Hubbry Logo
Close helmetClose helmetMain
Open search
Close helmet
Community hub
Close helmet
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Close helmet
Close helmet
Close helmet
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
French close helmet of the later split-visor type, c. 1555–1560

The close helmet or close helm is a type of combat helmet that was worn by knights and other men-at-arms in the Late Medieval and Renaissance eras. It was also used by some heavily armoured, pistol-armed cuirassiers into the mid-17th century. It is a fully enclosing helmet with a pivoting visor and integral bevor.

Characteristics

[edit]
Comparison of close helm and armet in open position. Note the close helm uses a single pivot point for the double visor and bevor, while the armet has hinged cheek plates that lock in place.

The close helmet was developed from the later versions of the sallet and the superficially similar armet in the late 15th century. In contemporary sources it was sometimes also referred to as an 'armet', though modern scholarship draws a clear distinction between the two types.[1]

While outwardly very similar to the armet, the close helmet had an entirely different method of opening. Like the armet, the close helmet followed the contours of the head and neck closely, and narrowed at the throat, therefore it required a mechanical method for opening and closing. While an armet opened laterally using two large hinged cheekpieces, a close helmet instead opened vertically via an integral rotating bevor, which was attached to the same pivots as its visor. The moving parts were usually secured when closed by pivot-hooks engaging pierced staples. Alternatively, spring-loaded studs could be employed. The bevor was often held closed by a strap.[2]

Variations

[edit]
German close helmet of the Maximillian type, with bellows visor, c. 1520

Beginning around 1500, armour, including helmets, became more immediately influenced by fashion, especially in civilian clothing. As a result close helmets came in a huge variety of forms. The earliest close helmets resembled contemporary armets. In Italy, England and France in the period 1510–1525 helmets were rounded with visors of the 'sparrow's beak' form, whereas in Germany, the fluted 'Maximillian' style of armour produced distinctive types of helmet. The skulls of these helmets were globular with a low crest; many were decorated with fluting but some were plain. Two types of visor were produced, the Nuremberg form, which had a 'bellows' shape, and the Augsburg form, which was more projecting and is commonly called a 'monkey face'.[3][4]

Close helmet with grotesque visor (modern reproduction of a German helmet of c. 1520 style)

From the 1520s a new, almost universal, variety of close helmet was developed. The previous forms of one-piece visor were replaced by a more complex system of face covering. The visor was split, below the eye-slits, into two independently pivoting parts. The lower half, called the ventail or upper bevor, was projecting and shaped like the prow of a modern ship. The upper visor, when closed, fitted within the upper edge of the ventail; it could be raised independently of the ventail by the provision of a projecting lifting peg. At the same time, on most helmets, the base of the bevor and the lower edge of the skull had laminated gorget plates attached. Crests, running from front to back tended to become taller in the course of the 16th century, becoming particularly exaggerated in some Italian-made examples, before becoming reduced in size at the century's close.[5][6]

There are many helmets surviving with 'grotesque' visors. These are thought to have been used as part of a 'costume armour' worn at parades and during festivities. Some of these masks portrayed the heads of animals or demons, whilst others were evidently for comic effect, being caricatures of the faces of their owners.[7]

Use

[edit]
A close helmet with a split visor (also with an extra pivoting peak), c. 1560 (notice that its bevor – secured by a strap – is attached to the same pivot as the visors)

The close helmet was used on the field of battle, but was also popular for use in tournaments. Wealthy men often owned 'garnitures', which were armours with interchangeable parts ('pieces of exchange') to suit heavy or light field use, and the many different forms of tournament combat. Garnitures would usually include elements for reinforcing the left side of the helmet for use in jousting. Such reinforcing pieces were called 'double pieces' or 'pieces of advantage'.[8]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Close helmet

