schools to use simulations to meet statutory learning outcomes on and . Internationally, integration varies; in (IB) schools, MUN complements the Middle Years Programme by emphasizing inquiry into global contexts like identities and relationships, often through assessed simulations that align with the program's learner profile. Some institutions blend formats by offering elective courses centered on MUN preparation or granting academic credit for conference attendance, particularly in urban or specialized public schools supported by organizations like the Association. This hybrid approach addresses accessibility while tying to graded assessments, though full curricular mandates remain rare outside targeted programs.

Criticisms and Limitations

Economic and Accessibility Barriers

Participation in Model United Nations (MUN) conferences entails significant financial costs, including delegate registration fees typically ranging from $90 to $150 per , advisor fees around $70, and delegation fees of $100 to $200. Additional expenses for , accommodation, meals, and formal attire can escalate totals to $1,000 or more per delegate for domestic events and $3,000–$4,000 for international ones, such as from to New York conferences. These outlays create substantial economic barriers, particularly for from low-income families or in developing regions, where even basic fees and required digital tools (e.g., laptops for ) compound inaccessibility. Such costs contribute to socioeconomic stratification in participation, with wealthier private schools and students from higher-income backgrounds disproportionately represented, fostering an environment perceived as elitist and limiting broader diversity. Anecdotal and participant accounts highlight how funding shortages exclude capable students from public or under-resourced institutions, reducing exposure to MUN's purported skill-building benefits for those outside privileged networks. This skew may perpetuate cycles of advantage, as MUN experiences often bolster applications and resumes for already advantaged applicants, while empirical data on participant demographics remains sparse, relying largely on self-reported observations rather than large-scale surveys. Efforts to mitigate these barriers include fee waivers, travel stipends, and guidance offered by major conferences, which aim to subsidize costs for qualifying delegations. Volunteer initiatives like Raise Your Placard provide targeted support to underrepresented groups, emphasizing socioeconomic inclusion through sponsorships and training. Local or virtual conferences, accelerated by the , have lowered travel demands, enabling broader access in regions with high costs for in-person events. However, these measures often fall short of eliminating disparities, as demand for aid exceeds supply, and international prestige events remain dominated by funded teams from affluent areas.

Deviations from Real-World Diplomacy

Model United Nations (MUN) simulations introduce several procedural and structural deviations from actual (UN) diplomacy to accommodate short conference durations, typically spanning 1 to 4 days, and the inexperience of participants, resulting in simplified mechanisms that prioritize educational engagement over precise replication of ongoing, professional negotiations. In real UN bodies, over 95% of caucusing and consensus-building occurs informally behind closed doors across weeks or months, often through regional groups or bilateral talks, whereas MUN compresses this into visible, moderated or unmoderated caucuses held in the committee room during formal sessions. Decision-making processes further diverge, as the UN favors consensus for more than 70% of resolutions since the 1980s, avoiding recorded votes to preserve unity and sidestep opposition, with drafts pre-negotiated and combined off-floor before reaching formal debate. In contrast, MUN committees frequently produce multiple competing resolution drafts simultaneously, culminating in majority or split votes—often near 50-50—due to time constraints and the absence of extended pre-coordination, which can foster performative rather than substantive outcomes. Real UN resolutions also incorporate budgetary and legal scrutiny absent in MUN, where delegates draft anew without such constraints. Rules of procedure in MUN adopt a more parliamentary style, including speakers' lists with placards, points of inquiry or personal privilege, and frequent interruptions via points of order—mechanisms rarely invoked in actual UN sessions, which emphasize orderly, alphabetical speaking and informal consultations over structured debate phases. Leadership structures differ as well: UN committee chairs and bureaux are elected by member states to represent their interests, supported by neutral Secretariat staff, while MUN members are typically appointed by organizers, exerting directive authority that underscores the simulation's hosted nature rather than equality. These adaptations, while enabling broad participation, can yield resolutions prioritizing creativity or awards over feasibility, as student delegates—lacking professional training—focus on rhetorical flair and bloc posturing instead of the quiet , veto considerations in the Security Council, or power asymmetries that define real interstate relations. For instance, bloc spokespeople, common in UN regional alignments to articulate pre-agreed positions, are seldom utilized in MUN owing to insufficient prior alignment. Such deviations risk instilling misconceptions about diplomacy's pace and efficacy, though UN outreach efforts, including guides issued since 2013, aim to mitigate inaccuracies by promoting consensus-oriented simulations.

Potential Ideological Slants and Overemphasis on Multilateralism

Model United Nations activities, by replicating the United Nations' consensus-driven framework, tend to emphasize multilateral cooperation as the predominant mechanism for resolving international disputes, potentially instilling an idealist orientation that prioritizes collective institutions over national sovereignty and power dynamics. This approach mirrors the UN's foundational liberal internationalist ethos but has drawn criticism for sidelining realist perspectives, which view state behavior as driven primarily by self-interest and relative capabilities rather than normative consensus. Participants often engage in simulations where resolutions pass through moderated caucuses and voting blocs, fostering the assumption that protracted dialogue invariably yields binding outcomes, despite the real UN's frequent paralysis due to Security Council vetoes—such as Russia's 2022 vetoes on Ukraine-related measures, which blocked multilateral action. Critics contend that this structure promotes an overly idealistic portrayal of , where global challenges like or are framed as amenable to universal agreements, undervaluing unilateral or bilateral alternatives that have historically succeeded outside UN auspices. For instance, the 1978 , which brokered peace between and , relied on U.S.-mediated bilateral negotiations rather than multilateral forums, highlighting how power asymmetries and direct incentives can achieve results where consensus fails. In MUN settings, topic selection—often drawn from UN agendas such as the —reinforces a globalist lens, with less emphasis on security dilemmas or , potentially reflecting institutional biases in educational environments where progressive internationalism predominates. Empirical observations from simulations note delegates debating impractical or disconnected proposals without rigorous feasibility checks, as in cases where broad topics like urban energy access led to advocacy for mismatched solutions like solar panels versus regulatory reforms, prioritizing rhetorical flair over causal efficacy. This overemphasis risks cultivating a skewed understanding among participants, particularly youth from affluent backgrounds who dominate conferences—evidenced by private schools comprising nearly 80% of top North American teams—potentially amplifying elite cosmopolitan views detached from domestic political realities. While proponents argue MUN builds skills applicable to diverse contexts, detractors highlight its failure to simulate enforcement gaps, such as the UN's ineffectiveness in preventing atrocities like the 1994 despite resolutions, underscoring how multilateralism's aspirational rhetoric often yields symbolic rather than substantive change. Consequently, may enter policymaking with inflated expectations of institutional efficacy, overlooking evidence that minilateral arrangements, like the Quad alliance formed in 2007 (revived 2017) for security, better address asymmetric threats without universal buy-in.

