Religious discrimination
View on Wikipedia| Freedom of religion |
|---|
| Religion portal |
Religious discrimination is treating a person or group differently because of the particular religion they align with or were born into (hereditary). This includes instances when adherents of different religions, denominations or non-religions are treated unequally due to their particular beliefs, either by the law or in institutional settings, such as employment or housing.
Religious discrimination or bias[1] is related to religious persecution, the most extreme forms of which would include instances in which people have been executed for beliefs that have been perceived to be heretical. Laws that only carry light punishments are described as mild forms of religious persecution or religious discrimination. In recent years, terms such as religism[2][3] and religionism have also been used, but "religious discrimination" remains the more widely used term.[4]
Even in societies where freedom of religion is a constitutional right, adherents of minority religions sometimes voice their concerns about religious discrimination against them. Insofar as legal policies are concerned, cases that are perceived to be cases of religious discrimination might be the result of interference in the religious sphere by other spheres of the public that are regulated by law.
History
[edit]Ancient
[edit]Jews faced religious discrimination in the Roman Empire. The low point was the expulsion of Jews from Jerusalem and subsequent paganization of the city during the reign of Emperor Hadrian (117–138 AD), which led to the Jewish diaspora.[5]
Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire was widespread. Christianity threatened the polytheistic order of the Roman Empire because of the importance of evangelism in Christianity. Under the Neronian persecution, Rome began to discriminate against monotheists who refused to worship the Roman gods. Nero blamed Christians for the Great Fire of Rome (64 AD).[6] During the Decian persecution, Valerianic persecution, and Diocletianic Persecution, Christians were slaughtered by being thrown to wild beasts, churches were destroyed, priests were imprisoned, and scriptures were confiscated.[7][6]
Religious discrimination against Christians ended with the Edict of Milan (313 AD), and the Edict of Thessalonica (380 AD) made Christianity the official religion of the empire.[8] By the 5th century Christianity became the dominant religion in Europe and took a reversed role, discriminating against pagans, heretics, and Jews.[9]
Medieval
[edit]
In the Middle Ages, antisemitism in Europe was widespread. Christians falsely accused Jews of Jewish deicide, blood libel, and well poisoning, and subjected them to expulsions, forced conversions, and mandatory sermons. In the Papal States, Jews were required to live in poor segregated neighbourhoods called ghettos.[10] Historians note that religious discrimination against Jews tended to increase during negative economic and climatic shocks in Europe, such as when they were scapegoated for causing the Black Death.[11]
During the Islamic Golden Age, many Jewish, Christian, Zoroastrian, and Pagan lands came under Muslim rule. As People of the Book, Jews, Christians, and Mandaeans living under Muslim rule became dhimmis with social status inferior to that of Muslims. Although Sharia law granted dhimmis freedom of religion, they were subjected to religious discrimination as second-class citizens and had to pay a jizya tax. They could not proselytize Muslims, marry Muslims (in the case of dhimmi men), build or repair churches and synagogues without permission, perform loud religious rituals such as the ringing of church bells, carry weapons, or ride horses and camels.[12][13][14] These discriminatory laws forced many Christians into poverty and slavery.[15]
During the First Crusade (1096), Christian knights recaptured the Holy Land from Muslim rule, massacring most of the Muslims and Jews in Jerusalem. This led to the creation of Catholic-ruled Crusader states, most notably the Kingdom of Jerusalem. In these kingdoms Jews, Muslims, and Orthodox Christians had no rights, being considered property of the crusader lords.[16][17]
Modern
[edit]
In early modern Europe, there was a religious conflict between Catholics and Protestants taking place in many countries. In early modern Britain, the Act of Uniformity 1548 compelled the Church of England to use only the Book of Common Prayer for its liturgy. There were several other Acts of Uniformity as the conflict continued well into the 19th century.[18] When Catholicism became the sole compulsory religion in early modern France during the reign of Louis XIV, the Huguenots had to leave the country en masse.[18]
The Act for the Settlement of Ireland 1652 barred Catholics from most public offices and confiscated large amounts of their land, much of which was given to Protestant settlers.[19]
During the decline of the Ottoman Empire in the late modern period, particularly ever since the Great Turkish War (1683), discrimination against religious minorities worsened. The destruction of churches and the expulsion of local Christian communities became commonplace.[20] Tolerance policies were abandoned in Ottoman Albania, in favor of reducing the size of Albania's Catholic population through Islamization.[21]
Antisemitism in the Russian Empire was widespread, as Imperial Russia contained the world's largest Jewish population at the time. Jews were subject to discriminatory laws such as the May Laws (1882), which restricted them from certain locations, jobs, transactions, schools, and political positions.[22] They were also targeted in frequent anti-Jewish riots, called pogroms.
In Asia
[edit]Religious discrimination in Pakistan is a serious issue. Several incidents of discrimination have been recorded with some finding support by the state itself. In a case of constitutionally sanctioned religious discrimination, non-Muslims in Pakistan cannot become prime minister or president, even if they are Pakistani citizens.[23][24][25] Pakistan's Blasphemy Law, according to critics, "is overwhelmingly being used to persecute religious minorities and settle personal vendettas".[26] Ahmadiyya Muslims have been subject to significant persecution and are sometimes declared 'non-Muslims'.[27]
Uyghurs or Uighurs are an ethnic and religious minority group in China.[28] Their identity is based on the Islamic religion and has roots in the former East Turkistan culture.[29][30] They reside in Xinjiang, an autonomous region situated in the west of the country.[29][31][28][30] This group is persecuted by the Chinese government due to its perceived threat to the nation's security and identity. The Chinese government believes that the Uyghurs have separatist, extremist, and terrorist thoughts.[29][28] It has detained around one million Uyghurs in camps.[29][31][28] According to the Chinese government, these camps are created to re-educate the minority Muslims by learning about the negative consequences of extremism.[29][31][32] Detainees are punished in these camps.[29][31][32][28] The treatment of the Uyghurs violates their human rights because they are forcibly sent to the camps for an indefinite period of time.[31][28] The discrimination against the Uyghurs comes in many forms. Some apparent restrictions include banning religious veils or robes in public.[29][28] The training camps serve to inculcate beliefs that are congruent with the beliefs of the Chinese Communist Party.[31][28] Subjected to abuse and suppression in China, some Uyghurs who were seeking refuge resettled in different parts of the world. In June 2021, it was reported that the Uyghurs were being detained even outside China. Following the diplomatic relations of China with the UAE, Uyghurs living in Dubai were subjected to arrest, prolonged detention and deportation to China. China allegedly requested for the deportation of Uyghurs from three Arab countries, including the UAE. The global influence of Beijing has even resulted in the expansion of religious discrimination against the Uyghur Muslims who are residing abroad.[33]
Although the Constitution of India prohibits discrimination based on religion[34][35] discrimination and religious violence in India are frequent, sometimes even involving the function of government.[36] For example dalit people who are not Hindu, Sikh, or Buddhist are not covered by the Scheduled Castes laws and hence dalit Christians and Muslims do not receive the affirmative action political representation and educational placement, welfare benefits, and hate crimes protections accorded to their fellows.[35] Dalits worshipping the same gods as Hindus were previously considered to be of a different religion and in the early twentieth century the question "Is he a Hindu or Pariah?" had currency.[35][37]
In the Middle East
[edit]Apostasy and proselytization is punishable by Algerian law.[38] Prison sentences for those that practice Christianity do occur.[39]
Apostasy and proselytization[40]
Violence against the Christian minority is common.[41][42]
Coptic Christians face many barriers to building and renovating Coptic churches.[43]
Christian Assyrians in Iraq have suffered from discrimination since Saddam Hussein's Arabization policies in the 1980s.[citation needed]
Apostasy and proselytization is punishable by Moroccan law.[44] Prison sentences for those that leave Islam do occur.[45]
Throughout the contemporary history of Iran, ethnic and religious minorities have experienced religious discrimination. Since most of the people of Iran follow the Shia religion, most of the official and unofficial laws of this country are influenced by the Shia religion.
