Hubbry Logo
NoahidismNoahidismMain
Open search
Noahidism
Community hub
Noahidism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Noahidism
Noahidism
Noahidism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The rainbow is the unofficial symbol of Noahidism, recalling the Genesis flood narrative in which a rainbow appears to Noah after the Flood; it represents God's promise to Noah to refrain from flooding the Earth and destroying all life again.[1]
Part of a series on
Jewish outreach
Core topics
Related topics
770 Eastern Parkway
Part of a series on
Chabad
Rebbes
Places and landmarks
Holidays
Organizations
Schools
Texts
Practices and concepts
Chabad offshoots

Noahidism (/ˈnoʊəhaɪdɪzəm/) or Noachidism (/ˈnoʊəxaɪdɪzəm/) is a monotheistic Jewish religious movement aimed at non-Jews,[9] based upon the Seven Laws of Noah[10] and their traditional interpretations within Orthodox Judaism.[11]

According to the Jewish law, non-Jews (gentiles) are not obligated to convert to Judaism, but they are required to observe the Seven Laws of Noah to be assured of a place in the World to Come (Olam Ha-Ba), the final reward of the righteous.[17] The penalty for violating any of the Noahide laws is discussed in the Talmud,[12] but in practical terms it is subject to the working legal system which is established by the society at large.[12] Those who subscribe to the observance of the Noahic Covenant are referred to as Bnei Noach (Hebrew: בני נח, "Sons of Noah") or Noahides (/ˈnoʊ.əhaɪdz/).[18] The modern Noahide movement was founded in the 1990s by Orthodox Jewish rabbis from Israel,[2][3][7] mainly tied to Chabad-Lubavitch and religious Zionist organizations,[2][3][7] including the Temple Institute.[2][3][7]

Historically, the Hebrew term Bnei Noach has been applied to all non-Jews as descendants of Noah.[3][12][13] However, nowadays it is primarily used to refer specifically to those "Righteous Gentiles" who observe the Seven Laws of Noah.[3][4][5] Noahide communities have spread and developed primarily in the United States, United Kingdom, Latin America, Nigeria, the Philippines, and Russia.[5] According to a Noahide source in 2018, there are over 20,000 official Noahides around the world and the country with the greatest number is the Philippines.[3][5][7]

Noahic Covenant

[edit]
Main article: Seven Laws of Noah
Further information: Covenant (biblical) § Noahic covenant

The scriptural and theological basis for the seven commandments of the Noahic Covenant is said to be derived interpretatively from demands addressed to Adam[19] and to Noah,[20] who are believed to be the progenitors of humankind in Judaism, and therefore to be regarded as universal moral laws.[24] The seven commandments of the Noahic Covenant enumerated in the Babylonian Talmud (Avodah Zarah 8:4, Sanhedrin 56a-b) are:[27]

  1. Do not worship idols.[28]
  2. Do not curse God.[29]
  3. Do not murder.[30]
  4. Do not commit adultery or sexual immorality.[31]
  5. Do not steal.[32]
  6. Do not eat flesh torn from a living animal.[33]
  7. Establish courts of justice.[35]

According to the American Roman Catholic priest and dogmatic theologian Bruce R. Barnes, the obligation to follow the Noahic Covenant and its seven commandments was incumbent upon the Jewish people as well, and remained effective for them until the Ten Commandments were given to Moses on Mount Sinai:[13]

With the giving of the Torah, God chose a people to live by His Commandments. This is a critical moment for those who believe that revelation is the only authentic expression of law. Such individuals think that the Revealed Law predominates and that the Noahide Laws are absorbed into the Mosaic Laws, thereby losing their independence. This unification of the two sets of law during the revelation at Sinai strengthened and confirmed (rather than diminished) the obligation for non-Jews to follow the Noahide Laws. Righteous Gentiles were obliged to follow the Seven Commandments and, by association, the Sinaitic Commandments because the Noahide Laws were now considered subsumed into the Sinai Laws. This did not alter the distinction between the two sets of people who followed the respective laws. [...] The relationship between the Noahites and the Jews would always be similar to the relationship between a priest and a faithful layman. The obligation to follow the Noahide Laws was incumbent upon the Jews from Adam to the Revelation at Sinai. Virtually all Jewish thinkers who dealt with this issue kept this in mind.[13]

Historical precedents

[edit]
Main articles: Ger toshav and God-fearer
Further information: Hellenistic Judaism and History of the Jews in the Roman Empire

The concept of "Righteous Gentiles" (gerim toshavim) has a few precedents in the history of Judaism, primarily during Biblical times and the Roman domination of the Mediterranean. In the Hebrew Bible, it is reported that the legal status of ger toshav (Biblical Hebrew: גר תושב, ger: "foreigner" or "alien" + toshav: "resident", lit. 'resident alien')[40] was granted to those Gentiles (non-Jews) living in the Land of Israel who did not want to convert to Judaism but agreed to observe the Seven Laws of Noah.[41] The Sebomenoi or God-fearers of the Roman Empire were another ancient example of non-Jews being included within the Jewish community without converting to Judaism.[2][42]

During the Golden Age of Jewish culture in the Iberian Peninsula, the medieval Jewish philosopher and rabbi Moses Maimonides (1135–1204) wrote in the halakhic legal code Mishneh Torah that Gentiles (non-Jews) must perform exclusively the Seven Laws of Noah and refrain from studying the Torah or performing any Jewish commandment, including resting on the Shabbat;[43] however, Maimonides also states that if Gentiles want to perform any Jewish commandment besides the Seven Laws of Noah according to the correct halakhic procedure, they are not prevented from doing so.[44] According to Maimonides, teaching non-Jews to follow the Seven Laws of Noah is incumbent on all Jews, a commandment in and of itself.[4] Nevertheless, the majority of rabbinic authorities over the centuries have rejected Maimonides' opinion, and the dominant halakhic consensus has always been that Jews are not required to spread the Noahide laws to non-Jews.[4]