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A close helmet is a type of full-face developed in during the late 15th and early 16th centuries, designed to enclose the wearer's entire head for maximum protection in battle or tournaments, featuring a one-piece skull cap, a pivoting for vision and ventilation, and a lower plate guarding the neck and chin, all typically forged from steel and connected via sliding rivets or pivots. This helmet evolved from earlier forms like the and , supplanting the around 1520 as the standard for mounted in the field, offering improved mobility and defense against thrusts and blows compared to more open designs. By the mid-16th century, close helmets became widespread across regions such as , , and , often customized with decorative fluting in the "Maximilian" style—named after I (r. 1493–1519)—which combined aesthetic appeal with structural reinforcement to deflect strikes. Notable examples include ornate pieces from Milanese workshops, weighing around 8–9 pounds and measuring approximately 14 inches in height, intended for elite knights or gentlemen soldiers who commissioned bespoke armor rather than standardized issues. Archaeological finds, such as a fragmented close helmet recovered from a 17th-century cellar at , highlight their continued use in colonial American contexts. Variations often incorporated grotesque visors for tournament spectacles or additional lames for enhanced coverage, reflecting both practical warfare needs and cultural influences from Italian and German armories.

History

Origins and Emergence

The close helmet, defined as a fully enclosing form of head protection that integrated the rounded skull and visor mechanisms of the with the rear tail and cheek defenses of the , first emerged in during the late , approximately 1480–1500. This development marked a pivotal advancement in plate armor design, transitioning from partially open helmets to complete facial enclosure for enhanced protection in close-quarters combat. The helmet's creation responded to the intensifying demands of late , where knights required robust head coverage without sacrificing mobility. Its precursors traced directly to the great bascinet, a 14th-century helmet featuring a pointed skull and pivoting visor, and the sallet, which appeared around 1430 and offered better neck protection through a extended tail but left the face more exposed. Early transitional examples, such as those preserved in the Churburg armory collection in northern Italy dating to the late 14th century, illustrate this evolution with bascinet forms incorporating early visor and bevor elements that foreshadowed full enclosure. These designs were refined in Milanese workshops, where the armet—a compact precursor to the close helmet—emerged by the 1440s, as evidenced by surviving pieces attributed to the Milanese armorer Lionardo. Driving this innovation were significant improvements in 15th-century , including better steel forging techniques that enabled the production of thinner, articulated plates capable of withstanding impacts while allowing flexible movement. During the (1337–1453), tactical necessities amplified these advancements, as combatants faced escalating threats from maces, pollaxes, and thrusting swords that could penetrate earlier mail-reinforced helmets, alongside the rising use of early weapons like handgonnes introduced at battles such as Crécy (1346) and increasingly prevalent by the 1430s. The close helmet's (a pivoting lower face guard) and sliding thus provided layered defense against such blows, prioritizing deflection and shock absorption. Documented appearances of the earliest true close helmets appear in inventories from late 15th-century Italian and Burgundian armories, with Milanese examples from the representing the archetype through their hinged construction and integrated . By around 1520, the close helmet had largely supplanted the as the preferred helmet for field use by mounted soldiers. Burgundian records from the late reference similar enclosed forms adapted for the and of the period's conflicts. These helmets quickly spread across , underscoring their role in elevating personal armor to a standard of comprehensive enclosure amid evolving battlefield perils.

Evolution and Decline

In the late , the close helmet saw key advancements in design, particularly in German and Flemish workshops between approximately 1480 and 1520, where armorers refined earlier forms derived from sallet-bascinet hybrids by adopting more ergonomic rounded skull shapes to improve blow deflection and incorporating secure locking mechanisms for visors to ensure stability in . These innovations enhanced protection and usability for mounted knights, transitioning the helmet toward a fully enclosed form suitable for field use. By the , the close helmet reached its peak of sophistication and aesthetic elaboration, especially in Italian production at the Milanese Negroli workshop, where pieces from the 1530s to 1550s featured intricate , , and embossing inspired by classical motifs, as seen in Filippo Negroli's close helmets around 1532–1535 and Giovan Paolo Negroli's gilded examples circa 1540–1545. In , similar decorative techniques like and adorned close helmets for elite users, while practical adaptations emerged, such as extended neck guards (gorged lames) to shield against downward strikes from pikes or arquebus fire, catering to like pikemen and arquebusiers in evolving battlefield roles. German examples from around 1520, like those with spring catches and wing-nut locks on visors, exemplified this blend of functionality and ornamentation. The decline of the close helmet began in the mid-to-late (circa 1550–1600), driven primarily by the increasing effectiveness of firearms, which rendered heavy, fully enclosed helmets impractical due to their weight and restricted visibility, prompting a shift toward lighter, open-faced alternatives like burgonets and morions that prioritized mobility over comprehensive protection. Although attempts were made to thicken steel for bullet resistance, the overall trend favored partial armor ensembles, with close helmets largely relegated to ceremonial or use by the early 17th century. Their last notable appearances occurred during the of the 1640s, primarily as heraldic or ceremonial pieces, such as those bearing family crests in funeral achievements. This obsolescence influenced transitional forms, including half-helmets that retained elements but sacrificed full enclosure for practicality.