Before the 1979 revolution, there were laws in Iran that allowed religious minorities to participate in elections, have representatives in the parliament, and even reach the highest government positions. After the revolution of 1979, the laws regarding religious minorities were changed. In the current constitution of Iran, only followers of Christianity, Judaism, Zoroastrianism and Sunnis are allowed to perform their religious ceremonies in private and they do not have the right to propagate and spread their religion in public places (proselytize).
Also, Iran's constitution does not recognize other religious minorities such as Baha'is, Buddhists, Hindus, and Atheists.[46][47][48][49] Adherents of these belief systems are not allowed to express their beliefs, but they are deprived of their various rights, including working in government and non-government jobs, etc.[50][51][52][53][54][55]
According to the current apostasy laws of Iran, no Muslim has the right to change his (or her) religion, and if he changes his religion, they can be punished by prison and execution. After the Islamic Revolution in 1979 until 2023, all important political and security posts and positions in the country have been assigned to the followers of the Shia religion.[54][56]
Javid Rahman, the UN rapporteur on Iran affairs, criticized the violation of human rights in Iran at the 77th session of the UN General Assembly. He accused the Iranian government of always ignoring the rights of ethnic and religious minorities in the country and involving them in various judicial cases. In this report, he demanded the release of dissident prisoners and the recognition of the rights of religious and political minorities in Iran.[54][57]
Kameel Ahmady, an anthropologist and developer of the book From Border to Border (a book about the situation of ethnic and religious minorities in Iran) and his colleagues believes that the legal discriminations in the country's laws regarding ethnic and religious minorities must be removed.[58][59][60]
In economic terms, Sunni rural areas lack important infrastructure. It is believed that the majority of the country’s facilities are concentrated in the central provinces. In terms of culture, some ethnic and religious minorities believe that they face restrictions on holding regional festivals and conferences. The national and local media do not cover and represent the cultures and traditions of these regions as the people believe they deserve, and do not provide media services related to the local and regional cultures of Different religions groups.[59] Most Baluchis, as well as some Kurds, have different religious orientations than the state’s official religion. These groups feel that the religious beliefs of government officials lead to the political, cultural, social and economic oppression of indigenous peoples.[61][58][62][63][64][65][66]
In Western countries
[edit]United States
[edit]Religious discrimination in the history of the United States dates back to the first Protestant Christian European settlers, composed mostly of English Puritans, during the British colonization of North America (16th century),[67][68] directed both towards Native Americans and non-Protestant Roman Catholic European settlers.[67][68] (See also Colonial history of the United States).
In a 1979 consultation on the issue, the United States Commission on Civil Rights defined religious discrimination in relation to the civil rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Whereas religious civil liberties, such as the right to hold or not to hold a religious belief, are essential for Freedom of Religion (in the United States secured by the First Amendment), religious discrimination occurs when someone is denied "the equal protection of the laws, equality of status under the law, equal treatment in the administration of justice, and equality of opportunity and access to employment, education, housing, public services and facilities, and public accommodation because they exercise their right to religious freedom".[69]
Canada
[edit]In Canada, during 1995-1998, Newfoundland had only Christian schools (four of them, Pentecostal, Roman Catholic, Seventh-day Adventist, and inter-denominational (Anglican, Salvation Army and United Church)). The right to organize publicly supported religious schools was only given to certain Christian denominations, thus tax money was used to support a selected group of Christian denominations. The denominational schools could also refuse the admission of a student or the hiring of a qualified teacher on purely religious grounds. Quebec has used two school systems, one Protestant and the other Roman Catholic, but it seems this system will be replaced with two secular school systems: one French and the other English.[70]
Ontario had two school systems going back before Confederation. The British North America Act (1867) gave the Provinces jurisdiction over education. Section 93 of the BNA Act offered constitutional protection for denominational schools as they existed in law at the time of Confederation. Like "Public schools", Catholic schools are fully funded from kindergarten to grade 12. However, profound demographic changes of the past few decades have made the province of Ontario a multicultural, multi-racial, and multi-religious society. The thought that one religious group is privileged to have schools funded from the public purse is often considered unacceptable in a pluralistic, multicultural, secular society. Although it's also true that the people who send their children to those schools have a form that directs their tax dollars to that school system.[71]
Canadian faith-based university Trinity Western University (TWU) is currently facing a challenge from members of the legal and LGBT community to its freedom to educate students in a private university context while holding certain "religious values", such as the freedom to discriminate against other people, including requiring students to sign a chastity oath, and denying LGBT students the same rights as straight students.[72][73] TWU faced a similar battle in 2001 (Trinity Western University v. British Columbia College of Teachers) where the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that TWU was capable to teach professional disciplines.[74]
On 16 June 2019, Quebec banned public servants in positions of authority from wearing visible religious symbols. The legislation was erected with the goal of promoting neutrality. Prime Minister Trudeau argues that the ban goes against the fundamental rights of the Canadian people.[75]
European Union
[edit]The Court of Justice of the European Union applies aspects of formal equality and substantive equality when evaluating religious discrimination.[76]
Germany
[edit]
Scientologists in Germany face specific political and economic restrictions. They are barred from membership in some major political parties, and businesses and other employers use so-called "sect filters" to expose a prospective business partner's or employee's association with the organization. German federal and state interior ministers started a process aimed at banning Scientology in late 2007, but abandoned the initiative a year later, finding insufficient legal grounds. Despite this, polls suggest that most Germans favor banning Scientology altogether. The U.S. government has repeatedly raised concerns over discriminatory practices directed at individual Scientologists.[77][78][79]
Greece
[edit]In Greece since the independence from the Muslim Ottomans rule in the 19th century, the Greek Orthodox Church has been given privileged status and only the Greek Orthodox church, Roman Catholic, some Protestant churches, Judaism and Islam are recognized religions. The Muslim minority alleges that Greece persistently and systematically discriminates against Muslims.[80][81]
Recently, professor Nick Drydakis (Anglia Ruskin University) examined religious affiliation and employment bias in Athens, by implementing an experimental field study. Labor market outcomes (occupation access, entry wage, and wait time for call back) were assessed for three religious minorities (Pentecostal, evangelical, and Jehovah's Witnesses). Results indicate that religious minorities experience employment bias. Moreover, religious minorities face greater constraints on occupational access in more prestigious jobs compared to less prestigious jobs. Occupational access and entry wage bias is highest for religious minority women. In all cases, Jehovah's Witnesses face the greatest bias; female employers offered significantly lower entry wages to Jehovah's Witnesses than male employers.[82]
Mexico
[edit]According to a Human Rights Practices report by the U.S. State department on Mexico note that "some local officials infringe on religious freedom, especially in the south". There is a conflict between Catholic/Mayan syncretists and Protestant evangelicals in the Chiapas region.[83][84][85]
United Kingdom
[edit]Within the United Kingdom (UK), Northern Ireland has a long history of discrimination based on the religious and political affiliations of Roman Catholics (Nationalists) and Protestants (Loyalists). Some discrimination against Catholics was based on the idea that they were disloyal to the State. In a speech on 19 March 1935, Basil Brooke (Prime Minister of Northern Ireland (1943-1963)) spoke on the issue of employment based on religion: "I recommend those people who are loyalists not employ Roman Catholics, ninety-nine percent of whom are disloyal."[86] In November 1934 the Prime Minister of Northern Ireland James Craig stated that his administration was a "Protestant Government for a Protestant People."[87] Discrimination based on religion in Northern Ireland is alleged to have occurred in the areas of housing allocation, employment, voting rights, state benefits and with the Gerrymandering (or discriminatory Electoral boundary delimitation) to ensure election results.
