Hubbry Logo
Self-loveSelf-loveMain
Open search
Self-love
Community hub
Self-love
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Self-love
Self-love
Self-love
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Love
Red-outline heart icon
Red-outline heart icon
Types of love
Social views
Concepts

Self-love, defined as "love of self" or "regard for one's own happiness or advantage",[1] has been conceptualized both as a basic human necessity[2] and as a moral flaw, akin to vanity and selfishness,[3] synonymous with amour-propre, conceitedness, egotism, narcissism, et al. However, throughout the 20th and 21st centuries self-love has adopted a more positive connotation through pride parades, Self-Respect Movement, self-love protests, the hippie era, the modern feminist movement (3rd & 4th wave), as well as the increase in mental health awareness that promotes self-love as intrinsic to self-help and support groups working to prevent substance abuse and suicide.

Views

[edit]

The Hindu arishadvargas (major sins) are short-term self-benefiting pursuits that are ultimately damaging. These include mada (pride). Jainism believes that the four kashaya (passions) stop people escaping the cycle of life and death.

Gautama Buddha (c. 563-483 BC) and Buddhism believe that the desires of the self are the root of all evil. However, this is balanced with karuṇā (compassion).

Confucius (551–479 BC) and Confucianism values society over the self.

Yang Zhu (440–360 BC) and Yangism viewed wei wo, or "everything for myself", as the only virtue necessary for self-cultivation.[4] All of what is known of Yangism comes from its contemporary critics - Yang's beliefs were hotly contested.

The thoughts of Aristotle (384–322 BC) about self-love (philautia) are recorded in the Nicomachean Ethics and Eudemian Ethics. Nicomachean Ethics Book 9, Chapter 8 focuses on it particularly. In this passage, Aristotle argues that people who love themselves to achieve unwarranted personal gain are bad, but those who love themselves to achieve virtuous principles are the best sort of good. He says the former kind of self-love is much more common than the latter.

Cicero (106–43 BC) considered those who were sui amantes sine rivali (lovers of themselves without rivals) were doomed to end in failure.

Jesus (c. 4 BC-30 AD) prioritised the loving of God, and commanded his followers to love others selflessly, following his example.[5] At the same time, in Mark 12:31 and Matthew 22:39, he taught one to love neighbor as self, implying a love of self. Early follower of Jesus, Paul the Apostle (c. 5–64/65 AD) wrote that inordinate self-love was opposed to love of God in his letter to the Phillipian church.[6] The author of the New Testament letter of James had the same belief.[7]

Christian monk Evagrius Ponticus (345–399) believed excessive self-love (hyperēphania – pride) was one of eight key sins. His list of sins was later lightly adapted by Pope Gregory I as the "seven deadly sins". This list of sins then became an important part of the doctrine of the western church. Under this system, pride is the original and most deadly of the sins. This position was expressed strongly in fiction by Dante's The Divine Comedy.

Augustine (354–430) – with his theology of evil as a mere distortion of the good – considered that the sin of pride was only a perversion of a normal, more modest degree of self-love.[8]

The Sikhs believe that the Five Thieves are the core human weaknesses that steal the innately good common sense from people. These selfish desires cause great problems.

In 1612 Francis Bacon condemned extreme self-lovers, who would burn down their own home, only to roast themselves an egg.[9][10]

In the 1660s Baruch Spinoza wrote in his book Ethics that self-preservation was the highest virtue.[citation needed]

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) believed there were two kinds of self-love. One was "amour de soi" (French for "love of self") which is the drive for self-preservation. Rousseau considered this drive to be the root of all human drives. The other was "amour-propre" (often also translated as "self-love", but which also means "pride"), which refers to the self-esteem generated from being appreciated by other people.[11]

The concept of "ethical egoism" was introduced by the philosopher Henry Sidgwick in his book The Methods of Ethics, written in 1874. Sidgwick compared egoism to the philosophy of utilitarianism, writing that whereas utilitarianism sought to maximize overall pleasure, egoism focused only on maximizing individual pleasure.[12]

In 1890, psychologist William James examined the concept of self esteem in his influential textbook Principles of Psychology. Robert H. Wozniak later wrote that William James's theory of self-love in this book was measured in "... three different but interrelated aspects of self: the material self (all those aspects of material existence in which we feel a strong sense of ownership, our bodies, our families, our possessions), the social self (our felt social relations), and the spiritual self (our feelings of our own subjectivity)".[13]

In 1956 psychologist and social philosopher Erich Fromm proposed that loving oneself is different from being arrogant, conceited or egocentric, meaning that instead caring about oneself and taking responsibility for oneself. Fromm proposed a re-evaluation of self-love in more positive sense, arguing that in order to be able to truly love another person, a person first needs to love oneself in the way of respecting oneself and knowing oneself (e.g. being realistic and honest about one's strengths and weaknesses).[14][15]

In the 1960s, Erik H. Erikson similarly wrote of a post-narcissistic appreciation of the value of the ego,[16] while Carl Rogers saw one result of successful therapy as the regaining of a quiet sense of pleasure in being one's own self.[17]

Self-love or self-worth was defined in 2003 by Aiden Gregg and Constantine Sedikides as "referring to a person's subjective appraisal of himself or herself as intrinsically positive or negative".[18]

Mental health

[edit]

Lack of self-love increases risk of suicide according to the American Association of Suicidology.[19] The association conducted a study in 2008 which researched the impact of low self-esteem and lack of self-love and its relation to suicidal tendencies and attempts. They defined self-love as being "beliefs about oneself (self-based self-esteem)[20] and beliefs about how other people regard oneself (other-based self-esteem)".[20] It concluded that "depression, hopelessness, and low self-esteem are implications of vulnerability factors for suicide ideation" and that "these findings suggest that even in the context of depression and hopelessness, low self-esteem may add to the risk for suicide ideation".