Core Procedures

Committee Formation and Representation

Model United Nations committees are established by conference organizers to replicate the structure and functions of bodies, such as the General Assembly's main committees, the Security Council, or the Economic and Social Council. Organizers select committee topics aligned with global issues, determine the number of participants—often ranging from 15 to over 100 delegates per committee—and assign roles to simulate diplomatic representation. This formation process ensures balanced debate, with committees forming blocs based on regional or ideological alignments mirroring real UN dynamics. Delegates represent assigned member states, observer states, non-governmental organizations, or occasionally historical figures, adhering strictly to the assigned entity's foreign policy positions. Country assignments are typically allocated to school delegations in advance, with larger powers like the United States or China often paired with smaller nations to promote equity in participation. In double-delegate formats, two students per country collaborate, dividing research and speaking duties while maintaining unified positions. Representation requires delegates to research and articulate their country's stance through position papers and speeches, avoiding personal opinions to preserve simulation integrity. Committee sessions begin with a by the to confirm and delegate presence, followed by procedural motions to set the agenda. Specialized committees, such as formats, may alter representation by introducing directed or backroom , where delegates respond to evolving scenarios while remaining bound by their assigned . This structure fosters skills in and policy advocacy, though it varies by rules, with some adopting modified procedures for efficiency over strict UN replication.

Debate Flow and Parliamentary Motions

Model United Nations committees conduct through a structured flow that balances formal speeches with opportunities for , primarily governed by rules of procedure adapted from practices but simplified for educational purposes. The process typically commences with a to establish and presence, followed by motions to set the agenda if multiple topics are listed. Once the agenda is adopted by simple majority vote, the chair opens a speakers' list on the selected topic, where delegates request to speak in sequence. Formal debate proceeds via the speakers' list, with each delegate allotted a fixed speaking time, often 60 to 90 seconds in introductory rounds, during which they present positions, propose solutions, or others. Speakers may yield remaining time to the , another delegate for questions, or answers, facilitating direct engagement; yielding to the chair returns control to the next speaker or motions. If the list exhausts without resolution, it may reopen upon motion. This phase emphasizes prepared orations but limits interaction, prompting procedural motions to transition to more dynamic formats. To advance , delegates introduce motions requiring a second from another participant and, typically, a simple majority vote for approval. A motion for a moderated specifies a total duration (e.g., 15 minutes), individual speaking time (e.g., 30 seconds), and subtopic, allowing the chair to recognize speakers from raised placards on focused issues like "implementation mechanisms" without a formal list. An unmoderated , or suspension of the meeting, permits informal group discussions for drafting resolutions or alliances, with time limits set by motion (e.g., 20 minutes); upon resumption, delegates report outcomes or continue formal debate. Motions to extend or limit speaking times, adjourn temporarily, or close debate entirely (moving to voting) further control pace, with the chair ruling on precedence—points and motions for caucuses outrank debate closure. Procedural points, raised at any time by placard without interrupting speakers unduly, address immediate concerns and are non-debatable. A challenges perceived violations of rules, such as improper motions; point of inquiry seeks clarification from the chair on procedure; point of personal privilege handles delegate discomfort (e.g., audibility issues); and point of information requests brief questions during yields. In National Model United Nations (NMUN) procedures, these ensure orderly conduct, while THIMUN rules emphasize chair discretion in rulings, with appeals possible by majority vote. Variations exist between procedure styles: North American-style (e.g., NMUN, used in many U.S. conferences) prioritizes frequent moderated and unmoderated caucuses for collaborative drafting, reflecting U.S. simulations since the . THIMUN-style, prevalent in and international events, relies more on formal motions to introduce resolutions or amendments mid-debate and limits yields, promoting concise speeches as in conferences since 1962. Both enforce decorum, with sanctions like removal for disruptions, but adapt to size—larger assemblies favor structured lists, smaller specialized bodies more caucuses.

Resolution Drafting, Voting, and Amendments


In Model United Nations committees, resolution drafting begins during unmoderated caucuses, where delegates form negotiation blocs to collaboratively author working papers that address the agenda topic. These initial documents evolve into formal draft resolutions upon gaining a required number of sponsors—typically 10 to 20 percent of committee members, varying by conference—and approval from the chair for submission. Draft resolutions must adhere to a standardized format: preambulatory clauses, which provide historical context, cite prior UN actions or facts, and conclude with commas; followed by operative clauses that propose specific, actionable solutions, commencing with verbs like "urges" or "recommends" and terminating with semicolons, except the final clause which ends with a period. This structure mirrors authentic UN resolutions, ensuring clarity and feasibility in proposed measures. Amendments to draft resolutions are formal proposals to alter text, submitted in writing and often requiring seconding by another delegate. Friendly amendments, endorsed by the resolution's sponsors, are incorporated without vote, while unfriendly amendments—opposed by sponsors—trigger debate and require a simple majority vote for adoption, calculated as more than half of delegates present and voting. Multiple amendments may be considered sequentially, with friendly ones processed first, and delegates can motion for division of the question to vote on clauses separately, excluding preambulatory clauses. This process allows refinement but can prolong proceedings if contentious changes arise. Voting on the final draft resolution follows amendment consideration and closure, typically via placards or hand-raising for efficiency in large committees. Procedural motions, such as closing , pass by simple majority (over 50 percent of votes cast), while substantive adoption of resolutions generally requires a two-thirds majority of members present and voting, though some conferences employ simple majority or prioritize consensus to emulate UN practices where over 80 percent of resolutions pass without formal vote. Abstentions count as present but neither affirm nor oppose, and absent delegates do not factor into , which is usually one-third to one-half of the committee. Passage of a resolution concludes the topic's substantive work, with the document serving as the committee's simulated output.

Conference Operations

Staff Structure and Dais Responsibilities

The secretariat of a Model United Nations (MUN) conference typically operates under a hierarchical structure led by a Secretary-General, who oversees overall operations including scheduling, staff coordination, budgeting, and liaison with host institutions or sponsors. Supporting the Secretary-General are deputy secretaries-general or undersecretaries-general responsible for specific domains such as academic content, , delegate services, and , ensuring smooth execution across multiple . Directors or committee chairs may handle individual simulations, bridging administrative oversight with on-site facilitation. At the committee level, the comprises the primary staff members seated at the head table, generally consisting of a , vice-chair, and , whose roles enforce procedural rules modeled after practices. The holds primary responsibility for moderating debate, setting the agenda after , recognizing speakers, ruling on points of inquiry or order, and maintaining decorum to prevent disruptions. This includes announcing moderated and unmoderated caucuses, yielding time between speakers, and ensuring equitable participation, often drawing on deep topic knowledge to guide substantive discussions without injecting personal bias. The vice-chair assists the by managing timing for speeches and caucuses, stepping in to moderate during absences, and handling administrative tasks such as distributing materials or verifying delegate eligibility. In larger or committees, additional dais members like a director or backroom staff may coordinate updates or directives, particularly in dynamic simulations requiring real-time responses. The focuses on documentation, recording key speeches, tracking draft resolutions and amendments, tallying votes, and compiling closing summaries for the conference report, thereby preserving an accurate procedural record. Collectively, the enforces rules of procedure—often adapted from UN models—to simulate diplomatic processes, adjudicating disputes impartially while promoting educational outcomes like skills, though their interpretations can vary by conference to accommodate simulation goals.