An analysis of the 1,095 Northern Ireland government appointments in 1951 showed that Nationalists (comprising 34 percent of the population) received only 11.8 percent of positions in local government bodies: Borough, County, Urban and Rural District Councils.[88] A system known as Plural voting provided for property owners to cast multiple votes in elections. Plural voting ended in the UK in 1948 but remained in effect in Northern Ireland until 1969.[89] The Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association (NICRA) was founded in 1967. Several of the demands made by NICRA were for "One Man One Vote", the end of gerrymandering and discrimination based on religion.[90]
See also
[edit]- Antisemitism
- Anti-Christian sentiment
- Anti-Hindu sentiment
- List of anti-discrimination acts
- Civil and political rights
- Discrimination against atheists
- Islamophobia
- Normalization of antisemitism
- Persecution of Buddhists
- Persecution of Christians
- Persecution of Christians in the post–Cold War era
- Persecution of Jews
- Persecution of Hindus
- Persecution of Muslims
- Religious antisemitism
- Religious intolerance
- Religious persecution
- Religious segregation
- Religious violence
Notes
[edit]- ^ Scheitle, Christopher P. (2023). The faithful scientist: experiences of anti-religious bias in scientific training. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 978-1-4798-2371-0.
- ^ "Religism". Thesaurus.com. Rock Holdings.
- ^ "Religism etymology". Etymologeek.
- ^ "religionism". The Free Dictionary. Farlex.
unwillingness to recognize and respect differences in opinions or beliefs
- ^ Richard Gottheil; Samuel Krauss (1901). "Hadrian". www.jewishencyclopedia.com. Vol. VI. pp. 134–135. Retrieved 2 January 2023.
- ^ a b Whitby, Michael; Streeter, Joseph, eds. (2006). Christian Persecution, Martyrdom, and Orthodoxy GEM de Ste.Croix. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-927812-1.
- ^ "Irenaeus – The mass slaughter of Lyon's Christians". Christian History Project.
- ^ "Persecution in the Early Church". Religion Facts.
- ^ MacMullen, R. Christianizing The Roman Empire A.D.100-400, Yale University Press, 1984, ISBN 0-300-03642-6
- ^ "Why the Jews? – Black Death". Holocaustcenterpgh.net. Archived from the original on 29 April 2007.
- ^ See Stéphane Barry and Norbert Gualde, La plus grande épidémie de Histoire ("The greatest epidemics in history"), in L'Histoire magazine, n°310, June 2006, p.47 (in French)
- ^ Sidney H. Griffith (2010). The Church in the Shadow of the Mosque: Christians and Muslims in the World of Islam. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691146287.
- ^ Heather J. Sharkey (2012). Introducing World Christianity. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-4443-4454-7.
- ^ Karsh, Ephraim (2006). Islamic Imperialism: A History. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10603-9.
- ^ Stillman, Norman A. (1998). "Under the New Order". The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society. pp. 22–28. ISBN 978-0-8276-0198-7.
- ^ "King John of England: Royal Licenses to Export and Import, 1205–1206". Fordham.edu.
- ^ Mayer calls them "chattels of the state"; Hans Mayer, "Latins, Muslims, and Greeks in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem", History 63 (1978), pg. 177; reprinted in Probleme des lateinischen Königreichs Jerusalem (Variorum, 1983).
- ^ a b The Works of Richard Hooker, II, p. 485; quoted after: John Coffey (2000)
- ^ John Morley, Biography of Oliver Cromwell. Page 298. 1900 and 2001. ISBN 978-1-4212-6707-4.; "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 25 May 2009.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) British National Archives web site. Accessed March 2007; "1649-52: Cromwell's conquest of Ireland". Archived from the original on 11 December 2004. Retrieved 17 January 2006. From a history site dedicated to the English Civil War. "... making Cromwell's name into one of the most hated in Irish history". Accessed March 2007. Site currently offline. WayBack Machine holds archive here - ^ Pavlowitch, Stevan K. (2002). Serbia: The History behind the Name. London: Hurst & Company. ISBN 9781850654773.
- ^ Zhelyazkova, Antonina. ‘'Albanian Identities'’. Sofia, 2000: International Center for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations. pp. 15-16
- ^ Singer, Isidore (1901). Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
- ^ "Non-Muslims ought to be eligible to become President, PM: Kamran Michael - The Express Tribune". The Express Tribune. 10 August 2011. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
- ^ Khan, Raza (11 August 2016). "Minority MPs seek constitutional amendment, demand top govt slots for non-Muslims". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
- ^ Farooq, Faisal (13 March 2012). "Why cannot a non-Muslim be president or prime minister? - News Pakistan". News Pakistan. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
- ^ "How to commit blasphemy in Pakistan". the Guardian. 5 September 2012. Retrieved 2 January 2023.
- ^ Basu, Subho (2010). Riaz, Ali, ed. Religion and Politics in South Asia (1st ed.). Routledge. p. 121. ISBN 978-0415778008.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Holder, Ross (27 March 2019). "On the Intersectionality of Religious and Racial Discrimination: A Case Study on the Applicability of ICERD with Respect to China's Uyghur Muslim Minority". Religion & Human Rights. 14 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1163/18710328-13021144. ISSN 1871-031X. S2CID 150640090.
- ^ a b c d e f g Butler, Brennan. "What is happening with the Uighurs in China?". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
- ^ a b "Why is there tension between China and the Uighurs?". BBC News. 26 September 2014. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f "Data leak details China's 'brainwashing system'". BBC News. 24 November 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
- ^ a b Graham-Harrison, Emma (24 September 2020). "China has built 380 internment camps in Xinjiang, study finds". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
- ^ "Uyghurs are being deported from Muslim countries, raising concerns about China's growing reach". CNN. 8 June 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
- ^ Constitution of India, Part III, Article 15
- ^ a b c Viswanath, Rupa (2015). "Silent Minority: Celebrated Difference, Caste Difference and the Hinduization of Modern India". In Vertovec, Steven (ed.). Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies. New York: Routledge. pp. 140–150. ISBN 9780415813860. OCLC 900901900.
- ^ Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2007). "Introduction". The Clash Within : Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press. p. 1. ISBN 9780674030596. OCLC 1006798430.
In order to understand India's current situation, we need to turn to a set of events that show more clearly than others how far the ideals of respectful pluralism and the rule of law have been threatened by religious ideology. These events are a terrible instance of genocidal violence; but they are more than that. The deeper problem they reveal is that of violence aided and abetted by the highest levels of government and law enforcement, a virtual announcement to minority citizens that they are unequal before the law and that their lives are not worth legal and police protection.
- ^ Mohan, Gopu (1 January 2018). "The 'P' Word: The dark history of 'pariah'". Commentary. The Caravan. ISSN 0008-6150. LCCN 2010328410. OCLC 613494967. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- ^ "Algeria: Christian charged with proselytism risks 5 years in prison | IIRF".