During the 1860s in Western Europe, the idea of Noahidism as a universal Judaic religion for non-Jews was developed by Elijah Benamozegh,[2][45] an Italian Sephardic Orthodox rabbi and renowned Jewish Kabbalist.[46] Between the years 1920s–1930s, French writer Aimé Pallière [fr] adopted the Noahide laws at the suggestion of his teacher Elijah Benamozegh; afterwards, Pallière spread Benamozegh's doctrine in Europe and never formally converted to Judaism.[2][23] Modern historians argue that Benamozegh's role in the debate on Jewish universalism in the history of Jewish philosophy was focused on the Seven Laws of Noah as the means subservient to the shift of Jewish ethics from particularism to universalism, although the arguments that he used to support his universalistic viewpoint were neither original nor unheard in the history of this debate.[45] According to Clémence Boulouque, Carl and Bernice Witten Associate Professor of Jewish and Israel Studies at Columbia University in the City of New York, Benamozegh ignored the ethnocentric biases contained in the Noahide laws, whereas some contemporary right-wing Jewish political movements have embraced them.[45]

Modern Noahide movement

[edit]
Main article: Religious Zionism
Further information: Jewish fundamentalism and Jewish supremacism

Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, encouraged his followers on many occasions to preach the Seven Laws of Noah,[2][4] devoting some of his addresses to the subtleties of this code.[47][48][49] Since the 1990s,[2][3] Orthodox Jewish rabbis from Israel, most notably those affiliated to Chabad-Lubavitch and religious Zionist organizations,[2][3][7] including The Temple Institute,[2][3][7] have set up the modern Noahide movement.[2][3][7] These Noahide organizations, led by religious Zionist and Orthodox Jewish rabbis, are aimed at non-Jews to proselytize among them and commit them to follow the Noahide laws.[2][3][7] According to Rachel Z. Feldman,[3] American anthropologist and Assistant Professor of Religious Studies at Dartmouth College, many of the Orthodox Jewish rabbis involved in mentoring Noahides are supporters of the Third Temple movement who believe that the messianic era shall begin with the establishment of a Jewish theocratic state in Israel, supported by communities of Noahides worldwide:[3]

Today, nearly 2,000 Filipinos consider themselves members of the "Children of Noah", a new Judaic faith that is growing into the tens of thousands worldwide as ex-Christians encounter forms of Jewish learning online. Under the tutelage of Orthodox Jewish rabbis, Filipino "Noahides", as they call themselves, study Torah, observe the Sabbath, and passionately support a form of messianic Zionism. Filipino Noahides believe that Jews are a racially superior people, with an innate ability to access divinity. According to their rabbi mentors, they are forbidden from performing Jewish rituals and even reading certain Jewish texts. These restrictions have necessitated the creation of new, distinctly Noahide ritual practices and prayers modeled after Jewish ones. Filipino Noahides are practicing a new faith that also affirms the superiority of Judaism and Jewish biblical right to the Land of Israel, in line with the aims of the growing messianic Third Temple Movement in Jerusalem.[3]

Feldman describes Noahidism as a "new world religion" that "carv[es] out a place for non-Jews in the messianic Zionist project".[3] She characterizes Noahide ideology in the Philippines and elsewhere in the global south as having a "markedly racial dimension" constructed around "an essential categorical difference between Jews and Noahides".[3] David Novak, professor of Jewish theology and ethics at the University of Toronto, has denounced the modern Noahide movement by stating that "If Jews are telling Gentiles what to do, it's a form of imperialism".[4]

High Council of Bnei Noah

[edit]
Main article: 2004 attempt to revive the Sanhedrin

In 2005 a "High Council of Bnei Noah", set up to represent Noahide communities around the world, was endorsed by a group that claimed to be the new Sanhedrin.[50] The High Council of Bnei Noah consists of a group of Noahides who, at the request of the nascent Sanhedrin, gathered in Jerusalem on 10 January 2006 to be recognized as an international Noahide organization for the purpose of serving as a bridge between the nascent Sanhedrin and Noahides worldwide.[51] There were ten initial members who flew to Israel and pledged to uphold the Seven Laws of Noah and to conduct themselves under the authority of the Noahide beth din (religious court) of the nascent Sanhedrin.[51]

Acknowledgment

[edit]

Meir Kahane and Shlomo Carlebach organized one of the first Noahide conferences in the 1980s. In 1990, Kahane was the keynote speaker at the First International Conference of the Descendants of Noah, the first Noahide gathering, in Fort Worth, Texas.[2][3][7] After the assassination of Meir Kahane that same year, The Temple Institute, which advocates to rebuild the Third Jewish Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, started to promote the Noahide laws as well.[2][7]

The Chabad-Lubavitch movement has been one of the most active in Noahide outreach, believing that there is spiritual and societal value for non-Jews in at least simply acknowledging the Noahide laws.[2][3][4][5] In 1982, Chabad-Lubavitch had a reference to the Noahide laws enshrined in a U.S. Presidential proclamation: the "Proclamation 4921",[52] signed by the then-U.S. President Ronald Reagan.[52] The United States Congress, recalling House Joint Resolution 447 and in celebration of Menachem Mendel Schneerson's 80th birthday, proclaimed 4 April 1982, as a "National Day of Reflection".[52]

In 1989 and 1990, they had another reference to the Noahide laws enshrined in a U.S. Presidential proclamation: the "Proclamation 5956",[53] signed by then-President George H. W. Bush.[53] The United States Congress, recalling House Joint Resolution 173 and in celebration of Menachem Mendel Schneerson's 87th birthday, proclaimed 16 April 1989, and 6 April 1990, as "Education Day, U.S.A."[53]

In January 2004, the spiritual leader of the Druze community in Israel, Sheikh Mowafak Tarif, met with a representative of Chabad-Lubavitch to sign a declaration calling on all non-Jews in Israel to observe the Noahide laws; the mayor of the Arab city of Shefa-'Amr (Shfaram) also signed the document.[54]

In March 2016, the Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel, Yitzhak Yosef, declared during a sermon that Jewish law requires that the only non-Jews allowed to live in Israel are obligated to follow the Noahide laws:[55][56]

