Hubbry Logo
Rapeseed oilRapeseed oilMain
Open search
Rapeseed oil
Community hub
Rapeseed oil
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Rapeseed oil
Rapeseed oil
Rapeseed oil
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Rapeseed oil is one of the oldest known vegetable oils. There are both edible and industrial forms produced from rapeseed, the seed of several cultivars of the plant family Brassicaceae (mustards). The term "rapeseed" applies to oilseeds from the species Brassica napus and Brassica rapa, while the term canola refers to specific rapeseed varieties bred to produce oil for use in human and animal foods.[1] In manufacturing, the edible varieties of canola are required to contain less than 2% erucic acid in Canada, the United States, European Union, and many other countries.[1][2][3]

Canola is produced as low erucic acid rapeseed (LEAR) oil and is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).[2][4]

In commerce, non-food varieties are typically called colza oil.[5] In 2022, Canada, Germany, China, and India were the leading producers of rapeseed oil, accounting together for 41% of the world total.

History

[edit]

The name for rapeseed comes from the Latin word rapum meaning turnip. Turnip, rutabaga (swede), cabbage, Brussels sprouts, and mustard are related to rapeseed. Rapeseed belongs to the genus Brassica. Brassica oilseed varieties are some of the oldest plants cultivated, with documentation of its use tracing back to India from 4,000 years ago, and use in China and Japan 2,000 years ago.[6]: 55  Its use in Northern Europe for oil lamps is documented to have started in the 13th century.[6] Rapeseed oil extracts were first put on the market in 1956–1957 as food products, but these had several unacceptable properties. That form of rapeseed oil had a distinctive taste and a greenish colour due to the presence of chlorophyll, and still contained a higher concentration of erucic acid.[7]

Canola field
Canola oil

Canola was bred from rapeseed cultivars of B. napus and B. rapa at the University of Manitoba in the early 1970s.[8][9] Its nutritional profile was then different from present-day oil, as well as containing much less[more?] erucic acid.[10] This work was performed at the National Research Council of Canada laboratories in Saskatoon using gas liquid chromatography.[11] Canola was originally a trademark name of the Rapeseed Association of Canada; the name is a portmanteau of "can" from Canada and "ola" from "oil".[12][13] Canola is now a generic term for edible varieties of rapeseed oil in North America and Australasia;[14] the change in name also serves to distinguish it from natural rapeseed oil, which has much higher erucic acid content.[15]

A genetically engineered rapeseed that is tolerant to the herbicide Roundup (glyphosate) was first introduced to Canada in 1995 (Roundup Ready). A genetically modified variety developed in 1998 is considered to be the most disease- and drought-resistant canola variety to date. In 2009, 90% of the Canadian crop was herbicide-tolerant.[16] In 2005, 87% of the canola grown in the US was genetically modified.[17] In 2011, out of the 31 million hectares of canola grown worldwide, 8.2 million (26%) were genetically modified.[18]

A 2010 study conducted in North Dakota found glyphosate- or glufosinate-resistance transgenes in 80% of wild natural rapeseed plants, and a few plants that were resistant to both herbicides. This may reduce the effectiveness of the herbicide tolerance trait for weed control over time, as the weed species could also become tolerant to the herbicide. However, one of the researchers agrees that "feral populations could have become established after trucks carrying cultivated GM seeds spilled some of their load during transportation". She also notes that the GM canola results they found may have been biased as they only sampled along roadsides.[19]

Genetically modified canola attracts a price penalty compared to non-GM canola; in Western Australia, it is estimated to be 7.2% on average.[20]

Production

[edit]
Rapeseed oil production
2022, millions of tonnes
 Canada 3.7
 Germany 3.7
 China 3.6
 India 3.4
 France 1.8
 Poland 1.4
World 26.7
Source: FAOSTAT of the United Nations[21]

In 2022, world production of rapeseed oil was 27 million tonnes, led by Canada, Germany, China, and India as the largest producers, accounting for 41% of the total when combined (table).

Production process

[edit]

Canola oil is made at a processing facility by slightly heating and then crushing the seed.[22] Almost all commercial canola oil is then extracted using hexane solvent,[23] which is recovered at the end of processing. Finally, the canola oil is refined using water precipitation and organic acid to remove gums and free fatty acids, filtering to remove color, and deodorizing using steam distillation.[22] Sometimes the oil is also bleached for a lighter color.[24] The average density of canola oil is 0.92 g/ml (7.7 lb/US gal; 9.2 lb/imp gal).[25]

Cold-pressed and expeller-pressed canola oil are also produced on a more limited basis. About 44% of a seed is oil, with the remainder as a canola meal used for animal feed.[22] About 23 kg (51 lb) of canola seed makes 10 L (2.64 US gal) of canola oil. Canola oil is a key ingredient in many foods. Its reputation as a healthful oil has created high demand in markets around the world,[26] and overall it is the third-most widely consumed vegetable oil, after soybean oil and palm oil.[27]

The oil has many non-food uses and, like soybean oil, is often used interchangeably with non-renewable petroleum-based oils in products,[26] including industrial lubricants, biodiesel, candles, lipsticks, and newspaper inks.[citation needed]

Canola vegetable oils certified as organic are required to be from non-GMO rapeseed.[28]

Nutrition and health

[edit]
Canola oil
Nutritional value per 100 g
Energy3,700 kJ (880 kcal)
0 g
Starch0 g
Sugars0 g
Dietary fiber0 g
100 g
Saturated7.4 g
Trans0.4 g
Monounsaturated63.3 g
Polyunsaturated28.1 g
9.1 g
18.6 g
0 g
Vitamins and minerals
VitaminsQuantity
%DV†
Vitamin A equiv.
0%
0 μg
0%
0 μg
0 μg
Vitamin A0 IU
Thiamine (B1)
0%
0 mg
Riboflavin (B2)
0%
0 mg
Niacin (B3)
0%
0 mg
Pantothenic acid (B5)
0%
0 mg
Vitamin B6
0%
0 mg
Folate (B9)
0%
0 μg
Vitamin B12
0%
0 μg
Vitamin C
0%
0 mg
Vitamin E
117%
17.5 mg
Vitamin K
59%
71.3 μg
MineralsQuantity
%DV†
Calcium
0%
0 mg
Iron
0%
0 mg
Magnesium
0%
0 mg
Manganese
0%
0 mg
Phosphorus
0%
0 mg
Potassium
0%
0 mg
Sodium
0%
0 mg
Zinc
0%
0 mg
Other constituentsQuantity
Water0 g
Full link to USDA FoodData Central entry
†Percentages estimated using US recommendations for adults,[29] except for potassium, which is estimated based on expert recommendation from the National Academies.[30]

Nutritional content

[edit]

Canola oil is 100% fat, composed of 63% monounsaturated fat, 28% polyunsaturated fat, and 7% saturated fat (table). The ratio of linoleic acid (an omega-6 fatty acid) to alpha-linolenic acid (an omega-3 fatty acid) is 2:1 (table). A 100 g (3.5 oz) reference amount of canola oil provides 880 calories of food energy and is a rich source of vitamin E (117% of the Daily Value, DV) and vitamin K (59% DV) (table).

Health research

[edit]

Reviews indicate that consumption of canola oil can reduce blood levels of cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) – two risk factors for cardiovascular diseases – and may help reduce body weight.[31][32][33][34]

In 2006, canola oil was given a qualified health claim by the United States Food and Drug Administration for lowering the risk of coronary heart disease, resulting from its significant content of unsaturated fats; the allowed claim for food labels states:[35]

"Limited and not conclusive scientific evidence suggests that eating about 1 1⁄2 tablespoons (19 grams) of canola oil daily may reduce the risk of coronary heart disease due to the unsaturated fat content in canola oil. To achieve this possible benefit, canola oil is to replace a similar amount of saturated fat and not increase the total number of calories you eat in a day. One serving of this product contains [x] grams of canola oil."