Logistical Elements Including Attire and Languages

Model United Nations conferences generally operate over multi-day schedules, often spanning three to five days, with activities commencing via registration and an followed by sessions held in dedicated venues such as halls, hotel rooms, or international centers. Logistics include advance submission of position papers, on-site for voting or updates in specialized formats, and structured breaks for moderated caucuses or unmoderated blocs, all managed to simulate diplomatic timelines while accommodating hundreds to thousands of participants. Attire requirements enforce a professional standard akin to real-world , typically mandating Western business attire to maintain and focus on substantive over personal expression. For male delegates, this consists of a , , collared , tie, and dress shoes in neutral tones like or gray, excluding casual items such as jeans, sneakers, or sandals. Female delegates follow suit with knee-length skirts or paired with blouses or jackets, or , alongside closed-toe shoes, prioritizing and formality over ostentation. Variations exist by , such as relaxed codes for events permitting khakis with buttoned shirts, but violations can result in points deductions or removal from sessions to uphold the simulation's gravity. Languages in Model UN proceedings center on English as the primary , facilitating accessibility across diverse international delegations despite the represented nations' native tongues. This choice reflects practical constraints in volunteer-run simulations, where real-time interpretation for the ' six official languages—, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish—is rarely feasible outside elite events like those affiliated with the UN itself. Non-native speakers often prepare speeches and resolutions in English, with some conferences offering preparatory workshops or leniency for accents, though fluency barriers can hinder participation in fast-paced debates. Multilingual elements appear in European or global forums, such as The Hague International Model United Nations (THIMUN), where French or other languages may supplement English in select committees, but English remains dominant to ensure equitable engagement.

Management of Large-Scale Events

Managing large-scale Model United Nations conferences, which can attract 3,000 or more participants from dozens of countries, demands a hierarchical administrative framework distinct from the simulation itself, including a secretariat overseeing subcommittees for , , communications, and response. These events, exemplified by the Harvard Model United Nations (HMUN) with over 3,000 high school delegates and 150-plus staff, or the National Model United Nations (NMUN) New York sessions drawing intercollegiate participants globally, rely on student-led teams augmented by advisors to coordinate operations spanning multiple days. Venue procurement poses significant hurdles, as organizers must reserve expansive facilities like campuses, hotels, or convention centers to host parallel committees, plenary sessions, and social events, often contending with institutional restrictions on access, competing bookings, and premiums for after-hours or weekend usage. Food services require contractual guarantees with vendors to ensure availability amid closed campus outlets, while housing arrangements involve block bookings in proximate hotels to manage transportation for thousands, with costs per delegate frequently exceeding $500 including fees and accommodations. Registration and participant tracking utilize online platforms to handle bulk submissions from schools and individuals, but face issues such as "phantom" sign-ups where delegates register without attending, oversubscription leading to waitlists, and processing delays for international contingents, which can reduce effective attendance by 10-20% in some cases. Security protocols include on-site personnel for , stations, and contingency plans for disruptions like room shortages or geopolitical travel restrictions, as seen in reduced foreign participation during politically tense periods. Staff coordination amplifies these efforts, with under-secretaries for overseeing awards distribution, vendor payments, and real-time adjustments, though volunteers' academic and personal commitments often strain timelines, necessitating early recruitment and contingency staffing.

Variations and Specialized Formats

Traditional General Assembly Simulations

Traditional General Assembly simulations in Model United Nations replicate the United Nations as its chief deliberative body, where delegates from all member states engage in structured debate on broad global topics such as , , and . These simulations emphasize multilateral consensus-building through resolution drafting, with each represented holding one equal vote regardless of real-world influence. Originating in the post-World War II era, the format traces to early model assemblies like the 1946 Middle Atlantic Model , which transitioned from simulations to mirror the newly formed UN structure. Procedures follow adapted UN parliamentary rules, often drawing from UNA-USA or THIMUN guidelines, beginning with a for confirmation and agenda setting by vote. Debate centers on a general speakers' list for formal position statements, limited to one or two minutes per speaker, interspersed with points of or yield options to the or another delegate. Delegates introduce motions without seconding requirements in simplified GA variants, transitioning to moderated caucuses for topic-specific moderated discussion or unmoderated caucuses for informal bloc negotiations. Resolution development involves working papers evolving into draft resolutions, structured with preambulatory clauses (commas-separated, affirming past actions) and operative clauses (semicolon-separated, proposing new measures), introduced after chair approval. Amendments, either friendly (consensus-based) or hostile, are debated separately before final voting by placard or show of hands, typically requiring a simple majority for passage, though some simulations incorporate veto simulations for realism in select contexts. This format prioritizes rhetorical skill and alliance formation over executive action, distinguishing it from specialized committees by its scale—often 150–300 delegates—and focus on non-binding recommendations. In practice, traditional GA simulations foster skills in and but can extend over multiple days due to their deliberate pace, with chairs enforcing akin to UN protocol, including gavel strikes to suspend or close meetings. Conferences like National Model United Nations (NMUN), running annually since 1951, exemplify this by simulating multiple GA committees simultaneously, each addressing one to two agenda items for comprehensive resolution outcomes. While effective for educating on , critiques note potential overemphasis on procedure at the expense of substantive policy depth, as evidenced in participant feedback from large-scale events.

