Hubbry Logo
AdamsiteAdamsiteMain
Open search
Adamsite
Community hub
Adamsite
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Adamsite
Adamsite
Adamsite
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Adamsite
Structural formula of adamsite
Structural formula of adamsite
Names
Preferred IUPAC name
10-Chloro-5,10-dihydrophenazarsinine
Other names
10-Chloro-5H-phenarsazinine
Diphenylaminechlorarsine
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
Abbreviations DM
ChemSpider
ECHA InfoCard 100.008.577 Edit this at Wikidata
EC Number
  • 209-433-1
MeSH Phenarsazine+chloride
UNII
  • InChI=1S/C12H9AsClN/c14-13-9-5-1-3-7-11(9)15-12-8-4-2-6-10(12)13/h1-8,15H checkY
    Key: PBNSPNYJYOYWTA-UHFFFAOYSA-N checkY
  • InChI=1/C12H9AsClN/c14-13-9-5-1-3-7-11(9)15-12-8-4-2-6-10(12)13/h1-8,15H
    Key: PBNSPNYJYOYWTA-UHFFFAOYAA
  • Cl[As]2c1ccccc1Nc3c2cccc3
  • Cl[As]1C2=C(NC3=C1C=CC=C3)C=CC=C2
Properties
C12H9AsClN
Molar mass 277.58 g·mol−1
Appearance Yellow-green crystals
Melting point 195 °C (383 °F; 468 K)
Boiling point 410 °C (770 °F; 683 K)
0.064 g dm−3
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
☒N verify (what is checkY☒N ?)

Adamsite or DM is an organic compound; technically, an arsenical diphenylaminechlorarsine, that can be used as a riot control agent. DM belongs to the group of chemical warfare agents known as vomiting agents or sneeze gases.[1] First synthesized in Germany by Heinrich Otto Wieland in 1915, it was independently developed by the US chemist Roger Adams (for whom it is named) at the University of Illinois in 1918.

Composition

[edit]

DM is an odourless crystalline compound with a very low vapour pressure. The colour of the crystals ranges from bright yellow to dark green depending on the purity. It is readily soluble in some organic solvents (e.g., acetone, dichloromethane), but nearly insoluble in water. In vaporous form it appears as a canary yellow smoke.[2]

Effects

[edit]

Adamsite is usually dispersed as an aerosol, making the upper respiratory tract the primary site of action. Although the effects are similar to those caused by typical riot control agents (e.g. CS), they are slower in onset but longer in duration, often lasting for 12 or more hours.[1] After a latency period of 5–10 minutes irritation of the eyes, lungs and mucous membranes develops followed by headache, nausea and persistent vomiting.[1]

Usage

[edit]

DM was produced and stockpiled by the British and the United States at the end of World War I. It was used by the British during the incursions at Murmansk and Arkhangelsk.[3] It is now regarded as obsolete and has been widely replaced by riot control agents such as CS which are less toxic and more rapid in the onset of symptoms. Early battlefield use was intended to be via "adamsite candles". These were large metal cans or tubes (weighing approximately 5 pounds [2.3 kg]) which contained a smoke composition made of adamsite plus a slow burning pyrotechnic composition. A series of candles were lit and the adamsite-laden smoke allowed to drift towards the enemy.[4]

In the United States, it was used against the Bonus Army who demonstrated in Washington, D.C., in 1932, reportedly causing the death and serious injury of several children who had accompanied their parents on the protests. It was again used in the Vietnam War.[5]

Japan's Unit 731 exposed victims to adamsite, amongst other chemical and viral agents.[6]

In 2003, North Korea was reportedly producing adamsite at its Aoji-ri Chemical Complex in Haksong-ri, Kyŏnghŭng county for stockpiling.[7] DM was allegedly used by Venezuelan authorities in the 2014–17 Venezuelan protests and described as "green gas"[8][9] with reports of protesters vomiting following exposure[10][11][12] and regional human rights groups condemning the usage of "green gas", stating that its usage is "internationally banned".[13]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Adamsite