Promotion

[edit]

History

[edit]

Self-love was first promoted by the Beat Generation of the 1950s and in the early years of the Hippie era of the 1960s. After witnessing the devastating consequences of World War II and having troops still fighting in the Vietnam War, western (especially North American) societies began promoting "peace and love" to help generate positive energy and to promote the preservation of dissipating environmental factors, such as the emergence of oil pipelines and the recognition of pollution caused by the greenhouse effect.

These deteriorating living conditions caused worldwide protests that primarily focused on ending the war, but secondarily promoted a positive environment aided by the fundamental concept of crowd psychology. This post-war community was left very vulnerable to persuasion but began encouraging freedom, harmony, and the possibility of a brighter, non-violent future. These protests took place on almost all continents and included countries such as the United States (primarily New York City and California), England, and Australia. Their dedication, perseverance, and empathy towards human life defined this generation as being peace advocates and carefree souls.

The emergence of the feminist movement began as early as the 19th century, but only began having major influence during the second wave movement, which included women's rights protests that inevitably led to women gaining the right to vote. These protests not only promoted equality but also suggested that women should recognize their self-worth through the knowledge and acceptance of self-love. Elizabeth Cady Stanton used the Declaration of Independence as a guideline to demonstrate that women have been harshly treated throughout the centuries in her feminist essay titled "Declaration of Sentiments". In the essay she claims that "all men and women are created equal; ... that among these [rights] are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness";[21] and that without these rights, the capacity to feel self-worth and self-love is scarce. This historical essay suggests that a lack of self-esteem and fear of self-love affects modern women due to lingering post-industrial gender conditions.

Self-love has also been used as a tool in communities of Color in the United States. In the 1970s Black-Power movement, the slogan "Black is beautiful!" became a way for African-Americans to throw off the mantle of predominately White beauty norms. The dominant cultural aesthetic pre-1970s was to straighten Black hair with a perm or hot comb. During the Black Power movement, the "afro" or "fro" became the popular hairstyle. It involved letting Black Hair grow naturally, without chemical treatment, so as to embrace and flaunt the extremely curly hair texture of Black people. Hair was teased out the hair using a pick. The goal was to cause the hair to form a halo around the head, flaunting the Blackness of its wearer. This form of self-love and empowerment during the 70s was a way for African-Americans to combat the stigma against their natural hair texture, which was, and still is, largely seen as unprofessional in the modern workplace.

Modern platforms

[edit]

The emergence of social media has created a platform for self-love promotion and mental health awareness in order to end the stigma surrounding mental health and to address self-love positively rather than negatively.

A few modern examples of self-love promotion platforms include:

Literary references

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Self-love

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Self-love denotes regard for and interest in one's own being or contentment, often involving , , and the prioritization of personal physical and emotional health. Historically rooted in , where it was viewed as a foundation for ethical behavior and virtuous living—as articulated by in associating self-love () with the honorable course toward others—the concept evolved through thinkers like , who saw healthy self-love as the basis for moral action, and , who in the mid-20th century distinguished it from as a productive, reality-grounded orientation enabling genuine relatedness to self and others. In modern , self-love is frequently conflated with and self-compassion, constructs shown empirically to foster resilience against adversity, reduce vulnerability to depression, and enhance interpersonal relationships when balanced with realistic self-appraisal. Despite these associations with , self-love remains a controversial construct, with historical and contemporary views polarizing it between a pathway to and a potential precursor to maladaptive traits like excessive self-focus. Empirical studies differentiate authentic self-love—characterized by , reality-testing, and acceptance of flaws—from , which involves fragile , exploitation of others, and of an idealized rather than true , often correlating with game-playing in relationships rather than prosocial . Overemphasis on unconditional self-love without boundaries or self-improvement can risk fostering avoidance of , underscoring the causal importance of integrating it with practical and external feedback for sustainable benefits.

Historical and Philosophical Foundations

Ancient Greek and Roman Perspectives

emphasized self-knowledge as the foundation of ethical self-regard, interpreting the Delphic maxim as an imperative for examining one's soul to discern virtue from vice. In Plato's Charmides, argues that temperance involves self-awareness of one's good and bad qualities, enabling rational governance of desires and actions rather than unexamined impulses. This introspective approach, central to , posits that ignorance of the self leads to moral error, while genuine self-understanding aligns personal conduct with objective good, independent of fleeting emotions. Aristotle, building on this, articulated proper self-love (philia pros heauton) in Nicomachean Ethics Book IX as the virtuous person's rational preference for noble activities that fulfill human function through excellence. There, he contends that the good man loves himself most fittingly by choosing actions guided by reason, which inherently promote communal harmony since virtue benefits both individual eudaimonia and the polis. Aristotle contrasts this with defective self-love among the incontinent or vicious, who prioritize sensory gratification over rational ends, yielding personal and social harm rather than sustainable flourishing. Roman Stoics like reframed self-love as disciplined alignment with one's rational nature within the providential cosmic order, eschewing indulgence for acceptance of unchangeables. In his Enchiridion, instructs that genuine entails distinguishing internals (opinions, volition) from externals (body, possessions), cultivating indifference to the latter to preserve inner and . This perspective views excessive attachment to self as a disrupting with universal reason (), advocating instead a measured regard that fortifies resilience against fortune's vicissitudes. Greek tragedies, however, critiqued immoderate self-love as , portraying it as arrogant overreach inviting divine retribution. In Sophocles' (c. 441 BCE), Creon's unyielding self-assurance in defying familial for state absolutism exemplifies , precipitating familial ruin and his own . Similarly, in (c. 429 BCE), Oedipus's pursuit of self-vindication blinds him to prophetic truths, transforming personal into tragic catastrophe that underscores the perils of unchecked self-elevation above cosmic limits. These narratives reinforce philosophical warnings that self-love divorced from and devolves into destructive excess.