Crisis and Historical Committees

Crisis committees in Model United Nations simulate dynamic, high-stakes decision-making bodies, such as national cabinets, corporate boards, or alliances, where delegates respond to evolving scenarios driven by real-time updates from crisis staff. Unlike traditional committees focused on consensus-building resolutions, crisis formats emphasize rapid action through directives—short, actionable orders submitted during unmoderated caucuses—and crisis notes sent to a "back room" where staff interpret delegate inputs to generate updates, such as invasions, scandals, or alliances. These committees typically involve 15-30 delegates representing individuals or small groups rather than entire nations, spanning 3-6 years of simulated history over a conference weekend, often starting at a pivotal moment like the in 1962. Procedures blend front-room debate (e.g., moderated caucuses limited to 5-15 minutes, round robins for quick input) with back-room mechanics, where crisis updates interrupt sessions to force immediate responses, rewarding adaptability, negotiation, and strategic note-writing over lengthy speeches. Historical committees adapt MUN simulations to past eras, requiring delegates to embody figures or entities from specific time periods, such as the 1945 Indonesian Provisional Council or the drafting of Chile's 1980 constitution, to deliberate on events with known outcomes but unpredictable delegate-driven paths. They differ from contemporary traditional committees by leveraging abundant archival data for preparation, yet emphasizing counterfactual decision-making—delegates may diverge from recorded history through alliances or policies, fostering analysis of causal chains like the ' formation or the San Francisco Conference of 1945 that birthed the UN. Many historical committees incorporate crisis elements for dynamism, such as simulating the Fall of the or medieval conflicts, where updates reflect delegate actions against fixed historical backdrops, contrasting the open-ended futures of modern crisis setups. This format prioritizes historical accuracy in setup guides while allowing creative deviations, with awards often for best altering or preserving timeline fidelity based on conference rules. Both formats emerged prominently in college-level MUN circuits by the early , evolving from standard simulations to address criticisms of static by introducing urgency and , though they demand stronger into personalities and era-specific constraints over broad . Examples include joint crisis committees merging multiple historical bodies, like a 1980s simulation, where emotional stakes amplify realism but risk procedural chaos if notes overwhelm staff. hinges on balanced chairing to prevent dominance by aggressive blocs, with directives voted via majority or chair approval, ensuring outcomes reflect collective agency rather than predetermination.

Hybrid and Virtual Adaptations

Online platforms for virtual Model United Nations simulations emerged prior to the , with the Online Model United Nations (O-MUN) launching in fall as the first dedicated debating system for high school students worldwide. O-MUN facilitated monthly global debates and weekly regional sessions using Blackboard Collaborate for live video interactions, alongside groups for real-time chat and collaboration, enabling participants to draft resolutions via digital whiteboards from remote locations. This format targeted students lacking access to local in-person conferences, simulating key MUN elements like moderated caucuses and voting through webcam-enabled sessions. The from 2020 onward accelerated the adoption of fully virtual and hybrid MUN formats, as travel restrictions and health protocols disrupted traditional events. Conferences such as GLOMUN 2020 transitioned to virtual platforms like Gatherly, which replicated physical venues with simulated hotel floors and elevators for delegate navigation. Similarly, Princeton Model United Nations (PMUNC) held its first fully virtual edition in February 2021, accommodating participants via online tools amid ongoing restrictions. Hybrid models, blending in-person and remote participation, gained traction as a post-pandemic compromise; for instance, the Secondary Schools Model UN (LASSMUN) in 2021 hosted 30 in-person delegates alongside virtual attendees in a 120-seat venue, enforcing protocols like physical distancing and UN-branded masks. Virtual and hybrid MUN sessions typically rely on video conferencing software such as Zoom for speeches and moderated caucuses, with supplementary tools like or integrated chat features for unmoderated discussions and document sharing. Organizers often limit virtual committees to 20 participants to maintain order, using pre-recorded videos or watch parties at schools to mitigate connectivity gaps during real-time interactions. Resolution drafting occurs via shared online documents, while voting employs digital polls to replicate parliamentary procedures. These adaptations offer benefits including expanded geographic reach and lower costs by eliminating travel and accommodation expenses, allowing broader participation from underrepresented regions. However, challenges persist, such as unreliable causing disruptions in debates and caucuses, elevated deployment costs for seamless streaming, and reduced opportunities for informal networking compared to in-person events. Despite these, hybrid formats have endured into the mid-2020s, with ongoing virtual conferences like those hosted by Best Delegate providing sustained access for training and competition.

Global Distribution and Regional Contexts

North America: Dominance and Scale

, particularly the , originated and sustains the largest Model United Nations ecosystem globally, with roots tracing to the first American simulation organized by the Harvard Liberal Club in 1923 as an International Assembly modeling the League of Nations. This early adoption evolved into widespread collegiate and high school programs, exemplified by the National Model United Nations (NMUN), which began simulating UN proceedings in 1946 and became the first to convene final sessions at UN Headquarters in in 1952, establishing procedural precedents still used today. The region's growth accelerated post-World War II amid heightened interest in international diplomacy, fostering hundreds of annual conferences hosted by universities and secondary schools. The scale of participation underscores North American preeminence, with flagship events drawing thousands of delegates. The National High School Model United Nations (NHSMUN), held annually in New York City, accommodates approximately 3,500 students from across the U.S. and abroad, positioning it as the world's largest high school conference. Similarly, the North American International Model United Nations (NAIMUN), organized by Georgetown University, attracts over 3,300 participants, including top delegates from the U.S. and international schools, and is frequently termed the "high school championship" of the circuit. At the collegiate level, the University of Chicago's Model United Nations Conference (MUNUC) hosts around 3,000 attendees yearly, while NMUN's three annual sessions—two in New York and one in Washington, D.C.—engage over 5,600 delegates from more than 300 colleges, representing 132 UN member states and all 50 U.S. states. This dominance manifests in competitive depth and institutional support, with North American teams dominating rankings. , for instance, has held the top spot in North American college Model UN rankings for four consecutive years through 2025, based on performance across multiple conferences. Platforms like BestDelegate.com, which track awards and standings, serve over 750,000 participants annually, with the majority of tracked events and teams originating from the U.S. circuit. The proliferation of large-scale events—often exceeding 1,000 delegates—relies on robust university infrastructure, volunteer staffing exceeding 300 per conference in some cases, and emphasis on diverse committees simulating UN bodies, though exact annual conference counts vary by circuit but number in the dozens for major college and high school levels. Factors contributing to this scale include early standardization of rules, such as NMUN's adoption of UN-like procedures, and cultural integration into extracurricular education, enabling high participation rates among U.S. students pursuing . NMUN delegates, for example, comprise 42% from the U.S. and 58% international, reflecting the region's role as a global hub that draws and influences participants worldwide. Historical conferences like Harvard Model UN, which in featured 142 delegations including 32 from foreign countries, further illustrate sustained large-scale ambition.