- ^ Djadi, Illia (10 July 2018). "Algerian 'happy to be free at last' after jail sentence and fine for carrying Christian items". World Watch Monitor.
- ^ "Considering Converting to Another Religion in Egypt? Think Again". 18 April 2017.
- ^ "Anti-Christian Violence Surges in Egypt, Prompting an Exodus". Wall Street Journal. 26 April 2019.
- ^ "Egyptian Copts Under Attack: The Frailty of a National Unity Discourse". Middle East Institute.
- ^ "The Reality of Church Construction in Egypt". TIMEP. 27 June 2019.
- ^ "Moroccan Christian jailed for evangelising". 9 September 2013.
- ^ "Marocco: 30 Mesi di Prigione per Essersi Convertito al Cristianesimo". 28 September 2013.
- ^ "A report about the persecution of atheists in Iran".
- ^ "Iran: Stop ruthless attacks on persecuted Baha'i religious minority". Amnesty International. 24 August 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
- ^ "Iran Targets Its Baha'i Community with Arrests and Home ..." 5 August 2022.
- ^ Foundation, Encyclopaedia Iranica. "Welcome to Encyclopaedia Iranica". iranicaonline.org. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
- ^ "53rd session of the Human Rights Council. Presentation of the Secretary-General's report on human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran (A/HRC/53/23). Statement by Nada Al-Nashif".
- ^ "Iran". United States Department of State. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
- ^ "Iran's Religious Freedom Worsened Last Year".
- ^ "Human rights in Iran". Amnesty International. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
- ^ a b c "Iran: UN experts alarmed by escalating religious persecution".
- ^ Tamadonfar, Mehran; Lewis, Roman B. (25 June 2019), "Religious Regulation in Iran", Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.864, ISBN 978-0-19-022863-7, retrieved 6 November 2023
- ^ "UN Human Rights Committee publishes findings in Iran".
- ^ "Iran must safeguard basic freedoms and protect human rights: UN expert".
- ^ a b Ahmady, Kameel.2023. From Border to Border (Comprehensive research study on identity and ethnicity in Iran), Scholars' Press publishes, Moldova.
- ^ a b Ahmady, Kameel (25 January 2022). "A Peace-Oriented Investigation of the Ethnic Identity Challenge in Iran (A Study of Five Iranian Ethnic Groups with the GT Method)". International Journal of Kurdish Studies. 8 (1): 1–40. doi:10.21600/ijoks.1039049. ISSN 2149-2751.
- ^ Ahmady, Kameel. "Investigation of the Ethnic Identity Challenge in Iran- A Peace-Oriented, EFFLATOUNIA - Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021) pp. 3242–3270". EFFLATOUNIA - Multidisciplinary Journal. JSTOR 4311704.
- ^ Ahmady, Kameel (30 December 2021). "A Peace-Oriented Investigation of the Ethnic Identity Challenge in Iran (A Study of Five Iranian Ethnic Groups with the GT Method)". EFFLATOUNIA - Multidisciplinary Journal. 5 (2). ISSN 1110-8703.
- ^ "Iran: Human Rights Abuses Against the Baluchi Minority" (PDF).
- ^ Nabatzai, Naser (24 January 2023). "Another threat to Maulvi Abdul Hamid | Balochistan Human Rights Group". Retrieved 6 November 2023.
- ^ Barry, James, ed. (2018), "Discrimination, Status, and Response", Armenian Christians in Iran: Ethnicity, Religion, and Identity in the Islamic Republic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–155, doi:10.1017/9781108684873.005, ISBN 978-1-108-42904-7, retrieved 6 November 2023
- ^ "Iran: End discrimination against the Kurdish minority". Amnesty International. 30 July 2008. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
- ^ Hafezi, Parisa; Butler, Daren (17 October 2022). "Putting Kurds in spotlight, Iran's leaders try to deflect national protest". Reuters. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
- ^ a b Corrigan, John; Neal, Lynn S., eds. (2010). "Religious Intolerance in Colonial America". Religious Intolerance in America: A Documentary History. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 17–48. doi:10.5149/9780807895955_corrigan.5. ISBN 9780807833896. LCCN 2009044820. S2CID 163405846.
- ^ a b Corrigan, John (2011). "Part I: Ideologies of Tolerance and Intolerance in Early America – Amalek and the Rhetoric of Extermination". In Beneke, Chris; Grenda, Christopher S. (eds.). The First Prejudice: Religious Tolerance and Intolerance in Early America. Early American Studies. Philadelphia and Oxford: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 53–74. ISBN 9780812223149. JSTOR j.ctt3fhn13.5. LCCN 2010015803.
- ^ U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1979: II
- ^ "The Constitution Since Patriation". Parl.gc.ca. 3 October 2006. Archived from the original on 3 October 2006. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 18 September 2016.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Craig, Elaine (18 December 2013). "Law societies must show more courage on Trinity Western application". The Globe and Mail.
- ^ "B.C. Law Society OK's Trinity Western law school despite gay sex ban - CBC News". cbc.ca.
- ^ "Trinity Western University v. British Columbia College of Teachers - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. January 2001.
- ^ "State shouldn't tell women what to wear, Trudeau says as Quebec promises ban on religious symbols | CBC News".
- ^ De Vos, Marc (2020). "The European Court of Justice and the march towards substantive equality in European Union anti-discrimination law". International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 20 (1): 62–87. doi:10.1177/1358229120927947. ISSN 1358-2291.
- ^ Barber (30 January 1997)
- ^ Kent (2001), pp. 3, 12–13 |
- ^ U.S. Department of State (1999)
- ^ "Turkish Minority Rights Violated in Greece". Hrw.org. 8 January 1999. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
- ^ "The Turks of Western Thrace". Hrw.org. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
- ^ Drydakis, Nick (2010). "Religious Affiliation and Employment Bias in the Labor Market". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 49 (3): 477–493. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01523.x.
- ^ "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices". State.gov. 4 March 2002. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
- ^ "BaptistFire - Persecution in Mexico". 2 October 1999. Archived from the original on 2 October 1999.
- ^ "U.S. Department of State Annual Report on International Religious Freedom for 1999: Mexico". State.gov. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
- ^ Gallagher, Frank (1957). The Indivisible Island. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd. p. 203.
- ^ Gallagher, Pg. 205
- ^ Gallagher, Pgs. 208-209
- ^ "Electoral Law Act (Northern Ireland) 1968". www.legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 9 April 2024.
- ^ Coogan, Tim Pat (2015). The Troubles : Ireland's Ordeal 1966-1995 and the search for peace. London. p. 57. ISBN 978-1-78497-538-8. OCLC 965779362.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
References
[edit]- Stokes, DaShanne. (In Press) Legalized Segregation and the Denial of Religious Freedom [dead link]
- Stokes, DaShanne. (2001). "Sage, Sweetgrass, and the First Amendment." The Chronicle of Higher Education. 18 May 2001, sec. 2: B16.