Medieval and Early Modern Views

In during the medieval period, self-love was frequently portrayed as a double-edged inclination, essential when rightly ordered but perilous when excessive. (354–430 CE), in De Civitate Dei (composed 413–426 CE), identified disordered self-love (amor sui) as the foundational vice underpinning sin and the earthly city, in contrast to the heavenly city grounded in (amor Dei); he contended that prioritizing self over divine will leads to contempt for God and societal discord. This framework subordinated personal regard to theological , viewing unchecked self-love as causal in human alienation from divine order. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274 CE), synthesizing with Christian doctrine in the (1265–1274 CE), affirmed ordered self-love as a natural good inherent to human appetite, serving as the model for the biblical mandate to "love thy neighbor as thyself" (:18). In Prima Secundae, Question 77, Article 4, he teaches that inordinate self-love, which involves disordered desire for temporal goods and leads to contempt of God, is the cause of every sin, while well-ordered self-love, whereby one desires fitting goods for oneself in accord with reason and divine order, is right and natural. Furthermore, in Secunda Secundae, Question 26 (on the order of charity), Aquinas places self-love within a hierarchy: one must love God above all, then oneself more than one's neighbor (in intensity, due to the greater union with oneself and direct participation in the divine good), though love for God remains supreme; self-love is legitimate when ordered toward God but becomes sinful when disordered. Yet Aquinas emphasized its moderation through charity and alignment with , arguing that inordinate self-love—manifesting as excessive desire for personal good—constitutes the root of all sin by distorting rational pursuit of beatitude toward selfish ends. Scholastic texts thus framed self-love as a prerequisite for ethical relations, presupposing a baseline self-regard to extend to others, though textual analyses reveal persistent tensions with virtues like , where excessive self-praise risked prideful . In the early , (1533–1592 CE) shifted toward introspective self-examination in his Essais (first published 1580, expanded 1588 and posthumously 1595 CE), advocating knowledge of one's flaws and capacities as a means to authentic living rather than theological subordination. He critiqued "strange self-love" as presumptuous fondness for one's opinions, promoting instead disciplined reflection to avoid and achieve balanced self-understanding, as in his counsel to "discover myself" through writing without self-obsession. This approach prefigured secular by treating self-knowledge as an end in itself, detached from strict divine , while cautioning against the excesses of unexamined regard that medieval thinkers had linked to moral disorder. Historical insights into these views rely on primary theological and philosophical texts, with no contemporaneous empirical measures of self-love's prevalence or effects.

Enlightenment and 19th-20th Century Developments

During the Enlightenment, integrated self-love into his conception of rational self-interest as a foundational motive for and . In his Second Treatise of Government (1689), Locke described self-love as a natural inclination that drives individuals to preserve their lives and possessions, thereby justifying the natural rights to life, , and independent of civil authority. This perspective framed self-love not as mere but as a rational principle aligned with divine intent, where compels moral duties toward others, influencing liberal theories that elevated individual rights over collective impositions. In the Romantic era, Jean-Jacques Rousseau advanced a more emotive understanding of self-love, distinguishing amour de soi—a benign, instinctual concern for one's physical and emotional welfare—from amour-propre, the inflated vanity fueled by social rivalry and societal corruption. Outlined in works like Emile, or On Education (1762), amour de soi was portrayed as essential for authentic self-acceptance, urging a return to natural sentiments unspoiled by civilization's artificial dependencies. Rousseau's framework critiqued Enlightenment rationalism for overlooking emotional dimensions, positing that genuine self-love fosters harmony with one's innate goodness amid external distortions. Nineteenth-century philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche radicalized self-love by tying it to relentless self-overcoming and rejection of resentment, as explored in Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883–1885). For Nietzsche, authentic self-love emerges through cultivating self-knowledge, reinterpreting one's past, and affirming life's totality via amor fati—a profound acceptance of fate without bitterness toward existence or others. This revaluation countered passive moralities rooted in ressentiment, advocating instead a dynamic affirmation that propels the individual toward higher personal values and creative autonomy. In early twentieth-century , delineated productive self-love from pathological , emphasizing its role in personal growth and relational maturity. In (1956) and related works, Fromm described productive self-love as an active, reasoned affirmation of one's capacities, enabling objective self-appraisal and resilience against life's challenges, in contrast to narcissism's illusory self-sufficiency driven by unmet needs. Grounded in a productive orientation toward existence, this form of self-love was deemed prerequisite for ethical love of others, aligning with Fromm's broader critique of alienated modern individualism.

Psychological and Scientific Perspectives

Definitions and Measurement

Self-love is defined in psychological literature as a regard for one's own , encompassing , , and prioritization of personal contentment without excessive . This construct involves intentional acts of kindness toward oneself, such as recognizing intrinsic worth and addressing emotional and physical needs, distinct from mere self-indulgence. It emphasizes unconditional self-regard, fostering resilience through self-soothing and honoring boundaries, rather than contingent approval. Psychologically, self-love differs from , which entails a subjective, often comparative evaluation of personal worth tied to achievements, social feedback, and metrics. can fluctuate with external validations, potentially leading to defensiveness when threatened, whereas self-love operates more steadily as a non-evaluative acceptance. In contrast to , marked by grandiose entitlement, superiority, and diminished toward others, self-love supports interpersonal harmony without exploiting or devaluing external relationships. Empirical profiles of these traits reveal 's association with fragile self-views and , while self-love aligns with adaptive, empathetic self-regulation. No standardized, validated scale exclusively measures self-love, as the construct remains conceptually diffuse and often proxied by related instruments. The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), developed by Neff in 2003, operationalizes a core facet through 26 items assessing self-kindness (vs. self-judgment), common humanity (vs. isolation), and (vs. over-identification), scored on a 5-point ; higher scores indicate greater self-compassionate tendencies linked to self-love. The (RSES), a 10-item measure from 1965, gauges global self-worth but primarily captures evaluative , with limitations in distinguishing contingent from intrinsic aspects and vulnerability to . These tools provide reliable (e.g., SCS α ≈ 0.92; RSES α ≈ 0.88) but fail to fully quantify self-love's causal dynamics, such as context-dependent behavioral adaptations for . Emerging pilot efforts, like 10-item self-love questionnaires tied to daily emotional triggers, show promise but lack broad validation.