Erucic acid

[edit]
Main article: Erucic acid
Compound Family % of total
Oleic acid ω-9 61%[36]
Linoleic acid ω-6 21%[36]
Alpha-linolenic acid ω-3 11%[36]
9%[37][38]
Saturated fatty acids 7%[36]
Palmitic acid 4%[37]
Stearic acid 2%[37]
Trans fat 0.4%[39]
Erucic acid 0.01%[40]
<0.1%[41][42]

Although wild rapeseed oil contains significant amounts of erucic acid,[43] the cultivars used to produce commercial, food-grade canola oil were bred to contain less than 2% erucic acid,[2] an amount deemed not significant as a health risk. The low-erucic trait was due to two mutations changing the activity of LEA1 and KCS17.[44][45]

The erucic acid content in canola oil has been reduced over the years. In western Canada, a reduction occurred from the average content of 0.5% between 1987 and 1996[46] to a current content of 0.01% from 2008 to 2015.[40] Other reports also show a content lower than 0.1% in Australia[41] and Brazil.[42]

To date, no health effects have been associated with dietary consumption of erucic acid by humans; but tests of erucic acid metabolism in other species imply that higher levels may be detrimental.[47][48] Canola oil produced using genetically modified plants has also not been shown to explicitly produce adverse effects.[49]

Canola oil is generally recognized as safe.[2]

Glucosinolates

[edit]
Main article: Glucosinolates

Another chemical change in canola is the reduction of glucosinolates.[44] As the oil is extracted, most of the glucosinolates are concentrated into the seed meal, an otherwise rich source of protein. Livestock have varying levels of tolerance to glucosinolates intake, with some being poisoned relatively easily.[50][51] A small amount of glucosinolates also enters the oil, imparting a pungent odor.[52]

Further reduction of glucosinolate levels remains important for the use of rapeseed meal in animal feed.[53][54]

It is not completely clear which genetic changes from plant breeding resulted in the current reduction in this group of chemicals.[44]

Uses

[edit]

B. napus is the source for canola as a high quality vegetable oil for human food products, and as a high-protein pomace to feed fish and farm animals.[1] Canola oil is favored for its culinary qualities, and is used widely as a salad oil, for shortening, margarine, in deep frying, baking, sandwich spreads, and non-dairy creamers.[1]

Apart from its use for human consumption, rapeseed oil is extensively used as a lubricant for machinery, in cosmetics, printing inks, fabrics, plastic products, and pesticides.[1] It was widely used in European domestic lighting before the advent of coal (city) gas or kerosene. It was the preferred oil for train pot lamps, and was used for lighting railway coaches in the United Kingdom before gas lighting, and later electric lighting, were adopted. Burned in a Carcel lamp, it was part of the definition of the French standard measure for illumination, the carcel, for most of the nineteenth century. In lighthouses, such as in early Canada, rapeseed oil was used before the introduction of mineral oil. Rapeseed oil was used with the Argand burner because it was cheaper than whale oil.[84] Rapeseed oil was burned to a limited extent in the Confederacy during the American Civil War.[85]

Biodiesel

[edit]
Main article: Biodiesel

Rapeseed oil is used as diesel fuel, either as biodiesel, straight in heated fuel systems, or blended with petroleum distillates for powering motor vehicles.[1] Biodiesel may be used in pure form in newer engines without engine damage and is frequently combined with fossil-fuel diesel in ratios varying from 2% to 20% biodiesel.

Rapeseed oil is the preferred oil stock for biodiesel production in Europe, Canada, and the United States, partly because rapeseed produces more oil per unit of land area compared to other oil sources, such as soybeans, but primarily because canola oil has a carbon footprint substantially lower than conventional diesel fuel.[86]

Other edible rapeseed oils

[edit]

Some less-processed versions of rapeseed oil are used for flavor in some countries. Chinese rapeseed oil was originally extracted from the field mustard. In the 19th century, rapeseed (B. rapa) was introduced by European traders, and local farmers crossed the new plant with field mustard to produce semi-winter rapeseed.[87] Their erucic acid content was reduced to modern "canola" levels by breeding with Canadian low-erucic acid cultivar "ORO".[45][88] Chinese rapeseed oil has a distinctive taste and a greenish colour due to the different processing method: seeds are roasted and expeller-pressed to obtain the oil. A centrifuge is used to remove solids, followed by a heating step. The resultant oil is heat-stable and fundamental to Sichuan cuisine.

In India, mustard oil is used in cooking.[89] In the United Kingdom and Ireland, some chefs use a "cabbagey"-tasting rapeseed oil processed by cold-pressing.[90] This cold process means that the oil has a low smoke point, and is therefore unsuitable for frying in Sichuan cuisine, for example.[91]

Spanish rapeseed poisoning outbreak

[edit]
Main article: Toxic oil syndrome

In 1981, there was an oil poisoning outbreak, later known as toxic oil syndrome that was attributed to people consuming what they thought was olive oil but turned out to be rapeseed oil that had been denatured with 2% aniline (phenylamine). The substance was intended for industrial use but had been illegally refined in an attempt to remove the aniline.[92] It was then fraudulently sold as olive oil, mainly in street markets, mostly in the Madrid area.[93][94]

[edit]
  • Close-up of canola blooms
    Close-up of canola blooms
  • Canola flower
    Canola flower

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Rapeseed oil.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Rapeseed oil

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Rapeseed oil is a extracted from the seeds of the plant (Brassica napus), an annual crop in the family cultivated primarily for its oil-rich seeds yielding approximately 40% oil by weight. The oil consists mainly of triglycerides with a composition featuring about 60% (monounsaturated), 20% , and 10% α-linolenic acid (polyunsaturated omega-3), alongside minor saturated fats. Traditional rapeseed varieties contained high levels of (over 40%), a long-chain monounsaturated linked to cardiac in animal feeding studies, prompting in the 1960s and 1970s to produce low-erucic acid (<2%) variants for food use. These low-erucic strains, marketed as canola oil in North America—a portmanteau of "Canada" and "ola" (oil)—differ from high-erucic industrial rapeseed oil used in lubricants and biofuels due to regulatory standards limiting erucic acid in edible oils to mitigate health risks like myocardial lipidosis observed in rats. As the third-largest source of vegetable oil globally after palm and soybean, rapeseed oil production derives from over 80 million metric tons of rapeseed seeds annually, with major producers including Canada (22% of global seed output), the European Union (20%), China, and India. Its applications span culinary uses for frying and salad dressings owing to a high smoke point (around 204°C) and neutral taste, as well as non-food sectors like biodiesel (providing up to 40% of EU biofuel) and high-erucic variants for plastics and hydraulic fluids. Peer-reviewed studies indicate that low-erucic rapeseed oil consumption correlates with reduced cardiovascular disease risk through its unsaturated fat profile, which lowers LDL cholesterol when substituting saturated fats, though controversies persist over processing methods (e.g., hexane extraction) and omega-6 to omega-3 ratios potentially exacerbating inflammation in imbalanced diets—claims not substantiated by meta-analyses showing net health benefits.

Botanical and Varietal Background

The Rapeseed Plant

, the primary species from which rapeseed oil is derived, is classified in the Brassicaceae family, known for its cruciferous plants. This allotetraploid species arose from natural hybridization between Brassica oleracea and Brassica rapa, with its center of origin debated but often linked to the Mediterranean region and temperate Europe. It is cultivated as an annual crop, typically reaching heights of 0.9 to 1.5 meters, featuring bright yellow flowers with four petals and producing silique pods that contain small, round seeds. The seeds of B. napus are notably rich in oil, comprising approximately 40-45% of their weight, which forms the basis for rapeseed oil extraction. The plant develops a deep taproot system alongside a fibrous network near the surface, aiding in nutrient uptake and soil penetration. As a cool-season crop, B. napus thrives in temperatures between 15-25°C, with a minimum soil temperature of 7°C (45°F) required for germination and tolerance to light frosts enhancing its suitability for temperate climates. Its deep roots contribute to agronomic benefits in crop rotations, such as improved soil structure, reduced erosion, and enhanced nutrient cycling, while breaking pest cycles associated with cereals.

High-Erucic vs. Low-Erucic Varieties

Traditional high-erucic acid rapeseed varieties, primarily from Brassica napus, feature erucic acid (C22:1 Δ13 cis) comprising 40-50% of total fatty acids, alongside elevated levels of glucosinolates in the seed meal. This composition results in oils with high viscosity and oxidative stability, rendering them suitable for non-food industrial applications such as lubricants, hydraulic fluids, and biofuels, where the long-chain monounsaturated fatty acid provides lubricity superior to shorter-chain alternatives. Low-erucic acid rapeseed (LEAR) varieties, in contrast, exhibit erucic acid below 2%—often under 1%—of total fatty acids, achieved through compositional shifts favoring (C18:1, up to 60-65%), (C18:2), and alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3), with reduced saturates like . These varieties also maintain glucosinolate levels under 30 μmol/g defatted seed meal, minimizing off-flavors and anti-nutritional compounds derived from hydrolysis products like isothiocyanates. Genetically, the differences stem from allelic variations in fatty acid elongase and desaturase enzymes, which limit the elongation of oleic acid to erucic acid in LEAR lines, altering the endoplasmic reticulum-based lipid biosynthesis pathway. The term "canola" specifically denotes LEAR-derived oil meeting North American regulatory standards (<2% erucic acid, <30 μmol/g glucosinolates), originally trademarked by the Rapeseed Association of Canada in the 1970s as a contraction of "Canadian oil, low acid." In Europe and elsewhere, equivalent low-erucic oils are classified simply as , without the proprietary branding, though both share the modified profile distinguishing them from high-erucic industrial types.

Historical Development

Ancient and Early Uses

Rapeseed, derived from plants of the Brassica genus, was cultivated in India as early as 4000 BCE, primarily for the extraction of oil used in lamps and as fodder for livestock. Archaeological and historical records indicate that its spread to China and Japan occurred around 2000 years ago, with applications centered on non-edible purposes such as illumination and animal nutrition rather than human consumption, owing to the oil's pungent flavor attributed to glucosinolates. Limited edible uses in Asia involved processed forms, but the plant's primary value lay in its oil's stability for burning and its meal's utility as feed. In Europe, rapeseed cultivation expanded by the 13th century, where the oil served mainly as fuel for lamps, supplanting other vegetable oils in northern regions due to its availability and combustion properties. Industrial applications emerged prominently during the 19th century with the rise of steam power, as the oil's viscosity made it ideal for lubricating engines in ships and locomotives, a role that persisted into the early 20th century amid wartime shortages of alternatives. Human dietary avoidance stemmed from the oil's unpalatable bitterness and reports of adverse effects in livestock, though systematic toxicity studies were absent until later. By the mid-20th century, research identified erucic acid, comprising up to 50% of traditional rapeseed oil's fatty acids, as the culprit in inducing myocardial lipidosis—fat accumulation in heart tissue—in rats fed high-erucic diets, with histological evidence of early lipid droplets progressing to fibrosis. This finding, corroborated across species like pigs, underscored the oil's unsuitability for routine human or broad animal consumption, reinforcing its historical niche in non-food sectors despite occasional regional culinary trials in diluted forms.

