Hubbry Logo
OpenStreetMapOpenStreetMapMain
Open search
OpenStreetMap
Community hub
OpenStreetMap
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
OpenStreetMap
OpenStreetMap
OpenStreetMap
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a map database maintained by a community of volunteers via open collaboration.[5] Contributors collect data from surveys, trace from aerial photo imagery or satellite imagery, and import from other freely licensed geodata sources. OpenStreetMap is freely licensed under the Open Database License and is commonly used to make electronic maps, inform turn-by-turn navigation, and assist in humanitarian aid and data visualisation. OpenStreetMap uses its own data model to store geographical features which can then be exported into other GIS file formats. The OpenStreetMap website itself is an online map, geodata search engine, and editor.

Key Information

OpenStreetMap was created by Steve Coast in response to the Ordnance Survey, the United Kingdom's national mapping agency, failing to release its data to the public under free licences in 2004. Initially, maps in OSM were created only via GPS traces, but it was quickly populated by importing public domain geographical data such as the U.S. TIGER and by tracing imagery as permitted by source. OpenStreetMap's adoption was accelerated by the development of supporting software and applications and Google Maps' 2012 introduction of pricing.

The database is hosted by the OpenStreetMap Foundation, a non-profit organisation registered in England and Wales, and is funded mostly via donations.

History

[edit]
OpenStreetMap was founded by Steve Coast in 2004.

Steve Coast founded the project in 2004 while attending University College London, initially focusing on mapping the United Kingdom.[4] In the UK and elsewhere, government-run and tax-funded projects like the Ordnance Survey created massive datasets but declined to freely and widely distribute them. The first contribution was a street that Coast entered in December 2004 after cycling around Regent's Park in London with a GPS tracking unit.[6][7][8] In April 2006, the OpenStreetMap Foundation was established to encourage the growth, development and distribution of free geospatial data and provide geospatial data for anybody to use and share.

In April 2007, Automotive Navigation Data (AND) donated a complete road data set for the Netherlands and trunk road data for India and China to the project.[9] By July 2007, when the first "State of the Map" (SotM) conference[10] was held, there were 9,000 registered users. In October 2007, OpenStreetMap completed the import of a US Census TIGER road dataset.[11] In December 2007, Oxford University became the first major organisation to use OpenStreetMap data on their main website.[12] Ways to import and export data have continued to grow – by 2008, the project developed tools to export OpenStreetMap data to power portable GPS units, replacing their existing proprietary and out-of-date maps.[13] In March 2008, two founders of CloudMade, a commercial company that uses OpenStreetMap data, announced that they had received venture capital funding of €2.4 million.[14] In 2010, AOL launched an OSM-based version of MapQuest and committed $1 million to increasing OSM's coverage of local communities for its Patch website.[15]

In 2012, the launch of pricing for Google Maps led several prominent websites to switch from their service to OpenStreetMap and other competitors.[16] Chief among these were Foursquare and Craigslist, which adopted OpenStreetMap, and Apple, which ended a contract with Google and launched a self-built mapping platform using TomTom and OpenStreetMap data.[17]

As of 2025, TomTom, Microsoft, Esri and Meta are the highest-tier corporate sponsors of the OpenStreetMap Foundation.[18]

Content

[edit]

The OSM project aims to collect data about stationary objects throughout the world, including infrastructure and other aspects of the built environment, points of interest, land use and cover classifications, and topography. Map features range in scale from international boundaries to hyperlocal details such as shops and street furniture. Although historically significant features and ongoing construction projects are routinely included in the database, the project's scope is limited to the present day, as opposed to the past or future.[19]

Data structure

[edit]
see caption
Illustration of OpenStreetMap data primitives (nodes, ways and relations)

OSM's data model differs markedly from that of a conventional GIS or CAD system. It is a topological data structure without the formal concept of a layer, allowing thematically diverse data to commingle and interconnect. A map feature or element is modelled as one of three geometric primitives:[20][21]

  • A node is a point with a geographic coordinate expressed in the WGS 84 coordinate system. A standalone node represents a point of interest, such as a mountain peak.[22]
  • A way is an ordered list of nodes that represents a polyline or polygon, depending on its metadata and whether it forms a closed ring. A way can represent either a linear feature, such as a street or river, or an area, such as a forest, park, parking lot, or lake.[22] Multiple ways can share a node to represent a connection, for instance, a street intersection or a confluence of two rivers. The node itself can simultaneously represent another feature, for example, an entrance that connects a footway to a building. Until 2007, a way was formally composed of explicit segments between pairs of nodes.
  • A relation is an ordered list of nodes, ways and other relations (together called members). A relation can optionally specify the role of each of its members. Relations form complex geometries or represent abstract relationships among members. Examples include turn restrictions on roads, routes that span several existing ways (for instance, a long-distance motorway), and areas with holes.[22] Multiple relations can contain the same member to represent an overlap, for example, a route concurrency or two adjoining political boundaries.

The OpenStreetMap data primitives are stored and processed in different formats. OpenStreetMap server uses PostgreSQL database, with one table for each data primitive, with individual objects stored as rows.[23][24]

The data structure is defined as part of the OSM API. The current version of the API, v0.6, was released in 2009. A 2023 study found that this version's changes to the relation data structure had the effect of reducing the total number of relations; however, it simultaneously lowered the barrier to creating new relations and spurred the application of relations to new use cases.[25]

"Any tags you like"

[edit]

OSM manages metadata as a folksonomy. Each element contains key–value pairs, called tags, that identify and describe the feature.[22] A recommended ontology of map features (the meaning of tags) is maintained on a wiki. New tagging schemes can always be proposed by a popular vote of a written proposal in OpenStreetMap wiki, however, there is no requirement to follow this process: editors are free to use any tags they like to describe a feature. There are over 89 million different kinds of tags in use as of June 2017.[26]

Coverage

[edit]

OpenStreetMap data has been favourably compared with proprietary datasources,[27] although as of 2009 data quality varied across the world.[28][29] A study in 2011 compared OSM data with TomTom for Germany. For car navigation TomTom has 9% more information, while for the entire street network, OSM has 27% more information.[30] In 2011, TriMet, which serves the Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area, found that OSM's street data, consumed through the routing engine OpenTripPlanner and the search engine Apache Solr, yields better results than analogous GIS datasets managed by local government agencies.[31]

A 2021 study compared the OpenStreetMap Carto style's symbology to that of the Soviet Union's comprehensive military mapping programme, finding that OSM matched the Soviet maps in coverage of some features such as road infrastructure but gave less prominence to the natural environment.[32]

A study from 2021 found the mean completeness of shop data in the German regions Baden-Württemberg and Saxony to be 88% and 82% respectively. Instead of comparing OSM data to other datasets, the authors looked at how the number of shops developed over time. They then determined the expected number of shops by estimating the saturation level.[33]

According to a 2024 study using PyPSA, OSM has the most detailed and up-to-date publicly available coverage of the European high-voltage electrical grid, comparable to official data from the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity.[34]

License

[edit]

All data added to the project needs to have a licence compatible with the Open Data Commons Open Database Licence (ODbL). This can include out-of-copyright information, public domain or other licences. Software used in the production and presentation of OpenStreetMap data may have separate licensing terms.

OpenStreetMap data and derived tiles were originally published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence (CC BY-SA) with the intention of promoting free use and redistribution of the data. In September 2012, the licence was changed to the ODbL in order to define its bearing on data rather than representation more specifically.[35][36] As part of this relicensing process, some of the map data was removed from the public distribution. This included all data contributed by members that did not agree to the new licensing terms, as well as all subsequent edits to those affected objects. It also included any data contributed based on input data that was not compatible with the new terms.

Estimates suggested that over 97% of data would be retained globally, but certain regions would be affected more than others, such as in Australia where 24 to 84% of objects would be retained, depending on the type of object.[37] Ultimately, more than 99% of the data was retained, with Australia and Poland being the countries most severely affected by the change.[38] The license change and resulting deletions prompted a group of dissenting mappers to establish Free Open Street Map (FOSM), a fork of OSM that remained under the previous license.[39]

Map tiles provided by the OpenStreetMap project were licensed under CC-BY-SA-2.0 until 1 August 2020. The ODbL license requires attribution to be attached to maps produced from OpenStreetMap data, but does not require that any particular license be applied to those maps. "©OpenStreetMap Contributors" with link to ODbL copyright page as attribution requirement is used on the site.[40]

Distribution

[edit]

OSM publishes official database dumps of the entire "planet" for reuse on minutely and weekly intervals, formatted as XML or binary Protocol Buffers. Alternative third-party distributions provide access to OSM data in other formats or to more manageable subsets of the data. Geofabrik publishes extracts of the database in OSM and shapefile formats for individual countries and political subdivisions. Amazon Web Services publishes the planet on S3 for querying in Athena.[41] As part of the QLever project, the University of Freiburg publishes Turtle dumps suitable for linked data systems.[42] From 2020 to 2024, Meta published the Daylight Map Distribution, which applied quality assurance processes and added some external datasets to OSM data to make it more production-ready.[43] OSM data also forms a major part of the Overture Maps Foundation's dataset and commercial datasets from Mapbox and MapTiler.[44]

Mapmaking

[edit]

Data sources

[edit]
Editing with JOSM after a ground survey

Map data is collected by ground survey, personal knowledge, digitizing from imagery, and government data. Ground survey data is collected by volunteers traditionally using tools such as a handheld GPS unit, a notebook, digital camera and voice recorder.

Software applications on smartphones (mobile devices) have made it easy for anybody to survey. The data is then entered into the OpenStreetMap database using a number of software tools including JOSM and Merkaator.[45] Additionally, more recently apps such as StreetComplete offer "quests" to users in nearby vicinity, allowing them to add metadata to specific points of interest (such as, for example, the opening hours of a restaurant or whether or not a particular crosswalk has tactile paving).

Mapathon competition events are also held by local OpenStreetMap teams and by non-profit organisations and local governments to map a particular area.

The availability of aerial photography and other data from commercial and government sources has added important sources of data for manual editing and automated imports. Special processes are in place to handle automated imports and avoid legal and technical problems.

Surveys and personal knowledge

[edit]
Surveying routes with a satellite navigation device

Ground surveys are performed by a mapper, on foot, bicycle, or in a car, motorcycle, or boat. Map data is typically recorded on a GPS unit or on a smart phone with mapping app; a common file format is GPX.

Once the data has been collected, it is entered into the database by uploading it onto the project's website together with appropriate attribute data. As collecting and uploading data may be separated from editing objects, contribution to the project is possible without using a GPS unit, such as by using paper mapping.

Similar to users contributing data using a GPS unit, corporations (e.g. Amazon) with large vehicle fleets may use telemetry data from the vehicles to contribute data to OpenStreetMap.[46]

Some committed contributors adopt the task of mapping whole towns and cities, or organising mapping parties to gather the support of others to complete a map area.

A large number of less-active users contributes corrections and small additions to the map.[citation needed]

Satellite/Aerial images

[edit]

Maxar,[47] Bing,[48] ESRI, and Mapbox are some of the providers of aerial/satellite imagery which are used as a backdrop for map production.