- U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1979: Religious discrimination. A neglected issue. A consultation sponsored by the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Washington D.C., 9–10 April 1979
Religious discrimination
View on GrokipediaDefinitions and Typology
Conceptual Distinctions from Related Concepts
Religious discrimination refers to the unequal or adverse treatment of individuals or groups based on their religious beliefs, practices, affiliations, or lack thereof, encompassing actions such as exclusion from employment, services, or public accommodations.[2] This differs from mere prejudice, which involves attitudinal biases or stereotypes without overt behavioral consequences, whereas discrimination manifests in tangible harms like denial of opportunities or harassment rooted in religious identity.[10] A key distinction lies between religious discrimination and religious persecution: the former includes everyday exclusions or biases, such as workplace favoritism against adherents of minority faiths, while persecution entails systematic denial of fundamental civil rights, often involving violence, imprisonment, or state-sanctioned oppression, as seen in cases where governments enforce conformity through force rather than mere unequal treatment.[11] For instance, U.S. legal frameworks under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 address religious discrimination in employment through remedies for disparate treatment, but persecution exceeds this by threatening life or liberty on a mass scale.[10] Religious discrimination must be differentiated from racism, which targets immutable or perceived biological traits like skin color or ancestry, whereas religion involves mutable beliefs or voluntary affiliations that individuals can adopt, change, or renounce without altering inherent physical characteristics.[12] Although overlaps occur—such as anti-Semitism blending ethnic and religious animus—core legal protections treat them separately: Title VII prohibits religious bias independently of race under Title VI, recognizing that religious identity stems from doctrinal adherence rather than genetic lineage.[13] Similarly, ethnic discrimination focuses on shared cultural heritage or national origin, which may correlate with religion but lacks the emphasis on theological practices or creeds that define religious cases.[14] In contrast to xenophobia, which arises from aversion to foreigners or cultural outsiders irrespective of faith, religious discrimination specifically hinges on doctrinal differences, such as objections to rituals or scriptures, even among co-nationals of the same ethnicity.[15] Sectarianism, meanwhile, operates intra-religiously, targeting subgroups within the same broad faith (e.g., Sunni vs. Shia divisions marked by denominational affiliation or surnames) rather than interfaith conflicts central to broader religious discrimination.[16] These boundaries underscore that while intersections exist—driven by demographic overlaps—religious discrimination's causal locus remains adherence to specific beliefs, enabling distinctions in legal and analytical frameworks.[17]Forms of Religious Discrimination
Religious discrimination manifests in multiple forms, ranging from institutional policies and legal restrictions to interpersonal harassment and violence. Direct discrimination involves explicit adverse treatment based on an individual's religion, such as denying employment or services solely due to religious affiliation. Indirect discrimination arises from neutral policies that disproportionately burden religious practices, like inflexible scheduling conflicting with Sabbath observance or bans on head coverings affecting adherents of faiths requiring them, such as Sikh turbans or Muslim hijabs.[10][18] Harassment constitutes another prevalent form, encompassing derogatory remarks, jokes, or physical intimidation creating a hostile environment, often in workplaces or schools. In employment settings under U.S. law, this violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which mandates reasonable accommodations for religious practices unless they impose undue hardship, such as allowing prayer breaks or exemptions from tasks conflicting with beliefs. Failure to accommodate, like refusing time off for religious holidays, frequently leads to claims; the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission handled 1,968 religious discrimination charges in fiscal year 2022, many involving such issues.[2][19] Government-imposed restrictions represent systemic forms, including prohibitions on ritual slaughter, limits on religious education, or closures of places of worship. Pew Research Center data indicate that government restrictions on religion, measured via the Government Restrictions Index, peaked globally in 2021 at a median score of 3.0 (on a 0-10 scale), with interference in worship services occurring in 139 countries and harassment of religious groups by authorities in 190 countries that year. Such policies often target minority faiths, as seen in bans on Jehovah's Witnesses' activities in Russia since 2017, ruled a violation of freedom of association by the European Court of Human Rights in 2022.[6][20][21] Violence and hate crimes form acute expressions, involving assaults, vandalism, or threats motivated by religious bias. The FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program documented 2,042 religion-based hate crime offenses in 2023, comprising 16% of all single-bias incidents, with anti-Jewish offenses accounting for 69% of those targeting religion despite Jews representing about 2% of the U.S. population. Internationally, the U.S. State Department's 2022 International Religious Freedom Report highlights executions for apostasy in countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia, where leaving Islam can incur death penalties under Sharia-based laws.[22][23][24] Additional forms appear in housing, education, and public services, such as denying rentals due to visible religious symbols or excluding students from activities over dietary needs. The UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, adopted in 1981, obligates states to prohibit such discrimination in all domains, including access to employment, education, and public facilities. Victimization, or retaliation against those complaining of discrimination, further compounds these issues, as protected under frameworks like the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidelines.[25][26][10]Underlying Causes
Theological and Ideological Drivers
Theological drivers of religious discrimination frequently arise from exclusivist doctrines asserting the unique truth of one faith, positioning adherents of other beliefs as spiritually deficient or adversarial. In Islamic theology, the dhimmi system codifies subordinate status for non-Muslims, particularly "People of the Book" (Jews and Christians), requiring them to pay the jizya poll tax in recognition of Islamic authority and exemption from military service, as mandated in Quran 9:29: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah... until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled."[27][28] This framework, implemented from the early caliphates, institutionalized legal inequalities, such as restrictions on public worship and testimony in courts, to affirm Muslim supremacy.[29] In Christianity, doctrinal emphasis on orthodoxy against heresy provided theological warrant for coercive measures. Heresy, defined as obstinate denial of core dogmas like the Trinity or Christ's divinity, was equated with spiritual treason, justifying excommunication and, with state cooperation, execution or imprisonment.[30] The Papal Inquisition, formalized by Pope Gregory IX's bull Excommunicamus on July 20, 1231, empowered Dominicans to investigate and prosecute heretics, leading to trials and burnings across Europe to preserve ecclesiastical unity.[31] Such actions drew from patristic views, as articulated by figures like Augustine, who initially opposed coercion but later endorsed it against Donatists, arguing that compulsion could save souls from eternal damnation.[32] Ideological drivers, particularly in secular materialist frameworks, frame religion as an impediment to rational progress or social equality, prompting systematic suppression. Karl Marx's 1843 assertion in A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right that "religion is the opium of the people"—a sedative distracting from class exploitation—underpinned communist regimes' campaigns to eradicate faith as false consciousness.[33] In the Soviet Union, this manifested in Bolshevik decrees from 1918 closing churches and monasteries; by 1922, at least 1,215 priests and 12 bishops had been executed amid anti-religious purges, with estimates of up to 200,000 clergy killed overall by 1991, including crucifixions and tortures documented in declassified records.[34] Similar policies in Maoist China, from 1949, demolished temples and persecuted believers, reflecting ideology's causal role in viewing religious adherence as counterrevolutionary.[35] These cases illustrate how atheistic ideologies, prioritizing state control over spiritual autonomy, engendered discrimination more aggressively than theological rivals in comparable eras.Demographic and Socio-Political Factors