Breeding for Low-Toxicity Varieties

In the early 1970s, researchers at the University of Manitoba, led by plant breeder Baldur Stefansson, identified natural mutants in rapeseed (Brassica napus) with significantly reduced erucic acid content in their seed oil, which typically comprised over 40% erucic acid in traditional high-erucic varieties and had been linked to cardiac concerns in animal studies. Through conventional cross-breeding techniques, Stefansson's team selected and propagated these low-erucic traits, achieving oil profiles with less than 2% erucic acid by the mid-1970s, without reliance on genetic modification or chemical mutagens. This breeding focused on fatty acid composition to mitigate potential toxicity, enabling rapeseed oil's potential shift from industrial and animal feed uses to human consumption. Concurrently, efforts targeted glucosinolates, sulfur-containing compounds in rapeseed meal that impart bitterness, reduce palatability, and pose risks to thyroid function in livestock and potentially humans due to their goitrogenic effects. Keith Downey at Agriculture Canada isolated lines with low glucosinolate levels through selective breeding, complementing Stefansson's work on erucic acid reduction. By 1974, these parallel programs yielded the first "double-low" or "00" varieties—low in both erucic acid (<2%) and glucosinolates (<30 micromoles per gram of meal, later refined to stricter thresholds)—exemplified by the registered cultivar 'Tower', which combined the traits via intercrossing. These double-low varieties facilitated the first commercial harvest of low-erucic rapeseed in Canada in 1974, providing empirical data that supported regulatory assessments deeming the oil safe for edible use when processed appropriately, with no observed adverse effects in subsequent feeding trials. The breeding success relied on phenotypic selection and field trials, demonstrating that antinutrient reductions could be stably inherited without compromising yield or agronomic performance in initial lines.

Commercialization as Canola Oil

The term "canola" originated as a trademark registered in 1978 by the Western Canadian Oilseed Crushers Association to designate low-erucic-acid rapeseed varieties compliant with defined oil quality standards, distinguishing them from traditional high-erucic rapeseed oil. The name derives from "Can" for Canada and "ola" signifying "oil, low acid," reflecting the Canadian development of these varieties for edible use. In 1985, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status to low-erucic-acid rapeseed oil, enabling its widespread incorporation into American food products and providing Canadian producers access to a market 18 times larger than domestic demand. This regulatory milestone spurred commercialization, with canola oil rapidly gaining traction in North American processed foods and culinary applications, where it began competing with and partially displacing due to its neutral flavor and high smoke point. Subsequent marketing efforts promoted canola oil's health benefits, including low saturated fat content, leading to expanded global distribution under the canola branding, particularly in export-oriented markets. By the 1990s, adoption accelerated as infrastructure for crushing and refining scaled up in Canada and the U.S. In recent years, demand has grown in the European Union and Asia, with 2024/25 projections highlighting biofuel mandates as a key driver elevating rapeseed oil prices amid strong biodiesel feedstock needs.

Global Production and Cultivation

Major Producers and Recent Statistics

Canada leads global rapeseed seed production, with an output of 19.24 million metric tons in the 2024/2025 marketing year, representing 22% of the world total. The European Union follows closely, producing 16.86 million metric tons or 20% of global supply. Other significant producers include at approximately 13.7 million metric tons and at 9.8 million metric tons.
Country/RegionProduction (million metric tons, seeds, 2024/25)
Canada19.24
European Union16.86
China13.7
India9.8
Global rapeseed seed production for 2024/25 is forecasted at 87.56 million metric tons, down from prior years due to weather-related declines, including a 5.4% drop attributed to adverse conditions in and the EU. This yields roughly 35 million metric tons of rapeseed oil worldwide, based on typical extraction rates of 40% from seeds. EU output specifically fell sharply in 2023/24 from drought, with some estimates indicating a 10% reduction year-over-year. Projections for 2025/26 anticipate recovery to around 90.9 million metric tons amid sustained biofuel demand. Trade flows feature Canada exporting 8.7 million metric tons of seeds in 2024/25, primarily to Asia, while prioritizing domestic crushing for oil. The EU, despite imports of 1.41 million metric tons of seeds, exports rapeseed oil to Asian markets to meet demand. Prices for rapeseed oil futures have risen in 2025, driven by strong biodiesel consumption in Europe, with spot prices reaching 1094 USD per metric ton in the US by June.

Agricultural Practices

Rapeseed cultivation primarily involves winter varieties sown in late summer or early autumn, typically from August to September in temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere, allowing the crop to establish before overwintering and achieving higher yields compared to spring varieties. Spring varieties are sown in early spring, such as March to April, and suit shorter seasons but generally yield 20-30% less than winter types due to a compressed growth cycle. Optimal soil preparation includes well-drained, fertile loams with pH 6.0-7.5, and seeding rates of 4-6 kg/ha for winter rapeseed to ensure even establishment. Nitrogen fertilization is critical, with total applications often ranging from 150-220 kg N/ha split across autumn, winter, and spring to support biomass accumulation and pod development, though uptake averages around 140 kg N/ha for yields of 3.5 t/ha in conventional systems. Phosphorus and potassium requirements are typically 60-90 kg/ha and 40-60 kg/ha, respectively, applied at sowing to enhance root growth and stress tolerance. Average seed yields for winter reach 2.5-4 t/ha in major producing regions like Europe, with hybrids often exceeding 4 t/ha under favorable conditions, reflecting efficiency gains from improved genetics and inputs. Pest and disease management relies heavily on crop rotation, with intervals of 3-4 years between rapeseed crops and non-host cereals to suppress soil-borne pathogens like clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae) and blackleg (Leptosphaeria spp.), reducing disease incidence by limiting spore buildup. Herbicide applications are standard for broadleaf and grass weed control, integrated with cultural practices to minimize resistance risks, though overuse can contribute to environmental concerns such as herbicide runoff into waterways. Rapeseed exhibits sensitivity to drought and heat stress, particularly during flowering and grain fill, where water deficits can reduce yields by 20-50% through pod abortion and smaller seeds; for instance, the 2022 European heatwave and drought led to yield shortfalls below five-year averages in affected areas. Harvesting is predominantly mechanized using combine harvesters at 8-12% moisture to minimize shattering losses, with straight combining preferred over windrowing in modern systems for efficiency, though pod shatter resistance varies by variety. These practices balance high productivity against trade-offs like nitrogen leaching from excess fertilization and soil compaction from heavy machinery, underscoring the need for site-specific management to sustain long-term soil health.

Prevalence of Genetic Modification

Genetically modified rapeseed varieties, primarily herbicide-tolerant types such as those resistant to glyphosate (e.g., , introduced by in 1995) or glufosinate, have seen widespread adoption in certain regions for improved weed management. In Canada, the dominant global producer of low-erucic acid canola, over 97% of cultivated canola acreage consists of GM varieties as of 2024, encompassing approximately 8.4 million hectares planted in 2023. This high penetration rate reflects rapid farmer uptake following commercialization in the mid-1990s, driven by traits enabling post-emergence herbicide application for broader-spectrum weed control. Globally, GM rapeseed cultivation remains concentrated in Canada, the United States, and Australia, with total areas estimated at around 10 million hectares as of recent years, stable amid broader GM crop expansion to 209.8 million hectares across all crops in 2024. In contrast, the European Union exhibits negligible adoption, with cultivation effectively prohibited under long-standing restrictions and national opt-outs, resulting in zero commercial GM rapeseed planting despite imports of GM-derived products. Adoption in Asia varies, with limited GM rapeseed deployment in major producers like China and India due to regulatory hurdles, though herbicide-tolerant traits are approved for import in some cases. Agronomic rationales for these GM traits include claimed yield increases of 10-20% through enhanced weed suppression via glyphosate application, alongside reduced tillage needs that lower fuel use and soil erosion. However, coexistence with non-GM crops necessitates measures like buffer zones—typically 10-50 meters wide—to mitigate cross-pollination risks from wind or insect-mediated pollen flow, which can introduce GM traits into adjacent non-GM fields at rates exceeding 1% without isolation. Such gene flow has prompted voluntary identity-preserved non-GM labeling schemes in export markets, including premiums for certified non-GM canola seed production.