Europe: Emphasis on Multilingualism and Policy Focus

Model United Nations conferences in highlight multilingual participation to accommodate the continent's diverse , often incorporating official proceedings in English alongside French, , or other languages in specific committees or sessions. This approach fosters inclusivity for delegates from non-English dominant backgrounds, with events like FerMUN operating as the world's only fully bilingual English-French high school MUN conference, enabling seamless debate in both languages. Similarly, conferences such as those organized by the or in integrate multilingual elements, reflecting the European Union's emphasis on linguistic equity in international simulations. THIMUN, a flagship event in founded in 1968, attracts multilingual students from across , where participants' proficiency in multiple languages enhances cross-cultural negotiations, though primary operations remain in English. European MUNs prioritize policy-focused deliberations over competitive elements prevalent in North American formats, emphasizing realistic diplomatic processes and substantive resolution drafting. THIMUN's procedural rules, including moderated caucuses and faculty approval panels for resolutions, promote collaborative development rather than rapid voting or individual accolades, aligning with a broader European orientation toward educational depth. This contrasts with larger, award-driven U.S. conferences, as European events like BERMUN in or PIMUN in stress skills and issue-specific expertise, often simulating UN bodies with a focus on European intersections such as EU-UN relations. The THIMUN Foundation, accredited as a UN-associated NGO in 1995, underscores this by fostering solution-oriented discussions on global issues, with annual gatherings drawing over 3,000 delegates to deliberate policies on topics from security to . This policy-centric model extends to specialized simulations, such as historical committees in THIMUN's 2026 edition focusing on 2002 Security Council dynamics, encouraging delegates to analyze past policies for contemporary relevance. Multilingual and policy emphases contribute to Europe's role in global MUN expansion, with circuits like MUN Europe hosting events in multiple capitals to build diplomatic capacities amid linguistic and regional diversity.

Asia-Pacific: Rapid Growth and National Adaptations

The region has experienced significant expansion in Model United Nations (MUN) participation since the late 1990s, driven by increasing emphasis on global education in rapidly developing economies. In , MUN conferences proliferated from initial university-level events to over 200 annual gatherings by the , encompassing high school and collegiate simulations that attract thousands of students annually. Similarly, hosted its inaugural collegiate MUN in 1995 at the , evolving into national-scale events like the China National Model United Nations (CNMUN), which reached its 20th iteration in 2024, and the Youth Model United Nations Conference, drawing over 5,000 participants in its 15th edition in 2025. This growth reflects broader investments in youth diplomacy training amid economic internationalization, with regional conferences such as the Asia Youth International Model United Nations (AYIMUN) hosting 522 delegates from 28 countries in its 14th edition in 2024, positioning it as one of the largest in the area. National adaptations often align MUN formats with local educational priorities and geopolitical contexts, prioritizing simulations of multilateral cooperation while navigating domestic sensitivities. In , conferences like CNMUN and the International Model United Nations—marking its 30th session in 2025—emphasize UN bodies focused on development and , but typically exclude or reframe topics challenging state sovereignty, such as territorial disputes, to foster skills in "harmonious" global engagement under official guidance from bodies like the United Nations Association of . In , adaptations incorporate socioeconomic themes relevant to domestic challenges, with events like Harvard Model United Nations assembling over 2,000 delegates from 14 countries since 2012, integrating advocacy for and to address local issues like inequality alongside international protocols. Australian and Japanese MUNs, by contrast, retain closer fidelity to Western-style procedural rigor, often hosted by universities with focuses on dynamics, though attendance remains smaller relative to population scale compared to and . These adaptations have facilitated broader accessibility, with hybrid formats emerging post-2020 to accommodate large cohorts, yet they underscore causal constraints: in state-influenced systems, MUN serves didactic purposes reinforcing over unfettered , as evidenced by topic selections in Chinese events that prioritize Belt and Road-aligned cooperation. Empirical participation metrics indicate sustained momentum, with India's conference density yielding measurable gains in diplomatic literacy among youth, though scalability in less urbanized Pacific islands lags due to logistical barriers.

Africa and Middle East: Emerging Participation Amid Challenges

Participation in Model United Nations activities has grown in the , particularly in countries, where international conferences draw delegates from across the region and beyond. THIMUN-Qatar, affiliated with International Model United Nations, hosts the largest such event in the , attracting over 1,200 high school delegates annually to simulate UN committees on global issues. Similarly, Harvard Model United Nations Dubai held its inaugural conference in 2022 and reached its fifth iteration by January 2026, emphasizing and leadership amid regional geopolitical tensions. Other events, such as Georgetown University's Model United Nations in , , convene hundreds of high school students yearly, incorporating cultural exchanges alongside simulations. These gatherings reflect increasing investment by host nations like and the in youth programs, often supported by educational institutions and government partnerships. In , MUN participation remains nascent but shows signs of expansion through localized s, primarily in urban centers of stable economies. The Model United Nations in , established as a pioneer in , convenes over 200 collegiate delegates each year at the , focusing on competitive simulations of UN bodies. The International Model UN , held in 2024 under UN auspices, targeted from the to address continental challenges like . North African events, such as the Africa World Model United Nations in , , in December 2021, have aimed to broaden access, though sustained growth is evident mainly in countries like , , and via platforms listing regional s. Overall, African delegations appear in global events like National Model United Nations, representing member states, but domestic participation hovers in the low hundreds per major , far below scales in or . Despite this emergence, challenges persist due to socioeconomic and political factors limiting widespread involvement. Economic constraints, including high youth poverty rates and funding shortfalls for educational travel—exacerbated by Africa's $1.3 trillion annual gap in financing—hinder delegate attendance from rural or low-income schools. Political instability and conflicts in parts of and the , such as ongoing disruptions in or , disrupt event planning and participant mobility, with fragile states comprising nearly two-thirds of low-income countries. In the , regional rivalries and security concerns occasionally constrain open debate on sensitive topics, though host nations mitigate this through controlled venues. These barriers result in uneven participation, with growth concentrated in relatively stable, resource-rich areas like the Gulf states, while broader continental engagement lags due to resource gaps rather than lack of interest, as indicated by online engagement from countries like .

Latin America: Community and Advocacy Orientations

Model United Nations activities in Latin America emphasize community engagement through cross-cultural exchanges and student-led organization, alongside advocacy focused on regional multilateral institutions addressing hemispheric issues. The Americas Model United Nations (AMUN) in Brazil, the region's pioneering conference, was established around 1997 by students at the University of Brasília and has continued for over 27 years as a volunteer-driven simulation of UN procedures. This format has influenced subsequent events by prioritizing accessible participation for university students across the continent, fostering networks among emerging diplomats. Conferences such as HACIA Democracy simulate the (OAS), directing advocacy toward topics like democratic governance and regional security, with the goal of inspiring youth leadership and commitment to hemispheric cooperation. Similarly, committees in events like Yale Model United Nations include the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), where delegates advocate positions on localized challenges including , , and sustainable economic development. The inaugural YMUN in in August 2024 hosted hundreds of participants from multiple countries, underscoring a focus on meaningful dialogue and cultural integration to build regional solidarity. Harvard National Model United Nations-Latin America (HNMUN-LA) extends established diplomatic training to the region, held in cities like , to promote academic excellence and interpersonal connections among Latin American youth. Programs such as FWWMUN integrate pre-conference workshops on , leadership, and youth advocacy, enhancing participants' abilities to engage in community-oriented policy simulations. This orientation reflects a broader trend in Latin American MUN toward volunteerism and regional relevance, contrasting with more award-competitive models elsewhere, and supports skill-building in collective problem-solving for issues like environmental and .