Demographic composition significantly influences the prevalence of religious discrimination, with minorities consistently facing higher rates of harassment and exclusion than majorities. In the United States, a 2020 University of Washington study analyzing survey data found that Muslims and atheists reported experiencing religious discrimination at rates exceeding those of Catholics or mainline Protestants, attributing this to their smaller population shares and perceived cultural deviance.[36] Globally, Pew Research Center's analysis of 198 countries from 2007 to 2017 revealed that social hostilities involving religion—such as mob violence or abuse—were more frequent in nations with multiple competing religious groups, where demographic pluralism heightens intergroup competition for resources and influence.[37] This pattern holds empirically: smaller religious minorities, comprising less than 10% of a population, encounter disproportionate targeting, as evidenced by elevated harassment scores in Pew's Social Hostilities Index for groups like Christians in sub-Saharan Africa or Hindus in Pakistan.[9] Migration-driven demographic shifts exacerbate tensions, particularly when rapid influxes alter local majorities and provoke identity-based backlash. For instance, post-2015 migration waves in Europe correlated with spikes in antisemitic incidents, often linked to higher proportions of Muslim immigrants in urban areas, per data from national monitoring bodies cross-referenced in Pew reports.[37] In contrast, homogeneous societies with dominant religions exhibit lower intra-religious conflict but impose systemic restrictions on outliers, as seen in Saudi Arabia's near-total exclusion of non-Muslims, where demographic uniformity underpins state-enforced orthodoxy.[9] Socio-political structures amplify these demographic vulnerabilities through policies that instrumentalize religion for control or mobilization. Authoritarian governments, scoring highest on Pew's Government Restrictions Index (median 5.0+ in 2021), often restrict minority faiths to consolidate power, as in China's suppression of Uyghur Muslims or North Korea's isolation of all external religions, where political ideology overrides pluralistic demographics.[38] Nationalism intertwined with religion fosters persecution by framing minorities as existential threats; India's Hindu nationalist policies since 2014 have targeted Muslims and Christians amid rising majoritarian rhetoric, correlating with increased vigilante attacks documented in annual reports.[39] In democracies, socio-political polarization—such as grievance narratives in populist movements—can elevate hostilities, with studies showing that perceived threats to group identity prompt discriminatory laws or social exclusion, independent of economic factors alone.[40] Historical socio-political legacies perpetuate cycles, as evidenced by a 2021 PNAS study on Inquisition-era Spain: municipalities with intense past persecutions exhibit 15-20% lower modern incomes, trust, and education levels, sustaining discrimination through entrenched social norms rather than current demographics.[41] Conversely, robust legal frameworks in diverse liberal democracies mitigate risks, though erosion via identity politics can revive hostilities, underscoring that institutional safeguards, not diversity per se, determine outcomes.[42]Historical Overview
Ancient and Medieval Periods
In ancient polytheistic societies, religious practices were often tolerated provided they did not threaten civic order or imperial authority, though monotheistic groups faced discrimination for refusing participation in state rituals. In the Roman Empire, Judaism received legal recognition as an ancient religion exempt from emperor worship, allowing Jews to maintain synagogues and avoid military service on Sabbath, as granted by Julius Caesar around 47 BCE and reaffirmed by later emperors.[43] However, Jewish revolts against Roman rule, such as the First Jewish-Roman War (66–73 CE), led to severe reprisals, including the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE and the enslavement or dispersal of over 97,000 Jews.[44] Early Christians, initially viewed as a Jewish sect, encountered sporadic but intensifying persecution due to their rejection of Roman gods and emperor cult, perceived as atheism or disloyalty. Under Nero in 64 CE, Christians were scapegoated for the Great Fire of Rome, subjected to tortures like crucifixion and being burned alive.[45] Systematic empire-wide edicts followed, notably Decius's in 250 CE requiring sacrifices to gods, resulting in thousands of executions or forced apostasy, and Diocletian's Great Persecution (303–311 CE), which destroyed churches, burned scriptures, and executed resisters.[46] These measures stemmed from concerns over social cohesion and divine favor amid crises, affecting an estimated 3,000–5,000 martyrs before the Edict of Milan in 313 CE legalized Christianity.[47] Following Christianity's ascendancy, pagans faced reciprocal suppression as imperial policy shifted to enforce orthodoxy. Theodosius I's edicts in 391–392 CE banned pagan sacrifices and closed temples, leading to the destruction of sites like the Serapeum in Alexandria in 391 CE and violent clashes, with estimates of thousands killed in riots.[48] In medieval Christian Europe, Jews endured escalating discrimination rooted in theological accusations of deicide and economic resentments, manifesting in ghettoization, badge-wearing mandates (e.g., Fourth Lateran Council, 1215), and violent pogroms. The Rhineland massacres of 1096 during the First Crusade killed thousands of Jews in cities like Worms and Mainz, as crusaders targeted "infidels" at home before departing.[49] Blood libel myths, alleging ritual murder, incited further attacks, such as the 1144 Norwich case, while expulsions occurred in England (1290, affecting 2,000–3,000 Jews) and France (1306).[49] Heretical movements like Catharism and Waldensianism prompted the Medieval Inquisition, established by Pope Gregory IX in 1231 to investigate and prosecute deviations from Catholic doctrine through trials, confiscations, and executions. In Languedoc, the Albigensian Crusade (1209–1229) against Cathars resulted in the massacre at Béziers (1209), where 15,000–20,000 were killed regardless of faith, justified by papal legates.[50] Under medieval Islamic caliphates, non-Muslims (dhimmis)—primarily Jews and Christians—held protected but subordinate status per the Pact of Umar (7th century), requiring jizya poll tax, distinctive clothing, and prohibitions on proselytizing or building new houses of worship. This system, while averting forced conversion, enforced social inferiority, with dhimmis barred from testifying against Muslims and subject to occasional humiliations or mob violence, as in the 1066 Granada massacre of 4,000 Jews.[51][52] In contrast to claims of golden ages, empirical records show systemic discrimination, including higher taxes funding Muslim armies and sporadic forced conversions under rulers like the Almohads (12th century), displacing thousands.[52]Early Modern to Contemporary Era
In the Early Modern period, the Protestant Reformation triggered widespread religious conflicts across Europe, leading to systematic persecution and mass violence against dissenting Christian sects. The French Wars of Religion (1562–1598) culminated in events like the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre on August 24, 1572, where thousands of Huguenots (French Protestants) were killed by Catholic forces in Paris and beyond, reflecting state-enforced Catholic dominance and intolerance toward Protestant minorities.[53] Similarly, the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) devastated Central Europe, with religious divisions exacerbating political rivalries and resulting in an estimated 4.5 to 8 million deaths, including targeted killings of Catholics, Lutherans, and Calvinists, as well as Jews scapegoated during famines and plagues.[54] These conflicts often involved expulsion, forced conversions, and legal discrimination, such as the Edict of Fontainebleau in 1685, which revoked prior toleration and drove approximately 200,000–400,000 Huguenots into exile.[55] During the colonial era from the 16th to 19th centuries, European powers imposed Christianity on indigenous populations through coercion and violence, eradicating native religions in many regions. Spanish and Portuguese colonizers in the Americas and Asia enforced mass baptisms, with the Spanish Inquisition extending to colonies like Mexico and Peru, where indigenous peoples faced torture, enslavement, or execution for resisting conversion; by 1550, millions of Native Americans had been baptized under duress, often accompanied by destruction of temples and sacred texts.[56] In Goa, Portuguese authorities under the Goa Inquisition (1560–1812) targeted Hindus and Muslims with forced conversions, confiscations, and executions, converting tens of thousands while banning public Hindu practices.[56] British and French colonies in North America similarly suppressed Native American spiritual traditions, with Puritan settlers in New England enforcing laws against "heathen" rituals, leading to cultural erasure alongside epidemics that decimated populations from 90% to 10% pre-contact levels by 1700.