Empirical Evidence for Benefits

Higher levels of self-compassion, a core component of self-love involving self-kindness, recognition of shared human experience, and mindful awareness of distress, correlate negatively with symptoms of anxiety and depression, with meta-analytic effect sizes typically modest (r = -0.30 to -0.50). A 2023 meta-analysis of self-compassion interventions across diverse populations reported significant reductions in depressive symptoms (Hedges' g ≈ 0.45), anxiety, and stress, though these effects were smaller in clinical samples and moderated by intervention duration. Similarly, self-compassion predicts enhanced resilience, buffering against by fostering adaptive emotion regulation, as evidenced in a 2024 synthesizing over 50 studies showing consistent links to lower emotional distress and higher psychological . Longitudinal data further support self-love's protective role against life stressors. In a 2022 study of 1,090 socioeconomically disadvantaged adults tracked over six months, baseline attenuated the association between perceived stress and subsequent depression, anxiety, and negative affect, with standardized beta coefficients indicating partial mediation (β ≈ -0.20). Among athletes, moderates subjective appraisals of competitive stress, reducing burnout and enhancing performance recovery, per a 2018 investigation where higher trait weakened links between threat perceptions and (interaction effect p < 0.05). These patterns extend to interpersonal domains, where longitudinally predicts improved relationship satisfaction by mitigating during conflicts, though effects are mediated by behavioral engagement rather than sentiment alone. Mindfulness-based interventions targeting self-compassion yield correlated gains in , but causal evidence remains tentative due to reliance on self-reported measures prone to demand characteristics and . A 2021 analysis of programs found moderate increases in (g = 0.48 for positive affect; 95% CI [0.19, 0.77]) sustained at six-month follow-up, attributed partly to heightened emotional clarity rather than isolated affirmations. However, randomized trials indicate benefits accrue primarily through downstream behavioral changes, such as increased problem-solving and social support-seeking, with standalone positive self-statements showing negligible effects (g < 0.20) absent skill-building components. Overall, while associations are robust, effect sizes underscore self-love's role as a rather than a , with stronger outcomes in non-clinical populations.

Associations with Narcissism and Pathological Traits

High self-esteem, often used as a proxy for self-love in , shows only weak and inconsistent links to positive life outcomes, while exhibiting stronger associations with when ego threats occur, particularly in individuals with traits. A comprehensive review by Baumeister, Bushman, and Campbell found that low self-esteem does not predict , but threatened —defensive reactions to perceived slights among those with inflated self-views—does, with amplifying such responses through heightened sensitivity to rather than inherent self-hate. This suggests that unchecked self-love, if rooted in fragile rather than realistic self-appraisal, can foster reactive hostility, as narcissists prioritize preservation over interpersonal harmony. Distinctions between adaptive self-regard and pathological hinge on and relational authenticity; healthy self-love correlates with genuine and prosocial behaviors, whereas manifests in exploitative patterns, such as game-playing love styles (Ludus), characterized by low commitment and manipulation for personal gain. Campbell, Foster, and Finkel's studies across multiple samples demonstrated that predicts endorsement of non-committal, strategic romantic approaches, independent of levels, indicating that self-focused "love" in narcissists often prioritizes over mutual . Pathological variants lack the integral to balanced self-love, leading to interpersonal deficits like entitlement and of others, as evidenced in meta-analyses linking grandiose to self-enhancement biases that distort reality-testing. Empirical trends underscore risks from cultural self-esteem initiatives, with Twenge's longitudinal analyses revealing a rise in narcissistic traits among American college students from the 1980s to the 2000s, coinciding with widespread self-esteem promotion in and media that emphasized unconditional positivity without accountability. This generational shift, tracked via the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, correlates with inflated entitlement and reduced , potentially causal as self-love narratives encourage avoidance of constructive , fostering fragility akin to "threatened ." Critics argue such movements, by decoupling self-worth from achievement or ethical behavior, exacerbate maladaptive traits, as high narcissism scores predict poorer long-term relational and occupational outcomes despite short-term confidence boosts.

Cultural and Religious Perspectives

Western Cultural Evolution

In the post-World War II era, Western attitudes toward self-love began shifting from traditional emphases on restraint, duty, and communal obligation toward proactive cultivation of personal self-worth, particularly through the self-esteem movement of the to . This movement gained institutional traction in education and policy, positing high self-esteem as a panacea for social problems like crime, teen pregnancy, and underachievement. A pivotal example was the California Task Force to Promote and Personal and Social Responsibility, established by state in 1986 and issuing its final report "Toward a State of Esteem" in 1990, which recommended integrating self-esteem-building programs into schools and public life. These initiatives influenced pedagogical practices, such as widespread use of unconditional praise and non-competitive rewards, correlating with the rise of participation trophies in youth sports starting in the late 1970s to ostensibly bolster children's feelings of accomplishment regardless of performance. By the 21st century, social media platforms amplified this cultural pivot, promoting performative self-love through affirmations, curated self-images, and viral trends like Instagram positivity posts, which often prioritize external validation over intrinsic resilience. Empirical studies link heavy engagement with such content to heightened anxiety and diminished self-esteem, particularly when users' self-worth becomes contingent on online feedback, as evidenced in research on social anxiety and platform-dependent identity. This emphasis on individualized self-affirmation has coincided with documented declines in social capital, as detailed in Robert Putnam's 2000 analysis "Bowling Alone," which traced eroding community ties—such as reduced participation in civic groups and clubs—from the late 1960s onward, with subsequent data confirming persistent or accelerated drops into the 2020s amid rising individualism. Critics, drawing on longitudinal data, argue this evolution has fostered entitlement over traditional virtues like perseverance and communal duty, contributing to epidemics of observed in generational cohorts raised under self-esteem-centric and . Psychologist attributes rising narcissistic traits—marked by inflated self-views untethered to achievement—to the self-esteem movement's legacy of effusive praise without corresponding effort, as explored in her co-authored 2009 book "The Narcissism Epidemic," supported by meta-analyses showing increased entitlement scores among younger Americans since the 1980s. Such patterns suggest a causal interplay where unchecked self-focus erodes relational bonds and resilience, prioritizing personal affirmation at the expense of collective responsibilities.