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Adamsite (DM), chemically 10-chloro-5,10-dihydrophenarsazine (C₁₂H₉AsClN), is an organoarsenic compound classified as a sternutatory or vomiting agent due to its potent irritant effects on the and mucous membranes. Developed independently by American chemist Roger Adams, who refined its synthesis in 1918, the yellow crystalline solid was stockpiled by the toward the close of as a non-persistent agent intended to incapacitate troops by inducing sneezing, , , and , thereby compelling removal of protective masks. Although never deployed in combat during the war, its aerosolized form allows penetration of early gas masks and environmental persistence, making it effective for harassment but insufficiently lethal for decisive battlefield use; post-war, it found limited application in military despite critiques of its potency exceeding civilian tolerance thresholds. Exposure triggers rapid onset of symptoms including eye irritation, chest pain, and gastrointestinal distress, with toxicity arising from content that decomposes to release corrosive fumes under heat, underscoring its dual role as both tactical irritant and hazardous material.

History

Discovery and Development

Adamsite, or diphenylaminochloroarsine (DM), was first synthesized in by German Heinrich Otto Wieland as part of early research into organoarsenic compounds. This initial synthesis occurred prior to its recognition as a potential agent, amid broader investigations into arsenic derivatives during . In 1918, American organic chemist Roger Adams independently developed the compound at the University of Illinois, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of the Army, naming it after himself. Adams' work focused on creating effective sternutatory agents—substances inducing sneezing, nausea, and irritation—to counter enemy chemical attacks, responding to the escalating use of gases on European battlefields. The U.S. Army Chemical Warfare Service, established in 1917, prioritized such non-persistent irritants for their psychological and disruptive effects without the lethality of vesicants like . This dual origin highlighted convergent wartime innovation, with Adamsite's properties—high toxicity via inhalation leading to and incapacitation—prompting rapid scale-up for potential deployment, though it saw limited use before the .

Early Military Trials and World War I Context

In 1918, amid escalating threats during , American chemist Roger Adams, working with the U.S. Chemical Warfare Service, resynthesized diphenylaminechlorarsine—originally discovered by German chemist Heinrich Otto Wieland in 1915—as a potential non-lethal incapacitant. This compound, later named adamsite (military designation DM), was pursued to counter German gas attacks by acting as a sternutatory or "sneeze gas," inducing violent coughing, , and to compel soldiers to remove protective masks. Early military trials focused on its efficacy as a "mask breaker," exploiting its aerosol form to penetrate early gas mask filters, unlike gaseous agents such as chlorine or phosgene. U.S. forces, entering the war in , accelerated testing at facilities like the Experiment Station, validating adamsite's irritant properties on mucous membranes and lungs while minimizing immediate lethality. By the Armistice on November 11, 1918, trials had progressed to production, yielding approximately 4 million five-pound "adamsite candles" for potential or smoke generator deployment. Despite readiness, adamsite saw no combat use in World War I due to its late-stage development and the war's abrupt end, though it was stockpiled alongside agents like and . In the broader context of WWI chemical escalation—where over 1.3 million casualties resulted from gases, primarily from German initiatives—the U.S. emphasized retaliatory capabilities, including irritants to disrupt enemy cohesion without violating emerging norms against lethal agents. Adamsite's trials underscored a shift toward psychological and physiological incapacitation, informing post-war doctrines on non-persistent agents.

Interwar Period and World War II Deployment

In the immediate post-World War I period, British forces deployed adamsite during the in 1919, dropping improvised bombs containing the agent from DH.9 aircraft against Bolshevik positions near and as part of efforts to support White Russian forces in the . This marked one of the earliest operational uses of adamsite, intended to induce and incapacitation without masks, though its effectiveness was limited by delivery challenges and cold weather. During the 1920s and 1930s, adamsite saw limited military adoption amid interwar efforts, including the 1925 prohibiting chemical and biological weapons in war, which many nations signed but did not ratify or fully adhere to in practice. The U.S. Chemical Warfare Service standardized adamsite (designated DM) as one of seven key agents for potential use in 1928, focusing on its role as a non-lethal harassing agent in munitions like candles and shells for training and stockpiling rather than active combat. Domestically, U.S. authorities employed adamsite against the of veterans protesting in , on July 28, 1932; troops under General dispersed the encampment using the agent alongside bayonets and , resulting in injuries to demonstrators, including children who suffered severe respiratory effects from exposure. In , adamsite was stockpiled by major powers including the , , and as part of broader preparations, with the U.S. producing and storing it in munitions for potential retaliatory or harassing roles, though estimates of total stockpiles varied and much was later disposed of at sea post-war. Despite production scaling—such as U.S. facilities preparing for mass output—no large-scale battlefield deployment occurred among Axis or Allied forces in Europe or the Pacific, attributable to fears of mutual escalation and Hitler's personal aversion to gas warfare stemming from his experiences. Limited field testing of adamsite and related arsenicals like took place on the Western Front by Allied forces, evaluating dispersion and effects in operational environments, but these did not progress to combat use.