Extraction and Processing

Seed Harvesting and Preparation

Rapeseed seeds are harvested primarily using combine harvesters adapted for oilseeds, with operations timed to achieve seed moisture contents of approximately 8-12% to balance maturity and minimize pod shattering losses during mechanical collection. Direct combining predominates in regions like Canada and Europe, where swathing is less common unless weather delays maturity; header heights are adjusted low to capture dropped seeds, and reel speeds optimized to prevent seed damage from threshing. Post-harvest, seeds are dried to 7-8% moisture content to enable safe long-term storage and prevent microbial growth or spoilage, as levels above 9% increase risks of heating and mold under ambient conditions. Drying occurs via aerated bins or continuous dryers, with air temperatures limited to 40-50°C to avoid protein denaturation or oil quality degradation; over-drying below 6% is avoided due to handling brittleness and potential rejection at processing facilities. Cleaning follows drying, employing screens, aspirators, and magnetic separators to remove debris, stones, and metallic impurities, achieving purity levels exceeding 99% to protect downstream equipment and maximize extractable oil yield. Dehulling is optional but applied in some facilities to separate fibrous hulls (comprising 15-20% of seed weight), yielding a higher-protein meal for animal feed while concentrating oil in the kernel fraction; this step uses impact dehullers or rollers, followed by aspiration for hull-kernel separation. Maintaining seed integrity during these mechanical processes is essential, as cracks or bruises expose oils to air, accelerating oxidation precursors like free fatty acids prior to extraction. Prepared seeds are stored in ventilated silos at temperatures below 10°C and monitored for moisture equilibrium, with global handling tied to crushing infrastructure; in , the primary producer, facilities processed over 10.5 million metric tons in 2023, supported by capacities approaching 13 million tons annually. Aeration maintains uniformity, and regular sampling detects early deterioration from pests or respiration, ensuring feedstock viability for pressing or solvent extraction.

Oil Extraction Techniques

Rapeseed oil is primarily extracted from seeds using mechanical pressing or solvent extraction methods, with the choice depending on desired yield, oil quality, and production scale. Mechanical pressing involves physically squeezing oil from flaked or conditioned seeds via screw presses, yielding 30-40% oil by seed weight for cold-pressing variants, which limit temperatures below 50°C to retain natural antioxidants and flavors. This lower-yield approach suits premium, unrefined oils but leaves more residual oil in the press cake compared to industrial alternatives. Expeller pressing, a subtype of mechanical extraction, employs continuous screw presses that generate frictional heat up to 60-100°C, increasing efficiency to recover 60-80% of available oil for bulk production while producing a defatted meal suitable for animal feed. Solvent extraction dominates large-scale operations, often following pre-pressing to remove 60-75% of oil mechanically, then using hexane to dissolve and recover over 95% of remaining oil from the cake, achieving total yields exceeding 95% of seed oil content. Hexane, a non-polar solvent, is evaporated and recycled with over 99% recovery efficiency, leaving regulated residues below 1 mg/kg (1 ppm) in refined oils per European Union standards, though the process is energy-intensive due to distillation requirements. Emerging techniques include supercritical CO2 extraction, which uses pressurized carbon dioxide above its critical point to selectively extract oil without chemical residues, optimized at pressures of 20-40 MPa and temperatures of 40-60°C for rapeseed yields comparable to solvents but at higher capital costs limiting it to niche, high-value applications. Enzymatic-assisted aqueous extraction employs proteases or cellulases to disrupt cell walls with minimal water (as low as 1 mL per 100 g seeds), yielding oil fractions while reducing solvent needs, though scalability remains constrained by enzyme costs and processing times. These solvent-free methods appeal for "natural" labeling but hold minor market share due to economic disadvantages over established hexane-based systems.

Refining Processes and Byproducts

The refining of crude for edible purposes typically follows a sequence of chemical and physical processes to remove impurities, including phospholipids, free fatty acids, pigments, and volatile compounds, ensuring compliance with food safety standards. Degumming is the initial step, where water or acid is added to hydrate and precipitate phospholipids (gums), which are then separated via centrifugation; this reduces gum content to below 10 ppm. Neutralization follows, involving alkali treatment to saponify free fatty acids into soapstock, lowering their levels to less than 0.05% in the final oil. Bleaching employs adsorbents like activated clay to eliminate pigments, trace metals, and residual soaps, followed by deodorization under vacuum and steam stripping at 240–270°C to remove odors, flavors, and volatile oxidants, yielding a neutral, stable oil with peroxide values under 1 meq/kg. Byproducts from these refining stages include lecithin-rich gums from degumming, valued as emulsifiers in food and industrial applications, and soapstock from neutralization, which contains fatty acids recoverable for soaps or biodiesel. The primary co-product from upstream oil extraction is rapeseed meal, comprising 35–40% protein after solvent or mechanical pressing removes 35–45% of the seed's oil content; this meal serves mainly as animal feed, with global production estimated at approximately 48 million metric tons in the 2024/2025 season. Cold-pressed rapeseed oil, extracted mechanically at temperatures below 40–50°C without solvents or full refining, retains natural flavors, colors, and higher levels of impurities like free fatty acids (up to 2–4%) and phospholipids, making it suitable for dressings but less stable for high-heat uses compared to refined variants. In contrast, high-erucic acid rapeseed oil intended for industrial applications, such as lubricants or biofuels, often bypasses extensive edible refining to preserve functional properties, focusing instead on basic filtration and minimal processing.

Chemical Composition

Fatty Acid Profile

Rapeseed oil derived from low-erucic acid varieties, such as those classified as canola, contains approximately 60% monounsaturated fatty acids, predominantly oleic acid (18:1 n-9). Polyunsaturated fatty acids account for 25-35% of the total, with linoleic acid (18:2 n-6) comprising about 19-21% and α-linolenic acid (18:3 n-3) ranging from 9-11%. Saturated fatty acids are minimal at less than 7%, primarily consisting of palmitic acid (16:0) at 4-5% and stearic acid (18:0) at 1-2%. Erucic acid (22:1 n-9), a long-chain monounsaturated fatty acid characteristic of traditional rapeseed, is restricted to under 2% in edible varieties through selective breeding and regulatory standards. Compositions can vary slightly by cultivar, growing conditions, and processing methods, but low-erucic profiles maintain these ranges to ensure suitability for human consumption. The following table summarizes a typical fatty acid composition for refined low-erucic rapeseed oil:
Fatty AcidNotationPercentage of Total Fatty Acids
Palmitic acid16:04-5%
Stearic acid18:01-2%
Oleic acid18:1 n-956-64%
Linoleic acid18:2 n-619-21%
α-Linolenic acid18:3 n-39-11%
Erucic acid22:1 n-9<2%
Refined rapeseed oil has a density of approximately 0.91-0.92 g/mL at 20°C, an iodine value of 105-126 indicating moderate unsaturation, and a smoke point around 220-230°C.

Antinutrients and Minor Compounds

Rapeseed seeds contain glucosinolates, sulfur-containing compounds that hydrolyze via myrosinase enzyme activity to form isothiocyanates, oxazolidinethiones, and other goitrogens potentially interfering with iodine uptake and thyroid function. In low-erucic acid rapeseed (LEAR) varieties, such as those qualifying as canola, total glucosinolate content in defatted seed meal is bred and regulated to below 30 μmol/g, with Canadian No. 1 grades averaging about 12 μmol/g. Oil extraction processes, including pressing and solvent methods, concentrate over 90% of glucosinolates into the byproduct meal, leaving residual levels in crude oil typically below detectable thresholds for sensory impact, though incomplete hydrolysis during processing can contribute to minor bitterness if seeds exceed quality limits. Among minor non-glyceride compounds, rapeseed oil features phospholipids (0.5–3% in crude oil, largely removed during degumming and refining), phytosterols (totaling 200–400 mg/100 g, with brassicasterol as a marker sterol unique to Brassica species, alongside β-sitosterol and campesterol), and tocopherols (totaling 500–800 mg/kg, predominantly γ-tocopherol at 400–600 mg/kg, conferring oxidative stability). These compounds persist variably through refining, with sterols and tocopherols often retained or concentrated in unrefined oils. Trace environmental contaminants, including heavy metals and pesticide residues, may carry over from seeds but are minimized by agricultural standards and processing. U.S. regulations limit heavy metals in rapeseed oil to not more than 10 ppm (as lead), while EU directives enforce maximum residue levels for pesticides under Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005, with typical detections in cold-pressed oils falling below 0.01 mg/kg for most analytes.

Nutritional Profile

Macronutrients and Energy Content

Rapeseed oil is composed entirely of fat, with no protein or carbohydrates, yielding an energy content of 884 kcal per 100 grams. A typical serving size of one tablespoon (14 grams) provides 120 kcal. The macronutrient profile features approximately 7% saturated fatty acids, 63% monounsaturated fatty acids (predominantly ), and 28% polyunsaturated fatty acids (primarily and alpha-linolenic acid). In a 14 g serving, this equates to roughly 1 g saturated fat, 9 g monounsaturated fat, and 4 g polyunsaturated fat, including about 1.3 g alpha-linolenic acid (an omega-3 fatty acid). Compared to typical soybean oil (often used as a benchmark for vegetable oil), which contains about 2 g saturated fat, 3 g monounsaturated fat, and 8 g polyunsaturated fat (mostly omega-6 linoleic acid) per 14 g serving, rapeseed oil has lower saturated fat and a more balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio. This fatty acid distribution positions rapeseed oil among vegetable oils low in saturated fat content. As a plant-derived lipid, rapeseed oil contains no cholesterol. Refined varieties maintain compositional stability under high-heat conditions owing to their unsaturated fat predominance.