Design and Construction

Key Components

The close helmet, a fully enclosing form of head protection developed in the late 15th and 16th centuries, consists of several interconnected components designed to provide comprehensive defense for the head, face, and while allowing for essential functions like vision, , and mobility. These parts are typically forged from and assembled to form a seamless barrier against blows, with each element contributing to the helmet's overall structural integrity and wearability. The skull serves as the domed upper section of the helmet, encasing and protecting the crown and sides of the head. Crafted from steel typically 2-3 mm thick to balance protection and weight, it forms the foundational bowl-shaped structure, often made in one or two pieces joined by a comb or seam for reinforcement. Historical examples measure approximately 25-30 cm in height to fully enclose the head, ensuring coverage from the forehead to the nape while distributing impact forces across its curved surface. The is an articulated front plate that safeguards the face, featuring narrow vision slits known as the ocularium for sight and ventilation holes or vents called ventails for . It pivots upward or slides via side hinges or bars attached to rivets on the , allowing the wearer to adjust it for visibility or removal during non-threatening moments. This mechanism not only enhances to prevent overheating but also permits restricted fields of view—typically limited to forward and slight lateral directions—to minimize vulnerabilities. Variations in visor shapes, such as or stepped profiles, adapted to regional preferences but maintained this core pivoting function. The bevor functions as a detachable lower guard that covers the and , extending from the to overlap with the upper chest armor. Shaped to conform to the lower face, it often pivots on the same side rivets as the and may be secured by hooks or studs to the , creating a tight seal against thrusting weapons. In full armor ensembles, the bevor is frequently riveted directly to the to eliminate gaps, thereby protecting vital areas like the carotid arteries from slashes or stabs. Gorget attachment refers to the rear lames or overlapping plates at the helmet's base, which connect to the pauldrons or upper armor to seal the region. These articulated plates, often two to three in number, allow for head rotation and shoulder movement while preventing exposure through flexible joints. By locking into the rim of the and , they ensure continuous protection down to the collarbone, crucial for mounted or foot combatants facing multi-directional attacks. Internal padding comprises leather liners and suspension systems fitted inside the helmet to absorb shocks, wick moisture, and provide comfort during extended wear. These include adjustable straps or quilted linings riveted to the , distributing the helmet's weight evenly across the head and reducing pressure points. Historical records indicate the use of fabric or stuffing in some linings for additional cushioning.