Long-Term Impact

Career Trajectories of Participants

Participation in Model United Nations (MUN) develops transferable skills such as , public speaking, , and , which participants report as beneficial for professional environments requiring interpersonal and analytical abilities. A 2019 study surveying high school and university students before and after MUN simulations found statistically significant improvements in these skills via multivariate , attributing gains to the immersive diplomatic . These experiences also shape career orientations, with the same study indicating that MUN participation alters students' views on future professions, often increasing interest in and policy roles through heightened awareness of global 's complexities. Pre- and post-event surveys showed shifts toward considering university programs and jobs in or related fields, though the analysis noted potential self-selection biases among motivated participants. Alumni trajectories frequently involve international organizations, service, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), , and , where and competencies provide edges in hiring and advancement. For instance, NMUN organizers report that former delegates enter international affairs and corporate roles leveraging MUN-honed expertise, though such accounts derive from program self-assessments rather than independent tracking. Longitudinal empirical data on rates or outcomes specific to MUN remains limited, with most evidence correlational and drawn from short-term assessments rather than decade-spanning cohort studies. Selection effects—where ambitious students self-select into MUN—complicate causal claims about direct boosts, as comparable extracurriculars like clubs yield similar gains.

Notable Alumni and Their Achievements

Chelsea Clinton participated in Model United Nations as a member of her high school team for three years. She later authored books including She Persisted (2017) and served as vice chair of the , focusing on and initiatives. Stephen Breyer engaged in Model United Nations during his academic career, including playing the role of secretary-general in simulations. Appointed to the U.S. in 1994, he served until his retirement in 2022, authoring opinions on cases involving and constitutional interpretation, such as Biden v. Nebraska (2023) on student loan forgiveness. King attended the 15th THIMUN conference in in 1983 as a delegate representing his country. He succeeded to the throne on April 30, 2013, following the abdication of Queen Beatrix, and has overseen duties including foreign policy representation and domestic crisis management, such as during the . took part in Model United Nations alongside activities like debate and marching band during high school. He gained fame portraying on (2005–2013), earning Emmy nominations, and later produced content on faith and through SoulPancake, acquired by Participant Media in 2016. Samuel L. Jackson participated in Model United Nations in segregated schools in , where it facilitated his first significant interracial interactions. His acting career includes over 150 films, with roles in (1994), earning an Academy Award nomination, and the as starting in 2008, grossing billions in box office revenue.

Broader Societal Influences and Critiques

Model United Nations activities have been associated with fostering greater societal awareness of international cooperation and multilateral problem-solving among , potentially contributing to a broader cultural emphasis on and diplomatic norms in educated demographics. Participants often report expanded perspectives on world affairs, which may translate into increased engagement with transnational issues in public discourse and professional spheres. However, empirical quantification of these effects remains limited, with most evidence drawn from self-reported educational outcomes rather than longitudinal societal metrics. Critiques highlight structural barriers that restrict broader societal penetration, including high participation costs for conferences—often exceeding hundreds of dollars per event plus travel—which favor participants from affluent schools and exclude lower-income or rural students, thereby reinforcing class-based rather than democratizing global education. In competitive formats, the emphasis on crisis committees and rapid-fire debates can devolve into aggressive, winner-takes-all simulations that prioritize rhetorical dominance and alliances over substantive policy analysis, diverging from the consensus-driven realities of actual proceedings. Further scrutiny points to MUN's tendency to idealize multilateral institutions without adequately addressing their real-world inefficiencies, such as powers or enforcement failures, potentially cultivating an overly optimistic view of international governance that underprepares participants for power asymmetries and conflicts. While proponents argue it builds cognitive and interpersonal skills transferable to civic life, detractors contend it functions more as performative extracurricular theater than a rigorous of global order, with limited evidence of scalable societal transformation beyond niche circles. Accessibility challenges, including research overload and handling sensitive geopolitical topics, further constrain its influence on diverse societal segments.