Yahoo! (2006–2011),[49][50] Bing (2010 – present),[48] and DigitalGlobe (2017[47]–2023[51]) allowed their aerial photography, satellite imagery to be used as a backdrop for map production. For a period from 2009 to 2011, NearMap Pty Ltd made their high-resolution PhotoMaps (of major Australian cities, plus some rural Australian areas) available under a CC BY-SA licence.[52]

Street-level image data

[edit]

Data from several street-level image platforms are available as map data photo overlays. Bing Streetside 360° image tracks, and the open and crowdsourced Mapillary and KartaView platforms provide generally smartphone and dashcam images. Additionally, a Mapillary traffic sign data layer, a product of user-submitted images is also available.[53]

Government data

[edit]

Some government agencies have released official data on appropriate licences. This includes the United States, where works of the federal government are placed under public domain. In the United States, most roads originate from TIGER from the Census Bureau.[54] Geographic names were initially sourced from Geographic Names Information System, and some areas contain water features from the National Hydrography Dataset. In the UK, some Ordnance Survey OpenData is imported. In Canada Natural Resources Canada's CanVec vector data and GeoBase provide landcover and streets.[55]

Globally, OpenStreetMap initially used the prototype global shoreline from NOAA. Due to it being oversimplified and crude, it has been mainly replaced by other government sources or manual tracing.[citation needed]

Out-of-copyright maps can be good sources of information about features that do not change frequently. Copyright periods vary, but in the UK Crown copyright expires after 50 years and hence old Ordnance Survey maps can legally be used. A complete set of UK 1 inch/mile maps from the late 1940s and early 1950s has been collected, scanned, and is available online as a resource for contributors.[56]

Editing software

[edit]
A map with different colored icons on it, currently a quest about a house number
StreetComplete asking user a question. User filled in the answer. After tapping "OK" this answer will be added to an OpenStreetMap database.

The map data can be edited from a number of editing applications that provide aids including satellite and aerial imagery, street-level imagery, GPS traces, and photo and voice annotations.

By default, the official OSM website directs contributors to the Web-based iD editor.[57][58] Meta develops a fork of this editor, Rapid, that provides access to external datasets, including some derived from machine learning detections.[59] For complex or large-scale changes, experienced users often turn to more powerful desktop editing applications such as JOSM and Potlatch.

Several mobile applications also edit OSM. Go Map!! and Vespucci are the primary full-featured editors for iOS and Android, respectively. StreetComplete is an Android application designed for laypeople around a guided question-and-answer format. CoMaps, Every Door, Maps.me, Organic Maps, and OsmAnd include basic functionality for editing points of interest.

Between 2018 and 2023, the top five editing tools by number of edits were JOSM, iD, StreetComplete, Rapid, and Potlatch.[60]

Quality assurance

[edit]

OSM accepts contributions from the general public. Changesets submitted through editors and the OSM API immediately enter the database and are quickly published for reuse, without going through peer review beforehand. The API only validates changes for basic well-formedness, but not for topological or logical consistency or for adherence to community norms.

As a crowdsourced project, OSM is susceptible to several forms of data vandalism, including copyright infringement, graffiti, and spam.[61] Overall, vandalism accounts for an estimated 0.2% of edits to OSM, which is relatively low compared to vandalism on Wikipedia. Members of the community detect and fix most unintentional errors and vandalism promptly,[62] by monitoring the slippy map and revision history on the main website, as well as by searching for issues using tools like OSMCha, OSM Inspector, and Osmose. In addition to community vigilance, the OpenStreetMap Foundation's Data Working Group and a group of administrators are responsible for responding to vandals.[61] As of 2022, a comprehensive security assessment of the OSM data model has yet to take place.[63]

There have been several high-profile incidents of vandalism and other errors in OSM:

  • In 2012, contractors affiliated with Google were found to be sabotaging OSM's navigation data in major cities around the world. Google responded by dismissing the contractors.[64]
  • In 2018, a vandal renamed New York City and some nearby map features to antisemitic names. Although the vandalism was quickly expunged, third-party replication lag caused it to resurface to readers of Wikipedia, as well as to users of Mapbox-powered applications such as Zillow, Snapchat, and Citibike.[65]
  • In 2020, Microsoft Flight Simulator players discovered an impossibly thin, 212-story building in a Melbourne suburb, which was traced to a typographical error that had gone unnoticed in OSM for a year.[66][67]
  • In 2021, Balad, an Iranian developer of OSM-based mobile navigation applications, apologized after the OSM community caught an employee vandalising streets in Iran.[68]
  • In 2023, the Taj Mahal was misidentified as "Shiva Kshetra (Shiv Mandir)" (a Hindu temple dedicated to Shiva) for 13 days until contributors from Kerala discovered and fixed it.[69]

Players of Pokémon Go have been known to vandalize OSM, one of the game's map data sources, to manipulate gameplay. However, this vandalism is casual, rarely sustained, and it is predictable based on the mechanics of the game.[62]

Community

[edit]
Field survey in various parts of the Guagua by a group of mappers. They took notes and photos, and recorded GPS tracks. Shown in the photo is the Betis group standing beside one of the Death March trail monuments.

The project has a geographically diverse user-base, due to emphasis of local knowledge and "on-the-ground" situation in the process of data collection.[70] Many early contributors were cyclists who survey with and for other cyclists, charting cycleroutes and navigable trails.[71] Others are GIS professionals. Contributors are predominately men, with only 3–5% being women.[72]

By August 2008, shortly after the second The State of the Map conference was held, there were over 50,000 registered contributors; by March 2009, there were 100,000 and by the end of 2009 the figure was nearly 200,000. In April 2012, OpenStreetMap cleared 600,000 registered contributors.[73] On 6 January 2013, OpenStreetMap reached one million registered users.[74] Around 30% of users have contributed at least one point to the OpenStreetMap database.[75][76]

As per a study conducted in 2011, only 38% of members carried out at least one edit and only 5% of members created more than 1000 nodes. Most members are in Europe (72%).[77] According to another study, when a competing maps platform is launched, OSM attracts fewer new contributors and pre-existing contributors increase their level of contribution possibly driven by their ideological attachment to the platform. Overall, there is a negative effect on the quantum of contributions.[78]

Commercial contributors

[edit]

Some companies freely license satellite/aerial/street imagery sources from which OpenStreetMap contributors trace roads and features, while other companies make data available for importing map data. Automotive Navigation Data (AND) provided a complete road data set for Netherlands and trunk roads data for China and India. Amazon Logistics uses OpenStreetMap for navigation and has a team which revises the map based on GPS traces and feedback from its drivers.[79] In eight Southeast Asian countries, Grab has contributed more than 800,000 kilometres (500,000 mi) of roads based on drivers' GPS traces, including many narrow alleyways that are missing from other mapping platforms.[80] eCourier also contributes its drivers' GPS traces to OSM.

According to a study, about 17% of road kilometers were last touched by corporate teams in March 2020.[81] The top 13 corporate contributors during 2014–2020 include Apple, Kaart, Amazon, Facebook, Mapbox, Digital Egypt, Grab, Microsoft, Telenav, Developmentseed, Uber, Lightcyphers and Lyft.[79]

According to OpenStreetMap Statistics, the over all percentage of edits from corporations peaked at about 10% in 2020 and 2021 and has since fallen to about 2-3% in 2024.[82]

Non-governmental organisations

[edit]

Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) is a nonprofit organisation promoting community mapping across the world. It developed the open source HOT Tasking Manager for collaboration, and contributed to mapping efforts after the April 2015 Nepal earthquake, the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, and the 2016 Ecuador earthquake. The Missing Maps Project, founded by the American Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders, and other NGOs, uses HOT Tasking Manager. The University of Heidelberg hosts the Disastermappers Project for training university students in mapping for humanitarian purposes. When Ebola broke out in 2014, the volunteers mapped 100,000 buildings and hundreds of miles of roads in Guinea in just five days.[83] Local groups such as Ramani Huria in Dar es Salaam incorporate OSM mapping into their community resilience programmes. Community emergency response teams in San Francisco and elsewhere organize field surveys and mapathons to contribute information about fire alarm call boxes, hazard symbols, and other relevant features.[84]

Conferences

[edit]
In 2022, over 600 people attended State of the Map in Florence or online.[85]

Since 2007, the OpenStreetMap community has organised State of the Map (SotM), an annual international conference at which stakeholders present on technical progress and discuss policy issues.[10][86] The conference is held each year in a different city around the world. Various regional editions of State of the Map are also held for each continent, regions such as the Baltics and Latin America, and some countries with especially active local communities, such as France, Germany, and the United States.

Operation

[edit]
OSM application architectural components

The official OSM website at openstreetmap.org is the project's main hub for contributors. A reference implementation of a slippy map (featuring a selection of third-party tile layers), a revision log, and integrations with basic geocoders and route planners facilitate the community's management of the database contents. Logged-in users can access an embedded copy of the iD editor and shortcuts for desktop editors for contributing to the database, as well as some rudimentary social networking features such as user profiles and diaries. The website's built-in REST API and OAuth authentication enable third-party applications to programmatically interact with the site's major functionality, including submitting changes. Much of the website runs as a Ruby on Rails application backed by a PostgreSQL database.

Software development

[edit]

Strictly speaking, the OSM project produces only a geographic database, leaving data consumers to handle every aspect of postprocessing the data and presenting it to end users. However, a large ecosystem of command line tools, software libraries, and cloud services has developed around OSM, much of it as free and open-source software.[citation needed]

Two kinds of software stacks have emerged for rendering OSM data as an interactive slippy map. In one, a server-side rendering engine such as Mapnik prerenders the data as a series of raster image tiles, then serves them using a library such as mod_tile. A library such as OpenLayers or Leaflet displays these tiles on the client side on the slippy map. Alternatively, a server application converts raw OSM data into vector tiles according to a schema, such as Mapbox Streets, OpenMapTiles, or Shortbread. These tiles are rendered on the client side by a library such as the Mapbox Maps SDK, MapLibre, Mapzen's Tangrams, or OpenLayers. Applications such as Mapbox Studio allow designers to author vector styles in an interactive, visual environment.[87] Vector maps are especially common among three-dimensional mapping applications and mobile applications. Plugins are available for embedding slippy maps in content management systems such as WordPress.[88][non-primary source needed]

A geocoder indexes map data so that users can search it by name and address (geocoding) or look up an address based on a given coordinate pair (reverse geocoding). Several geocoders are designed to index OSM data, including Nominatim (from the Latin, 'by name'), which is built into the official OSM website along with GeoNames.[89][90] Komoot's Photon search engine provides incremental search functionality based on a Nominatim database. The nonprofit Social Web Foundation's places.pub formats OSM locations as ActivityPub objects, enabling social media applications to enrich geocodes associated with check-ins.[91] Element 84's natural language geocoder uses a large language model to identify OSM geometries to return.[92]

A variety of route planning libraries and services are based on OSM data. OSM's official website has featured GraphHopper, the Open Source Routing Machine, and Valhalla since February 2015.[93][94] Other widely deployed routing engines include Openrouteservice and OpenTripPlanner, which specializes in public transport routing.[citation needed]

Criticism

[edit]

In 2018 one of OSM's former moderators[95] and longtime contributors,[96] Serge Wroclawski, criticised OSM as being more of a database than a map and for difficulties in search and edit functionality. He also criticised OSM's unclear usage policies, geocoder capability, lack of a moderation/review model, lack of layers, lack of permanent IDs, slowly-evolving APIs, and hidden gatekeepers who may be hostile to change, which conflicts with its claim to be an open map.[97]

Uses

[edit]

OSM is an important source of geographic data in many fields, including transportation, analysis, public services, and humanitarian aid. However, much of its use by consumers is indirect via third-party products, because customer reviews and aerial and satellite imagery are not part of the project per se.[44]

Cartography

[edit]
OpenStreetMap of Soho, central London, shown in the "Carto" OpenStreetMap layer

A variety of applications and services allow users to visualise OSM data in the form of a map. The official OSM website features an interactive slippy map interface so that users can efficiently edit maps and view changesets. It presents the general-purpose OpenStreetMap Carto style alongside a selection of specialised styles for cycling and public transport.