[57] The 19th century saw intensified antisemitic pogroms in the Russian Empire, where Jews faced organized riots, property destruction, and murders amid economic resentments and religious prejudices. Between 1881 and 1884, over 200 pogroms erupted following the assassination of Tsar Alexander II, killing dozens and displacing hundreds of thousands of Jews, with state complicity in some cases through lax enforcement or participation.[58] These events, rooted in longstanding Christian theological hostility toward Jews as "Christ-killers," accelerated Jewish emigration, with over 2 million leaving Russia by 1914.[58] In the 20th century, totalitarian regimes amplified religious discrimination through state atheism and racial ideologies. The Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin pursued aggressive antireligious campaigns from 1917 onward, closing or destroying over 90% of Orthodox churches by 1939, executing or imprisoning tens of thousands of clergy, and persecuting believers across denominations, with an estimated 12–20 million Christians affected by 1937 purges.[59] Nazi Germany's Holocaust (1941–1945) systematically murdered 6 million Jews, building on centuries of European religious antisemitism—such as medieval blood libels and expulsions—but reframing it as racial extermination, with discriminatory Nuremberg Laws of 1935 stripping Jews of citizenship and barring intermarriage.[60] Contemporary religious discrimination persists globally, often tied to geopolitical tensions and ideological extremism. Pew Research Center surveys indicate that in the United States, 82% of adults in 2019 perceived at least some discrimination against Muslims, rising to 44% viewing it as "a lot" by 2024, amid post-9/11 policies and hate crimes; similarly, 40% saw significant discrimination against Jews in 2024, exacerbated by events like the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting.[61][62] In Muslim-majority countries, Christians and other minorities face blasphemy laws and mob violence, while in China, Uyghur Muslims endure re-education camps since 2017, with over 1 million detained for religious practices.[63] Christians report high persecution levels in 50+ countries, per annual trackers, including church bombings in Nigeria and arrests in North Korea.[64]Patterns by Targeted Religious Group
Discrimination Against Christians
Discrimination against Christians manifests globally through violence, legal restrictions, and social marginalization, affecting an estimated 380 million adherents who experience high or extreme levels of persecution.[65] According to the Open Doors World Watch List 2025, this includes 310 million in the top 50 most dangerous countries, where believers face arrests, church demolitions, and forced renunciations of faith, driven by state authoritarianism and extremist ideologies.[65] Government restrictions on religion reached peak levels in 2022, persisting into recent years, with Christians harassed in 159 countries via interference in worship or favoritism toward dominant faiths.[66] In Muslim-majority countries, persecution often arises from Islamic governance structures that enforce Sharia-based penalties for apostasy, blasphemy, and proselytism, leading to systematic discrimination.[67] Nations like Somalia, Libya, and Pakistan rank among the highest for Christian vulnerability, where converts face death threats or honor killings, and Christian communities endure mob attacks and property seizures.[65] In Nigeria, Islamist groups such as Boko Haram killed over 5,000 Christians between 2019 and 2023, displacing entire villages and contributing to Christianity's decline in the north.[65] Egypt's Coptic Christians, comprising about 10% of the population, continue to experience church bombings, kidnappings of women for forced conversion, and bureaucratic barriers to building places of worship despite some legal reforms.[68] Authoritarian regimes in Asia impose surveillance, imprisonment, and cultural assimilation policies targeting unregistered churches. North Korea tops persecution rankings, with Christians subjected to labor camps and execution for possessing Bibles, affecting an underground population of 300,000–400,000.[65] In China, the government demolished thousands of crosses and arrested pastors under the 2018 Regulations on Religious Affairs, enforcing "Sinicization" that requires allegiance to the Communist Party over doctrine.[65] India saw over 855 verified incidents of violence against Christians in 2024, including assaults on clergy and conversions coerced by Hindu nationalist groups, amid state-level anti-conversion laws that disproportionately penalize Christian evangelism.[69][70] In Western countries, discrimination tends toward non-violent forms, including legal penalties for conscience-based objections and societal hostility toward traditional Christian teachings. European reports document rising church vandalisms—over 3,000 incidents in France alone in recent years—and workplace dismissals for voicing views on abortion or [same-sex marriage](/page/same-sex marriage), often framed as hate speech under expanding equality laws.[71] In the United States and Canada, bakers and counselors have faced lawsuits and license revocations for refusing services conflicting with biblical ethics, as seen in cases upheld by courts prioritizing nondiscrimination statutes.[72] These patterns reflect tensions between secular pluralism and religious exemptions, with Pew data indicating Christians perceive discrimination in 37% of surveyed Western contexts, though empirical violence remains rare compared to non-Western regions.[73]Discrimination Against Muslims
Discrimination against Muslims includes acts of violence, legal restrictions on religious practices, and systemic exclusion targeting individuals based on their adherence to Islam. Globally, such incidents have been documented in both minority and majority-Muslim contexts, often linked to ethnic or nationalistic tensions rather than purely theological conflicts. Empirical data from official reports indicate spikes following high-profile terrorist attacks attributed to Islamist groups, though baseline rates remain low relative to population size in Western nations.[74][75] In the United States, anti-Muslim hate crimes surged to 481 incidents in 2001 following the September 11 attacks, representing a sharp increase from an average of 25 annually in the 1990s. More recent FBI data for 2023 recorded an overall rise in hate crimes to 11,862 incidents, with religion-based offenses comprising a significant portion, though anti-Islamic bias incidents numbered in the low hundreds amid broader increases driven by anti-Jewish attacks. These events include vandalism of mosques and physical assaults, often correlated with geopolitical events like the Israel-Hamas conflict starting October 7, 2023. In Europe, self-reported surveys by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights indicate that 47% of Muslims experienced racial or ethnic discrimination in 2022, up from 39% in 2016, with 39% facing job market barriers and 25% reporting harassment. Actual verified incidents, such as mosque attacks, remain sporadic but have prompted policies like France's 2010 burqa ban, upheld by the European Court of Human Rights in 2014 as a proportionate security measure rather than blanket discrimination.[76][77][78] Severe forms of discrimination occur in Asia, particularly against Muslim minorities. In China's Xinjiang region, the government has detained over one million Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslims in re-education camps since 2017, involving forced labor, sterilization, and cultural erasure, as documented through satellite imagery, leaked internal documents, and survivor testimonies analyzed by U.S. government and independent researchers. The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum describes this as a systematic campaign of identity-based repression, including bans on religious practices like fasting during Ramadan. In Myanmar, the Rohingya Muslim minority has endured decades of institutionalized discrimination, culminating in the 2017 military clearance operations that displaced over 700,000 to Bangladesh, involving mass killings, rape, and village burnings classified by the United Nations as ethnic cleansing with genocidal intent. Myanmar's 1982 citizenship law effectively renders Rohingya stateless, denying them basic rights. In India, Pew Research found that 40% of northern Muslims reported personal religious discrimination in the prior year as of 2021, amid rising communal violence; however, official data shows Muslims comprising 14% of the population but facing disproportionate poverty and lower educational attainment, with Hindu-Muslim riots declining in frequency since the 1990s despite periodic flare-ups.[79][80][81][82][83]Antisemitism and Discrimination Against Jews