Micronutrients and Phytochemicals

Rapeseed oil is a source of fat-soluble vitamins, particularly vitamin E in the form of tocopherols, with refined varieties containing approximately 17-18 mg per 100 g, primarily as α- and γ-tocopherols. Vitamin K, mainly phylloquinone, is present at about 71 μg per 100 g in refined oil. These levels contribute modestly to daily requirements, with vitamin E supporting antioxidant defense against lipid peroxidation in the oil itself and in vivo. Phytosterols, including β-sitosterol (predominant), campesterol, and brassicasterol, occur at total concentrations of 558-1,407 mg per 100 g in , varying by cultivar and processing. These plant sterols structurally resemble cholesterol and compete for intestinal absorption, potentially reducing serum LDL cholesterol when consumed in elevated doses, though standard oil intake provides lower amounts. Other phytochemicals, such as phenolic compounds (e.g., sinapic acid derivatives) and carotenoids (primarily β-carotene and lutein), are present in trace quantities in refined rapeseed oil due to removal during alkali neutralization and bleaching steps. Crude or cold-pressed oils retain higher levels of these bioactives, including up to 58 mg tocopherols per 100 g, but refining causes losses of 30-45% in tocopherols, mainly via steam distillation in deodorization. Cold-pressed extraction preserves more phenolics and tocopherols compared to solvent-extracted and refined counterparts, enhancing oxidative stability.

Health Implications

Evidence from Clinical and Epidemiological Studies

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials involving individuals with overweight or obesity found that rapeseed oil supplementation, compared to other edible oils, significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by a mean difference of -0.14 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.21 to -0.08) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) levels, with no heterogeneity (I²=0%). These effects were attributed to rapeseed oil's favorable unsaturated fatty acid profile, including alpha-linolenic acid, potentially contributing to modest cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction in short-term interventions. Compared to vegetable oils high in omega-6 polyunsaturated fats, such as soybean oil, rapeseed oil's higher monounsaturated fat content and inclusion of omega-3 fatty acids align with evidence supporting cardiovascular benefits from such profiles, as noted by major health organizations including the American Heart Association, which consider both types safe in moderation. However, the clinical significance of these lipid changes remains limited by small effect sizes and trial durations typically under 12 weeks. In metabolic contexts, randomized trials indicate rapeseed oil improves certain glucolipid parameters in type 2 diabetes patients. For instance, a single-blind controlled trial in women with type 2 diabetes showed canola oil (a low-erucic rapeseed variant) lowered total cholesterol and LDL-C compared to sunflower oil after 8 weeks, alongside neutral effects on fasting glucose and insulin resistance proxies. A meta-analysis corroborated reductions in insulin levels but noted a potential increase in fasting glucose, suggesting inconsistent glycemic benefits. Effect sizes for glycemic markers like HbA1c appear small or absent in available trials, with no large-scale meta-analytic confirmation of sustained improvements. Effects on inflammation markers are neutral in controlled trials. A 2020 systematic review of canola oil interventions reported no significant changes in C-reactive protein or other inflammatory cytokines across multiple studies. Broader seed oil meta-analyses, including canola, similarly found minimal impact on 11 common inflammation markers, challenging claims of pro-inflammatory effects from omega-6 content. Long-term epidemiological data on rapeseed oil specifically is sparse and confounded by dietary patterns. Prospective cohorts linking higher plant oil intake (including canola-like profiles) to lower CVD events exist, but attribute benefits to overall unsaturated fat substitution rather than rapeseed uniquely, with mixed results adjusted for confounders like Mediterranean diet adherence. Observational associations with metabolic outcomes remain tentative due to self-reported exposures and inability to isolate causal effects from holistic lifestyle factors.

Risks Associated with Erucic Acid

Studies in rats have demonstrated that dietary intake of erucic acid at levels exceeding 10% of total fatty acids, often achieved through feeding high-erucic rapeseed oils containing approximately 40-50% erucic acid, induces myocardial lipidosis characterized by lipid accumulation in heart tissue, mitochondrial alterations, myofibril disorganization, and degenerative lesions. Similar effects, including increased severity of heart lipidosis correlated with erucic acid dosage, have been observed in pigs and other monogastric animals, with the heart identified as the primary target organ for toxicity. These findings stem from controlled feeding trials spanning weeks to months, where pure erucic acid or erucic-rich oils directly contributed to cardiac pathology via impaired fatty acid oxidation and triglyceride buildup. Extrapolation to humans remains cautious due to species differences in metabolism and lack of direct causation evidence for lipidosis at low exposures; however, regulatory bodies have established strict limits to mitigate potential risks. The European Union mandates that erucic acid comprise no more than 5% (50 g/kg) of total fatty acids in vegetable oils and fats intended for human consumption, while the Codex Alimentarius and U.S. standards for low-erucic rapeseed (canola) oil cap it at 2%. These thresholds derive from animal no-observed-adverse-effect levels adjusted by safety factors, acknowledging erucic acid's long-chain monounsaturated structure may lead to slower clearance and tissue accumulation in humans, though epidemiological data show no confirmed myocardial lesions below such limits. Historically, pre-low-erucic-acid (LEAR) varieties fed to livestock, including cattle and pigs, were linked to elevated incidences of cardiac fibrosis and lipid deposition, prompting breeding programs to reduce erucic content for oils while reserving high-erucic varieties (often >40%) for industrial segregation. Compliance is ensured through routine chromatographic assays of oil batches, with modern oils consistently testing below regulatory maxima, such as under 4 g/kg in surveyed German market samples. High-erucic oils are physically separated in supply chains to prevent cross-contamination, supporting non-food applications like lubricants where is not a concern. Despite these measures, in adipose and cardiac tissues raises theoretical long-term concerns for high consumers, particularly children, though human studies indicate minimal accumulation at typical dietary levels.

Stability and Oxidation Concerns

Rapeseed oil contains approximately 28% polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), contributing to its vulnerability to oxidative degradation via peroxidation reactions initiated by , , oxygen, or metal catalysts. In accelerated oxidation tests at 120°C, refined rapeseed oil exhibits an induction period of about 5 hours, indicating moderate stability that declines over storage to around 3 hours after 12 months, with peroxide values rising rapidly after initial resistance in oven tests at 63°C. During at 180°C or higher, peroxide values escalate markedly, as observed in deep-frying trials where values increased from 4.3 mEq O₂/kg initially to 10.5 mEq O₂/kg after extended use, reflecting accelerated primary oxidation of PUFAs. Endogenous tocopherols provide initial protection against peroxidation but undergo substantial depletion under thermal stress, with losses often exceeding 80-90% for γ-tocopherol and similar forms after prolonged , thereby reducing the oil's capacity to inhibit further chain reactions. This oxidative susceptibility results in faster rancidity onset compared to oils dominated by monounsaturated fats, such as , due to the inherent reactivity of PUFA double bonds. Refined rapeseed oil maintains quality for 1-2 years when stored in cool, dark environments to limit photo-oxidation and , beyond which sensory and nutritional deterioration accelerates. Trans fatty acids form in negligible amounts during standard refining but accumulate modestly with repeated high-temperature exposure, though ordinary contributes minimally to overall dietary from unhydrogenated sources.

Contribution to Omega-6/Omega-3 Imbalance

Rapeseed oil exhibits an omega-6 to omega-3 polyunsaturated ratio of approximately 2:1, with (omega-6) comprising about 19-21% and alpha-linolenic acid (omega-3) about 9-11% of total fatty acids. This profile is more balanced than that of , which has a ratio of roughly 7:1, yet rapeseed oil's widespread use in processed foods and cooking still elevates absolute omega-6 in populations already consuming seed oils heavily. In typical Western diets, the overall omega-6 to omega-3 ratio reaches 10:1 to 20:1 due to reliance on vegetable oils, far exceeding the near 1:1 ratio estimated for ancestral diets based on analyses of food sources and modern indigenous groups with traditional intakes. High dietary omega-6 from seed oils like contributes to this imbalance by providing , which the body converts to —a precursor to pro-inflammatory eicosanoids—potentially amplifying low-grade when omega-3 intake remains low. Animal models, including mice fed high omega-6 diets, demonstrate increased metabolic endotoxemia, gut permeability, and inflammatory markers such as TNF-alpha, linking excess to exacerbated responses independent of calorie intake. While short-term human trials substituting rapeseed oil for saturated fats show no immediate inflammatory spikes, epidemiological trends reveal correlations between rising seed oil consumption—coinciding with 's market growth since the 1970s—and increased prevalence, from under 15% in U.S. adults in 1980 to over 40% by 2020, alongside and rates. These patterns persist after adjusting for total calories, suggesting a causal role for polyunsaturated overload in metabolic dysregulation, though mainstream reviews often downplay this due to reliance on industry-funded substitution studies favoring oils. From a causal standpoint, the evolutionary discordance—where ancestral diets featured low total polyunsaturated fats from wild plants and animals versus modern seed oil dominance—implies that even rapeseed's relatively favorable fails to mitigate risks when it displaces whole-food fats lower in omega-6, such as or . Empirical data thus support moderating rapeseed oil intake to preserve a dietary closer to 4:1 or lower, prioritizing omega-3 sources like fatty over seed oil expansion, rather than viewing it as a neutral substitute in high-volume culinary applications.