Materials and Techniques

Close helmets were primarily constructed from high-carbon steel, produced through the bloomery process involving carburization to achieve desired hardness levels, typically tempered to a Rockwell C scale of 50-60 for optimal balance between toughness and resistance to impacts. This steel, often wrought iron refined with added carbon, was sourced from specialized mines such as those in Tyrol (modern Austria) or Spain, renowned for their high-quality ores suitable for armor production. Thickness varied by component to optimize weight and protection, generally ranging from 1.5 mm for lighter visors to 3 mm for the robust skull, ensuring the helmet weighed around 2.5-5 kg while covering the head fully. Secondary materials enhanced functionality and aesthetics, including or alloys for decorative borders, rivets, and plume holders, which provided resistance and ornamental contrast against the . linings and straps secured the helmet to the wearer, offering padding and adjustability, while occasional applications of or chemical bluing served dual purposes of decoration and surface protection against rust. Bluing, achieved by heating in a , created a dark layer, often combined with for high-status pieces. Construction began with hand-forging billets of on anvils to form initial sheets, followed by raising—hammering the metal over shaped stakes to create the curved and other forms—ensuring a seamless, form-fitting structure. with smooth hammers then refined the surface for a polished finish, removing marks and improving durability. Articulated joints, such as pivots, were assembled using riveting, with helmets incorporating up to 100 small or rivets to connect lames, befores, and gorgets securely without weakening the metal. via slack quenching—cooling heated slowly in air or oil—prevented while enhancing , a critical step performed in workshops to tailor the steel's properties. Quality varied significantly between bespoke armorer commissions and more standardized production; for instance, the royal workshops at Greenwich, , produced both custom pieces for with intricate detailing and semi-mass-produced items for use, often featuring consistent heat treatments for reliability. Specialized tools like fullers—grooved hammers or stakes—created reinforcing creases in the steel, while files shaped edges and prepared surfaces for finishing, allowing armorers to achieve precise fits despite the labor-intensive process.

Variations

Standard Forms

The basic Milanese close helmet, a staple in early 16th-century Italian armor for and use, consisted of a rounded skull cap integrated with a fixed for neck protection and a pivoting that allowed for ventilation and vision while enclosing the face. This emphasized compactness and mobility, typically weighing 3 to 4 kg to balance protection with wearability. In contrast, the German Gothic style close helmet, emerging around , adopted angular forms with fluted surfaces to distribute impact forces effectively, particularly against polearms, featuring a taller, more pointed and a sliding for adjustable coverage. These elements reflected late 15th- and early 16th-century Germanic preferences for robust, visually striking protection that enhanced structural integrity without excessive weight. English and Flemish variants of the close helmet offered simpler, rounded profiles with broader vision slits to improve peripheral sight, often manufactured in standardized series for export markets, as seen in the Greenwich armory pieces associated with Henry VIII's court in the early . This production approach prioritized efficiency and accessibility over ornate customization. Close helmets were generally sized for universal adult wear, fitting head circumferences from 55 to 62 cm, with internal liners providing adjustments for comfort and secure fit rather than shaping of the . Common accessories for standard close helmets included detachable plumes or crests mounted atop the , serving primarily for or identification without the elaborate embellishments of specialized variants.

Regional and Specialized Types

In the Burgundian and Holy Roman Imperial regions, close helmet variants evolved to support elaborate traditions in the early , often incorporating heavier construction for durability. These helmets typically included reinforced crests to absorb impacts and locking visors that secured the face guard during charges, distinguishing them from field models. An example from around illustrates this style, with asymmetrical reinforcements on the left side to accommodate rests and enhanced protection against glancing blows. Specialized jousting helmets like the German stechhelm diverged significantly from close helmets, prioritizing impact deflection over visibility or ventilation. Fully enclosed with a frog-mouth —often featuring narrow vision slits rather than bars—these were crafted for the Gestech style, where blunted lances targeted the helm to shatter or unhorse opponents. Weighing up to 8 kg, they included hinged straps bolting to the for stability, rendering them impractical for use. Rare variants during the (1494-1559) included leather-reinforced close helmets for lighter infantry and skirmishers, combining steel plates with (cuir bouilli) to reduce weight to under 3 kg while maintaining flexibility for prolonged marches. These hybrid designs, used by less affluent troops, incorporated padded leather liners and minimal metal for cost-effective protection against fire and .