According to Jewish law, it's forbidden for a non-Jew to live in the Land of Israel – unless he has accepted the seven Noahide laws, [...] If the non-Jew is unwilling to accept these laws, then we can send him to Saudi Arabia, [...] When there will be full, true redemption, we will do this.[55]

Yosef further added:

[N]on-Jews shouldn't live in the land of Israel. [...] If our hand were firm, if we had the power to rule, then non-Jews must not live in Israel. But, our hand is not firm. [...] Who, otherwise be the servants? Who will be our helpers? This is why we leave them in Israel.[57]

Yosef's sermon sparked outrage in Israel and was fiercely criticized by several human rights associations, NGOs and members of the Knesset;[55] Jonathan Greenblatt, Anti-Defamation League's CEO and national director, and Carole Nuriel, Anti-Defamation League's Israel Office acting director, issued a strong denunciation of Yosef's sermon:[55][57]

The statement by Chief Rabbi Yosef is shocking and unacceptable. It is unconscionable that the Chief Rabbi, an official representative of the State of Israel, would express such intolerant and ignorant views about Israel's non-Jewish population – including the millions of non-Jewish citizens.

As a spiritual leader, Rabbi Yosef should be using his influence to preach tolerance and compassion towards others, regardless of their faith, and not seek to exclude and demean a large segment of Israelis.

We call upon the Chief Rabbi to retract his statements and apologize for any offense caused by his comments.[57]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Noahidism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Noahidism refers to the ethical and religious observance by non-Jews of the Seven Noahide Laws, a set of universal moral imperatives derived from rabbinic interpretations of biblical covenants with and , intended to guide all humanity toward without requiring adherence to the full . These laws, enumerated in the ( 56a–b) and codified by in his (Hilchot Melachim 9:1), consist of prohibitions against , , , , sexual immorality, and eating the flesh of a living animal, alongside the positive obligation to establish just courts of law. In Jewish tradition, particularly Orthodox interpretations, Gentiles who uphold these laws are deemed "" and merit a place in , distinguishing Noahidism from proper while affirming a monotheistic framework compatible with revelation. The concept traces its formal development to post-biblical , where it serves as a minimalist halakhic path for non-Jews amid the fuller for , reflecting a theological distinction between universal and particular divine obligations. Revived in the late through the outreach of Chabad-Lubavitch, especially under Rabbi , Noahidism has fostered a global movement of communities studying and practicing these laws, often emphasizing over ritual conversion.

Core Doctrines

The Seven Noahide Laws

The Seven Noahide Laws constitute the foundational ethical and legal obligations binding upon all non-Jewish humanity in Jewish tradition, serving as universal commandments derived exegetically from the and codified in rabbinic sources as minimal requirements for righteous conduct. These laws originate from interpretations of Genesis chapters 2 and 9, where six were held to apply from Adam's time and the seventh added post-Flood to , emphasizing , social order, and prohibitions against core moral violations. , in his (Kings and Wars 9:1), enumerates them explicitly as prohibitions against , , , illicit sexual relations, , and eating a limb from a living animal, alongside the positive command to establish courts of , positioning these as divinely mandated minima for non-Jews to attain . The laws are detailed as follows:
  • Prohibition of idolatry: Derived from Genesis 2:16 (interpreted as Adam's implicit recognition of the one Creator) and reinforced in Genesis 9's covenant context, this mandates exclusive worship of the singular, incorporeal without intermediaries or images; rabbinic elaboration extends it to reject and any doctrine implying divine plurality, such as Trinitarian beliefs, which Orthodox authorities classify as impermissible avodah zarah (foreign worship) for Noahides under strict .
  • Prohibition of blasphemy: Rooted in Genesis 3:1-5's narrative of verbal defiance against divine authority and Leviticus 24:16 (applied universally), this forbids cursing or reviling 's name, upholding reverence for the divine as a baseline for speech.
  • Prohibition of murder: Explicitly commanded in Genesis 9:6 ("Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed"), this bars unjust killing, including except to save the mother's life and , with derivations emphasizing the in humanity as the causal basis for .
  • Prohibition of theft: Interpreted from Genesis 1-3's pre-Fall harmony and extended to include , , and withholding wages, this preserves rights and social trust as inferred from creation's order.
  • Prohibition of sexual immorality: Drawn from Genesis 2:24's marital union and Genesis 6's pre-Flood corruption via forbidden unions, this outlaws , , bestiality, and , limiting relations to monogamous heterosexual marriage to maintain familial stability.
  • Prohibition of eating flesh from a living animal: Directly stated in Genesis 9:4 ("But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat"), this prevents by barring consumption of severed from a live creature, promoting ethical treatment in sustenance.
  • Establishment of courts of justice: Encompassing dinim as a positive duty, derived from Genesis 9's implied societal renewal post-Flood and elaborated in the ( 56a) to enforce the other laws through legal systems addressing civil disputes, criminal penalties, and communal governance.
These commandments, while concise, involve detailed rabbinic interpretations for practical application, such as by the sword for violations under ideal Noahide courts, underscoring their role in fostering a just, monotheistic civilization without the full 613 mitzvot incumbent on . Observance requires intent and action aligned with their ethical intent, not mere ritual, as articulated in sources like the Talmud's formulation in 56a-b.