Industrial and Culinary Uses

Culinary Applications

Refined rapeseed features a neutral flavor, allowing it to serve as a versatile base in dishes without altering profiles. Cold-pressed variants, extracted without or chemicals, retain a nutty, buttery suitable for enhancing cold preparations. With a of 204–232°C (400–450°F), comparable to typical vegetable oils such as soybean oil at approximately 232°C (450°F), refined rapeseed oil withstands high-heat methods like stir-frying, , and deep-frying, preventing breakdown during cooking. Like vegetable oils, it is versatile for frying, baking, sautéing, dressings, and general cooking, with its neutral flavor and high-heat suitability supporting broad culinary applications. It finds application in , dressings, and dips, where its mild profile complements ingredients. In European cuisines, rapeseed oil supports and general cooking due to its stability. Asian traditions, particularly in , incorporate it for stir-frying and aromatic oils derived from toasted seeds. Blends with leverage rapeseed's heat tolerance alongside olive's fruity notes for dressings and . Rapeseed oil lacks common allergens and qualifies for kosher and certification when processed accordingly. Cold-pressed forms fetch premium prices, often exceeding refined counterparts by factors reflecting artisanal extraction.

and Production

Rapeseed oil serves as a primary feedstock for through , where triglycerides in the oil react with in the presence of a catalyst—typically sodium or —to yield methyl esters (FAME), the main component of , along with as a . This process achieves yields of 95-96% under optimized conditions, retaining approximately 90% of the oil's energy content for use as a renewable diesel substitute. FAME from rapeseed oil, often denoted as B100 when undiluted, meets European standards for blending into conventional diesel, such as , enabling its integration into transport fuels. In the , rapeseed oil dominates biodiesel feedstocks, accounting for around 50% of biomass-based diesel production in 2024, with approximately 6.5 million tons directed to amid strong policy-driven demand. Globally, rapeseed-derived contributes significantly to volumes, though exact figures vary; EU production alone underscores its role, with over half of regional output relying on rapeseed in recent years. For 2025, demand is projected to rise due to mandates under the EU's Renewable Energy Directive III (RED III), which targets 29% renewable energy in transport by 2030 and boosts advanced incentives, forecasting a 10% increase in overall EU consumption to 30.6 billion liters. This policy shift, including phasing out certain crop-based limits, sustains rapeseed's prominence despite competition from waste oils. Economically, rapeseed biodiesel viability hinges on government subsidies and blending mandates, as production costs exceed fossil diesel without support, linking rapeseed oil prices closely to diesel markets. This creates competition with edible oil uses, diverting feedstock and elevating during high demand periods, as observed in policy-induced shifts prioritizing over markets. Subsidies, such as tax credits under programs like Germany's biofuel quotas, offset these pressures but raise concerns over efficiency.

Non-Edible Industrial Uses

High-erucic acid rapeseed oil (HEAR), with content exceeding 40%, is employed in non-edible industrial sectors for its long-chain fatty acids that confer high , thermal stability, and biodegradability superior to many synthetic alternatives. Primary applications include of specialized lubricants and hydraulic fluids, where the oil's and low reduce wear in machinery operating under or in environmentally sensitive areas, such as equipment. These bio-based fluids degrade rapidly in and , minimizing ecological persistence compared to mineral oils. Historically, rapeseed oil gained prominence during as a for steam engines in Allied naval and merchant ships, addressing acute shortages that spurred expanded cultivation in regions like . This wartime demand underscored its mechanical properties, including resistance to oxidation under extreme conditions, which persist in modern industrial formulations. Beyond lubrication, HEAR serves as a feedstock for paints, inks, and plastics, where facilitates polymerization and enhances drying times or flexibility in coatings and resins. In plastics production, it contributes to bio-based polymers as a or precursor, supporting development of sustainable composites. Minor utilization occurs in as an emollient base, leveraging its non-greasy texture for skincare products, though volumes remain limited relative to edible variants.

Controversies and Incidents

Spanish Toxic Oil Syndrome Outbreak

In May 1981, an outbreak of a novel multisystem disease, later termed (TOS), emerged in central and northwestern , primarily affecting regions including . The was triggered by the consumption of fraudulently marketed as but derived from industrial-grade rapeseed oil. This rapeseed oil had been denatured with approximately 2% —a chemical additive used to render it unfit for human consumption and exempt it from certain taxes for its intended and industrial applications. A -based company illicitly refined batches of this oil to strip away the aniline, then relabeled and distributed it door-to-door at discounted prices as edible , deceiving consumers and evading regulatory oversight. The adulterated oil affected an estimated 20,000 individuals, with initial cases linked to household purchases from unregulated vendors. Acute symptoms typically began within days to weeks of ingestion, manifesting as flu-like fever, muscle pain, rash, and progressive respiratory distress resembling , often accompanied by (elevated eosinophil counts in blood). Severe cases progressed to , organ failure, and neurological complications, with approximately 300 deaths occurring in the immediate aftermath and several thousand survivors experiencing chronic conditions such as , autoimmunity-like disorders, and persistent disability. Long-term mortality data indicate over 600 fatalities by the mid-1980s, rising to around 1,800 by 1997 due to secondary complications. Epidemiological tracing confirmed the causal link to the fraudulent oil through case clustering among consumers of specific batches, with laboratory analysis identifying toxic anilides—ester derivatives formed during the improper refining of aniline-contaminated oil—as the primary etiological agents. These contaminants, rather than residual or inherent components like , induced the syndrome's vascular and inflammatory pathology via direct chemical toxicity and immune-mediated responses. Spanish health authorities, in collaboration with international experts, conducted the investigation amid initial diagnostic confusion with infectious diseases, ultimately pinpointing the source to a single importer and refiner responsible for distributing over 20,000 liters of the tainted product. The incident exposed vulnerabilities in integrity, particularly the risks of industrial-to-edible oil adulteration driven by economic incentives to circumvent taxes and import restrictions on edible oils. Prosecutions followed for and , though debates persisted over whether refining flaws alone or undetected contaminants amplified . The outbreak underscored the necessity for robust adulteration detection and vendor , influencing subsequent protocols without implicating rapeseed oil's inherent properties when properly processed for human use.

Regulatory Responses to Erucic Acid and Glucosinolates

In the 1970s, following animal studies indicating potential cardiac risks from high intake, European regulators required varieties for edible oil production to contain less than 5% erucic acid by 1977, prompting widespread breeding of low- cultivars. This shift addressed empirical evidence of myocardial lipidosis in fed high-erucic diets, though human data remained limited. Subsequent incidents in the early reinforced the need for stricter controls, leading to enhanced segregation protocols between industrial and food-grade to prevent adulteration. The formalized limits under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, setting a maximum content of 5% (50 g/kg) in oils and fats initially, which was reduced to 2% (20 g/kg) via amendments like Regulation (EU) No 696/2014 to align with precautionary thresholds derived from animal toxicology. These apply to oils marketed for direct consumption or used in foodstuffs, excluding infant formulas with separate stricter caps at 0.4%. The Standard for Named Oils (CXS 210-1999) mirrors this by defining low- rapeseed oil as containing no more than 2% as a of total fatty acids. Member states conduct annual monitoring to ensure compliance, with exceedances triggering enforcement actions. For , which hydrolyze to goitrogenic compounds affecting function in , EU feed regulations mandate low- meal, with registration requiring seed levels below 18 µmol/g to minimize antinutritional effects observed in animal feeding trials. Post-1980s breeding programs reduced average glucosinolate content in double-low (low-erucic, low-glucosinolate) varieties to under 30 µmol/g in defatted meal, enabling safer inclusion rates up to 20-30% in diets without significant productivity losses. The European Food Safety Authority's 2016 scientific opinion reaffirmed a tolerable daily intake of 7 mg per kg body weight, based on no-observed-adverse-effect levels from studies showing cardiac lipid accumulation at higher doses, while noting low human exposure risks under current limits but elevated margins for children. Ongoing EFSA assessments emphasize that while population-level data indicate negligible cardiometabolic effects, regulatory caps incorporate animal-derived uncertainty factors to prioritize causal evidence over observational gaps. Genetically modified (GM) rapeseed varieties, primarily herbicide-tolerant strains introduced commercially in and the since the mid-1990s, have sparked debates centered on agricultural efficiency versus ecological and uncertainties. Proponents argue that these varieties deliver improved yields through enhanced , with economic analyses attributing benefits to higher productivity and simplified farming practices. Herbicide-tolerant GM canola enables targeted applications that reduce and the diversity of chemical inputs, potentially lowering overall environmental herbicide burdens compared to conventional systems reliant on multiple pre- and post-emergence treatments. Opponents highlight risks of from GM rapeseed to wild relatives in the genus, which could foster herbicide-resistant feral populations and complicate weed management over time. Documented instances of spontaneous hybridization demonstrate persistence in non-agricultural settings, raising concerns about unintended ecological shifts despite efforts. Debates also encompass unproven but persistent claims of heightened allergenicity or from novel proteins, though regulatory approvals for consumption rely on short-term animal assays showing equivalence to non-GM counterparts. Public skepticism remains pronounced in the , where surveys of representative samples reveal 58% opposition to GM foods, driven by distrust in institutional assurances and preferences for precautionary approaches amid perceived risks to and long-term human health. This sentiment has fueled strict labeling mandates and legal challenges to imports, contrasting with adoption in where empirical data on approved varieties indicate no observable divergences in controlled studies. However, the absence of multi-generational human consumption data underscores a core truth-seeking critique: while acute safety profiles align with conventional , causal uncertainties persist regarding subtle, cumulative effects, paralleling broader reservations about seed oil stability under .