Post-World War II Uses and Stockpiling

Following World War II, the maintained Adamsite (DM) in its chemical munitions stockpiles as a or agent, often categorized as a agent (RCA) for potential non-lethal applications, though its content posed risks of severe toxicity and incidental fatalities. These stockpiles were stored alongside other materiel at U.S. military installations, including sites managed by the , which focused on preservation and limited production of existing agents into the early period. Adamsite munitions, such as thermal dissemination devices, were retained for training and contingency use, reflecting ongoing military interest in incapacitating agents despite international norms against chemical weapons proliferation. During the Vietnam War, U.S. forces deployed Adamsite starting in 1964, primarily to induce nausea and force enemy combatants to remove protective masks, thereby exposing them to other threats. U.S. Army field manuals explicitly cautioned against its use in scenarios where deaths were deemed unacceptable, acknowledging its capacity to cause persistent , , and potential lethality from exposure, particularly in high concentrations or prolonged engagements. Deployment involved dissemination via grenades or artillery shells, aimed at tunnel complexes and troop concentrations, though its effectiveness was limited by environmental factors like and . Stockpiling persisted through the , with Adamsite integrated into non-stockpile chemical warfare materiel (NSCWM) categories, including binary precursors and experimental munitions, stored at facilities such as Edgewood Chemical Biological Center. By the 1990s, as the U.S. prepared for compliance with the (ratified in ), Adamsite stocks were inventoried for destruction, with residual quantities treated as due to their environmental persistence and toxicity. Other nations, including , reportedly retained Adamsite in their arsenals into the early , highlighting uneven global demilitarization efforts.

Chemical and Physical Properties

Molecular Composition and Structure

Adamsite, also known as diphenylaminechloroarsine or DM, has the molecular C₁₂H₉AsClN and a molar mass of 277.58 g/mol. Its systematic IUPAC name is 10-chloro-5,10-dihydrophenarsazinine, reflecting its heterocyclic structure incorporating and . The molecule features a phenarsazinine core, consisting of two rings bridged by an atom bonded to and a atom with a . The is positioned at the 10th carbon in the dihydrophenarsazinine system, forming a five-membered ring fused to the central six-membered arsazine ring. This organoarsenic configuration contributes to its stability as a solid at and its volatility when heated, key properties for its historical use as a chemical agent. Structurally, adamsite belongs to the class of chloroarsenicals, distinguished by the As-Cl bond, which is central to its reactivity and toxicological profile. The compound's aromatic system enhances its persistence, with the chlorine atom directly attached to the arsenic facilitating potential or biological interactions.

Synthesis Methods

Adamsite, chemically known as 10-chloro-5,10-dihydrophenarsazine, is primarily synthesized via the condensation of with (AsCl₃). This reaction, first detailed in a German assigned to I.G. Farbenindustrie, proceeds by heating the reactants—typically at elevated temperatures exceeding 200°C—to facilitate ring closure between the nitrogen of and the arsenic atom, with concomitant elimination of gas. The process yields the cyclic phenarsazine structure characteristic of adamsite, often conducted in an inert solvent like to control the and improve yield. An alternative laboratory-scale preparation involves first forming diphenylamine hydrochloride by dissolving in concentrated , followed by drying and reaction with arsenious oxide (As₂O₃). The hydrochloride salt (approximately 42 g from 30 g ) is mixed with 25 g arsenious oxide and heated to 180–200°C with stirring until HCl evolution ceases after about 30 minutes. The resulting melt is cooled, extracted with hot to remove unreacted materials and excess oxide, and the residue sublimed under to isolate nearly pure adamsite as yellow crystals. Both methods exploit the reactivity of trivalent compounds with the secondary functionality of to form the As–N bond in the five-membered ring fused to the core. Yields vary with conditions but can exceed 70% in optimized setups, with purification typically via sublimation due to adamsite's low volatility and thermal stability. Industrial production during wartime emphasized , favoring the direct AsCl₃ route for its and use of readily available precursors.