Obligations and Rewards for Gentiles

In Jewish theology, observance of the seven Noahide laws constitutes the full moral and spiritual obligation for gentiles, rendering conversion to Judaism unnecessary for righteousness or salvation. Maimonides codifies this in Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 8:11, stating that a gentile who accepts these commandments and performs them scrupulously is deemed righteous among the nations and merits a portion in the Olam HaBa (World to Come), independent of Jewish covenantal practices such as the 613 mitzvot binding upon Jews. The Talmud elevates such righteous gentiles further, stating in Sanhedrin 59a that one who studies the Torah applicable to them (the seven Noahide laws) and lives ethically is comparable to a High Priest in sanctity, affirming their full righteousness within the Noahide framework. The Talmud similarly affirms this reward for righteous gentiles in Sanhedrin 105a, interpreting biblical verses to exclude only the unrighteous from the afterlife while granting the observant a share therein. Gentiles face no mandate to adopt rituals like circumcision (beyond basic hygiene), full Shabbat observance, or kosher dietary laws extending past the prohibition on consuming a limb from a living animal. Maimonides emphasizes in Hilchot Melachim 10:9 that gentiles are barred from innovating religious practices or fully emulating Jewish rites, such as complete Shabbat rest, to preserve the distinct Noahide covenant. However, voluntary performance of additional Torah mitzvot is permitted and rewarded if motivated by divine merit rather than obligation, as per Hilchot Melachim 10:10, though such acts do not elevate one's status beyond Noahide righteousness. This framework underscores a causal link between Noahide adherence and broader outcomes: monotheistic commitment and ethical prohibitions foster societal order by curbing , , , and , thereby securing divine favor and human flourishing without imposing Jewish particularism. Rabbinic sources derive these laws from primordial natural order, post-Flood renewal, and universal reason, positioning them as foundational for moral agency rather than derivative of Sinai revelation. Non-observance, conversely, incurs judgment, as the laws' neglect undermines the stability of civil life essential to God's covenantal intent.

Distinction from Judaism

Noahidism posits a monotheistic ethical framework for non-Jews that parallels but does not intersect with 's particular covenant, emphasizing that gentiles fulfill their divine obligations through universal laws without adopting or rituals. Unlike , which imposes upon Jews as descendants of the Sinai revelation, Noahidism confines non-Jews to pre-Sinai imperatives, preserving 's exclusivity as a articulated in Deuteronomy 7:6: "For you are a people holy to the Lord your God; the Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for his own possession, out of all the peoples that are on the face of the earth." Rabbinic sources maintain that these additional mitzvot bind only the Jewish people, selected for a distinct priestly role among nations, while gentiles' path avoids the full Torah's ritual and legal corpus to prevent conflation of universal and particular divine wills. Conversion to Judaism is not promoted for those adequately observing Noahide precepts, as rabbinic authorities deem such righteous without requiring assimilation into Jewish law or community structures. , in his codification, affirms that non-Jews meticulously upholding the seven laws secure eschatological reward equivalent to the righteous, obviating the need for conversion unless driven by profound spiritual compulsion. This stance counters , upholding causal distinctions in covenantal roles: Jews bear the Torah's comprehensive yoke to model , whereas gentiles contribute to global order via their delimited code, rejecting any imperative to transcend gentile status. Talmudic tradition further delineates boundaries by prohibiting gentiles from treating Jewish mitzvot as personally obligatory, viewing such emulation as presumptuous and disruptive to covenantal hierarchies. Gentiles lack access to Temple service, full , or rituals like for covenantal purposes absent formal conversion, as these pertain solely to Israel's post-Sinai election. This framework eschews , ensuring Noahidism functions as a standalone path for humanity at large, distinct from Judaism's insular sanctity and thereby safeguarding the unique election of the Jewish nation amid universal moral accountability.

Historical Origins

Biblical Covenant with Noah

The Noahic covenant originates in the following the Great Flood, which served as for the pre-flood world's pervasive corruption and violence. Genesis 6:11-13 describes the earth as filled with hamas (violence) and moral decay, where "all flesh had corrupted its way," necessitating the flood's cataclysmic reset to preserve righteous order. This event, dated by to the year 1656 (approximately 2105 BCE), underscores a causal link between societal and empirical consequence, with the covenant providing prophylactic moral boundaries for humanity's survival. In Genesis 9:1-7, blesses and his sons—, , and —commanding them to " and fill the ," reinstating over creation while imposing restrictions to avert prior excesses. Explicit prohibitions include consuming flesh with its lifeblood intact (Genesis 9:4), recognizing blood as the essence of life, and the mandate for capital accountability: "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for made man in his own image" (Genesis 9:6). These directives implicitly enforce justice through family lineage preservation, countering the unchecked violence that precipitated the deluge by prioritizing human sanctity and ordered procreation. Genesis 9:8-17 extends the covenant universally to Noah's descendants, every living creature, and the itself, promising never again to destroy all flesh by floodwaters. The emerges as its perpetual sign: "I have set my bow in the cloud... This is the sign of the covenant I have established between me and all life on the " (Genesis 9:13, 17). This bilateral assurance binds divine restraint to human compliance with the foundational imperatives, establishing a primordial framework for moral conduct independent of later law.

Talmudic Formulation

The earliest explicit rabbinic enumeration of the seven Noahide laws appears in the , tractate 9:4, which states that the sons of were commanded seven mitzvot: the establishment of courts of ; prohibitions against , , illicit sexual relations, , , and consumption of a limb torn from a living animal. This listing frames the laws as binding upon all humanity descending from , with courts serving as the mechanism to adjudicate and enforce compliance among gentiles. The Babylonian , in tractate 56a-b, provides a parallel and more detailed formulation, attributing to Yochanan the teaching that seven precepts were commanded to the children of : the positive to set up courts of justice (dinim), alongside prohibitions against , , illicit sexual relations (arayot), bloodshed (shefikhut damim), (gezel), and eating flesh from a living animal (ever min ha-chai). The derives these from scriptural interpretations, positing that six were originally given to and reiterated to after the , with the seventh—prohibiting consumption of live animal flesh—added specifically post-Flood to address the permission granted for meat-eating in Genesis 9:3. The courts commandment functions not merely as a prohibition's enforcer but as an affirmative duty to institute judicial systems that uphold the other laws, ensuring communal stability through impartial adjudication, witness testimony, and punishment. In the Talmud's ideal framework of a under Jewish , violations of any Noahide by a , once warned and tried before a competent , incur by or strangulation, as derived from 57a, which states that Noahides are liable to execution for these seven offenses. This severity underscores the laws' role in preserving moral order, with the Talmud emphasizing that gentiles must proactively establish such courts to preempt chaos, distinguishing the Noahide code from mere ethical guidelines by mandating institutional enforcement.