Antisemitism refers to prejudice, discrimination, or hostility directed at Jews, frequently grounded in religious stereotypes portraying them as responsible for the death of Jesus or as inherently opposed to Christian teachings.[84] This theological foundation, evident in early Christian texts like Matthew 27:20, fostered systemic exclusion, including bans on Jews holding public office and forced conversions from the early Church onward.[85] By the Middle Ages, such animus manifested in blood libel accusations—false claims of ritual murder—and widespread expulsions across Europe between 1100 and 1600, affecting regions from England in 1290 to Spain in 1492, often justified by religious purity doctrines amid economic resentments over moneylending roles barred to Christians.[86] These patterns displaced hundreds of thousands, with Jews relocating to Poland-Lithuania or the Ottoman Empire, where relative tolerance prevailed until later shifts. In the modern era, religious discrimination evolved into racialized forms, culminating in the Holocaust, where Nazi ideology drew on centuries-old Christian antisemitic tropes to justify the murder of six million Jews from 1941 to 1945, framing it as a divine or existential purge.[87] Post-World War II, overt theological antisemitism declined in the West due to Vatican II reforms in 1965 repudiating deicide charges, yet residual prejudices persisted, blending with secular conspiracy theories like Jewish world control myths rooted in forged texts such as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.[88] Discrimination continued through quotas in universities and professions, as in Ivy League institutions until the mid-20th century, and synagogue vandalism tied to religious festivals. Contemporary antisemitism has surged globally, particularly following Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which killed 1,200 and triggered a 140% rise in U.S. incidents to 8,873 in 2023 per ADL tracking of harassment, vandalism, and assaults.[89] FBI data for 2023 showed anti-Jewish bias motivating 1,832 of 2,699 religion-based hate crimes, comprising over 68% of such incidents despite Jews being 2% of the population.[77] In 2024, incidents hit record highs again, with anti-Jewish crimes nearly 70% of religion-motivated attacks, including spikes on campuses amid protests conflating Jewish identity with Israeli policy.[90] Europe saw similar escalations, with dozens of percentage points increase in violent acts across major Jewish communities, often linked to anti-Israel rhetoric veering into religious vilification.[91] These patterns underscore persistent religious undertones, such as synagogue attacks during holidays, amid broader societal failures to distinguish criticism of Israel from anti-Jewish hostility.[92]Discrimination Against Hindus, Sikhs, and Other Groups
Hindus, comprising approximately 1.2 billion adherents worldwide, face significant discrimination in several Muslim-majority countries in South Asia, particularly Pakistan and Bangladesh, where they constitute small minorities. In Pakistan, Hindus endure forced conversions, kidnappings of girls for marriage under religious pretexts, and violence linked to blasphemy accusations, contributing to a population decline from about 15% at partition in 1947 to roughly 2% today. Reports document over 1,000 cases of forced conversions annually, often involving minors, with limited legal recourse due to societal and institutional biases favoring the majority faith.[93] In Bangladesh, Hindus experience land expropriation through fabricated ownership claims, communal violence during political unrest, and targeted attacks on temples, prompting sustained emigration; their share of the population fell from 22% in 1951 to around 8% by recent estimates, driven by these pressures rather than natural demographic shifts alone.[94][95] Sikhs, numbering about 25-30 million globally with large diasporas in Western countries, encounter discrimination primarily through hate crimes motivated by misidentification with Muslims due to visible religious symbols like turbans and beards, a pattern intensified post-9/11 attacks. In the United States, the FBI recorded 153 anti-Sikh bias incidents in 2024, positioning Sikhs as the third-most targeted religious group after Jews and Muslims, down slightly from 198 in 2022 but still reflecting persistent vulnerability; these include assaults, vandalism, and threats, with underreporting estimated due to community distrust of authorities.[96] In Canada, police-reported hate crimes against South Asians, disproportionately affecting Sikhs, surged 227% from 2019 to 2023, comprising part of the "other religions" category (including Sikhs, Hindus, and Buddhists) at 2.3% of total incidents in recent data, amid rising online and offline rhetoric tied to geopolitical tensions like India-Canada disputes over Sikh separatism.[97][98] Among other groups, such as Jains and Buddhists, discrimination manifests less systematically globally but persists in specific contexts. Jains, a small community of under 5 million mostly in India, report sporadic social exclusion tied to vegetarianism and business stereotypes, though empirical data on widespread violence is scarce; in India, Pew surveys indicate low perceived discrimination against Jains compared to larger minorities. Buddhists face state-sponsored suppression in China, where Tibetan Buddhists endure cultural erasure policies, including monastery demolitions and forced secularization, affecting millions since the 1950s annexation, as documented in international religious freedom assessments. These cases underscore how minority status and theological incompatibilities with dominant ideologies drive targeted restrictions, often evading robust global scrutiny.[99]Regional Manifestations
In Muslim-Majority Countries
In Muslim-majority countries, religious discrimination often stems from constitutional provisions establishing Islam as the state religion and incorporating Sharia principles, which prioritize Muslims and impose restrictions on non-Muslims, apostates, and dissenting sects. Governments in these nations frequently designate certain groups as heretical or non-Muslim, leading to legal disabilities, social ostracism, and violence. For instance, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) recommended "Countries of Particular Concern" status in its 2025 report for Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and others, citing severe violations including executions for apostasy and blasphemy. Pew Research Center data from 2022, the most recent comprehensive global assessment, showed high or very high government restrictions on religion in 52% of Muslim-majority countries, exceeding global averages, with ongoing trends into 2024-2025 per USCIRF updates.[66] Christians face acute persecution in several such states. In Pakistan, blasphemy laws under Sections 295-B and 295-C of the penal code, carrying death penalties, disproportionately target Christians, with over 1,500 accusations since 1987, often leading to mob lynchings and forced conversions; in 2024, at least 10 Christians were killed in blasphemy-related violence. Nigeria, where Muslims comprise about 50% of the population in northern states, saw over 4,100 Christians killed by Islamist groups like Boko Haram and Fulani militants in 2024 alone, per Open Doors' World Watch List 2025, marking it as the deadliest country for Christians globally.[65] In Egypt, Coptic Christians endure church bombings and discriminatory family laws favoring Muslims, with 2024 incidents including attacks on at least five churches amid inadequate state protection.[100] Other minorities experience similar systemic biases. In Iran, Baha'is—deemed apostates—are barred from universities, face property confiscations, and endured over 200 arrests in 2024 for religious activities, while Sunni Muslims and evangelical Christians report torture and executions under apostasy charges. Saudi Arabia prohibits non-Muslim public worship, enforces guardianship laws discriminating against Shi'a Muslims (10-15% of the population), and punished at least 20 religious dissidents with imprisonment or flogging in 2024. Pakistan's Ahmadis, declared non-Muslims by a 1974 constitutional amendment, face voting restrictions and mosque demolitions, with 50 attacks on Ahmadi places of worship in 2024. Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh suffer forced conversions of girls (over 1,000 cases annually in Pakistan) and temple destructions, driven by blasphemy accusations and land grabs. Sectarian discrimination within Islam exacerbates tensions. Apostasy laws, prescribing death in 13 Muslim-majority countries including Afghanistan and Mauritania, deter conversion or criticism of Islam, with at least 10 executions reported globally in 2023-2024. Blasphemy statutes exist in 32 Muslim-majority nations, often conflated with apostasy, leading to vigilante justice; USCIRF notes Muslims comprise 56% of blasphemy prosecutions despite targeting minorities.[101] In Sunni-Shia divides, Yemen's Houthi rebels (Shia) destroyed Jewish sites in 2024, while Sunni extremists in Iraq and Syria continue targeting Yazidis post-2014 genocide, displacing over 200,000.[102] Turkey, under secular constitution but with rising Islamist influence, restricts Alevi (Shia-offshoot) worship and converts Hagia Sophia to a mosque in 2020, limiting non-Sunni access.[103]| Country | Key Discriminated Groups | Notable 2024-2025 Violations |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | Christians, Ahmadis, Hindus, Shia | 10+ blasphemy deaths; 50 Ahmadi attacks |
| Nigeria | Christians | 4,100+ killed by Islamists[65] |
| Iran | Baha'is, Sunnis, Christians | 200+ Baha'i arrests; apostasy executions |
| Saudi Arabia | Shi'a, non-Muslims | Worship bans; 20 dissident punishments |