Non-Western and Eastern Traditions

In Confucian philosophy, self-love is embedded in the practice of self-cultivation (xiushen), which emphasizes moral refinement to achieve virtue (ren) and harmony within familial and social roles, rather than autonomous individualism. This process integrates personal growth with filial piety (xiao), where cherishing one's reputation and future prospects serves relational obligations, such as honoring parents and contributing to societal order, as outlined in classical texts like the Analects. A 2025 analysis highlights how Confucian self-cultivation, alongside Daoist and Buddhist influences, reframes self-regard through humility and interdependent learning, contrasting with self-enhancement motives prevalent in Western contexts. Buddhist traditions subordinate self-love to the doctrine of anatta (no-self), viewing ego attachment as a root of suffering and prioritizing its dissolution for enlightenment. Practices like metta (loving-kindness) meditation begin with directing goodwill toward oneself to cultivate , but this extends outward to foster interdependence, fusing with universal benevolence without reinforcing a fixed ego. Hindu perspectives similarly frame around atman (eternal self), distinct from transient ego, advocating detachment () from desires to align with cosmic unity, as in the , where true self-confidence arises from spiritual identity over external validation. Cross-cultural empirical data reveal that East Asian societies, shaped by these traditions, report lower and self-enhancement compared to Western individualistic cultures, yet exhibit relational metrics like social harmony that challenge the universal benefits of self-love promotion. For example, studies document East Asians' dialectical self-views leading to ambivalent self-attitudes and reduced reports, but with strengths in collective resilience and lower prevalence. Global analyses in the indicate self-love appeals more strongly in individualistic settings, where it correlates with personal happiness pursuits, while collectivist Eastern adaptations embed it in communal duties, correlating with sustained group cohesion amid lower individual self-focus.

Religious Interpretations and Critiques

In , the commandment to "love your neighbor as yourself," originating in :18 and reiterated by in Matthew 22:39, implies a baseline instinct for and care as a prerequisite for ethical treatment of others, rather than an endorsement of self-elevation or therapeutic self-absorption. Early Church Augustine critiqued excessive self-love (amor sui) as the foundational of the earthly city, contrasting it with amor Dei— to the point of self-disregard—which defines the heavenly city; he argued that prioritizing self to the contempt of God engenders sin and societal discord. Contemporary evangelical theologians echo this by rejecting the "self-love gospel" as a of biblical , viewing it as inherently selfish and antithetical to Christ's call for and neighborly sacrifice, which supplants personal fulfillment with divine obedience. Judaism interprets the Torah's directive in :18—"love your neighbor as yourself"—as a core ethical principle, per , emphasizing empathy and reciprocity without elevating self-love to an independent virtue; self-regard serves communal harmony under God's law, not individual hubris. In Islam, self-preservation aligns with duties to maintain life as a trust from , yet kibr (arrogance or prideful self-exaltation) is severely condemned in the as a barrier to paradise, subordinating personal desires to total submission (islam) and prohibiting any self-love that rivals divine sovereignty. Empirical studies indicate that adherents in religious communities derive elevated from altruistic practices and prosocial orientations—such as communal and service—rather than self-focused pursuits, with religious engagement correlating positively with and meaning independent of metrics. This suggests traditional faith-based fosters without deficits in , countering secular narratives that frame self-love as essential for psychological health; instead, data reveal within divine frameworks yields superior outcomes over isolated self-prioritization.

Promotion and Contemporary Practices

Historical Movements in Self-Esteem

, emerging in the 1940s and gaining prominence through the 1960s, provided foundational theories linking self-regard to personal growth. Abraham Maslow's 1943 hierarchy of needs positioned —the realization of one's potential—at the apex, arguing that individuals with satisfied lower needs could pursue this state characterized by , realism, and acceptance of self and others. , in his 1951 work Client-Centered Therapy, emphasized from therapists and environments to foster congruence between one's ideal and actual self, thereby cultivating healthy as a prerequisite for psychological adjustment. These ideas shifted focus from pathology in to innate growth tendencies, influencing therapeutic practices that promoted as central to . The self-esteem movement intensified in the 1980s, particularly in the United States, with organized efforts to institutionalize high self-regard as a societal . In 1986, Assemblyman John Vasconcellos established the State Task Force to Promote and Personal and Social Responsibility, which produced a report asserting that robust self-esteem "insulates" individuals from teen pregnancy, , and drug abuse while enhancing academic and vocational success. This led to widespread school-based programs, including policies that decoupled grades from performance in favor of praise and awards for participation, aiming to build esteem independently of objective accomplishments. Subsequent empirical evaluations, however, revealed limited causal benefits from these interventions. A 2003 review by and colleagues analyzed decades of studies and found that while high correlates with positive outcomes like persistence, it does not precede or cause them; instead, achievements typically elevate , not vice versa. Longitudinal data from self-esteem programs showed short-term boosts in reported feelings but no sustained improvements in behavior, academic performance, or social adjustment, suggesting the movement often prioritized subjective affirmation over evidence-based skill-building. Critics argued this approach risked fostering entitlement by decoupling esteem from competence, potentially eroding motivation tied to real accomplishments.