Beyond this reference implementation, community-maintained map applications focus on alternative cartographic representations and specialised use cases. For example, OpenRailwayMap is a detailed online map of the world's railway infrastructure based on OSM data.[98] OpenSeaMap is a world nautical chart built as a mashup of OpenStreetMap, crowdsourced water depth tracks, and third-party weather and bathymetric data. OpenTopoMap uses OSM and SRTM data to create topographic maps.[99] Tactile Map Automated Production prints tactile maps that feature embossed streets, paths, and railroads from OSM.[100]

On the desktop, applications such as GNOME Maps and Marble provide their own interactive styles. GIS suites such as QGIS allow users to produce their own custom maps based on the same data.

Geolocation

[edit]
Map
Wikimedia Maps ({{Maplink}}) example, highlighting the Eiffel Tower using live OpenStreetMap data

Many commercial and noncommercial websites feature maps powered by OSM data in locator maps, store locators, infographics, story maps, and other mashups. Locator maps on Wikipedia and Wikivoyage articles for cities and points of interest are powered by a MediaWiki extension and the OSM-based Wikimedia Maps service.[101] The locator maps on Craigslist,[102] Facebook,[103] Flickr,[104] Foursquare City Guide,[105] Gurtam's Wialon,[106] and Snapchat[107] are also powered by OSM. From 2013 to 2022, GitHub visualized any uploaded GeoJSON data atop an OSM-based Mapbox basemap.[108][109]

In 2012, Apple quietly switched the locator map in iPhoto from Google Maps to OSM.[110] Interactive OSM-based maps appear in many mobile navigation applications, fitness applications, and augmented reality games, such as Strava.[111]

Geospatial analysis

[edit]
Raw OpenStreetMap data of India loading in QGIS for analysis and map-making

The Overpass API searches the OSM database for features whose metadata or topology match criteria specified in a structured query language.[112] Overpass turbo is an integrated development environment for querying this API. Bellingcat develops an alternative Overpass frontend for geolocating photographs.[113]

QLever and Sophox are triplestores that accept standard SPARQL queries to return facts about the OSM database. Geographic information retrieval systems such as NLMaps Web[114] and OSCAR[115] answer natural language queries based on OSM data. OSMnx is a Python package for analysing and visualising the OSM road network.[116]

OSM is often a source for realistic, large-scale transport network analyses[117] because the raw road network data is freely available or because of aspects of coverage that are uncommon in proprietary alternatives. OSM data can be imported into professional-grade traffic simulation frameworks such as Aimsun Next,[118] Eclipse SUMO,[119] and MATSim,[120] as well as urban planning–focused simulators such as A/B Street.[121] A team at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute has used Valhalla's map matching function to evaluate advanced driver-assistance systems.[122] The United States Census Bureau has analysed routes generated by the Open Source Routing Machine along with American Community Survey data to develop a socioeconomic profile of commuters affected by the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse.[123]

OSM is also used in conservation and land-use planning research. The annual Forest Landscape Integrity Index is based on a comprehensive map of remaining roadless areas derived from OSM's road network.[124][125] Computer vision researchers have trained convolutional neural networks on OSM's land use areas to perform feature detection and image segmentation on Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, both globally (OpenSentinelMap) and in Europe (OSMlanduse).[126][127]

Some newsrooms routinely incorporate OSM data into their workflows and data journalism projects. The Chicago Tribune maintains a dashboard of crime in Chicago visualized against an OSM basemap.[128] The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times accompany articles with locator maps and more in-depth visuals that rely on OSM's hyperlocal coverage of places that have less detail in proprietary maps.[129][130]

Various groups, including researchers, data journalists, the Open Knowledge Foundation, and Geochicas, have used OSM in conjunction with Wikidata to explore the demographics of people honoured by street names and raise awareness of gender bias in naming decisions.[131][132][133]

[edit]
A device on the dashboard of a Sydtrafik bus in Denmark tracks the operator's route using OSM data.

OSM is a data source for some Web-based map services. In 2010, Bing Maps introduced an option to display an OSM-based map[134] and later began including building data from OSM by default.[67] Wheelmap.org is a portal for discovering wheelchair-accessible places, mashing up OSM data with a separate, crowdsourced customer review database.

Mobile applications such as CoMaps, CycleStreets, Karta GPS, Komoot,[135] Locus Map, Maps.me, Organic Maps, and OsmAnd also provide offline route planning capabilities. Apple Maps uses OSM data in many countries.[136] Some of Garmin's GPS products incorporate OSM data.[137] OSM is a popular source for road data among Iranian navigation applications, such as Balad.[68] Geotab[138] and TeleNav[139] also use OSM data in their in-car navigation systems.

Some public transportation providers rely on OpenStreetMap data in their route planning services and for other analysis needs.

OSM data appears in the driver or rider application or powers backend operations for ridesharing companies and related services.[140] In 2022, Grab completed a migration from Google Maps and Here Maps to an in-house, OSM-based navigation solution, reducing trip times by about 90 seconds.[80] In 2024, Ola introduced a mapping platform partly based on OSM data.[141]

In 2019, owners of Tesla cars found that the Smart Summon automatic valet parking feature within Tesla Autopilot relied on OSM's coverage of parking lot details.[142] Webots uses OSM data to simulate realistic surroundings for autonomous vehicles.[143]

Humanitarian aid

[edit]
See also: Crisis mapping, Smart mob, and Ushahidi
OpenStreetMap Philippines GPS map, an end-product of over a thousand crisis mappers that contributed almost 5 million map updates during the 2013 Haiyan humanitarian activation[144]

Humanitarian aid agencies use OSM data both proactively and reactively. OSM's road and building coverage allow them to discover patterns of disease outbreaks and target interventions such as antimalarial medications toward remote villages. After a disaster occurs, they produce large-format printed maps and downloadable maps for GPS tracking units for aid workers to use in the field.[145]

The 2010 Haiti earthquake established a model for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to collaborate with international organisations. OpenStreetMap and Crisis Commons volunteers used available satellite imagery to map the roads, buildings and refugee camps of Port-au-Prince in just two days, building "the most complete digital map of Haiti's roads".[146][147] The resulting data and maps have been used by several organisations providing relief aid, such as the World Bank, the European Commission Joint Research Centre, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, UNOSAT and others.[148]

After Haiti, the OpenStreetMap community continued mapping to support humanitarian organisations for various crises and disasters. After the Northern Mali conflict (January 2013), Typhoon Haiyan[149][150] in the Philippines (November 2013), and the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa (March 2014), the OpenStreetMap community in association with the NGO Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) has shown it can play a significant role in supporting humanitarian organisations.[83]

Gaming

[edit]

OSM is a map data source for many location-based games that require broad coverage of local details such as streets and buildings. One of the earliest such games was Hasbro's short-lived Monopoly City Streets (2009), which offered a choice between OSM and Google Maps as the playing board.[151][152] Battlefield 4 (2013) used a customized OSM-based Mapbox map in its leaderboards.[153] In 2013, Ballardia shut down testing of World of the Living Dead: Resurrection, because too many players attempted to use the Google Maps–based game, then relaunched it after switching to OSM, which could handle thousands of players.[154]

Innsbruck in FlightGear Flight Simulator

Flight simulators combine OSM's coverage of roads and structures with other sources of natural environment data, acting as sophisticated 3D map renderers, in order to add realism to the ground below. X-Plane 10 (2011) replaced TIGER and VMAP0 with OSM for roads, railways, and some bodies of water.[155][156] Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020) introduced software-generated building models based in part on OSM data.[67] In 2020, FlightGear Flight Simulator officially integrated OSM buildings and roads into the official scenery.[157]

City-building games and business simulation games use a subset of OSM data as a base layer to take advantage of the player's familiarity with their surroundings. In NIMBY Rails (2021), the player develops a railway network that coexists with real-world roads and bodies of water.[158] In Jutsu Games' Infection Free Zone (2024), the player builds fortifications amid a post-apocalyptic world based on OSM streets and buildings.[159] Other titles include City Bus Manager, Global Farmer, and Logistical: Earth. These games incorporate realistic elements but take some liberties to enhance gameplay and mitigate gaps in OSM's coverage.[160]

Alternate reality games rely on OSM data to determine where rewards and other elements of the game spawn in the player's presence, such as the 'portals' in Ingress, the 'PokéStops' and 'Pokémon Gyms' in Pokémon Go, and the 'tappables' in Minecraft Earth (2019).[161] In 2017, when Niantic migrated its augmented reality titles, including Ingress and Pokémon Go, from Google Maps to OSM, the overworld maps in these games initially became more detailed for some players but completely blank for others, due to OSM's uneven geographic coverage at the time.[162][163] In the first six weeks after launching in South Korea, Pokémon Go produced a seventeenfold spike in daily OSM contributions within the country.[164] In 2024, Niantic migrated its titles to Overture Maps data, which incorporates some OSM data.[165]

Recognition

[edit]

OSM and projects based on it have been recognized for their contributions to design and the public good:

Influence

[edit]

According to the Open Data Institute, OSM is one of the most successful collaboratively maintained open datasets in existence.[172] A 2020 research report by Accenture estimated the total replacement value of the OSM database, the value of OSM software development effort, and maintenance overhead at $1.67 billion,[173] roughly equivalent to the value of the Linux kernel in 2008.[174] Several startups have turned OSM-based software as a service into a business model, including Carto, Mapbox,[175] MapTiler, and Mapzen. The Overture Maps Foundation incorporates OSM data in some of its GIS layers.[176]

Several open collaborative mapping projects are modeled after OSM and rely on OSM software. OpenHistoricalMap is a world historical map that tracks the evolution of human geography over time, from prehistory to the present day. OpenGeofiction focuses on fantasy cartography and worldbuilding. The OSM community sees these projects as complements for aspects of geography that are out of scope for OSM.[177][178][19]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

OpenStreetMap

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a collaborative project to create and maintain a free, editable geographic database of the world, relying on volunteer contributions to map features such as roads, buildings, and points of interest. Founded in 2004 by in the as an alternative to proprietary mapping services that restricted data access and reuse, the initiative draws inspiration from open-source models like to crowdsource location data via GPS tracking, aerial imagery, fieldwork, and imported public datasets. The core data structure consists of nodes, ways, and relations annotated with tags defining attributes like road types or building functions, stored in a vector format that supports detailed querying and rendering. Licensed under the (ODbL) since 2012, OSM data mandates attribution to contributors and requires share-alike for substantial derivative works, enabling widespread integration into applications while preserving communal ownership. This framework has facilitated usage in apps, tools, and systems, with the database powering services from independent developers to integrations by entities like . Over two decades, OSM has expanded to cover virtually all inhabited areas globally, with particular strengths in developing regions where commercial maps lag, amassing contributions from millions of users and enabling innovations like rapid humanitarian mapping during crises. However, growth has sparked debates over data quality inconsistencies from unvetted imports, governance strains from corporate-funded editing campaigns, and tensions between volunteer purity and pragmatic alliances with tech firms providing infrastructure or bulk data. These dynamics underscore OSM's evolution as a resilient yet contested commons, prioritizing empirical verification through community audits over centralized control.