Physical Characteristics and Stability

Adamsite appears as light green to yellow crystals in solid form at room temperature. When dispersed by heat, it forms a fine particulate smoke that is canary yellow in concentrated form and colorless when diluted with air. The compound has a melting point of 195°C (383°F) and a boiling point of 410°C (770°F), at which it decomposes. Its solid density is 1.65 g/cm³, while vapor density is negligible due to its extremely low vapor pressure of 2 × 10⁻¹³ mm Hg at 20°C. Adamsite exhibits low solubility in water (approximately 0.65 mg/L at 25°C) and is only slightly soluble in organic solvents such as benzene, xylene, and carbon tetrachloride. Adamsite is chemically stable under standard ambient conditions but decomposes upon heating, releasing corrosive and toxic fumes. It corrodes metals including iron, , and , and may react with certain metals to produce flammable gas. For storage, it requires tightly closed containers in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, separated from foodstuffs and incompatible materials to prevent degradation or reactions.

Physiological and Toxicological Effects

Mechanism of Action

Adamsite, or diphenylaminechlorarsine (DM), primarily exerts its effects through contact with mucous membranes and skin following dispersal, with the serving as the initial site of action due to . The compound's irritant properties stem from the oxidation of its trivalent moiety (As(III)) to pentavalent (As(V)), a process that releases and generates reactive species capable of damaging tissues. This chemical transformation contributes to the delayed onset of symptoms, distinguishing DM from faster-acting irritants like . As an organoarsenic agent, adamsite also interferes with cellular metabolism by binding to sulfhydryl groups on proteins and enzymes, such as , thereby inhibiting key metabolic pathways including the and . This binding uncouples ATP production, elevates like , and promotes , which amplifies and sensory nerve stimulation in exposed tissues. The resulting physiological response involves irritation of trigeminal and endings, triggering reflexive sneezing, coughing, lacrimation, and emesis as protective mechanisms against further exposure. At higher concentrations, the component may penetrate deeper into tissues, exacerbating through and prolonged enzyme inhibition, though the precise pathways linking initial oxidation to systemic effects like remain incompletely elucidated in human studies. Empirical data from animal exposures indicate that these mechanisms do not vary substantially across , supporting to human physiology.

Acute Symptoms and Exposure Effects

Exposure to adamsite (DM), primarily via of its form, induces rapid of the eyes, upper , and mucous membranes, manifesting as lacrimation, conjunctival inflammation, coughing, sneezing, and nasal discharge within minutes. Skin contact typically causes milder and compared to other agents, though higher concentrations or prolonged exposure can lead to more pronounced dermal effects. Systemic symptoms follow shortly after, including severe , chest tightness or pain, , and profuse , which can incapacitate individuals and persist for several hours. The latency period for peak effects varies by dose; low concentrations primarily elicit irritant responses, while doses as low as 5-15 mg may trigger violent emesis and gastrointestinal distress, including abdominal cramps and , often accompanied by generalized and transient mental depression. exposures, the most common route, target the upper airways initially but can extend to lower respiratory involvement at higher levels, exacerbating dyspnea. Symptoms generally resolve within 12 hours with removal from exposure and supportive care, though severe cases may require medical intervention for from vomiting.