Modern Media and Therapeutic Approaches

Therapeutic approaches to self-love have incorporated elements of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and (ACT), particularly through self-compassion protocols developed by and colleagues in the 2000s. These protocols, such as Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) training introduced in 2009, emphasize , self-kindness, and recognition of common humanity to counteract , integrating ACT's acceptance strategies with CBT's to foster adaptive self-regard. Empirical studies indicate these interventions yield small to medium short-term improvements in mood, with reductions in depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress observed post-treatment. Meta-analyses of self-compassion-focused therapies confirm moderate effects on enhancing levels and alleviating psychological distress, though benefits often diminish without ongoing practice, highlighting the need for sustained behavioral habits to prevent relapse. These habits include daily practices such as self-compassion through kind self-talk, gratitude journaling of 1-3 appreciated items, short mindful breathing or meditation sessions, mindful eating without distractions, physical movement like outdoor walks, screen unplugging especially before bed, and small self-kind acts like skincare routines; weekly practices encompass exercise or yoga for endorphin release, quality social connections, bodywork such as massages or baths, extended digital detoxes, and reflective journaling on weekly achievements and self-care needs. These evidence-based strategies nurture physical, emotional, and mental well-being, building self-acceptance, reducing stress, supporting emotional resilience, and promoting heart health through physical components. For instance, interventions like MSC have demonstrated efficacy in buffering anxiety during ego-threatening scenarios, outperforming boosts in resilience, but long-term maintenance requires integration beyond episodic sessions. Critics note that while accessible via structured programs, these approaches risk superficial application if not paired with deeper of underlying maladaptive patterns. In popular media, self-love dissemination occurs through apps and celebrity-endorsed books, expanding therapeutic concepts into consumer products. Platforms like Calm incorporate daily affirmations targeting self-worth and positivity, aiming to make practices routine via mobile reminders and guided sessions. RuPaul's 2010 book Workin' It!: RuPaul's Guide to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Style advocates through style and confidence-building, drawing from personal experiences to promote inner validation amid external pressures. Such media enhances , enabling widespread adoption without clinical oversight, yet commercialization introduces risks of dependency, where users rely on algorithmic prompts rather than internalizing skills, potentially yielding transient mood lifts without causal behavioral change. Empirical reviews underscore this superficiality, as app-based interventions often prioritize engagement metrics over verifiable long-term outcomes, fostering habitual consumption over autonomous self-regulation. In the early 2020s, following the , self-love discourse surged on platforms, particularly , where the hashtag amassed over 25 million posts and nearly 95 billion views by mid-2024, often featuring content on radical and boundary-setting rituals. This trend aligned with a broader wellness boom, yet surveys indicated correlations with heightened , as self-focused practices like solo affirmations were adopted amid declining in-person connections, with U.S. young adults reporting frequent at rates exceeding 60% in post-2020 polls. Technological integrations amplified these patterns, with AI-driven tools emerging in 2024-2025 to deliver personalized affirmations tailored to users' inputted moods or goals, as seen in apps like Affirmation AI and Manifest, which gamify daily self-validation routines. Such innovations promised but reflected escapist , critiqued for prioritizing internal validation over relational resilience amid economic strains like and job . Psychological emphases shifted toward as a counter to contingent , with proponents like arguing in 2025 publications that it fosters resilience without the pitfalls of comparative superiority. Concurrently, critiques of "toxic positivity"—an overreliance on unwavering —gained traction, with analyses highlighting its role in suppressing and exacerbating emotional suppression, as evidenced in workplace and reviews from 2025. Empirical data from 2020s longitudinal studies revealed mixed outcomes, where excessive self-love emphasis correlated with delayed adulthood markers like and family formation, potentially intensifying generational amid stagnant wages and housing costs. These trends underscore a causal tension: while buffers acute stress, unchecked may erode communal ties, per surveys linking self-care to broader epidemics.

Societal Impacts and Controversies

Positive Outcomes and Achievements

Programs promoting , a core component of self-love practices, have demonstrated modest improvements in , which correlates with enhanced personal agency and reduced educational dropout risks. A of self-compassion interventions found medium effect sizes in reducing self-criticism, enabling individuals to pursue goals with greater resilience, as evidenced by longitudinal studies linking self-compassion to improved barrier self-efficacy in health behaviors that extend to academic persistence. In higher education contexts, (MBCT) interventions enhancing self-compassion yielded significant gains, with network meta-analyses indicating superior outcomes for student and retention compared to controls. Self-love advocacy fosters healthier interpersonal boundaries through associations with styles, as supported by . Meta-analytic evidence shows positively correlates with secure attachment (r ≈ 0.30) and negatively with insecure patterns, mediating improved relationship satisfaction by promoting partner-directed compassion and reducing anxiety-driven conflicts. Empirical studies confirm that self-compassion buffers the negative impacts of attachment insecurity on relational quality, leading to outcomes like greater and efficacy in couples. On a societal level, self-love principles have contributed to destigmatizing vulnerabilities by encouraging , which facilitates help-seeking behaviors and broader interventions. Randomized trials of tasks, such as values-affirmation exercises, have reduced internalized stigma and improved attitudes toward treatment, with effect sizes indicating enhanced via mediated pathways like increased belonging. This shift, observable in rising service utilization rates since the 2010s amid campaigns, underscores causal links where self-love equips individuals for productive societal roles when integrated with , as lower self-stigma correlates with higher employment and metrics in longitudinal cohorts.