Medieval Rabbinic Elaborations

In the , (1138–1204) provided a systematic codification of the Noahide laws in his , particularly in Hilchot Melachim uMilchamot chapters 8–10, enumerating the prohibitions and establishing courts of justice as the seventh law. He stipulated that a non-Jew who accepts the seven laws—, , , illicit sexual relations, , eating flesh from a living animal, and failure to establish justice—and observes them scrupulously because they were divinely commanded to at Sinai qualifies as a "righteous " with a share in . explicitly deemed non-Jews engaged in , such as through worship of created beings or intermediaries, ineligible for this eschatological reward unless they repudiate such practices and comply fully, thereby excluding adherents of religions involving divine or from automatic compliance. Other medieval authorities refined specific applications amid ongoing halakhic discourse. Nachmanides (1194–1270), in his Torah commentaries, and the Tosafists (12th–13th centuries) debated nuances of the ever min hachai prohibition, including the minimal quantity of flesh—such as an olive-bulk versus larger amounts—that constitutes a violation for non-Jews, with Tosafot weighing interpretive variances from Talmudic sources to clarify practical observance. These elaborations unfolded against the backdrop of the 12th–15th centuries, marked by Crusader violence starting in 1096 and royal expulsions of Jews from regions like England in 1290 and France in 1306, periods when rabbinic writings emphasized gentile moral accountability without encouraging proselytism to Judaism. Interactions with dominant faiths shaped these refinements; , writing under Islamic rule in , regarded Muslim as aligning with Noahide rejection of , permitting certain accommodations, whereas he classified Christian Trinitarian doctrines and saint cults as violative, reinforcing the laws' role in delineating permissible . This framework promoted societal stability by upholding universal ethical minima for non-Jews, independent of conversion pressures, amid eras of interreligious friction.

Modern Revival

Key Proponents and Initiatives


Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902–1994), leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement from 1951, spearheaded the contemporary resurgence of Noahidism by emphasizing the Seven Noahide Laws as a universal ethical framework for non-Jews. In 1983, he launched a worldwide campaign directing Jews to disseminate these laws, viewing their observance as essential preparation for an era of global peace and moral enlightenment. This initiative reflected Chabad's post-World War II evolution toward expansive outreach, extending beyond Jewish revival to address secular moral challenges through Torah-derived principles applicable to all humanity. Schneerson's advocacy culminated in official recognitions, such as the U.S. Congress's designation of March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A.," honoring his 90th and linking the Noahide Laws to the ethical foundations of civilized upon which was established. He asserted that every Jew bears the responsibility to ensure non-Jews' adherence to these commandments, positioning Noahidism as a divine imperative for Gentiles to achieve righteousness without converting to . Other notable proponents include Yoel Schwartz, a prolific Israeli scholar who authored foundational texts like Noahide Commandments, delineating the practical obligations under these laws, and established the Court for Issues of Bnei Noah to guide non-Jewish observance. In , Shimon Dovid Cowen, affiliated with , has promoted the integration of Noahide principles into , authoring The Theory and Practice of Universal Ethics: The Noahide Laws (2015) to apply them against contemporary social ills like family breakdown. These efforts underscore a targeted intellectual and institutional push within to revive Noahidism as a viable path for spirituality.

Expansion and Demographics

The Noahide movement has expanded from a handful of isolated individuals in the 1970s and 1980s, primarily former encountering rabbinic teachings on Laws, to an estimated tens of thousands of adherents worldwide by the 2020s. This growth reflects incremental adoption rather than mass conversions, often appealing to those disillusioned with Christianity's doctrines perceived as idolatrous, such as the , or with atheism's implications for , prompting a return to monotheistic first principles without full Jewish observance. Communities have formed in diverse regions, with the hosting one of the largest concentrations, potentially exceeding 2,000 active participants as of the late 2010s, concentrated in areas with access to Jewish educational outreach. The stands out with the most cited sizable group, drawing from a cultural context amenable to monotheistic shifts amid Catholic dominance, though exact figures remain anecdotal and below national scales. Smaller but growing pockets exist in and the , where local study groups facilitate adherence amid broader societal . and , including potential Japanese interest, show sporadic activity but lack verified large-scale demographics, underscoring the movement's niche, non-proselytizing nature. In the and , digital platforms accelerated dissemination through online courses, forums, and resources explicating the Laws, enabling self-study and virtual communities that bypassed geographic barriers. Noahide-specific festivals and gatherings emerged to foster communal identity, adapting Jewish-inspired observances without prescribed rituals. However, adherents face empirical challenges, including the absence of formalized or holidays, leading to a perceived "worship void" and difficulties in sustaining without structured religious frameworks, as noted in accounts from the . These hurdles contribute to retention issues, with growth remaining organic and limited to intellectually committed individuals rather than institutional momentum.

Organizational Structures

Noahidism operates without a centralized , formal priesthood, or dedicated temples, emphasizing and communal observance under rabbinic guidance from Jewish scholars rather than an independent clerical hierarchy. Communities form around educational initiatives, with rabbis providing halachic interpretations while underscoring autonomy in applying the Seven Laws. In , the reestablished initiated the High Council of Bnei Noah in 2005, ordaining non-Jewish representatives to advise on Noahide matters and facilitate ties with . The associated Court for Issues of Bnei Noah adjudicates legal questions related to the laws, drawing on biblical principles and international norms for rulings applicable to gentiles. This body, though advisory, represents an effort to standardize halachic oversight without imposing Jewish ritual obligations. Educational support comes from decentralized networks, including Chabad-Lubavitch houses that disseminate teachings on the Noahide Laws through classes, publications, and online resources. Organizations like AskNoah.org, established around 2010, provide essays, forums, and codified guides such as Rabbi Moshe Weiner's The Divine Code for practical observance, fostering self-directed communities without institutional control. Rabbinic rulings clarify prohibitions and positive commandments, but Noahides retain discretion in daily implementation, avoiding the development of parallel religious institutions.