History

Founding and Initial Launch (2004–2005)

OpenStreetMap was founded by , a student at , who registered the project's domain and initiated development in July 2004 to create a free, editable world map as an open alternative to proprietary datasets dominated by entities like the UK's , which imposed high costs and restrictive licenses on digital geographic information. Coast's motivation stemmed from the absence of openly licensed, community-maintainable map data, drawing inspiration from collaborative models like Wikipedia but applied to geospatial content, emphasizing volunteer contributions over commercial control. The project officially launched on August 10, 2004, with initial focus on the , particularly , where began collecting data using a GPS receiver mounted on a to trace roads and paths manually. Early data entry relied exclusively on GPS traces uploaded to the nascent website, eschewing automated imports to ensure originality and adherence to open licensing from the outset; the first street was recorded on December 11, 2004, marking the initial substantive edit. This hands-on approach prioritized verifiable, ground-truthed information, with contributors noting locations and features during fieldwork before digitizing them via basic editing tools. By late 2005, the project had attracted around 1,000 registered users, reflecting gradual community uptake driven by online announcements and word-of-mouth among mapping enthusiasts frustrated with locked data ecosystems. Initial growth remained modest, centered on urban areas in the UK, as volunteers experimented with rendering maps from raw GPS data, laying groundwork for scalable crowdsourcing without institutional backing.

Early Expansion and Technical Foundations (2006–2010)

Following the initial launch, OpenStreetMap experienced rapid volunteer-driven expansion from 2006 onward, with contributors organizing mapping parties and collecting GPS traces to build street networks primarily in and . By mid-2006, the project had formalized institutional support through the establishment of the on August 22, which aimed to promote free geospatial data distribution and sustain development amid growing participation. This period saw the introduction of aerial imagery from Yahoo! in 2007, enabling armchair mapping by tracing satellite photos over GPS data, which accelerated coverage beyond direct fieldwork. Contributor numbers surged, reflecting organic growth fueled by open licensing and community events, with registered users reaching approximately 200,000 by January 2010 and 250,000 by April. Technical foundations solidified through key software advancements, beginning with the release of JOSM (Java OpenStreetMap Editor) version 1.0 on January 22, 2006, an offline desktop application offering advanced features like layer management and plugin extensibility for complex edits. Later that year, Potlatch 1, a browser-based Flash editor developed by Richard Fairhurst, debuted in mid-2006 as the project's first default online editing tool, simplifying contributions by allowing direct tracing and tagging without downloads. These tools addressed early limitations of the basic editor, enabling scalable data ingestion while maintaining the primitive-based model of nodes, ways, and relations. API evolution underpinned these tools' functionality, with version 0.5 deployed on October 7, 2007, introducing ways composed of ordered nodes (replacing segments) and improved versioning for during collaborative edits. This upgrade supported larger-scale uploads and better , though it required editor adaptations. By April 2009, API v0.6 further enhanced capabilities with changesets for batched modifications, GPS trace integration refinements, and relation support for complex features like routes, forming the core protocol still in use today. These developments, coupled with guidelines against bulk imports to preserve volunteer-sourced authenticity, established OSM's flexible, extensible schema emphasizing empirical tracing over automated derivation. Data volume grew exponentially, with analyses showing street network completeness approaching proprietary maps in select regions by 2010.

Institutionalization and Global Growth (2011–2020)

During the early 2010s, OpenStreetMap underwent significant institutional maturation, highlighted by the adoption of the (ODbL) on September 12, 2012, which replaced the prior Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license and introduced share-alike requirements for derivative databases to better protect the project's data integrity while facilitating commercial reuse. This change, approved after extensive community consultation, addressed vulnerabilities in the old licensing model that had allowed unchecked data extraction without reciprocal contributions, thereby incentivizing sustained input from users and organizations. The (OSMF), established in 2006 but gaining operational momentum in this era, formalized structures such as working groups for licensing, communication, and data quality, which coordinated global efforts and mediated disputes over imports and edits. User base expansion accelerated markedly, with registered contributors reaching 500,000 by November 29, 2011, and surpassing 1 million by January 6, 2013, reflecting broader adoption driven by improved editing tools and mobile apps. By spring 2015, the community had grown to 2 million users, and cumulative edits hit the 20 millionth changeset on January 14, 2014, indicating a surge in mapping activity that filled gaps in proprietary map coverage, particularly in rural and developing regions. This period also saw the internationalization of annual State of the Map conferences, with the 2012 event in marking a shift toward non-European hosts and fostering cross-cultural collaboration among mappers. Global reach expanded through humanitarian applications and corporate integrations, as the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT), formalized post-2010 Haiti response, mobilized remote mapping for disasters including in the (2013) and the Nepal earthquake (2015), adding millions of features like buildings and roads to aid recovery efforts. Companies such as and Telenav joined as OSMF corporate members starting around 2013, contributing server resources, imagery, and edits in exchange for access, which boosted infrastructure scalability and encouraged professional-grade contributions without compromising volunteer primacy. By November 8, 2018, registered users exceeded 5 million, with disproportionate growth in , , and due to low-cost GPS tools and local training initiatives that democratized mapping in data-scarce areas.

Contemporary Developments and Challenges (2021–Present)

The OpenStreetMap community has sustained annual international conferences through the State of the Map series, with the 2022 event held in , , from August 19–21, followed by the 2024 conference in , , on September 6–8, emphasizing global participation and regional mapping advancements. In 2025, the event shifted to , , highlighting growth, with calls for posters and tickets promoting community-driven presentations on mapping progress and tools. Parallel regional gatherings, such as State of the Map US in 2024 and 2025, focused on domestic contributions, including grants for camera deployments to enhance imagery coverage. Software ecosystem enhancements persisted, exemplified by the Engineering Working Group's 2025 microgrant program funding volunteer projects to bolster the OSM platform, alongside tools like OSM Latest Changes for monitoring recent edits within defined boundaries. OSM's utility expanded in humanitarian and rapid-response contexts, with increased adoption for mapping informal transport routes in developing regions, supported by OSMF blog discussions on quick-update capabilities. International outreach grew, including presentations at the 2024 UNMaps conference and 2025 UN Open Source Week, addressing among UN entities and maintainers. Persistent challenges include inconsistencies inherent to crowdsourced contributions, with studies from revealing heterogeneous completeness and positional inaccuracies in OSM road networks, particularly in less-mapped areas. relies on volunteer tools like JOSM validators and MapRoulette challenges to address tagging errors, routing issues, and import conflicts, yet unresolved mapping schemes and mechanical edit disputes continue to degrade usability. Community forums highlight concerns over erroneous bulk edits and , exacerbating debates on edit verification amid volunteer burnout. Legal and political pressures mounted, with the OSMF addressing threats over disputed territories in map data and preparing for post-Brexit database protections in the UK, alongside GDPR compliance updates. Sustainability strains the volunteer model, as manual labor struggles against commercial competitors' scale, prompting discussions on financial transparency and security hiring in 2024–2025 board minutes and general meetings. Licensing inquiries, such as for third-party imagery like footpath.ai, underscore ongoing efforts to maintain open data obligations amid evolving contributions.

Data Model and Standards

Core Data Elements and Geometry

OpenStreetMap's consists of three primary elements: nodes, ways, and relations, which collectively represent geographic features through points, lines, and complex polygons.
Element TypePrimary FunctionKey Attributes/ComponentsExamples
NodesRepresent point locationsUnique identifier, latitude, longitude (WGS 84), optional key-value tagsTrees, benches, traffic signals
WaysConstruct linear features or boundariesOrdered sequence of two or more nodes, tags; closed loop if first and last nodes coincideRoads, rivers, buildings, lakes
RelationsModel complex geometries and associationsOrdered list of member elements (nodes, ways, or relations) with assigned rolesMultipolygons, administrative boundaries, routes
Nodes serve as the fundamental building blocks, each defined by a , latitude, and longitude coordinates in the WGS 84 datum, optionally augmented with key-value tags for attributes such as names or types. These nodes enable precise point geometries, suitable for features like individual trees, benches, or traffic signals. Ways construct linear geometries by sequencing two or more nodes, forming either open paths for roads and rivers or closed loops that delineate boundaries for buildings and lakes. A way's geometry is derived from the ordered connection of its constituent nodes, with closure indicated when the first and last nodes coincide, though OpenStreetMap lacks a native primitive and instead relies on tagged closed ways or relations for area representation. This approach allows ways to model both polyline and boundary features flexibly, with over 1.5 billion ways contributing to the database as of recent analyses. Relations extend the model to handle multifaceted geometries and relationships, comprising an ordered list of member elements—nodes, ways, or other relations—each assigned a , such as outer or inner for multipolygons. For instance, multipolygon relations assemble multiple ways to define complex areas like enclaves or administrative boundaries, resolving issues that single closed ways cannot address, such as disjoint components. This relational structure supports advanced geometries beyond simple points and lines, including routes and turn restrictions, while maintaining the model's emphasis on without predefined schemas. All elements share common attributes like timestamps, version numbers, and user identifiers to track edits and ensure .

Flexible Tagging and Schema Flexibility

OpenStreetMap's data model utilizes a tagging system composed of key-value pairs attached to primitive elements—nodes, ways, and relations—to encode attributes of geographic features. Each tag follows the format key=value, where keys identify categories such as highway or building, and values specify details like residential or yes. This structure stores descriptive metadata as unstructured text strings, avoiding a fixed relational schema. The absence of a predefined enables schema flexibility, permitting contributors to introduce tags for novel or context-specific attributes without modifying the underlying database or requiring approval from a central authority prior to use. Tags evolve organically as a , with initial adoption occurring through practical mapping before community documentation and standardization via proposals on the OpenStreetMap . For instance, the , established by 2006, has supported the proliferation of over 100,000 unique tag combinations by accommodating bottom-up extensions for features like ratings or seasonal changes. This flexibility facilitates representation of real-world complexity, such as varying local naming conventions or attributes like access details, which rigid schemas in systems often omit. Empirical assessments highlight how the system's adaptability has enabled rapid global coverage expansion, with tags adapting to diverse environments from urban infrastructure to remote trails. However, the unconstrained nature introduces challenges, including inconsistent usage—such as multiple tags for synonymous concepts—and difficulties for applications, which rely on community-maintained conventions and validation tools to mitigate . Proposals for tag governance emphasize documentation over enforcement, with deprecated or synonymous tags persisting in legacy data, underscoring the between evolvability and uniformity. Studies on tag evolution reveal patterns where usage precedes formalization, driving model resilience but necessitating ongoing curation to preserve across the over 10 million registered contributors as of 2023.