Long-Term Health Risks and Arsenic Toxicity

Adamsite exposure primarily induces acute irritant effects, but a small minority of individuals—fewer than 1%—may experience serious, prolonged adverse outcomes, such as persistent ocular, airway, or dermal requiring extended and intervention. These effects can include prolonged redness, swelling, and blistering of the skin or mucous membranes following higher-concentration or extended exposures, with symptoms potentially lasting beyond the typical 12-hour duration of acute responses. Systemic absorption of from adamsite may contribute to these lingering irritations, though human data on repeated low-level exposures remain limited due to its historical use in controlled, non-lethal contexts. The component in adamsite, an organoarsenic compound (10-chloro-5,10-dihydrophenarsazine), raises concerns for akin to other arsenicals, potentially including , cardiovascular damage, and dermal changes like or upon accumulation from repeated exposures. However, specific data on carcinogenicity, , or developmental effects from chronic adamsite exposure in humans are unavailable, distinguishing it from inorganic , which is classified as a associated with skin, lung, and bladder cancers. and of organoarsenic warfare agents suggest enhanced potency over inorganic in inhibiting and causing tissue damage, implying possible amplified long-term risks not fully captured by acute toxicity profiles. Ecotoxicological research underscores adamsite's potential for chronic environmental persistence and , with recent studies demonstrating severe effects in (Danio rerio) at trace concentrations (as low as 0.20 µg/L), including reduced body length, weight, growth rates, and alterations in biomarkers of , , and endocrine disruption. These findings indicate that adamsite's low and may lead to prolonged exposure, indirectly posing health risks through contaminated water or food chains, though direct extrapolation to human chronic toxicity thresholds requires further validation. Overall, while adamsite's intended irritant mechanism limits widespread documentation of severe long-term human sequelae, its moiety warrants caution regarding cumulative exposures in vulnerable populations or polluted environments.

Deployment and Applications

Delivery Systems and Munitions

Adamsite (DM) has been incorporated into various munitions designed for dissemination, primarily as a respiratory irritant for training, , and potential harassment applications. Key systems include hand grenades like the M6 series, which contained a of 21% CN (chloroacetophenone), 21% DM, 55.4% ethyl centralite powder, and 2.6% , weighing approximately 0.62–0.64 pounds of fill in a tin-plate body with perforations for agent release upon ignition. These grenades, procured in quantities exceeding 685,000 units between 1941 and 1960, could be thrown by hand or launched via adapters such as the M2A1, producing irritant effective for incapacitating personnel through and lacrimation. Aerial delivery systems utilized pressurized aircraft tanks, including the 30-gallon M21 (holding 285 pounds of DM), 50-gallon M20 (475 pounds), and 70-gallon M33/AN-M33A1 (665 pounds), attached to bombers or spray aircraft for large-area dispersion as a or during testing and training operations. Ground-based thermal generators, such as the Comings candle containing 1.65 pounds of DM, provided localized release via , suitable for experimental or defensive perimeter applications. Munitions markings typically featured a gray body with a red band and "DM GAS" stencil, standardized from 1925 to 1960, reflecting its non-persistent nature and focus on short-range, irritant effects rather than lethal projection via or bombs. While developed as a potential " breaker" for integration into projectiles, documented U.S. stockpiles emphasized grenades and spray systems over high-velocity shells, with obsolescence of most DM-filled items by 1970 due to considerations and efficacy limitations in combat scenarios.

Military and Combat Uses

Adamsite, designated DM by the U.S. military, was developed in by American chemists as a sternutatory agent designed to incapacitate troops through severe respiratory irritation, sneezing, and vomiting, forcing the removal of gas masks without causing permanent harm. Although manufactured in quantity for potential use, the armistice in precluded its battlefield deployment by U.S. forces at that time. The first recorded combat application occurred in 1919 during the British intervention in North Russia against Bolshevik forces. Starting on August 27, 1919, aircraft from bases near dropped improvised Adamsite-filled bombs—cylinders packed with the agent and detonated mid-air to disperse aerosols—targeting positions and villages to disrupt enemy concentrations and force evacuation. This marked the initial instance of chemical weapons delivered by air, with reports indicating effectiveness in causing mass incapacitation but limited strategic impact due to small quantities and weather constraints. The U.S. Chemical Warfare Service formalized Adamsite as one of seven standard agents for military employment in , incorporating it into munitions such as shells, mortars, and hand grenades for harassing and incapacitating roles. Despite extensive stockpiling—over 2,000 tons produced by the early 1940s—no offensive combat use materialized during , as mutual deterrence and ethical concerns deterred initiation by major powers possessing superior conventional arms. In the , U.S. forces deployed Adamsite starting in 1964 as a tactical measure against positions, tunnels, and gatherings, aerosolized via munitions to induce and compel mask removal or flight, thereby aiding ground operations without escalating to lethal agents. Its employment remained sporadic, often in confined spaces for denial purposes, reflecting classification as a non-lethal incapacitant under U.S. policy despite debates over its wartime utility. Post-Vietnam, Adamsite saw no further confirmed combat roles, supplanted by less toxic alternatives amid international prohibitions on chemical weapons.