Recognitions and Influences

Governmental and Legislative Acknowledgments

In 1991, the United States Congress enacted Public Law 102-14 (H.J. Res. 104), designating March 1 as "Education Day, U.S.A." to honor Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson's contributions to education and moral values, while explicitly recognizing the Seven Noahide Laws as "the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization" and the ethical principles "upon which our great Nation was founded." This legislation underscores the Noahide Laws' role in fostering universal ethical standards essential to civilized order, positioning them as a foundational counter to moral relativism through non-sectarian imperatives like prohibitions on murder, theft, and idolatry. Successive U.S. presidents have reinforced this through annual proclamations for Education Day, U.S.A., affirming the Noahide Laws as divine commandments recorded in the that include bans on , , , , , and , thereby promoting their observance as a basis for global harmony and societal stability. For instance, President Ronald Reagan's Proclamation 4921 in 1982 highlighted their "eternal validity" as a moral code for humanity, a theme echoed in later declarations that link adherence to these laws with the preservation of foundational virtues against ethical decay. These acknowledgments frame the Noahide Laws not as religious imposition but as rational, universal guidelines derived from first principles of justice and human dignity, applicable to all nations without requiring .

Interfaith and Global Outreach

Chabad-Lubavitch has promoted Noahidism through international forums, including events affiliated with organizations dedicated to the Noahide code, such as gatherings uniting participants from multiple continents to affirm the seven universal laws as a basis for global morality. These efforts emphasize the laws' role in fostering ethical conduct among non-Jews without requiring conversion, positioning Noahidism as a framework for interfaith harmony rooted in monotheistic principles. Noahide teachings align with positions held by moral conservatives on issues like and , which are categorized under the prohibition against in the Noahide code; unnecessary termination of fetal and active mercy-killing violate the mandate to preserve human life as sacred. This convergence supports collaborative advocacy for justice and life-affirming policies, drawing on the laws' requirements for equitable courts and societal stability, without endorsing . In the 2020s, outreach has expanded digitally through podcasts and online platforms, featuring testimonies from Noahides worldwide and explanations of the laws' practical application to counter relativistic with objective moral standards derived from biblical covenants. These voluntary resources aim to provide non-Jews with accessible guidance for righteous living, emphasizing personal choice over imposition.

Controversies

Internal Jewish Debates

, in his (Hilchot Melachim 8:10), codified that bear a positive to teach gentiles the seven Noahide laws, emphasizing toward voluntary acceptance rather than , as forcible conversion or enforcement contradicts the laws' universal rationale. Subsequent rabbinic authorities, however, have debated the scope of this duty; while some affirm an active teaching role, others, including medieval commentators like , explicitly reject any mandate to compel observance, even in contexts of Jewish dominance over non-Jews, prioritizing ethical over imposition. This reflects a broader tension in halakhic discourse: the theoretical imperative for moral instruction versus practical concerns over reliability, with historical precedents showing sporadic rather than sustained adherence by non-Jews to these precepts amid and ethical lapses documented in Talmudic sources. In modern Orthodox circles, Chabad-Lubavitch has championed aggressive Noahide promotion, interpreting the Lubavitcher Rebbe's directives as requiring Jews to facilitate gentile education through global campaigns, publications, and institutions dedicated to the seven laws, viewing it as preparatory for messianic redemption. Conversely, segments of the Haredi community, particularly insular non-Chabad groups, exhibit caution or opposition, arguing that widespread risks diluting Jewish distinctiveness by encouraging gentiles toward quasi-Jewish practices, potentially inverting the halakhic separation between and the nations and echoing fears of spiritual assimilation akin to biblical warnings against intermingling. Zionist-leaning rabbis may align more with Chabad's universalist approach to bolster ethical societies supportive of Jewish , while anti-Zionist Haredim prioritize internal Jewish observance over external moral engineering. Practical disputes persist without consensus, such as the permissibility of Noahides joining services; some authorities permit limited attendance for educational purposes provided no Jewish-specific rituals are emulated, whereas others prohibit it to safeguard halakhic boundaries and avoid presumption of covenantal status. These variances underscore the absence of unified psak (halakhic ruling) on integrating Noahide adherents into Jewish communal spaces, with decisions often devolving to local rabbinic discretion based on intent and context.

External Religious Objections

Christian theologians have objected to Noahidism on the grounds that its prohibition against , as codified in the first of the seven laws, deems Trinitarian doctrine incompatible with , echoing ' classification of as (foreign worship) due to the deification of and of saints. This stance implies that Christians must renounce core tenets like the and to comply, rendering Noahide observance a rejection of salvific faith in Christ alone. Evangelical critics further portray the Noahide movement as a form of legalism that supplants grace with rabbinic authority, potentially fostering a "Judaizing" influence that undermines fulfillment of the law and promotes dependence on Jewish interpreters for righteousness. Such views frame Noahidism's expansion as an assault on Christian , wherein the Church inherits Israel's covenantal role, by reasserting Jewish oversight over non-Jewish and . Islamic objections arise from the assertion of Jewish scriptural authority in defining universal laws, which contradicts the Quran's claim to abrogate and perfect prior revelations, including the ; thus, Noahide codes are seen as invalid impositions lacking divine finality. While overlapping in and ethics, classical jurists like prioritized Sharia's comprehensive governance for all humanity under Islamic rule, implicitly rejecting alternative frameworks that bypass prophetic succession through . This positions Noahidism's growth as a challenge to Islam's universalist mandate, reviving pre-Islamic dispensations deemed obsolete.