Licensing Evolution and Open Data Obligations

OpenStreetMap data was initially licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 (CC-BY-SA 2.0) license from its founding in , which required attribution to contributors and mandated that derivative works be shared under the same terms. This license, however, was designed primarily for creative works rather than factual databases, leading to ambiguities in enforcing database rights and applying share-alike provisions to substantial data derivatives. In 2009, the OpenStreetMap Foundation's License Working Group proposed transitioning to the (ODbL), a database-specific license developed by the , which OSMF members approved with 89% support among participants. The switch addressed CC-BY-SA's shortcomings by providing clearer definitions for database protection, improved share-alike mechanisms for modified datasets, and better compatibility with principles, following extensive community consultation and legal review over two years. The change took effect on September 12, 2012, with the first ODbL-licensed planet file released two days later; pre-2012 contributions remained under CC-BY-SA unless contributors opted in, while non-assenting data—about 1% of the total—was redacted to comply with the new Contributor Terms. Under ODbL, users must attribute OpenStreetMap and its contributors in any public conveyance of the database or derivative works, including intact copyright notices and a license statement such as "Contains information from OpenStreetMap, which is made available here under the Open Database License." Share-alike obligations apply specifically to derivative databases—those involving substantial extraction, re-utilization, or modification of OSM contents—requiring such databases to be licensed under ODbL or a compatible open license when publicly used. In contrast, produced works (e.g., rendered maps or visualizations queried from the data) trigger only attribution, not share-alike, allowing freer downstream applications without mandating source data release. This distinction preserves the openness of factual data while preventing proprietary lock-in of substantially derived datasets, though it has prompted debates on enforcement thresholds for "substantial" changes.

Mapping Processes

Primary Data Collection Techniques

OpenStreetMap's primary relies on volunteer contributors gathering original geographic information through field-based methods, emphasizing direct and to ensure accuracy over remote derivation. These techniques prioritize ground-truth data, such as paths, points of interest, and attributes that may not be discernible from alone. The core method involves recording GPS tracks using handheld receivers, smartphones, or tablets to log precise paths of roads, trails, and boundaries. Contributors activate devices to achieve satellite fixes, set high-frequency (e.g., every second), and disable road-snapping features to capture raw trajectories, often while noting supplementary details like signage or landmarks via waypoints. Tracks are exported in GPX format and uploaded to OpenStreetMap's server for integration into editing tools like JOSM, where they guide the creation of ways and nodes. Handheld GPS units, such as models, offer extended battery life (over 24 hours) and ruggedness for prolonged surveys, while apps like GPS Logger enable similar with geotagged photos or audio notes for . Field surveys complement GPS by capturing non-linear features, such as building outlines or amenities, through on-site verification. Techniques include manual note-taking on printable atlases generated via Field Papers, which produce georeferenced sheets with barcodes for post-survey digitization, or voice recordings synchronized with GPS logs for efficient documentation during walks or bike rides. and video, timestamped and geotagged, provide evidence for points of interest, with tools like OSMTracker (Android) combining location data with custom forms for structured input. Mobile applications facilitate rapid, on-the-spot collection by prompting users for specific verifications, such as house numbers or pathway types, via gamified "quests." Apps like StreetComplete allow Android users to contribute during routine travel, automatically uploading validated data to align with OSM's schema. These methods ensure high-fidelity input but require cross-verification against multiple traces or photos to mitigate GPS inaccuracies, typically within 5-10 meters under open skies. Best practices include pre-survey planning to focus on unmapped areas and post-collection alignment in desktop editors for quality control.

Editing Software and Contributor Tools

OpenStreetMap editing primarily relies on the iD editor for browser-based contributions and JOSM for advanced desktop editing. The iD editor, a application integrated into the OpenStreetMap website, prioritizes simplicity and accessibility for novice users performing routine updates like adding points of interest or tracing roads from . Developed with funding from the , it handles basic geometry creation—nodes, ways, and relations—while enforcing data validation to prevent common errors such as invalid tags or duplicate features. JOSM, a standalone application requiring Java 11 or later, offers extensibility through plugins for tasks like importing GPX tracks, aligning aerial imagery, and batch-processing large datasets, making it suitable for experienced contributors handling complex edits across extensive areas. Tagging in OpenStreetMap employs a flexible key=value format to describe features, allowing contributors to add attributes to nodes, ways, and relations. Common tags for basic features include those for roads and buildings, as shown below:
Feature TypeKeyCommon Values
Roadshighwayprimary (major roads), residential (local streets), footway (pedestrian paths)
Buildingsbuildingyes (general structures), house (residential), school (educational)
These examples illustrate foundational tagging; the schema's flexibility supports extensive customization. Contributor tools extend editing to mobile devices, enabling field-based data capture. StreetComplete, an Android application, facilitates contributions via interactive "quests" that prompt users to answer specific questions about nearby features—such as verifying house numbers or surface types—without requiring prior OpenStreetMap knowledge, thereby streamlining tag completion for incomplete objects. Vespucci serves as a full-featured Android editor, supporting direct manipulation of OSM primitives, , and integration with GPS for precise node placement during surveys. For iOS and macOS, Go Map!! provides editing capabilities, supporting nodes, ways, arbitrary tagging, and offline editing. , a app with an OSM plugin, allows users to add or modify points of interest and notes directly from mobile devices, often leveraging device sensors for location accuracy. These tools adhere to OpenStreetMap's , ensuring edits conform to the project's XML-based format and tagging conventions, with uploads managed through calls to the central database. JOSM's plugin ecosystem, for instance, includes validators for conflict detection and remote control interfaces for scripted workflows, enhancing efficiency for bulk operations. Mobile apps like Every Door further support cross-platform (Android and ) object creation and polygon drawing, often with building outline presets derived from satellite views. Overall, the diversity of these software options accommodates varying contributor expertise, from casual field mappers to systematic data importers, fostering sustained database growth through specialized functionalities.

Verification and Quality Management Practices

OpenStreetMap's verification and quality management rely on a decentralized model emphasizing contributor self-policing, automated detection tools, and community intervention rather than centralized moderation. Edits are committed directly to the live database, with initial validation occurring through editor software that flags potential errors prior to upload, such as geometric inconsistencies or tagging violations. Post-upload, depends on volunteer monitoring of changesets and the application of third-party analysis tools to identify anomalies like duplicated nodes or unconnected ways. This approach stems from the project's open-editing ethos, where no pre-approval is required, but persistent issues trigger community-driven corrections or escalations to the Data Working Group for disputes involving or mechanical edits. Core tools for quality management include the Java OpenStreetMap Editor (JOSM), which integrates a plugin to detect and auto-fix errors such as overlapping ways, self-intersecting polygons, and schema mismatches during sessions. Complementing this, Osmose employs analyses to scan the global dataset for issues, categorizing them by severity and providing web-based interfaces for mappers to review and resolve flagged elements, such as misplaced tags or outdated attributions. Additional platforms like OSMCha enable changeset analytics to spot unusual patterns indicative of low-quality imports, while Atlas and MapRoulette gamify error hunting through crowdsourced challenges. These tools collectively address intrinsic quality dimensions, including logical consistency and positional accuracy, though their effectiveness varies by region due to uneven contributor density. In structured mapping campaigns, such as those via the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team's Tasking Manager, validation follows a multi-step protocol: initial mapper submissions are reviewed by experienced validators who cross-check against imagery or ground surveys, fix inaccuracies, and provide feedback before marking tasks complete. This includes four phases—pre-mapping guidelines, intra-task peer review, post-mapping audits, and final usability checks—ensuring data suitability for crisis response, as implemented during the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquake efforts. guidelines, enforced via talk pages and reversion capabilities, further mitigate risks like mechanical edit errors, with the Data Working Group intervening in escalated cases of suspected or widespread disruption since its formalization around 2009. Despite these mechanisms, remains heterogeneous, with denser urban areas benefiting from higher scrutiny compared to remote regions. Apps like StreetComplete enhance verification through mobile quests that prompt users to confirm or add details like house numbers via on-site photos, integrating crowdsourced ground-truthing into routine improvement. Overall, these practices prioritize over uniformity, leveraging open-source tooling and volunteer expertise to sustain amid millions of annual edits.

Community Dynamics

Volunteer Participation Patterns

OpenStreetMap's volunteer participation exhibits a long-tail distribution, with a vast pool of occasional contributors overshadowed by a committed core handling the majority of sustained edits. As of May 2020, the project had surpassed 6.5 million registered users, growing to over 10 million by early 2025, though only a fraction remain active beyond initial engagement. By March 2018, one million users had made at least one edit, reflecting cumulative growth amid high initial dropout rates. Annual active mappers, defined by substantive contributions, have stabilized at approximately 250,000 over the past three years ending in 2025, indicating steady but not accelerating participation volumes. Daily active contributors peaked at records like 1,019 in May 2020, driven partly by humanitarian surges, yet new registrations declined notably by about 20% in 2022 compared to prior years. Retention patterns reveal pronounced churn, particularly among newcomers: studies of urban mapping show 48% to 63% of contributors across sampled cities cease activity after their first day, rarely returning for further edits. Humanitarian mapping cohorts exhibit similarly low persistence, with most first-time participants disengaging within days unless supported by or prior experience, though experienced mappers demonstrate higher longevity. Despite this, the project's persists through decreasing contributor turnover times and a self-replenishing core, averting overall decline as of 2024 analyses. Coordination practices, such as mapathons or events, modestly boost short-term retention but fail to substantially alter long-term dropout trends without targeted interventions like phased training. Demographically, mappers skew heavily male and technically proficient, as evidenced by U.S. community surveys acknowledging underrepresentation of women and diverse ethnic groups. Geographically, contributions concentrate in high-income regions, with local mappers comprising a small fraction—often under 10% in analyzed areas—despite their critical role in verifying place-specific details; this fosters coverage biases favoring and over developing contexts. Participation surges episodically via events like State of the Map conferences or crisis responses, yet baseline activity relies on hobbyist persistence rather than broad demographic appeal.