Riot Control and Non-Lethal Applications

Adamsite, also known as diphenylaminochlorarsine or DM, has been classified as a agent due to its capacity to produce temporary incapacitation through severe respiratory irritation, , and , effects that can disperse crowds without causing immediate death in most exposures. Military designations explicitly list it as such, with deployment typically via from munitions like shells or generators, targeting the upper to induce sneezing, coughing, and emesis within seconds to minutes of exposure. Historical stockpiling by armed forces considered it for both in and non-lethal crowd management, leveraging its persistence as a yellow-to-green that lingers in enclosed or low-wind environments. Despite these attributes, adamsite's non-lethal applications have been severely curtailed by its inherent , particularly the component, which poses risks of acute at higher concentrations and potential chronic from residue accumulation. Early 20th-century trials demonstrated both lethal and sublethal responses in animal models, with thresholds for incapacitation (e.g., 4-21 mg-min/m³ for ) overlapping dangerously with toxicity levels, leading to its abandonment for by mid-century. Organizations like the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons have acknowledged limited legitimate past uses in scenarios but emphasize that safer alternatives, such as chloroacetophenone (CN) or o-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile (CS), offer comparable incapacitation with reduced health risks and faster recovery times. In contemporary contexts, adamsite sees negligible employment in or civilian , confined instead to specialized exercises where protective gear mitigates exposure, reflecting broader shifts toward agents with LCt50 values exceeding 50,000 mg-min/m³ to minimize fatalities. Its persistence and environmental contamination potential further deter non-lethal deployment, as residues can contaminate surfaces and water, exacerbating long-term exposure hazards in urban settings.

Industrial and Other Non-Military Uses

Adamsite, also known as diphenylaminechlorarsine (DM), has been utilized in industrial applications as a for . It was incorporated into treating solutions to protect timber from degradation by and marine borers, such as shipworms and gribbles that infest structures in aquatic environments. These formulations leveraged the compound's to deter biological attack, extending the service life of wooden materials in marine and terrestrial settings where such pests pose significant risks. Despite its effectiveness against wood-destroying organisms, the use of adamsite in these non-military contexts has been limited by its potent irritant properties and content, which raise environmental and concerns comparable to those in its primary applications. No widespread contemporary industrial is documented, reflecting regulatory shifts toward less hazardous alternatives for preservatives.