Criticisms and Potential Harms

Critics argue that the promotion of self-love, particularly through unconditional practices, has contributed to a rise in traits, as evidenced by longitudinal analyses of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) administered to American students. Scores increased significantly from an average of 15.06 in 1982 to 17.29 in 2006, with effect sizes indicating a generational shift toward greater entitlement and self-importance, which Twenge attributes to cultural emphases on building via praise and minimal criticism in education and parenting. This trend correlates with spikes in , where individuals exhibit higher rates of and antagonism toward colleagues, mediated by unmet expectations of special treatment, as observed in studies linking covert narcissism to instigated through and low reciprocity. High , when cultivated without , fosters fragility rather than resilience, leading to aggressive responses upon ego threats. Baumeister's review of empirical studies concludes that and stem not from low self-esteem but from high self-regard combined with perceived insults, as individuals with inflated egos retaliate disproportionately to maintain superiority, debunking the efficacy of blanket praise in child-rearing. Experimental evidence supports this, showing narcissists react with heightened anger and hostility to rejection or compared to those with secure self-views. On a societal level, self-love ideologies may erode communal bonds by prioritizing individual validation over collective duties, with narcissists engaging in primarily for self-promotion rather than altruistic motives, potentially contributing to observed declines in genuine prosocial participation. This shift encourages victimhood narratives, where personal setbacks are externalized as systemic injustices rather than opportunities for self-improvement, contrasting with historical traditions emphasizing stoic achievement and responsibility; empirical constructs like the Tendency for Interpersonal Victimhood (TIV) demonstrate how chronic self-perceived victimization correlates with reduced personal agency and interpersonal trust. Such patterns undermine causal realism by favoring blame attribution over behavioral adaptation, as critiqued in analyses of therapeutic culture's role in amplifying generalized victim mindsets.

Debates on Balance with Altruism and Community

The central debate surrounding self-love concerns whether it facilitates or undermines altruism and communal bonds, with empirical evidence indicating mixed outcomes depending on its form. Healthy self-compassion, characterized by kindness toward one's flaws without self-pity, positively correlates with empathy and prosocial tendencies; for instance, a 2023 study of university students found self-compassion predicted greater prosocial behavior, mediated by increased empathic concern and reduced personal distress. In contrast, narcissistic self-focus, marked by grandiosity and entitlement, consistently links to diminished altruism; research shows narcissism reduces intentions to help others, even when empathy is controlled for, as it prioritizes status-seeking over genuine concern. From an evolutionary standpoint, self-preservation forms the foundation for reciprocal altruism, enabling cooperation without which group survival falters; Robert Trivers' 1971 model demonstrates that behaviors benefiting others evolve only when actors maintain self-interest to ensure future reciprocity, as in long-lived social groups with low dispersal. Excess self-regard, however, can erode hierarchies and mutual aid, as unchecked individualism disrupts the conditional exchanges that sustain communities, per analyses of spite and reciprocity in large-scale human societies. Philosophically, Aristotle's doctrine of the golden mean frames appropriate self-love as intermediate between and , where the virtuous individual properly values their own to extend (friendship) outward, arguing that true self-lovers act justly toward others without excess. Religious perspectives often counter with calls for , viewing unchecked self-love as idolatrous and prioritizing communal duty; , for example, interprets ' command to "deny yourself" as subordinating personal desires to divine and neighborly service, critiquing modern as a dilution of sacrificial . Contemporary controversies highlight ideological tensions: progressive emphases on unconditional risk downplaying trade-offs like weakened commitments, where work-family conflicts tied to individualistic pursuits correlate with lower self-acceptance among women prioritizing careers over relational roles. Conservative critiques favor duty-oriented models, echoing religious , while empirical work on conditional self-regard reveals that tying worth to fosters instability and reduced intrinsic , advocating instead for realistic, non-extreme self-appraisal that supports rather than supplants communal reciprocity. Overall, supports a calibrated balance, where self-love enables absent pathological excess.