Governance via OpenStreetMap Foundation

The (OSMF), incorporated on 21 August 2006 as a in , functions as a not-for-profit entity dedicated to supporting the OpenStreetMap project without exerting direct control over its editable map data. Its core responsibilities include maintaining critical infrastructure such as the project's servers—hosted across locations including , Bytemark, , and —and the domain www.openstreetmap.org, alongside promoting the growth and dissemination of freely editable geographic information. The OSMF ensures legal safeguards against liabilities like claims, deriving authority from its , which outline its non-profit status and commitment to principles. Governance centers on a board of directors, typically comprising seven members elected annually by OSMF members and associate members via single transferable vote in electronic elections held around December. Membership requires an annual fee of £15 for standard participants, though exemptions apply to active mappers based on verifiable contributions, fostering broad volunteer engagement while funding operations through fees and donations. The board appoints officers—including a chairperson, secretary, and treasurer—and delegates operational tasks to specialized working groups, such as the Data Working Group for vandalism mitigation and dispute resolution, the Engineering Working Group for technical infrastructure, and the Licensing Working Group for compliance enforcement. These groups, staffed by volunteers, operate with board-granted autonomy to address issues like data imports and quality assurance without centralizing editorial decisions. Annual general meetings, conducted online since , enable member input on strategic directions, though the board retains executive authority over expenditures and partnerships. This structure balances decentralized editing—where contributors retain sovereignty over data modifications—with centralized oversight of non-editorial elements, such as trademark protection for the OpenStreetMap name and logo. constraints, reliant on modest membership dues and sporadic corporate sponsorships, have prompted periodic appeals for donations to sustain server costs exceeding £100,000 annually in recent years. Criticisms of the model include perceptions of limited board diversity and slow response to emerging challenges like large-scale data imports, though empirical audits of outputs demonstrate effective handling of thousands of disputes yearly without toward institutional actors.

Integration of Commercial and Institutional Actors

Major technology companies have integrated OpenStreetMap (OSM) data into their products and services, leveraging its open licensing for applications such as navigation, location-based features, and geospatial analysis. For instance, Apple incorporates OSM data into Apple Maps for rendering and routing functionalities, while Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta utilize it as a foundational dataset for mapping tools and services. These integrations require compliance with the Open Database License (ODbL), which mandates attribution and share-alike obligations for derived databases, ensuring that improvements from commercial uses can potentially benefit the broader OSM ecosystem. Commercial actors also contribute directly to OSM through editing, data donations, and infrastructure support. has historically provided aerial imagery via Bing for mapping verification, and companies like Meta employ teams to update OSM with business locations and pathways, enhancing data freshness in urban areas. Similarly, (AWS) participates in collaborative initiatives like Maps, which builds on OSM data to create standardized global map layers for developers. These efforts have accelerated in regions with high commercial interest, though they raise questions among volunteers about the influence of profit-driven edits on community-driven priorities. Institutional involvement includes partnerships with governments, nonprofits, and academic entities that support OSM for public good applications. The Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) collaborates with organizations like the United Nations for crisis mapping, integrating institutional data imports during disasters to aid response efforts. Universities such as the University of Cambridge and University of Southampton contribute through research-driven edits and tool development, often focusing on specialized datasets like transportation networks. Government agencies, including the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), partner with OSM US on initiatives like trail stewardship to improve recreational mapping accuracy. The OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF) facilitates commercial and institutional integration via its Corporate Membership program, which as of 2025 includes sponsors at varying levels providing financial support for server infrastructure and events. Notable members include at the strategic level and silver-tier contributors like Niantic and , whose dues—ranging from thousands to tens of thousands annually—fund core operations without granting editorial control. This model balances resource influx with community governance, though OSMF guidelines emphasize transparency in corporate contributions to mitigate risks of .

Applications and Integrations

OpenStreetMap data is integrated into numerous popular applications for navigation, fitness tracking, and outdoor activities. OpenStreetMap provides raw map data that enables the creation of customized maps from scratch, with numerous third-party online maps based on this data; it also supports offline map usage on desktop computers, mobile devices such as smartphones, and even the PlayStation Portable. The following table lists notable examples:
ApplicationDescription
OsmAndOffline navigation app providing detailed maps and routing using OSM data.
KomootRoute planning and navigation app for cycling, hiking, and mountain biking based on OSM.
StravaFitness tracking platform that uses OSM for route mapping and analysis in cycling and running.
AllTrailsTrail discovery and navigation app leveraging OSM for hiking and outdoor paths.
MAPS.MEOffline mapping and navigation app powered entirely by OSM data.
OpenStreetMap (OSM) data underpins numerous systems by supplying a detailed, editable graph of roadways, paths, and transit networks, which algorithms analyze to determine optimal paths based on factors such as distance, estimated travel time, and mode-specific constraints like turn restrictions or vehicle types. These systems preprocess OSM's vector data—comprising nodes, ways, and relations—into traversable graphs, enabling real-time or offline direction computation without reliance on centralized servers. This approach contrasts with closed mapping services by permitting customization, such as prioritizing scenic routes or integrating local traffic rules, though accuracy depends on the completeness of community-tagged attributes like maximum speeds or one-way designations. Key open-source routing engines drive much of this functionality. The (OSRM), designed specifically for OSM, excels in high-speed car , capable of processing queries across continental scales in milliseconds by employing for graph preprocessing. GraphHopper, implemented in , supports multimodal applications including foot, , and routing, with optimizations for efficiency suitable for embedded devices and servers; its Directions API handles worldwide OSM-derived routes and includes route optimization for fleets, potentially reducing fuel costs by up to 30%. , another OSM-focused engine, extends capabilities to include time-dependent and isochrone generation, powering services that compute travel time matrices for . Mobile and embedded applications leverage these engines for practical . OsmAnd, an Android and app, delivers offline using pre-downloaded OSM extracts, supplemented by online backends like GraphHopper or OSRM for dynamic adjustments, supporting profiles for cars, bikes, and pedestrians with voice-guided turn-by-turn instructions. Organic Maps, a privacy-focused offline navigation app, supports hiking, cycling, and driving using OSM data, with no ads or tracking. CoMaps, an open-source offline navigation app, supports walking, cycling, and driving using OSM data. GPS devices integrate OSM datasets directly, allowing users to load custom maps via tools that convert OSM files into device-compatible formats, ensuring up-to-date coverage in regions where updates lag. In automotive contexts, converted OSM data enables aftermarket in systems supporting imports, though compatibility varies by hardware, with tools like Mapwel facilitating batch conversions for units. These integrations promote independence from , as evidenced by widespread adoption in vehicles and recreational GPS units tracking via GPX formats aligned with OSM schemas.

Humanitarian Mapping Initiatives

The , established in 2010, coordinates volunteer efforts to generate and refine OSM data for crisis response, leveraging and remote mapping to support aid organizations in over 94 countries. HOT activations enable rapid digitization of , roads, and buildings in disaster zones, with tools like the Tasking Manager distributing tasks to thousands of contributors worldwide. For instance, following the January 12, 2010, , OSM volunteers produced detailed maps of within days, aiding search-and-rescue and for entities including the and Red Cross, marking the first large-scale demonstration of crowdsourced mapping in disaster management. The Missing Maps project, launched in 2014 by in collaboration with the , , and other NGOs, focuses on preemptively mapping underserved regions in the Global South to build baseline data for and response planning. By October 2025, the initiative has mobilized volunteers to add features covering millions of people in crisis-prone areas, such as and , enabling better-targeted interventions for epidemics, floods, and conflicts. These maps have supported and economic development beyond immediate relief, with data integrated into platforms used by humanitarian agencies for needs assessments. Recent activations illustrate OSM's operational scale: in response to the September 2023 and Libya floods, approximately 1,600 mappers contributed over 220,000 buildings and 5,000 kilometers of roads, with data shared via the UN's Humanitarian Data Exchange for real-time aid coordination. Similarly, post-Hurricane Maria in 2017, U.S. agencies like FEMA utilized OSM building footprints for damage evaluation and resource allocation in . HOT's efforts, funded partly through grants aiming to engage one million volunteers for one billion at-risk individuals, emphasize open-source tools and local capacity-building to sustain amid challenges like incomplete coverage in remote areas.

Geospatial Analysis and Research Uses

OpenStreetMap (OSM) data enables geospatial analysis by providing structured vector datasets of roads, buildings, points of interest (POIs), and tags, which researchers import into GIS platforms like for querying, visualization, and modeling; it also supports applications in education and research. This open dataset supports empirical studies on spatial patterns without proprietary restrictions, though its volunteered nature requires validation against for accuracy. In urban morphology research, OSM-derived street networks and building footprints yield metrics such as road density, block sizes, and building volume estimates, allowing cross-city comparisons of form and function. For example, a 2017 analysis processed OSM data for over 90 European and North American cities to compute indicators like street network entropy and fractal dimension, revealing correlations with urban density and accessibility. Similarly, time-series OSM POI data has been used to detect urban change dynamics, with a 2019 study validating coverage against authoritative sources to model commercial and residential shifts in Tel Aviv, achieving 80-90% accuracy in trend detection. Accessibility studies leverage OSM pedestrian paths, sidewalks, and amenity tags to quantify and service proximity. A 2022 global assessment integrated OSM with EU-OECD urban boundaries to compare intra-city indices, finding higher values in dense European centers versus sprawling North American ones, with OSM enabling scalable computation across 1,000+ cities. Building from OSM attributes supports and ; a 2024 dataset derived from OSM polygons classified over 10 million structures in the contiguous U.S., aiding traffic and models by estimating occupancy from tag heuristics like "building=residential." Spatio-temporal frameworks like the OpenStreetMap History Database (OSHDB) facilitate longitudinal analysis of data evolution, querying over 100 billion historical snapshots to track urban expansion toward . A 2023 applied this to 10,000+ cities, revealing OSM's completeness grew from 20% to 60% for built-up areas between 2010 and 2020, with rural biases persisting due to contributor density. Environmental extracts OSM for modeling, as in a 2022 approach using volunteered tags to train classifiers for urban expansion mapping over 30 years, reducing reliance on data costs. These applications underscore OSM's utility in hypothesis-driven , tempered by needs for quality auditing.

Niche and Emerging Applications

OpenStreetMap data supports niche applications in , particularly , where it provides , roads, and building footprints for realistic virtual environments. has incorporated OSM line data for official scenery generation since November 2013, enabling detailed procedural landscapes. Similarly, X-Plane blends OSM-derived roads with other sources to construct 3D scenery, enhancing flight path accuracy. leverages OSM for building placements and heights, though errors in OSM data, such as inflated building dimensions from mistaken edits, have occasionally propagated into the simulation, highlighting dependencies. OSM data can be rendered in 3D to convey additional spatial information, with applications across websites (e.g., Streets GL, F4 Map, OSMBuildings), desktops (e.g., OSM2World, Glosm), and mobiles (e.g., Organic Maps, PeakNav); such 3D OSM data is also utilized in video games like FlightGear. In video games focused on transportation and , OSM furnishes real-world like streets, bus stops, fields, and landmarks, fostering immersive simulations. City Bus Manager by PeDePe uses OSM to model passenger flows influenced by schools and districts, simulating realistic urban transit operations. Global Farmer from Thera Bytes allows players to input postal codes for location-specific farms, incorporating OSM buildings and terrain for personalized narratives, as demonstrated at 2024. These integrations capitalize on OSM's crowdsourced detail to create engaging, relatable gameplay without proprietary mapping costs. Emerging uses extend to (AR) and , where OSM facilitates spatial awareness in interactive and autonomous systems. AR applications overlay OSM points of interest (POIs) onto live camera views for real-time discovery, aiding and semantic-enhanced . In , automated systems convert architectural CAD files into hierarchical topometric OSM formats for indoor robot , supporting semantic in confined spaces. Indoor mapping represents a niche expansion of OSM beyond outdoor features, enabling applications in building navigation and environmental assessment. Specialized tagging schemes capture floor plans and room connectivity, powering tools like Itinerary for multi-modal transit including indoor routes. OSM data also informs environmental exposure studies, correlating land use tags with pollution or green space metrics for health impact modeling.