Use

In Warfare

The close helmet played a crucial role in 15th- and 16th-century battlefield combat, offering robust head protection when integrated into full plate harnesses known as "white armor." Worn by knights and men-at-arms, it enclosed the entire head and neck, deflecting glancing blows from swords and distributing the force of mace or warhammer impacts across its curved surfaces, which were typically 1.5–2 mm thick. This design enhanced survivability for heavily armored and in dense formations, where close-quarters dominated engagements, particularly among elite mounted men-at-arms and such as gendarmes. During conflicts like the (1494–1559), close helmets sealed with cuirasses to create comprehensive suits that shielded vital areas, allowing men-at-arms to withstand thrusts and slashes in prolonged clashes. The helmet's and pivoted on reinforced hinges, providing a secure fit that minimized gaps exploitable by edged weapons. In continental warfare, close helmets were employed by men-at-arms supporting charges, where the full enclosure guarded against strikes during pushes against enemy lines. Despite these advantages, the close helmet imposed tactical limitations. Its narrow visor slits restricted peripheral vision, forcing wearers to turn their heads fully to scan surroundings, which could prove disadvantageous in chaotic melees. Weighing 4–8 pounds (2–4 kg), it contributed to neck strain over extended wear, particularly when combined with the overall 45–55-pound (20–25 kg) load of full plate. Ventilation was minimal, with small perforations in the allowing only limited , leading to rapid heat buildup and fatigue in prolonged fights under physical exertion. Post-1500, the close helmet's vulnerabilities to emerging firearms became evident; while thicker reinforcements (up to 3–4 mm) could deflect low-velocity shots at range, direct hits or higher-caliber fire often penetrated or concussed wearers, accelerating the shift to lighter, open-faced alternatives like burgonets. Field maintenance was essential for reliability, with soldiers regularly polishing the steel interior and exterior using abrasives to remove oxidation and prevent rust, especially in damp campaigns. Armorsmiths frequently traveled with armies, such as the Milanese workshops that rapidly produced and repaired thousands of pieces for battles like (1525), ensuring helmets remained functional amid wear from combat and weather.

In Tournaments and Ceremonial Contexts

Close helmets were adapted for and other mounted through reinforcements such as additional lames on the skull and reinforced visors to better withstand lance impacts during high-speed charges. These modifications were evident in events like the Field of the Cloth of Gold in 1520, where Henry VIII's tournament armour, including a close helmet designed to rotate on a collar bolted to the , allowed for safer foot and barrier combats while incorporating extra plates that doubled the overall weight to approximately 42.6 kg for enhanced protection against blunt weapons. In tournament rules, particularly for foot combats known as behorden, close helmets featured wider or multiple vision slits—often with a central division and additional slits on either side—to improve peripheral awareness during close-quarters engagements, as seen in late 16th-century German examples made for the , a form of mock combat on foot or horseback. Such designs were prevalent in events across 15th-century and , where contestants in controlled, chivalric displays used these helmets to simulate battlefield scenarios without lethal intent. In ceremonial contexts, close helmets served as symbols of and chivalric prestige, often paraded as part of state armour in elaborate processions. For instance, Henry VIII's horned close helmet, gifted by Maximilian I around 1514 and crafted by Konrad Seusenhofer, was intended for parades rather than combat, featuring embossing to emphasize and diplomatic pomp. Gilded versions, such as those in Greenwich armour ensembles, further highlighted royal status through and embossed decorations, embodying ideals of knighthood during courtly displays where functionality was secondary to ornate presentation. Non-functional, highly decorated close helmets were common in these settings, prioritizing aesthetic appeal over practicality to convey wealth and . Safety features distinguished tournament close helmets from battlefield variants, emphasizing injury prevention in non-lethal spectacles. Interiors often included padded leather linings and textile straps to absorb shocks and ensure comfort during prolonged wear, as preserved in late 16th-century Augsburg examples with silk-covered padding. Removable crests and finials allowed for customization and reduced weight or snag risks, while pivoting visors and be vors provided adjustable ventilation and vision without compromising enclosure. These elements contrasted with the rugged, minimally padded designs of war helmets, prioritizing rider and spectator safety in regulated contests using rebated lances and swords. The use of close helmets extended into cultural events like mock battles and fairs, maintaining traditions into the as chivalric pastimes waned in relevance. German and Saxon examples from around 1640–1650, such as those for foot tournaments at , show active service marks from knightly contests, integrating into princely entertainments that blended sport with pageantry. These helmets facilitated symbolic reenactments, preserving armored combat as a in European courts long after practical warfare shifted away from plate.