References

  1. https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/introduction
  2. https://participedia.net/method/model-united-nations
  3. https://www.nmun.org/about-nmun/mission-and-history.html
  4. https://www.oxfordglobal.org/blog/2020/10/6/a-brief-history-of-model-united-nations
  5. https://www.leimun.com/home/what-is-mun
  6. https://www.wichita.edu/academics/fairmount_college_of_liberal_arts_and_sciences/polisci/modelun/wa-mun/documents/value_of_MUN.pdf
  7. https://www.un.org/en/mun/page/getting-started-model-united-nations
  8. https://sustainableearthreviews.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42055-025-00111-3
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229658525_The_Uses_and_Limits_of_Model_United_Nations_in_an_International_Relations_Classroom
  10. https://www.samford.edu/arts-and-sciences/model-united-nations
  11. https://www.democratic-erosion.com/2020/03/21/is-there-still-value-to-model-united-nations/
  12. https://uca.edu/politicalscience/files/2017/12/AMUN-Chapter-1.pdf
  13. https://www.wisemee.com/history-of-the-first-mun/
  14. https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-264
  15. https://www.nmun.org/assets/documents/about-nmun/mission-and-history/nmun-historical-timeline.pdf
  16. https://www.colegiobolivar.edu.co/cbmun/mun-history/
  17. https://bestdelegate.com/10-top-events-in-the-history-of-model-united-nations/
  18. https://www.lib.niu.edu/1996/il960147.html
  19. https://www.nmun.org/assets/documents/about-nmun/mission-and-history/nmun-history.pdf
  20. https://www.nmun.org/about-nmun/by-the-numbers.html
  21. https://web1.augusta.edu/pamplin/social-sciences/documents/modelingstudentsuccessarticle.pdf
  22. https://www.un.org/en/mun
  23. https://www.amun.org/how-we-went-virtual-in-2020/
  24. https://www.ash.nl/connect/detail-connect/~board/connect/post/thimun-2021-but-make-it-virtual
  25. https://www.allamericanmun.com/innovative-solutions-to-model-un-with-covid-19-distance-model-united-nations-dmunc/
  26. https://www.dmun.org/newsroom/4
  27. https://tower.mastersny.org/6617/features/from-hotels-to-homes-mun-transitions-to-remote-conferences/
  28. https://www.worldmunday.com/munsummit25-programme/
  29. https://www.un.org/sw/node/157377
  30. https://mymun.com/conferences/vr-mun-2025
  31. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6823&context=syllabi
  32. https://www.unacquinte.com/model-un
  33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1299406.pdf
  34. https://www.munprep.org/mun-faqs/
  35. https://blogs.jccc.edu/mun/sample-page/the-model-united-nations-a-strategy-for-enhancing-global-business-education/
  36. https://www.ccwa.org/model-un/
  37. https://www.unagb.org/global-learning/why-should-young-people-do-model-un/
  38. https://unagb.org/global-learning/why-should-young-people-do-model-un/
  39. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1340544.pdf
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318433444_Students%27_knowledge_and_perceptions_of_international_relations_and_the_%27Model_United_Nations%27_an_empirical_analysis
  41. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41304-020-00260-3
  42. https://multieducationjournal.com/assets/archives/2020/vol5issue6/5-6-13-590.pdf
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229735857_Evaluating_Hypotheses_About_Active_Learning
  44. https://www.unanca.org/images/content/global-classrooms/GCDC_How_to_Do_Model_UN.pdf
  45. https://www.wisemee.com/build-high-school-mun-program/
  46. https://unagb.org/model-un/classroom-support/
  47. https://una.org.uk/sites/default/files/Miscellaneous/School%2520resources.pdf
  48. https://www.ibo.org/contentassets/71f2f66b529f48a8a61223070887373a/model-un-and-the-ib-myp---angelika-kuster.pdf
  49. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=etap_fac_scholar
  50. https://www.mfriends.org/model-un-program-builds-skills-and-provides-leadership-training/
  51. https://ymun.org/fees-financial-aid
  52. https://www.nmun.org/conferences/new-york/register-and-plan-your-trip/plan-your-trip/cost-information.html
  53. https://www.kaleidoscopeadventures.com/how-to-plan-your-next-model-un-conference-trip/
  54. https://bestdelegate.com/opportunity-and-the-price-tag-of-model-un/
  55. https://www.reddit.com/r/MUN/comments/1laqxch/mun_conference_price_dilemma/
  56. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/consilience/blog/view/38
  57. https://www.reddit.com/r/MUN/comments/f6yb70/muns_are_for_the_privileged/
  58. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/[consilience](/page/Consilience)/blog/view/38
  59. https://munimpact.org/a-path-to-accessibility-the-story-of-raise-your-placard/
  60. https://ymuneurope.org/financialaid
  61. https://www.ilmunc.com/financial-aid
  62. https://www.ssuns.org/financial-aid
  63. https://www.amun.org/un-vs-model-un/
  64. https://bestdelegate.com/un4mun-workshop-recap-4-big-differences-between-model-un-and-the-real-un/
  65. https://news.un.org/en/story/2013/08/447922
  66. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-intl-relations/
  67. https://press.un.org/en/2024/gadis3740.doc.htm
  68. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1088937X.2023.2210315
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366158022_Does_the_UN_Model_Still_Work_Challenges_and_Prospects_for_the_Future_of_Multilateralism
  70. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/01/four-contending-us-approaches-to-multilateralism?lang=en
  71. https://www.un.org/en/ga/maincommittees/
  72. https://www.harvardmun.org/committee-list
  73. https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/step-step-outline-organizing-mun
  74. https://www.nmun.org/assets/documents/nmun-delegate-prep-guide.pdf
  75. https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/delegate-preparation
  76. https://foundation.thimun.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/BASIC-GUIDELINES-FOR-DELEGATES-final-version-2021.pdf
  77. https://mun.bestdelegate.com/2019/11/20/how-to-succeed-when-representing-a-small-country/
  78. https://www.ilmunc.com/what-is-model-un
  79. https://www.fwwmun-nyc.org/prepare-for-committee
  80. https://www.wisemee.com/effectively-represent-your-country-in-model-un/
  81. https://unsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Procedure-Guide.pdf
  82. https://munuc.org/crisis/
  83. https://www.wisemee.com/introduction-mun-rules-of-procedure/
  84. https://bestdelegate.com/mun-made-easy-how-to-get-started-with-model-united-nations/
  85. https://www.nmun.org/assets/documents/nmun-rules.pdf
  86. https://foundation.thimun.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Rules_of_Procedure_revised.pdf
  87. https://www.munprep.org/mun-points-and-motions-how-to-use-them-properly/
  88. https://www.munprep.org/mun-procedure-basics-speakers-list-caucus-round-table/
  89. https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/drafting-resolutions
  90. https://www.uml.edu/fahss/model-un/resources/rules-of-umlmun.aspx
  91. https://bestdelegate.com/model-un-made-easy-how-to-write-a-resolution/
  92. https://www.wisemee.com/preambulatory-and-operative-clauses/
  93. https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/rules-procedure-0
  94. https://www.munprep.org/mun-amendments/
  95. https://www.allamericanmun.com/how-to-amend-draft-resolutions/
  96. https://www.allamericanmun.com/model-un-voting-procedure/
  97. https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/how-decisions-are-made-un
  98. https://www.oxfordglobal.org/blog/2024/6/18/secretary-general-and-director-general-who-are-they
  99. https://colognemun.org/about/what-is-mun/
  100. https://blueprint.uchicago.edu/organization/munuc/documents/view/447489
  101. https://www.amun.org/handbooks/2024/2024-handbook/simulations-roles-and-roleplaying-2-2/
  102. https://www.columbusstate.edu/policy-justice-public-safety/_docs/dais_checklist.pdf
  103. http://hthcvmun.weebly.com/dias.html
  104. http://www.eaglemunc.org/uploads/1/0/5/3/105327687/eaglemunc_rules_of_procedure.pdf