Criticisms and Limitations

Accuracy Deficiencies and Regional Biases

OpenStreetMap's crowd-sourced model results in variable positional accuracy, often stemming from GPS trace errors and manual inconsistencies, with errors reported as low as 1.57 in tested urban areas but degrading in regions with sparse contributions. Attribute accuracy suffers from incomplete tagging, such as missing road speeds or building usages, leading to topological errors like disconnected networks or duplicated features, which automated tools detect but fail to fully resolve without volunteer intervention. Completeness deficiencies are pronounced for points of interest and non-road features, where empirical assessments reveal gaps in rural and low-density areas, exacerbated by reliance on volunteer-submitted aerial imagery alignments that introduce offsets up to several . Regional biases manifest in stark disparities tied to contributor density, with and exhibiting near-complete road networks—over 80% globally for streets, but with achieving higher attribute richness—while and parts of show building footprint completeness below 20% in over 30 countries. This unevenness correlates with human development indices, as mapping activity concentrates in high-income regions due to greater and volunteer participation, resulting in underrepresentation of informal settlements and rural in the Global South. Studies confirm that urban centers in developed nations surpass 80% building completeness in 16% of global urban populations, yet small towns and peripheral areas lag, perpetuating inequalities that affect applications like . Humanitarian mapping campaigns mitigate some gaps but cannot fully counteract the systemic volunteer skew toward affluent locales.

Conflicts Over Edits and Political Disputes

OpenStreetMap experiences conflicts over edits primarily in politically disputed territories, where mappers contest , boundary delineations, and feature classifications based on differing national or ideological perspectives. These disputes, often termed edit wars, involve repeated reversions of changes lacking consensus and adherence to established guidelines. Such conflicts are infrequent but tend to cluster around geopolitical flashpoints, driven by mappers prioritizing claims over empirical verification. To mitigate and promote neutrality, OpenStreetMap adheres to the "" principle, which mandates mapping verifiable physical realities and local usage—such as street signs for place names or effective control for administrative boundaries—irrespective of legal disputes or international recognition. Primary names use the "name" tag for predominant local usage, with alternatives appended via language-specific tags like "name:tr" or "name:el"; borders reflect control with one primary , enabling downstream map providers to overlay alternatives; and features like airports are tagged by function rather than contested status. This approach discourages deletions motivated by and favors notes or descriptions for contextual disputes, though enforcement relies on volunteer . The platform's inaugural edit war occurred in November 2007 in , a region divided since 1974, where one mapper tagged villages with primary Turkish names (e.g., Ozanköy) and secondary Greek names (e.g., Kazaphani), only for another to revert to Greek primaries, sparking debate on the mailing list without immediate formal resolution but highlighting the need for multilingual tagging. Similar patterns emerged in in 2011, involving warring over internal administrative borders amid ethnic tensions. During the 2022 , coordinated appeals urged restraint on sovereignty edits, emphasizing ground-truth data over wartime alterations. In October 2023, following the attack on , anonymous users deleted Tel Aviv's map data, prompting repeated restorations by defenders and subsequent account blocks, illustrating vandalism disguised as political correction. Resolution typically involves the Data Working Group intervening to revert non-compliant edits, suspend disruptive accounts, or facilitate discussions, though persistent ideological mapping—evident in studies showing disputed areas attract more participants and divergent edit histories—challenges the volunteer-driven model's scalability. Geopolitical pressures have occasionally escalated to legal threats against the , underscoring the tension between open editing and state sensitivities. Despite these frictions, the on-the-ground rule has preserved in most cases by privileging observable facts over abstract claims.

Concerns Regarding Corporate Dominance and Data Imports

Corporate involvement in OpenStreetMap has grown significantly since around 2014, with companies such as Apple, , , and conducting millions of edits focused on roads and buildings, often through automated or bulk processes. For instance, Apple editors alone accounted for 3.94 million edits across , while contributed 4.48 million, dominating road edits in active areas at up to 70% of changes. This scale has prompted concerns among volunteers that corporate priorities—such as enhancing services—may overshadow -driven mapping, potentially biasing data toward commercially valuable features like urban in the Global North. A survey indicated 43% opposition to paid , highlighting tensions over transparency and the risk of mishaps, as seen in Grab's 2018 edits in that sparked local disputes. Bulk data imports, frequently executed by corporations or governments to accelerate coverage, have repeatedly compromised and . The absence of robust pre-import review mechanisms allows errors to propagate without detection, while the lack of persistent identifiers for features hinders updates, leading to failures and outdated information that volunteers must manually rectify. Notable cases include the U.S. road from Census Bureau data around 2007–2009, which bootstrapped American coverage but introduced widespread inaccuracies in geometries, alignments, and attributes, necessitating ongoing fixup efforts and eroding trust in imports overall. Similarly, Japan's 2011 KSJ2 caused node tag duplications, disrupting consistency, and Russia's 2016 Moscow address yielded unverifiable, stale building outlines from sources like atlas.mos.ru. Corporate-led imports amplify these risks through high-volume automation, often prioritizing speed over verification. Facebook's AI-assisted road tracing, tested in regions like since 2017, has faced backlash for instances such as unannounced, erroneous data additions in that violated import guidelines and automated edits codes of conduct. has similarly cautioned against indiscriminate AI-generated imports, emphasizing they should not overwrite manual contributions without scrutiny to preserve . Such practices reduce local mappers' sense of ownership, complicate error correction by entangling imported and organic data, and foster community divisions, as bulk efforts can flood databases with low-fidelity elements harder to audit than hand-crafted ones. Analyses of large imports reveal they boost raw volume but introduce heterogeneity that challenges OSM's usability, underscoring the need for stricter protocols to balance acceleration with sustainability.

Broader Impact

Disruptions to Proprietary Mapping Dominance

OpenStreetMap's open licensing model, which permits free use, modification, and distribution under the , has undermined the control exerted by dominant providers like and HERE by supplying a viable alternative dataset for global mapping needs. This accessibility circumvents high licensing costs and restrictive terms associated with services, empowering developers, businesses, and applications to integrate comprehensive mapping without . As a result, OSM has facilitated the rise of independent mapping platforms and reduced in the geospatial market, particularly for high-volume users facing escalating API fees from incumbents. Concrete instances illustrate this shift: in August 2012, Craigslist embedded data in its apartment listings across select U.S. cities like Portland and the Bay Area, supplanting maps to deliver location context at no additional expense amid growing usage volumes. Similarly, in January 2023, German car-sharing operator Stadtmobil transitioned its booking platform's cartography from to OpenStreetMap, emphasizing enhanced and operational independence from third-party providers. These moves highlight OSM's appeal for cost-sensitive operations, where alternatives impose per-query charges that scale unfavorably with traffic—Craigslist, for instance, handles billions of page views monthly, rendering overages prohibitive at rates around $0.50 per thousand excess loads. OSM's data also underpins competitive services that erode proprietary market shares in developer ecosystems. , reliant on OSM as its core layer, offers customizable APIs that have attracted adopters seeking alternatives to ' 61.3% dominance, securing approximately 4.5% market penetration among mapping technologies as of 2021 through superior flexibility in styling and pricing. Major entities further amplify this disruption via partial integrations: incorporates OSM contributions for roads, paths, and other primitives, as acknowledged in its data attributions, supplementing in-house collections to bolster coverage without full proprietary dependency. , meanwhile, utilizes OSM for pedestrian navigation enhancements and internal routing models, actively contributing edits for driveways, parking aisles, and urban walkability since at least 2018 to refine real-time operations beyond vendor-supplied data. Such integrations not only diversify supply chains but also compel proprietary providers to confront open alternatives that prioritize community-driven updates over centralized curation.

Advancements in Open Data Ecosystems

![Diagram of OpenStreetMap components][float-right] OpenStreetMap has advanced ecosystems by pioneering a collaborative, crowdsourced model for geospatial information, enabling global contributors to build and maintain a comprehensive, freely accessible database since its in 2004. This volunteered geographic information (VGI) approach has demonstrated the feasibility of large-scale, community-driven data production, influencing other initiatives by emphasizing attribution, share-alike licensing, and iterative improvement. The project's adoption of the (ODbL) in September 2012 marked a key innovation, providing a legal framework for database derivatives that requires sharing substantial changes under the same terms, thus promoting sustainable reuse and preventing proprietary lock-in. The scale of OSM's data ecosystem underscores its impact, with over 10 million registered users and approximately 10 billion nodes as of August 2025, reflecting sustained growth in contributions and data volume. This expansion has been facilitated by integrations with governmental and organizational data imports, enhancing coverage in under-mapped regions and exemplifying how platforms can incorporate diverse sources while maintaining community governance. Tools such as the Overpass API for querying and editors like JOSM and have standardized data access and editing, fostering an interoperable ecosystem compatible with open standards for geospatial software. OSM's tagging schema has evolved into an informal standard for feature representation, allowing flexible yet consistent encoding of real-world elements, which supports advanced applications from to . By 2024, corporate and institutional contributions, including from entities like and Apple, have accelerated data enrichment, though this has also highlighted the need for balanced participation to mitigate inequality in mapping efforts. These developments have positioned OSM as a foundational layer in broader ecosystems, powering humanitarian responses via platforms like the Humanitarian Data Exchange and inspiring initiatives such as Maps for scalable open mapping.

Empirical Evaluations of Utility and Shortcomings

Empirical assessments of OpenStreetMap (OSM) data utility reveal substantial global coverage in road networks, with one analysis estimating over 80% completeness for roads across countries using comparative methods against and official datasets as of 2017. Building footprint data, however, averages 21% completeness worldwide as of 2024, with higher rates in and exceeding 50% in select regions, enabling reliable use in geospatial research and where data density supports it. In urban centers, approximately 16% of the global urban population resides in areas where OSM building data surpasses 80% completeness, facilitating applications like modeling and economic analysis. Positional accuracy evaluations indicate variability, with some studies finding OSM geocoding results equal to or exceeding commercial providers like in specific European contexts, attributed to community-driven refinements in densely mapped areas. Utility in tasks, such as automated sample generation for building detection, has been demonstrated through integration with models, yielding high-quality outputs from OSM primitives despite inherent noise. Systematic reviews confirm OSM's thematic and topological consistency supports niche research, though application-specific quality filters are often required for robustness. Shortcomings emerge prominently in spatial heterogeneity, where data quality favors high-income, urbanized regions over rural or low-income areas, leading to underrepresentation and positional errors exceeding 10-20 meters in less-contributed zones. Building completeness lags below 20% in 75% of global cities, exacerbating biases tied to contributor demographics and socio-economic factors, which persist despite temporal improvements from 2015-2020. Empirical evidence highlights intrinsic issues like missing roads, attribute inaccuracies, and lack of formalized review processes, complicating applications and reducing reliability for real-time navigation without supplementary validation. Comparative studies underscore divergences from proprietary maps like , where OSM exhibits gaps in amenity coverage and update consistency, though it offers greater detail in volunteered regions. Overall, crowd-sourced nature yields uneven fitness-for-use, necessitating hybrid approaches with authoritative data for assessments.