Classification Under International Treaties

Adamsite, chemically known as diphenylaminechlorarsine (DM), is encompassed by the 1925 Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, which bans such agents in international armed conflicts. Although developed in 1919 after the protocol's signing, its classification as a sternutatory or vomiting agent aligns it with the prohibited category of "other gases" due to its irritant effects on the respiratory system and mucous membranes, intended to incapacitate through severe physiological disruption. Many states, including the United States upon ratification in 1975, appended reservations permitting the use of non-lethal riot control agents in limited circumstances, such as domestic unrest or retaliation, but explicitly barring their deployment as a method of warfare. The 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which entered into force on April 29, 1997, prohibits the development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, retention, transfer, or use of Adamsite as a under Article I, defining chemical weapons to include any toxic chemical intended for hostile purposes or warfare methods. Adamsite is not listed in the CWC's Schedules 1, 2, or 3 of toxic chemicals and precursors, which focus on verification of high-risk substances like or mustard agents; its unscheduled status reflects limited current industrial or medical applications beyond research, but does not exempt it from the convention's general prohibitions on toxic chemicals (defined in Article II as any chemical acting on life processes to cause death, temporary incapacitation, or permanent harm). State parties, such as , have destroyed stockpiles containing Adamsite in compliance with CWC destruction mandates, treating it as chemical warfare . Regarding riot control applications, the CWC's Article II(9) defines permissible riot control agents (RCAs) as non-prohibited chemicals producing rapid sensory irritation or disabling physical effects that disappear completely post-exposure, allowable solely for domestic and not warfare. The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Scientific Advisory Board (SAB), in its SAB-III/1 report dated April 27, 2000, assessed Adamsite's toxicity profile—including an incapacitating dose (ICt₅₀) of 2-20 mg·min·m⁻³ and potential for arsenic accumulation—and concluded it is unsuitable as an RCA due to delayed onset, prolonged effects, environmental persistence from arsenic residues, and superior safety of alternatives like . This advisory reinforces that Adamsite's organoarsenic nature exceeds RCA criteria, aligning it more closely with historical agents despite past U.S. military designation as non-lethal. No state party has declared Adamsite as an RCA under CWC review procedures, and its retention is limited to minimal research quantities without weaponization.

Debates on Riot Control vs. Chemical Warfare

The classification of adamsite (DM) as a agent (RCA) rather than a has sparked debate, primarily due to its arsenic-based toxicity and the criteria outlined in international treaties like the (CWC). Developed during as a sternutatory harassing agent for military use, adamsite causes severe , , and persisting for hours, distinguishing it from milder irritants like . Proponents of its RCA status, including historical U.S. military designations, argued it enabled non-lethal incapacitation for or training, with effects intended to be transient enough to fit CWC Article II(9)(d), which permits chemicals producing "rapidly in humans sensory irritation or disabling physical effects which disappear within a short time" for purposes. Critics, however, contend that adamsite's organoarsenic composition leads to cumulative toxicity, including potential long-term arsenic poisoning, rendering it incompatible with RCA definitions under the CWC, as its effects do not reliably dissipate quickly and can cause serious harm beyond mere irritation. The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons' (OPCW) Scientific Advisory Board, in a 2000 assessment, noted adamsite's past use as a riot control and training agent but recommended against it due to its toxicity and the availability of less harmful alternatives, emphasizing that non-scheduled chemicals like adamsite still qualify as toxic chemicals prohibited in warfare contexts. This view aligns with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency evaluations, which documented adamsite's early riot control applications but highlighted its subsequent discontinuation owing to excessive toxicity risks, including respiratory distress and arsenic accumulation. The debate intensified around the blurred lines between domestic policing and warfare, echoing broader controversies over irritant use in conflicts like , where similar agents were defended as RCAs by the U.S. but condemned internationally as methods violating the 1925 Geneva Protocol's intent. For adamsite, ethical concerns focus on its content, which environmental assessments link to persistent and contamination, raising questions about proportionality in non-combat scenarios and potential escalation to prohibited uses. While not explicitly scheduled under CWC Annexes, adamsite's retention in some stockpiles until destruction mandates post-1997 highlighted tensions between tactical utility and treaty compliance, with experts prioritizing empirical toxicity data over historical precedents.