References

  1. https://dictionary.apa.org/self-love
  2. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-90865-001
  3. https://keapcandles.com/blogs/keap/the-honorable-course-how-self-love-lays-the-foundation-for-an-ethical-world
  4. https://www.themarginalian.org/2017/04/27/erich-fromm-sane-society-self-love/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10406111/
  6. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/321309
  7. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/narcissism-is-not-selflove-1522-4821-1000554-121902.html
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11232983_Does_Self-Love_Lead_to_Love_for_Others_A_Story_of_Narcissistic_Game_Playing
  9. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/the_trouble_with_self_love
  10. https://media.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/assets/pdf_file/0007/30103/Self-Love_and_Prac_R_copy.pdf
  11. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf102.iv.XIV.28.html
  12. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/aquinas/summa.FS_Q77_A4.html
  13. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/2077.htm
  14. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/3026.htm
  15. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3600/3600-h/3600-h.htm
  16. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-eng-101-college-writing-i/chapter/excerpts-from-john-lockes-second-treatise-of-government/
  17. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/
  18. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rousseau/
  19. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-politics/article/rousseau-on-selflove-what-weve-learned-what-we-might-have-learned/7973108398C2D5F0CACA03DBF1EDB621
  20. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10848770.2020.1839209
  21. https://philosophybreak.com/articles/nietzsche-on-what-finding-yourself-actually-means/
  22. https://www.verywellmind.com/fromms-five-character-orientations-2795956
  23. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-upside-things/201911/self-love
  24. https://nesslabs.com/self-love
  25. https://health.clevelandclinic.org/self-love
  26. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-a-new-home/202207/the-difference-between-narcissism-and-high-self-esteem
  27. https://self-compassion.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/empirical.article.pdf
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8650183/
  29. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beyond-cultural-competence/202206/how-healthy-self-esteem-and-clinical-narcissism-differ
  30. https://www.apa.org/obesity-guideline/rosenberg-self-esteem.pdf
  31. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=141294
  32. https://self-compassion.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Liao-et-al.-2021-A-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Relation-Between-Self-Compa.pdf
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10239723/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383867423_Self-compassion_and_mental_health_a_systematic_review_and_transactional_model_on_mechanisms_of_change
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8739681/
  36. https://self-compassion.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/BarczakEklund2018.pdf
  37. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12671-024-02383-w
  38. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12671-025-02606-8
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4198323/
  40. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031047
  41. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.00053
  42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26151640/
  43. https://www.scholars.northwestern.edu/en/publications/does-self-love-lead-to-love-for-others-a-story-of-narcissistic-ga
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283545041_Narcissism_and_Self-Insight_A_Review_and_Meta-Analysis_of_Narcissists%27_Self-Enhancement_Tendencies
  45. http://www.jeantwenge.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/narcissism_epidemic_appendices.pdf
  46. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psych-unseen/201607/the-narcissism-epidemic-and-what-we-can-do-about-it
  47. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20171115-millenials-are-the-most-narcissistic-generation-not-so-fast
  48. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED321170.pdf
  49. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/jun/03/quasi-religious-great-self-esteem-con
  50. https://astacademy.com/f/do-participation-trophies-hurt-self-esteem
  51. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711447/full
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8424035/
  53. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/bowling-alone-americas-declining-social-capital/
  54. https://bowlingalone.com/
  55. https://www.amazon.com/Narcissism-Epidemic-Living-Age-Entitlement/dp/1416575995
  56. https://iep.utm.edu/confucius/
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395587775_Rethinking_social_comparison_through_self-cultivation_An_East_Asian_perspective
  58. https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/various/wheel202.html
  59. https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/hinduism/concepts/concepts_1.shtml
  60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15448306/
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2771445/
  62. https://psychologyforsociety.org/2024/10/12/self-esteem-in-individualistic-and-collectivist-culture/
  63. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2019%3A18&version=NIV
  64. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2022%3A39&version=NIV
  65. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/120114.htm
  66. https://sola.network/article/false-gospel-self-love/
  67. https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/283565
  68. https://myislam.org/quran-verses/arrogance-pride/
  69. https://sunnah.com/search?q=arrogance+kibr
  70. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00876/full
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9777524/
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7677265/
  73. https://www.simplypsychology.org/humanistic.html
  74. https://positivepsychology.com/abraham-maslow/
  75. https://www.educationnext.org/social-emotional-learning-movement-self-esteem-movement/
  76. http://files.clps.brown.edu/jkrueger/journal_articles/baumeister-2003-doeshigh.pdf
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9306298/
  78. https://self-compassion.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/Chap4_Mindfulness-Acceptance-and-Positive-Psychology_11.06.pdf
  79. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12671-018-1037-6
  80. https://positivepsychology.com/self-love-exercises-worksheets/
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9482966/
  82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656606000353
  83. https://cogbtherapy.com/cbt-for-improving-low-confidence
  84. https://www.calm.com/blog/positive-affirmations
  85. https://www.amazon.com/Workin-RuPauls-Guide-Liberty-Pursuit/dp/006198583X
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12003299/
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5688908/
  88. https://tiktokhashtags.com/hashtag/selflove/
  89. https://engagelifenow.com/insights/the-pandemic-of-loneliness-in-young-adults-insights-and-strategies/
  90. https://www.affirmationai.io/blog/category/self-love-and-wellness
  91. https://standtogether.org/stories/health-care/ai-for-mental-health-meet-the-personalized-wellness-toolkit-app
  92. https://www.vox.com/even-better/350424/self-care-isolation-loneliness-epidemic
  93. https://www.meredithpsychologicalandtesting.com/self-compassion-is-the-new-self-esteem
  94. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/05/24/toxic-positivity-emotional-suppression/
  95. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tracylawrence/2025/03/26/the-blind-side-of-leadership-toxic-positivity-in-workplace-culture/
  96. https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/self-obsessed-obsession-narcissism-selfish-gen-z-b2782844.html
  97. https://medium.com/pen-with-paper/the-toxic-rise-of-self-love-culture-c9348409d4fd
  98. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2586
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11586801/
  100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395417917_Comparative_Effectiveness_of_Psychological_Interventions_for_Improving_Self-Compassion_Among_Higher_Education_Students_Insights_From_a_Network_Meta-Analysis
  101. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papt.12590?af=R
  102. https://self-compassion.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Bolt2019.pdf
  103. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-38615-001
  104. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/28367138.2025.2552484?src=exp-la
  105. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2167696812466548
  106. https://www.sdsu.edu/news/2009/04/narcissism-increasing-among-college-students
  107. https://ciencia.ucp.pt/en/publications/the-effect-of-covert-narcissism-on-workplace-incivility-the-media
  108. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20220518-the-quiet-threat-of-covert-narcissists-in-the-workplace
  109. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-01716-001
  110. https://roybaumeister.com/1996/10/15/relation-of-threatened-egotism-to-violence-and-aggression-the-dark-side-of-high-self-esteem/
  111. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15272953/
  112. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262065844_Narcissism_affects_reasons_for_volunteering
  113. https://kb.osu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/bce8871b-0d00-5aac-a653-5cfdc585f165/content
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7778419/
  115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341548585_The_Tendency_for_Interpersonal_Victimhood_The_Personality_Construct_and_its_Consequences
  116. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/unraveling-the-mindset-of-victimhood/
  117. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367644305_Exploring_the_Relationship_between_Self-Compassion_and_Prosocial_Behavior_among_University_Students_Mediating_Role_of_Empathy
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656622001337
  119. https://scholarworks.indianapolis.iu.edu/bitstream/1805/14676/1/Narcissism_and_prosocial_behavior_chapter.pdf
  120. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/Trivers-EvolutionReciprocalAltruism.pdf
  121. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2781875/
  122. https://philosophybreak.com/articles/the-golden-mean-aristotle-guide-to-living-excellently/
  123. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/self-care-and-self-denial/
  124. https://www.plough.com/en/topics/faith/discipleship/why-self-denial
  125. https://midus.wisc.edu/findings/pdfs/32.pdf
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6194514/
  127. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jad.12111
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.