  105. https://www.wisemee.com/how-to-chair-mun/
  106. https://bestdelegate.com/4-tips-for-chairing-a-crisis-committee/
  107. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/zh/mun/rules-for-simulating.html
  108. https://bestdelegate.com/the-challenges-of-running-a-model-un-conference/
  109. https://mun.saintdominique.fr/mun-st-do-live/behind-the-scenes-organizing-a-successful-model-united-nations-conference/
  110. https://www.munprep.org/model-un-dress-code/
  111. https://www.wisemee.com/how-to-dress-for-mun/
  112. https://www.theglobalcitizenacademy.com/blog/dress-like-a-diplomat-what-to-wear-for-mun
  113. https://www.amun.org/dress-to-impress-a-guide-to-being-amun-fabulous/
  114. https://montessori-mun.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/MMUN_ConferenceDresscode.pdf
  115. https://www.allamericanmun.com/how-to-navigate-a-language-barrier-in-model-united-nations-conferences/
  116. https://www.un.org/en/our-work/official-languages
  117. https://www.unitedambassadors.com/single-post/2016/10/05/when-english-is-a-second-language-tips-for-mun-success-despite-the-language-barrier
  118. https://bestdelegate.com/mun-business-attire-a-style-guide/
  119. https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/oversight-conference-things-consider
  120. https://www.harvardmun.org/
  121. https://www.nmun.org/conferences/new-york.html
  122. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/5/23/club-conferences-money-feature/
  123. https://www.smartmeetings.com/tips-tools/171205/navigating-international-attendance-challenges-in-2025s-political-climate
  124. https://www.reddit.com/r/MUN/comments/1f2gkss/what_do_i_do_as_usg_of_logistics_in_mun/
  125. https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/rules-procedure
  126. https://www.mesacc.edu/departments/social-science-justice-studies/political-science/model-un/simulation-procedures
  127. https://www.hofstra.edu/sites/default/files/2022-01/final-guide-mun-2022_0.pdf
  128. https://wfuna.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Sim-Handbook-GA.pdf
  129. https://munuc.org/intro-mun/
  130. https://www.munprep.org/chairing-a-mun-simulation/
  131. https://bestdelegate.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-crisis-committees/
  132. https://www.wisemee.com/mun-crisis-rules-of-procedure/
  133. https://www.munprep.org/mun-crisis-committees-ultimate-guide/
  134. https://www.uconnmun.com/crisisprocedures
  135. https://www.allamericanmun.com/crisis-front-room-in-model-un-guide/
  136. https://smunc.org/committees
  137. https://www.wisemee.com/chairing-a-historical-committee/
  138. https://munuc.org/intro-to-historical-committees-part-1/
  139. https://www.munprep.org/mun-committee-topics/
  140. https://bestdelegate.com/analysis-of-college-conferences-committees-should-delegates-be-outraged-by-fantasy-committees/
  141. https://www.mun-mannheim.de/mamun2023-crisis
  142. https://bestdelegate.com/online-model-united-nations-introduction/
  143. https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/hybrid-model-un-explainer
  144. https://www.allamericanmun.com/interview-with-glomun-2020-secretariat-the-premier-online-model-un-conference/
  145. https://shsmaroon.org/shss-experience-with-first-virtual-model-un-conference/
  146. https://www.amun.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/AMUN-Simulation-Guide-Supplement_-How-to-Prepare-for-a-Virtual-Model-UN-Conference.pdf
  147. https://www.allamericanmun.com/online-model-un-conferences-explained/
  148. https://muninstitute.com/pages/best-delegate-virtual-model-un-conferences
  149. https://www.unitedambassadors.com/single-post/2016/02/07/the-model-un-circuit-in-north-america-where-it-all-started
  150. https://naimun.modelun.org/overview
  151. https://bestdelegate.com/the-top-50-ranked-colleges-that-value-model-un/
  152. https://www.american.edu/sis/news/20250702-au-model-un-team-notches-history-making-four-peat.cfm
  153. https://bestdelegate.com/about/
  154. https://bestdelegate.com/2024-2025-north-american-college-model-u-n-final-rankings-world-division/
  155. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1996/2/17/model-un-is-largest-in-world/
  156. https://fermun.org/en/multilinguism/
  157. https://www.model-un.de/en/schueler/
  158. https://thehague.thimun.org/de-hague-conference/
  159. https://www.unitedambassadors.com/single-post/2016/05/02/a-contrast-between-the-commonly-used-terms-in-traditional-north-american-model-un-vs-thim
  160. https://bestdelegate.com/is-the-university-model-un-experience-better-in-europe-or-north-america/
  161. https://www.mun-germany.de/en/mun-berlin-germany/
  162. https://foundation.thimun.org/
  163. https://mymun.com/mun-europe
  164. https://oidaijsd.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/07-08-04.pdf
  165. https://www.unachina.org/en/class/10020
  166. https://china.un.org/en/299065-15th-youth-model-united-nations-conference
  167. https://www.instagram.com/p/C-ZMhWDPG77/?hl=en
  168. https://www.unachina.org/en/article/462
  169. https://www.facebook.com/BJReview/posts/the-30th-beijing-international-model-united-nations-mun-2025-hosted-by-china-for/996665259218832/
  170. https://www.allamericanmun.com/hmunindia/
  171. https://irc.modelun.org/conference-staffing
  172. https://www.hmunchina.org/what-is-hmun-china
  173. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2512390
  174. https://qatar.thimun.org/
  175. https://bestdelegate.com/model-un-middle-east/
  176. https://www.hmundubai.org/
  177. https://www.qatar.georgetown.edu/academics/programs/programs-high-school-students/model-united-nations/
  178. https://lmun.ng/who-we-are/
  179. https://www.allamericanmun.com/university-of-lagos-model-un-review-the-largest-collegiate-conference-in-nigeria/
  180. https://www.unon.org/content/sub-saharan-africa-international-model-un-saimun%25C2%25A0conference-2024-0
  181. https://africaworldmun.org/
  182. https://mymun.com/conferences/list?continent=af
  183. https://www.uneca.org/stories/aid-won%25E2%2580%2599t-close-africa%25E2%2580%2599s-%25241.3-trillion-sdg-gap
  184. https://4ther.com/breaking-the-funding-cycle-why-most-african-organizations-struggle-with-grants-and-how-to-change-that/
  185. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/fragilityconflictviolence/overview
  186. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/africa
  187. https://bestdelegate.com/which-countries-love-model-un-the-most-analysis-of-the-g20-countries-of-best-delegate-fans/
  188. https://www.amunbrazil.com/
  189. https://www.facebook.com/amun.brazil/
  190. https://www.haciademocracy.org/
  191. https://www.ymunlatam.org/committeedescriptions
  192. https://world.yale.edu/news/inaugural-yale-model-united-nations-latin-america-hosts-hundreds-of-students-in-sao-paulo
  193. https://www.hnmunla.org/
  194. https://www.fwwmun-nyc.org/mun-mexico-city
  195. https://munuc.org/committees/celac-36/
  196. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263395719852238
  197. https://www.nmun.org/assets/documents/nmunfdlprepguide.pdf
  198. https://x.com/ChelseaClinton/status/856904088553967616
  199. https://www.jfklibrary.org/events-and-awards/kennedy-library-forums/past-forums/transcripts/a-conversation-with-justice-stephen-breyer-2003
  200. https://www.oxfordglobal.org/blog/2020/9/18/famous-people-who-did-mun-in-high-school
  201. https://www.kuow.org/stories/rainn-wilson-nerd-king-pacific-northwest/
  202. https://hwchronicle.com/4077/uncategorized/samuel-l-jackson-tells-story-of-career-at-black-history-month-assembly/
  203. https://news.nau.edu/how-model-un-expanded-my-worldview/
  204. https://georgetownvoice.com/2022/10/07/improve-model-un/
  205. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/education/edlife/a-new-student-run-breed-crisis-oriented-and-fiercely-competitive.html
  206. https://bestdelegate.com/response-to-is-model-un-a-disgrace-in-pakistan/
  207. https://www.allamericanmun.com/model-un-is-dead/
  208. https://www.munprep.org/common-challenges-experienced-by-mun-teams/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.