Environmental and Ethical Criticisms

Adamsite's arsenic content contributes to long-term environmental , particularly from post-World War II sea-dumping practices, where munitions containing the agent have released phenylarsenic compounds into marine sediments, including in the . Approximately 50,000 tons of -based chemical agents, including Adamsite, are estimated to remain in the , undergoing slow degradation that produces bioaccumulative oxidized forms detectable in mussels and other organisms. These degradation products, such as DAox and DMox, persist due to the compound's chemical stability in low-oxygen seafloor conditions, exacerbating risks to benthic ecosystems. Aquatic toxicity assessments reveal severe impacts from Adamsite exposure. In laboratory tests, chronic low-level exposure significantly reduced body length, weight, and growth rates in zebrafish (Danio rerio), indicating potential disruption to fish populations even at trace concentrations. Acute toxicity to the water flea Daphnia magna is pronounced, with related arsenic agents like phenyldichloroarsine showing 48-hour LC50 values as low as 0.36 μg/L, underscoring Adamsite's hazard to freshwater and marine invertebrates. Military training sites and disposal areas, such as the Spring Valley site in Washington, D.C., have documented arsenic soil contamination from historical Adamsite testing, necessitating extensive remediation efforts across over 1,600 investigated locations. Ethical criticisms of Adamsite primarily stem from its dual legacy of human suffering and ecological harm, raising questions about the moral justification for deploying persistent toxins in conflict or . While classified as a non-lethal irritant, the agent's induction of intense vomiting, chest pain, and sensory irritation—effects lasting up to several hours—has been critiqued in broader discourse for inflicting disproportionate physiological distress without strategic necessity, echoing historical debates on humane limits in warfare. The environmental persistence, including intergenerational pollution burdens from unremediated dumpsites, amplifies ethical concerns over prioritizing short-term tactical gains against long-term and human health costs, as evidenced by ongoing hotspots. Such issues highlight tensions between utility and principles of , though specific prohibitions under treaties like the address deployment rather than historical legacies.

References

  1. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Adamsite
  2. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/files/PP/SIPRIPP23.pdf
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/adamsite
  4. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/emergencyresponsecard_29750017.html
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230760612_Arsenical_Vomiting_Agents
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271929515_Arsenic-Based_Warfare_Agents_Production_Use_and_Destruction
  7. https://jmvh.org/article/arsenic-the-poison-of-kings-and-the-saviour-of-syphilis/
  8. https://www.britannica.com/technology/adamsite
  9. https://www.kumc.edu/school-of-medicine/academics/departments/history-and-philosophy-of-medicine/archives/wwi/essays/medicine/gas-in-the-great-war.html
  10. https://www.bulletpicker.com/pdf/Old-Chemical-Weapons-and-Related-Materiel-Reference-Guide.pdf
  11. https://www.historynet.com/american-gas/
  12. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-08/documents/chloroarsenicals_interim_11_2007.v1.pdf.pdf
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2376985/
  14. https://simonjoneshistorian.com/2019/08/27/first-air-dropped-cw/
  15. https://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/resources//4582-chemical-weapons
  16. https://www.denix.osd.mil/rcwmprogram/history/
  17. https://explorethearchive.com/bonus-army
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10042769/
  19. https://medcoeckapwstorprd01.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/pfw-images/borden/chemwarfare/CHAP2_Pg_09-76.pdf
  20. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1968/05/09/poison-gas-in-vietnam/
  21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2642575
  22. https://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.10884.html
  23. https://www.echemi.com/products/pid_Seven43834-10-chloro-510-dihydrophenarsazine.html
  24. https://prepchem.com/synthesis-of-adamsite/
  25. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1927/jr/jr9270002499
  26. https://www.echemi.com/sds/10-chloro-510-dihydrophenarsazine-pid_Seven43834.html
  27. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/injuries-poisoning/mass-casualty-weapons/riot-control-chemical-agents
  28. https://www.t3db.ca/toxins/T3D0275
  29. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-08/documents/chloroarsenicals_interim_11_2007.v1.pdf
  30. https://www.visualdx.com/visualdx/diagnosis/adamsite%2Bpoisoning?diagnosisId=53360&moduleId=16
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5063699/
  32. https://www.clintox.org/question-of-the-day/question-of-the-day-wednesday-january-30-2019
  33. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10565-022-09710-8
  34. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/1136758
  35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8593082/
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39369753/
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653524023786
  38. https://www.denix.osd.mil/rcwmprogram/denix-files/sites/39/2022/04/2022-01-31_Final-Chemical-Weapons-Reference-Guide.pdf
  39. https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/SAB/en/sab-iii-01.pdf
  40. https://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/annexes/annex-chemicals/annex-chemicals
  41. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/88378.htm
  42. https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/SAB/en/sab25wp01_e_.pdf
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9092081/
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113620302105
  45. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04681
  46. https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/361349.pdf
  47. https://www.nab.usace.army.mil/Portals/63/docs/SpringValley/Final_RI_without_Appx.pdf
  48. https://openspaces.unk.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=hist-etd
  49. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/cbw_vol2.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.