Legacy

Surviving Examples

One notable surviving example is a close helmet from , , dating to about 1530, housed in the in . This helmet, weighing 3.36 kg and featuring etched, fluted, and roped decoration with copper alloy, leather, and canvas elements, exemplifies early 16th-century German craftsmanship with its articulated and for full head protection. Another key artifact is a close helmet attributed to the Milanese armorer Giovan Paolo Negroli, circa 1540–45, in the in New York. Crafted from with intricate embossing and , this example measures approximately 27.3 cm in height and 29 cm in width, demonstrating the ornate techniques of Italian armorers while maintaining functional combat design. The Royal Armouries in maintains an extensive collection of close helmets, including a rare English example from about 1485 with a cusped brow reinforce and pivoted , shaped to fit closely to the head with a broad nape tail for mobility. This institution holds dozens of such helmets from the late 15th to 17th centuries, providing a broad spectrum for comparative study of European variations. Another piece, dated around 1510 and known as a "sparrow's beak" type due to its projecting , further illustrates transitional designs from armets to fully enclosed forms. In , the armory at Churburg Castle (Castel Coira) in preserves a collection of armors from the 14th to 16th centuries from the Matsch family, including armets and a close helmet dating to 1540 crafted by Jörg Seusenhofer in for Jakob VI Trapp. These intact pieces, part of a larger assemblage of over 50 complete armor sets from the 14th to 16th centuries, offer direct evidence of Tyrolean nobility's equipment and regional adaptations. Conservation efforts on surviving close helmets often involve advanced imaging, such as analysis, to reveal internal structures and repairs without disassembly. For instance, examination of a 17th-century close helmet excavated at Historic Jamestowne, , used X-rays to identify details and guide restoration, uncovering original linings and pivot mechanisms obscured by . Such techniques confirm authenticity and production dates spanning 1420–1550 for many European examples. These artifacts provide critical insights for , with visible wear patterns—such as dents and polish from repeated use—enabling scholars to reconstruct damage and maintenance practices in historical battles. Public access to these helmets is facilitated through museum exhibitions and digital initiatives; the Metropolitan Museum offers high-resolution online images and 3D models, while the Royal Armouries provides virtual tours of its galleries, allowing global study of these rare pieces. The similarly features detailed catalog entries with photographs for scholarly reference.

Modern Reproductions and Influence

Modern reproductions of close helmets are crafted using techniques that prioritize historical accuracy while adapting to contemporary manufacturing capabilities. Artisans and companies such as Lord of Battles and By the Sword employ 16-gauge mild steel, often hammer-hardened for durability, to forge these helmets through hand-shaping and welding processes. These replicas typically weigh between 3.6 and 4.1 kg, with features like hinged visors and beavors that mimic 16th-century designs, and are available for prices ranging from $180 to $500 for functional models. Higher-end producers like Forge of Svan offer custom handcrafted versions in 2.0-2.5 mm tempered steel, priced around €1,990, based directly on originals such as the transitional in the Royal Armouries collection. In , close helmet replicas serve as essential protective gear, particularly in organizations like the (SCA). SCA regulations mandate steel helmets of at least 16-gauge thickness (1.6 mm) with secure welds, padded interiors using at least 0.5-inch closed-cell foam to prevent internal impacts, and face guards that block a 1-inch probe for eye safety. These adaptations ensure replicas withstand simulated combat while maintaining period aesthetics, with examples like the English Tourney Close Helm from By the Sword approved for SCA use due to its articulated and reinforced construction. Reproductions also influence media and , appearing as props in period dramas and video games to evoke Renaissance-era authenticity. Technological advancements enhance reproduction fidelity through of surviving artifacts, enabling precise CAD models for and milling. Institutions like Artec 3D have scanned knight helmets to create detailed digital replicas, facilitating accurate prototypes that preserve intricate details like ventilation slits and roping. Non-ferrous alloys, such as lighter variants offered by Forge of Svan, are used in training versions to reduce weight without compromising strength, aiding prolonged reenactment sessions. The cultural legacy of close helmets extends to educational and exhibit contexts, where reproductions promote hands-on engagement with history. Museums like Armouries offer scaled-down replicas for display and interaction, allowing visitors to explore late medieval knightly protection. These items inspire broader interest in , appearing in exhibits that highlight armor evolution from the 15th to 17th centuries. Producing modern replicas presents challenges in reconciling historical accuracy with safety standards for active use. Reenactment groups require additions like liners and chin straps to mitigate risks, as unpadded originals could cause injury under impact; for instance, SCA rules prohibit internal projections exceeding 0.5 inches unless padded. Balancing these modifications—such as thicker gauge for durability versus lighter alloys for comfort—ensures replicas remain wearable without altering core designs.