References

  1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/about
  2. https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/about-osm-community/history-of-osm/
  3. https://techcrunch.com/2024/08/10/one-man-decided-to-take-on-google-maps-20-years-later-openstreetmap-is-still-going-strong/
  4. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features
  5. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ
  6. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-19/openstreetmap-charts-a-controversial-new-direction
  7. https://blog.emacsen.net/osm-is-in-trouble.html
  8. https://birthday20.openstreetmap.org/
  9. https://birthday20.openstreetmap.org/timeline/first-street-entered-into-openstreetmap/
  10. https://mapdesign.icaci.org/2014/04/mapcarte-103365-openstreetmap-by-steve-coast-2004/
  11. http://sdistandards.icaci.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/OSM_SDI_2017.pdf
  12. https://www.tomtom.com/newsroom/behind-the-map/tomtom-openstreetmaps-mapmetrics-map-editing/
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267574387_The_emergence_and_evolution_of_OpenStreetMap_A_cellular_automata_approach
  14. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2010/01/05/200k-osm-users/
  15. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2010/04/19/today-is-the-day-250000-contributors/
  16. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/josmeditor/diary/38165
  17. https://birthday20.openstreetmap.org/timeline/2006-potlach-osms-first-default-editor/
  18. https://opengeospatialdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40965-019-0067-x
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/User-and-Data-development-of-OpenStreetMap-2005-2010-1_fig1_267989860
  20. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2012/09/12/openstreetmap-data-license-is-odbl/
  21. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ODbL
  22. https://osmfoundation.org/
  23. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/History_of_OpenStreetMap
  24. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2014/02/03/20-million-edits/
  25. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2012
  26. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-82404-z
  27. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19475683.2025.2457396
  28. https://stateofthemap.org/
  29. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_of_the_Map_2024
  30. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2025/06/
  31. https://openstreetmap.us/events/state-of-the-map-us/2024/
  32. https://openstreetmap.us/news/archive/
  33. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2025/07/12/the-2025-openstreetmap-ewg-microgrant-program/
  34. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Latest_Changes
  35. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/
  36. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2024/06/18/openstreetmap-at-the-unmaps-conference-2024/
  37. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2025/09/02/openstreetmap-at-un-open-source-week/
  38. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tgis.70077
  39. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance
  40. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_issues
  41. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/improving-openstreetmap-shop-coverage-with-alltheplaces/119979
  42. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board/Minutes/2025-02
  43. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/AGM2024/Election_to_Board/Answers_and_manifestos/Q07_Handling_Legal_and_Political_Challenges
  44. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/category/legal/
  45. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/followup-questions-to-2025-gm/135628
  46. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group/Minutes/2025-01-13
  47. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Elements
  48. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Node
  49. https://www.geoapify.com/ways-to-get-openstreetmap-data/
  50. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area
  51. https://osmfoundation.org/w/images/e/e6/2022-08-15-study-evolution-of-the-osm-data-model-by-Jochen-Topf_CC-BY-SA_4.0.pdf
  52. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
  53. https://dev.overpass-api.de/overpass-doc/en/preface/osm_data_model.html
  54. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags
  55. https://www.datamonkey.tech/post/what-are-tags-in-openstreetmap
  56. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10095020.2017.1368193
  57. https://blog.jochentopf.com/2022-08-15-study-on-the-evolution-of-the-osm-data-model.html
  58. https://courses.ems.psu.edu/geog585/node/738
  59. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/isnt-the-osm-tagging-scheme-is-too-difficult-osm/97059
  60. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/148025556/The_OpenStreetMap_folksonomy_and_its_evolution.pdf
  61. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License
  62. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/About_The_Licence_Change
  63. https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/
  64. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pick_your_mapping_technique
  65. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Recording_GPS_tracks
  66. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_techniques
  67. https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD
  68. https://ideditor.com/
  69. https://josm.openstreetmap.de/
  70. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
  71. https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete
  72. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go_Map!!
  73. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.blau.android
  74. https://osmand.net/docs/user/plugins/osm-editing/
  75. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editors
  76. https://blog.mapbox.com/check-your-openstreetmap-edits-with-the-josm-validator-d7e785c6f63f
  77. https://medium.com/radiant-solutions/using-existing-open-source-tools-to-validate-openstreetmap-data-2428a610dcbf
  78. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
  79. https://toolbox.hotosm.org/pages/5_data_quality_assurance/5.2._validating_with_josm/
  80. https://publications.neis-one.org/2014_Barron_et_al_ComprehensiveFrameworkIntrinsicOpenStreetMapQualityAnalysis_iOSMAnalyzer_AComprehensiveFrameworkforIntrinsicOpenStreetMapQualityAnalysis.pdf
  81. https://www.hotosm.org/updates/hot-approach-to-osm-data-validation-to-eq-mapping-projects/
  82. https://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ
  83. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation
  84. https://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Articles_of_Association
  85. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Groups
  86. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-is-core-software-governance-managed-in-openstreetmap-and-who-decides-which-projects-are-included/131621
  87. https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/about-osm-community/consumers/
  88. https://theodi.org/news-and-events/blog/how-are-facebook-apple-and-microsoft-contributing-to-openstreetmap/
  89. https://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-19/openstreetmap-charts-a-controversial-new-direction
  90. https://techcrunch.com/2023/07/26/meta-microsoft-and-amazon-release-open-map-dataset-to-rival-google-maps-apple-maps/
  91. https://www.hotosm.org/partners/
  92. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Universities
  93. https://www.usgs.gov/national-digital-trails/through-its-trails-stewardship-initiative-openstreetmap-us-leading-efforts
  94. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Corporate_Members
  95. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2025/02/07/eight-new-corporate-members/
  96. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2023/09/08/osm-foundation-announces-new-membership-guidelines-for-corporate-sponsorship/
  97. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Applications_of_OpenStreetMap
  98. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/They_are_using_OpenStreetMap
  99. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM-based_services
  100. https://www.geoapify.com/openstreetmap-routing/
  101. https://www.graphhopper.com/
  102. https://www.geofabrik.de/data/routing.html
  103. https://github.com/valhalla/valhalla
  104. https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/routing/online-routing/
  105. https://organicmaps.app/
  106. https://comaps.app/
  107. https://support.garmin.com/en-US/?faq=mSWyDE91q874qY0e9JkL1A
  108. https://www.mapwel.net/freemaps/osmbatch.html
  109. https://www.hotosm.org/what-we-do.html
  110. https://www.hotosm.org/projects/
  111. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/latinamerica/4-years-looking-back-openstreetmap-response-haiti-earthquake
  112. https://www.missingmaps.org/
  113. https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/get-involved/missing-maps-project
  114. https://www.jpmorganchase.com/newsroom/stories/why-are-we-mapping-missing-maps
  115. https://www.hotosm.org/updates/update-on-disaster-response-activations-for-morocco-and-libya/
  116. https://openstreetmap.us/news/2021/06/map-for-emergency/
  117. https://www.audaciousproject.org/grantees/humanitarian-openstreetmap-team
  118. https://www.carleton.edu/spatial-analysis/data-resources/open-street-map/
  119. https://opengeospatialdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40965-019-0061-3
  120. https://geoffboeing.com/2017/04/urban-form-analysis-openstreetmap/
  121. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212606
  122. https://www.eurogeojournal.eu/index.php/egj/article/view/241
  123. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11550320/
  124. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-39698-6
  125. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156984322200190X
  126. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343894748_Exploring_Urban_Form_Through_Openstreetmap_Data_A_Visual_Introduction
  127. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FlightGear
  128. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/X-Plane
  129. https://hackaday.com/2020/08/21/microsoft-flight-simultors-data-insanity-spawn-enourmous-buildings-an-anomalies-from-openstreetmap/
  130. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/3D
  131. https://www.theverge.com/games/672035/openstreetmap-data-games
  132. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337634212_An_augmented_reality_based_tool_for_contribution_to_OpenStreetMap
  133. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00552
  134. https://www.volkerkrause.eu/2025/06/28/osm-mapping-building-interiors.html
  135. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6267018/
  136. https://ijspm.vgtu.lt/index.php/GAC/article/download/2497/2018
  137. https://hcjournal.org/index.php/jhc/article/download/15/43/230
  138. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfamha/OSM%2520data%2520analysis%2520070808_web.pdf
  139. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180698
  140. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2022.2159550
  141. https://giscience.courses-pages.gistools.geog.uni-heidelberg.de/openstreetmap-analyses-with-qgis-python-and-r/content/chapter_2/exercise_osm_changesets.html
  142. https://heigit.org/the-evolution-of-humanitarian-mapping-within-the-openstreetmap-community-2/
  143. https://blog.emacsen.net/edit-wars-in-openstreetmap.html
  144. https://osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf
  145. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2007/11/12/osms-first-edit-war/
  146. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ukrainian-osm-community-appeal-re-edits-of-osm-data-during-russian-ukrainian-war/995
  147. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/security-aviation/2023-10-23/ty-article/.premium/saboteurs-successfully-erase-tel-aviv-off-the-maps/0000018b-5b9d-d473-a5fb-7fdd33210000
  148. https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3544548.3580758
  149. https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/7922/6558
  150. https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/8/5/232
  151. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Past_Problems
  152. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER
  153. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
  154. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2025.2473637
  155. https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/10/8/528
  156. https://brocoders.com/blog/mapbox-vs-google-maps-vs-openstreetmap/
  157. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/08/craigslist-is-on-board-openstreetmap-continues-soaring-to-new-heights/
  158. https://blog.stadtmobil-hannover.de/openstreetmap-statt-google-maps/
  159. https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Craigslist-use-OpenStreetMaps-instead-of-Google-Maps-for-inline-maps-on-listings
  160. https://acropolium.com/blog/choosing-a-map-api-mapbox-vs-google-maps/
  161. https://gspe21-ssl.ls.apple.com/html/attribution.html
  162. https://github.com/Uber-OSM/Global
  163. https://www.ubiquitypress.com/chapters/36/files/5ce682c5-fb57-4a5b-ba64-7794c7059d7c.pdf
  164. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats
  165. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/738531592553760735/pdf/Sustainability-in-OpenStreetMap-Building-a-More-Stable-Ecosystem-in-OSM-for-Development-and-Humanitarianism.pdf
  166. https://www.sovereign.tech/tech/openstreetmap
  167. https://opensource.com/article/23/3/open-source-open-data-humanitarian-response
  168. https://blog.jawg.io/what-does-overture-maps-mean-for-openstreetmap-and-the-future-of-open-source-mapping/
  169. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5552279/
  170. https://heigit.org/analysis-of-osm-building-data-completeness-using-new-data/
  171. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37414776/
  172. https://gispoint.de/fileadmin/user_upload/paper_gis_open/537521013.pdf
  173. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225002110
  174. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328762286_Systematic_Literature_Review_of_Data_Quality_Within_OpenStreetMap
  175. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971524000061
  176. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.06277
  177. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9016
  178. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354203893_Ten_Years_of_OpenStreetMap_Project_Have_We_Addressed_Data_Quality_Appropriately_-Review_Paper
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.