Economic and Environmental Aspects

The global rapeseed oil market reached a value of $26.3 billion in , supported by steady production volumes of approximately 33.1 million tonnes. Projections indicate growth at a (CAGR) of 5.5% to $34.2 billion by 2029, with demand as the primary driver, particularly in where policies like the Directive III promote blending. Demand segmentation allocates roughly 50% of output to production, 40% to uses such as cooking and processing, and 10% to industrial applications like lubricants, though remains dominant globally at around 60% in volume terms. Regional variations exist, with emphasizing biofuels—rapeseed oil comprising about 50% of feedstocks there—while prioritizes edible consumption. In global trade, the European Union functions as a net exporter of processed rapeseed oil but relies heavily on seed imports, accounting for 37% of worldwide rapeseed seed imports at 6.3 million tonnes in 2024. Ukraine emerged as the EU's top supplier, exporting over 1 million tonnes to Germany alone in the 2024/25 marketing year, followed by shipments to Belgium, amid ongoing geopolitical supply dependencies. Major producers include the EU, Canada, and China, with trade flows directed toward importing nations like India and China for domestic crushing and consumption. Market prices exhibited volatility in 2023, influenced by supply shortages from the conflict and variable harvests, though quarterly averages in key markets like declined from $1,354 per metric early in Q3 to $1,289 by quarter-end. Such fluctuations underscore the role of futures contracts, including CME Group's cash-settled European FOB Dutch Mill Rapeseed Oil (Argus) futures launched in 2025, which enable producers and buyers to risks tied to and edible demand.