References

  1. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/26428
  2. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1881-0802-41
  3. https://historicjamestowne.org/collections/archaearium/gentleman-soldiers/close-helm/
  4. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-17493
  5. https://resources.metmuseum.org/resources/metpublications/pdf/European_Helmets_1450_1650_Treasures_from_the_Reserve_Collection.pdf
  6. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/24686
  7. https://lordofbattles.com/history-behind-most-iconic-medieval-helmets/
  8. http://oakeshott.org/some-aspects-of-the-metallurgy-and-production-of-european-armor/
  9. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/the-function-of-armor-in-medieval-and-renaissance-europe
  10. https://thefatefulforce.com/firearms-vs-armour-in-the-late-middle-ages-and-renaissance/
  11. https://www.metmuseum.org/met-publications/european-helmets-1450-1650-treasures-from-the-reserve-collection
  12. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-7105
  13. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/arms-and-armor-common-misconceptions-and-frequently-asked-questions
  14. https://www.metmuseum.org/met-publications/heroic-armor-of-the-italian-renaissance-filippo-negroli-and-his-contemporaries
  15. https://www.cromwellmuseum.org/cromwell/key-collections/key-collection/arms-and-armour
  16. http://myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.9475.html
  17. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/23234
  18. https://www.rct.uk/collection/64177/close-helmet
  19. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-typical-Rockwell-C-B-if-softer-hardness-for-the-medieval-European-steel-armors-Do-they-receive-any-kind-of-heat-treatment
  20. https://hmsjournal.org/index.php/home/article/download/309/297
  21. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-56156
  22. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/fire-gilding-of-arms-and-armor
  23. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/techniques-of-decoration-on-arms-and-armor
  24. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/the-decoration-of-european-armor
  25. https://www.academia.edu/73174108/Armourers_and_their_workshops_the_tools_and_techniques_of_late_medieval_armour_production
  26. https://www.artic.edu/artworks/111777/close-helmet
  27. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/35903
  28. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-3300
  29. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/35953
  30. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/fashion-in-european-armor-1500-1600
  31. https://www.getty.edu/publications/resources/virtuallibrary/9780892367856.pdf
  32. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/23216
  33. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/27159
  34. https://acoup.blog/2019/06/21/collections-punching-through-some-armor-myths/
  35. https://www.1066.co.nz/Mosaic%20DVD/library/Medieval%20Armour.pdf
  36. https://herodotushistoryblog.wordpress.com/2016/03/10/closed-helmets-vs-open-helmets/
  37. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-19
  38. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/24795
  39. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/26518
  40. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-2623
  41. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-11384
  42. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/21919
  43. https://wallacelive.wallacecollection.org/eMP/eMuseumPlus?service=ExternalInterface&module=collection&objectId=60649&viewType=detailView
  44. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/22903
  45. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-42322
  46. https://www.instagram.com/p/CR6rhOjlv-m/
  47. https://www.kultofathena.com/product/close-helm-16-gauge-steel/
  48. https://www.by-the-sword.com/p-42205-european-close-helm-16-gauge-steel.aspx
  49. https://forgeofsvan.com/product/close-helmet/
  50. https://www.sca.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Armored_Combat_Handbook-Oct_2023.pdf
  51. https://www.by-the-sword.com/p-42327-english-tourney-close-helm-sca-helmet-14-gauge.aspx
  52. https://www.artec3d.com/3d-models/knight-helmet
  53. https://shop.royalarmouries.org/products/mini-close-helm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.