Secular and Conspiracy Critiques

Secular critics, including some atheists, have characterized the Noahide laws as a rabbinic construct to retroactively extend minimal moral obligations to non-Jews, compensating for the Hebrew Bible's primary emphasis on Jewish covenantal duties. Others perceive active promotion of Noahidism, particularly by Chabad-Lubavitch, as a challenge to Western by injecting theistic ethics into public discourse. Mainstream media outlets, reflecting institutional priorities favoring high-profile topics, have given scant coverage to Noahidism, treating it as a marginal phenomenon with adherents numbering only in the low thousands worldwide, far below major religions or . Conspiracy theories, often circulated in online communities, portray Noahidism as a covert Jewish blueprint for global domination, alleging plans to enforce the seven laws via mechanisms or U.S. legislation, purportedly culminating in the beheading of non-compliant under an "" regime. These narratives frequently cite misinterpretations of Menachem Mendel Schneerson's 1980s-1990s advocacy for educating humanity about the laws, as well as non-binding U.S. congressional proclamations like 102-14 in 1991 honoring Schneerson's efforts, as evidence of insidious coordination. Empirical examination reveals no substantiation for coercive intent or capability: Schneerson's directives emphasized voluntary moral awareness and , not legal imposition, with Chabad's activities confined to educational campaigns absent any institutional power for enforcement. The theories' causal reasoning falters by erroneously linking axiomatic prohibitions—against , , , and sexual immorality, which parallel foundational secular codes like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' bans on arbitrary killing and property violations—with totalitarian blueprints, disregarding the absence of centralized authority, global adoption metrics (near-zero mandatory observance), and the laws' congruence with ethical baselines derived from observable human harms. Such claims, frequently rooted in anti-Semitic tropes akin to Protocols of the Elders of fabrications, lack verifiable chains of causation and rely on selective, decontextualized readings of primary texts.

Impact and Reception

Effects on Gentile Morality and Society

The Noahide laws prescribe a monotheistic ethical framework for non-Jews, prohibiting idolatry, blasphemy, , , sexual immorality (including , , and homosexual relations), and the consumption of flesh torn from living animals, while mandating the establishment of just courts. Proponents contend that faithful adherence fosters personal integrity and communal stability by reinforcing absolute moral boundaries, thereby mitigating behaviors associated with , such as unchecked violence or familial dissolution. The sexual prohibitions, in particular, are emphasized as safeguards for family units, aligning with broader observations that religious codes upholding monogamous heterosexual norms correlate with lower rates of divorce and child out-of-wedlock births in observant populations, though direct causation in Noahide-specific contexts requires further empirical validation. Verifiable societal impacts remain constrained by the movement's small scale, with estimates of global Noahide adherents numbering in the tens of thousands, predominantly individuals rather than cohesive communities. In theoretical terms, the judicial mandate promotes equitable dispute resolution, potentially reducing vigilantism or corruption in adherent circles, while monotheism counters pluralistic fragmentation that empirical cross-cultural studies link to elevated ethical ambiguity. However, no large-scale quantitative data tracks outcomes like crime reduction or enhanced civic participation among Noahides, limiting assessments to anecdotal reports of improved self-reported ethical conduct. Challenges arise from the laws' , which eschews rituals, festivals, or priestly structures, often resulting in practitioner isolation and diminished communal . Outreach initiatives, such as those from Breslev, underscore the necessity of external support to combat this, noting that solitary observance can exacerbate feelings of detachment in secular environments where collective bolsters adherence. This structural sparsity may hinder broader societal , as evidenced by the movement's reliance on online networks over institutionalized gatherings.

Jewish Community Responses

Chabad-Lubavitch has been a primary proponent of Noahidism among Jewish communities, viewing the promotion of the Seven Noahide Laws as a fulfillment of the biblical mandate for Jews to serve as "a light unto the nations" described in Isaiah 42:6. The movement's late leader, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, emphasized the universal obligation for non-Jews to adhere to these laws as a foundation for global morality, integrating it into Chabad's outreach efforts without encouraging conversion to Judaism, thereby extending Jewish ethical influence. This approach is seen by supporters as enhancing Jewish spiritual leadership while preserving the distinct covenantal roles between Jews and gentiles. Within , Noahidism garners growing acceptance as a means to foster alliances with non-Jews who affirm Jewish sovereignty over and monotheistic principles aligned with values. Rabbis in this stream, including those involved in advocacy, regard observant Noahides as ideological partners who reinforce Zionist goals through their rejection of and support for biblical land rights, without blurring Jewish particularism. However, caution persists among some Orthodox circles, particularly in Litvish yeshiva traditions, where emphasis remains on internal Jewish observance over external proselytizing to gentiles. Critics highlight the absence of historical rabbinic adjudication of Noahide cases under Jewish law, raising concerns about halachic inconsistencies and the risk of non-Jews adopting pseudo-Judaic practices without proper rabbinic courts or oversight. Prominent halakhic authorities have historically rejected mandatory active of the laws, prioritizing prevention of errors in application over widespread adoption. These reservations underscore fears that unstructured observance could lead to doctrinal dilution or conflicts with core Jewish legal frameworks.

Challenges for Observant Noahides

Observant Noahides encounter significant spiritual challenges due to the absence of formalized rituals, holidays, and liturgical texts specific to their path, often leaving a perceived void after departing from prior religious structures with established rites. Unlike , Noahidism prohibits the creation of new holidays or worship forms, restricting observance to universal commandments without additional devotional frameworks, which can exacerbate feelings of disconnection during seasonal or communal transitions. Practical guidance requires reliance on rabbinic authorities expert in Noahide , as non-Jews lack autonomous interpretive authority and must seek rulings on applications like dietary laws or interpersonal from qualified Jewish scholars, often remotely via organizations like AskNoah International. This dependency can introduce delays or inconsistencies, particularly when rabbinic opinions diverge on nuanced matters, compelling Noahides to navigate limited access to personalized Torah-based instruction. Social hurdles intensify isolation, with family opposition common among those from Christian backgrounds who interpret Noahide rejection of Jesus as a personal affront or theological betrayal, straining marital and parental relationships. Accounts describe challenges in households where spouses or children adhere to "man-made" faiths, necessitating boundaries to prevent influence on Noahide children while maintaining familial ties. In the 2020s, online platforms such as the and Netiv Center's virtual classes have provided virtual support networks, enabling shared learning and encouragement among dispersed adherents. However, these digital communities mitigate but do not fully resolve empirical isolation, as Noahides report persistent without proximate physical gatherings, underscoring a causal need for localized groups to sustain long-term observance amid sociocultural barriers.