Sustainability Challenges and Impacts

Rapeseed cultivation relies heavily on fertilizers, contributing to significant (N2O) emissions, a potent with a 265 times that of CO2 over 100 years. Field studies indicate N2O emission factors from applied ranging from 0.6% to 2.54%, with emissions often accounting for 48.5% of total GHG from cultivation, equivalent to about 227 kg CO2 equivalents per of . Monoculture practices common in rapeseed farming exacerbate risks, particularly in regions with expansive fields, as reduced limits natural and increases vulnerability to wind and water runoff. While rapeseed's deep roots can improve and infiltration in rotations, intensive single-crop systems correlate with long-term degradation, including nutrient depletion and diminished . Water use in rapeseed production is relatively moderate compared to tropical oils like palm, with lifecycle assessments showing net freshwater savings due to rain-fed systems in temperate climates and efficiencies yielding up to 1,000 liters of oil per cubic meter of . However, in drier areas can strain local resources, though overall footprints remain lower than palm's in non-irrigated scenarios. As a biofuel feedstock, rapeseed oil offers GHG savings of around 45% versus fossil diesel under Renewable Energy Directive criteria, but indirect land use change (ILUC) from expanded cultivation can offset gains by 10-20% through emissions from prior conversion. Fertilizer-related N2O alone can negate up to 20% of purported CO2 reductions in lifecycle analyses, with total emissions for biodiesel production estimated at 1.0-1.3 kg CO2 equivalents per kg oil. Intensification drives , as high oilseed rape coverage disrupts networks and favors generalist over specialists, reducing floral diversity in field margins. techniques, such as variable-rate fertilization and drone-based monitoring, show potential to cut input overuse by 10-15% and mitigate emissions without yield loss, while cover crops in rotations can enhance . Yet, scaling these requires overcoming adoption barriers in monoculture-dominated systems, where trade-offs persist.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11548519/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9962526/
  3. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/canola-oil-properties.html
  4. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-184/subpart-B/section-184.1555
  5. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/2226000
  6. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/the-evidence-behind-seed-oils-health-effects
  7. https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/brassica-napus-oleifera-group/
  8. http://inspection.canada.ca/en/plant-varieties/plants-novel-traits/applicants/directive-94-08/biology-documents/brassica-napus
  9. https://www.agmrc.org/commodities-products/grains-oilseeds/rapeseed
  10. https://www.ocl-journal.org/articles/ocl/full_html/2025/01/ocl240046/ocl240046.html
  11. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/jd472w94r
  12. https://www.avatars-project.de/outreach/rapeseed/
  13. https://livefarmer.co.uk/oilseed-rape-3-ecological-advantages-concerns/
  14. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.899076/full
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/erucic-acid
  16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00122-008-0936-7
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10255854/
  18. https://www.millerchemical.com/crops-and-solutions/rapeseed-canola/
  19. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/96-325-x/2007000/article/10778-eng.htm
  20. https://www.goodrx.com/well-being/diet-nutrition/is-rapeseed-oil-healthy
  21. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/9/1776
  22. https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1482&context=jmas
  23. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/15617
  24. https://www.andersonintl.com/exploring-more-efficient-canola-processing-methods/
  25. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1385&context=ebl
  26. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/wordofmouth/2012/jun/12/rise-of-rapeseed-oil
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9962393/
  28. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4593
  29. https://www.canolacouncil.org/canola-encyclopedia/history-of-canola-seed-development/
  30. https://news.umanitoba.ca/think-you-know-um/
  31. https://www.plantbreeding.org/files/napb/5-sernyk-2020-02-19-birth-of-canola-oil---overcoming-palatability-and-nutritonal-barriers-through-breeding.pdf
  32. https://cwf.ca/research/publications/our-west-the-canola-story/
  33. https://agriculturemb150.ca/chapter-10/
  34. https://www.canolacouncil.org/canola-history/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/1974-Rapeseed-Digest-vol3-New-variety-licensed-Tower.pdf
  35. https://issuu.com/sardaagresearch/docs/october_2020/s/11175320
  36. https://www.canolacouncil.org/canola-history/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/1985-Canola-Digest-no2-GRAS-3.pdf
  37. https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/know-your-fats/the-great-con-ola/
  38. https://www.cmegroup.com/openmarkets/agriculture/2025/European-Rapeseed-Oil-Futures-Enter-the-Market-on-Strong-Biofuels-Demand.html
  39. https://www.reportlinker.com/dataset/7a006480d8a1f3faa63971cd24dcd25043811b7c
  40. https://ukragroconsult.com/en/news/usda-lowered-its-forecast-for-oilseed-production-in-my-2024-25-due-to-lower-sunseed-and-rapeseed-harvest/
  41. https://www.ofimagazine.com/news/oilseeds-production-expected-to-reach-new-record-levels-new-fao-food-outlook-report-says
  42. https://www.tridge.com/news/global-rapeseed-production-increases-accordi-wudqth
  43. https://www.ofimagazine.com/news/canadian-rapeseed-exports-expected-to-rise-by-30
  44. https://biofuels-news.com/news/large-imports-of-rapeseed-into-the-eu-figures-show/
  45. https://www.imarcgroup.com/rapeseed-oil-pricing-report
  46. https://grainrus.com/en/news/articles/rapeseed-cultivation-technology-growing-harvesting-and-storage/
  47. https://www.uscanola.com/crop-production/spring-and-winter-canola/
  48. https://www.fibl.org/fileadmin/documents/shop/1057-n-fertilisation-oilseed-rape.pdf
  49. https://www.khethari.com/blogs/news/rapeseed-and-mustard-cultivation-practices
  50. https://fieldcropnews.com/2025/09/winter-canola-field-selection-and-crop-rotation/
  51. https://www.canolacouncil.org/canola-encyclopedia/field-characteristics/crop-rotation/
  52. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-692X.12423
  53. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep18835
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429017315587
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8698283/
  56. https://cban.ca/gmos/issues/contamination/
  57. https://thehealthsciencesacademy.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Global-GM-Crop-Area-Review_Feb2024.pdf
  58. https://www.statista.com/topics/3013/genetically-modified-gm-crops-in-canada/
  59. https://gm.agbioinvestor.com/news/total-gm-crop-areas-increased-in-2024
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2854598/
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311924003332
  62. https://biotechbenefits.croplife.org/paper/the-benefits-of-herbicide-resistant-crops-2/
  63. https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/10/default.asp
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1161030108001159
  65. https://oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2024/02/15/willamette-valley-farmers-spar-over-risks-of-expanding-genetically-modified-canola-crop/
  66. https://www.agry.purdue.edu/ext/canola/Harvest.htm
  67. https://ahdb.org.uk/knowledge-library/grain-storage-moisture-targets-for-cereals-and-oilseed-rape
  68. https://www.farmersguardian.com/news/4086032/increase-oilseed-rape-moisture-content
  69. https://onecpm.com/process/canola-prep
  70. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/oil-and-oilseed-processing-i.html
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7023160/
  72. https://www.canolacouncil.org/canola-encyclopedia/storage/
  73. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/240313/dq240313d-eng.htm
  74. https://www.canolacouncil.org/about-canola/industry/
  75. https://www.technoilogy.it/insights/rapeseed-oil-processing-from-seed-to-refined-oil/
  76. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/oil-and-oilseed-processing-ii.html
  77. https://frenchoil.com/articles-events/oilseed-extraction-using-mechanical-extraction-and-beyond/
  78. https://onecpm.com/success-story/the-complete-guide-to-canola-oil-processing-from-seed-to-oil
  79. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/8/2/209
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9655691/
  81. https://www.andersonintl.com/understanding-hexane-extraction-of-vegetable-oils/
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267033695_Optimization_of_the_Supercritical_CO2_Extraction_of_Oil_from_Rapeseed_Using_Response_Surface_Methodology
  83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379064486_Enzyme-assisted_extraction_of_rapeseed_oil_with_minimum_water_addition_a_proof-of-concept_study
  84. http://m.doingoilmachine.com/FAQ/what_are_the_steps_involved_in_the_rapeseed_oil_refining_process_902.html
  85. https://m.edibleoilrefinerymachine.com/SOLUTION/rapeseed_oil_refinery_plant_427.html
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8767382/
  87. https://www.oilexpeller.com/mustard-canola-rapeseed-oil-refinery-plant-process/
  88. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/0813600
  89. https://www.littleseed.co.uk/blog/2024/1/17/understanding-the-difference-rapeseed-oil-vs-cold-pressed-rapeseed-oil
  90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/canola-oil
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8269665/
  92. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/print-publications/fapc-food-and-agricultural-products-center/canola-oil-properties-fapc-222.pdf
  93. https://innbak.is/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Refined-Rapeseedoil-full.pdf
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8622084/
  95. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02638228
  96. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10942912.2018.1514632
  97. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889157512001603
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4290100/
  99. https://aocs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1007/s11746-016-2921-7
  100. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/13/24/4186
  101. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28416887/
  102. https://www.nutritionix.com/food/rapeseed-oil
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4837738/
  104. https://dk.huel.com/pages/health-benefits-of-rapeseed-oil
  105. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227882386_Changes_of_the_tocopherol_and_fatty_acid_contents_in_rapeseed_oil_during_refining
  106. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723959/
  107. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Tocochromanol-phytosterol-and-phenolic-compound-contents-mg-100-g-in-rapeseed-oil_tbl1_314162499
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9781536/
  109. https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70529
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6407755/
  111. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/1438-9312%2528200010%2529102%253A10%253C618%253A%253AAID-EJLT618%253E3.0.CO%253B2-6
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5495719/
  113. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37740067/
  114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0939475320302349
  115. https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/eat-smart/fats/healthy-cooking-oils
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6405399/
  117. https://examine.com/research-feed/study/9LEOGd/
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6884729/
  119. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33127255/
  120. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/are-seed-oils-toxic-the-answer-is-complicated-according-to-research
  121. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6729825/
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0041008X84902758
  123. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0014480080900076
  124. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1250074/
  125. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/edible-oils-and-fats-level-of-erucic-acid.html
  126. https://www.ocl-journal.org/articles/ocl/full_html/2015/03/ocl150011-s/ocl150011-s.html
  127. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/rapeseed-oil
  128. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6100155/
  129. https://potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/1080/866
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11394795/
  131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814625009525
  132. https://www.chemiekontor.de/en/vegetable-oils-and-fats/rapeseed-oil-refined/
  133. https://thegoodoil.nz/about/rapeseed-oil-specifications-technical-information/
  134. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232393646_Formation_of_trans_fatty_acids_in_edible_oils_during_the_frying_and_heating_process
  135. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/is-canola-oil-healthy
  136. https://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/2015/04/13/ask-the-expert-concerns-about-canola-oil/
  137. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4837715/
  138. https://www.ocl-journal.org/articles/ocl/full_html/2010/05/ocl2010175p267/ocl2010175p267.html
  139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0753332202002536
  140. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3335257/
  141. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep11276
  142. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-019-0521-4
  143. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17904932/
  144. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10386285/
  145. https://tyleransom.github.io/research/obesity-seed-oils.pdf
  146. https://lipidworld.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12944-024-02399-0
  147. https://openheart.bmj.com/content/5/2/e000946
  148. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/optimize-omega-6-omega-3-ratio
  149. https://www.swiss-farmers.ch/knowledge/food/oil/
  150. https://www.ullisoilmill.com/blogs/articles/rapeseed-oil-benefits-uses-facts
  151. https://www.farrington-oils.co.uk/why-is-cold-pressed-rapeseed-oil-best/
  152. https://thermapen.co.uk/recipes/post/oil-temperature-guide
  153. https://www.bbc.co.uk/food/rapeseed_oil
  154. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6848836/
  155. https://www.quora.com/Can-olive-oil-be-mixed-with-rapseed-oil
  156. https://www.knowde.com/stores/epogee/products/epogee-epg
  157. https://www.franceajalimentaire.com/en/product/refined-rapeseed-oil
  158. https://www.podoroils.com/products/cold-pressed-oils/rapeseed-oil
  159. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016236107002141
  160. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9057709/
  161. https://biofuels-news.com/news/rapeseed-remains-dominant-feedstock-in-biodiesel-production/
  162. https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/market-opinion-and-analysis-blog/european-biofuels-prices-market
  163. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/07/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2025-2034_3eb15914/full-report/biofuels_6d29857a.html
  164. https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/environmental-economics/economics-biofuels_.html
  165. https://www.ifpri.org/blog/food-versus-fuel-v20-biofuel-policies-and-current-food-crisis/
  166. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140988314000711
  167. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4869010/
  168. https://www.hawe.com/fluid-lexicon/rapeseed-oil/
  169. https://www.listerfluidpower.com/post/the-future-of-hydraulic-fluids-how-bio-based-alternatives-are-powering-sustainable-industry
  170. https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2020/11/in-a-word-the-creation-of-canola-oil/
  171. https://www.jalopnik.com/your-cooking-oil-was-originally-created-to-keep-warship-1851657229/
  172. https://dataintelo.com/report/global-high-erucic-acid-rapeseed-oil-market
  173. https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/high-erucic-acid-rapeseed-oil-market-report
  174. https://www.chemanalyst.com/industry-report/erucic-acid-market-772
  175. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1240833/
  176. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/fake-olive-oil-scandal-that-caused-spains-worst-food-poisoning-epidemic-1981-2021-10-19/
  177. https://www.orpha.net/en/disease/detail/227972
  178. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12192735/
  179. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226172572_The_Toxic_Oil_Syndrome_in_Spain
  180. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15476910590960143
  181. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/nursing-and-health-professions/erucic-acid
  182. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4593
  183. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0696
  184. https://www.bav-institut.de/en/news/maximumlevelsforerucicacidinfoods
  185. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/tr/?lnk=1&url=https%25253A%25252F%25252Fworkspace.fao.org%25252Fsites%25252Fcodex%25252FStandards%25252FCXS%252B210-1999%25252FCXS_210e.pdf
  186. https://www.gcirc.org/fileadmin/documents/Bulletins/B20/B20%252025Glucosinorobbelen.pdf
  187. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/52
  188. https://agbioforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/AgBioForum-14-1-1.pdf
  189. https://www.canolacouncil.org/biotech/about-canola/herbicide-tolerant-canola
  190. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5033196/
  191. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1804201/
  192. https://www.vitaenaturals.com/europeans-still-largely-oppose-gmos-says-new-report/
  193. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/11/11/many-publics-around-world-doubt-safety-of-genetically-modified-foods/
  194. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3791249/
  195. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/153/1/e2023064774/196193/Use-of-Genetically-Modified-Organism-GMO
  196. https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/rapeseed-oil-global-market-report
  197. https://www.chemanalyst.com/industry-report/rapeseed-oil-market-3060
  198. https://market.us/report/global-rapeseed-oil-market/
  199. https://issuu.com/farmeurope/docs/fe_enlargement_ukraine_rapeseed
  200. https://www.tridge.com/news/rapeseed-exports-from-ukraine-in-202425-mark-ggukyp
  201. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=EU_trade_with_Ukraine_-_latest_developments
  202. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/oilseeds.pdf
  203. https://www.procurementresource.com/resource-center/rapeseed-oil-price-trends
  204. https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/oilseeds/european-fob-dutch-mill-rapeseed-oil-argus.html
  205. https://www.cmegroup.com/articles/faqs/faq-european-fob-dutch-mill-rapeseed-oil-argus-futures.html
  206. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880917303377
  207. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167198712000700
  208. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20183353959
  209. https://theconversation.com/single-crop-farming-is-leaving-wildlife-with-no-room-to-turn-38991
  210. https://lca-net.com/files/Paper-no-165_Munoz_et_al.pdf
  211. https://2-0-lca.com/publications/show/comparative-life-cycle-assessment-of-five-different-vegetable-oils/
  212. https://www.allaboutfeed.net/animal-feed/raw-materials/study-european-rapeseed-below-eu-sustainability-requirements/
  213. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5699
  214. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01759.x
  215. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924003221
  216. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/topics/agriculture/ecological-impact-of-farming/threats-to-biodiversity
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.