References

  1. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=studiaantiqua
  2. https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/articles/biblical-sources-7-noachide-laws
  3. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-noahide-laws/
  4. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/62221/jewish/The-7-Noahide-Laws.htm
  5. https://academic.oup.com/book/10695/chapter/158743174
  6. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-modern-noahide-movement/
  7. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188354/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-9.htm
  8. https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.59a
  9. https://www.chabad.org/torah-texts/5458664/The-Talmud/Sanhedrin/Chapter-11/105a
  10. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188355/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-10.htm
  11. https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.105a
  12. https://www.mesora.org/NoahidevsTorahLaw.htm
  13. https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/details?shiurid=736060
  14. https://ohr.edu/explore_judaism/ask_the_rabbi/ask_the_rabbi/1605
  15. https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/339310
  16. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A11-13&version=ESV
  17. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/246609/jewish/The-Story-of-Noah-and-the-Ark-in-the-Bible.htm
  18. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+9%3A1-7&version=ESV
  19. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+9%3A4-6&version=ESV
  20. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+9%3A8-17&version=ESV
  21. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+9%3A13%2C17&version=ESV
  22. https://www.sefaria.org/Tosefta_Avodah_Zarah.9.4
  23. https://rabbikaganoff.com/noahides-halacha/
  24. https://library.yctorah.org/files/2016/07/Dat_ha-emet_-FINAL_10-23_revision_7.pdf
  25. https://ohr.edu/1605
  26. https://www.torahmusings.com/2024/01/laws-of-ever-min-ha-chai/
  27. https://faculty.history.umd.edu/BCooperman/Medieval/GaryRemer.pdf
  28. https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/62180/jewish/1983-The-Rebbes-Message-to-Mankind.htm
  29. https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/livingtorah/player_cdo/aid/712309/jewish/Universal-Mission.htm
  30. https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/house-joint-resolution/104/text/enr
  31. https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/1167653/jewish/Education-Day-USA-1991.htm
  32. https://www.jlaw.com/Articles/noach2.html
  33. http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Questions_and_Answers_on_Bnei_Noah_by_Rav_Yoel_Shwartz
  34. https://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Jerusalem_Court_for_Issues_of_Bnei_Noah
  35. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Theory_and_Practice_of_Universal_Eth.html?id=tMvesgEACAAJ
  36. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/6578118
  37. https://www.noahide-academy.com/our_team/shimon-cowen/
  38. https://www.religionwatch.com/noahides-seen-as-useful-allies-for-zionists/
  39. https://mizrachi.org/hamizrachi/not-just-the-seven-noahide-mitzvot/
  40. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/263/article/737561
  41. https://www.facebook.com/groups/649385871155760/posts/706827892078224/
  42. https://newbooksnetwork.com/messianic-zionism-in-the-digital-age
  43. https://breslev.com/485227/
  44. https://breslev.com/488506/
  45. https://asknoah.org/
  46. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/90646
  47. https://jewishchronicle.timesofisrael.com/noahides-establish-website-for-interested-followers/
  48. https://asknoah.org/video/rabbi-weiner-interview
  49. https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/house-joint-resolution/104/text
  50. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-105/pdf/STATUTE-105-Pg44.pdf
  51. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-5956-education-day-usa-1989-and-1990
  52. https://thepostil.com/noahides-or-the-keeners/
  53. https://chabadinfo.com/moshiach/three-continents-unite-with-g-d-at-un-noahide-organization/
  54. https://asknoah.org/faq/abortion-euthanasia-prohibited-as-murder
  55. https://www.chabadresearch.net/seven-noahide-laws
  56. https://www.noahideacademy.org/blog/categories/podcasts
  57. https://rss.com/podcasts/asknoah/
  58. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/5559679/jewish/Video.htm
  59. https://www.nishma.org/articles/update/update5757-1-noahide.htm
  60. https://mymorningmeditations.com/2016/02/18/are-christians-and-messianic-gentiles-idolaters-according-to-judaism/
  61. https://academic.oup.com/book/10695/chapter/158744769
  62. https://www.messianicbible.com/feature/can-salvation-come-through-the-seven-noahide-laws/
  63. https://billrandles.wordpress.com/2020/10/06/what-is-the-noahide-movement-and-why-is-it-toxic/
  64. https://www.fisheaters.com/lawofnoah.html
  65. https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/119907/are-muslims-fit-to-be-noahides
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362133225_Imam_Al-Shafi%27i%27s_Thought_About_Human_Obligations_and_Rights_in_Islamic_Law
  67. https://www.alsadiqin.org/en/index.php/Islam_as_a_Noahide_Religion/Torah_Jews_as_Muslims:_an_Ancient_Paradigm_whose_Time_has_Come
  68. https://www.quora.com/How-do-atheists-feel-about-the-Noahide-Laws
  69. https://www.reddit.com/r/Judaism/comments/1e3pq7p/what_are_the_noahide_laws_and_what_connection/
  70. https://mythdetector.com/en/anti-semitic-disinformation-about-noahide-laws-and-the-elders-of-zion/
  71. https://politicalpotatoes.substack.com/p/idaho-aryan-bros-pettinger-reilly-whalen
  72. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Douglas-Youvan/publication/390702296_The_Menorah_and_the_Mandate_Chabad-Lubavitch_and_the_Architecture_of_Invisible_Power/links/67f9b0b9bfbe974b23a946b0/The-Menorah-and-the-Mandate-Chabad-Lubavitch-and-the-Architecture-of-Invisible-Power.pdf
  73. https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/816636/jewish/The-Rebbes-Guidance-to-US-Presidents.htm
  74. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/belief/articles/the-gentiles-who-act-like-jews
  75. https://breslev.com/446109/
  76. https://noahide.info/
  77. https://www.timesofisrael.com/what-do-the-third-temple-movement-and-noahide-laws-have-in-common-a-far-right-vision/
  78. https://buildingajewishlife.com/2012/02/why-not-be-a-noachide/
  79. https://asknoah.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=1823
  80. https://www.reddit.com/r/Judaism/comments/16avdyn/how_can_someone_follow_the_noahide_laws_and_whats/
  81. https://asknoah.org/forum/archive/index.php?thread-2022.html
  82. https://asknoah.org/essay/being-noahide-with-family-who-arent-there-yet
  83. https://www.facebook.com/groups/simplynoahidegroup/
  84. https://netivonline.org/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.